Consolidated Advisory Opinion and Enforcement Proceeding; Certain Robotic Vacuum Cleaning Devices and Components Thereof Such as Spare Parts Commission's Determination Not to Review an Initial Determination Terminating the Advisory Opinion Proceeding; Termination of Advisory Opinion Proceeding, 24542 [2019-10996]
Download as PDF
24542
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 102 / Tuesday, May 28, 2019 / Notices
Estimated
number of
annual
respondents
Activity/requirement
Completion
time per
response
(hours)
Estimated
total annual
burden hours
Partner Requests .............................................................................................
2
2
.5
1
Total ..........................................................................................................
37
37
........................
1,401
An agency may not conduct or
sponsor and a person is not required to
respond to a collection of information
unless it displays a currently valid OMB
control number.
The authority for this action is the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
Phadrea Ponds,
Acting Information Collection Clearance
Officer, National Park Service.
[FR Doc. 2019–11065 Filed 5–24–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4312–52–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337–TA–1057]
Consolidated Advisory Opinion and
Enforcement Proceeding; Certain
Robotic Vacuum Cleaning Devices and
Components Thereof Such as Spare
Parts Commission’s Determination Not
to Review an Initial Determination
Terminating the Advisory Opinion
Proceeding; Termination of Advisory
Opinion Proceeding
U.S. International Trade
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
Notice is hereby given that
the U.S. International Trade
Commission (‘‘the Commission’’) has
determined not to review an initial
determination (‘‘ID’’) (Order No. 52)
issued by the presiding administrative
law judge (‘‘ALJ’’) that terminates the
advisory opinion proceeding.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Robert Needham, Office of the General
Counsel, U.S. International Trade
Commission, 500 E Street SW,
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202)
708–5468. Copies of non-confidential
documents filed in connection with this
investigation are or will be available for
inspection during official business
hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the
Office of the Secretary, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E
Street SW, Washington, DC 20436,
telephone (202) 205–2000. General
information concerning the Commission
SUMMARY:
jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with NOTICES
Estimated
number of
annual
responses
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:49 May 24, 2019
Jkt 247001
may also be obtained by accessing its
internet server (https://www.usitc.gov).
The public record for this investigation
may be viewed on the Commission’s
electronic docket (EDIS) at https://
edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired
persons are advised that information on
this matter can be obtained by
contacting the Commission’s TDD
terminal on (202) 205–1810.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Commission instituted an investigation
on May 23, 2017, based on a complaint
filed by iRobot Corporation of Bedford,
Massachusetts (‘‘iRobot’’). 82 FR 23593–
94. The complaint, as supplemented,
alleged violations of section 337 of the
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19
U.S.C. 1337, in the importation into the
United States, the sale for importation,
and the sale within the United States
after importation of certain robotic
vacuum cleaning devices and
components thereof that infringe certain
claims of, inter alia, U.S. Patent No.
9,038,233 (‘‘the ’233 patent’’). Id. The
Commission’s notice of investigation
named as respondents, inter alia,
Shenzhen Silver Star Intelligent
Technology Co., Ltd., of Shenzhen,
China (‘‘Silver Star’’), and bObsweep
USA, of Henderson, Nevada, and
bObsweep Inc., of Toronto, Canada
(together, ‘‘bObsweep’’). Id. at 23593.
The Office of Unfair Import
Investigations did not participate in the
investigation. Id.
On November 30, 2018, the
Commission found, inter alia, that
Silver Star and bObsweep violated
section 337 with respect to the ’233
patent, and issued a limited exclusion
order (‘‘LEO’’) against, inter alia, Silver
Star and bObsweep, with respect to
certain claims of the ’233 patent. 83 FR
63186–87 (Dec. 7, 2018).
On January 30, 2019, Silver Star filed
a request for an advisory opinion that
eight of its new products do not violate
the LEO. On March 21, 2019, the
Commission instituted an advisory
opinion proceeding, and named as
parties iRobot, Silver Star, and the
Office of Unfair Import Investigations
(‘‘OUII’’). 84 FR 10531 (Mar. 21, 2019).
On February 21, 2019, iRobot filed an
enforcement complaint against
PO 00000
Frm 00081
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 9990
bObsweep. On April 1, 2019, the
Commission instituted a formal
enforcement proceeding, and named as
parties iRobot, bObsweep, and OUII. 84
FR 12289 (Apr. 1, 2019). The
Commission consolidated the formal
enforcement proceeding with the
advisory opinion proceeding described
above.
On April 12, 2019, iRobot and Silver
Star filed a joint motion to terminate the
advisory opinion proceeding based on a
settlement agreement. On April 24,
2019, OUII filed a response in support
of the motion.
On April 25, 2019, the ALJ issued the
subject ID, granting the motion and
terminating the advisory opinion
proceeding. The ALJ found that the
motion complied with Rule 210.21(b)
and that there is no evidence that
termination by settlement has any
adverse effect on the public interest. No
petitions for review of the ID were filed.
The Commission has determined not
to review the subject ID and terminates
the advisory opinion proceeding. The
Commission clarifies that this notice
does not terminate the enforcement
proceeding that was consolidated with
the advisory opinion proceeding.
The authority for the Commission’s
determination is contained in section
337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in part
210 of the Commission’s Rules of
Practice and Procedure (19 CFR part
210).
By order of the Commission.
Issued: May 15, 2019.
Lisa Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2019–10996 Filed 5–24–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
E:\FR\FM\28MYN1.SGM
28MYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 102 (Tuesday, May 28, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Page 24542]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-10996]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337-TA-1057]
Consolidated Advisory Opinion and Enforcement Proceeding; Certain
Robotic Vacuum Cleaning Devices and Components Thereof Such as Spare
Parts Commission's Determination Not to Review an Initial Determination
Terminating the Advisory Opinion Proceeding; Termination of Advisory
Opinion Proceeding
AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade
Commission (``the Commission'') has determined not to review an initial
determination (``ID'') (Order No. 52) issued by the presiding
administrative law judge (``ALJ'') that terminates the advisory opinion
proceeding.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert Needham, Office of the General
Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW,
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 708-5468. Copies of non-
confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are
or will be available for inspection during official business hours
(8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, Washington, DC 20436,
telephone (202) 205-2000. General information concerning the Commission
may also be obtained by accessing its internet server (https://www.usitc.gov). The public record for this investigation may be viewed
on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov.
Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter
can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on (202)
205-1810.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted an investigation
on May 23, 2017, based on a complaint filed by iRobot Corporation of
Bedford, Massachusetts (``iRobot''). 82 FR 23593-94. The complaint, as
supplemented, alleged violations of section 337 of the Tariff Act of
1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, in the importation into the United
States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States
after importation of certain robotic vacuum cleaning devices and
components thereof that infringe certain claims of, inter alia, U.S.
Patent No. 9,038,233 (``the '233 patent''). Id. The Commission's notice
of investigation named as respondents, inter alia, Shenzhen Silver Star
Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd., of Shenzhen, China (``Silver Star''),
and bObsweep USA, of Henderson, Nevada, and bObsweep Inc., of Toronto,
Canada (together, ``bObsweep''). Id. at 23593. The Office of Unfair
Import Investigations did not participate in the investigation. Id.
On November 30, 2018, the Commission found, inter alia, that Silver
Star and bObsweep violated section 337 with respect to the '233 patent,
and issued a limited exclusion order (``LEO'') against, inter alia,
Silver Star and bObsweep, with respect to certain claims of the '233
patent. 83 FR 63186-87 (Dec. 7, 2018).
On January 30, 2019, Silver Star filed a request for an advisory
opinion that eight of its new products do not violate the LEO. On March
21, 2019, the Commission instituted an advisory opinion proceeding, and
named as parties iRobot, Silver Star, and the Office of Unfair Import
Investigations (``OUII''). 84 FR 10531 (Mar. 21, 2019).
On February 21, 2019, iRobot filed an enforcement complaint against
bObsweep. On April 1, 2019, the Commission instituted a formal
enforcement proceeding, and named as parties iRobot, bObsweep, and
OUII. 84 FR 12289 (Apr. 1, 2019). The Commission consolidated the
formal enforcement proceeding with the advisory opinion proceeding
described above.
On April 12, 2019, iRobot and Silver Star filed a joint motion to
terminate the advisory opinion proceeding based on a settlement
agreement. On April 24, 2019, OUII filed a response in support of the
motion.
On April 25, 2019, the ALJ issued the subject ID, granting the
motion and terminating the advisory opinion proceeding. The ALJ found
that the motion complied with Rule 210.21(b) and that there is no
evidence that termination by settlement has any adverse effect on the
public interest. No petitions for review of the ID were filed.
The Commission has determined not to review the subject ID and
terminates the advisory opinion proceeding. The Commission clarifies
that this notice does not terminate the enforcement proceeding that was
consolidated with the advisory opinion proceeding.
The authority for the Commission's determination is contained in
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and
in part 210 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR
part 210).
By order of the Commission.
Issued: May 15, 2019.
Lisa Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2019-10996 Filed 5-24-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P