Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe Exchange, Inc.; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To Amend Its Rules Relating to Registration of Trading Permit Holders, 27667-27669 [2019-12450]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 114 / Thursday, June 13, 2019 / Notices
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–86065; File No. SR–CBOE–
2019–029]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe
Exchange, Inc.; Notice of Filing and
Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed
Rule Change To Amend Its Rules
Relating to Registration of Trading
Permit Holders
June 7, 2019.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on June 6,
2019, Cboe Exchange, Inc. (the
‘‘Exchange’’ or ‘‘Cboe Options’’) filed
with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the ‘‘Commission’’) the
proposed rule change as described in
Items I, and II, below, which Items have
been prepared by the Exchange. The
Exchange filed the proposal as a ‘‘noncontroversial’’ proposed rule change
pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of
the Act 3 and Rule 19b–4(f)(6)
thereunder.4 The Commission is
publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change
from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
Cboe Exchange, Inc. (the ‘‘Exchange’’
or ‘‘Cboe Options’’) proposes to amend
its rules relating to registration of
Trading Permit Holders. The text of the
proposed rule change is provided in
Exhibit 5.
The text of the proposed rule change
is also available on the Exchange’s
website (https://www.cboe.com/
AboutCBOE/
CBOELegalRegulatoryHome.aspx), at
the Exchange’s Office of the Secretary,
and at the Commission’s Public
Reference Room.
khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for
the proposed rule change and discussed
any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these
statements may be examined at the
places specified in Item IV below. The
Exchange has prepared summaries, set
1 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
CFR 240.19b–4.
3 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
4 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6).
2 17
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:55 Jun 12, 2019
Jkt 247001
forth in sections A, B, and C below, of
the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes to amend
certain rules relating to the registration
of its Trading Permit Holders (‘‘TPHs’’).
Qualifications of TPHs
The Exchange first proposes to amend
its rules that set forth the qualifications
required to be an individual TPH or
TPH organization. Particularly, Rule
3.2(b) currently provides, among other
things, that an individual must be
approved to engage in one or more of
the following enumerated trading
functions: (i) Market-Maker, (ii) Floor
Broker, (iii) Proprietary Trading Permit
Holder, (iv) DPM Designee, (v) FLEX
Appointed Market-Maker and (vi) FLEX
Qualified Market-Maker. Similarly, Rule
3.3(b) provides, in relevant part that a
TPH organization must be approved to
engage in one or more of the following
trading functions: (i) TPH organization
approved to transact business with the
public, (ii) Clearing Trading Permit
Holder, (iii) order service firm, (iv)
Market-Maker; (v) Lead Market-Maker,
(vi) Designated Primary Market-Maker,
and (vii) Proprietary Trading Permit
Holder.
The Exchange proposes to eliminate
subparagraph (b) of Rules 3.2 and 3.3.
The Exchange does not believe it is
necessary to enumerate in the manner
that it has the trading functions for
which a TPH may be approved to
engage in, nor is it required to do so.
Indeed, the Exchange notes that other
Exchanges with similar rules governing
member qualifications do not include
such a list, including its affiliate
Exchanges.5 The Exchange believes
eliminating the enumerated categories
from its rules provides the Exchange
more flexibility in the future should
additional registration capacities be
added or removed. In connection with
the proposed change, the Exchange also
proposes to eliminate cross references to
Rules 3.2(b) and 3.3(b).6
5 See Rules of Cboe C2, Exchange, Inc., Cboe BZX
Exchange, Inc., Cboe BYX Exchange, Inc., Cboe
EDGX Exchange, Inc. and Cboe EDGX Exchange,
Inc. See also e.g., Nasdaq PHLX LLC Rule 910 and
Nasdaq PHLX Rulebook generally. See also, NYSE
Arca LLC Rules 2.2, 2.3 and NYSE Arca Rulebook
generally.
6 The Exchange notes that Rule 3.10 references
Rule 3.3(c) instead of Rule 3.3(b). The Exchange
notes it inadvertently failed to update the reference
and that indeed, subparagraph (c) of Rule 3.3 no
longer exists.
PO 00000
Frm 00089
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
27667
TPH Orientation and Qualification
Examination
The Exchange proposes to amend its
rule governing the Exchange’s Trading
Permit Holder Orientation Program and
Trading Permit Holder Qualification
Exam. Rule 3.9(e) currently provides
that any person applying pursuant to
paragraph (a) of Rule 3.9 to have an
authorized trading function 7 is required
to complete the Exchange’s Trading
Permit Holder Orientation Program
(‘‘TPH Orientation’’) and to pass an
Exchange Trading Permit Holder
Qualification Exam (‘‘TPH Exam’’). The
Exchange proposes to eliminate in its
entirety the requirement to complete the
TPH Orientation and take the TPH
Exam. Particularly, the Exchange
believes that the qualification
requirements under Exchange Rule 3.6A
adequately test TPH applicants’
knowledge of the securities industry.
For example, all representative-level
applicants are now required to take the
Securities Industry Essentials
Examination (‘‘SIE’’) which assesses
basic product knowledge; the structure
and function of the securities industry
markets, regulatory agencies and their
functions; and regulated and prohibited
practices in addition to passing the
appropriate qualification examination
(e.g., Series 57). Additionally, the
Exchange notes that all TPHs are subject
to continuing education requirements
under Rule 9.3A, which, among other
things, requires each TPH and TPH
organization to maintain a continuing
and current education program for its
covered registered persons to enhance
their securities knowledge, skills and
professionalism. As such, the Exchange
believes requiring such individuals to
also attend a TPH Orientation and take
a TPH Exam in order to participate on
the Exchange is unnecessary and
duplicative. The Exchange therefore
seeks to eliminate these requirements.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes the proposed
rule change is consistent with the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
‘‘Act’’) and the rules and regulations
thereunder applicable to the Exchange
and, in particular, the requirements of
Section 6(b) of the Act.8 Specifically,
the Exchange believes the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Section
6(b)(5) 9 requirements that the rules of
7 Currently, Floor Brokers, Market-Makers (which
includes DPM Designees, FLEX Appointed MarketMakers and FLEX Qualified Market-Makers), and
Proprietary Traders applying pursuant to Rule 3.9
are subject to the TPH Orientation and TPH Exam.
8 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
9 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
E:\FR\FM\13JNN1.SGM
13JNN1
khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES
27668
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 114 / Thursday, June 13, 2019 / Notices
an exchange be designed to prevent
fraudulent and manipulative acts and
practices, to promote just and equitable
principles of trade, to foster cooperation
and coordination with persons engaged
in regulating, clearing, settling,
processing information with respect to,
and facilitating transactions in
securities, to remove impediments to
and perfect the mechanism of a free and
open market and a national market
system, and, in general, to protect
investors and the public interest. In
addition, the Exchange believes that the
proposed rule change is consistent with
Section 6(c)(3)(B) of the Act,10 which
authorizes exchanges to prescribe
standards of training, experience and
competence for persons associated with
exchange members, and gives exchanges
the authority to bar a natural person
from becoming a member or a person
associated with a member, if the person
does not meet the standards of training,
experience and competence prescribed
in the rules of the exchange.
In particular, the Exchange believes
eliminating from its rules a list of
trading functions individual TPHs and
TPH organizations may be approved to
engage in is not a substantive change as
it does not affect any rights or
obligations of TPHs. Rather, the
Exchange merely no longer wishes to
maintain Rules 3.2(b) and 3.3(b) and
notes it is not required to do so. As
noted above, several other Exchanges
similarly do not maintain any
provisions similar to current Rules
3.2(b) and 3.3(b), including its affiliate
Exchanges. Accordingly, the proposed
rule change will also provide further
harmonization across its affiliated
exchanges with respect to its
registration rules, which may alleviate
potential confusion.
Next, the Exchange notes that under
Section 6(c)(3)(B) of the Act, the
Exchange is authorized to prescribe
standards of training, experience and
competence for persons associated with
exchange members. The Exchange
believes the standards of training,
experience and competence it has
prescribed under its rules, not including
the TPH Orientation and Exam are, on
their own, an adequate prescription of
training, experience and competence.
Indeed, the Exchange believes the
requirements related to training,
experience and competence currently
set forth under rules 3.6A, along with
continuing education requirements set
forth under Rule 9.3A, are designed to
help ensure professionalism among
market participants, prevent fraudulent
and manipulative practices, and
10 15
U.S.C. 78f(c)(3)(B).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:55 Jun 12, 2019
Jkt 247001
promote just and equitable principles of
trade. Moreover, the Exchange believes
the prescribed qualification exams
required under Rule 3.6A align with the
various trading functions and associated
tasks that would be performed by a TPH
applicant currently subject to the TPH
Exam and tests knowledge of the most
current laws, rules, regulations and
skills relevant to the respective
functions and associated tasks. The
Exchange therefore believes that any
TPH applicant that can satisfy such
requirements has demonstrated that he
or she has attained a sufficient level of
competence and knowledge to
participate on the Exchange. In sum, the
Exchange has determined that the
requisite knowledge necessary to
participate on the Exchange can be
assessed adequately by the qualification
examinations prescribed under Rule
3.6A and that a TPH Orientation and
Exam requirement provides no material
improvements to the qualification
process. Accordingly, the Exchange
believes requiring such individuals to
also complete the TPH Orientation and
take the TPH Exam is redundant and
unnecessary. Furthermore, the Exchange
believes that it is in the interests of all
market participants to provide
consistent qualification and registration
requirements across markets and notes
that its affiliated markets do not have
any exchange-specific testing
requirements. The Exchange lastly notes
that there is no requirement to develop
or maintain an exchange-developed test
for member applicants.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that
the proposed rule change will impose
any burden on competition that is not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act. Particularly,
the Exchange does not believe that the
proposed rule change will impose any
burden on intramarket competition that
is not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act
because the proposed changes apply to
all TPH applicants. The Exchange does
not believe that the proposed rule
change will impose any burden on
intermarket competition that is not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act because the
proposed change only affects those
applying for membership to Cboe
Options. To the extent that the proposed
change makes Cboe Options a more
attractive marketplace for market
participants at other exchanges, such
market participants are welcome to
become Cboe Options market
participants. Lastly, the Exchange notes
PO 00000
Frm 00090
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
that it believes the proposed changes
will reduce the regulatory burden
placed on market participants engaged
in trading activities by eliminating a
redundant and unnecessary exam.
Indeed, the proposed rule change will
provide further harmonization of
registration requirements across various
markets, including its affiliates, which
will reduce burdens on competition by
removing impediments to participation
in the national market system and
promoting competition among
participants across the multiple national
securities exchanges.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
The Exchange neither solicited nor
received comments on the proposed
rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Because the foregoing proposed rule
change does not:
(i) Significantly affect the protection
of investors or the public interest;
(ii) impose any significant burden on
competition; and
(iii) become operative for 30 days
from the date on which it was filed, or
such shorter time as the Commission
may designate, it has become effective
pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the
Act 11 and Rule 19b–4(f)(6) 12
thereunder. At any time within 60 days
of the filing of the proposed rule change,
the Commission summarily may
temporarily suspend such rule change if
it appears to the Commission that such
action is necessary or appropriate in the
public interest, for the protection of
investors, or otherwise in furtherance of
the purposes of the Act. If the
Commission takes such action, the
Commission shall institute proceedings
under Section 19(b)(2)(B) 13 of the Act to
determine whether the proposed rule
change should be approved or
disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
11 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6).
13 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B).
12 17
E:\FR\FM\13JNN1.SGM
13JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 114 / Thursday, June 13, 2019 / Notices
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include File Number SR–
CBOE–2019–029 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to the Secretary, Securities and
Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549–1090.
khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–CBOE–2019–029. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
internet website (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for website viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the
filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change.
Persons submitting comments are
cautioned that we do not redact or edit
personal identifying information from
comment submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish
to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File
Number SR–CBOE–2019–029 and
should be submitted on or before July 5,
2019.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.14
Eduardo A. Aleman,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2019–12450 Filed 6–12–19; 8:45 am]
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–86062; File No. SR–
NYSEARCA–2019–41]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE
Arca, Inc.; Notice of Filing and
Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed
Rule Change To Amend Commentary
.02 to Rule 6.72–O in Order To Extend
the Penny Pilot in Options Classes in
Certain Issues
June 7, 2019.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) 1 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
‘‘Act’’) 2 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,3
notice is hereby given that, on May 30,
2019, NYSE Arca, Inc. (‘‘NYSE Arca’’ or
the ‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission
(the ‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule
change as described in Items I and II
below, which Items have been prepared
by the self-regulatory organization. The
Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule
change from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend
Commentary .02 to Rule 6.72–O in order
to extend the Penny Pilot in options
classes in certain issues (‘‘Pilot
Program’’) previously approved by the
Securities and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) through December 31,
2019. The Pilot Program is currently
scheduled to expire on June 30, 2019.
The proposed rule change is available
on the Exchange’s website at
www.nyse.com, at the principal office of
the Exchange, and at the Commission’s
Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
self-regulatory organization included
statements concerning the purpose of,
and basis for, the proposed rule change
and discussed any comments it received
on the proposed rule change. The text
of those statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below.
The Exchange has prepared summaries,
set forth in sections A, B, and C below,
of the most significant parts of such
statements.
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
1 15
U.S.C.78s(b)(1).
U.S.C. 78a.
3 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
2 15
14 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:55 Jun 12, 2019
Jkt 247001
PO 00000
Frm 00091
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
27669
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and the
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange hereby proposes to
amend Commentary .02 to Rule 6.72–O
to extend the time period of the Pilot
Program,4 which is currently scheduled
to expire on June 30, 2019, through
December 31. 2019. The Exchange
believes that the proposed extension
would allow for further analysis of the
Pilot Program and a determination of
how the Pilot Program should be
structured in the future.
This filing does not propose any
substantive changes to the Pilot
Program: All classes currently
participating will remain the same and
all minimum increments will remain
unchanged. The Exchange believes the
benefits to public customers and other
market participants who will be able to
express their true prices to buy and sell
options have been demonstrated to
outweigh the increase in quote traffic.
2. Statutory Basis
The proposed rule change is
consistent with Section 6(b) 5 of the Act,
in general, and furthers the objectives of
Section 6(b)(5),6 in particular, in that it
is designed to prevent fraudulent and
manipulative acts and practices, to
promote just and equitable principles of
trade, to foster cooperation and
coordination with persons engaged in
facilitating transactions in securities,
and to remove impediments to and
perfect the mechanisms of a free and
open market and a national market
system.
In particular, the proposed rule
change, which extends the Penny Pilot
Program for six months, allows the
Exchange to continue to participate in a
program that has been viewed as
beneficial to traders, investors and
public customers and viewed as
successful by the other options
exchanges participating in it.
Accordingly, the Exchange believes that
the proposal is consistent with the Act
because it would allow the Exchange to
extend the Pilot Program prior to its
expiration on June 30, 2019. The
Exchange notes that this proposal does
not propose any new policies or
provisions that are unique or unproven,
but instead relates to the continuation of
an existing program that operates on a
pilot basis.
4 See Exchange Act Release No. 84873 (December
19, 2018) 83 FR 66798 (December 27, 2018) (SR–
NYSEArca–2018–96).
5 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
6 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
E:\FR\FM\13JNN1.SGM
13JNN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 114 (Thursday, June 13, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 27667-27669]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-12450]
[[Page 27667]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-86065; File No. SR-CBOE-2019-029]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe Exchange, Inc.; Notice of
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To Amend
Its Rules Relating to Registration of Trading Permit Holders
June 7, 2019.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(the ``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given
that on June 6, 2019, Cboe Exchange, Inc. (the ``Exchange'' or ``Cboe
Options'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I, and
II, below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The Exchange
filed the proposal as a ``non-controversial'' proposed rule change
pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act \3\ and Rule 19b-
4(f)(6) thereunder.\4\ The Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
\3\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
\4\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
Cboe Exchange, Inc. (the ``Exchange'' or ``Cboe Options'') proposes
to amend its rules relating to registration of Trading Permit Holders.
The text of the proposed rule change is provided in Exhibit 5.
The text of the proposed rule change is also available on the
Exchange's website (https://www.cboe.com/AboutCBOE/CBOELegalRegulatoryHome.aspx), at the Exchange's Office of the
Secretary, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes to amend certain rules relating to the
registration of its Trading Permit Holders (``TPHs'').
Qualifications of TPHs
The Exchange first proposes to amend its rules that set forth the
qualifications required to be an individual TPH or TPH organization.
Particularly, Rule 3.2(b) currently provides, among other things, that
an individual must be approved to engage in one or more of the
following enumerated trading functions: (i) Market-Maker, (ii) Floor
Broker, (iii) Proprietary Trading Permit Holder, (iv) DPM Designee, (v)
FLEX Appointed Market-Maker and (vi) FLEX Qualified Market-Maker.
Similarly, Rule 3.3(b) provides, in relevant part that a TPH
organization must be approved to engage in one or more of the following
trading functions: (i) TPH organization approved to transact business
with the public, (ii) Clearing Trading Permit Holder, (iii) order
service firm, (iv) Market-Maker; (v) Lead Market-Maker, (vi) Designated
Primary Market-Maker, and (vii) Proprietary Trading Permit Holder.
The Exchange proposes to eliminate subparagraph (b) of Rules 3.2
and 3.3. The Exchange does not believe it is necessary to enumerate in
the manner that it has the trading functions for which a TPH may be
approved to engage in, nor is it required to do so. Indeed, the
Exchange notes that other Exchanges with similar rules governing member
qualifications do not include such a list, including its affiliate
Exchanges.\5\ The Exchange believes eliminating the enumerated
categories from its rules provides the Exchange more flexibility in the
future should additional registration capacities be added or removed.
In connection with the proposed change, the Exchange also proposes to
eliminate cross references to Rules 3.2(b) and 3.3(b).\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ See Rules of Cboe C2, Exchange, Inc., Cboe BZX Exchange,
Inc., Cboe BYX Exchange, Inc., Cboe EDGX Exchange, Inc. and Cboe
EDGX Exchange, Inc. See also e.g., Nasdaq PHLX LLC Rule 910 and
Nasdaq PHLX Rulebook generally. See also, NYSE Arca LLC Rules 2.2,
2.3 and NYSE Arca Rulebook generally.
\6\ The Exchange notes that Rule 3.10 references Rule 3.3(c)
instead of Rule 3.3(b). The Exchange notes it inadvertently failed
to update the reference and that indeed, subparagraph (c) of Rule
3.3 no longer exists.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
TPH Orientation and Qualification Examination
The Exchange proposes to amend its rule governing the Exchange's
Trading Permit Holder Orientation Program and Trading Permit Holder
Qualification Exam. Rule 3.9(e) currently provides that any person
applying pursuant to paragraph (a) of Rule 3.9 to have an authorized
trading function \7\ is required to complete the Exchange's Trading
Permit Holder Orientation Program (``TPH Orientation'') and to pass an
Exchange Trading Permit Holder Qualification Exam (``TPH Exam''). The
Exchange proposes to eliminate in its entirety the requirement to
complete the TPH Orientation and take the TPH Exam. Particularly, the
Exchange believes that the qualification requirements under Exchange
Rule 3.6A adequately test TPH applicants' knowledge of the securities
industry. For example, all representative-level applicants are now
required to take the Securities Industry Essentials Examination
(``SIE'') which assesses basic product knowledge; the structure and
function of the securities industry markets, regulatory agencies and
their functions; and regulated and prohibited practices in addition to
passing the appropriate qualification examination (e.g., Series 57).
Additionally, the Exchange notes that all TPHs are subject to
continuing education requirements under Rule 9.3A, which, among other
things, requires each TPH and TPH organization to maintain a continuing
and current education program for its covered registered persons to
enhance their securities knowledge, skills and professionalism. As
such, the Exchange believes requiring such individuals to also attend a
TPH Orientation and take a TPH Exam in order to participate on the
Exchange is unnecessary and duplicative. The Exchange therefore seeks
to eliminate these requirements.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ Currently, Floor Brokers, Market-Makers (which includes DPM
Designees, FLEX Appointed Market-Makers and FLEX Qualified Market-
Makers), and Proprietary Traders applying pursuant to Rule 3.9 are
subject to the TPH Orientation and TPH Exam.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the ``Act'') and the rules and
regulations thereunder applicable to the Exchange and, in particular,
the requirements of Section 6(b) of the Act.\8\ Specifically, the
Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with the
Section 6(b)(5) \9\ requirements that the rules of
[[Page 27668]]
an exchange be designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and
practices, to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to foster
cooperation and coordination with persons engaged in regulating,
clearing, settling, processing information with respect to, and
facilitating transactions in securities, to remove impediments to and
perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national market
system, and, in general, to protect investors and the public interest.
In addition, the Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is
consistent with Section 6(c)(3)(B) of the Act,\10\ which authorizes
exchanges to prescribe standards of training, experience and competence
for persons associated with exchange members, and gives exchanges the
authority to bar a natural person from becoming a member or a person
associated with a member, if the person does not meet the standards of
training, experience and competence prescribed in the rules of the
exchange.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
\9\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
\10\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(c)(3)(B).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In particular, the Exchange believes eliminating from its rules a
list of trading functions individual TPHs and TPH organizations may be
approved to engage in is not a substantive change as it does not affect
any rights or obligations of TPHs. Rather, the Exchange merely no
longer wishes to maintain Rules 3.2(b) and 3.3(b) and notes it is not
required to do so. As noted above, several other Exchanges similarly do
not maintain any provisions similar to current Rules 3.2(b) and 3.3(b),
including its affiliate Exchanges. Accordingly, the proposed rule
change will also provide further harmonization across its affiliated
exchanges with respect to its registration rules, which may alleviate
potential confusion.
Next, the Exchange notes that under Section 6(c)(3)(B) of the Act,
the Exchange is authorized to prescribe standards of training,
experience and competence for persons associated with exchange members.
The Exchange believes the standards of training, experience and
competence it has prescribed under its rules, not including the TPH
Orientation and Exam are, on their own, an adequate prescription of
training, experience and competence. Indeed, the Exchange believes the
requirements related to training, experience and competence currently
set forth under rules 3.6A, along with continuing education
requirements set forth under Rule 9.3A, are designed to help ensure
professionalism among market participants, prevent fraudulent and
manipulative practices, and promote just and equitable principles of
trade. Moreover, the Exchange believes the prescribed qualification
exams required under Rule 3.6A align with the various trading functions
and associated tasks that would be performed by a TPH applicant
currently subject to the TPH Exam and tests knowledge of the most
current laws, rules, regulations and skills relevant to the respective
functions and associated tasks. The Exchange therefore believes that
any TPH applicant that can satisfy such requirements has demonstrated
that he or she has attained a sufficient level of competence and
knowledge to participate on the Exchange. In sum, the Exchange has
determined that the requisite knowledge necessary to participate on the
Exchange can be assessed adequately by the qualification examinations
prescribed under Rule 3.6A and that a TPH Orientation and Exam
requirement provides no material improvements to the qualification
process. Accordingly, the Exchange believes requiring such individuals
to also complete the TPH Orientation and take the TPH Exam is redundant
and unnecessary. Furthermore, the Exchange believes that it is in the
interests of all market participants to provide consistent
qualification and registration requirements across markets and notes
that its affiliated markets do not have any exchange-specific testing
requirements. The Exchange lastly notes that there is no requirement to
develop or maintain an exchange-developed test for member applicants.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. Particularly, the Exchange
does not believe that the proposed rule change will impose any burden
on intramarket competition that is not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act because the proposed changes
apply to all TPH applicants. The Exchange does not believe that the
proposed rule change will impose any burden on intermarket competition
that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of
the Act because the proposed change only affects those applying for
membership to Cboe Options. To the extent that the proposed change
makes Cboe Options a more attractive marketplace for market
participants at other exchanges, such market participants are welcome
to become Cboe Options market participants. Lastly, the Exchange notes
that it believes the proposed changes will reduce the regulatory burden
placed on market participants engaged in trading activities by
eliminating a redundant and unnecessary exam. Indeed, the proposed rule
change will provide further harmonization of registration requirements
across various markets, including its affiliates, which will reduce
burdens on competition by removing impediments to participation in the
national market system and promoting competition among participants
across the multiple national securities exchanges.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
The Exchange neither solicited nor received comments on the
proposed rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Because the foregoing proposed rule change does not:
(i) Significantly affect the protection of investors or the public
interest;
(ii) impose any significant burden on competition; and
(iii) become operative for 30 days from the date on which it was
filed, or such shorter time as the Commission may designate, it has
become effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \11\ and
Rule 19b-4(f)(6) \12\ thereunder. At any time within 60 days of the
filing of the proposed rule change, the Commission summarily may
temporarily suspend such rule change if it appears to the Commission
that such action is necessary or appropriate in the public interest,
for the protection of investors, or otherwise in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act. If the Commission takes such action, the
Commission shall institute proceedings under Section 19(b)(2)(B) \13\
of the Act to determine whether the proposed rule change should be
approved or disapproved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
\12\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
\13\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
[[Page 27669]]
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an email to [email protected]. Please include
File Number SR-CBOE-2019-029 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to the Secretary,
Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC
20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-CBOE-2019-029. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's internet website (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml).
Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written
statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with
the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed
rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those
that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions
of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and printing in
the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC
20549, on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and
3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection
and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change. Persons submitting comments are
cautioned that we do not redact or edit personal identifying
information from comment submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR-CBOE-2019-029 and should be submitted on
or before July 5, 2019.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\14\
Eduardo A. Aleman,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2019-12450 Filed 6-12-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P