Certain Lined Paper Products From India: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2016-2017, 23017-23019 [2019-10546]

Download as PDF 23017 Notices Federal Register Vol. 84, No. 98 Tuesday, May 21, 2019 This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains documents other than rules or proposed rules that are applicable to the public. Notices of hearings and investigations, committee meetings, agency decisions and rulings, delegations of authority, filing of petitions and applications and agency statements of organization and functions are examples of documents appearing in this section. COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS Notice of Public Meeting of the Virginia Advisory Committee Commission on Civil Rights. Announcement of meeting. AGENCY: ACTION: Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the rules and regulations of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights (Commission), and the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA) that a meeting of the Virginia Advisory Committee to the Commission will convene by conference call at 12:00 p.m. (EST) on Wednesday, May 22, 2019. The purpose of the meeting is to discuss preparation of the Committee’s report on hate crimes in Virginia. DATES: Wednesday, May 22, 2019 at 12:00 p.m. EST. Public Call-In Information: Conference call-in number: 1–888–394– 8218 and conference call ID number: 8310490. SUMMARY: Ivy Davis at ero@usccr.gov or by phone at 202–376–7533. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Interested members of the public may listen to the discussion by calling the following tollfree conference call-in number: 1–888– 394–8218 and conference call ID number: 8310490. Please be advised that before placing them into the conference call, the conference call operator will ask callers to provide their names, their organizational affiliations (if any), and email addresses (so that callers may be notified of future meetings). Callers can expect to incur charges for calls they initiate over wireless lines, and the Commission will not refund any incurred charges. Callers will incur no charge for calls they initiate over landline connections to the toll-free conference call-in number. Persons with hearing impairments may also follow the discussion by first calling the Federal Relay Service at jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with NOTICES FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:50 May 20, 2019 Jkt 247001 1–800–877–8339 and providing the operator with the toll-free conference call-in number: 1–888–394–8218 and conference call ID number: 8310490. Members of the public are invited to make statements during the open comment period of the meeting or submit written comments. The written comments must be received in the regional office approximately 30 days after each scheduled meeting. Written comments may be mailed to the Eastern Regional Office, U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, 1331 Pennsylvania Avenue, Suite 1150, Washington, DC 20425, or emailed to Corrine Sanders at ero@usccr.gov. Persons who desire additional information may contact the Eastern Regional Office at (202) 376– 7533. Records and documents discussed during the meeting will be available for public viewing as they become available at: https://www.facadatabase.gov/ FACA/FACAPublicViewCommittee Details?id=a10t0000001gzjXAAQ, click the ‘‘Meeting Details’’ and ‘‘Documents’’ links. Records generated from this meeting may also be inspected and reproduced at the Eastern Regional Office, as they become available, both before and after the meetings. Persons interested in the work of this advisory committee are advised to go to the Commission’s website, www.usccr.gov, or to contact the Eastern Regional Office at the above phone number, email or street address. Agenda: Wednesday, May 22, 2019 I. Rollcall II. Welcome III. Discuss Preparation of Committee Report IV. Other Business V. Next Meeting VI. Open Comment VII. Adjourn Dated: May 15, 2019. David Mussatt, Supervisory Chief, Regional Programs Unit. [FR Doc. 2019–10518 Filed 5–20–19; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6335–01–P PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–533–843] Certain Lined Paper Products From India: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2016– 2017 Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that Kokuyo Riddhi Paper Products Pvt. Ltd. (Kokuyo) and Navneet Education Ltd. (Navneet) did not make sales of certain lined paper products (lined paper) from India below normal value. The period of review (POR) is September 1, 2016, through August 31, 2017. DATES: Effective May 21, 2019. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Cindy Robinson (for Navneet) and Joy Zhang (for Kokuyo), AD/CVD Operations, Office III, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone (202) 482–3797 and (202) 482–1168, respectively. AGENCY: SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background On October 10, 2018, Commerce published the Preliminary Results.1 For a history of events that occurred since the Preliminary Results, see the Issues and Decision Memorandum.2 On December 21, 2018, we extended the deadline for these final results until April 5, 2019.3 Commerce exercised its discretion to toll all deadlines affected by the partial federal government closure from December 22, 2018, through the resumption of operations on 1 See Certain Lined Paper Products from India: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Preliminary Determination of No Shipments; 2016–2017, 83 FR 50886 (October 10, 2018) (Preliminary Results) and accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum. 2 See Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Final Results of Administrative Review; 2016–2017,’’ dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum). 3 See Memorandum, ‘‘Certain Lined Paper Products from India: Extension of Time Limit for Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: 2016–2017,’’ dated December 21, 2018. E:\FR\FM\21MYN1.SGM 21MYN1 23018 Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 98 / Tuesday, May 21, 2019 / Notices January 29, 2019.4 Accordingly, the revised deadline for the final results of this administrative review is now May 15, 2019. Scope of the Order The merchandise covered by the order is lined paper. The lined paper subject to the order is currently classifiable under subheadings 4811.90.9035, 4811.90.9080, 4820.30.0040, 4810.22.5044, 4811.90.9050, 4811.90.9090, 4820.10.2010, 4820.10.2020, 4820.10.2030, 4820.10.2040, 4820.10.2050, 4820.10.2060, and 4820.10.4000 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States.5 Analysis of Comments Received All issues raised in the case and rebuttal briefs by parties are addressed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum. The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance’s Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at https://access.trade.gov, and is available to all parties in the Central Records Unit, Room B8024 of the main Department of Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly on the internet at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed Issues and Decision Memorandum and the electronic versions of the Issues and Decision Memorandum are identical in content. A list of the issues that parties raised, and to which we responded in the Issues and Decision Memorandum, is attached to this notice in the Appendix. Changes Since the Preliminary Results jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with NOTICES Based on our analysis of the comments received from parties, we made certain revisions to the margin calculations of Navneet and Kokuyo.6 4 See Memorandum to the Record from Gary Taverman, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, performing the non-exclusive functions and duties of the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, ‘‘Deadlines Affected by the Partial Shutdown of the Federal Government,’’ dated January 28, 2019. All deadlines in this segment of the proceeding affected by the partial federal government closure have been extended by 40 days. 5 For a full description of the scope of the order, see the Issues and Decision Memorandum. 6 See Issues and Decision Memorandum; see also Memorandum, ‘‘Certain Lined Paper Products from India (2016–2017): Sales and Cost of Production Calculation Memorandum for the Final Results of Navneet Education;’’ and ‘‘Analysis Memorandum for the Final Results of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review of Certain Lined Paper VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:50 May 20, 2019 Jkt 247001 Final Results of the Review As a result of this review, we determine the following weightedaverage dumping margins for the period September 1, 2016, through August 31, 2017: Manufacturer/exporter Weightedaverage dumping margin (percent) Kokuyo Riddhi Paper Products Pvt. Ltd .................................... Navneet Education Ltd ............... Magic International Pvt. Ltd ........ Pioneer Stationery Pvt Ltd ......... SGM Paper Products ................. 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 For the companies that were not selected for individual review, we assigned a rate based on the rates for the respondents that were selected for individual review, excluding rates that are zero, de minimis, or based entirely on facts available.7 In accordance with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit’s decision in Albemarle Corp. v. United States, we are applying to the three companies not selected for individual review the zero percent rates calculated for Navneet and Kokuyo.8 These are the only rates determined in this review for individual respondents and, thus, should be applied to the three firms not selected for individual review under section 735(c)(5)(B) of the Act. Disclosure and Public Comment We intend to disclose the calculations performed to parties in this proceeding within five days after publication of these final results in the Federal Register, in accordance with section 751(a) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.224(b). Assessment Rates Upon completion of this administrative review, Commerce shall determine and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) shall assess antidumping duties on all appropriate entries. Because the weighted-average dumping margins of Kokuyo, Navneet, and the three firms not selected for individual examination have been determined to be zero within the meaning of 19 CFR 351.106(c), we will instruct CBP to liquidate the appropriate entries without regard to antidumping duties. In accordance with Commerce’s Products from India: Kokuyo Riddhi Paper Products Pvt. Ltd.’’’ The analysis memoranda are dated concurrently with this notice. 7 See section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). 8 See Albemarle Corp. v. United States, 821 F.3d 1345 (Fed. Cir. 2016) (Albemarle Corp. v. United States). PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 practice, for entries of subject merchandise during the POR for which Navneet and Kokuyo did not know that the merchandise was destined for the United States, we will instruct CBP to liquidate such entries at the all-others rate if there is no company-specific rate for the intermediate company(ies) involved in the transaction.9 Commerce intends to issue assessment instructions directly to CBP 15 days after publication of these final results of review. Cash Deposit Requirements The following cash deposit requirements will be effective for all shipments of lined paper from India entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the date of publication of the final results of this administrative review, as provided by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) The cash deposit rate for the respondents noted above will be the rate established in the final results of this administrative review; (2) for merchandise exported by manufacturers or exporters not covered in this administrative review but covered in a prior segment of the proceeding, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the company-specific rate published for the most recently completed segment of this proceeding; (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered in this review, a prior review, or the original investigation, but the producer is, the cash deposit rate will be the rate established for the most recently completed segment of this proceeding for the producer of the subject merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit rate for all other producers or exporters will continue to be 3.91 percent, the allothers rate established in the investigation, as modified by the section 129 determination.10 These cash deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice. Notification to Importers This notice also serves as a final reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping and/or countervailing duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during the POR. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in Commerce’s presumption that 9 See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003). 10 See Implementation of the Findings of the WTO Panel in US—Zeroing (EC): Notice of Determinations Under Section 129 of the Uruguay Round Agreements Act and Revocations and Partial Revocations of Certain Antidumping Duty Orders, 72 FR 25261 (May 4, 2007). E:\FR\FM\21MYN1.SGM 21MYN1 Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 98 / Tuesday, May 21, 2019 / Notices reimbursement of antidumping and/or countervailing duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of double antidumping duties. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Notifications to Interested Parties Certain Hot-Rolled Steel Flat Products From the Republic of Korea: Notice of Court Decision Not in Harmony With Amended Final Determination of the Countervailing Duty Investigation This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility concerning the destruction of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely written notification of the return or destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation. We are issuing and publishing this notice in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.221. Dated: May 15, 2019. Jeffrey I. Kessler, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Appendix List of Topics Discussed in the Final Decision Memorandum I. Summary II. List of Comments III. Background IV. Scope of the Order V. Changes Made Since the Preliminary Results VI. Analysis of Comments Comments Concerning Navneet Comment 1: Whether Commerce Should Apply Total or Partial Adverse Facts Available to Navneet in the Final Results Comment 2: Whether Commerce Should Make a Central Excise Tax (CET) Adjustment for Navneet’s Home Market Price and/or Navneet’s Total Cost of Manufacture (TCOM) Comments Concerning Kokuyo Comment 3: Whether Commerce Should Grant a Full Scrap Offset to Kokuyo Comment 4: Whether Commerce Used the Correct Version of Kokuyo’s Comparison Market Database VII. Recommendation [FR Doc. 2019–10546 Filed 5–20–19; 8:45 am] jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with NOTICES BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:50 May 20, 2019 Jkt 247001 International Trade Administration [C–580–884] Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: On May 1, 2019, the United States Court of International Trade (CIT) sustained the final remand results pertaining to the countervailing duty (CVD) investigation on certain hotrolled steel flat products from the Republic of Korea covering the period January 1, 2014, through December 31, 2014. The Department of Commerce (Commerce) is notifying the public that the final judgment in this case is not in harmony with the Amended Final Determination of the CVD investigation and that Commerce is amending the Amended Final Determination with respect to the CVD rate assigned to POSCO. DATES: Applicable May 11, 2019. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Carrie Bethea, AD/CVD Operations, Office V, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–1491. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: AGENCY: Background On August 12, 2016, Commerce published its Final Determination.1 Upon consideration of ministerial error allegations, Commerce issued an Amended Final Determination and calculated a subsidy rate of 56.68 percent for POSCO.2 On September 11, 2018, the CIT remanded various aspects of the Amended Final Determination to Commerce.3 In its Remand Order, the CIT held that substantial evidence supports Commerce’s decision to apply adverse facts available (AFA).4 The CIT 1 See Countervailing Duty Investigation of Certain Hot-Rolled Steel Flat Products from the Republic of Korea: Final Affirmative Determination, 81 FR 53439 (August 12, 2016) (Final Determination) and accompanying Issues and Decision Memorandum. 2 See Certain Hot-Rolled Steel Flat Products from Brazil and the Republic of Korea: Amended Final Affirmative Countervailing Duty Determinations and Countervailing Duty Order, 81 FR 67960 (October 3, 2016) (Amended Final Determination). 3 See POSCO v. United States, Consol. Court No. 16–00227, Slip Op. 18–117 (CIT 2018) (Remand Order). 4 See Remand Order at 15. PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 23019 held that the record demonstrated that POSCO failed to provide requested information in a timely manner, reflecting a failure to act to the best of its ability.5 However, the CIT also held that Commerce had not conducted a ‘‘factspecific inquiry,’’ under the relatively new statutory language of section 776(d)(2) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act) and had not ‘‘provide{d} its reasons for selecting the highest rate out of all potential countervailable subsidy rates.’’ 6 The CIT, therefore, instructed Commerce to conduct this fact-specific inquiry.7 In addition, because the CIT remanded Commerce’s Amended Final Determination on this basis, the CIT reserved consideration of whether Commerce failed to corroborate the two selected rates in calculating POSCO’s total AFA margin.8 Pursuant to the Remand Order, Commerce issued its Final Redetermination, which addressed the CIT’s holdings and revised the CVD rate for POSCO to 41.57 percent.9 Specifically, we continued to find it appropriate to select the highest rate as an AFA rate, but selected the 1.05 percent rate from Washers from Korea to address concerns regarding the corroboration of the 1.64 percent rate used in the Amended Final Determination.10 On May 1, 2019, the CIT sustained in whole Commerce’s Final Redetermination.11 Timken Notice In its decision in Timken,12 as clarified by Diamond Sawblades,13 the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit held that, pursuant to section 516A(e) of the Act, Commerce must publish a notice of court decision that is not ‘‘in harmony’’ with Commerce’s determination and must suspend liquidation of entries pending a ‘‘conclusive’’ court decision. The CIT’s May 1, 2019 final judgment, sustaining Commerce’s selection of the 1.05 percent rate from Washers from Korea as the subsidy rate for programs that were calculated on the basis of adverse facts 5 Id. at 13–14, 17. at 19. 7 Id. at 15. 8 Id. 9 See POSCO v. United States, Consol. Court No. 16–00227, Slip Op. 18–117 (CIT 2018) Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant to Court Remand, dated November 13, 2018, at 24. 10 Id. at 17–19. 11 See POSCO v. United States, Consol. Court No. 16–00227, Slip Op. 19–52 (CIT May 1, 2019). 12 See Timken Co. v. United States, 893 F.2d 337 (Fed. Cir. 1990) (Timken). 13 See Diamond Sawblades Mfrs. Coalition v. United States, 626 F.3d 1374 (Fed. Cir. 2010) (Diamond Sawblades). 6 Id. E:\FR\FM\21MYN1.SGM 21MYN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 98 (Tuesday, May 21, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 23017-23019]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-10546]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-533-843]


Certain Lined Paper Products From India: Final Results of 
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2016-2017

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that Kokuyo 
Riddhi Paper Products Pvt. Ltd. (Kokuyo) and Navneet Education Ltd. 
(Navneet) did not make sales of certain lined paper products (lined 
paper) from India below normal value. The period of review (POR) is 
September 1, 2016, through August 31, 2017.

DATES: Effective May 21, 2019.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Cindy Robinson (for Navneet) and Joy 
Zhang (for Kokuyo), AD/CVD Operations, Office III, Enforcement and 
Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of 
Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone 
(202) 482-3797 and (202) 482-1168, respectively.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    On October 10, 2018, Commerce published the Preliminary Results.\1\ 
For a history of events that occurred since the Preliminary Results, 
see the Issues and Decision Memorandum.\2\ On December 21, 2018, we 
extended the deadline for these final results until April 5, 2019.\3\ 
Commerce exercised its discretion to toll all deadlines affected by the 
partial federal government closure from December 22, 2018, through the 
resumption of operations on

[[Page 23018]]

January 29, 2019.\4\ Accordingly, the revised deadline for the final 
results of this administrative review is now May 15, 2019.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Certain Lined Paper Products from India: Preliminary 
Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Preliminary 
Determination of No Shipments; 2016-2017, 83 FR 50886 (October 10, 
2018) (Preliminary Results) and accompanying Preliminary Decision 
Memorandum.
    \2\ See Memorandum, ``Issues and Decision Memorandum for the 
Final Results of Administrative Review; 2016-2017,'' dated 
concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this notice (Issues and 
Decision Memorandum).
    \3\ See Memorandum, ``Certain Lined Paper Products from India: 
Extension of Time Limit for Final Results of Antidumping Duty 
Administrative Review: 2016-2017,'' dated December 21, 2018.
    \4\ See Memorandum to the Record from Gary Taverman, Deputy 
Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 
Operations, performing the non-exclusive functions and duties of the 
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, ``Deadlines 
Affected by the Partial Shutdown of the Federal Government,'' dated 
January 28, 2019. All deadlines in this segment of the proceeding 
affected by the partial federal government closure have been 
extended by 40 days.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Scope of the Order

    The merchandise covered by the order is lined paper. The lined 
paper subject to the order is currently classifiable under subheadings 
4811.90.9035, 4811.90.9080, 4820.30.0040, 4810.22.5044, 4811.90.9050, 
4811.90.9090, 4820.10.2010, 4820.10.2020, 4820.10.2030, 4820.10.2040, 
4820.10.2050, 4820.10.2060, and 4820.10.4000 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ For a full description of the scope of the order, see the 
Issues and Decision Memorandum.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Analysis of Comments Received

    All issues raised in the case and rebuttal briefs by parties are 
addressed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum. The Issues and 
Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically 
via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 
Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to 
registered users at https://access.trade.gov, and is available to all 
parties in the Central Records Unit, Room B8024 of the main Department 
of Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the Issues and 
Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly on the internet at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed Issues and Decision Memorandum 
and the electronic versions of the Issues and Decision Memorandum are 
identical in content.
    A list of the issues that parties raised, and to which we responded 
in the Issues and Decision Memorandum, is attached to this notice in 
the Appendix.

Changes Since the Preliminary Results

    Based on our analysis of the comments received from parties, we 
made certain revisions to the margin calculations of Navneet and 
Kokuyo.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ See Issues and Decision Memorandum; see also Memorandum, 
``Certain Lined Paper Products from India (2016-2017): Sales and 
Cost of Production Calculation Memorandum for the Final Results of 
Navneet Education;'' and ``Analysis Memorandum for the Final Results 
of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review of Certain Lined Paper 
Products from India: Kokuyo Riddhi Paper Products Pvt. Ltd.''' The 
analysis memoranda are dated concurrently with this notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Final Results of the Review

    As a result of this review, we determine the following weighted-
average dumping margins for the period September 1, 2016, through 
August 31, 2017:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                               Weighted-
                                                                average
                    Manufacturer/exporter                       dumping
                                                                margin
                                                               (percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Kokuyo Riddhi Paper Products Pvt. Ltd.......................        0.00
Navneet Education Ltd.......................................        0.00
Magic International Pvt. Ltd................................        0.00
Pioneer Stationery Pvt Ltd..................................        0.00
SGM Paper Products..........................................        0.00
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    For the companies that were not selected for individual review, we 
assigned a rate based on the rates for the respondents that were 
selected for individual review, excluding rates that are zero, de 
minimis, or based entirely on facts available.\7\ In accordance with 
the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit's decision in 
Albemarle Corp. v. United States, we are applying to the three 
companies not selected for individual review the zero percent rates 
calculated for Navneet and Kokuyo.\8\ These are the only rates 
determined in this review for individual respondents and, thus, should 
be applied to the three firms not selected for individual review under 
section 735(c)(5)(B) of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ See section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 
amended (the Act).
    \8\ See Albemarle Corp. v. United States, 821 F.3d 1345 (Fed. 
Cir. 2016) (Albemarle Corp. v. United States).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Disclosure and Public Comment

    We intend to disclose the calculations performed to parties in this 
proceeding within five days after publication of these final results in 
the Federal Register, in accordance with section 751(a) of the Act and 
19 CFR 351.224(b).

Assessment Rates

    Upon completion of this administrative review, Commerce shall 
determine and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) shall assess 
antidumping duties on all appropriate entries. Because the weighted-
average dumping margins of Kokuyo, Navneet, and the three firms not 
selected for individual examination have been determined to be zero 
within the meaning of 19 CFR 351.106(c), we will instruct CBP to 
liquidate the appropriate entries without regard to antidumping duties. 
In accordance with Commerce's practice, for entries of subject 
merchandise during the POR for which Navneet and Kokuyo did not know 
that the merchandise was destined for the United States, we will 
instruct CBP to liquidate such entries at the all-others rate if there 
is no company-specific rate for the intermediate company(ies) involved 
in the transaction.\9\ Commerce intends to issue assessment 
instructions directly to CBP 15 days after publication of these final 
results of review.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: 
Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Cash Deposit Requirements

    The following cash deposit requirements will be effective for all 
shipments of lined paper from India entered, or withdrawn from 
warehouse, for consumption on or after the date of publication of the 
final results of this administrative review, as provided by section 
751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) The cash deposit rate for the respondents 
noted above will be the rate established in the final results of this 
administrative review; (2) for merchandise exported by manufacturers or 
exporters not covered in this administrative review but covered in a 
prior segment of the proceeding, the cash deposit rate will continue to 
be the company-specific rate published for the most recently completed 
segment of this proceeding; (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered 
in this review, a prior review, or the original investigation, but the 
producer is, the cash deposit rate will be the rate established for the 
most recently completed segment of this proceeding for the producer of 
the subject merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit rate for all other 
producers or exporters will continue to be 3.91 percent, the all-others 
rate established in the investigation, as modified by the section 129 
determination.\10\ These cash deposit requirements, when imposed, shall 
remain in effect until further notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ See Implementation of the Findings of the WTO Panel in US--
Zeroing (EC): Notice of Determinations Under Section 129 of the 
Uruguay Round Agreements Act and Revocations and Partial Revocations 
of Certain Antidumping Duty Orders, 72 FR 25261 (May 4, 2007).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Notification to Importers

    This notice also serves as a final reminder to importers of their 
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f) to file a certificate regarding 
the reimbursement of antidumping and/or countervailing duties prior to 
liquidation of the relevant entries during the POR. Failure to comply 
with this requirement could result in Commerce's presumption that

[[Page 23019]]

reimbursement of antidumping and/or countervailing duties occurred and 
the subsequent assessment of double antidumping duties.

Notifications to Interested Parties

    This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to 
administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility 
concerning the destruction of proprietary information disclosed under 
APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely written 
notification of the return or destruction of APO materials or 
conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to 
comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a sanctionable 
violation.
    We are issuing and publishing this notice in accordance with 
sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.221.

    Dated: May 15, 2019.
Jeffrey I. Kessler,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.

Appendix

List of Topics Discussed in the Final Decision Memorandum

I. Summary
II. List of Comments
III. Background
IV. Scope of the Order
V. Changes Made Since the Preliminary Results
VI. Analysis of Comments
    Comments Concerning Navneet
    Comment 1: Whether Commerce Should Apply Total or Partial 
Adverse Facts Available to Navneet in the Final Results
    Comment 2: Whether Commerce Should Make a Central Excise Tax 
(CET) Adjustment for Navneet's Home Market Price and/or Navneet's 
Total Cost of Manufacture (TCOM)
    Comments Concerning Kokuyo
    Comment 3: Whether Commerce Should Grant a Full Scrap Offset to 
Kokuyo
    Comment 4: Whether Commerce Used the Correct Version of Kokuyo's 
Comparison Market Database
VII. Recommendation

[FR Doc. 2019-10546 Filed 5-20-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P