Proposed Collection; Comment Request, 27384-27385 [2019-12423]

Download as PDF 27384 Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 113 / Wednesday, June 12, 2019 / Notices inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments received will be posted without change. Persons submitting comments are cautioned that we do not redact or edit personal identifying information from comment submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions should refer to File Number SR–EMERALD–2019–23 and should be submitted on or before July 3, 2019.T≤ For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated authority.9 Eduardo A. Aleman, Deputy Secretary. [FR Doc. 2019–12337 Filed 6–11–19; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8011–01–P SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Proposed Collection; Comment Request Upon Written Request, Copies Available From: Securities and Exchange Commission, Office of FOIA Services, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549–2736. jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with NOTICES Extension: Exchange Act Rule 3a71–3, SEC File No. 270–655, OMB Control No. 3235–0717 Notice is hereby given that pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.) (‘‘PRA’’), the Securities and Exchange Commission (‘‘Commission’’) is soliciting comments on the existing collection of information provided for in Rule 3a71–3 (17 CFR 240.3a71–3) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78a et seq.). The Commission plans to submit this existing collection of information to the Office of Management and Budget (‘‘OMB’’) for extension and approval. Rule 3a71–3 is adopted and in effect, but the compliance date for Rule 3a71– 3 has not yet passed. The representations contemplated by Rule 3a71–3 will be relied upon by counterparties to determine whether such transaction is a ‘‘transaction conducted through a foreign branch’’ of a counterparty, as defined in Rule 3a71– 3(a)(3)(i), as well as to verify whether a security-based swap counterparty is a ‘‘U.S. person.’’ Counterparties to security-based swap transactions may voluntarily give such representations to one another to reduce operational costs and allow each party to ascertain whether such transaction is subject to certain Title VII requirements. Because 9 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12). VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:00 Jun 11, 2019 Jkt 247001 any representations provided to counterparties under Rule 3a71–3 will constitute voluntary third-party disclosures, the Commission will not typically receive these disclosures. The Commission believes that the representations contemplated by Rule 3a71–3 will, in most cases, be made through amendments to the parties’ existing trading documentation (e.g., the schedule to a master agreement). The Commission believes that, because trading relationship documentation is established between two counterparties, whether a counterparty is able to represent that it is entering into a ‘‘transaction conducted through a foreign branch’’ or that it does not meet the criteria of the ‘‘U.S. person’’ definition will not change on a transaction-by-transaction basis and, therefore, such representations will generally be made in the schedule to a master agreement, rather than in individual confirmations. Because these representations relate to new regulatory requirements, the Commission anticipates that counterparties may elect to develop and incorporate these representations in trading documentation soon after the effective date of the Commission’s security-based swap regulations, rather than incorporating specific language on a transactional basis. The Commission believes that counterparties will be able to adopt, where appropriate, standardized language across all of their security-based swap trading relationships. The Commission believes that this standardized language may be developed by individual respondents or through a combination of trade associations and industry working groups. a. Representations regarding a ‘‘transaction conducted through a foreign branch’’ Pursuant to Rule 3a71–3, parties to security-based swaps are permitted to rely on certain representations from their counterparties when determining whether a transaction falls within the definition of a ‘‘transaction conducted through a foreign branch.’’ The Commission staff estimates that a total of 50 entities will incur burdens under this collection of information, whether solely in connection with the business conduct requirements or also in connection with the application of the de minimis exception. These estimates are based on our understanding of the over-the-counter (‘‘OTC’’) derivatives markets, including the size of the market, the number of counterparties that are active in the market, and how market participants currently structure security-based swap transactions. PO 00000 Frm 00154 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 The Commission estimates the onetime third-party disclosure burden associated with developing representations under this collection of information will be, for each U.S. bank counterparty that will make such representations, no more than five hours, and up to $2,000 for the services of outside professionals, for an estimate of approximately 250 hours 1 or 83.33 hours 2 per year when annualized over three years, across all security-based swap counterparties that will make such representations.3 This estimate assumes little or no reliance on standardized disclosure language. The Commission expects that the majority of the burden associated with the new disclosure requirements will be experienced during the first year as language is developed and trading documentation is amended. After the new representations are developed and incorporated into trading documentation, the Commission continues to believe that the ongoing third-party disclosure burden associated with this requirement will be 10 hours per U.S. bank counterparty for verifying representations with existing counterparties, for a total of approximately 500 hours 4 across all applicable U.S. bank counterparties.5 The Commission believes that some of the entities that will have to comply with Rule 3a71–3 will seek outside counsel to help them develop new representations contemplated by Rule 3a71–3. For PRA purposes, the Commission assumes that all 50 respondents will seek outside counsel for the first year only and will, on average, consult with outside counsel for a cost of up to $2,000. The Commission also assumes that none of the 50 respondents will seek outside legal services for year two or year three. Thus, the Commission expects the cost over the three-year period will be $100,000 6 or $33,333 7 per year when annualized over three years, across all security-based swap counterparties that will make such representations. The 1 50 (total number of entities) * 5 hours = 250 hours. 2 250 hours (total hours to develop representations) ÷ 3 years = 83.33 hours. 3 See Business Conduct Adopting Release at 30096. 4 50 (total number of entities) * 10 hours = 500 hours. 5 The Commission staff estimates that this burden will consist of 10 hours of in-house counsel time for each security-based swap market participant that will make such representations. See Business Conduct Adopting Release, at 30097, note 1581. 6 50 (estimated number of entities) * $2,000 (cost of outside counsel) = $100,000. 7 $100,000 (total cost to seek outside counsel over three years) ÷ 3 years = $33,333.33. E:\FR\FM\12JNN1.SGM 12JNN1 Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 113 / Wednesday, June 12, 2019 / Notices jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with NOTICES Commission expects the total labor cost per respondent will be approximately $666.67 8 when annualized over three years. b. Representations regarding U.S.person status Pursuant to Rule 3a71–3(a)(4)(iv), persons may rely on representations from a counterparty that the counterparty does not satisfy the criteria defining U.S. person set forth in Rule 3a71–3(a)(4)(i), unless such person knows or has reason to know that the representation is not accurate. Commission staff has estimated, based on its understanding of OTC derivatives markets, including the domiciles of counterparties that are active in the market, that up to 2,400 entities will provide representations that they do not meet the criteria necessary to be U.S. persons. As with representations regarding whether a transaction is conducted through a foreign branch, the Commission estimates the maximum total third-party disclosure burden associated with developing new representations will be, for each counterparty that will make such representations, no more than five hours and up to $2,000 for the services of outside professionals, for a maximum of approximately 12,000 hours or 4,000 hours per year when annualized over three years, across all security-based swap counterparties that will make such representations. This estimate assumes little or no reliance on standardized disclosure language. The Commission expects that the majority of the burden associated with the new disclosure requirements will be experienced during the first year as language is developed and trading documentation is amended. After the new representations are developed and incorporated into trading documentation, the Commission believes that the annual third-party disclosure burden associated with this requirement will be no more than approximately 10 hours per counterparty for verifying representations with existing counterparties and onboarding new counterparties, for a maximum of approximately 24,000 hours 9 across all applicable security-based swap counterparties. The Commission believes that some of the entities that will have to comply 8 $33,333 (total labor cost to seek outside counsel per year) ÷ 50 (estimated number of entities that will seek outside counsel to help them develop new representations contemplated by Rule 3a71– 3(a)(3)(ii)) = $666.67. 9 2,400 (total number of entities) * 10 hours = 24,000 hours VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:00 Jun 11, 2019 Jkt 247001 with Rule 3a71–3 will seek outside counsel to help them develop new representations contemplated by Rule 3a71–3. For PRA purposes, the Commission assumes that all 2,400 respondents will seek outside legal for the first year only and will, on average, consult with outside counsel for a cost of up to $2,000. The Commission also assumes that none of the 2,400 respondents will seek outside legal services for year two or year three. Thus, the Commission expects the cost over the three-year period will be $4,800,000 10 or $1,600,000 11 per year when annualized over three years, across all security-based swap counterparties that will make such representations. The Commission expects the total labor cost per respondent will be approximately $666.67 12 when annualized over three years. Written comments are invited on: (a) Whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the Commission, including whether the information shall have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the Commission’s estimates of the burden of the proposed collection of information; (c) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on respondents, including through the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology. Consideration will be given to comments and suggestions submitted in writing within 60 days of this publication. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information under the PRA unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. Please direct your written comments to: Charles Riddle, Acting Director/Chief Information Officer, Securities and Exchange Commission, c/o Candace Kenner, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549, or send an email to: PRA_ Mailbox@sec.gov. Dated: June 7, 2019. Eduardo A. Aleman, Deputy Secretary. [FR Doc. 2019–12423 Filed 6–11–19; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8011–01–P 10 2,400 (total number of entities) * $2,000 = $4,800,000. 11 $4,800,000 (total cost over three years) ÷ 3 years = $1,600,000. 12 $1,600,000 (total labor cost to seek outside counsel per year) ÷ 2,400 (estimated number of entities that will seek outside counsel to help them develop new representations contemplated by Rule 3a71–3(4)(iv)) = $666.67. PO 00000 Frm 00155 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 27385 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION [Release No. 34–86054; File No. SR–MIAX– 2019–27] Self-Regulatory Organizations; Miami International Securities Exchange, LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To Amend Rule 510, Minimum Price Variations and Minimum Trading Increments To Extend the Penny Pilot Program June 6, 2019. Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2 notice is hereby given that on May 30, 2019, Miami International Securities Exchange, LLC (‘‘MIAX Options’’ or the ‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (‘‘Commission’’) a proposed rule change as described in Items I, II, and III below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons. I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Terms of Substance of the Proposed Rule Change The Exchange is filing a proposal to amend Rule 510, Minimum Price Variations and Minimum Trading Increments, Interpretation and Policy .01 to extend the pilot program for the quoting and trading of certain options in pennies. The text of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange’s website at https://www.miaxoptions.com/rulefilings/ at MIAX Options’ principal office, and at the Commission’s Public Reference Room. II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such statements. 1 15 2 17 E:\FR\FM\12JNN1.SGM U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). CFR 240.19b–4. 12JNN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 113 (Wednesday, June 12, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 27384-27385]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-12423]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Proposed Collection; Comment Request

Upon Written Request, Copies Available From: Securities and Exchange 
Commission, Office of FOIA Services, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 
20549-2736.

Extension:
    Exchange Act Rule 3a71-3, SEC File No. 270-655, OMB Control No. 
3235-0717

    Notice is hereby given that pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act 
of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.) (``PRA''), the Securities and Exchange 
Commission (``Commission'') is soliciting comments on the existing 
collection of information provided for in Rule 3a71-3 (17 CFR 240.3a71-
3) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78a et seq.). 
The Commission plans to submit this existing collection of information 
to the Office of Management and Budget (``OMB'') for extension and 
approval.
    Rule 3a71-3 is adopted and in effect, but the compliance date for 
Rule 3a71-3 has not yet passed. The representations contemplated by 
Rule 3a71-3 will be relied upon by counterparties to determine whether 
such transaction is a ``transaction conducted through a foreign 
branch'' of a counterparty, as defined in Rule 3a71-3(a)(3)(i), as well 
as to verify whether a security-based swap counterparty is a ``U.S. 
person.'' Counterparties to security-based swap transactions may 
voluntarily give such representations to one another to reduce 
operational costs and allow each party to ascertain whether such 
transaction is subject to certain Title VII requirements. Because any 
representations provided to counterparties under Rule 3a71-3 will 
constitute voluntary third-party disclosures, the Commission will not 
typically receive these disclosures.
    The Commission believes that the representations contemplated by 
Rule 3a71-3 will, in most cases, be made through amendments to the 
parties' existing trading documentation (e.g., the schedule to a master 
agreement). The Commission believes that, because trading relationship 
documentation is established between two counterparties, whether a 
counterparty is able to represent that it is entering into a 
``transaction conducted through a foreign branch'' or that it does not 
meet the criteria of the ``U.S. person'' definition will not change on 
a transaction-by-transaction basis and, therefore, such representations 
will generally be made in the schedule to a master agreement, rather 
than in individual confirmations. Because these representations relate 
to new regulatory requirements, the Commission anticipates that 
counterparties may elect to develop and incorporate these 
representations in trading documentation soon after the effective date 
of the Commission's security-based swap regulations, rather than 
incorporating specific language on a transactional basis. The 
Commission believes that counterparties will be able to adopt, where 
appropriate, standardized language across all of their security-based 
swap trading relationships. The Commission believes that this 
standardized language may be developed by individual respondents or 
through a combination of trade associations and industry working 
groups.
    a. Representations regarding a ``transaction conducted through a 
foreign branch''
    Pursuant to Rule 3a71-3, parties to security-based swaps are 
permitted to rely on certain representations from their counterparties 
when determining whether a transaction falls within the definition of a 
``transaction conducted through a foreign branch.'' The Commission 
staff estimates that a total of 50 entities will incur burdens under 
this collection of information, whether solely in connection with the 
business conduct requirements or also in connection with the 
application of the de minimis exception. These estimates are based on 
our understanding of the over-the-counter (``OTC'') derivatives 
markets, including the size of the market, the number of counterparties 
that are active in the market, and how market participants currently 
structure security-based swap transactions.
    The Commission estimates the one-time third-party disclosure burden 
associated with developing representations under this collection of 
information will be, for each U.S. bank counterparty that will make 
such representations, no more than five hours, and up to $2,000 for the 
services of outside professionals, for an estimate of approximately 250 
hours \1\ or 83.33 hours \2\ per year when annualized over three years, 
across all security-based swap counterparties that will make such 
representations.\3\ This estimate assumes little or no reliance on 
standardized disclosure language.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 50 (total number of entities) * 5 hours = 250 hours.
    \2\ 250 hours (total hours to develop representations) / 3 years 
= 83.33 hours.
    \3\ See Business Conduct Adopting Release at 30096.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission expects that the majority of the burden associated 
with the new disclosure requirements will be experienced during the 
first year as language is developed and trading documentation is 
amended. After the new representations are developed and incorporated 
into trading documentation, the Commission continues to believe that 
the ongoing third-party disclosure burden associated with this 
requirement will be 10 hours per U.S. bank counterparty for verifying 
representations with existing counterparties, for a total of 
approximately 500 hours \4\ across all applicable U.S. bank 
counterparties.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ 50 (total number of entities) * 10 hours = 500 hours.
    \5\ The Commission staff estimates that this burden will consist 
of 10 hours of in-house counsel time for each security-based swap 
market participant that will make such representations. See Business 
Conduct Adopting Release, at 30097, note 1581.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission believes that some of the entities that will have to 
comply with Rule 3a71-3 will seek outside counsel to help them develop 
new representations contemplated by Rule 3a71-3. For PRA purposes, the 
Commission assumes that all 50 respondents will seek outside counsel 
for the first year only and will, on average, consult with outside 
counsel for a cost of up to $2,000. The Commission also assumes that 
none of the 50 respondents will seek outside legal services for year 
two or year three. Thus, the Commission expects the cost over the 
three-year period will be $100,000 \6\ or $33,333 \7\ per year when 
annualized over three years, across all security-based swap 
counterparties that will make such representations. The

[[Page 27385]]

Commission expects the total labor cost per respondent will be 
approximately $666.67 \8\ when annualized over three years.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ 50 (estimated number of entities) * $2,000 (cost of outside 
counsel) = $100,000.
    \7\ $100,000 (total cost to seek outside counsel over three 
years) / 3 years = $33,333.33.
    \8\ $33,333 (total labor cost to seek outside counsel per year) 
/ 50 (estimated number of entities that will seek outside counsel to 
help them develop new representations contemplated by Rule 3a71-
3(a)(3)(ii)) = $666.67.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    b. Representations regarding U.S.-person status
    Pursuant to Rule 3a71-3(a)(4)(iv), persons may rely on 
representations from a counterparty that the counterparty does not 
satisfy the criteria defining U.S. person set forth in Rule 3a71-
3(a)(4)(i), unless such person knows or has reason to know that the 
representation is not accurate. Commission staff has estimated, based 
on its understanding of OTC derivatives markets, including the 
domiciles of counterparties that are active in the market, that up to 
2,400 entities will provide representations that they do not meet the 
criteria necessary to be U.S. persons.
    As with representations regarding whether a transaction is 
conducted through a foreign branch, the Commission estimates the 
maximum total third-party disclosure burden associated with developing 
new representations will be, for each counterparty that will make such 
representations, no more than five hours and up to $2,000 for the 
services of outside professionals, for a maximum of approximately 
12,000 hours or 4,000 hours per year when annualized over three years, 
across all security-based swap counterparties that will make such 
representations. This estimate assumes little or no reliance on 
standardized disclosure language.
    The Commission expects that the majority of the burden associated 
with the new disclosure requirements will be experienced during the 
first year as language is developed and trading documentation is 
amended. After the new representations are developed and incorporated 
into trading documentation, the Commission believes that the annual 
third-party disclosure burden associated with this requirement will be 
no more than approximately 10 hours per counterparty for verifying 
representations with existing counterparties and onboarding new 
counterparties, for a maximum of approximately 24,000 hours \9\ across 
all applicable security-based swap counterparties.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ 2,400 (total number of entities) * 10 hours = 24,000 hours
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission believes that some of the entities that will have to 
comply with Rule 3a71-3 will seek outside counsel to help them develop 
new representations contemplated by Rule 3a71-3. For PRA purposes, the 
Commission assumes that all 2,400 respondents will seek outside legal 
for the first year only and will, on average, consult with outside 
counsel for a cost of up to $2,000. The Commission also assumes that 
none of the 2,400 respondents will seek outside legal services for year 
two or year three. Thus, the Commission expects the cost over the 
three-year period will be $4,800,000 \10\ or $1,600,000 \11\ per year 
when annualized over three years, across all security-based swap 
counterparties that will make such representations. The Commission 
expects the total labor cost per respondent will be approximately 
$666.67 \12\ when annualized over three years.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ 2,400 (total number of entities) * $2,000 = $4,800,000.
    \11\ $4,800,000 (total cost over three years) / 3 years = 
$1,600,000.
    \12\ $1,600,000 (total labor cost to seek outside counsel per 
year) / 2,400 (estimated number of entities that will seek outside 
counsel to help them develop new representations contemplated by 
Rule 3a71-3(4)(iv)) = $666.67.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Written comments are invited on: (a) Whether the proposed 
collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of 
the functions of the Commission, including whether the information 
shall have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the Commission's 
estimates of the burden of the proposed collection of information; (c) 
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information 
collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of 
information on respondents, including through the use of automated 
collection techniques or other forms of information technology. 
Consideration will be given to comments and suggestions submitted in 
writing within 60 days of this publication.
    An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required 
to respond to, a collection of information under the PRA unless it 
displays a currently valid OMB control number.
    Please direct your written comments to: Charles Riddle, Acting 
Director/Chief Information Officer, Securities and Exchange Commission, 
c/o Candace Kenner, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549, or send an 
email to: [email protected].

    Dated: June 7, 2019.
Eduardo A. Aleman,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2019-12423 Filed 6-11-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.