Petitions for Modification of Application of Existing Mandatory Safety Standards, 29881-29883 [2019-13472]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 122 / Tuesday, June 25, 2019 / Notices
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Mine Safety and Health Administration
Petitions for Modification of
Application of Existing Mandatory
Safety Standards
Mine Safety and Health
Administration, Labor.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
This notice is a summary of
petitions for modification submitted to
the Mine Safety and Health
Administration (MSHA) by the parties
listed below.
DATES: All comments on the petitions
must be received by MSHA’s Office of
Standards, Regulations, and Variances
on or before July 25, 2019.
ADDRESSES: You may submit your
comments, identified by ‘‘docket
number’’ on the subject line, by any of
the following methods:
1. Electronic Mail: zzMSHAcomments@dol.gov. Include the docket
number of the petition in the subject
line of the message.
2. Facsimile: 202–693–9441.
3. Regular Mail or Hand Delivery:
MSHA, Office of Standards,
Regulations, and Variances, 201 12th
Street South, Suite 4E401, Arlington,
Virginia 22202–5452, Attention: Sheila
McConnell, Director, Office of
Standards, Regulations, and Variances.
Persons delivering documents are
required to check in at the receptionist’s
desk in Suite 4E401. Individuals may
inspect copies of the petition and
comments during normal business
hours at the address listed above.
MSHA will consider only comments
postmarked by the U.S. Postal Service or
proof of delivery from another delivery
service such as UPS or Federal Express
on or before the deadline for comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Sheila McConnell, Office of Standards,
Regulations, and Variances at 202–693–
9440 (Voice), barron.barbara@dol.gov
(Email), or 202–693–9441 (Facsimile).
[These are not toll-free numbers.]
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section
101(c) of the Federal Mine Safety and
Health Act of 1977 and Title 30 of the
Code of Federal Regulations Part 44
govern the application, processing, and
disposition of petitions for modification.
khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
I. Background
Section 101(c) of the Federal Mine
Safety and Health Act of 1977 (Mine
Act) allows the mine operator or
representative of miners to file a
petition to modify the application of any
mandatory safety standard to a coal or
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:35 Jun 24, 2019
Jkt 247001
other mine if the Secretary of Labor
determines that:
1. An alternative method of achieving
the result of such standard exists which
will at all times guarantee no less than
the same measure of protection afforded
the miners of such mine by such
standard; or
2. That the application of such
standard to such mine will result in a
diminution of safety to the miners in
such mine.
In addition, the regulations at 30 CFR
44.10 and 44.11 establish the
requirements and procedures for filing
petitions for modification.
II. Petitions for Modification
Docket Number: M–2019–016–C.
Petitioner: S & J Coal Company, 15
Road View Lane, Pine Grove,
Pennsylvania 17963.
Mine: Slope #2 Mine, MSHA I.D. No.
36–09963, located in Schuylkill County,
Pennsylvania.
Regulation Affected: 30 CFR
75.1400(c) (Hoisting equipment;
general).
Modification Request: The petitioner
requests a modification of the existing
standard to permit operating the
gunboat used in the mine to transport
persons without safety catches or other
no less effective devices.
The petitioner states that:
(1) To date, a functional safety catch
has not been developed because no such
safety catch or device is available for
steeply pitching and undulating slopes
with numerous curves and knuckles
present in the main haulage slopes of
anthracite mines. Makeshift devices, if
installed, could be activated on
knuckles and curves when no
emergency exists causing a tumbling
effect on the conveyance which would
increase rather than decrease the hazard
to miners.
(2) Anthracite mine slopes range in
length from 180 to 1,000 feet and vary
in pitch from 30 to 75 degrees.
(3) The petitioner proposes to operate
the steel gunboat with secondary safety
connections securely fastened around
the gunboat and to the hoisting rope
above the main connecting device, and
use hoisting ropes having a safety factor
in excess of three (3).
The petitioner proposes the following
terms and conditions:
(a) A communication signal system,
audible to the hoist operator will be
installed so that it can be activated from
the gunboat at any location along the
slope.
(b) The design safety factor of the
hoist rope will be maintained at all
times not less than three (3) times the
value specified in 30 CFR 75.1431.
PO 00000
Frm 00043
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
29881
(c) A detailed inspection procedure of
the ropes and terminations used at the
mine will be posted in the hoist house
and will be complied with at all times.
(d) A secondary connection will be
securely fastened around the gunboat
and securely fastened to the hoisting
rope at a point above the main
connecting device. The secondary safety
connection must meet the safety factor
requirements described in Item (b)
above and be of the same size as the
primary hoist rope, properly terminated
above the primary hoist rope attachment
with at least two clips on each end or
with equivalent strength chains.
(e) At least 2 feet of clearance must be
maintained between the highest part of
the secondary attachment and the head
sheave when the gunboat is positioned
in the full dump position.
(f) Within 60 days after the Proposed
Decision and Order (PDO) becomes
final, the petitioner will submit
proposed revisions for its approved 30
CFR part 48 training plan to the District
Manager. These proposed revisions will
include initial and refresher training
regarding compliance with the
alternative method stated in the petition
and the special terms and conditions
stated in the PDO.
The petitioner asserts that the
proposed alternative method will
provide no less than the same measure
of protection afforded the miners under
the existing standard.
Docket Number: M–2019–017–C.
Petitioner: Blackjewel, LLC, P.O. Box
249, Stanville, Kentucky 41659.
Mine: D–31 Cut-Through Mine,
MSHA I.D. No. 44–06782, located in Lee
County, Virginia.
Regulation Affected: 30 CFR
75.1108(c) (Approved conveyor belts).
Modification Request: The petitioner
requests a modification of the existing
standard to permit the continued use of
existing steel cable conveyor belt.
The petitioner states that:
—The D–31 Cut-Through mine is not an
active mine and is in non-producing
status; however, it is used as a belt
corridor to convey coal mined in
Kentucky to the preparation and
loadout facilities in Virginia.
Therefore, no coal is being mined and
there is typically only one employee
that conducts examinations.
—The mine is approximately 9,500 feet
long, is in a straight line, and has
portals on each end for access.
—The mine has no belt drives, take-ups,
transfer points, nor power
underground, other than the lowvoltage power required for mine
phones, mine monitoring equipment,
tracking, and communications.
E:\FR\FM\25JNN1.SGM
25JNN1
khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES
29882
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 122 / Tuesday, June 25, 2019 / Notices
—The main travelway in the mine is
beside the belt so that every time the
mine is examined, the belt is
examined in its entirety.
—The mine currently has carbon
monoxide (CO) monitoring at 1,000
feet spacing for fire detection.
—The mine currently has fire valves for
firefighting at a maximum spacing of
300 feet along the belt, with enough
hose stored along the belt to reach the
entire length of the belt from the
valves.
—There are no seals in the mine.
—The existing conveyor belt has been in
service since approximately 2003 and
has no incidents or issues due to the
design and layout of the belt.
—The belt is a steel cable belt with
approximately 20,000 feet of belt that
is continuous using vulcanized
splices with a few temporary
maintenance clips here and there.,
The belt has never been replaced in
its entirety since its installation.
—The petitioner states that the belt has
several years of life left on the belt.
—The belt is equipped with turnovers
outside on each end of the belt, such
that no rollers contact the coal
carrying dirty side of the belt
anywhere underground. The
petitioner states that the design
virtually eliminates carryback and
reduces significantly the risk of fire
associated with the belt. The design
also minimizes wear on the rollers.
—There is no return since there is no
mining being done in the mine. All
entries are intake.
—Belt air velocity is typically greater
than 100 feet per minute and over
10,000 cubic feet per minute.
—The mines uses tracking radios, mine
phones, and a dial telephone midway
for communication.
—Employees in the mine, with usually
one employee working in the mine at
any time, have two means of escape
on either end of the belt.
The petitioner proposes the following
actions in order to continue using the
conveyor belt currently in use.
(1) Replace the belt with Part 14
compliant belt when it becomes
necessary to replace the belt.
(2) Activate a different CO sensor each
day by applying 50 parts per millions
CO gas until all CO sensors are checked,
then repeat.
(3) Inspect the belt and belt entry
twice each shift when the belt is
running.
The petitioner states that the
proposed alternative method will
provide a degree of safety that is at least
equal to the requirements of the existing
standard.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:35 Jun 24, 2019
Jkt 247001
Docket Number: M–2019–018–C.
Petitioner: Hartshorne Mining Group,
LLC, P.O. Box 449, Calhoun, Kentucky
42327.
Mine: Poplar Grove Mine, MSHA I.D.
No. 15–19806, located in McLean
County, Kentucky.
Regulation Affected: 30 CFR 75.500(d)
(Permissible electric equipment).
Modification Request: The petitioner
requests a modification of the existing
standard to permit an alternative
method of compliance to allow the use
of nonpermissible electronic surveying
equipment including, but not limited to,
portable battery-operated mine transits,
total station surveying equipment,
distance meters, and data loggers, in or
inby the last open crosscut.
The petitioner states that:
(1) The alternative method of
compliance will allow the mine
operator to comply with requirements
for mine ventilation maps and mine
maps in 30 CFR 75.372 and 75.1200,
using the most practical and accurate
surveying equipment.
(2) Application of the existing
standard would result in a diminution
of safety to the miners. Underground
mining requires that accurate and
precise measurements be completed in
a prompt and efficient manner.
(3) All nonpermissible electronic
surveying equipment to be used in or
inby the last open crosscut will be
examined by surveying personnel prior
to use to ensure the equipment is being
maintained in a safe operating
condition. The examination will include
the following:
(a) Checking the instrument for any
physical damage and the integrity of the
case.
(b) Removing the battery and
inspecting for corrosion.
(c) Inspecting the contact points to
ensure a secure connection to the
battery.
(d) Reinserting the battery and
powering up and shutting down to
ensure proper connections.
(e) Checking the battery compartment
cover or battery attachment to ensure
that it is securely fastened.
(4) The results of the examinations
will be recorded and retained for 1 year
and made available to MSHA on
request.
(5) A qualified person, as defined in
30 CFR 75.151, will continuously
monitor for methane immediately before
and during the use of nonpermissible
electronic surveying equipment in or
inby the last open crosscut.
(6) Nonpermissible electronic
surveying equipment will not be used if
methane is detected in concentrations at
or above 1.0 percent for the area being
PO 00000
Frm 00044
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
surveyed. When 1.0 percent or more
methane is detected while such
equipment is being used, the equipment
will be de-energized immediately and
withdrawn outby the last open crosscut.
(7) All hand-held methane detectors
will be MSHA-approved and
maintained in permissible and proper
operating condition, as defined in 30
CFR 75.320.
(8) Batteries in the nonpermissible
electronic surveying equipment will be
changed out or charged in fresh air
outby the last open crosscut.
(9) Qualified personnel who use
surveying equipment will be properly
trained to recognize the hazards
associated with the use of
nonpermissible electronic surveying
equipment in areas where methane may
be present.
(10) The nonpermissible electronic
surveying equipment will not be put
into service in or inby the last open
crosscut until MSHA has initially
inspected the equipment and
determined that it is in compliance with
all the terms and conditions in this
petition.
The petitioner asserts that the
proposed alternative method will at all
times guarantee no less than the same
measure of protection afforded by the
existing standard.
Docket Number: M–2019–019–C.
Petitioner: Hartshorne Mining, LLC,
P.O. Box 449, Calhoun, Kentucky 42327.
Mine: Poplar Grove Mine, MSHA I.D.
No. 15–19806, located in McLean
County, Kentucky.
Regulation Affected: 30 CFR 75.507–
1(a) (Electric equipment other than
power-connection points; outby the last
open crosscut; return air; permissibility
requirements).
Modification Request: The petitioner
requests a modification of the existing
standard to permit an alternative
method of compliance to allow the use
of nonpermissible electronic surveying
equipment including, but not limited to,
portable battery-operated mine transits,
total station surveying equipment,
distance meters, and data loggers, in
return airways.
The petitioner states that:
(1) The alternative method of
compliance will allow the mine
operator to comply with requirements
for mine ventilation maps and mine
maps in 30 CFR 75.372 and 75.1200,
using the most practical and accurate
surveying equipment.
(2) Application of the existing
standard would result in a diminution
of safety to the miners. Underground
mining requires that accurate and
precise measurements be completed in
a prompt and efficient manner.
E:\FR\FM\25JNN1.SGM
25JNN1
khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 122 / Tuesday, June 25, 2019 / Notices
(3) All nonpermissible electronic
surveying equipment to be used in
return airways will be examined by
surveying personnel prior to use to
ensure the equipment is being
maintained in a safe operating
condition. The examination will include
the following:
(a) Checking the instrument for any
physical damage and the integrity of the
case.
(b) Removing the battery and
inspecting for corrosion.
(c) Inspecting the contact points to
ensure a secure connection to the
battery.
(d) Reinserting the battery and
powering up and shutting down to
ensure proper connections.
(e) Checking the battery compartment
cover or battery attachment to ensure
that it is securely fastened.
(4) The results of the examinations
will be recorded and retained for 1 year
and made available to MSHA on
request.
(5) A qualified person, as defined in
30 CFR 75.151, will continuously
monitor for methane immediately before
and during the use of nonpermissible
electronic surveying equipment in
return airways.
(6) Nonpermissible electronic
surveying equipment will not be used if
methane is detected in concentrations at
or above 1.0 percent for the area being
surveyed. When 1.0 percent or more
methane is detected while such
equipment is being used, the equipment
will be de-energized immediately and
withdrawn out of the return airway.
(7) All hand-held methane detectors
will be MSHA-approved and
maintained in permissible and proper
operating condition, as defined in 30
CFR 75.320.
(8) Batteries in the nonpermissible
electronic surveying equipment will be
changed out or charged in fresh air out
of the return airway.
(9) Qualified personnel who use
surveying equipment will be properly
trained to recognize the hazards
associated with the use of
nonpermissible electronic surveying
equipment in areas where methane may
be present.
(10) The nonpermissible electronic
surveying equipment will not be put
into service in the return airway until
MSHA has initially inspected the
equipment and determined that it is in
compliance with all the terms and
conditions in this petition.
The petitioner asserts that the
proposed alternative method will at all
times guarantee no less than the same
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:35 Jun 24, 2019
Jkt 247001
measure of protection afforded by the
existing standard.
Sheila McConnell,
Director, Office of Standards, Regulations,
and Variances.
[FR Doc. 2019–13472 Filed 6–24–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4520–43–P
NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION
Agency Information Collection
Activities: Comment Request
National Science Foundation.
Submission for OMB Review;
Comment Request.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The National Science
Foundation (NSF) has submitted the
following information collection
requirement to OMB for review and
clearance under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995. This is the
second notice for public comment; the
first was published in the Federal
Register, and no comments were
received. NSF is forwarding the
proposed submission to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for
clearance simultaneously with the
publication of this second notice. The
full submission may be found at: https://
www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain.
DATES: Comments regarding this
information collection are best assured
of having their full effect if received by
July 25, 2019.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs of OMB, Attention: Desk Officer
for National Science Foundation, 725
17th Street, NW, Room 10235,
Washington, DC 20503, and Suzanne H.
Plimpton, Reports Clearance Officer,
National Science Foundation, 2415
Eisenhower Avenue, Alexandria, VA
22314, or send email to splimpto@
nsf.gov. Individuals who use a
telecommunications device for the deaf
(TDD) may call the Federal Information
Relay Service (FIRS) at 1–800–877–
8339, which is accessible 24 hours a
day, 7 days a week, 365 days a year
(including federal holidays).
Copies of the submission may be
obtained by calling 703–292–7556.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: NSF may
not conduct or sponsor a collection of
information unless the collection of
information displays a currently valid
OMB control number and the agency
informs potential persons who are to
respond to the collection of information
that such persons are not required to
respond to the collection of information
unless it displays a currently valid OMB
control number.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00045
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
29883
Comments regarding (a) whether the
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have
practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of burden including
the validity of the methodology and
assumptions used; (c) ways to enhance
the quality, utility and clarity of the
information to be collected; (d) ways to
minimize the burden of the collection of
information on those who are to
respond, including through the use of
appropriate automated, electronic,
mechanical, or other technological
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology should be
addressed to the points of contact in the
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section.
Title of Collection: Biological Sciences
Proposal Classification Forms.
OMB Number: 3145–0203.
Overview of this Information
Collection: Five organizational units
within the Directorate of Biological
Sciences of the National Science
Foundation will use the Biological
Sciences Proposal Classification Form.
They are the Division of Biological
Infrastructure (DBI), the Division of
Environmental Biology (DEB), the
Division of Molecular and Cellular
Biosciences (MCB), the Division of
Integrative Organismal Systems IOS)
and Emerging Frontiers (EF). All
scientists submitting proposals to these
units will be asked to complete an
electronic version of the Proposal
Classification Form. The form consists
of brief questions about the substance of
the research and the investigator’s
previous federal support. Each division
will have a slightly different version of
the form. In this way, submitters will
only confront response choices that are
relevant to their discipline.
Use of the Information: The
information gathered with the Biological
Sciences Proposal Classification Form
serves two main purposes. The first is
facilitation of the proposal review
process. Since peer review is a key
component of NSF’s grant-making
process, it is imperative that proposals
are reviewed by scientists with
appropriate expertise. The information
collected with the Proposal
Classification Form helps ensure that
the proposals are evaluated by
specialists who are well versed in
appropriate subject matter. This helps
maintain a fair and equitable review
process.
The second use of the information is
program evaluation. The Directorate is
committed to investing in a range of
substantive areas. With data from this
E:\FR\FM\25JNN1.SGM
25JNN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 122 (Tuesday, June 25, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 29881-29883]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-13472]
[[Page 29881]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Mine Safety and Health Administration
Petitions for Modification of Application of Existing Mandatory
Safety Standards
AGENCY: Mine Safety and Health Administration, Labor.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This notice is a summary of petitions for modification
submitted to the Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA) by the
parties listed below.
DATES: All comments on the petitions must be received by MSHA's Office
of Standards, Regulations, and Variances on or before July 25, 2019.
ADDRESSES: You may submit your comments, identified by ``docket
number'' on the subject line, by any of the following methods:
1. Electronic Mail: [email protected]. Include the docket
number of the petition in the subject line of the message.
2. Facsimile: 202-693-9441.
3. Regular Mail or Hand Delivery: MSHA, Office of Standards,
Regulations, and Variances, 201 12th Street South, Suite 4E401,
Arlington, Virginia 22202-5452, Attention: Sheila McConnell, Director,
Office of Standards, Regulations, and Variances. Persons delivering
documents are required to check in at the receptionist's desk in Suite
4E401. Individuals may inspect copies of the petition and comments
during normal business hours at the address listed above.
MSHA will consider only comments postmarked by the U.S. Postal
Service or proof of delivery from another delivery service such as UPS
or Federal Express on or before the deadline for comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sheila McConnell, Office of Standards,
Regulations, and Variances at 202-693-9440 (Voice),
[email protected] (Email), or 202-693-9441 (Facsimile). [These are
not toll-free numbers.]
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 101(c) of the Federal Mine Safety
and Health Act of 1977 and Title 30 of the Code of Federal Regulations
Part 44 govern the application, processing, and disposition of
petitions for modification.
I. Background
Section 101(c) of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977
(Mine Act) allows the mine operator or representative of miners to file
a petition to modify the application of any mandatory safety standard
to a coal or other mine if the Secretary of Labor determines that:
1. An alternative method of achieving the result of such standard
exists which will at all times guarantee no less than the same measure
of protection afforded the miners of such mine by such standard; or
2. That the application of such standard to such mine will result
in a diminution of safety to the miners in such mine.
In addition, the regulations at 30 CFR 44.10 and 44.11 establish
the requirements and procedures for filing petitions for modification.
II. Petitions for Modification
Docket Number: M-2019-016-C.
Petitioner: S & J Coal Company, 15 Road View Lane, Pine Grove,
Pennsylvania 17963.
Mine: Slope #2 Mine, MSHA I.D. No. 36-09963, located in Schuylkill
County, Pennsylvania.
Regulation Affected: 30 CFR 75.1400(c) (Hoisting equipment;
general).
Modification Request: The petitioner requests a modification of the
existing standard to permit operating the gunboat used in the mine to
transport persons without safety catches or other no less effective
devices.
The petitioner states that:
(1) To date, a functional safety catch has not been developed
because no such safety catch or device is available for steeply
pitching and undulating slopes with numerous curves and knuckles
present in the main haulage slopes of anthracite mines. Makeshift
devices, if installed, could be activated on knuckles and curves when
no emergency exists causing a tumbling effect on the conveyance which
would increase rather than decrease the hazard to miners.
(2) Anthracite mine slopes range in length from 180 to 1,000 feet
and vary in pitch from 30 to 75 degrees.
(3) The petitioner proposes to operate the steel gunboat with
secondary safety connections securely fastened around the gunboat and
to the hoisting rope above the main connecting device, and use hoisting
ropes having a safety factor in excess of three (3).
The petitioner proposes the following terms and conditions:
(a) A communication signal system, audible to the hoist operator
will be installed so that it can be activated from the gunboat at any
location along the slope.
(b) The design safety factor of the hoist rope will be maintained
at all times not less than three (3) times the value specified in 30
CFR 75.1431.
(c) A detailed inspection procedure of the ropes and terminations
used at the mine will be posted in the hoist house and will be complied
with at all times.
(d) A secondary connection will be securely fastened around the
gunboat and securely fastened to the hoisting rope at a point above the
main connecting device. The secondary safety connection must meet the
safety factor requirements described in Item (b) above and be of the
same size as the primary hoist rope, properly terminated above the
primary hoist rope attachment with at least two clips on each end or
with equivalent strength chains.
(e) At least 2 feet of clearance must be maintained between the
highest part of the secondary attachment and the head sheave when the
gunboat is positioned in the full dump position.
(f) Within 60 days after the Proposed Decision and Order (PDO)
becomes final, the petitioner will submit proposed revisions for its
approved 30 CFR part 48 training plan to the District Manager. These
proposed revisions will include initial and refresher training
regarding compliance with the alternative method stated in the petition
and the special terms and conditions stated in the PDO.
The petitioner asserts that the proposed alternative method will
provide no less than the same measure of protection afforded the miners
under the existing standard.
Docket Number: M-2019-017-C.
Petitioner: Blackjewel, LLC, P.O. Box 249, Stanville, Kentucky
41659.
Mine: D-31 Cut-Through Mine, MSHA I.D. No. 44-06782, located in Lee
County, Virginia.
Regulation Affected: 30 CFR 75.1108(c) (Approved conveyor belts).
Modification Request: The petitioner requests a modification of the
existing standard to permit the continued use of existing steel cable
conveyor belt.
The petitioner states that:
--The D-31 Cut-Through mine is not an active mine and is in non-
producing status; however, it is used as a belt corridor to convey coal
mined in Kentucky to the preparation and loadout facilities in
Virginia. Therefore, no coal is being mined and there is typically only
one employee that conducts examinations.
--The mine is approximately 9,500 feet long, is in a straight line, and
has portals on each end for access.
--The mine has no belt drives, take-ups, transfer points, nor power
underground, other than the low-voltage power required for mine phones,
mine monitoring equipment, tracking, and communications.
[[Page 29882]]
--The main travelway in the mine is beside the belt so that every time
the mine is examined, the belt is examined in its entirety.
--The mine currently has carbon monoxide (CO) monitoring at 1,000 feet
spacing for fire detection.
--The mine currently has fire valves for firefighting at a maximum
spacing of 300 feet along the belt, with enough hose stored along the
belt to reach the entire length of the belt from the valves.
--There are no seals in the mine.
--The existing conveyor belt has been in service since approximately
2003 and has no incidents or issues due to the design and layout of the
belt.
--The belt is a steel cable belt with approximately 20,000 feet of belt
that is continuous using vulcanized splices with a few temporary
maintenance clips here and there., The belt has never been replaced in
its entirety since its installation.
--The petitioner states that the belt has several years of life left on
the belt.
--The belt is equipped with turnovers outside on each end of the belt,
such that no rollers contact the coal carrying dirty side of the belt
anywhere underground. The petitioner states that the design virtually
eliminates carryback and reduces significantly the risk of fire
associated with the belt. The design also minimizes wear on the
rollers.
--There is no return since there is no mining being done in the mine.
All entries are intake.
--Belt air velocity is typically greater than 100 feet per minute and
over 10,000 cubic feet per minute.
--The mines uses tracking radios, mine phones, and a dial telephone
midway for communication.
--Employees in the mine, with usually one employee working in the mine
at any time, have two means of escape on either end of the belt.
The petitioner proposes the following actions in order to continue
using the conveyor belt currently in use.
(1) Replace the belt with Part 14 compliant belt when it becomes
necessary to replace the belt.
(2) Activate a different CO sensor each day by applying 50 parts
per millions CO gas until all CO sensors are checked, then repeat.
(3) Inspect the belt and belt entry twice each shift when the belt
is running.
The petitioner states that the proposed alternative method will
provide a degree of safety that is at least equal to the requirements
of the existing standard.
Docket Number: M-2019-018-C.
Petitioner: Hartshorne Mining Group, LLC, P.O. Box 449, Calhoun,
Kentucky 42327.
Mine: Poplar Grove Mine, MSHA I.D. No. 15-19806, located in McLean
County, Kentucky.
Regulation Affected: 30 CFR 75.500(d) (Permissible electric
equipment).
Modification Request: The petitioner requests a modification of the
existing standard to permit an alternative method of compliance to
allow the use of nonpermissible electronic surveying equipment
including, but not limited to, portable battery-operated mine transits,
total station surveying equipment, distance meters, and data loggers,
in or inby the last open crosscut.
The petitioner states that:
(1) The alternative method of compliance will allow the mine
operator to comply with requirements for mine ventilation maps and mine
maps in 30 CFR 75.372 and 75.1200, using the most practical and
accurate surveying equipment.
(2) Application of the existing standard would result in a
diminution of safety to the miners. Underground mining requires that
accurate and precise measurements be completed in a prompt and
efficient manner.
(3) All nonpermissible electronic surveying equipment to be used in
or inby the last open crosscut will be examined by surveying personnel
prior to use to ensure the equipment is being maintained in a safe
operating condition. The examination will include the following:
(a) Checking the instrument for any physical damage and the
integrity of the case.
(b) Removing the battery and inspecting for corrosion.
(c) Inspecting the contact points to ensure a secure connection to
the battery.
(d) Reinserting the battery and powering up and shutting down to
ensure proper connections.
(e) Checking the battery compartment cover or battery attachment to
ensure that it is securely fastened.
(4) The results of the examinations will be recorded and retained
for 1 year and made available to MSHA on request.
(5) A qualified person, as defined in 30 CFR 75.151, will
continuously monitor for methane immediately before and during the use
of nonpermissible electronic surveying equipment in or inby the last
open crosscut.
(6) Nonpermissible electronic surveying equipment will not be used
if methane is detected in concentrations at or above 1.0 percent for
the area being surveyed. When 1.0 percent or more methane is detected
while such equipment is being used, the equipment will be de-energized
immediately and withdrawn outby the last open crosscut.
(7) All hand-held methane detectors will be MSHA-approved and
maintained in permissible and proper operating condition, as defined in
30 CFR 75.320.
(8) Batteries in the nonpermissible electronic surveying equipment
will be changed out or charged in fresh air outby the last open
crosscut.
(9) Qualified personnel who use surveying equipment will be
properly trained to recognize the hazards associated with the use of
nonpermissible electronic surveying equipment in areas where methane
may be present.
(10) The nonpermissible electronic surveying equipment will not be
put into service in or inby the last open crosscut until MSHA has
initially inspected the equipment and determined that it is in
compliance with all the terms and conditions in this petition.
The petitioner asserts that the proposed alternative method will at
all times guarantee no less than the same measure of protection
afforded by the existing standard.
Docket Number: M-2019-019-C.
Petitioner: Hartshorne Mining, LLC, P.O. Box 449, Calhoun, Kentucky
42327.
Mine: Poplar Grove Mine, MSHA I.D. No. 15-19806, located in McLean
County, Kentucky.
Regulation Affected: 30 CFR 75.507-1(a) (Electric equipment other
than power-connection points; outby the last open crosscut; return air;
permissibility requirements).
Modification Request: The petitioner requests a modification of the
existing standard to permit an alternative method of compliance to
allow the use of nonpermissible electronic surveying equipment
including, but not limited to, portable battery-operated mine transits,
total station surveying equipment, distance meters, and data loggers,
in return airways.
The petitioner states that:
(1) The alternative method of compliance will allow the mine
operator to comply with requirements for mine ventilation maps and mine
maps in 30 CFR 75.372 and 75.1200, using the most practical and
accurate surveying equipment.
(2) Application of the existing standard would result in a
diminution of safety to the miners. Underground mining requires that
accurate and precise measurements be completed in a prompt and
efficient manner.
[[Page 29883]]
(3) All nonpermissible electronic surveying equipment to be used in
return airways will be examined by surveying personnel prior to use to
ensure the equipment is being maintained in a safe operating condition.
The examination will include the following:
(a) Checking the instrument for any physical damage and the
integrity of the case.
(b) Removing the battery and inspecting for corrosion.
(c) Inspecting the contact points to ensure a secure connection to
the battery.
(d) Reinserting the battery and powering up and shutting down to
ensure proper connections.
(e) Checking the battery compartment cover or battery attachment to
ensure that it is securely fastened.
(4) The results of the examinations will be recorded and retained
for 1 year and made available to MSHA on request.
(5) A qualified person, as defined in 30 CFR 75.151, will
continuously monitor for methane immediately before and during the use
of nonpermissible electronic surveying equipment in return airways.
(6) Nonpermissible electronic surveying equipment will not be used
if methane is detected in concentrations at or above 1.0 percent for
the area being surveyed. When 1.0 percent or more methane is detected
while such equipment is being used, the equipment will be de-energized
immediately and withdrawn out of the return airway.
(7) All hand-held methane detectors will be MSHA-approved and
maintained in permissible and proper operating condition, as defined in
30 CFR 75.320.
(8) Batteries in the nonpermissible electronic surveying equipment
will be changed out or charged in fresh air out of the return airway.
(9) Qualified personnel who use surveying equipment will be
properly trained to recognize the hazards associated with the use of
nonpermissible electronic surveying equipment in areas where methane
may be present.
(10) The nonpermissible electronic surveying equipment will not be
put into service in the return airway until MSHA has initially
inspected the equipment and determined that it is in compliance with
all the terms and conditions in this petition.
The petitioner asserts that the proposed alternative method will at
all times guarantee no less than the same measure of protection
afforded by the existing standard.
Sheila McConnell,
Director, Office of Standards, Regulations, and Variances.
[FR Doc. 2019-13472 Filed 6-24-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4520-43-P