Self-Regulatory Organizations; Nasdaq PHLX LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Amend the Exchange's Transaction Fees at Equity 7, Section 3 To Adopt a Qualified Market Maker Program and a Related Credit, and To Modify Two Existing Fees, 23112-23114 [2019-10512]
Download as PDF
23112
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 98 / Tuesday, May 21, 2019 / Notices
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include File Number SR–
NYSE–2019–24 on the subject line.
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
Paper Comments
[Release No. 34–85862; File No. SR–Phlx–
2019–19]
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Secretary, Securities and Exchange
Commission, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–NYSE–2019–24. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
internet website (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for website viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the
filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change.
Persons submitting comments are
cautioned that we do not redact or edit
personal identifying information from
comment submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish
to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File
Number SR–NYSE–2019–24 and should
be submitted on or before June 11, 2019.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.15
Eduardo A. Aleman,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2019–10515 Filed 5–20–19; 8:45 am]
jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with NOTICES
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Nasdaq
PHLX LLC; Notice of Filing and
Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed
Rule Change To Amend the
Exchange’s Transaction Fees at Equity
7, Section 3 To Adopt a Qualified
Market Maker Program and a Related
Credit, and To Modify Two Existing
Fees
May 15, 2019.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on May 1,
2019, Nasdaq PHLX LLC (‘‘Phlx’’ or
‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (‘‘SEC’’ or
‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule
change as described in Items I, II, and
III, below, which Items have been
prepared by the Exchange. The
Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule
change from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend the
Exchange’s transaction fees at Equity 7,
Section 3 to adopt a Qualified Market
Maker Program and a related credit, and
to modify two existing fees, as described
further below. The text of the proposed
rule change is available on the
Exchange’s website at https://
nasdaqphlx.cchwallstreet.com/, at the
principal office of the Exchange, and at
the Commission’s Public Reference
Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for
the proposed rule change and discussed
any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these
statements may be examined at the
places specified in Item IV below. The
Exchange has prepared summaries, set
forth in sections A, B, and C below, of
the most significant aspects of such
statements.
1 15
15 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:50 May 20, 2019
2 17
Jkt 247001
PO 00000
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
CFR 240.19b–4.
Frm 00096
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
The purpose of the proposed rule
change is to amend Equity 7, Section 3
to: (i) Adopt a Qualified Market Maker
Program and a related credit; and (ii)
amend two existing fees.
The first purpose of this change is to
adopt a Qualified Market Maker
(‘‘QMM’’) Program and a related fee. A
QMM is a member organization that
makes a significant contribution to
market quality by providing liquidity at
the national best bid and offer
(‘‘NBBO’’) in a large number of
securities for a significant portion of the
day. A QMM may be, but is not required
to be, a registered market maker in any
security; thus, the QMM designation
does not by itself impose a two-sided
quotation obligation or convey any of
the benefits associated with being a
registered market maker. The
designation will, however, reflect the
QMM’s commitment to provide
meaningful and consistent support to
market quality and price discovery by
extensive quoting at the NBBO in a large
number of securities. Thus, the program
is designed to attract liquidity both from
traditional market makers and from
other firms that are willing to commit
capital to support liquidity at the NBBO.
In return for providing the required
contribution of market-improving
liquidity, a QMM will be provided with
a supplemental credit for executions of
displayed orders in securities in Tape A
priced at $1 or more per share that
provide liquidity on the Exchange
System. Through the use of this
incentive, the Exchange hopes to
provide improved trading conditions for
all market participants through
narrower bid-ask spreads and increased
depth of liquidity available at the inside
market. In addition, the program reflects
an effort to use financial incentives to
encourage a wider variety of members to
make positive commitments to promote
market quality. To be designated as a
QMM, a member organization must
quote at the NBBO at least 10% of the
time during regular market hours in an
average of at least 750 securities per day
during a month. In return for its
contributions, the Exchange will
provide a credit for executions of
displayed orders in securities priced at
$1 or more per share that provide
liquidity on the Exchange System.
Specifically, the Exchange is proposing
to provide a credit of $0.0002 per share
executed with respect to all displayed
orders in securities in Tape A priced at
E:\FR\FM\21MYN1.SGM
21MYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 98 / Tuesday, May 21, 2019 / Notices
$1 or more per share that provide
liquidity. This credit will be in addition
to any credit that the Exchange provides
under Equity 7, Section 3.
The second purpose of this change is
to amend two fees that the Exchange
charges to member organizations that
enter orders on the Exchange that access
more than certain specified volumes
during a month. For a member
organization that accesses 0.065% or
more of Consolidated Volume 3 during a
month, the Exchange presently charges
a fee of $0.0029 per share executed in
Nasdaq-Listed Securities, a fee of
$0.0028 per share executed in NYSEListed Securities, and a fee of $0.0028
per share executed in Securities Listed
on Exchanges other than Nasdaq and
NYSE. The Exchange also charges a
$0.0030 per share executed fee for all
other member organizations.
The Exchange proposes to increase,
from $0.0028 per share executed to
$0.0029 per share executed, its fees in
NYSE-listed securities and in securities
listed on exchanges other than NYSE
and Nasdaq for member organizations
that access 0.065% or more of
Consolidated Volume during a month.
This proposed change will equalize the
Exchange’s liquidity removal fees for
securities in all three Tapes for member
organizations that access 0.065% or
more of Consolidated Volume during a
month. The Exchange will continue to
assess a $0.0030 per share executed fee
to all other member organizations that
remove liquidity from the Exchange.
jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with NOTICES
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that its
proposal is consistent with Section 6(b)
of the Act,4 in general, and furthers the
objectives of Sections 6(b)(4) and 6(b)(5)
of the Act,5 in particular, in that it
provides for the equitable allocation of
reasonable dues, fees and other charges
among members and issuers and other
persons using any facility, and is not
designed to permit unfair
discrimination between customers,
issuers, brokers, or dealers.
The Commission and the courts have
repeatedly expressed their preference
for competition over regulatory
3 As used in Equity 7, Section 3, the term
‘‘Consolidated Volume’’ means the total
consolidated volume reported to all consolidated
transaction reporting plans by all exchanges and
trade reporting facilities during a month in equity
securities, excluding executed orders with a size of
less than one round lot. For purposes of calculating
Consolidated Volume and the extent of a member’s
trading activity the date of the annual reconstitution
of the Russell Investments Indexes are excluded
from both total Consolidated Volume and the
member’s trading activity.
4 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
5 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4) and (5).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:50 May 20, 2019
Jkt 247001
23113
intervention in determining prices,
products, and services in the securities
markets. In Regulation NMS, while
adopting a series of steps to improve the
current market model, the Commission
highlighted the importance of market
forces in determining prices and SRO
revenues and, also, recognized that
current regulation of the market system
‘‘has been remarkably successful in
promoting market competition in its
broader forms that are most important to
investors and listed companies.’’ 6
Likewise, in NetCoalition v. Securities
and Exchange Commission 7
(‘‘NetCoalition’’) the D.C. Circuit upheld
the Commission’s use of a market-based
approach in evaluating the fairness of
market data fees against a challenge
claiming that Congress mandated a costbased approach.8 As the court
emphasized, the Commission ‘‘intended
in Regulation NMS that ‘market forces,
rather than regulatory requirements’
play a role in determining the market
data . . . to be made available to
investors and at what cost.’’ 9
Further, ‘‘[n]o one disputes that
competition for order flow is ‘fierce.’
. . . As the SEC explained, ‘[i]n the U.S.
national market system, buyers and
sellers of securities, and the brokerdealers that act as their order-routing
agents, have a wide range of choices of
where to route orders for execution’;
[and] ‘no exchange can afford to take its
market share percentages for granted’
because ‘no exchange possesses a
monopoly, regulatory or otherwise, in
the execution of order flow from broker
dealers’ . . . .’’ 10 Although the court
and the SEC were discussing the cash
equities markets, the Exchange believes
that these views apply with equal force
to the options markets.
The Exchange believes that its
proposed supplemental $0.0002 per
share executed credit for displayed
orders of QMMs in securities in Tape A
priced at $1 or more per share that
provide liquidity is reasonable because
it is similar to other credits offered by
the Exchange for displayed orders that
provide liquidity. In addition to the
proposed $0.0002 per share executed
credit described above, the Exchange
also has other credit tiers for displayed
orders ranging from $0.0030 per share
executed to $0.0023 per share executed.
The proposed credit will provide an
opportunity to member organizations to
receive an additional credit in return for
certain levels of participation on the
Exchange as measured by quoting at the
NBBO. The proposed credit is set at a
level that is reflective of the beneficial
contributions of market participants that
quote significantly at the NBBO for a
wide range of symbols. The Exchange
believes that it is appropriate to limit
applicability of the proposed credit to
displayed orders in securities in Tape A
insofar as the Exchange seeks to
incentivize member organizations to
add liquidity to the Exchange in such
securities and improve the market
therefor.
The Exchange believes that the
proposed $0.0002 per share executed
credit and qualification criteria of the
QMM Program are an equitable
allocation and are not unfairly
discriminatory because the Exchange
will offer the same credit to all similarly
situated member organizations.
Moreover, the proposed qualification
criteria requires a member to quote
significantly at the NBBO therefore
contributing to market quality in a
meaningful way on the Exchange. Any
member organization may quote at the
NBBO at the level required by the
qualification criteria of the QMM
Program. The Exchange notes that
Nasdaq and BX also have similar QMM
programs in which Nasdaq and BX
members are required to quote at the
NBBO more than a certain amount of
time during regular market hours.11 For
these reasons, the Exchange believes
that the proposed QMM Program credit
and qualification criteria are an
equitable allocation and are not unfairly
discriminatory.
Likewise, the Exchange believes that
it is reasonable to increase its per share
executed fees, for orders in securities (i)
listed on NYSE and (ii) on exchanges
other than NYSE and Nasdaq, which it
assesses to member organizations that
access at least 0.065% of Consolidated
Volume during a month. This proposal
will equalize the fees for executions of
securities in all three Tapes that the
Exchange assesses to members that
access liquidity of at least 0.065% of
Consolidated Volume in a month.
6 Securities Exchange Act Release No. 51808
(June 9, 2005), 70 FR 37496, 37499 (June 29, 2005)
(‘‘Regulation NMS Adopting Release’’).
7 NetCoalition v. SEC, 615 F.3d 525 (D.C. Cir.
2010).
8 See NetCoalition, at 534—535.
9 Id. at 537.
10 Id. at 539 (quoting Securities Exchange Act
Release No. 59039 (December 2, 2008), 73 FR
74770, 74782–83 (December 9, 2008) (SR–
NYSEArca–2006–21)).
11 See Nasdaq Equity 7, Section 114(d); BX Equity
7, Section 118(f). In contrast to the Exchange’s
proposal, Nasdaq and BX require members to quote
at the NBBO more than 25% of the time. Nasdaq
also requires a member to quote at the NBBO in an
average of at least 1,000 securities per day during
the month, while BX requires a member to quote
at the NBBO in an average of at least 400 securities
during the month. BX also charges a fee, rather than
assesses a credit, due to the fact that it operates on
the ‘‘taker-maker’’ model.
PO 00000
Frm 00097
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\21MYN1.SGM
21MYN1
23114
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 98 / Tuesday, May 21, 2019 / Notices
jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with NOTICES
The proposal is equitable and is not
unfairly discriminatory because the
Exchange proposes to offer the same
credits to all similarly situated members
and because the increased fees will be
the same for securities in all three
Tapes.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that
the proposed rule change will impose
any burden on competition not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act. In terms of
inter-market competition, the Exchange
notes that it operates in a highly
competitive market in which market
participants can readily favor competing
venues if they deem fee levels at a
particular venue to be excessive, or
rebate opportunities available at other
venues to be more favorable. In such an
environment, the Exchange must
continually adjust its fees to remain
competitive with other exchanges and
with alternative trading systems that
have been exempted from compliance
with the statutory standards applicable
to exchanges. Because competitors are
free to modify their own fees in
response, and because market
participants may readily adjust their
order routing practices, the Exchange
believes that the degree to which fee
changes in this market may impose any
burden on competition is extremely
limited.
In this instance, the proposed changes
to the Exchange’s fees assessed and
credits provided to member
organizations do not impose a burden
on competition because the Exchange’s
execution services are completely
voluntary and subject to extensive
competition both from other exchanges
and from off-exchange venues. The
proposed QMM Program credit provides
member organizations with the
opportunity to be assessed higher
credits for transactions if they improve
the market by providing significant
quoting at the NBBO in a large number
of securities which the Exchange
believes will improve market quality.
The proposed increases to fees that the
Exchange assesses to member
organizations that access at least
0.0065% [sic] of Consolidated Volume
during a month are intended to
harmonize these fees for executions of
orders in all three Tapes.
In sum, the proposed changes are
designed to make the Exchange a more
desirable venue on which to transact;
however, if the changes proposed herein
are unattractive to market participants,
it is likely that the Exchange will lose
market share as a result. Accordingly,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:50 May 20, 2019
Jkt 247001
the Exchange does not believe that the
proposed changes will impair the ability
of member organizations or competing
order execution venues to maintain
their competitive standing in the
financial markets.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were either
solicited or received.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing rule change has become
effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act.12
At any time within 60 days of the
filing of the proposed rule change, the
Commission summarily may
temporarily suspend such rule change if
it appears to the Commission that such
action is: (i) Necessary or appropriate in
the public interest; (ii) for the protection
of investors; or (iii) otherwise in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
If the Commission takes such action, the
Commission shall institute proceedings
to determine whether the proposed rule
should be approved or disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include File Number SR–
Phlx–2019–19 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Secretary, Securities and Exchange
Commission, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–Phlx–2019–19. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
internet website (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
12 15
PO 00000
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
Frm 00098
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for website viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the
filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change.
Persons submitting comments are
cautioned that we do not redact or edit
personal identifying information from
comment submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish
to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File
Number SR–Phlx–2019–19 and should
be submitted on or before June 11, 2019.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.13
Eduardo A. Aleman,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2019–10512 Filed 5–20–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Investment Company Act Release No.
33475; 812–14898]
Nuveen Churchill BDC LLC, et al.
May 15, 2019.
Securities and Exchange
Commission (‘‘Commission’’).
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
Notice of application for an order
under sections 17(d) and 57(i) of the
Investment Company Act of 1940 (the
‘‘Act’’) and rule 17d–1 under the Act to
permit certain joint transactions
otherwise prohibited by sections 17(d)
and 57(a)(4) of the Act and rule 17d–1
under the Act.
SUMMARY OF APPLICATION: Applicants
request an order to permit business
development companies (‘‘BDCs’’) and
closed-end management investment
companies to co-invest in portfolio
companies with each other and with
certain affiliated investment funds and
accounts.
13 17
E:\FR\FM\21MYN1.SGM
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
21MYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 98 (Tuesday, May 21, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 23112-23114]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-10512]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-85862; File No. SR-Phlx-2019-19]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Nasdaq PHLX LLC; Notice of Filing
and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Amend the
Exchange's Transaction Fees at Equity 7, Section 3 To Adopt a Qualified
Market Maker Program and a Related Credit, and To Modify Two Existing
Fees
May 15, 2019.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on May 1, 2019, Nasdaq PHLX LLC (``Phlx'' or ``Exchange'') filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (``SEC'' or ``Commission'') the
proposed rule change as described in Items I, II, and III, below, which
Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The Commission is publishing
this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from
interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend the Exchange's transaction fees at
Equity 7, Section 3 to adopt a Qualified Market Maker Program and a
related credit, and to modify two existing fees, as described further
below. The text of the proposed rule change is available on the
Exchange's website at https://nasdaqphlx.cchwallstreet.com/, at the
principal office of the Exchange, and at the Commission's Public
Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
The purpose of the proposed rule change is to amend Equity 7,
Section 3 to: (i) Adopt a Qualified Market Maker Program and a related
credit; and (ii) amend two existing fees.
The first purpose of this change is to adopt a Qualified Market
Maker (``QMM'') Program and a related fee. A QMM is a member
organization that makes a significant contribution to market quality by
providing liquidity at the national best bid and offer (``NBBO'') in a
large number of securities for a significant portion of the day. A QMM
may be, but is not required to be, a registered market maker in any
security; thus, the QMM designation does not by itself impose a two-
sided quotation obligation or convey any of the benefits associated
with being a registered market maker. The designation will, however,
reflect the QMM's commitment to provide meaningful and consistent
support to market quality and price discovery by extensive quoting at
the NBBO in a large number of securities. Thus, the program is designed
to attract liquidity both from traditional market makers and from other
firms that are willing to commit capital to support liquidity at the
NBBO. In return for providing the required contribution of market-
improving liquidity, a QMM will be provided with a supplemental credit
for executions of displayed orders in securities in Tape A priced at $1
or more per share that provide liquidity on the Exchange System.
Through the use of this incentive, the Exchange hopes to provide
improved trading conditions for all market participants through
narrower bid-ask spreads and increased depth of liquidity available at
the inside market. In addition, the program reflects an effort to use
financial incentives to encourage a wider variety of members to make
positive commitments to promote market quality. To be designated as a
QMM, a member organization must quote at the NBBO at least 10% of the
time during regular market hours in an average of at least 750
securities per day during a month. In return for its contributions, the
Exchange will provide a credit for executions of displayed orders in
securities priced at $1 or more per share that provide liquidity on the
Exchange System. Specifically, the Exchange is proposing to provide a
credit of $0.0002 per share executed with respect to all displayed
orders in securities in Tape A priced at
[[Page 23113]]
$1 or more per share that provide liquidity. This credit will be in
addition to any credit that the Exchange provides under Equity 7,
Section 3.
The second purpose of this change is to amend two fees that the
Exchange charges to member organizations that enter orders on the
Exchange that access more than certain specified volumes during a
month. For a member organization that accesses 0.065% or more of
Consolidated Volume \3\ during a month, the Exchange presently charges
a fee of $0.0029 per share executed in Nasdaq-Listed Securities, a fee
of $0.0028 per share executed in NYSE-Listed Securities, and a fee of
$0.0028 per share executed in Securities Listed on Exchanges other than
Nasdaq and NYSE. The Exchange also charges a $0.0030 per share executed
fee for all other member organizations.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ As used in Equity 7, Section 3, the term ``Consolidated
Volume'' means the total consolidated volume reported to all
consolidated transaction reporting plans by all exchanges and trade
reporting facilities during a month in equity securities, excluding
executed orders with a size of less than one round lot. For purposes
of calculating Consolidated Volume and the extent of a member's
trading activity the date of the annual reconstitution of the
Russell Investments Indexes are excluded from both total
Consolidated Volume and the member's trading activity.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange proposes to increase, from $0.0028 per share executed
to $0.0029 per share executed, its fees in NYSE-listed securities and
in securities listed on exchanges other than NYSE and Nasdaq for member
organizations that access 0.065% or more of Consolidated Volume during
a month. This proposed change will equalize the Exchange's liquidity
removal fees for securities in all three Tapes for member organizations
that access 0.065% or more of Consolidated Volume during a month. The
Exchange will continue to assess a $0.0030 per share executed fee to
all other member organizations that remove liquidity from the Exchange.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that its proposal is consistent with Section
6(b) of the Act,\4\ in general, and furthers the objectives of Sections
6(b)(4) and 6(b)(5) of the Act,\5\ in particular, in that it provides
for the equitable allocation of reasonable dues, fees and other charges
among members and issuers and other persons using any facility, and is
not designed to permit unfair discrimination between customers,
issuers, brokers, or dealers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
\5\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4) and (5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Commission and the courts have repeatedly expressed their
preference for competition over regulatory intervention in determining
prices, products, and services in the securities markets. In Regulation
NMS, while adopting a series of steps to improve the current market
model, the Commission highlighted the importance of market forces in
determining prices and SRO revenues and, also, recognized that current
regulation of the market system ``has been remarkably successful in
promoting market competition in its broader forms that are most
important to investors and listed companies.'' \6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ Securities Exchange Act Release No. 51808 (June 9, 2005), 70
FR 37496, 37499 (June 29, 2005) (``Regulation NMS Adopting
Release'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Likewise, in NetCoalition v. Securities and Exchange Commission \7\
(``NetCoalition'') the D.C. Circuit upheld the Commission's use of a
market-based approach in evaluating the fairness of market data fees
against a challenge claiming that Congress mandated a cost-based
approach.\8\ As the court emphasized, the Commission ``intended in
Regulation NMS that `market forces, rather than regulatory
requirements' play a role in determining the market data . . . to be
made available to investors and at what cost.'' \9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ NetCoalition v. SEC, 615 F.3d 525 (D.C. Cir. 2010).
\8\ See NetCoalition, at 534--535.
\9\ Id. at 537.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Further, ``[n]o one disputes that competition for order flow is
`fierce.' . . . As the SEC explained, `[i]n the U.S. national market
system, buyers and sellers of securities, and the broker-dealers that
act as their order-routing agents, have a wide range of choices of
where to route orders for execution'; [and] `no exchange can afford to
take its market share percentages for granted' because `no exchange
possesses a monopoly, regulatory or otherwise, in the execution of
order flow from broker dealers' . . . .'' \10\ Although the court and
the SEC were discussing the cash equities markets, the Exchange
believes that these views apply with equal force to the options
markets.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ Id. at 539 (quoting Securities Exchange Act Release No.
59039 (December 2, 2008), 73 FR 74770, 74782-83 (December 9, 2008)
(SR-NYSEArca-2006-21)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange believes that its proposed supplemental $0.0002 per
share executed credit for displayed orders of QMMs in securities in
Tape A priced at $1 or more per share that provide liquidity is
reasonable because it is similar to other credits offered by the
Exchange for displayed orders that provide liquidity. In addition to
the proposed $0.0002 per share executed credit described above, the
Exchange also has other credit tiers for displayed orders ranging from
$0.0030 per share executed to $0.0023 per share executed. The proposed
credit will provide an opportunity to member organizations to receive
an additional credit in return for certain levels of participation on
the Exchange as measured by quoting at the NBBO. The proposed credit is
set at a level that is reflective of the beneficial contributions of
market participants that quote significantly at the NBBO for a wide
range of symbols. The Exchange believes that it is appropriate to limit
applicability of the proposed credit to displayed orders in securities
in Tape A insofar as the Exchange seeks to incentivize member
organizations to add liquidity to the Exchange in such securities and
improve the market therefor.
The Exchange believes that the proposed $0.0002 per share executed
credit and qualification criteria of the QMM Program are an equitable
allocation and are not unfairly discriminatory because the Exchange
will offer the same credit to all similarly situated member
organizations. Moreover, the proposed qualification criteria requires a
member to quote significantly at the NBBO therefore contributing to
market quality in a meaningful way on the Exchange. Any member
organization may quote at the NBBO at the level required by the
qualification criteria of the QMM Program. The Exchange notes that
Nasdaq and BX also have similar QMM programs in which Nasdaq and BX
members are required to quote at the NBBO more than a certain amount of
time during regular market hours.\11\ For these reasons, the Exchange
believes that the proposed QMM Program credit and qualification
criteria are an equitable allocation and are not unfairly
discriminatory.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ See Nasdaq Equity 7, Section 114(d); BX Equity 7, Section
118(f). In contrast to the Exchange's proposal, Nasdaq and BX
require members to quote at the NBBO more than 25% of the time.
Nasdaq also requires a member to quote at the NBBO in an average of
at least 1,000 securities per day during the month, while BX
requires a member to quote at the NBBO in an average of at least 400
securities during the month. BX also charges a fee, rather than
assesses a credit, due to the fact that it operates on the ``taker-
maker'' model.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Likewise, the Exchange believes that it is reasonable to increase
its per share executed fees, for orders in securities (i) listed on
NYSE and (ii) on exchanges other than NYSE and Nasdaq, which it
assesses to member organizations that access at least 0.065% of
Consolidated Volume during a month. This proposal will equalize the
fees for executions of securities in all three Tapes that the Exchange
assesses to members that access liquidity of at least 0.065% of
Consolidated Volume in a month.
[[Page 23114]]
The proposal is equitable and is not unfairly discriminatory
because the Exchange proposes to offer the same credits to all
similarly situated members and because the increased fees will be the
same for securities in all three Tapes.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act. In terms of inter-market
competition, the Exchange notes that it operates in a highly
competitive market in which market participants can readily favor
competing venues if they deem fee levels at a particular venue to be
excessive, or rebate opportunities available at other venues to be more
favorable. In such an environment, the Exchange must continually adjust
its fees to remain competitive with other exchanges and with
alternative trading systems that have been exempted from compliance
with the statutory standards applicable to exchanges. Because
competitors are free to modify their own fees in response, and because
market participants may readily adjust their order routing practices,
the Exchange believes that the degree to which fee changes in this
market may impose any burden on competition is extremely limited.
In this instance, the proposed changes to the Exchange's fees
assessed and credits provided to member organizations do not impose a
burden on competition because the Exchange's execution services are
completely voluntary and subject to extensive competition both from
other exchanges and from off-exchange venues. The proposed QMM Program
credit provides member organizations with the opportunity to be
assessed higher credits for transactions if they improve the market by
providing significant quoting at the NBBO in a large number of
securities which the Exchange believes will improve market quality. The
proposed increases to fees that the Exchange assesses to member
organizations that access at least 0.0065% [sic] of Consolidated Volume
during a month are intended to harmonize these fees for executions of
orders in all three Tapes.
In sum, the proposed changes are designed to make the Exchange a
more desirable venue on which to transact; however, if the changes
proposed herein are unattractive to market participants, it is likely
that the Exchange will lose market share as a result. Accordingly, the
Exchange does not believe that the proposed changes will impair the
ability of member organizations or competing order execution venues to
maintain their competitive standing in the financial markets.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were either solicited or received.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act.\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is: (i)
Necessary or appropriate in the public interest; (ii) for the
protection of investors; or (iii) otherwise in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act. If the Commission takes such action, the
Commission shall institute proceedings to determine whether the
proposed rule should be approved or disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an email to [email protected]. Please include
File Number SR-Phlx-2019-19 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-Phlx-2019-19. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's internet website (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml).
Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written
statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with
the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed
rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those
that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions
of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and printing in
the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC
20549, on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and
3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection
and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change. Persons submitting comments are
cautioned that we do not redact or edit personal identifying
information from comment submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR-Phlx-2019-19 and should be submitted on
or before June 11, 2019.
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eduardo A. Aleman,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2019-10512 Filed 5-20-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P