Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe EDGX Exchange, Inc.; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change Relating To Update Its Price Adjust Process To Allow for the Process To Apply to Bulk Messages, 28113-28117 [2019-12658]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 116 / Monday, June 17, 2019 / Notices
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
The Exchange neither solicited nor
received comments on the proposed
rule change.
Commission summarily may
temporarily suspend such rule change if
it appears to the Commission that such
action is necessary or appropriate in the
public interest, for the protection of
investors, or otherwise in furtherance of
the purposes of the Act.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Because the proposed rule change
does not (i) significantly affect the
protection of investors or the public
interest; (ii) impose any significant
burden on competition; and (iii) become
operative for 30 days from the date on
which it was filed, or such shorter time
as the Commission may designate if
consistent with the protection of
investors and the public interest, the
proposed rule change has become
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)
of the Act 23 and Rule 19b–4(f)(6)
thereunder.24
A proposed rule change filed under
Rule 19b–4(f)(6) 25 normally does not
become operative for 30 days after the
date of filing. However, pursuant to
Rule 19b–4(f)(6)(iii) 26 the Commission
may designate a shorter time if such
action is consistent with the protection
of investors and the public interest.
The Exchange has asked the
Commission to waive the 30-day
operative delay. The Commission
believes that waiving the 30-day
operative delay is consistent with the
protection of investors and the public
interest as it will allow the Exchange to
offer two order types that are
substantially similar to order types that
are currently available on Cboe Options.
Thus, as represented by the Exchange,
the proposed rule change does not
introduce any new functionality or
present any novel issues. For this
reason, the Commission designates the
proposed rule change to be operative on
June 20, 2019, the day before the
Exchange would like to implement
MOC and LOC orders.27
At any time within 60 days of the
filing of the proposed rule change, the
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
23 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6). In addition, Rule 19b–
4(f)(6)(iii) requires a self-regulatory organization to
give the Commission written notice of its intent to
file the proposed rule change at least five business
days prior to the date of filing of the proposed rule
change, or such shorter time as designated by the
Commission. The Exchange has satisfied this
requirement.
25 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6).
26 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6)(iii).
27 For purposes only of waiving the 30-day
operative delay, the Commission has also
considered the proposed rule’s impact on
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See
15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES
24 17
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:34 Jun 14, 2019
Jkt 247001
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include File Number SR–
CboeBZX–2019–050 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Secretary, Securities and Exchange
Commission, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–CboeBZX–2019–050. This
file number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
internet website (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for website viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549 on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the
filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change.
Persons submitting comments are
cautioned that we do not redact or edit
personal identifying information from
comment submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish
to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File
Number SR–CboeBZX–2019–050 and
PO 00000
Frm 00114
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
28113
should be submitted on or before July 8,
2019.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.28
Eduardo A. Aleman,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2019–12657 Filed 6–14–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–86082; File No. SR–
CboeEDGX–2019–034]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe
EDGX Exchange, Inc.; Notice of Filing
and Immediate Effectiveness of a
Proposed Rule Change Relating To
Update Its Price Adjust Process To
Allow for the Process To Apply to Bulk
Messages
June 11, 2019.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on June 4,
2019, Cboe EDGX Exchange, Inc. (the
‘‘Exchange’’ or ‘‘EDGX’’) filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission
(the ‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule
change as described in Items I and II
below, which Items have been prepared
by the Exchange. The Exchange filed the
proposal as a ‘‘non-controversial’’
proposed rule change pursuant to
Section 19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act 3 and
Rule 19b–4(f)(6) thereunder.4 The
Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule
change from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
Cboe EDGX Exchange, Inc. (the
‘‘Exchange’’ or ‘‘EDGX Options’’)
proposes to update its Price Adjust
process to allow for the process to apply
to bulk messages. The text of the
proposed rule change is provided in
Exhibit 5.
The text of the proposed rule change
is also available on the Exchange’s
website (https://markets.cboe.com/us/
options/regulation/rule_filings/edgx/),
at the Exchange’s Office of the
Secretary, and at the Commission’s
Public Reference Room.
28 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
3 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
4 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6).
1 15
E:\FR\FM\17JNN1.SGM
17JNN1
28114
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 116 / Monday, June 17, 2019 / Notices
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for
the proposed rule change and discussed
any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these
statements may be examined at the
places specified in Item IV below. The
Exchange has prepared summaries, set
forth in sections A, B, and C below, of
the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes to amend its
rules to allow for the Price Adjust
process to apply to bulk messages and
make corresponding changes where
applicable. The Exchange is proposing
these amendments in order to provide
Users that submit bulk messages with
functionality that is currently available
to them for orders.
In December 2018, the Exchange
adopted bulk messaging functionality,
in which a User may enter, modify or
cancel up to an Exchange-specified
number of bids and offers in a single
message. A User may submit a bulk
message through a bulk port.5 The
System 6 handles bulk message bids and
offers in the same manner as it handles
an order, or quote if submitted by a
Market Maker, unless the Rules specify
otherwise. Currently, Rule 21.1(i)(1)
subjects orders to the Price Adjust
process.7 Pursuant to the Price Adjust
process, if an order (that is not an allor-none (‘‘AON’’) order 8), at the time of
entry, would lock or cross a Protected
Quotation of another options exchange
or the Exchange (subjecting it to the
Price Adjust process), the System
ranks 9 and displays the order at one
minimum price variation below (above)
5 See
Rule 21.1(j)(3).
‘‘System’’ is the automated system for order
execution and trade reporting owned and operated
by the Exchange. See Rule 21.1(a).
7 The Exchange notes that market orders will not
be subject to the price adjust process given that they
execute immediately at the best price, therefore,
they will not lock or cross the market.
8 An AON order is either a market or a limit order
to be executed in their entirety or not at all. See
Rule 21.1(d)(4).
9 In the EDGX Rules, the term ‘‘rank’’ means that
an order will be prioritized and eligible for
execution at its ranked price for purposes of
allocation if an execution were to occur at that
price. For an AON order ‘‘ranked’’ at a price, it
would be prioritized last at that price.
khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES
6 The
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:34 Jun 14, 2019
Jkt 247001
the current NBO (NBB). If a non-AON
order is subject to the Price Adjust
process by locking or crossing the offer
(bid) of a AON order resting on the
EDGX Options Book at or better than the
Exchange’s best offer (bid), the System
ranks the resting AON order at one
minimum price variation above (below)
the bid (offer) of the non-AON order.
Additionally, the System ranks an AON
orders that cross a Protected Offer (Bid)
of another options exchange or a sell
(buy) AON order resting on the EDGX
Options Book at or better than the
Exchange’s best offer (bid), at a price
equal to the Protected Offer (Bid) or the
offer (bid) of the resting AON order,
respectively. AON orders that lock or
cross a Protected Offer (Bid) of the
Exchange are ranked by the System at a
price one minimum price variation
below (above) the Protected Offer (Bid).
The Price Adjust process applies to
orders (subject to the User’s instructions
or the Rules) that do not execute upon
entry and go to rest in the EDGX
Options Book (for example, because an
order is not marketable upon entry, is
not eligible to route, etc.). It ensures
these orders rest at executable prices in
accordance with linkage rules.10 Current
Rule 21.1(i)(4) states that the Price
Adjust process does not apply to bulk
messages.11
Furthermore, current Rule
21.1(j)(3)(A) provides for additional
handling provisions regarding bulk
messages submitted through bulk
quoting ports. Specifically, Rule
21.1(j)(3)(A)(iv) provides that the
System will cancel or reject a Post Only
bulk message bid (offer) with a price
that locks or crosses the Exchange best
offer (bid) or ABO (ABB).12 The
Exchange notes that bulk messages that
include a Post Only instruction do not
remove liquidity from the Exchange or
route away to other exchanges.13
Current Rule 21.1(j)(3)(A)(iv) is
consistent with how the System handles
10 See Chapter XXVII of the Rules. See also
Options Order Protection and Locked/Crossed
Market Plan (the ‘‘Linkage Plan’’).
11 Specifically, the individual bids (offers)
submitted within a single bulk message. Therefore,
as proposed, the Price Adjust process or a Cancel
Back designation, as applicable, applies to all bulk
message bids and offers within a single message.
12 The ABBO means the best bid (offer)
disseminated by other exchanges.
13 See Rule 21.1(d)(8), which defines ‘‘Post Only
Orders’’ as orders that are to be ranked and
executed on the Exchange pursuant to Rule 21.8
(Order Display and Book Processing) or cancelled,
as appropriate, without routing away to another
options exchange except that the order will not
remove liquidity from the EDGX Options Book. A
Post Only Order that is not subject to the Price
Adjust process that would lock or cross a Protected
Quotation of another options exchange or the
Exchange will be cancelled. Users may designate
bulk messages as Post Only.
PO 00000
Frm 00115
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
a Post Only order not subject to the
Price Adjust process that locks or
crosses the opposite side Exchange best
bid or offer (‘‘BBO’’) or if displaying the
order on the EDGX Options Book would
create a violation of linkage Rule 27.3
(Locked and Crossed Markets).
Additionally, current Rule
21.1(j)(3)(A)(v) provides that the System
executes a Book Only bulk message bid
(offer) that locks or crosses the ABO
(ABB) against offers (bids) resting in the
EDGX Options Book at prices the same
as or better than the ABO (ABB) and
then cancels the unexecuted portion of
that bid (offer). Book Only orders do not
route away to other exchanges.14
Current Rule 21.1(j)(3)(A)(v) is
consistent with how the System handles
Book Only orders not subject to the
Price Adjust process.15 The Exchange
also notes that pursuant to Rule
21.1(j)(3)(a)(ii), a Market Maker with an
appointment in a class may designate a
bulk message for that class as Post Only
or Book Only, and other Users (i.e., nonMarket Makers or Market Makers
without an appointment in a class) must
designate a bulk message for that class
as Post Only.16
The Exchange now proposes to amend
Rule 21.1(i)(1) to subject bulk messages
to the Price Adjust process. Specifically,
the proposed rule change will subject a
User’s bulk messages to the Price Adjust
process, which will apply to all bulk
message bids and offers within a single
message, unless a User designates a bulk
message as Cancel Back (as described
below), which will also apply to all bulk
message bids and offers within a single
message. As such, the Exchange also
proposes to delete subparagraph (i)(4)
which disallows bulk messages from the
Price Adjust process. The Exchange
notes that Users have noted the
regularity with which their bulk
message bids and offers are rejected
because Price Adjust does not apply to
them. As a result, some Users find this
inefficient when submitting bulk
messages. The Exchange believes that
allowing bulk message bids and offers to
be subject to the Price Adjust process
will provide market participants with
14 See Rule 21.1(d)(7), which defines ‘‘Book Only
Orders’’ as orders that are to be ranked and
executed on the Exchange pursuant to Rule 21.8
(Order Display and Book Processing) or cancelled,
as appropriate, without routing away to another
options exchange. A Book Only Order will be
subject to the Price Adjust process unless a User has
entered instructions not to use such process. Users
may designate bulk messages as Book Only.
15 See supra note 10.
16 Pursuant to the current Rules, a bulk message
must be designated as Post Only or Book Only.
Additionally, because bulk messages must include
bids and offers and may not be market orders, all
bulk messages are limit orders. See Rules 16.1(a)(4)
and 21.1(d)(5).
E:\FR\FM\17JNN1.SGM
17JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 116 / Monday, June 17, 2019 / Notices
khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES
additional opportunities for execution
and price improvement, as well as
additional flexibility and control over
their submission of bulk messages. The
Exchange notes that the System
currently will not allow a User to
submit bulk messages as AON orders.
Moreover, the Exchange notes that AON
orders are not displayed on the Book,17
therefore, they do not contribute to
displayed liquidity, which is
inconsistent with the primary purpose
of bulk message functionality to
encourage liquidity and trading through
quoting behavior on the Exchange. The
Exchange also notes that an AON
order’s size contingency (executed in its
entirety or not at all) provides it with
few opportunities for execution, which
is also inconsistent with the purpose of
bulk messages. The Exchange now
proposes to explicitly state in Rule
21.1(d)(4) that a User may not designate
bulk messages as AON orders.18
Additionally, the Exchange proposes
to explicitly state under Rule 21.1(i)(1)
that a User may enter instructions for an
order (including bulk messages) not to
be subject to the Price Adjust process.
The ability for Users not to subject
orders to the Price Adjust process (and
Cancel Back) currently exists for a
User’s orders, including Book Only and
Post Only orders,19 that are not
otherwise subject to limitations under
the Rules. The Exchange is now
proposing to make this election explicit
under the Price Adjust provision and
applicable to a User’s orders and bulk
messages. The proposed opt-out election
is based on the corresponding Price
Adjust process under Rule 6.12 of the
Exchange’s affiliated exchange, Cboe C2
Exchange, Inc. (‘‘C2’’).20 In line with
this proposed change, the Exchange
now proposes to codify the existing
Cancel Back instruction (proposed Rule
21.1(l)) that is substantially similar to
that of C2’s Cancel Back provision
under C2 Rule 6.10(c) for Users that do
not wish for their orders or bulk
messages to be subject to the Price
Adjust process. As proposed, a Cancel
Back order is an order (including bulk
messages) a User designates to not be
subject to the Price Adjust Process
pursuant to Rule 21.1(i) that the System
cancels or rejects (immediately at the
time the System receives the order or
upon return to the System after being
17 The Exchange notes that it does not
disseminate bids or offers of AON orders to OPRA,
as the prices of AON orders are not included in the
BBO for a series.
18 See Rule 21.1(d)(4).
19 See Rule 21.1(d)(7)–(8).
20 The Exchange notes that C2 is simultaneously
proposing to include bulk messages in its Price
Adjust and Cancel Back processes.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:34 Jun 14, 2019
Jkt 247001
routed away) if displaying the order on
the Book would create a violation of
Rule 27.3 (Locked and Crossed
Markets), or if the order cannot
otherwise be executed or displayed in
the EDGX Options Book at its limit
price. As stated, a Cancel Back
designation for a bulk message applies
to all bulk message bids and offers
within a single message. The System
executes a Book Only—Cancel Back
order against resting orders, and cancels
or rejects a Post Only—Cancel Back
order, that locks or crosses the opposite
side of the BBO. The Exchange notes
that pursuant to the Book Only
instruction, an order or bulk message
may not route away to another
Exchange. Therefore, if an incoming
Book Only order or bulk message bid or
offer designated as Cancel Back locked
or crossed an away market (i.e. the
ABBO), the System would execute it to
the extent it could against contra-side
interest on the Exchange at prices the
same as or better than the ABBO in
accordance with the linkage rules.21 The
System would then cancel it to prevent
a violation of Rule 27.3 of the
intermarket linkage rules. The Exchange
also notes that pursuant to the Post Only
instruction, an order or bulk message
may not remove liquidity from the Book
or route away to another Exchange.
Therefore, if a Post Only order or bulk
message bid or offer designated as
Cancel Back locked or crossed the best
contra-side interest on the Exchange (i.e.
the BBO) or the ABBO, the System
would cancel it to prevent it from
executing against resting interest on the
Exchange and to prevent a violation of
Rule 27.3 of the intermarket linkage
rules.
Pursuant to the proposed rule change
described above, all bulk message bids
and offers would now be subject to the
Price Adjust process, if not otherwise
designated as Cancel Back, if they lock
or cross a Protected Quotation of
another options exchange or the
Exchange, and rest in the EDGX Options
Book pursuant to the process, thus
avoiding display of a locked or crossed
market in accordance with the linkage
rules.22 Therefore, the Exchange now
proposes to remove Rules
21.1(j)(3)(A)(iv) and 21.1(j)(3)(A)(v) (and
amend the subsequent lettering as a
result) because Post Only and Book
Only bulk messages will now be
included in the Price Adjust process,
the handling of which would now be
consistent with the current order
handing of Post Only and Book Only
21 See
supra note 10.
22 Id.
PO 00000
Frm 00116
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
28115
orders under the Price Adjust process.23
The Exchange also notes that all bulk
message bids and offers designated as
Cancel Back pursuant to proposed Rule
21.1(l), and thus designated to not be
subject to the Price Adjust process,
would be handled in the same manner
as they are today pursuant to current
subparagraphs (j)(3)(A)(iv) and
(j)(3)(A)(v) (which the Exchange
proposes to delete).24
The Exchange notes that allowing
bulk message bids and offers to be
subject to a repricing process is
consistent with the handling of similar
order (and quote) types on other
exchanges.25 A similar repricing
(display-price sliding) process for bulk
messages currently exists under Rule
21.1(h)(1) of the Exchange’s affiliated
exchange, Cboe BZX Exchange, Inc.
(‘‘BZX Options’’). The Exchange also
notes that other exchanges subject
orders (quotes), including quotes similar
to Post Only and Book Only bulk
messages, to a repricing process like the
Price Adjust process. For example,
NYSE Arca, Inc. (‘‘Arca’’) recently
adopted order types called the Market
Maker Add Liquidity Only quotation
(‘‘MMALO’’), which like a Post Only
instruction may not remove liquidity
from the Exchange, and the Market
Maker Repricing quotation (‘‘MMRP’’).26
Pursuant to Arca’s repricing process, if
these quotes would not be able to trade
upon entry (for example, because the
MMALO would take liquidity or display
at a price that locks or crosses any
interest on the Exchange or the NBBO),
it would be displayed at one minimum
price variation below (above) such sell
(buy) interest.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes the proposed
rule change is consistent with the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
‘‘Act’’) and the rules and regulations
thereunder applicable to the Exchange
and, in particular, the requirements of
Section 6(b) of the Act.27 Specifically,
the Exchange believes the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Section
23 Id.
24 Given that the proposed rule change will
subject bulk messages to the Price Adjust process,
and allow for a User to opt-out of the Price Adjust
process and, instead, designate their bulk message
bids and offers as Cancel Back, these provisions are
no longer necessary.
25 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 84737
(December 6, 2018), 83 FR 63919 (December 12,
2018) (SR–NYSEArca–2018–74) (Order Approving a
Proposed Rule Change, as Modified by Amendment
No. 1, to Amend Rules 6.62–O and 6.37A–O to Add
New Order Types and Quotation Designations). See
also BZX Options Rule 21.1(h)(1).
26 See Arca Rule 6.37A–O(a)(3)(A) and Rule
6.37A–O(a)(3)(C).
27 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
E:\FR\FM\17JNN1.SGM
17JNN1
khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES
28116
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 116 / Monday, June 17, 2019 / Notices
6(b)(5) 28 requirements that the rules of
an exchange be designed to prevent
fraudulent and manipulative acts and
practices, to promote just and equitable
principles of trade, to foster cooperation
and coordination with persons engaged
in regulating, clearing, settling,
processing information with respect to,
and facilitating transactions in
securities, to remove impediments to
and perfect the mechanism of a free and
open market and a national market
system, and, in general, to protect
investors and the public interest.
Additionally, the Exchange believes the
proposed rule change is consistent with
the Section 6(b)(5) 29 requirement that
the rules of an exchange not be designed
to permit unfair discrimination between
customers, issuers, brokers, or dealers.
In particular, the Exchange believes
that the proposed rule change subjecting
bulk messages to the Price Adjust
process will remove impediments to
and perfect the mechanism of a free and
open market because it provides Users
with the flexibility to apply to bulk
messages the same functionality they
may apply to their orders. The Exchange
believes that repricing individual bids
and offers within a single bulk message
for Users (that do not opt-out of the
Price Adjust process), as opposed to
automatically rejecting messages that
lock or cross protected quotes when
posted to the EDGX Options Book, will
permit Users to use bulk messages to
respond to continuously changing
market conditions in a more efficient
manner, as well as provide additional
opportunity for execution and price
improvement. The proposed repricing of
bulk messages prevents the display of a
locked or crossed market and is
consistent with the Linkage Plan,30
thereby perfecting the mechanism of a
free and open market and national
market system and protecting investors.
The Exchange also believes that by
subjecting bulk message bids and offers
to the Price Adjust process instead of
cancelling or rejecting them under
certain circumstances, will give Users
greater flexibility and control over the
circumstances under which their orders
are able to interact with contra sideinterest on the Exchange. The Exchange
believes this may increase the
opportunities for execution at multiple
price points and encourage the
provision of more liquidity to the
market, and therefore believes that it is
reasonably designed to facilitate the
mechanism of price discovery.
28 15
The Exchange notes that the options
markets are quote driven markets and
thus dependent on liquidity providers,
which are most commonly registered
market makers but also other Users,
such as professional traders, for
liquidity and price discovery. The
Exchange believes that subjecting bulk
messages to the Price Adjust process
will provide liquidity providers with
greater flexibility with respect to their
submission of bulk messages, the
primary purpose of which is to provide
liquidity to the market. The Exchange
believes that the reduction in the
number of rejected bulk message bids
and offers will promote efficacy in bulk
messaging and may encourage the
provision of more liquidity. This may
result in more trading opportunities and
tighter spreads and contribute to price
discovery. As a result, this proposed
change intends to improve overall
market quality and enhance competition
on the Exchange to the benefit of all
investors.
The Exchange believes that allowing
for a User to enter instructions for an
order or bulk message not to be subject
to the Price Adjust process under Rule
21.1(i)(1), and rather designate an order
or bulk message as Cancel Back under
proposed Rule 21.1(l), serves to remove
impediments to and perfect the
mechanism of a free and open market
and a national market system because
this change provides Users with
additional flexibility regarding how they
want the System to handle their orders
and bulk messages. The Exchange also
notes that permitting Users to elect that
their orders and/or bulk messages not be
subject to the Price Adjust process, and
instead treated as Cancel Back orders, is
an additional way to ensure compliance
with the linkage rules,31 thereby
protecting investors and the public
interest. Additionally, this change is
consistent with the Price Adjust and
Cancel Back processes language under
Rule 6.10 and Rule 6.12 of the
Exchange’s affiliated exchange, C2.32
The Exchange believes that mirroring
the corresponding C2 rule language will
provide better understanding for Users
participating across the affiliated
exchanges.
Lastly, by amending Rule 21.1(d)(4)
for AON orders to state that such orders
may not be bulk messages, a System
functionality currently in place, the
Exchange believes the proposed rule
change will remove impediments to the
mechanism of a free and open market
and protect investors by providing
investors with rules that accurately
U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
29 Id.
30 See
31 Id.
supra note 10.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:34 Jun 14, 2019
32 See
Jkt 247001
PO 00000
also supra note 20.
Frm 00117
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
reflect functionality currently
unavailable for bulk messages.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that
the proposed rule change will impose
any burden on competition that is not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act. The
Exchange does not believe the proposed
rule change will impose any burden on
intramarket competition that is not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act, as the
proposed application of the Price Adjust
process and opt-out instructions to bulk
messages, along with the Cancel Back
process to both orders and bulk
messages, will be available to all
applicable Users (e.g. Market Makers
may submit Book Only bulk messages,
therefore, the option to apply the Price
Adjust process to Book Only bulk
messages is available to all Market
Makers). While bulk messages will by
default be subject to the Price Adjust
process, all Users may opt-out of that
process for bulk messages by
designating their bulk messages (and
orders) as Cancel Back, thus, allowing
Users the choice to continue to have
their bulk messages be handled in the
same manner they are today. The
Exchange also notes that the Price
Adjust process (including opt-out
instructions) are already available to all
Users for orders, including Post Only
and Book Only orders, and will apply to
bulk messages in the same manner as
they apply to orders.
The Exchange does not believe the
proposed rule change will impose any
burden on intermarket competition that
is not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act,
because it will provide Users with bulk
message repricing functionality and optout provisions that are similar to other
order and quote repricing and opt-out
provisions available on other exchanges.
The Exchange believes the proposed
functionality will permit the Exchange
to operate on an even playing field
relative to other exchanges that have
similar functionality.
As discussed above, the options
markets are quote driven markets and
thus dependent on various Users as
liquidity providers and for price
discovery. The Exchange believes the
proposed amendment to subject bulk
messages to the Price Adjust process
will provide liquidity providers with
additional flexibility and control over
interactions of their individual bids and
offers within a bulk message with
contra-side liquidity, as well as
additional opportunity for execution at
E:\FR\FM\17JNN1.SGM
17JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 116 / Monday, June 17, 2019 / Notices
multiple price points and price
improvement. This may encourage the
provision of more liquidity, which may
result in more trading opportunities and
tighter spreads, and contribute to price
discovery. This may improve overall
market quality and enhance competition
on the Exchange, to the benefit of all
investors.
Electronic Comments
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
Paper Comments
The Exchange neither solicited nor
received comments on the proposed
rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Because the foregoing proposed rule
change does not:
A. Significantly affect the protection
of investors or the public interest;
B. impose any significant burden on
competition; and
C. become operative for 30 days from
the date on which it was filed, or such
shorter time as the Commission may
designate, it has become effective
pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the
Act 33 and Rule 19b–4(f)(6) 34
thereunder.35
At any time within 60 days of the
filing of the proposed rule change, the
Commission summarily may
temporarily suspend such rule change if
it appears to the Commission that such
action is necessary or appropriate in the
public interest, for the protection of
investors, or otherwise in furtherance of
the purposes of the Act. If the
Commission takes such action, the
Commission will institute proceedings
to determine whether the proposed rule
change should be approved or
disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES
33 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
34 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6).
35 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6). In addition, Rule 19b–
4(f)(6)(iii) requires a self-regulatory organization to
give the Commission written notice of its intent to
file the proposed rule change, along with a brief
description and text of the proposed rule change,
at least five business days prior to the date of filing
of the proposed rule change, or such shorter time
as designated by the Commission. The Exchange
has satisfied this requirement.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:34 Jun 14, 2019
Jkt 247001
• Use the Commission’s internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include File Number SR–
CboeEDGX–2019–034 on the subject
line.
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Secretary, Securities and Exchange
Commission, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–CboeEDGX–2019–034. This
file number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
internet website (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for website viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549 on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the
filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change.
Persons submitting comments are
cautioned that we do not redact or edit
personal identifying information from
comment submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish
to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File
Number SR–CboeEDGX–2019–034 and
should be submitted on or before July 8,
2019.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.36
Eduardo A. Aleman,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2019–12658 Filed 6–14–19; 8:45 am]
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–86087; File No. SR–
NASDAQ–2019–050]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; The
Nasdaq Stock Market LLC; Notice of
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of
Proposed Rule Change To Delay
Implementation of the MIDP Routing
Option
June 11, 2019.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on June 3,
2019, The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC
(‘‘Nasdaq’’ or ‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule
change as described in Items I and II
below, which Items have been prepared
by the Exchange. The Commission is
publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change
from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to delay
implementation of the MIDP routing
option until the third quarter of 2019.
The text of the proposed rule change
is available on the Exchange’s website at
https://nasdaq.cchwallstreet.com, at the
principal office of the Exchange, and at
the Commission’s Public Reference
Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for
the proposed rule change and discussed
any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these
statements may be examined at the
places specified in Item IV below. The
Exchange has prepared summaries, set
forth in sections A, B, and C below, of
the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange is proposing to delay
implementation of the MIDP routing
option until the third quarter of 2019.
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
1 15
36 17
PO 00000
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
Frm 00118
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
28117
2 17
E:\FR\FM\17JNN1.SGM
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
CFR 240.19b–4.
17JNN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 116 (Monday, June 17, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 28113-28117]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-12658]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-86082; File No. SR-CboeEDGX-2019-034]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe EDGX Exchange, Inc.; Notice
of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change
Relating To Update Its Price Adjust Process To Allow for the Process To
Apply to Bulk Messages
June 11, 2019.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(the ``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given
that on June 4, 2019, Cboe EDGX Exchange, Inc. (the ``Exchange'' or
``EDGX'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I and II
below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The Exchange
filed the proposal as a ``non-controversial'' proposed rule change
pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act \3\ and Rule 19b-
4(f)(6) thereunder.\4\ The Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
\3\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
\4\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
Cboe EDGX Exchange, Inc. (the ``Exchange'' or ``EDGX Options'')
proposes to update its Price Adjust process to allow for the process to
apply to bulk messages. The text of the proposed rule change is
provided in Exhibit 5.
The text of the proposed rule change is also available on the
Exchange's website (https://markets.cboe.com/us/options/regulation/rule_filings/edgx/), at the Exchange's Office of the Secretary, and at
the Commission's Public Reference Room.
[[Page 28114]]
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes to amend its rules to allow for the Price
Adjust process to apply to bulk messages and make corresponding changes
where applicable. The Exchange is proposing these amendments in order
to provide Users that submit bulk messages with functionality that is
currently available to them for orders.
In December 2018, the Exchange adopted bulk messaging
functionality, in which a User may enter, modify or cancel up to an
Exchange-specified number of bids and offers in a single message. A
User may submit a bulk message through a bulk port.\5\ The System \6\
handles bulk message bids and offers in the same manner as it handles
an order, or quote if submitted by a Market Maker, unless the Rules
specify otherwise. Currently, Rule 21.1(i)(1) subjects orders to the
Price Adjust process.\7\ Pursuant to the Price Adjust process, if an
order (that is not an all-or-none (``AON'') order \8\), at the time of
entry, would lock or cross a Protected Quotation of another options
exchange or the Exchange (subjecting it to the Price Adjust process),
the System ranks \9\ and displays the order at one minimum price
variation below (above) the current NBO (NBB). If a non-AON order is
subject to the Price Adjust process by locking or crossing the offer
(bid) of a AON order resting on the EDGX Options Book at or better than
the Exchange's best offer (bid), the System ranks the resting AON order
at one minimum price variation above (below) the bid (offer) of the
non-AON order. Additionally, the System ranks an AON orders that cross
a Protected Offer (Bid) of another options exchange or a sell (buy) AON
order resting on the EDGX Options Book at or better than the Exchange's
best offer (bid), at a price equal to the Protected Offer (Bid) or the
offer (bid) of the resting AON order, respectively. AON orders that
lock or cross a Protected Offer (Bid) of the Exchange are ranked by the
System at a price one minimum price variation below (above) the
Protected Offer (Bid). The Price Adjust process applies to orders
(subject to the User's instructions or the Rules) that do not execute
upon entry and go to rest in the EDGX Options Book (for example,
because an order is not marketable upon entry, is not eligible to
route, etc.). It ensures these orders rest at executable prices in
accordance with linkage rules.\10\ Current Rule 21.1(i)(4) states that
the Price Adjust process does not apply to bulk messages.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ See Rule 21.1(j)(3).
\6\ The ``System'' is the automated system for order execution
and trade reporting owned and operated by the Exchange. See Rule
21.1(a).
\7\ The Exchange notes that market orders will not be subject to
the price adjust process given that they execute immediately at the
best price, therefore, they will not lock or cross the market.
\8\ An AON order is either a market or a limit order to be
executed in their entirety or not at all. See Rule 21.1(d)(4).
\9\ In the EDGX Rules, the term ``rank'' means that an order
will be prioritized and eligible for execution at its ranked price
for purposes of allocation if an execution were to occur at that
price. For an AON order ``ranked'' at a price, it would be
prioritized last at that price.
\10\ See Chapter XXVII of the Rules. See also Options Order
Protection and Locked/Crossed Market Plan (the ``Linkage Plan'').
\11\ Specifically, the individual bids (offers) submitted within
a single bulk message. Therefore, as proposed, the Price Adjust
process or a Cancel Back designation, as applicable, applies to all
bulk message bids and offers within a single message.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Furthermore, current Rule 21.1(j)(3)(A) provides for additional
handling provisions regarding bulk messages submitted through bulk
quoting ports. Specifically, Rule 21.1(j)(3)(A)(iv) provides that the
System will cancel or reject a Post Only bulk message bid (offer) with
a price that locks or crosses the Exchange best offer (bid) or ABO
(ABB).\12\ The Exchange notes that bulk messages that include a Post
Only instruction do not remove liquidity from the Exchange or route
away to other exchanges.\13\ Current Rule 21.1(j)(3)(A)(iv) is
consistent with how the System handles a Post Only order not subject to
the Price Adjust process that locks or crosses the opposite side
Exchange best bid or offer (``BBO'') or if displaying the order on the
EDGX Options Book would create a violation of linkage Rule 27.3 (Locked
and Crossed Markets). Additionally, current Rule 21.1(j)(3)(A)(v)
provides that the System executes a Book Only bulk message bid (offer)
that locks or crosses the ABO (ABB) against offers (bids) resting in
the EDGX Options Book at prices the same as or better than the ABO
(ABB) and then cancels the unexecuted portion of that bid (offer). Book
Only orders do not route away to other exchanges.\14\ Current Rule
21.1(j)(3)(A)(v) is consistent with how the System handles Book Only
orders not subject to the Price Adjust process.\15\ The Exchange also
notes that pursuant to Rule 21.1(j)(3)(a)(ii), a Market Maker with an
appointment in a class may designate a bulk message for that class as
Post Only or Book Only, and other Users (i.e., non-Market Makers or
Market Makers without an appointment in a class) must designate a bulk
message for that class as Post Only.\16\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ The ABBO means the best bid (offer) disseminated by other
exchanges.
\13\ See Rule 21.1(d)(8), which defines ``Post Only Orders'' as
orders that are to be ranked and executed on the Exchange pursuant
to Rule 21.8 (Order Display and Book Processing) or cancelled, as
appropriate, without routing away to another options exchange except
that the order will not remove liquidity from the EDGX Options Book.
A Post Only Order that is not subject to the Price Adjust process
that would lock or cross a Protected Quotation of another options
exchange or the Exchange will be cancelled. Users may designate bulk
messages as Post Only.
\14\ See Rule 21.1(d)(7), which defines ``Book Only Orders'' as
orders that are to be ranked and executed on the Exchange pursuant
to Rule 21.8 (Order Display and Book Processing) or cancelled, as
appropriate, without routing away to another options exchange. A
Book Only Order will be subject to the Price Adjust process unless a
User has entered instructions not to use such process. Users may
designate bulk messages as Book Only.
\15\ See supra note 10.
\16\ Pursuant to the current Rules, a bulk message must be
designated as Post Only or Book Only. Additionally, because bulk
messages must include bids and offers and may not be market orders,
all bulk messages are limit orders. See Rules 16.1(a)(4) and
21.1(d)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange now proposes to amend Rule 21.1(i)(1) to subject bulk
messages to the Price Adjust process. Specifically, the proposed rule
change will subject a User's bulk messages to the Price Adjust process,
which will apply to all bulk message bids and offers within a single
message, unless a User designates a bulk message as Cancel Back (as
described below), which will also apply to all bulk message bids and
offers within a single message. As such, the Exchange also proposes to
delete subparagraph (i)(4) which disallows bulk messages from the Price
Adjust process. The Exchange notes that Users have noted the regularity
with which their bulk message bids and offers are rejected because
Price Adjust does not apply to them. As a result, some Users find this
inefficient when submitting bulk messages. The Exchange believes that
allowing bulk message bids and offers to be subject to the Price Adjust
process will provide market participants with
[[Page 28115]]
additional opportunities for execution and price improvement, as well
as additional flexibility and control over their submission of bulk
messages. The Exchange notes that the System currently will not allow a
User to submit bulk messages as AON orders. Moreover, the Exchange
notes that AON orders are not displayed on the Book,\17\ therefore,
they do not contribute to displayed liquidity, which is inconsistent
with the primary purpose of bulk message functionality to encourage
liquidity and trading through quoting behavior on the Exchange. The
Exchange also notes that an AON order's size contingency (executed in
its entirety or not at all) provides it with few opportunities for
execution, which is also inconsistent with the purpose of bulk
messages. The Exchange now proposes to explicitly state in Rule
21.1(d)(4) that a User may not designate bulk messages as AON
orders.\18\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\17\ The Exchange notes that it does not disseminate bids or
offers of AON orders to OPRA, as the prices of AON orders are not
included in the BBO for a series.
\18\ See Rule 21.1(d)(4).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Additionally, the Exchange proposes to explicitly state under Rule
21.1(i)(1) that a User may enter instructions for an order (including
bulk messages) not to be subject to the Price Adjust process. The
ability for Users not to subject orders to the Price Adjust process
(and Cancel Back) currently exists for a User's orders, including Book
Only and Post Only orders,\19\ that are not otherwise subject to
limitations under the Rules. The Exchange is now proposing to make this
election explicit under the Price Adjust provision and applicable to a
User's orders and bulk messages. The proposed opt-out election is based
on the corresponding Price Adjust process under Rule 6.12 of the
Exchange's affiliated exchange, Cboe C2 Exchange, Inc. (``C2'').\20\ In
line with this proposed change, the Exchange now proposes to codify the
existing Cancel Back instruction (proposed Rule 21.1(l)) that is
substantially similar to that of C2's Cancel Back provision under C2
Rule 6.10(c) for Users that do not wish for their orders or bulk
messages to be subject to the Price Adjust process. As proposed, a
Cancel Back order is an order (including bulk messages) a User
designates to not be subject to the Price Adjust Process pursuant to
Rule 21.1(i) that the System cancels or rejects (immediately at the
time the System receives the order or upon return to the System after
being routed away) if displaying the order on the Book would create a
violation of Rule 27.3 (Locked and Crossed Markets), or if the order
cannot otherwise be executed or displayed in the EDGX Options Book at
its limit price. As stated, a Cancel Back designation for a bulk
message applies to all bulk message bids and offers within a single
message. The System executes a Book Only--Cancel Back order against
resting orders, and cancels or rejects a Post Only--Cancel Back order,
that locks or crosses the opposite side of the BBO. The Exchange notes
that pursuant to the Book Only instruction, an order or bulk message
may not route away to another Exchange. Therefore, if an incoming Book
Only order or bulk message bid or offer designated as Cancel Back
locked or crossed an away market (i.e. the ABBO), the System would
execute it to the extent it could against contra-side interest on the
Exchange at prices the same as or better than the ABBO in accordance
with the linkage rules.\21\ The System would then cancel it to prevent
a violation of Rule 27.3 of the intermarket linkage rules. The Exchange
also notes that pursuant to the Post Only instruction, an order or bulk
message may not remove liquidity from the Book or route away to another
Exchange. Therefore, if a Post Only order or bulk message bid or offer
designated as Cancel Back locked or crossed the best contra-side
interest on the Exchange (i.e. the BBO) or the ABBO, the System would
cancel it to prevent it from executing against resting interest on the
Exchange and to prevent a violation of Rule 27.3 of the intermarket
linkage rules.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\19\ See Rule 21.1(d)(7)-(8).
\20\ The Exchange notes that C2 is simultaneously proposing to
include bulk messages in its Price Adjust and Cancel Back processes.
\21\ See supra note 10.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pursuant to the proposed rule change described above, all bulk
message bids and offers would now be subject to the Price Adjust
process, if not otherwise designated as Cancel Back, if they lock or
cross a Protected Quotation of another options exchange or the
Exchange, and rest in the EDGX Options Book pursuant to the process,
thus avoiding display of a locked or crossed market in accordance with
the linkage rules.\22\ Therefore, the Exchange now proposes to remove
Rules 21.1(j)(3)(A)(iv) and 21.1(j)(3)(A)(v) (and amend the subsequent
lettering as a result) because Post Only and Book Only bulk messages
will now be included in the Price Adjust process, the handling of which
would now be consistent with the current order handing of Post Only and
Book Only orders under the Price Adjust process.\23\ The Exchange also
notes that all bulk message bids and offers designated as Cancel Back
pursuant to proposed Rule 21.1(l), and thus designated to not be
subject to the Price Adjust process, would be handled in the same
manner as they are today pursuant to current subparagraphs
(j)(3)(A)(iv) and (j)(3)(A)(v) (which the Exchange proposes to
delete).\24\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\22\ Id.
\23\ Id.
\24\ Given that the proposed rule change will subject bulk
messages to the Price Adjust process, and allow for a User to opt-
out of the Price Adjust process and, instead, designate their bulk
message bids and offers as Cancel Back, these provisions are no
longer necessary.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange notes that allowing bulk message bids and offers to be
subject to a repricing process is consistent with the handling of
similar order (and quote) types on other exchanges.\25\ A similar
repricing (display-price sliding) process for bulk messages currently
exists under Rule 21.1(h)(1) of the Exchange's affiliated exchange,
Cboe BZX Exchange, Inc. (``BZX Options''). The Exchange also notes that
other exchanges subject orders (quotes), including quotes similar to
Post Only and Book Only bulk messages, to a repricing process like the
Price Adjust process. For example, NYSE Arca, Inc. (``Arca'') recently
adopted order types called the Market Maker Add Liquidity Only
quotation (``MMALO''), which like a Post Only instruction may not
remove liquidity from the Exchange, and the Market Maker Repricing
quotation (``MMRP'').\26\ Pursuant to Arca's repricing process, if
these quotes would not be able to trade upon entry (for example,
because the MMALO would take liquidity or display at a price that locks
or crosses any interest on the Exchange or the NBBO), it would be
displayed at one minimum price variation below (above) such sell (buy)
interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\25\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 84737 (December 6,
2018), 83 FR 63919 (December 12, 2018) (SR-NYSEArca-2018-74) (Order
Approving a Proposed Rule Change, as Modified by Amendment No. 1, to
Amend Rules 6.62-O and 6.37A-O to Add New Order Types and Quotation
Designations). See also BZX Options Rule 21.1(h)(1).
\26\ See Arca Rule 6.37A-O(a)(3)(A) and Rule 6.37A-O(a)(3)(C).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the ``Act'') and the rules and
regulations thereunder applicable to the Exchange and, in particular,
the requirements of Section 6(b) of the Act.\27\ Specifically, the
Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with the
Section
[[Page 28116]]
6(b)(5) \28\ requirements that the rules of an exchange be designed to
prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to promote just
and equitable principles of trade, to foster cooperation and
coordination with persons engaged in regulating, clearing, settling,
processing information with respect to, and facilitating transactions
in securities, to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a
free and open market and a national market system, and, in general, to
protect investors and the public interest. Additionally, the Exchange
believes the proposed rule change is consistent with the Section
6(b)(5) \29\ requirement that the rules of an exchange not be designed
to permit unfair discrimination between customers, issuers, brokers, or
dealers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\27\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
\28\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
\29\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In particular, the Exchange believes that the proposed rule change
subjecting bulk messages to the Price Adjust process will remove
impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market
because it provides Users with the flexibility to apply to bulk
messages the same functionality they may apply to their orders. The
Exchange believes that repricing individual bids and offers within a
single bulk message for Users (that do not opt-out of the Price Adjust
process), as opposed to automatically rejecting messages that lock or
cross protected quotes when posted to the EDGX Options Book, will
permit Users to use bulk messages to respond to continuously changing
market conditions in a more efficient manner, as well as provide
additional opportunity for execution and price improvement. The
proposed repricing of bulk messages prevents the display of a locked or
crossed market and is consistent with the Linkage Plan,\30\ thereby
perfecting the mechanism of a free and open market and national market
system and protecting investors.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\30\ See supra note 10.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange also believes that by subjecting bulk message bids and
offers to the Price Adjust process instead of cancelling or rejecting
them under certain circumstances, will give Users greater flexibility
and control over the circumstances under which their orders are able to
interact with contra side-interest on the Exchange. The Exchange
believes this may increase the opportunities for execution at multiple
price points and encourage the provision of more liquidity to the
market, and therefore believes that it is reasonably designed to
facilitate the mechanism of price discovery.
The Exchange notes that the options markets are quote driven
markets and thus dependent on liquidity providers, which are most
commonly registered market makers but also other Users, such as
professional traders, for liquidity and price discovery. The Exchange
believes that subjecting bulk messages to the Price Adjust process will
provide liquidity providers with greater flexibility with respect to
their submission of bulk messages, the primary purpose of which is to
provide liquidity to the market. The Exchange believes that the
reduction in the number of rejected bulk message bids and offers will
promote efficacy in bulk messaging and may encourage the provision of
more liquidity. This may result in more trading opportunities and
tighter spreads and contribute to price discovery. As a result, this
proposed change intends to improve overall market quality and enhance
competition on the Exchange to the benefit of all investors.
The Exchange believes that allowing for a User to enter
instructions for an order or bulk message not to be subject to the
Price Adjust process under Rule 21.1(i)(1), and rather designate an
order or bulk message as Cancel Back under proposed Rule 21.1(l),
serves to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and
open market and a national market system because this change provides
Users with additional flexibility regarding how they want the System to
handle their orders and bulk messages. The Exchange also notes that
permitting Users to elect that their orders and/or bulk messages not be
subject to the Price Adjust process, and instead treated as Cancel Back
orders, is an additional way to ensure compliance with the linkage
rules,\31\ thereby protecting investors and the public interest.
Additionally, this change is consistent with the Price Adjust and
Cancel Back processes language under Rule 6.10 and Rule 6.12 of the
Exchange's affiliated exchange, C2.\32\ The Exchange believes that
mirroring the corresponding C2 rule language will provide better
understanding for Users participating across the affiliated exchanges.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\31\ Id.
\32\ See also supra note 20.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lastly, by amending Rule 21.1(d)(4) for AON orders to state that
such orders may not be bulk messages, a System functionality currently
in place, the Exchange believes the proposed rule change will remove
impediments to the mechanism of a free and open market and protect
investors by providing investors with rules that accurately reflect
functionality currently unavailable for bulk messages.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. The Exchange does not
believe the proposed rule change will impose any burden on intramarket
competition that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act, as the proposed application of the Price Adjust
process and opt-out instructions to bulk messages, along with the
Cancel Back process to both orders and bulk messages, will be available
to all applicable Users (e.g. Market Makers may submit Book Only bulk
messages, therefore, the option to apply the Price Adjust process to
Book Only bulk messages is available to all Market Makers). While bulk
messages will by default be subject to the Price Adjust process, all
Users may opt-out of that process for bulk messages by designating
their bulk messages (and orders) as Cancel Back, thus, allowing Users
the choice to continue to have their bulk messages be handled in the
same manner they are today. The Exchange also notes that the Price
Adjust process (including opt-out instructions) are already available
to all Users for orders, including Post Only and Book Only orders, and
will apply to bulk messages in the same manner as they apply to orders.
The Exchange does not believe the proposed rule change will impose
any burden on intermarket competition that is not necessary or
appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act, because it will
provide Users with bulk message repricing functionality and opt-out
provisions that are similar to other order and quote repricing and opt-
out provisions available on other exchanges. The Exchange believes the
proposed functionality will permit the Exchange to operate on an even
playing field relative to other exchanges that have similar
functionality.
As discussed above, the options markets are quote driven markets
and thus dependent on various Users as liquidity providers and for
price discovery. The Exchange believes the proposed amendment to
subject bulk messages to the Price Adjust process will provide
liquidity providers with additional flexibility and control over
interactions of their individual bids and offers within a bulk message
with contra-side liquidity, as well as additional opportunity for
execution at
[[Page 28117]]
multiple price points and price improvement. This may encourage the
provision of more liquidity, which may result in more trading
opportunities and tighter spreads, and contribute to price discovery.
This may improve overall market quality and enhance competition on the
Exchange, to the benefit of all investors.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
The Exchange neither solicited nor received comments on the
proposed rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Because the foregoing proposed rule change does not:
A. Significantly affect the protection of investors or the public
interest;
B. impose any significant burden on competition; and
C. become operative for 30 days from the date on which it was
filed, or such shorter time as the Commission may designate, it has
become effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \33\ and
Rule 19b-4(f)(6) \34\ thereunder.\35\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\33\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
\34\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
\35\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6). In addition, Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii)
requires a self-regulatory organization to give the Commission
written notice of its intent to file the proposed rule change, along
with a brief description and text of the proposed rule change, at
least five business days prior to the date of filing of the proposed
rule change, or such shorter time as designated by the Commission.
The Exchange has satisfied this requirement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission
takes such action, the Commission will institute proceedings to
determine whether the proposed rule change should be approved or
disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an email to [email protected]. Please include
File Number SR-CboeEDGX-2019-034 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-CboeEDGX-2019-034. This
file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's internet website (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml).
Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written
statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with
the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed
rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those
that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions
of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and printing in
the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC
20549 on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and
3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection
and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change. Persons submitting comments are
cautioned that we do not redact or edit personal identifying
information from comment submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR-CboeEDGX-2019-034 and should be
submitted on or before July 8, 2019.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\36\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\36\
Eduardo A. Aleman,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2019-12658 Filed 6-14-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P