Glycine From Thailand: Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Final Affirmative Determination of Critical Circumstances in Part, 37998-38001 [2019-16663]
Download as PDF
37998
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 150 / Monday, August 5, 2019 / Notices
from multiple parties simultaneously. In
such a case, we will inform parties in a
letter or memorandum of the deadline
(including a specified time) by which
extension requests must be filed to be
considered timely. An extension request
must be made in a separate, stand-alone
submission; under limited
circumstances we will grant untimelyfiled requests for the extension of time
limits. Parties should review Extension
of Time Limits; Final Rule, 78 FR 57790
(September 20, 2013), available at
https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-201309-20/html/2013-22853.htm, prior to
submitting factual information in these
investigations.
Certification Requirements
Any party submitting factual
information in an AD or CVD
proceeding must certify to the accuracy
and completeness of that information.59
Parties must use the certification
formats provided in 19 CFR
351.303(g).60 Commerce intends to
reject factual submissions if the
submitting party does not comply with
the applicable certification
requirements.
Notification to Interested Parties
Interested parties must submit
applications for disclosure under APO
in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305. On
January 22, 2008, Commerce published
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Proceedings: Documents Submission
Procedures; APO Procedures, 73 FR
3634 (January 22, 2008). Parties wishing
to participate in these investigations
should ensure that they meet the
requirements of these procedures (e.g.,
the filing of letters of appearance as
discussed at 19 CFR 351.103(d)).
This notice is issued and published
pursuant to sections 732(c)(2) and 777(i)
of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.203(c).
Dated: July 29, 2019.
Jeffrey I. Kessler,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance.
Appendix—Scope of the Investigations
jspears on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
The merchandise covered by these
investigations consists of certain wind
towers, whether or not tapered, and sections
thereof. Certain wind towers support the
nacelle and rotor blades in a wind turbine
with a minimum rated electrical power
generation capacity in excess of 100 kilowatts
and with a minimum height of 50 meters
measured from the base of the tower to the
bottom of the nacelle (i.e., where the top of
the tower and nacelle are joined) when fully
assembled.
A wind tower section consists of, at a
minimum, multiple steel plates rolled into
cylindrical or conical shapes and welded
together (or otherwise attached) to form a
steel shell, regardless of coating, end-finish,
painting, treatment, or method of
manufacture, and with or without flanges,
doors, or internal or external components
(e.g., flooring/decking, ladders, lifts,
electrical buss boxes, electrical cabling,
conduit, cable harness for nacelle generator,
interior lighting, tool and storage lockers)
attached to the wind tower section. Several
wind tower sections are normally required to
form a completed wind tower.
Wind towers and sections thereof are
included within the scope whether or not
they are joined with nonsubject merchandise,
such as nacelles or rotor blades, and whether
or not they have internal or external
components attached to the subject
merchandise.
Specifically excluded from the scope are
nacelles and rotor blades, regardless of
whether they are attached to the wind tower.
Also excluded are any internal or external
components which are not attached to the
wind towers or sections thereof, unless those
components are shipped with the tower
sections.
Further, excluded from the scope of the
antidumping duty investigations are any
products covered by the existing
antidumping duty order on utility scale wind
towers from the Socialist Republic of
Vietnam. See Utility Scale Wind Towers from
the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Amended
Final Determination of Sales at Less Than
Fair Value and Antidumping Duty Order, 78
FR 11150 (February 15, 2013).
Merchandise covered by these
investigations is currently classified in the
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United
States (HTSUS) under subheading
7308.20.0020 or 8502.31.0000. Wind towers
of iron or steel are classified under HTSUS
7308.20.0020 when imported separately as a
tower or tower section(s). Wind towers may
be classified under HTSUS 8502.31.0000
when imported as combination goods with a
wind turbine (i.e., accompanying nacelles
and/or rotor blades). While the HTSUS
subheadings are provided for convenience
and customs purposes, the written
description of the scope of the investigations
is dispositive.
[FR Doc. 2019–16655 Filed 8–2–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
59 See
section 782(b) of the Act.
Certification of Factual Information to
Import Administration During Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Proceedings, 78 FR 42678 (July
17, 2013) (Final Rule). Answers to frequently asked
questions regarding the Final Rule are available at
https://enforcement.trade.gov/tlei/notices/factual_
info_final_rule_FAQ_07172013.pdf.
60 See
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:42 Aug 02, 2019
Jkt 247001
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–549–837]
Glycine From Thailand: Final
Determination of Sales at Less Than
Fair Value and Final Affirmative
Determination of Critical
Circumstances in Part
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
(Commerce) determines that glycine
from Thailand is being, or is likely to be,
sold in the United States at less than fair
value (LTFV). In addition, Commerce
determines that critical circumstances
exist with respect to certain imports of
the subject merchandise. The period of
investigation (POI) is January 1, 2017
through December 31, 2017. The final
estimated weighted-average dumping
margins are listed below in the ‘‘Final
Determination’’ section of this notice.
DATES: Applicable August 5, 2019.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Brian Smith or Jesus Saenz, AD/CVD,
AD/CVD Operations, Office VIII,
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401
Constitution Avenue NW, Washington,
DC 20230; telephone (202) 482–1766 or
(202) 482–8184, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
AGENCY:
Background
The petitioners in this investigation
are GEO Specialty Chemicals, Inc. and
Chattem Chemicals, Inc. (collectively,
the petitioners). The mandatory
respondent in this investigation is
Newtrend Food Ingredient (Thailand)
Co., Ltd. (Newtrend Thailand).
The events that occurred since
Commerce published the Preliminary
Determination 1 on October 31, 2018
and postponed the final determination
until March 15, 2019 are discussed in
the Issues and Decision Memorandum.2
Commerce exercised its discretion to
toll all deadlines affected by the partial
federal government closure from
1 See Glycine from Thailand Preliminary
Determination of Sales at Not Less Than Fair Value,
Preliminary Negative Determination of Critical
Circumstances, Postponement of Final
Determination, 83 FR 54717 (October 31, 2018)
(Preliminary Determination), and accompanying
Preliminary Decision Memorandum (PDM).
2 See Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision
Memorandum for the Final Determination in the
Less-Than-Fair-Value Investigation of Glycine from
Thailand,’’ dated concurrently with, and hereby
adopted by, this notice (Issues and Decision
Memorandum).
E:\FR\FM\05AUN1.SGM
05AUN1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 150 / Monday, August 5, 2019 / Notices
December 22, 2018 through the
resumption of operations on January 29,
2019.3 Commerce revised the deadline
for the final determination in this
investigation to April 24, 2019.
On March 19, 2019, the petitioners
submitted new factual information (NFI)
on the record of this investigation,
which included the notice of U.S.
Customs and Border Protection’s (CBP’s)
commencement of a formal
investigation and imposition of interim
measures (CBP Interim Measures) under
Title IV, Section 421 of the Trade
Facilitation and Trade Enforcement Act
of 2015 (also referred to as the Enforce
and Protect Act or EAPA).4 Commerce
accepted the NFI and provided
interested parties with an opportunity to
comment. On April 24, 2019, Commerce
postponed until further notice the
issuance of the final determination in
this investigation, in order to further
investigate this matter.5 We
subsequently issued to Newtrend
Thailand additional requests for sales
and cost information relevant to this
matter. Newtrend Thailand timely
responded to these requests for
information, and Commerce
subsequently conducted verification of
the additional information submitted.
We invited interested parties to
comment on the Preliminary
Determination and on events that
occurred since the publication of that
determination. A detailed summary of
the events that occurred in this
investigation since Commerce published
the Preliminary Determination, as well
as a full discussion of the issues raised
by parties for this final determination,
can be found in the Issues and Decision
Memorandum.
Scope of the Investigation
jspears on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
The product covered by this
investigation is glycine from Thailand.
For a full description of the scope of this
investigation, see the ‘‘Scope of the
3 See Memorandum to the Record from Gary
Taverman, Deputy Assistant Secretary for
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations,
performing the non-exclusive functions and duties
of the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance, ‘‘Deadlines Affected by the Partial
Shutdown of the Federal Government,’’ dated
January 28, 2019. All deadlines in this segment of
the proceeding have been extended by 40 days.
4 See Petitioners’ Letter, ‘‘Glycine from Thailand:
Request to Accept U.S. Customs and Border
Protection’s Interim Measures,’’ dated March 19,
2019.
5 See Memorandum from Gary Taverman, Deputy
Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Operations, to Jeffrey I.
Kessler, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance, ‘‘Postponement of the Final
Determinations in the Less-Than-Fair Value and
Countervailing Duty Investigations of Glycine from
Thailand,’’ dated April 24, 2019.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:42 Aug 02, 2019
Jkt 247001
Investigation’’ in Appendix I of this
notice.
Scope Comments
We invited parties to comment on
Commerce’s Preliminary Scope Decision
Memorandum.6 Commerce reviewed the
briefs submitted by interested parties,
considered the arguments therein, and
made no changes to the scope of the
investigation. For further discussion, see
Commerce’s Scope Comments Final
Decision Memorandum.7
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised in the case and
rebuttal briefs submitted by parties in
this investigation are addressed in the
Issues and Decision Memorandum. A
list of the issues addressed in the Issues
and Decision Memorandum is attached
to this notice as Appendix II. The Issues
and Decision Memorandum is a public
document and is on file electronically
via Enforcement and Compliance’s
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Centralized Electronic Service System
(ACCESS). ACCESS is available to
registered users at https://
access.trade.gov, and it is available to
all parties in the Central Records Unit,
Room B–8024 of the main Commerce
building. In addition, a complete
version of the Issues and Decision
Memorandum can be accessed directly
at https://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/
index.html. The signed and electronic
versions of the Issues and Decision
Memorandum are identical in content.
Verification
As provided in section 782(i) of the
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act),
from November to December 2018 and
during June 2019, Commerce conducted
verifications of Newtrend Thailand’s
sales and cost information. We used
standard verification procedures,
including an examination of relevant
accounting and production records, and
original source documents provided by
Newtrend Thailand.8
6 See Memorandum, ‘‘Glycine from India, Japan,
the People’s Republic of China and Thailand: Scope
Comments Decision Memorandum for the
Preliminary Determinations,’’ dated August 27,
2018 (Preliminary Scope Decision Memorandum).
7 See Memorandum, ‘‘Glycine from India, Japan,
the People’s Republic of China and Thailand: Scope
Comments Decision Memorandum for the Final
Determinations,’’ dated April 24, 2019 (Scope
Comments Final Decision Memorandum).
8 For a discussion of our verification findings, see
‘‘U.S. Verification of the Sales Response of
Newtrend Food Ingredient (Thailand) Co., Ltd. in
the Antidumping Investigation of Glycine from
Thailand,’’ dated March 14, 2019; ‘‘Home Market
Verification of the Sales Response of Newtrend
Food Ingredient (Thailand) Co., Ltd. in the
Antidumping Investigation of Glycine from
Thailand’’ and ‘‘Verification of Cost Response of
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
37999
Changes Since the Preliminary
Determination
Based on our review and analysis of
the comments received from parties and
our verification findings, we find that
facts available with an adverse inference
is warranted for Newtrend Thailand in
the final determination in accordance
with sections 776(a) and (b) of the Act
and 19 CFR 351.308. For further
discussion, see ‘‘Use of Adverse Facts
Available’’ section below and the Issues
and Decision Memorandum.
Use of Adverse Facts Available
Newtrend Thailand, the sole
mandatory respondent, failed to provide
critical information in determining its
cost of production of glycine during the
POI, rendering its reported costs
unreliable and unusable for purposes of
calculating an accurate estimated
weighted-average dumping margin.
Therefore, pursuant to section 776(a)
and (b) of the Act, we find that the
application of facts available with an
adverse inference is warranted with
respect to Newtrend Thailand in the
final determination. In applying total
adverse facts available (AFA),
Commerce has determined that
Newtrend Thailand’s estimated
weighted-average dumping margin is
227.17 percent, which is the highest
dumping margin alleged in the Petition,
as supplemented on April 9, 2018, and
will apply this margin to its exports of
glycine to the United States.9 For further
discussion, see the Issues and Decision
Memorandum at Comment 1.
All-Others Rate
Section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act
provides that Commerce estimate the
weighted-average dumping margin for
all other producers or exporters equal to
the weighted average of the estimated
weighted-average dumping margins of
those companies individually
examined, excluding any rates that are
zero, de minimis, or based entirely on
facts available pursuant to section 776
of the Act. Section 735(c)(5)(B) of the
Newtrend Food Ingredient (Thailand) Co., Ltd. in
the Antidumping Duty Investigation of Glycine
from Thailand’’ both dated March 15, 2019; and
‘‘Verification of the Questionnaire Response of
Newtrend Food Ingredient (Thailand) Co., Ltd. in
the Antidumping Investigation of Glycine from
Thailand with Respect to the Transshipment
Allegation’’ and ‘‘2nd Verification of Cost Response
of Newtrend Food Ingredient (Thailand) Co., Ltd. in
the Antidumping Duty Investigation of Glycine
from Thailand,’’ both dated June 20, 2019.
9 See Petitioners’ Letter, ‘‘Glycine from Thailand:
Petition for the Imposition of Antidumping Duties,’’
dated March 28, 2018 (Petition); and Petitioners’
Letter, ‘‘Glycine from Thailand: Responses to
Second Supplemental Questionnaire,’’ dated April
9, 2018 (Thailand AD Second Petition Supplement),
at Exhibit TA–2S5.
E:\FR\FM\05AUN1.SGM
05AUN1
38000
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 150 / Monday, August 5, 2019 / Notices
Act provides that when, as here, each of
the estimated weighted-average
dumping margins established for all
exporters or producers individually
examined are zero, de minimis, or based
entirely on facts available, Commerce
may use any reasonable method to
establish the rate for all other exporters
or producers. In such a situation,
Commerce’s practice has been to
determine the estimated weightedaverage dumping margin for all other
producers or exporters as the simple
average of the dumping margins alleged
in the Petition,10 which we have done
for this final determination.11
jspears on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
Final Affirmative Determination of
Critical Circumstances, in Part
In accordance with section 733(e)(1)
of the Act and 19 CFR 351.206, we
preliminarily determined that critical
circumstances did not exist with respect
to imports of glycine because that
subject merchandise was not being, or
was not likely to be, sold in the United
States at LTFV.12 However, in this final
determination, in accordance with
section 735(a)(3) and 19 CFR 351.206,
we find that critical circumstances exist
with respect to subject merchandise
produced or exported by Newtrend
Thailand, but do not exist with respect
to all other producers or exporters. For
a full description of the methodology
and results of Commerce’s critical
circumstances analysis, see the Issues
and Decision Memorandum.
Disclosure
Normally, Commerce discloses to
interested parties the calculations
performed in connection with a final
determination within five days of its
public announcement or, if there is no
public announcement, within five days
of the date of publication of this notice
in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b).
However, in this investigation,
Commerce applied AFA to the sole
respondent, Newtrend Thailand, in
accordance with section 776 of the Act,
the applied AFA rate is based solely on
the Petition, and the all-others rate is a
simple average of the Petition rates.13
Therefore, there are no margin
calculations to disclose.
Suspension of Liquidation
In accordance with section
735(c)(1)(B) and (C) of the Act, for this
final determination, we will direct CBP
to suspend liquidation of all entries of
glycine from Thailand, as described in
Appendix I of this notice, which are
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse,
for consumption on or after the date of
publication in the Federal Register of
this notice. Section 735(c)(4)(C) of the
Act provides that, given an affirmative
determination of critical circumstances,
any suspension of liquidation shall
apply to unliquidated entries of subject
merchandise entered, or withdrawn
from warehouse, for consumption on or
after the date which is 90 days before
the date on which the suspension of
Final Determination
liquidation was first ordered.
For entries made by Newtrend
The final estimated weighted-average
Thailand, in accordance with section
dumping margins are as follows:
735(c)(4)(C) of the Act, because we find
that critical circumstances exist, we will
Estimated
weightedinstruct CBP to suspend liquidation of
average
all appropriate entries of glycine from
Exporter or producer
dumping
Thailand which were entered, or
margin
withdrawn from warehouse, for
(percent)
consumption on or after the date which
Newtrend Food Ingredient
is 90 days prior to the date of
(Thailand) Co., Ltd ............
227.17 publication of this notice. For entries
All Others ..............................
201.59
made by companies covered by the allothers rate, because we find that critical
10 See, e.g., Silicon Metal From Australia:
circumstances do not exist, we will not
Affirmative Final Determination of Sales at Less
give CBP such instructions.
Than Fair Value and Final Affirmative
Further, pursuant to section
Determination of Critical Circumstances in Part, 83
735(c)(1)(B)(ii) of the Act and 19 CFR
FR 9839, 9840 (March 8, 2018); Certain Uncoated
351.210(d), Commerce will instruct CBP
Paper from Australia: Final Determination of Sales
at Less Than Fair Value and Affirmative Final
to require a cash deposit equal to the
Determination of Critical Circumstances, In Part, 81
estimated weighted-average dumping
FR 3108 (January 20, 2016); and Notice of
margin as follows: (1) The cash deposit
Preliminary Determination of Sales at Less Than
Fair Value: Light-Walled Rectangular Pipe and
rate for Newtrend Thailand will be
Tube from Turkey, 73 FR 5508 (January 30, 2008),
equal to the (estimated) weightedunchanged in Notice of Final Determination of
average dumping margin determined in
Sales at Less Than Fair Value: Light-Walled
Rectangular Pipe and Tube from Turkey, 73 FR
19814 (April 11, 2008).
11 See Petition; Thailand AD Second Petition
Supplement, at Exhibit TA–2S5.
12 See Preliminary Determination, 83 FR at 54717,
and accompanying PDM at 16.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:42 Aug 02, 2019
Jkt 247001
13 See Glycine from India, Japan, and Thailand:
Initiation of Less-Than-Fair-Value Investigations, 83
FR 17995 (April 17, 2018), and accompanying
Antidumping Duty Investigation Initiation
Checklist: Glycine from Thailand, at 13.
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
this final determination; (2) if the
exporter is not a respondent identified
above, but the producer is, then the cash
deposit rate will be equal to the
company-specific (estimated) weightedaverage dumping margin established for
that producer of the subject
merchandise; and (3) the cash deposit
rate for all other producers or exporters
will be equal to the all-others
(estimated) weighted-average dumping
margin determined in this final
determination.
Commerce normally adjusts cash
deposits for estimated antidumping
duties by the amount of export subsidies
countervailed in a companion
countervailing duty (CVD) proceeding,
when CVD provisional measures are in
effect. In the concurrent CVD
investigation of glycine from Thailand,
however, Commerce did not make an
affirmative determination for
countervailable export subsidies.
Therefore, Commerce has not offset the
estimated weighted-average dumping
margins by countervailable export
subsidies.
These suspension of liquidation
instructions will remain in effect until
further notice.
International Trade Commission
Notification
In accordance with section 735(d) of
the Act, Commerce will notify the
International Trade Commission (ITC) of
its final affirmative determination of
sales at LTFV. Because Commerce’s
final determination is affirmative, in
accordance with section 735(b)(2) of the
Act, the ITC will make its final
determination as to whether the
domestic industry in the United States
is materially injured, or threatened with
material injury, by reason of imports, or
sales (or the likelihood of sales) for
importation of glycine from Thailand no
later than 45 days after this final
determination. If the ITC determines
that such injury does not exist, this
proceeding will be terminated, and all
cash deposits posted will be refunded or
canceled. If the ITC determines that
such injury does exist, Commerce will
issue an antidumping duty order
directing CBP to assess, upon further
instruction by Commerce, antidumping
duties on all imports of the subject
merchandise entered, or withdrawn
from warehouse, for consumption on or
after the effective date of the suspension
of liquidation, as discussed above in the
‘‘Suspension of Liquidation’’ section.
Administrative Protective Orders
This notice serves as the only
reminder to parties subject to an
administrative protective order (APO) of
E:\FR\FM\05AUN1.SGM
05AUN1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 150 / Monday, August 5, 2019 / Notices
their responsibility concerning the
disposition of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely
written notification of return or
destruction of APO materials, or
conversion to judicial protective order,
is hereby requested. Failure to comply
with the regulations and the terms of an
APO is a sanctionable violation.
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Notification to Interested Parties
AGENCY:
This determination and this notice are
issued and published pursuant to
sections 735(d) and 777(i)(1) of the Act
and 19 CFR 351.210(c).
Dated: July 29, 2019.
Jeffrey I. Kessler,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance.
Appendix I—Scope of the Investigation
The merchandise covered by this
investigation is glycine at any purity level or
grade. This includes glycine of all purity
levels, which covers all forms of crude or
technical glycine including, but not limited
to, sodium glycinate, glycine slurry and any
other forms of amino acetic acid or glycine.
Subject merchandise also includes glycine
and precursors of dried crystalline glycine
that are processed in a third country,
including, but not limited to, refining or any
other processing that would not otherwise
remove the merchandise from the scope of
this investigation if performed in the country
of manufacture of the in-scope glycine or
precursors of dried crystalline glycine.
Glycine has the Chemical Abstracts Service
(CAS) registry number of 56–40–6. Glycine
and glycine slurry are classified under
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United
States (HTSUS) subheading 2922.49.43.00.
Sodium glycinate is classified in the HTSUS
under 2922.49.80.00. While the HTSUS
subheadings and CAS registry number are
provided for convenience and customs
purposes, the written description of the
scope of this investigation is dispositive.
jspears on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
Appendix II—List of Topics Discussed
in the Issues and Decision
Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Investigation
IV. Margin Calculations
V. Adjustment for Countervailable Export
Subsidies
VI. Affirmative Determination of Critical
Circumstances
VII. Discussion of the Issues
Comment 1 Application of Adverse Facts
Available (AFA)
Comment 2 CBP Interim Measures
VIII. Recommendation
[FR Doc. 2019–16663 Filed 8–2–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:42 Aug 02, 2019
Jkt 247001
International Trade Administration
[A–588–869]
Diffusion-Annealed Nickel-Plated FlatRolled Steel Products From Japan:
Final Results of the Expedited First
Five-Year Sunset Review of the
Antidumping Duty Order
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: As a result of this sunset
review, the Department of Commerce
(Commerce) finds that revocation of the
antidumping duty order on diffusionannealed nickel-plated flat-rolled steel
products from Japan would be likely to
lead to continuation or recurrence of
dumping at the levels indicated in the
‘‘Final Results of Review’’ section of this
notice.
DATES: Applicable August 5, 2019.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ian
Hamilton, AD/CVD Operations, Office
II, Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401
Constitution Avenue NW, Washington,
DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–4798.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On May 29, 2014, Commerce
published its antidumping duty order
on diffusion-annealed nickel-plated flatrolled steel products from Japan in the
Federal Register.1 On April 1, 2019,
Commerce published the notice of
initiation of the first sunset review of
the antidumping duty order on
diffusion-annealed nickel-plated flatrolled steel products from Japan,2
pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff
Act of 1930, as amended (the Act).3
Commerce received a notice of intent to
participate from Thomas Steel Strip
Corporation (Thomas), within the
deadline specified in 19 CFR
351.218(d)(1)(i).4 Thomas claimed
1 See Diffusion-Annealed, Nickel-Plated FlatRolled Steel Products from Japan: Antidumping
Duty Order, 79 FR 30816 (May 29, 2014) (Order).
2 See Diffusion-Annealed, Nickel-Plated FlatRolled Steel Products from Japan: Antidumping
Duty Order, 79 FR 30816 (May 29, 2014) (Order).
Consistent with the Final Determination, we
applied the following weighted-average dumping
margins for the two mandatory respondents, one of
which was based entirely on adverse facts available:
(1) Toyo Kohan Co., Ltd., 45.42 percent; and (2)
Nippon Steel & Sumitomo Metal Corporation, 77.70
percent. The All Others dumping margin was
established as 45.42 percent. Id. at 30817.
3 See Initiation of Five-Year (Sunset) Review, 84
FR 12227 (April 1, 2019) (Initiation).
4 See Thomas’ Letter, ‘‘Diffusion-Annealed,
Nickel-Plated Flat-Rolled Steel Products from
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
38001
interested party status under section
771(9)(C) of the Act, as a domestic
producer of diffusion-annealed nickelplated flat-rolled steel products.
Commerce received a substantive
response from Thomas 5 within the 30day deadline specified in 19 CFR
351.218(d)(3)(i). We received no
substantive response from any other
domestic or interested parties in this
proceeding, nor was a hearing
requested.
On May 24, 2019, Commerce notified
the U.S. International Trade
Commission (ITC) that it did not receive
an adequate substantive response from
respondent interested parties.6 As a
result, pursuant to section 751(c)(3)(B)
of the Act and 19 CFR
351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2), Commerce
conducted an expedited (120-day)
sunset review of this antidumping duty
order.
Scope of the Order
The diffusion-annealed, nickel-plated
flat-rolled steel products included in
this order are flat-rolled, cold-reduced
steel products, regardless of chemistry;
whether or not in coils; either plated or
coated with nickel or nickel-based
alloys and subsequently annealed (i.e.,
‘‘diffusion-annealed’’); whether or not
painted, varnished or coated with
plastics or other metallic or nonmetallic
substances; and less than or equal to 2.0
mm in nominal thickness. For purposes
of this order, ‘‘nickel-based alloys’’
include all nickel alloys with other
metals in which nickel accounts for at
least 80 percent of the alloy by volume.
Imports of merchandise included in
the scope of this order are classified
primarily under Harmonized Tariff
Schedule of the United States (HTSUS)
subheadings 7212.50.0000 and
7210.90.6000, but may also be classified
under HTSUS subheadings
7210.70.6090, 7212.40.1000,
7212.40.5000, 7219.90.0020,
7219.90.0025, 7219.90.0060,
7219.90.0080, 7220.90.0010,
7220.90.0015, 7225.99.0090, or
7226.99.0180. Although the HTSUS
subheadings are provided for
convenience and customs purposes, the
written description of the scope of this
order is dispositive. For a complete
description of the scope of the Order,
Japan: Notice of Intent to Participate,’’ dated April
16, 2019.
5 See Thomas’ Letter, ‘‘Diffusion-Annealed,
Nickel-Plated Flat Steel Products from Japan:
Thomas’s Substantive Response to the Notice of
Initiation of Five-Year (Sunset) Review of
Antidumping Duty Order,’’ dated May 1, 2019.
6 See Commerce Letter, ‘‘Sunset Review Initiated
on April 1, 2019,’’ dated May 24, 2019.
E:\FR\FM\05AUN1.SGM
05AUN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 150 (Monday, August 5, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 37998-38001]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-16663]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-549-837]
Glycine From Thailand: Final Determination of Sales at Less Than
Fair Value and Final Affirmative Determination of Critical
Circumstances in Part
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that glycine
from Thailand is being, or is likely to be, sold in the United States
at less than fair value (LTFV). In addition, Commerce determines that
critical circumstances exist with respect to certain imports of the
subject merchandise. The period of investigation (POI) is January 1,
2017 through December 31, 2017. The final estimated weighted-average
dumping margins are listed below in the ``Final Determination'' section
of this notice.
DATES: Applicable August 5, 2019.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Brian Smith or Jesus Saenz, AD/CVD,
AD/CVD Operations, Office VIII, Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401
Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone (202) 482-1766
or (202) 482-8184, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The petitioners in this investigation are GEO Specialty Chemicals,
Inc. and Chattem Chemicals, Inc. (collectively, the petitioners). The
mandatory respondent in this investigation is Newtrend Food Ingredient
(Thailand) Co., Ltd. (Newtrend Thailand).
The events that occurred since Commerce published the Preliminary
Determination \1\ on October 31, 2018 and postponed the final
determination until March 15, 2019 are discussed in the Issues and
Decision Memorandum.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Glycine from Thailand Preliminary Determination of Sales
at Not Less Than Fair Value, Preliminary Negative Determination of
Critical Circumstances, Postponement of Final Determination, 83 FR
54717 (October 31, 2018) (Preliminary Determination), and
accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum (PDM).
\2\ See Memorandum, ``Issues and Decision Memorandum for the
Final Determination in the Less-Than-Fair-Value Investigation of
Glycine from Thailand,'' dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted
by, this notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Commerce exercised its discretion to toll all deadlines affected by
the partial federal government closure from
[[Page 37999]]
December 22, 2018 through the resumption of operations on January 29,
2019.\3\ Commerce revised the deadline for the final determination in
this investigation to April 24, 2019.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ See Memorandum to the Record from Gary Taverman, Deputy
Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Operations, performing the non-exclusive functions and duties of the
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, ``Deadlines
Affected by the Partial Shutdown of the Federal Government,'' dated
January 28, 2019. All deadlines in this segment of the proceeding
have been extended by 40 days.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
On March 19, 2019, the petitioners submitted new factual
information (NFI) on the record of this investigation, which included
the notice of U.S. Customs and Border Protection's (CBP's) commencement
of a formal investigation and imposition of interim measures (CBP
Interim Measures) under Title IV, Section 421 of the Trade Facilitation
and Trade Enforcement Act of 2015 (also referred to as the Enforce and
Protect Act or EAPA).\4\ Commerce accepted the NFI and provided
interested parties with an opportunity to comment. On April 24, 2019,
Commerce postponed until further notice the issuance of the final
determination in this investigation, in order to further investigate
this matter.\5\ We subsequently issued to Newtrend Thailand additional
requests for sales and cost information relevant to this matter.
Newtrend Thailand timely responded to these requests for information,
and Commerce subsequently conducted verification of the additional
information submitted.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ See Petitioners' Letter, ``Glycine from Thailand: Request to
Accept U.S. Customs and Border Protection's Interim Measures,''
dated March 19, 2019.
\5\ See Memorandum from Gary Taverman, Deputy Assistant
Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, to
Jeffrey I. Kessler, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance, ``Postponement of the Final Determinations in the Less-
Than-Fair Value and Countervailing Duty Investigations of Glycine
from Thailand,'' dated April 24, 2019.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
We invited interested parties to comment on the Preliminary
Determination and on events that occurred since the publication of that
determination. A detailed summary of the events that occurred in this
investigation since Commerce published the Preliminary Determination,
as well as a full discussion of the issues raised by parties for this
final determination, can be found in the Issues and Decision
Memorandum.
Scope of the Investigation
The product covered by this investigation is glycine from Thailand.
For a full description of the scope of this investigation, see the
``Scope of the Investigation'' in Appendix I of this notice.
Scope Comments
We invited parties to comment on Commerce's Preliminary Scope
Decision Memorandum.\6\ Commerce reviewed the briefs submitted by
interested parties, considered the arguments therein, and made no
changes to the scope of the investigation. For further discussion, see
Commerce's Scope Comments Final Decision Memorandum.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ See Memorandum, ``Glycine from India, Japan, the People's
Republic of China and Thailand: Scope Comments Decision Memorandum
for the Preliminary Determinations,'' dated August 27, 2018
(Preliminary Scope Decision Memorandum).
\7\ See Memorandum, ``Glycine from India, Japan, the People's
Republic of China and Thailand: Scope Comments Decision Memorandum
for the Final Determinations,'' dated April 24, 2019 (Scope Comments
Final Decision Memorandum).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised in the case and rebuttal briefs submitted by
parties in this investigation are addressed in the Issues and Decision
Memorandum. A list of the issues addressed in the Issues and Decision
Memorandum is attached to this notice as Appendix II. The Issues and
Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically
via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to
registered users at https://access.trade.gov, and it is available to
all parties in the Central Records Unit, Room B-8024 of the main
Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the Issues and
Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly at https://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed and electronic
versions of the Issues and Decision Memorandum are identical in
content.
Verification
As provided in section 782(i) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended
(the Act), from November to December 2018 and during June 2019,
Commerce conducted verifications of Newtrend Thailand's sales and cost
information. We used standard verification procedures, including an
examination of relevant accounting and production records, and original
source documents provided by Newtrend Thailand.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ For a discussion of our verification findings, see ``U.S.
Verification of the Sales Response of Newtrend Food Ingredient
(Thailand) Co., Ltd. in the Antidumping Investigation of Glycine
from Thailand,'' dated March 14, 2019; ``Home Market Verification of
the Sales Response of Newtrend Food Ingredient (Thailand) Co., Ltd.
in the Antidumping Investigation of Glycine from Thailand'' and
``Verification of Cost Response of Newtrend Food Ingredient
(Thailand) Co., Ltd. in the Antidumping Duty Investigation of
Glycine from Thailand'' both dated March 15, 2019; and
``Verification of the Questionnaire Response of Newtrend Food
Ingredient (Thailand) Co., Ltd. in the Antidumping Investigation of
Glycine from Thailand with Respect to the Transshipment Allegation''
and ``2nd Verification of Cost Response of Newtrend Food Ingredient
(Thailand) Co., Ltd. in the Antidumping Duty Investigation of
Glycine from Thailand,'' both dated June 20, 2019.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Changes Since the Preliminary Determination
Based on our review and analysis of the comments received from
parties and our verification findings, we find that facts available
with an adverse inference is warranted for Newtrend Thailand in the
final determination in accordance with sections 776(a) and (b) of the
Act and 19 CFR 351.308. For further discussion, see ``Use of Adverse
Facts Available'' section below and the Issues and Decision Memorandum.
Use of Adverse Facts Available
Newtrend Thailand, the sole mandatory respondent, failed to provide
critical information in determining its cost of production of glycine
during the POI, rendering its reported costs unreliable and unusable
for purposes of calculating an accurate estimated weighted-average
dumping margin. Therefore, pursuant to section 776(a) and (b) of the
Act, we find that the application of facts available with an adverse
inference is warranted with respect to Newtrend Thailand in the final
determination. In applying total adverse facts available (AFA),
Commerce has determined that Newtrend Thailand's estimated weighted-
average dumping margin is 227.17 percent, which is the highest dumping
margin alleged in the Petition, as supplemented on April 9, 2018, and
will apply this margin to its exports of glycine to the United
States.\9\ For further discussion, see the Issues and Decision
Memorandum at Comment 1.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ See Petitioners' Letter, ``Glycine from Thailand: Petition
for the Imposition of Antidumping Duties,'' dated March 28, 2018
(Petition); and Petitioners' Letter, ``Glycine from Thailand:
Responses to Second Supplemental Questionnaire,'' dated April 9,
2018 (Thailand AD Second Petition Supplement), at Exhibit TA-2S5.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
All-Others Rate
Section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act provides that Commerce estimate the
weighted-average dumping margin for all other producers or exporters
equal to the weighted average of the estimated weighted-average dumping
margins of those companies individually examined, excluding any rates
that are zero, de minimis, or based entirely on facts available
pursuant to section 776 of the Act. Section 735(c)(5)(B) of the
[[Page 38000]]
Act provides that when, as here, each of the estimated weighted-average
dumping margins established for all exporters or producers individually
examined are zero, de minimis, or based entirely on facts available,
Commerce may use any reasonable method to establish the rate for all
other exporters or producers. In such a situation, Commerce's practice
has been to determine the estimated weighted-average dumping margin for
all other producers or exporters as the simple average of the dumping
margins alleged in the Petition,\10\ which we have done for this final
determination.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ See, e.g., Silicon Metal From Australia: Affirmative Final
Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Final Affirmative
Determination of Critical Circumstances in Part, 83 FR 9839, 9840
(March 8, 2018); Certain Uncoated Paper from Australia: Final
Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Affirmative Final
Determination of Critical Circumstances, In Part, 81 FR 3108
(January 20, 2016); and Notice of Preliminary Determination of Sales
at Less Than Fair Value: Light-Walled Rectangular Pipe and Tube from
Turkey, 73 FR 5508 (January 30, 2008), unchanged in Notice of Final
Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value: Light-Walled
Rectangular Pipe and Tube from Turkey, 73 FR 19814 (April 11, 2008).
\11\ See Petition; Thailand AD Second Petition Supplement, at
Exhibit TA-2S5.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Final Affirmative Determination of Critical Circumstances, in Part
In accordance with section 733(e)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.206,
we preliminarily determined that critical circumstances did not exist
with respect to imports of glycine because that subject merchandise was
not being, or was not likely to be, sold in the United States at
LTFV.\12\ However, in this final determination, in accordance with
section 735(a)(3) and 19 CFR 351.206, we find that critical
circumstances exist with respect to subject merchandise produced or
exported by Newtrend Thailand, but do not exist with respect to all
other producers or exporters. For a full description of the methodology
and results of Commerce's critical circumstances analysis, see the
Issues and Decision Memorandum.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ See Preliminary Determination, 83 FR at 54717, and
accompanying PDM at 16.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Final Determination
The final estimated weighted-average dumping margins are as
follows:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Estimated
weighted-
Exporter or producer average
dumping margin
(percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Newtrend Food Ingredient (Thailand) Co., Ltd............ 227.17
All Others.............................................. 201.59
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Disclosure
Normally, Commerce discloses to interested parties the calculations
performed in connection with a final determination within five days of
its public announcement or, if there is no public announcement, within
five days of the date of publication of this notice in accordance with
19 CFR 351.224(b). However, in this investigation, Commerce applied AFA
to the sole respondent, Newtrend Thailand, in accordance with section
776 of the Act, the applied AFA rate is based solely on the Petition,
and the all-others rate is a simple average of the Petition rates.\13\
Therefore, there are no margin calculations to disclose.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ See Glycine from India, Japan, and Thailand: Initiation of
Less-Than-Fair-Value Investigations, 83 FR 17995 (April 17, 2018),
and accompanying Antidumping Duty Investigation Initiation
Checklist: Glycine from Thailand, at 13.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Suspension of Liquidation
In accordance with section 735(c)(1)(B) and (C) of the Act, for
this final determination, we will direct CBP to suspend liquidation of
all entries of glycine from Thailand, as described in Appendix I of
this notice, which are entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for
consumption on or after the date of publication in the Federal Register
of this notice. Section 735(c)(4)(C) of the Act provides that, given an
affirmative determination of critical circumstances, any suspension of
liquidation shall apply to unliquidated entries of subject merchandise
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the
date which is 90 days before the date on which the suspension of
liquidation was first ordered.
For entries made by Newtrend Thailand, in accordance with section
735(c)(4)(C) of the Act, because we find that critical circumstances
exist, we will instruct CBP to suspend liquidation of all appropriate
entries of glycine from Thailand which were entered, or withdrawn from
warehouse, for consumption on or after the date which is 90 days prior
to the date of publication of this notice. For entries made by
companies covered by the all-others rate, because we find that critical
circumstances do not exist, we will not give CBP such instructions.
Further, pursuant to section 735(c)(1)(B)(ii) of the Act and 19 CFR
351.210(d), Commerce will instruct CBP to require a cash deposit equal
to the estimated weighted-average dumping margin as follows: (1) The
cash deposit rate for Newtrend Thailand will be equal to the
(estimated) weighted-average dumping margin determined in this final
determination; (2) if the exporter is not a respondent identified
above, but the producer is, then the cash deposit rate will be equal to
the company-specific (estimated) weighted-average dumping margin
established for that producer of the subject merchandise; and (3) the
cash deposit rate for all other producers or exporters will be equal to
the all-others (estimated) weighted-average dumping margin determined
in this final determination.
Commerce normally adjusts cash deposits for estimated antidumping
duties by the amount of export subsidies countervailed in a companion
countervailing duty (CVD) proceeding, when CVD provisional measures are
in effect. In the concurrent CVD investigation of glycine from
Thailand, however, Commerce did not make an affirmative determination
for countervailable export subsidies. Therefore, Commerce has not
offset the estimated weighted-average dumping margins by
countervailable export subsidies.
These suspension of liquidation instructions will remain in effect
until further notice.
International Trade Commission Notification
In accordance with section 735(d) of the Act, Commerce will notify
the International Trade Commission (ITC) of its final affirmative
determination of sales at LTFV. Because Commerce's final determination
is affirmative, in accordance with section 735(b)(2) of the Act, the
ITC will make its final determination as to whether the domestic
industry in the United States is materially injured, or threatened with
material injury, by reason of imports, or sales (or the likelihood of
sales) for importation of glycine from Thailand no later than 45 days
after this final determination. If the ITC determines that such injury
does not exist, this proceeding will be terminated, and all cash
deposits posted will be refunded or canceled. If the ITC determines
that such injury does exist, Commerce will issue an antidumping duty
order directing CBP to assess, upon further instruction by Commerce,
antidumping duties on all imports of the subject merchandise entered,
or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the effective
date of the suspension of liquidation, as discussed above in the
``Suspension of Liquidation'' section.
Administrative Protective Orders
This notice serves as the only reminder to parties subject to an
administrative protective order (APO) of
[[Page 38001]]
their responsibility concerning the disposition of proprietary
information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR
351.305(a)(3). Timely written notification of return or destruction of
APO materials, or conversion to judicial protective order, is hereby
requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and the terms of an
APO is a sanctionable violation.
Notification to Interested Parties
This determination and this notice are issued and published
pursuant to sections 735(d) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR
351.210(c).
Dated: July 29, 2019.
Jeffrey I. Kessler,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
Appendix I--Scope of the Investigation
The merchandise covered by this investigation is glycine at any
purity level or grade. This includes glycine of all purity levels,
which covers all forms of crude or technical glycine including, but
not limited to, sodium glycinate, glycine slurry and any other forms
of amino acetic acid or glycine. Subject merchandise also includes
glycine and precursors of dried crystalline glycine that are
processed in a third country, including, but not limited to,
refining or any other processing that would not otherwise remove the
merchandise from the scope of this investigation if performed in the
country of manufacture of the in-scope glycine or precursors of
dried crystalline glycine. Glycine has the Chemical Abstracts
Service (CAS) registry number of 56-40-6. Glycine and glycine slurry
are classified under Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States
(HTSUS) subheading 2922.49.43.00. Sodium glycinate is classified in
the HTSUS under 2922.49.80.00. While the HTSUS subheadings and CAS
registry number are provided for convenience and customs purposes,
the written description of the scope of this investigation is
dispositive.
Appendix II--List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision
Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Investigation
IV. Margin Calculations
V. Adjustment for Countervailable Export Subsidies
VI. Affirmative Determination of Critical Circumstances
VII. Discussion of the Issues
Comment 1 Application of Adverse Facts Available (AFA)
Comment 2 CBP Interim Measures
VIII. Recommendation
[FR Doc. 2019-16663 Filed 8-2-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P