Heavy Walled Rectangular Welded Carbon Steel Pipes and Tubes From Mexico: Amended Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2016-2017, 32870-32871 [2019-14688]

Download as PDF 32870 Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 132 / Wednesday, July 10, 2019 / Notices completely through the mattress from the top through to the bottom, and it does not contain innersprings or foam. A futon mattress is both the bed and seating surface for the futon. Also excluded from the scope are airbeds (including inflatable mattresses) and waterbeds, which consist of air- or liquidfilled bladders as the core or main support system of the mattress. Further, also excluded from the scope of this investigation are any products covered by the existing antidumping duty order on uncovered innerspring units. See Uncovered Innerspring Units from the People’s Republic of China: Notice of Antidumping Duty Order, 74 FR 7661 (February 19, 2009). Additionally, also excluded from the scope of this investigation are ‘‘mattress toppers.’’ A ‘‘mattress topper’’ is a removable bedding accessory that supplements a mattress by providing an additional layer that is placed on top of a mattress. Excluded mattress toppers have a height of four inches or less. The products subject to this investigation are currently properly classifiable under Harmonized Tariff Schedule for the United States (HTSUS) subheadings: 9404.21.0010, 9404.21.0013, 9404.29.1005, 9404.29.1013, 9404.29.9085, and 9404.29.9087. Products subject to this investigation may also enter under HTSUS subheadings: 9404.21.0095, 9404.29.1095, 9404.29.9095, 9401.40.0000, and 9401.90.5081. Although the HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes, the written description of the merchandise subject to this investigation is dispositive. [FR Doc. 2019–14689 Filed 7–9–19; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–201–847] Heavy Walled Rectangular Welded Carbon Steel Pipes and Tubes From Mexico: Amended Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2016–2017 Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (Commerce) is amending the final results of the administrative review of the antidumping duty (AD) order on heavy walled rectangular welded carbon steel pipes and tubes (HWR) from Mexico to correct a ministerial error. DATES: Applicable July 10, 2019. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David Crespo or Jacob Garten, AD/CVD Operations, Office II, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: jspears on DSK30JT082PROD with NOTICES AGENCY: VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:32 Jul 09, 2019 Jkt 247001 (202) 482–3693 or (202) 482–3342, respectively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background On May 28, 2019, Commerce issued the final results of the first administrative review of the AD order on HWR from Mexico.1 Also on this date, Atlas Tube, a division of Zekelman Industries, and Searing Industries (collectively, the domestic producers), submitted comments alleging a ministerial error in Commerce’s Final Results.2 Legal Framework A ministerial error, as defined in section 751(h) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), includes ‘‘errors in addition, subtraction, or other arithmetic function, clerical errors resulting from inaccurate copying, duplication, or the like, and any other type of unintentional error which the administering authority considers ministerial.’’ 3 With respect to final results of administrative reviews, 19 CFR 351.224(e) provides that Commerce ‘‘will analyze any comments received and, if appropriate, correct any ministerial error by amending . . . the final results of review. . . .’’ Ministerial Errors Commerce committed an inadvertent error within the meaning of section 735(e) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.224(f) 4 with respect to the cash deposit rate assigned to the companies not selected for individual examination. In the Final Results, we stated our intention to base this calculation on the average of the margins calculated for Maquilacero S.A. de C.V. (Maquilacero) and Productos Laminados de Monterrey S.A. de C.V. (Prolamsa), weighted by their publicly-ranged sales quantities.5 However, we did not rely on Prolamsa’s most recently-submitted publiclyranged sales quantity. Accordingly, we have determined, in accordance with section 751(h) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.224(f), that an unintentional ministerial error was made in the Final 1 See Heavy Walled Rectangular Welded Carbon Steel Pipes and Tubes from Mexico: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Final Determination of No Shipments; 2016–2017, 84 FR 24473 (May 28, 2019) (Final Results). 2 See Domestic Producers’ letter, ‘‘Heavy Walled Rectangular Welded Carbon Steel Pipes and Tubes from Mexico: Ministerial Error Comments,’’ dated May 28, 2019. 3 See 19 CFR 351.224(f). 4 Id. 5 See Memorandum, ‘‘Calculation of the Cash Deposit Rate for Non-Reviewed Companies,’’ dated May 20, 2019 (Final Results Average Rate Memo); and Final Results, 84 FR at 24474. PO 00000 Frm 00012 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Results. Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.224(e), Commerce is amending the Final Results to reflect the correction of this ministerial error. Specifically, we have now revised the calculation to include Prolamsa’s correct U.S. quantity.6 This correction changes the cash deposit rate for the non-individually-examined companies from 5.88 percent to 6.13 percent.7 For a detailed discussion of this ministerial error, as well as Commerce’s analysis, see Ministerial Error Memorandum.8 Amended Final Results of the Review We are assigning the following weighted-average dumping margins to the firms listed below for the period March 1, 2016 through August 31, 2017: Exporter/producer Weightedaverage dumping margin (percent) 9 Maquilacero S.A. de C.V ............ Productos Laminados de Monterrey S.A. de C.V ............ 1.43 8.09 Review-Specific Average Rate Applicable to the Following Companies: 10 Exporter/producer Arco Metal S.A. de C.V .............. Forza Steel S.A. de C.V ............. Industrias Monterrey, S.A. de C.V .......................................... Perfiles y Herrajes LM S.A. de C.V .......................................... PYTCO S.A. de C.V ................... Regiomontana de Perfiles y Tubos S.A. de C.V .................. Ternium S.A. de C.V .................. Tuberia Nacional S.A. de C.V .... Tuberia Procarsa S.A. de C.V .... Weightedaverage dumping margin (percent) 6.13 6.13 6.13 6.13 6.13 6.13 6.13 (*) 6.13 * No shipments or sales subject to this review. 6 See Final Results Average Rate Memo. Memorandum, ‘‘Amended Calculation of the Cash Deposit Rate for Non-Reviewed Companies,’’ dated concurrently with this notice (Amended Final Results Review-Specific Average Rate Memo). 8 See Memorandum, ‘‘Antidumping Duty Administrative Review of Heavy Walled Rectangular Welded Carbon Steel Pipes and Tubes from Mexico; 2016–2017: Ministerial Error Memorandum,’’ dated concurrently with this notice (Ministerial Error Memorandum). 9 We note that Maquilacero’s and Prolamsa’s margins remain unchanged from the Final Results. 10 See Amended Final Results Review-Specific Average Rate Memo. This rate is based on the rates for the respondents that were selected for individual review, excluding rates that are zero, de minimis, or based entirely on facts available. See section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act. 7 See E:\FR\FM\10JYN1.SGM 10JYN1 Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 132 / Wednesday, July 10, 2019 / Notices Disclosure We intend to disclose the calculation performed for these amended final results in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b). Antidumping Duty Assessment Cash Deposit Requirements jspears on DSK30JT082PROD with NOTICES Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), Commerce has determined, and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries of subject merchandise in accordance with the amended final results of this review. Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), where Maquilacero and Prolamsa reported the entered value of their U.S. sales, we calculated importer-specific ad valorem duty assessment rates based on the ratio of the total amount of dumping calculated for the examined sales to the total entered value of the sales for which entered value was reported. Where the respondents did not report entered value, we calculated the entered value in order to calculate the assessment rate. Where either the respondent’s weighted-average dumping margin is zero or de minimis within the meaning of 19 CFR 351.106(c)(1), or an importer-specific rate is zero or de minimis, we will instruct CBP to liquidate the appropriate entries without regard to antidumping duties. In addition, for entries of subject merchandise during the period of review (POR) produced by Maquilacero or Prolamsa for which the respondent did not know its merchandise was destined for the United States, we will instruct CBP to liquidate unreviewed entries at the all-others rate if there is no rate for the intermediate company or companies involved in the transaction. The all-others rate is 4.91 percent.11 We will also instruct CBP to take into account the ‘‘provisional measures cap’’ in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(d). For the companies which were not selected for individual review, we will assign an assessment rate based on the average 12 of the cash deposit rates calculated for Maquilacero and Prolamsa. The amended final results of this review shall be the basis for the assessment of antidumping duties on entries of merchandise covered by the amended final results of this review and 11 See Heavy Walled Rectangular Welded Carbon Steel Pipes and Tubes from the Republic of Korea, Mexico, and the Republic of Turkey: Antidumping Duty Orders, 81 FR 62865, 62866 (September 13, 2016) (AD Orders). We note that the Final Results contained an incorrect all-others rate. 12 This rate was calculated as discussed in footnote 10, above. VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:32 Jul 09, 2019 Jkt 247001 for future deposits of estimated duties, where applicable.13 We intend to issue liquidation instructions to CBP 41 days after publication of the final results of this administrative review. The following cash deposit requirements will be effective retroactively, as appropriate, for all shipments of subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the May 28, 2019, the date of publication of the Final Results of this administrative review, as provided for by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) The cash deposit rate for each specific company listed above will be that established in the amended final results, except if the rate is less than 0.50 percent and, therefore, de minimis within the meaning of 19 CFR 351.106(c)(1), in which case the cash deposit rate will be zero; (2) for previously reviewed or investigated companies, including those for which Commerce may have determined they had no shipments during the POR, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the companyspecific rate published for the most recently completed segment of this proceeding; (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered in this review or another completed segment of this proceeding, but the manufacturer is, then the cash deposit rate will be the rate established for the most recently completed segment of this proceeding for the manufacturer of the merchandise; and (4) if neither the exporter nor the manufacturer is a firm covered in this or any previously completed segment of this proceeding, then the cash deposit rate will be the all-others rate of 4.91 percent established in the less-than-fair-value investigation.14 These deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice. Notification to Importers This notice serves as a final reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in the Secretary’s presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of doubled antidumping duties. PO 00000 13 See 14 See section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act. AD Orders. Frm 00013 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 32871 Administrative Protective Order This notice serves as a reminder to parties subject to administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility concerning the disposition of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which continues to govern business proprietary information in this segment of the proceeding. Timely written notification of return/destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation. Notification to Interested Parties These amended final results and notice are issued and published in accordance with sections 751(h) and 777(i) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.224(e). Dated: July 1, 2019. Jeffrey I. Kessler, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. [FR Doc. 2019–14688 Filed 7–9–19; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–580–878; C–580–879] Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products From Republic of Korea: Affirmative Preliminary Determination of Anti-Circumvention Inquiries on the Antidumping Duty and Countervailing Duty Orders Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (Commerce) preliminarily determines that imports of certain corrosionresistant steel products (CORE), produced in the Socialist Republic of Vietnam (Vietnam) using hot-rolled steel (HRS) and/or cold-rolled steel (CRS) flat products manufactured in the Republic of Korea (Korea), are circumventing the antidumping duty (AD) and countervailing duty (CVD) orders on CORE from Korea. DATES: Applicable July 10, 2019. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Chien-Min Yang, AD/CVD Operations, Office VII, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–5484. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: AGENCY: E:\FR\FM\10JYN1.SGM 10JYN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 132 (Wednesday, July 10, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 32870-32871]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-14688]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-201-847]


Heavy Walled Rectangular Welded Carbon Steel Pipes and Tubes From 
Mexico: Amended Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative 
Review; 2016-2017

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (Commerce) is amending the final 
results of the administrative review of the antidumping duty (AD) order 
on heavy walled rectangular welded carbon steel pipes and tubes (HWR) 
from Mexico to correct a ministerial error.

DATES: Applicable July 10, 2019.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David Crespo or Jacob Garten, AD/CVD 
Operations, Office II, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade 
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-3693 or (202) 482-3342, 
respectively.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    On May 28, 2019, Commerce issued the final results of the first 
administrative review of the AD order on HWR from Mexico.\1\ Also on 
this date, Atlas Tube, a division of Zekelman Industries, and Searing 
Industries (collectively, the domestic producers), submitted comments 
alleging a ministerial error in Commerce's Final Results.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Heavy Walled Rectangular Welded Carbon Steel Pipes and 
Tubes from Mexico: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative 
Review and Final Determination of No Shipments; 2016-2017, 84 FR 
24473 (May 28, 2019) (Final Results).
    \2\ See Domestic Producers' letter, ``Heavy Walled Rectangular 
Welded Carbon Steel Pipes and Tubes from Mexico: Ministerial Error 
Comments,'' dated May 28, 2019.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Legal Framework

    A ministerial error, as defined in section 751(h) of the Tariff Act 
of 1930, as amended (the Act), includes ``errors in addition, 
subtraction, or other arithmetic function, clerical errors resulting 
from inaccurate copying, duplication, or the like, and any other type 
of unintentional error which the administering authority considers 
ministerial.'' \3\ With respect to final results of administrative 
reviews, 19 CFR 351.224(e) provides that Commerce ``will analyze any 
comments received and, if appropriate, correct any ministerial error by 
amending . . . the final results of review. . . .''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ See 19 CFR 351.224(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Ministerial Errors

    Commerce committed an inadvertent error within the meaning of 
section 735(e) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.224(f) \4\ with respect to the 
cash deposit rate assigned to the companies not selected for individual 
examination. In the Final Results, we stated our intention to base this 
calculation on the average of the margins calculated for Maquilacero 
S.A. de C.V. (Maquilacero) and Productos Laminados de Monterrey S.A. de 
C.V. (Prolamsa), weighted by their publicly-ranged sales quantities.\5\ 
However, we did not rely on Prolamsa's most recently-submitted 
publicly-ranged sales quantity. Accordingly, we have determined, in 
accordance with section 751(h) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.224(f), that 
an unintentional ministerial error was made in the Final Results. 
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.224(e), Commerce is amending the Final Results 
to reflect the correction of this ministerial error. Specifically, we 
have now revised the calculation to include Prolamsa's correct U.S. 
quantity.\6\ This correction changes the cash deposit rate for the non-
individually-examined companies from 5.88 percent to 6.13 percent.\7\ 
For a detailed discussion of this ministerial error, as well as 
Commerce's analysis, see Ministerial Error Memorandum.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ Id.
    \5\ See Memorandum, ``Calculation of the Cash Deposit Rate for 
Non-Reviewed Companies,'' dated May 20, 2019 (Final Results Average 
Rate Memo); and Final Results, 84 FR at 24474.
    \6\ See Final Results Average Rate Memo.
    \7\ See Memorandum, ``Amended Calculation of the Cash Deposit 
Rate for Non-Reviewed Companies,'' dated concurrently with this 
notice (Amended Final Results Review-Specific Average Rate Memo).
    \8\ See Memorandum, ``Antidumping Duty Administrative Review of 
Heavy Walled Rectangular Welded Carbon Steel Pipes and Tubes from 
Mexico; 2016-2017: Ministerial Error Memorandum,'' dated 
concurrently with this notice (Ministerial Error Memorandum).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Amended Final Results of the Review

    We are assigning the following weighted-average dumping margins to 
the firms listed below for the period March 1, 2016 through August 31, 
2017:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ We note that Maquilacero's and Prolamsa's margins remain 
unchanged from the Final Results.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                               Weighted-
                                                                average
                                                                dumping
                      Exporter/producer                         margin
                                                               (percent)
                                                                  \9\
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Maquilacero S.A. de C.V.....................................        1.43
Productos Laminados de Monterrey S.A. de C.V................        8.09
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Review-Specific Average Rate Applicable to the Following Companies: 
\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ See Amended Final Results Review-Specific Average Rate 
Memo. This rate is based on the rates for the respondents that were 
selected for individual review, excluding rates that are zero, de 
minimis, or based entirely on facts available. See section 
735(c)(5)(A) of the Act.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                               Weighted-
                                                                average
                      Exporter/producer                         dumping
                                                                margin
                                                               (percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Arco Metal S.A. de C.V......................................        6.13
Forza Steel S.A. de C.V.....................................        6.13
Industrias Monterrey, S.A. de C.V...........................        6.13
Perfiles y Herrajes LM S.A. de C.V..........................        6.13
PYTCO S.A. de C.V...........................................        6.13
Regiomontana de Perfiles y Tubos S.A. de C.V................        6.13
Ternium S.A. de C.V.........................................        6.13
Tuberia Nacional S.A. de C.V................................         (*)
Tuberia Procarsa S.A. de C.V................................        6.13
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* No shipments or sales subject to this review.


[[Page 32871]]

Disclosure

    We intend to disclose the calculation performed for these amended 
final results in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b).

Antidumping Duty Assessment

    Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act, and 19 CFR 
351.212(b)(1), Commerce has determined, and U.S. Customs and Border 
Protection (CBP) shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate 
entries of subject merchandise in accordance with the amended final 
results of this review.
    Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), where Maquilacero and Prolamsa 
reported the entered value of their U.S. sales, we calculated importer-
specific ad valorem duty assessment rates based on the ratio of the 
total amount of dumping calculated for the examined sales to the total 
entered value of the sales for which entered value was reported. Where 
the respondents did not report entered value, we calculated the entered 
value in order to calculate the assessment rate. Where either the 
respondent's weighted-average dumping margin is zero or de minimis 
within the meaning of 19 CFR 351.106(c)(1), or an importer-specific 
rate is zero or de minimis, we will instruct CBP to liquidate the 
appropriate entries without regard to antidumping duties. In addition, 
for entries of subject merchandise during the period of review (POR) 
produced by Maquilacero or Prolamsa for which the respondent did not 
know its merchandise was destined for the United States, we will 
instruct CBP to liquidate unreviewed entries at the all-others rate if 
there is no rate for the intermediate company or companies involved in 
the transaction. The all-others rate is 4.91 percent.\11\ We will also 
instruct CBP to take into account the ``provisional measures cap'' in 
accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(d).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ See Heavy Walled Rectangular Welded Carbon Steel Pipes and 
Tubes from the Republic of Korea, Mexico, and the Republic of 
Turkey: Antidumping Duty Orders, 81 FR 62865, 62866 (September 13, 
2016) (AD Orders). We note that the Final Results contained an 
incorrect all-others rate.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    For the companies which were not selected for individual review, we 
will assign an assessment rate based on the average \12\ of the cash 
deposit rates calculated for Maquilacero and Prolamsa. The amended 
final results of this review shall be the basis for the assessment of 
antidumping duties on entries of merchandise covered by the amended 
final results of this review and for future deposits of estimated 
duties, where applicable.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ This rate was calculated as discussed in footnote 10, 
above.
    \13\ See section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    We intend to issue liquidation instructions to CBP 41 days after 
publication of the final results of this administrative review.

Cash Deposit Requirements

    The following cash deposit requirements will be effective 
retroactively, as appropriate, for all shipments of subject merchandise 
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the 
May 28, 2019, the date of publication of the Final Results of this 
administrative review, as provided for by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the 
Act: (1) The cash deposit rate for each specific company listed above 
will be that established in the amended final results, except if the 
rate is less than 0.50 percent and, therefore, de minimis within the 
meaning of 19 CFR 351.106(c)(1), in which case the cash deposit rate 
will be zero; (2) for previously reviewed or investigated companies, 
including those for which Commerce may have determined they had no 
shipments during the POR, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the 
company-specific rate published for the most recently completed segment 
of this proceeding; (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered in this 
review or another completed segment of this proceeding, but the 
manufacturer is, then the cash deposit rate will be the rate 
established for the most recently completed segment of this proceeding 
for the manufacturer of the merchandise; and (4) if neither the 
exporter nor the manufacturer is a firm covered in this or any 
previously completed segment of this proceeding, then the cash deposit 
rate will be the all-others rate of 4.91 percent established in the 
less-than-fair-value investigation.\14\ These deposit requirements, 
when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \14\ See AD Orders.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Notification to Importers

    This notice serves as a final reminder to importers of their 
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation 
of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply 
with this requirement could result in the Secretary's presumption that 
reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent 
assessment of doubled antidumping duties.

Administrative Protective Order

    This notice serves as a reminder to parties subject to 
administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility 
concerning the disposition of proprietary information disclosed under 
APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which continues to govern 
business proprietary information in this segment of the proceeding. 
Timely written notification of return/destruction of APO materials or 
conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to 
comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a sanctionable 
violation.

Notification to Interested Parties

    These amended final results and notice are issued and published in 
accordance with sections 751(h) and 777(i) of the Act and 19 CFR 
351.224(e).

    Dated: July 1, 2019.
Jeffrey I. Kessler,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2019-14688 Filed 7-9-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P