Self-Regulatory Organizations; Miami International Securities Exchange LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To Amend Its Fee Schedule, 14438-14441 [2019-07049]
Download as PDF
14438
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 69 / Wednesday, April 10, 2019 / Notices
Rule 19b–4(f)(6)(iii),36 the Commission
may designate a shorter time if such
action is consistent with the protection
of investors and the public interest. The
Exchange has asked the Commission to
waive the 30-day operative delay so that
the proposal may become operative
upon filing. The Exchange states that
the proposed changes are primarily
intended to update and reorganize the
Exchange’s existing membership rules
and processes. Further, the Exchange
states these rules are intended to
streamline and clarify processes and
also eliminate unused and outdated
provisions. The Exchange states the
effect of these changes will make the
membership process less burdensome
for Applicants, Members, and
Associated Persons while not limiting
the Exchange’s ability to appropriately
scrutinize prospective and existing
Members and Associated Persons. For
the foregoing reasons, the Commission
believes that waiving the 30-day
operative delay is consistent with the
protection of investors and the public
interest and, therefore, the Commission
designates the proposed rule change to
be operative upon filing.37
At any time within 60 days of the
filing of the proposed rule change, the
Commission summarily may
temporarily suspend such rule change if
it appears to the Commission that such
action is necessary or appropriate in the
public interest, for the protection of
investors, or otherwise in furtherance of
the purposes of the Act. If the
Commission takes such action, the
Commission shall institute proceedings
to determine whether the proposed rule
should be approved or disapproved.
jbell on DSK30RV082PROD with NOTICES
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Secretary, Securities and Exchange
Commission, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–NASDAQ–2019–022. This
file number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
internet website (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for website viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the
filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change.
Persons submitting comments are
cautioned that we do not edit personal
identifying information from comment
submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR–
NASDAQ–2019–022 and should be
submitted on or before May 1, 2019.
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.38
Eduardo A. Aleman,
Deputy Secretary.
Electronic Comments
[FR Doc. 2019–07050 Filed 4–9–19; 8:45 am]
• Use the Commission’s internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include File Number SR–
NASDAQ–2019–022 on the subject line.
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
36 17
CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6)(iii).
purposes only of waiving the 30-day
operative delay, the Commission has also
considered the proposed rule’s impact on
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See
15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
37 For
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:36 Apr 09, 2019
Jkt 247001
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–85512; File No. SR–MIAX–
2019–17]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Miami
International Securities Exchange LLC;
Notice of Filing and Immediate
Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule
Change To Amend Its Fee Schedule
April 4, 2019.
Pursuant to the provisions of Section
19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 (‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4
thereunder,2 notice is hereby given that
on March 27, 2019, Miami International
Securities Exchange LLC (‘‘MIAX
Options’’ or ‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) a proposed rule change
as described in Items I, II, and III below,
which Items have been prepared by the
Exchange. The Commission is
publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change
from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange is filing a proposal to
amend the MIAX Options Fee Schedule
(the ‘‘Fee Schedule’’) to amend its fees
and rebates for Qualified Contingent
Cross (‘‘QCC’’) orders and Complex
Qualified Contingent Cross (‘‘cQCC’’)
orders.
The text of the proposed rule change
is available on the Exchange’s website at
https://www.miaxoptions.com/rulefilings, at MIAX’s principal office, and
at the Commission’s Public Reference
Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for
the proposed rule change and discussed
any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these
statements may be examined at the
places specified in Item IV below. The
Exchange has prepared summaries, set
forth in sections A, B, and C below, of
the most significant aspects of such
statements.
1 15
38 17
PO 00000
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
Frm 00100
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
2 17
E:\FR\FM\10APN1.SGM
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
CFR 240.19b–4.
10APN1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 69 / Wednesday, April 10, 2019 / Notices
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
jbell on DSK30RV082PROD with NOTICES
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes to amend
Sections 1(a)(vii) and (viii) of the Fee
Schedule to amend its fees and rebates
for QCC and cQCC Orders. A QCC Order
is comprised of an order to buy or sell
at least 1,000 contracts that is identified
as being part of a qualified contingent
trade, coupled with a contra side order
to buy or sell an equal number of
contracts.3 Currently, the Exchange
assesses a transaction fee for all types of
market participants other than Priority
Customer 4 for QCC Orders of $0.15 per
contract (Priority Customer orders are
assessed a charge of $0.00 per contract)
for the Initiator and the Contra-side. In
addition, the Exchange currently pays a
$0.10 per contract rebate for the
initiating order, regardless of the type of
market participant. The rebate is paid to
the Member 5 that enters the order into
the System 6, but is only paid on the
initiating side of the QCC transaction.
No rebates are paid for QCC transactions
in which both the initiator and contraside orders are from Priority Customers.
The Exchange notes that with regard to
order entry, the first order submitted
into the System is marked as the
initiating side and the second order is
marked as the contra side.
The Exchange now proposes to
increase the Per Contract Fee for Contraside QCC Orders for all types of market
participants other than Priority
Customer from $0.15 to $0.17 (Priority
Customer orders will continue to be
assessed a Per Contract Fee for Contraside QCC Orders of $0.00). The
Exchange does not propose to change
the Per Contract Fee for Initiator QCC
Orders for any market participants. In
addition, the Exchange proposes to
3 A Qualified Contingent Cross Order is
comprised of an originating order to buy or sell at
least 1,000 contracts, or 10,000 mini-option
contracts, that is identified as being part of a
qualified contingent trade, as that term is defined
in Interpretation and Policy .01 to Rule 516,
coupled with a contra-side order or orders totaling
an equal number of contracts. See Exchange Rule
516(j).
4 The term ‘‘Priority Customer’’ means a person
or entity that (i) is not a broker or dealer in
securities, and (ii) does not place more than 390
orders in listed options per day on average during
a calendar month for its own beneficial accounts(s).
See Exchange Rule 100.
5 The term ‘‘Member’’ means an individual or
organization approved to exercise the trading rights
associated with a Trading Permit. Members are
deemed ‘‘members’’ under the Exchange Act. See
Exchange Rule 100.
6 The term ‘‘System’’ means the automated
trading system used by the Exchange for the trading
of securities. See Exchange Rule 100.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:36 Apr 09, 2019
Jkt 247001
increase the Per Contract Rebate for
Initiator QCC Orders for all types of
market participants from $0.10 per
contract to $0.14 per contract. The
Exchange is not proposing to change
that no rebates will be paid for QCC
transactions for which both the Initiator
and Contra-side orders are Priority
Customers.
A cQCC Order is comprised of an
originating complex order to buy or sell
where each component is at least 1,000
contracts that is identified as being part
of a qualified contingent trade, coupled
with a contra-side complex order or
orders to sell or buy an equal number
of contracts.7 Currently, the Exchange
assesses a transaction fee for all types of
market participants other than Priority
Customer for cQCC Orders of $0.15 per
contract (Priority Customer orders are
assessed a charge of $0.00 per contract)
for the Initiator and the Contra-side. In
addition, the Exchange currently pays a
$0.10 per contract rebate for the
initiating order, regardless of the type of
market participant. No rebates are paid
for cQCC transactions in which both the
initiator and contra-side orders are from
Priority Customers. All fees and rebates
are per contract per leg. The rebate is
paid to the Member that enters the order
into the System, but is only paid on the
initiating side of the cQCC transaction.
The Exchange now proposes to
increase the Per Contract Fee for Contraside cQCC Orders for all types of market
participants other than Priority
Customer from $0.15 to $0.17 (Priority
Customer orders will continue to be
assessed a Per Contract Fee for Contraside cQCC Orders of $0.00). The
Exchange does not propose to change
the Per Contract Fee for Initiator cQCC
Orders for any market participants. In
addition, the Exchange proposes to
increase the Per Contract Rebate for
Initiator cQCC Orders for all types of
market participants from $0.10 per
contract to $0.14 per contract. The
Exchange is not proposing to change
that no rebates will be paid for cQCC
transactions for which both the initiator
and contra-side orders are Priority
Customers.
The Exchange notes that QCC and
cQCC Orders are excluded from: (i) The
volume threshold calculations for the
Market Maker Sliding Scale; (ii) the
rebates and volume calculations as part
of the Priority Customer Rebate
Program; (iii) participation in the
Professional Rebate Program; and (iv)
the Marketing Fee that is assessed to
Market Makers in their assigned classes
in simple or complex order executions
7 See
PO 00000
Exchange Rule 518(b)(6).
Frm 00101
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
14439
when the contra-party to the execution
is a Priority Customer.
The purpose of increasing the
specified QCC and cQCC Order fees and
rebates is for business and competitive
reasons. The Exchange believes that it is
appropriate to adjust these specified
QCC and cQCC Order fees and rebates
in order to attract additional QCC and
cQCC order flow and grow its market
share in this segment, through offering
a higher rebate (than the Exchange
currently offers) and fees that are
consistent with other exchanges,
effectively lowering the overall cost to
Members executing these orders on the
Exchange. The Exchange notes that
other competing exchanges similarly
provide rebates on QCC and cQCC
initiating orders,8 and similarly charge
fees on QCC and cQCC on Contra-side
orders.9
The proposed rule change is to
become operative April 1, 2019.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that its
proposal to amend its Fee Schedule is
consistent with Section 6(b) of the Act 10
in general, and furthers the objectives of
Section 6(b)(4) of the Act 11 in
particular, in that it provides for the
equitable allocation of reasonable dues,
fees and other charges among Exchange
Members and issuers and other persons
using its facilities. The Exchange also
believes the proposal furthers the
objectives of Section 6(b)(5) of the Act 12
in that it is designed to promote just and
equitable principles of trade, to remove
8 See BOX Fee Schedule, Section I(D)(1) (a $0.14
per contract rebate will be applied to the Agency
Order where at least one party to the QCC
transaction is a Non-Public Customer); see also
Cboe Fee Schedule, ‘‘QCC Rate Table,’’ Page 5 (a
$0.10 per contract credit will be delivered to the
TPH Firm that enters the order into Cboe Command
but will only be paid on the initiating side of the
QCC transaction); see also NYSE American Options
Fee Schedule, Section I.F (a $0.07 credit is applied
to Floor Brokers executing 300,000 or fewer
contracts in a month and a $0.10 credit is applied
to Floor Brokers executing more than 300,000
contracts in a month); see also Nasdaq ISE Pricing
Schedule, Options 7, Section 6, Other Options Fees
and Rebate, A. QCC and Solicitation Rebate (rebates
range from $0.00 to $0.11 per contract).
9 See BOX Options Market LLC (‘‘BOX’’) Fee
Schedule, Section I(D) (BOX does not charge Public
Customers but charges Professional Customers,
Broker-Dealers and Market Makers $0.17 per
contract on both Agency and Contra Orders); see
also Cboe Exchange, Inc. (‘‘Cboe’’) Fee Schedule,
‘‘QCC Rate Table,’’ Page 5 (Cboe charges non-Public
Customers $0.17 per contract and does not charge
Public Customers); see also NYSE American
Options Fee Schedule, Section I.F (NYSE American
charges Non-Customers $0.20 per contract,
Specialists and e-Specialists $0.13 per contract, and
does not charge Customer and Professional
Customers).
10 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
11 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
12 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
E:\FR\FM\10APN1.SGM
10APN1
jbell on DSK30RV082PROD with NOTICES
14440
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 69 / Wednesday, April 10, 2019 / Notices
impediments to and perfect the
mechanism of a free and open market
and a national market system, and, in
general to protect investors and the
public interest and is not designed to
permit unfair discrimination between
customer, issuers, brokers and dealers.
The Exchange believes its proposal to
increase the Per Contract Fee for Contraside QCC and cQCC Orders is
reasonable, equitable and not unfairly
discriminatory because, at the same
time, the Exchange is proposing to
increase the Per Contract Rebate for
Initiator QCC and cQCC Orders for all
types of market participants, effectively
resulting in a lower, all-in execution
cost for Members for these orders. The
Exchange believes that the proposed fee
and rebate changes are reasonable,
equitable, and not unfairly
discriminatory because the proposed
fees and rebates are intended to attract
additional QCC and cQCC Order flow,
grow the Exchange’s market share in
this segment by effectively reducing the
all-in execution cost for these orders to
the benefit of all market participants.
Additionally, the Exchange believes
that the proposed increase to the Per
Contract Fee for Contra-side QCC and
cQCC Orders is not unfairly
discriminatory because the proposed
fees would be charged to all market
participants other than Priority
Customers. Assessing QCC and cQCC
Order rates to all market participants
other than Priority Customer is
equitable and not unfairly
discriminatory because Priority
Customer order flow enhances liquidity
on the Exchange for the benefit of all
market participants. Specifically,
Priority Customer liquidity benefits all
market participants by providing more
trading opportunities, which attracts
Market Makers. An increase in the
activity of these market participants in
turn facilitates tighter spreads, which
may cause an additional corresponding
increase in order flow from other market
participants. By assessing a $0.00 fee for
Priority Customer orders, the Exchange
believes the proposed QCC and cQCC
Order fees will not discourage the
sending of Priority Customer orders.
The Exchange believes the proposed
increase to the Per Contract Fee for
Contra-side QCC and cQCC Orders for
all types of market participants is
reasonable because the proposed
amount is in line with the amount
assessed at other Exchanges for similar
transactions.13
The Exchange believes the proposed
increase to the Per Contract Rebate for
Initiator QCC and cQCC Orders for all
types of market participants is
reasonable because the rebate will offset
the fee resulting in a lower all-in
execution cost for Members for these
orders, even with the proposed increase
to the Per Contract Fee for Contra-side
QCC and cQCC Orders. Further, other
competing exchanges also provide
rebates on the initiating order side and
the proposed rebate amount is within
the range of the rebate amounts at the
other competing exchanges.14 The
Exchange believes the proposed
increase to the rebate is equitable and
not unfairly discriminatory because it
applies to all Members that enter the
initiating order (except for when both
the initiator and contra-side orders are
Priority Customers) and because it is
intended to incentivize the sending of
more QCC and cQCC Orders to the
Exchange. The Exchange believes it is
reasonable, equitable and not unfairly
discriminatory to not provide a rebate
for the Initiator for QCC and cQCC
Orders for which both the Initiator and
the Contra-side are Priority Customers
since Priority Customers are already
incentivized by being assessed a fee of
$0.00 for submitting QCC and cQCC
Orders.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that
the proposed rule change will impose
any burden on competition not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act, because the
proposed rule change applies to all
Members. The Exchange believes this
proposal will not cause an unnecessary
burden on intermarket competition
because the proposed changes will
actually enhance the competiveness of
the Exchange relative to other exchanges
which offer comparable fees and rebates
for QCC and cQCC Orders. To the extent
that the proposed changes make the
Exchange a more attractive marketplace
for market participants at other
exchanges, such market participants are
welcome to become market participants
on the Exchange.
The Exchange notes that it operates in
a highly competitive market in which
market participants can readily favor
competing venues if they deem fee
levels at a particular venue to be
excessive. In such an environment, the
Exchange must continually adjust its
fees to remain competitive with other
exchanges and to attract order flow to
the Exchange. The Exchange believes
that the proposed rule change reflects
this competitive environment because it
establishes a fee structure in a manner
that encourages market participants to
direct their order flow, to provide
liquidity, and to attract additional
transaction volume to the Exchange.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
Written comments were neither
solicited nor received.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing rule change has become
effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act,15 and Rule
19b–4(f)(2) 16 thereunder. At any time
within 60 days of the filing of the
proposed rule change, the Commission
summarily may temporarily suspend
such rule change if it appears to the
Commission that such action is
necessary or appropriate in the public
interest, for the protection of investors,
or otherwise in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act. If the Commission
takes such action, the Commission shall
institute proceedings to determine
whether the proposed rule should be
approved or disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include File Number SR–
MIAX–2019–17 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Secretary, Securities and Exchange
Commission, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–MIAX–2019–17. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
internet website (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
15 15
13 See
supra note 9.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:36 Apr 09, 2019
14 See
Jkt 247001
PO 00000
supra note 8.
Frm 00102
Fmt 4703
16 17
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\10APN1.SGM
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
CFR 240.19b–4(f)(2).
10APN1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 69 / Wednesday, April 10, 2019 / Notices
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for website viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549 on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the
filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change.
Persons submitting comments are
cautioned that we do not redact or edit
personal identifying information from
comment submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish
to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File
Number SR–MIAX–2019–17, and
should be submitted on or before May
1, 2019.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.17
Eduardo A. Aleman,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2019–07049 Filed 4–9–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
FR 9195, is extended. Comments should
be received on or before April 24, 2019.
ADDRESSES: The public, Office of
Management and Budget (OMB), and
Congress may comment on this
publication by writing to the Executive
Director, Office of Privacy and
Disclosure, Office of the General
Counsel, SSA, Room G–401, West High
Rise, 6401 Security Boulevard,
Baltimore, Maryland 21235–6401, or
through the Federal e-Rulemaking Portal
at https://www.regulations.gov, please
reference docket number SSA–2018–
0071. All comments we receive will be
available for public inspection at the
above address and we will post them to
https://www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Navdeep Sarai, Government Information
Specialist, Privacy Implementation
Division, Office of Privacy and
Disclosure, Office of the General
Counsel, SSA, Room G–401, West High
Rise, 6401 Security Boulevard,
Baltimore, Maryland 21235–6401,
telephone: (410) 965–2997, email:
Navdeep.Sarai@ssa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
notice extends the public comment
period 12 additional days for the new
system of record notice, published on
March 13, 2019, the Travel and Border
Crossing system to collect information
about applicants, beneficiaries, and
recipients under Titles II, XVI, and
XVIII who have had absences from the
United States (U.S.). (84 FR 9195). The
extended comment period closes April
24, 2019.
Mary Zimmerman,
Acting Executive Director, Office of Privacy
and Disclosure, Office of the General Counsel.
[Docket No. SSA–2018–0071]
Privacy Act of 1974; System of
Records; Extension of Comment
Period
[FR Doc. 2019–06907 Filed 4–9–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
jbell on DSK30RV082PROD with NOTICES
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:36 Apr 09, 2019
Jkt 247001
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
[Public Notice: 10729]
We are extending the
comment period for a previously
published Notice of a new system of
records, due to the inability of the
public to comment from the day the
notice published on March 13, 2019,
until March 25, 2019. Accordingly, we
are extending the comment period by 12
days for the new system of records
entitled, Travel and Border Crossing
Records (60–0389).
DATES: The comment period for the
notice published March 13, 2019, at 84
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
Melike A. Yetken,
Designated Federal Officer, U.S. Department
of State.
BILLING CODE 4710–07–P
Deputy Commissioner of
Operations, Social Security
Administration (SSA).
ACTION: Notice of a new system of
records.
17 17
economic policy. The discussion at the
meeting will include topics such as
women’s economic empowerment,
emerging technologies, data flows, and
data privacy. The Sanctions
Subcommittee as well as the
Stakeholder Advisory Board might
present updates.
This meeting is open to the public,
though seating is limited. Entry to the
building is controlled. To obtain preclearance for entry, members of the
public planning to attend must, no later
than April 25, provide their full name
and professional affiliation (if any) to
Melike Yetken by email: YetkenMA@
state.gov. Requests for reasonable
accommodation should also be made to
Melike Yetken before April 25. Requests
made after that date will be considered,
but might not be possible to fulfill.
This information is being collected
pursuant to 22 U.S.C. 2651a and 22
U.S.C. 4802 for the purpose of screening
and pre-clearing participants to enter
the host venue at the U.S. Department
of State, in line with standard security
procedures for events of this size. The
Department of State will use this
information consistent with the routine
uses set forth in the System of Records
Notices for Protocol Records (State-33)
and Security Records (State-36). See
https://www.state.gov/privacy/sorns/
index.htm. Provision of this information
is voluntary, but failure to provide
accurate information may impede your
ability to register for the event.
For additional information, contact
Melike Ann Yetken, Bureau of
Economic and Business Affairs, at (202)
647–1817, or YetkenMA@state.gov.
[FR Doc. 2019–07026 Filed 4–9–19; 8:45 am]
AGENCY:
SUMMARY:
14441
Advisory Committee On International
Economic Policy: Notice of Open
Meeting
The Advisory Committee on
International Economic Policy (ACIEP)
will meet from 1:00 until 4:00 p.m., on
Thursday, May 9 in Washington DC at
the State Department, 320 21st Street
NW. The meeting will be hosted by the
Assistant Secretary of State for
Economic and Business Affairs,
Manisha Singh, and Committee Chair
Paul R. Charron. The ACIEP serves the
U.S. government in a solely advisory
capacity, and provides advice
concerning topics in international
PO 00000
Frm 00103
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
[Public Notice: 10730]
Additional Designation Pursuant to
E.O.
Department of State.
Designation of One Iranian
Individual Pursuant to Executive Order
(E.O.) 13382.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
Pursuant to the authority in
section 1(ii) of Executive Order 13382,
‘‘Blocking Property of Weapons of Mass
Destruction Proliferators and Their
Supporters’’, the State Department, in
consultation with the Secretary of the
Treasury and the Attorney General, has
determined that Reza Ebrahimi engaged,
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\10APN1.SGM
10APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 69 (Wednesday, April 10, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 14438-14441]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-07049]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-85512; File No. SR-MIAX-2019-17]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Miami International Securities
Exchange LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a
Proposed Rule Change To Amend Its Fee Schedule
April 4, 2019.
Pursuant to the provisions of Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice
is hereby given that on March 27, 2019, Miami International Securities
Exchange LLC (``MIAX Options'' or ``Exchange'') filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'') a proposed rule
change as described in Items I, II, and III below, which Items have
been prepared by the Exchange. The Commission is publishing this notice
to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested
persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange is filing a proposal to amend the MIAX Options Fee
Schedule (the ``Fee Schedule'') to amend its fees and rebates for
Qualified Contingent Cross (``QCC'') orders and Complex Qualified
Contingent Cross (``cQCC'') orders.
The text of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's
website at https://www.miaxoptions.com/rule-filings, at MIAX's principal
office, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.
[[Page 14439]]
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes to amend Sections 1(a)(vii) and (viii) of the
Fee Schedule to amend its fees and rebates for QCC and cQCC Orders. A
QCC Order is comprised of an order to buy or sell at least 1,000
contracts that is identified as being part of a qualified contingent
trade, coupled with a contra side order to buy or sell an equal number
of contracts.\3\ Currently, the Exchange assesses a transaction fee for
all types of market participants other than Priority Customer \4\ for
QCC Orders of $0.15 per contract (Priority Customer orders are assessed
a charge of $0.00 per contract) for the Initiator and the Contra-side.
In addition, the Exchange currently pays a $0.10 per contract rebate
for the initiating order, regardless of the type of market participant.
The rebate is paid to the Member \5\ that enters the order into the
System \6\, but is only paid on the initiating side of the QCC
transaction. No rebates are paid for QCC transactions in which both the
initiator and contra-side orders are from Priority Customers. The
Exchange notes that with regard to order entry, the first order
submitted into the System is marked as the initiating side and the
second order is marked as the contra side.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ A Qualified Contingent Cross Order is comprised of an
originating order to buy or sell at least 1,000 contracts, or 10,000
mini-option contracts, that is identified as being part of a
qualified contingent trade, as that term is defined in
Interpretation and Policy .01 to Rule 516, coupled with a contra-
side order or orders totaling an equal number of contracts. See
Exchange Rule 516(j).
\4\ The term ``Priority Customer'' means a person or entity that
(i) is not a broker or dealer in securities, and (ii) does not place
more than 390 orders in listed options per day on average during a
calendar month for its own beneficial accounts(s). See Exchange Rule
100.
\5\ The term ``Member'' means an individual or organization
approved to exercise the trading rights associated with a Trading
Permit. Members are deemed ``members'' under the Exchange Act. See
Exchange Rule 100.
\6\ The term ``System'' means the automated trading system used
by the Exchange for the trading of securities. See Exchange Rule
100.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange now proposes to increase the Per Contract Fee for
Contra-side QCC Orders for all types of market participants other than
Priority Customer from $0.15 to $0.17 (Priority Customer orders will
continue to be assessed a Per Contract Fee for Contra-side QCC Orders
of $0.00). The Exchange does not propose to change the Per Contract Fee
for Initiator QCC Orders for any market participants. In addition, the
Exchange proposes to increase the Per Contract Rebate for Initiator QCC
Orders for all types of market participants from $0.10 per contract to
$0.14 per contract. The Exchange is not proposing to change that no
rebates will be paid for QCC transactions for which both the Initiator
and Contra-side orders are Priority Customers.
A cQCC Order is comprised of an originating complex order to buy or
sell where each component is at least 1,000 contracts that is
identified as being part of a qualified contingent trade, coupled with
a contra-side complex order or orders to sell or buy an equal number of
contracts.\7\ Currently, the Exchange assesses a transaction fee for
all types of market participants other than Priority Customer for cQCC
Orders of $0.15 per contract (Priority Customer orders are assessed a
charge of $0.00 per contract) for the Initiator and the Contra-side. In
addition, the Exchange currently pays a $0.10 per contract rebate for
the initiating order, regardless of the type of market participant. No
rebates are paid for cQCC transactions in which both the initiator and
contra-side orders are from Priority Customers. All fees and rebates
are per contract per leg. The rebate is paid to the Member that enters
the order into the System, but is only paid on the initiating side of
the cQCC transaction.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ See Exchange Rule 518(b)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange now proposes to increase the Per Contract Fee for
Contra-side cQCC Orders for all types of market participants other than
Priority Customer from $0.15 to $0.17 (Priority Customer orders will
continue to be assessed a Per Contract Fee for Contra-side cQCC Orders
of $0.00). The Exchange does not propose to change the Per Contract Fee
for Initiator cQCC Orders for any market participants. In addition, the
Exchange proposes to increase the Per Contract Rebate for Initiator
cQCC Orders for all types of market participants from $0.10 per
contract to $0.14 per contract. The Exchange is not proposing to change
that no rebates will be paid for cQCC transactions for which both the
initiator and contra-side orders are Priority Customers.
The Exchange notes that QCC and cQCC Orders are excluded from: (i)
The volume threshold calculations for the Market Maker Sliding Scale;
(ii) the rebates and volume calculations as part of the Priority
Customer Rebate Program; (iii) participation in the Professional Rebate
Program; and (iv) the Marketing Fee that is assessed to Market Makers
in their assigned classes in simple or complex order executions when
the contra-party to the execution is a Priority Customer.
The purpose of increasing the specified QCC and cQCC Order fees and
rebates is for business and competitive reasons. The Exchange believes
that it is appropriate to adjust these specified QCC and cQCC Order
fees and rebates in order to attract additional QCC and cQCC order flow
and grow its market share in this segment, through offering a higher
rebate (than the Exchange currently offers) and fees that are
consistent with other exchanges, effectively lowering the overall cost
to Members executing these orders on the Exchange. The Exchange notes
that other competing exchanges similarly provide rebates on QCC and
cQCC initiating orders,\8\ and similarly charge fees on QCC and cQCC on
Contra-side orders.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ See BOX Fee Schedule, Section I(D)(1) (a $0.14 per contract
rebate will be applied to the Agency Order where at least one party
to the QCC transaction is a Non-Public Customer); see also Cboe Fee
Schedule, ``QCC Rate Table,'' Page 5 (a $0.10 per contract credit
will be delivered to the TPH Firm that enters the order into Cboe
Command but will only be paid on the initiating side of the QCC
transaction); see also NYSE American Options Fee Schedule, Section
I.F (a $0.07 credit is applied to Floor Brokers executing 300,000 or
fewer contracts in a month and a $0.10 credit is applied to Floor
Brokers executing more than 300,000 contracts in a month); see also
Nasdaq ISE Pricing Schedule, Options 7, Section 6, Other Options
Fees and Rebate, A. QCC and Solicitation Rebate (rebates range from
$0.00 to $0.11 per contract).
\9\ See BOX Options Market LLC (``BOX'') Fee Schedule, Section
I(D) (BOX does not charge Public Customers but charges Professional
Customers, Broker-Dealers and Market Makers $0.17 per contract on
both Agency and Contra Orders); see also Cboe Exchange, Inc.
(``Cboe'') Fee Schedule, ``QCC Rate Table,'' Page 5 (Cboe charges
non-Public Customers $0.17 per contract and does not charge Public
Customers); see also NYSE American Options Fee Schedule, Section I.F
(NYSE American charges Non-Customers $0.20 per contract, Specialists
and e-Specialists $0.13 per contract, and does not charge Customer
and Professional Customers).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The proposed rule change is to become operative April 1, 2019.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that its proposal to amend its Fee Schedule
is consistent with Section 6(b) of the Act \10\ in general, and
furthers the objectives of Section 6(b)(4) of the Act \11\ in
particular, in that it provides for the equitable allocation of
reasonable dues, fees and other charges among Exchange Members and
issuers and other persons using its facilities. The Exchange also
believes the proposal furthers the objectives of Section 6(b)(5) of the
Act \12\ in that it is designed to promote just and equitable
principles of trade, to remove
[[Page 14440]]
impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and
a national market system, and, in general to protect investors and the
public interest and is not designed to permit unfair discrimination
between customer, issuers, brokers and dealers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
\11\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
\12\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange believes its proposal to increase the Per Contract Fee
for Contra-side QCC and cQCC Orders is reasonable, equitable and not
unfairly discriminatory because, at the same time, the Exchange is
proposing to increase the Per Contract Rebate for Initiator QCC and
cQCC Orders for all types of market participants, effectively resulting
in a lower, all-in execution cost for Members for these orders. The
Exchange believes that the proposed fee and rebate changes are
reasonable, equitable, and not unfairly discriminatory because the
proposed fees and rebates are intended to attract additional QCC and
cQCC Order flow, grow the Exchange's market share in this segment by
effectively reducing the all-in execution cost for these orders to the
benefit of all market participants.
Additionally, the Exchange believes that the proposed increase to
the Per Contract Fee for Contra-side QCC and cQCC Orders is not
unfairly discriminatory because the proposed fees would be charged to
all market participants other than Priority Customers. Assessing QCC
and cQCC Order rates to all market participants other than Priority
Customer is equitable and not unfairly discriminatory because Priority
Customer order flow enhances liquidity on the Exchange for the benefit
of all market participants. Specifically, Priority Customer liquidity
benefits all market participants by providing more trading
opportunities, which attracts Market Makers. An increase in the
activity of these market participants in turn facilitates tighter
spreads, which may cause an additional corresponding increase in order
flow from other market participants. By assessing a $0.00 fee for
Priority Customer orders, the Exchange believes the proposed QCC and
cQCC Order fees will not discourage the sending of Priority Customer
orders. The Exchange believes the proposed increase to the Per Contract
Fee for Contra-side QCC and cQCC Orders for all types of market
participants is reasonable because the proposed amount is in line with
the amount assessed at other Exchanges for similar transactions.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ See supra note 9.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange believes the proposed increase to the Per Contract
Rebate for Initiator QCC and cQCC Orders for all types of market
participants is reasonable because the rebate will offset the fee
resulting in a lower all-in execution cost for Members for these
orders, even with the proposed increase to the Per Contract Fee for
Contra-side QCC and cQCC Orders. Further, other competing exchanges
also provide rebates on the initiating order side and the proposed
rebate amount is within the range of the rebate amounts at the other
competing exchanges.\14\ The Exchange believes the proposed increase to
the rebate is equitable and not unfairly discriminatory because it
applies to all Members that enter the initiating order (except for when
both the initiator and contra-side orders are Priority Customers) and
because it is intended to incentivize the sending of more QCC and cQCC
Orders to the Exchange. The Exchange believes it is reasonable,
equitable and not unfairly discriminatory to not provide a rebate for
the Initiator for QCC and cQCC Orders for which both the Initiator and
the Contra-side are Priority Customers since Priority Customers are
already incentivized by being assessed a fee of $0.00 for submitting
QCC and cQCC Orders.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ See supra note 8.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act, because the proposed rule
change applies to all Members. The Exchange believes this proposal will
not cause an unnecessary burden on intermarket competition because the
proposed changes will actually enhance the competiveness of the
Exchange relative to other exchanges which offer comparable fees and
rebates for QCC and cQCC Orders. To the extent that the proposed
changes make the Exchange a more attractive marketplace for market
participants at other exchanges, such market participants are welcome
to become market participants on the Exchange.
The Exchange notes that it operates in a highly competitive market
in which market participants can readily favor competing venues if they
deem fee levels at a particular venue to be excessive. In such an
environment, the Exchange must continually adjust its fees to remain
competitive with other exchanges and to attract order flow to the
Exchange. The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change reflects
this competitive environment because it establishes a fee structure in
a manner that encourages market participants to direct their order
flow, to provide liquidity, and to attract additional transaction
volume to the Exchange.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
Written comments were neither solicited nor received.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act,\15\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(2) \16\ thereunder.
At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule change,
the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule change if it
appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or appropriate
in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or otherwise
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission takes such
action, the Commission shall institute proceedings to determine whether
the proposed rule should be approved or disapproved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\15\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
\16\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an email to [email protected]. Please include
File Number SR-MIAX-2019-17 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-MIAX-2019-17. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's internet website (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml).
Copies of the submission, all subsequent
[[Page 14441]]
amendments, all written statements with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the Commission, and all written
communications relating to the proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than those that may be withheld from
the public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for website viewing and printing in the Commission's Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549 on official
business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of
the filing also will be available for inspection and copying at the
principal office of the Exchange. All comments received will be posted
without change. Persons submitting comments are cautioned that we do
not redact or edit personal identifying information from comment
submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions should refer to File Number SR-
MIAX-2019-17, and should be submitted on or before May 1, 2019.
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\17\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\17\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eduardo A. Aleman,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2019-07049 Filed 4-9-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P