Welded Stainless Pressure Pipe From India: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2016-2017, 20098-20099 [2019-09453]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
20098
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 89 / Wednesday, May 8, 2019 / Notices
Notification to Interested Parties
Interested parties must submit
applications for disclosure under APO
in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305. On
January 22, 2008, Commerce published
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Proceedings: Documents Submission
Procedures; APO Procedures, 73 FR
3634 (January 22, 2008). Parties wishing
to participate in this investigation
should ensure that they meet the
requirements of these procedures (e.g.,
the filing of letters of appearance as
discussed at 19 CFR 351.103(d)).
This notice is issued and published
pursuant to sections 732(c)(2) and 777(i)
of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.203(c).
Dated: April 30, 2019.
Jeffrey I. Kessler,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance.
khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES
The merchandise covered by this
investigation is ceramic flooring tile, wall
tile, paving tile, hearth tile, porcelain tile,
mosaic tile, flags, finishing tile, and the like
(hereinafter ceramic tile). Ceramic tiles are
articles containing a mixture of minerals
including clay (generally hydrous silicates of
alumina or magnesium) that are fired so the
raw materials are fused to produce a finished
good that is less than 3.2 cm in actual
thickness. All ceramic tile is subject to the
scope regardless of end use, surface area, and
weight, regardless of whether the tile is
glazed or unglazed, regardless of the water
absorption coefficient by weight, regardless
of the extent of vitrification, and regardless
of whether or not the tile is on a backing.
Subject merchandise includes ceramic tile
with decorative features that may in spots
exceed 3.2 cm in thickness and includes
ceramic tile ‘‘slabs’’ or ‘‘panels’’ (tiles that are
larger than 1 meter2 (11 ft.2)).
Subject merchandise includes ceramic tile
that undergoes minor processing in a third
country prior to importation into the United
States. Similarly, subject merchandise
includes ceramic tile produced that
undergoes minor processing after importation
into the United States. Such minor
processing includes, but is not limited to, one
or more of the following: Beveling, cutting,
trimming, staining, painting, polishing,
finishing, additional firing, or any other
processing that would otherwise not remove
the merchandise from the scope of the
investigation if performed in the country of
manufacture of the in-scope product.
Subject merchandise is currently classified
in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the
United States (HTSUS) under the following
subheadings of heading 6907: 6907.21.1005,
6907.21.1011, 6907.21.1051, 6907.21.2000,
6907.21.3000, 6907.21.4000, 6907.21.9011,
6907.21.9051, 6907.22.1005, 6907.22.1011,
6907.22.1051, 6907.22.2000, 6907.22.3000,
6907.22.4000, 6907.22.9011, 6907.22.9051,
6907.23.1005, 6907.23.1011, 6907.23.1051,
6907.23.2000, 6907.23.3000, 6907.23.4000,
6907.23.9011, 6907.23.9051, 6907.30.1005,
6907.30.1011, 6907.30.1051, 6907.30.2000,
16:57 May 07, 2019
Jkt 247001
[FR Doc. 2019–09451 Filed 5–7–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
with sections 751(a)(1) and (2) of the
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act).
Commerce exercised its discretion to
toll all deadlines affected by the partial
federal government closure from
December 22, 2018, through the
resumption of operations on January 29,
2019.2 If the new deadline falls on a
non-business day, in accordance with
Commerce’s practice, the deadline will
become the next business day. The
revised deadline for the final results of
this administrative review is now May
13, 2019.
Scope of the Order
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
(Commerce) determines that producers/
exporters subject to this review made
sales of subject merchandise at less than
normal value during the May 10, 2016,
through October 31, 2017, period of
review (POR).
DATES: Effective May 8, 2019.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Laurel LaCivita or Stephanie Berger,
AD/CVD Operations, Office III,
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401
Constitution Avenue NW, Washington,
DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–4243
and (202) 482–2483, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
The merchandise covered by this
order is circular welded austenitic
stainless pressure pipe not greater than
14 inches in outside diameter. For
purposes of this scope, references to size
are in nominal inches and include all
products within tolerances allowed by
pipe specifications. This merchandise
includes, but is not limited to, the
American Society for Testing and
Materials (ASTM) A–312 or ASTM
A–778 specifications, or comparable
domestic or foreign specifications.
ASTM A–358 products are only
included when they are produced to
meet ASTM A–312 or ASTM A–778
specifications, or comparable domestic
or foreign specifications.
The subject imports are normally
classified in subheadings 7306.40.5005,
7306.40.5040, 7306.40.5062,
7306.40.5064, and 7306.40.5085 of the
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the
United States (HTSUS). They may also
enter under HTSUS subheadings
7306.40.1010, 7306.40.1015,
7306.40.5042, 7306.40.5044,
7306.40.5080, and 7306.40.5090. The
HTSUS subheadings are provided for
convenience and customs purposes
only; the written description of the
scope of this order is dispositive.3
Background
Changes Since the Preliminary Results
Commerce published the Preliminary
Results of this administrative review of
the antidumping duty (AD) order on
welded stainless pressure pipe (WSPP)
from India on December 12, 2018.1 We
invited interested parties to comment on
the Preliminary Results; however, no
interested party submitted comments.
Commerce conducted this
administrative review in accordance
As no parties submitted comments on
the Preliminary Results, we made no
changes in the final results of this
review.
International Trade Administration
[A–533–867]
Appendix—Scope of the Investigation
VerDate Sep<11>2014
6907.30.3000, 6907.30.4000, 6907.30.9011,
6907.30.9051, 6907.40.1005, 6907.40.1011,
6907.40.1051, 6907.40.2000, 6907.40.3000,
6907.40.4000, 6907.40.9011, and
6907.40.9051. Subject merchandise may also
enter under subheadings of headings 6914
and 6905: 6914.10.8000, 6914.90.8000,
6905.10.0000, and 6905.90.0050. The HTSUS
subheadings are provided for convenience
and customs purposes only. The written
description of the scope of this investigation
is dispositive.
Welded Stainless Pressure Pipe From
India: Final Results of Antidumping
Duty Administrative Review; 2016–
2017
AGENCY:
1 See Welded Stainless Pressure Pipe from India:
Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review; 2016–2017, 83 FR 63827
(December 12, 2018) (Preliminary Results) and
accompanying memorandum, ‘‘Decision
Memorandum for the Preliminary Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: Welded
Stainless Pressure Pipe from India: 2016–2017,’’
dated December 3, 2018 (PDM).
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Final Results of the Review
Commerce determines that the
following weighted-average dumping
2 See memorandum to the Record from Gary
Taverman, Deputy Assistant Secretary for
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations,
performing the non-exclusive functions and duties
of the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance, ‘‘Deadlines Affected by the Partial
Shutdown of the Federal Government,’’ dated
January 28, 2019. All deadlines in this segment of
the proceeding have been extended by 40 days.
3 For the full text of the scope of the order, see
the PDM.
E:\FR\FM\08MYN1.SGM
08MYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 89 / Wednesday, May 8, 2019 / Notices
margins exist for the May 10, 2016,
through October 31, 2017 POR:
Exporter/producer
Bhandari Foils & Tubes, Ltd .......
Hindustan Inox, Ltd ....................
Apex Tubes Private Ltd ..............
Apurvi Industries .........................
Arihant Tubes .............................
Divine Tubes Pvt. Ltd .................
Heavy Metal & Tubes .................
J.S.S. Steelitalia Ltd ...................
Linkwell Seamless Tubes Private
Limited .....................................
Maxim Tubes Company Pvt. Ltd
MBM Tubes Pvt. Ltd ...................
Mukat Tanks & Vessel Ltd .........
Neotiss Ltd ..................................
Prakash Steelage Ltd .................
Quality Stainless Pvt. Ltd ...........
Raajratna Metal Industries Ltd ...
Ratnadeep Metal & Tubes Ltd ...
Ratnamani Metals & Tubes Ltd ..
Remi Edelstahl Tubulars ............
Shubhlaxmi Metals & Tubes Private Limited .............................
SLS Tubes Pvt. Ltd ....................
Steamline Industries Ltd .............
Estimated
weightedaverage
dumping
margin
(percent)
7.19
2.03
4 3.89
3.89
3.89
3.89
3.89
3.89
3.89
3.89
3.89
3.89
3.89
3.89
3.89
3.89
3.89
3.89
3.89
For the companies which were not
selected for individual review, we will
assign an assessment rate based on the
weighted average of the cash deposit
rates calculated for the companies
selected for individual review (i.e.,
Bhandari and Hindustan).
In accordance with Commerce’s
‘‘automatic assessment’’ practice, for
entries of subject merchandise during
the POR produced by each respondent
for which they did not know that their
merchandise was destined for the
United States, we will instruct CBP to
liquidate entries not reviewed at the allothers rate of 8.35 percent if there is no
rate for the intermediate company(ies)
involved in the transaction.6
We intend to issue instructions to
CBP 15 days after publication of these
final results of this review in the
Federal Register.
Cash Deposit Requirements
khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES
The following deposit requirements
will be effective upon publication of
this notice of final results of
3.89 administrative review in the Federal
3.89 Register for all shipments of WSPP from
3.89 India entered, or withdrawn from
warehouse, for consumption on or after
the date of publication provided by
Assessment Rates
section 751(a)(2) of the Act: (1) The cash
Pursuant to the final results of this
deposit rate for each company listed
review, Commerce determines, and U.S.
above will be equal to the dumping
Customs and Border Protection (CBP)
margins established in the final results
shall assess, antidumping duties on all
of this review; (2) for merchandise
appropriate entries of subject
exported by producers or exporters not
merchandise in accordance with section
covered in this administrative review
751(a)(2)(C) of the Act and 19 CFR
but covered in a prior segment of the
351.212(b).
proceeding, the cash deposit rate will
For the mandatory respondents (i.e.,
Bhandari Foils & Tubes, Ltd. (Bhandari) continue to be the company-specific rate
published for the most recently
and Hindustan Inox, Ltd. (Hindustan)),
completed segment of this proceeding in
as the weighted-average dumping
margins are not zero or de minimis (i.e., which the producer or exporter
participated; (3) if the exporter is not a
less than 0.5 percent), we calculated
firm covered in this review, a prior
importer-specific ad valorem AD
review, or the original less-than-fairassessment rates based on the ratio of
value investigation but the producer is,
the total amount of dumping calculated
the cash deposit rate will be the rate
for the importers’ examined sales to the
established for the most recently
total entered value of those same sales
completed segment of the proceeding
in accordance with 19 CFR
for the producer of the merchandise;
5
351.212(b)(1).
and (4) the cash deposit rate for all other
producers or exporters will continue to
4 This rate is based on the rates for the
be 8.35 percent, the all-others rate
respondents that were selected for individual
review, excluding rates that are zero, de minimis or
established in the antidumping
based entirely on facts available. See section
investigation.7 These deposit
735(c)(5)(A) of the Act; see also memorandum,
requirements,
when imposed, shall
‘‘Welded Stainless Pressure Pipe from India:
remain in effect until further notice.
Calculation of the All-Others Rate in the
Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review; 2016–2017,’’ dated
December 3, 2018.
5 In these preliminary results, Commerce applied
the assessment rate calculation method adopted in
Antidumping Proceedings. See Calculation of the
Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and
Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping
Proceedings: Final Modification, 77 FR 8101
(February 14, 2012).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:57 May 07, 2019
Jkt 247001
Notification to Importers
This notice serves as a final reminder
to importers of their responsibility
6 See Welded Stainless Pressure Pipe From India:
Antidumping Duty and Countervailing Duty Orders,
81 FR 81062 (November 17, 2016).
7 Id.
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
20099
under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a
certificate regarding the reimbursement
of antidumping and/or countervailing
duties prior to liquidation of the
relevant entries during this review
period. Failure to comply with this
requirement could result in the
Secretary’s presumption that
reimbursement of the antidumping and/
or countervailing duties occurred and
the subsequent assessment of double
antidumping duties.
Administrative Protective Order
This notice also serves as a reminder
to parties subject to administrative
protective order (APO) of their
responsibility concerning the return or
destruction of proprietary information
disclosed under the APO in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which
continues to govern business
proprietary information in this segment
of the proceeding. Timely written
notification of the return/destruction of
APO materials or conversion to judicial
protective order is hereby requested.
Failure to comply with the regulations
and terms of an APO is a violation
which is subject to sanction.
Notification to Interested Parties
We are issuing and publishing these
final results of administrative review in
accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and
777(i) of the Act and 19 CFR
351.221(b)(5).
Dated: May 1, 2019.
Jeffrey I. Kessler,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2019–09453 Filed 5–7–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–520–803]
Polyethylene Terephthalate Film,
Sheet, and Strip From the United Arab
Emirates: Final Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review; 2016–2017
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
(Commerce) determines that JBF RAK
LLC (JBF) made sales of subject
merchandise at less than normal value
during the period of review (POR),
November 1, 2016, through October 31,
2017.
DATES: May 8, 2019.
AGENCY:
E:\FR\FM\08MYN1.SGM
08MYN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 89 (Wednesday, May 8, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 20098-20099]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-09453]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-533-867]
Welded Stainless Pressure Pipe From India: Final Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2016-2017
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that
producers/exporters subject to this review made sales of subject
merchandise at less than normal value during the May 10, 2016, through
October 31, 2017, period of review (POR).
DATES: Effective May 8, 2019.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Laurel LaCivita or Stephanie Berger,
AD/CVD Operations, Office III, Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401
Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-4243
and (202) 482-2483, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Commerce published the Preliminary Results of this administrative
review of the antidumping duty (AD) order on welded stainless pressure
pipe (WSPP) from India on December 12, 2018.\1\ We invited interested
parties to comment on the Preliminary Results; however, no interested
party submitted comments. Commerce conducted this administrative review
in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and (2) of the Tariff Act of
1930, as amended (the Act).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Welded Stainless Pressure Pipe from India: Preliminary
Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2016-2017, 83 FR
63827 (December 12, 2018) (Preliminary Results) and accompanying
memorandum, ``Decision Memorandum for the Preliminary Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: Welded Stainless Pressure
Pipe from India: 2016-2017,'' dated December 3, 2018 (PDM).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Commerce exercised its discretion to toll all deadlines affected by
the partial federal government closure from December 22, 2018, through
the resumption of operations on January 29, 2019.\2\ If the new
deadline falls on a non-business day, in accordance with Commerce's
practice, the deadline will become the next business day. The revised
deadline for the final results of this administrative review is now May
13, 2019.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ See memorandum to the Record from Gary Taverman, Deputy
Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Operations, performing the non-exclusive functions and duties of the
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, ``Deadlines
Affected by the Partial Shutdown of the Federal Government,'' dated
January 28, 2019. All deadlines in this segment of the proceeding
have been extended by 40 days.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scope of the Order
The merchandise covered by this order is circular welded austenitic
stainless pressure pipe not greater than 14 inches in outside diameter.
For purposes of this scope, references to size are in nominal inches
and include all products within tolerances allowed by pipe
specifications. This merchandise includes, but is not limited to, the
American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) A-312 or ASTM A-778
specifications, or comparable domestic or foreign specifications. ASTM
A-358 products are only included when they are produced to meet ASTM A-
312 or ASTM A-778 specifications, or comparable domestic or foreign
specifications.
The subject imports are normally classified in subheadings
7306.40.5005, 7306.40.5040, 7306.40.5062, 7306.40.5064, and
7306.40.5085 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States
(HTSUS). They may also enter under HTSUS subheadings 7306.40.1010,
7306.40.1015, 7306.40.5042, 7306.40.5044, 7306.40.5080, and
7306.40.5090. The HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and
customs purposes only; the written description of the scope of this
order is dispositive.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ For the full text of the scope of the order, see the PDM.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Changes Since the Preliminary Results
As no parties submitted comments on the Preliminary Results, we
made no changes in the final results of this review.
Final Results of the Review
Commerce determines that the following weighted-average dumping
[[Page 20099]]
margins exist for the May 10, 2016, through October 31, 2017 POR:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ This rate is based on the rates for the respondents that
were selected for individual review, excluding rates that are zero,
de minimis or based entirely on facts available. See section
735(c)(5)(A) of the Act; see also memorandum, ``Welded Stainless
Pressure Pipe from India: Calculation of the All-Others Rate in the
Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2016-
2017,'' dated December 3, 2018.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Estimated
weighted-
average
Exporter/producer dumping
margin
(percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bhandari Foils & Tubes, Ltd................................. 7.19
Hindustan Inox, Ltd......................................... 2.03
Apex Tubes Private Ltd...................................... \4\ 3.89
Apurvi Industries........................................... 3.89
Arihant Tubes............................................... 3.89
Divine Tubes Pvt. Ltd....................................... 3.89
Heavy Metal & Tubes......................................... 3.89
J.S.S. Steelitalia Ltd...................................... 3.89
Linkwell Seamless Tubes Private Limited..................... 3.89
Maxim Tubes Company Pvt. Ltd................................ 3.89
MBM Tubes Pvt. Ltd.......................................... 3.89
Mukat Tanks & Vessel Ltd.................................... 3.89
Neotiss Ltd................................................. 3.89
Prakash Steelage Ltd........................................ 3.89
Quality Stainless Pvt. Ltd.................................. 3.89
Raajratna Metal Industries Ltd.............................. 3.89
Ratnadeep Metal & Tubes Ltd................................. 3.89
Ratnamani Metals & Tubes Ltd................................ 3.89
Remi Edelstahl Tubulars..................................... 3.89
Shubhlaxmi Metals & Tubes Private Limited................... 3.89
SLS Tubes Pvt. Ltd.......................................... 3.89
Steamline Industries Ltd.................................... 3.89
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assessment Rates
Pursuant to the final results of this review, Commerce determines,
and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) shall assess, antidumping
duties on all appropriate entries of subject merchandise in accordance
with section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.212(b).
For the mandatory respondents (i.e., Bhandari Foils & Tubes, Ltd.
(Bhandari) and Hindustan Inox, Ltd. (Hindustan)), as the weighted-
average dumping margins are not zero or de minimis (i.e., less than 0.5
percent), we calculated importer-specific ad valorem AD assessment
rates based on the ratio of the total amount of dumping calculated for
the importers' examined sales to the total entered value of those same
sales in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1).\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ In these preliminary results, Commerce applied the
assessment rate calculation method adopted in Antidumping
Proceedings. See Calculation of the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin
and Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping Proceedings: Final
Modification, 77 FR 8101 (February 14, 2012).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
For the companies which were not selected for individual review, we
will assign an assessment rate based on the weighted average of the
cash deposit rates calculated for the companies selected for individual
review (i.e., Bhandari and Hindustan).
In accordance with Commerce's ``automatic assessment'' practice,
for entries of subject merchandise during the POR produced by each
respondent for which they did not know that their merchandise was
destined for the United States, we will instruct CBP to liquidate
entries not reviewed at the all-others rate of 8.35 percent if there is
no rate for the intermediate company(ies) involved in the
transaction.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ See Welded Stainless Pressure Pipe From India: Antidumping
Duty and Countervailing Duty Orders, 81 FR 81062 (November 17,
2016).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
We intend to issue instructions to CBP 15 days after publication of
these final results of this review in the Federal Register.
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following deposit requirements will be effective upon
publication of this notice of final results of administrative review in
the Federal Register for all shipments of WSPP from India entered, or
withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the date of
publication provided by section 751(a)(2) of the Act: (1) The cash
deposit rate for each company listed above will be equal to the dumping
margins established in the final results of this review; (2) for
merchandise exported by producers or exporters not covered in this
administrative review but covered in a prior segment of the proceeding,
the cash deposit rate will continue to be the company-specific rate
published for the most recently completed segment of this proceeding in
which the producer or exporter participated; (3) if the exporter is not
a firm covered in this review, a prior review, or the original less-
than-fair-value investigation but the producer is, the cash deposit
rate will be the rate established for the most recently completed
segment of the proceeding for the producer of the merchandise; and (4)
the cash deposit rate for all other producers or exporters will
continue to be 8.35 percent, the all-others rate established in the
antidumping investigation.\7\ These deposit requirements, when imposed,
shall remain in effect until further notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Notification to Importers
This notice serves as a final reminder to importers of their
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping and/or countervailing duties
prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this review period.
Failure to comply with this requirement could result in the Secretary's
presumption that reimbursement of the antidumping and/or countervailing
duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of double antidumping
duties.
Administrative Protective Order
This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility
concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information
disclosed under the APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which
continues to govern business proprietary information in this segment of
the proceeding. Timely written notification of the return/destruction
of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby
requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO
is a violation which is subject to sanction.
Notification to Interested Parties
We are issuing and publishing these final results of administrative
review in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Act and
19 CFR 351.221(b)(5).
Dated: May 1, 2019.
Jeffrey I. Kessler,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2019-09453 Filed 5-7-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
