Initiation of Five-Year (Sunset) Reviews, 25741-25743 [2019-11655]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 107 / Tuesday, June 4, 2019 / Notices
exceed six months.16 However, we find
that a compelling reason to deny the
request to postpone the final
determination exists because
THIELMANN declined to respond to
our original questionnaire or otherwise
participate in the investigation.
THIELMANN is the sole mandatory
respondent in this case, and because it
declined to respond to our initial
questionnaire and is not participating in
the investigation, there is no need to
postpone the final determination, and
we are thus compelled to deny the
request. In accordance with section
735(a)(2)(A) of the Act and 19 CFR
351.210(e)(1) and (2), because a
compelling reason for denial exists we
are not granting THIELMANN’s request
to postpone the final determination.
Therefore, we intend to issue the final
determination pursuant to section
735(a)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR
351.210(b)(1).
International Trade Commission
Notification
In accordance with section 733(f) of
the Act, Commerce will notify the
International Trade Commission (ITC) of
its preliminary determination. If the
final determination is affirmative, the
ITC will determine before the later of
120 days after the date of this
preliminary determination or 45 days
after the final determination whether
these imports are materially injuring, or
threaten material injury to, the U.S.
industry.
Notification to Interested Parties
This determination is issued and
published in accordance with sections
733(f) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19
CFR 351.205(c).
Dated: May 28, 2019.
Christian Marsh,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement
and Compliance.
khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES
Appendix I
Scope of the Investigation
The merchandise covered by this
investigation are kegs, vessels, or containers
with bodies that are approximately
cylindrical in shape, made from stainless
steel (i.e., steel containing at least 10.5
percent chromium by weight and less than
1.2 percent carbon by weight, with or
without other elements), and that are
compatible with a ‘‘D Sankey’’ extractor
(refillable stainless steel kegs) with a nominal
liquid volume capacity of 10 liters or more,
regardless of the type of finish, gauge,
thickness, or grade of stainless steel, and
16 See THIELMANN’s Letter, ‘‘Refillable Stainless
Steel Kegs from Mexico: Request For Postponement
of Final Determination,’’ dated April 29, 2019.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:16 Jun 03, 2019
Jkt 247001
whether or not covered by or encased in
other materials. Refillable stainless steel kegs
may be imported assembled or unassembled,
with or without all components (including
spears, couplers or taps, necks, collars, and
valves), and be filled or unfilled.
‘‘Unassembled’’ or ‘‘unfinished’’ refillable
stainless steel kegs include drawn stainless
steel cylinders that have been welded to form
the body of the keg and attached to an upper
(top) chime and/or lower (bottom) chime.
Unassembled refillable stainless steel kegs
may or may not be welded to a neck, may
or may not have a valve assembly attached,
and may be otherwise complete except for
testing, certification, and/or marking.
Subject merchandise also includes
refillable stainless steel kegs that have been
further processed in a third country,
including but not limited to, attachment of
necks, collars, spears or valves, heat
treatment, pickling, passivation, painting,
testing, certification or any other processing
that would not otherwise remove the
merchandise from the scope of the
investigation if performed in the country of
manufacture of the in-scope refillable
stainless steel keg.
Specifically excluded are the following:
(1) Vessels or containers that are not
approximately cylindrical in nature (e.g.,
box, ‘‘hopper’’ or ‘‘cone’’ shaped vessels);
(2) stainless steel kegs, vessels, or
containers that have either a ‘‘ball lock’’
valve system or a ‘‘pin lock’’ valve system
(commonly known as ‘‘Cornelius,’’ ‘‘corny’’
or ‘‘ball lock’’ kegs);
(3) necks, spears, couplers or taps, collars,
and valves that are not imported with the
subject merchandise; and
(4) stainless steel kegs that are filled with
beer, wine, or other liquid and that are
designated by the Commissioner of Customs
as Instruments of International Traffic within
the meaning of section 332(a) of the Tariff
Act of 1930, as amended.
The merchandise covered by this
investigation are currently classified in the
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United
States (HTSUS) under subheadings
7310.10.0010, 7310.10.0050, 7310.29.0025,
and 7310.29.0050.
These HTSUS subheadings are provided
for convenience and customs purposes; the
written description of the scope of this
investigation is dispositive.
Appendix II
List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary
Decision Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Period of Investigation
IV. Scope of the Investigation
V. Scope Comments
VI. Product Characteristics
VII. Application of Facts Available and Use
of Adverse Inference, and Calculation of
All-Others Rate
A. Application of Facts Available
B. Use of Adverse Inference
C. Preliminary Estimated WeightedAverage Dumping Margins Based on
Adverse Facts Available
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
25741
D. Corroboration of Secondary Information
E. All Others Rate
VIII. Critical Circumstances
IX. Verification
X. Conclusion
[FR Doc. 2019–11586 Filed 6–3–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
Initiation of Five-Year (Sunset)
Reviews
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
AGENCY:
In accordance with the Tariff
Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), the
Department of Commerce (Commerce) is
automatically initiating the five-year
reviews (Sunset Reviews) of the
antidumping and countervailing duty
(AD/CVD) order(s) listed below. The
International Trade Commission (the
Commission) is publishing concurrently
with this notice its notice of Institution
of Five-Year Reviews which covers the
same order(s).
SUMMARY:
DATES:
Applicable June 1, 2019.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Commerce official identified in the
Initiation of Review section below at
AD/CVD Operations, Enforcement and
Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW, Washington, DC 20230. For
information from the Commission
contact Mary Messer, Office of
Investigations, U.S. International Trade
Commission at (202) 205–3193.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Commerce’s procedures for the
conduct of Sunset Reviews are set forth
in its Procedures for Conducting FiveYear (Sunset) Reviews of Antidumping
and Countervailing Duty Orders, 63 FR
13516 (March 20, 1998) and 70 FR
62061 (October 28, 2005). Guidance on
methodological or analytical issues
relevant to Commerce’s conduct of
Sunset Reviews is set forth in
Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation
of the Weighted-Average Dumping
Margin and Assessment Rate in Certain
Antidumping Duty Proceedings; Final
Modification, 77 FR 8101 (February 14,
2012).
E:\FR\FM\04JNN1.SGM
04JNN1
25742
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 107 / Tuesday, June 4, 2019 / Notices
Initiation of Review
In accordance with section 751(c) of
the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(c), we are
DOC case No.
ITC case No.
Country
Product
Carbon and Certain Alloy, Steel Wire Rod
(3rd Review).
Carbon and Certain Alloy, Steel Wire Rod
(3rd Review).
Circular Welded Austenitic, Stainless
Pressure Pipe (2nd Review).
Circular Welded Austenitic, Stainless
Pressure Pipe (2nd Review).
Oil Country Tubular Goods (1st Review)
Oil Country Tubular Goods (1st Review)
Carbon and Certain Alloy, Steel Wire Rod
(2nd Review).
Welded Stainless Steel, Pressure Pipe
(1st Review).
Carbon and Certain Alloy, Steel Wire Rod
(3rd Review).
Carbon and Certain Alloy, Steel Wire Rod
(3rd Review).
Oil Country Tubular Goods (1st Review)
Silicon Metal (3rd Review) ........................
Welded Stainless Steel, Pressure Pipe
(1st Review).
Welded Stainless Steel, Pressure Pipe
(1st Review).
Carbon and Certain Alloy, Steel Wire Rod
(3rd Review).
Oil Country Tubular Goods (1st Review)
Oil Country Tubular Goods (1st Review)
Oil Country Tubular Goods (1st Review)
(Suspension Agreement).
A–351–832 ......
731–TA–953
Brazil .......................
C–351–833 ......
701–TA–417
Brazil .......................
A–570–930 ......
731–TA–1144
China .......................
C–570–931 ......
701–TA–454
China .......................
A–533–857 ......
C–533–858 ......
A–560–815 ......
731–TA–1215
701–TA–499
731–TA–957
India ........................
India ........................
Indonesia .................
A–557–815 ......
731–TA–1210
Malaysia ..................
A–201–830 ......
731–TA–958
Mexico .....................
A–841–805 ......
731–TA–959
Moldova ...................
A–580–870 ......
A–821–817 ......
A–552–816 ......
731–TA–1216
731–TA–991
731–TA–1212
Republic of Korea ...
Russia .....................
Vietnam ...................
A–549–830 ......
731–TA–1211
Thailand ..................
A–274–804 ......
731–TA–961
A–489–816 ......
C–489–817 ......
A–823–815 ......
731–TA–1221
701–TA–500
731–TA–1222
Trinidad And Tobago.
Turkey .....................
Turkey .....................
Ukraine ....................
With respect to the antidumping and
countervailing duty orders on Oil
Country Tubular Goods from India,
Vietnam, Republic of Korea and Turkey,
we have advanced the initiation date of
these Sunset Reviews upon determining
that initiation of the Sunset Reviews for
these antidumping and countervailing
duty orders on the same date would
promote administrative efficiency.1
Filing Information
As a courtesy, we are making
information related to sunset
proceedings, including copies of the
pertinent statute and Commerces’s
regulations, Commerce’s schedule for
Sunset Reviews, a listing of past
revocations and continuations, and
current service lists, available to the
public on Commerce’s website at the
following address: https://
enforcement.trade.gov/sunset/. All
submissions in these Sunset Reviews
must be filed in accordance with
khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES
initiating the Sunset Reviews of the
following antidumping and
countervailing duty order(s):
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:16 Jun 03, 2019
Jkt 247001
Commerce’s regulations regarding
format, translation, and service of
documents. These rules, including
electronic filing requirements via
Enforcement and Compliance’s
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Centralized Electronic Service System
(ACCESS), can be found at 19 CFR
351.303.2
Any party submitting factual
information in an AD/CVD proceeding
must certify to the accuracy and
completeness of that information.3
Parties must use the certification
formats provided in 19 CFR 351.303(g).4
Commerce intends to reject factual
submissions if the submitting party does
not comply with applicable revised
certification requirements.
On April 10, 2013, Commerce
modified two regulations related to AD/
CVD proceedings: The definition of
2 See
1 With respect to these Sunset Reviews,
Commerce is advancing their initiation from August
to June 2019 to coincide with the initiation of the
companion Sunset Reviews being conducted by the
U.S. International Trade Commission, as well as
with Commerce’s initiation of the Sunset Review
for the companion Ukrainian case (A–823–815),
which was already scheduled to be initiated on
June 2019.
Commerce contact
also Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Proceedings: Electronic Filing Procedures;
Administrative Protective Order Procedures, 76 FR
39263 (July 6, 2011).
3 See section 782(b) of the Act.
4 See also Certification of Factual Information to
Import Administration During Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Proceedings, 78 FR 42678 (July
17, 2013) (Final Rule). Answers to frequently asked
questions regarding the Final Rule are available at
https://enforcement.trade.gov/tlei/notices/factual_
info_final_rule_FAQ_07172013.pdf.
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Joshua Poole, (202) 482–1293.
Joshua Poole, (202) 482–1293.
Matthew Renkey, (202) 482–2312.
Joshua Poole, (202) 482–1293.
Jacqueline Arrowsmith, (202) 482–5255.
Jacqueline Arrowsmith, (202) 482–5255.
Joshua Poole, (202) 482–1293.
Matthew Renkey, (202) 482–2312.
Joshua Poole, (202) 482–1293.
Joshua Poole, (202) 482–1293.
Jacqueline Arrowsmith, (202) 482–5255.
Jacqueline Arrowsmith, (202) 482–5255.
Matthew Renkey, (202) 482–2312.
Matthew Renkey, (202) 482–2312.
Joshua Poole, (202) 482–1293.
Jacqueline Arrowsmith, (202) 482–5255.
Joshua Poole, (202) 482–1293.
Jacqueline Arrowsmith, (202) 482–5255.
factual information (19 CFR
351.102(b)(21)), and the time limits for
the submission of factual information
(19 CFR 351.301).5 Parties are advised to
review the final rule, available at https://
enforcement.trade.gov/frn/2013/
1304frn/2013-08227.txt, prior to
submitting factual information in these
segments. To the extent that other
regulations govern the submission of
factual information in a segment (such
as 19 CFR 351.218), these time limits
will continue to be applied. Parties are
also advised to review the final rule
concerning the extension of time limits
for submissions in AD/CVD
proceedings, available at https://
enforcement.trade.gov/frn/2013/
1309frn/2013-22853.txt, prior to
submitting factual information in these
segments.6
Letters of Appearance and
Administrative Protective Orders
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.103(d),
Commerce will maintain and make
available a public service list for these
proceedings. Parties wishing to
5 See Definition of Factual Information and Time
Limits for Submission of Factual Information: Final
Rule, 78 FR 21246 (April 10, 2013).
6 See Extension of Time Limits, 78 FR 57790
(September 20, 2013).
E:\FR\FM\04JNN1.SGM
04JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 107 / Tuesday, June 4, 2019 / Notices
khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES
participate in any of these five-year
reviews must file letters of appearance
as discussed at 19 CFR 351.103(d)). To
facilitate the timely preparation of the
public service list, it is requested that
those seeking recognition as interested
parties to a proceeding submit an entry
of appearance within 10 days of the
publication of the Notice of Initiation.
Because deadlines in Sunset Reviews
can be very short, we urge interested
parties who want access to proprietary
information under administrative
protective order (APO) to file an APO
application immediately following
publication in the Federal Register of
this notice of initiation. Commerce’s
regulations on submission of proprietary
information and eligibility to receive
access to business proprietary
information under APO can be found at
19 CFR 351.304–306.
Information Required From Interested
Parties
Domestic interested parties, as
defined in section 771(9)(C), (D), (E), (F),
and (G) of the Act and 19 CFR
351.102(b), wishing to participate in a
Sunset Review must respond not later
than 15 days after the date of
publication in the Federal Register of
this notice of initiation by filing a notice
of intent to participate. The required
contents of the notice of intent to
participate are set forth at 19 CFR
351.218(d)(1)(ii). In accordance with
Commerce’s regulations, if we do not
receive a notice of intent to participate
from at least one domestic interested
party by the 15-day deadline, Commerce
will automatically revoke the order
without further review.7
If we receive an order-specific notice
of intent to participate from a domestic
interested party, Commerce’s
regulations provide that all parties
wishing to participate in a Sunset
Review must file complete substantive
responses not later than 30 days after
the date of publication in the Federal
Register of this notice of initiation. The
required contents of a substantive
response, on an order-specific basis, are
set forth at 19 CFR 351.218(d)(3). Note
that certain information requirements
differ for respondent and domestic
parties. Also, note that Commerce’s
information requirements are distinct
from the Commission’s information
requirements. Consult Commerce’s
regulations for information regarding
Commerce’s conduct of Sunset Reviews.
Consult Commerce’s regulations at 19
CFR part 351 for definitions of terms
and for other general information
concerning antidumping and
7 See
17:16 Jun 03, 2019
Dated: May 30, 2019.
Gary Taverman,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping
and Countervailing Duty Operations.
[FR Doc. 2019–11655 Filed 6–3–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–580–881]
Certain Cold Rolled Steel Flat Products
From the Republic of Korea: Notice of
Court Decision Not in Harmony With
Final Results and Notice of Amended
Final Results of the Antidumping Duty
Investigation
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
AGENCY:
On February 26, 2019, the
United States Court of International
Trade (the Court) issued final judgment
in Hyundai Steel Company. v. United
States, Court No. 16–00228, sustaining
the Department of Commerce’s
(Commerce) final results of the
redetermination pursuant to remand.
Consistent with the decision of the
United States Court of Appeals for the
Federal Circuit (Federal Circuit) in
Timken Co., v United States, 893 F.2d
337 (Fed. Cir. 1990) (Timken), as
clarified by Diamond Sawblades Mfrs.
Coalition v. United States, 626 F.3d
1374 (Fed. Cir. 2010) (Diamond
Sawblades), Commerce is notifying the
public that the final judgment in this
case is not in harmony with Commerce’s
Amended Final Results and
Antidumping Duty Order published on
September 20, 2016 (Order). Commerce
is amending the final results with
respect to the weighted-average
dumping margin assigned to Hyundai
Steel Company (Hyundai Steel).
SUMMARY:
DATES:
Applicable March 8, 2019.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Michael J. Heaney or Daniel Deku, AD/
CVD Operations, Office VI, Enforcement
and Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone:
(202) 482–4475 or (202) 482–5075,
respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(iii).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
countervailing duty proceedings at
Commerce.
This notice of initiation is being
published in accordance with section
751(c) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(c).
Jkt 247001
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
25743
Background
Commerce published the Final
Determination on July 29, 2016,1 and
issued the antidumping duty order on
September 20, 2016.2 Hyundai Steel
filed an action before the CIT to
challenge several aspects of Commerce’s
Final Determination.
After review, the Court sustained
Commerce’s determination that
Hyundai Steel failed to demonstrate that
the affiliated parties who supplied
Hyundai Steel with home market
movement, home market warehousing,
U.S. international freight, and U.S.
inland freight expenses did so on an
arm’s-length basis.3 The Court further
sustained Commerce’s application of
adverse facts available (AFA), pursuant
to sections 776(a) and (b) of the Tariff
Act of 1930 (the Act), as amended, to
the affiliated parties who provided
Hyundai Steel with home market
movement, home market warehousing,
U.S. international freight, and U.S.
inland freight.4 Additionally, the Court
sustained Commerce’s application of
AFA to three product specifications
reported by Hyundai Steel.5
However, the Court remanded to
Commerce for further explanation or
reconsideration whether it intended to
apply AFA to those U.S. sales where: (1)
Hyundai Steel used an unaffiliated
freight provider to supply domestic
inland freight; or (2) Hyundai Steel
incurred no domestic inland freight
charges in the U.S.6 While the Court
found that Commerce appropriately
assigned an AFA freight amount to U.S.
sales for which Hyundai Steel secured
freight services from affiliated parties,7
the Court found Commerce offered no
justification as to why Commerce
applied AFA freight amounts to U.S.
sales for which Hyundai Steel either: (1)
Incurred no domestic inland freight or
warehousing expense; or (2) the
domestic inland freight or warehousing
was provided by unaffiliated parties.8
Additionally, the Court determined
that the AFA adjustment applied to
1 See Certain Cold-Rolled Steel Flat Products from
the Republic of Korea: Final Determination of Sales
at Less Than Fair Value, 81 FR 49953 (July 29,
2016) (Final Determination).
2 See Certain Cold Rolled Steel Flat Products from
Brazil, India, the Republic of Korea, and the United
Kingdom: Amended Final Affirmative Antidumping
Determinations for Brazil and the United Kingdom
and Antidumping Duty Orders, 81 FR 64432
(September 20, 2016) (Order).
3 See Hyundai Steel Company v. United States,
Slip Op. 18–80 Court No., 16–00228 dated June 28,
2018 (Remand Order) at 20–22.
4 Id. at 22–31.
5 Id. at 38–43.
6 Id. at 34.
7 Id. at 22–31.
8 Id. at 34.
E:\FR\FM\04JNN1.SGM
04JNN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 107 (Tuesday, June 4, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 25741-25743]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-11655]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
Initiation of Five-Year (Sunset) Reviews
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: In accordance with the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the
Act), the Department of Commerce (Commerce) is automatically initiating
the five-year reviews (Sunset Reviews) of the antidumping and
countervailing duty (AD/CVD) order(s) listed below. The International
Trade Commission (the Commission) is publishing concurrently with this
notice its notice of Institution of Five-Year Reviews which covers the
same order(s).
DATES: Applicable June 1, 2019.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Commerce official identified in the
Initiation of Review section below at AD/CVD Operations, Enforcement
and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230. For
information from the Commission contact Mary Messer, Office of
Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission at (202) 205-3193.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Commerce's procedures for the conduct of Sunset Reviews are set
forth in its Procedures for Conducting Five-Year (Sunset) Reviews of
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Orders, 63 FR 13516 (March 20,
1998) and 70 FR 62061 (October 28, 2005). Guidance on methodological or
analytical issues relevant to Commerce's conduct of Sunset Reviews is
set forth in Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of the Weighted-
Average Dumping Margin and Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping Duty
Proceedings; Final Modification, 77 FR 8101 (February 14, 2012).
[[Page 25742]]
Initiation of Review
In accordance with section 751(c) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(c),
we are initiating the Sunset Reviews of the following antidumping and
countervailing duty order(s):
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DOC case No. ITC case No. Country Product Commerce contact
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A-351-832............ 731-TA-953 Brazil............ Carbon and Certain Joshua Poole, (202)
Alloy, Steel Wire Rod 482-1293.
(3rd Review).
C-351-833............ 701-TA-417 Brazil............ Carbon and Certain Joshua Poole, (202)
Alloy, Steel Wire Rod 482-1293.
(3rd Review).
A-570-930............ 731-TA-1144 China............. Circular Welded Matthew Renkey, (202)
Austenitic, Stainless 482-2312.
Pressure Pipe (2nd
Review).
C-570-931............ 701-TA-454 China............. Circular Welded Joshua Poole, (202)
Austenitic, Stainless 482-1293.
Pressure Pipe (2nd
Review).
A-533-857............ 731-TA-1215 India............. Oil Country Tubular Jacqueline Arrowsmith,
Goods (1st Review). (202) 482-5255.
C-533-858............ 701-TA-499 India............. Oil Country Tubular Jacqueline Arrowsmith,
Goods (1st Review). (202) 482-5255.
A-560-815............ 731-TA-957 Indonesia......... Carbon and Certain Joshua Poole, (202)
Alloy, Steel Wire Rod 482-1293.
(2nd Review).
A-557-815............ 731-TA-1210 Malaysia.......... Welded Stainless Matthew Renkey, (202)
Steel, Pressure Pipe 482-2312.
(1st Review).
A-201-830............ 731-TA-958 Mexico............ Carbon and Certain Joshua Poole, (202)
Alloy, Steel Wire Rod 482-1293.
(3rd Review).
A-841-805............ 731-TA-959 Moldova........... Carbon and Certain Joshua Poole, (202)
Alloy, Steel Wire Rod 482-1293.
(3rd Review).
A-580-870............ 731-TA-1216 Republic of Korea. Oil Country Tubular Jacqueline Arrowsmith,
Goods (1st Review). (202) 482-5255.
A-821-817............ 731-TA-991 Russia............ Silicon Metal (3rd Jacqueline Arrowsmith,
Review). (202) 482-5255.
A-552-816............ 731-TA-1212 Vietnam........... Welded Stainless Matthew Renkey, (202)
Steel, Pressure Pipe 482-2312.
(1st Review).
A-549-830............ 731-TA-1211 Thailand.......... Welded Stainless Matthew Renkey, (202)
Steel, Pressure Pipe 482-2312.
(1st Review).
A-274-804............ 731-TA-961 Trinidad And Carbon and Certain Joshua Poole, (202)
Tobago. Alloy, Steel Wire Rod 482-1293.
(3rd Review).
A-489-816............ 731-TA-1221 Turkey............ Oil Country Tubular Jacqueline Arrowsmith,
Goods (1st Review). (202) 482-5255.
C-489-817............ 701-TA-500 Turkey............ Oil Country Tubular Joshua Poole, (202)
Goods (1st Review). 482-1293.
A-823-815............ 731-TA-1222 Ukraine........... Oil Country Tubular Jacqueline Arrowsmith,
Goods (1st Review) (202) 482-5255.
(Suspension
Agreement).
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
With respect to the antidumping and countervailing duty orders on
Oil Country Tubular Goods from India, Vietnam, Republic of Korea and
Turkey, we have advanced the initiation date of these Sunset Reviews
upon determining that initiation of the Sunset Reviews for these
antidumping and countervailing duty orders on the same date would
promote administrative efficiency.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ With respect to these Sunset Reviews, Commerce is advancing
their initiation from August to June 2019 to coincide with the
initiation of the companion Sunset Reviews being conducted by the
U.S. International Trade Commission, as well as with Commerce's
initiation of the Sunset Review for the companion Ukrainian case (A-
823-815), which was already scheduled to be initiated on June 2019.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Filing Information
As a courtesy, we are making information related to sunset
proceedings, including copies of the pertinent statute and Commerces's
regulations, Commerce's schedule for Sunset Reviews, a listing of past
revocations and continuations, and current service lists, available to
the public on Commerce's website at the following address: https://enforcement.trade.gov/sunset/. All submissions in these Sunset Reviews
must be filed in accordance with Commerce's regulations regarding
format, translation, and service of documents. These rules, including
electronic filing requirements via Enforcement and Compliance's
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service
System (ACCESS), can be found at 19 CFR 351.303.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ See also Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings:
Electronic Filing Procedures; Administrative Protective Order
Procedures, 76 FR 39263 (July 6, 2011).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Any party submitting factual information in an AD/CVD proceeding
must certify to the accuracy and completeness of that information.\3\
Parties must use the certification formats provided in 19 CFR
351.303(g).\4\ Commerce intends to reject factual submissions if the
submitting party does not comply with applicable revised certification
requirements.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ See section 782(b) of the Act.
\4\ See also Certification of Factual Information to Import
Administration During Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Proceedings, 78 FR 42678 (July 17, 2013) (Final Rule). Answers to
frequently asked questions regarding the Final Rule are available at
https://enforcement.trade.gov/tlei/notices/factual_info_final_rule_FAQ_07172013.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
On April 10, 2013, Commerce modified two regulations related to AD/
CVD proceedings: The definition of factual information (19 CFR
351.102(b)(21)), and the time limits for the submission of factual
information (19 CFR 351.301).\5\ Parties are advised to review the
final rule, available at https://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/2013/1304frn/2013-08227.txt, prior to submitting factual information in these
segments. To the extent that other regulations govern the submission of
factual information in a segment (such as 19 CFR 351.218), these time
limits will continue to be applied. Parties are also advised to review
the final rule concerning the extension of time limits for submissions
in AD/CVD proceedings, available at https://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/2013/1309frn/2013-22853.txt, prior to submitting factual information in
these segments.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ See Definition of Factual Information and Time Limits for
Submission of Factual Information: Final Rule, 78 FR 21246 (April
10, 2013).
\6\ See Extension of Time Limits, 78 FR 57790 (September 20,
2013).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Letters of Appearance and Administrative Protective Orders
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.103(d), Commerce will maintain and make
available a public service list for these proceedings. Parties wishing
to
[[Page 25743]]
participate in any of these five-year reviews must file letters of
appearance as discussed at 19 CFR 351.103(d)). To facilitate the timely
preparation of the public service list, it is requested that those
seeking recognition as interested parties to a proceeding submit an
entry of appearance within 10 days of the publication of the Notice of
Initiation. Because deadlines in Sunset Reviews can be very short, we
urge interested parties who want access to proprietary information
under administrative protective order (APO) to file an APO application
immediately following publication in the Federal Register of this
notice of initiation. Commerce's regulations on submission of
proprietary information and eligibility to receive access to business
proprietary information under APO can be found at 19 CFR 351.304-306.
Information Required From Interested Parties
Domestic interested parties, as defined in section 771(9)(C), (D),
(E), (F), and (G) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.102(b), wishing to
participate in a Sunset Review must respond not later than 15 days
after the date of publication in the Federal Register of this notice of
initiation by filing a notice of intent to participate. The required
contents of the notice of intent to participate are set forth at 19 CFR
351.218(d)(1)(ii). In accordance with Commerce's regulations, if we do
not receive a notice of intent to participate from at least one
domestic interested party by the 15-day deadline, Commerce will
automatically revoke the order without further review.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ See 19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(iii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
If we receive an order-specific notice of intent to participate
from a domestic interested party, Commerce's regulations provide that
all parties wishing to participate in a Sunset Review must file
complete substantive responses not later than 30 days after the date of
publication in the Federal Register of this notice of initiation. The
required contents of a substantive response, on an order-specific
basis, are set forth at 19 CFR 351.218(d)(3). Note that certain
information requirements differ for respondent and domestic parties.
Also, note that Commerce's information requirements are distinct from
the Commission's information requirements. Consult Commerce's
regulations for information regarding Commerce's conduct of Sunset
Reviews. Consult Commerce's regulations at 19 CFR part 351 for
definitions of terms and for other general information concerning
antidumping and countervailing duty proceedings at Commerce.
This notice of initiation is being published in accordance with
section 751(c) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(c).
Dated: May 30, 2019.
Gary Taverman,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Operations.
[FR Doc. 2019-11655 Filed 6-3-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
