Self-Regulatory Organizations; BOX Exchange LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To Amend the Fee Schedule on the BOX Options Market LLC (“BOX”) Facility To Modify Its Strategy QOO Order Fee Cap and Rebate, 19133-19135 [2019-09017]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 86 / Friday, May 3, 2019 / Notices
amozie on DSK9F9SC42PROD with NOTICES
04, ‘‘Risk-Informed Performance-Based
Guidance for Non-Light Water Reactor
Licensing Basis Development,’’ as one
acceptable method for determining the
appropriate scope and level of detail for
parts of applications for licenses,
certifications, and approvals for nonLWRs. NEI 18–04 outlines an approach
for use by reactor developers to select
licensing basis events; classify
structures, systems, and components;
determine special treatments and
programmatic controls; and assess the
adequacy of a design in terms of
providing layers of defense in depth.
The methodology described in NEI 18–
04 and the draft RG also provide a
general methodology for identifying an
appropriate scope and depth of
information to be provided in
applications to the NRC for licenses,
certifications, and approvals for nonLWRs.
III. Backfitting and Issue Finality
Draft regulatory guide, DG–1353, if
finalized as a new regulatory guide,
would provide guidance for informing
the licensing basis and content of
applications for non-LWRs. The
selection of licensing-basis events;
classification and special treatments of
structures, systems, and components;
and assessment of defense in depth are
fundamental to the safe design of nonLWRs. These activities also support
identifying the appropriate scope and
depth of information provided in
applications for licenses, certifications,
and approvals required under part 50 of
title 10 of the Code of Federal
Regulations (10 CFR), ‘‘Domestic
Licensing of Production and Utilization
Facilities,’’ and 10 CFR part 52,
‘‘Licenses, Certifications, and Approvals
for Nuclear Power Plants.’’ The
methodology outlined in DG–1353 and
NEI 18–04 provide guidance intended to
support the design and licensing of nonLWRs.
The DG, if finalized, would not
constitute regulatory requirements. For
this reason, issuance of DG–1353, if
finalized, would not constitute
backfitting under 10 CFR 50.109 (the
‘‘Backfit Rule’’). Future applicants may
choose to follow the guidance or utilize
another approach in developing
applications for licenses, certifications,
or approvals. Applicants and potential
applicants are not, with certain
exceptions, protected by either the
Backfit Rule or any issue finality
provisions under 10 CFR part 52.
Neither the Backfit Rule nor the issue
finality provisions under 10 CFR part
52—with certain exclusions discussed
below—were intended to apply to every
NRC action which substantially changes
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:41 May 02, 2019
Jkt 247001
the expectations of current and future
applicants. Therefore, the positions in
any regulatory guide, if imposed on
applicants under 10 CFR 50.34(a)(3),
52.47(a)(3), 52.79(a)(4), 52.137(a)(3), or
52.157(a), would not represent
backfitting or a violation of issue finality
(except as discussed below).
The exceptions to the general
principle are applicable whenever a
combined license applicant references a
10 CFR part 52 license (i.e., an early site
permit or a manufacturing license) and/
or 10 CFR part 52 regulatory approval
(i.e., a design certification rule or design
approval). There are no current nonLWR applicants or holders of licenses or
design certifications for non-LWR
designs. Therefore, issuance of DG–1353
in final form would not constitute a
violation of issue finality.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 30th day
of April, 2019.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Thomas H. Boyce,
Chief, Regulatory Guidance and Generic
Issues Branch, Division of Engineering, Office
of Nuclear Regulatory Research.
[FR Doc. 2019–09089 Filed 5–2–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
POSTAL SERVICE
Temporary Emergency Committee of
the Board of Governors; Sunshine Act
Meeting
Thursday, May 9,
2019, at 11:00 a.m.; and Friday, May 10,
2019, at 9:00 a.m.
PLACE: Indianapolis, Indiana, at the
Hyatt Regency Indianapolis Hotel, 1
South Capitol Avenue, Indianapolis,
Indiana 46204, in the Cosmopolitan A
Room.
STATUS: Thursday, May 9, 2019, at 11:00
a.m.–Closed; Friday, May 10, 2019, at
9:00 a.m.–Open.
MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:
19133
3. Approval of Minutes of Previous
Meetings.
4. Committee Reports.
5. Quarterly Financial Report.
6. Quarterly Service Performance
Report.
7. Approval of Tentative Agenda for
August meetings.
A public comment period will begin
immediately following the adjournment
of the open session on May 10, 2019.
During the public comment period,
which shall not exceed 30 minutes,
members of the public may comment on
any item or subject listed on the agenda
for the open session above. Registration
of speakers at the public comment
period is required. Speakers may
register online at https://
www.surveymonkey.com/r/BOG-5-1019. Onsite registration will be available
until thirty minutes before the meeting
starts. No more than three minutes shall
be allotted to each speaker. The time
allotted to each speaker will be
determined after registration closes.
Participation in the public comment
period is governed by 39 CFR 232.1(n).
CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:
Acting Secretary of the Board, U.S.
Postal Service, 475 L’Enfant Plaza SW,
Washington, DC 20260–1000.
Telephone: (202) 268–4800.
Michael J. Elston,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2019–09247 Filed 5–1–19; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 7710–12–P
DATES AND TIMES:
Thursday, May 9, 2019, at 11:00 a.m.
(Closed)
1. Strategic Issues.
2. Financial Matters.
3. Compensation and Personnel
Matters.
4. Executive Session—Discussion of
prior agenda items and Board
governance.
Friday, May 10, 2019, at 9:00 a.m.
(Open)
1. Remarks of the Chairman of the
Temporary Emergency Committee of the
Board.
2. Remarks of the Postmaster General
and CEO.
PO 00000
Frm 00104
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–85744; File No. SR–BOX–
2019–14]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; BOX
Exchange LLC; Notice of Filing and
Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed
Rule Change To Amend the Fee
Schedule on the BOX Options Market
LLC (‘‘BOX’’) Facility To Modify Its
Strategy QOO Order Fee Cap and
Rebate
April 29, 2019.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on April 17,
2019, BOX Exchange LLC (the
‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule
change as described in Items I, II, and
III below, which Items have been
prepared by the Exchange. The
1 15
2 17
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
CFR 240.19b–4.
E:\FR\FM\03MYN1.SGM
03MYN1
19134
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 86 / Friday, May 3, 2019 / Notices
Exchange filed the proposed rule change
pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the
Act,3 and Rule 19b–4(f)(2) thereunder,4
which renders the proposal effective
upon filing with the Commission. The
Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule
change from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of the Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange is filing with the
Securities and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) a proposed rule change
to amend the Fee Schedule on the BOX
Options Market LLC (‘‘BOX’’) options
facility. While changes to the fee
schedule pursuant to this proposal will
be effective upon filing, the changes will
become operative on May 1, 2019. The
text of the proposed rule change is
available from the principal office of the
Exchange, at the Commission’s Public
Reference Room and also on the
Exchange’s internet website at https://
boxexchange.com.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for
the proposed rule change and discussed
any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these
statements may be examined at the
places specified in Item IV below. The
Exchange has prepared summaries, set
forth in Sections A, B, and C below, of
the most significant aspects of such
statements.
amozie on DSK9F9SC42PROD with NOTICES
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes to amend the
Fee Schedule for trading on BOX to
amend Section II.D (Strategy QOO Order
Fee Cap and Rebate). Currently, the
Exchange caps fees and offers rebates on
all dividend, short stock interest,
reversal, conversion, jelly roll, and box
spread strategies on the BOX Trading
Floor. The Exchange is now proposing
to cap fees and offer a Floor Broker
rebate for merger strategy transactions.
A ‘‘merger strategy’’ is defined as a
transaction done to achieve a merger
arbitrage involving the purchase, sale
and exercise of options of the same class
and expiration date, each executed prior
3 15
4 17
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
CFR 240.19b–4(f)(2).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:41 May 02, 2019
Jkt 247001
to the date on which shareholders of
record are required to elect their
respective form of consideration, i.e.,
cash or stock. The Exchange proposes to
include this definition in a footnote in
the BOX Fee Schedule along with the
other definitions of the strategies in
Section II.D.
The Exchange proposes to offer a
strategy cap for merger strategies.
Today, Floor Participant transactions
are capped at $1,000 for all short stock
interest, reversal, conversion, jelly roll,
and box spread strategies executed on
the same trading day.5 The Exchange
proposes to include merger strategies in
the daily Strategy QOO Order Fee Cap
and Rebate. As such, Floor Participant
transactions will also be capped at
$1,000 for all merger strategies executed
on the same trading day. Further, the
Exchange proposes to include merger
strategies in the Floor Broker Strategy
QOO Rebate. As proposed, on each
trading day, Floor Brokers are eligible to
receive a $500 rebate for presenting
certain Strategy QOO Orders on the
Trading Floor. The rebate will be
applied once the $1,000 fee cap for all
dividend, short stock interest, reversal,
merger, conversion, jelly roll, and box
spread strategies is met.
The Exchange notes that the fee cap
discussed herein exists at another
options exchange in the industry.6
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that the
proposal is consistent with the
requirements of Section 6(b) of the Act,
in general, and Section 6(b)(4) and
6(b)(5) of the Act,7 in particular, in that
it provides for the equitable allocation
of reasonable dues, fees, and other
charges among BOX Participants and
other persons using its facilities and
does not unfairly discriminate between
customers, issuers, brokers or dealers.
The Exchange believes that including
merger strategies in Section II.D of the
BOX Fee Schedule is reasonable, as
another exchange offers fee caps for
merger strategies, namely Cboe.8
Moreover, the Exchange believes the
proposed fees are reasonable in
comparison because BOX’s fee cap for
merger strategies is identical to Cboe’s
fee cap. Further, the Exchange believes
that including merger strategies in the
5 Short stock interest, reversal, conversion, jelly
roll and box spread transactions are not included
in the monthly fee cap for Broker Dealers.
6 See Cboe Exchange Inc. (‘‘Cboe’’) Fee Schedule
Footnote 13. At Cboe, market-maker, Clearing
Trading Permit Holder, JBO participant, brokerdealer and non-Trading Permit Holder marketmaker transaction fees are capped at $1,000 for all
merger strategies.
7 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4) and (5).
8 See supra note 6.
PO 00000
Frm 00105
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Strategy QOO Order rebate is
appropriate as Floor Brokers are eligible
to receive a $500 rebate for presenting
all other strategies to the BOX Trading
Floor.
The Exchange believes that the
proposed fee cap for merger strategies is
equitable and not unfairly
discriminatory because it provides
incentives for all Participants to submit
these types of strategy orders to the BOX
Trading Floor, which brings increased
liquidity and order flow to the floor for
the benefit of all market participants.
Further, the Exchange believes that
including merger strategies in the
Strategy QOO Order rebate is equitable
and not unfairly discriminatory as the
rebate is available to all Floor Brokers
who submit such orders to the BOX
Trading Floor.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that
the proposed rule change will impose
any burden on competition not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act because the
proposed change applies uniformly to
all Participants that incur transaction
fees for merger strategies. Further,
another options exchange today offer
[sic] caps on merger strategies; therefore,
the Exchange believes that the proposal
is consistent with robust competition
and does not provide any unnecessary
burden on competition. Further,
because Floor Participants pay Floor
Brokers to execute trades on the
Exchange floor, the Exchange believes
that offering fee caps on merger
strategies to Participants executing floor
transactions and not electronic
executions does not create an
unnecessary burden on competition
because the fee cap defrays brokerage
costs associated with executing merger
strategy transactions, similar to other
strategies today.
The Exchange operates in a highly
competitive market in which market
participants can easily and readily
direct order flow to competing venues if
they deem fee levels at a particular
venue to be excessive or rebates to be
inadequate. Accordingly, the fee cap
and Floor Broker rebate for short stock
interest [sic] strategies proposed by the
Exchange, as described in the proposal,
are influenced by these robust market
forces and therefore must remain
competitive with fee caps at other
venues and therefore must continue to
be reasonable and equitably allocated to
those Participants that opt to direct
orders to the Exchange rather than
competing venues.
E:\FR\FM\03MYN1.SGM
03MYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 86 / Friday, May 3, 2019 / Notices
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were either
solicited or received.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing rule change has become
effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Exchange Act 9 and
Rule 19b–4(f)(2) thereunder,10 because
it establishes or changes a due, or fee.
At any time within 60 days of the
filing of the proposed rule change, the
Commission summarily may
temporarily suspend the rule change if
it appears to the Commission that the
action is necessary or appropriate in the
public interest, for the protection of
investors, or would otherwise further
the purposes of the Act. If the
Commission takes such action, the
Commission shall institute proceedings
to determine whether the proposed rule
should be approved or disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
amozie on DSK9F9SC42PROD with NOTICES
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include File Number SR–
BOX–2019–14 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Secretary, Securities and Exchange
Commission, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–BOX–2019–14. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
internet website (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for website viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549 on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such
filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change.
Persons submitting comments are
cautioned that we do not redact or edit
personal identifying information from
comment submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish
to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File
Number SR–BOX–2019–14, and should
be submitted on or before May 24, 2019.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.11
Eduardo A. Aleman,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2019–09017 Filed 5–2–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–85745; File No. SR–
NASDAQ–2019–032]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; The
Nasdaq Stock Market LLC; Notice of
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of
Proposed Rule Change To Delay
Implementation of the Early Order
Imbalance Information Functionality
April 29, 2019.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on April 16,
2019, The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC
(‘‘Nasdaq’’ or ‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule
change as described in Items I and II
below, which Items have been prepared
by the Exchange. The Commission is
publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change
from interested persons.
11 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
9 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
10 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(2).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:41 May 02, 2019
1 15
Jkt 247001
PO 00000
Frm 00106
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
19135
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to delay
implementation of the Early Order
Imbalance Information functionality
until Q3 2019.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for
the proposed rule change and discussed
any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these
statements may be examined at the
places specified in Item IV below. The
Exchange has prepared summaries, set
forth in sections A, B, and C below, of
the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
On February 27, 2019, the Exchange
filed a proposed rule change to establish
the Early Order Imbalance Indicator
(‘‘EOII’’), which contains a subset of the
information comprising the Net Order
Imbalance Indicator (‘‘NOII’’) that the
Exchange will disseminate ten minutes
prior to the market close and five
minutes prior to the cutoff time for
entering Market on Close and certain
Limit on Close Orders into the Nasdaq
Closing Cross.3 The proposed rule
change indicated that the Exchange
would implement EOII in Q2 2019.4 The
Exchange proposes to delay the
implementation of EOII functionality
until Q3 2019. The Exchange will issue
an Equity Trader Alert notifying
participants prior to implementing the
functionality. The Exchange proposes
this delay to allow the Exchange time to
consider whether to propose, as part of
a separate rule filing, a related
enhancement to the Closing Cross
process that would be implemented in
conjunction with EOII.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that its
proposal is consistent with Section 6(b)
of the Act,5 in general, and furthers the
3 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 34–
85292 (Mar. 12, 2019), 84 FR 9848 (Mar. 18, 2019)
(SR–NASDAQ–2019–010).
4 See id. at 9850.
5 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
E:\FR\FM\03MYN1.SGM
03MYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 86 (Friday, May 3, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 19133-19135]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-09017]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-85744; File No. SR-BOX-2019-14]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; BOX Exchange LLC; Notice of Filing
and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To Amend the Fee
Schedule on the BOX Options Market LLC (``BOX'') Facility To Modify Its
Strategy QOO Order Fee Cap and Rebate
April 29, 2019.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(the ``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given
that on April 17, 2019, BOX Exchange LLC (the ``Exchange'') filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'') the proposed
rule change as described in Items I, II, and III below, which Items
have been prepared by the Exchange. The
[[Page 19134]]
Exchange filed the proposed rule change pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act,\3\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(2) thereunder,\4\
which renders the proposal effective upon filing with the Commission.
The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the
proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
\3\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
\4\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of the
Substance of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange is filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'') a proposed rule change to amend the Fee Schedule on
the BOX Options Market LLC (``BOX'') options facility. While changes to
the fee schedule pursuant to this proposal will be effective upon
filing, the changes will become operative on May 1, 2019. The text of
the proposed rule change is available from the principal office of the
Exchange, at the Commission's Public Reference Room and also on the
Exchange's internet website at https://boxexchange.com.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
Sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes to amend the Fee Schedule for trading on BOX
to amend Section II.D (Strategy QOO Order Fee Cap and Rebate).
Currently, the Exchange caps fees and offers rebates on all dividend,
short stock interest, reversal, conversion, jelly roll, and box spread
strategies on the BOX Trading Floor. The Exchange is now proposing to
cap fees and offer a Floor Broker rebate for merger strategy
transactions.
A ``merger strategy'' is defined as a transaction done to achieve a
merger arbitrage involving the purchase, sale and exercise of options
of the same class and expiration date, each executed prior to the date
on which shareholders of record are required to elect their respective
form of consideration, i.e., cash or stock. The Exchange proposes to
include this definition in a footnote in the BOX Fee Schedule along
with the other definitions of the strategies in Section II.D.
The Exchange proposes to offer a strategy cap for merger
strategies. Today, Floor Participant transactions are capped at $1,000
for all short stock interest, reversal, conversion, jelly roll, and box
spread strategies executed on the same trading day.\5\ The Exchange
proposes to include merger strategies in the daily Strategy QOO Order
Fee Cap and Rebate. As such, Floor Participant transactions will also
be capped at $1,000 for all merger strategies executed on the same
trading day. Further, the Exchange proposes to include merger
strategies in the Floor Broker Strategy QOO Rebate. As proposed, on
each trading day, Floor Brokers are eligible to receive a $500 rebate
for presenting certain Strategy QOO Orders on the Trading Floor. The
rebate will be applied once the $1,000 fee cap for all dividend, short
stock interest, reversal, merger, conversion, jelly roll, and box
spread strategies is met.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ Short stock interest, reversal, conversion, jelly roll and
box spread transactions are not included in the monthly fee cap for
Broker Dealers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange notes that the fee cap discussed herein exists at
another options exchange in the industry.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ See Cboe Exchange Inc. (``Cboe'') Fee Schedule Footnote 13.
At Cboe, market-maker, Clearing Trading Permit Holder, JBO
participant, broker-dealer and non-Trading Permit Holder market-
maker transaction fees are capped at $1,000 for all merger
strategies.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that the proposal is consistent with the
requirements of Section 6(b) of the Act, in general, and Section
6(b)(4) and 6(b)(5) of the Act,\7\ in particular, in that it provides
for the equitable allocation of reasonable dues, fees, and other
charges among BOX Participants and other persons using its facilities
and does not unfairly discriminate between customers, issuers, brokers
or dealers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4) and (5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange believes that including merger strategies in Section
II.D of the BOX Fee Schedule is reasonable, as another exchange offers
fee caps for merger strategies, namely Cboe.\8\ Moreover, the Exchange
believes the proposed fees are reasonable in comparison because BOX's
fee cap for merger strategies is identical to Cboe's fee cap. Further,
the Exchange believes that including merger strategies in the Strategy
QOO Order rebate is appropriate as Floor Brokers are eligible to
receive a $500 rebate for presenting all other strategies to the BOX
Trading Floor.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ See supra note 6.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange believes that the proposed fee cap for merger
strategies is equitable and not unfairly discriminatory because it
provides incentives for all Participants to submit these types of
strategy orders to the BOX Trading Floor, which brings increased
liquidity and order flow to the floor for the benefit of all market
participants. Further, the Exchange believes that including merger
strategies in the Strategy QOO Order rebate is equitable and not
unfairly discriminatory as the rebate is available to all Floor Brokers
who submit such orders to the BOX Trading Floor.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act because the proposed change
applies uniformly to all Participants that incur transaction fees for
merger strategies. Further, another options exchange today offer [sic]
caps on merger strategies; therefore, the Exchange believes that the
proposal is consistent with robust competition and does not provide any
unnecessary burden on competition. Further, because Floor Participants
pay Floor Brokers to execute trades on the Exchange floor, the Exchange
believes that offering fee caps on merger strategies to Participants
executing floor transactions and not electronic executions does not
create an unnecessary burden on competition because the fee cap defrays
brokerage costs associated with executing merger strategy transactions,
similar to other strategies today.
The Exchange operates in a highly competitive market in which
market participants can easily and readily direct order flow to
competing venues if they deem fee levels at a particular venue to be
excessive or rebates to be inadequate. Accordingly, the fee cap and
Floor Broker rebate for short stock interest [sic] strategies proposed
by the Exchange, as described in the proposal, are influenced by these
robust market forces and therefore must remain competitive with fee
caps at other venues and therefore must continue to be reasonable and
equitably allocated to those Participants that opt to direct orders to
the Exchange rather than competing venues.
[[Page 19135]]
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were either solicited or received.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Exchange Act \9\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(2)
thereunder,\10\ because it establishes or changes a due, or fee.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
\10\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend the rule
change if it appears to the Commission that the action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
would otherwise further the purposes of the Act. If the Commission
takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings to
determine whether the proposed rule should be approved or disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an email to [email protected]. Please include
File Number SR-BOX-2019-14 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-BOX-2019-14. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's internet website (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml).
Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written
statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with
the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed
rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those
that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions
of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and printing in
the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC
20549 on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and
3:00 p.m. Copies of such filing also will be available for inspection
and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change. Persons submitting comments are
cautioned that we do not redact or edit personal identifying
information from comment submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR-BOX-2019-14, and should be submitted on
or before May 24, 2019.
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eduardo A. Aleman,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2019-09017 Filed 5-2-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P