Certain Microperforated Packaging Containing Fresh Produce (II); Commission Determination Not To Review an Initial Determination Granting a Motion To Terminate the Investigation With Respect to Respondent Growers Express, LLC.; Termination of the Investigation, 14673 [2019-07190]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 70 / Thursday, April 11, 2019 / Notices public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be able to do so. Authority: 43 CFR 1784.4–2. Jeff Kitchens, Deschutes District Manager. [FR Doc. 2019–07134 Filed 4–10–19; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4310–33–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation No. 337–TA–1127] Certain Microperforated Packaging Containing Fresh Produce (II); Commission Determination Not To Review an Initial Determination Granting a Motion To Terminate the Investigation With Respect to Respondent Growers Express, LLC.; Termination of the Investigation U.S. International Trade Commission. ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has determined not to review an initial determination (‘‘ID’’) (Order No. 7) of the presiding administrative law judge (‘‘ALJ’’), granting complainant’s motion to terminate the investigation as to respondent Growers Express, LLC (‘‘Growers Express’’) based on a settlement and license agreement. The investigation is terminated in its entirety. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Cathy Chen, Esq., Office of the General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205–2392. Copies of non-confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are or will be available for inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205–2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at https:// edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on (202) 205–1810. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted this investigation on August 16, 2018, based on a amozie on DSK9F9SC42PROD with NOTICES SUMMARY: VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:50 Apr 10, 2019 Jkt 247001 complaint filed on behalf of Windham Packaging, LLC (‘‘Windham’’) of Windham, New Hampshire. 83 FR 40787 (Aug. 16, 2018). The complaint alleges violations of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, in the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, or the sale within the United States after importation of certain microperforated packaging containing fresh produce by reason of infringement of certain claims of U.S. Patent No. 7,083,837. Id. The complaint further alleges that a domestic industry exists. Id. The Commission’s notice of investigation named as respondents C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. (‘‘C.H. Robinson’’) of Eden Prairie, Minnesota and Growers Express of Salinas, California. Id. at 40788. Respondent C.H. Robinson has been terminated from the investigation based on Windham’s withdrawal of the allegations of the complaint pursuant to Commission Rule 210.21(a) (19 CFR 210.21(a)). See Order No. 6 at 1 (Feb. 25, 2019), Comm’n Notice (Mar. 11, 2019). On February 19, 2019, Windham filed an unopposed motion to terminate the investigation as to Growers Express based on a settlement and license agreement between Windham and Growers Express. On March 14, 2019, the ALJ issued the subject ID granting the motion pursuant to Commission Rule 210.21(b)(1) (19 CFR 210.21(b)(1)). Order No. 7 at 2 (Mar. 14, 2019). The ALJ found that the motion complies with the Commission’s rules, and there is no evidence that terminating this investigation as to Growers Express based on a settlement and license agreement would be contrary to the public interest. Id. at 1–2. The subject ID indicates that Growers Express is the last remaining respondent. Id. at 2 n.1. No petitions for review were filed. The Commission has determined not to review the subject ID. The investigation is terminated in its entirety. The authority for the Commission’s determination is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in Part 210 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR part 210). By order of the Commission. Issued: April 8, 2019. Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 2019–07190 Filed 4–10–19; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P PO 00000 Frm 00032 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 14673 INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation Nos. 731–TA–1435–1440 (Preliminary)] Acetone From Belgium, Korea, Saudi Arabia, Singapore, South Africa, and Spain Determination On the basis of the record 1 developed in the subject investigations, the United States International Trade Commission (‘‘Commission’’) determines, pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930 (‘‘the Act’’), that there is a reasonable indication that an industry in the United States is materially injured by reason of imports of acetone from Belgium, Korea, Singapore, South Africa, and Spain, provided for in subheading 2914.11.10 and 2914.11.50 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States, that are alleged to be sold in the United States at less than fair value (‘‘LTFV’’).2 In addition, the Commission terminates the antidumping duty investigation on acetone from Saudi Arabia. Commencement of Final Phase Investigation Pursuant to section 207.18 of the Commission’s rules, the Commission also gives notice of the commencement of the final phase of its investigations. The Commission will issue a final phase notice of scheduling, which will be published in the Federal Register as provided in section 207.21 of the Commission’s rules, upon notice from the U.S. Department of Commerce (‘‘Commerce’’) of an affirmative preliminary determination in the investigation under section 733(b) of the Act, or, if the preliminary determination is negative, upon notice of an affirmative final determination in that investigation under section 735(a) of the Act. Parties that filed entries of appearance in the preliminary phase of the investigations need not enter a separate appearance for the final phase of the investigation. Industrial users, and, if the merchandise under investigation is sold at the retail level, representative consumer organizations have the right to appear as parties in Commission antidumping and countervailing duty investigations. The Secretary will prepare a public service list containing the names and addresses 1 The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 207.2(f)). 2 Acetone from Belgium, the Republic of Korea, the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, Singapore, the Republic of South Africa, and Spain: Initiation of Less-Than-Fair-Value Investigations, 84 FR 9755 (March 18, 2019). E:\FR\FM\11APN1.SGM 11APN1

Agencies

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 70 (Thursday, April 11, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Page 14673]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-07190]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation No. 337-TA-1127]


Certain Microperforated Packaging Containing Fresh Produce (II); 
Commission Determination Not To Review an Initial Determination 
Granting a Motion To Terminate the Investigation With Respect to 
Respondent Growers Express, LLC.; Termination of the Investigation

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade 
Commission has determined not to review an initial determination 
(``ID'') (Order No. 7) of the presiding administrative law judge 
(``ALJ''), granting complainant's motion to terminate the investigation 
as to respondent Growers Express, LLC (``Growers Express'') based on a 
settlement and license agreement. The investigation is terminated in 
its entirety.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Cathy Chen, Esq., Office of the 
General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, 
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205-2392. Copies of non-
confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are 
or will be available for inspection during official business hours 
(8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. 
International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, Washington, DC 20436, 
telephone (202) 205-2000. General information concerning the Commission 
may also be obtained by accessing its internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be viewed 
on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. 
Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter 
can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on (202) 
205-1810.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted this investigation 
on August 16, 2018, based on a complaint filed on behalf of Windham 
Packaging, LLC (``Windham'') of Windham, New Hampshire. 83 FR 40787 
(Aug. 16, 2018). The complaint alleges violations of section 337 of the 
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, in the importation into 
the United States, the sale for importation, or the sale within the 
United States after importation of certain microperforated packaging 
containing fresh produce by reason of infringement of certain claims of 
U.S. Patent No. 7,083,837. Id. The complaint further alleges that a 
domestic industry exists. Id. The Commission's notice of investigation 
named as respondents C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. (``C.H. Robinson'') 
of Eden Prairie, Minnesota and Growers Express of Salinas, California. 
Id. at 40788.
    Respondent C.H. Robinson has been terminated from the investigation 
based on Windham's withdrawal of the allegations of the complaint 
pursuant to Commission Rule 210.21(a) (19 CFR 210.21(a)). See Order No. 
6 at 1 (Feb. 25, 2019), Comm'n Notice (Mar. 11, 2019).
    On February 19, 2019, Windham filed an unopposed motion to 
terminate the investigation as to Growers Express based on a settlement 
and license agreement between Windham and Growers Express.
    On March 14, 2019, the ALJ issued the subject ID granting the 
motion pursuant to Commission Rule 210.21(b)(1) (19 CFR 210.21(b)(1)). 
Order No. 7 at 2 (Mar. 14, 2019). The ALJ found that the motion 
complies with the Commission's rules, and there is no evidence that 
terminating this investigation as to Growers Express based on a 
settlement and license agreement would be contrary to the public 
interest. Id. at 1-2. The subject ID indicates that Growers Express is 
the last remaining respondent. Id. at 2 n.1. No petitions for review 
were filed.
    The Commission has determined not to review the subject ID. The 
investigation is terminated in its entirety.
    The authority for the Commission's determination is contained in 
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and 
in Part 210 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 
part 210).

    By order of the Commission.

    Issued: April 8, 2019.
Lisa Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2019-07190 Filed 4-10-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 7020-02-P

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.