Monosodium Glutamate From the Republic of Indonesia: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2016-2017, 37625-37626 [2019-15918]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 148 / Thursday, August 1, 2019 / Notices
7. Leder Lighting Co., Ltd.
8. Luoyang Cuide Imp. & Exp.
9. Ningbo Haishu Spark Imp. & Exp. Co., Ltd.
10. Ningbo Haitian International Co.
11. Qingdao Liansheng
12. Shanxi Ktl Agricultural Technology Co.,
Ltd.
13. Shanxi Sijian Group Co., Ltd.
14. Shenzhen Zhilai Sci and Tech Co., Ltd.
15. Top Perfect Ltd.
16. Zhengzhou Puhui Trading Co., Ltd.
[FR Doc. 2019–16326 Filed 7–31–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–560–826]
Monosodium Glutamate From the
Republic of Indonesia: Final Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review; 2016–2017
Scope of the Order
The merchandise covered by this
order is MSG, whether or not blended
or in solution with other products.
Merchandise covered by this order is
currently classified in the Harmonized
Tariff Schedule of the United States
(HTSUS) at subheading 2922.42.10.00.
Merchandise covered by this order may
also enter under HTSUS subheadings
2922.42.50.00, 2103.90.72.00,
2103.90.74.00, 2103.90.78.00,
2103.90.80.00, and 2103.90.90.91.5 The
written description of the scope of the
antidumping duty order is dispositive.
Analysis of Comments Received
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
(Commerce) determines that PT. Cheil
Jedang Indonesia (CJ Indonesia), an
Indonesian producer/exporter of
monosodium glutamate (MSG) and the
sole respondent in this review, did not
make sales of MSG at prices below
normal value during the period of
review (POR) November 1, 2016 through
October 31, 2017.
DATES: Applicable August 1, 2019.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Gene H. Calvert, AD/CVD Operations,
Office VII, Enforcement and
Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone:
(202) 482–3586.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
All issues raised in the case and
rebuttal briefs by interested parties are
addressed in the Issues and Decision
Memorandum. The Issues and Decision
Memorandum is a public document and
is on file electronically via Enforcement
and Compliance’s Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Centralized
Electronic System (ACCESS). ACCESS
is available to registered users at https://
access.trade.gov, and is available to all
parties in the Central Records Unit,
room B8024 of the main Commerce
Building. In addition, a complete
version of the Issues and Decision
Memorandum can be accessed directly
on the internet at https://
enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed
Issues and Decision Memorandum and
its electronic version are identical in
content.
A list of the issues that parties raised,
and to which we responded in the
Issues and Decision Memorandum, is
attached as the Appendix to this notice.
Background
Changes Since the Preliminary Results
On December 11, 2018, Commerce
published the Preliminary Results.1 For
a detailed history of events that
occurred since the Preliminary Results,
see the Issues and Decision
Memorandum.2 Commerce exercised its
discretion to toll all deadlines affected
by the partial federal government
closure from December 22, 2018 through
Based on our analysis of the
comments we received from interested
parties, we made certain changes to the
margin calculations for CJ Indonesia.6
AGENCY:
jspears on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
the resumption of operations on January
29, 2019.3 On May 13, 2019, we
extended the deadline for these final
results until no later than July 19, 2019.4
1 See Monosodium Glutamate from the Republic
of Indonesia: Preliminary Results of Antidumping
Duty Administrative Review; 2016–2017, 83 FR
63626 (December 11, 2018) (Preliminary Results).
2 See Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision
Memorandum for the Final Results of the 2016–
2017 Administrative Review of the Antidumping
Duty Order on Monosodium Glutamate from the
Republic of Indonesia,’’ dated concurrently with,
and hereby adopted by, this notice (Issues and
Decision Memorandum).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:14 Jul 31, 2019
Jkt 247001
3 See Memorandum to the Record from Gary
Taverman, Deputy Assistant Secretary for
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations,
performing the non-exclusive functions and duties
of the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance, ‘‘Deadlines Affected by the Partial
Shutdown of the Federal Government,’’ dated
January 28, 2019. All deadlines in this segment of
the proceeding have been extended by 40 days.
4 See Memorandum, ‘‘Monosodium Glutamate
from the Republic of Indonesia: Extension of
Deadline for Final Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review; 2016–2017,’’ dated May 13,
2019.
5 For a full description of the scope of the order,
see the Issues and Decision Memorandum.
6 See Issues and Decision Memorandum.
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
37625
Final Results of Administrative Review
As a result of this administrative
review, we determine the following
weighted-average dumping margin
exists for the period November 1, 2016
through October 31, 2017:
Producer/exporter
PT. Cheil Jedang Indonesia
Weightedaverage
dumping
margin
(prcent)
0.00
Disclosure and Public Comment
We intend to disclose the margin
calculations performed in this
proceeding within five days after
publication of these final results in the
Federal Register, in accordance with
section 751(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930,
as amended (the Act), and 19 CFR
351.224(b).
Assessment Rates
Upon completion of this
administrative review, Commerce shall
determine and U.S. Customs and Border
Protection (CBP) shall assess
antidumping duties on all appropriate
entries. Because the weighted-average
dumping margin for CJ Indonesia has
been determined to be zero within the
meaning of 19 CFR 351.106(c), we will
instruct CBP to liquidate the appropriate
entries of subject merchandise without
regard to antidumping duties.
In accordance with Commerce’s
practice, for entries of subject
merchandise during the POR produced
by CJ Indonesia for which it did not
know that the merchandise was
destined for the United States, we will
instruct CBP to liquidate those entries at
the all-others rate if there is no rate for
the intermediate company(ies) involved
in the transaction.7
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following cash deposit
requirements will be effective upon
publication of the final results of this
administrative review for all shipments
of the subject merchandise entered, or
withdrawn from warehouse, for
consumptions on or after the
publication date, as provided for by
section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) The
cash deposit rate for merchandise
produced and/or exported by CJ
Indonesia will be 0.00 percent, the rate
established in the final results of this
administrative review; (2) for previously
reviewed or investigated companies not
7 For a full discussion of this practice, see
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings:
Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954
(May 6, 2003).
E:\FR\FM\01AUN1.SGM
01AUN1
37626
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 148 / Thursday, August 1, 2019 / Notices
covered under this administrative
review, the cash deposit rate will
continue to be the company-specific rate
published for the most recent period; (3)
if the exporter is not a firm covered in
this or any previous review or in the
original less-than-fair-value (LTFV)
investigation but the manufacturer is,
the cash deposit rate will be the rate
established for the most recent period
for the manufacturer of the
merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit
rate for all other manufacturers or
exporters will continue to be 6.19
percent, the all-others rate established
in the LTFV investigation.8 These
deposit requirements, when imposed,
shall remain in effect until further
notice.
Notification to Importers
This notice serves as a final reminder
to importers of their responsibility
under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a
certificate regarding the reimbursement
of antidumping duties prior to
liquidation of the relevant entries
during this review period. Failure to
comply with this requirement could
result in the Secretary’s presumption
that reimbursement of antidumping
duties occurred and the subsequent
assessment of double antidumping
duties.
This notice also services as a
reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective order (APO) of
their responsibility concerning the
return or destruction of proprietary
information disclosed under APO in
accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3),
which governs business proprietary
information in this segment of the
proceeding. Timely written notification
of the return/destruction of APO
materials or conversion to judicial
protective order is hereby requested.
Failure to comply with the regulations
and terms of an APO is a sanctionable
violation.
Notification to Interested Parties
jspears on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
We are issuing and publishing this
notice in accordance with sections
751(a)(1) and 771(i)(1) of the Act, and 19
CFR 351.221(b)(5).
8 See Monosodium Glutamate from the Republic
of Indonesia: Final Determination of Sales at Less
Than Fair Value, 79 FR 58329 (September 29,
2014).
19:14 Jul 31, 2019
Jkt 247001
Appendix List of Topics Discussed in
the Issues and Decision Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Order
IV. Changes Since the Preliminary Results
V. Discussion of the Issues
Comment 1: Whether Commerce Should
Rely on Facts Available for CJ
Indonesia’s Inland Freight/Plant
Warehouse to Customer Expenses
Comment 2: Whether Commerce Should
Rely on CJ Indonesia’s Reported General
and Administrative (G&A) Expenses,
Modified to Reflect Royalty Expense
Comment 3: Whether Commerce Should
Correct Currency Conversion Errors in
the Preliminary Results
VI. Recommendation
[FR Doc. 2019–15918 Filed 7–31–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
Dynamics and SSAB Enterprises for the
following companies: (1) An Fang Steel
Co., Ltd., (An Fang); (2) Kao Hsing
Chang Iron & Steel Corp (Kao Hsing); (3)
Kao Hsuing Chang Iron and Steel Corp.
(Kao Hsuing); (4) Shang Chen Steel Co.,
Ltd. (Shang Chen); and (5) Yieh Phui
Enterprise Co., Ltd. (Yieh Phui), in
accordance with section 751(a) of the
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act),
and 19 CFR.351.213(b).3 No other
parties requested an administrative
review. Pursuant to the review requests
filed by Steel Dynamics and SSAB
Enterprises, and in accordance with 19
CFR 351.221(c)(1)(i), on February 6,
2019, Commerce published in the
Federal Register a notice of initiation of
an administrative review covering An
Fang, Kao Hsing, Kao Hsuing, Shang
Chen, and Yieh Phui.4 On April 4, 2019,
Steel Dynamics and SSAB Enterprises
withdrew their review requests for
administrative reviews for each of the
companies named in their review
request.5
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Rescission of Review
International Trade Administration
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1),
Commerce will rescind an
administrative review, in whole or in
part, if the party, or parties, that
requested a review withdraw the
request/s within 90 days of the
publication of the notice of initiation of
the requested review. As noted above,
Steel Dynamics and SSAB Enterprises
withdrew their request for review by the
90-day deadline, and no other party
requested an administrative review of
this order. Therefore, in response to the
timely withdrawal of the request for
review, and, in accordance with 19 CFR
351.213(d)(1), Commerce is rescinding
this administrative review in its
entirety.
[A–583–835]
Certain Hot-Rolled Carbon Steel Flat
Products From Taiwan: Rescission of
Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review; 2017/2018
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
DATES: Applicable August 1, 2019.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Michael J. Heaney, AD/CVD Operations,
Office VI, Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401
Constitution Avenue NW, Washington,
DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–4475.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
AGENCY:
Administrative Protective Order
VerDate Sep<11>2014
Dated: July 19, 2019.
Jeffrey I. Kessler,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance.
Background
On November 1, 2018, Commerce
published in the Federal Register a
notice of opportunity to request an
administrative review of the
antidumping duty order 1 of certain hotrolled carbon steel flat products from
Taiwan for the period of review (POR)
November 1, 2017 through October 31,
2018.2 On November 30, 2018,
Commerce received timely requests for
administrative reviews from Steel
1 See Notice of Antidumping Duty Order; Certain
Hot-Rolled Carbon Steel Flat Products from Taiwan,
66 FR 59563 (November 29, 2011).
2 See Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order,
Finding, or Suspended Investigation; Opportunity
to Request Administrative Review, 83 FR 54912
(November 1, 2018).
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Assessment
Commerce will instruct U.S. Customs
and Border Protection (CBP) to assess
antidumping duties on all appropriate
entries. Antidumping duties shall be
assessed at rates equal to the cash
deposit of estimated antidumping duties
required at the time of entry, or
withdrawal from warehouse, for
consumption, in accordance with 19
CFR 351.212(c)(1)(i). Commerce intends
to issue appraisement instructions to
3 See Steel Dynamics and SSAB Enterprises
Letter, ‘‘Certain Hot-Rolled Carbon Steel Flat
Products from Taiwan: Request for Administrative
Review,’’ dated November 30, 2018.
4 See Initiation of Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 84 FR
2159 (February 6, 2019).
5 See Steel Dynamics and SSAB Enterprises
Letter, ‘‘Withdrawal of Request for Administrative
Review,’’ dated April 4, 2019.
E:\FR\FM\01AUN1.SGM
01AUN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 148 (Thursday, August 1, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 37625-37626]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-15918]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-560-826]
Monosodium Glutamate From the Republic of Indonesia: Final
Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2016-2017
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that PT.
Cheil Jedang Indonesia (CJ Indonesia), an Indonesian producer/exporter
of monosodium glutamate (MSG) and the sole respondent in this review,
did not make sales of MSG at prices below normal value during the
period of review (POR) November 1, 2016 through October 31, 2017.
DATES: Applicable August 1, 2019.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gene H. Calvert, AD/CVD Operations,
Office VII, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-3586.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On December 11, 2018, Commerce published the Preliminary
Results.\1\ For a detailed history of events that occurred since the
Preliminary Results, see the Issues and Decision Memorandum.\2\
Commerce exercised its discretion to toll all deadlines affected by the
partial federal government closure from December 22, 2018 through the
resumption of operations on January 29, 2019.\3\ On May 13, 2019, we
extended the deadline for these final results until no later than July
19, 2019.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Monosodium Glutamate from the Republic of Indonesia:
Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2016-
2017, 83 FR 63626 (December 11, 2018) (Preliminary Results).
\2\ See Memorandum, ``Issues and Decision Memorandum for the
Final Results of the 2016-2017 Administrative Review of the
Antidumping Duty Order on Monosodium Glutamate from the Republic of
Indonesia,'' dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this
notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum).
\3\ See Memorandum to the Record from Gary Taverman, Deputy
Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Operations, performing the non-exclusive functions and duties of the
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, ``Deadlines
Affected by the Partial Shutdown of the Federal Government,'' dated
January 28, 2019. All deadlines in this segment of the proceeding
have been extended by 40 days.
\4\ See Memorandum, ``Monosodium Glutamate from the Republic of
Indonesia: Extension of Deadline for Final Results of Antidumping
Duty Administrative Review; 2016-2017,'' dated May 13, 2019.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scope of the Order
The merchandise covered by this order is MSG, whether or not
blended or in solution with other products. Merchandise covered by this
order is currently classified in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the
United States (HTSUS) at subheading 2922.42.10.00. Merchandise covered
by this order may also enter under HTSUS subheadings 2922.42.50.00,
2103.90.72.00, 2103.90.74.00, 2103.90.78.00, 2103.90.80.00, and
2103.90.90.91.\5\ The written description of the scope of the
antidumping duty order is dispositive.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ For a full description of the scope of the order, see the
Issues and Decision Memorandum.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised in the case and rebuttal briefs by interested
parties are addressed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum. The Issues
and Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file
electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic System (ACCESS). ACCESS is
available to registered users at https://access.trade.gov, and is
available to all parties in the Central Records Unit, room B8024 of the
main Commerce Building. In addition, a complete version of the Issues
and Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly on the internet at
https://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed Issues and Decision
Memorandum and its electronic version are identical in content.
A list of the issues that parties raised, and to which we responded
in the Issues and Decision Memorandum, is attached as the Appendix to
this notice.
Changes Since the Preliminary Results
Based on our analysis of the comments we received from interested
parties, we made certain changes to the margin calculations for CJ
Indonesia.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ See Issues and Decision Memorandum.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Final Results of Administrative Review
As a result of this administrative review, we determine the
following weighted-average dumping margin exists for the period
November 1, 2016 through October 31, 2017:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Weighted-
average
Producer/exporter dumping
margin
(prcent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
PT. Cheil Jedang Indonesia.............................. 0.00
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Disclosure and Public Comment
We intend to disclose the margin calculations performed in this
proceeding within five days after publication of these final results in
the Federal Register, in accordance with section 751(a) of the Tariff
Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), and 19 CFR 351.224(b).
Assessment Rates
Upon completion of this administrative review, Commerce shall
determine and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) shall assess
antidumping duties on all appropriate entries. Because the weighted-
average dumping margin for CJ Indonesia has been determined to be zero
within the meaning of 19 CFR 351.106(c), we will instruct CBP to
liquidate the appropriate entries of subject merchandise without regard
to antidumping duties.
In accordance with Commerce's practice, for entries of subject
merchandise during the POR produced by CJ Indonesia for which it did
not know that the merchandise was destined for the United States, we
will instruct CBP to liquidate those entries at the all-others rate if
there is no rate for the intermediate company(ies) involved in the
transaction.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ For a full discussion of this practice, see Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties,
68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon
publication of the final results of this administrative review for all
shipments of the subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from
warehouse, for consumptions on or after the publication date, as
provided for by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) The cash deposit
rate for merchandise produced and/or exported by CJ Indonesia will be
0.00 percent, the rate established in the final results of this
administrative review; (2) for previously reviewed or investigated
companies not
[[Page 37626]]
covered under this administrative review, the cash deposit rate will
continue to be the company-specific rate published for the most recent
period; (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered in this or any
previous review or in the original less-than-fair-value (LTFV)
investigation but the manufacturer is, the cash deposit rate will be
the rate established for the most recent period for the manufacturer of
the merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit rate for all other
manufacturers or exporters will continue to be 6.19 percent, the all-
others rate established in the LTFV investigation.\8\ These deposit
requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further
notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ See Monosodium Glutamate from the Republic of Indonesia:
Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value, 79 FR 58329
(September 29, 2014).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Notification to Importers
This notice serves as a final reminder to importers of their
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation
of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply
with this requirement could result in the Secretary's presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent
assessment of double antidumping duties.
Administrative Protective Order
This notice also services as a reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility
concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which
governs business proprietary information in this segment of the
proceeding. Timely written notification of the return/destruction of
APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby
requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO
is a sanctionable violation.
Notification to Interested Parties
We are issuing and publishing this notice in accordance with
sections 751(a)(1) and 771(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.221(b)(5).
Dated: July 19, 2019.
Jeffrey I. Kessler,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
Appendix List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Order
IV. Changes Since the Preliminary Results
V. Discussion of the Issues
Comment 1: Whether Commerce Should Rely on Facts Available for
CJ Indonesia's Inland Freight/Plant Warehouse to Customer Expenses
Comment 2: Whether Commerce Should Rely on CJ Indonesia's
Reported General and Administrative (G&A) Expenses, Modified to
Reflect Royalty Expense
Comment 3: Whether Commerce Should Correct Currency Conversion
Errors in the Preliminary Results
VI. Recommendation
[FR Doc. 2019-15918 Filed 7-31-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P