Certain Steel Wheels 12 to 16.5 Inches in Diameter From the People's Republic of China: Final Affirmative Countervailing Duty Determination, and Final Affirmative Determination of Critical Circumstances, 32723-32725 [2019-14558]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 131 / Tuesday, July 9, 2019 / Notices
time of entry for all imports of subject
merchandise.
The effective date of the continuation
of this Order will be the date of
publication in the Federal Register of
this notice of continuation. Pursuant to
section 751(c)(2) of the Act and 19 CFR
351.218(c)(2), Commerce intends to
initiate the next five-year review of this
Order not later than 30 days prior to the
fifth anniversary of the effective date of
continuation.
Notification to Interested Parties
This five-year sunset review and this
notice are in accordance with section
751(c) of the Act and published
pursuant to section 777(i)(1) of the Act
and 19 CFR 351.218(f)(4).
Dated: July 2, 2019.
Jeffrey I. Kessler,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2019–14561 Filed 7–8–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[C–570–091]
Certain Steel Wheels 12 to 16.5 Inches
in Diameter From the People’s
Republic of China: Final Affirmative
Countervailing Duty Determination,
and Final Affirmative Determination of
Critical Circumstances
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
AGENCY:
The Department of Commerce
(Commerce) determines that
countervailable subsidies are being
provided to producers and exporters of
certain steel wheels 12 to 16.5 inches in
diameter (certain steel wheels) from the
People’s Republic of China (China).
SUMMARY:
DATES:
Applicable July 9, 2019.
khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Emily Halle or Keith Haynes, AD/CVD
Operations, Office III, Enforcement and
Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone:
(202) 482–0176 or (202) 482–5139,
respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On February 25, 2019, Commerce
published the Preliminary
Determination of this investigation in
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:47 Jul 08, 2019
Jkt 247001
the Federal Register.1 In the Preliminary
Determination, Commerce aligned the
final determination in this
countervailing duty (CVD) investigation
with the final determination in the
companion less-than-fair-value (LTFV)
investigation, in accordance with
section 705(a)(1) of the Tariff Act of
1930, as amended (the Act), and 19 CFR
351.210(b)(4). A complete summary of
the events that occurred since
Commerce published the Preliminary
Determination, as well as a full
discussion of the issues raised by parties
for this final determination, may be
found in the Issues and Decision
Memorandum.2
The Issues and Decision
Memorandum is a public document and
is on file electronically via Enforcement
and Compliance’s Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Centralized
Electronic Service System (ACCESS).
ACCESS is available to registered users
at https://access.trade.gov, and is
available to all parties in the Central
Records Unit, Room B8024 of the main
Commerce building. In addition, a
complete version of the Issues and
Decision Memorandum can be accessed
directly at https://enforcement.trade.gov/
frn/. The signed Issues and Decision
Memorandum and the electronic
version are identical in content.
Commerce exercised its discretion to
toll all deadlines affected by the partial
Federal government closure from
December 22, 2018, through the
resumption of operations on January 29,
2019.3 Accordingly, the deadline for the
final determination of this investigation
is July 1, 2019.
Period of Investigation
The period of investigation (POI) is
January 1, 2017 through December 31,
2017.
1 See Certain Steel Wheels 12 to 16.5 Inches in
Diameter from the People’s Republic of China:
Preliminary Affirmative Countervailing Duty
Determination, 84 FR 5989 (February 25, 2019)
(Preliminary Determination) and accompanying
Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
2 See Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision
Memorandum for the Final Determination in the
Countervailing Duty Investigation of Certain Steel
Wheels 12 to 16.5 Inches in Diameter from the
People’s Republic of China,’’ dated concurrently
with, and hereby adopted by, this notice (Issues and
Decision Memorandum).
3 See Memorandum to the Record from Gary
Taverman, Deputy Assistant Secretary for
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations,
performing the non-exclusive functions and duties
of the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance, ‘‘Deadlines Affected by the Partial
Shutdown of the Federal Government,’’ dated
January 28, 2019. All deadlines in this segment of
the proceeding have been extended by 40 days.
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
32723
Scope of the Investigation
The products covered by this
investigation are certain steel wheels 12
to 16.5 inches in diameter from China.
For a complete description of the scope
of this investigation, see Appendix I of
this notice.
Scope Comments
During the course of this investigation
and the concurrent LTFV investigation
of certain steel wheels from China,
Commerce received scope comments
from interested parties. Commerce
issued a Preliminary Scope Decision
Memorandum to address these
comments and set aside a period of time
for parties to address scope issues in
scope case and rebuttal briefs.4
Commerce has reviewed the briefs
submitted by interested parties,
considered the arguments therein, and
has made changes to the scope of the
investigation, including additional
exclusions, and clarifying language. For
a summary of the scope comments and
rebuttal responses submitted to the
record for this final determination,
along with the accompanying
discussion and analysis of all comments
timely received, see the Final Scope
Decision Memorandum.5
Final Affirmative Determination of
Critical Circumstances
In the Preliminary Determination,
Commerce preliminarily determined,
pursuant to section 703(e)(1) of the Act,
that critical circumstances exist with
respect to Xingmin Intelligent
Transportation Systems (Group)
(Xingmin), Zhejiang Jingu Company
Limited (Zhejiang Jingu), and all other
exporters or producers not individually
examined. For this final determination,
we continue to find that critical
circumstances exist for Xingmin,
Zhejiang Jingu, and all other exporters
or producers not individually examined,
pursuant to section 705(a)(2) of the Act.
For a full description of the
methodology and results of Commerce’s
analysis, see the Issues and Decision
Memorandum.
Analysis of Subsidy Programs and
Comments Received
All issues raised in the case and
rebuttal briefs submitted by interested
parties in this proceeding, other than
4 See Memorandum, ‘‘Certain Steel Wheels 12 to
16.5 Inches in Diameter from the People’s Republic
of China: Preliminary Scope Decision
Memorandum,’’ dated April 15, 2019, at 11.
5 See Memorandum, ‘‘Certain Steel Wheels 12 to
16.5 Inches in Diameter from the People’s Republic
of China: Final Scope Comments Decision
Memorandum,’’ dated concurrently with this notice
(Final Scope Decision Memorandum).
E:\FR\FM\09JYN1.SGM
09JYN1
32724
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 131 / Tuesday, July 9, 2019 / Notices
those issues related to scope, are
discussed in the Issues and Decision
Memorandum. A list of the issues raised
by parties and responded to by
Commerce in the Issues and Decision
Memorandum, is attached at Appendix
II.
Use of Adverse Facts Available
Commerce relied on ‘‘facts otherwise
available,’’ including adverse facts
available (AFA), for several findings in
the Preliminary Determination. For this
final determination, we are basing the
CVD rates for Xingmin and Zhejiang
Jingu on facts otherwise available, with
an adverse inference, pursuant to
sections 776(a) and (b) of the Act. For
a full discussion of our application of
AFA, see the Issues and Decision
Memorandum.
khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES
Changes Since the Preliminary
Determination
Based on our analysis of the
comments received from parties, we
made certain changes to the
respondents’ subsidy rate calculations
set forth in the Preliminary
Determination. For a discussion of these
changes, see the Issues and Decision
Memorandum.
All-Others Rate
In accordance with section
705(c)(5)(A) of the Act, Commerce shall
determine an estimated all-others rate
for companies not individually
examined. Generally, under section
705(c)(5)(A)(i) of the Act, this rate shall
be an amount equal to the weighted
average of the estimated subsidy rates
established for those companies
individually examined, excluding any
zero and de minimis rates and any rates
based entirely on AFA under section
776 of the Act. However, section
705(c)(5)(A)(ii) of the Act provides that,
where all countervailable subsidy rates
established for the mandatory
respondents are zero, de minimis, or
based entirely on facts available,
Commerce may use ‘‘any reasonable
method’’ for assigning an all-others rate,
including ‘‘averaging the estimated
average countervailable subsidy rates
determined for the exporters and
producers individually investigated.’’ In
this investigation, all rates for the
individually-investigated respondents
are based entirely on facts available,
pursuant to section 776 of the Act. We
are relying on a simple average of the
total AFA rates assigned to Xingmin and
Zhejiang Jingu as the ‘‘all-others’’ rate in
this final determination, consistent with
the statutory provision to rely on ‘‘any
reasonable method.’’ Specifically, there
is no other information on the record
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:47 Jul 08, 2019
Jkt 247001
from which to determine the all-others
rate. For further information on the allothers rate, see the Issues and Decision
Memorandum.
Methodology
Commerce conducted this
investigation in accordance with section
701 of the Act. For each of the subsidy
programs found countervailable,
Commerce determines that there is a
subsidy, i.e., a financial contribution by
an ‘‘authority’’ that gives rise to a
benefit to the recipient, and that the
subsidy is specific.6 In making these
findings, Commerce relied, in part, on
facts otherwise available and, because it
finds that one or more respondents did
not act to the best of their ability to
respond to Commerce’s requests for
information, Commerce drew an adverse
inference where appropriate in selecting
from among the facts otherwise
available.7 For a full description of the
methodology underlying our final
determination, see the Issues and
Decision Memorandum.
Final Determination
In accordance with section
705(c)(1)(B)(i)(I) of the Act, we
established individual estimated
countervailable subsidy rates, as
follows:
Subsidy
rate
(percent)
Company
Xingmin Intelligent Transportation Systems (Group) 8 ...................................
Zhejiang Jingu Company Limited 9 .......
All-Others ..............................................
386.45
388.31
387.38
Disclosure
We intend to disclose the calculations
performed to parties in this proceeding
within five days of its public
announcement, or if there is no public
announcement, within five days of the
6 See sections 771(5)(B) and (D) of the Act
regarding financial contribution; section 771(5)(E)
of the Act regarding benefit; and section 771(5A) of
the Act regarding specificity.
7 See sections 776(a), (b), and 782(d) of the Act.
8 Commerce assigned Xingmin’s rate to each of
the entities for which Xingmin provided an initial
questionnaire response: Sino-Tex (Longkou) Wheel
Manufacturers Inc.; Tangshan Xingmin Wheel Co.,
Ltd.; and Xianning Xingmin Wheel Co., Ltd.
9 Commerce assigned Zhejiang Jingu Company
Limited’s rate to each of the entities named as crossowned in its affiliation questionnaire response:
Shanghai Yata Industry Company Limited;
Shangdong Jingu Auto Parts Co., Ltd.; An’Gang
Jingu (Hangzhou) Metal Materials Co., Ltd.;
Zhejiang Wheel World Co., Ltd.; and Hangzhou
Jingu New Energy Development Co. Ltd. Zhejiang
Jingu’s rate has also been assigned to Zhejiang Jingu
Automobile Components, which was the prior
name of Zhejiang Jingu.
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
date of this notice, in accordance with
19 CFR 351.224(b).
Continuation of Suspension of
Liquidation
As a result of our Preliminary
Determination, and pursuant to sections
703(d)(1)(B) and (2) of the Act, we
instructed U.S. Customs and Border
Protection (CBP) to suspend liquidation
of all appropriate entries of certain steel
wheels from China, as described in
Appendix I of this notice, that were
entered or withdrawn from warehouse,
for consumption, on or after November
27, 2018, 90 days prior to the date of
publication of the Preliminary
Determination in the Federal Register,
for Xingmin, Zhejiang and all other
producers and exporters of merchandise
under consideration. In accordance with
section 703(d) of the Act, we issued
instructions to CBP to discontinue the
suspension of liquidation for CVD
purposes for subject merchandise
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse,
on or after June 25, 2019, but to
continue the suspension of liquidation
of all entries from November 27, 2018
through June 24, 2019.
If the U.S. International Trade
Commission (ITC) issues a final
affirmative injury determination, we
will issue a CVD order, reinstate the
suspension of liquidation under section
706(a) of the Act, and require a cash
deposit of estimated countervailing
duties for such entries of subject
merchandise in the amounts indicated
above. If the ITC issues a final
affirmative injury determination but a
final negative determination of critical
circumstances, we will instruct CBP to
liquidate entries prior to the date of
publication of the Preliminary
Determination without regard to duties,
and all estimated duties deposited or
securities posted as a result of the
suspension of liquidation will be
refunded or canceled. If the ITC
determines that material injury, or
threat of material injury, does not exist,
this proceeding will be terminated, and
all estimated duties deposited or
securities posted as a result of the
suspension of liquidation will be
refunded or canceled.
International Trade Commission
Notification
In accordance with section 705(d) of
the Act, we will notify the ITC of our
final affirmative determination that
countervailable subsidies are being
provided to producers and exporters of
certain steel wheels from China.
Because the final determination in this
proceeding is affirmative, in accordance
with section 705(b) of the Act, the ITC
E:\FR\FM\09JYN1.SGM
09JYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 131 / Tuesday, July 9, 2019 / Notices
will make its final determination as to
whether the domestic industry in the
United States is materially injured, or
threatened with material injury, by
reason of imports, or sales (or the
likelihood of sales) for importation of
certain steel wheels from China no later
than 45 days after our final
determination. If the ITC determines
that material injury or threat of material
injury does not exist, the proceeding
will be terminated, and all cash deposits
will be refunded. If the ITC determines
that such injury does exist, Commerce
will issue a CVD order directing CBP to
assess, upon further instruction by
Commerce, countervailing duties on all
imports of the subject merchandise
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse,
for consumption on or after the effective
date of the suspension of liquidation.
Administrative Protective Orders
This notice serves as the only
reminder to parties subject to the
administrative protective order (APO) of
their responsibility concerning the
destruction of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely
notification of the return or destruction
of APO materials or conversion to
judicial protective order is hereby
requested. Failure to comply with the
regulations and terms of an APO is a
sanctionable violation.
Notification to Interested Parties
This determination is issued and
published in accordance with sections
705(d) and 777(i) of the Act and 19 CFR
351.210(c).
Dated: July 1, 2019.
Jeffrey I. Kessler,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance.
khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES
Appendix I—Scope of the Investigation
The scope of this investigation is certain
on-the-road steel wheels, discs, and rims for
tubeless tires with a nominal wheel diameter
of 12 inches to 16.5 inches, regardless of
width. Certain on-the-road steel wheels with
a nominal wheel diameter of 12 inches to
16.5 inches within the scope are generally for
road and highway trailers and other towable
equipment, including, inter alia, utility
trailers, cargo trailers, horse trailers, boat
trailers, recreational trailers, and towable
mobile homes. The standard widths of
certain on-the-road steel wheels are 4 inches,
4.5 inches, 5 inches, 5.5 inches, 6 inches, and
6.5 inches, but all certain on-the-road steel
wheels, regardless of width, are covered by
the scope.
The scope includes rims and discs for
certain on-the-road steel wheels, whether
imported as an assembly, unassembled, or
separately. The scope includes certain onthe-road steel wheels regardless of steel
composition, whether cladded or not
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:47 Jul 08, 2019
Jkt 247001
cladded, whether finished or not finished,
and whether coated or uncoated. The scope
also includes certain on-the-road steel wheels
with discs in either a ‘‘hub-piloted’’ or ‘‘studpiloted’’ mounting configuration, though the
stud-piloted configuration is most common
in the size range covered.
All on-the-road wheels sold in the United
States must meet Standard 110 or 120 of the
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration’s (NHTSA) Federal Motor
Vehicle Safety Standards, which requires a
rim marking, such as the ‘‘DOT’’ symbol,
indicating compliance with applicable motor
vehicle standards. See 49 CFR 571.110 and
571.120. The scope includes certain on-theroad steel wheels imported with or without
NHTSA’s required markings.
Certain on-the-road steel wheels imported
as an assembly with a tire mounted on the
wheel and/or with a valve stem or rims
imported as an assembly with a tire mounted
on the rim and/or with a valve stem are
included in the scope of this investigation.
However, if the steel wheels or rims are
imported as an assembly with a tire mounted
on the wheel or rim and/or with a valve stem
attached, the tire and/or valve stem is not
covered by the scope.
The scope includes rims, discs, and wheels
that have been further processed in a third
country, including, but not limited to, the
welding and painting of rims and discs to
form a steel wheel, or any other processing
that would not otherwise remove the
merchandise from the scope of the
investigations if performed in the People’s
Republic of China.
Excluded from this scope are the following:
(1) Steel wheels for use with tube-type
tires; such tires use multi piece rims, which
are two-piece and three-piece assemblies and
require the use of an inner tube;
(2) aluminum wheels;
(3) certain on-the-road steel wheels that are
coated entirely in chrome. This exclusion is
limited to chrome wheels coated entirely in
chrome and produced through a chromium
electroplating process, and does not extend
to wheels that have been finished with other
processes, including but not limited to
Physical Vapor Deposition (PVD); and
(4) steel wheels that do not meet Standard
110 or 120 of the NHTSA’s requirements
other than the rim marking requirements
found in 49 CFR 571.110S4.4.2 and
571.120S5.2;
(5) steel wheels that meet the following
specifications: Steel wheels with a nominal
wheel diameter ranging from 15 inches to 16.
5 inches, with a rim width of 8 inches or
greater, and a wheel backspacing ranging
from 3. 75 inches to 5.5 inches; and
(6) steel wheels with wire spokes.
Certain on-the-road steel wheels subject to
this investigation are properly classifiable
under the following category of the
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United
States (HTSUS): 8716.90.5035 which covers
the exact product covered by the scope
whether entered as an assembled wheel or in
components. Certain on-the-road steel wheels
entered with a tire mounted on them may be
entered under HTSUS 8716.90.5059 (Trailers
and semi-trailers; other vehicles, not
mechanically propelled, parts, wheels, other,
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
32725
wheels with other tires) (a category that will
be broader than what is covered by the
scope). While the HTSUS subheadings are
provided for convenience and customs
purposes, the written description of the
subject merchandise is dispositive.
Appendix II—List of Topics Discussed
in the Issues and Decision
Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Period of Investigation
IV. Scope Comments
V. Affirmative Final Determination of Critical
Circumstances
VI. Use of Facts Otherwise Available and
Adverse Inferences
VII. Discussion of the Issues
Comment 1: Calculation of the Total AFA
Rate
Comment 2: Calculation of the All Others
Rate
Comment 3: Whether Critical
Circumstances Exist
VIII. Recommendation
[FR Doc. 2019–14558 Filed 7–8–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
RIN 0648–XH077
New England Fishery Management
Council; Public Meeting
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice; public meeting.
AGENCY:
The New England Fishery
Management Council (Council) is
scheduling a public meeting of its
Ecosystem-Based Fishery Management
(EBFM) Committee to consider actions
affecting New England fisheries in the
exclusive economic zone (EEZ).
Recommendations from this group will
be brought to the full Council for formal
consideration and action, if appropriate.
DATES: This meeting will be held on
Wednesday, July 24, 2019 at 9:30 a.m.
ADDRESSES:
Meeting address: The meeting will be
held at the Boston Marriott Quincy,
1000 Marriott Drive, Quincy, MA 02169;
telephone: (617) 472–1000.
Council address: New England
Fishery Management Council, 50 Water
Street, Mill 2, Newburyport, MA 01950.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Thomas A. Nies, Executive Director,
New England Fishery Management
Council; telephone: (978) 465–0492.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\09JYN1.SGM
09JYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 131 (Tuesday, July 9, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 32723-32725]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-14558]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[C-570-091]
Certain Steel Wheels 12 to 16.5 Inches in Diameter From the
People's Republic of China: Final Affirmative Countervailing Duty
Determination, and Final Affirmative Determination of Critical
Circumstances
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that
countervailable subsidies are being provided to producers and exporters
of certain steel wheels 12 to 16.5 inches in diameter (certain steel
wheels) from the People's Republic of China (China).
DATES: Applicable July 9, 2019.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Emily Halle or Keith Haynes, AD/CVD
Operations, Office III, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-0176 or (202) 482-5139,
respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On February 25, 2019, Commerce published the Preliminary
Determination of this investigation in the Federal Register.\1\ In the
Preliminary Determination, Commerce aligned the final determination in
this countervailing duty (CVD) investigation with the final
determination in the companion less-than-fair-value (LTFV)
investigation, in accordance with section 705(a)(1) of the Tariff Act
of 1930, as amended (the Act), and 19 CFR 351.210(b)(4). A complete
summary of the events that occurred since Commerce published the
Preliminary Determination, as well as a full discussion of the issues
raised by parties for this final determination, may be found in the
Issues and Decision Memorandum.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Certain Steel Wheels 12 to 16.5 Inches in Diameter from
the People's Republic of China: Preliminary Affirmative
Countervailing Duty Determination, 84 FR 5989 (February 25, 2019)
(Preliminary Determination) and accompanying Preliminary Decision
Memorandum.
\2\ See Memorandum, ``Issues and Decision Memorandum for the
Final Determination in the Countervailing Duty Investigation of
Certain Steel Wheels 12 to 16.5 Inches in Diameter from the People's
Republic of China,'' dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by,
this notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on
file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS).
ACCESS is available to registered users at https://access.trade.gov,
and is available to all parties in the Central Records Unit, Room B8024
of the main Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the
Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly at https://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed Issues and Decision Memorandum
and the electronic version are identical in content.
Commerce exercised its discretion to toll all deadlines affected by
the partial Federal government closure from December 22, 2018, through
the resumption of operations on January 29, 2019.\3\ Accordingly, the
deadline for the final determination of this investigation is July 1,
2019.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ See Memorandum to the Record from Gary Taverman, Deputy
Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Operations, performing the non-exclusive functions and duties of the
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, ``Deadlines
Affected by the Partial Shutdown of the Federal Government,'' dated
January 28, 2019. All deadlines in this segment of the proceeding
have been extended by 40 days.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Period of Investigation
The period of investigation (POI) is January 1, 2017 through
December 31, 2017.
Scope of the Investigation
The products covered by this investigation are certain steel wheels
12 to 16.5 inches in diameter from China. For a complete description of
the scope of this investigation, see Appendix I of this notice.
Scope Comments
During the course of this investigation and the concurrent LTFV
investigation of certain steel wheels from China, Commerce received
scope comments from interested parties. Commerce issued a Preliminary
Scope Decision Memorandum to address these comments and set aside a
period of time for parties to address scope issues in scope case and
rebuttal briefs.\4\ Commerce has reviewed the briefs submitted by
interested parties, considered the arguments therein, and has made
changes to the scope of the investigation, including additional
exclusions, and clarifying language. For a summary of the scope
comments and rebuttal responses submitted to the record for this final
determination, along with the accompanying discussion and analysis of
all comments timely received, see the Final Scope Decision
Memorandum.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ See Memorandum, ``Certain Steel Wheels 12 to 16.5 Inches in
Diameter from the People's Republic of China: Preliminary Scope
Decision Memorandum,'' dated April 15, 2019, at 11.
\5\ See Memorandum, ``Certain Steel Wheels 12 to 16.5 Inches in
Diameter from the People's Republic of China: Final Scope Comments
Decision Memorandum,'' dated concurrently with this notice (Final
Scope Decision Memorandum).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Final Affirmative Determination of Critical Circumstances
In the Preliminary Determination, Commerce preliminarily
determined, pursuant to section 703(e)(1) of the Act, that critical
circumstances exist with respect to Xingmin Intelligent Transportation
Systems (Group) (Xingmin), Zhejiang Jingu Company Limited (Zhejiang
Jingu), and all other exporters or producers not individually examined.
For this final determination, we continue to find that critical
circumstances exist for Xingmin, Zhejiang Jingu, and all other
exporters or producers not individually examined, pursuant to section
705(a)(2) of the Act. For a full description of the methodology and
results of Commerce's analysis, see the Issues and Decision Memorandum.
Analysis of Subsidy Programs and Comments Received
All issues raised in the case and rebuttal briefs submitted by
interested parties in this proceeding, other than
[[Page 32724]]
those issues related to scope, are discussed in the Issues and Decision
Memorandum. A list of the issues raised by parties and responded to by
Commerce in the Issues and Decision Memorandum, is attached at Appendix
II.
Use of Adverse Facts Available
Commerce relied on ``facts otherwise available,'' including adverse
facts available (AFA), for several findings in the Preliminary
Determination. For this final determination, we are basing the CVD
rates for Xingmin and Zhejiang Jingu on facts otherwise available, with
an adverse inference, pursuant to sections 776(a) and (b) of the Act.
For a full discussion of our application of AFA, see the Issues and
Decision Memorandum.
Changes Since the Preliminary Determination
Based on our analysis of the comments received from parties, we
made certain changes to the respondents' subsidy rate calculations set
forth in the Preliminary Determination. For a discussion of these
changes, see the Issues and Decision Memorandum.
All-Others Rate
In accordance with section 705(c)(5)(A) of the Act, Commerce shall
determine an estimated all-others rate for companies not individually
examined. Generally, under section 705(c)(5)(A)(i) of the Act, this
rate shall be an amount equal to the weighted average of the estimated
subsidy rates established for those companies individually examined,
excluding any zero and de minimis rates and any rates based entirely on
AFA under section 776 of the Act. However, section 705(c)(5)(A)(ii) of
the Act provides that, where all countervailable subsidy rates
established for the mandatory respondents are zero, de minimis, or
based entirely on facts available, Commerce may use ``any reasonable
method'' for assigning an all-others rate, including ``averaging the
estimated average countervailable subsidy rates determined for the
exporters and producers individually investigated.'' In this
investigation, all rates for the individually-investigated respondents
are based entirely on facts available, pursuant to section 776 of the
Act. We are relying on a simple average of the total AFA rates assigned
to Xingmin and Zhejiang Jingu as the ``all-others'' rate in this final
determination, consistent with the statutory provision to rely on ``any
reasonable method.'' Specifically, there is no other information on the
record from which to determine the all-others rate. For further
information on the all-others rate, see the Issues and Decision
Memorandum.
Methodology
Commerce conducted this investigation in accordance with section
701 of the Act. For each of the subsidy programs found countervailable,
Commerce determines that there is a subsidy, i.e., a financial
contribution by an ``authority'' that gives rise to a benefit to the
recipient, and that the subsidy is specific.\6\ In making these
findings, Commerce relied, in part, on facts otherwise available and,
because it finds that one or more respondents did not act to the best
of their ability to respond to Commerce's requests for information,
Commerce drew an adverse inference where appropriate in selecting from
among the facts otherwise available.\7\ For a full description of the
methodology underlying our final determination, see the Issues and
Decision Memorandum.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ See sections 771(5)(B) and (D) of the Act regarding
financial contribution; section 771(5)(E) of the Act regarding
benefit; and section 771(5A) of the Act regarding specificity.
\7\ See sections 776(a), (b), and 782(d) of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Final Determination
In accordance with section 705(c)(1)(B)(i)(I) of the Act, we
established individual estimated countervailable subsidy rates, as
follows:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subsidy
Company rate
(percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Xingmin Intelligent Transportation Systems (Group) \8\...... 386.45
Zhejiang Jingu Company Limited \9\.......................... 388.31
All-Others.................................................. 387.38
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Disclosure
We intend to disclose the calculations performed to parties in this
proceeding within five days of its public announcement, or if there is
no public announcement, within five days of the date of this notice, in
accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ Commerce assigned Xingmin's rate to each of the entities for
which Xingmin provided an initial questionnaire response: Sino-Tex
(Longkou) Wheel Manufacturers Inc.; Tangshan Xingmin Wheel Co.,
Ltd.; and Xianning Xingmin Wheel Co., Ltd.
\9\ Commerce assigned Zhejiang Jingu Company Limited's rate to
each of the entities named as cross-owned in its affiliation
questionnaire response: Shanghai Yata Industry Company Limited;
Shangdong Jingu Auto Parts Co., Ltd.; An'Gang Jingu (Hangzhou) Metal
Materials Co., Ltd.; Zhejiang Wheel World Co., Ltd.; and Hangzhou
Jingu New Energy Development Co. Ltd. Zhejiang Jingu's rate has also
been assigned to Zhejiang Jingu Automobile Components, which was the
prior name of Zhejiang Jingu.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Continuation of Suspension of Liquidation
As a result of our Preliminary Determination, and pursuant to
sections 703(d)(1)(B) and (2) of the Act, we instructed U.S. Customs
and Border Protection (CBP) to suspend liquidation of all appropriate
entries of certain steel wheels from China, as described in Appendix I
of this notice, that were entered or withdrawn from warehouse, for
consumption, on or after November 27, 2018, 90 days prior to the date
of publication of the Preliminary Determination in the Federal
Register, for Xingmin, Zhejiang and all other producers and exporters
of merchandise under consideration. In accordance with section 703(d)
of the Act, we issued instructions to CBP to discontinue the suspension
of liquidation for CVD purposes for subject merchandise entered, or
withdrawn from warehouse, on or after June 25, 2019, but to continue
the suspension of liquidation of all entries from November 27, 2018
through June 24, 2019.
If the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) issues a final
affirmative injury determination, we will issue a CVD order, reinstate
the suspension of liquidation under section 706(a) of the Act, and
require a cash deposit of estimated countervailing duties for such
entries of subject merchandise in the amounts indicated above. If the
ITC issues a final affirmative injury determination but a final
negative determination of critical circumstances, we will instruct CBP
to liquidate entries prior to the date of publication of the
Preliminary Determination without regard to duties, and all estimated
duties deposited or securities posted as a result of the suspension of
liquidation will be refunded or canceled. If the ITC determines that
material injury, or threat of material injury, does not exist, this
proceeding will be terminated, and all estimated duties deposited or
securities posted as a result of the suspension of liquidation will be
refunded or canceled.
International Trade Commission Notification
In accordance with section 705(d) of the Act, we will notify the
ITC of our final affirmative determination that countervailable
subsidies are being provided to producers and exporters of certain
steel wheels from China. Because the final determination in this
proceeding is affirmative, in accordance with section 705(b) of the
Act, the ITC
[[Page 32725]]
will make its final determination as to whether the domestic industry
in the United States is materially injured, or threatened with material
injury, by reason of imports, or sales (or the likelihood of sales) for
importation of certain steel wheels from China no later than 45 days
after our final determination. If the ITC determines that material
injury or threat of material injury does not exist, the proceeding will
be terminated, and all cash deposits will be refunded. If the ITC
determines that such injury does exist, Commerce will issue a CVD order
directing CBP to assess, upon further instruction by Commerce,
countervailing duties on all imports of the subject merchandise
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the
effective date of the suspension of liquidation.
Administrative Protective Orders
This notice serves as the only reminder to parties subject to the
administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility
concerning the destruction of proprietary information disclosed under
APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely notification of the
return or destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial
protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the
regulations and terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation.
Notification to Interested Parties
This determination is issued and published in accordance with
sections 705(d) and 777(i) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.210(c).
Dated: July 1, 2019.
Jeffrey I. Kessler,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
Appendix I--Scope of the Investigation
The scope of this investigation is certain on-the-road steel
wheels, discs, and rims for tubeless tires with a nominal wheel
diameter of 12 inches to 16.5 inches, regardless of width. Certain
on-the-road steel wheels with a nominal wheel diameter of 12 inches
to 16.5 inches within the scope are generally for road and highway
trailers and other towable equipment, including, inter alia, utility
trailers, cargo trailers, horse trailers, boat trailers,
recreational trailers, and towable mobile homes. The standard widths
of certain on-the-road steel wheels are 4 inches, 4.5 inches, 5
inches, 5.5 inches, 6 inches, and 6.5 inches, but all certain on-
the-road steel wheels, regardless of width, are covered by the
scope.
The scope includes rims and discs for certain on-the-road steel
wheels, whether imported as an assembly, unassembled, or separately.
The scope includes certain on-the-road steel wheels regardless of
steel composition, whether cladded or not cladded, whether finished
or not finished, and whether coated or uncoated. The scope also
includes certain on-the-road steel wheels with discs in either a
``hub-piloted'' or ``stud-piloted'' mounting configuration, though
the stud-piloted configuration is most common in the size range
covered.
All on-the-road wheels sold in the United States must meet
Standard 110 or 120 of the National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration's (NHTSA) Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards,
which requires a rim marking, such as the ``DOT'' symbol, indicating
compliance with applicable motor vehicle standards. See 49 CFR
571.110 and 571.120. The scope includes certain on-the-road steel
wheels imported with or without NHTSA's required markings.
Certain on-the-road steel wheels imported as an assembly with a
tire mounted on the wheel and/or with a valve stem or rims imported
as an assembly with a tire mounted on the rim and/or with a valve
stem are included in the scope of this investigation. However, if
the steel wheels or rims are imported as an assembly with a tire
mounted on the wheel or rim and/or with a valve stem attached, the
tire and/or valve stem is not covered by the scope.
The scope includes rims, discs, and wheels that have been
further processed in a third country, including, but not limited to,
the welding and painting of rims and discs to form a steel wheel, or
any other processing that would not otherwise remove the merchandise
from the scope of the investigations if performed in the People's
Republic of China.
Excluded from this scope are the following:
(1) Steel wheels for use with tube-type tires; such tires use
multi piece rims, which are two-piece and three-piece assemblies and
require the use of an inner tube;
(2) aluminum wheels;
(3) certain on-the-road steel wheels that are coated entirely in
chrome. This exclusion is limited to chrome wheels coated entirely
in chrome and produced through a chromium electroplating process,
and does not extend to wheels that have been finished with other
processes, including but not limited to Physical Vapor Deposition
(PVD); and
(4) steel wheels that do not meet Standard 110 or 120 of the
NHTSA's requirements other than the rim marking requirements found
in 49 CFR 571.110S4.4.2 and 571.120S5.2;
(5) steel wheels that meet the following specifications: Steel
wheels with a nominal wheel diameter ranging from 15 inches to 16. 5
inches, with a rim width of 8 inches or greater, and a wheel
backspacing ranging from 3. 75 inches to 5.5 inches; and
(6) steel wheels with wire spokes.
Certain on-the-road steel wheels subject to this investigation
are properly classifiable under the following category of the
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS):
8716.90.5035 which covers the exact product covered by the scope
whether entered as an assembled wheel or in components. Certain on-
the-road steel wheels entered with a tire mounted on them may be
entered under HTSUS 8716.90.5059 (Trailers and semi-trailers; other
vehicles, not mechanically propelled, parts, wheels, other, wheels
with other tires) (a category that will be broader than what is
covered by the scope). While the HTSUS subheadings are provided for
convenience and customs purposes, the written description of the
subject merchandise is dispositive.
Appendix II--List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision
Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Period of Investigation
IV. Scope Comments
V. Affirmative Final Determination of Critical Circumstances
VI. Use of Facts Otherwise Available and Adverse Inferences
VII. Discussion of the Issues
Comment 1: Calculation of the Total AFA Rate
Comment 2: Calculation of the All Others Rate
Comment 3: Whether Critical Circumstances Exist
VIII. Recommendation
[FR Doc. 2019-14558 Filed 7-8-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P