Circular Welded Carbon Steel Pipes and Tubes From Thailand: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Preliminary Determination of No Shipments; 2017-2018, 22450-22452 [2019-10271]
Download as PDF
22450
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 96 / Friday, May 17, 2019 / Notices
jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with NOTICES
and an actual shank diameter of 0.1015″
to 0.166″, inclusive; and an actual
washer or cap diameter of 0.900″ to
1.10″, inclusive; (2) Non-collated (i.e.,
hand-driven or bulk), steel nails having
a bright or galvanized finish, a smooth,
barbed or ringed shank, an actual length
of 0.500″ to 4″, inclusive; an actual
shank diameter of 0.1015″ to 0.166″,
inclusive; and an actual head diameter
of 0.3375″ to 0.500″, inclusive; (3) Wire
collated steel nails, in coils, having a
galvanized finish, a smooth, barbed or
ringed shank, an actual length of 0.500″
to 1.75″, inclusive; an actual shank
diameter of 0.116″ to 0.166″, inclusive;
and an actual head diameter of 0.3375″
to 0.500″, inclusive; and (4) Noncollated (i.e., hand-driven or bulk), steel
nails having a convex head (commonly
known as an umbrella head), a smooth
or spiral shank, a galvanized finish, an
actual length of 1.75″ to 3″, inclusive; an
actual shank diameter of 0.131″ to
0.152″, inclusive; and an actual head
diameter of 0.450″ to 0.813″, inclusive.
Also excluded from the scope of this
order are corrugated nails. A corrugated
nail is made of a small strip of
corrugated steel with sharp points on
one side. Also excluded from the scope
of this order are fasteners suitable for
use in powder-actuated hand tools, not
threaded and threaded, which are
currently classified under HTSUS
7317.0020 and 7317.0030. Also
excluded from the scope of this order
are thumb tacks, which are currently
classified under HTSUS 7317.00.1000.
Also excluded from the scope of this
order are certain brads and finish nails
that are equal to or less than 0.0720
inches in shank diameter, round or
rectangular in cross section, between
0.375 inches and 2.5 inches in length,
and that are collated with adhesive or
polyester film tape backed with a heat
seal adhesive. Also excluded from the
scope of this order are fasteners having
a case hardness greater than or equal to
50 HRC, a carbon content greater than
or equal to 0.5 percent, a round head,
a secondary reduced-diameter raised
head section, a centered shank, and a
smooth symmetrical point, suitable for
use in gas-actuated hand tools. While
the HTSUS subheadings are provided
for convenience and customs purposes,
the written description of the scope of
this order is dispositive.
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised in this sunset review,
including the likelihood of continuation
or recurrence of dumping in the event
of revocation and the magnitude of the
margins likely to prevail if the China
Nails Order were to be revoked, are
addressed in the accompanying Issues
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:05 May 16, 2019
Jkt 247001
and Decision Memorandum. The Issues
and Decision Memorandum is a public
document and is on file electronically
via Enforcement and Compliance’s
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Centralized Electronic Service System
(ACCESS). ACCESS is available to
registered users at https://access.trade
.gov, and to all parties in the Central
Records Unit, Room B8024 of the main
Department of Commerce building. In
addition, a complete version of the
Issues and Decision Memorandum can
be accessed directly on the internet at
https://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The
signed Issues and Decision
Memorandum and the electronic
version of the Issues and Decision
Memorandum are identical in content.
Final Results of Sunset Review
Pursuant to sections 751(c)(1) and
752(c)(1) and (3) of the Act, Commerce
determines that revocation of the China
Nails Order would likely lead to the
continuation or recurrence of dumping,
and that the magnitude of the dumping
margins likely to prevail would be
weighted-average dumping margins up
to 118.04 percent.
Notification to Interested Parties
This notice serves as the only
reminder to interested parties subject to
administrative protective order (APO) of
their responsibility concerning the
return or destruction of proprietary
information disclosed under APO in
accordance with 19 CFR 351.305.
Timely notification of the return or
destruction of APO materials or
conversion to judicial protective order is
hereby requested. Failure to comply
with the regulations and terms of an
APO is a violation which is subject to
sanction. We are issuing and publishing
these results and notice in accordance
with sections 751(c), 752(c), and
777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218.
Dated: May 13, 2019.
P. Lee Smith,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and
Negotiations.
Appendix
List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and
Decision Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Order
IV. History of the Order
V. Legal Framework
VI. Discussion of the Issues
1. Likelihood of Continuation or
Recurrence of Dumping
2. Magnitude of the Margin Likely to
Prevail
VII. Final Results of Sunset Review
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
VIII. Recommendation
[FR Doc. 2019–10272 Filed 5–16–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–549–502]
Circular Welded Carbon Steel Pipes
and Tubes From Thailand: Preliminary
Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review and Preliminary
Determination of No Shipments; 2017–
2018
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
(Commerce) preliminarily finds that
Saha Thai Steel Pipe (Public) Company,
Ltd. (Saha Thai) made sales of subject
merchandise at less than normal value
during the period of review (POR)
March 1, 2017 through February 28,
2018. We invite interested parties to
comment on these preliminary results.
DATES: Applicable May 17, 2019.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Toni
Page, AD/CVD Operations, Office VII,
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401
Constitution Avenue NW, Washington,
DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–1398.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
AGENCY:
Background
Commerce is conducting an
administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on circular
welded carbon steel pipes and tubes
(pipe and tube) from Thailand. The POR
is March 1, 2017, through February 28,
2018. Commerce selected Saha Thai for
individual examination.
On November 29, 2018, Commerce
extended the time for issuing the
preliminary results of this review from
245 days to 335 days from the last day
of the anniversary month.1 Commerce
exercised its discretion to toll all
deadlines affected by the partial federal
government closure from December 22,
2018, through the resumption of
operations on January 29, 2019.2 This
1 See Memorandum, ‘‘2017–2018 Antidumping
Duty Administrative Review of Circular Welded
Carbon Steel Pipes and Tubes from Thailand:
Extension of Deadline for Preliminary Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review,’’ dated
November 29, 2018.
2 See Memorandum, ‘‘Deadlines Affected by the
Partial Shutdown of the Federal Government,’’
dated January 28, 2019. All deadlines in this
segment of the proceeding have been extended by
40 days.
E:\FR\FM\17MYN1.SGM
17MYN1
22451
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 96 / Friday, May 17, 2019 / Notices
extended the deadline for the
preliminary results to April 10, 2019.
On April 5, 2019, we further extended
the deadline for the preliminary results
an additional 30 days until May 10,
2019.3
Scope of the Order
The products covered by the
antidumping order are certain circular
welded carbon steel pipes and tubes
from Thailand. The subject merchandise
has an outside diameter of 0.375 inches
or more, but not exceeding 16 inches.
For a full description of the scope of this
order, see the accompanying
Preliminary Decision Memorandum.4
Preliminary Determination of No
Shipments
Based on an analysis of U.S. Customs
and Border Protection (CBP)
information, and comments provided by
interested parties, Commerce
preliminarily determines that three
companies under review, Expeditors
Ltd. (Expeditors); K Line Logistics (KLine); and Panalpina World Transport
Ltd. (Panalpina), each had no shipments
during the POR. For additional
information regarding this
determination, see the Preliminary
Decision Memorandum.
Methodology
Commerce conducted this review in
accordance with section 751(a)(2) of the
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act).
Export price is calculated in accordance
with section 772 of the Act. Normal
value is calculated in accordance with
section 773 of the Act.
For a full description of the
methodology underlying these
preliminary results, see the Preliminary
Decision Memorandum. The
Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a
public document and is on file
electronically via Enforcement and
Compliance’s Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Centralized
Electronic Service System (ACCESS).
ACCESS is available to registered users
at https://access.trade.gov, and it is
available to all parties in the Central
Records Unit, Room B8024 of the main
Department of Commerce building. In
addition, the signed Preliminary
Decision Memorandum can be accessed
directly at https://enforcement.trade.gov/
frn/. The signed and the electronic
versions of the Preliminary Decision
Memorandum are identical in content.
A list of topics discussed in the
Preliminary Decision Memorandum is
attached in the appendix to this notice.
Preliminary Results of Review
Commerce preliminarily determines
that the following weighted-average
dumping margins exist for the period
March 1, 2017, through February 28,
2018:
Weightedaverage
dumping
margin
(percent)
Producer or exporter
Saha Thai Steel Pipe (Public) Company, Ltd .....................................................................................................................................
Apex International Logistics .................................................................................................................................................................
Aquatec Maxcon Asia ..........................................................................................................................................................................
Asian Unity Part Co., Ltd .....................................................................................................................................................................
CSE Technologies Co., Ltd .................................................................................................................................................................
Pacific Pipe Public Company Limited (also known as Pacific Pipe Company) ..................................................................................
Pacific Pipe and Pump ........................................................................................................................................................................
Polypipe Engineering Co., Ltd .............................................................................................................................................................
Siam Fittings Co., Ltd ..........................................................................................................................................................................
Siam Steel Pipe Co., Ltd .....................................................................................................................................................................
Thai Malleable Iron and Steel .............................................................................................................................................................
Thai Premium Pipe Co., Ltd ................................................................................................................................................................
Vatana Phaisal Engineering Company ................................................................................................................................................
We intend to disclose the calculations
performed to parties in this proceeding
within five days after public
announcement of the preliminary
results in accordance with 19 CFR
351.224(b). Pursuant to 19 CFR
351.309(c), interested parties may
submit case briefs not later than 30 days
after the date of publication of this
notice. Rebuttal briefs, limited to issues
raised in the case briefs, may be filed
not later than five days after the date for
filing case briefs.5 Parties who submit
case briefs or rebuttal briefs in this
proceeding are encouraged to submit
with each argument: (1) A statement of
the issue; (2) a brief summary of the
argument; and (3) a table of authorities.6
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c),
interested parties who wish to request a
hearing, must submit a written request
to the Assistant Secretary for
Enforcement and Compliance, filed
electronically via Commerce’s electronic
records system, ACCESS. An
electronically filed document must be
received successfully in its entirety in
ACCESS by 5 p.m. Eastern Time within
30 days after the date of publication of
this notice. Requests should contain: (1)
The party’s name, address and
telephone number; (2) the number of
participants; and (3) a list of issues to be
discussed. Issues raised in the hearing
will be limited to those raised by each
party in their respective case brief.
Commerce intends to issue the final
results of this administrative review,
including the results of its analysis of
the issues raised in any written briefs,
not later than 120 days after the date of
publication of this notice, unless
extended, pursuant to section
751(a)(3)(A) of the Act.
3 See Memorandum, ‘‘2017–2018 Antidumping
Duty Administrative Review of Circular Welded
Carbon Steel Pipes and Tubes from Thailand:
Extension of Deadline for Preliminary Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review,’’ dated
April 5, 2019.
4 See Memorandum, ‘‘Circular Welded Carbon
Steel Pipes and Tubes from Thailand: Decision
Memorandum for the Preliminary Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, and
Preliminary Determination of No Shipments; 2017–
2018,’’ dated concurrently with, and hereby
adopted by, this notice (Preliminary Decision
Memorandum).
5 See 19 CFR 351.309(d).
6 See 19 CFR 351.303 (for general filing
requirements).
Disclosure and Public Comment
jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with NOTICES
5.32
5.32
5.32
5.32
5.32
5.32
5.32
5.32
5.32
5.32
5.32
5.32
5.32
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:05 May 16, 2019
Jkt 247001
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Assessment Rates
Upon completion of this
administrative review, Commerce shall
determine and CBP shall assess
antidumping duties on all appropriate
entries. If a respondent’s weightedaverage dumping margin is not zero or
E:\FR\FM\17MYN1.SGM
17MYN1
22452
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 96 / Friday, May 17, 2019 / Notices
de minimis (i.e., less than 0.5 percent)
in the final results of this review, we
will calculate importer-specific ad
valorem assessment rates on the basis of
the ratio of the total amount of dumping
calculated for an importer’s examined
sales and the total entered value of such
sales in accordance with 19 CFR
351.212(b)(1). Where either the
respondent’s weighted-average dumping
margin is zero or de minimis within the
meaning of 19 CFR 351.106(c), or an
importer-specific assessment rate is zero
or de minimis, we will instruct CBP to
liquidate the appropriate entries
without regard to antidumping duties.
Commerce clarified its ‘‘automatic
assessment’’ regulation on May 6, 2003.7
This clarification applies to entries of
subject merchandise during the POR
produced by a respondent for which it
did not know its merchandise was
destined for the United States. In such
instances, we will instruct CBP to
liquidate unreviewed entries at the allothers rate if there is no rate for the
intermediate company(ies) involved in
the transaction.
We intend to issue instructions to
CBP 15 days after publication of the
final results of this review.
jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with NOTICES
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following cash deposit
requirements will be effective for all
shipments of subject merchandise
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse,
for consumption on or after the date of
publication of the final results of this
administrative review, as provided for
by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1)
The cash deposit rate for the companies
under review will be equal to the
weighted-average dumping margin
established in the final results of this
review (except, if that rate is de
minimis, then the cash deposit rate will
be zero); (2) for previously reviewed or
investigated companies not listed above
in the Preliminary Results of Review,
including those for which Commerce
may determine had no shipments
during the POR, the cash deposit rate
will continue to be the companyspecific rate published for the most
recently completed segment of this
proceeding; (3) if the exporter is not a
firm covered in this review or another
completed segment of this proceeding,
but the manufacturer is, then the cash
deposit rate will be the rate established
for the most recently completed segment
of this proceeding for the manufacturer
of the merchandise; and (4) if neither
a full discussion of this clarification, see
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings:
Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954
(May 6, 2003).
the exporter nor the manufacturer is a
firm covered in this or any previously
completed segment of this proceeding,
then the cash deposit rate will be the
‘‘all-others’’ rate of 15.67 percent
established in the less-than-fair-value
investigation.8 These deposit
requirements, when imposed, shall
remain in effect until further notice.
Notification to Importers
This notice serves as a preliminary
reminder to importers of their
responsibility under 19 CFR
351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of
antidumping duties prior to liquidation
of the relevant entries during this
review period. Failure to comply with
this requirement could result in
Commerce’s presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties
occurred and the subsequent assessment
of double antidumping duties.
Notification to Interested Parties
We are issuing and publishing these
preliminary results in accordance with
sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Act,
and 19 CFR 351.213(h) and
351.221(b)(4).
Dated: May 10, 2019.
Jeffrey I. Kessler,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance.
Appendix
List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary
Decision Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Order
IV. Preliminary Determination of No
Shipments
V. Particular Market Situation
A. Background
B. Interested Parties’ Arguments
C. Analysis
VI. Comparison to Normal Value
VII. Product Comparisons
VIII. Discussion of Methodology
A. Determination of Comparison Method
B. Results of the Differential Pricing
Analysis
C. Date of Sale
D. Export Price
E. Normal Value
F. Currency Conversion
IX. Recommendation
[FR Doc. 2019–10271 Filed 5–16–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
7 For
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:05 May 16, 2019
Jkt 247001
8 See Antidumping Duty Order: Circular Welded
Carbon Steel Pipes and Tubes from Thailand, 51 FR
8341 (March 11, 1986).
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
RIN 0648–XG359
Marine Mammals; File No. 21482
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice; receipt of application.
AGENCY:
Notice is hereby given that
Dan T. Engelhaupt, Ph.D., HDR, Inc.,
4173 Ewell Road, Virginia Beach, VA
23455, has applied in due form for a
permit to conduct scientific research on
83 species of marine mammals.
DATES: Written, telefaxed, or email
comments must be received on or before
June 17, 2019.
ADDRESSES: The application and related
documents are available for review by
selecting ‘‘Records Open for Public
Comment’’ from the ‘‘Features’’ box on
the Applications and Permits for
Protected Species (APPS) home page,
https://apps.nmfs.noaa.gov, and then
selecting File No. 21482 from the list of
available applications.
These documents are also available
upon written request or by appointment
in the Permits and Conservation
Division, Office of Protected Resources,
NMFS, 1315 East-West Highway, Room
13705, Silver Spring, MD 20910; phone
(301) 427–8401; fax (301) 713–0376.
Written comments on this application
should be submitted to the Chief,
Permits and Conservation Division, at
the address listed above. Comments may
also be submitted by facsimile to (301)
713–0376, or by email to
NMFS.Pr1Comments@noaa.gov. Please
include the File No. in the subject line
of the email comment.
Those individuals requesting a public
hearing should submit a written request
to the Chief, Permits and Conservation
Division at the address listed above. The
request should set forth the specific
reasons why a hearing on this
application would be appropriate.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Shasta McClenahan or Carrie Hubard,
(301) 427–8401.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
subject permit is requested under the
authority of the Marine Mammal
Protection Act of 1972, as amended
(MMPA; 16 U.S.C. 1361 et seq.), the
regulations governing the taking and
importing of marine mammals (50 CFR
part 216), the Endangered Species Act of
1973, as amended (ESA; 16 U.S.C. 1531
et seq.), the regulations governing the
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\17MYN1.SGM
17MYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 96 (Friday, May 17, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 22450-22452]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-10271]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-549-502]
Circular Welded Carbon Steel Pipes and Tubes From Thailand:
Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and
Preliminary Determination of No Shipments; 2017-2018
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (Commerce) preliminarily finds that
Saha Thai Steel Pipe (Public) Company, Ltd. (Saha Thai) made sales of
subject merchandise at less than normal value during the period of
review (POR) March 1, 2017 through February 28, 2018. We invite
interested parties to comment on these preliminary results.
DATES: Applicable May 17, 2019.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Toni Page, AD/CVD Operations, Office
VII, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington,
DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-1398.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Commerce is conducting an administrative review of the antidumping
duty order on circular welded carbon steel pipes and tubes (pipe and
tube) from Thailand. The POR is March 1, 2017, through February 28,
2018. Commerce selected Saha Thai for individual examination.
On November 29, 2018, Commerce extended the time for issuing the
preliminary results of this review from 245 days to 335 days from the
last day of the anniversary month.\1\ Commerce exercised its discretion
to toll all deadlines affected by the partial federal government
closure from December 22, 2018, through the resumption of operations on
January 29, 2019.\2\ This
[[Page 22451]]
extended the deadline for the preliminary results to April 10, 2019. On
April 5, 2019, we further extended the deadline for the preliminary
results an additional 30 days until May 10, 2019.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Memorandum, ``2017-2018 Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review of Circular Welded Carbon Steel Pipes and Tubes from
Thailand: Extension of Deadline for Preliminary Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review,'' dated November 29, 2018.
\2\ See Memorandum, ``Deadlines Affected by the Partial Shutdown
of the Federal Government,'' dated January 28, 2019. All deadlines
in this segment of the proceeding have been extended by 40 days.
\3\ See Memorandum, ``2017-2018 Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review of Circular Welded Carbon Steel Pipes and Tubes from
Thailand: Extension of Deadline for Preliminary Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review,'' dated April 5, 2019.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scope of the Order
The products covered by the antidumping order are certain circular
welded carbon steel pipes and tubes from Thailand. The subject
merchandise has an outside diameter of 0.375 inches or more, but not
exceeding 16 inches. For a full description of the scope of this order,
see the accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ See Memorandum, ``Circular Welded Carbon Steel Pipes and
Tubes from Thailand: Decision Memorandum for the Preliminary Results
of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, and Preliminary
Determination of No Shipments; 2017-2018,'' dated concurrently with,
and hereby adopted by, this notice (Preliminary Decision
Memorandum).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Preliminary Determination of No Shipments
Based on an analysis of U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP)
information, and comments provided by interested parties, Commerce
preliminarily determines that three companies under review, Expeditors
Ltd. (Expeditors); K Line Logistics (K-Line); and Panalpina World
Transport Ltd. (Panalpina), each had no shipments during the POR. For
additional information regarding this determination, see the
Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
Methodology
Commerce conducted this review in accordance with section 751(a)(2)
of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). Export price is
calculated in accordance with section 772 of the Act. Normal value is
calculated in accordance with section 773 of the Act.
For a full description of the methodology underlying these
preliminary results, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum. The
Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file
electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS).
ACCESS is available to registered users at https://access.trade.gov, and
it is available to all parties in the Central Records Unit, Room B8024
of the main Department of Commerce building. In addition, the signed
Preliminary Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly at https://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed and the electronic versions of
the Preliminary Decision Memorandum are identical in content. A list of
topics discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum is attached in
the appendix to this notice.
Preliminary Results of Review
Commerce preliminarily determines that the following weighted-
average dumping margins exist for the period March 1, 2017, through
February 28, 2018:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Weighted-
average
Producer or exporter dumping margin
(percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Saha Thai Steel Pipe (Public) Company, Ltd.............. 5.32
Apex International Logistics............................ 5.32
Aquatec Maxcon Asia..................................... 5.32
Asian Unity Part Co., Ltd............................... 5.32
CSE Technologies Co., Ltd............................... 5.32
Pacific Pipe Public Company Limited (also known as 5.32
Pacific Pipe Company)..................................
Pacific Pipe and Pump................................... 5.32
Polypipe Engineering Co., Ltd........................... 5.32
Siam Fittings Co., Ltd.................................. 5.32
Siam Steel Pipe Co., Ltd................................ 5.32
Thai Malleable Iron and Steel........................... 5.32
Thai Premium Pipe Co., Ltd.............................. 5.32
Vatana Phaisal Engineering Company...................... 5.32
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Disclosure and Public Comment
We intend to disclose the calculations performed to parties in this
proceeding within five days after public announcement of the
preliminary results in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b). Pursuant to
19 CFR 351.309(c), interested parties may submit case briefs not later
than 30 days after the date of publication of this notice. Rebuttal
briefs, limited to issues raised in the case briefs, may be filed not
later than five days after the date for filing case briefs.\5\ Parties
who submit case briefs or rebuttal briefs in this proceeding are
encouraged to submit with each argument: (1) A statement of the issue;
(2) a brief summary of the argument; and (3) a table of authorities.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ See 19 CFR 351.309(d).
\6\ See 19 CFR 351.303 (for general filing requirements).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), interested parties who wish to
request a hearing, must submit a written request to the Assistant
Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, filed electronically via
Commerce's electronic records system, ACCESS. An electronically filed
document must be received successfully in its entirety in ACCESS by 5
p.m. Eastern Time within 30 days after the date of publication of this
notice. Requests should contain: (1) The party's name, address and
telephone number; (2) the number of participants; and (3) a list of
issues to be discussed. Issues raised in the hearing will be limited to
those raised by each party in their respective case brief. Commerce
intends to issue the final results of this administrative review,
including the results of its analysis of the issues raised in any
written briefs, not later than 120 days after the date of publication
of this notice, unless extended, pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of
the Act.
Assessment Rates
Upon completion of this administrative review, Commerce shall
determine and CBP shall assess antidumping duties on all appropriate
entries. If a respondent's weighted-average dumping margin is not zero
or
[[Page 22452]]
de minimis (i.e., less than 0.5 percent) in the final results of this
review, we will calculate importer-specific ad valorem assessment rates
on the basis of the ratio of the total amount of dumping calculated for
an importer's examined sales and the total entered value of such sales
in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). Where either the respondent's
weighted-average dumping margin is zero or de minimis within the
meaning of 19 CFR 351.106(c), or an importer-specific assessment rate
is zero or de minimis, we will instruct CBP to liquidate the
appropriate entries without regard to antidumping duties.
Commerce clarified its ``automatic assessment'' regulation on May
6, 2003.\7\ This clarification applies to entries of subject
merchandise during the POR produced by a respondent for which it did
not know its merchandise was destined for the United States. In such
instances, we will instruct CBP to liquidate unreviewed entries at the
all-others rate if there is no rate for the intermediate company(ies)
involved in the transaction.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ For a full discussion of this clarification, see Antidumping
and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping
Duties, 68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
We intend to issue instructions to CBP 15 days after publication of
the final results of this review.
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following cash deposit requirements will be effective for all
shipments of subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse,
for consumption on or after the date of publication of the final
results of this administrative review, as provided for by section
751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) The cash deposit rate for the companies
under review will be equal to the weighted-average dumping margin
established in the final results of this review (except, if that rate
is de minimis, then the cash deposit rate will be zero); (2) for
previously reviewed or investigated companies not listed above in the
Preliminary Results of Review, including those for which Commerce may
determine had no shipments during the POR, the cash deposit rate will
continue to be the company-specific rate published for the most
recently completed segment of this proceeding; (3) if the exporter is
not a firm covered in this review or another completed segment of this
proceeding, but the manufacturer is, then the cash deposit rate will be
the rate established for the most recently completed segment of this
proceeding for the manufacturer of the merchandise; and (4) if neither
the exporter nor the manufacturer is a firm covered in this or any
previously completed segment of this proceeding, then the cash deposit
rate will be the ``all-others'' rate of 15.67 percent established in
the less-than-fair-value investigation.\8\ These deposit requirements,
when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ See Antidumping Duty Order: Circular Welded Carbon Steel
Pipes and Tubes from Thailand, 51 FR 8341 (March 11, 1986).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Notification to Importers
This notice serves as a preliminary reminder to importers of their
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation
of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply
with this requirement could result in Commerce's presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent
assessment of double antidumping duties.
Notification to Interested Parties
We are issuing and publishing these preliminary results in
accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Act, and 19 CFR
351.213(h) and 351.221(b)(4).
Dated: May 10, 2019.
Jeffrey I. Kessler,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
Appendix
List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Order
IV. Preliminary Determination of No Shipments
V. Particular Market Situation
A. Background
B. Interested Parties' Arguments
C. Analysis
VI. Comparison to Normal Value
VII. Product Comparisons
VIII. Discussion of Methodology
A. Determination of Comparison Method
B. Results of the Differential Pricing Analysis
C. Date of Sale
D. Export Price
E. Normal Value
F. Currency Conversion
IX. Recommendation
[FR Doc. 2019-10271 Filed 5-16-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P