Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request, 43254-43256 [2019-17935]
Download as PDF
43254
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 161 / Tuesday, August 20, 2019 / Notices
fees to remain competitive with other
exchanges and to attract order flow to
the Exchange. Based on publiclyavailable information, and excluding
index-based options, no single exchange
has more than 16% of the market share
of executed volume of multiply-listed
equity and ETF options trades.21
Therefore, no exchange possesses
significant pricing power in the
execution of multiply-listed equity &
ETF options order flow. More
specifically, in the first quarter of 2019,
the Exchange had less than 10% market
share of executed volume of multiplylisted equity & ETF options trades.22
The Exchange believes that the
proposed rule change reflects this
competitive environment because it
modifies the Exchange’s fees in a
manner designed to encourage ATP
Holders to direct trading interest
(particularly ICC volume) to the
Exchange, to provide liquidity and to
attract order flow. To the extent that this
purpose is achieved, all the Exchange’s
market participants should benefit from
the improved market quality and
increased opportunities for price
improvement.
The Exchange believes that the
proposed change could promote
competition between the Exchange and
other execution venues, including those
that currently offer similar price
improvement auctions for complex
orders and comparable (manual)
transaction pricing, by encouraging
additional orders to be sent to the
Exchange for execution. The Exchange
also believes that the proposed change
is designed to provide the public and
investors with a Fee Schedule that is
clear and consistent, thereby reducing
burdens on the marketplace and
facilitating investor protection.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were solicited
or received with respect to the proposed
rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with NOTICES
The foregoing rule change is effective
upon filing pursuant to Section
21 The OCC publishes options and futures volume
in a variety of formats, including daily and monthly
volume by exchange, available here: https://
www.theocc.com/market-data/volume/default.jsp.
22 Based on OCC data, see id., the Exchange’s
market share in equity-based options declined from
9.82% for the month of January to 8.84% for the
month of April.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:49 Aug 19, 2019
Jkt 247001
19(b)(3)(A) 23 of the Act and
subparagraph (f)(2) of Rule 19b–4 24
thereunder, because it establishes a due,
fee, or other charge imposed by the
Exchange.
At any time within 60 days of the
filing of such proposed rule change, the
Commission summarily may
temporarily suspend such rule change if
it appears to the Commission that such
action is necessary or appropriate in the
public interest, for the protection of
investors, or otherwise in furtherance of
the purposes of the Act. If the
Commission takes such action, the
Commission shall institute proceedings
under Section 19(b)(2)(B) 25 of the Act to
determine whether the proposed rule
change should be approved or
disapproved.
available for website viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the
filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change.
Persons submitting comments are
cautioned that we do not redact or edit
personal identifying information from
comment submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish
to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File No.
SR–NYSEAMER–2019–33, and should
be submitted on or before September 10,
2019.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.26
Jill M. Peterson,
Assistant Secretary.
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include File No. SR–
NYSEAMER–2019–33 on the subject
line.
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Secretary, Securities and Exchange
Commission, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File No.
SR–NYSEAMER–2019–33. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
internet website (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
23 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
CFR 240.19b–4(f)(2).
25 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B).
[FR Doc. 2019–17853 Filed 8–19–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
Submission for OMB Review;
Comment Request
Upon Written Request, Copies Available
From: Securities and Exchange
Commission, Office of FOIA Services,
100 F Street NE, Washington, DC
20549–2736
Extension:
Exchange Act Rule 3a71–3; SEC File No.
270–655, OMB Control No. 3235–0717
Notice is hereby given that pursuant
to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(‘‘PRA’’) (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the
Securities and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) has submitted to the
Office of Management and Budget
(‘‘OMB’’) a request for approval of
extension of the previously approved
collection of information provided for in
Rule 3a71–3 under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78a et
seq.).
Rule 3a71–3 is adopted and in effect,
but the compliance date for Rule 3a71–
3 has not yet passed. The
representations contemplated by Rule
3a71–3 will be relied upon by
counterparties to determine whether
such transaction is a ‘‘transaction
conducted through a foreign branch’’ of
a counterparty, as defined in Rule 3a71–
3(a)(3)(i), as well as to verify whether a
security-based swap counterparty is a
‘‘U.S. person.’’ Counterparties to
24 17
PO 00000
Frm 00156
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
26 17
E:\FR\FM\20AUN1.SGM
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
20AUN1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 161 / Tuesday, August 20, 2019 / Notices
jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with NOTICES
security-based swap transactions may
voluntarily give such representations to
one another to reduce operational costs
and allow each party to ascertain
whether such transaction is subject to
certain Title VII requirements. Because
any representations provided to
counterparties under Rule 3a71–3 will
constitute voluntary third-party
disclosures, the Commission will not
typically receive these disclosures.
The Commission believes that the
representations contemplated by Rule
3a71–3 will, in most cases, be made
through amendments to the parties’
existing trading documentation (e.g., the
schedule to a master agreement). The
Commission believes that, because
trading relationship documentation is
established between two counterparties,
whether a counterparty is able to
represent that it is entering into a
‘‘transaction conducted through a
foreign branch’’ or that it does not meet
the criteria of the ‘‘U.S. person’’
definition will not change on a
transaction-by-transaction basis and,
therefore, such representations will
generally be made in the schedule to a
master agreement, rather than in
individual confirmations. Because these
representations relate to new regulatory
requirements, the Commission
anticipates that counterparties may elect
to develop and incorporate these
representations in trading
documentation soon after the effective
date of the Commission’s security-based
swap regulations, rather than
incorporating specific language on a
transactional basis. The Commission
believes that counterparties will be able
to adopt, where appropriate,
standardized language across all of their
security-based swap trading
relationships. The Commission believes
that this standardized language may be
developed by individual respondents or
through a combination of trade
associations and industry working
groups.
a. Representations Regarding a
‘‘Transaction Conducted Through a
Foreign Branch’’
Pursuant to Rule 3a71–3, parties to
security-based swaps are permitted to
rely on certain representations from
their counterparties when determining
whether a transaction falls within the
definition of a ‘‘transaction conducted
through a foreign branch.’’ The
Commission staff estimates that a total
of 50 entities will incur burdens under
this collection of information, whether
solely in connection with the business
conduct requirements or also in
connection with the application of the
de minimis exception. These estimates
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:49 Aug 19, 2019
Jkt 247001
are based on our understanding of the
over-the-counter (‘‘OTC’’) derivatives
markets, including the size of the
market, the number of counterparties
that are active in the market, and how
market participants currently structure
security-based swap transactions.
The Commission estimates the onetime third-party disclosure burden
associated with developing
representations under this collection of
information will be, for each U.S. bank
counterparty that will make such
representations, no more than five
hours, and up to $2,000 for the services
of outside professionals, for an estimate
of approximately 250 hours 1 or 83.33
hours 2 per year when annualized over
three years, across all security-based
swap counterparties that will make such
representations.3 This estimate assumes
little or no reliance on standardized
disclosure language.
The Commission expects that the
majority of the burden associated with
the new disclosure requirements will be
experienced during the first year as
language is developed and trading
documentation is amended. After the
new representations are developed and
incorporated into trading
documentation, the Commission
continues to believe that the ongoing
third-party disclosure burden associated
with this requirement will be 10 hours
per U.S. bank counterparty for verifying
representations with existing
counterparties, for a total of
approximately 500 hours 4 across all
applicable U.S. bank counterparties.5
The Commission believes that some of
the entities that will have to comply
with Rule 3a71–3 will seek outside
counsel to help them develop new
representations contemplated by Rule
3a71–3. For PRA purposes, the
Commission assumes that all 50
respondents will seek outside counsel
for the first year only and will, on
average, consult with outside counsel
for a cost of up to $2,000. The
Commission also assumes that none of
the 50 respondents will seek outside
legal services for year two or year three.
Thus, the Commission expects the cost
over the three-year period will be
1 50 (total number of entities) * 5 hours = 250
hours.
2 250 hours (total hours to develop
representations) ÷ 3 years = 83.33 hours.
3 See Business Conduct Adopting Release at
30096.
4 50 (total number of entities) * 10 hours = 500
hours.
5 The Commission staff estimates that this burden
will consist of 10 hours of in-house counsel time
for each security-based swap market participant
that will make such representations. See Business
Conduct Adopting Release, at 30097, note 1581.
PO 00000
Frm 00157
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
43255
$100,000 6 or $33,333 7 per year when
annualized over three years, across all
security-based swap counterparties that
will make such representations. The
Commission expects the total labor cost
per respondent will be approximately
$666.67 8 when annualized over three
years.
b. Representations Regarding U.S.Person Status
Pursuant to Rule 3a71–3(a)(4)(iv),
persons may rely on representations
from a counterparty that the
counterparty does not satisfy the criteria
defining U.S. person set forth in Rule
3a71–3(a)(4)(i), unless such person
knows or has reason to know that the
representation is not accurate.
Commission staff has estimated, based
on its understanding of OTC derivatives
markets, including the domiciles of
counterparties that are active in the
market, that up to 2,400 entities will
provide representations that they do not
meet the criteria necessary to be U.S.
persons.
As with representations regarding
whether a transaction is conducted
through a foreign branch, the
Commission estimates the maximum
total third-party disclosure burden
associated with developing new
representations will be, for each
counterparty that will make such
representations, no more than five hours
and up to $2,000 for the services of
outside professionals, for a maximum of
approximately 12,000 hours or 4,000
hours per year when annualized over
three years, across all security-based
swap counterparties that will make such
representations. This estimate assumes
little or no reliance on standardized
disclosure language.
The Commission expects that the
majority of the burden associated with
the new disclosure requirements will be
experienced during the first year as
language is developed and trading
documentation is amended. After the
new representations are developed and
incorporated into trading
documentation, the Commission
believes that the annual third-party
disclosure burden associated with this
requirement will be no more than
approximately 10 hours per
counterparty for verifying
representations with existing
6 50 (estimated number of entities) * $2,000 (cost
of outside counsel) = $100,000.
7 $100,000 (total cost to seek outside counsel over
three years) ÷ 3 years = $33,333.33.
8 $33,333 (total labor cost to seek outside counsel
per year) ÷ 50 (estimated number of entities that
will seek outside counsel to help them develop new
representations contemplated by Rule 3a71–
3(a)(3)(ii)) = $666.67.
E:\FR\FM\20AUN1.SGM
20AUN1
43256
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 161 / Tuesday, August 20, 2019 / Notices
jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with NOTICES
counterparties and onboarding new
counterparties, for a maximum of
approximately 24,000 hours 9 across all
applicable security-based swap
counterparties.
The Commission believes that some of
the entities that will have to comply
with Rule 3a71–3 will seek outside
counsel to help them develop new
representations contemplated by Rule
3a71–3. For PRA purposes, the
Commission assumes that all 2,400
respondents will seek outside legal for
the first year only and will, on average,
consult with outside counsel for a cost
of up to $2,000. The Commission also
assumes that none of the 2,400
respondents will seek outside legal
services for year two or year three. Thus,
the Commission expects the cost over
the three-year period will be
$4,800,000 10 or $1,600,000 11 per year
when annualized over three years,
across all security-based swap
counterparties that will make such
representations. The Commission
expects the total labor cost per
respondent will be approximately
$666.67 12 when annualized over three
years.
An agency may not conduct or
sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to, a collection of information
under the PRA unless it displays a
currently valid OMB control number.
The public may view background
documentation for this information
collection at the following website:
www.reginfo.gov. Comments should be
directed to: (i) Desk Officer for the
Securities and Exchange Commission,
Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs, Office of Management and
Budget, Room 10102, New Executive
Office Building, Washington, DC 20503,
or by sending an email to:
Lindsay.M.Abate@omb.eop.gov; and (ii)
Charles Riddle, Acting Director/Chief
Information Officer, Securities and
Exchange Commission, c/o Candace
Kenner, 100 F Street NE, Washington,
DC 20549, or by sending an email to:
PRA_Mailbox@sec.gov. Comments must
be submitted to OMB within 30 days of
this notice.
9 2,400 (total number of entities) * 10 hours =
24,000 hours.
10 2,400 (total number of entities) * $2,000 =
$4,800,000.
11 $4,800,000 (total cost over three years) ÷ 3 years
= $1,600,000.
12 $1,600,000 (total labor cost to seek outside
counsel per year) ÷ 2,400 (estimated number of
entities that will seek outside counsel to help them
develop new representations contemplated by Rule
3a71–3(4)(iv)) = $666.67.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:49 Aug 19, 2019
Jkt 247001
Dated: August 15, 2019.
Jill M. Peterson,
Assistant Secretary.
SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION
[Disaster Declaration #15896 and #15897;
NEBRASKA Disaster Number NE–00073]
[FR Doc. 2019–17935 Filed 8–19–19; 8:45 am]
Presidential Declaration Amendment of
a Major Disaster for the State of
Nebraska
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION
Disaster Declaration #15896 and
#15897; Nebraska Disaster Number
NE–00073 Presidential Declaration
Amendment of a Major Disaster for the
State of Nebraska
U.S. Small Business
Administration.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
Amendment 7.
SUMMARY: This is an amendment of the
Presidential declaration of a major
disaster for the State of NEBRASKA
(FEMA–4420–DR), dated 03/21/2019.
Incident: Severe Winter Storm,
Straight-line Winds, and Flooding.
Incident Period: 03/09/2019 through
07/14/2019.
Issued on 03/21/2019.
Physical Loan Application Deadline
Date: 06/19/2019.
Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan
Application Deadline Date: 12/23/2019.
DATES:
Submit completed loan
applications to: U.S. Small Business
Administration, Processing and
Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.
ADDRESSES:
A.
Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance,
U.S. Small Business Administration,
409 3rd Street SW, Suite 6050,
Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205–6734.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
The notice
of the President’s major disaster
declaration for the State of Nebraska,
dated 03/21/2019, is hereby amended to
include the following areas as adversely
affected by the disaster:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Primary Counties (Physical Damage and
Economic Injury Loans): Dawson
Contiguous Counties (Economic Injury
Loans Only):
Nebraska: Frontier, Gosper
All other information in the original
declaration remains unchanged.
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
Number 59008)
James Rivera,
Associate Administrator for Disaster
Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2019–17930 Filed 8–19–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025–01–P
PO 00000
Frm 00158
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
U.S. Small Business
Administration.
ACTION: Amendment 8.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This is an amendment of the
Presidential declaration of a major
disaster for the State of NEBRASKA
(FEMA–4420–DR), dated 03/21/2019.
Incident: Severe Winter Storm,
Straight-line Winds, and Flooding.
Incident Period: 03/09/2019 through
07/14/2019.
DATES: Issued on 03/21/2019.
Physical Loan Application Deadline
Date: 09/13/2019.
Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan
Application Deadline Date: 12/23/2019.
ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan
applications to: U.S. Small Business
Administration, Processing And
Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A.
Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance,
U.S. Small Business Administration,
409 3rd Street SW, Suite 6050,
Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205–6734.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice
of the President’s major disaster
declaration for the State of NEBRASKA,
dated 03/21/2019, is hereby amended to
extend the deadline for filing
applications for physical damages as a
result of this disaster to 09/13/2019.
All other information in the original
declaration remains unchanged.
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
Number 59008)
James Rivera.
Associate Administrator for Disaster
Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2019–17929 Filed 8–19–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8026–03–P
SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION
Meeting of the Interagency Task Force
on Veterans Small Business
Development
U.S. Small Business
Administration (SBA).
ACTION: Notice of open Federal Advisory
Committee meeting.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The SBA is issuing this notice
to announce the location, date, time and
agenda for the next meeting of the
Interagency Task Force on Veterans
E:\FR\FM\20AUN1.SGM
20AUN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 161 (Tuesday, August 20, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 43254-43256]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-17935]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request
Upon Written Request, Copies Available From: Securities and Exchange
Commission, Office of FOIA Services, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC
20549-2736
Extension:
Exchange Act Rule 3a71-3; SEC File No. 270-655, OMB Control No.
3235-0717
Notice is hereby given that pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act
of 1995 (``PRA'') (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Securities and Exchange
Commission (``Commission'') has submitted to the Office of Management
and Budget (``OMB'') a request for approval of extension of the
previously approved collection of information provided for in Rule
3a71-3 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78a et
seq.).
Rule 3a71-3 is adopted and in effect, but the compliance date for
Rule 3a71-3 has not yet passed. The representations contemplated by
Rule 3a71-3 will be relied upon by counterparties to determine whether
such transaction is a ``transaction conducted through a foreign
branch'' of a counterparty, as defined in Rule 3a71-3(a)(3)(i), as well
as to verify whether a security-based swap counterparty is a ``U.S.
person.'' Counterparties to
[[Page 43255]]
security-based swap transactions may voluntarily give such
representations to one another to reduce operational costs and allow
each party to ascertain whether such transaction is subject to certain
Title VII requirements. Because any representations provided to
counterparties under Rule 3a71-3 will constitute voluntary third-party
disclosures, the Commission will not typically receive these
disclosures.
The Commission believes that the representations contemplated by
Rule 3a71-3 will, in most cases, be made through amendments to the
parties' existing trading documentation (e.g., the schedule to a master
agreement). The Commission believes that, because trading relationship
documentation is established between two counterparties, whether a
counterparty is able to represent that it is entering into a
``transaction conducted through a foreign branch'' or that it does not
meet the criteria of the ``U.S. person'' definition will not change on
a transaction-by-transaction basis and, therefore, such representations
will generally be made in the schedule to a master agreement, rather
than in individual confirmations. Because these representations relate
to new regulatory requirements, the Commission anticipates that
counterparties may elect to develop and incorporate these
representations in trading documentation soon after the effective date
of the Commission's security-based swap regulations, rather than
incorporating specific language on a transactional basis. The
Commission believes that counterparties will be able to adopt, where
appropriate, standardized language across all of their security-based
swap trading relationships. The Commission believes that this
standardized language may be developed by individual respondents or
through a combination of trade associations and industry working
groups.
a. Representations Regarding a ``Transaction Conducted Through a
Foreign Branch''
Pursuant to Rule 3a71-3, parties to security-based swaps are
permitted to rely on certain representations from their counterparties
when determining whether a transaction falls within the definition of a
``transaction conducted through a foreign branch.'' The Commission
staff estimates that a total of 50 entities will incur burdens under
this collection of information, whether solely in connection with the
business conduct requirements or also in connection with the
application of the de minimis exception. These estimates are based on
our understanding of the over-the-counter (``OTC'') derivatives
markets, including the size of the market, the number of counterparties
that are active in the market, and how market participants currently
structure security-based swap transactions.
The Commission estimates the one-time third-party disclosure burden
associated with developing representations under this collection of
information will be, for each U.S. bank counterparty that will make
such representations, no more than five hours, and up to $2,000 for the
services of outside professionals, for an estimate of approximately 250
hours \1\ or 83.33 hours \2\ per year when annualized over three years,
across all security-based swap counterparties that will make such
representations.\3\ This estimate assumes little or no reliance on
standardized disclosure language.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 50 (total number of entities) * 5 hours = 250 hours.
\2\ 250 hours (total hours to develop representations) / 3 years
= 83.33 hours.
\3\ See Business Conduct Adopting Release at 30096.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Commission expects that the majority of the burden associated
with the new disclosure requirements will be experienced during the
first year as language is developed and trading documentation is
amended. After the new representations are developed and incorporated
into trading documentation, the Commission continues to believe that
the ongoing third-party disclosure burden associated with this
requirement will be 10 hours per U.S. bank counterparty for verifying
representations with existing counterparties, for a total of
approximately 500 hours \4\ across all applicable U.S. bank
counterparties.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ 50 (total number of entities) * 10 hours = 500 hours.
\5\ The Commission staff estimates that this burden will consist
of 10 hours of in-house counsel time for each security-based swap
market participant that will make such representations. See Business
Conduct Adopting Release, at 30097, note 1581.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Commission believes that some of the entities that will have to
comply with Rule 3a71-3 will seek outside counsel to help them develop
new representations contemplated by Rule 3a71-3. For PRA purposes, the
Commission assumes that all 50 respondents will seek outside counsel
for the first year only and will, on average, consult with outside
counsel for a cost of up to $2,000. The Commission also assumes that
none of the 50 respondents will seek outside legal services for year
two or year three. Thus, the Commission expects the cost over the
three-year period will be $100,000 \6\ or $33,333 \7\ per year when
annualized over three years, across all security-based swap
counterparties that will make such representations. The Commission
expects the total labor cost per respondent will be approximately
$666.67 \8\ when annualized over three years.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ 50 (estimated number of entities) * $2,000 (cost of outside
counsel) = $100,000.
\7\ $100,000 (total cost to seek outside counsel over three
years) / 3 years = $33,333.33.
\8\ $33,333 (total labor cost to seek outside counsel per year)
/ 50 (estimated number of entities that will seek outside counsel to
help them develop new representations contemplated by Rule 3a71-
3(a)(3)(ii)) = $666.67.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
b. Representations Regarding U.S.-Person Status
Pursuant to Rule 3a71-3(a)(4)(iv), persons may rely on
representations from a counterparty that the counterparty does not
satisfy the criteria defining U.S. person set forth in Rule 3a71-
3(a)(4)(i), unless such person knows or has reason to know that the
representation is not accurate. Commission staff has estimated, based
on its understanding of OTC derivatives markets, including the
domiciles of counterparties that are active in the market, that up to
2,400 entities will provide representations that they do not meet the
criteria necessary to be U.S. persons.
As with representations regarding whether a transaction is
conducted through a foreign branch, the Commission estimates the
maximum total third-party disclosure burden associated with developing
new representations will be, for each counterparty that will make such
representations, no more than five hours and up to $2,000 for the
services of outside professionals, for a maximum of approximately
12,000 hours or 4,000 hours per year when annualized over three years,
across all security-based swap counterparties that will make such
representations. This estimate assumes little or no reliance on
standardized disclosure language.
The Commission expects that the majority of the burden associated
with the new disclosure requirements will be experienced during the
first year as language is developed and trading documentation is
amended. After the new representations are developed and incorporated
into trading documentation, the Commission believes that the annual
third-party disclosure burden associated with this requirement will be
no more than approximately 10 hours per counterparty for verifying
representations with existing
[[Page 43256]]
counterparties and onboarding new counterparties, for a maximum of
approximately 24,000 hours \9\ across all applicable security-based
swap counterparties.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ 2,400 (total number of entities) * 10 hours = 24,000 hours.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Commission believes that some of the entities that will have to
comply with Rule 3a71-3 will seek outside counsel to help them develop
new representations contemplated by Rule 3a71-3. For PRA purposes, the
Commission assumes that all 2,400 respondents will seek outside legal
for the first year only and will, on average, consult with outside
counsel for a cost of up to $2,000. The Commission also assumes that
none of the 2,400 respondents will seek outside legal services for year
two or year three. Thus, the Commission expects the cost over the
three-year period will be $4,800,000 \10\ or $1,600,000 \11\ per year
when annualized over three years, across all security-based swap
counterparties that will make such representations. The Commission
expects the total labor cost per respondent will be approximately
$666.67 \12\ when annualized over three years.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ 2,400 (total number of entities) * $2,000 = $4,800,000.
\11\ $4,800,000 (total cost over three years) / 3 years =
$1,600,000.
\12\ $1,600,000 (total labor cost to seek outside counsel per
year) / 2,400 (estimated number of entities that will seek outside
counsel to help them develop new representations contemplated by
Rule 3a71-3(4)(iv)) = $666.67.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required
to respond to, a collection of information under the PRA unless it
displays a currently valid OMB control number.
The public may view background documentation for this information
collection at the following website: www.reginfo.gov. Comments should
be directed to: (i) Desk Officer for the Securities and Exchange
Commission, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of
Management and Budget, Room 10102, New Executive Office Building,
Washington, DC 20503, or by sending an email to:
[email protected]; and (ii) Charles Riddle, Acting Director/
Chief Information Officer, Securities and Exchange Commission, c/o
Candace Kenner, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549, or by sending an
email to: [email protected]. Comments must be submitted to OMB within
30 days of this notice.
Dated: August 15, 2019.
Jill M. Peterson,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2019-17935 Filed 8-19-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P