Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe Exchange, Inc.; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To Amend and Move Certain Current Rules From the Exchange's Currently Effective Rulebook to the Shell Structure for the Exchange's Rulebook That Will Become Effective Upon the Migration of the Exchange's Trading Platform to the Same System Used by the Cboe Affiliated Exchanges, 30267-30282 [2019-13541]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 123 / Wednesday, June 26, 2019 / Notices
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No 34–86173; File No. SR–CBOE–
2019–027]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe
Exchange, Inc.; Notice of Filing and
Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed
Rule Change To Amend and Move
Certain Current Rules From the
Exchange’s Currently Effective
Rulebook to the Shell Structure for the
Exchange’s Rulebook That Will
Become Effective Upon the Migration
of the Exchange’s Trading Platform to
the Same System Used by the Cboe
Affiliated Exchanges
June 20, 2019.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on June 7,
2019, Cboe Exchange, Inc. (the
‘‘Exchange’’ or ‘‘Cboe Options’’) filed
with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the ‘‘Commission’’) the
proposed rule change as described in
Items I and II below, which Items have
been prepared by the Exchange. The
Exchange filed the proposal as a ‘‘noncontroversial’’ proposed rule change
pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of
the Act 3 and Rule 19b–4(f)(6)
thereunder.4 The Commission is
publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change
from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
Cboe Exchange, Inc. (the ‘‘Exchange’’
or ‘‘Cboe Options’’) proposes to amend
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for
the proposed rule change and discussed
any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these
statements may be examined at the
places specified in Item IV below. The
Exchange has prepared summaries, set
forth in sections A, B, and C below, of
the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
In 2016, the Exchange’s parent
company, Cboe Global Markets, Inc.
(formerly named CBOE Holdings, Inc.)
(‘‘Cboe Global’’), which is also the
parent company of Cboe C2 Exchange,
Inc. (‘‘C2’’), acquired Cboe EDGA
Exchange, Inc. (‘‘EDGA’’), Cboe EDGX
Exchange, Inc. (‘‘EDGX’’ or ‘‘EDGX
Options’’), Cboe BZX Exchange, Inc.
(‘‘BZX’’ or ‘‘BZX Options’’), and Cboe
BYX Exchange, Inc. (‘‘BYX’’ and,
together with Cboe Options, C2, EDGX,
EDGA, and BZX, the ‘‘Cboe Affiliated
Exchanges’’). The Cboe Affiliated
Exchanges are working to align certain
system functionality, retaining only
intended differences between the Cboe
Affiliated Exchanges, in the context of a
technology migration. Cboe Options
intends to migrate its trading platform to
the same system used by the Cboe
Affiliated Exchanges, which the
Exchange expects to complete on
October 7, 2019. Cboe Options believes
offering similar functionality to the
extent practicable will reduce potential
confusion for market participants.
In connection with this technology
migration, the Exchange has a shell
Rulebook that resides alongside its
current Rulebook, which shell Rulebook
will contain the Rules that will be in
place upon completion of the Cboe
Options technology migration.
Chapter 1
The proposed rule change amends
and moves the definitions of terms used
throughout the Rules contained in
current Rule 1.1 in the current Rulebook
to proposed Rule 1.1 in the shell
Rulebook. While there are no
substantive changes to the majority of
defined terms in Rule 1.1 being moved
to the shell structure, the proposed rule
change adds or amends the following
definitions:
Defined
term
Provision
Current Cboe options
rule
Corresponding Cboe
affiliated exchange rule
ABBO ..............................
best bid(s) or offer(s) disseminated by
other Eligible Exchanges 5 and calculated by the Exchange based on
market information the Exchange receives from OPRA.
options class the Exchange lists for trading during RTH and GTH.
N/A ................................
C2 Rule 1.1 and EDGX
Rule 21.20(a)(1).
Added to Rule 1.1.
N/A ................................
C2 Rule 1.1 and EDGX
Rule 16.1.
1.1 .................................
BZX Rule 16.1(a)(9), C2
Rule 1.1, and EDGX
Rule 16.1.
Adds defined term for classes the Exchange lists for trading during GTH
and RTH.
Currently, there is a separate book for
each of RTH and GTH, but following
migration, there will be a single book
used for both trading sessions, as discussed below; rules of Cboe Affiliated
Exchanges have no reference to separate trading sessions, as there are
no GTH on those exchanges.
All Sessions class ...........
Book or Simple Book ......
jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with NOTICES
and move certain current Rules from the
Exchange’s currently effective Rulebook
(‘‘current Rulebook’’) to the shell
structure for the Exchange’s Rulebook
that will become effective upon the
migration of the Exchange’s trading
platform to the same system used by the
Cboe Affiliated Exchanges (as defined
below) (‘‘shell Rulebook’’). The text of
the proposed rule change is provided in
Exhibit 5.
The text of the proposed rule change
is also available on the Exchange’s
website (https://www.cboe.com/About
CBOE/CBOELegalRegulatory
Home.aspx), at the Exchange’s Office of
the Secretary, and at the Commission’s
Public Reference Room.
30267
1 15
2 17
electronic book of simple orders and
quotes maintained by the System,
which single book is used during both
the RTH and GTH trading sessions 6.
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
CFR 240.19b–4.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:47 Jun 25, 2019
3 15
4 17
Jkt 247001
PO 00000
Description of change
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6).
Frm 00186
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\26JNN1.SGM
26JNN1
30268
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 123 / Wednesday, June 26, 2019 / Notices
Defined
term
Provision
Current Cboe options
rule
Corresponding Cboe
affiliated exchange rule
Description of change
Capacity ..........................
capacity in which a User submits an
order, which the User specifies by applying the corresponding code to the
order, and includes B (account of a
broker or dealer, including a Foreign
Broker-Dealer), C (Public Customer
account), F (OCC clearing firm proprietary account), J (joint back office account), L (non-Trading Permit Holder
affiliate account), M (Market-Maker account), N (market-maker or specialist
on another options exchange), U (Professional account).
Cboe Trading, Inc., broker-dealer affiliated with C2 and will serve as inbound and outbound router for C2, as
discussed below.
Executing Firm ID ...................................
N/A ................................
C2 Rule 1.1 ...................
N/A ................................
BZX Rule 2.11, C2 Rule
1.1, and EDGX Rule
2.11.
Cboe Options currently refers to capacity as origin code; current Cboe Options origin codes are in Regulatory
Circular RG13–038, and are the same
as the proposed Capacities, except
the proposed rule changes W to U
(see specifications 7); proposed rule
change deletes Y (orders for the account of a specialist registered in the
underlying stock at the primary exchange for trading the stock), which
will not be available following migration 8.
Added to Rule 1.1.
N/A ................................
C2 Rule 1.1 and EDGX
Rule 21.1(k).
trading session consisting of the hours
outside of Regular Trading Hours
(‘‘RTH’’) during which transactions in
options may be effected on the Exchange and are set forth in proposed
Rule 5.1.
share traded on a national securities exchange that is an NMS stock and represents ownership of a security that
provides for payment at maturity as
set forth in proposed Rule 4.3 (current
Rule 5.3).
time the Exchange specifies for the end
of a trading session on the Exchange
on that trading day.
1.1 and 6.1.01 (proposed Rule 5.1).
N/A ................................
5.3.13 ............................
N/A ................................
Added to Rule 1.1.
N/A (market close time
set forth in current
Rule 6.1 (proposed
Rule 5.1)).
BZX Rule 16.1, C2 Rule
1.1, and EDGX Rule
16.1.
TPH registered with the Exchange pursuant to proposed Rule 3.52 (current
Rule 8.1) for the purpose of making
markets in option contracts traded on
the Exchange and that has the rights
and responsibilities set forth in proposed Chapter 5, Section D (current
Chapter VIII) of the Rules.
time the Exchange specifies for the start
of a trading session on the Exchange
on that trading day.
8.1 .................................
BZX Rule 16.1(a)(37),
C2 Rule 1.1, and
EDGX Rule 16.1.
Added to Rule 1.1; same as Cboe Affiliated Exchanges’ Rules, except proposed rule references the concept of
a trading session, which does not
exist on Cboe Affiliated Exchanges, as
they do not have GTH.
Added to Rule 1.1.
N/A (market open time
set forth in current
rule 6.1 (proposed
Rule 5.1)).
BZX Rule 16.1(a)(35),
C2 Rule 1.1, and
EDGX Rule 16.1.
Trading Permit Holder registered with
the Exchange pursuant to proposed
Rule 3.51 representing as agent Customer Orders on the Exchange and
non-Market-Maker Trading Permit
Holder conducting proprietary trading.
a Protected Bid or Protected Offer, as
each of those terms is defined in proposed Rule 5.65 (current Rule 6.80).
firm bid or offer a Market-Maker (a) submits electronically (including to update
any of its previous quotes), which may
be updated in block quantities, or (b)
represents for open outcry on the
trading floor.
options class the Exchange lists for trading during RTH only.
number of contracts up to 999,999 associated with an order or quote.
N/A ................................
BZX Rule 16.1(a)(36),
C2 Rule 1.1, and
EDGX Rule 16.1.
6.80 ...............................
BZX Rule 16.1(a)(47),
C2 Rule 1.1, and
EDGX Rule 16.1.
BZX Rule 16.1(a)(51),
C2 Rule 1.1, and
EDGX Rule 16.1.
Cboe Trading ..................
EFID ................................
Global Trading Hours or
GTH.
Index-Linked Security or
ETN.
Market Close ..................
Market-Maker ..................
Market Open ...................
Order Entry Firm/OEF ....
Protected Quotation ........
Quote and Quotation ......
jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with NOTICES
RTH Class ......................
Size .................................
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:47 Jun 25, 2019
Jkt 247001
PO 00000
1.1 .................................
N/A ................................
N/A ................................
Frm 00187
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Added to Rule 1.1; same as Cboe Affiliated Exchanges’ Rules, except proposed rule references the concept of
a trading session, which does not
exist on Cboe Affiliated Exchanges, as
they do not have GTH.
Added to Rule 1.1.
Added to Rule 1.1.
Updated to reflect the distinction between electronic quotes and quotes in
open outcry (consistent with current
practice and functionality on the Exchange).
C2 Rule 1.1, EDGX
Rule 16.1.
BZX Rule 21.1(e), C2
Rule 1.1, and EDGX
Rule 21.1(e).
E:\FR\FM\26JNN1.SGM
Added to Rule 1.1; similar to the term
acronym, which is used in current
Cboe Options Rules; EFID is the term
used in the technical specifications
that will apply post-migration, and thus
is more appropriate for the shell
Rulebook; a firm may have multiple
EFIDs.
Added language to clarify that GTH refers to hours during which trading on
the Exchange may occur outside of
RTH.
Added to Rule 1.1 (consistent with current Cboe Options system).
26JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 123 / Wednesday, June 26, 2019 / Notices
Defined
term
Provision
Current Cboe options
rule
System ............................
the Exchange’s hybrid trading platform
that integrates electronic and open
outcry trading of option contracts on
the Exchange, and includes any
connectivity to the foregoing trading
platform that is administered by or on
behalf of the Exchange, such as a
communications hub 9.
options that currently trade on the Exchange pursuant to proposed Chapter
4 (current Chapters 5 and 24) in the
shell Rulebook 10.
Exchange operations staff authorized to
make certain trading determinations
on behalf of the Exchange.
1.1 .................................
BZX Rule 16.1(a)(59),
C2 Rule 1.1, and
EDGX Rule 16.1.
Deleted reference from current definition
to Hybrid, as that relates to the current technology from which the Cboe
Options trading platform is being migrated.
N/A ................................
BZX Rule 21.1(b), C2
Rule 1.1, and EDGX
Rule 21.1(b).
Added to Rule 1.1 (additional term for
options listed for trading).
N/A ................................
N/A ................................
hours during which the Exchange is
open for trading for Regular Trading
Hours or Global Trading Hours (each
of which may be referred to as a trading session), each as set forth in proposed Rule 5.1. Unless otherwise
specified in the Rules or the context
otherwise indicates, all Rules apply in
the same manner during each trading
session.
with respect to an index option, means
the index that is the subject of an
index option.
with respect to an equity option, the security that the Clearing Corporation
must sell (in the case of a call option
contract) or purchase (in the case of a
put option contract) upon the valid exercise of the option contract, and, with
respect to an index option any of the
securities or mutual funds that are the
basis for the calculation of the underlying index.
any TPH or Sponsored User who is authorized to obtain access to the System pursuant to proposed Rule 5.5
(current Rule 6.23A) 11.
1.1 and 6.1A(a) and (h)
C2 Rule 1.1 and EDGX
Rule 16.1.
Added to Rule 1.1; Trade Desk is new
term for Help Desk at the Exchange
(which term will be deleted from the
Rules).
Moved provisions from Rule 6.1A(a) and
(h) regarding applicability of Rules
during GTH to definition.
N/A ................................
N/A ................................
1.1 and 24.1(e) .............
N/A ................................
N/A ................................
BZX Rule 16.1(a)(63),
C2 Rule 1.1, and
EDGX Rule 16.1.
System Securities ...........
Trade Desk .....................
Trading Session ..............
Underlying index .............
Underlying security .........
User ................................
jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with NOTICES
The proposed rule change deletes
current Rule 1.1 (and any other current
Rule referenced in the table above) from
the current Rulebook, as further
discussed below.
The proposed rule change deletes the
term Voluntary Professional, as that
Capacity designation will no longer be
5 Eligible Exchange is defined in current Rule
6.80(7) and proposed Rule 5.65(g).
6 The proposed rule change also deletes current
Rule 6.1A(g), which describes the separate books
currently used for the RTH and GTH sessions.
7 BOE Specifications, available at https://
cdn.batstrading.com/resources/membership/BATS_
US_Options_BOE2_Specification.pdf, and FIX
Specifications, available at https://
cdn.batstrading.com/resources/membership/BATS_
US_Options_BZX_FIX_Specification.pdf.
8 Capacity codes applicable to trading of FLEX
options will be addressed in a separate rule filing.
9 Rules related to orders submitted for routing to
PAR for open outcry trading will be addressed in
a separate rule filing.
10 The Exchange will move all Rules from the
current Rulebook regarding options the Exchange is
authorized to list for trading into Chapter 4 of the
shell Rulebook in a separate rule filing.
11 The Exchange will add provisions regarding
System access from the current Rulebook to Rule
5.5 of the shell Rulebook in a separate rule filing.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:47 Jun 25, 2019
Jkt 247001
Corresponding Cboe
affiliated exchange rule
30269
available on Cboe Options following the
technology migration. It is currently
unavailable on the Cboe Affiliated
Exchanges. Within the definition of the
term Professional, the proposed rule
change deletes the list of rules pursuant
to which a Professional would be
treated as a broker-dealer, which in
general relate to allocation priority, but
adds that a Professional order will be
handled the same as a broker-dealer
order unless the Rules specify
otherwise. The definition of a Priority
Customer (which excludes
Professionals) and this change to the
definition of Professional accomplish
the same result, as that definition within
the applicable rules provide that
Professionals will not be treated as
customers, and instead as brokerdealers. The proposed rule change also
deletes the term TPH Department, as
that is not the current name of the
Exchange department that handle s
membership requirements.
Additionally, the Exchange believes it is
appropriate to refer to the Exchange
PO 00000
Frm 00188
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Description of change
Added to Rule 1.1; consistent with index
options (based on OCC By-Laws Article 1(U)).
Added provision from Rule 24.1(e) to
1.1.
Added to C2 Rule 1.1 (common term to
apply to two types of market participants defined in C2 Rules, which are
the only two market participants that
may access the System under C2
Rules).
rather than a specific department in the
Rules, as is the case in the Cboe
Affiliated Exchanges’ rules. The Rules
that use that term will be updated in a
separate rule filing. Definitions for
continuous electronic quotes, Exchange
spread market, and national spread
market will be added to different rules
in a separate filing to conform to the
location of those defined terms in the
rules of the Cboe Affiliated Exchanges.
The Exchange also deletes the
definitions of Quarterly Options Series
and Short Term Options Series from
Rule 1.1, as those terms are defined and
explained in the appropriate listing
rules. There are other types of series the
Exchange may list that are not defined
in Rule 1.1. The proposed rule change
also makes nonsubstantive changes to
certain defined terms, including to make
the rule provisions plain English,
update defined terms, add crossreferences to defined terms in other
Rules, add clarifying language, and
update rule cross-references (to
E:\FR\FM\26JNN1.SGM
26JNN1
30270
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 123 / Wednesday, June 26, 2019 / Notices
reference the expected Rule number for
the cross-referenced Rule).
Proposed Rule 1.5 (current Rule 1.2)
states the Exchange announces to
Trading Permit Holders all
determinations it makes pursuant to the
Rules via (a) specifications, Notices, or
Regulatory Circulars with appropriate
advanced notice, which will be posted
on the Exchange’s website, or as
otherwise provided in the Rules, (b)
electronic message, or (c) other
communication method as provided in
the Rules. Most current Rules indicate
determinations will be made by
Regulatory Circular, which current Rule
1.2 indicates may also be made by
Exchange Notice. The Exchange will
update references to Regulatory Circular
throughout the Rules in separate rule
filings. Proposed Rule 1.5(b) states to
the extent the Rules allow the Exchange
to make a determination, including on
a class-by-class or series-by-series basis,
the Exchange may make a determination
for GTH that differs from the
determination it makes for RTH. This is
consistent with current Rule 6.1A(i),
which the proposed rule change deletes.
This single rule simplifies the Rules by
including all provisions related to
determinations the Exchange may make
within a single Rule. The Exchange will
make conforming changes throughout
the Rules in separate rule filings. The
proposed rule change deletes current
Rules 1.2 and 6.1A(i) from the current
Rulebook, as further discussed below.
Proposed Cboe Options Rule 1.6 of
the shell Rulebook states unless
otherwise specified, all times in the
Rules are Eastern Time. Current Cboe
Options Rules are generally in Chicago
time. The Exchange will update times to
Eastern Time in other Rules as
necessary in separate rule filings.
The proposed rule change moves
current rules related to Exchange
liability, including disclaimers and
limitations, from the current Rulebook
to Chapter 1, Section C of the shell
Rulebook (to be named Exchange
Liability and Disclaimers, as proposed)
as follows:
Number in current Rulebook
Exchange Liability Disclaimers and Limitations ..........................
6.7, 20.5(a) (which states 6.7 applies to Range options, which
are a type of Index option), 22.5(a) (which states 6.7 applies to Binary options, which are a type of Index option).
6.15 ............................................................................................
Limitation on the Liability of Index Licensors for Options on
Units.
Limitation on Liability of Reporting Authorities for Indexes Underlying Options.
Limitation of Liability of Reporting Authority for Interest Rate
Options.
Limitation of Liability of Reporting Authority for Credit Options
Legal Proceedings Against the Exchange ..................................
These rules are virtually identical
(other than updating cross-references
and defined terms), and are merely
moving locations. The proposed rule
change deletes current Rules referenced
Chapter 5
The proposed rule change moves all
rule provisions in the current Rulebook
related to trading days and trading
hours from the current Rulebook
(specifically, Rules 6.1, 6.1A, 20.2,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:47 Jun 25, 2019
Jkt 247001
29.10 ..........................................................................................
6.7A ............................................................................................
1.14
1.15
in the table above from the current
Rulebook, as further discussed below.
Chapter 2
The proposed rule change moves
current rules related to TPH Fees from
12 The Exchange proposes to delete all indexes
listed in current Rule 24.6 other than ETF-Based
Volatility Indexes and S&P Select Sector Indexes, as
the Exchange does not currently list options on
those other indexes and does not intend to in the
future.
13 Current Rule 24.6 includes conflicting language
regarding the Regular Trading Hours for ETF-Based
Volatility Index options, as paragraph (b) provides
such options will trade from 8:30 a.m. until 3:00
p.m., while Interpretation and Policy .02 states they
will trade from 8:30 a.m. until 3:15 p.m., except if
the closing time for the index components is earlier.
The proposed rule change deletes ETF-Based
Frm 00189
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
1.13
Chapter 2 of the current Rulebook to
Chapter 2 of the shell Rulebook as
follows:
Number in
current
Rulebook
21.10, 22.2, 23.6, 24.6,12 24A.2, 28.9,
and 29.11) to proposed Rule 5.1(a) and
(b) in the shell Rulebook.13 The
PO 00000
1.11
1.12
TPH Fees and Charges ...........................................................................................................................................
Regulatory Revenues ..............................................................................................................................................
Integrated Billing System .........................................................................................................................................
Liability for Payment ................................................................................................................................................
Exchange’s Cost of Defending Legal Proceedings .................................................................................................
These rules are virtually identical
(other than updating cross-references
and defined terms), and are merely
moving locations. The proposed rule
change deletes current Rules referenced
in the table above from the current
Rulebook, as further discussed below.
1.10
20.5(b) (which states 24.14 applies to Range options, which
are a type of Index option), 22.5(b) (which states 24.14 applies to Binary options, which are a type of Index option),
and 24.14.
23.14 ..........................................................................................
Rule
jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with NOTICES
Rule in shell
Rulebook
Rule
2.1
2.4
3.23
2.2
2.3
Rule in shell
Rulebook
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
2.5
proposed rule change adds Rule 5.1(a),
which states the System will accept
orders and quotes at times set forth in
proposed Rule 5.7 (current Rule 6.2(a)).
Proposed Rule 5.1(c) states the hours for
GTH, the classes and series that may be
listed during GTH, that trading during
GTH is electronic only, as well as a
Volatility Index options from the list of options that
will trade until 3:00 p.m., and includes the
language from Interpretation and Policy .02, as that
language is accurate. Note these options are not
currently listed for trading, and if the Exchange
does list them in the future and determines they
should close at 3:00 p.m., the Exchange will submit
a rule filing to make such a change.
E:\FR\FM\26JNN1.SGM
26JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 123 / Wednesday, June 26, 2019 / Notices
jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with NOTICES
provision regarding the dissemination of
index values during GTH (which
provisions are unchanged and just
moved from Rule 6.1(c) and (k), except
as described below regarding FLEX
options). Currently, the Exchange does
not allow FLEX options to trade during
GTH. The Exchange has authorized
FLEX options classes with the same
underlying index as options deemed
eligible for trading during GTH
(currently SPX, XSP, and VIX options)
to be eligible for trading during GTH,
and proposed paragraph (c)(1) includes
that authorization. The Exchange
believes there may be demand from
investors for FLEX options with the
same underlying indexes as the options
that currently trade during GTH, and
listing FLEX option classes 14 with these
underlying indexes will provide
investors that participate in GTH with
alternatives for hedging and other
investment purposes. Proposed Rule 5.1
is substantially similar to C2 Rule 6.1
(except C2 has a shorter GTH trading
session and different GTH-eligible
products are different, and proposed
Rule 5.1 lists hours for additional
products that are not expected to be
listed on C2). Proposed Rule 5.1 is also
consistent with EDGX Rule 21.2(a). No
other substantive changes were made to
these Rules. This single rule simplifies
the Rules by including all provisions
related to trading days and hours within
a single Rule. The proposed rule change
deletes current Rules referenced above
regarding trading days and hours from
the current Rulebook, as further
discussed below.
Global Trading Hours will continue to
be a separate trading session from
Regular Trading Hours, and will
continue to be electronic only trading.15
However, the Book used during Regular
Trading Hours will be the same Book
used during Global Trading Hours. This
is different than the current trading
sessions on Cboe Options, each of
which use a separate Book.16 There is
14 Because SPX, XSP, and VIX options may only
be listed Cboe and its affiliated exchanges, FLEX
options on the same indexes may also only be listed
on Cboe and its affiliated exchanges.
15 See proposed Rule 5.1(c)(4) (current Rule
6.1A(b), which the proposed rule change deletes).
The proposed rule change also deletes Rule 6.1A(j)
regarding disclosures that must be made regarding
GTH trading and moves it to proposed Rule 9.20.
The proposed rule change makes no changes to this
provision.
16 See proposed Rule 1.1, which amends the
definition of Book to mean the electronic book of
simple orders and quotes maintained by the System
on which orders and quotes may execute during the
applicable trading session. The Book during GTH
may be referred to as the ‘‘GTH Book,’’ and the
Book during RTH may be referred to as the ‘‘RTH
Book.’’ This is different than Cboe Options, which
uses separate books for each trading session, which
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:47 Jun 25, 2019
Jkt 247001
generally reduced liquidity, higher
volatility, and wider markets during
Global Trading Hours, and investors
may not want their orders or quotes to
execute during Global Trading Hours
given those trading conditions. To
provide investors with flexibility to
have their orders and quotes execute
only during RTH, or both RTH and
GTH, the proposed rule change adds an
All Sessions order and an RTH Only
order. An ‘‘All Sessions’’ order is an
order a User designates as eligible to
trade during both GTH and RTH. An
unexecuted All Sessions order on the
GTH Book at the end of a GTH trading
session enters the RTH Queuing Book
and becomes eligible for execution
during the RTH opening rotation and
trading session on that same trading
day, subject to a User’s instructions.17
An ‘‘RTH Only’’ order is an order a User
designates as eligible to trade only
during RTH or not designated as All
Sessions. An unexecuted RTH Only
order with a Time-in-Force of good-tilcancelled (‘‘GTC’’) or good-til-day
(‘‘GTD’’) on the RTH Book at the end of
an RTH trading session enters the RTH
Queuing Book and becomes eligible for
execution during the RTH opening
rotation and trading session on the
following trading day (but not during
the GTH trading session on the
following trading day), subject to a
User’s instructions.18
Because trading sessions are currently
completely separate on Cboe Options,
there are not distinct order types
corresponding to the proposed RTH
Only and All Sessions order
instructions. An order or quote
submitted to GTH on Cboe Options may
only execute during GTH, and an order
or quote submitted to RTH on Cboe
Options may only execute during RTH.
The proposed RTH Only order is
equivalent to any order submitted to
RTH on Cboe Options. While the
Exchange is not proposing an equivalent
to an order submitted to GTH on Cboe
Options, and instead is proposing an All
are not connected. See current Rule 6.1A(g) (which
the proposed rule change deletes).
17 See proposed Rule 5.6(c), proposed definition
of All Sessions order. The Exchange notes the ‘‘RTH
Queuing Book’’ means the book into which Users
may submit orders and quotes (and onto which
orders remaining on the Book from the previous
trading session or trading day, as applicable, are
entered) during the Queuing Period for
participation in the applicable opening rotation.
The Exchange will add a definition and additional
descriptions regarding the Queuing Book to the
Rules in a future rule filing. However, the Queuing
Book is equivalent to the Book into which TPHs
may submit quotes and orders during the order
entry period prior to the opening process. See
current Rule 6.2.
18 See proposed Rule 5.6(c), proposed definition
of RTH Only order.
PO 00000
Frm 00190
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
30271
Sessions order, Users may still submit
an equivalent to a ‘‘GTH only’’ order by
submitting an All Sessions order with a
good-til-date Time-in-Force, with a time
to cancel before the RTH market open.
Therefore, Users can submit orders to
participate in either trading session, or
both, and thus the proposed rule change
provides Users with the same order
entry ability as well as additional
flexibility and control regarding in
which trading sessions their orders and
quotes may be eligible to trade.
Generally, trading during the GTH
trading session will occur in the same
manner as it occurs during the RTH
trading session. However, because the
GTH market may have different
characteristics than the RTH market
(such as lower trading levels, reduced
liquidity, and fewer participants), the
Exchange may deem it appropriate to
make different determinations for
trading rules for each trading session.
Proposed Rule 1.5(b) states to the extent
the Rules allow the Exchange to make
a determination, including on a classby-class or series-by-series basis, the
Exchange may make a determination for
GTH that differs from the determination
it makes for RTH.19 The Exchange
maintains flexibility with respect to
certain rules so that it may apply
different settings and parameters to
address the specific characteristics of
that class and its market. For example,
current Rule 6.45(a) allows the
Exchange to determine electronic
allocation algorithms on a class-by-class
basis; 20 and current Rule 6.53 (proposed
Rule 5.6) allows the Exchange to make
certain order types, Order Instructions,
and Times-in-Force not available for all
Exchange systems or classes (and unless
stated in the Rules or the context
indicates otherwise, as proposed).21
Because trading characteristics during
RTH may be different than those during
GTH (such as lower trading levels,
19 See current Rule 6.1A(i) (which the proposed
rule change proposes to delete).
20 Therefore, the allocation algorithm that applies
to a class during RTH may differ from the allocation
algorithm that apply to that class during GTH.
21 Proposed Rule 5.6(a) explicitly state that the
Exchange may make these determinations on a
trading session basis. It also states that all order
types the Exchange makes available in an All
Sessions class for RTH electronic trading are
available in that class for GTH electronic trading,
except as otherwise specified in the Rules. See
current Rule 6.1A(f) (which the proposed rule
change proposes to delete). The Exchange notes
Rule 6.1A(f) currently provides GTC orders are not
available during GTH. However, because the
Exchange will use the same Book for GTH and RTH,
the Exchange will make available the GTC time-inforce for GTH, as an order in an All Sessions class
with that time-in-force can remain in the Book
following the conclusion of the GTH trading session
and be available for trading during the RTH trading
session.
E:\FR\FM\26JNN1.SGM
26JNN1
30272
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 123 / Wednesday, June 26, 2019 / Notices
reduced liquidity, and fewer
participants), the Exchange believes it is
appropriate to extend this flexibility to
each trading session. The Exchange
represents that it will continue to have
appropriate personnel available during
GTH to make any determinations that
Rules provide the Exchange or Exchange
personnel will make (such as trading
halts, opening series, and obvious
errors).
The proposed rule change also moves
Rule 6.40 regarding the unit of trading
for option series from the current
Rulebook to Rule 5.2 of the shell
Rulebook, and deletes current Rule 6.40
from the current Rulebook, as discussed
below. The proposed rule change makes
no substantive changes to this Rule. The
proposed rule change moves all
provisions regarding the meaning of
bids and offers from the current
Rulebook (including Rules 6.41 and 6.44
(including Interpretations and Policies
.01 [sic], .02 [sic], .04 and .05) 22 as well
as Rules 20.10(a), 21.13, 22.13(a), 23.9,
24.8, 28.11, and 29.14(a) and (c) related
to the meaning of bids and offers for
Range options, Government Security
options, Binary options, Corporate Debt
Security options, Interest Rate options,
and Credit options, respectively) to
proposed Rule 5.3 in the shell Rulebook.
regarding minimum increments from
the current Rulebook, as further
discussed below.
The proposed rule change moves the
order types currently available on the
Exchange from Rule 6.53 in the current
Rulebook to proposed Rule 5.6 in the
shell Rulebook. The proposed rule
change makes certain changes to
conform some of the definitions to those
used in the Cboe Affiliated Exchanges’
Rules, and also adds certain Order
Instructions and Times-in-Force, as
described below. The introduction to
proposed Rule 5.6 states unless
otherwise specified in the Rules or the
context indicates otherwise, the
Exchange determines which of the
following order types, Order
Instructions, and Times-in-Force are
available on a class, system, or trading
session basis.23 The introduction also
states other Rules will list which order
types, Order Instructions, and Times-inForce the Exchange may make available
for electronic and PAR routing (for open
outcry trading), during RTH, during
GTH, and for complex orders.24 This is
consistent with the introductory
language in current Rule 6.53(a), as well
as current Rule 6.1A(i), which permits
the Exchange to make separate
determinations for GTH and RTH.
Defined term
Provision
Current Cboe options
rule
Corresponding Cboe
affiliated exchange
rule
Order Type .................
orders may be market or limit orders ............
6.53 ............................
C2 Rule 6.10(b) .........
Limit Order .................
order to buy or sell a stated number of option contracts at a specified price or better;
a limit order to buy (sell) is marketable
when, at the time it enters the System, the
order price is equal to or higher (lower)
than the then-current offer (bid).
6.53 ............................
BZX Rule 21.1(d)(2),
C2 Rule 6.10(b),
and EDGX Rule
21.1(d)(2).
Market Order ..............
order to buy or sell a stated number of option contracts at the best price available at
the time of execution; Users may not designate a market order as All Sessions.
processing instruction a User may apply to
an order (multiple instructions may apply
to a single order) when entering it into the
System for electronic or open outcry processing, subject to any restrictions set forth
in the Rules.
6.1A(f) and 6.53 .........
BZX Rule 21.1(d)(5),
C2 Rule 6.10(b),
and EDGX Rule
21.1(d)(5).
BZX Rule 21.1(d), C2
Rule 6.10(c), and
EDGX Rule 21.1(d).
Order Instruction ........
jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with NOTICES
The proposed rule change makes no
substantive changes to those Rules. This
single rule simplifies the Rules by
including all provisions related to the
meaning of bids and offers within a
single Rule. The proposed rule change
deletes current Rules referenced above
regarding the meaning of bids and offers
from the current Rulebook, as further
discussed below. The proposed rule
change deletes current Rules referenced
in the table above from the current
Rulebook, as further discussed below.
The proposed rule change also moves
all provisions regarding the minimum
increments for bids and offers
(including Rule 6.42 as well as
provisions in Rules 20.10(b), 21.13,
22.13(b), 23.9, 28.11, and 29.14(b)
related to minimum increments for
Range options, Government Security
options, Binary options, Interest Rate
options, Corporate Debt Security
options, and Credit options,
respectively) to proposed Rule 5.4 in the
shell Rulebook. This single rule
simplifies the Rules by including all
provisions related to minimum
increments of options trading on the
Exchange within a single Rule. No
substantive changes were made to these
Rules. The proposed rule change deletes
current Rules referenced above
22 The Exchange will move provisions in Rules
6.41.01 and 24.8.01 related to orders with cash
prices to the shell Rulebook in separate rule filings.
23 As noted above, the introduction also states all
order types the Exchange makes available in an All
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:47 Jun 25, 2019
Jkt 247001
6.53 ............................
Sessions class for RTH electronic trading will be
available in that class for GTH electronic trading,
except as otherwise specified in the Rules.
24 The Exchange will add Rules regarding which
order types, Order Instructions, and Times-in-Force
PO 00000
Frm 00191
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Description of change
Moved to proposed
Rule 5.6(b).
Moved to proposed
Rule 5.6(b); clarified
that the order price
compared to thencurrent bid or offer
determines whether
the limit order is
marketable.
Moved to proposed
Rule 5.6(b).
Added to Rule 5.6(c)
(rules currently permit various instructions).
will be available specifically for electronic trading
and PAR routing (and open outcry trading), for
GTH, and for complex orders in separate rule
filings.
E:\FR\FM\26JNN1.SGM
26JNN1
30273
Corresponding Cboe
affiliated exchange
rule
Description of change
6.1A(f), 6.53, and
6.44.03.
EDGX Rule 21.1(d)(4)
Moved to Rule 5.6(c).
6.53 ............................
BZX Rule 21.1(c)(1),
C2 Rule 6.10(c),
and EDGX Rule
21.1(c)(1).
BZX Rule 21.1(d)(7),
C2 Rule 6.10(c),
and EDGX Rule
21.1(d)(7).
Moved to Rule 5.6(c).
N/A .............................
C2 Rule 6.10(c) and
EDGX Rule 11.6(b).
Added to Rule 5.6(c)
(consistent with current Rule 6.82) and
substantively similar
Cboe Affiliated Exchanges Rules (further discussed
below).
6.53 ............................
N/A .............................
6.53 ............................
N/A .............................
Moved to Rule 5.6(c);
clarified that the
legs need not consist of the same
number of contracts
if the contracts represent the same
number of shares of
the underlying (currently says ‘‘shares
at option’’).
Moved to Rule 5.6(c).
Current Cboe options
rule
Defined term
Provision
All-or-None .................
order a User designates to be executed in
whole or not at all; an AON order may be
a market or limit order; Users may not
designate an AON order as All Sessions;
the Exchange does not disseminate bids
or offers of AON orders to OPRA; a User
may not designate an AON order as Post
Only; an AON limit order is always subject
to the Price Adjust process as set forth in
proposed Rule 5.32; a User may apply
MCN (as defined below), but no other
MTP Modifier (if a User applies any other
MTP Modifier to an AON order, the System handles it as an MCN), to an AON
order; the Exchange may restrict the entry
of AON orders in a series or class if the
Exchange deems it necessary or appropriate to maintain a fair and orderly market 25.
order a User designates for display (price
and size) that includes the User’s EFID or
other unique identifier.
Attributable .................
Book Only ..................
Cancel Back ...............
Combination Order ....
Electronic Only ...........
jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 123 / Wednesday, June 26, 2019 / Notices
VerDate Sep<11>2014
order the System ranks and executes pursuant to current Rule 6.45, subjects to the to
be proposed Price Adjust process, or cancels, as applicable (in accordance with
User instructions), without routing away to
another exchange.
order a User designates to not be subject to
the to be proposed Price Adjust process
that the System cancels or rejects (immediately at the time the System receives the
order or upon return to the System after
being routed away) if displaying the order
on the Book would create a violation current Rule 6.82,26 or if the order cannot
otherwise be executed or displayed in the
Book at its limit price; the System executes a Book Only—Cancel Back order
against resting orders, and cancels or rejects a Post Only—Cancel Back order, that
locks or crosses the opposite side of the
BBO.
an order involving a number of call option
contracts and the same number of put option contracts in the same underlying security; in the case of an adjusted option
contract, a combination order need not
consist of the same number of put and call
contracts if such contracts both represent
the same number of shares of the underlying.
order a User designates for electronic execution (in whole or in part) on the Exchange
only, and does not route to PAR for execution in open outcry; the System cancels
an Electronic Only order that would otherwise route to PAR pursuant to the Rules.
18:47 Jun 25, 2019
Jkt 247001
PO 00000
Frm 00192
Fmt 4703
6.53 ............................
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\26JNN1.SGM
26JNN1
Moved to Rule 5.6(c);
currently referred to
as Cboe Options
Only in Rule 6.53.
30274
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 123 / Wednesday, June 26, 2019 / Notices
Provision
Current Cboe options
rule
Corresponding Cboe
affiliated exchange
rule
order that has the meaning provided in current Section E of Chapter 6, which may be
executed at one or multiple price levels in
the System without regard to Protected
Quotations at other options exchanges;
the Exchange relies on the marking of an
order by a User as an ISO order when
handling such order, and thus, it is the entering Trading Permit Holder’s responsibility, not the Exchange’s responsibility, to
comply with the requirements relating to
ISOs.
order that does not execute against a resting
opposite side order also marked with an
MTP modifier and originating from the
same EFID, Trading Permit Holder identifier, trading group identifier, or Sponsored
User identifier (‘‘Unique Identifier’’), with
five types of modifiers available.
order that requires a specified minimum
quantity of contracts be executed or is
cancelled; Minimum Quantity orders will
only execute against multiple, aggregated
orders if such executions would occur simultaneously, and only a Book Only order
with TIF designation of IOC may have a
Minimum Quantity instruction (the System
disregards a Minimum Quantity instruction
on any other order) 27.
6.53 ............................
BZX Rule 21.1(d)(10),
C2 Rule 6.10(c),
and EDGX Rule
21.1(d)(9).
Moved to Rule 5.6(c).
6.53 ............................
BZX Rule 21.1(g), C2
Rule 6.10(c), and
EDGX Rule 21.1(g).
Moved to Rule 5.6(c)
and conformed to
Cboe Affiliated Exchanges’ rules (further discussed
below).
6.53 and 6.44.05 ........
BZX Rule 21.1(d)(3),
C2 Rule 6.10(c),
and EDGX Rule
21.1(d)(3).
Non-Attributable .........
order a User designates for display (price
and size) on an anonymous basis or not
designated as an Attributable Order.
N/A .............................
BZX Rule 21.1(c)(2),
C2 Rule 6.10(c),
and EDGX Rule
21.1(c)(2).
Not Held .....................
order marked ‘‘not held’’, ‘‘take time’’ or
which bears any qualifying notation giving
discretion as to the price or time at which
such order is to be executed. An order entrusted to a Floor Broker will be considered a not held order, unless otherwise
specified by a Floor Broker’s client or the
order was received by the Exchange electronically and subsequently routed to a
Floor Broker or PAR Official pursuant to
the User’s instructions. Not held orders
and/or ‘‘held’’ orders must be marked in a
manner and form prescribed by the Exchange.
6.53 ............................
N/A .............................
Moved to Rule 5.6(c)
and renamed as
minimum quantity
from minimum volume; may be eligible for electronic
trading, in addition
to open outcry trading (currently minimum volume orders
are only eligible for
open outcry trading).
Added to Rule 5.6(c);
orders currently not
marked Attributable
on Cboe Options
are non-attributable;
proposed rule
change merely permits Users to affirmatively designate orders as non-attributable, and specify
the Exchange will
by default treat orders as Non-Attributable unless the
User designates it
as Attributable.
Moved to Rule 5.6(c).
Defined term
Intermarket Sweep
Order/ISO.
Match Trade Prevention/MTP Modifier.
jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with NOTICES
Minimum Quantity ......
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:47 Jun 25, 2019
Jkt 247001
PO 00000
Frm 00193
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\26JNN1.SGM
26JNN1
Description of change
30275
Corresponding Cboe
affiliated exchange
rule
Description of change
Defined term
Provision
Current Cboe options
rule
Post Only ...................
order the System ranks and executes pursuant to current Rule 6.45,28 subjects to the
to be proposed Price Adjust process, or
cancels or rejects (including if it is not subject to the Price Adjust process and locks
or crosses a Protected Quotation of another exchange), as applicable (in accordance with a User’s instructions), except
the order may not remove liquidity from
the Book or route away to another Exchange.
order a User designates to be subject to the
to be proposed Price Adjust process, or an
order a User does not designate as Cancel Back 29.
initiating order to buy (sell) at least 1,000
standard option contracts or 10,000 minioption contracts that is identified as being
part of a qualified contingent trade coupled
with a contra-side order or orders totaling
an equal number of contracts. QCC orders
with one option leg may only be entered in
the standard increments applicable to simple orders in the options class under Rule
5.4. QCC orders with more than one option leg may be entered in the increments
specified for complex orders under Rule
5.4; QCC orders may execute without exposure subject to certain requirements.
a spread, straddle, or combination order in
which the stated number of option contracts to buy (sell) is not equal to the stated number of option contracts to sell
(buy), provided that the number of contracts differ by a permissible ratio; for purposes of the Rules, a permissible ratio is
any ratio that is equal to or greater than
one-to-three (.333) and less than or equal
to three-to-one (3.00); for example, a oneto-two (.5) ratio, a two-to-three (.667) ratio,
or a two-to-one (2.00) ratio is permissible,
whereas a one-to-four (.25) ratio or a fourto-one (4.0) ratio is not.
limit order with both a portion of the quantity
displayed (‘‘Display Quantity’’) and a reserve portion of the quantity (‘‘Reserve
Quantity’’) not displayed; both display
quantity and reserve quantity are available
for potential execution against incoming
orders, with Max Floor and replenishment
instructions available 30.
order to buy a stated number of option contracts and to sell the same number of option contracts, or contracts representing
the same number of shares as the underlying, of the same class of options.
N/A .............................
BZX Rule 21.1(d)(8),
C2 Rule 6.10(c),
and EDGX Rule
21.1(d)(8).
Added to Rule 5.6(c)
(further discussed
below).
N/A .............................
BZX Rule 21.1(j), C2
Rule 6.10(c), and
EDGX Rule 21.1(i).
Added to Rule 5.6(c)
(further discussed
below).
6.53 ............................
EDGX Rule 21.1(d) ....
Moved to Rule 5.6(c).
6.53 ............................
N/A .............................
Moved to Rule 5.6(c).
6.53 ............................
BZX Rule 21.1(d)(1),
C2 Rule 6.10(c),
and EDGX Rule
21.1(d)(1).
Moved to Rule 5.6(c)
and conformed to
Cboe Affiliated Exchanges rules (further discussed
below).
6.53 ............................
N/A .............................
6.1A(f) and 6.10(c)(3)
BZX Rule 21.1(d)(11),
C2 Rule 6.10(c),
and EDGX Rule
21.1(d)(11).
Moved to Rule 5.6(c);
clarified that the
contracts may represent the same
number of shares of
the underlying (currently says ‘‘shares
at option’’).
Moved to Rule 5.6(c);
modified to compare
stop prices to national prices rather
than Exchange
prices (BZX, EDGX,
and C2 similarly use
the NBBO), which
reflect prices from
the entire market.
Price Adjust ................
QCC Order .................
Ratio Order ................
Reserve Order ...........
Spread .......................
Stop (Stop-Loss)
Order.
jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 123 / Wednesday, June 26, 2019 / Notices
VerDate Sep<11>2014
order to buy (sell) that becomes a market
order when the consolidated last sale price
(excluding prices from complex order
trades if outside the NBBO) or NBB (NBO)
for a particular option contract is equal to
or above (below) the stop price specified
by the User; Users may not designate a
Stop Order as All Sessions.
18:47 Jun 25, 2019
Jkt 247001
PO 00000
Frm 00194
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\26JNN1.SGM
26JNN1
30276
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 123 / Wednesday, June 26, 2019 / Notices
Defined term
Provision
Current Cboe options
rule
Corresponding Cboe
affiliated exchange
rule
Stop-Limit Order ........
order to buy (sell) that becomes a limit order
when the consolidated last sale price (excluding prices from complex order trades if
outside the NBBO) or NBB (NBO) for a
particular option contract is equal to or
above (below) the stop price specified by
the User; Users may not designate a StopLimit Order as All Sessions.
6.1A(f) and 6.53 .........
BZX Rule 21.1(d)(12),
C2 Rule 6.10(c),
and EDGX Rule
21.1(d)(12).
Straddle ......................
order to buy a number of call option contracts and the same number of put option
contracts on the same underlying security
which contracts have the same exercise
price and expiration date; or an order to
sell a number of call option contracts and
the same number of put option contracts
on the same underlying security which
contracts have the same exercise price
and expiration date (e.g., an order to buy
two XYZ July 50 calls and to buy two July
50 XYZ puts is a straddle order) In the
case of adjusted option contracts, a straddle order need not consist of the same
number of put and call contracts if such
contracts both represent the same number
of shares of the underlying.
period of time the System will hold an order
for potential execution; or quote for potential execution; unless otherwise specified
in the Rules or the context indicates otherwise, the Exchange determines which of
the following Times-in-Force are available
on a class, system, or trading session
basis; current Rule 6.53C (which the Exchange intends to update and move to
Rule 5.33 in the shell Rulebook) will set
forth the Times-in-Force the Exchange
may make available for complex orders.
time-in-force that means an order to buy or
sell that, if not executed, expires at the
RTH market close.
6.53 ............................
N/A .............................
6.53(d) ........................
BZX Rule 21.1(f), C2
Rule 6.10(d), and
EDGX Rule 21.1(f).
Moved to Rule 5.6(d).
6.53(d) ........................
Moved to Rule 5.6(d).
time-in-force that means an order that is to
be executed in its entirety as soon as the
System receives it and, if not so executed,
cancelled; the System considers an FOK
order to be an AON order.
time-in-force that means, if after entry into
the System, the order is not fully executed,
the order (or unexecuted portion) remains
available for potential display or execution
(with the same timestamp) unless cancelled by the entering User, or until the option expires, whichever comes first.
time-in-force that means, if after entry into
the System, the order is not fully executed,
the order (or unexecuted portion) remains
available for potential display or execution
(with the same timestamp) until a date and
time specified by the entering User unless
cancelled by the entering User.
6.53(d) and 6.44.04 ...
BZX Rule 21.1(f)(3),
C2 Rule 6.10(d),
and EDGX Rule
21.1(f)(3).
BZX Rule 21.1(f)(5),
C2 Rule 6.10(d),
and EDGX Rule
21.1(f)(5).
6.53(d) ........................
BZX Rule 21.1(f)(4),
C2 Rule 6.10(d),
and EDGX Rule
21.1(f)(4).
Moved to Rule 5.6(d).
N/A .............................
BZX Rule 21.1(f)(1,
C2 Rule 6.10(d),
and EDGX Rule
21.1(f)(1).
Added to Rule 5.6(d);
similar to GTC orders, except it provides Users with additional flexibility to
have an order automatically cancel at a
specific time on a
specific date, rather
than manually cancel a GTC order at
that time (similar to
Cboe Affiliated Exchanges’ rules).
Time-in-Force .............
Day .............................
Fill-or-Kill/FOK ............
Good-til-Cancelled/
GTC.
jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with NOTICES
Good-til-Date/GTD .....
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:47 Jun 25, 2019
Jkt 247001
PO 00000
Frm 00195
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\26JNN1.SGM
26JNN1
Description of change
Moved to Rule 5.6(c);
modified to compare
stop prices to national prices rather
than Exchange
prices (BZX, C2,
and EDGX similarly
use the NBBO),
which reflect prices
from the entire market.
Moved to Rule 5.6(c);
clarified that the
contracts may represent the same
number of shares of
the underlying (currently says ‘‘shares
at option’’).
Moved to Rule 5.6(d).
30277
Corresponding Cboe
affiliated exchange
rule
Description of change
Defined term
Provision
Current Cboe options
rule
Immediate-or-Cancel/
IOC.
time-in-force for a limit order that is to be executed in whole or in part as soon as the
System receives it; the System cancels
and does not post to the Book any portion
of an IOC order (or unexecuted portion)
not executed immediately on the Exchange or another options exchange.
a limit order that may not execute on the Exchange until three minutes prior to RTH
market close; at that time, the System enters LOC orders into the Book in time sequence (based on the times at which the
System initially received them), where they
may be processed in accordance with current Rule 6.45 (to be moved to Rule 5.32
in the shell Rulebook); the System cancels
an LOC order (or unexecuted portion) that
does not execute by the RTH market
close; Users may not designate an LOC
order as All Sessions.
a market order that may not execute on the
Exchange until three minutes prior to RTH
market close; at that time, the System enters MOC orders into the Book in time sequence (based on the times at which the
System initially received them), where they
may be processed in accordance with current Rule 6.45 (to be moved to Rule 5.32
in the shell Rulebook); the System cancels
an MOC order (or unexecuted portion) that
does not execute by the RTH market
close; Users may not designate an MOC
order as All Sessions.
time-in-force means an order that may only
participate in the Opening Process on the
Exchange; the System cancels an OPG
order (or unexecuted portion) that does
not execute during the Opening Process.
6.53(d) ........................
BZX Rule 21.1(f)(2),
C2 Rule 6.10(d),
and EDGX Rule
21.1(f)(2).
Moved to Rule 5.6(d).
6.1A(f) and 6.53(d) ....
....................................
Moved to Rule 5.6(d)
and separated from
MOC definition; updated (as discussed
below).
6.1A(f) and 6.53(d) ....
....................................
Moved to Rule 5.6(d)
and separated from
LOC definition; updated (as discussed
below).
6.53(d) ........................
BXZ Rule 21.1(f)(6),
C2 Rule 6.10(d),
and EDGX Rule
21.1(f)(6).
Moved to Rule 5.6(d).
Limit-on-Close/LOC ...
Market on Close/MOC
At the Open/OPG ......
jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 123 / Wednesday, June 26, 2019 / Notices
25 In addition to determining the availability of
AONs on a class basis, the Exchange may restrict
the entry of AONs on a series basis when it deems
necessary to maintain a fair and orderly market.
This is consistent with current Rules 6.44.03 and
6.53, which the proposed rule change deletes from
the current Rulebook. The Exchange will describe
the proposed price adjust process in a future rule
filing, but it will be equivalent to the price adjust
process described in EDGX Rule 21.1(i).
26 The Exchange intends to move Rule 6.82 from
the current Rulebook to Rule 5.67 in the shell
Rulebook in a separate rule filing. The substance of
the rule will not change.
27 The proposed rule change deletes Rule 6.44,
Interpretation and Policy .05. As noted above, the
Exchange will make Minimum Quantity orders
available for electronic trading (currently, the
Exchange only makes these orders available for
open outcry trading). Additionally, because
Minimum Quantity orders will be IOC (and thus not
rest in the Book), there is no need to address the
priority of Minimum Quantity orders.
28 The Exchange intends to move Rule 6.45 from
the current Rulebook to Rule 5.32 in the shell
Rulebook in a separate rule filing. The rule will
remain substantively the same.
29 See BZX Rule 21.1(i), C2 Rule 6.12(b), and
EDGX Rule 21.1(i) for a description of the Price
Adjust process, which the Exchange will propose to
add to the shell Rulebook in a separate filing.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:47 Jun 25, 2019
Jkt 247001
The proposed rule change also makes
nonsubstantive changes to the
definitions of certain order types, Order
Instructions, and Times-in-Force,
including to make the rule provisions
plain English, update defined terms,
and add clarifying language. The
Exchange will also add appropriate
cross-references in the definitions of
order types, Order Instructions, and
Times-in-Force as the applicable crossreferenced Rules are moved from the
current Rulebook to the shell Rulebook.
The proposed rule change deletes
current Rules in the above table from
the current Rulebook, as further
discussed below.
As noted above, the proposed rule
change adds the following Order
Instructions to proposed Rule 5.6(c),
which are currently available on the
Cboe Affiliated Exchanges, as indicated
above.
30 The Exchange will move provisions related to
the priority of Reserve Orders in a separate filing.
PO 00000
Frm 00196
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
• AON: The Exchange currently
permits AON orders.31 The proposed
rule change does not permit a User to
designate an AON order as Post Only.32
An AON order’s size contingency, and
the fact that AON orders have last
priority while resting in the Book,33 will
provide AON orders resting on the Book
with few opportunities for AON orders
to receive an execution. Additionally,
Post Only orders are intended to add
displayed liquidity to the Book; because
AON orders are not displayed, the
purpose of a Post Only instruction
conflicts with AON functionality. For
these reasons, the Exchange believes
there will be minimal investor demand
for Post Only AON orders.34 The
31 See
Rule 6.53.
discussed below, a Post Only order may not,
among other things, remove liquidity from the
Book.
33 See Rule 6.45.
34 Cboe Options does not currently offer a Post
Only instruction. Additionally, other exchanges,
such as ISE and NOM, only permit AON orders to
be entered as IOC, and thus AON orders at those
options exchanges would only execute upon entry
32 As
E:\FR\FM\26JNN1.SGM
Continued
26JNN1
30278
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 123 / Wednesday, June 26, 2019 / Notices
jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with NOTICES
Exchange believes it is appropriate to
not restrict the opportunities for
execution of an AON order to the
minimal execution opportunities that
would exist for an AON order while
resting on the Book. This ensures that
an AON order may execute upon entry
if there is sufficient size resting on the
Book, as well as have an opportunity for
execution if it cannot so execute.
Additionally, the proposed rule
change only permits Users to apply
MCN (MTP cancel newest), but no other
MTP Modifiers, to an AON order.35
Proposed Rule 5.6(c) provides that an
incoming order marked with the MCN
Modifier will not execute against
opposite side resting interest market
with any MTP modifier originating from
the same Unique Identifier. The
incoming order marked with the MCN
modifier will be cancelled back to the
originating User(s). The resting order
marked with an MTP modifier will
remain on the Book. The Exchange
believes there will be little demand for
the use of any MTP Modifiers on AON
orders given that primarily retail
investors submit AONs, and retail
investors are unlikely to have interest
on both sides of the market. Therefore,
orders of different retail investors would
have the opportunity to execute against
each other, unlike a broker who may
have orders resting on both sides of the
market and may want to avoid those
orders executing against each other.
Therefore, the Exchange believes
offering one MTP Modifier for AON
orders is sufficient. The Exchange
believes MCN is the most appropriate
MTP modifier for AON orders, because
it is the simplest modifier to implement
from a System perspective and an
offering of other MTP modifier for
investors would present significant
technical complexities given the size
contingency of AON orders.36
Additionally, the Exchange has
determined to handle an AON order
with any other MTP Modifier as an
MCN rather than cancel the AON,
because the proposed rules provide
investors with sufficient transparency
regarding how the System will handle
AON orders with MTP Modifiers, and
Users may achieve other results
manually if so desired. For example, if
User were to prefer to have a resting
order with an MTP Modifier cancel and
and never rest on the book (and thus Post Only, if
available on those exchanges, would not be
permitted).
35 If a User applies any other MTP Modifier to an
AON order, the System will handle it as an MCN).
36 Additionally, the Decrement and Cancel MTP
Modifier is inconsistent with an AON order,
because it may result in partial execution of an
order.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:47 Jun 25, 2019
Jkt 247001
let the newer AON order rest, it could
manually cancel the resting order and
then resubmit the AON order.
The Exchange currently only offers
match trade prevention only for marketmakers, and thus the current rules
regarding AON orders contains no
restrictions on the use of match trade
prevention instructions, as it would
only be available to market-makers that
submit AON orders. Because the
Exchange will have match-trade
prevention functionality available for all
Users (as proposed) and not just MarketMakers, the Exchange believes it is
appropriate to provide this functionality
to all Users that submit AON orders and
want match trade prevention
functionality. The rules of other
exchanges are also silent on whether
any match trade prevention instructions
are available for AON orders.
• Cancel Back: A Book Only or Post
Only order a User designates to not be
subject to the Price Adjust Process
(which the Exchange will add to the
shell Rulebook in a separate filing),
which the System cancels or rejects if it
locks or crosses the opposite side of the
ABBO. The System executes a Book
Only—Cancel Back order against resting
orders, and cancels or rejects a Post
Only—Cancel Back order, that locks or
crosses the opposite side of the BBO.
The proposed functionality is partially
included in the definition of Post Only
in the BZX and EDGX rules,37 and
substantially similar to C2 Rule 6.10(c).
The proposed rule change is also
consistent with linkage rules. Book Only
orders and Post Only orders do not
route by definition, and the Cancel Back
instruction provides an option for Users
to determine how these non-routable
orders will be handled within the
System, consistent with their
definitions.38
• Match Trade Prevention (MTP)
Modifiers: Current Rule 6.53(c) defines a
Market-Maker Trade Prevention Order
as an IOC order market with the MarketMaker Trade Prevention designation. A
Market-Maker Trade Prevention Order
that would trade against a resting quote
or order for the same Market-Maker will
be cancelled, as will the resting quote or
order (unless the Market-Maker Trade
Prevention Order is received while an
order for the same Market-Maker is
subject to an auction, in which case
only the Market-Maker Trade
Prevention Order will be cancelled).
The Exchange proposes to adopt MTP
37 See BZX Rule 21.6(d)(8); and EDGX Rule
21.6(d)(8).
38 C2 Rule 6.10(c) contains a substantively similar
Cancel Back instruction. EDGX Rule 11.6(b) (which
relates to the EDGX Equities market) contains a
similar Cancel Back instruction.
PO 00000
Frm 00197
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
modifiers substantively the same as
those available on the Cboe Affiliated
Exchanges.39 The proposed MTP
modifiers expand this functionality to
all Users, rather than just MarketMakers, and provide Users with
multiple options regarding how the
System handles orders with the same
Unique Identifiers. Pursuant to the
proposed rule change, an order
designated with any MTP modifier is
not executed against a resting opposite
side order also designated with an MTP
modifier and originating from the same
Unique Identifier. Except for the MDC
modifier described below, the MTP
modifier on the incoming order controls
the interaction between two orders
marked with MTP modifiers:
Æ MTP Cancel Newest (‘‘MCN’’): An
incoming order marked with the ‘‘MCN’’
modifier does not execute against a
resting order marked with any MTP
modifier originating from the same
Unique Identifier. The System cancels
or rejects the incoming order, and the
resting order remains in the Book.
Æ MTP Cancel Oldest (‘‘MCO’’): An
incoming order marked with the ‘‘MCO’’
modifier does not execute against a
resting order marked with any MTP
modifier originating from the same
Unique Identifier. The System cancels
or rejects the resting order, and
processes the incoming order in
accordance with current Rule 6.45
(which the Exchange will move to the
shell Rulebook in a separate filing).
Æ MTP Decrement and Cancel
(‘‘MDC’’): An incoming order marked
with the ‘‘MDC’’ modifier does not
execute against a resting order marked
with any MTP modifier originating from
the same Unique Identifier. If both
orders are equivalent in size, the System
cancels or rejects both orders. If the
orders are not equivalent in size, the
System cancels or rejects the smaller of
the two orders and decrements the size
of the larger order by the size of the
smaller order, which remaining balance
remains on or processes in accordance
with the equivalent of current Rule 6.45
(which the Exchange will move to the
shell Rulebook in a separate filing), as
applicable. Notwithstanding the
foregoing, unless a User instructs the
Exchange not to do so, the System
cancels or rejects both orders if the
resting order is marked with any MTP
modifier other than MDC and the
incoming order is smaller in size than
the resting order.
Æ MTP Cancel Both (‘‘MCB’’): An
incoming order marked with the ‘‘MCB’’
modifier does not execute against a
39 See BZX Rule 21.1(g), C2 Rule 6.10(c), and
EDGX Rule 21.1(g).
E:\FR\FM\26JNN1.SGM
26JNN1
jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 123 / Wednesday, June 26, 2019 / Notices
resting order marked with any MTP
modifier originating from the same
Unique Identifier. The System cancels
or rejects both orders.
Æ MTP Cancel Smallest (‘‘MCS’’): An
incoming order marked with the ‘‘MCS’’
modifier does not execute against a
resting order marked with any MTP
modifier originating from the same
Unique Identifier. If both orders are
equivalent in size, the System cancels or
rejects both orders. If the orders are not
equivalent in size, the System cancels or
rejects the smaller of the two orders, and
the larger order remains on the Book or
processes in accordance with the
equivalent of current Rule 6.45 (which
the Exchange will move to the shell
Rulebook in a separate filing), as
applicable.
The proposed MTP functionality is
designed to prevent market participants
from unintentionally causing a
proprietary self-trade. The Exchange
believes these modifiers will allow firms
to better manage order flow and prevent
undesirable executions with themselves.
Trading Permit Holders may have
multiple connections into the Exchange
consistent with their business needs and
function. As a result, orders routed by
the same firm via different connections
may, in certain circumstances, trade
against each other. The proposed
modifiers provide Trading Permit
Holders with functionality (in addition
to what is available on Cboe Options
today) with the opportunity to prevent
these potentially undesirable trades.
The Exchange notes that offering the
MTP modifiers may streamline certain
regulatory functions by reducing false
positive results that may occur on
Exchange generated wash trading
surveillance reports when orders are
executed under the same Unique
Identifier. For these reasons, the
Exchange believes the MTP modifiers
offer users enhanced order processing
functionality that may prevent
potentially undesirable executions
without negatively impacting brokerdealer best execution obligations.
• Post Only Order: An order the
System ranks and executes pursuant to
current Rule 6.45 (which the Exchange
will move to the shell Rulebook in a
separate filing), subjects to the Price
Adjust process, or cancels (including if
it is not subject to the Price Adjust
process and it would lock or cross a
Protected Quotation on another
exchange), as applicable (in accordance
with User instructions), except the order
may not remove liquidity from the Book
or route away to another Exchange. This
proposed instructions is nearly identical
to the Cboe Options Only order
instruction (the Book Only order
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:47 Jun 25, 2019
Jkt 247001
instruction as proposed), except it will
also not remove liquidity from the Book.
This proposed instruction provides
Users with flexibility to submit an order
to add liquidity to the Book without
interacting with then-currently resting
interest and incurring applicable taker
fees.
• Reserve Order: A limit order with
both a portion of the quantity displayed
(‘‘Display Quantity’’) and a reserve
portion of the quantity (‘‘Reserve
Quantity’’) not displayed. Both the
Display Quantity and Reserve Quantity
of the Reserve Order are available for
potential execution against incoming
orders. When entering a Reserve Order,
a User must instruct the Exchange as to
the quantity of the order to be initially
displayed by the System (‘‘Max Floor’’).
If the Display Quantity of a Reserve
Order is fully executed, the System will,
in accordance with the User’s
instruction, replenish the Display
Quantity from the Reserve Quantity
using one of the below replenishment
instructions. If the remainder of an
order is less than the replenishment
amount, the System will display the
entire remainder of the order. The
System creates a new timestamp for
both the Display Quantity and Reserve
Quantity of the order each time it is
replenished from reserve.
Æ Random Replenishment: An
instruction that a User may attach to an
order with Reserve Quantity where the
System randomly replenishes the
Display Quantity for the order with a
number of contracts not outside a
replenishment range, which equals the
Max Floor plus and minus a
replenishment value established by the
User when entering a Reserve Order
with a Random Replenishment
instruction.
Æ Fixed Replenishment: For any order
for that a User does not select Random
Replenishment, the System will
replenish the Display Quantity of an
order with the number of contracts
equal to the Max Floor.
Current Rule 6.53(c) describes current
reserve order functionality available on
the Exchange. The proposed
functionality is generally the same as
the current functionality but enhances
the use of reserve orders by providing
flexibility for Users to determine
whether the reserve replenishment
amount is fixed or random. This
proposed functionality is substantively
the same as that available on the Cboe
Affiliated Exchanges.40
The proposed rule change also
modifies and adds detail to the
40 See BZX Rule 21.1(d)(1), C2 Rule 6.10(c), and
EDGX Rule 21.1(d)(1).
PO 00000
Frm 00198
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
30279
definitions of MOC and LOC orders.
Currently, an MOC order is a market or
limit order to be executed as close as
possible to the close of the market near
to or at the closing price for the
particular option series. The proposed
rule change specifies that an MOC or
LOC may not execute on the Exchange
until three minutes prior to RTH market
close.41 The System enters LOC and
MOC orders into the Book in time
sequence (based on the times at which
the Exchange initially received them),
where they may be processed in
accordance with current Rule 6.45
(which the Exchange intends to move to
Rule 5.32 in the shell Rulebook).42 The
Exchange notes that it does not have a
closing auction in which market
participants may participate in an
auction rotation that determines the
closing price for a series, like that of the
equities space, but that the proposed
MOC and LOC orders merely become
executable three minutes prior to the
close of RTH. The Exchange queues
LOC and MOC orders in the System
until three minutes before the RTH
market close. At that time, the System
handles a LOC or MOC order as a limit
order or market order, as applicable, and
processes them in accordance with Rule
6.45. The Exchange believes that three
minutes prior to the RTH market close
is a reasonable time prior to the market
close to trigger MOC and LOC orders, as
it provides those orders with sufficient
time to interact with contra-side interest
and potentially execute at a time close
to the RTH market close. The proposed
LOC and MOC order definitions also
provide that the System cancels an LOC
order or an MOC order (or an
unexecuted portion of an LOC or MOC
order) that does not execute by the RTH
market close. This is consistent with
current functionality and the purpose of
these orders, which is to execute near
the RTH market close on the day they
were submitted to the Exchange. As the
execution of MOC and LOC orders is
linked to the RTH market close, such
orders will be valid only during RTH;
however, the System will accept such
orders during any trading session.43 A
User may not designate an MOC or LOC
order as ‘‘All Sessions’’; any MOC or
LOC order designated as All Sessions
will be rejected.
The proposed rule change deletes the
definition of a market-if-touched order
and a facilitation order, as those order
41 The Exchange currently triggers MOC and LOC
orders three minutes prior to the RTH market close.
42 Rule 6.45 describes how the System processes
orders and quotes in the Book.
43 The Exchange notes that an RTH Only MOC or
LOC order submitted during GTH will remain on
the book until the close of RTH.
E:\FR\FM\26JNN1.SGM
26JNN1
30280
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 123 / Wednesday, June 26, 2019 / Notices
types are not currently available on the
Exchange and will not be available
following the technology migration. The
Exchange will move the definitions of
an AIM Sweep order and Sweep and
AIM order to the shell Rulebook in
separate rule filings.
jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with NOTICES
Deletion of Current Rules
As noted above, to the extent the
proposed rule change moves current
Rules from the current Rulebook to the
shell Rulebook, the proposed rule
change also deletes those current Rules
from the current Rulebook (as noted
above, some rules will be moved to the
shell Rulebook in future rule filings).
However, these Rules will remain in
effect and on the current Rulebook until
completion of the technology migration,
at which time the Rules in the shell
Rulebook will take effect.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes the proposed
rule change is consistent with the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
‘‘Act’’) and the rules and regulations
thereunder applicable to the Exchange
and, in particular, the requirements of
Section 6(b) of the Act.44 Specifically,
the Exchange believes the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Section
6(b)(5) 45 requirements that the rules of
an exchange be designed to prevent
fraudulent and manipulative acts and
practices, to promote just and equitable
principles of trade, to foster cooperation
and coordination with persons engaged
in regulating, clearing, settling,
processing information with respect to,
and facilitating transactions in
securities, to remove impediments to
and perfect the mechanism of a free and
open market and a national market
system, and, in general, to protect
investors and the public interest.
Additionally, the Exchange believes the
proposed rule change is consistent with
the Section 6(b)(5) 46 requirement that
the rules of an exchange not be designed
to permit unfair discrimination between
customers, issuers, brokers, or dealers.
In particular, the proposed rule
changes are generally intended to add or
align certain system functionality
currently offered by the Exchange and
the Cboe Affiliated Exchanges in order
to provide a consistent technology
offering for the Cboe Affiliated
Exchanges. A consistent technology
offering, in turn, will simplify the
technology implementation, changes
and maintenance by Users of the
Exchange that are also participants on
44 15
45 15
U.S.C. 78f(b).
U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
46 Id.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:47 Jun 25, 2019
Jkt 247001
Cboe Affiliated Exchanges. The
proposed rule change does not propose
to implement new or unique
functionality that has not been
previously filed with the Commission or
is not available on Cboe Affiliated
Exchanges. The Exchange notes that the
proposed rule text is generally based on
rules of Cboe Affiliated Exchanges and
is different only to the extent necessary
to conform to the Exchange’s current
rules, retain intended differences based
on the Exchange’s market model, or
make other nonsubstantive changes to
simplify, clarify, eliminate duplicative
language, or make the rule provisions
plain English.
To the extent a proposed rule change
is based on an existing Cboe Affiliated
Exchange rule, the language of Exchange
Rules and Cboe Affiliated Exchange
rules may differ to extent necessary to
conform with existing Exchange rule
text or to account for details or
descriptions included in the Exchange’s
Rules but not in the applicable Cboe
Affiliated Exchange rule, such as
references to trading sessions, which
apply to the Exchange but not the Cboe
Affiliated Exchanged, as they do not
have Global Trading Hours. Where
possible, the Exchange has substantively
mirrored Cboe Affiliated Exchange
rules, because consistent rules will
simplify the regulatory requirements
and increase the understanding of the
Exchange’s operations for Trading
Permit Holders that are also participants
on Cboe Affiliated Exchanges. The
proposed rule change would provide
greater harmonization between the rules
of the Cboe Affiliated Exchanges,
resulting in greater uniformity and less
burdensome and more efficient
regulatory compliance. As such, the
proposed rule change would foster
cooperation and coordination with
persons engaged in facilitating
transactions in securities and would
remove impediments to and perfect the
mechanism of a free and open market
and a national market system. The
Exchange also believes that the
proposed amendments will contribute
to the protection of investors and the
public interest by making the
Exchange’s Rules easier to understand.
The proposed rule change clearly
identifies the ways in which trading
during Regular Trading Hours will
different from trading during Global
Trading Hours (such as identifying
order types and instructions that will
not be available during Global Trading
Hours). This ensures that investors will
continue to be aware of any differences
among trading sessions. The flexibility
the Exchange maintains to make
determinations for each trading session
PO 00000
Frm 00199
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
will allow the Exchange to apply
settings and parameters to address the
different market conditions that may be
present during each trading session.
The proposed All Sessions order and
RTH Only order will protect investors
by permitting investors who do not wish
to trade during Global Trading Hours
from having orders or quotes execute
during those orders. Consistent with the
goal of investor protection, the
Exchange will not allow market orders
during Global Trading Hours due to the
expected increased volatility and
decreased liquidity during these hours.
The other proposed Order Instructions
and Times-in-Force not currently
available on the Exchange add
functionality currently offered by Cboe
Affiliated Exchanges in order to provide
consistent order handling options across
the Cboe Affiliated Exchanges. The
proposed rule changes would also
provide Users with access to optional
functionality that may result in the
efficient execution of such orders and
will provide additional flexibility as
well as increased functionality to the
Exchange’s System and its Users. As
explained above, the proposed
functionality is substantially similar to
functionality on Cboe Affiliated
Exchanges, and is optional for Users.
The proposed rule change would
provide greater harmonization between
the order handling instructions
available amongst the Cboe Affiliated
Exchanges, resulting in greater
uniformity and less burdensome and
more efficient regulatory compliance.
With respect to the proposed MTP
modifier functionality, the Exchange
believes the various proposed modifier
options would allow firms to better
manage order flow and prevent
undesirable executions against
themselves, and the proposed change
described herein enhances the choices
available to such firms in how they do
so. The proposed rule change also is
designed to support the principles of
Section 11A(a)(1) of the Act 47 in that it
seeks to assure fair competition among
brokers and dealers and among
exchange markets. The proposed rule
change would also provide Users with
access to functionality that may result in
the efficient execution of such orders
and will provide additional flexibility as
well as increased functionality to the
Exchange’s System and its Users.
The Exchange believes not permitting
Users to apply the Post Only instruction
to AON orders will protect investors,
because it will maximize execution
opportunities for AON orders. An AON
order’s size contingency, and the fact
47 15
E:\FR\FM\26JNN1.SGM
U.S.C. 78k–1(a)(1).
26JNN1
jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 123 / Wednesday, June 26, 2019 / Notices
that AON orders will have last priority
while resting in the Book, will provide
AON orders resting on the Book with
few opportunities for AON orders to
receive an execution. Additionally, Post
Only orders are intended to add
displayed liquidity to the Book; because
AON orders are not displayed, the
purpose of a Post Only instruction
conflicts with AON functionality. For
these reasons, the Exchange believes
there will be minimal investor demand
for Post Only AON orders. This ensures
that an AON order may execute upon
entry if there is sufficient size resting on
the Book. Additionally, as noted above,
other exchanges do not permit AON
orders to rest in the book at all (as they
are required to be IOC).48 Unlike those
exchanges, the Exchange will permit
AON orders to rest in the Book, and will
merely not permit AON orders to only
rest in the book. Cboe Options does not
currently offer a Post Only instruction,
and therefore, an AON order submitted
to Cboe Options pursuant to the
proposed rule change will be handled in
the same manner as it is handled today,
as such an order would execute upon
entry (if possible), route (if eligible), or
enter the Book (subject to any User
instructions).
The Exchange believes the proposed
rule change to offer use of the MCN
Modifier (and not the other MTP
Modifiers) for AON orders protects
investors, because it provides all
investors with the option to apply
match-trade prevention functionality to
AON orders. The Exchange believes
there will be little demand for the use
of any MTP Modifiers on AON orders
given that primarily retail investors
submit AONs, and retail investors are
unlikely to have interest on both sides
of the market. Therefore, orders of
different retail investors would have the
opportunity to execute against each
other, unlike a broker who may have
orders resting on both sides of the
market and may want to avoid those
orders executing against each other.
Therefore, the Exchange believes
offering one MTP Modifier for AON
orders is sufficient. Given this expected
minimal demand, the Exchange believes
offering one MTP Modifier for AON
orders is sufficient. Additionally, the
Exchange believes that MCN is the most
appropriate MTP modifier for AON
orders because an offering of other MTP
modifier for investors would present
significant technical complexities given
the size contingency of AON orders and
that MCN is the simplest modifier to
48 See, e.g., ISE Rule 715(c); NOM Chapter VI,
section 1(e)(10); and Phlx Rule 1066(c)(4).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:47 Jun 25, 2019
Jkt 247001
implement from a System perspective.49
The proposed rules provide investors
with sufficient transparency regarding
how the System will handle AON orders
with MTP Modifiers, and Users may
achieve other results manually if so
desired. For example, if a User were to
prefer to have a resting order with an
MTP Modifier cancel and let the newer
AON order rest, it could manually
cancel the resting order and then
resubmit the AON order. The Exchange
has determined to handle an AON order
with any other MTP Modifier as an
MCN rather than cancel the AON, and
the Exchange believes the proposed
rules will protect investors because they
provide investors with sufficient
transparency regarding how the System
will handle AON orders with MTP
Modifiers. Additionally, Users may
achieve other results manually if so
desired.
The proposed changes to the
definitions of MOC and LOC orders will
benefit investors, as they provide
additional transparency in the Rules
regarding how the System handles these
orders. The proposed changes are
consistent with current functionality.
The proposed rule change makes no
substantive changes to the other current
Rules being moved from the current
Rulebook to the shell Rulebook. The
proposed rule change makes various
nonsubstantive changes throughout the
Rules, which the Exchange believes will
protect investors and benefit market
participants, as these changes simplify
or clarify rules, update defined terms,
use plain English, and conform language
to corresponding Cboe Affiliated
Exchange rules as appropriate.
As described above, the basis for the
majority of the substantive proposed
rule changes in this filing are the
approved rules of Cboe Affiliated
Exchanges, which have already been
found to be consistent with the Act. For
instance, the Exchange does not believe
that any of the proposed Order
Instructions or Times-in-Force raise any
new or novel issues that have not
previously been considered by the
Commission.
Thus, the Exchange further believes
that the functionality that it proposes to
offer is consistent with Section 6(b)(5) of
the Act, because the System upon the
technology migration is designed to
continue to be efficient and its operation
transparent, thereby facilitating
transactions in securities, removing
impediments to and perfecting the
49 Additionally, the Decrement and Cancel MTP
Modifier is inconsistent with an AON order,
because it may result in partial execution of an
order.
PO 00000
Frm 00200
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
30281
mechanism of a free and open market
and a national market system.
When Cboe Options migrates to the
same technology as that of the Cboe
Affiliated Exchanges, Users of the
Exchange and other Cboe Affiliated
Exchanges will have access to similar
functionality on all Cboe Affiliated
Exchanges and similar language can be
incorporated into the rules of all Cboe
Affiliated Exchanges. As such, the
proposed rule change would foster
cooperation and coordination with
persons engaged in facilitating
transactions in securities and would
remove impediments to and perfect the
mechanism of a free and open market
and a national market system.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that
the proposed rule change will impose
any burden on competition that is not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act. The
Exchange reiterates that the proposed
rule change is being proposed in the
context of the technology integration of
the Cboe Affiliated Exchanges. Thus, the
Exchange believes this proposed rule
change is necessary to permit fair
competition among national securities
exchanges. In addition, the Exchange
believes the proposed rule change will
benefit Exchange participants in that it
will provide a consistent technology
offering for Users by the Cboe Affiliated
Exchanges. Following the technology
migration, the proposed Rules being
added to the shell Rulebook will apply
to all Users and orders submitted by
Users in the same manner. As discussed
above, the basis for most of the
substantive proposed rule changes in
this filing are the approved rules of
Cboe Affiliated Exchanges, which have
already been found to be consistent with
the Act.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
The Exchange neither solicited nor
received comments on the proposed
rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Because the foregoing proposed rule
change does not:
A. Significantly affect the protection
of investors or the public interest;
B. impose any significant burden on
competition; and
C. become operative for 30 days from
the date on which it was filed, or such
E:\FR\FM\26JNN1.SGM
26JNN1
30282
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 123 / Wednesday, June 26, 2019 / Notices
shorter time as the Commission may
designate, it has become effective
pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the
Act 50 and Rule 19b–4(f)(6) 51
thereunder.52
At any time within 60 days of the
filing of the proposed rule change, the
Commission summarily may
temporarily suspend such rule change if
it appears to the Commission that such
action is necessary or appropriate in the
public interest, for the protection of
investors, or otherwise in furtherance of
the purposes of the Act. If the
Commission takes such action, the
Commission will institute proceedings
to determine whether the proposed rule
change should be approved or
disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include File Number SR–
CBOE–2019–027 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Secretary, Securities and Exchange
Commission, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–CBOE–2019–027. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
internet website (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
50 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6).
52 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6). In addition, Rule 19b–
4(f)(6)(iii) requires a self-regulatory organization to
give the Commission written notice of its intent to
file the proposed rule change, along with a brief
description and text of the proposed rule change,
at least five business days prior to the date of filing
of the proposed rule change, or such shorter time
as designated by the Commission. The Exchange
has satisfied this requirement.
jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with NOTICES
51 17
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:47 Jun 25, 2019
Jkt 247001
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for website viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549 on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the
filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change.
Persons submitting comments are
cautioned that we do not redact or edit
personal identifying information from
comment submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish
to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File
Number SR–CBOE–2019–027 and
should be submitted on or before July
17, 2019.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.53
Vanessa A. Countryman,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2019–13541 Filed 6–25–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No 34–86168; File No. SR–
CboeEDGA–2019–012]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe
EDGA Exchange, Inc.; Notice of Filing
of a Proposed Rule Change To
Introduce a Liquidity Provider
Protection on EDGA
June 20, 2019.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on June 7,
2019, Cboe EDGA Exchange, Inc. (the
‘‘Exchange’’ or ‘‘EDGA’’) filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission
(the ‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule
change as described in Items I, II, and
III below, which Items have been
prepared by the Exchange. The
Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule
change from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
Cboe EDGA Exchange, Inc. (‘‘EDGA’’
or the ‘‘Exchange’’) is filing with the
53 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
1 15
PO 00000
Frm 00201
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Securities and Exchange Commission
(the ‘‘Commission’’) a proposed rule
change to introduce a Liquidity Provider
Protection on EDGA. The text of the
proposed rule change is attached [sic] as
Exhibit 5.
The text of the proposed rule change
is also available on the Exchange’s
website (https://markets.cboe.com/us/
equities/regulation/rule_filings/edga/),
at the Exchange’s Office of the
Secretary, and at the Commission’s
Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for
the proposed rule change and discussed
any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these
statements may be examined at the
places specified in Item IV below. The
Exchange has prepared summaries, set
forth in sections A, B, and C below, of
the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
The purpose of the proposed rule
change is to introduce a delay
mechanism on EDGA that is designed to
protect liquidity providers and thereby
enable those liquidity providers to make
better markets in equity securities
traded on the Exchange. The Liquidity
Provider Protection (‘‘LP2’’) delay
mechanism would function similarly to
delay mechanisms adopted by the
Investors Exchange LLC (‘‘IEX’’) and
NYSE American LLC (‘‘NYSE
American’’) in that it is an intentional
access delay applied to a subset of order
messages in order to allow resting
orders to be updated before
opportunistic traders can trade with
them at stale prices.3 The LP2 delay
mechanism, however, is unique in that
it is designed primarily to enhance
market quality by promoting price
forming displayed liquidity in addition
to the non-displayed liquidity
encouraged by both IEX and NYSE
American. Liquidity provision is critical
to the proper functioning of the equities
markets, and finding ways to enhance
3 See Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 78101
(June 17, 2016), 81 FR 41141 (June 23, 2016) (File
No. 10–222) (‘‘IEX Exchange Approval’’); 80700
(May 16, 2017), 82 FR 23381 (May 22, 2017) (SR–
NYSEMKT–2017–05) (‘‘MKT Approval Order’’).
E:\FR\FM\26JNN1.SGM
26JNN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 123 (Wednesday, June 26, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 30267-30282]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-13541]
[[Page 30267]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No 34-86173; File No. SR-CBOE-2019-027]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe Exchange, Inc.; Notice of
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To Amend
and Move Certain Current Rules From the Exchange's Currently Effective
Rulebook to the Shell Structure for the Exchange's Rulebook That Will
Become Effective Upon the Migration of the Exchange's Trading Platform
to the Same System Used by the Cboe Affiliated Exchanges
June 20, 2019.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(the ``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given
that on June 7, 2019, Cboe Exchange, Inc. (the ``Exchange'' or ``Cboe
Options'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I and II
below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The Exchange
filed the proposal as a ``non-controversial'' proposed rule change
pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act \3\ and Rule 19b-
4(f)(6) thereunder.\4\ The Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
\3\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
\4\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
Cboe Exchange, Inc. (the ``Exchange'' or ``Cboe Options'') proposes
to amend and move certain current Rules from the Exchange's currently
effective Rulebook (``current Rulebook'') to the shell structure for
the Exchange's Rulebook that will become effective upon the migration
of the Exchange's trading platform to the same system used by the Cboe
Affiliated Exchanges (as defined below) (``shell Rulebook''). The text
of the proposed rule change is provided in Exhibit 5.
The text of the proposed rule change is also available on the
Exchange's website (https://www.cboe.com/AboutCBOE/CBOELegalRegulatoryHome.aspx), at the Exchange's Office of the
Secretary, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
In 2016, the Exchange's parent company, Cboe Global Markets, Inc.
(formerly named CBOE Holdings, Inc.) (``Cboe Global''), which is also
the parent company of Cboe C2 Exchange, Inc. (``C2''), acquired Cboe
EDGA Exchange, Inc. (``EDGA''), Cboe EDGX Exchange, Inc. (``EDGX'' or
``EDGX Options''), Cboe BZX Exchange, Inc. (``BZX'' or ``BZX
Options''), and Cboe BYX Exchange, Inc. (``BYX'' and, together with
Cboe Options, C2, EDGX, EDGA, and BZX, the ``Cboe Affiliated
Exchanges''). The Cboe Affiliated Exchanges are working to align
certain system functionality, retaining only intended differences
between the Cboe Affiliated Exchanges, in the context of a technology
migration. Cboe Options intends to migrate its trading platform to the
same system used by the Cboe Affiliated Exchanges, which the Exchange
expects to complete on October 7, 2019. Cboe Options believes offering
similar functionality to the extent practicable will reduce potential
confusion for market participants.
In connection with this technology migration, the Exchange has a
shell Rulebook that resides alongside its current Rulebook, which shell
Rulebook will contain the Rules that will be in place upon completion
of the Cboe Options technology migration.
Chapter 1
The proposed rule change amends and moves the definitions of terms
used throughout the Rules contained in current Rule 1.1 in the current
Rulebook to proposed Rule 1.1 in the shell Rulebook. While there are no
substantive changes to the majority of defined terms in Rule 1.1 being
moved to the shell structure, the proposed rule change adds or amends
the following definitions:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Corresponding Cboe
Defined term Provision Current Cboe affiliated Description of
options rule exchange rule change
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ABBO............................ best bid(s) or N/A............... C2 Rule 1.1 and Added to Rule 1.1.
offer(s) EDGX Rule
disseminated by 21.20(a)(1).
other Eligible
Exchanges \5\ and
calculated by the
Exchange based on
market
information the
Exchange receives
from OPRA.
All Sessions class.............. options class the N/A............... C2 Rule 1.1 and Adds defined term
Exchange lists EDGX Rule 16.1. for classes the
for trading Exchange lists
during RTH and for trading
GTH. during GTH and
RTH.
Book or Simple Book............. electronic book of 1.1............... BZX Rule Currently, there
simple orders and 16.1(a)(9), C2 is a separate
quotes maintained Rule 1.1, and book for each of
by the System, EDGX Rule 16.1. RTH and GTH, but
which single book following
is used during migration, there
both the RTH and will be a single
GTH trading book used for
sessions \6\. both trading
sessions, as
discussed below;
rules of Cboe
Affiliated
Exchanges have no
reference to
separate trading
sessions, as
there are no GTH
on those
exchanges.
[[Page 30268]]
Capacity........................ capacity in which N/A............... C2 Rule 1.1....... Cboe Options
a User submits an currently refers
order, which the to capacity as
User specifies by origin code;
applying the current Cboe
corresponding Options origin
code to the codes are in
order, and Regulatory
includes B Circular RG13-
(account of a 038, and are the
broker or dealer, same as the
including a proposed
Foreign Broker- Capacities,
Dealer), C except the
(Public Customer proposed rule
account), F (OCC changes W to U
clearing firm (see
proprietary specifications
account), J \7\); proposed
(joint back rule change
office account), deletes Y (orders
L (non-Trading for the account
Permit Holder of a specialist
affiliate registered in the
account), M underlying stock
(Market-Maker at the primary
account), N exchange for
(market-maker or trading the
specialist on stock), which
another options will not be
exchange), U available
(Professional following
account). migration \8\.
Cboe Trading.................... Cboe Trading, N/A............... BZX Rule 2.11, C2 Added to Rule 1.1.
Inc., broker- Rule 1.1, and
dealer affiliated EDGX Rule 2.11.
with C2 and will
serve as inbound
and outbound
router for C2, as
discussed below.
EFID............................ Executing Firm ID. N/A............... C2 Rule 1.1 and Added to Rule 1.1;
EDGX Rule 21.1(k). similar to the
term acronym,
which is used in
current Cboe
Options Rules;
EFID is the term
used in the
technical
specifications
that will apply
post-migration,
and thus is more
appropriate for
the shell
Rulebook; a firm
may have multiple
EFIDs.
Global Trading Hours or GTH..... trading session 1.1 and 6.1.01 N/A............... Added language to
consisting of the (proposed Rule clarify that GTH
hours outside of 5.1). refers to hours
Regular Trading during which
Hours (``RTH'') trading on the
during which Exchange may
transactions in occur outside of
options may be RTH.
effected on the
Exchange and are
set forth in
proposed Rule 5.1.
Index-Linked Security or ETN.... share traded on a 5.3.13............ N/A............... Added to Rule 1.1.
national
securities
exchange that is
an NMS stock and
represents
ownership of a
security that
provides for
payment at
maturity as set
forth in proposed
Rule 4.3 (current
Rule 5.3).
Market Close.................... time the Exchange N/A (market close BZX Rule 16.1, C2 Added to Rule 1.1;
specifies for the time set forth in Rule 1.1, and same as Cboe
end of a trading current Rule 6.1 EDGX Rule 16.1. Affiliated
session on the (proposed Rule Exchanges' Rules,
Exchange on that 5.1)). except proposed
trading day. rule references
the concept of a
trading session,
which does not
exist on Cboe
Affiliated
Exchanges, as
they do not have
GTH.
Market-Maker.................... TPH registered 8.1............... BZX Rule Added to Rule 1.1.
with the Exchange 16.1(a)(37), C2
pursuant to Rule 1.1, and
proposed Rule EDGX Rule 16.1.
3.52 (current
Rule 8.1) for the
purpose of making
markets in option
contracts traded
on the Exchange
and that has the
rights and
responsibilities
set forth in
proposed Chapter
5, Section D
(current Chapter
VIII) of the
Rules.
Market Open..................... time the Exchange N/A (market open BZX Rule Added to Rule 1.1;
specifies for the time set forth in 16.1(a)(35), C2 same as Cboe
start of a current rule 6.1 Rule 1.1, and Affiliated
trading session (proposed Rule EDGX Rule 16.1. Exchanges' Rules,
on the Exchange 5.1)). except proposed
on that trading rule references
day. the concept of a
trading session,
which does not
exist on Cboe
Affiliated
Exchanges, as
they do not have
GTH.
Order Entry Firm/OEF............ Trading Permit N/A............... BZX Rule Added to Rule 1.1.
Holder registered 16.1(a)(36), C2
with the Exchange Rule 1.1, and
pursuant to EDGX Rule 16.1.
proposed Rule
3.51 representing
as agent Customer
Orders on the
Exchange and non-
Market-Maker
Trading Permit
Holder conducting
proprietary
trading.
Protected Quotation............. a Protected Bid or 6.80.............. BZX Rule Added to Rule 1.1.
Protected Offer, 16.1(a)(47), C2
as each of those Rule 1.1, and
terms is defined EDGX Rule 16.1.
in proposed Rule
5.65 (current
Rule 6.80).
Quote and Quotation............. firm bid or offer 1.1............... BZX Rule Updated to reflect
a Market-Maker 16.1(a)(51), C2 the distinction
(a) submits Rule 1.1, and between
electronically EDGX Rule 16.1. electronic quotes
(including to and quotes in
update any of its open outcry
previous quotes), (consistent with
which may be current practice
updated in block and functionality
quantities, or on the Exchange).
(b) represents
for open outcry
on the trading
floor.
RTH Class....................... options class the N/A............... C2 Rule 1.1, EDGX ..................
Exchange lists Rule 16.1.
for trading
during RTH only.
Size............................ number of N/A............... BZX Rule 21.1(e), Added to Rule 1.1
contracts up to C2 Rule 1.1, and (consistent with
999,999 EDGX Rule 21.1(e). current Cboe
associated with Options system).
an order or quote.
[[Page 30269]]
System.......................... the Exchange's 1.1............... BZX Rule Deleted reference
hybrid trading 16.1(a)(59), C2 from current
platform that Rule 1.1, and definition to
integrates EDGX Rule 16.1. Hybrid, as that
electronic and relates to the
open outcry current
trading of option technology from
contracts on the which the Cboe
Exchange, and Options trading
includes any platform is being
connectivity to migrated.
the foregoing
trading platform
that is
administered by
or on behalf of
the Exchange,
such as a
communications
hub \9\.
System Securities............... options that N/A............... BZX Rule 21.1(b), Added to Rule 1.1
currently trade C2 Rule 1.1, and (additional term
on the Exchange EDGX Rule 21.1(b). for options
pursuant to listed for
proposed Chapter trading).
4 (current
Chapters 5 and
24) in the shell
Rulebook \10\.
Trade Desk...................... Exchange N/A............... N/A............... Added to Rule 1.1;
operations staff Trade Desk is new
authorized to term for Help
make certain Desk at the
trading Exchange (which
determinations on term will be
behalf of the deleted from the
Exchange. Rules).
Trading Session................. hours during which 1.1 and 6.1A(a) C2 Rule 1.1 and Moved provisions
the Exchange is and (h). EDGX Rule 16.1. from Rule 6.1A(a)
open for trading and (h) regarding
for Regular applicability of
Trading Hours or Rules during GTH
Global Trading to definition.
Hours (each of
which may be
referred to as a
trading session),
each as set forth
in proposed Rule
5.1. Unless
otherwise
specified in the
Rules or the
context otherwise
indicates, all
Rules apply in
the same manner
during each
trading session.
Underlying index................ with respect to an N/A............... N/A............... Added to Rule 1.1;
index option, consistent with
means the index index options
that is the (based on OCC By-
subject of an Laws Article
index option. 1(U)).
Underlying security............. with respect to an 1.1 and 24.1(e)... N/A............... Added provision
equity option, from Rule 24.1(e)
the security that to 1.1.
the Clearing
Corporation must
sell (in the case
of a call option
contract) or
purchase (in the
case of a put
option contract)
upon the valid
exercise of the
option contract,
and, with respect
to an index
option any of the
securities or
mutual funds that
are the basis for
the calculation
of the underlying
index.
User............................ any TPH or N/A............... BZX Rule Added to C2 Rule
Sponsored User 16.1(a)(63), C2 1.1 (common term
who is authorized Rule 1.1, and to apply to two
to obtain access EDGX Rule 16.1. types of market
to the System participants
pursuant to defined in C2
proposed Rule 5.5 Rules, which are
(current Rule the only two
6.23A) \11\. market
participants that
may access the
System under C2
Rules).
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The proposed rule change deletes current Rule 1.1 (and any other
current Rule referenced in the table above) from the current Rulebook,
as further discussed below.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ Eligible Exchange is defined in current Rule 6.80(7) and
proposed Rule 5.65(g).
\6\ The proposed rule change also deletes current Rule 6.1A(g),
which describes the separate books currently used for the RTH and
GTH sessions.
\7\ BOE Specifications, available at https://cdn.batstrading.com/resources/membership/BATS_US_Options_BOE2_Specification.pdf, and FIX
Specifications, available at https://cdn.batstrading.com/resources/membership/BATS_US_Options_BZX_FIX_Specification.pdf.
\8\ Capacity codes applicable to trading of FLEX options will be
addressed in a separate rule filing.
\9\ Rules related to orders submitted for routing to PAR for
open outcry trading will be addressed in a separate rule filing.
\10\ The Exchange will move all Rules from the current Rulebook
regarding options the Exchange is authorized to list for trading
into Chapter 4 of the shell Rulebook in a separate rule filing.
\11\ The Exchange will add provisions regarding System access
from the current Rulebook to Rule 5.5 of the shell Rulebook in a
separate rule filing.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The proposed rule change deletes the term Voluntary Professional,
as that Capacity designation will no longer be available on Cboe
Options following the technology migration. It is currently unavailable
on the Cboe Affiliated Exchanges. Within the definition of the term
Professional, the proposed rule change deletes the list of rules
pursuant to which a Professional would be treated as a broker-dealer,
which in general relate to allocation priority, but adds that a
Professional order will be handled the same as a broker-dealer order
unless the Rules specify otherwise. The definition of a Priority
Customer (which excludes Professionals) and this change to the
definition of Professional accomplish the same result, as that
definition within the applicable rules provide that Professionals will
not be treated as customers, and instead as broker-dealers. The
proposed rule change also deletes the term TPH Department, as that is
not the current name of the Exchange department that handle s
membership requirements. Additionally, the Exchange believes it is
appropriate to refer to the Exchange rather than a specific department
in the Rules, as is the case in the Cboe Affiliated Exchanges' rules.
The Rules that use that term will be updated in a separate rule filing.
Definitions for continuous electronic quotes, Exchange spread market,
and national spread market will be added to different rules in a
separate filing to conform to the location of those defined terms in
the rules of the Cboe Affiliated Exchanges. The Exchange also deletes
the definitions of Quarterly Options Series and Short Term Options
Series from Rule 1.1, as those terms are defined and explained in the
appropriate listing rules. There are other types of series the Exchange
may list that are not defined in Rule 1.1. The proposed rule change
also makes nonsubstantive changes to certain defined terms, including
to make the rule provisions plain English, update defined terms, add
cross-references to defined terms in other Rules, add clarifying
language, and update rule cross-references (to
[[Page 30270]]
reference the expected Rule number for the cross-referenced Rule).
Proposed Rule 1.5 (current Rule 1.2) states the Exchange announces
to Trading Permit Holders all determinations it makes pursuant to the
Rules via (a) specifications, Notices, or Regulatory Circulars with
appropriate advanced notice, which will be posted on the Exchange's
website, or as otherwise provided in the Rules, (b) electronic message,
or (c) other communication method as provided in the Rules. Most
current Rules indicate determinations will be made by Regulatory
Circular, which current Rule 1.2 indicates may also be made by Exchange
Notice. The Exchange will update references to Regulatory Circular
throughout the Rules in separate rule filings. Proposed Rule 1.5(b)
states to the extent the Rules allow the Exchange to make a
determination, including on a class-by-class or series-by-series basis,
the Exchange may make a determination for GTH that differs from the
determination it makes for RTH. This is consistent with current Rule
6.1A(i), which the proposed rule change deletes. This single rule
simplifies the Rules by including all provisions related to
determinations the Exchange may make within a single Rule. The Exchange
will make conforming changes throughout the Rules in separate rule
filings. The proposed rule change deletes current Rules 1.2 and 6.1A(i)
from the current Rulebook, as further discussed below.
Proposed Cboe Options Rule 1.6 of the shell Rulebook states unless
otherwise specified, all times in the Rules are Eastern Time. Current
Cboe Options Rules are generally in Chicago time. The Exchange will
update times to Eastern Time in other Rules as necessary in separate
rule filings.
The proposed rule change moves current rules related to Exchange
liability, including disclaimers and limitations, from the current
Rulebook to Chapter 1, Section C of the shell Rulebook (to be named
Exchange Liability and Disclaimers, as proposed) as follows:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number in current Rule in shell
Rule Rulebook Rulebook
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Exchange Liability Disclaimers 6.7, 20.5(a) (which 1.10
and Limitations. states 6.7 applies to
Range options, which
are a type of Index
option), 22.5(a)
(which states 6.7
applies to Binary
options, which are a
type of Index option).
Limitation on the Liability of 6.15................... 1.11
Index Licensors for Options on
Units.
Limitation on Liability of 20.5(b) (which states 1.12
Reporting Authorities for 24.14 applies to Range
Indexes Underlying Options. options, which are a
type of Index option),
22.5(b) (which states
24.14 applies to
Binary options, which
are a type of Index
option), and 24.14.
Limitation of Liability of 23.14.................. 1.13
Reporting Authority for
Interest Rate Options.
Limitation of Liability of 29.10.................. 1.14
Reporting Authority for Credit
Options.
Legal Proceedings Against the 6.7A................... 1.15
Exchange.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
These rules are virtually identical (other than updating cross-
references and defined terms), and are merely moving locations. The
proposed rule change deletes current Rules referenced in the table
above from the current Rulebook, as further discussed below.
Chapter 2
The proposed rule change moves current rules related to TPH Fees
from Chapter 2 of the current Rulebook to Chapter 2 of the shell
Rulebook as follows:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number in
Rule current Rule in shell
Rulebook Rulebook
------------------------------------------------------------------------
TPH Fees and Charges.................... 2.1 2.1
Regulatory Revenues..................... 2.4 2.2
Integrated Billing System............... 3.23 2.3
Liability for Payment................... 2.2 2.4
Exchange's Cost of Defending Legal 2.3 2.5
Proceedings............................
------------------------------------------------------------------------
These rules are virtually identical (other than updating cross-
references and defined terms), and are merely moving locations. The
proposed rule change deletes current Rules referenced in the table
above from the current Rulebook, as further discussed below.
Chapter 5
The proposed rule change moves all rule provisions in the current
Rulebook related to trading days and trading hours from the current
Rulebook (specifically, Rules 6.1, 6.1A, 20.2, 21.10, 22.2, 23.6,
24.6,\12\ 24A.2, 28.9, and 29.11) to proposed Rule 5.1(a) and (b) in
the shell Rulebook.\13\ The proposed rule change adds Rule 5.1(a),
which states the System will accept orders and quotes at times set
forth in proposed Rule 5.7 (current Rule 6.2(a)). Proposed Rule 5.1(c)
states the hours for GTH, the classes and series that may be listed
during GTH, that trading during GTH is electronic only, as well as a
[[Page 30271]]
provision regarding the dissemination of index values during GTH (which
provisions are unchanged and just moved from Rule 6.1(c) and (k),
except as described below regarding FLEX options). Currently, the
Exchange does not allow FLEX options to trade during GTH. The Exchange
has authorized FLEX options classes with the same underlying index as
options deemed eligible for trading during GTH (currently SPX, XSP, and
VIX options) to be eligible for trading during GTH, and proposed
paragraph (c)(1) includes that authorization. The Exchange believes
there may be demand from investors for FLEX options with the same
underlying indexes as the options that currently trade during GTH, and
listing FLEX option classes \14\ with these underlying indexes will
provide investors that participate in GTH with alternatives for hedging
and other investment purposes. Proposed Rule 5.1 is substantially
similar to C2 Rule 6.1 (except C2 has a shorter GTH trading session and
different GTH-eligible products are different, and proposed Rule 5.1
lists hours for additional products that are not expected to be listed
on C2). Proposed Rule 5.1 is also consistent with EDGX Rule 21.2(a). No
other substantive changes were made to these Rules. This single rule
simplifies the Rules by including all provisions related to trading
days and hours within a single Rule. The proposed rule change deletes
current Rules referenced above regarding trading days and hours from
the current Rulebook, as further discussed below.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ The Exchange proposes to delete all indexes listed in
current Rule 24.6 other than ETF-Based Volatility Indexes and S&P
Select Sector Indexes, as the Exchange does not currently list
options on those other indexes and does not intend to in the future.
\13\ Current Rule 24.6 includes conflicting language regarding
the Regular Trading Hours for ETF-Based Volatility Index options, as
paragraph (b) provides such options will trade from 8:30 a.m. until
3:00 p.m., while Interpretation and Policy .02 states they will
trade from 8:30 a.m. until 3:15 p.m., except if the closing time for
the index components is earlier. The proposed rule change deletes
ETF-Based Volatility Index options from the list of options that
will trade until 3:00 p.m., and includes the language from
Interpretation and Policy .02, as that language is accurate. Note
these options are not currently listed for trading, and if the
Exchange does list them in the future and determines they should
close at 3:00 p.m., the Exchange will submit a rule filing to make
such a change.
\14\ Because SPX, XSP, and VIX options may only be listed Cboe
and its affiliated exchanges, FLEX options on the same indexes may
also only be listed on Cboe and its affiliated exchanges.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Global Trading Hours will continue to be a separate trading session
from Regular Trading Hours, and will continue to be electronic only
trading.\15\ However, the Book used during Regular Trading Hours will
be the same Book used during Global Trading Hours. This is different
than the current trading sessions on Cboe Options, each of which use a
separate Book.\16\ There is generally reduced liquidity, higher
volatility, and wider markets during Global Trading Hours, and
investors may not want their orders or quotes to execute during Global
Trading Hours given those trading conditions. To provide investors with
flexibility to have their orders and quotes execute only during RTH, or
both RTH and GTH, the proposed rule change adds an All Sessions order
and an RTH Only order. An ``All Sessions'' order is an order a User
designates as eligible to trade during both GTH and RTH. An unexecuted
All Sessions order on the GTH Book at the end of a GTH trading session
enters the RTH Queuing Book and becomes eligible for execution during
the RTH opening rotation and trading session on that same trading day,
subject to a User's instructions.\17\ An ``RTH Only'' order is an order
a User designates as eligible to trade only during RTH or not
designated as All Sessions. An unexecuted RTH Only order with a Time-
in-Force of good-til-cancelled (``GTC'') or good-til-day (``GTD'') on
the RTH Book at the end of an RTH trading session enters the RTH
Queuing Book and becomes eligible for execution during the RTH opening
rotation and trading session on the following trading day (but not
during the GTH trading session on the following trading day), subject
to a User's instructions.\18\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\15\ See proposed Rule 5.1(c)(4) (current Rule 6.1A(b), which
the proposed rule change deletes). The proposed rule change also
deletes Rule 6.1A(j) regarding disclosures that must be made
regarding GTH trading and moves it to proposed Rule 9.20. The
proposed rule change makes no changes to this provision.
\16\ See proposed Rule 1.1, which amends the definition of Book
to mean the electronic book of simple orders and quotes maintained
by the System on which orders and quotes may execute during the
applicable trading session. The Book during GTH may be referred to
as the ``GTH Book,'' and the Book during RTH may be referred to as
the ``RTH Book.'' This is different than Cboe Options, which uses
separate books for each trading session, which are not connected.
See current Rule 6.1A(g) (which the proposed rule change deletes).
\17\ See proposed Rule 5.6(c), proposed definition of All
Sessions order. The Exchange notes the ``RTH Queuing Book'' means
the book into which Users may submit orders and quotes (and onto
which orders remaining on the Book from the previous trading session
or trading day, as applicable, are entered) during the Queuing
Period for participation in the applicable opening rotation. The
Exchange will add a definition and additional descriptions regarding
the Queuing Book to the Rules in a future rule filing. However, the
Queuing Book is equivalent to the Book into which TPHs may submit
quotes and orders during the order entry period prior to the opening
process. See current Rule 6.2.
\18\ See proposed Rule 5.6(c), proposed definition of RTH Only
order.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Because trading sessions are currently completely separate on Cboe
Options, there are not distinct order types corresponding to the
proposed RTH Only and All Sessions order instructions. An order or
quote submitted to GTH on Cboe Options may only execute during GTH, and
an order or quote submitted to RTH on Cboe Options may only execute
during RTH. The proposed RTH Only order is equivalent to any order
submitted to RTH on Cboe Options. While the Exchange is not proposing
an equivalent to an order submitted to GTH on Cboe Options, and instead
is proposing an All Sessions order, Users may still submit an
equivalent to a ``GTH only'' order by submitting an All Sessions order
with a good-til-date Time-in-Force, with a time to cancel before the
RTH market open. Therefore, Users can submit orders to participate in
either trading session, or both, and thus the proposed rule change
provides Users with the same order entry ability as well as additional
flexibility and control regarding in which trading sessions their
orders and quotes may be eligible to trade.
Generally, trading during the GTH trading session will occur in the
same manner as it occurs during the RTH trading session. However,
because the GTH market may have different characteristics than the RTH
market (such as lower trading levels, reduced liquidity, and fewer
participants), the Exchange may deem it appropriate to make different
determinations for trading rules for each trading session. Proposed
Rule 1.5(b) states to the extent the Rules allow the Exchange to make a
determination, including on a class-by-class or series-by-series basis,
the Exchange may make a determination for GTH that differs from the
determination it makes for RTH.\19\ The Exchange maintains flexibility
with respect to certain rules so that it may apply different settings
and parameters to address the specific characteristics of that class
and its market. For example, current Rule 6.45(a) allows the Exchange
to determine electronic allocation algorithms on a class-by-class
basis; \20\ and current Rule 6.53 (proposed Rule 5.6) allows the
Exchange to make certain order types, Order Instructions, and Times-in-
Force not available for all Exchange systems or classes (and unless
stated in the Rules or the context indicates otherwise, as
proposed).\21\ Because trading characteristics during RTH may be
different than those during GTH (such as lower trading levels,
[[Page 30272]]
reduced liquidity, and fewer participants), the Exchange believes it is
appropriate to extend this flexibility to each trading session. The
Exchange represents that it will continue to have appropriate personnel
available during GTH to make any determinations that Rules provide the
Exchange or Exchange personnel will make (such as trading halts,
opening series, and obvious errors).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\19\ See current Rule 6.1A(i) (which the proposed rule change
proposes to delete).
\20\ Therefore, the allocation algorithm that applies to a class
during RTH may differ from the allocation algorithm that apply to
that class during GTH.
\21\ Proposed Rule 5.6(a) explicitly state that the Exchange may
make these determinations on a trading session basis. It also states
that all order types the Exchange makes available in an All Sessions
class for RTH electronic trading are available in that class for GTH
electronic trading, except as otherwise specified in the Rules. See
current Rule 6.1A(f) (which the proposed rule change proposes to
delete). The Exchange notes Rule 6.1A(f) currently provides GTC
orders are not available during GTH. However, because the Exchange
will use the same Book for GTH and RTH, the Exchange will make
available the GTC time-in-force for GTH, as an order in an All
Sessions class with that time-in-force can remain in the Book
following the conclusion of the GTH trading session and be available
for trading during the RTH trading session.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The proposed rule change also moves Rule 6.40 regarding the unit of
trading for option series from the current Rulebook to Rule 5.2 of the
shell Rulebook, and deletes current Rule 6.40 from the current
Rulebook, as discussed below. The proposed rule change makes no
substantive changes to this Rule. The proposed rule change moves all
provisions regarding the meaning of bids and offers from the current
Rulebook (including Rules 6.41 and 6.44 (including Interpretations and
Policies .01 [sic], .02 [sic], .04 and .05) \22\ as well as Rules
20.10(a), 21.13, 22.13(a), 23.9, 24.8, 28.11, and 29.14(a) and (c)
related to the meaning of bids and offers for Range options, Government
Security options, Binary options, Corporate Debt Security options,
Interest Rate options, and Credit options, respectively) to proposed
Rule 5.3 in the shell Rulebook. The proposed rule change makes no
substantive changes to those Rules. This single rule simplifies the
Rules by including all provisions related to the meaning of bids and
offers within a single Rule. The proposed rule change deletes current
Rules referenced above regarding the meaning of bids and offers from
the current Rulebook, as further discussed below. The proposed rule
change deletes current Rules referenced in the table above from the
current Rulebook, as further discussed below. The proposed rule change
also moves all provisions regarding the minimum increments for bids and
offers (including Rule 6.42 as well as provisions in Rules 20.10(b),
21.13, 22.13(b), 23.9, 28.11, and 29.14(b) related to minimum
increments for Range options, Government Security options, Binary
options, Interest Rate options, Corporate Debt Security options, and
Credit options, respectively) to proposed Rule 5.4 in the shell
Rulebook. This single rule simplifies the Rules by including all
provisions related to minimum increments of options trading on the
Exchange within a single Rule. No substantive changes were made to
these Rules. The proposed rule change deletes current Rules referenced
above regarding minimum increments from the current Rulebook, as
further discussed below.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\22\ The Exchange will move provisions in Rules 6.41.01 and
24.8.01 related to orders with cash prices to the shell Rulebook in
separate rule filings.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The proposed rule change moves the order types currently available
on the Exchange from Rule 6.53 in the current Rulebook to proposed Rule
5.6 in the shell Rulebook. The proposed rule change makes certain
changes to conform some of the definitions to those used in the Cboe
Affiliated Exchanges' Rules, and also adds certain Order Instructions
and Times-in-Force, as described below. The introduction to proposed
Rule 5.6 states unless otherwise specified in the Rules or the context
indicates otherwise, the Exchange determines which of the following
order types, Order Instructions, and Times-in-Force are available on a
class, system, or trading session basis.\23\ The introduction also
states other Rules will list which order types, Order Instructions, and
Times-in-Force the Exchange may make available for electronic and PAR
routing (for open outcry trading), during RTH, during GTH, and for
complex orders.\24\ This is consistent with the introductory language
in current Rule 6.53(a), as well as current Rule 6.1A(i), which permits
the Exchange to make separate determinations for GTH and RTH.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\23\ As noted above, the introduction also states all order
types the Exchange makes available in an All Sessions class for RTH
electronic trading will be available in that class for GTH
electronic trading, except as otherwise specified in the Rules.
\24\ The Exchange will add Rules regarding which order types,
Order Instructions, and Times-in-Force will be available
specifically for electronic trading and PAR routing (and open outcry
trading), for GTH, and for complex orders in separate rule filings.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Corresponding
Defined term Provision Current Cboe Cboe affiliated Description of
options rule exchange rule change
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Order Type..................... orders may be market 6.53............. C2 Rule 6.10(b).. Moved to proposed
or limit orders. Rule 5.6(b).
Limit Order.................... order to buy or sell a 6.53............. BZX Rule Moved to proposed
stated number of 21.1(d)(2), C2 Rule 5.6(b);
option contracts at a Rule 6.10(b), clarified that
specified price or and EDGX Rule the order price
better; a limit order 21.1(d)(2). compared to then-
to buy (sell) is current bid or
marketable when, at offer determines
the time it enters whether the
the System, the order limit order is
price is equal to or marketable.
higher (lower) than
the then-current
offer (bid).
Market Order................... order to buy or sell a 6.1A(f) and 6.53. BZX Rule Moved to proposed
stated number of 21.1(d)(5), C2 Rule 5.6(b).
option contracts at Rule 6.10(b),
the best price and EDGX Rule
available at the time 21.1(d)(5).
of execution; Users
may not designate a
market order as All
Sessions.
Order Instruction.............. processing instruction 6.53............. BZX Rule 21.1(d), Added to Rule
a User may apply to C2 Rule 6.10(c), 5.6(c) (rules
an order (multiple and EDGX Rule currently permit
instructions may 21.1(d). various
apply to a single instructions).
order) when entering
it into the System
for electronic or
open outcry
processing, subject
to any restrictions
set forth in the
Rules.
[[Page 30273]]
All-or-None.................... order a User 6.1A(f), 6.53, EDGX Rule Moved to Rule
designates to be and 6.44.03. 21.1(d)(4). 5.6(c).
executed in whole or
not at all; an AON
order may be a market
or limit order; Users
may not designate an
AON order as All
Sessions; the
Exchange does not
disseminate bids or
offers of AON orders
to OPRA; a User may
not designate an AON
order as Post Only;
an AON limit order is
always subject to the
Price Adjust process
as set forth in
proposed Rule 5.32; a
User may apply MCN
(as defined below),
but no other MTP
Modifier (if a User
applies any other MTP
Modifier to an AON
order, the System
handles it as an
MCN), to an AON
order; the Exchange
may restrict the
entry of AON orders
in a series or class
if the Exchange deems
it necessary or
appropriate to
maintain a fair and
orderly market \25\.
Attributable................... order a User 6.53............. BZX Rule Moved to Rule
designates for 21.1(c)(1), C2 5.6(c).
display (price and Rule 6.10(c),
size) that includes and EDGX Rule
the User's EFID or 21.1(c)(1).
other unique
identifier.
Book Only...................... order the System ranks 6.53............. BZX Rule Moved to Rule
and executes pursuant 21.1(d)(7), C2 5.6(c);
to current Rule 6.45, Rule 6.10(c), currently
subjects to the to be and EDGX Rule referred to as
proposed Price Adjust 21.1(d)(7). Cboe Options
process, or cancels, Only in Rule
as applicable (in 6.53.
accordance with User
instructions),
without routing away
to another exchange.
Cancel Back.................... order a User N/A.............. C2 Rule 6.10(c) Added to Rule
designates to not be and EDGX Rule 5.6(c)
subject to the to be 11.6(b). (consistent with
proposed Price Adjust current Rule
process that the 6.82) and
System cancels or substantively
rejects (immediately similar Cboe
at the time the Affiliated
System receives the Exchanges Rules
order or upon return (further
to the System after discussed
being routed away) if below).
displaying the order
on the Book would
create a violation
current Rule
6.82,\26\ or if the
order cannot
otherwise be executed
or displayed in the
Book at its limit
price; the System
executes a Book Only--
Cancel Back order
against resting
orders, and cancels
or rejects a Post
Only--Cancel Back
order, that locks or
crosses the opposite
side of the BBO.
Combination Order.............. an order involving a 6.53............. N/A.............. Moved to Rule
number of call option 5.6(c);
contracts and the clarified that
same number of put the legs need
option contracts in not consist of
the same underlying the same number
security; in the case of contracts if
of an adjusted option the contracts
contract, a represent the
combination order same number of
need not consist of shares of the
the same number of underlying
put and call (currently says
contracts if such ``shares at
contracts both option'').
represent the same
number of shares of
the underlying.
Electronic Only................ order a User 6.53............. N/A.............. Moved to Rule
designates for 5.6(c).
electronic execution
(in whole or in part)
on the Exchange only,
and does not route to
PAR for execution in
open outcry; the
System cancels an
Electronic Only order
that would otherwise
route to PAR pursuant
to the Rules.
[[Page 30274]]
Intermarket Sweep Order/ISO.... order that has the 6.53............. BZX Rule Moved to Rule
meaning provided in 21.1(d)(10), C2 5.6(c).
current Section E of Rule 6.10(c),
Chapter 6, which may and EDGX Rule
be executed at one or 21.1(d)(9).
multiple price levels
in the System without
regard to Protected
Quotations at other
options exchanges;
the Exchange relies
on the marking of an
order by a User as an
ISO order when
handling such order,
and thus, it is the
entering Trading
Permit Holder's
responsibility, not
the Exchange's
responsibility, to
comply with the
requirements relating
to ISOs.
Match Trade Prevention/MTP order that does not 6.53............. BZX Rule 21.1(g), Moved to Rule
Modifier. execute against a C2 Rule 6.10(c), 5.6(c) and
resting opposite side and EDGX Rule conformed to
order also marked 21.1(g). Cboe Affiliated
with an MTP modifier Exchanges' rules
and originating from (further
the same EFID, discussed
Trading Permit Holder below).
identifier, trading
group identifier, or
Sponsored User
identifier (``Unique
Identifier''), with
five types of
modifiers available.
Minimum Quantity............... order that requires a 6.53 and 6.44.05. BZX Rule Moved to Rule
specified minimum 21.1(d)(3), C2 5.6(c) and
quantity of contracts Rule 6.10(c), renamed as
be executed or is and EDGX Rule minimum quantity
cancelled; Minimum 21.1(d)(3). from minimum
Quantity orders will volume; may be
only execute against eligible for
multiple, aggregated electronic
orders if such trading, in
executions would addition to open
occur simultaneously, outcry trading
and only a Book Only (currently
order with TIF minimum volume
designation of IOC orders are only
may have a Minimum eligible for
Quantity instruction open outcry
(the System trading).
disregards a Minimum
Quantity instruction
on any other order)
\27\.
Non-Attributable............... order a User N/A.............. BZX Rule Added to Rule
designates for 21.1(c)(2), C2 5.6(c); orders
display (price and Rule 6.10(c), currently not
size) on an anonymous and EDGX Rule marked
basis or not 21.1(c)(2). Attributable on
designated as an Cboe Options are
Attributable Order. non-
attributable;
proposed rule
change merely
permits Users to
affirmatively
designate orders
as non-
attributable,
and specify the
Exchange will by
default treat
orders as Non-
Attributable
unless the User
designates it as
Attributable.
Not Held....................... order marked ``not 6.53............. N/A.............. Moved to Rule
held'', ``take time'' 5.6(c).
or which bears any
qualifying notation
giving discretion as
to the price or time
at which such order
is to be executed. An
order entrusted to a
Floor Broker will be
considered a not held
order, unless
otherwise specified
by a Floor Broker's
client or the order
was received by the
Exchange
electronically and
subsequently routed
to a Floor Broker or
PAR Official pursuant
to the User's
instructions. Not
held orders and/or
``held'' orders must
be marked in a manner
and form prescribed
by the Exchange.
[[Page 30275]]
Post Only...................... order the System ranks N/A.............. BZX Rule Added to Rule
and executes pursuant 21.1(d)(8), C2 5.6(c) (further
to current Rule Rule 6.10(c), discussed
6.45,\28\ subjects to and EDGX Rule below).
the to be proposed 21.1(d)(8).
Price Adjust process,
or cancels or rejects
(including if it is
not subject to the
Price Adjust process
and locks or crosses
a Protected Quotation
of another exchange),
as applicable (in
accordance with a
User's instructions),
except the order may
not remove liquidity
from the Book or
route away to another
Exchange.
Price Adjust................... order a User N/A.............. BZX Rule 21.1(j), Added to Rule
designates to be C2 Rule 6.10(c), 5.6(c) (further
subject to the to be and EDGX Rule discussed
proposed Price Adjust 21.1(i). below).
process, or an order
a User does not
designate as Cancel
Back \29\.
QCC Order...................... initiating order to 6.53............. EDGX Rule 21.1(d) Moved to Rule
buy (sell) at least 5.6(c).
1,000 standard option
contracts or 10,000
mini-option contracts
that is identified as
being part of a
qualified contingent
trade coupled with a
contra-side order or
orders totaling an
equal number of
contracts. QCC orders
with one option leg
may only be entered
in the standard
increments applicable
to simple orders in
the options class
under Rule 5.4. QCC
orders with more than
one option leg may be
entered in the
increments specified
for complex orders
under Rule 5.4; QCC
orders may execute
without exposure
subject to certain
requirements.
Ratio Order.................... a spread, straddle, or 6.53............. N/A.............. Moved to Rule
combination order in 5.6(c).
which the stated
number of option
contracts to buy
(sell) is not equal
to the stated number
of option contracts
to sell (buy),
provided that the
number of contracts
differ by a
permissible ratio;
for purposes of the
Rules, a permissible
ratio is any ratio
that is equal to or
greater than one-to-
three (.333) and less
than or equal to
three-to-one (3.00);
for example, a one-to-
two (.5) ratio, a two-
to-three (.667)
ratio, or a two-to-
one (2.00) ratio is
permissible, whereas
a one-to-four (.25)
ratio or a four-to-
one (4.0) ratio is
not.
Reserve Order.................. limit order with both 6.53............. BZX Rule Moved to Rule
a portion of the 21.1(d)(1), C2 5.6(c) and
quantity displayed Rule 6.10(c), conformed to
(``Display and EDGX Rule Cboe Affiliated
Quantity'') and a 21.1(d)(1). Exchanges rules
reserve portion of (further
the quantity discussed
(``Reserve below).
Quantity'') not
displayed; both
display quantity and
reserve quantity are
available for
potential execution
against incoming
orders, with Max
Floor and
replenishment
instructions
available \30\.
Spread......................... order to buy a stated 6.53............. N/A.............. Moved to Rule
number of option 5.6(c);
contracts and to sell clarified that
the same number of the contracts
option contracts, or may represent
contracts the same number
representing the same of shares of the
number of shares as underlying
the underlying, of (currently says
the same class of ``shares at
options. option'').
Stop (Stop-Loss) Order......... order to buy (sell) 6.1A(f) and BZX Rule Moved to Rule
that becomes a market 6.10(c)(3). 21.1(d)(11), C2 5.6(c); modified
order when the Rule 6.10(c), to compare stop
consolidated last and EDGX Rule prices to
sale price (excluding 21.1(d)(11). national prices
prices from complex rather than
order trades if Exchange prices
outside the NBBO) or (BZX, EDGX, and
NBB (NBO) for a C2 similarly use
particular option the NBBO), which
contract is equal to reflect prices
or above (below) the from the entire
stop price specified market.
by the User; Users
may not designate a
Stop Order as All
Sessions.
[[Page 30276]]
Stop-Limit Order............... order to buy (sell) 6.1A(f) and 6.53. BZX Rule Moved to Rule
that becomes a limit 21.1(d)(12), C2 5.6(c); modified
order when the Rule 6.10(c), to compare stop
consolidated last and EDGX Rule prices to
sale price (excluding 21.1(d)(12). national prices
prices from complex rather than
order trades if Exchange prices
outside the NBBO) or (BZX, C2, and
NBB (NBO) for a EDGX similarly
particular option use the NBBO),
contract is equal to which reflect
or above (below) the prices from the
stop price specified entire market.
by the User; Users
may not designate a
Stop-Limit Order as
All Sessions.
Straddle....................... order to buy a number 6.53............. N/A.............. Moved to Rule
of call option 5.6(c);
contracts and the clarified that
same number of put the contracts
option contracts on may represent
the same underlying the same number
security which of shares of the
contracts have the underlying
same exercise price (currently says
and expiration date; ``shares at
or an order to sell a option'').
number of call option
contracts and the
same number of put
option contracts on
the same underlying
security which
contracts have the
same exercise price
and expiration date
(e.g., an order to
buy two XYZ July 50
calls and to buy two
July 50 XYZ puts is a
straddle order) In
the case of adjusted
option contracts, a
straddle order need
not consist of the
same number of put
and call contracts if
such contracts both
represent the same
number of shares of
the underlying.
Time-in-Force.................. period of time the 6.53(d).......... BZX Rule 21.1(f), Moved to Rule
System will hold an C2 Rule 6.10(d), 5.6(d).
order for potential and EDGX Rule
execution; or quote 21.1(f).
for potential
execution; unless
otherwise specified
in the Rules or the
context indicates
otherwise, the
Exchange determines
which of the
following Times-in-
Force are available
on a class, system,
or trading session
basis; current Rule
6.53C (which the
Exchange intends to
update and move to
Rule 5.33 in the
shell Rulebook) will
set forth the Times-
in-Force the Exchange
may make available
for complex orders.
Day............................ time-in-force that 6.53(d).......... BZX Rule Moved to Rule
means an order to buy 21.1(f)(3), C2 5.6(d).
or sell that, if not Rule 6.10(d),
executed, expires at and EDGX Rule
the RTH market close. 21.1(f)(3).
Fill-or-Kill/FOK............... time-in-force that 6.53(d) and BZX Rule Moved to Rule
means an order that 6.44.04. 21.1(f)(5), C2 5.6(d).
is to be executed in Rule 6.10(d),
its entirety as soon and EDGX Rule
as the System 21.1(f)(5).
receives it and, if
not so executed,
cancelled; the System
considers an FOK
order to be an AON
order.
Good-til-Cancelled/GTC......... time-in-force that 6.53(d).......... BZX Rule Moved to Rule
means, if after entry 21.1(f)(4), C2 5.6(d).
into the System, the Rule 6.10(d),
order is not fully and EDGX Rule
executed, the order 21.1(f)(4).
(or unexecuted
portion) remains
available for
potential display or
execution (with the
same timestamp)
unless cancelled by
the entering User, or
until the option
expires, whichever
comes first.
Good-til-Date/GTD.............. time-in-force that N/A.............. BZX Rule Added to Rule
means, if after entry 21.1(f)(1, C2 5.6(d); similar
into the System, the Rule 6.10(d), to GTC orders,
order is not fully and EDGX Rule except it
executed, the order 21.1(f)(1). provides Users
(or unexecuted with additional
portion) remains flexibility to
available for have an order
potential display or automatically
execution (with the cancel at a
same timestamp) until specific time on
a date and time a specific date,
specified by the rather than
entering User unless manually cancel
cancelled by the a GTC order at
entering User. that time
(similar to Cboe
Affiliated
Exchanges'
rules).
[[Page 30277]]
Immediate-or-Cancel/IOC........ time-in-force for a 6.53(d).......... BZX Rule Moved to Rule
limit order that is 21.1(f)(2), C2 5.6(d).
to be executed in Rule 6.10(d),
whole or in part as and EDGX Rule
soon as the System 21.1(f)(2).
receives it; the
System cancels and
does not post to the
Book any portion of
an IOC order (or
unexecuted portion)
not executed
immediately on the
Exchange or another
options exchange.
Limit-on-Close/LOC............. a limit order that may 6.1A(f) and ................. Moved to Rule
not execute on the 6.53(d). 5.6(d) and
Exchange until three separated from
minutes prior to RTH MOC definition;
market close; at that updated (as
time, the System discussed
enters LOC orders below).
into the Book in time
sequence (based on
the times at which
the System initially
received them), where
they may be processed
in accordance with
current Rule 6.45 (to
be moved to Rule 5.32
in the shell
Rulebook); the System
cancels an LOC order
(or unexecuted
portion) that does
not execute by the
RTH market close;
Users may not
designate an LOC
order as All Sessions.
Market on Close/MOC............ a market order that 6.1A(f) and ................. Moved to Rule
may not execute on 6.53(d). 5.6(d) and
the Exchange until separated from
three minutes prior LOC definition;
to RTH market close; updated (as
at that time, the discussed
System enters MOC below).
orders into the Book
in time sequence
(based on the times
at which the System
initially received
them), where they may
be processed in
accordance with
current Rule 6.45 (to
be moved to Rule 5.32
in the shell
Rulebook); the System
cancels an MOC order
(or unexecuted
portion) that does
not execute by the
RTH market close;
Users may not
designate an MOC
order as All Sessions.
At the Open/OPG................ time-in-force means an 6.53(d).......... BXZ Rule Moved to Rule
order that may only 21.1(f)(6), C2 5.6(d).
participate in the Rule 6.10(d),
Opening Process on and EDGX Rule
the Exchange; the 21.1(f)(6).
System cancels an OPG
order (or unexecuted
portion) that does
not execute during
the Opening Process.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\25\ In addition to determining the availability of AONs on a
class basis, the Exchange may restrict the entry of AONs on a series
basis when it deems necessary to maintain a fair and orderly market.
This is consistent with current Rules 6.44.03 and 6.53, which the
proposed rule change deletes from the current Rulebook. The Exchange
will describe the proposed price adjust process in a future rule
filing, but it will be equivalent to the price adjust process
described in EDGX Rule 21.1(i).
\26\ The Exchange intends to move Rule 6.82 from the current
Rulebook to Rule 5.67 in the shell Rulebook in a separate rule
filing. The substance of the rule will not change.
\27\ The proposed rule change deletes Rule 6.44, Interpretation
and Policy .05. As noted above, the Exchange will make Minimum
Quantity orders available for electronic trading (currently, the
Exchange only makes these orders available for open outcry trading).
Additionally, because Minimum Quantity orders will be IOC (and thus
not rest in the Book), there is no need to address the priority of
Minimum Quantity orders.
\28\ The Exchange intends to move Rule 6.45 from the current
Rulebook to Rule 5.32 in the shell Rulebook in a separate rule
filing. The rule will remain substantively the same.
\29\ See BZX Rule 21.1(i), C2 Rule 6.12(b), and EDGX Rule
21.1(i) for a description of the Price Adjust process, which the
Exchange will propose to add to the shell Rulebook in a separate
filing.
\30\ The Exchange will move provisions related to the priority
of Reserve Orders in a separate filing.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The proposed rule change also makes nonsubstantive changes to the
definitions of certain order types, Order Instructions, and Times-in-
Force, including to make the rule provisions plain English, update
defined terms, and add clarifying language. The Exchange will also add
appropriate cross-references in the definitions of order types, Order
Instructions, and Times-in-Force as the applicable cross-referenced
Rules are moved from the current Rulebook to the shell Rulebook. The
proposed rule change deletes current Rules in the above table from the
current Rulebook, as further discussed below.
As noted above, the proposed rule change adds the following Order
Instructions to proposed Rule 5.6(c), which are currently available on
the Cboe Affiliated Exchanges, as indicated above.
AON: The Exchange currently permits AON orders.\31\ The
proposed rule change does not permit a User to designate an AON order
as Post Only.\32\ An AON order's size contingency, and the fact that
AON orders have last priority while resting in the Book,\33\ will
provide AON orders resting on the Book with few opportunities for AON
orders to receive an execution. Additionally, Post Only orders are
intended to add displayed liquidity to the Book; because AON orders are
not displayed, the purpose of a Post Only instruction conflicts with
AON functionality. For these reasons, the Exchange believes there will
be minimal investor demand for Post Only AON orders.\34\ The
[[Page 30278]]
Exchange believes it is appropriate to not restrict the opportunities
for execution of an AON order to the minimal execution opportunities
that would exist for an AON order while resting on the Book. This
ensures that an AON order may execute upon entry if there is sufficient
size resting on the Book, as well as have an opportunity for execution
if it cannot so execute.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\31\ See Rule 6.53.
\32\ As discussed below, a Post Only order may not, among other
things, remove liquidity from the Book.
\33\ See Rule 6.45.
\34\ Cboe Options does not currently offer a Post Only
instruction. Additionally, other exchanges, such as ISE and NOM,
only permit AON orders to be entered as IOC, and thus AON orders at
those options exchanges would only execute upon entry and never rest
on the book (and thus Post Only, if available on those exchanges,
would not be permitted).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Additionally, the proposed rule change only permits Users to apply
MCN (MTP cancel newest), but no other MTP Modifiers, to an AON
order.\35\ Proposed Rule 5.6(c) provides that an incoming order marked
with the MCN Modifier will not execute against opposite side resting
interest market with any MTP modifier originating from the same Unique
Identifier. The incoming order marked with the MCN modifier will be
cancelled back to the originating User(s). The resting order marked
with an MTP modifier will remain on the Book. The Exchange believes
there will be little demand for the use of any MTP Modifiers on AON
orders given that primarily retail investors submit AONs, and retail
investors are unlikely to have interest on both sides of the market.
Therefore, orders of different retail investors would have the
opportunity to execute against each other, unlike a broker who may have
orders resting on both sides of the market and may want to avoid those
orders executing against each other. Therefore, the Exchange believes
offering one MTP Modifier for AON orders is sufficient. The Exchange
believes MCN is the most appropriate MTP modifier for AON orders,
because it is the simplest modifier to implement from a System
perspective and an offering of other MTP modifier for investors would
present significant technical complexities given the size contingency
of AON orders.\36\ Additionally, the Exchange has determined to handle
an AON order with any other MTP Modifier as an MCN rather than cancel
the AON, because the proposed rules provide investors with sufficient
transparency regarding how the System will handle AON orders with MTP
Modifiers, and Users may achieve other results manually if so desired.
For example, if User were to prefer to have a resting order with an MTP
Modifier cancel and let the newer AON order rest, it could manually
cancel the resting order and then resubmit the AON order.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\35\ If a User applies any other MTP Modifier to an AON order,
the System will handle it as an MCN).
\36\ Additionally, the Decrement and Cancel MTP Modifier is
inconsistent with an AON order, because it may result in partial
execution of an order.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange currently only offers match trade prevention only for
market-makers, and thus the current rules regarding AON orders contains
no restrictions on the use of match trade prevention instructions, as
it would only be available to market-makers that submit AON orders.
Because the Exchange will have match-trade prevention functionality
available for all Users (as proposed) and not just Market-Makers, the
Exchange believes it is appropriate to provide this functionality to
all Users that submit AON orders and want match trade prevention
functionality. The rules of other exchanges are also silent on whether
any match trade prevention instructions are available for AON orders.
Cancel Back: A Book Only or Post Only order a User
designates to not be subject to the Price Adjust Process (which the
Exchange will add to the shell Rulebook in a separate filing), which
the System cancels or rejects if it locks or crosses the opposite side
of the ABBO. The System executes a Book Only--Cancel Back order against
resting orders, and cancels or rejects a Post Only--Cancel Back order,
that locks or crosses the opposite side of the BBO. The proposed
functionality is partially included in the definition of Post Only in
the BZX and EDGX rules,\37\ and substantially similar to C2 Rule
6.10(c). The proposed rule change is also consistent with linkage
rules. Book Only orders and Post Only orders do not route by
definition, and the Cancel Back instruction provides an option for
Users to determine how these non-routable orders will be handled within
the System, consistent with their definitions.\38\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\37\ See BZX Rule 21.6(d)(8); and EDGX Rule 21.6(d)(8).
\38\ C2 Rule 6.10(c) contains a substantively similar Cancel
Back instruction. EDGX Rule 11.6(b) (which relates to the EDGX
Equities market) contains a similar Cancel Back instruction.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Match Trade Prevention (MTP) Modifiers: Current Rule
6.53(c) defines a Market-Maker Trade Prevention Order as an IOC order
market with the Market-Maker Trade Prevention designation. A Market-
Maker Trade Prevention Order that would trade against a resting quote
or order for the same Market-Maker will be cancelled, as will the
resting quote or order (unless the Market-Maker Trade Prevention Order
is received while an order for the same Market-Maker is subject to an
auction, in which case only the Market-Maker Trade Prevention Order
will be cancelled). The Exchange proposes to adopt MTP modifiers
substantively the same as those available on the Cboe Affiliated
Exchanges.\39\ The proposed MTP modifiers expand this functionality to
all Users, rather than just Market-Makers, and provide Users with
multiple options regarding how the System handles orders with the same
Unique Identifiers. Pursuant to the proposed rule change, an order
designated with any MTP modifier is not executed against a resting
opposite side order also designated with an MTP modifier and
originating from the same Unique Identifier. Except for the MDC
modifier described below, the MTP modifier on the incoming order
controls the interaction between two orders marked with MTP modifiers:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\39\ See BZX Rule 21.1(g), C2 Rule 6.10(c), and EDGX Rule
21.1(g).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
[cir] MTP Cancel Newest (``MCN''): An incoming order marked with
the ``MCN'' modifier does not execute against a resting order marked
with any MTP modifier originating from the same Unique Identifier. The
System cancels or rejects the incoming order, and the resting order
remains in the Book.
[cir] MTP Cancel Oldest (``MCO''): An incoming order marked with
the ``MCO'' modifier does not execute against a resting order marked
with any MTP modifier originating from the same Unique Identifier. The
System cancels or rejects the resting order, and processes the incoming
order in accordance with current Rule 6.45 (which the Exchange will
move to the shell Rulebook in a separate filing).
[cir] MTP Decrement and Cancel (``MDC''): An incoming order marked
with the ``MDC'' modifier does not execute against a resting order
marked with any MTP modifier originating from the same Unique
Identifier. If both orders are equivalent in size, the System cancels
or rejects both orders. If the orders are not equivalent in size, the
System cancels or rejects the smaller of the two orders and decrements
the size of the larger order by the size of the smaller order, which
remaining balance remains on or processes in accordance with the
equivalent of current Rule 6.45 (which the Exchange will move to the
shell Rulebook in a separate filing), as applicable. Notwithstanding
the foregoing, unless a User instructs the Exchange not to do so, the
System cancels or rejects both orders if the resting order is marked
with any MTP modifier other than MDC and the incoming order is smaller
in size than the resting order.
[cir] MTP Cancel Both (``MCB''): An incoming order marked with the
``MCB'' modifier does not execute against a
[[Page 30279]]
resting order marked with any MTP modifier originating from the same
Unique Identifier. The System cancels or rejects both orders.
[cir] MTP Cancel Smallest (``MCS''): An incoming order marked with
the ``MCS'' modifier does not execute against a resting order marked
with any MTP modifier originating from the same Unique Identifier. If
both orders are equivalent in size, the System cancels or rejects both
orders. If the orders are not equivalent in size, the System cancels or
rejects the smaller of the two orders, and the larger order remains on
the Book or processes in accordance with the equivalent of current Rule
6.45 (which the Exchange will move to the shell Rulebook in a separate
filing), as applicable.
The proposed MTP functionality is designed to prevent market
participants from unintentionally causing a proprietary self-trade. The
Exchange believes these modifiers will allow firms to better manage
order flow and prevent undesirable executions with themselves. Trading
Permit Holders may have multiple connections into the Exchange
consistent with their business needs and function. As a result, orders
routed by the same firm via different connections may, in certain
circumstances, trade against each other. The proposed modifiers provide
Trading Permit Holders with functionality (in addition to what is
available on Cboe Options today) with the opportunity to prevent these
potentially undesirable trades. The Exchange notes that offering the
MTP modifiers may streamline certain regulatory functions by reducing
false positive results that may occur on Exchange generated wash
trading surveillance reports when orders are executed under the same
Unique Identifier. For these reasons, the Exchange believes the MTP
modifiers offer users enhanced order processing functionality that may
prevent potentially undesirable executions without negatively impacting
broker-dealer best execution obligations.
Post Only Order: An order the System ranks and executes
pursuant to current Rule 6.45 (which the Exchange will move to the
shell Rulebook in a separate filing), subjects to the Price Adjust
process, or cancels (including if it is not subject to the Price Adjust
process and it would lock or cross a Protected Quotation on another
exchange), as applicable (in accordance with User instructions), except
the order may not remove liquidity from the Book or route away to
another Exchange. This proposed instructions is nearly identical to the
Cboe Options Only order instruction (the Book Only order instruction as
proposed), except it will also not remove liquidity from the Book. This
proposed instruction provides Users with flexibility to submit an order
to add liquidity to the Book without interacting with then-currently
resting interest and incurring applicable taker fees.
Reserve Order: A limit order with both a portion of the
quantity displayed (``Display Quantity'') and a reserve portion of the
quantity (``Reserve Quantity'') not displayed. Both the Display
Quantity and Reserve Quantity of the Reserve Order are available for
potential execution against incoming orders. When entering a Reserve
Order, a User must instruct the Exchange as to the quantity of the
order to be initially displayed by the System (``Max Floor''). If the
Display Quantity of a Reserve Order is fully executed, the System will,
in accordance with the User's instruction, replenish the Display
Quantity from the Reserve Quantity using one of the below replenishment
instructions. If the remainder of an order is less than the
replenishment amount, the System will display the entire remainder of
the order. The System creates a new timestamp for both the Display
Quantity and Reserve Quantity of the order each time it is replenished
from reserve.
[cir] Random Replenishment: An instruction that a User may attach
to an order with Reserve Quantity where the System randomly replenishes
the Display Quantity for the order with a number of contracts not
outside a replenishment range, which equals the Max Floor plus and
minus a replenishment value established by the User when entering a
Reserve Order with a Random Replenishment instruction.
[cir] Fixed Replenishment: For any order for that a User does not
select Random Replenishment, the System will replenish the Display
Quantity of an order with the number of contracts equal to the Max
Floor.
Current Rule 6.53(c) describes current reserve order functionality
available on the Exchange. The proposed functionality is generally the
same as the current functionality but enhances the use of reserve
orders by providing flexibility for Users to determine whether the
reserve replenishment amount is fixed or random. This proposed
functionality is substantively the same as that available on the Cboe
Affiliated Exchanges.\40\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\40\ See BZX Rule 21.1(d)(1), C2 Rule 6.10(c), and EDGX Rule
21.1(d)(1).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The proposed rule change also modifies and adds detail to the
definitions of MOC and LOC orders. Currently, an MOC order is a market
or limit order to be executed as close as possible to the close of the
market near to or at the closing price for the particular option
series. The proposed rule change specifies that an MOC or LOC may not
execute on the Exchange until three minutes prior to RTH market
close.\41\ The System enters LOC and MOC orders into the Book in time
sequence (based on the times at which the Exchange initially received
them), where they may be processed in accordance with current Rule 6.45
(which the Exchange intends to move to Rule 5.32 in the shell
Rulebook).\42\ The Exchange notes that it does not have a closing
auction in which market participants may participate in an auction
rotation that determines the closing price for a series, like that of
the equities space, but that the proposed MOC and LOC orders merely
become executable three minutes prior to the close of RTH. The Exchange
queues LOC and MOC orders in the System until three minutes before the
RTH market close. At that time, the System handles a LOC or MOC order
as a limit order or market order, as applicable, and processes them in
accordance with Rule 6.45. The Exchange believes that three minutes
prior to the RTH market close is a reasonable time prior to the market
close to trigger MOC and LOC orders, as it provides those orders with
sufficient time to interact with contra-side interest and potentially
execute at a time close to the RTH market close. The proposed LOC and
MOC order definitions also provide that the System cancels an LOC order
or an MOC order (or an unexecuted portion of an LOC or MOC order) that
does not execute by the RTH market close. This is consistent with
current functionality and the purpose of these orders, which is to
execute near the RTH market close on the day they were submitted to the
Exchange. As the execution of MOC and LOC orders is linked to the RTH
market close, such orders will be valid only during RTH; however, the
System will accept such orders during any trading session.\43\ A User
may not designate an MOC or LOC order as ``All Sessions''; any MOC or
LOC order designated as All Sessions will be rejected.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\41\ The Exchange currently triggers MOC and LOC orders three
minutes prior to the RTH market close.
\42\ Rule 6.45 describes how the System processes orders and
quotes in the Book.
\43\ The Exchange notes that an RTH Only MOC or LOC order
submitted during GTH will remain on the book until the close of RTH.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The proposed rule change deletes the definition of a market-if-
touched order and a facilitation order, as those order
[[Page 30280]]
types are not currently available on the Exchange and will not be
available following the technology migration. The Exchange will move
the definitions of an AIM Sweep order and Sweep and AIM order to the
shell Rulebook in separate rule filings.
Deletion of Current Rules
As noted above, to the extent the proposed rule change moves
current Rules from the current Rulebook to the shell Rulebook, the
proposed rule change also deletes those current Rules from the current
Rulebook (as noted above, some rules will be moved to the shell
Rulebook in future rule filings). However, these Rules will remain in
effect and on the current Rulebook until completion of the technology
migration, at which time the Rules in the shell Rulebook will take
effect.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the ``Act'') and the rules and
regulations thereunder applicable to the Exchange and, in particular,
the requirements of Section 6(b) of the Act.\44\ Specifically, the
Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with the
Section 6(b)(5) \45\ requirements that the rules of an exchange be
designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to
promote just and equitable principles of trade, to foster cooperation
and coordination with persons engaged in regulating, clearing,
settling, processing information with respect to, and facilitating
transactions in securities, to remove impediments to and perfect the
mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system, and,
in general, to protect investors and the public interest. Additionally,
the Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with the
Section 6(b)(5) \46\ requirement that the rules of an exchange not be
designed to permit unfair discrimination between customers, issuers,
brokers, or dealers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\44\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
\45\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
\46\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In particular, the proposed rule changes are generally intended to
add or align certain system functionality currently offered by the
Exchange and the Cboe Affiliated Exchanges in order to provide a
consistent technology offering for the Cboe Affiliated Exchanges. A
consistent technology offering, in turn, will simplify the technology
implementation, changes and maintenance by Users of the Exchange that
are also participants on Cboe Affiliated Exchanges. The proposed rule
change does not propose to implement new or unique functionality that
has not been previously filed with the Commission or is not available
on Cboe Affiliated Exchanges. The Exchange notes that the proposed rule
text is generally based on rules of Cboe Affiliated Exchanges and is
different only to the extent necessary to conform to the Exchange's
current rules, retain intended differences based on the Exchange's
market model, or make other nonsubstantive changes to simplify,
clarify, eliminate duplicative language, or make the rule provisions
plain English.
To the extent a proposed rule change is based on an existing Cboe
Affiliated Exchange rule, the language of Exchange Rules and Cboe
Affiliated Exchange rules may differ to extent necessary to conform
with existing Exchange rule text or to account for details or
descriptions included in the Exchange's Rules but not in the applicable
Cboe Affiliated Exchange rule, such as references to trading sessions,
which apply to the Exchange but not the Cboe Affiliated Exchanged, as
they do not have Global Trading Hours. Where possible, the Exchange has
substantively mirrored Cboe Affiliated Exchange rules, because
consistent rules will simplify the regulatory requirements and increase
the understanding of the Exchange's operations for Trading Permit
Holders that are also participants on Cboe Affiliated Exchanges. The
proposed rule change would provide greater harmonization between the
rules of the Cboe Affiliated Exchanges, resulting in greater uniformity
and less burdensome and more efficient regulatory compliance. As such,
the proposed rule change would foster cooperation and coordination with
persons engaged in facilitating transactions in securities and would
remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open
market and a national market system. The Exchange also believes that
the proposed amendments will contribute to the protection of investors
and the public interest by making the Exchange's Rules easier to
understand.
The proposed rule change clearly identifies the ways in which
trading during Regular Trading Hours will different from trading during
Global Trading Hours (such as identifying order types and instructions
that will not be available during Global Trading Hours). This ensures
that investors will continue to be aware of any differences among
trading sessions. The flexibility the Exchange maintains to make
determinations for each trading session will allow the Exchange to
apply settings and parameters to address the different market
conditions that may be present during each trading session.
The proposed All Sessions order and RTH Only order will protect
investors by permitting investors who do not wish to trade during
Global Trading Hours from having orders or quotes execute during those
orders. Consistent with the goal of investor protection, the Exchange
will not allow market orders during Global Trading Hours due to the
expected increased volatility and decreased liquidity during these
hours. The other proposed Order Instructions and Times-in-Force not
currently available on the Exchange add functionality currently offered
by Cboe Affiliated Exchanges in order to provide consistent order
handling options across the Cboe Affiliated Exchanges. The proposed
rule changes would also provide Users with access to optional
functionality that may result in the efficient execution of such orders
and will provide additional flexibility as well as increased
functionality to the Exchange's System and its Users. As explained
above, the proposed functionality is substantially similar to
functionality on Cboe Affiliated Exchanges, and is optional for Users.
The proposed rule change would provide greater harmonization between
the order handling instructions available amongst the Cboe Affiliated
Exchanges, resulting in greater uniformity and less burdensome and more
efficient regulatory compliance. With respect to the proposed MTP
modifier functionality, the Exchange believes the various proposed
modifier options would allow firms to better manage order flow and
prevent undesirable executions against themselves, and the proposed
change described herein enhances the choices available to such firms in
how they do so. The proposed rule change also is designed to support
the principles of Section 11A(a)(1) of the Act \47\ in that it seeks to
assure fair competition among brokers and dealers and among exchange
markets. The proposed rule change would also provide Users with access
to functionality that may result in the efficient execution of such
orders and will provide additional flexibility as well as increased
functionality to the Exchange's System and its Users.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\47\ 15 U.S.C. 78k-1(a)(1).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange believes not permitting Users to apply the Post Only
instruction to AON orders will protect investors, because it will
maximize execution opportunities for AON orders. An AON order's size
contingency, and the fact
[[Page 30281]]
that AON orders will have last priority while resting in the Book, will
provide AON orders resting on the Book with few opportunities for AON
orders to receive an execution. Additionally, Post Only orders are
intended to add displayed liquidity to the Book; because AON orders are
not displayed, the purpose of a Post Only instruction conflicts with
AON functionality. For these reasons, the Exchange believes there will
be minimal investor demand for Post Only AON orders. This ensures that
an AON order may execute upon entry if there is sufficient size resting
on the Book. Additionally, as noted above, other exchanges do not
permit AON orders to rest in the book at all (as they are required to
be IOC).\48\ Unlike those exchanges, the Exchange will permit AON
orders to rest in the Book, and will merely not permit AON orders to
only rest in the book. Cboe Options does not currently offer a Post
Only instruction, and therefore, an AON order submitted to Cboe Options
pursuant to the proposed rule change will be handled in the same manner
as it is handled today, as such an order would execute upon entry (if
possible), route (if eligible), or enter the Book (subject to any User
instructions).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\48\ See, e.g., ISE Rule 715(c); NOM Chapter VI, section
1(e)(10); and Phlx Rule 1066(c)(4).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange believes the proposed rule change to offer use of the
MCN Modifier (and not the other MTP Modifiers) for AON orders protects
investors, because it provides all investors with the option to apply
match-trade prevention functionality to AON orders. The Exchange
believes there will be little demand for the use of any MTP Modifiers
on AON orders given that primarily retail investors submit AONs, and
retail investors are unlikely to have interest on both sides of the
market. Therefore, orders of different retail investors would have the
opportunity to execute against each other, unlike a broker who may have
orders resting on both sides of the market and may want to avoid those
orders executing against each other. Therefore, the Exchange believes
offering one MTP Modifier for AON orders is sufficient. Given this
expected minimal demand, the Exchange believes offering one MTP
Modifier for AON orders is sufficient. Additionally, the Exchange
believes that MCN is the most appropriate MTP modifier for AON orders
because an offering of other MTP modifier for investors would present
significant technical complexities given the size contingency of AON
orders and that MCN is the simplest modifier to implement from a System
perspective.\49\ The proposed rules provide investors with sufficient
transparency regarding how the System will handle AON orders with MTP
Modifiers, and Users may achieve other results manually if so desired.
For example, if a User were to prefer to have a resting order with an
MTP Modifier cancel and let the newer AON order rest, it could manually
cancel the resting order and then resubmit the AON order. The Exchange
has determined to handle an AON order with any other MTP Modifier as an
MCN rather than cancel the AON, and the Exchange believes the proposed
rules will protect investors because they provide investors with
sufficient transparency regarding how the System will handle AON orders
with MTP Modifiers. Additionally, Users may achieve other results
manually if so desired.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\49\ Additionally, the Decrement and Cancel MTP Modifier is
inconsistent with an AON order, because it may result in partial
execution of an order.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The proposed changes to the definitions of MOC and LOC orders will
benefit investors, as they provide additional transparency in the Rules
regarding how the System handles these orders. The proposed changes are
consistent with current functionality.
The proposed rule change makes no substantive changes to the other
current Rules being moved from the current Rulebook to the shell
Rulebook. The proposed rule change makes various nonsubstantive changes
throughout the Rules, which the Exchange believes will protect
investors and benefit market participants, as these changes simplify or
clarify rules, update defined terms, use plain English, and conform
language to corresponding Cboe Affiliated Exchange rules as
appropriate.
As described above, the basis for the majority of the substantive
proposed rule changes in this filing are the approved rules of Cboe
Affiliated Exchanges, which have already been found to be consistent
with the Act. For instance, the Exchange does not believe that any of
the proposed Order Instructions or Times-in-Force raise any new or
novel issues that have not previously been considered by the
Commission.
Thus, the Exchange further believes that the functionality that it
proposes to offer is consistent with Section 6(b)(5) of the Act,
because the System upon the technology migration is designed to
continue to be efficient and its operation transparent, thereby
facilitating transactions in securities, removing impediments to and
perfecting the mechanism of a free and open market and a national
market system.
When Cboe Options migrates to the same technology as that of the
Cboe Affiliated Exchanges, Users of the Exchange and other Cboe
Affiliated Exchanges will have access to similar functionality on all
Cboe Affiliated Exchanges and similar language can be incorporated into
the rules of all Cboe Affiliated Exchanges. As such, the proposed rule
change would foster cooperation and coordination with persons engaged
in facilitating transactions in securities and would remove impediments
to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national
market system.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. The Exchange reiterates that
the proposed rule change is being proposed in the context of the
technology integration of the Cboe Affiliated Exchanges. Thus, the
Exchange believes this proposed rule change is necessary to permit fair
competition among national securities exchanges. In addition, the
Exchange believes the proposed rule change will benefit Exchange
participants in that it will provide a consistent technology offering
for Users by the Cboe Affiliated Exchanges. Following the technology
migration, the proposed Rules being added to the shell Rulebook will
apply to all Users and orders submitted by Users in the same manner. As
discussed above, the basis for most of the substantive proposed rule
changes in this filing are the approved rules of Cboe Affiliated
Exchanges, which have already been found to be consistent with the Act.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
The Exchange neither solicited nor received comments on the
proposed rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Because the foregoing proposed rule change does not:
A. Significantly affect the protection of investors or the public
interest;
B. impose any significant burden on competition; and
C. become operative for 30 days from the date on which it was
filed, or such
[[Page 30282]]
shorter time as the Commission may designate, it has become effective
pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \50\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(6)
\51\ thereunder.\52\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\50\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
\51\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
\52\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6). In addition, Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii)
requires a self-regulatory organization to give the Commission
written notice of its intent to file the proposed rule change, along
with a brief description and text of the proposed rule change, at
least five business days prior to the date of filing of the proposed
rule change, or such shorter time as designated by the Commission.
The Exchange has satisfied this requirement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission
takes such action, the Commission will institute proceedings to
determine whether the proposed rule change should be approved or
disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an email to [email protected]. Please include
File Number SR-CBOE-2019-027 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-CBOE-2019-027. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's internet website (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml).
Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written
statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with
the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed
rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those
that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions
of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and printing in
the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC
20549 on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and
3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection
and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change. Persons submitting comments are
cautioned that we do not redact or edit personal identifying
information from comment submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR-CBOE-2019-027 and should be submitted on
or before July 17, 2019.
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\53\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\53\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Vanessa A. Countryman,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2019-13541 Filed 6-25-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P