Self-Regulatory Organizations; BOX Exchange LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To Modify the Criteria for Listing an Option on an Underlying Covered Security, 20940-20944 [2019-09724]

Download as PDF 20940 Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 92 / Monday, May 13, 2019 / Notices information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information will have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency’s estimate of the burden imposed by the collection of information; (c) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on respondents, including through the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology. Consideration will be given to comments and suggestions submitted in writing within 60 days of this publication. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid control number. Please direct your written comments to Charles Riddle, Acting Director/Chief Information Officer, Securities and Exchange Commission, c/o Candace Kenner, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549 or send an email to: PRA_ Mailbox@sec.gov. Dated: May 8, 2019. Eduardo A. Aleman, Deputy Secretary. [FR Doc. 2019–09797 Filed 5–10–19; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8011–01–P SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Proposed Collection; Comment Request Upon Written Request Copies Available From: Securities and Exchange Commission, Office of FOIA Services, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549–2736 jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with NOTICES Extension: Form F–7, SEC File No. 270–331, OMB Control No. 3235–0383 Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Securities and Exchange Commission (‘‘Commission’’) is soliciting comments on the collection of information summarized below. The Commission plans to submit this existing collection of information to the Office of Management and Budget for extension and approval. Form F–7 (17 CFR 239.37) is a registration statement under the Securities Act of 1933 (15 U.S.C. 77a et seq.) used to register securities that are offered for cash upon the exercise of rights granted to a registrant’s existing security holders to purchase or VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:29 May 10, 2019 Jkt 247001 subscribe such securities. The information collected is intended to ensure that the information required to be filed by the Commission permits verification of compliance with securities law requirements and assures the public availability of such information. Form F–7 takes approximately 4 hours per response to prepare and is filed by approximately 5 respondents. We estimate that 25% of 4 hours per response (one hour) is prepared by the company for a total annual reporting burden of 5 hours (one hour per response × 5 responses). Written comments are invited on: (a) Whether this proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information will have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency’s estimate of the burden imposed by the collection of information; (c) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on respondents, including through the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology. Consideration will be given to comments and suggestions submitted in writing within 60 days of this publication. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid control number. Please direct your written comment to Charles Riddle, Acting Director/Chief Information Officer, Securities and Exchange Commission, c/o Candace Kenner, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549 or send an email to: PRA_ Mailbox@sec.gov. Dated: May 8, 2019. Eduardo A. Aleman, Deputy Secretary. [FR Doc. 2019–09798 Filed 5–10–19; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8011–01–P SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION [Release No. 34–85798; File No. SR–BOX– 2019–15] Self-Regulatory Organizations; BOX Exchange LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To Modify the Criteria for Listing an Option on an Underlying Covered Security Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Frm 00095 I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Terms of Substance of the Proposed Rule Change The Exchange proposes to amend BOX Rule 5020 (Criteria for Underlying Securities) to modify the criteria for listing an option on an underlying covered security. The text of the proposed rule change is available from the principal office of the Exchange, at the Commission’s Public Reference Room and also on the Exchange’s internet website at https:// boxoptions.com. II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in Item IV below. The self-regulatory organization has prepared summaries, set forth in Sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such statements. A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change 1. Purpose The Exchange proposes to amend BOX Rule 5020 (Criteria for Underlying Securities) to modify the criteria for listing an option on an underlying covered security. This is a competitive filing that is based on a proposal submitted by NASDAQ PHLX LLC (‘‘Phlx’’) and approved by the Commission.3 The Exchange proposes to modify Rule 5020(b)(5)(i) to permit the listing of an option on an underlying covered security that has a market price of at least $3.00 for the previous three 1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). CFR 240.19b–4. 3 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 34– 82474 (January 9, 2018) (Order Approving SR– Phlx–2017–75). 2 17 May 7, 2019. PO 00000 (‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2 notice is hereby given that on April 25, 2019, BOX Exchange LLC (‘‘Exchange’’ or ‘‘BOX’’) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule change as described in Items I and II below, which Items have been prepared by the selfregulatory organization. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule from interested persons. Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\13MYN1.SGM 13MYN1 Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 92 / Monday, May 13, 2019 / Notices jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with NOTICES consecutive business days preceding the date on which the Exchange submits a certificate to the Options Clearing Corporation (‘‘OCC’’) for listing and trading. The Exchange does not intend to amend any other criteria for listing options on an underlying security in Rule 5020. Currently, the underlying covered security must have a closing market price of at least $3.00 per share for the previous five consecutive business days preceding the date on which the Exchange submits a listing certificate to the OCC. In the proposed amendment, the market price will still be measured by the closing price reported in the primary market in which the underlying covered security is traded, but the measurement will be the price over the prior three consecutive business day period preceding the submission of the listing certificate to OCC, instead of the prior five business day period. The Exchange acknowledges that the Options Listing Procedures Plan 4 requires that the listing certificate be provided to OCC no earlier than 12:01 a.m. and no later than 11:00 a.m. (Chicago time) on the trading day prior to the day on which trading is to begin.5 The proposed amendment will still comport with that requirement. For example, if an initial public offering (‘‘IPO’’) occurs at 11 a.m. on Monday, the earliest date the Exchange could submit its listing certificate to OCC would be on Thursday by 12:01 a.m. (Chicago time), with the market price determined by the closing price over the three-day period from Monday through Wednesday. The option on the IPO would then be eligible for trading on the Exchange on Friday. The proposed amendment would essentially enable options trading within four business days of an IPO becoming available instead of six business days (five 4 The Plan for the Purpose of Developing and Implementing procedures Designed to Facilitate the Listing and Trading of Standardized Options Submitted Pursuant to Section 11a(2)(3)(B) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (a/k/a the Options Listing Procedures Plan (‘‘OLPP’’)) is a national market system plan that, among other things, sets forth procedures governing the listing of new options series. See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 44521 (July 6, 2001), 66 FR 36809 (July 13, 2001) (Order approving OLPP). The sponsors of OLPP include Phlx; OCC; BATS Exchange, Inc.; BOX Options Exchange LLC; C2 Options Exchange, Incorporated; Chicago Board Options Exchange, Incorporated; EDGX Exchange, Inc.; Miami International Securities Exchange, LLC; MIAX PEARL, LLC; The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC; NASDAQ BX, Inc.; Nasdaq GEMX, LLC; Nasdaq ISE, LLC; Nasdaq MRX, LLC; NYSE American, LLC; and NYSE Arca, Inc. 5 See OLPP at page 3. VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:29 May 10, 2019 Jkt 247001 consecutive days plus the day the listing certificate is submitted to OCC). At the time the Exchange adopted the ‘‘look back’’ period of five consecutive business days, it determined that the five-day period was sufficient to protect against attempts to manipulate the market price of the underlying security and would provide a reliable test for stability.6 Surveillance technologies and procedures concerning manipulation have evolved since then to provide adequate prevention or detection of rule or securities law violations within the proposed time frame, and the Exchange represents that its existing trading surveillances are adequate to monitor the trading of options on the Exchange.7 Furthermore, the Exchange notes that the scope of its surveillance program also includes cross market surveillance for trading that is not just limited to the Exchange. In particular, the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (‘‘FINRA’’), pursuant to a regulatory services agreement, operates a range of cross-market equity surveillance patterns on behalf of the Exchange to look for potential manipulative behavior, including spoofing, algorithm gaming, marking the close and open, and momentum ignition strategies, as well as more general, abusive behavior related to front running, wash shales, quoting/routing, and Reg SHO violations. These cross-market patterns incorporate relevant data from various markets beyond the Exchange, including data from the New York Stock Exchange (‘‘NYSE’’) and from the Nasdaq Stock Market (‘‘Nasdaq’’). Additionally, for options, the Exchange, through FINRA, utilizes an array of patterns that monitor manipulation of options, or manipulation of equity securities (regardless of venue) for the purpose of impacting options prices on BOX options facility (i.e., mini-manipulation strategies). Accordingly, the Exchange believes that the cross market 6 See Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 47190 (January 15, 2003), 68 FR 3072 (January 22, 2003) (SR–CBOE–2002–62); 47352 (February 11, 2003), 68 FR 8319 (February 20, 2003) (SR–PCX–2003–06); 47483 (March 11, 2003), 68 FR 13352 (March 19,2003) (SR–ISE–2003–04); 47613 (April 1, 2003), 68 FR 17120 (April 8, 2003) (SR–Amex–2003–19); and 47794 (May 5, 2003), 68 FR 25076 (May 9, 2003) (SR–Phlx–2003–27) 7 Such surveillance procedures generally focus on detecting securities trading subject to opening price manipulation, closing price manipulation, layering, spoofing or other unlawful activity impacting an underlying security, the option, or both. The Exchange, through the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (‘‘FINRA’’), has price movement alerts, unusual market activity and order book alerts active for all trading symbols. These real time patterns are active for the new security as soon as the IPO begins trading. PO 00000 Frm 00096 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 20941 surveillance performed by FINRA on behalf of the Exchange, coupled with the Exchange staff’s real-time monitoring of similarly violative activity on the exchange as described herein, reflects a comprehensive surveillance program that is adequate to monitor for manipulation of the underlying security and overlying option within the proposed three-day look back period. Furthermore, the Exchange notes that the proposed listing criteria would still require that the underlying security be listed on NYSE, the American Stock Exchange (now known as NYSE American), or the National Market System of The Nasdaq Stock Market (now known as the Nasdaq Global Market) (collectively, the ‘‘Named Markets’’), as provided for in the definition of ‘‘covered security’’ from Section 18(b)(1)(A) of the 1933 Act.8 Accordingly, the Exchange believes that the proposed rule change would still ensure that the underlying security meets the high listing standards of a Named Market, and would also ensure that the underlying is covered by the regulatory protections (including market surveillance, investigation and enforcement) offered by these exchanges for trading in covered securities conducted on their facilities. Furthermore, according to Phlx’s approved proposal, the Nasdaq, had no cases, within a five year period ending in 2018, where an IPO-related issue for which it had pricing information qualified for the $3.00 price requirement during the first three (3) days of trading and did not qualify for the $3.00 price requirement during the first five (5) days.9 In other words, none of these qualifying issues fell below the $3.00 threshold within the first three (3) or five (5) days of trading. As such, the Exchange believes that its existing surveillance technologies and procedures, coupled with Nasdaq’s findings related to the IPO-related issues as described herein, adequately address potential concerns regarding possible manipulation or price stability within the proposed timeframe. The Exchange also believes that the proposed look back period can be implemented in connection with the other initial listing criteria for 8 See 15 U.S.C. 77r(b)(1)(A). were over 750 IPO-related issues on Nasdaq within the past five years. Out of all of the issues with pricing information, there was only one issue that had a price below $3.00 during the first five consecutive business days. The Exchange notes, however, that Nasdaq allows for companies to list on the Nasdaq Capital Market at $2.00 or $3.00 per share in some instances, which was the case for this particular issue. See Nasdaq Rule 5500 Series for initial listing standards on the Nasdaq Capital Market. See also supra note 3. 9 There E:\FR\FM\13MYN1.SGM 13MYN1 20942 Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 92 / Monday, May 13, 2019 / Notices underlying covered securities. In particular, the Exchange recognizes that it may be difficult to verify the number of shareholders in the days immediately following an IPO due to the fact that stock trades generally clear within two business days (T+2) of their trade date and therefore the shareholder count will generally not be known until T+2.10 The Exchange notes that the current T+2 settlement cycle was recently reduced from T+3 on September 5, 2017 in connection with the Commission’s amendments to Exchange Rule 15c6– 1(a) to adopt the shortened settlement cycle,11 and the look back period of three (3) consecutive business days proposed herein reflects this shortened T+2 settlement period. As proposed, stock trades would clear within T+2 of their trade date (i.e., within three (3) business days) and therefore the number of shareholders could be verified within three (3) business days, thereby enabling options trading within four (4) business days of an IPO (three (3) consecutive business days plus the day the listing certificate is submitted to OCC). Furthermore, the Exchange notes that various brokerage firms that have a large retail customer clientele can confirm the number of individual customers who have a position in new issues. The earliest that these firms can provide confirmation is usually the day after the first day of trading (T+1) on an unsettled basis, while others can confirm on the third day of trading (T+2). For the foregoing reasons, the Exchange believes that basing the proposed three (3) business day look back period on the T+2 settlement cycle would allow for sufficient verification of the number of shareholders. The proposed rule change will apply to all covered securities that meet the criteria of Rule 5020. Pursuant to Rule 5020, the Exchange establishes guidelines to be considered in evaluating the potential underlying securities for Exchange option transactions.12 However, the fact that a particular security may meet the guidelines established by the Exchange does not necessarily mean that it will be approved as an underlying security.13 As part of the established criteria, the jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with NOTICES 10 The number of shareholders of record can be validated by large clearing agencies such as the Depository Trust and Clearing Corporation (‘‘DTCC’’) upon the settlement date (i.e., T+2). 11 See Securities Exchange Act Release no. 78962 (September 28, 2016), 81 FR 69240 (October 5, 2016) (Amendment to Securities Transaction Settlement Cycle) (File No. S7–22–16). 12 See Exchange Rule 5020. The Exchange established specific criteria to be considered in evaluating potential underlying securities for Exchange option transactions. 13 Id. VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:29 May 10, 2019 Jkt 247001 issuer must be in compliance with any applicable requirement of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.14 Additionally, in considering the underlying security, the Exchange relies on information made publicly available by the issuer and/or the markets in which the security is traded.15 Even if the proposed option meets the objective criteria, the Exchange may decide not to list, or place limitations or conditions upon listing.16 The Exchange believes that these measures, together with its existing surveillance procedures, provide adequate safeguards in the review of any covered security that may meet the proposed criteria for consideration of the option within the timeframe contained in this proposal. 2. Statutory Basis The Exchange believes that the proposal is consistent with the requirements of Section 6(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the ‘‘Act’’),17 in general, and Section 6(b)(5) of the Act,18 in particular, in that it is designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to foster cooperation and coordination with persons engaged in facilitating transactions in securities, to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system, and, in general to protect investors and the public interest. In particular, the Exchange believes that the proposed changes to its listing standards for covered securities would allow the Exchange to more quickly list options on a qualifying covered security that has met the $3.00 eligibility price without sacrificing investor protection. As discussed above, the Exchange believes that its existing trading surveillances provide a sufficient measure of protection against potential price manipulation within the proposed three (3) consecutive business day timeframe. The Exchange also believes that the proposed three (3) consecutive business day timeframe would continue to be a reliable test for price stability in light of Nasdaq’s findings that none of the IPO-related issues on Nasdaq, within a five year time period ending in 2018, qualified for the $3.00 per share price standard during the first three trading days fell below the $3.00 threshold during the fourth or fifth trading day. Furthermore, the 14 See Exchange Rule 5020(b)(3). Exchange Rule 5020(d). 16 See Exchange Rule 5020(b). 17 15 U.S.C. 78f(b). 18 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5). 15 See PO 00000 Frm 00097 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 established guidelines to be considered by the Exchange in evaluating the potential underlying securities for Exchange option transactions,19 together with existing trading surveillances, provide adequate safeguards in the review of any covered security that may meet the proposed criteria for consideration of the option within the proposed timeframe. In addition, the Exchange believes that basing the proposed timeframe on the T+2 settlement cycle adequately addresses the potential difficulties in confirming the number of shareholders of the underlying covered security. For the foregoing reasons, the Exchange believes that the proposed amendments will remove impediments and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system by providing an avenue for investors to swiftly hedge their investment in the stock in a shorter amount of time than what is currently in place.20 Finally, it should be noted that a price/time standard for the underlying security was first adopted when the listed options market was in its infancy, and was intended to prevent the proliferation of options being listed on low-priced securities that presented special manipulation concerns and/or lacked liquidity needed to maintain fair and orderly markets.21 When options trading commenced in 1973, the Commission determined that it was necessary for securities underlying options to meet certain minimum standards regarding both the quality of the issuer and the quality of the market for a particular security.22 These standards, including a price/time standard, were imposed to ensure that those issuers upon whose securities options were to be traded were widelyheld, financially sound companies whose shares had trading volume and float substantial enough so as not to be readily susceptible to manipulation.23 At the time, the Commission determined that the imposition of these standards was reasonable in view of the pilot nature of options trading and the 19 See notes 12–16 above. proposed rule change does not alter any obligations of issuers or other investors of an IPO that may be subject to a lock-up or other restrictions on trading related securities. 21 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 29628 (August 29, 1991), 56 FR 43949–01 (September 5, 1991) (SR–AMEX–86–21; SR–CBOE–86–15; SR– NYSE–86–20; SR–PSE86–15; and SR–PHLX–86–21) (‘‘1991 Approval Order’’) at 43949 (discussing the Commission’s concerns when options trading initially commenced in 1973). 22 See 1991 Approval Order at 43949. 23 Id. 20 This E:\FR\FM\13MYN1.SGM 13MYN1 Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 92 / Monday, May 13, 2019 / Notices limited experience of investors with options trading.24 Now more than 40 years later, the listed options market has evolved into a mature market with sophisticated investors. In view of this evolution, the Commission has approved various exchange proposals to relax some of these initial listing standards throughout the years,25 including reducing the price/time standard in 2003 from $7.50 per share for the majority of business days over a three month period to the current $3.00 per share/five business day standard (‘‘2003 Proposal’’).26 It has been over sixteen years since the Commission approved the 2003 proposal, and both the listed options market and exchange technologies have continued to evolve since then. In this instance, the Exchange is only proposing a modest reduction of the current five (5) business day standard to three (3) business days to correspond to the securities industry’s move to a T+2 standard settlement cycle.27 The $3.00 per share standard and all other initial options listing criteria in Rule 5020 will remain unchanged by this proposal. For the reasons discussed herein, the Exchange therefore believes that the proposed three (3) business day period will be beneficial to the marketplace without sacrificing investor protections. B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement on Burden on Competition The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will impose any burden on competition not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. In this regard and as indicated above, the Exchange notes that the rule change is being proposed as a competitive response to a filing submitted by Phlx that was approved by the Commission.28 The proposed rule change will reduce the number of days to list options on an underlying security, and is intended to bring new options listings to the marketplace quicker. C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement on Comments on the Proposed Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others The Exchange has neither solicited nor received comments on the proposed rule change. III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for Commission Action Because the foregoing proposed rule change does not: (i) Significantly affect the protection of investors or the public interest; (ii) impose any significant burden on competition; and (iii) become operative for 30 days from the date on which it was filed, or such shorter time as the Commission may designate, it has become effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act 29 and subparagraph (f)(6) of Rule 19b–4 thereunder.30 A proposed rule change filed under Rule 19b–4(f)(6) 31 normally does not become operative prior to 30 days after the date of the filing. However, Rule 19b–4(f)(6)(iii) 32 permits the Commission to designate a shorter time if such action is consistent with the protection of investors and the public interest. The Exchange has asked the Commission to waive the 30-day operative delay so that the proposal may become operative immediately upon filing. The Exchange states that the waiver of the operative delay will ensure fair competition among the exchanges by allowing the Exchange to modify the criteria for listing an option on an underlying covered security which is currently allowed on other options exchanges. The Commission believes that waiver of the 30-day operative delay is consistent with the protection of investors and the public interest. Accordingly, the Commission hereby waives the operative delay and designates the proposed rule change as operative upon filing.33 jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with NOTICES 24 Id. 25 See e.g., 1991 Approval Order (modifying a number of initial listing criteria, including the reduction of the price/time standard from $10 per share each day during the preceding three calendar months to $7.50 per share for the majority of days during the same period). 26 See Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 47190 (January 15, 2003), 68 FR 3072 (January 22, 2003) (SR–CBOE–2002–62); 47352 (February 11, 2003), 68 FR 8319 (February 20, 2003) (SR–PCX– 2003–06); 47483 (March 11, 2003), 68 FR 13352 (March 19, 2003) (SR–ISE–2003–04); 47613 (April 1, 2003), 68 FR 17120 (April 8, 2003) (SRAmex– 2003–19); and 47794 (May 5, 2003), 68 FR 25076 (May 9, 2003) (SR–Phlx–200327). 27 See supra note 11. 28 See supra, note 3. VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:29 May 10, 2019 Jkt 247001 29 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii). CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6). In addition, Rule 19b– 4(f)(6)(iii) requires a self-regulatory organization to give the Commission written notice of its intent to file the proposed rule change, along with a brief description and the text of the proposed rule change, at least five business days prior to the date of filing of the proposed rule change, or such shorter time as designated by the Commission. The Exchange has satisfied this requirement. 31 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6). 32 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6)(iii). 33 For purposes only of waiving the 30-day operative delay, the Commission has also considered the proposed rule’s impact on efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C. 78c(f). 30 17 PO 00000 Frm 00098 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 20943 At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule change if it appears to the Commission that such action is: (i) Necessary or appropriate in the public interest; (ii) for the protection of investors; or (iii) otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule should be approved or disapproved. IV. Solicitation of Comments Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods: Electronic Comments • Use the Commission’s internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/ rules/sro.shtml); or • Send an email to rule-comments@ sec.gov. Please include File Number SR– BOX–2019–15 on the subject line. Paper Comments • Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549–1090. All submissions should refer to File Number SR–BOX–2019–15. This file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on the Commission’s internet website (https://www.sec.gov/ rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and printing in the Commission’s Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments received will be posted without change. Persons submitting comments are cautioned that we do not redact or edit E:\FR\FM\13MYN1.SGM 13MYN1 20944 Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 92 / Monday, May 13, 2019 / Notices personal identifying information from comment submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions should refer to File Number SR–BOX–2019–15 and should be submitted on or before June 3, 2019. For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated authority.34 Eduardo A. Aleman, Deputy Secretary. [FR Doc. 2019–09724 Filed 5–10–19; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8011–01–P SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Sunshine Act Meetings FEDERAL REGISTER CITATION OF PREVIOUS ANNOUNCEMENT: 84 FR 19979, 7 May 2019. PREVIOUSLY ANNOUNCED TIME AND DATE OF THE MEETING: Thursday, May 9, 2019 at 9:00 a.m. The following item will not be considered during the Open Meeting on Thursday, May 9, 2019: • Whether to propose certain rule amendments and interpretive guidance regarding the cross-border application of certain security-based swap requirements under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 that were added by Title VII of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act. CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: For further information and to ascertain what, if any, matters have been added, deleted or postponed, please contact the Office of the Secretary at (202) 551– 5400. CHANGES IN THE MEETING: Dated: May 8, 2019. Vanessa A. Countryman, Acting Secretary. [FR Doc. 2019–09894 Filed 5–9–19; 11:15 am] BILLING CODE 8011–01–P SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with NOTICES Administrator’s Line of Succession Designation, No. 1–A, Revision 37 This document replaces and supersedes ‘‘Line of Succession Designation No. 1–A, Revision 36’’. Line of Succession Designation No. 1– A, Revision 37: Effective immediately, the Administrator’s Line of Succession Designation is as follows: 34 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12). VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:29 May 10, 2019 Jkt 247001 (a) In the event of my inability to perform the functions and duties of my position, or my absence from the office, the Deputy Administrator will assume all functions and duties of the Administrator. In the event the Deputy Administrator and I are both unable to perform the functions and duties of the position or are absent from our offices, I designate the officials in listed order below, if they are eligible to act as Administrator under the provisions of the Federal Vacancies Reform Act of 1998 (5 U.S.C. 3345–3349d), to serve as Acting Administrator with full authority to perform all acts which the Administrator is authorized to perform: (1) Chief of Staff; (2) General Counsel; (3) Associate Administrator, Office of Capital Access; (4) Associate Administrator, Office of Disaster Assistance; (5) Regional Administrator for Region IX; and (6) Regional Administrator for Region VIII. Notwithstanding the provisions of SBA Standard Operating Procedure 00 01 2, ‘‘absence from the office,’’ as used in reference to myself in paragraph (a) above, means the following: (1) I am not present in the office and cannot be reasonably contacted by phone or other electronic means, and there is an immediate business necessity for the exercise of my authority; or (2) I am not present in the office and, upon being contacted by phone or other electronic means, I determine that I cannot exercise my authority effectively without being physically present in the office. (b) An individual serving in an acting capacity in any of the positions listed in subparagraphs (a)(1) through (6), unless designated as such by the Administrator, is not also included in this Line of Succession. Instead, the next non-acting incumbent in the Line of Succession shall serve as Acting Administrator. (c) This designation shall remain in full force and effect until revoked or superseded in writing by the Administrator, or by the Deputy Administrator when serving as Acting Administrator. (d) Serving as Acting Administrator has no effect on the officials listed in subparagraphs (a)(1) through (6), above, with respect to the authorities, duties, and responsibilities of their full-time positions (except that such official PO 00000 Frm 00099 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 cannot both recommend and approve an action). Christopher M. Pilkerton, Acting Administrator. [FR Doc. 2019–09775 Filed 5–10–19; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE P DEPARTMENT OF STATE [Public Notice: 10768] Advisory Committee for the Study of Eastern Europe and the Independent States of the Former Soviet Union (Title VIII) Public Meeting Notice The Advisory Committee for the Study of Eastern Europe and the Independent States of the Former Soviet Union (Advisory Committee) will convene on Wednesday, June 26, from 1:30 p.m. until approximately 3:30 p.m. The meeting will take place at the U.S. Department of State, Harry S Truman Building, 2201 C Street NW, Washington, DC, in Room 1485. The Advisory Committee will recommend grant recipients for the 2019 funding opportunity for the Program for the Study of Eastern Europe and the Independent States of the Former Soviet Union, in accordance with the Research and Training for Eastern Europe and the Independent States of the Former Soviet Union Act of 1983, Public Law 98–164, as amended. The agenda will include opening statements by the chairperson and members of the committee. The committee will provide an overview and discussion of grant proposals from ‘‘national organizations with an interest and expertise in conducting research and training concerning the countries of Eastern Europe and the Independent States of the Former Soviet Union,’’ based on the guidelines set forth in the June request for proposals published on Grants.gov and SAMS Domestic (mygrants.service-now.com). Following committee deliberation, interested members of the public may make oral statements concerning the Title VIII program. This meeting will be open to the public; however, attendance is limited to available seating. Entry into the Harry S Truman building is controlled and must be arranged in advance of the meeting. Those planning to attend should notify the Title VIII Program Officer at the U.S. Department of State at TitleVIII@state.gov, subject: Public Meeting RSVP, no later than close of business, Tuesday, June 25, 2019. For pre-clearance into the Harry S Truman building, the Title VIII Program Officer will request identifying data pursuant to Public Law 99–399 E:\FR\FM\13MYN1.SGM 13MYN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 92 (Monday, May 13, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 20940-20944]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-09724]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-85798; File No. SR-BOX-2019-15]


Self-Regulatory Organizations; BOX Exchange LLC; Notice of Filing 
and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To Modify the 
Criteria for Listing an Option on an Underlying Covered Security

May 7, 2019.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 
(``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that 
on April 25, 2019, BOX Exchange LLC (``Exchange'' or ``BOX'') filed 
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'') the 
proposed rule change as described in Items I and II below, which Items 
have been prepared by the self-regulatory organization. The Commission 
is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule from 
interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance 
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposes to amend BOX Rule 5020 (Criteria for 
Underlying Securities) to modify the criteria for listing an option on 
an underlying covered security. The text of the proposed rule change is 
available from the principal office of the Exchange, at the 
Commission's Public Reference Room and also on the Exchange's internet 
website at https://boxoptions.com.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization 
included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the 
proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the 
proposed rule change. The text of these statements may be examined at 
the places specified in Item IV below. The self-regulatory organization 
has prepared summaries, set forth in Sections A, B, and C below, of the 
most significant aspects of such statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The Exchange proposes to amend BOX Rule 5020 (Criteria for 
Underlying Securities) to modify the criteria for listing an option on 
an underlying covered security. This is a competitive filing that is 
based on a proposal submitted by NASDAQ PHLX LLC (``Phlx'') and 
approved by the Commission.\3\ The Exchange proposes to modify Rule 
5020(b)(5)(i) to permit the listing of an option on an underlying 
covered security that has a market price of at least $3.00 for the 
previous three

[[Page 20941]]

consecutive business days preceding the date on which the Exchange 
submits a certificate to the Options Clearing Corporation (``OCC'') for 
listing and trading. The Exchange does not intend to amend any other 
criteria for listing options on an underlying security in Rule 5020.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 34-82474 (January 9, 
2018) (Order Approving SR-Phlx-2017-75).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Currently, the underlying covered security must have a closing 
market price of at least $3.00 per share for the previous five 
consecutive business days preceding the date on which the Exchange 
submits a listing certificate to the OCC. In the proposed amendment, 
the market price will still be measured by the closing price reported 
in the primary market in which the underlying covered security is 
traded, but the measurement will be the price over the prior three 
consecutive business day period preceding the submission of the listing 
certificate to OCC, instead of the prior five business day period.
    The Exchange acknowledges that the Options Listing Procedures Plan 
\4\ requires that the listing certificate be provided to OCC no earlier 
than 12:01 a.m. and no later than 11:00 a.m. (Chicago time) on the 
trading day prior to the day on which trading is to begin.\5\ The 
proposed amendment will still comport with that requirement. For 
example, if an initial public offering (``IPO'') occurs at 11 a.m. on 
Monday, the earliest date the Exchange could submit its listing 
certificate to OCC would be on Thursday by 12:01 a.m. (Chicago time), 
with the market price determined by the closing price over the three-
day period from Monday through Wednesday. The option on the IPO would 
then be eligible for trading on the Exchange on Friday. The proposed 
amendment would essentially enable options trading within four business 
days of an IPO becoming available instead of six business days (five 
consecutive days plus the day the listing certificate is submitted to 
OCC).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ The Plan for the Purpose of Developing and Implementing 
procedures Designed to Facilitate the Listing and Trading of 
Standardized Options Submitted Pursuant to Section 11a(2)(3)(B) of 
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (a/k/a the Options Listing 
Procedures Plan (``OLPP'')) is a national market system plan that, 
among other things, sets forth procedures governing the listing of 
new options series.
    See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 44521 (July 6, 2001), 66 
FR 36809 (July 13, 2001) (Order approving OLPP). The sponsors of 
OLPP include Phlx; OCC; BATS Exchange, Inc.; BOX Options Exchange 
LLC; C2 Options Exchange, Incorporated; Chicago Board Options 
Exchange, Incorporated; EDGX Exchange, Inc.; Miami International 
Securities Exchange, LLC; MIAX PEARL, LLC; The NASDAQ Stock Market 
LLC; NASDAQ BX, Inc.; Nasdaq GEMX, LLC; Nasdaq ISE, LLC; Nasdaq MRX, 
LLC; NYSE American, LLC; and NYSE Arca, Inc.
    \5\ See OLPP at page 3.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At the time the Exchange adopted the ``look back'' period of five 
consecutive business days, it determined that the five-day period was 
sufficient to protect against attempts to manipulate the market price 
of the underlying security and would provide a reliable test for 
stability.\6\ Surveillance technologies and procedures concerning 
manipulation have evolved since then to provide adequate prevention or 
detection of rule or securities law violations within the proposed time 
frame, and the Exchange represents that its existing trading 
surveillances are adequate to monitor the trading of options on the 
Exchange.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ See Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 47190 (January 15, 
2003), 68 FR 3072 (January 22, 2003) (SR-CBOE-2002-62); 47352 
(February 11, 2003), 68 FR 8319 (February 20, 2003) (SR-PCX-2003-
06); 47483 (March 11, 2003), 68 FR 13352 (March 19,2003) (SR-ISE-
2003-04); 47613 (April 1, 2003), 68 FR 17120 (April 8, 2003) (SR-
Amex-2003-19); and 47794 (May 5, 2003), 68 FR 25076 (May 9, 2003) 
(SR-Phlx-2003-27)
    \7\ Such surveillance procedures generally focus on detecting 
securities trading subject to opening price manipulation, closing 
price manipulation, layering, spoofing or other unlawful activity 
impacting an underlying security, the option, or both. The Exchange, 
through the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (``FINRA''), has 
price movement alerts, unusual market activity and order book alerts 
active for all trading symbols. These real time patterns are active 
for the new security as soon as the IPO begins trading.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Furthermore, the Exchange notes that the scope of its surveillance 
program also includes cross market surveillance for trading that is not 
just limited to the Exchange. In particular, the Financial Industry 
Regulatory Authority (``FINRA''), pursuant to a regulatory services 
agreement, operates a range of cross-market equity surveillance 
patterns on behalf of the Exchange to look for potential manipulative 
behavior, including spoofing, algorithm gaming, marking the close and 
open, and momentum ignition strategies, as well as more general, 
abusive behavior related to front running, wash shales, quoting/
routing, and Reg SHO violations. These cross-market patterns 
incorporate relevant data from various markets beyond the Exchange, 
including data from the New York Stock Exchange (``NYSE'') and from the 
Nasdaq Stock Market (``Nasdaq'').
    Additionally, for options, the Exchange, through FINRA, utilizes an 
array of patterns that monitor manipulation of options, or manipulation 
of equity securities (regardless of venue) for the purpose of impacting 
options prices on BOX options facility (i.e., mini-manipulation 
strategies). Accordingly, the Exchange believes that the cross market 
surveillance performed by FINRA on behalf of the Exchange, coupled with 
the Exchange staff's real-time monitoring of similarly violative 
activity on the exchange as described herein, reflects a comprehensive 
surveillance program that is adequate to monitor for manipulation of 
the underlying security and overlying option within the proposed three-
day look back period.
    Furthermore, the Exchange notes that the proposed listing criteria 
would still require that the underlying security be listed on NYSE, the 
American Stock Exchange (now known as NYSE American), or the National 
Market System of The Nasdaq Stock Market (now known as the Nasdaq 
Global Market) (collectively, the ``Named Markets''), as provided for 
in the definition of ``covered security'' from Section 18(b)(1)(A) of 
the 1933 Act.\8\ Accordingly, the Exchange believes that the proposed 
rule change would still ensure that the underlying security meets the 
high listing standards of a Named Market, and would also ensure that 
the underlying is covered by the regulatory protections (including 
market surveillance, investigation and enforcement) offered by these 
exchanges for trading in covered securities conducted on their 
facilities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ See 15 U.S.C. 77r(b)(1)(A).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Furthermore, according to Phlx's approved proposal, the Nasdaq, had 
no cases, within a five year period ending in 2018, where an IPO-
related issue for which it had pricing information qualified for the 
$3.00 price requirement during the first three (3) days of trading and 
did not qualify for the $3.00 price requirement during the first five 
(5) days.\9\ In other words, none of these qualifying issues fell below 
the $3.00 threshold within the first three (3) or five (5) days of 
trading. As such, the Exchange believes that its existing surveillance 
technologies and procedures, coupled with Nasdaq's findings related to 
the IPO-related issues as described herein, adequately address 
potential concerns regarding possible manipulation or price stability 
within the proposed timeframe.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ There were over 750 IPO-related issues on Nasdaq within the 
past five years. Out of all of the issues with pricing information, 
there was only one issue that had a price below $3.00 during the 
first five consecutive business days. The Exchange notes, however, 
that Nasdaq allows for companies to list on the Nasdaq Capital 
Market at $2.00 or $3.00 per share in some instances, which was the 
case for this particular issue. See Nasdaq Rule 5500 Series for 
initial listing standards on the Nasdaq Capital Market. See also 
supra note 3.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange also believes that the proposed look back period can 
be implemented in connection with the other initial listing criteria 
for

[[Page 20942]]

underlying covered securities. In particular, the Exchange recognizes 
that it may be difficult to verify the number of shareholders in the 
days immediately following an IPO due to the fact that stock trades 
generally clear within two business days (T+2) of their trade date and 
therefore the shareholder count will generally not be known until 
T+2.\10\ The Exchange notes that the current T+2 settlement cycle was 
recently reduced from T+3 on September 5, 2017 in connection with the 
Commission's amendments to Exchange Rule 15c6-1(a) to adopt the 
shortened settlement cycle,\11\ and the look back period of three (3) 
consecutive business days proposed herein reflects this shortened T+2 
settlement period. As proposed, stock trades would clear within T+2 of 
their trade date (i.e., within three (3) business days) and therefore 
the number of shareholders could be verified within three (3) business 
days, thereby enabling options trading within four (4) business days of 
an IPO (three (3) consecutive business days plus the day the listing 
certificate is submitted to OCC).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ The number of shareholders of record can be validated by 
large clearing agencies such as the Depository Trust and Clearing 
Corporation (``DTCC'') upon the settlement date (i.e., T+2).
    \11\ See Securities Exchange Act Release no. 78962 (September 
28, 2016), 81 FR 69240 (October 5, 2016) (Amendment to Securities 
Transaction Settlement Cycle) (File No. S7-22-16).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Furthermore, the Exchange notes that various brokerage firms that 
have a large retail customer clientele can confirm the number of 
individual customers who have a position in new issues. The earliest 
that these firms can provide confirmation is usually the day after the 
first day of trading (T+1) on an unsettled basis, while others can 
confirm on the third day of trading (T+2). For the foregoing reasons, 
the Exchange believes that basing the proposed three (3) business day 
look back period on the T+2 settlement cycle would allow for sufficient 
verification of the number of shareholders.
    The proposed rule change will apply to all covered securities that 
meet the criteria of Rule 5020. Pursuant to Rule 5020, the Exchange 
establishes guidelines to be considered in evaluating the potential 
underlying securities for Exchange option transactions.\12\ However, 
the fact that a particular security may meet the guidelines established 
by the Exchange does not necessarily mean that it will be approved as 
an underlying security.\13\ As part of the established criteria, the 
issuer must be in compliance with any applicable requirement of the 
Securities Exchange Act of 1934.\14\ Additionally, in considering the 
underlying security, the Exchange relies on information made publicly 
available by the issuer and/or the markets in which the security is 
traded.\15\ Even if the proposed option meets the objective criteria, 
the Exchange may decide not to list, or place limitations or conditions 
upon listing.\16\ The Exchange believes that these measures, together 
with its existing surveillance procedures, provide adequate safeguards 
in the review of any covered security that may meet the proposed 
criteria for consideration of the option within the timeframe contained 
in this proposal.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ See Exchange Rule 5020. The Exchange established specific 
criteria to be considered in evaluating potential underlying 
securities for Exchange option transactions.
    \13\ Id.
    \14\ See Exchange Rule 5020(b)(3).
    \15\ See Exchange Rule 5020(d).
    \16\ See Exchange Rule 5020(b).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that the proposal is consistent with the 
requirements of Section 6(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 
(the ``Act''),\17\ in general, and Section 6(b)(5) of the Act,\18\ in 
particular, in that it is designed to prevent fraudulent and 
manipulative acts and practices, to promote just and equitable 
principles of trade, to foster cooperation and coordination with 
persons engaged in facilitating transactions in securities, to remove 
impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and 
a national market system, and, in general to protect investors and the 
public interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \17\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \18\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In particular, the Exchange believes that the proposed changes to 
its listing standards for covered securities would allow the Exchange 
to more quickly list options on a qualifying covered security that has 
met the $3.00 eligibility price without sacrificing investor 
protection. As discussed above, the Exchange believes that its existing 
trading surveillances provide a sufficient measure of protection 
against potential price manipulation within the proposed three (3) 
consecutive business day timeframe. The Exchange also believes that the 
proposed three (3) consecutive business day timeframe would continue to 
be a reliable test for price stability in light of Nasdaq's findings 
that none of the IPO-related issues on Nasdaq, within a five year time 
period ending in 2018, qualified for the $3.00 per share price standard 
during the first three trading days fell below the $3.00 threshold 
during the fourth or fifth trading day. Furthermore, the established 
guidelines to be considered by the Exchange in evaluating the potential 
underlying securities for Exchange option transactions,\19\ together 
with existing trading surveillances, provide adequate safeguards in the 
review of any covered security that may meet the proposed criteria for 
consideration of the option within the proposed timeframe.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \19\ See notes 12-16 above.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In addition, the Exchange believes that basing the proposed 
timeframe on the T+2 settlement cycle adequately addresses the 
potential difficulties in confirming the number of shareholders of the 
underlying covered security. For the foregoing reasons, the Exchange 
believes that the proposed amendments will remove impediments and 
perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national market 
system by providing an avenue for investors to swiftly hedge their 
investment in the stock in a shorter amount of time than what is 
currently in place.\20\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \20\ This proposed rule change does not alter any obligations of 
issuers or other investors of an IPO that may be subject to a lock-
up or other restrictions on trading related securities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Finally, it should be noted that a price/time standard for the 
underlying security was first adopted when the listed options market 
was in its infancy, and was intended to prevent the proliferation of 
options being listed on low-priced securities that presented special 
manipulation concerns and/or lacked liquidity needed to maintain fair 
and orderly markets.\21\ When options trading commenced in 1973, the 
Commission determined that it was necessary for securities underlying 
options to meet certain minimum standards regarding both the quality of 
the issuer and the quality of the market for a particular security.\22\ 
These standards, including a price/time standard, were imposed to 
ensure that those issuers upon whose securities options were to be 
traded were widely-held, financially sound companies whose shares had 
trading volume and float substantial enough so as not to be readily 
susceptible to manipulation.\23\ At the time, the Commission determined 
that the imposition of these standards was reasonable in view of the 
pilot nature of options trading and the

[[Page 20943]]

limited experience of investors with options trading.\24\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \21\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 29628 (August 29, 
1991), 56 FR 43949-01 (September 5, 1991) (SR-AMEX-86-21; SR-CBOE-
86-15; SR-NYSE-86-20; SR-PSE86-15; and SR-PHLX-86-21) (``1991 
Approval Order'') at 43949 (discussing the Commission's concerns 
when options trading initially commenced in 1973).
    \22\ See 1991 Approval Order at 43949.
    \23\ Id.
    \24\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Now more than 40 years later, the listed options market has evolved 
into a mature market with sophisticated investors. In view of this 
evolution, the Commission has approved various exchange proposals to 
relax some of these initial listing standards throughout the years,\25\ 
including reducing the price/time standard in 2003 from $7.50 per share 
for the majority of business days over a three month period to the 
current $3.00 per share/five business day standard (``2003 
Proposal'').\26\ It has been over sixteen years since the Commission 
approved the 2003 proposal, and both the listed options market and 
exchange technologies have continued to evolve since then. In this 
instance, the Exchange is only proposing a modest reduction of the 
current five (5) business day standard to three (3) business days to 
correspond to the securities industry's move to a T+2 standard 
settlement cycle.\27\ The $3.00 per share standard and all other 
initial options listing criteria in Rule 5020 will remain unchanged by 
this proposal. For the reasons discussed herein, the Exchange therefore 
believes that the proposed three (3) business day period will be 
beneficial to the marketplace without sacrificing investor protections.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \25\ See e.g., 1991 Approval Order (modifying a number of 
initial listing criteria, including the reduction of the price/time 
standard from $10 per share each day during the preceding three 
calendar months to $7.50 per share for the majority of days during 
the same period).
    \26\ See Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 47190 (January 15, 
2003), 68 FR 3072 (January 22, 2003) (SR-CBOE-2002-62); 47352 
(February 11, 2003), 68 FR 8319 (February 20, 2003) (SR-PCX-2003-
06); 47483 (March 11, 2003), 68 FR 13352 (March 19, 2003) (SR-ISE-
2003-04); 47613 (April 1, 2003), 68 FR 17120 (April 8, 2003) 
(SRAmex-2003-19); and 47794 (May 5, 2003), 68 FR 25076 (May 9, 2003) 
(SR-Phlx-200327).
    \27\ See supra note 11.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will 
impose any burden on competition not necessary or appropriate in 
furtherance of the purposes of the Act. In this regard and as indicated 
above, the Exchange notes that the rule change is being proposed as a 
competitive response to a filing submitted by Phlx that was approved by 
the Commission.\28\ The proposed rule change will reduce the number of 
days to list options on an underlying security, and is intended to 
bring new options listings to the marketplace quicker.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \28\ See supra, note 3.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed 
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    The Exchange has neither solicited nor received comments on the 
proposed rule change.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for 
Commission Action

    Because the foregoing proposed rule change does not: (i) 
Significantly affect the protection of investors or the public 
interest; (ii) impose any significant burden on competition; and (iii) 
become operative for 30 days from the date on which it was filed, or 
such shorter time as the Commission may designate, it has become 
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act \29\ and 
subparagraph (f)(6) of Rule 19b-4 thereunder.\30\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \29\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
    \30\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6). In addition, Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii) 
requires a self-regulatory organization to give the Commission 
written notice of its intent to file the proposed rule change, along 
with a brief description and the text of the proposed rule change, 
at least five business days prior to the date of filing of the 
proposed rule change, or such shorter time as designated by the 
Commission. The Exchange has satisfied this requirement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    A proposed rule change filed under Rule 19b-4(f)(6) \31\ normally 
does not become operative prior to 30 days after the date of the 
filing. However, Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii) \32\ permits the Commission to 
designate a shorter time if such action is consistent with the 
protection of investors and the public interest. The Exchange has asked 
the Commission to waive the 30-day operative delay so that the proposal 
may become operative immediately upon filing. The Exchange states that 
the waiver of the operative delay will ensure fair competition among 
the exchanges by allowing the Exchange to modify the criteria for 
listing an option on an underlying covered security which is currently 
allowed on other options exchanges. The Commission believes that waiver 
of the 30-day operative delay is consistent with the protection of 
investors and the public interest. Accordingly, the Commission hereby 
waives the operative delay and designates the proposed rule change as 
operative upon filing.\33\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \31\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
    \32\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6)(iii).
    \33\ For purposes only of waiving the 30-day operative delay, 
the Commission has also considered the proposed rule's impact on 
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C. 
78c(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule 
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule 
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is: (i) 
Necessary or appropriate in the public interest; (ii) for the 
protection of investors; or (iii) otherwise in furtherance of the 
purposes of the Act. If the Commission takes such action, the 
Commission shall institute proceedings to determine whether the 
proposed rule should be approved or disapproved.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and 
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule 
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of 
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to [email protected]. Please include 
File Number SR-BOX-2019-15 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities 
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-BOX-2019-15. This file 
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help 
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, 
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on 
the Commission's internet website (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). 
Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written 
statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with 
the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed 
rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those 
that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions 
of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and printing in 
the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 
20549, on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 
3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection 
and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments 
received will be posted without change. Persons submitting comments are 
cautioned that we do not redact or edit

[[Page 20944]]

personal identifying information from comment submissions. You should 
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All 
submissions should refer to File Number SR-BOX-2019-15 and should be 
submitted on or before June 3, 2019.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, 
pursuant to delegated authority.\34\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \34\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Eduardo A. Aleman,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2019-09724 Filed 5-10-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.