Polyester Textured Yarn From India: Amended Preliminary Determination of Countervailing Duty Determination, 27240-27241 [2019-12404]
Download as PDF
27240
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 113 / Wednesday, June 12, 2019 / Notices
Guard ALJ Docketing Center, 40 South
Gay Street, Baltimore, Maryland 21202–
4022.
In accordance with the provisions of
Section 766.24(d) of the EAR, BIS may
seek renewal of this Order by filing a
written request not later than 20 days
before the expiration date. A renewal
request may be opposed by Mahan
Airways, Al Naser Airlines, Ali
Abdullah Alhay, and/or Bahar Safwa
General Trading as provided in Section
766.24(d), by filing a written submission
with the Assistant Secretary of
Commerce for Export Enforcement,
which must be received not later than
seven days before the expiration date of
the Order.
A copy of this Order shall be provided
to Mahan Airways, Al Naser Airlines,
Ali Abdullah Alhay, and Bahar Safwa
General Trading and each related
person, and shall be published in the
Federal Register.
This Order is effective immediately
and shall remain in effect for 180 days.
Dated: June 5, 2019.
Douglas R. Hassebrock,
Director, Office of Export Enforcement
performing the non-exclusive functions and
duties of the Assistant Secretary of Commerce
for Export Enforcement.
[FR Doc. 2019–12396 Filed 6–11–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Bureau of Industry and Security
jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with NOTICES
Submission for OMB Review;
Comment Request
The Department of Commerce will
submit to the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) for clearance the
following proposal for collection of
information under the provisions of the
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35).
Agency: Bureau of Industry and
Security.
Title: License Exemptions and
Exclusions.
Form Number: N/A.
OMB Control Number: 0694–0137.
Type of Review: Regular submission.
Estimated Total Annual Burden
Hours: 29,998.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
19,738.
Estimated Time per Response: 1.52
hours.
Needs and Uses: Over the years, BIS
has worked with other Government
agencies and the affected public to
identify areas where export licensing
requirements may be relaxed without
jeopardizing U.S. national security or
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:00 Jun 11, 2019
Jkt 247001
foreign policy. Many of these
relaxations have taken the form of
licensing exceptions and exclusions.
Some of these license exceptions and
exclusions have a reporting or
recordkeeping requirement to enable the
Government to continue to monitor
exports of these items. Exporters may
choose to utilize the license exception
and accept the reporting or
recordkeeping burden in lieu of
submitting a license application. These
exceptions and exclusions have allow
exporters to ship items quickly, without
having to wait for license approval.
These collections are designed to
reduce export licensing burden. It is up
to the individual company to decide
whether it is most advantageous to
continue to submit license applications
or to comply with the reporting or
recordkeeping requirements and take
advantage of the licensing exception or
exclusion.
Affected Public: Non-profit
institutions; State, local, or tribal
government; business or other for-profit
organizations.
Frequency: On Occasion.
Respondent’s Obligation: Voluntary.
This information collection request
may be viewed at reginfo.gov https://
www.reginfo.gov/public/. Follow the
instructions to view Department of
Commerce collections currently under
review by OMB.
Written comments and
recommendations for the proposed
information collection should be sent
within 30 days of publication of this
notice to OIRA_Submission@
omb.eop.gov.
Sheleen Dumas,
Departmental Lead PRA Officer, Office of the
Chief Information Officer, Commerce
Department.
[FR Doc. 2019–12355 Filed 6–11–19; 8:45 am]
certain steel nails from the People’s
Republic of China (China).
DATES: Applicable June 12, 2019.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Susan Pulongbarit or Benito Ballesteros,
AD/CVD Operations, Office V,
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401
Constitution Avenue NW, Washington,
DC 20230; telephone 202–482–4031 or
202–482–7425, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
On May 29, 2019, Commerce
published in the Federal Register the
Amended Final Results of the 2016–
2017 administrative review on the
antidumping duty order on certain steel
nails from China.1 Commerce is
correcting the Amended Final Results to
address the misspelling of one nonselected respondent company name.
Specifically, the company, Hebei
Cangzhou New Century Foreign Trade
Co., Ltd., was misspelled in the
Amended Final Results. The correct
spelling of the company’s name is listed
in this notice. As a result, the Amended
Final Results are being corrected.
This correction to the Federal
Register notice is issued and published
in accordance with section 777(i)(1) of
the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended.
Dated: June 6, 2019.
Christian Marsh,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement
and Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2019–12391 Filed 6–11–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[C–533–886]
BILLING CODE 3510–33–P
Polyester Textured Yarn From India:
Amended Preliminary Determination of
Countervailing Duty Determination
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
AGENCY:
International Trade Administration
[A–570–909]
Certain Steel Nails From the People’s
Republic of China: Notice of
Correction of the Amended Final
Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review; 2016–2017
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
(Commerce) is correcting the amended
final results of the administrative review
of the antidumping duty order on
AGENCY:
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
(Commerce) is amending the
preliminary determination in the
countervailing duty investigation of
polyester textured yarn from India to
correct a significant ministerial error.
DATES: Applicable June 12, 2019.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Janae Martin or Jesus Saenz, AD/CVD
1 See Certain Steel Nails from the People’s
Republic of China: Amended Final Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2016–
2017, 84 FR 24751 (May 29, 2019) (Amended Final
Result).
E:\FR\FM\12JNN1.SGM
12JNN1
27241
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 113 / Wednesday, June 12, 2019 / Notices
Operations, Office VIII, Enforcement
and Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW, Washington, DC, 20230; telephone:
(202) 482–0238 or (202) 482–8184,
respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On May 3, 2019, Commerce published
in the Federal Register the Preliminary
Determination,1 and completed the
disclosure of all calculation materials to
interested parties. From May 6 through
May 13, 2019, the petitioners,2 JBF
Industries Limited (JBF), and Sanathan
Textile Private Limited, India
(Sanathan) timely filed ministerial error
allegations regarding the Preliminary
Determination.3
Period of Investigation
The period of investigation (POI) is
April 1, 2017 through March 31, 2018.
Scope of Investigation
The product covered by this
investigation is polyester textured yarn
from India. For a complete description
of the scope of this investigation, see the
Appendix to this notice.
Analysis of Significant Ministerial
Error Allegations
jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with NOTICES
Commerce will analyze any
comments received and, if appropriate,
correct any significant ministerial error
by amending the preliminary
1 See Polyester Textured Yarn from India:
Preliminary Affirmative Countervailing Duty
Determination, and Alignment of Final
Determination With Final Antidumping Duty
Determination, 84 FR 19036 (May 3, 2019)
(Preliminary Determination) and accompanying
Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
2 The petitioners in this investigation are Unifi
Manufacturing, Inc. and Nan Ya Plastics
Corporation, America.
3 See Petitioners’ letter, ‘‘Countervailing Duty
Investigation of Polyester Textured Yarn from
India—Petitioners’ Ministerial Error Allegation
Concerning the Preliminary Subsidy Calculation for
JBF Industries,’’ dated May 6, 2019 (Petitioners’
Clerical Error Comments); JBF’s letter, ‘‘CVD
Investigation of Polyester Textured Yarn from India:
Comments on Significant Ministerial Errors Found
in Preliminary Determination Calculation for JBF,’’
dated May 6, 2019 (JBF’s Clerical Error Comments);
Petitioners’ letter, ‘‘Countervailing Duty
Investigation of Polyester Textured Yarn from India:
Petitioners’ Ministerial Error Allegation Concerning
the Department’s Preliminary All-Others Rate
Calculation,’’ dated May 7, 2019 (Petitioners’ AllOthers Rate Clerical Error Comments); Sanathan’s
letter, ‘‘Certain Polyester Textured Yarn from India
(C–533–886): Ministerial Error Allegation
Concerning the Preliminary Subsidy Rate
Calculation for All Others,’’ dated May 7, 2019
(Sanathan’s Clerical Error Comments). On May 13,
2019, Sanathan also submitted rebuttal comments,
however, pursuant to 19 CFR 351.224(c)(3),
Commerce will not consider replies to comments in
connection with a preliminary determination.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:00 Jun 11, 2019
Jkt 247001
determination according to 19 CFR
351.224(e). A ministerial error is
defined in 19 CFR 351.224(f) as ‘‘an
error in addition, subtraction, or other
arithmetic function, clerical error
resulting from inaccurate copying,
duplication, or the like, and any other
similar type of unintentional error
which the Secretary considers
ministerial.’’ 4 A significant ministerial
error is defined as a ministerial error,
the correction of which, singly or in
combination with other errors, would
result in: (1) A change of at least five
absolute percentage points in, but not
less than 25 percent of, the
countervailing duty rate calculated in
the original preliminary determination;
or (2) a difference between a
countervailing duty rate of zero (or de
minimis) and a countervailing duty rate
greater than de minimis, or vice versa.5
Amended Preliminary Determination
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.224(e) and
(g)(1), Commerce is amending the
Preliminary Determination to reflect the
correction of a ministerial error made in
the calculation of the estimated
weighted-average all-others
countervailable subsidy rate. This error
is a significant ministerial error within
the meaning of 19 CFR 351.224(g)
because the all-other’s rate decreases
from 13.82 percent to 7.24 percent as a
result of correcting this ministerial
error, exceeding the specified threshold,
i.e., a change of at least five absolute
percentage points in, but not less than
25 percent of, the countervailable
subsidy rate calculated in the original
Preliminary Determination.6
Amended Cash Deposits and
Suspension of Liquidation
The collection of cash deposits and
suspension of liquidation will be
revised according to the rates calculated
in this amended preliminary
determination. Because these amended
rates result in decreased cash deposits,
the amended rate for the all-others rate
will be effective retroactively to May 3,
2019, the date of publication of the
Preliminary Determination. Parties will
be notified of this determination, in
accordance with section 733(d) and (f)
of the Act.
4 See section 735(e) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (the Act).
5 See 19 CFR 351.224(g).
6 See Memorandum, ‘‘Countervailing Duty
Investigation of Polyester Textured Yarn from India:
Allegations of Significant Ministerial Errors in the
Preliminary Determination,’’ dated concurrently
with this notice.
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 9990
Amended Preliminary Determination
Exporter/producer
Weightedaverage
margin
All-Others ....................................
7.24
Disclosure
We intend to disclose the calculations
performed to parties in this proceeding
within five days after publication of the
notice of amended preliminary
determination in the Federal Register in
accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b).
International Trade Commission
Notification
In accordance with section 733(f) of
the Act, we notified the International
Trade Commission of our amended
preliminary determination.
This amended preliminary
determination is issued and published
in accordance with sections 733(f) and
777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR
351.224(e).
Dated: June 6, 2019.
Jeffrey I. Kessler,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance.
Appendix I—Scope of the Investigation
The merchandise covered by this
investigation, polyester textured yarn, is
synthetic multifilament yarn that is
manufactured from polyester (polyethylene
terephthalate). Polyester textured yarn is
produced through a texturing process, which
imparts special properties to the filaments of
the yarn, including stretch, bulk, strength,
moisture absorption, insulation, and the
appearance of a natural fiber. This scope
includes all forms of polyester textured yarn,
regardless of surface texture or appearance,
yarn density and thickness (as measured in
denier), number of filaments, number of
plies, finish (luster), cross section, color, dye
method, texturing method, or packing
method (such as spindles, tubes, or beams).
Excluded from the scope of this
investigation is bulk continuous filament
yarn that: (a) Is polyester synthetic
multifilament yarn; (b) has denier size ranges
of 900 and above; (c) has turns per meter of
40 and above; and (d) has a maximum
shrinkage of 2.5 percent.
The merchandise subject to this
investigation is properly classified under
subheadings 5402.33.3000 and 5402.33.6000
of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the
United States (HTSUS). Although the HTSUS
subheadings are provided for convenience
and customs purposes, the written
description of the scope of the investigation
is dispositive.
[FR Doc. 2019–12404 Filed 6–11–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
E:\FR\FM\12JNN1.SGM
12JNN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 113 (Wednesday, June 12, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 27240-27241]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-12404]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[C-533-886]
Polyester Textured Yarn From India: Amended Preliminary
Determination of Countervailing Duty Determination
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (Commerce) is amending the
preliminary determination in the countervailing duty investigation of
polyester textured yarn from India to correct a significant ministerial
error.
DATES: Applicable June 12, 2019.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Janae Martin or Jesus Saenz, AD/CVD
[[Page 27241]]
Operations, Office VIII, Enforcement and Compliance, International
Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution
Avenue NW, Washington, DC, 20230; telephone: (202) 482-0238 or (202)
482-8184, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On May 3, 2019, Commerce published in the Federal Register the
Preliminary Determination,\1\ and completed the disclosure of all
calculation materials to interested parties. From May 6 through May 13,
2019, the petitioners,\2\ JBF Industries Limited (JBF), and Sanathan
Textile Private Limited, India (Sanathan) timely filed ministerial
error allegations regarding the Preliminary Determination.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Polyester Textured Yarn from India: Preliminary
Affirmative Countervailing Duty Determination, and Alignment of
Final Determination With Final Antidumping Duty Determination, 84 FR
19036 (May 3, 2019) (Preliminary Determination) and accompanying
Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
\2\ The petitioners in this investigation are Unifi
Manufacturing, Inc. and Nan Ya Plastics Corporation, America.
\3\ See Petitioners' letter, ``Countervailing Duty Investigation
of Polyester Textured Yarn from India--Petitioners' Ministerial
Error Allegation Concerning the Preliminary Subsidy Calculation for
JBF Industries,'' dated May 6, 2019 (Petitioners' Clerical Error
Comments); JBF's letter, ``CVD Investigation of Polyester Textured
Yarn from India: Comments on Significant Ministerial Errors Found in
Preliminary Determination Calculation for JBF,'' dated May 6, 2019
(JBF's Clerical Error Comments); Petitioners' letter,
``Countervailing Duty Investigation of Polyester Textured Yarn from
India: Petitioners' Ministerial Error Allegation Concerning the
Department's Preliminary All-Others Rate Calculation,'' dated May 7,
2019 (Petitioners' All-Others Rate Clerical Error Comments);
Sanathan's letter, ``Certain Polyester Textured Yarn from India (C-
533-886): Ministerial Error Allegation Concerning the Preliminary
Subsidy Rate Calculation for All Others,'' dated May 7, 2019
(Sanathan's Clerical Error Comments). On May 13, 2019, Sanathan also
submitted rebuttal comments, however, pursuant to 19 CFR
351.224(c)(3), Commerce will not consider replies to comments in
connection with a preliminary determination.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Period of Investigation
The period of investigation (POI) is April 1, 2017 through March
31, 2018.
Scope of Investigation
The product covered by this investigation is polyester textured
yarn from India. For a complete description of the scope of this
investigation, see the Appendix to this notice.
Analysis of Significant Ministerial Error Allegations
Commerce will analyze any comments received and, if appropriate,
correct any significant ministerial error by amending the preliminary
determination according to 19 CFR 351.224(e). A ministerial error is
defined in 19 CFR 351.224(f) as ``an error in addition, subtraction, or
other arithmetic function, clerical error resulting from inaccurate
copying, duplication, or the like, and any other similar type of
unintentional error which the Secretary considers ministerial.'' \4\ A
significant ministerial error is defined as a ministerial error, the
correction of which, singly or in combination with other errors, would
result in: (1) A change of at least five absolute percentage points in,
but not less than 25 percent of, the countervailing duty rate
calculated in the original preliminary determination; or (2) a
difference between a countervailing duty rate of zero (or de minimis)
and a countervailing duty rate greater than de minimis, or vice
versa.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ See section 735(e) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended
(the Act).
\5\ See 19 CFR 351.224(g).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Amended Preliminary Determination
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.224(e) and (g)(1), Commerce is amending the
Preliminary Determination to reflect the correction of a ministerial
error made in the calculation of the estimated weighted-average all-
others countervailable subsidy rate. This error is a significant
ministerial error within the meaning of 19 CFR 351.224(g) because the
all-other's rate decreases from 13.82 percent to 7.24 percent as a
result of correcting this ministerial error, exceeding the specified
threshold, i.e., a change of at least five absolute percentage points
in, but not less than 25 percent of, the countervailable subsidy rate
calculated in the original Preliminary Determination.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ See Memorandum, ``Countervailing Duty Investigation of
Polyester Textured Yarn from India: Allegations of Significant
Ministerial Errors in the Preliminary Determination,'' dated
concurrently with this notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Amended Cash Deposits and Suspension of Liquidation
The collection of cash deposits and suspension of liquidation will
be revised according to the rates calculated in this amended
preliminary determination. Because these amended rates result in
decreased cash deposits, the amended rate for the all-others rate will
be effective retroactively to May 3, 2019, the date of publication of
the Preliminary Determination. Parties will be notified of this
determination, in accordance with section 733(d) and (f) of the Act.
Amended Preliminary Determination
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Weighted-
Exporter/producer average
margin
------------------------------------------------------------------------
All-Others................................................. 7.24
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Disclosure
We intend to disclose the calculations performed to parties in this
proceeding within five days after publication of the notice of amended
preliminary determination in the Federal Register in accordance with 19
CFR 351.224(b).
International Trade Commission Notification
In accordance with section 733(f) of the Act, we notified the
International Trade Commission of our amended preliminary
determination.
This amended preliminary determination is issued and published in
accordance with sections 733(f) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR
351.224(e).
Dated: June 6, 2019.
Jeffrey I. Kessler,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
Appendix I--Scope of the Investigation
The merchandise covered by this investigation, polyester
textured yarn, is synthetic multifilament yarn that is manufactured
from polyester (polyethylene terephthalate). Polyester textured yarn
is produced through a texturing process, which imparts special
properties to the filaments of the yarn, including stretch, bulk,
strength, moisture absorption, insulation, and the appearance of a
natural fiber. This scope includes all forms of polyester textured
yarn, regardless of surface texture or appearance, yarn density and
thickness (as measured in denier), number of filaments, number of
plies, finish (luster), cross section, color, dye method, texturing
method, or packing method (such as spindles, tubes, or beams).
Excluded from the scope of this investigation is bulk continuous
filament yarn that: (a) Is polyester synthetic multifilament yarn;
(b) has denier size ranges of 900 and above; (c) has turns per meter
of 40 and above; and (d) has a maximum shrinkage of 2.5 percent.
The merchandise subject to this investigation is properly
classified under subheadings 5402.33.3000 and 5402.33.6000 of the
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). Although
the HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs
purposes, the written description of the scope of the investigation
is dispositive.
[FR Doc. 2019-12404 Filed 6-11-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P