Certain Data Transmission Devices, Components Thereof, Associated Software, and Products Containing the Same; Commission Determination Not To Review an Initial Determination To Terminate the Investigation With Respect to All Name Respondents Based on Withdrawal of the Complaint; and Termination of the Investigation, 33965 [2019-15011]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 136 / Tuesday, July 16, 2019 / Notices DongGuan OPPO Precision Electronic Corp, Ltd., a subsidiary of Guandong OPPO. IFT also moved to add allegations asserting the ’012, ’572, and ’236 patents against Qualcomm and Vizio based on information learned in discovery. On May 29, 2019, Qualcomm and Vizio opposed the amendment and argued that IFT could have discovered the relevant information through diligent investigation. On June 5, 2019, IFT moved for leave to file a reply in support of its motion. On June 13, 2019, the ALJ, pursuant to Commission Rule 210.14(b) (19 CFR 210.14(b)), issued the subject ID, granting the motion to amend the complaint and notice of investigation. The ALJ also granted leave to file the reply. No petitions for review of the ID were received. The Commission has determined not to review the subject ID. The authority for the Commission’s determination is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in part 210 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR part 210). By order of the Commission. Issued: July 10, 2019. Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 2019–15012 Filed 7–15–19; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation No. 337–TA–1150] Certain Data Transmission Devices, Components Thereof, Associated Software, and Products Containing the Same; Commission Determination Not To Review an Initial Determination To Terminate the Investigation With Respect to All Name Respondents Based on Withdrawal of the Complaint; and Termination of the Investigation U.S. International Trade Commission. ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission (the ‘‘Commission’’) has determined not to review an initial determination (‘‘ID’’) (Order No. 8) to terminate the investigation with respect to all named respondents based on the withdrawal of the complaint. The investigation is terminated. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Carl P. Bretscher, Office of the General Counsel, U.S. International Trade jspears on DSK30JT082PROD with NOTICES SUMMARY: VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:33 Jul 15, 2019 Jkt 247001 Commission, 500 E Street SW, Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205–2382. Copies of non-confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are or will be available for inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205–2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its internet server (https://www.usitc.gov). The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission’s Electronic Docket Information System (‘‘EDIS’’) (https://edis.usitc.gov). Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal, telephone (202) 205–1810. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On April 5, 2019, the Commission instituted the present investigation based on a complaint filed by Data Scape Ltd. of Sandyford, Ireland, and C-Scape Consulting Corp. of Rockville Centre, New York (collectively, ‘‘Complainants’’). 84 FR 13717 (April 5, 2019). The complaint alleges violations of 19 U.S.C. 1337, as amended (‘‘Section 337’’), in the importation, sale for importation, and sale in the United States after importation of certain data transmission devices, components thereof, associated software, and products containing the same that allegedly infringe one or more of the asserted claims of U.S. Patent Nos. 7,720,929; 7,617,537; and 8,386,581. Id. The notice of investigation named the following respondents: Verizon Communications, Inc. (‘‘VCI’’) of New York, New York; Cellco Partnership d/ b/a Verizon Wireless of Basking Ridge, New Jersey (‘‘Verizon Wireless’’); Apple Inc. of Cupertino, California; Amazon.com, Inc. of Seattle, Washington; and Amazon Digital Services, LLC of Seattle, Washington (collectively, ‘‘Respondents’’). The Office of Unfair Import Investigations (‘‘OUII’’) was also named as a party. Id. The Commission previously terminated the investigation with respect to VCI. Order No. 6 (May 16, 2019), not reviewed, Comm’n Op. (June 16, 2019). On May 29, 2019, Complainants filed an unopposed motion to withdraw the complaint and terminate the investigation as to all named respondents. Complainants also moved to stay the investigation’s procedural schedule pending the outcome of the motion. On May 31, 2019, Respondents PO 00000 Frm 00062 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 33965 filed a response supporting the motion because the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California recently held that each of the patents at issue is invalid under 35 U.S.C. 101 for failure to claim patentable subject matter. On June 6, 2019, OUII also filed a response in support of the motion. On May 30, 2019, the presiding administrative law judge (‘‘ALJ’’) issued Order No. 7, granting the request to stay the procedural schedule. On June 13, 2019, the ALJ issued the subject ID (Order No. 8) granting the motion to terminate the investigation. No party filed a petition to review the subject ID. The Commission has determined not to review the subject ID. This investigation is terminated. The authority for the Commission’s determination is contained in Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in Part 210 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR part 210). By order of the Commission. Issued: July 10, 2019. Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 2019–15011 Filed 7–15–19; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Notice of Lodging of Proposed Consent Decree Under the Clean Air Act On July 11, 2019, the Department of Justice lodged a proposed Consent Decree with the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois in the lawsuit entitled United States v. Clean Harbors Recycling Services of Chicago, LLC, et al., Civil Action No. 19–cv–4657. The United States filed a Complaint in this lawsuit seeking civil penalties and injunctive relief from Defendants Clean Harbors Recycling Services of Chicago, LLC, and Clean Harbors Recycling Services of Ohio, LLC (collectively ‘‘Clean Harbors’’) for alleged violations of the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. 7401–7671q, at Clean Harbors’ spent industrial solvent treatment, storage, and disposal facilities in Chicago, Illinois, and Hebron, Ohio (the ‘‘Facilities’’). The Complaint alleges that Clean Harbors has violated statutory and regulatory requirements applicable to solvent storage tanks at the Facilities arising under the Clean Air Act and National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (‘‘NESHAP’’) regulations promulgated by the U.S. E:\FR\FM\16JYN1.SGM 16JYN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 136 (Tuesday, July 16, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Page 33965]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-15011]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation No. 337-TA-1150]


Certain Data Transmission Devices, Components Thereof, Associated 
Software, and Products Containing the Same; Commission Determination 
Not To Review an Initial Determination To Terminate the Investigation 
With Respect to All Name Respondents Based on Withdrawal of the 
Complaint; and Termination of the Investigation

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade 
Commission (the ``Commission'') has determined not to review an initial 
determination (``ID'') (Order No. 8) to terminate the investigation 
with respect to all named respondents based on the withdrawal of the 
complaint. The investigation is terminated.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Carl P. Bretscher, Office of the 
General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, 
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205-2382. Copies of non-
confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are 
or will be available for inspection during official business hours 
(8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. 
International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, Washington, DC 20436, 
telephone (202) 205-2000. General information concerning the Commission 
may also be obtained by accessing its internet server (https://www.usitc.gov). The public record for this investigation may be viewed 
on the Commission's Electronic Docket Information System (``EDIS'') 
(https://edis.usitc.gov). Hearing-impaired persons are advised that 
information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the 
Commission's TDD terminal, telephone (202) 205-1810.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On April 5, 2019, the Commission instituted 
the present investigation based on a complaint filed by Data Scape Ltd. 
of Sandyford, Ireland, and C-Scape Consulting Corp. of Rockville 
Centre, New York (collectively, ``Complainants''). 84 FR 13717 (April 
5, 2019). The complaint alleges violations of 19 U.S.C. 1337, as 
amended (``Section 337''), in the importation, sale for importation, 
and sale in the United States after importation of certain data 
transmission devices, components thereof, associated software, and 
products containing the same that allegedly infringe one or more of the 
asserted claims of U.S. Patent Nos. 7,720,929; 7,617,537; and 
8,386,581. Id. The notice of investigation named the following 
respondents: Verizon Communications, Inc. (``VCI'') of New York, New 
York; Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless of Basking Ridge, New 
Jersey (``Verizon Wireless''); Apple Inc. of Cupertino, California; 
Amazon.com, Inc. of Seattle, Washington; and Amazon Digital Services, 
LLC of Seattle, Washington (collectively, ``Respondents''). The Office 
of Unfair Import Investigations (``OUII'') was also named as a party. 
Id.
    The Commission previously terminated the investigation with respect 
to VCI. Order No. 6 (May 16, 2019), not reviewed, Comm'n Op. (June 16, 
2019).
    On May 29, 2019, Complainants filed an unopposed motion to withdraw 
the complaint and terminate the investigation as to all named 
respondents. Complainants also moved to stay the investigation's 
procedural schedule pending the outcome of the motion. On May 31, 2019, 
Respondents filed a response supporting the motion because the U.S. 
District Court for the Central District of California recently held 
that each of the patents at issue is invalid under 35 U.S.C. 101 for 
failure to claim patentable subject matter. On June 6, 2019, OUII also 
filed a response in support of the motion.
    On May 30, 2019, the presiding administrative law judge (``ALJ'') 
issued Order No. 7, granting the request to stay the procedural 
schedule. On June 13, 2019, the ALJ issued the subject ID (Order No. 8) 
granting the motion to terminate the investigation. No party filed a 
petition to review the subject ID.
    The Commission has determined not to review the subject ID. This 
investigation is terminated.
    The authority for the Commission's determination is contained in 
Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and 
in Part 210 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 
part 210).

    By order of the Commission.

    Issued: July 10, 2019.
Lisa Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2019-15011 Filed 7-15-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.