Labor Certification Process for Temporary Employment in the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands (CW-1 Workers), 12380-12448 [2019-05937]
Download as PDF
12380
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 62 / Monday, April 1, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
20 CFR Part 655
[DOL Docket No. ETA–2019–0001]
RIN 1205–AB92
Labor Certification Process for
Temporary Employment in the
Commonwealth of the Northern
Mariana Islands (CW–1 Workers)
Employment and Training
Administration, Department of Labor.
ACTION: Interim final rule; request for
comments.
AGENCY:
The Department of Labor
(Department or DOL) is issuing new
regulations governing the certification of
temporary employment opportunities to
be filled by nonimmigrant workers in
the Commonwealth of the Northern
Mariana Islands (CNMI) and the
obligations applicable to employers of
such workers under the CNMI-Only
Transitional Worker visa program
(CW–1). This interim final rule (IFR),
implementing provisions of the
Northern Mariana Islands U.S.
Workforce Act of 2018 (Workforce Act),
establishes the process by which a
CNMI employer will obtain a prevailing
wage determination (PWD) and
temporary labor certification (TLC) from
DOL for use in petitioning the
Department of Homeland Security
(DHS) to employ a nonimmigrant
worker in CW–1 status. Although the
CW–1 visa classification predates the
Workforce Act, classification as a
CW–1 nonimmigrant does not currently
require a labor certification. The
Workforce Act institutes a labor
certification requirement as a
prerequisite for approval of a CW–1
petition by DHS and charges the
Department with promulgating an IFR to
administer this new labor certification
requirement. We are also issuing
regulations to provide for increased
worker protections for both United
States (U.S.) and foreign workers to
ensure no U.S. worker is placed at a
competitive disadvantage compared to a
foreign worker or is displaced by a
foreign worker.
DATES: This IFR is effective April 4,
2019, at 12:00 a.m. Eastern Time (ET).
Interested parties are invited to submit
written comments on this IFR on or
before May 31, 2019.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by the Regulatory Information
Number (RIN) 1205–AB92, by any one
of the following methods:
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:01 Mar 29, 2019
Jkt 247001
Electronic Comments: Comments may
be sent via https://www.regulations.gov,
a Federal E-Government website that
allows the public to find, review, and
submit comments on documents that
agencies have published in the Federal
Register and that are open for comment.
Simply type in ‘‘DOL CNMI IFR’’ (in
quotes) in the Comment or Submission
search box, click Go, and follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
Mail: Address written submissions to
(including disk and CD–ROM
submissions) to Adele Gagliardi,
Administrator, Office of Policy
Development and Research,
Employment and Training
Administration, U.S. Department of
Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue NW,
Room N–5641, Washington, DC 20210.
Instructions: Please submit only one
copy of your comments by only one
method. All submissions must include
the agency name and the RIN 1205–
AB92. Please be advised that comments
received will become a matter of public
record and will be posted without
change to https://www.regulations.gov,
including any personal information
provided. Comments that are mailed
must be received by the date indicated
for consideration.
Docket: For access to the docket to
read documentation prepared in support
of this rule or comments, go to the
Federal e-Rulemaking Portal at https://
www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Thomas M. Dowd, Deputy Assistant
Secretary, Employment and Training
Administration, Department of Labor,
Box #12–200, 200 Constitution Ave.
NW, Washington, DC 20210, telephone
(202) 513–7350 (this is not a toll-free
number). Individuals with hearing or
speech impairments may access the
telephone numbers above via TTY by
calling the toll-free Federal Information
Relay Service at 1–877–889–5627 (TTY/
TDD).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Executive Summary
The Workforce Act, Public Law 115–
218 (July 24, 2018), provides the
Secretary of Homeland Security with
authority to administer and enforce a
system of allocating and determining
the terms and conditions of visas to be
issued to certain nonimmigrant workers
performing services or labor for an
employer in the CNMI. Department of
Homeland Security (DHS) regulations
establish the CW–1 visa classification to
provide for an orderly transition from
the CNMI permit system to the U.S.
immigration system for a foreign
national who is otherwise ineligible for
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
another classification under the
Immigration and Nationality Act (INA).
In accordance with the Workforce Act,
DHS will update regulations to reflect
the statutory requirement that a CW–1
petition for temporary employment in
the CNMI be accompanied by an
approved TLC from DOL. A TLC granted
by DOL confirms that there are not
sufficient U.S. workers in the CNMI
who are able, willing, qualified, and
available to fill the petitioning CW–1
employer’s job opportunity. The TLC
also confirms that a foreign worker’s
employment in the job opportunity will
not adversely affect the wages or
working conditions of similarly
employed U.S. workers.
As explained more fully in the
preamble, the IFR establishes the
process by which employers obtain a
TLC from DOL for use in petitioning
DHS to employ a nonimmigrant worker
in CW–1 status, which involves four
basic steps. First, the employer must
request and obtain a PWD from DOL’s
Office of Foreign Labor Certification
(OFLC) before filing a CW–1 Application
for Temporary Employment
Certification. To make this request, the
employer will submit a completed
Application for Prevailing Wage
Determination (Form ETA–9141C) with
OFLC’s National Prevailing Wage Center
(NPWC) containing information about
the job opportunity in which the
nonimmigrant workers will be
employed. Based on a review of the
information provided by the employer
on the Form ETA–9141C, the NPWC
will issue a PWD, indicate the source
and validity period for its use, and
return the Form ETA–9141C with its
endorsement to the employer.
Second, the employer must file a
completed CW–1 Application for
Temporary Employment Certification
(Form ETA–9142C and appropriate
appendices) with the OFLC National
Processing Center (NPC) no more than
120 calendar days before the date of
need. Consistent with the Workforce
Act, the employer seeking to extend the
employment of a CW–1 worker may file
a CW–1 Application for Temporary
Employment Certification no more than
180 calendar days before the date on
which the CW–1 status expires. The
NPC Certifying Officer (CO) will review
the employer’s application for
compliance with all applicable program
requirements and issue either a Notice
of Deficiency (NOD) or Notice of
Acceptance (NOA). Where deficiencies
in the application are discovered, the
NOD will direct the employer that it
must respond within 10 business days
to submit a modified application
E:\FR\FM\01APR2.SGM
01APR2
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 62 / Monday, April 1, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
correcting the deficiencies or the CO
will deny the application.
Third, where all program
requirements are met, the employer will
receive a NOA from the CO directing the
recruitment of U.S. workers for the job
opportunity and requesting a written
report of the employer’s recruitment
efforts. To encourage the hiring of U.S.
workers for employment in the CNMI,
the employer will be required to
advertise the job opportunity on the
CNMI Department of Labor’s job listing
system; contact its former U.S. workers
and solicit their return to the job; post
a copy of the CW–1 Application for
Temporary Employment Certification at
the place(s) of employment in which the
work will be performed by the CW–1
workers; and conduct any other
recruitment activities (e.g., contacting
community-based organizations or trade
unions) required by the CO. The
recruitment period will last
approximately 21 calendar days and all
employer-conducted recruitment must
be completed before the written
recruitment report can be prepared,
signed, and submitted to the NPC for
review.
And finally, upon review of the
recruitment report, the CO will make a
determination either to certify or to
deny the CW–1 Application for
Temporary Employment Certification.
The CO will certify the application only
where the employer has met all
regulatory requirements. If the employer
has met all requirements, the CO will
send a Final Determination notice and
copy of the certified CW–1 Application
for Temporary Employment
Certification to the employer and a
copy, if applicable, to the employer’s
agent or attorney. The employer will use
the Final Determination notice, as well
as any other required documentation, to
support the filing of a CW–1 petition
with U.S. Citizenship and Immigration
Services (USCIS).
As a condition of receiving a TLC, the
IFR provides a number of worker
protections to ensure U.S. workers are
not placed at a competitive
disadvantage compared to a CW–1
worker, such as requiring a minimum
number of hours per week for full-time
employment; requiring that U.S.
workers in corresponding employment
receive the same wages and benefits as
the CW–1 workers; and requiring the
payment of wages by employers to be
finally and unconditionally ‘‘free and
clear’’ and no less frequent than every
2 weeks. It also requires that employers
guarantee employment for a total
number of work hours equal to at least
three-fourths of the workdays of the
total period of employment for both
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:01 Mar 29, 2019
Jkt 247001
CW–1 workers and workers in
corresponding employment.
The IFR requires employers to pay
visa and related fees of CW–1 workers,
and it requires employers to pay the
inbound transportation costs—including
subsistence costs incurred in transit—of
workers who complete 50 percent of the
job order period and the outbound
transportation costs—including
subsistence costs incurred in transit—of
employees who complete the entire job
order period. To protect U.S. workers in
their employment from displacement by
a CW–1 worker, this IFR prohibits the
employer from laying off any similarly
employed U.S. worker in the occupation
beginning 270 calendar days before the
date of need through the end of the
period of employment certified by DOL.
It also prohibits employers from
retaliating against employees for
exercising rights under the CW–1
program and protects workers from
discriminatory hiring practices.
Finally, the IFR contains a number of
provisions that will lead to increased
transparency and enhanced program
integrity. It requires employers to
provide workers with earnings
statements on or before each payday,
with hours worked and deductions
clearly specified; requires employers to
provide workers with copies of the work
contract in a language understood by the
worker; and requires DOL to maintain
an electronic file accessible to the
general public with information on all
employers applying for TLC to employ
CW–1 workers. Additionally, the IFR
requires employers to retain all
documents and records establishing
compliance with the regulations for a
period of 3 years after the CW–1
Application for Temporary Employment
Certification is adjudicated or from the
date the CO receives a letter of
withdrawal. The employer must make
these documents and records available
to the DOL, DHS or to any Federal
Government Official performing an
investigation, inspection, audit, or other
law enforcement activity. It also
establishes a sanctions and penalties
regime for employers that violate
program requirements, such as more
intensive or assisted recruitment
requirements, revocation of a certified
CW–1 Application for Temporary
Employment Certification, or debarment
from filing any labor certification
application or labor condition
application with the Department for up
to 5 years. The debarment process for
the CW–1 program will provide for
notice, an opportunity for rebuttal, and
a right to appeal the Department’s
determination. CW–1 debarment, once it
takes effect however, will automatically
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
12381
debar an individual or entity from other
foreign labor certification programs as
well. That is, an individual or entity
debarred from the CW–1 program will
be disqualified from filing any labor
certification applications 1 or labor
condition applications 2 with DOL,
including an agent or attorney’s filing of
an application on the debarred entity’s
behalf, for the period of time set forth
in the CW–1 Notice of Debarment, Final
Determination (if rebuttal evidence is
submitted), or ARB Decision (if the
debarment action is appealed).
The Department has concluded that
the procedures and requirements
outlined in this IFR will help employers
obtain a reliable and productive
workforce while also providing
appropriate incentives to encourage the
hiring of U.S. workers in the CNMI and
protect the integrity of the program.
This IFR is considered an Executive
Order (E.O.) 13771 regulatory action.
Details on the estimated costs can be
found in the rule’s economic analysis.
Implementing this new labor
certification process will further the
Congressional intent to incentivize the
hiring of U.S. workers in the CNMI by
developing and strengthening the CNMI
labor force over time; contribute to the
success of its economy and labor market
by benefiting small business; and create
greater job opportunities for U.S.
workers in that geographical
demarcation. The new regulations also
seek to ensure that the wages of U.S.
workers are protected, in addition to
extending worker protection assurances
currently afforded in other TLC
programs.
II. Background
A. Legal Framework
President Donald J. Trump signed the
Workforce Act into law on July 24,
2018. The purposes of the Workforce
Act are to encourage the hiring of U.S.
workers in the CNMI workforce and
ensure that no U.S. worker is placed at
a competitive disadvantage compared to
a non-U.S. worker or is displaced by a
non-U.S. worker. The Workforce Act
1 See 20 CFR part 655, subpart A (governing H–
2B temporary nonagricultural workers); 20 CFR part
655, subpart B (governing H–2A temporary
agricultural workers); 20 CFR part 655, subpart F
(governing the temporary employment of D–1
crewmembers on foreign vessels to perform
longshore work at U.S. ports); and 20 CFR part 656
(permanent labor certification).
2 See 20 CFR part 655, subpart H (governing labor
condition applications for H–1B foreign nationals
entering the U.S. on a temporary basis to work in
specialty occupations or as fashion models, H–1b1
professionals entering under the U.S.-Chile or U.S.Singapore Free Trade Agreements, and E–3
professionals entering under the U.S.-Australia Free
Trade Agreement).
E:\FR\FM\01APR2.SGM
01APR2
12382
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 62 / Monday, April 1, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
extends the transition period described
below (and thus, the CW–1 visa
program) through 2029. It also requires
that a CW–1 petition for temporary
employment filed with DHS be
accompanied by an approved TLC from
DOL. See Public Law 115–218, sec. 3, 48
U.S.C. 1806(a)(2) and (d)(2). The TLC
from DOL must confirm that: (1) There
are not sufficient U.S. workers in the
CNMI who are able, willing, qualified,
and available at the time and place
needed to perform the services or labor
involved in the petition; and (2) the
employment of a nonimmigrant worker
who is the subject of a petition will not
adversely affect the wages and working
conditions of similarly employed U.S.
workers. 48 U.S.C. 1806(d)(2)(A).
In order to implement the second
requirement that nonimmigrant
employment will not adversely affect
U.S. workers’ wages and working
conditions, the Workforce Act mandates
the determination of the relevant wage
rates. The first option for this
determination is for DOL to use, or
make available to employers, an
occupational wage survey conducted by
the Governor of the CNMI (Governor)
that meets the statistical standards
established by the Department for
determining prevailing wages in the
CNMI on an annual basis. 48 U.S.C.
1806(d)(2)(B). If that does not occur,
then the Workforce Act requires that the
prevailing wage for a given occupation
in the CNMI be the arithmetic mean of
the wages of workers similarly
employed in the territory of Guam based
on the Occupational Employment
Statistics (OES) Survey conducted by
the Department’s Bureau of Labor
Statistics (BLS). Id. The Secretary of
Labor (Secretary) has delegated the
statutory responsibilities of
administering the TLC process through
the ETA Assistant Secretary to OFLC.
The CNMI is a self-governing
commonwealth and unincorporated
territory of the United States. In 1976,
Congress approved a Covenant to
Establish a Commonwealth of the
Northern Mariana Islands in Political
Union with the United States of
America (the Covenant), Public Law 94–
241, sec. 1, 90 Stat. 263 (Mar. 24, 1976)
(48 U.S.C. 1801 and 1801 note). The
Covenant, which entered into full effect
on Nov. 4, 1986, Presidential
Proclamation No. 5564, 51 FR 40399
(Nov. 3, 1986) (48 U.S.C. 1801 note),
established the terms of the political
relationship between the United States
and the CNMI, granted U.S. citizenship
to eligible CNMI residents, exempted
the CNMI from most U.S. immigration
laws, and gave the CNMI local control
over its own immigration system.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:01 Mar 29, 2019
Jkt 247001
Congress retained the authority to
extend U.S. immigration laws to the
CNMI at any time.3 In addition, the
Covenant sought to increase the
percentage of U.S. workers in the total
workforce of the CNMI, while
maintaining the minimum number of
workers who are not U.S. workers to
meet the changing demands of the
CNMI economy; to encourage the hiring
of U.S. workers into such workforce;
and to ensure that no U.S. worker is at
a competitive disadvantage for
employment compared to a worker who
is not a U.S. worker, or is displaced by
a worker who is not a U.S. worker.
In 2008, Congress extended U.S.
immigration laws to the CNMI through
the Consolidated Natural Resources Act
of 2008 (CNRA). See Public Law 110–
229, Title VII, 122 Stat. 754, 853 (May
8, 2008) (48 U.S.C. 1806 note). Under
the CNRA, which amended the
Covenant, Federal immigration laws
would fully apply after a 5-year (2009–
2014) transition period. Once the
Federal immigration laws were in place
in 2014 without CNMI exceptions, a
percentage of the workforce would
likely not meet the requirements of U.S.
temporary employment visas, and thus
would be ineligible to enter or reenter
the CNMI, negatively impacting the
local economy. Thus, the CNRA
provided for a new CommonwealthOnly Transitional Worker visa
classification, to be administered by
DHS, with the proviso that, to
incrementally reduce the
Commonwealth’s dependence on
foreign labor, the number of visas issued
would decrease each year, ending with
the issuance of zero visas by the end of
the transition period. Congress later
extended the period’s end to December
31, 2019. See Public law 110–229, sec.
702(a); S. Rep. No. 115–214 at 6–7;
Report on 902 Consultations at 6–7; and
Consolidated and Further Continuing
Appropriations Act, 2015, Public Law
113–235, sec. 10, 128 Stat. 2130, 2134
(Dec. 16, 2014) (extending the transition
period to December 31, 2019). The
CNRA did not stipulate the requirement
of obtaining a labor certification prior to
3 See history summarized in S. Rep. No. 115–214
at 6–7 (2018), https://www.congress.gov/115/crpt/
srpt214/CRPT-115srpt214.pdf, accompanying
S.2325, Northern Mariana Islands U.S. Workforce
Act. Provisions of S. 2325 were enacted as part of
the Workforce Act. See also immigration issues and
recommendations discussed, pre-Workforce Act, in
Special Representatives of the United States and the
Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands,
‘‘Report to the President on 902 Consultations 6–
25’’ (Jan. 2017) (hereafter ‘‘Report on 902
Consultations’’), https://www.doi.gov/sites/doi.gov/
files/uploads/902-consultations-report-january2017.pdf.
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
filing a petition for a CW–1 worker with
DHS.
B. Statutory Basis for an Interim Final
Rule
The Workforce Act requires the
Secretary to promulgate an IFR
implementing the CW–1 TLC and its
related provisions, and exempts this
rulemaking from the Administrative
Procedure Act’s (APA’s) notice-andcomment requirement under 5 U.S.C.
553(b). See Public Law 115–218, sec.
3(b)(2).
This exemption reflects the exigency
created by the new labor certification
requirement. Under the CW–1 visa
program as amended by the Workforce
Act, the Secretary must develop and
implement new standards,
requirements, and procedures for
employers to obtain a TLC before a CW–
1 petition can be submitted to DHS.
This new TLC process—including a
procedure to obtain a PWD required to
support the employer’s TLC
application—must enable employers to
hire a nonimmigrant worker under the
CW–1 classification with an
employment start date as early as
October 1, 2019, when the new
requirement takes effect.4 By statute, an
employer that desires to renew the
employment of a CW–1 worker may
petition DHS no more than 180 calendar
days before the expiration of that
worker’s visa status.5 The earliest
possible renewal petition date for a CW–
1 worker with an October 1, 2019 start
date is April 4, 2019. Accordingly, the
Secretary must have a process for
employers to obtain a PWD and TLC in
place by April 4, 2019. See 48 U.S.C.
1806(d)(2)(A)(i).
Because of the exigency created by the
statute, the Department is also issuing
this IFR with an April 4, 2019 effective
date, rather than providing for the usual
30-day waiting period required by
section 553(d) of the APA. Under the
APA, an agency is authorized to make
a rule effective immediately upon a
showing of good cause instead of
imposing a 30-day delay. 5 U.S.C.
553(d)(3). An agency can show good
cause for eliminating the 30-day waiting
period when it demonstrates urgent
conditions the rule seeks to correct or
unavoidable time limitations. U.S. Steel
Corp. v. EPA, 605 F.2d 283, 290 (7th Cir.
4 The governing statute, as amended by the
Workforce Act, establishes a temporary labor
certification requirement beginning with CW–1
petitions filed with DHS with employment start
dates in FY 2020. See 48 U.S.C. 1806(d)(2)(A)(i).
5 See 48 U.S.C. 1806(d)(3)(D), providing that an
employer may petition DHS no earlier than 180
days before the expiration of a CW–1 visa, when the
petition is for renewal of the visa.
E:\FR\FM\01APR2.SGM
01APR2
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 62 / Monday, April 1, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
1979); United States v. Gavrilovic, 551
F.2d 1099, 1104 (8th Cir. 1977). As
explained above, because Congress has
required that a labor certification
process be in place to enable employers
to hire CW–1 workers with start dates as
early as October 1, 2019, this
rulemaking must be effective no later
than April 4, 2019, so that an employer
may obtain a timely PWD. A valid PWD
is required when an employer files its
CW–1 Application for Temporary
Employment Certification. Only after
the employer receives a TLC from the
Department may it petition USCIS for a
CW–1 visa, so the Department is making
this rule effective as soon as possible.
Employers may request a PWD as early
as April 4, 2019.
C. CNMI Labor Market
The CNMI has a total population of
52,263, according to the CNMI
Department of Commerce Central
Statistics Division.6 In the years that
followed the establishment of the
Covenant, the CNMI economy became
reliant on the use of temporary foreign
labor. The Government Accountability
Office (GAO) found that in 2016, foreign
workers made up 53 percent of those
employed and filled the majority of all
hospitality and construction jobs. The
GAO also found that, if all CW workers
were removed from the CNMI’s labor
market, the CNMI’s gross domestic
product (GDP) would be reduced by
between 26 and 62 percent. The GAO
report noted that the supply of workers
in the unemployed domestic workforce
would be well below the CNMI’s
demand for foreign labor.7 The
estimated employment level was 29,215
workers (15,559 foreign workers and
13,656 domestic workers) in 2016,8
while the number of unemployed
persons was 2,386 persons.9
Historically, the unemployment rate in
the CNMI has been higher than 10
percent because many unemployed
6 CNMI Department of Commerce, Central
Statistics Division, ‘‘CNMI Labor Force
Participation Measures’’ (May 2018), https://
ver1.cnmicommerce.com/wp-content/uploads/
2018/05/20174QLFPFD-ver.-1.1.pdf.
7 See Report on 902 Consultations at 6–7. See U.S.
Govt. Accountability Office, ‘‘Commonwealth of the
Northern Mariana Islands: Implementation of
Federal Minimum Wage and Immigration Laws,’’
GAO–17–437 (May 2017), https://www.gao.gov/
products/GAO-17-437.
8 U.S. Government Accountability Office,
‘‘Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands:
Recent Economic Trends and Preliminary
Observations on Workforce Data,’’ GAO–18–373T
(Feb. 2018), https://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-18373T.
9 U.S. Government Accountability Office,
‘‘Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands:
Implementation of Federal Minimum Wage and
Immigration Laws,’’ GAO–17–437 (May 2017),
https://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-17-437.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:01 Mar 29, 2019
Jkt 247001
persons in the CNMI lack the skill sets
and work experience required for the
jobs filled by foreign workers, even
though many of those jobs are for lowskilled workers.
According to the CNMI Department of
Commerce Central Statistics Division,
there were an estimated 2,646
unemployed persons in the CNMI in the
4th quarter of 2017, 53.1 percent (1,406)
of whom were U.S. citizens and 11.7
percent (310) of whom were permanent
residents.10 The CNMI unemployment
rate was 10.5 percent. The
unemployment rate for U.S. citizens was
13.5 percent, for permanent residents
was 9.2 percent, and for non-U.S.
citizens was 8.2 percent. The
unemployment rate was negatively
associated with age: The highest rate
was 26.2 percent for youth 16 to 19
years of age, while the lowest rate was
2.0 percent for persons 65 years of age
and older. The unemployment rate was
also inversely related to education level:
Persons with less than a high school
diploma had the highest unemployment
rate at 21.3 percent, while those with at
least a master’s degree had the lowest
unemployment rate at 3.7 percent. With
respect to place of birth, the
unemployment rate for persons born in
a U.S. State or territory was 14.3
percent, for persons born in an Asian
country was 7.3 percent, and for persons
born in the Pacific Islands was 18.9
percent.11
In light of the CNMI economy’s
continuing dependence on foreign labor,
the CNRA’s requirement to reduce and
eventually eliminate CW–1 visas
generated significant concern among
CNMI employers. Increased employer
demand for CW–1 visas has resulted, in
large part, from recent economic
expansion in the construction, casinos,
and related hospitality industry sectors.
In its February 2018 report, the GAO
noted that the U.S. Department of
Commerce’s Bureau of Economic
Analysis (BEA) estimated that the
CNMI’s GDP increased by almost 29
percent in 2016 (to $1.242 billion), after
increasing by about 4 percent in 2015.
BEA attributed this economic growth to
a significant increase in visitor
10 The report included the following note
regarding the presence of unemployed non-U.S.
citizens: ‘‘Note that while there are Not U.S.
Citizens in the unemployed population, they are
likely to be more temporary, compared to U.S
Citizen and Permanent Resident, because of existing
laws governing migrant workers. With no job, Not
U.S. Citizen, migrant worker will eventually leave
the CNMI.’’
11 CNMI Department of Commerce, Central
Statistics Division, ‘‘CNMI Labor Force
Participation Measures’’ (May 2018), https://
ver1.cnmicommerce.com/wp-content/uploads/
2018/05/20174QLFPFD-ver.-1.1.pdf.
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
12383
spending, particularly for casino
gambling, and investment in the
construction of a casino resort in
Garapan and other hotel construction in
Saipan.12 The number of visitors to the
CNMI grew over 10 percent, primarily
reflecting an increase in visitor arrivals
from South Korea and China. Reflecting
the increase in economic activity,
employment rose by approximately 25
percent, from 23,344 in 2013 to 29,215
in 2016. However, documented patterns
of labor abuse and exploitation of
foreign workers by certain CNMI
employers in recent decades have also
led to calls for improving the
employment opportunities of U.S.
workers and strengthening labor
protections.13
The number of guest workers in the
CNMI surged in the 1980s when
garment manufacturers from Hong Kong
and Korea set up business in the CNMI.
The CNMI economy became dependent
on foreign labor as the garment and
tourism industries expanded in the
1980s and 1990s. According to an
October 1999 economic study by the
Northern Marianas College, garment
manufacturing and tourism accounted
for about 85 percent of the CNMI’s total
economic activity and 96 percent of its
exports.14 The CNMI’s guest worker
program gained worldwide notoriety in
the 1990s when reports of sweatshop
conditions and widespread abuse of
guest workers began to surface.15
Notwithstanding large lawsuit
settlements and independent
monitoring at garment factories, the
number of labor abuses continued to be
significant.16
12 See S. Rep. No. 115–214 at 7. See U.S. Govt.
Accountability Office, ‘‘Commonwealth of the
Northern Mariana Islands: Recent Economic Trends
and Preliminary Observations on Workforce Data,’’
GAO–18–373T (Feb. 2018), https://www.gao.gov/
products/GAO-18-373T.
13 See S. Rep. No. 115–214 at 8 (referring to
protections such as ‘‘higher minimum wage
requirements, the potential for revocation,
legitimate business requirements, [and] a
prohibition on the use of CW visas for construction
workers’’).
14 U.S. Government Accountability Office, ‘‘U.S.
Insular Areas: Economic, Fiscal, and Financial
Accountability Challenges,’’ GAO–07–119 (Dec. 12,
2006) https://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-07-119.
15 Scott L. Cummings, ‘‘Hemmed In Legal
Mobilization in the Los Angeles Anti-Sweatshop
Movement,’’ Berkeley Journal of Employment and
Labor Law, Volume 30, 2009.
16 U.S. Department of the Interior, Office of
Insular Affairs, ‘‘Federal Ombudsman’s Report on
the Status of Nonresident Workers in the
Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands:
Current Conditions, Issues and Trends in the
CNMI’’ (Mar. 29, 2006), https://www.doi.gov/oia/
reports/upload/OmbudsmansReport.pdf.
(concluding that while labor conditions had
improved ‘‘significantly’’ in the CNMI since the late
1990s, ‘‘complaints of illegal recruitment scams and
nonpayment of wages [were] still prevalent.’’).
E:\FR\FM\01APR2.SGM
01APR2
12384
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 62 / Monday, April 1, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
Changes to international trade law
and various external events led to
declines in the garment and tourism
industries in the early 2000s. In the
process, the CNMI’s dependence on
foreign labor in those industries also
declined. In 2016, foreign workers were
primarily employed in the following
occupations: Food preparation and
serving related (1,434 foreign workers);
management (1,423); office and
administrative support (1,269);
construction and extraction (1,221); and
education, training, and library (1,016).
Foreign workers especially
outnumbered U.S. workers in education,
training, and library (1,016 foreign
workers compared to 214 U.S. workers);
construction and extraction (1,221
foreign workers compared to 268 U.S.
workers); and building and grounds
cleaning and maintenance (895 foreign
workers compared to 255 U.S.
workers).17
D. Comments on the Rulemaking From
Governor of the CNMI
Pursuant to section 3(b)(3) of the
Workforce Act, the Governor submitted
comments and recommendations on the
development of this IFR in a September
2018 letter. In the letter, the Governor
recommended that the Department
adopt a regulatory framework for the
Commonwealth’s CW–1 program similar
to the H–2B program’s framework for
Guam, in which the government of
Guam approves TLCs. Specifically, the
letter stated that ‘‘[g]iven the changing
nature of the CNMI labor force, and the
lack of DOL statistics for the CNMI labor
force, it would be in the interest of both
DOL and the CNMI to authorize that the
preliminary determination of U.S.
worker availability in occupational
categories petitioned for CW–1 permits
be granted to the CNMI government.’’
Alternatively, the Governor
recommended that the Commonwealth
collaborate with the Department by
providing the Department with data on
the number of U.S. workers available in
the Commonwealth’s major
occupational categories. The Governor
suggested that the Department use this
information to determine whether
applications for TLC must be approved.
In accordance with the Workforce
Act, the Department has considered the
Governor’s recommendations in the
development of this regulation. As
stated in sec. 3(b)(3)(B) of the Workforce
Act, the Department may include
provisions in this IFR ‘‘that are
17 CNMI Department of Commerce, Statistical
Yearbook 2017, Table 5.24 ‘‘Average Hourly Wages
by Occupation and Citizenship, CNMI: 2016,’’
https://ver1.cnmicommerce.com/sy-2017-table-5-1731-wage-survey/.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:01 Mar 29, 2019
Jkt 247001
responsive to any recommendation of
the Governor that is not inconsistent
with this Act,’’ including the need to
protect U.S. workers.
The Governor’s request for the
authority to issue TLCs in the same
manner as the government of Guam
approves TLCs in the H–2B program is
inconsistent with the statute. This
procedure for Guam was established by
DHS regulation, under which a
petitioning employer must apply for a
temporary labor certification with the
Governor of Guam. 8 CFR
214.2(h)(6)(iii)(A). The Workforce Act
mandates that the Secretary of
Homeland Security may not approve a
CW–1 petition unless the employer has
received a TLC from the Secretary.
Public Law 115–218 sec. 3(a)(2)(B), 48
U.S.C. 1806(d)(2)(A). The underlying
statutory schemes and histories for these
programs are different. Given DOL’s
longstanding role in issuing TLCs in
other contexts, as well as Congress’
express direction that DOL issue such
TLCs, DOL respectfully declines the
Governor’s request.
The Governor also requested that the
Department use Commonwealthprovided local data in major
occupational categories as the primary
means for granting TLCs. This request is
inconsistent with statutory
requirements. The statute states that a
TLC must confirm the lack of qualified
workers available at the time and place
needed to perform the job for which
foreign workers are sought. Public Law
115–218 sec. 3(a)(2)(A)(i)(I), 48 U.S.C.
1806(d)(2)(A)(i)(I). The statute requires a
case-by-case determination of worker
unavailability at the particular time and
location of the job for which foreign
workers are sought, as opposed to a
determination based on general data
about worker availability in certain
occupational categories. Therefore, the
Department did not accept this
proposal. It should also be noted that
the Governor’s suggestion does not
provide any details as to what kind of
local data might be provided and that it
is unclear how ‘‘major occupational
categories’’ would be determined or
whether those categories would align
with the occupations for which there is
demand in the CW–1 program. It is
possible that local data could be useful
to the CO when deciding whether
additional recruitment methods are
required, but without substantial details
as to what kind of data is being
proposed, it is not possible to determine
whether such data would be useful to
the CO.
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
E. Request for Comments on all Aspects
of This Interim Final Rule
The Department invites the public to
submit comments on this IFR. The
standards and procedures for employers
to obtain a TLC under this IFR are
largely equivalent to the provisions
governing the H–2B temporary
nonagricultural program, 80 FR 24042
(Apr. 29, 2015) (2015 H–2B Rule).
III. Discussion of 20 CFR Part 655,
Subpart E
A. Introductory Sections
1. Section 655.400, Scope and Purpose
of Subpart E
This section informs program users of
the statutory authority for the CW–1
TLC process, and the scope of the
Department’s role in receiving,
reviewing, and adjudicating
applications for TLC, and in upholding
the integrity of CW–1 Applications for
Temporary Employment Certification. It
is through the regulatory provisions in
this subpart that the Secretary makes the
statutory determination that: (1) There
are not sufficient U.S. workers in the
Commonwealth who are able, willing,
qualified, and who will be available at
the time and place needed to perform
the services or labor for which an
employer desires to import foreign
workers; and (2) the employment of the
CW–1 worker(s) will not adversely
affect the wages and working conditions
of U.S. workers similarly employed.
Under the authority in 48 U.S.C.
1806(d)(2)(A), this section also explains
that this subpart establishes the
minimum standards and obligations
with respect to the terms and conditions
of the TLC with which CW–1 employers
must comply, as well as the rights and
obligations of CW–1 workers and
workers in corresponding employment.
2. Section 655.401, Authority of
Agencies, Offices and Divisions in the
Department of Labor
This section describes the authority of
and division of activities related to the
CW–1 program within DOL. It discusses
the authority of OFLC, an office within
the Department’s Employment and
Training Administration (ETA), to issue
TLCs and carry out the Secretary’s
statutory responsibilities as required by
48 U.S.C. 1806.
3. Section 655.402, Definition of Terms
This section establishes definitions of
the terms used in part 655, subpart E. To
the extent possible, the definitions in
this section are consistent with the
definition of terms used in other TLC
programs, such as the H–2A and H–2B
programs.
E:\FR\FM\01APR2.SGM
01APR2
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 62 / Monday, April 1, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
a. Administrative Law Judge
Administrative Law Judge (ALJ)
means a person within the Department’s
Office of Administrative Law Judges
(OALJ) appointed under 5 U.S.C. 3105,
or a panel of such persons designated by
the Chief ALJ from the Board of Alien
Labor Certification Appeals (BALCA or
Board) established by part 656 of this
chapter, but which must hear and
decide administrative judicial reviews,
as set forth in § 655.461.
b. Agent
Agent is a term commonly defined
and used in other TLC programs and is
defined in this section similarly as a
person or entity authorized to act on
behalf of the employer for TLC
purposes, and does not itself employ
workers with respect to a specific
application. This definition further
provides that the agent representing the
CW–1 employer must not be disallowed
from practice before any court, the
Department, the Executive Office for
Immigration Review (EOIR) or DHS
under 8 CFR 292.3 or 1003.101.
c. Applicant
Applicant means a U.S. worker who
is applying for a job opportunity, or on
whose behalf an application is made, in
response to the employer’s recruitment
efforts required by this subpart and for
which an employer has filed a CW–1
Application for Temporary Employment
Certification.
d. Application for Prevailing Wage
Determination
The Application for Prevailing Wage
Determination means the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB)approved Form ETA–9141C and the
appropriate appendices, submitted by
an employer, as set forth in § 655.410,
to secure a PWD for use in filing a CW–
1 Application for Temporary
Employment Certification.
e. CW–1 Application for Temporary
Employment Certification
The CW–1 Application for Temporary
Employment Certification means the
OMB-approved Form ETA–9142C and
the appropriate appendices, a valid
PWD, and all supporting documentation
submitted by an employer, as set forth
in §§ 655.420 through 655.422, to secure
a TLC determination from OFLC
Administrator.
f. Attorney
Attorney means any person who is a
member in good standing of the bar of
the highest court of any State,
possession, territory, or commonwealth
of the United States, or the District of
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:01 Mar 29, 2019
Jkt 247001
Columbia. An attorney can act as an
agent as defined in, and subject to the
requirements of, this regulation.
g. Board of Alien Labor Certification
Appeals or BALCA
BALCA means the permanent Board
established by part 656 of this chapter,
chaired by the Chief ALJ, and consisting
of ALJs appointed pursuant to 5 U.S.C.
3105 and designated by the Chief ALJ to
be members of BALCA, to handle all
administrative judicial reviews in
accordance with § 655.461 of this
subpart.
h. Certifying Officer or CO
CO means the person who processes
CW–1 Applications for Temporary
Employment Certification submitted by
employers with authority to grant or
deny TLC, as set forth in § 655.450 of
this subpart, under the CW–1 program.
The OFLC Administrator is the national
CO. Other COs may also be designated
by the OFLC Administrator to make the
determinations required under this
subpart, including making PWDs.
i. Chief Administrative Law Judge or
Chief ALJ
Chief ALJ means the chief official of
the Department’s OALJ or the Chief
ALJ’s designee.
j. CNMI Department of Labor
The CNMI Department of Labor
means the executive Department of the
Commonwealth Government that
administers employment and job
training activities for employers and
U.S. workers in the Commonwealth.
k. Commonwealth or CNMI
Commonwealth or CNMI, used
interchangeably in this subpart, means
the Commonwealth of the Northern
Mariana Islands.
l. Corresponding Employment
Corresponding employment means
the employment of U.S. workers who
are not CW–1 workers by an employer
that has an approved CW–1 Application
for Temporary Employment
Certification in any work included in
the approved job offer, or in any work
performed by the CW–1 workers.
Workers in corresponding employment
may be either workers hired during the
recruitment process, in connection with
the CW–1 Application for Temporary
Employment Certification, or workers
who already work for the employer and
who perform any work included in the
approved job order or any work
performed by CW–1 workers.
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
12385
m. CW–1 Petition
The CW–1 petition means USCIS
Form I–129CW, Petition for a CNMI–
Only Nonimmigrant Transitional
Worker, a successor form, other form, or
electronic equivalent, any supplemental
information requested by USCIS, and
additional evidence as may be
prescribed or requested by USCIS.
n. CW–1 Worker
The CW–1 worker means any foreign
worker who is lawfully present in the
Commonwealth and authorized by DHS
to perform temporary labor or services
under 48 U.S.C. 1806(d).
o. Date of Need
The date of need means the first date
the employer requires services of the
CW–1 workers as indicated on the CW–
1 Application for Temporary
Employment Certification.
p. Department of Homeland Security or
DHS
DHS means the Federal Department
having jurisdiction over certain
immigration-related functions, acting
through its component agencies,
including USCIS.
q. Employee
Employee means a person who is
engaged to perform work for an
employer, as defined under the general
common law of agency. Some of the
factors relevant to the determination of
employee status include: The hiring
party’s right to control the manner and
means by which the work is
accomplished; the skill required to
perform the work; the source of the
instrumentalities and tools for
accomplishing the work; the location of
the work; the hiring party’s discretion
over when and how long to work; and
whether the work is part of the regular
business of the hiring party. Other
applicable factors may be considered
and no one factor is dispositive. The
terms employee and worker are used
interchangeably in this subpart.
r. Employer
Employer means, in summary, a
person with a physical location in the
Commonwealth that has an employer
relationship with a CW–1 worker or
worker in corresponding employment
under the common law of agency, and
that possesses a Federal Employer
Identification Number.
s. Employer-Client
Employer-client means an employer
that has entered into an agreement with
a job contractor and that is not an
affiliate, branch, or subsidiary of the job
E:\FR\FM\01APR2.SGM
01APR2
12386
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 62 / Monday, April 1, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
contractor, under which the job
contractor provides services or labor to
the employer-client on a temporary
basis and will not exercise substantial,
direct day-to-day supervision and
control in the performance of the
services or labor to be performed other
than hiring, paying, and firing the
workers.
t. Employment and Training
Administration or ETA
ETA means the agency within the
Department that includes OFLC and has
been delegated authority by the
Secretary to fulfill the Secretary’s
mandate under the Workforce Act for
the administration and adjudication of a
CW–1 Application for Temporary
Employment Certification and related
functions.
u. Federal Holiday
Federal holiday means a legal public
holiday as defined at 5 U.S.C. 6103.
v. Full-Time
Full-time for the CW–1 program is 35
or more hours of work per week.
w. Governor
Governor means the Governor of the
Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana
Islands.
x. Job Contractor
Job contractor means an employer that
contracts services or labor on a
temporary basis to one or more
employers which is not an affiliate,
branch, or subsidiary of the job
contractor and where the job contractor
will not exercise substantial, direct dayto-day supervision and control over the
services or labor other than hiring,
paying, and releasing the workers.
Job contractors generally have an
ongoing business of supplying workers
to other employers where substantial,
direct day-to-day supervision,
scheduling, and assignment of work
occurs. The following examples
illustrate the differences between an
employer that is a job contractor and an
employer that is not. Employer A is a
construction staffing company. It sends
several of its employees to Acme
Corporation to perform construction
work on a commercial building for 11
months. Although Employer A has hired
these employees and will be issuing
paychecks to these employees for the
time worked at Acme Corporation,
Employer A will not exercise
substantial, direct day-to-day
supervision and control over its
employees during their performance of
services at Acme Corporation. Rather,
Acme Corporation will direct and
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:01 Mar 29, 2019
Jkt 247001
supervise the Employer A employees
during the 11-month project period.
Under this particular set of facts,
Employer A would be considered a job
contractor. By contrast, Employer B is a
computer repair company. It sends
several of its employees to Acme
Corporation and many other employers
during the course of a year to
disassemble desktop computers for
repair and maintenance. Among the
employees that Employer B sends to
Acme Corporation and these other
employers are several computer repair
technicians and one supervisor.
Employer B’s supervisor instructs and
supervises the technicians as to the
desktops to be repaired at each
employer’s establishment. Under this
particular set of facts, Employer B
generally would not be considered a job
contractor.
y. Job Offer
Job offer means the written offer made
by an employer or potential employer of
CW–1 workers to both U.S. and CW–1
workers describing all the material
terms and conditions of employment,
including those relating to wages,
working conditions, and other benefits,
for which the CW–1 Application for
Temporary Employment Certification is
filed. The minimum content
requirements of the employer’s job offer
are discussed under § 655.441 of this
subpart.
z. Job Opportunity
Job opportunity means full-time
employment at a place in the
Commonwealth to which U.S. workers
can be referred.
aa. Joint Employment
Where two or more employers each
have sufficient definitional indicia of
being a joint employer of a worker
under the common law of agency, they
are, at all times, joint employers of that
worker. The Department additionally
notes that the CNMI program definitions
of employer, employee, and joint
employment that the Department
provides herein are different from the
definitions of ‘‘employer,’’ ‘‘employee,’’
and ‘‘employ’’ in the Fair Labor
Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. 201 et seq.
(FLSA) and the definition of ‘‘employ’’
in the Migrant and Seasonal
Agricultural Worker Protection Act, 29
U.S.C. 1801 et seq. (MSPA). Thus, the
statutory definitions in the FLSA and
MSPA that determine the existence of
an employment relationship or joint
employer status neither apply nor are
relevant to the determination of whether
an entity is a CNMI employer or joint
employer.
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
bb. Layoff
Layoff means any involuntary
separation of one or more U.S.
employees. This does not include an
employer’s cause-based termination
actions.
cc. Long-Term Worker
Long-term worker means an alien who
was admitted to the CNMI as a CW–1
nonimmigrant during fiscal year (FY)
2015, and who was granted CW–1
nonimmigrant status during each of FYs
2016 through 2018. Public Law 115–218
sec. 3(a)(3)(F), 48 U.S.C. 1806(d)(7)(B).
As provided by the statute, long-term
workers are exempt from the prohibition
on Construction and Extraction
Occupations under the Department’s
Standard Occupational Classification
Group 47–0000. Public Law 115–218
sec. 3(a)(3)(C), 48 U.S.C.
1806(d)(3)(D)(v).
dd. National Prevailing Wage Center or
NPWC
NPWC means that office within OFLC
from which employers, agents, or
attorneys who wish to file an CW–1
Application for Temporary Employment
Certification receive a PWD.
ee. NPWC Director
The NPWC Director means the OFLC
official to whom the OFLC
Administrator has delegated authority to
carry out certain NPWC operations and
functions.
ff. National Processing Center or NPC
NPC means the office within OFLC in
which the COs operate, and which are
charged with the adjudication of CW–1
Applications for Temporary
Employment Certification.
gg. NPC Director
The NPC Director is the OFLC official
to whom the OFLC Administrator has
delegated authority for purposes of
certain NPC operations and functions.
hh. Occupational Employment Statistics
or OES Survey
The OES survey means the program
under the jurisdiction of BLS that
reports annual wage estimates for Guam
based on standard occupational
classifications (SOCs).
ii. Offered Wage
The offered wage means the wage
offered by an employer in the CW–1
Application for Temporary Employment
Certification and job offer. The offered
wage must equal or exceed the highest
of the prevailing wage, the Federal
minimum wage, or the Commonwealth
minimum wage.
E:\FR\FM\01APR2.SGM
01APR2
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 62 / Monday, April 1, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
jj. Office of Foreign Labor Certification
or OFLC
OFLC means the organizational
component of the ETA, within the
Department of Labor, that provides
national leadership and policy guidance
and develops regulations to carry out
the Secretary’s responsibilities,
including overseeing the CW–1 program
and issuing determinations related to an
employer’s request for an Application
for Prevailing Wage Determination or
CW–1 Application for Temporary
Employment Certification.
kk. Place of Employment
The place of employment means the
worksite (or physical location) where
work under the CW–1 Application for
Temporary Employment Certification,
including the job offer, actually is
performed by the CW–1 workers and
workers in corresponding employment.
The employer must provide all known
places of employment at the time of
filing the CW–1 Application for
Temporary Employment Certification.
ll. Prevailing Wage
A prevailing wage is the official wage
issued by the NPWC on the Form ETA
9141C, Application for Prevailing Wage
Determination for the CW–1 Program.
The employer must pay all CW–1
workers and U.S. workers in
corresponding employment the highest
of the prevailing wage, the Federal
minimum wage, or the Commonwealth
minimum wage.
mm. Prevailing Wage Determination or
PWD
A PWD is the prevailing wage
determination issued by OFLC’s NPWC
on the Form ETA–9141C, Application
for Prevailing Wage Determination. The
PWD is used in support of the CW–1
Application for Temporary Employment
Certification.
nn. Secretary
The Secretary means the U.S.
Secretary of Labor, the chief official of
the U.S. DOL, or the Secretary’s
designee.
oo. Secretary of Homeland Security
The Secretary of Homeland Security
means the chief official of the U.S. DHS
or the Secretary of Homeland Security’s
designee.
pp. Secretary of State
The Secretary of State means the chief
official of the U.S. Department of State
or the Secretary of State’s designee.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:01 Mar 29, 2019
Jkt 247001
qq. Strike
Strike means a concerted stoppage of
work by employees as a result of a labor
dispute, or any concerted slowdown or
other concerted interruption of
operation (including stoppage by reason
of the expiration of a collective
bargaining agreement).
rr. Successor in Interest
Successor in interest means an
employer, agent or attorney that is
controlling and carrying on the business
of a previous employer:
• Where an employer, agent, or
attorney has violated 48 U.S.C. 1806 or
these regulations, and has ceased doing
business or cannot be located for
purposes of enforcement, the following
factors, as used under Title VII of the
Civil Rights Act and the Vietnam Era
Veterans’ Readjustment Assistance Act,
may be considered in determining
whether an employer, agent, or attorney
is a successor in interest; no one factor
is dispositive, and all the circumstances
will be considered as a whole:
Æ Substantial continuity of the same
business operations;
Æ Use of the same facilities;
Æ Continuity of the work force;
Æ Similarity of jobs and working
conditions;
Æ Similarity of supervisory personnel;
Æ Whether the former management or
owner retains a direct or indirect
interest in the new enterprise;
Æ Similarity in machinery,
equipment, and production methods;
Æ Similarity of products and services;
and
Æ The ability of the predecessor to
provide relief.
• For purposes of debarment only, the
primary consideration will be the
personal involvement of the firm’s
ownership, management, supervisors,
and others associated with the firm in
the violation(s) at issue.
ss. Temporary Labor Certification or
TLC
TLC means the certification made by
the OFLC Administrator, based on the
CW–1 Application for Temporary
Employment Certification, job offer, and
all supporting documentation, with
respect to an employer seeking to file
with DHS a visa petition to employ one
or more foreign nationals as a CW–1
worker.
tt. United States
The United States means the
continental United States, Alaska,
Hawaii, the Commonwealth of Puerto
Rico, Guam, the U.S. Virgin Islands, and
the Commonwealth of the Northern
Mariana Islands.
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
12387
uu. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration
Services or USCIS
USCIS means the Federal agency
within DHS that makes the
determination under the immigration
laws whether to grant petitions filed by
employers seeking CW–1 workers to
perform temporary work in the
Commonwealth.
vv. United States Worker
United States worker (U.S. worker)
means a worker who is:
• A citizen or national of the United
States;
• An alien lawfully admitted for
permanent residence; or
• A citizen of the Federated States of
Micronesia, the Republic of the
Marshall Islands, or the Republic of
Palau, who has been admitted to the
United States as a nonimmigrant and is
employment-authorized under the
Compacts of Free Association between
the United States and those nations.
ww. Wages
Wages mean all forms of cash
remuneration to a worker by an
employer in payment for labor or
services.
xx. Work Contract
Work contract means the document
containing all the material terms and
conditions of employment relating to
wages, hours, working conditions,
places of employment, and other
benefits, including all assurances and
obligations required to be included
under this subpart.
4. Section 655.403, Persons and Entities
Authorized To File
The employer, the employer’s agent,
or the employer’s attorney is authorized
to file Applications for Prevailing Wage
Determination and/or CW–1
Applications for Temporary
Employment Certification. To obtain a
TLC, the employer must submit to OFLC
a signed and dated Appendix C of the
CW–1 Application for Temporary
Employment Certification (Form ETA–
9142C) attesting to comply with all of
the terms, assurances, and obligations of
the CW–1 program, regardless of
whether it is represented by an agent or
attorney. If an agent or attorney is
identified in the CW–1 Application for
Temporary Employment Certification,
that agent or attorney must also sign and
date Appendix C, declaring that the
employer has designated the agent or
attorney to act on the employer’s behalf
in connection with the CW–1
Application for Temporary Employment
Certification. Employers, their agents,
and their attorneys are each responsible
E:\FR\FM\01APR2.SGM
01APR2
12388
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 62 / Monday, April 1, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
for the truthfulness and accuracy of the
information and documentation
submitted with the CW–1 Application
for Temporary Employment
Certification.
5. Section 655.404, Requirements of
Agents
In addition to signing Appendix C of
the CW–1 Application for Temporary
Employment Certification, an
employer’s agent is required to provide,
as part of the CW–1 Application for
Temporary Employment Certification, a
copy of the current agreement, contract,
or other document defining the scope of
its relationship with the employer and
demonstrating the agent’s authority to
represent the employer. The Department
will review the agreement to determine
if a bona fide relationship exists
between the agent and the employer
and, where the agent is also engaged in
recruitment, review to ensure it
includes language prohibiting the
payment of fees by the worker, as
required by § 655.423(n).
The Department reserves the right to
further review the agreement in the
course of an audit examination or other
integrity measure and provide the
agreement to DHS or any other Federal
Government Official performing an
investigation, inspection, audit, or law
enforcement function. A certification of
an employer’s CW–1 Application for
Temporary Employment Certification
that includes such an agreement in no
way indicates OFLC’s approval of the
agreement or the terms therein. The
requirement does not obligate either the
agent or the employer to disclose any
trade secrets or other proprietary
business information; rather it only
requires the agent to provide sufficient
documentation to demonstrate clearly
the scope of the agent’s relationship
with the employer.
B. Prefiling Procedures
1. Section 655.410, Offered Wage Rate
and Determination of Prevailing Wage
The Workforce Act requires that an
employer must pay each CW–1 worker
‘‘a wage that is not less than the greater
of—(i) the statutory minimum wage in
the Commonwealth; (ii) the Federal
minimum wage; or (iii) the prevailing
wage in the Commonwealth for the
occupation in which the worker is
employed.’’ 48 U.S.C. 1806(d)(2)(C). The
Workforce Act further provides that
‘‘the Secretary of Labor shall use, or
make available to employers, an
occupational wage survey conducted by
the Governor that the Secretary of Labor
has determined meets the statistical
standards for determining prevailing
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:01 Mar 29, 2019
Jkt 247001
wages in the Commonwealth on an
annual basis.’’ Id. at 1806(d)(2)(B)(i).
Finally, under the statute, ‘‘[i]n the
absence of an occupational wage survey
approved by the Secretary of Labor . . .
the prevailing wage for an occupation in
the Commonwealth shall be the
arithmetic mean of the wages of workers
similarly employed in the territory of
Guam according to the wage component
of the Occupational Employment
Statistics Survey conducted by the
Bureau of Labor Statistics.’’ Id. at
1806(d)(2)(B)(ii). Section 655.410 of this
IFR establishes the procedures for wage
determinations, how employers will
obtain a PWD, and employers record
retention requirements for the PWD.
Consistent with 48 U.S.C.
1806(d)(2)(C), § 655.410(a) of the IFR
requires an employer seeking to employ
CW–1 workers to offer and pay the
highest of the prevailing wage, the
Federal minimum wage,18 or the
Commonwealth minimum wage to both
CW–1 workers and workers in
corresponding employment. While the
statute does not expressly state that the
employer must pay the offered wage to
workers in corresponding employment,
this requirement is necessary to prevent
the employment of CW–1 workers from
causing an adverse effect on the wages
and working conditions of similarly
employed U.S. workers. The statute
prohibits the Department from
approving an application for TLC unless
the petitioner has demonstrated that
there are not sufficient U.S. workers in
CNMI and that employment of CW–1
workers will not adversely affect the
wages of similarly employed U.S.
workers. Without this wage
requirement, U.S. workers performing
the same work as the work requested in
the job order, but earning less than the
advertised wage, would be required to
quit their current employment and reapply for the same job with the same
employer to obtain the higher wage rate
offered to the CW–1 worker. Such a
result is inconsistent with the
requirement to protect against adverse
effects on similarly employed U.S.
workers. Section 655.410(a) also
clarifies that the issuance of a PWD does
not permit an employer to pay less than
the highest wage required by any
applicable Federal or Commonwealth
law. This requirement is also consistent
with similar requirements currently in
place for other TLC programs.19
18 Effective October 1, 2018, the full Federal
minimum wage of $7.25 per hour applies to
workers in the Commonwealth.
19 20 CFR part 655, subpart A; While this
requirement is true also for 20 CFR part 655,
subpart B, in terms of the offered wage requirement,
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
As required by the Workforce Act,
§ 655.410(b)(1) provides that if the
Governor conducts an annual survey for
an occupational classification, and the
survey meets the statistical
requirements set forth in § 655.410(e), as
determined by the OFLC Administrator,
the wage reported by the Governor’s
survey must be the prevailing wage for
the occupational classification. The
regulation requires that the survey must
include a mean hourly wage. The
requirement that the Governor’s survey
reports a mean hourly wage provides
consistency between prevailing wages
issued from the Governor’s survey and
prevailing wages issued from the OES
survey, which by statute must use the
mean wage. See 48 U.S.C.
1806(d)(2)(B)(ii).
After the NPWC reviews the
Governor’s survey for consistency with
the statistical standards in § 655.410(e),
discussed below, OFLC will make
available on its website a listing of all
occupational classifications for which it
has determined there is a valid
Governor’s survey wage with the
accompanying prevailing wage. This
will allow employers to determine the
potential wage obligation associated
with the CW–1 program, even before
submitting a PWD request.
In the absence of an approved wage
survey, the Department will establish
the prevailing wage using the mean
wage of workers similarly employed in
Guam from the OES survey. The OES
survey is among the largest continuous
statistical wage survey programs and is
cooperatively administered between
BLS and the State Workforce Agencies
(SWAs). For the territory of Guam, the
OES survey is administered by BLS and
the Guam Department of Labor. BLS
funds the OES survey and provides the
statistical procedures and technical
support, while the SWAs and Guam
Department of Labor collect most of the
data. BLS creates a national sampling
frame by combining the administrative
lists of unemployment insurance (UI)
program reports from all of the SWAs
into a single database called the
Quarterly Census of Employment and
Wages.20 Because the territory of Guam
does not report data to the UI program,
the Guam Department of Labor
administers an Annual Census of
Establishments survey program to create
a database of employers in all industries
employers do not receive a PWD from DOL’s NPWC
for the H–2A program.
20 See Bureau of Labor Statistics, ‘‘Survey
Methods and Reliability Statement for the May 2017
Occupational Employment Statistics Survey for a
comprehensive and technical discussion of the OES
survey methodology,’’ https://www.bls.gov/oes/
current/methods_statement.pdf.
E:\FR\FM\01APR2.SGM
01APR2
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 62 / Monday, April 1, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
for use in the OES survey.21 The OES
survey sample is stratified by
metropolitan and nonmetropolitan area,
industry, and size, and the survey
reports wage estimates based on
geographic areas at the national and
State levels and for certain territories in
which the OES survey can report
statistically valid data, including Guam,
but not the CNMI.
Wages for the OES survey are straighttime, gross pay, exclusive of premium
pay. For purposes of the OES survey,
‘‘pay’’ includes base rate; cost-of-living
allowances; guaranteed pay; hazardous
duty pay; incentive pay, including
commissions and production bonuses;
piece-rates; tips; and on-call pay.22 The
OES survey is a comprehensive and
statistically valid wage survey and is
widely used in the DOL’s
nonagricultural foreign labor
certification programs (H–2B, H–1B, and
PERM). The frequency and precision of
the data collected, as well as the
comprehensive nature of the
occupations for which such data are
collected, make it an appropriate data
source for determining applicable wages
across the range of occupations found in
the CW–1 program.
The OES prevailing wage that will be
used for the CW–1 program is the mean
wage paid to workers in a particular
SOC in Guam. The use of the mean
wage in this IFR is required by the
Workforce Act. See 48 U.S.C.
1806(d)(2)(B)(ii). The Department will
therefore issue prevailing wages at the
mean of all workers ‘‘similarly
employed in the territory of Guam’’ in
the relevant SOC from the OES survey,
without regard to industry, experience,
or skill level.
The Workforce Act requires
employers to pay a wage that is the
highest of the Commonwealth minimum
wage, the Federal minimum wage, or
the prevailing wage in the
Commonwealth. 48 U.S.C.
1806(d)(2)(C). However, the statute is
silent about how the Department must
set the prevailing wage if both: (1) The
Governor’s annual survey for the
occupation does not meet the
Department’s statistical standards or the
Governor does not submit a survey
covering a given occupation; and (2) the
21 The Bureau of Labor Statistics within the Guam
Department of Labor is responsible for
administering the Annual Census of
Establishments, which is funded in part by the
Department’s Employment and Training
Administration under the Workforce Information
Grants, https://bls.guam.gov/annual-census-ofestablishments/.
22 See ‘‘Occupational Employment Report Form,
Instructions for Reporting Wage Information,’’ p. 2,
available at https://www.bls.gov/respondents/oes/
pdf/forms/uuuuuu_fillable.pdf.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:01 Mar 29, 2019
Jkt 247001
OES survey does not report a mean of
the wages paid to workers in the SOC
in Guam due to insufficient data. In the
event this situation occurs, the
Department remains statutorily bound
to issue a prevailing wage given that the
statute requires the employer to pay the
highest of the statutory minimum wage,
the Federal minimum wage, or the
prevailing wage in the Commonwealth.
See 48 U.S.C. 1806(d)(2)(C).
When the OES survey cannot produce
a statistically valid wage estimate for a
given geographic area, BLS reports a
wage at the next largest geographic area
until it reaches an area large enough that
it has enough data to report.23 As a
result, when the BLS cannot produce a
statistically valid wage rate for Guam in
a given SOC, the reported wage rate is
a national wage for the SOC. OFLC uses
that national wage rate to establish the
prevailing wage in Guam in the other
foreign labor certification programs
when BLS cannot report a mean wage
based on wages paid to workers in
Guam for a given SOC. However, the
Workforce Act’s mandate for the
Department to base prevailing wage
rates on wages paid to workers in the
Commonwealth or Guam as the first and
second prevailing wage options
establishes a clear preference in the
CW–1 program for prevailing wage rates
to be based on wages paid in these
islands, rather than other geographic
areas. As a result, the Department
concludes that it would be
inappropriate to require an employer to
pay a prevailing wage that is based only
on the national wage for the SOC from
the OES survey, without adjustment, in
the CW–1 program. Accordingly, if both
prevailing wage sources expressly
provided in the statute do not report a
wage, the Department will base the
prevailing wage on the national mean
wage for the SOC from the OES, but will
adjust the national SOC wage by the
percentage difference between the mean
wage paid to workers in all SOCs for
which the OES survey can produce an
average wage paid to workers in Guam
compared with the national mean wage
paid to workers in all SOCs in the
United States. Given the lack of
available, comprehensive, and reliable
alternative data sources, this method
will best meet: (1) The statutory
requirement for the Department to
require employers to pay a prevailing
wage; and (2) the statutory intent for the
Department to issue prevailing wage
rates based on wages paid to similarly
employed workers in the
Commonwealth or Guam. The
23 The
BLS practice of survey expansion is
generally described in GAL 2–98, at p. 4.
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
12389
Department requests comments on its
use of an adjusted national wage to
establish the prevailing wage for the
CW–1 program if a mean wage is not
available for the occupational
classification from both a survey
conducted by the CNMI Governor and
from the OES for workers in Guam, as
well as on alternative sources it might
use to establish the prevailing wage in
these circumstances.
Section 655.410(b)(2) provides that if
the job duties on the Application for
Prevailing Wage Determination do not
fall within a single occupational
classification, the NPWC will determine
the prevailing wage by assigning the
highest prevailing wage for all
applicable occupational classifications.
This approach ensures that employers
do not adversely affect wages or
discourage U.S. workers from applying
for a job by advertising a job which
contains the duties of distinct
occupations, and asking workers to
perform the duties of a higher wage
occupation while being paid for the
duties of a lower wage occupation. This
is codifies existing NPWC procedures
and practice for determining prevailing
wages for other foreign labor
certification programs (i.e., H–1B, H–2B,
and PERM) and protects against
occupational misclassification.24
Section 655.410(c) requires an
employer to electronically request and
obtain a PWD from the NPWC before
electronically submitting its CW–1
Application for Temporary Employment
Certification. The PWD must be valid on
the day the employer submits the CW–
1 Application for Temporary
Employment Certification. To avoid
delays, the Department encourages
employers to request a PWD in the CW–
1 program at least 90 calendar days
before the date the employer plans to
file its CW–1 Application for Temporary
Employment Certification.
CW–1 employers that lack adequate
access to electronic filing, either due to
lack of internet access of physical
disability precluding electronic filing,
may file the Application for Prevailing
Wage Determination by mail with a
statement of why it qualifies to file by
mail. There is no specific format for the
statement but it must accompany the
application at the time of filing. The
NPWC will return without review any
application submitted by mail or any
method other than the designated
electronic method(s) provided in this
regulation, unless the employer submits
the application package in accordance
24 See OFLC Frequently Asked Questions and
Answers, https://www.foreignlaborcert.doleta.gov/
faqsanswers.cfm.
E:\FR\FM\01APR2.SGM
01APR2
12390
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 62 / Monday, April 1, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
with paragraph (c)(1)(ii) of § 655.410
and with the statement of the need to
file by mail. If an employer files its
Application for Prevailing Wage
Determination by mail with the required
statement of need, the employer may
file its CW–1 Application for Temporary
Employment Certification by mail
without a statement of need. This
statement must be updated each fiscal
year.
Section 655.410(d) provides that
when the NPWC issues the prevailing
wage, it must provide the following
information: The prevailing wage, the
source of the prevailing wage, and the
Application for Prevailing Wage
Determination, with the NPWC’s
endorsement to the employer.
Section 655.410(e) establishes the
‘‘statistical standards’’ the Department
will use to evaluate a survey conducted
by the Governor under 48 U.S.C.
1806(d)(2)(B)(i). The Department will
use a survey conducted by the Governor
to establish the prevailing wage for an
occupational classification only if the
survey meets the following
requirements: (1) The survey must be
independently conducted and issued by
the Governor, including through any
Commonwealth agency, Commonwealth
college, or Commonwealth university;
(2) the survey must provide the
arithmetic mean of the wages of workers
in the occupational classification in the
Commonwealth; (3) the independent
surveyor must either make a reasonable,
good faith attempt to contact all
employers in the Commonwealth
employing workers in that occupation
or conduct a randomized sampling of
such employers, which means the
surveyor must collect the wages of
workers performing the job duties
covered by the survey’s occupational
classification without regard to the
education, experience, or immigration
status of the workers in the occupational
classification or the size of the
employer; (4) if used, the randomized
survey must include the wages of at
least 30 workers in the Commonwealth;
(5) if used, the randomized survey must
include the wages of workers in the
Commonwealth employed by at least 3
employers; (6) if used, the randomized
survey must be conducted across
industries that employ workers in the
occupational classification; 25 (7) the
wage reported in the survey must
include all types of pay, consistent with
the OES definition of ‘‘pay,’’ as
discussed above; (8) the survey must be
based on wages paid to workers in the
25 The occupational classification for the survey
is based on the job duties performed and need not
be identical to an SOC.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:01 Mar 29, 2019
Jkt 247001
occupational classification not more
than 12 months before the date the
survey is submitted to the OFLC
Administrator for consideration; and (9)
the Governor of the Commonwealth
must submit the survey to the OFLC
Administrator, with specific
information about the survey
methodology, including such items as
sample size and source, sample
selection procedures, types of payments
(e.g., overtime, weekend or holiday pay
premiums) included in the survey, and
survey job descriptions, to allow a
determination to be made about the
adequacy of the data provided and the
validity of the statistical methodology
used in conducting the survey.
The statistical standards in this IFR
for surveys conducted by the Governor
in the CW–1 program are generally
consistent with the regulatory standards
for prevailing wage surveys in the H–2B
program. See 20 CFR 655.10(f).26
Adherence to the H–2B survey
standards will promote consistency in
the wage rates that apply to similarly
employed workers across nonimmigrant
programs in the Commonwealth. This
alignment will also make the CW–1
regulation easier to implement because
the Commonwealth government has
experience in conducting prevailing
wage surveys under the H–2B standards.
The CW–1 program is based on the
statutory requirement that the
Governor’s survey must be conducted
‘‘on an annual basis.’’ 48 U.S.C.
1806(d)(2)(B)(i). In comparison to the
H–2B program, there are two notable
changes. First, a survey for the CW–1
program must report the mean and
cannot report only the median, unlike in
the H–2B program, which permits a
survey to report either a mean or a
median only. As discussed above, this
CW–1 requirement will align the survey
methodology for the Governor’s survey
with the OES methodology required by
the Workforce Act. Either a mean or
median rate can be calculated from the
underlying survey data, so limiting CW–
1 surveys to those that produce a mean
wage requires no change in the practice
of conducting surveys that is used for
H–2B. In addition, past prevailing wage
surveys conducted by the
26 The H–2B regulatory survey standards are
discussed in depth in the 2015 H–2B Rule, 80 FR
24146 (Apr. 29, 2015). Except for limitations on
who may conduct a survey—which are not relevant
here because 48 U.S.C. 1806(d)(2)(B)(i) allows only
for surveys conducted by the Governor and the
BLS—the regulatory H–2B survey standards are
unaffected by current appropriations riders in the
H–2B program. See ‘‘Effects of the 2016 Department
of Labor Appropriations Act’’ (Dec. 29, 2015),
https://www.foreignlaborcert.doleta.gov/pdf/H-2B_
Prevailing_Wage_FAQs_DOL_Appropriations_
Act.pdf.
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
Commonwealth government for the H–
2B program have reported a mean wage,
and so the CW–1 regulation will not
require a change to existing practice.
Second, § 655.410(e)(8) of this IFR
requires that the survey is based on
wages paid to workers in the
occupational classification not more
than 12 months before the survey is
submitted to OFLC, while the H–2B
regulation permits employers to submit
surveys based on wages paid no more
than 24 months before the survey is
submitted. This difference for the CW–
1 program is based on the statutory
requirement that the Governor’s survey
must be conducted ‘‘on an annual
basis.’’
As provided in § 655.410(f), the OFLC
Administrator will review the survey for
compliance with the regulatory
requirements. If the OFLC
Administrator finds the wage reported
for any occupational classification is
unacceptable, the OFLC Administrator
must inform the Governor in writing of
the reasons for the finding. The
Governor may respond to the finding by
submitting corrected wage data or by
conducting a new wage survey, and may
submit the revised wage data to the
OFLC Administrator for consideration.
Under § 655.410(g), a PWD issued
based on either the Governor’s survey or
the OES survey will be valid for at least
90 calendar days and as many as 365
days, the same validity period used by
the NPWC across programs. See, e.g., 20
CFR 656.40(c). The length of the validity
period for the survey will depend, in
part, on when the prevailing wage
source used to establish the prevailing
wage will be updated.
As provided in § 655.410(h),
employers must retain the PWD for 3
years from the date of issuance if not
used in support of a TLC application or
if used in support of a TLC application
that is denied, or 3 years from the end
date of the validity period of the CW–
1 Application for Temporary
Employment Certification, whichever is
later. The employer must submit the
PWD to the CO if requested and to any
Federal Government Official performing
an investigation, inspection, audit, or
law enforcement function.
Employers may request review of a
PWD only through the appeals process
described in § 655.411 of this IFR.
2. Section 655.411, Review of Prevailing
Wage Determinations
Paragraph (a) of this section requires
an employer that wants to appeal a PWD
to make a written request to the NPWC
Director within 7 business days from the
date the PWD was issued. Requests
made more than 7 business days after
E:\FR\FM\01APR2.SGM
01APR2
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 62 / Monday, April 1, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
the issuance of a PWD will be
considered time barred. The request for
review must clearly identify the PWD
for which review is sought, set forth the
particular grounds for the request, and
include any materials submitted to the
NPWC for the purposes of securing the
PWD.
Under paragraph (b), the employer
may submit supplementary material
with its request for review by the NPWC
Director. The NPWC Director will
review the employer’s request and
accompanying documentation,
including supplementary material
provided. After performing a review of
the documentation, the NPWC Director
will issue a Final Determination letter to
the employer and, if applicable, to the
employer’s agent or attorney, either
affirming the PWD as issued or
modifying the PWD.
If the employer desires review of the
NPWC Director’s decision, paragraph (c)
establishes the process the employer
must follow to request review by
BALCA. Specifically, the employer must
make a written request for review that
must be received by BALCA within 10
business days from the date the Final
Determination letter was issued by the
NPWC Director, and the employer must
simultaneously send a copy to the
NPWC Director who issued the Final
Determination. Upon receipt of the
request, the NPWC will prepare an
Appeal File and submit it to BALCA.
The request for review, statements,
briefs, and other submissions of the
parties must contain only legal
arguments and may only refer to
evidence that was within the record
upon which the decision on the PWD by
the NPWC Director was based. BALCA
will then handle the appeal in
accordance with § 655.461 as explained
further in the preamble to that section.
indicating that it qualifies for one of the
regulatory exemptions in the IFR. The
Department believes that the below
regulatory requirements will advance
the Department’s statutory obligations.
Based on the Department’s experience
administering other TLC programs, the
requirements outlined below
appropriately ensure that U.S. workers
have equal access to job opportunities
and protect their wages and working
conditions from adverse effect.
C. CW–1 Application for Temporary
Employment Certification Filing
Procedures
b. Paragraph (c), Location and Methods
of Filing
1. Section 655.420, Application Filing
Requirements
In accordance with Section (2)(A)(i) of
the Workforce Act, an employer must
first obtain a TLC from the Department
before filing a CW–1 petition with DHS.
Public Law 115–218 sec. 3(a)(3)(B), 48
U.S.C. 1806(d)(2)(A). This section
establishes the standards, timeframes,
and procedures for employers to request
TLC under the CW–1 program,
including the requirement that the
employer must file the TLC application
electronically unless the employer has
submitted a statement when filing the
PWD request or files a statement when
submitting the TLC application
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:01 Mar 29, 2019
Jkt 247001
a. Paragraphs (a) and (b), What To File
and Statutory Timeframes for Filing an
CW–1 Application for Temporary
Employment Certification
Paragraph (a) specifies that an
employer seeking TLC must file a
completed CW–1 Application for
Temporary Employment Certification—
consisting of the Form ETA–9142C,
appropriate appendices, and a valid
PWD—and all supporting
documentation and information that
this subpart requires at the time of
filing. Incomplete applications will not
be accepted for processing; OFLC will
return them without review. In
accordance with the Workforce Act, 48
U.S.C. 1806(d)(3)(D)(i), paragraph (b)(1)
provides that an employer seeking to
hire CW–1 workers must file a
completed CW–1 Application for
Temporary Employment Certification no
more than 120 calendar days before the
employer’s date of need. However,
where the employer is seeking TLC to
support a petition to renew a visa
(extending the employment of a CW–1
worker), paragraph (b)(2) requires that
the employer file the application no
more than 180 calendar days before the
date on which the CW–1 status expires.
See id.
Paragraph (c) of this section
establishes the location and method by
which an employer may file a CW–1
Application for Temporary Employment
Certification under the CW–1 program.
In paragraph (c)(1), the Department
requires an employer to submit the
Form ETA–9142C and all required
supporting documentation to the NPC
using an electronic method(s)
designated by the OFLC Administrator.
Unless the employer qualifies to file by
mail,, the NPC will return, without
review, any CW–1 Application for
Temporary Employment Certification
submitted using a method other than the
electronic method(s) designated by the
OFLC Administrator.
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
12391
c. Paragraph (c)(1), Procedures for
Electronic Filing of the CW–1
Application for Temporary Employment
Certification
Absent an exemption employers or, if
applicable, their agents or attorneys will
prepare and electronically submit CW–
1 Applications for Temporary
Employment Certification using OFLC’s
new Foreign Labor Application Gateway
(FLAG) System at https://flag.dol.gov. Efiling will be required for the Form
ETA–9142C, applicable appendices, and
all supporting documentation required
by this subpart. All of these documents
must be electronically submitted at the
time of filing to constitute a complete,
properly filed application. In addition,
DOL’s forms, will require employers
and, if applicable, their authorized
representatives, to designate a valid
email address for sending and receiving
official correspondence concerning the
processing of these e-filings by the NPC.
d. Justification for Mandatory Electronic
Filing of CW–1 Applications for
Temporary Employment Certification
For the reasons discussed below in
the preamble, the Department has
concluded that the e-filing requirement
for employers will modernize the endto-end electronic processing of CW–1
Applications for Temporary
Employment Certification and create
significant administrative efficiencies
for employers in the CNMI and the
Department. The Department has also
estimated that mandating e-filing should
minimize costs and burdens for
employers and the Department, improve
the quality of the information collected
by minimizing errors through systemgenerated prompts, ensure required
information and document uploads are
provided to reduce the frequency of
delays related to filing applications,
improve the quality of information
collected, and promote administrative
efficiency and accountability.
Electronic submissions do not require
manual data entry by NPC staff and can
be instantaneously categorized and
assigned for review by the NPC. If an
electronic CW–1 Application for
Temporary Employment Certification
requires amendments or other
corrections, those amendments and
corrections can be automatically entered
by NPC staff. Furthermore, as previously
stated, electronic submissions are more
likely to include all necessary
documentation and information because
the system will require electronic
validation of the form entries and
supporting documentation prior to
acceptance. Again, employers will have
an immediate opportunity to correct the
E:\FR\FM\01APR2.SGM
01APR2
12392
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 62 / Monday, April 1, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
errors or upload the missing
documentation. Electronic filing also
expedites the process of addressing any
potential problems with an application
because the NPC is able to email an
employer or their representative directly
from the electronic filing module to
alert it of information which must be
corrected or if it needs clarification
about something. Electronic contact
with the employer or their
representative allows for instantaneous
delivery of questions to employers and
allows employers to respond quickly as
well, which is much faster than
transmitting questions by mail. The
electronic system will also allow an
employer or their representative to
upload necessary documentation
directly to their case file, which
expedites review of applications and the
issuance of final determinations. The
Department’s e-filing requirement will
improve the customer experience by
permitting more prompt adjudication of
applications and reducing paperwork
burdens and mailing costs. This
approach should reduce processing
delays and costs employers with access
to the internet, as they would otherwise
need to pay for expedited mail or
private courier services to submit
corrected applications, as has been
OFLC’s experience in connection with
its other temporary labor certification
programs.27
The Department’s e-filing requirement
is consistent with several Federal
statutes. First, the Government
Paperwork Elimination Act (GPEA),
Public Law 105–277, Title XVII (secs.
1701–1710), 112 Stat. 2681–749 (Oct.
21, 1998), 44 U.S.C. 3504 note, was
enacted to improve customer service
and governmental efficiency through the
use of information technology. The
GPEA directs federal agencies, when
possible, to use electronic forms, efiling, and electronic submissions to
conduct agency business with the
public. Second, the E-Government Act
of 2002, Public Law 107–347, 116 Stat.
2899 (Dec. 17, 2002), 44 U.S.C. 3601
note, was enacted to encourage use of
technology to enhance governmental
functions and services, integrate related
interagency functions, achieve more
efficient agency performance, increase
public access to Government
information, and reduce costs and
burdens for businesses and other
Government entities. Third, the
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA), 44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq., was enacted with
the goal of reducing paperwork burdens
imposed by Government information
27 20
CFR part 655, subpart A; 20 CFR part 655,
subpart B.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:01 Mar 29, 2019
Jkt 247001
collections, improving the efficiency of
Government information collection and
the quality of information collected, and
minimizing Government costs
associated with the creation, collection,
maintenance, use, and disposition of
information. Finally, this e-filing
requirement is consistent with several
other open Government initiatives and
information technology modernization
policies expressed in memoranda and
Executive Orders, such as E.O. 13571,28
which require agencies to use
innovative technology to reduce costs
and streamline customer service
processes.
The Department is aware that some
employers in the CNMI, especially those
located on islands without adequate
technological infrastructure, may be
unable to take advantage of the more
efficient e-filing process. Therefore, the
Department will permit these employers
to file using a paper-based process if
they lack adequate access to e-filing.
This IFR also establishes that
individuals with disabilities may file by
mail.
e. Paragraphs (c)(2) and (3), Alternative
Filing Procedures for Employers
Lacking Adequate Access to Electronic
Filing or Due to a Disability in the CNMI
The Department is also establishing
procedures allowing employers in the
CNMI that lack adequate access to efiling to file by mail and, for those
employers who are unable or limited in
their ability to use or access the
electronic application due to a
disability, file the application through
other means.
f. Paragraph (d), Original Signature and
Acceptance of Electronic Signatures
Paragraph (d) of this section requires
that the CW–1 Application for
Temporary Employment Certification,
as filed, contains an electronic
(scanned) copy of the employer’s
original signature (and that of the
employer’s authorized attorney or agent,
if the employer is represented by an
attorney or agent) or, in the alternative,
use a verifiable electronic signature
method, as directed by the OFLC
Administrator. If the employer, under
paragraph (c) of this section, is
permitted to file by mail, the CW–1
28 E.O. 13571, Streamlining Service Delivery and
Improving Customer Service (Apr. 27, 2011)
(requiring agencies to enhance customer service by
‘‘identifying ways to use innovative technologies .
. . [to] lower[] costs, decreas[e] service delivery
times, and improve[e] the customer experience.’’);
see also OMB Memorandum M–11–24,
‘‘Implementing Executive Order 13571 on
Streamlining Service Delivery and Improving
Customer Service’’ (June 13, 2011) (implementing
E.O. 13571).
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
Application for Temporary Employment
Certification, when filed, must bear the
original signature of the employer and,
if applicable, the employer’s authorized
attorney or agent.
When electronically filing the CW–1
Application for Temporary Employment
Certification, the FLAG System will
require the employer and, if applicable,
the employer’s authorized attorney or
agent to digitally sign the Form ETA–
9142C, Appendix C,29 or require the
system account holder to upload an
electronic (scanned) copy of the
originally signed and dated Appendix C.
In the case of a job contractor filing as
a joint employer with its employerclient, a separate signed and dated
Appendix C for the employer-client
must also be submitted concurrently
with the CW–1 Application for
Temporary Employment Certification,
as required by § 655.421 of this subpart.
The Appendix C is a crucial component
of the CW–1 Application for Temporary
Employment Certification because it
contains the requisite program
assurances and obligations an employer
must provide to the Department. An
employer that fails to provide a signed
and dated Appendix C at the time of
filing the CW–1 Application for
Temporary Employment Certification,
in accordance with the original
signature requirements of this
paragraph, is ineligible to file and its
application will be returned by the NPC
without review.
The Department has concluded that
this provision will maximize
efficiencies in the application process
and establish parity between paper and
electronic documents by expanding the
ability of employers, agents, and
attorneys to use electronic methods to
comply with signature requirements for
the CW–1 program. As a matter of
longstanding policy, the Department
considers an original signature to be
legally binding evidence of the intention
of a person with regard to a document,
record, or transaction. Since the
implementation of an e-filing option in
late 2012 for the H–2A and H–2B
programs, the Department also has
considered a signature valid where the
employer’s original signature on a
document retained in the employer’s
file is photocopied, scanned, or
similarly reproduced for electronic
transmission to the Department,
whether at the time of filing or during
the course of processing a CW–1
Application for Temporary Employment
Certification. Although acceptance of
29 Appendix C includes a declaration to be signed
by the employer’s attorney or agent, and a separate,
lengthier declaration to be signed by the employer.
E:\FR\FM\01APR2.SGM
01APR2
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 62 / Monday, April 1, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
electronic (scanned) copies of original
signatures on documents generates
efficiencies in the application process,
modern technologies and evolving
business practices are rendering the
distinction between original paper and
electronic signatures nearly obsolete.
The Department and employers can
achieve even greater efficiencies using
and accepting electronic signature
methods.
Under this provision, the Department
will permit an employer, agent, or
attorney to sign or certify a document
required under this subpart using a
valid electronic signature method. This
proposal is consistent with the
principles of two Federal statutes that
govern an agency’s implementation of
electronic document and signature
requirements. First, the GPEA requires
Federal agencies to allow individuals or
entities that deal with the agencies,
when practicable, the option to submit
information or transact with the
agencies electronically and to
electronically maintain those records.
The GPEA and e-Gov also specifically
states that electronic records and their
related electronic signatures are not to
be denied legal effect, validity, or
enforceability merely because they are
in electronic form, and encourages
Federal Government use of a range of
electronic signature alternatives. See
sections 1704, 1707 of the GPEA.
Second, the Electronic Signatures in
Global and National Commerce (E–
SIGN) Act, Public Law 106–229, 114
Stat. 464 (June 30, 2000), 15 U.S.C. 7001
et seq., generally provides that
electronic documents have the same
legal effect as their hard copy
counterparts.
The GPEA and E–SIGN Act adopt a
‘‘functional equivalence approach’’ to
electronic signature requirements where
the purposes and functions of the
traditional paper-based requirements for
a signature must be considered, together
with how those purposes and functions
can be fulfilled in an electronic context.
The functional equivalence approach
rejects the precept that Federal agency
requirements impose on users of
electronic signatures more stringent
standards of security than required for
handwritten or other forms of signatures
in a paper-based environment.
Consistent with the GPEA, the
Department will accept an electronic
signature on CW–1 applications as long
as it: (1) Identifies and authenticates a
particular person as the source of the
electronic communication; and (2)
indicates such person’s approval of the
information contained in the electronic
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:01 Mar 29, 2019
Jkt 247001
communication.30 In addition, OMB
guidelines state that a valid and
enforceable electronic signature would
require satisfying the following signing
requirements: (1) The signer must use
an acceptable electronic form of
signature; (2) the electronic form of
signature must be executed or adopted
by the signer with the intent to sign the
electronic record; (3) the electronic form
of signature must be attached to or
associated with the electronic record
being signed; (4) there must be a means
to identify and authenticate a particular
person as the signer; and (5) there must
be a means to preserve the integrity of
the signed record.31 The Department
will rely on best practices for electronic
signature safety and integrity, such as
these five signing requirements.
Consistent with the GPEA and E–SIGN
Act, the Department adopts a
technology ‘‘neutral’’ policy with
respect to the requirements for
electronic signature. That is, the
employer, agent, or attorney can apply
an electronic signature required on a
document using any available
technology that meets the five signing
requirements.
The Department concludes that these
standards for electronic signature are
reasonable and accepted by Federal
agencies. Promoting the use of
electronic signatures will enable
employers, agents, and attorneys to
reduce printing, paper, and storage
costs. For employers that need to retain
and refer to multiple CW–1 Applications
for Temporary Employment
Certification, the time and costs savings
can be considerable. Since the CW–1
program serves employers located
thousands of miles from the continental
United States on the westward side of
the International Date Line,
implementing electronic signatures will
help reduce operational costs and
maximize processing efficiency for the
Department.
g. Paragraph (e), Requests for Multiple
Positions on the CW–1 Application for
Temporary Employment Certification
Similar to the Department’s
administration of other TLC programs,32
paragraph (e) of this section permits an
employer to request certification of
30 Section 1710(1) of the GPEA. The definition of
electronic signature in the E–SIGN Act essentially
is equivalent to the definition in the GPEA. The E–
SIGN Act defines an electronic signature as ‘‘an
electronic sound, symbol, or process, attached to or
logically associated with a contract or other record
and executed or adopted by a person with the intent
to sign the record.’’ 15 U.S.C. 7006(5).
31 Federal Chief Information Council, ‘‘Use of
Electronic Signatures in Federal Organization
Transactions,’’ Version 1.0 (Jan. 25, 2013).
32 20 CFR part 655, subparts A and B.
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
12393
more than one position on its CW–1
Application for Temporary Employment
Certification as long as all CW–1
workers will perform the same services
or labor under the same terms and
conditions, in the same occupation,
during the same period of employment,
and at a location (or locations) covered
by the application. The Department’s
experience in managing similar
programs demonstrates this policy
reduces the paperwork and advertising
burden on employers while also
preventing the NPC from receiving and
processing multiple applications for the
same employer and job opportunity.
Filing more than one CW–1 Application
for Temporary Employment
Certification is necessary when an
employer needs CW–1 workers to
perform full-time job opportunities that
do not involve the same occupation or
comparable work, or needs workers to
perform the same full-time work, but in
different areas of intended employment
or with different starting and ending
dates.
h. Paragraph (f), Scope of CW–1
Applications for Temporary
Employment Certification
Paragraph (f) of this section specifies
the scope of all CW–1 Applications for
Temporary Employment Certification
submitted by employers to the NPC.
First, paragraph (f)(1) provides that each
CW–1 Application for Temporary
Employment Certification must be
limited to places of employment within
the Commonwealth. In circumstances
where the job opportunity covers places
of employment located on more than
one of the islands within the
Commonwealth, the employer may
submit a single CW–1 Application for
Temporary Employment Certification to
the NPC. However, an employer
submitting a CW–1 Application for
Temporary Employment Certification
containing places of employment
outside the Commonwealth, regardless
of the period of employment, will not be
accepted by the CO.
The CO will use the places of
employment identified in the CW–1
Application for Temporary Employment
Certification for the purpose of
determining the recruitment
requirements employers must follow to
locate qualified and available U.S.
workers, and to aid the CO in assessing
whether the wages, job requirements,
and terms and conditions of the job
opportunity will adversely affect U.S.
workers similarly employed within the
Commonwealth.
Second, paragraph (f)(2) prohibits an
association or other organization of
employers from filing a CW–1
E:\FR\FM\01APR2.SGM
01APR2
12394
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 62 / Monday, April 1, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
Application for Temporary Employment
Certification on behalf of more than one
employer-member under the CW–1
program. An association or other
organization of employers is permitted
by this subpart to file CW–1
Applications for Temporary
Employment Certification as either a
sole employer of CW–1 workers, or as
an agent representing one employermember seeking to employ CW–1
workers.
However, this subpart does not permit
an association or other organization of
employers to file CW–1 Applications for
Temporary Employment Certification on
behalf of multiple employer-members,
each seeking to employ CW–1 workers
in full-time employment. This type of
filing is often referred to as a ‘‘master’’
application and is likewise prohibited
in the H–2B program. Only an
agricultural association seeking to
employ H–2A workers jointly with its
employer-members is expressly
permitted by the INA to file an
Application for Temporary Employment
Certification in this manner.
Accordingly, except where otherwise
permitted under § 655.421 of this
subpart governing job contractors, each
employer-member of an association or
other organization of employers seeking
to employ CW–1 workers in full-time
employment within the Commonwealth
must submit separate CW–1
Applications for Temporary
Employment Certification to the NPC.
i. Paragraph (g), Maximum Period of
Employment on the CW–1 Application
for Temporary Employment
Certification
Under paragraph (g) of this section, an
employer seeking to employ a CW–1
worker is permitted to identify a period
of employment lasting not more than 1
year. However, an employer seeking to
employ a long-term CW–1 worker, as
defined under § 655.402 of this subpart,
is permitted to identify a period of
employment lasting not more than 3
years. The effect of these provisions is
that the period of employment on the
CW–1 Application for Temporary
Employment Certification will be
consistent with the maximum periods of
admission permitted by the Workforce
Act,33 regardless of whether the
employer’s need for the services or labor
33 See 48 U.S.C. 1806(d)(7)(A)(i) (generally
limiting CW–1 permit validity to a period not to
exceed 1 year, renewable for no more than 2
consecutive 1-year periods) and 1806(d)(7)(B) (a
long-term worker may receive a permit that is valid
for a period not to exceed 3 years, renewable for
additional 3-year periods during the transition
period).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:01 Mar 29, 2019
Jkt 247001
to be performed is temporary or
permanent in nature.
Under this provision, an employer
seeking a TLC would be required to
disclose the period of employment for
the job opportunity in the CW–1
Application for Temporary Employment
Certification. Generally, the employer
will be held to recruiting and filling
with a CW–1 worker(s) a job
opportunity that lasts no longer than 1
year. If, however, the employer attests in
the CW–1 Application for Temporary
Employment Certification that it intends
to employ a long-term CW–1 worker,
and that the period of employment will
be longer than 1 year, the CO would
approve a labor certification lasting no
longer than 3 years, the maximum
period permitted by the statute.
Before issuing a NOA under
§ 655.433, the Department would review
the expected start and end dates of work
identified in the CW–1 Application for
Temporary Employment Certification as
discussed above. The Department’s
NOA would not serve as an approval
that the application demonstrated the
work under the certification will be
performed by a long-term CW–1 worker.
As the Department does not have access
to the identities of CW–1 beneficiaries,
only USCIS is able to make a
determination with respect to whether
the CW–1 beneficiary involved in the
petition qualifies as a long-term worker.
j. Paragraph (h), Return of CW–1
Applications for Temporary
Employment Certification Based on
USCIS Reaching Statutory Cap
The Workforce Act raised the annual
numerical limits, or ‘‘visa caps,’’ on the
total number of foreign nationals who
may be issued a CW–1 visa or otherwise
granted CW–1 status by DHS for FY
2019, and established new, annually
reduced caps for subsequent fiscal
years. See 48 U.S.C. 1806(d)(3)(B).34 As
employer demand for foreign workers in
the CNMI could remain high in relation
to these statutory visa caps, the
Department anticipates receiving more
requests for TLC than will result in CW–
1 visas in some fiscal years. Based on
OFLC’s experience administering the H–
1B and H–2B programs, both of which
are subject to statutory visa caps, the
Department has determined that an
effective and efficient administration of
the CW–1 program must provide for the
suspension of the acceptance of
employer applications for TLC as soon
34 The fiscal year in which the annual statutory
numerical limits apply spans October 1 through
September 30.
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
as the statutory visa cap in a fiscal year
is reached.
Accordingly, if USCIS issues a public
notice stating that it has received a
sufficient number of CW–1 petitions to
meet the statutory numerical limit on
the total number of foreign nationals
who may be issued a CW–1 visa or
otherwise granted CW–1 status for the
fiscal year, paragraph (h)(1) of this
section authorizes the OFLC
Administrator to return without review
any CW–1 Applications for Temporary
Employment Certification with dates of
need in that fiscal year and received on
or after the date that the OFLC
Administrator provides public notice.
Paragraph (h)(2) of this section
specifies that the OFLC Administrator
will announce, through a notice on
OFLC’s website, the last receipt date of
the applications OFLC will review, and
the return of CW–1 Applications for
Temporary Employment Certification
received after that date reflecting dates
of need in the fiscal year for which the
statutory limit has been met. This notice
will be effective on the date it is posted
on OFLC’s website and will remain in
effect until the close of the fiscal year,
unless: (1) USCIS subsequently issues a
public notice stating additional CW–1
visas are available for that fiscal year;
and (2) the OFLC Administrator
publishes a new notice announcing that
OFLC will accept additional TLCs with
dates of need in the fiscal year. This
provision provides the OFLC
Administrator with flexibility to adapt
to future changes DHS may announce in
the availability of CW–1 visas within a
fiscal year. The Department reminds
employers that the notices issued under
this paragraph are premised on
interagency consultation and visa cap
processing considerations by DHS.
Except where a qualifying exemption
applies, the Department will not
suspend filing or lift a suspension of
filing notice due to the individual
circumstances of employers, workers, or
other interested stakeholders.
Finally, paragraph (h)(3) of this
section establishes the two instances
when the OFLC Administrator’s notice
to return CW–1 Applications for
Temporary Employment Certification
filed after the effective date, will not be
applied. First, OFLC will not return, but
will continue to process CW–1
Applications for Temporary
Employment Certification filed before
the last receipt date listed on the notice
in accordance with all requirements of
this subpart. Second, OFLC will
continue to accept the filing of CW–1
Applications for Temporary
Employment Certification by employers
that identify in the CW–1 Application
E:\FR\FM\01APR2.SGM
01APR2
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 62 / Monday, April 1, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
for Temporary Employment
Certification that the CW–1 workers to
be employed under the application will
be exempt from the statutory visa cap
for that fiscal year.35 Since DHS is the
agency responsible for administering the
annual CW–1 visa cap and for making
final determinations regarding any
exemptions to the visa cap, the
designation of cap-exempt status in the
CW–1 Application for Temporary
Employment Certification is an
attestation by the employer at the TLC
stage. Even when an application is
prepared by an authorized agent or
attorney, the Department reminds
employers that they are obligated to
read and review the CW–1 Application
for Temporary Employment
Certification prior to its submission to
OFLC, including every page of the Form
ETA–9142C and any applicable
appendices and supporting
documentation, as they will be held,
through their original signature, to the
assurance that the information
contained therein is true and accurate,
subject to penalties contained in this
rulemaking and otherwise according to
law.
2. Section 655.421, Job Contractor Filing
Requirements
This section establishes the
requirements under which job
contractors may file CW–1 Applications
for Temporary Employment
Certification in the CW–1 program.
Generally, a job contractor, as defined
under § 655.402, has no need for
workers itself. Rather, its need for labor
is based on the underlying need of its
employer-clients. A job contractor
generally has an ongoing business of
supplying workers to its employerclients.
Paragraph (a) of this section provides
that a job contractor may file an
application on behalf of itself and an
employer-client. When the job
contractor does so, the Department will
deem the job contractor a joint
employer. Pursuant to paragraph (b), job
contractors must also have a separate
contract with each employer-client, and
each agreement may only support one
CW–1 Application for Temporary
Employment Certification. While either
a job contractor or the employer-client
may file an Application for Prevailing
Wage Determination, paragraph (c)
specifies that each of the joint
employers is separately responsible for
35 As currently, designed, the form will ask the
employer (or preparer) to indicate the type of
CW–1 application it is filing: Whether it will
support a petition for a new visa or a renewal and,
separately, whether it involves long-term workers,
cap-exempt workers, or an emergency situation.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:01 Mar 29, 2019
Jkt 247001
ensuring that the wage offer(s) listed in
the CW–1 Application for Temporary
Employment Certification and related
recruitment at least equals the
prevailing wage obtained from the
NPWC, or the Federal or
Commonwealth minimum wage,
whichever is higher, and that all other
wage obligations are met.
As required by paragraph (d) of this
section, a job contractor filing as a joint
employer with its employer-client must
submit to the NPC a completed CW–1
Application for Temporary Employment
Certification clearly identifying its
employer-client. This must be
accompanied by the contract or
agreement establishing the employers’
relationship to the workers sought.
Consistent with the requirements for
original signature explained in further
detail under § 655.420(d), the CW–1
Application for Temporary Employment
Certification must bear the original
signature of both the job contractor and
the employer-client, or use a verifiable
electronic signature method. By signing
the CW–1 Application for Temporary
Employment Certification, each
employer independently attests to the
conditions of employment required of
an employer participating in the CW–1
program. Each employer assumes full
responsibility for the accuracy of the
representations made in the application
and for an employer’s obligations in the
CW–1 program, as defined in this IFR.
If a violation of these obligations has
occurred, either or both employers may
be found to be responsible for attendant
penalties and for remedying the
violation.
To ensure an adequate level of
transparency in the recruitment of U.S.
workers in the CNMI, paragraph (e)
establishes standards related to
advertising the job opportunity,
interviewing prospective U.S. workers,
and preparing the recruitment report.
Specifically, although either the job
contractor or its employer-client may
place advertisements for the job
opportunity, conduct the recruitment
required by the CO, and assume
responsibility for interviewing U.S.
workers who apply, both joint
employers must sign the recruitment
report that is submitted to the NPC as
a condition of receiving a final
determination. All recruitment
conducted by the joint employers must
satisfy the job-offer-assurance and
advertising content requirements, as
specified and further explained under
§ 655.441.
In order to fully inform prospective
applicants of the job opportunity and
avoid potential confusion inherent in a
job opportunity involving two
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
12395
employers, paragraph (e) also requires
that the advertisements clearly identify
both employers (the job contractor and
its employer-client) by name and the
place(s) of employment where workers
will perform labor or services. In
situations where all of the employerclients’ job opportunities are in the
same occupation and have the same
requirements and terms and conditions
of employment (including dates of
employment), this paragraph permits a
job contractor to combine more than one
of its joint-employer employer-clients’
job opportunities in a single
advertisement. The regulation provides
a sample format to assist job contractors
in properly disclosing the job
opportunities and creates standard
language that job contractors must use
in their advertisements to inform U.S.
workers fully on how to apply for the
job opportunities.
Finally, paragraph (f) of this section
provides that if a TLC for the joint
employers is granted by the CO, the
Final Determination notice certifying
the CW–1 Application for Temporary
Employment Certification will be sent to
both the job contractor and its
employer-client, in accordance with the
procedures set forth under § 655.452,
governing approved certifications.
3. Section 655.422, Emergency
Situations
This section provides an employer in
a qualifying emergency situation with
some flexibility to participate in the
CW–1 program without first obtaining a
PWD from the NPWC. Specifically,
paragraph (a) permits the CO to waive
the requirement for an employer to
obtain a PWD prior to filing a CW–1
Application for Temporary Employment
Certification, provided the employer can
demonstrate good and substantial cause
and meets the requirements of subpart
E. The requirement to obtain a PWD
prior to filing the TLC application is the
only provision of this rule that is
waived by the emergency situation
procedures. If the employer’s request for
emergency situation procedures is
granted, it must comply with all other
requirements under this subpart. To rely
on this provision, paragraph (b) requires
the employer to submit to the NPC a
completed Application for Prevailing
Wage Determination, a completed
CW–1 Application for Temporary
Employment Certification, and a
detailed statement describing the good
and substantial cause that has
necessitated the waiver request. Good
and substantial cause may include the
substantial loss of U.S. workers due to
Acts of God, similar unforeseeable manmade catastrophic events (such as a
E:\FR\FM\01APR2.SGM
01APR2
12396
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 62 / Monday, April 1, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
hazardous materials emergency or
government-controlled flooding),
unforeseeable changes in market
conditions, pandemic health issues, or
similar conditions that are wholly
outside the employer’s control.
However, an employer may not justify
an emergency situation based on the
Department’s promulgation of this IFR
and the associated timeframes for
requesting prevailing wage and TLC
determinations, which are foreseeable
events required by the statute. A denial
of a previously submitted CW–1
Application for Temporary Employment
Certification or CW–1 petition with
USCIS also does not constitute good and
substantial cause. Consistent with
OFLC’s treatment of emergency requests
for the H–2B program, another program
subject to a visa cap, the CW–1 visa cap
does not constitute ‘‘good and
substantial cause’’ justifying an
emergency application. Unlike the H–2B
regulations, however, the CW–1
regulation makes explicit that the visa
cap may not be the basis for such an
application, thus clarifying that the
Department does not consider an
impending visa cap to be an
unforeseeable event beyond the
employer’s control. Finally, an
employer may also not use the
procedures contained in this section to
either request a waiver of the timeframe
for filing an CW–1 Application for
Temporary Employment Certification
earlier than that permitted under
§ 655.420(b) or request an amendment to
the date of need for an CW–1
Application for Temporary Employment
Certification that has already been
submitted to the NPC for processing.
Paragraph (c) of this section
establishes the procedures under which
the CO will handle the employer’s
requests for a waiver. Upon receipt of
the request, the CO will process the
Application for Prevailing Wage
Determination and CW–1 Application
for Temporary Employment
Certification concurrently and in a
manner consistent with the provisions
of this subpart E. While § 655.420(a)
states that incomplete applications are
to be returned unprocessed, in the case
of applications which request
emergency situation procedures at the
time of filing and do not provide good
and substantial cause for doing so, the
application will be returned
unprocessed, but with an explanation as
to why the employer failed to justify
good and substantial case for the use of
the procedures. Prior to returning the
application, the CO at its discretion,
may request additional details about the
employer’s good and substantial cause.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:01 Mar 29, 2019
Jkt 247001
CW–1 Applications for Temporary
Employment Certification processed
under the emergency situation provision
are subject to the same recruitment
requirements, audit processes, and other
integrity measures as nonemergency
CW–1 Applications for Temporary
Employment Certification. However,
DOL intends to subject emergency
applications to a higher level of scrutiny
than nonemergency applications in
order to ensure that this provision is not
misused. The regulation provides the
CO with the discretion to reject the
emergency filing based on the totality of
the circumstances and documentation
provided in the CW–1 Application for
Temporary Employment Certification.
The CO will determine the
foreseeability of the emergency based on
the precise circumstances of each
situation presented. The burden is on
the employer to demonstrate the
unforeseeability of the events leading to
a request for a filing on an emergency
basis.
4. Section 655.423, Assurances and
Obligations of CW–1 Employers
This section contains the terms,
assurances, and obligations of the CW–
1 program, similar to requirements for
the H–2A and H–2B TLC programs the
Department administers, that will be
enforced to ensure the employment of
CW–1 workers will not adversely affect
the wages and working conditions of
similarly employed U.S. workers. The
terms, assurances, and obligations
contained in this section are essential
for the protection of U.S. workers from
adverse effects related to the hiring of
CW–1 workers. As participants in the
CW–1 program, employers are required
to review and comply with program
provisions to protect similarly
employed U.S. workers. Further,
employers are to ensure that their hiring
of CW–1 workers will not disadvantage
the U.S. workers in their employ.
Requiring employers to comply with
these terms, assurances, and obligations,
which are incorporated into the Form
ETA–9142C, Appendix C, is the most
effective way to meet the requirements
of the Workforce Act. The Form ETA–
9142C, Appendix C, reiterates necessary
worker protections for the CW–1
program and by completing Appendix C
the employer attests its agreement to
ensuring the protection of CW–1
workers and, further, ensuring that U.S.
workers are both protected and not
disadvantaged by the employer’s CW–1
employment. As discussed in the
preamble to § 655.402, workers engaged
in corresponding employment are
entitled to the same protections and
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
benefits, set forth below, that are
provided to CW–1 workers.
a. Paragraph (a), Rate of Pay
Paragraph (a)(1) of this section,
consistent with the Workforce Act,
provides that to protect U.S. worker
wages the offered wage in the work
contract must equal or exceed the
highest of the prevailing wage or
Federal minimum wage, or
Commonwealth minimum wage. If,
during the course of the period certified
in the CW–1 Application for Temporary
Employment Certification, the Federal
or Commonwealth minimum wage
increases to a level higher than the
prevailing wage certified in the CW–1
Application for Temporary Employment
Certification, then the employer is
obligated to pay that higher rate for the
work performed after the new minimum
wage takes effect. It also requires the
employer to pay such wages, free and
clear, during the entire period of the
CW–1 Application for Temporary
Employment Certification granted by
OFLC. See 29 CFR 531.35. In addition,
to ensure the wage equals or exceeds the
highest of the prevailing wage, Federal
minimum wage, or Commonwealth
minimum wage, paragraph (a)(2)
provides that the wage may not be based
on commissions, bonuses, or other
incentives, including paying on a piecerate basis, unless the employer
guarantees a wage earned every
workweek that equals or exceeds the
offered wage.
If one or more minimum productivity
standards is required of workers as a
condition of job retention, paragraph
(a)(3) requires the employer to disclose
the minimum productivity standards in
the work contract and the employer
must be able to demonstrate that such
standards are normal and usual for nonCW–1 employers for the same
occupation in the Commonwealth.
Productivity standards must be
expressed in objective and quantifiable
terms based on the hours or days of
work needed to produce a unit of
production, and the standards must be
specified in a manner that is easily
understood by the worker. The CO will
not accept productivity standards that
fail to quantify specifically the expected
output per worker or do not clearly
communicate to the worker the output
required for job retention. For example,
requiring workers to ‘‘perform work in
a timely and proficient manner,’’
‘‘perform work at a sustained, vigorous
pace,’’ ‘‘make bona fide efforts to work
efficiently and consistently considering
climatic and other working conditions,’’
‘‘keep up with the work crew,’’
‘‘produce at a rate that does not
E:\FR\FM\01APR2.SGM
01APR2
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 62 / Monday, April 1, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
detrimentally affect other workers’
productivity,’’ or ‘‘perform work in the
amount, quality, and efficiency of other
workers’’ are unacceptable because such
statements lack objectivity,
quantification, and clarity regarding job
performance expectations for workers.
Consistent with the Department’s
administration of the H–2B program, if
an employer wishes to provide
productivity standards as a condition of
job retention, the burden of proof rests
with the employer to show that such
productivity standards are normal and
usual for employers in the same
occupation that are not employing CW–
1 workers, in order to ensure there is no
adverse effect on similarly employed
U.S. workers. Some examples of
evidence that may be used to prove that
productivity standards are normal and
usual include industry-level reports of
typical production standards for a job,
copies of production reports from other
employers, and copies of job
advertisements from employers with
similar production requirements.
Finally, pursuant to paragraph (a)(4),
an employer that pays on a piece-rate
basis must demonstrate that the piecerate is no less than the normal rate paid
by non-CW–1 employers to workers
performing the same activity in the
Commonwealth, and that each
workweek the average hourly piece-rate
earnings result in an amount at least
equal to the offered wage (or the
employer must make up the difference).
b. Paragraph (b), Wages Free and Clear
To protect the wages of CW–1 workers
and workers in corresponding
employment, paragraph (b) requires the
employer to timely pay wages either in
cash or in negotiable instrument payable
at par. The payment of wages to workers
must also be made finally and
unconditionally and ‘‘free and clear,’’ in
accordance with WHD regulations at 29
CFR part 531. This assurance clarifies
the preexisting obligation for both
employers and employees to ensure that
wages are not reduced below the
required rate.
c. Paragraph (c), Deductions
Paragraph (c) of this section ensures
workers are paid the wage offered in the
job opportunity by limiting deductions
that reduce wages to below the offered
wage indicated on the CW–1
Application for Temporary Employment
Certification. Specifically, this section
requires the employer make all
deductions required by law, such as
taxes payable by workers that are
required to be withheld by the employer
and amounts due under a court order.
The section also limits other authorized
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:01 Mar 29, 2019
Jkt 247001
deductions to those that are for the
reasonable cost or fair value of board,
lodging, or facilities furnished that
primarily benefit the employee, or that
are amounts paid to third parties
authorized by the employee or a
collective bargaining agreement. The
work contract must specify all
deductions not required by law that the
employer will make from the worker’s
pay. Any such deductions not disclosed
in the work contract are prohibited.
The section also specifies deductions
that are never permissible to the extent
they reduce the actual wage below the
offered wage. Additionally, these
deductions are always prohibited: those
for costs that are primarily for the
benefit of the employer; those not
specified in the work contract; ‘‘kickbacks’’ of worker wages, directly or
indirectly, to the employer or to another
person for the employer’s benefit; and
amounts paid to third parties which are
unauthorized, unlawful, or from which
the employer or its foreign labor
contractor, recruiter, agent, or affiliated
person benefits.
Consistent with the FLSA and 29 CFR
part 531, for deductions not required by
law to be permissible, they must, among
other requirements, be truly voluntary,
and may not be a condition of
employment as determined under the
totality of the circumstances. Moreover,
for purposes of paragraph (c), a
deduction for any cost that is primarily
for the benefit of the employer is never
permitted under this IFR. Some
examples of costs that the Department
has long held to be primarily for the
benefit of the employer are tools of the
trade and other materials and services
incidental to carrying on the employer’s
business; the cost of any construction by
and for the employer; the cost of
required uniforms (whether purchased
or rented) and their laundering; and
transportation charges where such
transportation is an incident of and
necessary to the employment. 29 CFR
531.3(d)(1). This list is not all-inclusive.
Further, the concept of de facto
deductions initially developed under
the FLSA, where employees are
required to purchase items like
uniforms or tools that are employer
business expenses, is equally applicable
to purchases that bring CW–1 workers’
wages below the required wage, as the
payment of the prevailing wage is
necessary to ensure that the
employment of foreign workers does not
adversely affect the wages and working
conditions of similarly employed U.S.
workers. Allowing worker deductions
for business expenses would undercut
the prevailing wage and, as a result,
would hurt U.S. workers.
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
12397
d. Paragraph (d), Job Opportunity Is
Full-Time
Paragraph (d) of this section requires
that the job opportunity for which the
employer is seeking to employ CW–1
workers is a full-time position, and that
the employer use a single workweek as
its standard for computing wages due.
Additionally, consistent with the FLSA,
this section provides that the workweek
must be a fixed and regularly recurring
period of 168 hours, i.e., 7 consecutive
24-hour periods, which may start on any
day and any hour of the day. This
establishment of a clear period for
determining whether wages are properly
paid by the employer will help workers
understand their wage guarantees and
aid the Department in determining
compliance during the audit
examination process.
The requirement that the position be
full-time is for the protection of U.S.
workers in the CNMI and for the
protection of U.S. workers in
corresponding employment. By virtue of
the CW–1 TLC, the Department requires
the employer to ensure that the
employment of CW–1 workers will not
adversely affect the wages and working
conditions of U.S. workers similarly
employed. Comparably, the full-time
requirement is consistent with the
Department’s administration of its other
TLC programs, the H–2B and H–2A
programs, both of which require fulltime positions for issuance of the labor
certification.36 Most similar to the H–2B
program, the CW–1 program has a
statutory numerical visa cap, which
limits the number of annually available
visas. As with the capped H–2B
program, the Department believes that
allowing CW–1 employers to hire parttime workers in instances in which an
employer could, instead, choose to hire
one or more full-time workers, could
serve to dissuade U.S. workers from the
job opportunity or place U.S. workers,
who may be less likely to seek part-time
work, at a competitive disadvantage for
employment compared to CW–1
workers. The Department believes such
an allowance would undercut the law as
intended, which serves to encourage the
hiring of U.S. workers in the CNMI.
36 See 20 CFR part 655, subpart A (governing H–
2B temporary nonagricultural workers); 20 CFR part
655, subpart B (governing H–2A temporary
agricultural workers). The TLC programs are unlike
the Department’s H–1B program, which is a labor
condition application program, for which the U.S.
labor market is only tested in very limited
circumstances for H–1B dependent employers and
willful violators not claiming an exemption, and for
which certification is granted unless the application
is obviously inaccurate or incomplete. See 20 CFR
part 655, subpart H (governing H–1B labor
condition applications for H–1B workers).
E:\FR\FM\01APR2.SGM
01APR2
12398
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 62 / Monday, April 1, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
e. Paragraph (e), Job Qualifications and
Requirements
Paragraph (e) of this section requires
that each qualification and requirement
for the job be listed in the work contract,
and be bona fide and consistent with the
normal and accepted qualifications and
requirements imposed by non-CW–1
employers in the same occupation and
in the CNMI. This protects U.S. workers
and is consistent with requirements for
the Department’s administration of
similar TLC programs.37 Further, the
employer’s job qualifications and
requirements imposed on U.S. workers
must be no less favorable than the
qualifications and requirements that the
employer is imposing or will impose on
CW–1 workers. The CO has the
authority to require the employer to
provide sufficient justification for any
job qualification or requirement
imposed for the particular job
opportunity.
Consistent with the Department’s
administration of similar TLC
programs,38 job qualifications and
requirements must be customary, i.e.,
they may not be used to discourage
applicants capable of performing the
needed work from applying for the job
opportunity. The standard for
employment of CW–1 workers is that
there are not sufficient U.S. workers in
the CNMI who are able, willing, and
qualified, and who will be available to
perform such services or labor. For
purposes of complying with this
statutory mandate, the Department has
clarified the meaning of qualifications
and requirements. A qualification
means a characteristic that is necessary
to the individual’s ability to perform the
job in question. Such characteristics
include the ability to use specific
equipment or any education or
experience required for performing a
certain job task. A requirement, on the
other hand, means a term or condition
of employment that a worker must
accept in order to obtain or retain the
job opportunity.
To the extent an employer has
requirements that are related to the U.S.
workers’ qualifications or availability,
the Department uses the Occupational
Information Network database (O*NET)
as a primary source for occupational
qualifications and requirements, and
will therefore consult O*NET when
making a determination as to whether
qualifications or requirements are
normal for a specific job. For example,
the Department recognizes that
37 20 CFR part 655, subpart A; 20 CFR part 655,
subpart B.
38 20 CFR part 655, subpart A; 20 CFR part 655,
subpart B.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:01 Mar 29, 2019
Jkt 247001
background checks are used in private
industry, so employers may conduct
them to the extent that the requirement
is a bona fide, normal, and accepted
requirement applied by non-CW–1
employers for the occupation in the area
of employment, and the employer
applies the same criteria to both CW–1
and U.S. workers. However, where such
job requirements are included in the
recruitment materials, the Department
may inquire further as to whether such
requirements are normal and accepted
by non-CW–1 employers in the CNMI
and by which methods the employer
will use such requirements.
f. Paragraph (f), Three-Fourths
Guarantee
To ensure CW–1 workers and workers
in corresponding employment are
provided full-time employment under
the work contract, the employer must
guarantee under paragraph (f)(1) to offer
each worker employment for a total
number of work hours equal to at least
three-fourths of the workdays of the
total period of employment specified in
the work contract, beginning with the
first workday after the arrival of the
worker at the place of employment or
the advertised contractual first date of
need, whichever is later, and ending on
the expiration date specified in the work
contract or in its extensions, if any.
Paragraph (f)(1)(i) defines a workday
to mean the number of hours in a
workday as stated in the work contract.
The employer must offer a total number
of hours to ensure the provision of
sufficient work to reach the threefourths guarantee. The work hours must
be offered during the work period
specified in the work contract, or during
any modified work contract period to
which the worker and employer have
mutually agreed and that has been
approved by the CO. In the event the
worker begins working later than the
specified beginning date, paragraph
(f)(1)(ii) clarifies that the guarantee
period begins with the first workday
after the arrival of the worker at the
place of employment and continues
until the last day during which the work
contract and all extensions thereof are
in effect. To assist employers in
complying with the three-fourths
guarantee, paragraph (f)(1)(iii) provides
a practical example of how to calculate
the guaranteed total number of work
hours for a 10-week work contract
period.
Paragraph (f)(1)(iv) establishes
additional standards for employers to
comply with this provision.
Specifically, although a worker may be
offered more than the specified hours of
work on a single workday, the worker
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
cannot be required to work for more
than the number of hours specified in
the work contract for a workday.
However, all hours of work actually
performed may be counted by the
employer in calculating whether the
period of guaranteed employment has
been met. An employer will not be
considered to have met the work
guarantee if the employer has merely
offered work on three-fourths of the
workdays of the work contract period if
each workday did not consist of a full
number of hours of work time as
specified in the work contract.
To ensure workers are not adversely
impacted in their employment, if during
the total work contract period the
employer affords the U.S. or CW–1
worker less employment than that
required under the three-fourths
guarantee, the employer must pay such
worker the amount the worker would
have earned had the worker, in fact,
worked for the guaranteed number of
days. For workers that are paid on a
piece-rate basis, paragraph (f)(2)
specifies that the employer must use the
worker’s average hourly piece-rate
earnings or the offered wage, whichever
is higher, to calculate the amount due
under the guarantee in accordance with
paragraph (f)(1) of this section.
Pursuant to paragraph (f)(3), any
hours the worker fails to work, up to a
maximum of the number of hours
specified in the work contract for a
workday, when the worker has been
offered an opportunity to work, and all
hours of work actually performed
(including voluntary work over 8 hours
in a workday), may be counted by the
employer in calculating whether the
period of guaranteed employment has
been met. An employer seeking to
calculate whether the guaranteed
number of hours has been met must
maintain the payroll records in
accordance with this subpart.
Based on its experience with
administering TLC programs, the
Department has concluded that a threefourths guarantee strikes an appropriate
balance of guaranteeing the benefits of
full-time employment to workers, while
providing employers with sufficient
flexibility to spread the required work
contract hours over a sufficiently long
period of time such that the vagaries of
the weather or other events out of their
control that affect their need for labor do
not prevent employers from fulfilling
their guarantee. When employers file
applications for CW–1 TLCs, they
represent that they have a need for fulltime workers during the entire
certification period. Therefore, it is
important to the integrity of the
program, which is a capped visa
E:\FR\FM\01APR2.SGM
01APR2
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 62 / Monday, April 1, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
program, to have a methodology for
ensuring that employers have fairly and
accurately estimated their temporary
need.
The guarantee also deters employers
from misusing the program by
overstating their need for full-time
workers. This will prevent employers
from overestimating the hours of work
needed per week, or the total number of
workers required to do the work
available. The guarantee will not only
result in U.S. and CW–1 workers
actually working most of the hours
promised in the work contract, but also
free up capped CW–1 visas for other
employers whose businesses need CW–
1 workers.
g. Paragraph (g), Impossibility of
Fulfillment
Paragraph (g) of this section allows an
employer to terminate the work contract
in certain narrowly prescribed
circumstances where the services of the
worker are no longer required for
reasons beyond the control of the
employer due to fire, weather, or other
Act of God, or similar unforeseeable
man-made catastrophes (such as oil
spills or controlled flooding) wholly
outside the employer’s control that
makes fulfillment of the work contract
impossible. In such an event, the
employer must fulfill the three-fourths
guarantee for the time that has elapsed
from the start date listed in the work
contract or the first workday after the
arrival of the worker at the place of
employment, whichever is later, to the
time of its termination.
To safeguard the employment of the
workers, this paragraph also requires the
employer to make efforts to transfer the
CW–1 worker (to the extent permitted
by DHS) and worker in corresponding
employment to other comparable
employment acceptable to the worker.
Actions employers could take include
contacting any known CW–1 employers
with comparable employment or the
CNMI Department of Labor for
assistance in placing workers with other
CNMI employers with comparable job
vacancies. Absent such placement, the
employer is required to comply with the
transportation requirement, as set forth
under § 655.423(j), to return the worker
to the place from which the worker
came prior to entering the
Commonwealth (disregarding
intervening employment 39) or transport
39 In terms of the referenced transportation
requirements in an intervening employment
situation for the CW–1 worker, where there is an
initial CW–1 employer and a subsequent non-CW–
1 employer, the obligation to pay for the
transportation costs between the place of
employment with the CW–1 employer and the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:01 Mar 29, 2019
Jkt 247001
the worker to the worker’s next certified
CW–1 employer,40 whichever the
worker prefers. CO approval is required
before terminating the work contract
with the workers. Simply submitting a
request to the CO is insufficient to
terminate the work contract and absolve
the employer of the three-fourths
guarantee.
h. Paragraph (h), Frequency of Pay
Paragraph (h) of this section requires
that the employer indicate the frequency
of pay in the work contract, and
guarantee to pay workers at least every
2 weeks and when wages are due. The
requirement that workers be paid at
least every 2 weeks is designed to
protect financially vulnerable workers.
Allowing an employer to pay less
frequently than every 2 weeks would
impose an undue burden on workers
who are often paid low wages and may
lack the means to make their income
last through a month until they get paid.
i. Paragraph (i), Earnings Statements
To ensure compliance with the wage
requirements of this subpart and
transparency of the requirement to
workers, paragraph (i)(1) of this section
requires the employer to maintain
accurate and adequate records with
respect to the workers’ earnings and to
specify the minimum amount of
information to be retained. The
employer is further required under
paragraph (i)(2) to furnish to each
worker an appropriate written earnings
statement on or before each payday,
specifying the information that the
employer must include in such a
statement (e.g., the worker’s total
earnings for each workweek in the pay
period, the hourly rate or piece-rate of
pay, the hours of employment offered
and hours actually worked by the
worker, and an itemization of all
deductions from the worker’s wages).
The Department notes that this
paragraph also requires employers to
maintain records of any additions made
to a worker’s wages and to include such
subsequent place of employment with the non-CW–
1 employer depends on the subsequent employer’s
work contract. In the absence of a contractual
agreement to pay for travel costs, the CW–1
employer is obligated to pay the travel expenses
between its place of employment and the
immediate subsequent place of employment with
the non-CW–1 employer.
40 In terms of the referenced transportation
requirements in an intervening employment
situation for the CW–1 worker, where there is an
initial CW–1 employer and a subsequent CW–1
employer, the initial CW–1 employer is responsible
for transporting the CW–1 worker from its place of
employment to the subsequent CW–1 employer’s
place of employment, but the subsequent CW–1
employer is responsible for reimbursing the initial
CW–1 employer with transportation costs.
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
12399
information in the earnings statements
furnished to the worker. Such additions
could include performance bonuses,
cash advances, or reimbursements for
costs incurred by the worker. This
requirement is consistent with the
recordkeeping requirements under the
FLSA in 29 CFR part 516. See 29 CFR
part 785 for guidance regarding what
constitutes hours worked.
The Department has concluded that
any administrative burden resulting
from this provision is outweighed by the
importance of providing workers with
this crucial information, especially
because an earnings statement provides
workers with an opportunity to quickly
identify and resolve any anomalies with
the employer and will hold employers
accountable for proper payment. Similar
to § 655.20(i) in the H–2B program, this
IFR requires an employer to record the
reasons why a worker declined any
offered hours of work, which will
support the Department’s audit
examination activities related to the
three-fourths guarantee previously
discussed under paragraph (f) of this
section.
j. Paragraph (j), Transportation and Visa
Fees
Consistent with the Department’s
transportation provisions in similar TLC
programs, paragraph (j)(1)(i) of this
section requires an employer to provide
inbound transportation and subsistence
during transportation to CW–1
employees and to U.S. employees in
corresponding employment who have
traveled to take the position from such
a distance that they are not reasonably
able to return to their residence each
day, if the workers complete 50 percent
of the period of employment covered by
the work contract (not counting any
extensions). Before the 50 percent point,
employers have no responsibility under
the CW–1 program to pay these
expenses. Transportation and
subsistence costs must be paid for travel
between the place from which the
worker has come to work for the
employer, whether in the United States,
including another part of the CNMI, or
abroad, to the place of employment.
This paragraph provides that employers
may arrange and pay for the
transportation and subsistence directly;
advance, at a minimum, the most
economical and reasonable common
carrier cost and subsistence; or
reimburse the worker’s reasonable costs.
If the employer advances or provides
transportation and subsistence costs to
foreign workers, or it is the prevailing
practice of non-CW–1 employers in the
CNMI to do so, the employer must
advance such costs or provide the
E:\FR\FM\01APR2.SGM
01APR2
12400
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 62 / Monday, April 1, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
services to workers in corresponding
employment traveling to the place of
employment. The Department has
concluded that this approach is
appropriate and adequately protects the
interests of both U.S. and CW–1 workers
and employers because it does not
require employers to pay the inbound
transportation and subsistence costs of
U.S. workers recruited pursuant to CW–
1 job offers who do not remain on the
job for more than a very brief period.
Paragraph (j)(1)(ii) requires the
employer, at the end of the employment,
to provide or pay for the U.S. or foreign
worker’s return transportation and daily
subsistence from the place of
employment to the place from which
the worker departed to work for the
employer, if the worker has no
immediate subsequent approved CW–1
employment. However, this obligation
attaches only if the worker completes
the period of employment covered by
the work contract or if the worker is
dismissed from employment for any
reason before the end of the certified
period of employment. The employer is
required to provide or pay for the return
transportation and daily subsistence of
a worker who has completed the period
of employment listed on the certified
CW–1 Application for Temporary
Employment Certification, regardless of
any subsequent extensions of the work
contract for that worker. An employer is
not required to provide return
transportation if separation is due to a
worker’s voluntary abandonment or
termination for cause, as set forth under
§ 655.423(v). If the worker has been
contracted to work for a subsequent and
certified employer, the last CW–1
employer to employ the worker is
required to provide or pay the U.S. or
foreign worker’s return transportation.
Therefore, prior employers are not
obligated to pay for such return
transportation costs.
Paragraph (j)(1)(iii) of this section
requires that all employer-provided
transportation—including
transportation to and from the place of
employment, if provided—comply with
all applicable Federal and
Commonwealth laws and regulations
including vehicle safety standards,
driver licensure requirements, and
vehicle insurance coverage.
And finally, to protect CW–1 workers
from predatory and abusive labor
practices, paragraph (j)(2) of this section
requires the employer to pay or
reimburse the worker in the first
workweek for all visa, visa processing,
border crossing, and other related fees
(including those mandated by the
government) incurred by the CW–1
worker, but not for passport expenses or
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:01 Mar 29, 2019
Jkt 247001
other charges primarily for the benefit of
the worker.
Under the FLSA and as the
Department has explained in Wage and
Hour’s Field Assistance Bulletin No.
2009–2 (Aug. 21, 2009), transportation,
subsistence, and visa and related
expenses for CW–1 workers are for the
primary benefit of employers. The
employer primarily benefits because it
obtains foreign workers where the
employer has demonstrated that there
are not sufficient qualified U.S. workers
available to perform the work; the
employer has demonstrated that
unavailability by engaging in prescribed
recruiting activities that do not yield
sufficient U.S. workers.
The CW–1 workers, on the other
hand, only receive the right to work for
a particular employer, in a particular
location, and for a particular period of
time. If they leave that specific job, they
generally must leave the country.
Transporting these CW–1 workers from
remote locations to the workplace thus
primarily benefits the employer who has
sought authority to fill its workforce
needs by bringing in workers from
foreign countries. Similarly, because a
CW–1 worker’s visa (including all the
related expenses, which vary by
country, including the visa processing
interview fee and border crossing fee) is
an incident of and necessary to
employment under the program, the
employer is the primary beneficiary of
such expenses. The visa does not allow
the employee to find work in the United
States generally, but rather permits the
visa holder to apply for admission in
CW–1 nonimmigrant status in the
CNMI, which restricts the worker to the
employer with an approved TLC and
petition to the particular approved work
described in the employer’s application.
In addition, the FLSA applies
independently of the CW–1
requirements and imposes obligations
on employers regarding payment of
wages. Employers covered by the FLSA
must generally pay such expenses to
nonexempt employees in the first
workweek, to the level necessary to
meet the FLSA minimum wage. See,
e.g., Rivera v. Peri & Sons Farms, Inc.,
735 F.3d 892, 898–99 (9th Cir. 2013);
Arriaga v. Florida Pacific Farms, LLC,
305 F.3d 1228 (11th Cir. 2002); MoranteNavarro v. T&Y Pine Straw, Inc., 350
F.3d 1163 (11th Cir. 2003); Gaxiola v.
Williams Seafood of Arapahoe, Inc.,
2011 WL 806792 (E.D.N.C. 2011); Teoba
v. Trugreen Landcare LLC, 2011 WL
573572 (W.D.N.Y. 2011); DeLeonGranados v. Eller & Sons Trees, Inc.,
581 F. Supp. 2d 1295 (N.D. Ga. 2008);
Rosales v. Hispanic Employee Leasing
Program, 2008 WL 363479 (W.D. Mich.
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
2008); Rivera v. Brickman Group, 2008
WL 81570 (E.D. Pa. 2008). But see
Castellanos-Contreras v. Decatur Hotels,
LLC, 622 F.3d 393 (5th Cir. 2010) (en
banc). Payment sufficient to satisfy the
FLSA in the first workweek is also
required because § 655.423(w)
specifically requires employers to
comply with all applicable Federal and
Commonwealth employment-related
laws and regulations, including health
and safety laws. Furthermore, because
U.S. workers are entitled to receive at
least the same terms and conditions of
employment as CW–1 workers, in order
to prevent adverse effects on U.S.
workers from the presence of foreign
workers, employers must provide the
same reimbursement for U.S. workers in
corresponding employment who are
unable to return to their residence each
workday, such as those from another
U.S. State or territory who saw the
position advertised on the CNMI
Department of Labor’s job listing
system.
The Department has determined these
provisions fulfill its statutory mandate
to protect U.S. workers from adverse
effects due to the presence of temporary
foreign workers. As discussed above,
under the FLSA, numerous courts have
held in the context of both H–2B and H–
2A workers that the inbound and
outbound transportation costs
associated with employing workers are
an inevitable and inescapable
consequence of employers choosing to
participate in these visa programs.
Moreover, the courts have held that
such transportation expenses are not
ordinary living expenses, because they
have no substantial value to the
employee independent of the job and do
not ordinarily arise in an employment
relationship, unlike normal daily hometo-work commuting costs.
Therefore, the courts view employers
as the primary beneficiaries of such
expenses under the FLSA; in essence
the courts have held that inbound and
outbound transportation are employer
business expenses. A similar analysis
applies to the CW–1 required wage. This
requirement ensures the integrity of the
full CW–1 required wage, over the full
term of employment. Both CW–1
workers and U.S. workers in
corresponding employment will receive
the CW–1 required wage they were
promised, as well as reimbursement for
the reasonable transportation and
subsistence costs that primarily benefit
the employer, over the full period of
employment.
Finally, to comply with the provisions
of this section, transportation must be
reimbursed from wherever the place
from which the worker has come to
E:\FR\FM\01APR2.SGM
01APR2
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 62 / Monday, April 1, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
work for the employer to the place of
employment; therefore, the employer
must pay for transportation from the
place of recruitment to the city with the
consulate that adjudicates the worker’s
visa application and then on to the
place of employment. Similarly, the
employer must pay for subsistence
during that period, so if an overnight
stay at a hotel in the consular city is
required while the employee is
interviewing for and obtaining a visa,
that subsistence must be reimbursed.
k. Paragraph (k), Employer-Provided
Items
Consistent with the requirement
under the FLSA regulations at 29 CFR
part 531, paragraph (k) of this section
requires the employer provide to the
worker, without charge or deposit
charge, all tools, supplies, and
equipment required to perform the
duties assigned. The employer may not
shift to the employee the burden to pay
for damage to, loss of, or normal wear
and tear of, such items. This provision
gives workers additional protections
against improper deductions for the
employer’s business expenses from
required wages.
Section 3(m) of the FLSA (29 U.S.C.
203(m)) prohibits employers from
making deductions for items that are
primarily for the benefit of the employer
if such deductions reduce the
employee’s wage below the Federal
minimum wage. Therefore, an employer
that does not provide tools but requires
its employees to bring their own would
already be required under the FLSA to
reimburse its employees for the
difference between the weekly wage
minus the cost of equipment and the
weekly minimum wage. Paragraph (k)
simply extends this protection in a
manner that protects the integrity of the
required CW–1 wage rate and thereby
avoids adverse effects on the wages of
U.S. workers. However, this
requirement does not prohibit
employees from voluntarily choosing to
use their own specialized equipment;
rather, it simply requires employers to
make available to employees adequate
and appropriate equipment.
l. Paragraph (l), Disclosure of Work
Contract
Paragraph (l) of this section requires
the employer to provide a copy of the
work contract, including any
subsequent approved modifications, to a
CW–1 worker outside of the United
States no later than the time at which
the worker applies for the visa, or to a
worker in corresponding employment
no later than on the day work
commences. To clarify, the time at
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:01 Mar 29, 2019
Jkt 247001
which the worker applies for the visa
should be read as the time before the
worker has made any payment, whether
to a recruiter or directly to the
consulate, to initiate the visa
application process. The Department
has concluded that it is most practical
to require disclosure of the work
contract at the time the worker applies
for a visa, to ensure that workers fully
understand the terms and conditions of
their job offer before they make a
commitment to come to the United
States.
For CW–1 workers who are moving to
a subsequent CW–1 employer, the work
contract must be provided no later than
the time the subsequent offer of
employment is made. At a minimum,
the work contract must contain all of the
provisions required to be included by
this section and must be in a language
understood by the worker. In the
absence of a separate, written work
contract between the employer and the
worker, the required terms of the
certified CW–1 Application for
Temporary Employment Certification
are those in the work contract.
The Department has determined that
the disclosure required by this
paragraph is a vital component of
strengthening program compliance and
provides workers with sufficient notice
of the terms and conditions of the job so
that they can make an informed
decision of the terms under which they
are accepting the job. In addition,
providing the terms and conditions of
employment to each worker in a
language that the individual
understands protects those workers.
m. Paragraph (m), No Unfair Treatment
To protect vulnerable U.S. workers
and CW–1 workers, paragraph (m) of
this section provides nondiscrimination
and nonretaliation protections for
workers. Workers are protected from
retaliation, including retaliation based
on contact or consultation with an
employee of a legal assistance program,
labor union, workers’ center, or
community organization, or an attorney
on matters related to perceived
violations. These entities frequently
have the first contact with temporary
foreign workers when they seek help to
correct or report perceived violations.
This provision applies to oral
complaints and complaints made
internally to employers, and it also
applies to current, former, and
prospective workers.
This provision protects workers from
discrimination and retaliation for
asserting rights under any applicable
Federal or Commonwealth law or
regulation, including the CW–1
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
12401
program. For example, if workers sought
legal assistance relating to the terms and
conditions of employment, such as
employer-provided housing because an
employer charged for housing that was
listed as free of charge in the work
contract, this serves as a protected act;
however, a routine landlord-tenant
dispute may not fall under the
protections of this section. This section
provides protection to U.S. workers and
CW–1 workers alike.
n. Paragraph (n), Comply With the
Prohibitions Against Employees Paying
Fees
Paragraph (n), similarly to the
Department’s H–2B regulation at 20 CFR
655.20(o), of this section prohibits the
employer and its attorneys, agents, or
employees from seeking or receiving
payment of any kind from workers for
any activity related to obtaining CW–1
labor certification or employment,
including payment of the employer’s
attorney or agent fees, application and
CW–1 Petition fees, recruitment costs, or
any fees attributed to obtaining the
approved CW–1 Application for
Temporary Employment Certification.
Payments under this provision include
but are not limited to monetary
payments, wage concessions (including
deductions from wages, salary, or
benefits), kickbacks, bribes, tributes, inkind payments, and free labor. However,
this provision allows employers and
their agents to receive reimbursement
for fees that are primarily for the benefit
of the worker, such as Governmentrequired passport fees, which can be
used for personal travel or for travel to
another job. This provision also
reiterates that employers must pay all
wages to workers free and clear.
Paragraph (o), Contracts with Third
Parties to Comply with Prohibitions.
Paragraph (o) of this section requires
that an employer contractually prohibit
in writing any agent or recruiter (or any
agent or employee of such agent or
recruiter) whom the employer engages,
either directly or indirectly, in
recruitment of CW–1 workers to seek or
receive payments or other compensation
from prospective workers. For
employers’ convenience, this paragraph
contains the exact language of the
required contractual prohibition that
must appear in such agreements.
o. Paragraph (p), Prohibition Against
Preferential Treatment of Foreign
Workers
For the protection of U.S. workers,
paragraph (p) of this section requires the
employer to offer and provide to U.S.
workers no less than the same benefits,
wages, and working conditions that the
E:\FR\FM\01APR2.SGM
01APR2
12402
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 62 / Monday, April 1, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
employer is offering, intends to offer, or
will provide to CW–1 workers. Job offers
may not impose on U.S. workers any
restrictions or obligations that will not
be imposed on the employer’s CW–1
workers. Employers are required to offer
and provide CW–1 workers at least the
minimum benefits, wages, and working
conditions outlined in this paragraph.
This provision will protect U.S. workers
by ensuring that employers do not
understate wages and/or benefits in an
attempt to discourage U.S. applicants or
to provide preferential treatment to
temporary foreign workers.
The employer is not precluded from
offering a higher wage rate or more
generous benefits or working conditions
to U.S. workers, so long as the employer
offers to U.S. workers all the wages,
benefits, and working conditions offered
to and required for CW–1 workers
pursuant to the certified CW–1
Application for Temporary Employment
Certification.
p. Paragraph (q), Nondiscriminatory
Hiring Practices
For the protection of U.S. workers,
paragraph (q) of this section sets forth a
nondiscriminatory hiring provision by
guaranteeing the job opportunity is open
to any qualified U.S. worker regardless
of race, color, national origin, age, sex,
religion, disability, or citizenship. This
paragraph works together with
paragraph (p) of this same section,
which specifies that job qualifications
and requirements imposed on U.S.
workers must be no less favorable than
the qualifications and requirements that
the employer is imposing or will impose
on CW–1 workers. Thus, for example,
an employer violates this provision if it
requires drug tests or criminal
background checks for U.S. workers but
not for CW–1 workers.
Additionally, where an employer
conducts criminal background checks
on prospective employees, in order to be
lawful and job-related, the employer’s
consideration of any arrest or conviction
history must be consistent with
applicable guidance from the Equal
Employment Opportunity Commission
on employer consideration of arrest and
conviction history under Title VII of the
Civil Rights Act of 1964. Thus,
employers may reject U.S. workers
solely for lawful, job-related reasons,
and they must also comply with all
applicable employment-related laws, as
set forth under § 655.423(w). All U.S.
workers not rejected on this basis must
be hired. This paragraph also reminds
the employer of its obligation to retain
records of all hired workers as well as
those rejected, as set forth under
§ 655.456.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:01 Mar 29, 2019
Jkt 247001
q. Paragraph (r), Recruitment
Requirements
Paragraph (r) of this section requires
employers to assure the Department that
they will conduct all recruitment for
U.S. workers required by §§ 655.440
through 655.445, including any
activities directed by the CO. Such
required recruitment activities are
discussed further in the preamble to
those applicable sections.
r. Paragraph (s), No Strike or Lockout
Paragraph (s) of this section requires
an employer to assure the Department
that there is no strike or lockout at any
of the employer’s place(s) of
employment within the Commonwealth
for which the employer is requesting
CW–1 certification. If there is a strike or
lockout at the place(s) of employment
when the employer requests CW–1
workers, the CO may deny the CW–1
certification to ensure that U.S. workers
are not adversely impacted by the hiring
of a CW–1 worker(s). This provision
will protect U.S. workers in their
employment by preventing employers
from filling positions with CW–1
workers at places of employment where
such positions are vacated by U.S.
workers due to a strike or lockout.41
s. Paragraph (t), No Recent or Future
Layoffs
Paragraph (t) of this section
establishes the standards under which
an employer cannot lay off similarly
employed U.S. workers who would be
considered in corresponding
employment upon approval of a TLC.
Specifically, the employer must assure
the Department that it has not laid off
any similarly employed U.S. worker in
the occupation that is the subject of the
CW–1 Application for Temporary
Employment Certification in the
Commonwealth within the period
beginning 270 calendar days before the
date of need and will not lay off any
similarly employed U.S. worker in the
occupation that is subject to the CW–1
Application for Temporary Employment
Certification in the Commonwealth
through the end of the period of
certification. However, the provision
specifically permits layoffs due to
lawful, job-related reasons, such as lack
of work or the end of a season, as long
as, if applicable, the employer lays off
its CW–1 workers first before any U.S.
worker in corresponding employment.
The Department has determined that
the 270-day period before the date of
need is an appropriate timeframe to
prohibit layoffs of similarly employed
41 This provision is consistent with the H–2B
provisions at 20 CFR 655.20(u).
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
U.S. workers, because it represents the
earliest possible period the employer
may request a PWD from the NPWC for
a job opportunity that it may seek to fill
with a nonimmigrant worker in CW–1
status. By extending this prohibition
through the end of the certified period
of employment, the Department is
seeking to maximize the protection of
U.S. workers in their employment and
discourage employers from seeking to
use the CW–1 program to displace their
current U.S. workforce.
t. Paragraph (u), No Work Performed
Outside the Commonwealth and Job
Opportunity
Paragraph (u) of this section helps
ensure integrity of the CW–1 program by
prohibiting the employer from placing
any CW–1 workers outside the
Commonwealth or in a job opportunity
not listed on the approved CW–1
Application for Temporary Employment
Certification. The requirement that all
work must be performed within the
Commonwealth is consistent with the
statutory mandate prohibiting
individuals in CW–1 status from being
present anywhere in the United States
other than the Commonwealth, with
limited exception. Furthermore, placing
CW–1 workers to perform labor or
services outside the scope of the job
opportunity certified by the CO can
depress the wages of similarly employed
U.S. workers and undermines the labor
market test upon which the CO granted
TLC.
u. Paragraph (v), Abandonment/
Termination of Employment
Paragraph (v) of this section requires
the employer to notify OFLC within 2
working days of the separation of a CW–
1 worker or worker in corresponding
employment if the separation occurs
before the end date of the period of
employment certified in the CW–1
Application for Temporary Employment
Certification. It also deems that an
abandonment or abscondment begins
after a worker fails to report for work at
the regularly scheduled time without
the employer’s consent for 5
consecutive working days, and adds
language relieving the employer of the
subsequent transportation and
subsistence requirements, previously
discussed under § 655.423(j), only
where the separation is due to a
worker’s voluntary abandonment or
termination for cause. Additionally, the
section clarifies that if a worker
voluntarily abandons employment or is
terminated for cause, and appropriate
notification under this section is
provided, an employer is not required to
guarantee three-fourths of the work
E:\FR\FM\01APR2.SGM
01APR2
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 62 / Monday, April 1, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
contract, as previously discussed under
§ 655.423(f).42
OFLC’s awareness of early separations
is critical to program integrity, and
timely notification of CW–1 workers
who voluntarily abandon employment
is likewise vital to identifying workers
who are no longer covered by an
approved temporary labor certification
and no longer have a legal purpose for
being in the CNMI. Timely notification
also allows the agency to conduct audit
examinations or refer matters for further
investigation to DHS or any other
Federal Government Office. Absent
proper notification, employers with
histories of frequent and unjustified
early dismissals of workers could
continue to have their CW–1
Applications for Temporary
Employment Certification certified and
a CW–1 Petitions approved.
v. Paragraph (w), Compliance With
Applicable Laws
During the period of employment
certified by the CO on the CW–1
Application for Temporary Employment
Certification, paragraph (w) of this
section requires CW–1 employers to
comply with all applicable Federal and
Commonwealth employment and labor
laws and regulations, including health
and safety laws. It also explicitly
references 18 U.S.C. 1592(a), which
prohibits holding or confiscating
workers’ immigration documents, such
as passports or visas, under certain
circumstances.
D. Processing of an CW–1 Application
for Temporary Employment
Certification
1. Section 655.430, Review of
Applications
This section establishes requirements
for the CO to review CW–1 Applications
for Temporary Employment
Certification, methods of
communication between the CO and
employer, and authority for the CO to
share information with other Federal
Government Officials performing
enforcement and/or investigative
activities.
Paragraph (a) requires the CO to
conduct a comprehensive review of the
CW–1 Application for Temporary
Employment Certification, including all
applicable addenda and supporting
documentation, for compliance with all
applicable program requirements. After
performing a review, the CO will
provide written notification to the
employer and, if applicable, to the
employer’s agent or attorney indicating
42 This provision is consistent with H–2B
program requirements at 20 CFR 655.20(y).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:01 Mar 29, 2019
Jkt 247001
whether the CW–1 Application for
Temporary Employment Certification
can be accepted for further processing.
If the CO determines all applicable
program requirements have been met, a
NOA authorizing the recruitment of U.S.
workers in the CNMI will be issued, as
required by § 655.433. However, if the
CO determines the CW–1 Application
for Temporary Employment
Certification contains one or more
deficiencies, a NOD will be issued, as
required by § 655.431, requiring a
response from the employer addressing
each deficiency before a NOA can be
issued.
To ensure communications between
the CO and employer are accomplished
in a reliable and efficient manner,
paragraph (b) of this section requires the
CO to send all notices or requests to the
employer electronically or using first
class U.S. Mail based on address
information supplied by the employer
on the CW–1 Application for Temporary
Employment Certification. Similarly, the
employer’s response to a notice or
request received from the CO must be
sent electronically or via traditional
methods that assure expedited delivery.
If the due date for the employer’s
response falls on a Saturday, Sunday or
Federal Holiday, this paragraph requires
the employer to send the response by
the date due or the next business day.
To ensure program integrity and
effective coordination with other
Federal Government Officials, and
consistent with how the Department
administers other TLC programs,
paragraph (c) provides that OFLC may
forward to DHS or any other Federal
Government Official performing an
investigation, inspection, audit, or law
enforcement function, the information
that OFLC receives in the course of
processing a request for an CW–1
Application for Temporary Employment
Certification or of administering
program integrity measures such as
audits under this subpart.
2. Section 655.431, Notice of Deficiency
This section establishes the
procedures under which the CO will
issue a NOD after reviewing the
employer’s CW–1 Application for
Temporary Employment Certification.
The purpose of the NOD is to provide
employers, especially those
participating in the CW–1 program for
the first time, an opportunity to comply
with program requirements before a
denial determination needs to be issued
by the CO, thereby avoiding a
burdensome and costly administrative
judicial review process. Thus, paragraph
(a) provides that a NOD will be issued
to the employer where the CO
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
12403
determines the CW–1 Application for
Temporary Employment Certification,
including the material terms and
conditions of the job offer, contains
errors or inaccuracies, or fails to comply
with applicable requirements set forth
in this subpart. A copy of the NOD will
be sent to the employer’s agent or
attorney, as applicable.
Paragraph (b) of this section specifies
the content requirements of the NOD.
The NOD will include the specific
reason(s) the CW–1 Application for
Temporary Employment Certification
fails to meet the criteria for acceptance
and will identify the type(s) of
response(s) or modification(s) needed
for the CO to issue a NOA. The
employer will be offered an opportunity
to submit a modified CW–1 Application
for Temporary Employment
Certification within 10 business days
from the date of the NOD addressing
each deficiency noted by the CO.
Finally, the NOD will state that if the
employer does not submit a modified
CW–1 Application for Temporary
Employment Certification, in
accordance with the standards and
procedures set forth under § 655.432,
the CO will deny the CW–1 Application
for Temporary Employment
Certification.
Based on the Department’s experience
administering other TLC programs,
there are circumstances in which the
modified CW–1 Application for
Temporary Employment Certification
submitted by the employer does not
resolve the stated deficiency or creates
a question or concern requiring
additional clarification before a NOA
can be issued. Therefore, as § 655.432(a)
provides, the CO may issue one or more
NODs, as necessary, to work with
employers to resolve deficiencies that
are preventing acceptance of their CW–
1 Application for Temporary
Employment Certification and achieve
program compliance.
3. Section 655.432, Submission of
Modified Applications
This section establishes the
procedures under which the CO will
handle responses to a NOD, including
any modifications to the CW–1
Application for Temporary Employment
Certification, submitted by an employer
as well as other necessary modifications
requested by the CO before a final
determination is issued. Upon receipt of
a response to a NOD, including any
modifications to the CW–1 Application
for Temporary Employment
Certification, paragraph (a) specifies the
CO will review the response and may
issue one or more additional NODs to
ensure compliance with regulatory
E:\FR\FM\01APR2.SGM
01APR2
12404
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 62 / Monday, April 1, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
requirements before issuing a decision
under this section. However, an
employer’s failure to comply with a
NOD, including not responding in a
timely manner or not providing all
required documentation requested by
the CO, will result in a denial of the
CW–1 Application for Temporary
Employment Certification.
If the CO accepts the response
submitted by the employer, paragraph
(b) provides that the CO will issue a
NOA. In the NOA, the CO directs the
employer to conduct recruitment of U.S.
workers for the job opportunity, in
accordance with the procedures and
requirements set forth under § 655.433.
If the modified application fails to cure
the deficiencies or otherwise comply
with program requirements, and the CO
finds the employer’s response to the
NOD unacceptable, paragraphs (c) and
(d) provide that the CO will deny the
CW–1 Application for Temporary
Employment Certification, and offer the
employer an opportunity to request
administrative judicial review of the
denial, in accordance with the
procedures set forth under § 655.461.
Notwithstanding the decision to
accept the CW–1 Application for
Temporary Employment Certification,
paragraph (e) of this section authorizes
the CO to require additional
modifications where the CO determines
the job offer identified in the CW–1
Application for Temporary Employment
Certification does not contain all the
minimum benefits, wages, and working
conditions specified under § 655.441.
The CO’s ability to require
modification(s) of a job offer strengthens
CW–1 program integrity. In some cases,
information may come to the CO’s
attention after acceptance indicating
that the job offer does not contain all the
applicable minimum benefits, wages,
and working conditions that are
required for certification. This provision
enables the CO to ensure that the job
offer meets all regulatory requirements
before a decision to grant TLC is issued.
The CO may request additional
modifications at any time after the NOA
is issued and before the CO makes the
final determination to grant or deny the
CW–1 Application for Temporary
Employment Certification. The
employer must make the requested
modifications, or the CO will deny the
TLC in accordance with the procedures
set forth under § 655.453. Once all
requested modifications are made and
approved by the CO, paragraph (e)
requires that the employer provide to all
workers recruited in connection with
the job opportunity a copy of the
modified CW–1 Application for
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:01 Mar 29, 2019
Jkt 247001
Temporary Employment Certification no
later than the date work commences.
4. Section 655.433, Notice of
Acceptance
This section establishes the
procedures under which the CO will
issue a NOA after reviewing the
employer’s CW–1 Application for
Temporary Employment Certification.
The purpose of the NOA is to provide
the employer with specific instructions
on where to conduct recruitment in the
CNMI and the length of time
advertisements for the job opportunity
must appear to prospective U.S.
workers. Paragraph (a) provides that a
NOA will be issued to the employer
where the CO determines the CW–1
Application for Temporary Employment
Certification, including the material
terms and conditions of the job offer,
contains no errors or inaccuracies, and
meets the requirements set forth in this
subpart. A copy of the NOA will be sent
to the employer’s agent or attorney, as
applicable.
Paragraph (b) of this section specifies
the content requirements of the NOA.
The NOA will direct the employer to
recruit for U.S. workers by placing an
advertisement on the CNMI Department
of Labor’s job listing system, as further
explained under § 655.442; contacting
its former U.S. employees employed
during the previous year and soliciting
their return to the jobs, as further
explained under § 655.443; and posting
notice of the job opportunity in at least
two conspicuous locations at the
place(s) of employment, as further
explained under § 655.444.
Additionally, the NOA may contain
instructions for the employer to conduct
additional recruitment where the CO
determines qualified U.S. workers will
be available for the work, as further
explained under § 655.445.
To ensure employers initiate
recruitment in a timely manner, the
NOA will require all employerconducted recruitment to begin within
14 calendar days from the date the NOA
is issued. Finally, in the NOA the CO
will require the employer to submit a
report of its recruitment efforts by a
specific date, as further explained under
§ 655.446, for the CO to determine
whether there is a sufficient number of
qualified U.S. workers in the CNMI who
will be available for the employer’s job
opportunity.
5. Section 655.434, Amendments to an
Application
This section establishes the standards
and procedures under which the
employer may request to amend its
CW–1 Application for Temporary
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
Employment Certification to increase
the number of workers requested,
modify the period of employment, and/
or request other minor changes to the
application. All amendment requests
must be made in writing and before a
certification determination is issued on
the employer’s CW–1 Application for
Temporary Employment Certification
and will not be effective until approved
by the CO.
Paragraph (a) permits the employer to
request a minor amendment to increase
the number of workers requested in the
initial CW–1 Application for Temporary
Employment Certification. The
employer may request an increase of not
more than 20 percent (50 percent for
employers requesting less than 10
workers) of the number of workers
requested on the initial application
without requiring an additional
recruitment period for U.S. workers.
Requests for increases above the
prescribed percentages, which are
similar to other TLC programs 43
administered by the Department, may be
approved without additional
recruitment only when the employer
demonstrates that the need for
additional workers could not have been
foreseen and is wholly outside of the
employer’s control.
Paragraph (b) permits the employer to
request minor changes in the total
period of employment in the initial
CW–1 Application for Temporary
Employment Certification. The
employer may request an amendment of
not more than 14 calendar days to the
total period of employment without
requiring an additional recruitment
period for U.S. workers. Requests for
minor changes to the period of
employment must be in writing and
may be approved by the CO only when
the employer demonstrates that the
need for such changes could not have
been foreseen and is wholly outside of
the employer’s control. To ensure
amendments to the period of
employment are approved in a manner
consistent with the statute, the CO will
deny any request to change the period
of employment where the total amended
period of employment will exceed the
maximum applicable duration
permitted under § 655.420(g).
Additionally, the Department does not
intend for employers to use this
provision to amend their dates of need
in order to gain a competitive advantage
with respect to accessing the USCISadministered CW–1 visa cap. Therefore,
the Department will not approve cap43 The H–2B provisions may be found at 20 CFR
655.35. The H–2A provisions may be found at 20
CFR 655.145.
E:\FR\FM\01APR2.SGM
01APR2
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 62 / Monday, April 1, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
related amendment requests on the
CW–1 Application for Temporary
Employment Certification.
Paragraph (c) permits the employer to
request other minor changes to the
initial CW–1 Application for Temporary
Employment Certification before the
CO’s certification determination is
issued. After reviewing an employer’s
request to amend its CW–1 Application
for Temporary Employment
Certification, the CO will approve these
changes if the CO determines the
proposed amendment(s) are justified
after review of pertinent information,
including what effect, if any, the
proposed amendments have on the
underlying labor market test in the
CNMI for U.S. workers.
This provision provides clarity to
employers and workers alike of the
limitations on and processes for
amending a CW–1 Application for
Temporary Employment Certification
and the need to inform any U.S. workers
already recruited of the changed job
opportunity. For any amendments
approved by the CO under this section,
the employer is required to promptly
provide copies of any approved
amendments to all U.S. workers
recruited and hired under the original
job offer. These provisions also
recognize that business operations are
dynamic and employers can face
changed circumstances from varying
sources—from climatic conditions to
cancelled contracts. Accordingly, the
Department includes these provisions to
provide a limited degree of flexibility to
enable employers to assess and respond
to such changes. However, as provided
for in paragraph (d) of this section, these
provisions permit an employer to seek
such amendments only prior to the CO
issuing a determination to certify the
CW–1 Application for Temporary
Employment Certification, not after
certification.
E. Post-Acceptance Requirements
1. Section 655.440, EmployerConducted Recruitment
This section establishes the
requirements for employers to conduct
recruitment for U.S. workers in the
CNMI and provides that such
recruitment may occur only after the
employer files a CW–1 Application for
Temporary Employment Certification
and receives a NOA from the CO. To
carry out the statutory requirement that
certifications be granted only if no U.S.
workers are available, paragraph (a)
contains the general requirement that
employers must conduct recruitment in
the CNMI to ensure that there are not
able and qualified U.S. workers who
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:01 Mar 29, 2019
Jkt 247001
will be available for the positions listed
in the CW–1 Application for Temporary
Employment Certification. The
requirement that employers seeking TLC
conduct a thorough test of the CNMI
labor market is an essential requirement
to ensure that the importation of foreign
workers will not have an adverse effect
on U.S. workers.
Paragraph (b) requires that the
employer begin specific recruitment
steps outlined in §§ 655.442 through
655.445 within 14 calendar days from
the date the NOA is issued, unless the
CO provides different instructions to the
employer in the NOA. This requirement
provides the employer with time to
initiate all recruitment steps and
ensures all advertisements and notices
of the job opportunities appear to
prospective U.S. workers in the same
time period. To ensure U.S. workers are
fully considered for the job
opportunities, this paragraph also
requires that all employer-conducted
recruitment be completed before the
employer submits the recruitment report
to the CO as specified in the NOA and
required in § 655.446.
Where the employer desires to
conduct interviews with U.S. workers
for the job opportunity, paragraph (c)
requires that such interviews with U.S.
workers be done by telephone or at a
location where workers can participate
at little or no cost to the workers. This
provision does not require employers to
conduct employment interviews under
this provision. Rather, where employers
choose to conduct interviews,
employers are barred from offering
preferential treatment to potential CW–
1 workers, including any requirement to
interview for the job opportunity. In
addition, this provision ensures that
employers conduct a fair labor market
test by requiring employers to conduct
those interviews by phone or provide a
procedure for the interviews to be
conducted in the location where the
worker is being recruited so that the
worker incurs little or no cost.
Accordingly, an employer who requires
a U.S. worker to undergo an interview
must provide such worker with a
reasonable opportunity to meet such a
requirement. The purpose of these
requirements is to ensure that the
employer does not use the interview
process to the disadvantage of U.S.
workers.
To ensure no adverse effect to U.S.
workers, paragraph (d) requires the
employer to consider all U.S. applicants
interested in the position, and hire all
U.S. applicants who are qualified and
who will be available for the job
opportunity. This paragraph further
provides that U.S. applicants can be
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
12405
rejected only for lawful, job-related
reasons, and those not rejected on this
basis will be hired by the employer.
And finally, in order for the CO to
issue a final determination on the
CW–1 Application for Temporary
Employment Certification, paragraph (e)
requires the employer to prepare and
submit a written report of its
recruitment activities, in accordance
with the requirements set forth under
§ 655.446.
2. Section 655.441, Job Offer Assurances
and Advertising Contents
This section establishes the standards
and minimum content requirements for
an employer to advertise the job
opportunity to U.S. workers for
employment in the CNMI. The job offer
is essential for U.S. workers to make
informed employment decisions. The
job offer serves to apprise U.S. workers
of the available job opportunity and,
further, provides U.S. and CW–1
workers with the material terms and
conditions of employment under this
program. To apprise both U.S. and CW–
1 workers, it must include not only
standard information about the job
opportunity, including wage
information to avoid any U.S. worker
wage depression, but also key
assurances to which the employer is
committed by filing an CW–1
Application for Temporary Employment
Certification to employ CW–1 workers
and to which U.S. workers are also
entitled. Accordingly, paragraph (a)
provides that all recruitment contain
terms and conditions of employment
that are not less favorable than those
offered to the CW–1 workers and
comply with the assurances applicable
to job offers, as set forth in § 655.423.
Paragraph (b) provides a list of the
minimum terms and conditions of
employment that must be included in
all advertising, including a requirement
that the employer make the appropriate
disclosure when it is offering or
providing board, lodging or other
facilities, as well as identify any
deductions not required by law, if
applicable, that will be applied to the
employee’s pay for the provision of such
accommodations. The terms and
conditions of employment, as well as
the required disclosures, serve to inform
U.S. workers of the available job
opportunity. In requiring that
advertisements comply with minimum
content requirements, but not requiring
that advertisements contain all the text
of the applicable regulatory assurances
associated with these terms and
conditions of employment under
§ 655.423, the Department is striking an
appropriate balance between the
E:\FR\FM\01APR2.SGM
01APR2
12406
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 62 / Monday, April 1, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
employer’s cost in placing potentially
lengthy advertisements and the need to
ensure consistent disclosure of all
necessary information to prospective
U.S. workers. In addition, as a
continuing practice in other TLC
programs administered by the
Department, employers will be able to
use abbreviations in the advertisements
so long as they clearly and accurately
capture the underlying content
requirement.
In order to help employers comply
with these requirements, the
Department provides specific language
which is sufficient on the material terms
and conditions of employment related
to transportation; the three-fourths
guarantee; availability of overtime;
availability of on-the-job training; and
tools, equipment, and supplies to
apprise U.S. applicants of those
required items in the advertisement. As
provided above, the employer may
abbreviate some of this language so long
as the underlying guarantee is clearly
stated for U.S. workers and can be
clearly understood by a prospective
applicant. To apprise U.S. workers of
the available job opportunity, the
following statements in an employer’s
advertisements are permitted:
1. Transportation: Transportation
(including meals and, to the extent
necessary, lodging) to the place of
employment will be provided, or its cost
to workers reimbursed, if the worker
completes half the employment period.
Return transportation will be provided
if the worker completes the employment
period or is dismissed early by the
employer.
2. Three-fourths guarantee:
Employment will be offered for a total
number of work hours equal to at least
three fourths of the workdays of the
total period of employment.
3. Availability of overtime: Overtime
hours may be available and will be paid
at $ll per hour.
4. Availability of on-the-job training:
Employer will provide on-the-job
training to perform the duties safely and
effectively.
5. Tools, equipment, and supplies:
Employer will provide workers at no
charge all tools, supplies, and
equipment required to perform the job.
To afford U.S. workers access to
available job opportunities, this
paragraph also requires all
advertisements include the name and
contact information of the employer,
and a statement directing applicants to
apply for the job with the employer
using two verifiable methods, one of
which must be electronic, and the time
applicants will be considered for the job
opportunity. Contact information of the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:01 Mar 29, 2019
Jkt 247001
employer must be a person employed by
the employer with authority to consider
U.S. workers who apply for the job
opportunity. Electronic methods by
which applicants may apply for the job
can include a telephone number,
electronic mail address, or website
where applications or resumes can be
submitted for the specific job
opportunity. At any time during the
processing of a CW–1 Application for
Temporary Employment Certification or
a post-certification audit examination,
the CO has the authority to verify the
methods by which applicants apply for
the job opportunity to ensure each is
bona fide.
3. Section 655.442, Place Advertisement
With CNMI Department of Labor
This section requires the employer to
place an advertisement with the CNMI
Department of Labor. Specifically,
paragraph (a) requires the employer to
place an advertisement with the CNMI
Department of Labor that satisfies the
requirements set forth in § 655.441 and
remains open to prospective U.S.
workers for 21 consecutive calendar
days, which is similar to the H–2B
program. Also similar to other TLC
programs,44 the advertisement must be
sufficient under § 655.441 to ensure that
the advertisement informs U.S. workers
of the employer’s available job
opportunity and to ensure that U.S.
workers are not placed at a competitive
disadvantage. Further, the
advertisement provides the means by
which U.S. workers will contact
employers for the available job
opportunity. The employer’s job
qualifications and requirements
imposed on U.S. workers must be no
less favorable than the qualifications
and requirements that the employer is
imposing or will impose on CW–1
workers.
The CNMI Department of Labor is the
government agency responsible for
providing employment and training
services, and maintaining an electronic
system for registered and approved
employers to post job vacancy
announcements and receive referrals of
qualified U.S. workers in the CNMI.
Registration for employers to post
vacancy announcements on the job
listing system is a one-time, free
process, and readily accessible through
the CNMI Department of Labor’s
website. Consistent with the
requirements in other TLC programs 45
for employers to place job orders with
44 20 CFR 655.41; 20 CFR 655.18; 20 CFR 655.151;
20 CFR 655.122.
45 20 CFR part 655, subpart A; 20 CFR part 655,
subpart B.
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
SWAs, the Department has concluded
that the requirement for employers to
place an advertisement with the CNMI
Department of Labor represents a
reliable method of recruitment for the
job opportunity with a capacity to reach
a large number of prospective U.S.
workers in the CNMI.
Paragraph (b) also requires the
employer to maintain documentation
that the advertisement was placed with
the CNMI Department of Labor to
establish compliance with the
requirements of this section. The
employer’s documentation must include
printouts of web pages in which the
advertisement appeared on the CNMI
Department of Labor job listing system,
or other verifiable evidence from the
CNMI Department of Labor containing
the text of the advertisement. The
documentation must also clearly show
the dates on which the advertisement
appeared on the CNMI Department of
Labor’s job listing system in order to
establish compliance with the 21-day
recruitment period. The Department
reminds employers that the CO may
request this documentation during the
course of processing the CW–1
Application for Temporary Employment
Certification or a post-certification audit
examination.
4. Section 655.443, Contact With Former
U.S. Workers
This section requires the employer to
make reasonable efforts to contact by
mail or other effective means its former
U.S. workers, including those who were
laid off within 270 calendar days before
the date of need listed in the CW–1
Application for Temporary Employment
Certification, employed by the employer
in the occupation and at the places of
employment listed in the application
during the previous year to solicit their
return to the job. However, employers
are not required to contact U.S. workers
who were dismissed for cause or who
abandoned the places of employment.
The dismissal-for-cause exception does
not apply to workers improperly fired in
retaliation for their exercise of rights
protected under the program. The
Department has concluded that this
provision will help ensure that the
greatest number of U.S. workers,
particularly those who have previously
held these positions, have awareness of
and access to these job opportunities.
Each employer must provide its
former U.S. workers with a full
disclosure of the material terms and
conditions of the job offer and solicit the
U.S. workers’ return to the job. This
contact must occur during the period of
time that the job offer is being
advertised on the CNMI Department of
E:\FR\FM\01APR2.SGM
01APR2
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 62 / Monday, April 1, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
Labor’s job listing system, and the
employer must maintain documentation
sufficient to prove such contact in the
event of an investigation, inspection,
audit, or law enforcement function
performed by the Department, DHS, or
any Federal Government Official. This
documentation may consist of a dated
copy of a form letter or other written
notification sent to all former U.S.
workers, along with evidence of its
transmission (postage account, address
list, etc.).
The Department recognizes that
collective bargaining agreements may
exist between employers and workers
and contain requirements for the
employer to contact laid-off workers in
accordance with specific terms
governing recall and a recall period. The
requirement in this section that the
employer contact former U.S. workers
employed by the employer during the
270 calendar days before the date of
need would not substitute for the terms
in a collective bargaining agreement.
The employer is separately obligated to
comply with the terms and conditions
of the bargaining agreement, which may
include recall provisions that cover
workers employed by the employer
beyond the 270 calendar day period.
specifically, the regulation includes the
language ‘‘or in some other manner that
provides reasonable notification to all
employees in the job classification and
area in which the work will be
performed by the CW–1 workers.’’ This
permits the employer to devise an
alternative method for disseminating
this information to the employer’s U.S.
workers, for example, by posting the
notice in the same manner and location
as for other notices, such as safety and
health occupational notices, that the
employer is required by law to post.
This provision further provides that
electronic posting, such as displaying
the notice prominently on any internal
or external website that is maintained
by the employer and customarily used
for notices to employees about terms
and conditions of employment, is
sufficient to meet this posting
requirement as long as the posting
otherwise meets the requirements of this
section. Finally, this section requires the
employer maintain proof the CW–1
Application for Temporary Employment
Certification was posted and identify
the location(s) and the specific period of
time on which the notice appeared to
U.S. workers, in accordance with
§ 655.456.
5. Section 655.444, Notice of Posting
Requirement
Consistent with the Department’s TLC
programs, for the protection of U.S.
workers, this section requires employers
to post notice of the job opportunity
sufficient to apprise U.S. workers of the
available opportunity. For this notice
requirement, the employer must post a
copy of the CW–1 Application for
Temporary Employment Certification in
at least two conspicuous locations at all
places of employment or in some other
manner that provides reasonable
notification to all employees in the job
classification and area in which the
work will be performed by the CW–1
workers. The notice must be posted at
all places of employment for a period of
21 consecutive calendar days. Posting
on a website may fulfill this
requirement in some circumstances.
The posting of the notice at the
employer’s place(s) of employment is
intended to provide notice that all the
employer’s U.S. workers are afforded
the same access to the job opportunities
for which the employer intends to hire
CW–1 workers. In addition, the posting
of the notice may result in the sharing
of information between the employer’s
unionized and nonunionized workers
and therefore result in more referrals
and a greater pool of qualified U.S.
workers. This IFR provides flexibility
for complying with this requirement;
6. Section 655.445, Additional
Employer-Conducted Requirement
Where the CO determines that the
employer-conducted recruitment
described in §§ 655.442 through 655.444
is not sufficient to attract qualified U.S.
workers, this section provides the CO
with discretion to require the employer
to engage in additional recruitment
activities. Paragraph (a) provides the CO
with discretion to order additional
reasonable recruitment where the CO
has determined that there is a likelihood
that U.S. workers who are qualified will
be available for the work. This
discretion may be exercised where
additional recruitment efforts will likely
result in more opportunities for and a
greater response from available and
qualified U.S. workers. The additional
recruitment ordered by the CO under
this section will be conducted within
the same time period as placement of
the advertisement with the CNMI
Department of Labor and the other
mandatory employer-conducted
recruitment described above.
Paragraph (b) provides that, if the CO
elects to require additional recruitment,
the CO will describe the number and
type of additional recruitment efforts
required. This paragraph also provides a
nonexhaustive list of the types of
additional recruitment that may be
required by the CO, including
advertising on the employer’s website or
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:01 Mar 29, 2019
Jkt 247001
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
12407
another website, with community-based
organizations, local unions or trade
unions, or via a professional, trade, or
other publication where such a
publication is appropriate for the
workers likely to apply for the job
opportunity. When assessing the
appropriateness of a particular
recruitment method, the CO will take
into consideration all options at her/his
disposal, and will consider both the cost
and the likelihood that the additional
recruitment will identify qualified and
available U.S. workers, and will, where
appropriate, opt for the least
burdensome method(s).
The Department recognizes that the
increased rate of technological
innovation, including its implications
for communication of information about
job opportunities, is changing the way
many U.S. workers search for and find
jobs. In part due to these changes, the
inclusion of this requirement is
intended to allow the CO flexibility to
keep pace with the ever-changing labor
market trends. To administer this
provision effectively, the Department
intends to leverage its relationship with
the CNMI Department of Labor to obtain
information on the primary sources and
methods of recruitment that are
reasonable and most likely to attract
U.S. workers in the CNMI for those jobs
employers who are seeking CW–1
workers.
Paragraph (c) provides that, where the
CO requires additional recruitment, the
CO will specify the documentation or
other supporting evidence that must be
retained by the employer as proof that
the additional recruitment requirements
were met, as required in § 655.456.
7. Section 655.446, Recruitment Report
This section establishes the
requirements that all employers must
meet in order for the CO to issue a final
determination on the CW–1 Application
for Temporary Employment
Certification. Specifically, paragraph (a)
requires the employer to submit to the
NPC a signed and dated recruitment
report, by the date specified in the NOA,
which accounts for its recruitment
efforts for U.S. workers in the CNMI.
Where recruitment was conducted by a
job contractor or its employer-client,
then both joint employers named in the
CW–1 Application for Temporary
Employment Certification must sign the
recruitment report, as specified under
§ 655.421(e)(1). To ensure all U.S.
workers who apply for the job are fully
considered, paragraph (a) specifies that
the employer must not prepare, sign,
and date the recruitment report until 2
calendar days after the last date on
which the last advertisement appeared.
E:\FR\FM\01APR2.SGM
01APR2
12408
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 62 / Monday, April 1, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
Except in circumstances where an
employer may be required to do assisted
recruitment under § 655.471, the last
day on which the last advertisement
appears will generally be the 21st
consecutive calendar day of the
recruitment period.
The minimum content recruitment
report must contain, the name of each
recruitment activity or source,
confirmation that each recruitment step
required by the CO in the NOA was
completed and when, and the results of
the recruitment effort. The employer
must provide the name and contact
information of each U.S. worker who
applied or was referred to the job
opportunity as well as the disposition of
each worker’s application. The
employer must clearly indicate whether
the job opportunity was offered to each
U.S. worker applicant and whether each
U.S. worker accepted or declined
employment. This reporting allows the
Department to ensure the employer has
met its recruitment obligations whether
there were insufficient U.S. workers
who are able, qualified and available to
perform the job for which the employer
seeks TLC. In addition, the NPC may
contact U.S. workers listed in the
recruitment report, either prior to
issuing a final determination or during
the course of a post-certification audit
examination, to verify the reasons given
by the employer as to why they were not
hired, where applicable.
To ensure all U.S. applicants are
considered for the job opportunity and
the outcome of each worker’s
application are recorded timely and
accurately, paragraph (b) of this section
requires employers to update the
recruitment report throughout the
recruitment period. In a joint
employment situation, either the job
contractor or the employer-client may
update the recruitment report
throughout the recruitment period.
F. Labor Certification Determinations
1. Section 655.450, Determinations
This section generally authorizes the
OFLC Administrator and NPC-based
COs, by virtue of delegation from the
OFLC Administrator, to make the
determinations to certify or deny CW–1
Applications for Temporary
Employment Certification. The CO will
certify the CW–1 Application for
Temporary Employment Certification
only if the employer has met all
requirements, including the criteria
established at § 655.451, thus
demonstrating that there is an
insufficient number of U.S. workers in
the Commonwealth who are able,
willing, qualified, and available for the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:01 Mar 29, 2019
Jkt 247001
job opportunity for which certification
is sought and that the employment of
the CW–1 workers will not adversely
affect the wages and working conditions
of U.S. workers similarly employed in
the Commonwealth.
2. Section 655.451, Criteria for
Temporary Labor Certification
This section requires, as a condition
of certification, that the employer
demonstrate full compliance with the
requirements of this subpart. The CO
will determine whether the employer
has successfully established that there
are insufficient U.S. workers in the
Commonwealth to fill the employer’s
job opportunity. In making a
determination about the availability of
U.S. workers in the Commonwealth for
the job opportunity, the CO will
consider individuals whom the
employer rejected for any reason that
was not lawful or job-related to be
willing, able, available, and qualified
U.S. workers. Since the individuals will
be considered willing, able, available,
and qualified U.S. workers who were
unlawfully rejected, if the application is
certified, the number of certified CW–1
workers will be reduced by the number
of unlawfully rejected U.S. workers. If
the number of unlawfully rejected U.S.
workers exceeds the number of CW–1
workers requested, the application will
be denied. This new section furthers the
explicit Congressional intent to require
a TLC in connection with the CW–1 visa
program, as expressly mandated in Sec.
(2)(A) of the Workforce Act, which seeks
to protect U.S. workers by means of
adding this requirement to the program,
in addition to mandating a prevailing
wage survey, and an alternate method
for determining a prevailing wage, as
well as requiring that a minimum wage
is paid. See also 48 U.S.C. 1806
(d)(2)(A)–(C).
3. Section 655.452, Approved
Certification
In cases where the CO grants TLC, the
CO will electronically transmit a Final
Determination notice and certified CW–
1 Application for Temporary
Employment Certification to the
employer and USCIS. In cases where an
employer is permitted to file by mail,
the CO will use the same electronic
method to transmit the certification
documentation directly to USCIS
electronically, but will deliver
certification documentation to the
employer using first class mail.
Consistent with current practices in
other TLC programs, the Department
will send a copy of all certification
documentation to the employer and, if
applicable, to the employer’s agent or
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
attorney. The Department has
determined that that even when an
employer is represented, the employer
should directly receive notification from
OFLC, and maintain the Final
Determination notice, as well as the
certified CW–1 Application for
Temporary Employment Certification,
because the employer attests to, and is
primarily responsible for, meeting the
obligations and requirements.
Due to the geographic location of the
CNMI, the Department has concluded
that the use of an electronic method to
issue approved certification approvals
will be most efficient. The Department
anticipates these procedures will also
promote program integrity and expedite
the processing of CW–1 petitions at
USCIS, in part, by providing
certification information directly from
OFLC to USCIS electronically.
Finally, the employer is required to
retain a copy of the certified CW–1
Application for Temporary Employment
Certification, including the original
signed Appendix C, as required under
the record keeping provisions at
§ 655.456.
4. Section 655.453, Denied Certification
In cases where the CO denies TLC, the
CO issues a Final Determination notice
to the employer and, if applicable, to the
employer’s agent or attorney. Consistent
with the procedural requirements for
issuing approved certifications, the CO
is required to send the Final
Determination notice to the employer
using an electronic method authorized
by the OFLC Administrator, except
where the Department has permitted an
employer to file by mail as set forth in
§ 655.420(c), in which case the CO will
send the Final Determination notice
using first class mail.
The Final Determination notice will
state the reason(s) for denying the
employer’s request for TLC, and cite the
relevant regulatory provisions governing
the stated grounds for denial. The Final
Determination notice will also advise
the employer of its right to seek
administrative review of the final
determination. The Final Determination
notice will notify the employer that
failure to timely request administrative
judicial review will result in the denial
of the application for labor certification
becoming final and the Department will
not accept any appeal on such
application.
5. Section 655.454, Partial Certification
This section provides the CO with
authority to issue a partial TLC
reflecting either a shorter-thanrequested period of employment or a
lower-than-requested number of CW–1
E:\FR\FM\01APR2.SGM
01APR2
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 62 / Monday, April 1, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
workers, or both. A partial certification
may be issued based upon information
the CO receives during the course of
processing the CW–1 Application for
Temporary Employment Certification.
For example, the period of employment
will be reduced where the employer is
unable to demonstrate that full-time
employment will be available beginning
on the date of need through the entire
period of employment identified on the
application. The number of workers
requested for certification will be
reduced by one for each able, willing,
qualified, and available U.S. worker the
CNMI Department of Labor refers or
who applies directly with the employer,
and who the employer has rejected for
reasons that are unlawful or unrelated to
the job. In other words, the CO can issue
a full certification only where the
employer has fully considered each U.S.
worker who applied, whether directly or
through referral from the CNMI
Department of Labor, and has identified
a lawful, job-related reason for each U.S.
worker not hired.
If a partial labor certification is
issued, the CO will send the Final
Determination notice and certified CW–
1 Application for Temporary
Employment Certification electronically,
except where the employer is permitted
to file by mail as set forth in
§ 655.420(c). The Final Determination
notice will state the reasons why either
the period of need or the number of
CW–1 workers requested has been
reduced. The Final Determination
notice will also offer the employer an
opportunity to request administrative
judicial review using the procedures
further explained under § 655.461.
Where the employer does not timely
request administrative judicial review,
the partial certification determination
will be final on the date the CO issued
the certification, and the Department
will not accept any appeal on that CW–
1 Application for Temporary
Employment Certification.
6. Section 655.455, Validity of
Temporary Labor Certification
This section provides that a TLC
granted by the CO is valid only for the
period of employment identified in the
certified CW–1 Application for
Temporary Employment Certification
and for the number of CW–1 positions,
the places of employment, the job
classification, the specific services or
labor to be performed, and the
employer(s), including any
modifications approved by the CO.
Finally, a TLC is prohibited from being
transferred from one employer to
another unless the employer to which
the TLC is being transferred is a
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:01 Mar 29, 2019
Jkt 247001
successor in interest to the employer
that received the TLC.
These limitations protect the integrity
of the labor certification process and are
consistent with the other labor
certification programs administered by
the Department.
7. Section 655.456, Document Retention
Requirements for CW–1 Employers
CW–1 employers filing an CW–1
Application for Temporary Employment
Certification must retain the documents
and records to demonstrate compliance
for 3 years from the date on which the
CW–1 Application for Temporary
Employment Certification expires, or 3
years from the date of the final
determination if the CW–1 Application
for Temporary Employment
Certification is denied, or 3 years from
the date the Department receives the
request for withdrawal of the CW–1
Application for Temporary Employment
Certification. Employers may maintain
these documents and records
electronically.
The documents and records required
to be retained include: Proof of efforts
to recruit U.S. workers in the
Commonwealth; documentation
supporting the recruitment report,
including justification for failure to
contact former U.S. workers, and any
supporting resumes and contact
information; and records of each
worker’s earnings, hours offered and
worked, location(s) where work is
performed, if applicable, records of
reimbursement of transportation and
subsistence costs incurred by the
workers during transportation; copies of
written contracts with third parties
demonstrating compliance with the
prohibitions to seek or receive payments
or other compensation of any kind from
prospective workers; evidence of the
employer’s contact with U.S. workers
who applied for the job opportunity,
including documents demonstrating
that any rejections of U.S. workers were
for lawful, job-related reasons; copies of
written notices informing OFLC of each
CW–1 worker or worker in
corresponding employment who
separate from employment; and a copy
of the CW–1 Application for Temporary
Employment Certification (including the
original signed Form ETA–9142C,
Appendix C) and all accompanying
appendices, including any
modifications, amendments or
extensions approved by the CO.
Based on the Department’s experience
administering other TLC programs, the
documents and records to be retained by
the employer are critical to ensuring an
appropriate level of integrity and
accountability in the CW–1 program.
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
12409
Thus, paragraph (d) of this section
requires employers to make all
documents and records required to be
retained under this subpart available to
the Department, DHS or to any Federal
Government Official performing an
investigation, inspection, audit, or law
enforcement function for purposes of
copying, transcribing, or inspecting
them to verify employer compliance
with program requirements.
G. Post Certification Activities
1. Section 655.460, Extensions
This section establishes the standards
and procedures for employers to request
extensions of the period of employment
on the certified CW–1 Application for
Temporary Employment Certification.
Extensions differ from amendments to
the period of employment in that
extensions are requested after
certification, while amendments are
requested before the CO issues a final
determination. The Department’s
experience administering other TLC
programs demonstrates that some
employers, due to unforeseen
circumstances, need some degree of
flexibility in the authorized period of
employment after the CW–1 Application
for Temporary Employment
Certification is granted.
Therefore, employers may request
extensions to the period of employment
related solely to weather conditions or
other factors beyond their control
(which may include unforeseen changes
in market conditions). The employer
must submit the request to the CO
documenting that the extension is
needed and that it could not have been
reasonably foreseen by the employer.
The CO will not grant an extension
where the total period of employment
with the extension would exceed the
maximum applicable duration
permitted under § 655.420(g). The
Department has concluded that this
requirement provides employers with
important flexibility to address
unforeseen circumstances while
maintaining the integrity of the
certification decision issued by the
Department, including the labor market
test to ensure U.S. worker access to the
job opportunities.
Upon review of the employer’s
extension request, the CO will provide
notification to the employer and, if
applicable, to the employer’s agent or
attorney of the decision. Where the CO
denies the extension request, the
employer has the right to request
administrative review using the
procedures under § 655.461. Where the
CO approves the employer’s request for
an extension, the written notification
E:\FR\FM\01APR2.SGM
01APR2
12410
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 62 / Monday, April 1, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
the employer receives from the CO will
constitute an amended Final
Determination notice.
The employer must immediately
provide to its CW–1 workers and
workers in corresponding employment a
copy of any approved extension,
especially since the CO’s determination
may have an impact on the duration of
the CW–1 visa status of the workers.
2. Section 655.461, Administrative
Review
This section establishes the standards
and procedures under which an
employer may request administrative
review of a determination issued by the
CO, as well as the procedures BALCA
must follow in conducting such a
review. An employer may request
administrative review of a
determination issued by the CO with
respect to a PWD under § 655.411;
denial of a modified CW–1 Application
for Temporary Employment
Certification under § 655.432; denial of
TLC under § 655.453; issuance of a
partial certification under § 655.454;
denial of a request for an extension
under § 655.460; imposition of assisted
recruitment under § 655.471. In
addition, an employer may request
administrative review of a revocation of
an approved TLC by the OFLC
Administrator under § 655.472.
An employer wishing review of a
determination by the CO must request
an administrative review before BALCA
to exhaust its administrative remedies
within 10 business days from the date
of the CO’s determination. This allows
for prompt processing while providing
employers with sufficient time to
prepare their requests. Additionally,
this paragraph sets forth the various
requirements for requests for review.
Such requests must clearly identify the
particular determination for which
review is sought and include a copy of
that determination, and set forth the
grounds for the request, including the
specific factual issues the employer
wishes BALCA to examine, but may
contain only evidence that was actually
before the CO at the time of the
determination.
To facilitate the timely preparation of
the Appeal File, the employer must also
send a copy of its request for review to
the CO. Upon the receipt of the request
for review, paragraph (b) of this section
requires the CO to assemble and submit
the Appeal File to BALCA, the
employer, and the Associate Solicitor
for Employment and Training Legal
Services, Office of the Solicitor, U.S.
Department of Labor as soon as
practicable by means normally assuring
expedited delivery. If applicable, a copy
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:01 Mar 29, 2019
Jkt 247001
of the Appeal File will also be sent to
the employer’s agent or attorney.
Pursuant to paragraph (c), once BALCA
receives the Appeal File, the Chief ALJ
will assign either a single ALJ or a panel
of three ALJs to consider the case.
Paragraph (d)(1) explains the briefing
schedules for appeals under this
section. If the employer wishes to
submit a brief, it must do so with its
request for review. The CO may submit
a brief within 7 business days of receipt
of the Appeal File. Under this schedule,
within the timeframe permitted for the
submission of a request for review, the
employer may develop a brief that sets
forth the specific grounds for its request
and corresponding legal arguments. In
turn, the CO may respond to those
arguments within a set timeframe. This
procedure assists the ALJ’s decisionmaking process by allowing for a
complete set of arguments by the
employer and responses by the CO
while providing the parties a
predictable, yet expedited, briefing
schedule.
Paragraph (d)(2) sets forth the
standard of review that applies to
requests for administrative review.
When reviewing such requests, the ALJ
must uphold the CO’s decision unless
the employer shows that the decision is
arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of
discretion, or otherwise not in
accordance with the law. Including this
standard in the IFR will make clear
what employers must prove in order to
receive a favorable decision. It will also
ensure BALCA is conducting its
administrative review in a consistent
manner.
To ensure an administrative judicial
decision is rendered as expeditiously as
possible, paragraph (e) specifies that
BALCA must review the CO’s
determination only on the basis of the
documents in the Appeal File that were
before the CO at the time of the CO’s
determination, the request for review,
and any legal briefs submitted.
Sometimes, the Appeal File contains
new evidence submitted by the
employer to the CO after the CO has
issued his or her decision, such as when
the employer submits a request for
review with new evidence, or a
corrected recruitment report with new
information, after the CO has denied
certification. Although such evidence is
in the Appeal File, BALCA may not
consider this new evidence because it
was not before the CO at the time of the
CO’s determination. Similarly, BALCA
may not consider evidence not before
the CO by the time the CO’s
determination was issued, even if such
evidence is in the request for review or
legal briefs. This provision reflects
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
longstanding principles in the
administrative review of H–2A and H–
2B cases, and provides for fair
determinations of these matters.
Finally, paragraphs (e) and (f) states
that BALCA must notify all parties of its
decision within 7 business days of the
submission of the CO’s brief or 10
business days after receipt of the Appeal
File, whichever is later, of its decision
to: (1) Affirm the CO’s determination;
(2) reverse or modify the CO’s
determination; or (3) remand the case
back to the CO for further action. This
timeline provides BALCA with a
reasonable timeframe in which to render
a decision, while ensuring prompt
resolution of employers’ review
requests.
3. Section 655.462, Withdrawal of an
CW–1 Application for Temporary
Employment Certification
Paragraph (a) permits an employer to
submit a request to withdraw an CW–1
Application for Temporary Employment
Certification at any time after the
application is submitted to the NPC for
processing, including after the CO
grants TLC under § 655.450. However,
the employer must continue to comply
with the terms and conditions of
employment contained in the CW–1
Application for Temporary Employment
Certification and work contract for all
workers recruited and hired in
connection with that application. In
accordance with paragraph (b), the
employer must submit a withdrawal
request in writing to the NPC, clearly
identifying the CW–1 Application for
Temporary Employment Certification to
be withdrawn and stating the reasons
for requesting withdrawal.
4. Section 655.463, Public Disclosure
This section provides that the
Department will maintain a publicly
accessible electronic file with
information on all employers who
voluntarily elect to request TLC under
the CW–1 program. The database will
include nonprivileged information
extracted from the CW–1 Applications
for Temporary Employment
Certification including, but not limited
to, the number of workers requested for
TLC, the date an application is filed, the
date an application is decided, and the
final disposition of an application.
Providing this information
electronically will enhance
transparency of the CW–1 program and
of OFLC’s processing of these
applications. It will also make certain
that such information is readily
available to those who seek it from the
Department.
E:\FR\FM\01APR2.SGM
01APR2
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 62 / Monday, April 1, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
H. Integrity Measures
1. Section 655.470, Audits
This section outlines the process
under which the CO will conduct audits
of certified CW–1 Applications for
Temporary Employment Certification.
The statutory mandate to ensure that a
sufficient number of qualified U.S.
workers in the CNMI are not available
and that employment of the foreign
workers will not adversely affect the
wages and working conditions of
similarly employed U.S. workers serves
as the basis for the Department’s
authority to conduct audit
examinations. There is real value in
auditing certified CW–1 Applications for
Temporary Employment Certification
because they can establish a record of
employer compliance or noncompliance
with program requirements, and they
contain information that assists the
Department in determining whether it
needs to refer findings to other Federal
agencies for further investigation or,
depending on the nature of the
violations, initiate debarment
proceedings to prohibit an employer,
agent, or attorney, or their successors in
interest, from participating in the CW–
1 program.
Paragraph (a) provides that the CO has
sole discretion to choose the certified
CW–1 Applications for Temporary
Employment Certification that will be
audited, which includes the selection of
applications using a random assignment
method. When a certified CW–1
Application for Temporary Employment
Certification is selected for audit,
paragraph (b) requires the CO to issue
an audit letter to the employer and, if
appropriate, a copy of such letter to the
employer’s attorney or agent, listing the
documentation the employer must
submit and the date (no more than 30
calendar days from the date the audit
letter is issued) by which the
documentation must be sent to the CO.
Additionally, paragraph (b) requires that
the audit letter issued by the CO advise
the employer that failure to fully
comply with the audit process may
result in the revocation of its
certification or in debarment, under
§§ 655.472 and 655.473, respectively, or
require the employer to undergo
assisted recruitment in future filings of
a CW–1 Application for Temporary
Employment Certification, under
§ 655.471.
Paragraph (c) permits the CO to
request additional information and/or
documentation from the employer as
needed in order to complete the audit.
Paragraph (d) provides the CO with
authority to provide the audit findings
and underlying documentation to DHS
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:01 Mar 29, 2019
Jkt 247001
or other appropriate enforcement
agencies. The CO may refer any findings
that an employer discouraged a
qualified U.S. worker from applying,
failed to hire, discharged, or otherwise
discriminated against a qualified U.S.
worker, to the Department of Justice,
Civil Rights Division, Immigrant and
Employee Rights Section.
2. Section 655.471, Assisted
Recruitment
This section protects the integrity of
the CW–1 program by requiring the
employer to follow special requirements
during its recruitment process where the
CO determines the employer committed
one or more violations that do not
warrant program debarment.
Specifically, paragraph (a) permits the
CO to require an employer to participate
in assisted recruitment for any future
CW–1 Application for Temporary
Employment Certification, if the CO
determines as a result of an audit, or
otherwise, that a violation not
warranting debarment from the CW–1
program has occurred. Assisted
recruitment ordered by the CO can also
be an effective tool to help employers
that, due to either program inexperience
or confusion, commit unintentional
violations in their CW–1 Application for
Temporary Employment Certification
and indicate a need for further
assistance from the Department.
Paragraph (b) of this section requires
the CO to provide written notification to
the employer and, if applicable, to the
employer’s agent or attorney, of the
requirement to participate in assisted
recruitment for any future filed CW–1
Application for Temporary Employment
Certification. The CO may require the
employer to follow special requirements
during its recruitment process for a
period of up to 2 years from the date the
notice is issued. The nature of the
assisted recruitment will be at the
discretion of the CO, and such
requirements will be based on the
totality of the circumstances of the
employer. The notification issued by the
CO will state the reasons for the
imposition of the additional
requirements and explain that the
employer’s agreement to accept the
conditions related to the assisted
recruitment process will constitute their
inclusion as bona fide conditions and
terms of a CW–1 Application for
Temporary Employment Certification.
In the notice, the CO must also offer the
employer an opportunity to request an
administrative judicial review, in
accordance with the procedures further
explained under § 655.461.
As set forth in paragraph (c), the
assisted recruitment process will be in
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
12411
addition to any recruitment required of
the employer under §§ 655.442 through
655.445 of this subpart. This paragraph
also provides a nonexhaustive list of
special requirements the CO may order
the employer to undertake during its
recruitment process, such as requiring
submission to the CO of draft
advertisements at the time of filing the
CW–1 Application for Temporary
Employment Certification, designating
specific sources of recruitment for U.S.
workers, extending the period of time
advertisements are available to U.S.
workers, requiring the employer to
either notify the CO when
advertisements are placed and/or
provide proof of publication of all
advertisements, or other requirements
verifying the employer conducted the
assisted recruitment ordered by the CO.
To ensure employers comply with
these assisted recruitment requirements,
paragraph (d) provides that, where the
employer materially fails to comply
with the requirements of this section,
the CO will deny the CW–1 Application
for Temporary Employment
Certification and may initiate debarment
proceedings against the employer, agent,
or attorney, or their successors in
interest, in accordance with the
standard and procedures under
§ 655.473.
3. Section 655.472, Revocation
This section outlines the process by
which the OFLC Administrator may
revoke an approved CW–1 TLC. The
ability to revoke an approved labor
certification is a critical tool for
enabling the Department to protect the
integrity of the CW–1 program and
stems from the agency’s inherent
authority to reconsider its decisions.
As set forth in paragraph (a) of this
section, the OFLC Administrator will
only revoke TLCs under certain
circumstances: (1) When the OFLC
Administrator finds that the issuance of
the TLC was not justified due to fraud
or willful misrepresentation of a
material fact in the application process,
as defined in at § 655.473(d); (2) when
the OFLC Administrator finds that the
employer substantially failed to comply
with any of the terms and conditions of
the TLC, as defined in § 655.473(d) and
(e); or (3) when the OFLC Administrator
determines that the employer is
impeding the Department’s audit
examination authority under § 655.470,
or impeding any Federal Government
Official performing an investigation,
inspection, audit, or law enforcement
function under this subpart.
Paragraph (b) of this section outlines
the procedures OFLC will use when the
OFLC Administrator decides to revoke
E:\FR\FM\01APR2.SGM
01APR2
12412
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 62 / Monday, April 1, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
an approved TLC for CW–1 workers. If
the OFLC Administrator decides to
revoke an approved TLC, paragraph
(b)(1) provides that it will send a Notice
of Revocation to the CW–1 employer,
and a copy to its attorney or agent, if
applicable. The notice will contain a
detailed statement of the grounds for the
revocation and inform the employer,
and its agent or attorney if applicable,
of the employer’s rights. Upon receiving
the Notice of Revocation, the CW–1
employer has two options if it wishes to
challenge the revocation: (1) It may
submit rebuttal evidence to the OFLC
Administrator; or (2) it may request
Administrator review of the Notice of
Revocation by BALCA pursuant to the
procedures detailed in § 655.461. As set
forth in paragraph (b)(2) of this section,
if the employer does not submit rebuttal
evidence or file a request for
Administrator review within 10
business days of the date of the Notice
of Revocation, the notice will be
deemed the final agency action and will
take effect immediately at the end of the
10 business days. If the employer
chooses to file rebuttal evidence, and
the employer timely files that evidence,
the OFLC Administrator will review it
and provide the employer with a final
determination on revocation within 10
business days of receiving the rebuttal
evidence.
If the OFLC Administrator decides to
uphold the revocation, it will inform the
CW–1 employer of its right to request
administrative review by BALCA
according to the procedures set forth at
§ 655.461. The CW–1 employer must
appeal OFLC’s determination within 10
business days; otherwise, OFLC’s
decision becomes the final agency
action by the Secretary and will take
effect immediately at the end of the 10
business days.
If the CW–1 employer chooses to
request administrative review, either in
lieu of submitting rebuttal evidence, or
after the OFLC Administrator makes a
determination on the rebuttal evidence,
paragraph (b)(3) of this section explains
that such requests must be submitted
according to the appeal procedures of
§ 655.461. Paragraph (b)(4) provides that
the timely filing of either the rebuttal
evidence or a request for administrative
review stays the revocation pending the
outcome of the applicable proceeding. If
the TLC is ultimately revoked,
paragraph (b)(5) provides that OFLC
will notify DHS and the Department of
State.
Finally, paragraph (c) of this section
lists a CW–1 employer’s continuing
obligations to its CW–1 and
corresponding workers if the employer’s
CW–1 certification is revoked. The
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:01 Mar 29, 2019
Jkt 247001
obligations include reimbursement of
actual inbound transportation, visa, and
other expenses (if they have not been
paid), payment of the workers’
outbound transportation expenses,
payment to the workers of the amount
due under the three-fourths guarantee;
and payment of any other wages,
benefits, and working conditions due or
owing to workers under this subpart.
When an employer’s certification is
revoked, the revocation applies to that
particular certification only; violations
relating to a particular certification will
not be imputed to other certifications
issued to the same employer for which
there has been no finding of employer
culpability. In some situations,
however, OFLC may revoke all of an
employer’s existing labor certifications
where the underlying violation applies
to all of the employer’s certifications.
For instance, if OFLC finds that the
employer meets either the basis for
revocation in paragraph (a)(3) of this
section (i.e., failure to cooperate with a
Department’s investigation or with a
Department official performing an
investigation, inspection, audit, or law
enforcement function), this finding
could provide a basis for revoking any
and all of the employer’s existing TLCs
approved under this subpart.
Additionally, where OFLC finds that
violations of paragraph (a)(1) or (2) of
this section affect all of the employer’s
certifications, such as where an
employer misrepresents its legal status,
OFLC also may revoke all of that
employer’s certifications. Lastly, where
an employer’s certification has been
revoked, OFLC may take a more careful
look at the employer’s other
certifications to determine if similar
violations exist that would warrant
revocation.
The Department recognizes the
seriousness of revocation as an
administrative remedy; accordingly, the
grounds for revocation reflect violations
that significantly undermine the
integrity of the CW–1 program. OFLC
intends to use the authority to revoke
only when an employer’s actions
warrant such a severe consequence.
4. Section 655.473, Debarment
This section outlines the process
under which the OFLC Administrator
may debar an employer, agent, attorney,
or their successors in interest, from
participation in the CW–1 program. The
ability to suspend and debar entities
from participating in the labor
certification program is necessary to
encourage compliance with program
requirements and maintain the integrity
of the program. Suspension and
debarment authority is a critical tool for
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
enabling the Department to protect both
U.S. and foreign workers, and to fulfill
its statutory mandate to prevent adverse
effects on U.S. workers due to the
presence of temporary foreign labor.
The Department has repeatedly
recognized its inherent suspension and
debarment authority in the foreign labor
certification context. As the Second
Circuit found in Janik Paving &
Construction, Inc. v. Brock, 828 F.2d 84
(2d Cir. 1987), the Department possesses
an inherent authority to refuse to
provide a benefit or lift a restriction for
an employer that has acted contrary to
the welfare of U.S. workers. In assessing
the Department’s authority to debar
violators, the court found that ‘‘[t]he
Secretary may . . . make such rules and
regulations allowing reasonable
variations, tolerances, and exemptions
to and from any or all provisions . . .
as he may find necessary and proper in
the public interest to prevent injustice
or undue hardship or to avoid serious
impairment of the conduct of
Government business.’’ Id. at 89 n.6. In
that case, the implied authority to debar
existed even though the statute in
question ‘‘specifically provided civil
and criminal sanctions for violations of
overtime work requirements but failed
to mention debarment.’’ Id. at 89. The
court held that debarment may be
necessary to ‘‘effective enforcement of a
statute.’’ Id. at 91.
The power to debar is also a function
of a Federal agency’s general authority
to prescribe rules of procedure to
determine who can practice and
participate in administrative
proceedings before it. Koden v. DOJ, 546
F.2d 228, 232–33 (7th Cir. 1977) (citing
Goldsmith v. U.S. Board of Tax
Appeals, 270 U.S. 117 (1926)). Such
power exists even if the agency does not
have express statutory authority to
prescribe the qualifications of those
entities. Touche Ross & Co. v. SEC, 609
F.2d 570, 582 (2d Cir. 1979). An agency
with the power to determine who may
practice before it also has the authority
to debar or discipline such individuals
for unprofessional conduct. See Koden,
564 F. 2d at 233. The Department has
exercised such authority in the past in
prescribing the qualifications, and
procedures for denying the appearance,
of attorneys and other representatives
before the Department’s OALJ under 29
CFR 18.34(g). See also Smiley v.
Director, OWCP, 984 F.2d 278, 283 (9th
Cir. 1993).
In order to encourage compliance, the
regulations for the CW–1 program
incorporate attestations, audits, and the
remedial measure of debarment. Use of
debarment as a mechanism to encourage
compliance has been used by the
E:\FR\FM\01APR2.SGM
01APR2
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 62 / Monday, April 1, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
Department in its other foreign labor
certification and attestation programs.46
Ensuring the integrity of a statutory
program enacted to protect U.S. workers
is an important part of the Department’s
mission.
Paragraph (a) of this section provides
that the OFLC Administrator may debar
an employer, agent, attorney, or any
successor in interest to that employer,
agent, or attorney, from participating in
any action under this subpart, if the
OFLC Administrator finds that the
employer, agent, or attorney
substantially violated a material term or
condition of the Application for
Prevailing Wage Determination or CW–
1 Application for Temporary
Employment Certification. This section
also notes that copies of final debarment
decisions will be forwarded to DHS and
DOS promptly. Paragraph (b) explains
that the debarred employer, agent,
attorney, or any successor in interest to
any debarred employer, agent, or
attorney, will be disqualified not only
from filing under this subpart, but also
from filing any labor certification
applications 47 or labor condition
applications 48 with the Department. If
such an application is filed, it will be
denied without review. The debarred
party will be unable to file, or have filed
on its behalf, labor certification
applications in connection with not
only the CW–1 program, but also
applications under any other program
managed by OFLC.
Paragraph (c) limits any period of
debarment under paragraphs (a) and (b)
to not more than 5 years for a single
violation. This means that the total
debarment period may exceed 5 years if
more than one violation has occurred.
For example, if the OFLC Administrator
finds that an employer, agent, attorney,
or any successor in interest to that
employer, agent, or attorney, has
committed two violations warranting
debarment, the OFLC Administrator
may impose two periods of debarment
that will run consecutively, for a total of
up to 10 years. The first period of
46 20 CFR 655.73; 20 CFR 655.182; and 20 CFR
656.31(f).
47 See 20 CFR part 655, subpart A (governing H–
2B temporary nonagricultural workers); 20 CFR part
655, subpart B (governing H–2A temporary
agricultural workers); 20 CFR part 655, subpart F
(governing the temporary employment of D–1
crewmembers on foreign vessels to perform
longshore work at U.S. ports); and 20 CFR part 656
(permanent labor certification).
48 20 CFR 655, subpart H (governing labor
condition applications for H–1B foreign nationals
entering the U.S. on a temporary basis to work in
specialty occupations or as fashion models, H–1b1
professionals entering under the U.S.-Chile or U.S.Singapore Free Trade Agreements, and E–3
professionals entering under the U.S.-Australia Free
Trade Agreement).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:01 Mar 29, 2019
Jkt 247001
debarment would run from the date of
the final agency decision, and the
second period of debarment would run
from the end of the first period of
debarment.
Paragraph (d) of this section defines a
violation for purposes of debarment. It
explains that a violation includes one or
more acts of commission or omission on
the part of the employer, agent, or
attorney, which involve: Failure to pay
or provide the required wages, benefits,
or working conditions to the employer’s
CW–1 workers and/or workers in
corresponding employment; failure,
except for lawful, job-related reasons, to
offer employment to qualified U.S.
workers who applied for the job
opportunity for which certification was
sought; failure to comply with the
employer’s obligations to recruit U.S.
workers; improper layoff or
displacement of U.S. workers or workers
in corresponding employment; failure to
comply with the NOD process, as set
forth in § 655.431, or the assisted
recruitment process, as set forth in
§ 655.471; impeding the audit process,
as set forth in § 655.470, or impeding
any Federal Government Official
performing an investigation, inspection,
audit, or law enforcement function;
employing a CW–1 worker outside of
the Commonwealth, in an activity/
activities not listed in the work contract,
or outside the validity period of
employment of the work contract,
including any approved extension
thereof; a violation of the requirements
of § 655.423(n) or (o); a violation of any
of the provisions listed in § 655.423(q);
or any other act showing such flagrant
disregard for the law that future
compliance with program requirements
cannot reasonably be expected. For
debarment purposes, a violation also
includes fraud involving the
Application for Prevailing Wage
Determination or the CW–1 Application
for Temporary Employment
Certification, or a material
misrepresentation of fact during the
course of processing the CW–1
Application for Temporary Employment
Certification. It is important to
emphasize that debarment in the
context of the CW–1 program can be
triggered by a single act or omission, as
opposed to a pattern or practice of such
actions or omissions.
Paragraph (e) provides the standard
for determining whether a violation is
so substantial as to merit debarment.
This section provides a nonexhaustive
list of factors that the OFLC
Administrator may consider in
determining whether a violation is
substantial, including: A previous
history of violations under the CW–1
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
12413
program; the number of CW–1 workers,
workers in corresponding employment,
or U.S. workers who were and/or are
affected by the violations; the gravity of
the violations; and the extent to which
the violator achieved a financial gain
due to the violations, or the potential
financial loss or potential injury to the
workers. This list provides
comprehensive, but not exhaustive,
grounds or factors that may advise the
OFLC Administrator when making a
determination as to whether the
substantiality standard has been met. In
assessing whether debarment is
appropriate, the OFLC Administrator
may also consider any mitigating facts
the employer, agent, or attorney wishes
to provide, such as efforts made in good
faith to comply with the CW–1 program,
an explanation from the person charged
with the violation or violations, or a
commitment to future compliance,
taking into account the public health,
interest, or safety, and previous history
of violations under the CW–1 program.
Paragraph (f) provides the procedures
for debarment. The procedures for
debarment are similar to the debarment
procedures that are currently in place in
other temporary employment programs,
particularly the H–2B program. See 20
CFR 655.73. As provided in paragraph
(f)(1), the debarment process begins
when the OFLC Administrator makes a
determination to debar an employer,
agent, attorney, or any successor in
interest to the employer, agent, or
attorney, and issues the party a Notice
of Debarment. The notice must state the
reasons for the debarment finding,
including a detailed explanation of the
grounds for and the duration of the
debarment, and must inform the party
subject to the notice of its right to
submit rebuttal evidence or to request
administrative review of the debarment
by BALCA. If the party does not file
rebuttal evidence or a request for
BALCA review within 30 calendar days,
the Notice of Debarment will take effect
on the date specified in the notice or, if
no date is specified, at the end of the 30day period. If the party timely files
rebuttal evidence or a request for
review, the debarment will be stayed
pending the outcome of the appeal as
provided in paragraphs (f)(2) through (6)
of this section.
If the party who received the Notice
of Debarment wishes to file rebuttal
evidence, paragraph (f)(2) provides that
the OFLC Administrator will review any
timely filed rebuttal evidence and will
inform the party of the Final
Determination on debarment within 30
calendar days of receiving the rebuttal
evidence. If the OFLC Administrator
determines that the party must be
E:\FR\FM\01APR2.SGM
01APR2
12414
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 62 / Monday, April 1, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
debarred, OFLC will inform the party of
its right to request administrative review
by BALCA. The party must request
review within 30 calendar days after the
date of the Final Determination, or the
Final Determination becomes the final
agency order and the debarment will
take effect on the date specified in the
Final Determination or, if no date is
specified, at the end of that 30-day
period.
Paragraph (f)(3) explains the process
for requesting review of a Notice of
Debarment or Final Determination.
Paragraph (f)(3)(i) instructs the party
requesting review of a debarment to file
a written request with the Chief ALJ and
simultaneously serve a copy on the
OFLC Administrator. The request for
review must clearly identify the
particular debarment determination for
which review is sought and must set
forth the particular grounds for the
request. If no request for review is filed,
or if such a request is filed untimely, the
debarment will take effect on the date
specified in the Notice of Debarment or
Final Determination or, if no date is
specified, 30 calendar days from the
date the Notice of Debarment or Final
Determination is issued.
Paragraph (f)(3)(ii) explains that upon
receipt of the request for review, the
OFLC Administrator will promptly send
a certified copy of the ETA case file to
the Chief ALJ by means normally
assuring expedited delivery. The Chief
ALJ will immediately assign an ALJ to
conduct the review. Paragraph (f)(3)(iii)
states that the submissions of the parties
must contain only legal argument and
evidence that was within the record
upon which the debarment was based.
This ensures that all parties have fair
notice of the facts potentially at issue
during the review.
Paragraph (f)(4) explains the
procedures for the ALJ’s review. In
considering requests for review, the ALJ
must provide all parties with 30
calendar days to submit legal briefs. The
ALJ must review the debarment
determination on the basis of the record
upon which the determination was
made, the request for review, and any
briefs submitted. The ALJ’s decision
must affirm, reverse, or modify the
OFLC Administrator’s determination,
and provide the decision to the parties
by means normally assuring expedited
delivery. The ALJ’s decision will
become the final agency action, unless
either party timely seeks review of the
decision with the Administrative
Review Board (ARB).
As set forth in paragraph (f)(5)(i),
either party wishing review of the ALJ’s
decision must, within 30 calendar days
of the decision, file a petition with the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:01 Mar 29, 2019
Jkt 247001
ARB requesting review of the decision.
Copies of the petition request must be
served on all parties and on the ALJ. If
the ARB declines to accept the petition
or does not issue a notice accepting the
petition for review within 30 calendar
days after the receipt of a timely filed
petition, the ALJ’s decision becomes the
final agency action. If the ARB accepts
the petition for review, the ALJ’s
decision will be stayed unless and until
the ARB issues an order affirming the
decision. The ARB must serve notice of
its decision to accept or not to accept
the petition upon the ALJ and upon all
parties to the proceeding. Paragraphs
(f)(5)(ii) and (iii) provide that, upon
receipt of the ARB’s notice to accept the
petition, the OALJ will promptly
forward a copy of the complete appeal
record to the ARB. Where the ARB has
determined to review the decision and
order, the ARB will notify each party of
the issues raised, the form in which
submissions must be made (e.g., briefs
or oral argument), and the time within
which the presentation must be
submitted. Paragraph (f)(6) requires the
ARB’s final decision to be issued within
90 calendar days from the notice
granting the petition, and to be served
upon all parties and the ALJ.
IV. Rulemaking Analyses and Notices
A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory
Planning and Review; Executive Order
13563: Improving Regulation and
Regulatory Review; and Executive Order
13771: Reducing Regulation and
Controlling Regulatory Costs
Under E.O. 12866, the OMB’s Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs
(OIRA) determines whether a regulatory
action is significant and, therefore,
subject to the requirements of the E.O.
and review by OMB. Section 3(f) of E.O.
12866 defines a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ as an action that is likely to
result in a rule that: (1) Has an annual
effect on the economy of $100 million
or more, or adversely affects in a
material way the economy, a sector of
the economy, productivity, competition,
jobs, the environment, public health or
safety, or State, local, or tribal
governments or communities (also
referred to as ‘‘economically
significant’’); (2) creates serious
inconsistency or otherwise interferes
with an action taken or planned by
another agency; (3) materially alters the
budgetary impacts of entitlement grants,
user fees, or loan programs, or the rights
and obligations of recipients thereof; or
(4) raises novel legal or policy issues
arising out of legal mandates, the
President’s priorities, or the principles
set forth in the E.O. Id. OMB has
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
determined that this IFR is significant
regulatory action under section 3(f) of
E.O. 12866.
E.O. 13563 directs agencies to: (1)
Propose or adopt a regulation only upon
a reasoned determination that its
benefits justify its costs; (2) tailor the
regulation to impose the least burden on
society, consistent with achieving the
regulatory objectives; and (3) in
choosing among alternative regulatory
approaches, select those approaches that
maximize net benefits. E.O. 13563
recognizes that some benefits are
difficult to quantify and provides that,
where appropriate and permitted by
law, agencies may consider and discuss
qualitatively values that are difficult or
impossible to quantify, including
equity, human dignity, fairness, and
distributive impacts.
This IFR is an E.O. 13771 regulatory
action.
1. Summary of the Economic Analysis
The Department anticipates that the
IFR will result in benefits, costs, and
transfer payments, and will benefit U.S.
workers and their wages, as described in
more detail below. In particular, and as
presented in Exhibit 1 below, U.S.
workers are estimated to receive wage
transfer payments of approximately
$102,042,965 49 from employers over the
11.25-year period that the IFR is in
effect (from FY 2019 through FY 2030
Q1).
The benefits of the IFR are described
qualitatively in section IV.A.2
(Benefits). The estimated costs and
transfer payments are explained in
sections IV.A.3 (Quantitative Analysis
Considerations) and IV.A.4 (Subject-bySubject Analysis).
The costs of the IFR are associated
with rule familiarization and
recordkeeping requirements for CW–1
employers, as well as the new processes
by which employers will obtain a PWD
and TLC from the Department. The
estimated transfer payments reflect the
requirement that employers pay for
transportation, lodging, and subsistence
for CW–1 workers traveling between the
workers’ country of origin and the
CNMI. In addition, the estimated
transfer payments include the
anticipated impact on the wages of CW–
1 workers and corresponding U.S.
workers.
Exhibit 1 shows the total estimated
costs and transfer payments of the IFR.
The IFR is expected to have first-year
costs of $4,359,067 and first-year
49 For purposes of this economic analysis the
Department has conservatively estimated a constant
number of U.S. workers and corresponding total
wage transfer to those U.S. workers in the CNMI
throughout the life of the program.
E:\FR\FM\01APR2.SGM
01APR2
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 62 / Monday, April 1, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
transfer payments of $42,286,653 (=
$28,877,022 to CW–1 workers +
$13,409,631 to U.S. workers). Over the
11.25-year period that the IFR is in
effect, the annualized costs are
estimated at $3,190,028 and the
annualized transfer payments are
estimated at $35,522,023 (=$22,117,381
to CW–1 workers+$13,404,642 to U.S.
workers) at a discount rate of 7 percent.
In total, the IFR is estimated to result in
a cost of $24,284,121 and transfer
12415
payments of $270,411,736
(=$168,368,772 to CW–1 workers +
$102,042,965 to U.S. workers) at a
discount rate of 7 percent.
EXHIBIT 1—ESTIMATED COSTS AND TRANSFER PAYMENTS
[2018 dollars]
Transfer payments
Costs
First Year Total ................................................................................................
Annualized, 3% discount rate, 11.25 years .....................................................
Annualized, 7% discount rate, 11.25 years .....................................................
Total, 3% discount rate, 11.25 years ..............................................................
Total, 7% discount rate, 11.25 years ..............................................................
2. Benefits
The purposes of the Workforce Act
are (1) to increase the percentage of U.S.
workers in the CNMI while maintaining
the minimum number of foreign
workers to meet the changing demands
of the CNMI economy; (2) to encourage
the hiring of U.S. workers; and (3) to
ensure that no U.S. worker is at a
competitive disadvantage for
employment compared to a foreign
worker or is displaced by a foreign
worker. The Department anticipates that
the provisions of this IFR will engender
the benefits for U.S. workers that
Congress intended in passing the
Workforce Act. For example, the
mandated payment of transportation
and subsistence costs for CW–1 workers
and corresponding U.S. workers will
help ensure that U.S. workers are not
placed at a competitive disadvantage
compared to foreign workers.
Additionally, the requirement to
advertise the job opportunity on the
CNMI Department of Labor’s job listing
system will improve the visibility of job
openings to U.S. workers, thus
expanding employment opportunities
for U.S. workers. The requirement of a
supervised labor market test and
required submission of supporting
documents by the employer will further
provide that CW–1 workers are only
hired if there are not sufficient U.S.
workers in the Commonwealth who are
able, willing, qualified, and available to
perform the work for which CW–1
workers are sought. In addition,
employers seeking to employ CW–1
workers must pay the highest of the
prevailing wage, the Commonwealth
minimum wage, or the Federal
minimum wage; and corresponding U.S.
workers must be offered at least the
same wages, benefits, and working
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:01 Mar 29, 2019
Jkt 247001
$4,359,067
3,086,620
3,190,028
29,106,568
24,284,121
conditions offered to foreign workers.
These protections, and others in this
regulation, will provide that the
employment of nonimmigrant workers
will not adversely affect the wages and
working conditions of U.S. workers.
According to the BEA, the GDP of the
CNMI increased 25.1 percent in 2017
after increasing 28.2 percent in 2016.50
The most significant contributor to GDP
growth was the accommodations and
amusement industry, which includes
tourism as well as the casino sector. The
CNMI experienced substantial growth in
visitor spending, particularly on casino
gambling. The number of visitors to the
CNMI grew 11 percent in 2016 and 24
percent in 2017.51 CW–1 workers are
heavily employed in these sectors. The
CNMI’s Bureau of Environmental and
Coastal Quality estimates that at least
8,124 employees will be needed to
operate new hotels and casinos.52 The
island of Tinian’s labor demand alone is
expected to be 6,359 workers for
operation, more than twice the Tinian
island population in 2016.53 The 2017
‘‘Report to the President on 902
Consultations’’ estimates that 11,613
workers will be needed to operate the
new facilities by 2021.54 This would be
50 Source: U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau
of Economic Analysis, ‘‘CNMI GDP Increases in
2017: Growth Led by Tourism and Gaming Industry
Revenue,’’ https://www.bea.gov/system/files/201810/cnmigdp_101718.pdf.
51 Id.
52 Source: U.S. Government Accountability
Office, ‘‘Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana
Islands Implementation of Federal Minimum Wage
and Immigration Laws’’ (May 2017), https://
www.gao.gov/assets/690/684778.pdf.
53 Ibid.
54 Source: Special Representatives of the United
States and the Commonwealth of the Northern
Mariana Islands, ‘‘Report to the President on 902
Consultations’’ (January 2017), https://
www.doi.gov/sites/doi.gov/files/uploads/902consultations-report-january-2017.pdf.
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
Total transfer
payments
$42,286,653
34,794,484
35,522,023
328,109,108
270,411,736
Transfer
payments to
CW–1 workers
$28,877,022
21,387,623
22.118.381
201,683,522
168,368,772
Transfer
payments to
U.S. workers
$13,409,631
12,406,860
13,404,642
126,425,586
102,042,965
a substantial increase from the 3,226
workers in the accommodation and food
services industry in 2014 (80 percent of
whom were not U.S. citizens) and 928
workers in the arts, entertainment, and
recreation industry (78 percent of whom
were not U.S. citizens).55
Available CNMI labor could be
recruited from recent graduates. CNMI
high schools graduated 678 students in
2016, while the Northern Marianas
College graduated 204 students,
although this increase by new entrants
may be somewhat offset by people who
are retiring from the workforce.56
Additionally, there were nearly 2,400
unemployed persons in the CNMI
domestic workforce in 2016.57 Workers
could also be recruited from U.S. States,
territories, and freely associated States.
Higher prevailing wages and employerprovided transportation and subsistence
costs may make relocation to the CNMI
more attractive and feasible for workers
in U.S. States, territories and freely
associated States. Thus, the Department
anticipates that the IFR will increase the
percentage of U.S. workers employed in
the CNMI.
3. Quantitative Analysis Considerations
The Department estimated the costs
and transfer payments of the IFR
relative to the existing baseline (i.e., the
current practices for complying with the
CW–1 program as currently codified at
8 CFR 214.2(w)). In accordance with the
regulatory analysis guidance articulated
in OMB’s Circular A–4 and consistent
with the Department’s practices in
55 Source: U.S. Government Accountability
Office, ‘‘Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana
Islands Implementation of Federal Minimum Wage
and Immigration Laws’’ (May 2017), https://
www.gao.gov/assets/690/684778.pdf.
56 Id.
57 Id.
E:\FR\FM\01APR2.SGM
01APR2
12416
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 62 / Monday, April 1, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
previous rulemakings, this regulatory
analysis focuses on the likely
consequences of the IFR (i.e., the costs
and transfer payments that are expected
to accrue to the affected entities). The
analysis covers 11.25 years (from FY
2019 through FY 2030 Q1) to ensure it
captures the major costs and transfer
payments that are likely to accrue over
time. The Department expresses all
quantifiable impacts in 2018 dollars and
uses discount rates of three and seven
percent, pursuant to Circular A–4.
a. Estimated Number of CW–1
Employers, Applications, and Workers
To calculate the annual costs and
transfer payments, the Department first
needed to estimate the number of CW–
1 employers, CW–1 TLC applications,
and CW–1 workers (beneficiaries) in the
11.25-year period from FY 2019 through
the first quarter of FY 2030. Both the
projected number of CW–1 employers
and the projected number of CW–1 TLC
applications are based on the projected
number of CW–1 workers. The projected
number of CW–1 workers is equivalent
to the annual statutory limit (numerical
cap) on the number of CW–1
beneficiaries.
To estimate the number of CW–1
employers, the Department identified
the total number of unique employers in
the USCIS beneficiary data over the FY
2012–2018 period, which was 2,404
employers.58 Then, the Department
calculated the ratio of projected CW–1
workers to employers for FY 2019,
which is 5.4 (= 13,000 ÷ 2,404). Next,
the Department divided the numerical
cap of CW–1 workers for each fiscal year
by 5.4 to project the number of CW–1
employers for each year in the analysis
period. For example, the numerical cap
for FY 2020 is 12,500, so the projected
number of CW–1 employers in FY 2020
is 2,315 (= 12,500 ÷ 5.4).
To estimate the number of CW–1 TLC
applications, the Department calculated
the average annual ratio of CW–1
beneficiaries to CW–1 petitions filed
with DHS over the FY 2012–2018
period, which was 1.5 (rounded).59
Then, the Department divided the
numerical cap of CW–1 workers for each
fiscal year by 1.5 to project the number
of CW–1 applications for each year in
the analysis period. For example, the
numerical cap for FY 2019 is 13,000, so
the projected number of CW–1 labor
certification applications for FY 2019 is
8,636 (= 13,000 ÷ 1.5054).
Exhibit 2 presents the projected
number of CW–1 employers,
applications, and workers for each year
in the analysis period.
EXHIBIT 2: PROJECTED NUMBER OF CW–1 EMPLOYERS, APPLICATIONS, AND WORKERS
[FY 2019–FY 2030 Q1]
Fiscal year
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
2029
2030
Projected CW–1
employers
Projected CW–1
applications
Projected CW–1
workers
(equivalent to
numerical cap)
2,404
2,315
2,222
2,130
2,037
1,852
1,667
1,481
1,296
1,111
926
185
8,636
8,303
7,971
7,639
7,307
6,643
5,979
5,314
4,650
3,986
3,321
664
13,000
12,500
12,000
11,500
11,000
10,000
9,000
8,000
7,000
6,000
5,000
1,000
.................................................................................................................................
.................................................................................................................................
.................................................................................................................................
.................................................................................................................................
.................................................................................................................................
.................................................................................................................................
.................................................................................................................................
.................................................................................................................................
.................................................................................................................................
.................................................................................................................................
.................................................................................................................................
Q1 ...........................................................................................................................
To estimate the number of CW–1
workers who will need to be provided
with transportation, lodging, and
subsistence payments, the Department
used petition renewal data from
USCIS.60 The data reveal that employers
filed extension-of-stay petitions for 63
percent of CW–1 workers in FYs 2016–
18, indicating that those CW–1 workers
were already living in the CNMI.
Therefore, the DOL projects that 37
percent of CW–1 workers will travel to
the CNMI from their country of origin in
FY 2019 through the first quarter of FY
2030.
58 Source: U.S. Department of Homeland Security,
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services,
unpublished table. In accordance with 8 CFR
214.2(w)(9), a petitioning employer may include
more than one beneficiary in a CW–1 petition if the
beneficiaries will be working in the same
occupational category, for the same period of time,
and in the same location.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:01 Mar 29, 2019
Jkt 247001
b. Estimated Number of Corresponding
U.S. Workers
To estimate the number of
corresponding U.S. workers in the
CNMI in FY 2019 through the first
quarter of FY 2030, the Department used
2016 data from the CNMI Department of
Commerce on the number of U.S.
citizens and non-U.S. citizens by major
occupation.61 The Department
calculated the ratios of the number of
U.S. citizens to non-U.S. citizens by
major occupation, and then applied
those ratios to the pertinent number of
CW–1 workers in each detailed
occupation in FY 2018. Totaling these
59 Source: U.S. Department of Homeland Security,
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services,
unpublished table.
60 Source: U.S. Department of Homeland Security,
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services,
unpublished table.
61 CNMI Department of Commerce, Statistical
Yearbook 2017, Table 5.24 ‘‘Average Hourly Wages
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
results, the Department estimates that
there were 8,353 corresponding U.S.
workers in FY 2018.62 This estimate
remains constant throughout the
analysis because the Department does
not expect the number of corresponding
U.S. workers to decrease; in fact, the
number may increase.
c. Compensation Rates
Exhibit 3 presents the hourly
compensation rates for the occupational
categories that are expected to
experience an increase in workload due
to the provisions of the IFR. The
Department used the mean hourly wage
rate for private sector Human Resources
by Occupation and Citizenship, CNMI: 2016,’’
https://ver1.cnmicommerce.com/sy-2017-table-5-1731-wage-survey/.
62 Source: U.S. Department of Homeland Security,
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services,
unpublished table.
E:\FR\FM\01APR2.SGM
01APR2
12417
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 62 / Monday, April 1, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
Managers and Translators in the
CNMI.63 These hourly wage rates
include benefits. The Department
adjusted the 2016 CNMI wages to 2018
dollars, and then increased them by 17
percent to account for overhead costs
such as rent, utilities, and office
equipment.64
The wage rates of Federal employees
at NPWC and NPC in Chicago were
estimated using the midpoint (Step 5)
for Grade 12 of the General Schedule in
the Chicago locality area.65 The
Department multiplied the hourly wage
rate by 2 to account for a fringe benefits
rate of 69 percent 66 and an overhead
rate of 31 percent.67
The Department used the hourly
compensation rates presented in Exhibit
3 throughout this analysis to estimate
the labor costs for each provision.
EXHIBIT 3—COMPENSATION RATES
[2018 dollars]
Position
Grade level
CNMI Private Sector Employees:
Human Resources Manager .....................................................................
Translator ..................................................................................................
Federal Government Employees:
NPWC Staff ..............................................................................................
NPC Staff ..................................................................................................
4. Subject-by-Subject Analysis
The Department’s subject-by-subject
analysis covers the estimated costs and
transfer payments of the IFR. In
accordance with Circular A–4, the
Department considers transfer payments
to be payments from one group to
another that do not affect the total
resources available to society.
a. Costs
The following sections describe the
costs of the IFR. The costs of the IFR
may vary with the size of the CW–1
employers in the CNMI. As such, the
Department requests comments from the
public on the distribution of
participating CW–1 firms by size.
44.02
44.02
2
2
88.04
88.04
(2) Recordkeeping
Frm 00039
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
a×b
12
12
Department’s experience with other TLC
programs (1 hour) and by the hourly
compensation rate of Human Resources
Managers ($23.49 per hour). This
calculation results in a one-time
undiscounted cost of $56,470 (= 2,404
employers × 1 hour × $23.49 per hour).
The annualized cost over the 11.25-year
period is estimated at $5,814 at a
discount rate of 3 percent and $6,933 at
a discount rate of 7 percent. The total
cost over the 11.25-year period is
estimated at $54,825 at a discount rate
of 3 percent and $52,776 at a discount
rate of 7 percent.
PO 00000
(b)
$23.49
18.73
65 Source: Office of Personnel Management,
‘‘2018 General Schedule (GS) Locality Pay Tables,’’
https://www.opm.gov/policy-data-oversight/payleave/salaries-wages/2018/general-schedule/.
66 Source: Congressional Budget Office,
‘‘Comparing the Compensation of Federal and
Private-Sector Employees, 2011 to 2015’’ (April
2017), https://www.cbo.gov/publication/52637. The
wages of Federal workers averaged $38.30 per hour
over the study period, while the benefits averaged
$26.50 per hour, which is a benefits rate of 69
percent.
67 Source: U.S. Department of Health and Human
Services, ‘‘Guidelines for Regulatory Impact
Jkt 247001
(a)
1.17
1.17
63 Source: CNMI Department of Commerce, ‘‘2016
CNMI Prevailing Wage and Workforce Assessment
Study,’’ https://
i2io42u7ucg3bwn5b3l0fquc.wpengine.netdnacdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/2016PWWAS-Report-One-Full-Report-v1.1-1.pdf. The
wage rates used here ‘‘include all applicable fringe
benefits.’’
64 Source: Cody Rice, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, ‘‘Wage Rates for Economic
Analyses of the Toxics Release Inventory Program’’
(June 10, 2002), https://www.regulations.gov/
document?D=EPA-HQ-OPPT-2014-0650-0005.
20:01 Mar 29, 2019
Hourly
compensation
rate
$20.08
$16.01
When the IFR takes effect, employers
of CW–1 workers will need to
familiarize themselves with the new
regulations, thereby incurring a onetime cost in the first year. To estimate
the first-year cost of rule familiarization,
the Department multiplied the
estimated number of unique CW–1
employers in FY 2019 (2,404) by the
estimated amount of time required to
review the rule based on the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
Loaded wage
factor
N/A
N/A
The IFR requires that all CW–1
employers filing a CW–1 Application for
Temporary Employment Certification
retain documents and records for a
period of 3 years from the date of
certification. Employers may keep these
documents and records electronically.
Based on the Department’s experience
administering other TLC programs, the
documents and records to be retained by
the employer are critical to ensuring an
appropriate level of integrity and
accountability in the CW–1 program,
and to protecting the wages, benefits,
(1) Rule Familiarization
Base hourly
wage rate
and other guarantees afforded to CW–1
workers and workers in corresponding
employment. For purposes of this
analysis, the Department assumes that
employers will not retain these
documents and records electronically,
although they are permitted to do so.
Therefore, the following recordkeeping
costs may be an overestimation.
To calculate the estimated
recordkeeping costs associated with
purchasing a filing cabinet for document
retention, the Department multiplied
the number of unique CW–1 employers
in FY 2019 (2,404) by the estimated cost
of a filing cabinet ($89.99),68 which
equals $216,336. This cost is assumed to
be a one-time cost in the first year. The
annualized cost over the 11.25-year
period is estimated at $22,273 at a
discount rate of 3 percent and $26,559
at a discount rate of 7 percent. The total
cost over the 11.25-year period is
estimated at $210,035 at a discount rate
of 3 percent and $202,183 at a discount
rate of 7 percent.
To estimate the recordkeeping costs
associated with printing CW–1
applications, the Department multiplied
the number of projected CW–1
applications in each year by the
Analysis’’ (2016), https://aspe.hhs.gov/system/files/
pdf/242926/HHS_RIAGuidance.pdf. On page 30,
HHS states, ‘‘As an interim default, while HHS
conducts more research, analysts should assume
overhead costs (including benefits) are equal to 100
percent of pretax wages. . . .’’ To isolate the
overhead rate, the Department subtracted the
benefits rate of 69 percent from the recommended
rate of 100 percent.
68 Source: https://www.staples.com/staples-2drawer-vertical-file-cabinet-charcoal-letter-18-d52143/product_2806760.
E:\FR\FM\01APR2.SGM
01APR2
12418
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 62 / Monday, April 1, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
estimated number of pages in a CW–1
application (30 pages) and by the
estimated paper and printing cost ($0.09
per page) to estimate the total cost of
printing applications. For example, the
projected number of CW–1 applications
in FY 2019 is 8,636, so the estimated FY
2019 cost is $23,317 (= 8,636
applications × 30 pages × $0.09 per
page). The annualized cost over the
11.25-year period is estimated at
$17,354 at a discount rate of 3 percent
and $17,925 at a discount rate of 7
percent. The total cost over the 11.25year period is estimated at $163,647 at
a discount rate of 3 percent and
$136,454 at a discount rate of 7 percent.
To calculate the estimated
recordkeeping costs associated with a
Human Resources Manager printing and
filing documents, the Department
multiplied the projected number of CW–
1 applications in each year by the
estimated time required to print and file
documents (20 minutes) and by the
hourly compensation rate for Human
Resources Managers ($23.49 per hour).
For example, the projected number of
CW–1 applications in FY 2019 is 8,636,
so the estimated FY 2019 cost is $66,944
(= 8,636 applications × 20 minutes ×
$23.49 per hour). The annualized cost
over the 11.25-year period is estimated
at $49,824 at a discount rate of 3 percent
and $51,462 at a discount rate of 7
percent. The total cost over the 11.25year period is estimated at $469,832 at
a discount rate of 3 percent and
$391,758 at a discount rate of 7 percent.
(3) Applications
(a) Electronic Filing of Request for
Prevailing Wage Determination
The IFR establishes the process by
which employers obtain a TLC from the
Department for use in petitioning DHS
to employ a nonimmigrant worker in
CW–1 status, which involves four basic
steps. First, the employer must request
and obtain a PWD from the
Department’s OFLC NPWC before filing
a CW–1 Application for Temporary
Employment Certification. To make this
request, the employer will submit a
completed Application for Prevailing
Wage Determination to the NPWC
containing information about the job
opportunity in which the nonimmigrant
workers will be employed. Based on a
review of the information provided by
the employer, the NPWC will issue a
PWD, indicate the source and validity
period for its use, and return the
application with its endorsement to the
employer.
To estimate the labor costs to
employers associated with
electronically filing a PWD request, the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:01 Mar 29, 2019
Jkt 247001
Department multiplied the number of
projected CW–1 applications in each
year by the estimated time required to
file the request based on the
Department’s experience with other TLC
programs (46 minutes) and by the
hourly compensation rate for Human
Resources Managers ($23.49 per hour).
For example, the projected number of
CW–1 applications in FY 2019 is 8,636,
so the estimated FY 2019 cost is
$156,202 (= 8,636 applications × 46
minutes × $23.49 per hour). The
annualized cost over the 11.25-year
period is estimated at $116,255 at a
discount rate of 3 percent and $120,079
at a discount rate of 7 percent. The total
cost over the 11.25-year period is
estimated at $1,096,274 at a discount
rate of 3 percent and $914,102 at a
discount rate of 7 percent.
To estimate the labor costs to the
Federal Government associated with
reviewing PWD requests and issuing
PWDs, the Department multiplied the
number of projected CW–1 applications
in each year by the estimated time
required to review a PWD request and
issue a PWD (1 hour) and by the hourly
compensation rate for NPWC staff
($88.04 per hour). For example, the
projected number of CW–1 applications
in FY 2019 is 8,636, so the estimated FY
2019 cost is $760,313 (= 8,636
applications × 1 hour × $88.04 per
hour). The annualized cost over the
11.25-year period is estimated at
$565,871 at a discount rate of 3 percent
and $584,485 at a discount rate of 7
percent. The total cost over the 11.25year period is estimated at $5,336,117 at
a discount rate of 3 percent and
$4,449,397 at a discount rate of 7
percent.
(b) Appealing a Prevailing Wage
Determination
An employer that does not agree with
a PWD may appeal under 20 CFR
655.411. The employer must make a
written request to the NPWC Director
within 7 business days from the date the
PWD was issued.
To estimate the labor costs associated
with filing an appeal of a PWD, the
Department multiplied the number of
projected CW–1 applications in each
year by the estimated percentage of
applications that will involve an appeal
based on the Department’s experience
with other TLC programs (5 percent of
applications). Then, the Department
multiplied this number by the estimated
time required to comply with this
provision (1 hour) and by the hourly
compensation rate for Human Resources
Managers ($23.49 per hour). For
example, the projected number of CW–
1 applications in FY 2019 is 8,636, so
PO 00000
Frm 00040
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
the estimated FY 2019 cost is $10,143 (=
8,636 applications × 5 percent × 1 hour
× $23.49 per hour). The annualized cost
over the 11.25-year period is estimated
at $7,549 at a discount rate of 3 percent
and $7,797 at a discount rate of 7
percent. The total cost over the 11.25year period is estimated at $71,187 at a
discount rate of 3 percent and $59,357
at a discount rate of 7 percent.
(c) Electronic Filing of CW–1
Application
Next, the IFR requires the employer to
file a completed CW–1 Application for
Temporary Employment Certification
with the OFLC NPC no more than 120
calendar days before the date of need or,
for employers seeking to extend the
employment of a CW–1 worker, no more
than 180 calendar days before the date
on which the CW–1 status expires. The
NPC CO will review the employer’s
application for compliance with all
applicable program requirements and
issue either a NOD or NOA. Where
deficiencies in the application are
discovered, the NOD will provide the
employer with 10 business days to
correct the deficiencies.
To calculate the estimated labor costs
associated with electronically filing a
CW–1 application, the Department
multiplied the number of projected CW–
1 applications in each year by the
estimated time required to file the
application (45 minutes) and by the
hourly compensation rate for Human
Resources Managers ($23.49 per hour).
For example, the projected number of
CW–1 applications in FY 2019 is 8,636,
so the estimated FY 2019 cost is
$152,145 (= 8,636 applications × 45
minutes × $23.49 per hour). The
annualized cost over the 11.25-year
period is estimated at $113,235 at a
discount rate of 3 percent and $116,960
at a discount rate of 7 percent. The total
cost over the 11.25-year period is
estimated at $1,067,799 at a discount
rate of 3 percent and $890,359 at a
discount rate of 7 percent.
To estimate the labor costs to the
Federal Government associated with
reviewing applications and issuing
initial determinations, the Department
multiplied the number of projected CW–
1 applications in each year by the
estimated time required to review an
application and issue an initial
determination (1 hour) and by the
hourly compensation rate for OFLC NPC
staff ($88.04 per hour). For example, the
projected number of CW–1 applications
in FY 2019 is 8,636, so the estimated FY
2019 cost is $760,313 (= 8,636
applications × 1 hour × $88.04 per
hour). The annualized cost over the
11.25-year period is estimated at
E:\FR\FM\01APR2.SGM
01APR2
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 62 / Monday, April 1, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
$565,871 at a discount rate of 3 percent
and $584,485 at a discount rate of 7
percent. The total cost over the 11.25year period is estimated at $5,336,117 at
a discount rate of 3 percent and
$4,449,397 at a discount rate of 7
percent.
(d) Proof of Agent Relationship
The IFR requires all agents who file
CW–1 applications on behalf of
employers to demonstrate that a bona
fide relationship exists between them
and the employer. The Department will
accept a copy of the agent agreement or
any other document demonstrating the
agent’s authority to act on behalf of the
employer.
To estimate the labor costs associated
with creating, printing, signing, and
delivering a document confirming the
agent relationship, the Department
multiplied the number of projected CW–
1 employers in each year by the
estimated percentage of employers that
will be represented based on the
Department’s experience with other TLC
programs (25 percent of employers).
Then, the Department multiplied this
number by the estimated time required
to comply with this provision (30
minutes) and by the hourly
compensation rate for Human Resources
Managers ($23.49 per hour). For
example, the projected number of CW–
1 employers in FY 2019 is 2,404, so the
estimated FY 2019 cost is $7,059 (=
2,404 employers × 25 percent × 30
minutes × $23.49 per hour). The
annualized cost over the 11.25-year
period is estimated at $5,260 at a
discount rate of 3 percent and $5,433 at
a discount rate of 7 percent. The total
cost over the 11.25-year period is
estimated at $49,603 at a discount rate
of 3 percent and $41,359 at a discount
rate of 7 percent.
(e) Contracts With Third Parties To
Comply With Prohibitions
The IFR requires employers to
prohibit in a written contract any agent
or recruiter whom the employer engages
in recruitment of CW–1 workers, from
seeking or receiving payments or other
compensation from prospective
workers. The required contractual
prohibition applies to the agents and
employees of the recruiting agent, and
encompasses both direct and indirect
fees.
To estimate the labor costs associated
with creating, printing, signing, and
delivering the written contract, the
Department multiplied the number of
projected CW–1 employers in each year
by the estimated percentage of
employers that will use an agent or
recruiter based on the Department’s
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:01 Mar 29, 2019
Jkt 247001
experience with other TLC programs (55
percent of employers). Then, the
Department multiplied this number by
the estimated time required to comply
with this provision (15 minutes) and by
the hourly compensation rate for
Human Resources Managers ($23.49 per
hour). For example, the projected
number of CW–1 employers in FY 2019
is 2,404, so the estimated FY 2019 cost
is $7,765 (= 2,404 employers × 55
percent × 15 minutes × $23.49 per hour).
The annualized cost over the 11.25-year
period is estimated at $5,786 at a
discount rate of 3 percent and $5,976 at
a discount rate of 7 percent. The total
cost over the 11.25-year period is
estimated at $54,564 at a discount rate
of 3 percent and $45,495 at a discount
rate of 7 percent.
(f) Appendix A of Form ETA–9142C,
Employer-Client Information of Job
Contractor
The IFR requires an employer filing as
a job contractor and acting as a joint
employer with its employer-client to
submit a single application. In filing the
application, the job contractor must
disclose the identity and contact
information of its employer-client by
completing Appendix A.
To estimate the labor costs associated
with completing Appendix A, the
Department multiplied the number of
projected CW–1 applications in each
year by the estimated percentage of
applications that will include Appendix
A based on the Department’s experience
with other TLC programs (35 percent of
applications). Then, the Department
multiplied this number by the estimated
time required to comply with this
provision (15 minutes) and by the
hourly compensation rate for Human
Resources Managers ($23.49 per hour).
For example, the projected number of
CW–1 applications in FY 2019 is 8,636,
so the estimated FY 2019 cost is $17,750
(= 8,636 applications × 35 percent × 15
minutes × $23.49 per hour). The
annualized cost over the 11.25-year
period is estimated at $13,211 at a
discount rate of 3 percent and $13,645
at a discount rate of 7 percent. The total
cost over the 11.25-year period is
estimated at $124,577 at a discount rate
of 3 percent and $103,875 at a discount
rate of 7 percent.
(g) Appendix B of Form ETA–9142C,
Additional Place(s) of Employment and
Wage Information
If work needs to be performed at
worksite locations other than the
primary one identified on Form ETA–
9142C, the employer must complete
Appendix B identifying all places of
employment and details about the wage
PO 00000
Frm 00041
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
12419
offers for each of those places of
employment. OFLC will use this
information to ensure all places of
employment are located within the
CNMI and that the employer is offering
wages that are at least equal to the
prevailing wage covering each place of
employment.
To estimate the labor costs associated
with completing Appendix B, the
Department multiplied the number of
projected CW–1 applications in each
year by the estimated percentage of
applications that will include Appendix
B based on the Department’s experience
with other TLC programs (70 percent of
applications). Then, the Department
multiplied this number by the estimated
time required to comply with this
provision (20 minutes) and by the
hourly compensation rate for Human
Resources Managers ($23.49 per hour).
For example, the projected number of
CW–1 applications in FY 2019 is 8,636,
so the estimated FY 2019 cost is $46,861
(= 8,636 applications × 70 percent × 20
minutes × $23.49 per hour). The
annualized cost over the 11.25-year
period is estimated at $34,876 at a
discount rate of 3 percent and $36,024
at a discount rate of 7 percent. The total
cost over the 11.25-year period is
estimated at $328,882 at a discount rate
of 3 percent and $274,231 at a discount
rate of 7 percent.
(h) Appendix C of Form ETA–9142C,
Attorney/Agent/Employer Declarations
The IFR requires an employer to
complete Appendix C to attest to
compliance with all of the terms,
assurances, and obligations of the CW–
1 program. The agent or attorney
identified in the CW–1 Application for
Temporary Employment Certification
must also sign and date Appendix C,
declaring that it has been designated by
the employer to act on the employer’s
behalf.
To estimate the labor costs associated
with completing Appendix C, the
Department multiplied the number of
projected CW–1 applications in each
year by the estimated time required to
comply with this provision (20 minutes)
and by the hourly compensation rate for
Human Resources Managers ($23.49 per
hour). For example, the projected
number of CW–1 applications in FY
2019 is 8,636, so the estimated FY 2019
cost is $66,944 (= 8,636 applications ×
20 minutes × $23.49 per hour). The
annualized cost over the 11.25-year
period is estimated at $49,824 at a
discount rate of 3 percent and $51,462
at a discount rate of 7 percent. The total
cost over the 11.25-year period is
estimated at $469,832 at a discount rate
E:\FR\FM\01APR2.SGM
01APR2
12420
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 62 / Monday, April 1, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
of 3 percent and $391,758 at a discount
rate of 7 percent.
(i) Request for Waiver of Obtaining PWD
Due to Emergency Situation
The IFR permits an employer that is
unable to obtain a PWD prior to filing
an application to request a waiver by
submitting a letter of explanation along
with the completed application. The
employer must provide a detailed
statement describing the good and
substantial cause that necessitated the
waiver request. This provision provides
an employer experiencing a qualifying
emergency situation with some degree
of flexibility to participate in the CW–
1 program without first obtaining a PWD
from the NPWC.
To estimate the labor costs associated
with composing and submitting a
waiver request, the Department
multiplied the number of projected CW–
1 applications in each year by the
estimated percentage of applications
that will include a waiver request based
on the Department’s experience with
other TLC programs (10 percent of
applications). (10 percent of
applications). Then, the Department
multiplied this number by the estimated
time required to comply with this
provision (30 minutes) and by the
hourly compensation rate for Human
Resources Managers ($23.49 per hour).
For example, the projected number of
CW–1 applications in FY 2019 is 8,636,
so the estimated FY 2019 cost is $10,143
(= 8,636 applications × 10 percent × 30
minutes × $23.49 per hour). The
annualized cost over the 11.25-year
period is estimated at $7,549 at a
discount rate of 3 percent and $7,797 at
a discount rate of 7 percent. The total
cost over the 11.25-year period is
estimated at $71,187 at a discount rate
of 3 percent and $59,357 at a discount
rate of 7 percent.
(j) Submission of a Modified
Application
The IFR permits an employer to
modify and resubmit its application to
address insufficiencies listed in the
NOD. The employer must respond to the
NOD and correct any deficiencies
within 10 business days of issuance.
To estimate the labor costs associated
with modifying an application, the
Department multiplied the number of
projected CW–1 applications in each
year by the estimated percentage of
applications that will be modified based
on the Department’s experience with
other TLC programs (one-third of
applications). Then, the Department
multiplied this number by the estimated
time required to comply with this
provision (1 hour) and by the hourly
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:01 Mar 29, 2019
Jkt 247001
compensation rate for Human Resources
Managers ($23.49 per hour). For
example, the projected number of CW–
1 applications in FY 2019 is 8,636, so
the estimated FY 2019 cost is $67,620 (=
8,636 applications × 33.3 percent × 1
hour × $23.49 per hour). The annualized
cost over the 11.25-year period is
estimated at $50,327 at a discount rate
of 3 percent and $51,982 at a discount
rate of 7 percent. The total cost over the
11.25-year period is estimated at
$474,577 at a discount rate of 3 percent
and $395,715 at a discount rate of 7
percent.
(k) Amending the Application
The IFR permits an employer to
request to amend its application at any
time before the Department makes a
final determination to grant or deny the
application. The employer may request
to increase the number of workers
requested, modify the period of
employment, or request other minor
changes to the application.
To estimate the labor costs associated
with amending an application, the
Department multiplied the number of
projected CW–1 applications in each
year by the estimated percentage of
applications that will be amended based
on the Department’s experience with
other TLC programs (15 percent of
applications). Then, the Department
multiplied this number by the estimated
time required to comply with this
provision (30 minutes) and by the
hourly compensation rate for Human
Resources Managers ($23.49 per hour).
For example, the projected number of
CW–1 applications in FY 2019 is 8,636,
so the estimated FY 2019 cost is $15,214
(= 8,636 applications × 15 percent × 30
minutes × $23.49 per hour). The
annualized cost over the 11.25-year
period is estimated at $11,324 at a
discount rate of 3 percent and $11,696
at a discount rate of 7 percent. The total
cost over the 11.25-year period is
estimated at $106,780 at a discount rate
of 3 percent and $89,036 at a discount
rate of 7 percent.
(l) Posting the Job With the CNMI
Department of Labor
If all program requirements are met,
the employer will receive a NOA from
the CO directing the recruitment of U.S.
workers for the job opportunity and
requesting a written report of the
employer’s recruitment efforts. To
encourage the hiring of U.S. workers for
employment in the CNMI, the employer
will be required to advertise the job
opportunity on the CNMI Department of
Labor’s job listing system.
To calculate the estimated labor costs
associated with posting a job
PO 00000
Frm 00042
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
opportunity with the CNMI Department
of Labor, the Department multiplied the
number of projected CW–1 applications
in each year by the estimated time
required to post the job ad (1 hour) and
by the hourly compensation rate for
Human Resources Managers ($23.49 per
hour). For example, the projected
number of CW–1 applications in FY
2019 is 8,636, so the estimated FY 2019
cost is $202,860 (= 8,636 applications ×
1 hour × $23.49 per hour). The
annualized cost over the 11.25-year
period is estimated at $150,980 at a
discount rate of 3 percent and $155,947
at a discount rate of 7 percent. The total
cost over the 11.25-year period is
estimated at $1,423,732 at a discount
rate of 3 percent and $1,187,146 at a
discount rate of 7 percent.
(m) Contacting Former U.S. Employees
As part of an employer’s recruitment
efforts and to encourage the hiring of
U.S. workers, the IFR requires
employers to contact former U.S.
employees and solicit their return to the
job.
To estimate the labor costs associated
with contacting former U.S. employees
regarding the job opportunity, the
Department multiplied the number of
projected CW–1 applications in each
year by the estimated number of former
U.S. employees that will be contacted
based on the Department’s experience
with other TLC programs (an average of
1.5 former U.S. employees per
application). Then, the Department
multiplied this number by the estimated
time required to comply with this
provision (1 hour) and by the hourly
compensation rate for Human Resources
Managers ($23.49 per hour). For
example, the projected number of CW–
1 applications in FY 2019 is 8,636, so
the estimated FY 2019 cost is $304,289
(= 8,636 applications times; 1.5 former
U.S. employees × 1 hour × $23.49 per
hour). The annualized cost over the
11.25-year period is estimated at
$226,471 at a discount rate of 3 percent
and $233,920 at a discount rate of 7
percent. The total cost over the 11.25year period is estimated at $2,135,598 at
a discount rate of 3 percent and
$1,780,719 at a discount rate of 7
percent.
(n) Posting a Job Notice
As part of an employer’s recruitment
efforts and to encourage the hiring of
U.S. workers, the IFR requires
employers to post a copy of the CW–1
Application for Temporary Employment
Certification in at least two conspicuous
locations at the place(s) of employment
or in some other manner that provides
reasonable notification to all employees
E:\FR\FM\01APR2.SGM
01APR2
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 62 / Monday, April 1, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
in the area in which the work will be
performed by the CW–1 workers.
To estimate the labor costs associated
with posting a notice of the job, the
Department multiplied the number of
projected CW–1 applications in each
year by the estimated time required to
post the notice (30 minutes) and by the
hourly compensation rate for Human
Resources Managers ($23.49 per hour).
For example, the projected number of
CW–1 applications in FY 2019 is 8,636,
so the estimated FY 2019 cost is
$101,430 (= 8,636 applications × 30
minutes × $23.49 per hour). The
annualized cost over the 11.25-year
period is estimated at $75,490 at a
discount rate of 3 percent and $77,973
at a discount rate of 7 percent. The total
cost over the 11.25-year period is
estimated at $711,866 at a discount rate
of 3 percent and $593,573 at a discount
rate of 7 percent.
(o) Additional Recruitment
As part of an employer’s recruitment
efforts and to encourage the hiring of
U.S. workers, the IFR requires
employers to conduct other recruitment
activities such as contacting
community-based organization or trade
unions when required by the CO.
To estimate the labor costs associated
with conducting additional recruiting if
ordered by the CO, the Department
multiplied the number of projected CW–
1 applications in each year by the
estimated percentage of applications
that will require additional recruitment
based on the Department’s experience
with other TLC programs (35 percent of
applications). Then, the Department
multiplied this number by the estimated
time required to make the additional
outreach based on the Department’s
experience with other TLC programs (15
minutes) and by the hourly
compensation rate for Human Resources
Managers ($23.49 per hour). For
example, the projected number of CW–
1 applications in FY 2019 is 8,636, so
the estimated FY 2019 cost is $17,750 (=
8,636 applications × 35 percent × 15
minutes × $23.49 per hour). The
annualized cost over the 11.25-year
period is estimated at $13,211 at a
discount rate of 3 percent and $13,645
at a discount rate of 7 percent. The total
cost over the 11.25-year period is
estimated at $124,577 at a discount rate
of 3 percent and $103,875 at a discount
rate of 7 percent.
(p) Electronic Submission of
Recruitment Report
The recruitment period will last
approximately 21 calendar days and all
employer-conducted recruitment must
be completed before the written
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:01 Mar 29, 2019
Jkt 247001
recruitment report can be prepared,
signed, and submitted to the NPC for
review. Upon review of the recruitment
report, the CO will make a
determination either to certify or to
deny the CW–1 Application for
Temporary Employment Certification.
The employer will use the Final
Determination notice and any other
required documentation to support the
filing of a CW–1 petition with USCIS.
To estimate the labor costs associated
with electronically submitting a
recruitment report, the Department
multiplied the number of projected CW–
1 applications in each year by the
estimated time required to file the report
(1 hour) and by the hourly
compensation rate for Human Resources
Managers ($23.49 per hour). For
example, the projected number of CW–
1 applications in FY 2019 is 8,636, so
the estimated FY 2019 cost is $202,860
(= 8,636 applications × 1 hour × $23.49
per hour). The annualized cost over the
11.25-year period is estimated at
$150,980 at a discount rate of 3 percent
and $155,947 at a discount rate of 7
percent. The total cost over the 11.25year period is estimated at $1,423,732 at
a discount rate of 3 percent and
$1,187,146 at a discount rate of 7
percent.
To estimate the labor costs to the
Federal Government associated with
reviewing recruitment reports and
issuing final determinations, the
Department multiplied the number of
projected CW–1 applications in each
year by the estimated time required to
review a recruitment report and issue a
final determination (1 hour) and by the
hourly compensation rate for OFLC NPC
staff ($88.04 per hour). For example, the
projected number of CW–1 applications
in FY 2019 is 8,636, so the estimated FY
2019 cost is $760,313 (= 8,636
applications × 1 hour × $88.04 per
hour). The annualized cost over the
11.25-year period is estimated at
$565,871 at a discount rate of 3 percent
and $584,485 at a discount rate of 7
percent. The total cost over the 11.25year period is estimated at $5,336,117 at
a discount rate of 3 percent and
$4,449,397 at a discount rate of 7
percent.
(q) Translating the Work Contract
The IFR contains provisions related to
the disclosure of the work contract. The
employer is required to provide a copy
of the work contract to a CW–1 worker
outside of the United States no later
than the time at which the worker
applies for the visa, or to a worker in
corresponding employment no later
than on the day the work commences.
For a CW–1 worker changing to another
PO 00000
Frm 00043
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
12421
CW–1 employer, the work contract must
be provided no later than the time the
subsequent offer of employment is
made. The work contract must be
provided in a language understood by
the worker. The costs associated with
the disclosure requirements include
translating costs, time and materials
costs, and postage costs.
To estimate the labor costs associated
with translating the work contract, the
Department multiplied the number of
projected CW–1 applications in each
year by the estimated time required to
translate the work contract (1 hour) and
by the hourly compensation rate for
Translators ($18.73 per hour). For
example, the projected number of CW–
1 applications in FY 2019 is 8,636, so
the estimated FY 2019 cost is $161,752
(= 8,636 applications × 1 hour × $18.73
per hour). The annualized cost over the
11.25-year period is estimated at
$120,386 at a discount rate of 3 percent
and $124,346 at a discount rate of 7
percent. The total cost over the 11.25year period is estimated at $1,135,228 at
a discount rate of 3 percent and
$946,583 at a discount rate of 7 percent.
(r) Reproducing the Work Contract
To estimate the labor costs associated
with reproducing the work contract, the
Department added the projected number
of CW–1 workers in each year to the
estimated number of corresponding U.S.
workers (8,353 U.S. workers). The
Department then multiplied the
estimated total number of workers in
each year by the amount of time
required to reproduce each work
contract (5 minutes) and by the hourly
compensation rate for Human Resources
Managers ($23.49 per hour). For
example, the projected number of CW–
1 workers in FY 2019 is 13,000 and the
projected number of U.S. workers is
8,353, which totals 21,353 workers. So,
the estimated FY 2019 labor cost is
$41,631 (= 21,353 workers × 5 minutes
× $23.49 per hour).
To estimate the materials costs
associated with reproducing the work
contract, the Department again added
the projected number of CW–1 workers
in each year to the estimated number of
corresponding U.S. workers (8,353 U.S.
workers). The Department then
multiplied the estimated total number of
workers in each year by the estimated
length of a work contract (3 pages) and
by the estimated per-page printing cost
($0.09). For example, the projected
number of CW–1 and U.S. workers in
FY 2019 is 21,353, so the estimated FY
2019 materials cost is $5,765 (= 21,353
workers × 3 pages × $0.09 per page).
Combining the labor and materials
costs for reproducing the work contract,
E:\FR\FM\01APR2.SGM
01APR2
12422
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 62 / Monday, April 1, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
the first-year cost is estimated at
$47,397 (= $41,631 + $5,765). The
annualized cost over the 11.25-year
period is estimated at $41,049 at a
discount rate of 3 percent and $41,529
at a discount rate of 7 percent. The total
cost over the 11.25-year period is
estimated at $387,085 at a discount rate
of 3 percent and $316,138 at a discount
rate of 7 percent.
(s) Mailing the Work Contracts
To estimate the labor costs associated
with mailing work contracts to workers,
the Department first added the projected
number of CW–1 workers in each year
to the estimated number of
corresponding U.S. workers (8,353 U.S.
workers). The Department then
multiplied the estimated total number of
workers in each year by the amount of
time required to mail each work
contract (10 minutes) and by the hourly
compensation rate for Human Resources
Managers ($23.49 per hour). For
example, the projected number of CW–
1 workers in FY 2019 is 13,000 and the
projected number of U.S. workers is
8,353, which totals 21,353 workers. So,
the estimated FY 2019 labor cost is
$83,764 (= 21,353 workers × 10 minutes
× $23.49 per hour).
To estimate the postage costs
associated with mailing work contracts
to CW–1 workers not living in the
CNMI, the Department multiplied the
projected number of CW–1 workers in
each year by the estimated percentage of
CW–1 workers not currently living in
the CNMI (37 percent) and by the
estimated international postage cost
($1.15). For example, the projected
number of CW–1 workers in FY 2019 is
13,000, so the estimated FY 2019 cost to
employers for mailing work contracts to
CW–1 workers not living in the CNMI
is $5,532 (= 13,000 CW–1 workers × 37
percent × $1.15 per work contract).
To estimate the postage costs
associated with mailing work contracts
to workers currently in the CNMI, the
Department multiplied the projected
number of CW–1 workers by the
estimated percentage of CW–1 workers
currently in the CNMI (63 percent) and
then added the estimated number of
corresponding U.S. workers (8,353 U.S.
workers) to obtain the total number of
work contracts to be mailed within the
CNMI. The Department multiplied this
estimate by the current cost of a U.S.
postage stamp ($0.50). For example, the
projected number of CW–1 workers in
FY 2019 is 13,000, so the estimated
number of CW–1 workers currently in
the CNMI is 8,190 (= 13,000 × 63
percent). Combined with 8,353 U.S.
workers, the total number of workers in
the CNMI who would be mailed a work
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:01 Mar 29, 2019
Jkt 247001
contract in FY 2019 is estimated to be
16,543. Accordingly, the estimated FY
2019 cost to employers for mailing work
contracts within the CNMI is $8,272 (=
16,543 workers × $0.50 per work
contract).
Combining the labor and materials
costs for mailing the work contract, the
first-year cost is estimated at $97,568 (=
$83,764 + $5,532 + $8,272). The
annualized cost over the 11.25-year
period is estimated at $84,119 at a
discount rate of 3 percent and $85,152
at a discount rate of 7 percent. The total
cost over the 11.25-year period is
estimated at $793,235 at a discount rate
of 3 percent and $648,223 at a discount
rate of 7 percent.
(t) Notification of Abandonment or
Termination
The IFR requires employers to notify
the Department when any of their CW–
1 workers voluntarily abandons the job
or is terminated before the certified end
date of employment. This task involves
writing an email message to the
Department to meet this requirement.
To estimate the labor costs associated
with notifying the Department of
abandonment or termination of
employment, the Department multiplied
the number of projected CW–1
applications in each year by the
estimated percentage of applications
that will be affected by this requirement
based on the Department’s experience
with other TLC programs (5 percent of
applications). Then, the Department
multiplied this number by the estimated
time required to comply with this
provision (10 minutes) and by the
hourly compensation rate for Human
Resources Managers ($23.49 per hour).
For example, the projected number of
CW–1 applications in FY 2019 is 8,636,
so the estimated FY 2019 cost is $1,694
(= 8,636 applications × 5 percent × 10
minutes × $23.49 per hour). The
annualized cost over the 11.25-year
period is estimated at $1,261 at a
discount rate of 3 percent and $1,302 at
a discount rate of 7 percent. The total
cost over the 11.25-year period is
estimated at $11,888 at a discount rate
of 3 percent and $9,913 at a discount
rate of 7 percent.
(u) Extension of the Certified Period of
Employment
The IFR permits employers, under
certain circumstances involving weather
conditions or other factors beyond the
control of the employer, to request in
writing an extension of the certified
period of employment. The employer
must submit the written request to the
CO with documentation showing that
the extension is needed and that the
PO 00000
Frm 00044
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
need could not have been reasonably
foreseen by the employer.
To estimate the labor costs associated
with requesting an extension of the
certified period of employment, the
Department multiplied the number of
projected CW–1 applications in each
year by the estimated percentage of
applications for which an extension will
be requested based on the Department’s
experience with other TLC programs (5
percent of applications).Then, the
Department multiplied this number by
the estimated time required to comply
with this provision (30 minutes) and by
the hourly compensation rate for
Human Resources Managers ($23.49 per
hour). For example, the projected
number of CW–1 applications in FY
2019 is 8,636, so the estimated FY 2019
cost is $5,071 (= 8,636 applications × 5
percent × 30 minutes × $23.49 per hour).
The annualized cost over the 11.25-year
period is estimated at $3,775 at a
discount rate of 3 percent and $3,899 at
a discount rate of 7 percent. The total
cost over the 11.25-year period is
estimated at $35,593 at a discount rate
of 3 percent and $29,679 at a discount
rate of 7 percent.
(v) Administrative Appeals
The IFR permits an employer that has
certification denied to request
administrative review of the decision by
BALCA. To do so, an employer must
submit a written request for review
within 10 business days from the date
of determination.
To estimate the labor costs associated
with seeking administrative review, the
Department multiplied the number of
projected CW–1 applications in each
year by the estimated percentage of
applications for which administrative
review will be requested based on the
Department’s experience with other TLC
programs (5 percent of applications).
Then, the Department multiplied this
number by the estimated time required
to comply with this provision (1 hour)
and by the hourly compensation rate for
Human Resources Managers ($23.49 per
hour). For example, the projected
number of CW–1 applications in FY
2019 is 8,636, so the estimated FY 2019
cost is $10,143 (= 8,636 applications ×
5 percent × 1 hour × $23.49 per hour).
The annualized cost over the 11.25-year
period is estimated at $7,549 at a
discount rate of 3 percent and $7,797 at
a discount rate of 7 percent. The total
cost over the 11.25-year period is
estimated at $71,187 at a discount rate
of 3 percent and $59,357 at a discount
rate of 7 percent.
E:\FR\FM\01APR2.SGM
01APR2
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 62 / Monday, April 1, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
(w) Request for Withdrawal
The IFR permits employers to request
withdrawal of an application any time
after it has been accepted for processing,
as long as the employer complies with
the terms and conditions of employment
in the application and work contract
with respect to all workers recruited and
hired in connection with that
application. The employer must submit
a request in writing to the NPC stating
the reason(s) for withdrawal.
To estimate the labor costs associated
with requesting withdrawal of an
application, the Department multiplied
the number of projected CW–1
applications in each year by the
estimated percentage of applications
that will be withdrawn based on the
Department’s experience with other TLC
programs (10 percent of applications).).
Then, the Department multiplied this
number by the estimated time required
to comply with this provision (10
minutes) and by the hourly
compensation rate for Human Resources
Managers ($23.49 per hour). For
example, the projected number of CW–
1 applications in FY 2019 is 8,636, so
the estimated FY 2019 cost is $3,388 (=
8,636 applications × 10 percent × 10
minutes × $23.49 per hour). The
annualized cost over the 11.25-year
period is estimated at $2,521 at a
discount rate of 3 percent and $2,604 at
a discount rate of 7 percent. The total
cost over the 11.25-year period is
estimated at $23,776 at a discount rate
of 3 percent and $19,825 at a discount
rate of 7 percent.
determines that the violation does not
warrant debarment, the CO may require
the employer to undergo assisted
recruitment for future applications. This
requirement not only protects the
integrity of the CW–1 program but can
also be an effective tool to help an
employer that, due to either program
inexperience or confusion, commits an
unintentional violation in its
application and indicates a need for
assistance from the Department.
To estimate the labor costs associated
with conducting assisted recruitment,
the Department multiplied the number
of projected CW–1 applications in each
year by the estimated percentage of
applications that will be affected by this
requirement based on the Department’s
experience with other TLC programs
(0.5 percent of applications). Then, the
Department multiplied this number by
the estimated time required to comply
with this provision (1 hour) and by the
hourly compensation rate for Human
Resources Managers ($23.49 per hour).
For example, the projected number of
CW–1 applications in FY 2019 is 8,636,
so the estimated FY 2019 cost is $1,014
(= 8,636 applications × 0.5 percent × 1
hour × $23.49 per hour). The annualized
cost over the 11.25-year period is
estimated at $755 at a discount rate of
3 percent and $780 at a discount rate of
7 percent. The total cost over the 11.25year period is estimated at $7,119 at a
discount rate of 3 percent and $5,936 at
a discount rate of 7 percent.
(x) Certifying Officer-Ordered Assisted
Recruitment
If an employer violates the terms of
the CW–1 program and the Department
This section discusses the
quantifiable transfer payments related to
transportation and subsistence costs, as
well as the impact on the wages of CW–
b. Transfer Payments
12423
1 workers and corresponding U.S.
workers.
(1) Transportation and Subsistence
Costs
The IFR requires CW–1 employers to
pay the inbound transportation and
daily subsistence costs of workers who
complete 50 percent of the job order
period and the outbound transportation
and subsistence costs of workers who
complete the entire job order period.
Reasonable expenses incurred between
a worker’s hometown and the consular
city are within the scope of inbound
transportation and subsistence costs,
including lodging costs while CW–1
workers travel from their hometown to
the consular city to wait to obtain a visa
and from the consular city to the place
of employment. The impacts of
requiring CW–1 employers to pay for
workers’ transportation and subsistence
represent transfers from CW–1
employers to workers because the
impacts are distributional effects, not a
change in society’s resources.69
To estimate the transfer payments
related to transportation and
subsistence, the Department first
calculated the proportion of CW–1
workers from each of the 10 most
common countries of origin in FY 2016–
2018. The Department then averaged
these proportions and normalized them
to account for the small portion of CW–
1 workers in each year originating from
countries other than the 10 most
common countries of origin. These
normalized proportions, presented in
Exhibit 4, were used to create weighted
averages of travel costs in the analysis
below.
EXHIBIT 4—AVERAGE PROPORTION OF WORKERS BY COUNTRY OF ORIGIN
[FY 2016–2018]
Country
FY 2016
Proportion
(percent)
FY 2017
Proportion
(percent)
FY 2018
Proportion
(percent)
Average
proportion
(percent)
Normalized
proportion
(percent)
Philippines ........................
China ................................
South Korea .....................
Bangladesh ......................
Japan ...............................
Taiwan ..............................
Malaysia ...........................
Vietnam ............................
Thailand ...........................
India .................................
7,086
4,844
433
473
142
35
26
4
56
14
53.28
36.42
3.26
3.56
1.07
0.26
0.20
0.03
0.42
0.11
6,497
5,298
380
352
200
240
200
116
58
24
47.90
39.06
2.80
2.60
1.47
1.77
1.47
0.86
0.43
0.18
6,043
1,703
374
210
92
276
202
95
54
44
65.02
18.32
4.02
2.26
0.99
2.97
2.17
1.02
0.58
0.47
55.40
31.27
3.36
2.80
1.18
1.67
1.28
0.64
0.48
0.25
56.34
31.80
3.42
2.85
1.20
1.70
1.30
0.65
0.48
0.26
Top 10 Total .............
13,113
98.60
13,365
98.54
9,093
97.84
98.33
100.00
69 For the purpose of this analysis, CW–1 workers
are considered temporary residents of the United
States.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:01 Mar 29, 2019
Jkt 247001
PO 00000
Frm 00045
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\01APR2.SGM
01APR2
12424
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 62 / Monday, April 1, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
EXHIBIT 4—AVERAGE PROPORTION OF WORKERS BY COUNTRY OF ORIGIN—Continued
[FY 2016–2018]
Country
FY 2016
Total ..........................
Proportion
(percent)
13,299
100.00
The Department estimated total
transportation, lodging, and subsistence
costs to and from the CNMI based on
four components: (1) The average
estimated cost of a one-way bus or train
trip from three major regional cities to
the consular city; (2) the estimated cost
of lodging in the consular city for 1
night; (3) the minimum daily
Proportion
(percent)
FY 2017
13,563
100.00
FY 2018
9,294
subsistence amount for workers
traveling to their place of employment;
and (4) the estimated cost of a one-way
flight from the consular city to Saipan.
The Department estimated the total oneway cost from each country of origin by
adding these four components and then
estimating a weighted average total oneway travel cost by multiplying the total
Proportion
(percent)
100.00
Average
proportion
(percent)
Normalized
proportion
(percent)
....................
....................
one-way travel cost from each country
of origin with the appropriate
normalized weight from Exhibit 4 and
summing the resulting weighted costs.
The Department estimated the total
round-trip travel costs by multiplying
the weighted average total one-way
travel cost by two. These figures are
presented in Exhibit 5.
EXHIBIT 5—ESTIMATED COST OF TRAVEL FOR CW–1 WORKERS
Cost
(2018 dollars)
Item
Philippines
One-way travel—within Manila ........................................................................................................................................................
One-way travel—Quezon City to Manila .........................................................................................................................................
One-way travel—Caloocan to Manila ..............................................................................................................................................
$0.00
1.00
1.00
Average—Home city to Manila .................................................................................................................................................
Lodging Cost—Manila .....................................................................................................................................................................
Meals ...............................................................................................................................................................................................
One-way travel—Manila to Saipan ..................................................................................................................................................
0.67
1.47
12.26
397.00
Total one-way travel .................................................................................................................................................................
411.40
China
One-way travel—within Beijing ........................................................................................................................................................
One-way travel—Chongqing to Beijing ...........................................................................................................................................
One-way travel—Shanghai to Beijing ..............................................................................................................................................
0.00
77.00
87.50
Average—Home city to Beijing ................................................................................................................................................
Lodging cost—Beijing ......................................................................................................................................................................
Meals ...............................................................................................................................................................................................
One-way travel—Beijing to Saipan ..................................................................................................................................................
54.83
8.74
12.26
410.20
Total one-way travel .................................................................................................................................................................
486.03
South Korea
One-way travel—within Seoul .........................................................................................................................................................
One-way travel—Busan to Seoul ....................................................................................................................................................
One-way travel—Incheon to Seoul ..................................................................................................................................................
0.00
27.00
1.50
Average—Home city to Seoul ..................................................................................................................................................
Lodging cost—Seoul ........................................................................................................................................................................
Meals ...............................................................................................................................................................................................
One-way travel—Seoul to Saipan ...................................................................................................................................................
9.50
9.01
12.26
206.00
Total one-way travel .................................................................................................................................................................
236.77
Bangladesh
One-way travel—within Dhaka ........................................................................................................................................................
One-way travel—Sylhet to Dhaka ...................................................................................................................................................
One-way travel—Chittagong to Dhaka ............................................................................................................................................
0.00
6.00
12.00
Average—Home city to Dhaka .................................................................................................................................................
Lodging cost—Dhaka ......................................................................................................................................................................
Meals ...............................................................................................................................................................................................
One-way travel—Dhaka to Saipan ..................................................................................................................................................
6.00
15.00
12.26
970.00
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:01 Mar 29, 2019
Jkt 247001
PO 00000
Frm 00046
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\01APR2.SGM
01APR2
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 62 / Monday, April 1, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
12425
EXHIBIT 5—ESTIMATED COST OF TRAVEL FOR CW–1 WORKERS—Continued
Cost
(2018 dollars)
Item
Total one-way travel .................................................................................................................................................................
1,003.26
Japan
One-way travel—within Tokyo .........................................................................................................................................................
One-way travel—Yokohama to Tokyo .............................................................................................................................................
One-way travel—Osaka to Tokyo ...................................................................................................................................................
0.00
5.50
60.00
Average—Home city to Tokyo .................................................................................................................................................
Lodging cost—Tokyo .......................................................................................................................................................................
Meals ...............................................................................................................................................................................................
One-way travel—Tokyo to Saipan ...................................................................................................................................................
21.83
12.26
12.26
336.00
Total one-way travel .................................................................................................................................................................
382.35
Taiwan
One-way travel—New Taipei City to Taipei City .............................................................................................................................
One-way travel—Taichung to Taipei City ........................................................................................................................................
One-way travel—Kaohsiung to Taipei City .....................................................................................................................................
1.00
6.50
21.00
Average—Home city to Taipei City ..........................................................................................................................................
Lodging cost—Taipei City ................................................................................................................................................................
Meals ...............................................................................................................................................................................................
One-way travel—Taipei City to Saipan ...........................................................................................................................................
9.50
.79
12.26
308.00
Total one-way travel .................................................................................................................................................................
339.55
Malaysia
One-way travel—within Kuala Lumpur ............................................................................................................................................
One-way travel—Ipoh to Kuala Lumpur ..........................................................................................................................................
0.00
5.00
One-way travel—Iskander Puteri to Kuala Lumpur .........................................................................................................................
21.50
Average—Home city to Kuala Lumpur .....................................................................................................................................
Lodging cost—Kuala Lumpur ..........................................................................................................................................................
Meals ...............................................................................................................................................................................................
One-way travel—Kuala Lumpur to Saipan ......................................................................................................................................
8.83
5.08
12.26
445.00
Total one-way travel .................................................................................................................................................................
471.17
Vietnam
One-way travel—within Hanoi .........................................................................................................................................................
One-way travel—Ho Chi Minh City to Hanoi ...................................................................................................................................
One-way travel—Da Nang to Hanoi ................................................................................................................................................
0.00
30.00
14.00
Average—Home city to Hanoi ..................................................................................................................................................
Lodging cost—Hanoi .......................................................................................................................................................................
Meals ...............................................................................................................................................................................................
One-way travel—Hanoi to Saipan ...................................................................................................................................................
14.67
5.08
12.26
419.00
Total one-way travel .................................................................................................................................................................
448.63
Thailand
One-way travel—within Bangkok .....................................................................................................................................................
One-way travel—Pattaya to Bangkok .............................................................................................................................................
One-way travel—Nonthaburi to Bangkok ........................................................................................................................................
0.00
5.00
1.00
Average—Home city to Bangkok .............................................................................................................................................
Lodging cost—Bangkok ...................................................................................................................................................................
Meals ...............................................................................................................................................................................................
One-way travel—Bangkok to Saipan ..............................................................................................................................................
2.00
3.68
12.26
447.00
Total one-way travel .................................................................................................................................................................
464.94
India
One-way travel—within New Delhi ..................................................................................................................................................
One-way travel—Mumbai to New Delhi ..........................................................................................................................................
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:01 Mar 29, 2019
Jkt 247001
PO 00000
Frm 00047
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\01APR2.SGM
01APR2
0.00
16.00
12426
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 62 / Monday, April 1, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
EXHIBIT 5—ESTIMATED COST OF TRAVEL FOR CW–1 WORKERS—Continued
Cost
(2018 dollars)
Item
One-way travel—Bengaluru to New Delhi .......................................................................................................................................
30.00
Average—Home city to New Delhi ...........................................................................................................................................
Lodging cost—New Delhi ................................................................................................................................................................
Meals ...............................................................................................................................................................................................
One-way travel—New Delhi to Saipan ............................................................................................................................................
15.33
3.27
12.26
592.00
Total one-way travel .................................................................................................................................................................
622.86
All
One-way travel—Weighted average ................................................................................................................................................
Round-trip travel—Weighted average .............................................................................................................................................
To calculate the total transfers
associated with workers traveling to the
CNMI, the Department first multiplied
the projected number of CW–1 workers
in each year by the estimated percentage
of CW–1 workers not currently living in
CNMI (37 percent) to obtain an estimate
for the number of workers that will
require transportation, lodging, and
subsistence. The Department then
multiplied this estimate by the countryof-origin weighted average total roundtrip travel cost ($892.54). For example,
the projected number of CW–1 workers
in FY 2019 is 13,000, so the estimated
FY 2019 transfer is $4,293,109 (= 13,000
workers × 37 percent × $892.54). The
annualized transfer over the 11.25-year
period is estimated at $3,195,353 at a
discount rate of 3 percent and
$3,300,461 at a discount rate of 7
percent. The total transfer over the
11.25-year period is estimated at
$30,131,920 at a discount rate of 3
percent and $25,124,791 at a discount
rate of 7 percent.
(2) Wage Impact Analysis
The IFR, at § 655.410(b)(1), provides
that if the mean hourly wage for an
occupational classification in the CNMI
is reported by the Governor, annually,
and meets the Department’s statistical
requirements set forth in § 655.410(e),
the wage reported by the Governor must
be the prevailing wage for the
occupational classification. When the
Department has not approved a survey
for the occupation—either because the
Governor has not conducted a survey or
because the Governor’s survey fails to
meet the statistical standards for the
occupation—the prevailing wage must
be the mean wage estimate for Guam for
the appropriate occupation, as reported
by BLS in the OES. If Guam OES wage
data are unavailable for an occupation,
the prevailing wage must be the mean
wage paid to workers in the SOC in the
United States from the BLS OES Survey,
adjusted based on the ratio of the mean
wage paid to workers in all SOCs in
Guam compared to the mean wage paid
to workers in all SOCs in the United
States from the BLS OES survey. For
this analysis, the Department used the
May 2017 ratio of 0.71, which is the
ratio of the Guam mean wage rate of
$17.30 70 to the national mean wage rate
of $24.34.71 First, the Department
matched each CW–1 occupation from
the USCIS CW–1 beneficiary data to the
most appropriate SOC code. Then, the
Department established a baseline wage
446.27
892.54
for each occupation using the hourly
wage for the appropriate SOC code in
the 2016 CNMI Prevailing Wage and
Workforce Assessment Study (inflated
to 2018 dollars). In contrast to the
statistical requirements for the
prevailing wage—namely, 3 or more
employers surveyed with a total of 30 or
more employees—the baseline wage for
this analysis was established using a
statistical standard of 3 or more
employers surveyed with a total of just
6 or more employees. If the occupation
met the statistical standard but the
survey wage was lower than $7.25 per
hour, the Department assigned $7.25 per
hour as the baseline because the CNMI
minimum wage increased to $7.25 after
the reference period for the 2016 CNMI
Prevailing Wage and Workforce
Assessment Study (November 1–16,
2016). Similarly, if the survey wage
failed to meet the statistical standard,
the Department assigned $7.25 per hour.
For each occupation, the Department
calculated the hourly wage difference by
subtracting the baseline wage estimate
from the chosen prevailing wage.
Exhibit 6 provides four examples to
illustrate how the baseline and
prevailing wages were chosen for each
occupation.
EXHIBIT 6—CNMI PREVAILING HOURLY WAGE UNDER THE IFR
[Example cases]
CW–1 occupation title
SOC code
Accountant ...................
Civil Engineer ...............
Architect/Surveyor ........
Fisher/Hunter/Trapper ..
Baseline
wage a
132011
172051
173031
453011
CNMI
survey wage
$12.86
23.52
8.06
7.25
Guam
OES wage
$12.86
N/A
N/A
N/A
$22.23
29.06
N/A
N/A
National OES
wage × 0.71
$26.60
31.33
15.82
10.65
Assigned
wage
$12.86
29.06
15.82
10.65
Wage
difference
$0.00
5.54
7.76
3.40
a The baseline wage is the wage in the 2016 CNMI Prevailing Wage and Workforce Assessment Study (inflated to 2018 dollars) if the number
of employers surveyed is three or more and the total number of employees is six or more. Otherwise, the baseline is $7.25 per hour.
70 U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor
Statistics, Occupational Employment Statistics
program, ‘‘State Occupational Employment and
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:01 Mar 29, 2019
Jkt 247001
Wage Estimates, Guam’’ (May 2017), https://
www.bls.gov/oes/current/oes_gu.htm.
71 U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor
Statistics, Occupational Employment Statistics
PO 00000
Frm 00048
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
program, ‘‘National Occupational Employment and
Wage Estimates, United States’’ (May 2017), https://
www.bls.gov/oes/current/oes_nat.htm.
E:\FR\FM\01APR2.SGM
01APR2
12427
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 62 / Monday, April 1, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
For accountants, the 2016 CNMI
Prevailing Wage and Workforce
Assessment Study provided an hourly
wage of $12.86 (inflated to 2018 dollars)
based on survey responses from 165
employers with a total of 332
employees, meeting the Department’s
baseline wage criteria of 3 employers
and 6 employees. The survey sample
size also met the Department’s
prevailing wage criteria of 3 employers
and 30 employees, so $12.86 per hour
was assigned. This results in zero wage
difference between the baseline and the
chosen prevailing wage for accountants
in the CNMI.
For civil engineers, the 2016 CNMI
Prevailing Wage and Workforce
Assessment Study provided an hourly
wage of $23.52 (inflated to 2018 dollars)
based on survey responses from 12
employers with a total of 26 employees,
meeting the Department’s baseline
criteria. However, this survey sample
size falls short of the Department’s
prevailing wage criteria of 3 employers
with a total of 30 employees. Therefore,
the 2016 CNMI Prevailing Wage and
Workforce Assessment Study hourly
wage for civil engineers was not chosen
as the prevailing wage. Instead, the May
2017 OES wage for Guam of $29.06 per
hour was assigned as the prevailing
wage, resulting in an hourly wage
difference of $5.54 for civil engineers.
The CW–1 occupation labeled as
architect/surveyor was assigned the
SOC code for Surveying and Mapping
Technicians. The 2016 CNMI Prevailing
Wage and Workforce Assessment Study
provided an hourly wage of $8.06
(inflated to 2018 dollars) for Surveying
and Mapping Technicians. The survey
wage was based on responses from three
employers with a total of eight
employees, making it sufficient for the
baseline estimate but not for the
prevailing wage. The May 2017 OES
hourly wage for Guam was also
unavailable. Therefore, the scaled down
May 2017 national OES wage of $15.82
per hour was assigned as the prevailing
wage, resulting in a wage difference of
$7.76.
Lastly, the CW–1 occupation labeled
as fishers, hunters, and trappers was
assigned the SOC code for Fishers and
Related Fishing Workers. The 2016
CNMI Prevailing Wage and Workforce
Assessment Study provided an hourly
wage of $6.60 for this SOC code, so the
Department assigned $7.25 per hour as
the baseline. The hourly wage from the
2016 CNMI Prevailing Wage and
Workforce Assessment Study was based
on responses from 8 employers with a
total of 19 employees, so the survey
sample size was not large enough to use
as the prevailing wage. The May 2017
OES hourly wage for Guam was also
unavailable. Therefore, the scaled down
May 2017 national OES wage of $10.65
was assigned as the prevailing wage,
resulting in a wage difference of $3.40.
This process was repeated for all CW–
1 occupation titles provided by USCIS.
Next, the Department used FY 2018
USCIS CW–1 beneficiary approvals data
to calculate the percentage of the CW–
1 workers in each occupation relative to
the total number of CW–1 workers. The
Department then multiplied the
percentage for each occupation by the
statutory limit of workers to estimate the
total number of CW–1 workers in each
occupation for each year of the analysis.
The Department then calculated the
number of U.S. workers in
corresponding employment by
multiplying the number of CW–1
beneficiaries in each occupation in FY
2018 by a ratio of citizen to noncitizen
workers derived from CNMI Department
of Commerce data on the number of
citizen and noncitizen workers in highly
aggregated occupational groups.72
Exhibit 7 provides examples for the
same CW–1 occupations as in Exhibit 6
to illustrate how the number of CW–1
workers and corresponding U.S.
workers were estimated.
EXHIBIT 7—FY 2019 CORRESPONDING U.S. WORKERS IN CW–1 OCCUPATIONS
[Example cases]
CW–1 occupation title
Accountant ...................
Civil Engineer ...............
Architect/Surveyor ........
Fisher/Hunter/Trapper ..
SOC
code
132011
172051
173031
453011
FY 2018
CW–1
approvals
Percentage
of FY 2018
approvals
Projected FY 2019
CW–1 workers
(a)
(b)
(c) = 13,000 × (b)
287
10
6
19
3.09
0.11
0.06
0.20
401
14
8
27
CNMI Department of Commerce
category
the prevailing wage for civil engineers,
the Department multiplied the number
of affected CW–1 workers (14) by the
number of hours worked in 1 year
(2,080) and by the change in the hourly
wage ($5.54). The result is an estimated
increase in wages of $161,257 in FY
2019 (= 14 workers × 2,080 hours ×
$5.54).73 For U.S. workers, the result is
an estimated increase in wages of
$96,223 in FY 2019 (= 8 workers × 2,080
hours × $5.54).
This calculation was performed for
each CW–1 occupation in each year, and
the total impacts were estimated by
summing across all occupations in each
72 CNMI Department of Commerce, Statistical
Yearbook 2017, Table 5.24 ‘‘Average Hourly Wages
by Occupation and Citizenship, CNMI: 2016’’ at
https://ver1.cnmicommerce.com/sy-2017-table-5-1731-wage-survey/.
20:01 Mar 29, 2019
Jkt 247001
PO 00000
Frm 00049
Fmt 4701
Corresponding
U.S. workers
Total
affected
workers
(d)
(e) = (a) × (d)
(c) + (e)
Business and Financial Operations
Architecture and Engineering .........
Architecture and Engineering .........
Farming, Fishing, and Forestry ......
The Department estimated wage
impacts for each occupation by
multiplying the sum of the estimated
number of CW–1 workers and
corresponding U.S. workers in each
occupation by the difference between
the chosen prevailing hourly wage and
the baseline wage, multiplied by 2,080
hours per year. For example, in the case
of civil engineers, the Department
estimated a wage increase of $5.54 per
hour, as shown in Exhibit 6. Exhibit 7
projects 14 CW–1 workers and 8
corresponding U.S. workers in FY 2019.
To calculate the wage impacts for CW–
1 workers resulting from the increase in
VerDate Sep<11>2014
Ratio
of U.S.
workers
to CW–1
workers
Sfmt 4700
1.35
0.84
0.84
0.77
387
8
5
15
788
22
13
42
year. The annualized wage transfer over
the 11.25-year period is estimated at
$31,599,130 (= $18,192,270 to CW–1
workers + $13,406,860 to U.S. workers)
at a discount rate of 3 percent and
$32,221,562 (= $18,816,920 to CW–1
workers + $13,404,642 to U.S. workers)
at a discount rate of 7 percent. The total
wage transfer over the 11.25-year period
is estimated at $297,977,189 (=
$171,551,603 to CW–1 workers +
$126,425,586 to U.S. workers) at a
discount rate of 3 percent and
$245,286,945 (= $143,243,981 to CW–1
workers + $102,042,965 to U.S. workers)
at a discount rate of 7 percent.
73 Calculations
E:\FR\FM\01APR2.SGM
01APR2
may not match due to rounding.
12428
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 62 / Monday, April 1, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
The wage impact estimates of this IFR
are driven, in large part, by the statutory
requirement that employers offer a wage
that equals or exceeds the highest of the
prevailing wage, or the Federal
minimum wage, or the Commonwealth
minimum wage. In the absence of a
valid wage based on the 2016 CNMI
Prevailing Wage and Workforce
Assessment Study conducted by the
CNMI Governor, the Department’s
estimates predominantly use the mean
wage of workers similarly employed in
Guam from the BLS OES survey, as
required by the statute, which are
significantly higher than what
employers in the CNMI are currently
paying workers in the occupational
classification. Additionally, beginning
September 30, 2018, the minimum wage
in the Commonwealth reached the
Federal minimum wage of $7.25 per
hour, representing a $0.20-cent increase
over the Commonwealth’s prior
minimum wage of $7.05 per hour. Thus,
where the wage for any occupation
based on the 2016 CNMI Prevailing
Wage and Workforce Assessment Study
conducted by the CNMI Governor fell
below $7.25 per hour, the Department’s
estimates assume these employers
would increase the rate of pay for
workers to match current minimum
wage requirements in the
Commonwealth.
5. Summary of Costs and Transfer
Payments
Exhibit 8 presents a summary of the
costs and transfer payments associated
with this IFR.74
EXHIBIT 8—ESTIMATED COSTS AND TRANSFER PAYMENTS
[2018 dollars]
Transfer payments
Fiscal year
Costs
2019 .................................................................................................................
2020 .................................................................................................................
2021 .................................................................................................................
2022 .................................................................................................................
2023 .................................................................................................................
2024 .................................................................................................................
2025 .................................................................................................................
2026 .................................................................................................................
2027 .................................................................................................................
2028 .................................................................................................................
2029 .................................................................................................................
2030,Q1 ...........................................................................................................
Annualized, 3% discount rate, 11.25 years .....................................................
Annualized, 7% discount rate, 11.25 years .....................................................
Total, 3% discount rate, 11.25 years ..............................................................
Total, 7% discount rate, 11.25 years ..............................................................
6. Regulatory Alternatives
The Department considered two
regulatory alternatives to the provisions
in the IFR. The two alternatives differ
from the IFR in one respect: The third
option used to set the prevailing wage.
$4,359,067
3,930,868
3,775,905
3,620,948
3,465,984
3,156,064
2,846,144
2,535,763
2,225,842
1,915,922
1,605,547
365,405
3,086,620
3,190,028
29,106,568
24,284,121
Under the IFR, if wage data are not
available from the Governor’s survey or
the OES survey for Guam, the
Department will base the prevailing
wage on an adjusted national OES wage.
Under the first regulatory alternative,
Total transfer
payments
$42,286,653
41,175,998
40,065,343
38,954,589
37,844,034
35,622,725
33,401,415
31,180,106
28,958,796
26,737,487
24,516,178
4,155,414
34,794,484
35,522,023
328,109,108
270,411,736
Transfer
payments to
CW–1 workers
$28,877,022
27,766,367
26,655,712
25,545,058
24,434,403
22,213,094
19,991,784
17,770,475
15,549,165
13,327,856
11,106,547
903,007
21,387,623
22,117,381
201,683,522
168,638,772
Transfer
payments to
U.S. workers
$13,409,631
13,409,631
13,409,631
13,409,631
13,409,631
13,409,631
13,409,631
13,409,631
13,409,631
13,409,631
13,409,631
3,352,408
13,406,860
13,404,642
126,425,586
102,042,965
the third option would be the national
OES wage without adjustment. To
illustrate how prevailing wages would
be determined under this regulatory
alternative, Exhibit 9 presents the PWD
for four occupations.
EXHIBIT 9—CNMI PREVAILING HOURLY WAGE UNDER REGULATORY ALTERNATIVE 1
[Example cases]
CW–1 occupation title
SOC code
Accountant ...................
Civil Engineer ...............
Architect/Surveyor ........
Fisher/Hunter/Trapper ..
Baseline wage
132011
172051
173031
453011
CNMI survey
wage
$12.86
23.52
8.06
7.25
Guam OES
wage
$12.86
N/A
N/A
N/A
$22.23
29.06
N/A
N/A
National OES
wage
$37.46
44.13
22.28
15.00
Assigned
wage
$12.86
29.06
22.28
15.00
Wage
difference
$0.00
5.54
14.22
7.75
The PWDs for accountants and civil
engineers under this regulatory
alternative are identical to those of the
IFR methodology. In contrast, the PWDs
for architects/surveyors and fishers/
hunters/trappers are higher due to the
fact that they are not scaled down to
reflect the ratio of the mean wage in
74 In addition to the costs and transfers estimated
by the Department, the IFR is expected to cause
deadweight loss (DWL). DWL occurs when a market
operates at less than optimal equilibrium output,
which happens anytime the conditions for a
perfectly competitive market are not met. Causes of
DWL include taxes, subsidies, externalities, labor
market interventions, price ceilings, and price
floors. This IFR establishes a wage floor, which will
increase compensation rates above the equilibrium
level for some occupations. The higher cost of labor
may lead to a decrease in the total number of labor
hours that are purchased on the market. DWL is a
function of the difference between the
compensation employers were willing to pay for the
hours lost and the compensation employees were
willing to accept for those hours. The extent of the
DWL will largely depend on the elasticities of labor
demand and labor supply in the CNMI.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:01 Mar 29, 2019
Jkt 247001
PO 00000
Frm 00050
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\01APR2.SGM
01APR2
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 62 / Monday, April 1, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
Guam compared to the mean national
wage.
The total impact of this regulatory
alternative was calculated in the same
manner as the calculations for the IFR.
The annualized transfer over the 11.25year period is estimated at $37,945,227
(= $21,376,630 to CW–1 workers +
$16,568,597 to U.S. workers) at a
discount rate of 3 percent and
$38,676,475 (= $22,110,619 to CW–1
workers + $16,565,856 to U.S. workers)
at a discount rate of 7 percent. The total
transfer over the 11.25-year period is
estimated at $357,820,363 (=
$201,579,856 to CW–1 workers +
$156,240,507 to U.S. workers) at a
discount rate of 3 percent and
$294,425,028 (= $168,317,291 to CW–1
workers + $126,107,737 to U.S. workers)
at a discount rate of 7 percent. As
explained earlier in the preamble, the
Department did not select this
regulatory option because the
Department concluded it would be
inappropriate to require an employer to
12429
pay a prevailing wage that is based only
on the national wage for the SOC from
the OES survey, without adjustment.
Under the second regulatory
alternative considered by the
Department, the third option used to set
the prevailing wage would be the
Federal minimum wage of $7.25. To
illustrate how prevailing wages would
be determined under this regulatory
alternative, Exhibit 10 presents the PWD
for four occupations.
EXHIBIT 10—CNMI PREVAILING HOURLY WAGE UNDER REGULATORY ALTERNATIVE 2
[Example cases]
CW–1 occupation title
SOC code
Accountant ...................
Civil Engineer ...............
Architect/Surveyor ........
Fisher/Hunter/Trapper ..
Baseline wage
132011
172051
173031
453011
$12.86
23.52
8.06
7.25
The PWDs for accountants and civil
engineers under this regulatory
alternative are identical to those of the
IFR methodology. In contrast, the PWDs
for architects/surveyors and fishers/
hunters/trappers are lower due to the
fact that they are based on the Federal
minimum wage rather than an adjusted
national wage.
The total impact of this regulatory
alternative was calculated in the same
manner as the calculations for the IFR.
The annualized transfer over the 11.25year period is estimated at $21,206,225
(= $13,260,759 to CW–1 workers +
$7,945,466 to U.S. workers) at a
discount rate of 3 percent and
$21,660,232 (= $13,716,081 to CW–1
workers + $7,944,151 to U.S. workers) at
a discount rate of 7 percent. The total
transfer over the 11.25-year period is
estimated at $199,972,952 (=
$125,047,868 to CW–1 workers +
$74,925,085 to U.S. workers) at a
discount rate of 3 percent and
$164,888,722 (= $104,413,798 to CW–1
workers + $60,474,924 to U.S. workers)
at a discount rate of 7 percent. The
Department did not select this
regulatory option because the
Department concluded it would not
prevent the employment of CW–1
workers from causing an adverse effect
on the wages and working conditions of
similarly employed U.S. workers.
B. Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5
U.S.C. 601 et seq. (RFA) imposes certain
requirements on Federal agency rules
that are subject to the notice-andcomment requirements of the APA, 5
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:01 Mar 29, 2019
Jkt 247001
CNMI survey
wage
Guam OES
wage
$12.86
N/A
N/A
N/A
$22.23
29.06
N/A
N/A
U.S.C. 553(b),75 and that are likely to
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
This IFR is exempt from the notice-andcomment requirements of the APA
because, as described earlier, the
Workforce Act directs the Secretary to
publish an IFR ‘‘[n]otwithstanding the
requirements under sec. 553(b) of [the
Administrative Procedure Act].’’ Public
Law 115–218, sec. 3(b). Therefore, the
requirements of the RFA applicable to
notices of proposed rulemaking, 5
U.S.C. 603 (providing for an initial
regulatory flexibility analysis), do not
apply to this IFR. Accordingly, the
Department is not required to either
certify that the IFR would not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities or
conduct a regulatory flexibility analysis.
C. Paperwork Reduction Act
As part of its effort to streamline
information collection, clarify statutory
and regulatory requirements, and
provide greater transparency and
oversight of PWDs and TLCs in the
context of the CW–1 program, the
Department engages with the public and
Federal agencies to provide them with
an opportunity to comment on
collections of information tools in
accordance with the PRA (44 U.S.C.
3506(c)(2)(A)). In January 2019, the
Department submitted an Information
75 The Regulatory Flexibility Act, as amended,
governs ‘‘any rule for which [a Federal] agency
publishes a general notice of proposed rulemaking
pursuant to sec. 553(b) of [the Administrative
Procedure Act] or any other law.’’ 5 U.S.C. 601(2)
(defining ‘‘rule,’’ for purposes of the RFA).
PO 00000
Frm 00051
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
Federal
minimum
wage
$7.25
7.25
7.25
7.25
Assigned
wage
$12.86
29.06
7.25
7.25
Wage
difference
$0.00
5.54
¥0.81
0.00
Collection Requests (ICR) in connection
with this IFR to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for
which it obtained approval using
emergency clearance procedures
outlined at 5 CFR 1320.13, to create new
information collection tools on which it
will rely to administer the issuance of
PWDs and TLCs in connection with the
CW–1 program. OMB assigned a new
OMB Control Number for this
information collection, 1205–053X.
This process of engaging the public
and other Federal agencies helps ensure
that requested data can be provided in
the desired format, reporting burden
(time and financial resources) is
minimized, collection instruments are
clearly understood, and the impact of
collection requirements on respondents
can be properly assessed. The PRA
provides that a Federal agency generally
cannot conduct or sponsor a collection
of information, and the public is
generally not required to respond to an
information collection, unless it is
approved by OMB under the PRA and
displays a currently valid OMB Control
Number. See 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq. In
addition, notwithstanding any other
provisions of law, no person must
generally be subject to penalty for
failing to comply with a collection of
information that does not display a
valid OMB Control Number. See 5 CFR
1320.5(a) and 1320.6.
In accordance with the PRA, the
Department, is affording the public with
notice and an opportunity to comment
on these new information collection
tools that are related to the CW–1
Program, and that are necessary to
E:\FR\FM\01APR2.SGM
01APR2
12430
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 62 / Monday, April 1, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
implement the requirements of this IFR.
The information collection activities
covered by this new OMB Control
Number 1205–053X is required by 48
U.S.C. 1806 of the Workforce Act, and
20 CFR 655, subpart E. The Workforce
Act provides that a petition to import a
nonimmigrant worker under the CW–1
visa classification may not be approved
by DHS unless the employer has
received a TLC from the Department
confirming that: (1) There are not
sufficient U.S. workers in the CNMI
who are able, willing, qualified, and
available at the time and place needed
to perform the services or labor involved
in the petition; and (2) the employment
of a nonimmigrant worker who is the
subject of a petition will not adversely
affect the wages and working conditions
of similarly employed U.S. workers.
As mentioned above, the new OMB
Control No. 1205–053X, includes the
collection of information to be
conducted through information
collection tools, that include forms and
record keeping requirements, on which
the Department relies for determining
prevailing wages and issuing TLCs in
connection with the CW–1 program.
Additionally, the new information
collection tools permit employers to
assure compliance with respect to the
minimum terms and conditions
associated with the PWD and TLC
processes, which include the rights and
obligations of CW–1 workers and
workers in corresponding employment,
in addition to information regarding
record keeping requirements associated
with the CW–1 program. Specifically,
ETA has created new Form ETA–9141C,
Application for Prevailing Wage
Determination and new Form ETA–
9142C, CW–1 Application for
Temporary Employment Certification.
The information contained in the new
Form ETA–9141C is the basis for the
Secretary’s determination of the
appropriate prevailing wage that
employers in the CNMI must pay in the
hiring of a foreign worker, to make sure
there is no adverse effect on U.S.
workers’ wages. Prior to submitting a
requests to OFLC for a TLCs and, as
needed, labor condition applications,
employers must obtain a prevailing
wage for the job opportunity based on
the place of employment. In order to
carry out the provisions of this IFR, the
Department created under this ICR the
collection of information on the Form
ETA–9141C, to collect information from
employers under the CW–1 program to
establish a prevailing wage in the
occupational classification and places of
employment within the Commonwealth.
This request must be electronically
submitted unless the regulatory
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:01 Mar 29, 2019
Jkt 247001
exemptions, specified in the rule, apply,
in which case the employer will be
allowed to submit a PW via mail.
In addition, the Department has
created the Form ETA–9142C, CW–1
Application for Temporary Employment
Certification, and corresponding
appendices which serve as the basis for
the Secretary’s certification that
qualified U.S. workers are not available
to perform the services or labor needed
by the employer, and that the wages and
working conditions of similarly
employed U.S. workers will not be
adversely affected by the employment of
CW–1 workers. This certification is
required before a petition for a CW–1
worker can be filed with and approved
by DHS. This request must be filed
electronically through the newly created
OFLC FLAG system, unless the
employer establishes inadequate access
to the internet or requests that a special
accommodation be made; under these
exemptions, employers will be allowed
to file the request by mail, and when
necessary, with the assistance of the
Department.
The Form ETA–9142C collects basic
information related to the employer in
the CNMI and the job opportunity in
which it seeks to employ CW–1
workers, including, but not limited to,
the job title and occupational
classification, number of workers,
period of employment, job duties and
minimum requirements, and other
material terms and conditions of the job
offer. To ensure no adverse effect on the
wages of similarly employed U.S.
workers and that all work expected to be
performed by CW–1 workers will be
located within the Commonwealth, an
employer must disclose on the Form
ETA–9142C—and on Appendix B, if
appropriate 76—all places of
employment (i.e., worksites) and the
wage rates to be paid to CW–1 workers
at those worksites. The latter allows
OFLC to compare the reported wage
rates with the PWDs obtained by the
employer for each of those places of
employment. Where it is not practical to
collect supporting documentation using
one of the standard OMB-approved
appendices, the newly created FLAG
System will permit an employer to
upload documentation in support of the
application, required by this subpart at
the time of filing, in an acceptable
digitized format (e.g., Adobe PDF,
Microsoft Word, .TXT) to minimize
employer reporting burden.
The Form ETA–9142C must also be
filed electronically through the newly
created OFLC FLAG system, unless the
employer establishes inadequate access
to the internet or requests that a special
accommodation be made; under these
PO 00000
Frm 00052
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
exemptions, employers will be allowed
to file the request by mail, and when
necessary, with the assistance of the
Department. In preparing the Form
ETA–9142C in the FLAG System, the
employer will be provided with a series
of electronic data validation checks and
prompts to ensure each required field is
completed and values entered on the
form are valid and consistent with
regulatory requirements. OFLC’s
website and the FLAG System’s e-filing
capability will include detailed
instructions designed to help employers
understand what each form collection
item means, what kind of entries are
required, and what other documentation
or information is required to be attached
in order for a complete Application for
Temporary Employment Certification
for the CW–1 Program to be submitted
for processing by the NPC.
In addition to its requests for
comments in connection with this IFR,
the Department is seeking comments on
the recordkeeping costs associated with
this IFR and its implementation of Form
ETA–9142C and its three appendices
and accompanying general instructions.
The Appendix A provides a standard
format for an employer filing as a job
contractor to disclose the name and
contact information of its employerclient, as required by this IFR. The
Appendix B requires an employer to use
a standard format to disclose multiple
places of employment and, if applicable,
multiple wage offers for the job
opportunity within the Commonwealth.
And finally, employers and, if
applicable, their authorized agents or
attorneys, use Appendix C to attest to
their compliance with all of the terms,
conditions, and obligations of the
CW–1 program.
To promote greater efficiency in
issuing TLC decisions and minimize
delays associated with employers filing
CW–1 petitions with DHS, the Form
ETA–9142C, Final Determination: CW–
1 Temporary Labor Certification
Approval, will be issued electronically
to employers granted TLC by ETA. In
circumstances where the employer or, if
applicable, its authorized attorney or
agent, is not able to receive the TLC
documents electronically, ETA will
send the certification documents
printed on standard paper in a manner
that ensures expedited delivery.
The information collection
requirements associated with this rule
are summarized as follows:
Agency: DOL–ETA.
Type of Information Collection: New.
Title of the Collection: CW–1
Temporary Labor Certification.
E:\FR\FM\01APR2.SGM
01APR2
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 62 / Monday, April 1, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
Agency Form Number: Form ETA–
9142C; Form ETA–9141C;
recordkeeping requirements.
Affected Public: Private Sector—
businesses or other for-profits; nonprofits.
Total Estimated Number of
Respondents: Approximately 2,314.
Form ETA–9142C:
Estimated Number of Respondents
filing electronically: Approximately
2,198
Estimated Number of Respondents
filing by mail: Approximately 166
Form ETA–9141C:
Estimated Number of Respondents
filing electronically: Approximately
2,198
Estimated Number of Respondents
filing by mail: Approximately 116
Record keeping:
Estimated Number of Respondents
that must comply with record keeping
requirements: Approximately 2,314.
Total Estimated Number of
Responses: Approximately 149,739
responses.
Average Time per Response: 46
minutes per Form ETA 9141 application
and 1 hour and 50 minutes per Form
ETA 9142C application materials; 20
minutes to comply with recordkeeping
requirements.
Total Estimated Annual Time Burden:
73,987 hours.
Total Estimated Other Costs Burden:
$155,155.00.
D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995
This IFR has been reviewed in
accordance with the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA).
2 U.S.C. 1501 et seq. For the purposes
of the UMRA, this IFR does not impose
any federal mandate that may result in
increased expenditures by State, local,
or Tribal governments, or increased
expenditures by the private sector, of
more than $100 million in any year.
E. Small Business Regulatory
Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996
This IFR would not be a major rule as
defined by section 804 of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement Act of
1996, Public Law 104–121, 804, 110
Stat. 847, 872 (1996), 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
OIRA has found that this rule is not
likely to result in an annual effect on the
economy of $100 million or more; a
major increase in costs or prices; or
significant adverse effects on
competition, employment, investment,
productivity, innovation, or on the
ability of United States-based
companies to compete with foreignbased companies in domestic or export
markets.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:01 Mar 29, 2019
Jkt 247001
F. Executive Order 13132, Federalism
This IFR does not have federalism
implications because it would not have
substantial direct effects on the States,
on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government. Accordingly, E.O.
13132, Federalism, requires no further
agency action or analysis.
G. Executive Order 13175, Indian Tribal
Governments
This IFR does not have ‘‘tribal
implications’’ because it would not have
substantial direct effects on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal government and Indian tribes.
Accordingly, E.O. 13175, Consultation
and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, requires no further
agency action or analysis.
List of Subjects in 20 CFR Part 655
Administrative practice and
procedure, Foreign workers,
Employment, Employment and training,
Enforcement, Forest and forest products,
Fraud, Health professions, Immigration,
Labor, Passports and visas, Penalties,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Unemployment, Wages,
Working conditions.
For the reasons stated in the
preamble, the Department of Labor
amends 20 CFR part 655 as follows:
Title 20—Employees’ Benefits
PART 655—TEMPORARY
EMPLOYMENT OF FOREIGN
WORKERS IN THE UNITED STATES
1. The authority citation for part 655
is revised to read as follows:
■
Authority: Section 655.0 issued under 8
U.S.C. 1101(a)(15)(E)(iii), 1101(a)(15)(H)(i)
and (ii), 8 U.S.C. 1103(a)(6), 1182(m), (n), and
(t), 1184(c), (g), and (j), 1188, and 1288(c) and
(d); sec. 3(c)(1), Pub. L. 101–238, 103 Stat.
2099, 2102 (8 U.S.C. 1182 note); sec. 221(a),
Pub. L. 101–649, 104 Stat. 4978, 5027 (8
U.S.C. 1184 note); sec. 303(a)(8), Pub. L. 102–
232, 105 Stat. 1733, 1748 (8 U.S.C. 1101
note); sec. 323(c), Pub. L. 103–206, 107 Stat.
2428; sec. 412(e), Pub. L. 105–277, 112 Stat.
2681 (8 U.S.C. 1182 note); sec. 2(d), Pub. L.
106–95, 113 Stat. 1312, 1316 (8 U.S.C. 1182
note); 29 U.S.C. 49k; Pub. L. 107–296, 116
Stat. 2135, as amended; Pub. L. 109–423, 120
Stat. 2900; 8 CFR 214.2(h)(4)(i); 8 CFR
214.2(h)(6)(iii); and sec. 6, Pub. L. 115–218,
132 Stat. 1547 (48 U.S.C. 1806).
Subpart A issued under 8 CFR 214.2(h).
Subpart B issued under 8 U.S.C.
1101(a)(15)(H)(ii)(a), 1184(c), and 1188; and 8
CFR 214.2(h).
PO 00000
Frm 00053
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
12431
Subpart E issued under 48 U.S.C. 1806.
Subparts F and G issued under 8 U.S.C.
1288(c) and (d); sec. 323(c), Pub. L. 103–206,
107 Stat. 2428; and 28 U.S.C. 2461 note, Pub.
L. 114–74 at section 701.
Subparts H and I issued under 8 U.S.C.
1101(a)(15)(H)(i)(b) and (b)(1), 1182(n) and
(t), and 1184(g) and (j); sec. 303(a)(8), Pub. L.
102–232, 105 Stat. 1733, 1748 (8 U.S.C. 1101
note); sec. 412(e), Pub. L. 105–277, 112 Stat.
2681; 8 CFR 214.2(h); and 28 U.S.C. 2461
note, Pub. L. 114–74 at section 701.
Subparts L and M issued under 8 U.S.C.
1101(a)(15)(H)(i)(c) and 1182(m); sec. 2(d),
Pub. L. 106–95, 113 Stat. 1312, 1316 (8 U.S.C.
1182 note); Pub. L. 109–423, 120 Stat. 2900;
and 8 CFR 214.2(h).
■
2. Add subpart E to read as follows:
Subpart E—Labor Certification
Process for Temporary Employment in
the Commonwealth of the Northern
Marianas Islands (CW–1 Workers)
Sec.
655.400 Scope and purpose of this subpart.
655.401 Authority of the agencies, offices,
and divisions in the Department of
Labor.
655.402 Definition of terms.
655.403 Persons and entities authorized to
file.
655.404 Requirements for agents.
655.405–655.409 [Reserved]
Prefiling Procedures
655.410 Offered wage rate and determination
of prevailing wage.
655.411 Review of prevailing wage
determinations.
655.412–655.419 [Reserved]
CW–1 Application for Temporary
Employment Certification Filing Procedures
655.420 Application filing requirements.
655.421 Job contractor filing requirements.
655.422 Emergency situations.
655.423 Assurances and obligations of
CW–1 employers.
655.424–655.429 [Reserved]
Processing of an CW–1 Application for
Temporary Employment Certification
655.430 Review of applications.
655.431 Notice of Deficiency.
655.432 Submission of modified
applications.
655.433 Notice of Acceptance.
655.434 Amendments to an application.
655.435–655.439 [Reserved]
Post Acceptance Requirements
655.440 Employer-conducted recruitment.
655.441 Job offer assurances and
advertising contents.
655.442 Place advertisement with CNMI
Department of Labor.
655.443 Contact with former U.S. workers.
655.444 Notice of posting requirement.
655.445 Additional employer-conducted
recruitment.
655.446 Recruitment report.
655.447–655.449 [Reserved]
Labor Certification Determinations
655.450 Determinations.
E:\FR\FM\01APR2.SGM
01APR2
12432
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 62 / Monday, April 1, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
655.451 Criteria for temporary labor
certification.
655.452 Approved certification.
655.453 Denied certification.
655.454 Partial certification.
655.455 Validity of temporary labor
certification.
655.456 Document retention requirements
for CW–1 employers.
655.457–655.459 [Reserved]
Post Certification Activities
655.460 Extensions.
655.461 Administrative review.
655.462 Withdrawal of a CW–1 Application
for Temporary Employment
Certification.
655.463 Public disclosure.
655.464–655.469 [Reserved]
Integrity Measures
655.470 Audits.
655.471 Assisted recruitment.
655.472 Revocation.
655.473 Debarment.
655.474–655.499 [Reserved]
§ 655.400
subpart.
Scope and purpose of this
(a) Purpose. (1) A temporary labor
certification (TLC) issued under this
subpart reflects a determination by the
Secretary of Labor (Secretary), pursuant
to 48 U.S.C. 1806(d)(2)(A), that:
(i) There are not sufficient U.S.
workers in the Commonwealth who are
able, willing, and qualified and who
will be available at the time and place
needed to perform the services or labor
for which an employer desires to hire
foreign workers; and
(ii) The employment of the CNMIOnly Transitional Worker visa program
(CW–1) nonimmigrant worker(s) will
not adversely affect the wages and
working conditions of U.S. workers
similarly employed.
(2) This subpart describes the process
by which the Department of Labor
(Department or DOL) makes such a
determination and certifies its
determination to the Department of
Homeland Security (DHS).
(b) Scope. This subpart sets forth the
procedures governing the labor
certification process for the employment
of foreign workers in the CW–1
nonimmigrant classification, as defined
in 48 U.S.C. 1806(d). It also establishes
standards and obligations with respect
to the terms and conditions of the
temporary labor certification (TLC) with
which CW–1 employers must comply,
as well as the rights and obligations of
CW–1 workers and workers in
corresponding employment.
Additionally, this subpart sets forth
integrity measures for ensuring
employers’ continued compliance with
the terms and conditions of the TLC.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:01 Mar 29, 2019
Jkt 247001
§ 655.401 Authority of the agencies,
offices, and divisions in the Department of
Labor.
Attorney means any person who is a
member in good standing of the bar of
the highest court of any State,
The Secretary has delegated authority possession, territory, or commonwealth
to the Assistant Secretary for the
of the United States, or the District of
Columbia. Such a person is also
Employment and Training
permitted to act as an agent under this
Administration (ETA), who in turn has
subpart. No attorney who is under
delegated that authority to the Office of
suspension, debarment, expulsion, or
Foreign Labor Certification (OFLC), to
disbarment from practice before any
issue certifications and carry out other
court, the Department, the Executive
statutory responsibilities as required by
Office for Immigration Review, or DHS
48 U.S.C. 1806. Determinations on a
under 8 CFR 1003.101 or 292.3, may
CW–1 Application for Temporary
represent an employer under this
Employment Certification are made by
subpart.
the OFLC Administrator who, in turn,
Board of Alien Labor Certification
may delegate this responsibility to
Appeals (BALCA or Board) means the
designated staff members, e.g., a
permanent Board established by part
Certifying Officer (CO).
656 of this chapter, chaired by the Chief
§ 655.402 Definition of terms.
Administrative Law Judge (Chief ALJ),
and consisting of ALJs appointed
For purposes of this subpart:
Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) means pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 3105 and
a person within the Department’s Office designated by the Chief ALJ to be
of Administrative Law Judges appointed members of BALCA.
Certifying Officer or CO means the
under 5 U.S.C. 3105.
person
who makes determination on a
Agent means a person or a legal
CW–1 Application for Temporary
entity, such as an association or other
Employment Certification filed under
organization of employers, or an
the CW–1 program. The OFLC
attorney for an association or other
Administrator is the national CO. Other
organization of employers, that:
COs may also be designated by the
(1) Is authorized to act on behalf of
OFLC Administrator to make the
the employer for Temporary Labor
determinations required under this
Certification (TLC) purposes;
(2) Is not itself an employer, or a joint subpart, including making PWDs.
Chief Administrative Law Judge or
employer, as defined in this subpart
Chief ALJ means the chief official of the
with respect to the specific application;
Department’s Office of Administrative
and
Law Judges or the Chief ALJ’s designee.
(3) Is not under suspension,
CNMI Department of Labor means the
debarment, expulsion, disbarment, or
executive Department of the
otherwise restricted from practice before Commonwealth Government that
any court, the Department, the
administers employment and job
Executive Office for Immigration
training activities for employers and
Review or DHS under 8 CFR 292.3 or
U.S. workers in the Commonwealth.
1003.101.
Commonwealth or CNMI means the
Applicant (or U.S. applicant) means a Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana
U.S. worker who is applying for a job
Islands.
opportunity for which an employer has
Corresponding employment means
filed a CW–1 Application for Temporary the employment of U.S. workers who
Employment Certification.
are not CW–1 workers by an employer
Application for Prevailing Wage
who has an approved CW–1 Application
Determination means the Office of
for Temporary Employment
Management and Budget (OMB)Certification in any work included in
approved Form ETA–9141C (or
the approved job offer, or in any work
successor form) and the appropriate
performed by the CW–1 workers. To
appendices, submitted by an employer
qualify as corresponding employment
to secure a prevailing wage
the work must be performed during the
determination (PWD) from the National
validity period of the CW–1 Application
Prevailing Wage Center (NPWC).
for Temporary Employment
CW–1 Application for Temporary
Certification and approved job offer,
Employment Certification means the
including any approved extension
OMB-approved Form ETA–9142C (or
thereof.
CW–1 Petition means the U.S.
successor form) and the appropriate
appendices, a valid wage determination, Citizenship and Immigration Services
(USCIS) Form I–129CW, Petition for a
as required by § 655.410, and all
supporting documentation submitted by CNMI–Only Nonimmigrant Transitional
Worker, a successor form, other form, or
an employer to secure a TLC
electronic equivalent, any supplemental
determination from the OFLC
information requested by USCIS, and
Administrator.
PO 00000
Frm 00054
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\01APR2.SGM
01APR2
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 62 / Monday, April 1, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
additional evidence as may be
prescribed or requested by USCIS.
CW–1 worker means any foreign
worker who is lawfully present in the
Commonwealth and authorized by DHS
to perform temporary labor or services
under 48 U.S.C. 1806(d).
Date of need means the first date the
employer requires services of the CW–
1 workers as indicated on the CW–1
Application for Temporary Employment
Certification.
Department of Homeland Security or
DHS means the Federal Department
having jurisdiction over certain
immigration-related functions, acting
through its component agencies,
including USCIS.
Employee means a person who is
engaged to perform work for an
employer, as defined under the general
common law of agency. Some of the
factors relevant to the determination of
employee status include: The hiring
party’s right to control the manner and
means by which the work is
accomplished; the skill required to
perform the work; the source of the
instrumentalities and tools for
accomplishing the work; the location of
the work; the hiring party’s discretion
over when and how long to work; and
whether the work is part of the regular
business of the hiring party. Other
applicable factors may be considered
and no one factor is dispositive. The
terms employee and worker are used
interchangeably in this subpart.
Employer means a person (including
any individual, partnership, association,
corporation, cooperative, firm, joint
stock company, trust, or other
organization with legal rights and
duties) that:
(1) Has a place of business (physical
location) in the Commonwealth and a
means by which it may be contacted for
employment;
(2) Has an employer relationship
(such as the ability to hire, pay, fire,
supervise or otherwise control the work
of employees) with respect to a CW–1
worker or a worker in corresponding
employment, as defined under the
common law of agency; and
(3) Possesses, for purposes of filing a
CW–1 Application for Temporary
Employment Certification, a valid
Federal Employer Identification Number
(FEIN).
Employer-client means an employer
that has entered into an agreement with
a job contractor and that is not an
affiliate, branch, or subsidiary of the job
contractor, under which the job
contractor provides services or labor to
the employer-client on a temporary
basis and will not exercise substantial,
direct day-to-day supervision and
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:01 Mar 29, 2019
Jkt 247001
control in the performance of the
services or labor to be performed other
than hiring, paying, and firing the
workers.
Employment and Training
Administration or ETA means the
agency within the Department that
includes OFLC and has been delegated
authority by the Secretary to fulfill the
Secretary’s mandate under for the
administration and adjudication of a
CW–1 Application for Temporary
Employment Certification and related
functions.
Federal holiday means a legal public
holiday as defined at 5 U.S.C. 6103.
Full-time means 35 or more hours of
work per week.
Governor means the Governor of the
Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana
Islands.
Job contractor means a person,
association, firm, or a corporation that
meets the definition of an employer and
that contracts services or labor on a
temporary basis to one or more
employers that are not an affiliate,
branch, or subsidiary of the job
contractor and where the job contractor
will not exercise substantial, direct dayto-day supervision and control in the
performance of the services or labor to
be performed other than hiring, paying,
and releasing the workers.
Job offer means the offer made by an
employer or potential employer of CW–
1 workers to both U.S. and CW–1
workers describing all the material
terms and conditions of employment,
including those relating to wages,
working conditions, and other benefits.
Job opportunity means full-time
employment at a place in the
Commonwealth to which U.S. workers
can be referred.
Joint employment means that where
two or more employers each have
sufficient definitional indicia of being a
joint employer of a worker under the
common law of agency, they are, at all
times, joint employers of that worker.
Layoff means any involuntary
separation of one or more U.S.
employees other than for cause.
Long-term worker means an alien who
was admitted to the CNMI as a CW–1
nonimmigrant during fiscal year (FY)
2015, and who was granted CW–1
nonimmigrant status during each of FYs
2016 through 2018, as defined by DHS.
National Prevailing Wage Center or
NPWC means that office within OFLC
from which employers, agents, or
attorneys who wish to file a CW–1
Application for Temporary Employment
Certification receive a PWD.
NPWC Director means the OFLC
official to whom the OFLC
Administrator has delegated authority to
PO 00000
Frm 00055
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
12433
carry out certain NPWC operations and
functions.
National Processing Center (NPC)
means the office within OFLC in which
the COs operate, and which are charged
with the adjudication of CW–1
Applications for Temporary
Employment Certification.
NPC Director means the OFLC official
to whom the OFLC Administrator has
delegated authority for purposes of
certain NPC operations and functions.
Occupational employment statistics
(OES) survey means the program under
the jurisdiction of the Bureau of Labor
Statistics (BLS) that reports annual wage
estimates, including those for Guam,
based on standard occupational
classifications (SOCs).
Offered wage means the wage offered
by an employer in the CW–1
Application for Temporary Employment
Certification and job offer. The offered
wage must equal or exceed the highest
of the prevailing wage, or the Federal
minimum wage, or the Commonwealth
minimum wage.
Office of Foreign Labor Certification
or OFLC means the organizational
component of the ETA that provides
national leadership and policy guidance
and develops regulations to carry out
the Secretary’s responsibilities,
including determinations related to an
employer’s request for an Application
for Prevailing Wage Determination or
CW–1 Application for Temporary
Employment Certification.
Place of employment means the
worksite (or physical location) where
work under the CW–1 Application for
Temporary Employment Certification
and job offer actually is performed by
the CW–1 workers and workers in
corresponding employment.
Prevailing wage (PW) means the
official wage issued by the NPWC on the
Form ETA 9141C, Application for
Prevailing Wage Determination for the
CW–1 Program, or successor form. At
least that amount must be paid to all
CW–1 workers and U.S. workers in
corresponding employment.
Prevailing wage determination (PWD)
means the prevailing wage issued by the
OFLC NPWC on the Form ETA–9141C,
Application for Prevailing Wage
Determination for the CW–1 Program, or
successor form. The PWD is used in
support of the CW–1 Application for
Temporary Employment Certification.
Secretary of Labor or Secretary means
the chief official of the U.S. DOL, or the
Secretary’s designee.
Secretary of Homeland Security
means the chief official of DHS or the
Secretary of Homeland Security’s
designee.
E:\FR\FM\01APR2.SGM
01APR2
12434
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 62 / Monday, April 1, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
Secretary of State means the chief
official of the U.S. Department of State
or the Secretary of State’s designee.
Strike means a concerted stoppage of
work by employees as a result of a labor
dispute, or any concerted slowdown or
other concerted interruption of
operation (including stoppage by reason
of the expiration of a collective
bargaining agreement).
Successor in interest means an
employer, agent, or attorney that is
controlling and carrying on the business
of a previous employer.
(1) Where an employer, agent, or
attorney has violated 48 U.S.C. 1806 or
the regulations in this subpart and has
ceased doing business or cannot be
located for purposes of enforcement, a
successor in interest to that employer,
agent, or attorney may be held liable for
the duties and obligations of the
violating employer in certain
circumstances. The following factors, as
used under Title VII of the Civil Rights
Act and the Vietnam Era Veterans’
Readjustment Assistance Act, may be
considered in determining whether an
employer, agent, or attorney is a
successor in interest; no one factor is
dispositive, and all the circumstances
will be considered as a whole:
(i) Substantial continuity of the same
business operations;
(ii) Use of the same facilities;
(iii) Continuity of the work force;
(iv) Similarity of jobs and working
conditions;
(v) Similarity of supervisory
personnel;
(vi) Whether the former management
or owner retains a direct or indirect
interest in the new enterprise;
(vii) Similarity in machinery,
equipment, and production methods;
(viii) Similarity of products and
services; and
(ix) The ability of the predecessor to
provide relief.
(2) For purposes of debarment only,
the primary consideration will be the
personal involvement of the firm’s
ownership, management, supervisors,
and others associated with the firm in
the violation(s) at issue.
Temporary labor certification or TLC
means the certification made by the
OFLC Administrator, based on the CW–
1 Application for Temporary
Employment Certification, job offer, and
all supporting documentation, with
respect to an employer seeking to file
with DHS a visa petition to employ one
or more foreign nationals as a CW–1
worker.
United States means the continental
United States, Alaska, Hawaii, the
Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, Guam,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:01 Mar 29, 2019
Jkt 247001
the U.S. Virgin Islands, and the
Commonwealth.
United States worker (U.S. worker)
means a worker who is:
(1) A citizen or national of the United
States;
(2) An alien lawfully admitted for
permanent residence; or
(3) A citizen of the Federated States
of Micronesia, the Republic of the
Marshall Islands, or the Republic of
Palau, who is eligible for nonimmigrant
admission and is employmentauthorized under the Compacts of Free
Association between the United States
and those nations.
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration
Services or USCIS means the Federal
agency within DHS that makes the
determination whether to grant petitions
filed by employers seeking CW–1
workers to perform temporary work in
the Commonwealth.
Wages mean all forms of cash
remuneration to a worker by an
employer in payment for labor or
services.
Work contract means the document
containing all the material terms and
conditions of employment relating to
wages, hours, working conditions,
places of employment, and other
benefits, including all assurances and
obligations required to be included
under this subpart. The contract
between the employer and the worker
may be in the form of a separate written
document containing the advertised
terms and conditions of the job offer. In
the absence of a separate, written work
contract incorporating the required
terms and conditions of employment,
agreed to by both the employer and the
worker, the required terms of the
certified CW–1 Application for
Temporary Employment Certification
will be the work contract.
§ 655.403
to file.
Persons and entities authorized
(a) Persons authorized to file. In
addition to the employer, a request for
a PWD or TLC under this subpart may
be filed by an attorney or agent, as
defined in § 655.402.
(b) Employer’s signature required.
Regardless of whether the employer is
represented by an attorney or agent, the
employer is required to sign the CW–1
Application for Temporary Employment
Certification and all documentation
submitted to the Department.
§ 655.404
Requirements for agents.
An agent filing a CW–1 Application
for Temporary Employment
Certification on behalf of an employer
must provide a copy of the agent
agreement or other document
PO 00000
Frm 00056
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
demonstrating the agent’s authority to
represent the employer to the NPC at the
time of filing the application.
§§ 655.405–655.409
[Reserved]
Prefiling Procedures
§ 655.410 Offered wage rate and
determination of prevailing wage.
(a) Offered wage. (1) The employer
must advertise the position to all
potential workers at a wage that is at
least the highest of the following:
(i) The prevailing wage for the job
opportunity obtained from the NPWC;
(ii) The Federal minimum wage; or
(iii) The Commonwealth minimum
wage.
(2) The employer must offer and pay
at least the wage provided in paragraph
(a)(1) of this section to both its CW–1
workers and its workers in
corresponding employment. The
issuance of a PWD under this section
does not permit an employer to pay a
wage lower than the highest wage
required by any applicable Federal or
Commonwealth law.
(b) Determinations—(1) Methods. The
OFLC Administrator will determine
prevailing wages in the Commonwealth
and occupational classification as
follows:
(i) If the mean hourly wage for the
occupational classification in the
Commonwealth is reported by the
Governor, annually, and meets the
requirements set forth in paragraph (e)
of this section, as determined by the
OFLC Administrator, that wage must be
the prevailing wage for the occupational
classification;
(ii) If the OFLC Administrator has not
approved a survey, as reported by the
Governor, for the occupational
classification under paragraph (b)(1)(i)
of this section, and the BLS OES survey
reports a mean wage paid to workers in
the SOC in Guam, the prevailing wage
must be the mean wage paid to workers
in the SOC in Guam from the BLS OES
survey; and
(iii) If the OFLC Administrator has not
approved a survey, as reported by the
Governor, for the occupational
classification under paragraph (b)(1)(i)
of this section and the BLS OES survey
does not report the mean wage paid to
workers in the SOC in Guam under
paragraph (b)(1)(ii) of this section, the
prevailing wage must be the mean wage
paid to workers in the SOC in the
United States from the BLS OES Survey,
adjusted based on the ratio of the mean
wage paid to workers in all SOCs in
Guam compared to the mean wage paid
to workers in all SOCs in the United
States from the BLS OES survey.
E:\FR\FM\01APR2.SGM
01APR2
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 62 / Monday, April 1, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
(2) Multiple occupations. If the job
duties on the Application for Prevailing
Wage Determination do not fall within
a single occupational classification, the
NPC will determine the applicable
prevailing wage based on the highest
prevailing wage for all applicable
occupational classifications.
(c) Request for PWD. (1) Filing
requirement. An employer must
electronically request and receive a
PWD from the NPWC then
electronically file the CW–1 Application
for Temporary Employment
Certification with the NPC.
(2) Location and methods of filing—
(i) Electronic filing. The employer must
file the Application for Prevailing Wage
Determination and all required
supporting documentation with the
NPWC using the electronic method(s)
designated by the OFLC Administrator.
The NPWC will return without review
any application submitted using a
method other than the designated
electronic method(s), unless the
employer submits with the application
a statement of the need to file by mail.
(ii) Filing by mail. Employers that are
unable to file electronically, either due
to lack of internet access or physical
disability precluding electronic filing,
may file the application by mail. The
mailed application must include a
statement indicating the need to file by
mail. The NPWC will return, without
review, mailed applications that do not
contain such a statement. OFLC will
publish the address for mailed
applications in the instructions to Form
ETA–9141C.
(d) NPWC action. The NPWC will
provide the PWD, indicate the source of
the PWD, and return the Application for
Prevailing Wage Determination with its
endorsement to the employer.
(e) Wage survey reported by the
Governor. The OFLC Administrator will
issue a prevailing wage for the
occupational classification in the
Commonwealth based on a wage survey
reported by the Governor if all of the
following requirements are met:
(1) The survey was independently
conducted and issued by the Governor
of the Commonwealth, including
through any Commonwealth agency,
Commonwealth college, or
Commonwealth university;
(2) The survey provides the arithmetic
mean of the wages of workers in the
occupational classification in the
Commonwealth;
(3) The surveyor either made a
reasonable, good faith attempt to contact
all employers in the Commonwealth
employing workers in the occupation or
conducted a randomized sampling of
such employers;
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:01 Mar 29, 2019
Jkt 247001
(4) The survey includes the wages of
at least 30 workers in the
Commonwealth;
(5) The survey includes the wages of
workers in the Commonwealth
employed by at least three employers;
(6) The survey was conducted across
industries that employ workers in the
occupational classification;
(7) The wage reported in the survey
includes all types of pay;
(8) The survey is based on wages paid
to workers in the occupational
classification not more than 12 months
before the date the survey is submitted
to the OFLC Administrator for
consideration; and
(9) The Governor submits the survey
to the OFLC Administrator, with
specific information about the survey
methodology, including such items as
sample size and source, sample
selection procedures, and survey job
descriptions, to allow a determination of
the adequacy of the data provided and
validity of the statistical methodology
used in conducting the survey.
(f) Review of wage survey reported by
the Governor. (1) If the OFLC
Administrator finds the wage reported
for any occupational classification not
to be acceptable, the OFLC
Administrator must inform the
Governor in writing of the reasons the
wage reported in the survey was not
accepted.
(2) The Governor, after receiving
notification from the OFLC
Administrator that the wage reported in
the survey it provided for consideration
is not acceptable, may submit corrected
wage data or conduct a new wage
survey and submit revised wage data to
the OFLC Administrator for
consideration under this section.
(g) Validity period. The NPWC will
specify the validity period of the
prevailing wage, which in no event may
be more than 365 days or fewer than 90
days from the date that the
determination is issued.
(h) Retention of documentation. The
employer must retain the PWD for 3
years from the date of issuance if not
used in support of a TLC application or
if it is used in support of a TLC
application that is denied, and 3 years
from the date on which the certification
of the CW–1 Application for Temporary
Employment Certification expires,
whichever is later. The employer must
submit the PWD to a CO if requested by
a Notice of Deficiency (NOD), described
in § 655.431, or audit, as described in
§ 655.470, or to any Federal Government
Official performing an investigation,
inspection, audit, or law enforcement
function.
PO 00000
Frm 00057
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
12435
§ 655.411 Review of prevailing wage
determinations.
(a) Request for review of PWDs. Any
employer desiring review of a PWD
must make a written request for such
review to the NPWC Director. The
written request must be received by the
NPWC Director within 7 business days
from the date the PWD was issued. The
request for review must clearly identify
the PWD for which review is sought; set
forth the particular grounds for the
request; and include any materials
submitted to the NPWC for purposes of
securing the PWD.
(b) NPWC review. Upon the receipt of
the written request for review, the
NPWC Director will review the
employer’s request and accompanying
documentation, including any
supplementary material submitted by
the employer, and after review must
issue a Final Determination letter; that
letter may:
(1) Affirm the PWD issued by the
NPWC; or
(2) Modify the PWD.
(c) Request for review by BALCA. Any
employer desiring review of the NPWC
Director’s decision on a PWD must
make a written request to BALCA for
review of the determination, with a
copy simultaneously sent to the NPWC
Director who issued the final
determination. The written request must
be received by BALCA within 10
business days from the date the Final
Determination letter was issued.
(1) Upon receipt of a request for
BALCA review, the NPWC will prepare
an Appeal File and submit it to BALCA.
(2) The request for review, statements,
briefs, and other submissions of the
parties must contain only legal
arguments and may refer to only the
evidence that was within the record
upon which the decision on the PWD by
the NPWC Director was based.
(3) BALCA will handle appeals in
accordance with § 655.461.
§ § 655.412
–655.419 [Reserved]
CW–1 Application for Temporary
Employment Certification Filing
Procedures
§ 655.420
Application filing requirements.
An employer seeking to hire CW–1
workers must electronically file a CW–
1 Application for Temporary
Employment Certification with the NPC
designated by the OFLC Administrator.
This section provides the procedures an
employer must follow when filing.
(a) What to file. An employer seeking
a TLC must file a completed CW–1
Application for Temporary Employment
Certification (Form ETA–9142C and the
appropriate appendices and valid PWD),
E:\FR\FM\01APR2.SGM
01APR2
12436
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 62 / Monday, April 1, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
and all supporting documentation and
information required at the time of filing
under this subpart. Applications that are
incomplete at the time of submission
will be returned to the employer
without review.
(b) Timeliness. (1) Except as provided
in paragraph (b)(2) of this section, a
completed CW–1 Application for
Temporary Employment Certification
must be filed no more than 120 calendar
days before the employer’s date of need.
(2) If the employer is seeking a TLC
to extend the employment of a CW–1
worker, a completed CW–1 Application
for Temporary Employment
Certification must be filed no more than
180 calendar days before the date on
which the CW–1 status expires.
(c) Location and methods of filing—
(1) Electronic filing. The employer must
file the CW–1 Application for
Temporary Employment Certification
and all required supporting
documentation with the NPC using the
electronic method(s) designated by the
OFLC Administrator. The NPC will
return, without review, any application
submitted using a method other than the
designated electronic method(s), unless
the employer submits with the
application a statement of the need to
file by mail or indicates that it already
submitted such a statement to NPWC
during the same fiscal year.
(2) Filing by mail. Employers that are
unable to file electronically, either due
to lack of internet access or physical
disability precluding electronic filing,
may file the application by mail. The
mailed application must include a
statement indicating the need to file by
mail as indicated above. The NPC will
return, without review, mailed
applications that do not contain such a
statement. OFLC will publish the
address for mailed applications in the
instructions to Form ETA–9142C.
(d) Original signature and acceptance
of electronic signatures. An
electronically filed CW–1 Application
for Temporary Employment
Certification must contain an electronic
(scanned) copy of the original signature
of the employer (and that of the
employer’s authorized attorney or agent,
if the employer is represented by an
attorney or agent) or, in the alternative,
use a verifiable electronic signature
method, as directed by the OFLC
Administrator. If submitted by mail, the
CW–1 Application for Temporary
Employment Certification must bear the
original signature of the employer and,
if applicable, the employer’s authorized
attorney or agent.
(e) Requests for multiple positions. An
employer may request certification of
more than one position on its CW–1
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:01 Mar 29, 2019
Jkt 247001
Application for Temporary Employment
Certification as long as all CW–1
workers will perform the same services
or labor under the same terms and
conditions, in the same occupation,
during the same period of employment,
and at a location (or locations) covered
by the application.
(f) Scope of application. (1) A CW–1
Application for Temporary Employment
Certification must be limited to places
of employment within the
Commonwealth.
(2) In a single application filing, an
association or other organization of
employers is not permitted to file a CW–
1 Application for Temporary
Employment Certification on behalf of
more than one employer-member under
the CW–1 program.
(g) Period of employment. (1) Except
as provided in paragraph (g)(2) of this
section, the period of need identified in
the CW–1 Application for Temporary
Employment Certification must not
exceed 1 year.
(2) If the employer is seeking TLC to
employ a long-term CW–1 worker, the
period of need identified in the CW–1
Application for Temporary Employment
Certification must not exceed 3 years.
(h) Return of applications based on
USCIS CW–1 cap notice. (1) Except as
provided in paragraph (h)(3) of this
section, if USCIS issues a public notice
stating that it has received a sufficient
number of CW–1 petitions to meet the
statutory numerical limit on the total
number of foreign nationals who may be
issued a CW–1 permit or otherwise
granted CW–1 status for the fiscal year,
the OFLC Administrator must return
without review any CW–1 Applications
for Temporary Employment
Certification with dates of need in that
fiscal year received on or after the date
that the OFLC Administrator provides
the notice in paragraph (h)(2) of this
section.
(2) The OFLC Administrator will
announce the return of future CW–1
Applications for Temporary
Employment Certification with dates of
need in the fiscal year for which the cap
is met with a notice on the OFLC’s
website. This notice will be effective on
the date of its publication on the OFLC’s
website and will remain valid for the
fiscal year unless:
(i) USCIS issues a public notice
stating additional CW–1 permits are
available for the fiscal year; and
(ii) The OFLC Administrator
publishes a new notice announcing that
additional TLCs may be granted in the
fiscal year.
(3) After the notice that OFLC will
return future CW–1 Applications for
Temporary Employment Certification,
PO 00000
Frm 00058
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
the OFLC Administrator will continue
to process CW–1 Applications for
Temporary Employment Certification
filed before the effective date of the
suspension notice and will continue to
permit the filing of CW–1 Applications
for Temporary Employment
Certification by employers who identify
in the CW–1 Application for Temporary
Employment Certification that the
employment of all CW–1 workers
employed under the CW–1 Application
for Temporary Employment
Certification will be exempt from the
statutory numerical limit on the total
number of foreign nationals who may be
issued a CW–1 permit or otherwise
granted CW–1 status.
§ 655.421 Job contractor filing
requirements.
(a) A job contractor may submit a CW–
1 Application for Temporary
Employment Certification on behalf of
itself and that employer-client. By doing
so, the Department deems the job
contractor a joint employer.
(b) A job contractor must have
separate contracts with each different
employer-client. A single contract or
agreement may support only one CW–1
Application for Temporary Employment
Certification for each employer-client
job opportunity in the Commonwealth.
(c) Either the job contractor or its
employer-client may submit an
Application for Prevailing Wage
Determination describing the job
opportunity to the NPWC. However,
each of the joint employers is separately
responsible for ensuring that the wage
offer(s) listed in the CW–1 Application
for Temporary Employment
Certification and related recruitment at
least equals the prevailing wage
obtained from the NPWC, or the Federal
or Commonwealth minimum wage,
whichever is highest, and that all other
wage obligations are met.
(d)(1) A job contractor that is filing as
a joint employer with its employerclient must submit to the NPC a
completed CW–1 Application for
Temporary Employment Certification
that clearly identifies the joint
employers (the job contractor and its
employer-client) and the employment
relationship (including the places of
employment), in accordance with
instructions provided by the OFLC
Administrator. The CW–1 Application
for Temporary Employment
Certification must bear the original
signature of the job contractor and the
employer-client or use a verifiable
electronic signature method, consistent
with the requirements set forth at
§ 655.420(d), and be accompanied by
the contract or agreement establishing
E:\FR\FM\01APR2.SGM
01APR2
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 62 / Monday, April 1, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
the employers’ relationships related to
the workers sought.
(2) By signing the CW–1 Application
for Temporary Employment
Certification, each employer
independently attests to the conditions
of employment required of an employer
participating in the CW–1 program and
assumes full responsibility for the
accuracy of the representations made in
the application and for all of the
responsibilities of an employer in the
CW–1 program.
(e)(1) Either the job contractor or its
employer-client may place the required
advertisements and conduct recruitment
as described in §§ 655.442 through
655.445. Also, either one of the joint
employers may assume responsibility
for interviewing applicants. However,
both of the joint employers must sign
the recruitment report that is submitted
to the NPC meeting the requirement set
forth in § 655.446.
(2) All recruitment conducted by the
joint employers must satisfy the job
offer assurance and advertising content
requirements identified in § 655.441.
Additionally, in order to fully inform
applicants of the job opportunity and
avoid potential confusion inherent in a
job opportunity involving two
employers, joint employer recruitment
must clearly identify both employers
(the job contractor and its employerclient) by name and must clearly
identify the place(s) of employment
where workers will perform labor or
services.
(3)(i) Provided that all of the
employer-clients’ job opportunities are
in the same occupation located in the
Commonwealth and have the same
requirements and terms and conditions
of employment, including dates of
employment, a job contractor may
combine more than one of its joint
employer employer-clients’ job
opportunities in a single advertisement.
Each advertisement must fully inform
potential workers of the job opportunity
available with each employer-client and
otherwise satisfy the job offer
assurances and advertising content
requirements identified in § 655.441.
Such a shared advertisement must
clearly identify the job contractor by
name, the joint employment
relationship, and the number of workers
sought for each job opportunity,
identified by employer-client names and
locations (e.g., five openings with
Employer-Client A (place of
employment location), three openings
with Employer-Client B (place of
employment location)).
(ii) In addition, the advertisement
must contain the following statement:
‘‘Applicants may apply for any or all of
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:01 Mar 29, 2019
Jkt 247001
the jobs listed. When applying, please
identify the job(s) (by company and
work location) you are applying to for
the entire period of employment
specified.’’ If an applicant fails to
identify one or more specific work
location(s), that applicant is presumed
to have applied to all work locations
listed in the advertisement.
(f) If a TLC for the joint employers is
granted, the Final Determination
certifying the CW–1 Application for
Temporary Employment Certification
will be sent to both the job contractor
and employer-client.
§ 655.422
(c) Processing of emergency
applications. The CO will process the
emergency CW–1 Application for
Temporary Employment Certification,
including the Application for Prevailing
Wage Determination for the CW–1
Program, in a manner consistent with
the provisions of this subpart and make
a determination in accordance with
§ 655.450. The CO will notify the
employer, if the application cannot be
processed because, pursuant to
paragraph (a) of this section, the request
for emergency filing was not justified
and/or the filing does not meet the
requirements set forth in this subpart.
Emergency situations.
(a) Waiver of PWD requirement prior
to application filing. The CO may waive
the requirement to obtain a PWD, as
required under § 655.410(c), prior to
filing a CW–1 Application for
Temporary Employment Certification
for employers that have good and
substantial cause, provided that the CO
has sufficient time to thoroughly test the
labor market and to make a final
determination as required by § 655.450.
The requirement to obtain a PWD prior
to filing the CW–1 Application for
Temporary Employment Certification,
under § 655.410(c), is the only provision
of this subpart which will be waived
under these emergency situation
procedures.
(b) Employer requirements. The
employer requesting a waiver of the
requirement to obtain a PWD must
submit to the NPC a completed
Application for Prevailing Wage
Determination, a completed CW–1
Application for Temporary Employment
Certification, and a statement justifying
the waiver request. The employer’s
waiver request must include detailed
information describing the good and
substantial cause that has necessitated
the waiver request. Good and
substantial cause may include, but is
not limited to, the substantial loss of
U.S. workers due to an Act of God, or
similar unforeseeable man-made
catastrophic events (such as a hazardous
materials emergency or governmentcontrolled flooding), unforeseeable
changes in market conditions, pandemic
health issues, or similar conditions that
are wholly outside of the employer’s
control. Issues related to the CW–1 visa
cap are not good and substantial cause
for a waiver of the filing requirements.
Further, a denial of a previously
submitted CW–1 Application for
Temporary Employment Certification or
CW–1 petition with USCIS does not
constitute good and substantial cause
necessitating a waiver under this
section.
PO 00000
12437
Frm 00059
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
§ 655.423 Assurances and obligations of
CW–1 employers.
An employer employing CW–1
workers and/or workers in
corresponding employment under a
CW–1 Application for Temporary
Employment Certification has agreed as
part of the CW–1 Application for
Temporary Employment Certification
that it will abide by the following
conditions with respect to its CW–1
workers and any workers in
corresponding employment:
(a) Rate of pay. (1) The offered wage
in the work contract equals or exceeds
the highest of the prevailing wage,
Federal minimum wage, or
Commonwealth minimum wage. The
employer must pay at least the offered
wage, free and clear, during the entire
period of the CW–1 Application for
Temporary Employment Certification
granted by OFLC.
(2) The offered wage is not based on
commissions, bonuses, or other
incentives, including paying on a piecerate basis, unless the employer
guarantees a wage earned every
workweek that equals or exceeds the
offered wage.
(3) If the employer requires one or
more minimum productivity standards
of workers as a condition of job
retention, the standards must be
specified in the work contract and the
employer must demonstrate that they
are normal and usual for non-CW–1
employers for the same occupation in
the Commonwealth.
(4) An employer that pays on a piecerate basis must demonstrate that the
piece-rate is no less than the normal rate
paid by non-CW–1 employers to
workers performing the same activity in
the Commonwealth. The average hourly
piece-rate earnings must result in an
amount at least equal to the offered
wage. If the worker is paid on a piecerate basis and at the end of the
workweek the piece-rate does not result
in average hourly piece-rate earnings
during the workweek at least equal to
E:\FR\FM\01APR2.SGM
01APR2
12438
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 62 / Monday, April 1, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
the amount the worker would have
earned had the worker been paid at the
offered hourly wage, then the employer
must supplement the worker’s pay at
that time so that the worker’s earnings
are at least as much as the worker would
have earned during the workweek if the
worker had instead been paid at the
offered hourly wage for each hour
worked.
(b) Wages free and clear. The payment
requirements for wages in this section
will be satisfied by the timely payment
of such wages to the worker either in
cash or in negotiable instrument payable
at par. The payment must be made
finally and unconditionally and ‘‘free
and clear.’’ The principles applied in
determining whether deductions are
reasonable and payments are received
free and clear, and the permissibility of
deductions for payments to third
persons are explained in more detail in
29 CFR part 531.
(c) Deductions. The employer must
make all deductions from the worker’s
paycheck required by law. The work
contract must specify all deductions not
required by law that the employer will
make from the worker’s pay; any such
deductions not disclosed in the work
contract are prohibited. The wage
payment requirements of paragraph (b)
of this section are not met where
unauthorized deductions, rebates, or
refunds reduce the wage payment made
to the worker below the minimum
amounts required by the offered wage or
where the worker fails to receive such
amounts free and clear because the
worker ‘‘kick backs’’ directly or
indirectly to the employer or to another
person for the employer’s benefit the
whole or part of the wages delivered to
the worker. Authorized deductions are
limited to: Those required by law, such
as taxes payable by workers that are
required to be withheld by the employer
and amounts due workers which the
employer is required by court order to
pay to another; deductions for the
reasonable cost or fair value of board,
lodging, and facilities furnished; and
deductions of amounts which are
authorized to be paid to third persons
for the worker’s account and benefit
through his or her voluntary assignment
or order or which are authorized by a
collective bargaining agreement with
bona fide representatives of workers
which covers the employer. Deductions
for amounts paid to third persons for the
worker’s account and benefit which are
not so authorized or are contrary to law
or from which the employer, agent, or
recruiter, including any agents or
employees of these entities or any
affiliated person, derives any payment,
rebate, commission, profit, or benefit
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:01 Mar 29, 2019
Jkt 247001
directly or indirectly, may not be made
if they reduce the actual wage paid to
the worker below the offered wage
indicated on the CW–1 Application for
Temporary Employment Certification.
(d) Job opportunity is full time. The
job opportunity is a full-time position,
consistent with § 655.402, and the
employer must use a single workweek
as its standard for computing wages
due. An employee’s workweek must be
a fixed and regularly recurring period of
168 hours—7 consecutive 24-hour
periods. It need not coincide with the
calendar week but may begin on any
day and at any hour of the day.
(e) Job qualifications and
requirements. Each job qualification and
requirement must be listed in the work
contract and must be bona fide and
consistent with the normal and accepted
qualifications and requirements
imposed by non-CW–1 employers in the
same occupation and in the
Commonwealth. The employer’s job
qualifications and requirements
imposed on U.S. workers must not be
less favorable than the qualifications
and requirements that the employer is
imposing or will impose on CW–1
workers. A qualification means a
characteristic that is necessary to the
individual’s ability to perform the job in
question. A requirement means a term
or condition of employment that a
worker is required to accept in order to
obtain the job opportunity. The CO may
require the employer to submit
documentation to substantiate the
appropriateness of any job qualification
and/or requirement.
(f) Three-fourths guarantee—(1) Offer
to worker. The employer must guarantee
to offer the worker employment for a
total number of work hours equal to at
least three-fourths of the workdays of
the total period of employment
specified in the work contract,
beginning with the first workday after
the arrival of the worker at the place of
employment or the advertised
contractual first date of need, whichever
is later, and ending on the expiration
date specified in the work contract or in
its extensions, if any. See the exception
in paragraph (f)(1)(iv) of this section.
(i) For purposes of this paragraph (f),
a workday means the number of hours
in a workday as stated in the work
contract. The employer must offer a
total number of hours to ensure the
provision of sufficient work to reach the
three-fourths guarantee. The work hours
must be offered during the work period
specified in the work contract, or during
any modified work contract period to
which the worker and employer have
mutually agreed and that has been
approved by the CO.
PO 00000
Frm 00060
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
(ii) In the event the worker begins
working later than the start date of need
specified in the application, the
guarantee period begins with the first
workday after the arrival of the worker
at the place of employment and
continues until the last day during
which the work contract and all
extensions thereof are in effect.
(iii) Therefore, if, for example, a work
contract is for a 10-week period, during
which a normal workweek is specified
as 6 days a week, 8 hours per day, the
worker would have to be guaranteed
employment for at least 360 hours (10
weeks × 48 hours/week = 480 hours ×
75 percent = 360). If a Federal holiday
occurred during the 10-week period, the
8 hours would be deducted from the
total hours for the work contract, before
the guarantee is calculated. Continuing
with the above example, the worker
would have to be guaranteed
employment for 354 hours (10 weeks ×
48 hours/week = 480 hours¥8 hours
(Federal holiday) = 472 hours × 75
percent = 354 hours).
(iv) A worker may be offered more
than the specified hours of work on a
single workday. For purposes of meeting
the guarantee, the worker will not be
required to work more than the number
of hours specified in the work contract
for a workday but all hours of work
actually performed may be counted by
the employer in calculating whether the
period of guaranteed employment has
been met. If during the total work
contract period the employer affords the
U.S. or CW–1 worker less employment
than that required under this paragraph
(f)(1)(iv), the employer must pay such
worker the amount the worker would
have earned had the worker, in fact,
worked for the guaranteed number of
days. An employer will not be
considered to have met the work
guarantee if the employer has merely
offered work on three-fourths of the
workdays of the work contract period if
each workday did not consist of a full
number of hours of work time as
specified in the work contract.
(2) Guarantee for piece-rate paid
worker. If the worker is paid on a piecerate basis, the employer must use the
worker’s average hourly piece-rate
earnings or the offered wage, whichever
is higher, to calculate the amount due
under the guarantee in accordance with
paragraph (f)(1) of this section.
(3) Failure to work. Any hours the
worker fails to work, up to a maximum
of the number of hours specified in the
work contract for a workday, when the
worker has been offered an opportunity
to work in accordance with paragraph
(f)(1) of this section, and all hours of
work actually performed (including
E:\FR\FM\01APR2.SGM
01APR2
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 62 / Monday, April 1, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
voluntary work over 8 hours in a
workday), may be counted by the
employer in calculating whether the
period of guaranteed employment has
been met. An employer seeking to
calculate whether the guaranteed
number of hours has been met must
maintain the payroll records in
accordance with this subpart.
(g) Impossibility of fulfillment. If
before the expiration date specified in
the work contract, the services of the
worker are no longer required for
reasons beyond the control of the
employer due to fire, weather, or other
Act of God, or similar unforeseeable
man-made catastrophic event (such as
an oil spill or controlled flooding) that
is wholly outside the employer’s control
that makes the fulfillment of the work
contract impossible, the employer may
terminate the work contract with the
approval of the CO. In the event of such
termination, the employer must fulfill a
three-fourths guarantee, as described in
paragraph (f) of this section, for the time
that has elapsed from the start date
listed in the work contract or the first
workday after the arrival of the worker
at the place of employment, whichever
is later, to the time of its termination.
The employer must make efforts to
transfer the CW–1 worker or worker in
corresponding employment to other
comparable employment acceptable to
the worker and consistent with
immigration laws, as applicable. If a
transfer is not affected, the employer
must return the worker, at the
employer’s expense, to the place from
which the worker (disregarding
intervening employment) came to work
for the employer, or transport the
worker to the worker’s next certified
CW–1 employer, whichever the worker
prefers.
(h) Frequency of pay. The employer
must state in the work contract the
frequency with which the worker will
be paid, which must be at least every 2
weeks. Employers must pay wages when
due.
(i) Earnings statements. (1) The
employer must keep accurate and
adequate records with respect to the
workers’ earnings, including but not
limited to: Records showing the nature,
amount, and location(s) of the work
performed; the number of hours of work
offered each day by the employer
(broken out by hours offered both in
accordance with and over and above the
three-fourths guarantee in paragraph (f)
of this section); the hours actually
worked each day by the worker; if the
number of hours worked by the worker
is less than the number of hours offered,
the reason(s) the worker did not work;
the time the worker began and ended
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:01 Mar 29, 2019
Jkt 247001
each workday; the rate of pay (both
piece-rate and hourly, if applicable); the
worker’s earnings per pay period; the
worker’s home address; and the amount
of and reasons for any and all
deductions taken from or additions
made to the worker’s wages.
(2) The employer must furnish to the
worker on or before each payday in one
or more written statements the
following information:
(i) The worker’s total earnings for
each workweek in the pay period;
(ii) The worker’s hourly rate or piecerate of pay;
(iii) For each workweek in the pay
period the hours of employment offered
to the worker (showing offers in
accordance with the three-fourths
guarantee as determined in paragraph (f)
of this section, separate from any hours
offered over and above the guarantee);
(iv) For each workweek in the pay
period the hours actually worked by the
worker;
(v) An itemization of all deductions
made from or additions made to the
worker’s wages;
(vi) If piece-rates are used, the units
produced daily;
(vii) The beginning and ending dates
of the pay period; and
(viii) The employer’s name, address,
and FEIN.
(j) Transportation and visa fees—(1)(i)
Transportation to the place of
employment. The employer must
provide or reimburse the worker for
transportation and subsistence from the
place from which the worker has come
to work for the employer, whether in the
United States, including another part of
the Commonwealth, or abroad, to the
place of employment if the worker
completes 50 percent of the period of
employment covered by the work
contract (not counting any extensions).
The employer may arrange and pay for
the transportation and subsistence
directly, advance at a minimum the
most economical and reasonable
common carrier cost of the
transportation and subsistence to the
worker before the worker’s departure, or
pay the worker for the reasonable costs
incurred by the worker. When it is the
prevailing practice of non-CW–1
employers in the occupation and in the
Commonwealth to do so or when the
employer extends such benefits to
similarly situated CW–1 workers, the
employer must advance the required
transportation and subsistence costs (or
otherwise provide them) to workers in
corresponding employment who are
traveling to the employer’s place of
employment from such a distance that
the worker is not reasonably able to
return to their residence each day. The
PO 00000
Frm 00061
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
12439
amount of the transportation payment
must be no less (and is not required to
be more) than the most economical and
reasonable common carrier
transportation charges for the distances
involved. The amount of the daily
subsistence must be at least the amount
permitted in § 655.173. Where the
employer will reimburse the reasonable
costs incurred by the worker, it must
keep accurate and adequate records of:
The costs of transportation and
subsistence incurred by the worker; the
amount reimbursed; and the date(s) of
reimbursement. Note that the Fair Labor
Standards Act applies independently of
the CW–1 requirements and imposes
obligations on employers regarding
payment of wages.
(ii) Transportation from the place of
employment. If the worker completes
the period of employment covered by
the work contract (not counting any
extensions), or if the worker is
dismissed from employment for any
reason by the employer before the end
of the period, and the worker has no
immediate subsequent CW–1
employment, the employer must
provide or pay at the time of departure
for the worker’s cost of return
transportation and daily subsistence
from the place of employment to the
place from which the worker,
disregarding intervening employment,
departed to work for the employer. If the
worker has contracted with a
subsequent employer that has not
agreed in the work contract to provide
or pay for the worker’s transportation
from the former employer’s place of
employment to such subsequent
employer’s place of employment, the
former employer must provide or pay
for that transportation and subsistence.
If the worker has contracted with a
subsequent employer that has agreed in
the work contract to provide or pay for
the worker’s transportation from the
former employer’s place of employment
to such subsequent employer’s place of
employment, the subsequent employer
must provide or pay for such expenses.
(iii) Employer-provided
transportation. All employer-provided
transportation must comply with all
applicable Federal and Commonwealth
laws and regulations including, but not
limited to, vehicle safety standards,
driver licensure requirements, and
vehicle insurance coverage.
(2) The employer must pay or
reimburse the worker in the first
workweek for all visa, visa processing,
border crossing, and other related fees
(including those mandated by the
government) incurred by the CW–1
worker, but not for passport expenses or
E:\FR\FM\01APR2.SGM
01APR2
12440
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 62 / Monday, April 1, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
other charges primarily for the benefit of
the worker.
(k) Employer-provided items. The
employer must provide to the worker,
without charge or deposit charge, all
tools, supplies, and equipment required
to perform the duties assigned.
(l) Disclosure of work contract. The
employer must provide to a CW–1
worker outside of the United States no
later than the time at which the worker
applies for the visa, or to a worker in
corresponding employment no later
than on the day work commences, a
copy of the work contract including any
subsequent approved modifications. For
a CW–1 worker changing employment
from a CW–1 employer to a subsequent
CW–1 employer, the copy must be
provided no later than the time an offer
of employment is made by the
subsequent CW–1 employer. The
disclosure of all documents required by
this paragraph (l) must be provided in
a language understood by the worker. At
a minimum, the work contract must
contain all of the provisions required to
be included by this section. In the
absence of a separate, written work
contract entered into between the
employer and the worker, the required
terms of the certified CW–1 Application
for Temporary Employment
Certification will be the work contract.
(m) No unfair treatment. The
employer has not and will not
intimidate, threaten, restrain, coerce,
blacklist, discharge, or in any manner
discriminate against, and has not and
will not cause any person to intimidate,
threaten, restrain, coerce, blacklist,
discharge, or in any manner
discriminate against, any person who
has, related to the CW–1 program:
(1) Filed a complaint under or related
to any applicable Federal or
Commonwealth laws and regulations;
(2) Instituted or caused to be
instituted any proceeding under or
related to any applicable Federal or
Commonwealth laws and regulations;
(3) Testified or is about to testify in
any proceeding under or related to any
applicable Federal or Commonwealth
laws and regulations;
(4) Consulted with a workers’ center,
community organization, labor union,
legal assistance program, or an attorney
on matters related to any applicable
Federal or Commonwealth laws and
regulations; or
(5) Exercised or asserted on behalf of
himself/herself or others any right or
protection afforded by any applicable
Federal or Commonwealth laws and
regulations.
(n) Comply with the prohibitions
against employees paying fees. The
employer and its attorney, agents, or
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:01 Mar 29, 2019
Jkt 247001
employees have not sought or received
payment of any kind from the worker
for any activity related to obtaining CW–
1 labor certification or employment,
including payment of the employer’s
attorney or agent fees, application and
CW–1 Petition fees, recruitment costs, or
any fees attributed to obtaining the
approved CW–1 Application for
Temporary Employment Certification.
For purposes of this paragraph (n),
payment includes, but is not limited to,
monetary payments, wage concessions
(including deductions from wages,
salary, or benefits), kickbacks, bribes,
tributes, in-kind payments, and free
labor. All wages must be paid free and
clear. This paragraph (n) does not
prohibit employers or their agents from
receiving reimbursement for costs that
are the responsibility and primarily for
the benefit of the worker, such as
government-required passport fees.
(o) Contracts with third parties to
comply with prohibitions. The employer
must contractually prohibit in writing
any agent or recruiter (or any agent or
employee of such agent or recruiter)
whom the employer engages, either
directly or indirectly, in recruitment of
CW–1 workers to seek or receive
payments or other compensation from
prospective workers. The contract must
include the following statement: ‘‘Under
this agreement, [name of agent,
recruiter] and any agent of or employee
of [name of agent or recruiter] are
prohibited from seeking or receiving
payments from any prospective
employee of [employer name] at any
time, including before or after the
worker obtains employment. Payments
include but are not limited to, any direct
or indirect fees paid by such employees
for recruitment, job placement,
processing, maintenance, attorneys’
fees, agent fees, application fees, or
petition fees.’’
(p) Prohibition against preferential
treatment of foreign workers. The
employer’s job offer must offer to U.S.
workers no less than the same benefits,
wages, and working conditions that the
employer is offering, intends to offer, or
will provide to CW–1 workers. Job offers
may not impose on U.S. workers any
restrictions or obligations that will not
be imposed on the employer’s CW–1
workers. This does not relieve the
employer from providing to CW–1
workers at least the minimum benefits,
wages, and working conditions which
must be offered to U.S. workers
consistent with this section.
(q) Nondiscriminatory hiring
practices. The job opportunity is open
to any qualified U.S. worker as defined
in § 655.402, regardless of race, color,
national origin, age, sex, religion,
PO 00000
Frm 00062
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
disability, or citizenship. Rejections of
any U.S. workers who applied or apply
for the job must only be for lawful, jobrelated reasons, and those not rejected
on this basis have been or will be hired.
In addition, the employer has and will
continue to retain records of all hired
workers and rejected applicants as
required by § 655.456.
(r) Recruitment requirements. The
employer must conduct all required
recruitment activities, including any
additional employer-conducted
recruitment activities as directed by the
CO, and as specified in §§ 655.442
through 655.445.
(s) No strike or lockout. There is no
strike or lockout at any of the
employer’s place(s) of employment
within the Commonwealth for which
the employer is requesting CW–1
certification at the time the CW–1
Application for Temporary Employment
Certification is filed.
(t) No recent or future layoffs. The
employer has not laid off and will not
lay off any similarly employed U.S.
worker in the occupation that is the
subject of the CW–1 Application for
Temporary Employment Certification in
the Commonwealth within the period
beginning 270 calendar days before the
date of need and through the end of the
TLC’s period of certification. A layoff
for lawful, job-related reasons such as
lack of work or the end of a season is
permissible if all CW–1 workers are laid
off before any U.S. worker in
corresponding employment.
(u) No work performed outside the
Commonwealth and job opportunity.
The employer must not place any CW–
1 workers employed under the approved
CW–1 Application for Temporary
Employment Certification outside the
Commonwealth or in a job opportunity
not listed on the approved CW–1
Application for Temporary Employment
Certification.
(v) Abandonment/termination of
employment. Upon the separation from
employment of any worker employed
under the CW–1 Application for
Temporary Employment Certification or
workers in corresponding employment,
if such separation occurs before the end
date of the employment period specified
in the CW–1 Application for Temporary
Employment Certification, the employer
must notify OFLC in writing of the
separation from employment not later
than 2 working days after such
separation is discovered by the
employer. An abandonment or
abscondment is deemed to begin after a
worker fails to report for work at the
regularly scheduled time for 5
consecutive working days without the
consent of the employer. If the
E:\FR\FM\01APR2.SGM
01APR2
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 62 / Monday, April 1, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
separation is due to the voluntary
abandonment of employment by the
CW–1 worker or worker in
corresponding employment or is
terminated for cause, and the employer
provides appropriate notification
specified under this paragraph (v), the
employer will not be responsible for
providing or paying for the subsequent
transportation and subsistence costs of
that worker under this section, and that
worker is not entitled to the threefourths guarantee described in
paragraph (f) of this section.
(w) Compliance with applicable laws.
During the period of employment
specified on the CW–1 Application for
Temporary Employment Certification,
the employer must comply with all
applicable Federal and Commonwealth
employment-related laws and
regulations, including health and safety
laws. This includes compliance with 18
U.S.C. 1592(a), with respect to
prohibitions against employers, the
employer’s agents, or their attorneys
knowingly holding, destroying or
confiscating workers’ passports, visas,
or other immigration documents.
§§ 655.424–655.429
[Reserved]
Processing of an CW–1 Application for
Temporary Employment Certification
§ 655.430
Review of applications.
(a) NPC review. The CO will review
the CW–1 Application for Temporary
Employment Certification for
compliance with all applicable program
requirements, including compliance
with the requirements set forth in this
subpart, and make a decision as to
whether to issue a NOD under § 655.431
or a Notice of Acceptance (NOA) under
§ 655.433.
(b) Mailing and postmark
requirements. Any notice or request sent
by the CO to an employer requiring a
response will be sent electronically or
via first class mail using the address,
including electronic mail address,
provided on the CW–1 Application for
Temporary Employment Certification.
The employer’s response to such a
notice or request must be filed
electronically or via first class mail. The
employer’s response must be filed
electronically or postmarked by the date
due or the next business day if the due
date falls on a Saturday, Sunday, or
Federal Holiday.
(c) Information dissemination. OFLC
may forward, to DHS or any other
Federal Government Official performing
an investigation, inspection, audit, or
law enforcement function, information
OFLC receives in the course of
processing a request for a CW–1
Application for Temporary Employment
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:01 Mar 29, 2019
Jkt 247001
Certification or of administering
program integrity measures such as
audits.
§ 655.431
Notice of Deficiency.
(a) Notification. If the CO determines
the CW–1 Application for Temporary
Employment Certification contains
errors or inaccuracies, or does not meet
the requirements set forth in this
subpart, the CO will issue a NOD to the
employer and, if applicable, the
employer’s attorney or agent.
(b) Notice content. The NOD will:
(1) State the reason(s) the CW–1
Application for Temporary Employment
Certification fails to meet the criteria for
acceptance;
(2) Offer the employer an opportunity
to submit a modified CW–1 Application
for Temporary Employment
Certification within 10 business days
from the date of the NOD, and state the
modification that is required for the CO
to issue a NOA; and
(3) State that if the employer does not
comply with the requirements of
§ 655.432 for submitting a modified
application, the CO will deny the CW–
1 Application for Temporary
Employment Certification.
§ 655.432 Submission of modified
applications.
(a) Review of a modified CW–1
Application for Temporary Employment
Certification. Upon receipt of a response
to a NOD, including any modifications,
the CO will review the response. The
CO may issue one or more additional
NODs before issuing a decision. The
employer’s failure to comply with a
NOD, including not responding in a
timely manner or not providing all
required documentation, will result in a
denial of the CW–1 Application for
Temporary Employment Certification.
(b) Acceptance of a modified CW–1
Application for Temporary Employment
Certification. If the CO accepts the
modification(s) to the CW–1 Application
for Temporary Employment
Certification, the CO will issue a NOA
to the employer and, if applicable, the
employer’s attorney or agent.
(c) Denial of modified CW–1
Application for Temporary Employment
Certification. If the modified CW–1
Application for Temporary Employment
Certification does not cure the
deficiencies cited in the NOD(s) or
otherwise fails to satisfy the criteria
required for certification, the CO will, at
its discretion, either send a second NOD
or deny the CW–1 Application for
Temporary Employment Certification in
accordance with the labor certification
determination provisions in § 655.453.
(d) Appeal from denial of modified
CW–1 Application for Temporary
PO 00000
Frm 00063
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
12441
Employment Certification. The
procedures for appealing a denial of a
modified CW–1 Application for
Temporary Employment Certification
are the same as for appealing the denial
of a nonmodified CW–1 Application for
Temporary Employment Certification,
outlined in § 655.461.
(e) Post acceptance modifications.
Notwithstanding the decision to accept
the CW–1 Application for Temporary
Employment Certification, the CO may
require modifications to the CW–1
Application for Temporary Employment
Certification at any time before the final
determination to grant or deny the CW–
1 Application for Temporary
Employment Certification if the CO
determines that the job offer does not
contain the minimum benefits, wages,
and working conditions set forth in
§ 655.441. The employer must make
such modifications, or the application
will be denied under § 655.453. The
employer must provide all workers
recruited in connection with the job
opportunity in the CW–1 Application
for Temporary Employment
Certification with a copy of the
modified CW–1 Application for
Temporary Employment Certification,
as approved by the CO, no later than the
date work commences.
§ 655.433
Notice of Acceptance.
(a) Notification. When the CO
determines the CW–1 Application for
Temporary Employment Certification
contains no errors or inaccuracies, and
meets the requirements set forth in this
subpart, the CO will issue a NOA to the
employer and, if applicable, the
employer’s attorney or agent.
(b) Notice content. The NOA must:
(1) Direct the employer to engage in
recruitment of U.S. workers as provided
in §§ 655.442 through 655.444,
including any additional recruitment
ordered by the CO under § 655.445;
(2) State that such employerconducted recruitment must begin
within 14 calendar days from the date
the NOA is issued, consistent with
§ 655.440(b);
(3) Require the employer to submit a
report of its recruitment efforts, by the
date required by the CO in the NOA, as
specified in § 655.446; and
(4) Advise the employer that failure to
submit a complete recruitment report by
the deadline will lead to denial of the
application.
§ 655.434
Amendments to an application.
(a) Increases in number of workers.
The CW–1 Application for Temporary
Employment Certification may be
amended at any time before the CO’s
certification determination to increase
E:\FR\FM\01APR2.SGM
01APR2
12442
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 62 / Monday, April 1, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
the number of workers requested in the
initial CW–1 Application for Temporary
Employment Certification by not more
than 20 percent (50 percent for
employers requesting less than 10
workers) without requiring an
additional recruitment period for U.S.
workers. Requests for increases above
the percent prescribed, without
additional recruitment, may be
approved by the CO only when the
employer demonstrates that the need for
additional workers could not have been
foreseen and is wholly outside of the
employer’s control. All requests to
increase the number of workers must be
made in writing and will not be
effective until approved by the CO.
Upon acceptance of an amendment, the
employer must promptly provide copies
of any approved amendments to all U.S.
workers recruited and hired under the
original job offer.
(b) Minor changes to the period of
employment. The CW–1 Application for
Temporary Employment Certification
may be amended at any time before the
CO’s certification determination to make
minor changes (meaning a change of up
to 14 calendar days) in the total period
of employment, without requiring an
additional recruitment period for U.S.
workers. Changes will not be effective
until submitted in writing and approved
by the CO. In considering whether to
approve the request, the CO will review
the reason(s) for the request, determine
whether the reason(s) are on the whole
justified, and take into account the
effect any change(s) would have on the
adequacy of the underlying test of the
domestic labor market for the job
opportunity. An employer must
demonstrate that the change to the
period of employment could not have
been foreseen and is wholly outside of
the employer’s control. The CO will
deny any request to change the period
of employment where the total amended
period of employment will exceed the
maximum applicable duration
permitted under § 655.420(g). Upon
acceptance of an amendment, the
employer must promptly provide copies
of any approved amendments to all U.S.
workers recruited and hired under the
original job offer.
(c) Other minor amendments to the
CW–1 Application for Temporary
Employment Certification. The
employer may request other minor
amendments to the CW–1 Application
for Temporary Employment
Certification at any time before the CO’s
certification determination is issued. In
considering whether to approve the
request, the CO will determine whether
the proposed amendment(s) are
sufficiently justified and must take into
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:01 Mar 29, 2019
Jkt 247001
account the effect of the changes on the
underlying labor market test for the job
opportunity. All requests for minor
changes must be made in writing and
will not be effective until approved by
the CO. Upon acceptance of an
amendment, the employer must
promptly provide copies of any
approved amendments to all U.S.
workers recruited and hired under the
original job offer.
(d) Amendments after certification are
not permitted. After the CO has made a
determination to certify the CW–1
Application for Temporary Employment
Certification, the employer may no
longer request amendments.
§§ 655.435–655.439
[Reserved]
Post Acceptance Requirements
§ 655.440 Employer-conducted
recruitment.
(a) Employer obligations. Employers
must conduct recruitment of U.S.
workers to ensure that there are not
qualified U.S. workers who will be
available for the positions listed in the
CW–1 Application for Temporary
Employment Certification.
(b) Period to begin employerconducted recruitment. Unless
otherwise instructed by the CO, the
employer must begin the recruitment
required in §§ 655.442 through 655.445
within 14 calendar days from the date
the NOA is issued. All employerconducted recruitment must be
completed before the employer submits
the recruitment report as required in
§ 655.446.
(c) Interviewing U.S. workers.
Employers that wish to require
interviews must conduct those
interviews by phone or provide a
procedure for the interviews to be
conducted in the location where the
worker is being recruited so that the
worker incurs little or no cost.
Employers cannot provide potential
CW–1 workers with more favorable
treatment with respect to the
requirement for, and conduct of,
interviews.
(d) Qualified and available U.S.
workers. The employer must consider
all U.S. applicants for the job
opportunity and must hire all U.S.
applicants who are qualified and who
will be available for the job opportunity.
U.S. applicants may be rejected only for
lawful, job-related reasons, and those
not rejected on this basis will be hired.
(e) Recruitment report. The employer
must prepare a recruitment report
meeting the requirements of § 655.446,
by the date specified by the CO in the
NOA.
PO 00000
Frm 00064
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
§ 655.441 Job offer assurances and
advertising contents.
(a) General. All recruitment
conducted under §§ 655.442 through
655.445 in connection with an CW–1
Application for Temporary Employment
Certification must contain terms and
conditions of employment that are not
less favorable than those offered to the
CW–1 workers and must comply with
the assurances applicable to job offers as
set forth in § 655.423.
(b) Contents. All advertising must
contain the following information:
(1) The employer’s name and contact
information;
(2) A statement that the job
opportunity is a temporary, full-time
position and identify the job title and
total number of job openings the
employer intends to fill;
(3) A description of the job
opportunity with sufficient information
to apprise applicants of the services or
labor to be performed, including the job
duties, the minimum education and
experience requirements, the work
hours and days, and the anticipated
start and end dates of the job
opportunity;
(4) The place(s) of employment with
enough specificity to apprise applicants
of any travel requirements and where
applicants will likely have to reside to
perform the services or labor;
(5) The wage that the employer is
offering, intends to offer or will provide
to the CW–1 workers or, in the event
that there are multiple wage offers, the
range of applicable wage offers, each of
which must equal or exceed the highest
of the prevailing wage or the Federal or
Commonwealth minimum wage;
(6) If applicable, a statement that
overtime will be available to the worker
and specify the wage offer(s) for
working any overtime hours;
(7) The frequency with which the
worker will be paid as required by
§ 655.423(h);
(8) A statement that the employer will
make all deductions from the worker’s
paycheck required by law, and must
specify any deductions the employer
intends to make from the worker’s
paycheck which are not required by
law, including, if applicable, any
deductions for the reasonable cost of
board, lodging, or other facilities;
(9) A statement summarizing the
three-fourths guarantee as required by
§ 655.423(f);
(10) A statement that transportation
and subsistence will be provided to the
worker while traveling from the
worker’s origin to the place of
employment as will the return
transportation and subsistence at the
E:\FR\FM\01APR2.SGM
01APR2
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 62 / Monday, April 1, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
conclusion of the job opportunity, as
required by § 655.423(j)(1);
(11) If applicable, a statement that
daily transportation to and from the
place(s) of employment will be provided
by the employer;
(12) If applicable, a statement that the
employer will provide to the worker,
without charge or deposit charge, all
tools, supplies, and equipment required
to perform the duties assigned, in
accordance with § 655.423(k);
(13) If applicable, any board, lodging,
or other facilities the employer will offer
to workers or intends to assist workers
in securing;
(14) If applicable, a statement
indicating that on-the-job training will
be provided to the worker; and
(15) A statement that directs
applicants to apply for the job
opportunity directly with the employer,
and that indicates at least two verifiable
methods by which applicants may apply
for the job opportunity, one of which
must be via electronic means, and that
provides the days and hours during
which applicants may be interviewed
for the job opportunity.
§ 655.442 Place advertisement with CNMI
Department of Labor.
(a) The employer must place an
advertisement with the CNMI
Department of Labor for a period of 21
consecutive calendar days satisfying the
requirements set forth in § 655.441.
(b) Documentation of this step must
include:
(1) Either printouts of web pages in
which the advertisement appeared on
the CNMI Department of Labor job
listing system, or other verifiable
evidence from the CNMI Department of
Labor containing the text of the
advertisement; and
(2) The dates of publication
demonstrating compliance with the
requirement of this section.
§ 655.443
workers.
Contact with former U.S.
The employer must contact (by mail
or other effective means) its former U.S.
workers, including those who have been
laid off within 270 calendar days before
the date of need, employed by the
employer in the occupation at the
place(s) of employment during the
previous year (except those who were
dismissed for cause or who abandoned
the place(s) of employment), provide a
copy of the CW–1 Application for
Temporary Employment Certification,
and solicit their return to the job. This
contact must occur during the period of
time that the job offer is being
advertised on the CNMI Department of
Labor’s job listing system under
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:01 Mar 29, 2019
Jkt 247001
§ 655.442. The employer must retain
documentation sufficient to prove such
contact in accordance with § 655.456.
An employer has no obligation to
contact U.S. workers it terminated for
cause or who abandoned employment at
any time during the previous year, if the
employer provided timely notice to the
NPC of the termination or abandonment
in the manner described in § 655.423(v).
§ 655.444
Notice of posting requirement.
The employer must post a copy of the
CW–1 Application for Temporary
Employment Certification in at least two
conspicuous locations at the place(s) of
employment or in some other manner
that provides reasonable notification to
all employees in the job classification
and area in which the work will be
performed by the CW–1 workers.
Electronic posting, such as displaying
an electronic copy of the CW–1
Application for Temporary Employment
Certification prominently on any
internal or external website that is
maintained by the employer and
customarily used for notices to
employees about terms and conditions
of employment, is sufficient to meet this
posting requirement as long as it
otherwise meets the requirements of this
section. The notice must be posted for
a period of 21 consecutive calendar
days. The employer must maintain
proof the CW–1 Application for
Temporary Employment Certification
was posted and identify where and
during what period of time it was
posted in accordance with § 655.456.
§ 655.445 Additional employer-conducted
recruitment.
(a) Requirement to conduct additional
recruitment. The employer may be
instructed by the CO to conduct
additional reasonable recruitment. Such
recruitment may be required at the
discretion of the CO where the CO has
determined that there is a likelihood
that U.S. workers who are qualified will
be available for the work.
(b) Nature of the additional employerconducted recruitment. The CO will
describe the precise number and nature
of the additional recruitment efforts.
Additional recruitment may include,
but is not limited to, advertising the job
offer on the employer’s website or
another electronic job search website;
advertising with community-based
organizations, local unions, or trade
unions; or other advertising using a
professional, trade, or other publication
where such a publication is appropriate
for the workers likely to apply for the
job opportunity. When assessing the
appropriateness of a particular
recruitment method, the CO will
PO 00000
Frm 00065
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
12443
consider the cost of the additional
recruitment and the likelihood that the
additional recruitment method(s) will
identify qualified and available U.S.
workers.
(c) Proof of the additional employerconducted recruitment. The CO will
specify the documentation or other
supporting evidence that must be
retained by the employer as proof that
the additional recruitment requirements
were met. Documentation must be
retained as required in § 655.456.
§ 655.446
Recruitment report.
(a) Requirements of the recruitment
report. No fewer than 2 calendar days
after the last date on which the last
advertisement appeared, as required by
the NOA issued under § 655.433, the
employer must prepare, sign, and date
a recruitment report. Where recruitment
was conducted by a job contractor or its
employer-client, both joint employers
must sign the recruitment report in
accordance with § 655.421(e)(1). The
recruitment report must be submitted to
the NPC, by the date specified in the
NOA, and contain the following
information:
(1) The name of each recruitment
activity or source;
(2) The name and contact information
of each U.S. worker who applied or was
referred to the job opportunity up to the
date of the preparation of the
recruitment report, and the disposition
of each worker’s application. The
employer must clearly indicate whether
the job opportunity was offered to the
U.S. worker and whether the U.S.
worker accepted or declined;
(3) Confirmation that the
advertisement was posted on the CNMI
Department of Labor’s job listing system
and the dates of advertising;
(4) Confirmation that former U.S.
employees were contacted, if applicable,
and by what means and the date(s) of
contact;
(5) Confirmation the employer posted
the availability of the job opportunity to
all employees in the job classification
and area in which the work will be
performed by the CW–1 workers and the
dates of advertising;
(6) If applicable, confirmation that
additional recruitment was conducted
as directed by the CO and the date(s) of
advertising; and
(7) If applicable, for each U.S. worker
who applied for the position but was
not hired, the lawful job-related
reason(s) for not hiring the U.S. worker.
(b) Duty to update and retain the
recruitment report. The employer must
update the recruitment report
throughout the recruitment period. In a
joint employment situation, either the
E:\FR\FM\01APR2.SGM
01APR2
12444
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 62 / Monday, April 1, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
job contractor or the employer-client
may update the recruitment report
throughout the recruitment period. The
employer must retain the recruitment
report as required in § 655.456.
§§ 655.447–655.449
[Reserved]
Labor Certification Determinations
§ 655.450
Determinations.
Except as otherwise noted in this
section, the OFLC Administrator and
CO(s), by virtue of delegation from the
OFLC Administrator, have the authority
to certify or deny CW–1 Applications for
Temporary Employment Certification.
The CO will certify the application only
if the employer has met all the
requirements of this subpart, including
the criteria for certification in § 655.451,
thus demonstrating that there is an
insufficient number of U.S. workers in
the Commonwealth who are able,
willing, qualified and who will be
available at the time and place of the job
opportunity for which certification is
sought and that the employment of the
CW–1 workers will not adversely affect
the wages and working conditions of
similarly employed U.S. workers.
§ 655.451 Criteria for temporary labor
certification.
(a) The criteria for TLC include
whether the employer has complied
with all of the requirements of this
subpart, which are required to grant the
labor certification.
(b) In determining whether there are
insufficient U.S. workers in the
Commonwealth to fill the employer’s
job opportunity, the CO will count as
available any U.S. worker who applied
(or on whose behalf an application is
made) directly to the employer, but who
was rejected by the employer for other
than a lawful job-related reason. In
making this determination, the CO will
also consider the employer’s contacts
with its former U.S. workers, including
workers that have been laid off within
270 calendar days before the date of
need.
§ 655.452
Approved certification.
If the TLC is granted, the CO will send
a Final Determination notice and a copy
of the certified CW–1 Application for
Temporary Employment Certification to
the employer and a copy, if applicable,
to the employer’s agent or attorney
using an electronic method(s)
designated by the OFLC Administrator.
For employers permitted to file by mail
as set forth in § 655.420(c), the CO will
send the Final Determination notice and
a copy of the certified CW–1
Application for Temporary Employment
Certification by first class mail. The CO
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:01 Mar 29, 2019
Jkt 247001
will send the certified CW–1
Application for Temporary Employment
Certification, including approved
modifications, on behalf of the
employer, directly to USCIS using an
electronic method(s) designated by the
OFLC Administrator. The employer
must retain a copy of the certified CW–
1 Application for Temporary
Employment Certification, including the
original signed Appendix C, as required
by § 655.456.
§ 655.453
Denied certification.
If an electronically filed TLC is
denied, the CO will send the Final
Determination notice to the employer
and a copy, if applicable, to the
employer’s agent or attorney using an
electronic method(s) designated by the
OFLC Administrator. For employers
permitted to file by mail as set forth in
§ 655.420(c), the CO will send the Final
Determination notice by first class mail.
The Final Determination notice will:
(a) State the reason(s) certification is
denied, citing the relevant regulatory
standards;
(b) Offer the employer an opportunity
to request administrative review of the
denial under § 655.461; and
(c) State that if the employer does not
request administrative review in
accordance with § 655.461, the denial is
final, and the Department will not
accept any appeal on that CW–1
Application for Temporary Employment
Certification.
§ 655.454
Partial certification.
The CO may issue a partial
certification, reducing either the period
of need or the number of CW–1 workers
or both, based upon information the CO
receives during the course of processing
the CW–1 Application for Temporary
Employment Certification, an audit, or
otherwise. The number of workers
certified will be reduced by one for each
U.S. worker who is able, willing, and
qualified, and who will be available at
the time and place needed and who has
not been rejected for lawful, job-related
reasons, to perform the labor or services.
If a partial labor certification is issued,
the CO will send the Final
Determination notice approving partial
certification using the procedures at
§ 655.452.
The Final Determination notice will:
(a) State the reason(s) the period of
employment or the number of CW–1
workers requested has been reduced,
citing the relevant regulatory standards;
(b) Offer the employer an opportunity
to request administrative review of the
partial certification under § 655.461;
and
PO 00000
Frm 00066
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
(c) State that if the employer does not
request administrative judicial review in
accordance with § 655.461, the partial
certification is final, and the Department
will not accept any appeal on that CW–
1 Application for Temporary
Employment Certification.
§ 655.455 Validity of temporary labor
certification.
(a) Validity period. A TLC is valid
only for the period of employment as
approved on the CW–1 Application for
Temporary Employment Certification.
The certification expires after the last
day of authorized employment,
including any approved extensions
thereof.
(b) Scope of validity. A TLC is valid
only for the number of CW–1 positions,
the places of employment located in the
Commonwealth, the job classification
and specific services or labor to be
performed, and the employer(s)
specified on the approved CW–1
Application for Temporary Employment
Certification, including any approved
modifications. The TLC may not be
transferred from one employer to
another unless the employer to which it
is transferred is a successor in interest
to the employer to which it was issued.
§ 655.456 Document retention
requirements for CW–1 employers.
(a) Entities required to retain
documents. All CW–1 employers filing
a CW–1 Application for Temporary
Employment Certification are required
to retain the documents and records
establishing compliance with this
subpart, including but not limited to
those specified in paragraph (c) of this
section.
(b) Period of record retention. The
employer must retain records and
documents for 3 years from the date on
which the certification of the CW–1
Application for Temporary Employment
Certification expires, or 3 years from the
date of the final determination if the
CW–1 Application for Temporary
Employment Certification is denied, or
3 years from the date the Department
receives the request for withdrawal of a
CW–1 Application for Temporary
Employment Certification under
§ 655.462.
(c) Documents and records to be
retained by all employers. All employers
filing a CW–1 Application for
Temporary Employment Certification
must retain the following documents
and records and must provide the
documents and records to the
Department and any other Federal
Government Official in the event of an
audit or investigation:
E:\FR\FM\01APR2.SGM
01APR2
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 62 / Monday, April 1, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
(1) Proof of recruitment efforts,
including:
(i) Placement of the job offer with the
CNMI Department of Labor as specified
in § 655.442;
(ii) Contact with former U.S.
employees as specified in § 655.443,
including documents demonstrating
that each such U.S. worker had been
offered the job opportunity listed in the
CW–1 Application for Temporary
Employment Certification, and that the
U.S. worker either refused the job
opportunity or was rejected only for
lawful, job-related reasons;
(iii) Posting notice of the job
opportunity to all employees in the job
classification and area in which the
work will be performed by the CW–1
workers as specified in § 655.444; and
(iv) All additional employerconducted recruitment required by the
CO as specified in § 655.445.
(2) Documentation supporting the
information submitted in the
recruitment report prepared in
accordance with § 655.446, such as
evidence of nonapplicability of contact
with former workers as specified in
§ 655.443 and any supporting resumes
and contact information as specified in
§ 655.446.
(3) Records of each worker’s earnings,
hours offered and worked, location(s)
where work is performed, and other
information as specified in § 655.423(i).
(4) If applicable, records of
reimbursement of transportation and
subsistence costs incurred by the
workers, as specified in § 655.423(j).
(5) Copies of written contracts with
third parties demonstrating compliance
with the prohibition of seeking or
receiving payments or other
compensation of any kind from
prospective workers as specified in
§ 655.423(o).
(6) Evidence of the employer’s contact
with U.S. workers who applied for the
job opportunity in the CW–1
Application for Temporary Employment
Certification, including, but not limited
to, documents demonstrating that any
rejections of U.S. workers were for
lawful, job-related reasons, as specified
in § 655.423(q).
(7) Written notice provided to and
informing OFLC that a CW–1 worker or
worker in corresponding employment
has separated from employment before
the end date of employment specified in
the CW–1 Application for Temporary
Employment Certification, as specified
in § 655.423(v).
(8) A copy of the CW–1 Application
for Temporary Employment
Certification and all accompanying
appendices, including any
modifications, amendments, or
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:01 Mar 29, 2019
Jkt 247001
extensions, signed by the employer as
directed by the CO.
(d) Availability of documents and
records for enforcement purposes. The
employer must make available to the
Department, DHS or to any Federal
Government Official performing an
investigation, inspection, audit, or law
enforcement function all documents and
records required to be retained under
this subpart for purposes of copying,
transcribing, or inspecting them.
§§ 655.457–655.459
[Reserved]
Post Certification Activities
§ 655.460
Extensions.
(a) Basis for extension. Under certain
circumstances an employer may apply
for extensions of the period of
employment. A request for extension
must be related to weather conditions or
other factors beyond the control of the
employer (which may include
unforeseen changes in market
conditions). Such requests must be
supported in writing, with
documentation showing that the
extension is needed and that the need
could not have been reasonably foreseen
by the employer. The CO will not grant
an extension where the total period of
employment under that CW–1
Application for Temporary Employment
Certification and the authorized
extension would exceed the maximum
applicable duration permitted under
§ 655.420(g).
(b) Decision by the CO. The CO will
notify the employer of the decision in
writing. The employer may appeal a
denial of a request for an extension by
following the appeal procedures in
§ 655.461.
(c) Obligations during period of
extension. The CW–1 employer’s
assurances and obligations under the
TLC will continue to apply during the
extended period of employment. The
employer must immediately provide to
its CW–1 workers and workers in
corresponding employment a copy of
any approved extension.
§ 655.461
Administrative review.
(a) Request for review. Where
authorized in this subpart, an employer
wishing review of a determination by
the CO must request an administrative
review before BALCA of that
determination to exhaust its
administrative remedies. In such cases,
the request for review:
(1) Must be received by BALCA, and
the CO who issued the determination,
within 10 business days from the date
of the determination;
PO 00000
Frm 00067
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
12445
(2) Must clearly identify the particular
determination for which review is
sought;
(3) Must include a copy of the CO’s
determination;
(4) Must set forth the particular
grounds for the request, including the
specific factual issues the requesting
party alleges needs to be examined in
connection with the CO’s
determination;
(5) May contain any legal argument
that the employer believes will rebut the
basis for the CO’s determination,
including any briefing the employer
wishes to submit; and
(6) May contain only such evidence as
was actually before the CO at the time
of the CO’s determination.
(b) Appeal File. After the receipt of a
request for review, the CO will send a
copy of the Appeal File, as soon as
practicable by means normally assuring
next-day delivery, to BALCA, the
employer, the employer’s attorney or
agent (if applicable), and the Associate
Solicitor for Employment and Training
Legal Services, Office of the Solicitor,
U.S. Department of Labor (counsel).
(c) Assignment. The Chief ALJ will
immediately, upon receipt of the appeal
file from the CO, assign either a single
member or a three-member panel of
BALCA to consider a particular case.
(d) Administrative review—(1)
Briefing schedule. If the employer
wishes to submit a brief on appeal, it
must do so as part of its request for
review. Within 7 business days of
receipt of the Appeal File, the counsel
for the CO may submit a brief in support
of the CO’s decision and, if applicable,
in response to the employer’s brief.
(2) Standard of review. The ALJ must
uphold the CO’s decision unless shown
by the employer to be arbitrary,
capricious, an abuse of discretion, or
otherwise not in accordance with the
law.
(e) Scope of review. BALCA will
affirm, reverse, or modify the CO’s
determination, or remand to the CO for
further action. BALCA will reach this
decision after due consideration of the
documents in the Appeal File that were
before the CO at the time of the CO’s
determination, the request for review,
and any legal briefs submitted. BALCA
may not consider evidence not before
the CO at the time of the CO’s
determination, even if such evidence is
in the Appeal File, request for review,
or legal briefs.
(f) Decision. The decision of BALCA
must specify the reasons for the action
taken and must be provided to the
employer, the CO, and counsel for the
CO within 7 business days of the
submission of the CO’s brief or 10
E:\FR\FM\01APR2.SGM
01APR2
12446
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 62 / Monday, April 1, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
business days after receipt of the Appeal
File, whichever is later, using means
normally assuring expedited delivery.
§ 655.462 Withdrawal of a CW–1
Application for Temporary Employment
Certification.
(a) The employer may withdraw a
CW–1 Application for Temporary
Employment Certification after it has
been submitted to the NPC for
processing, including after the CO
grants certification under § 655.450.
However, the employer is still obligated
to comply with the terms and
conditions of employment contained in
the CW–1 Application for Temporary
Employment Certification and work
contract with respect to all workers
recruited and hired in connection with
that application.
(b) To request withdrawal, the
employer must submit a request in
writing to the NPC identifying the CW–
1 Application for Temporary
Employment Certification and stating
the reason(s) for the withdrawal.
§ 655.463
Public disclosure.
The Department will maintain an
electronic file accessible to the public
with information on all employers
applying for TLCs. The database will
include such information as the number
of workers requested, the date filed, the
date decided, and the final disposition.
§§ 655.464–655.469
[Reserved]
Integrity Measures
§ 655.470
Audits.
The CO may conduct audits of
certified CW–1 Applications for
Temporary Employment Certification.
(a) Discretion. The CO has the sole
discretion to choose the certified
applications selected for audit.
(b) Audit letter. Where an application
is selected for audit, the CO will issue
an audit letter to the employer and a
copy, if appropriate, to the employer’s
attorney or agent. The audit letter will:
(1) Specify the documentation that
must be submitted by the employer;
(2) Specify a date, no more than 30
calendar days from the date the audit
letter is issued, by which the required
documentation must be sent to the CO;
and
(3) Advise that failure to comply fully
with the audit process may result:
(i) In the requirement that the
employer undergo the assisted
recruitment procedures in § 655.471 in
future filings of CW–1 Applications for
Temporary Employment Certification
for a period of up to 2 years; or
(ii) In a revocation of the certification
or debarment from the CW–1 program
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:01 Mar 29, 2019
Jkt 247001
and any other foreign labor certification
program administered by the
Department.
(c) Supplemental information request.
During the course of the audit
examination, the CO may request
supplemental information or
documentation from the employer in
order to complete the audit. If
circumstances warrant, the CO can issue
one or more requests for supplemental
information.
(d) Potential referrals. In addition to
measures in this subpart, the CO may
decide to provide the audit findings and
underlying documentation to DHS or
other appropriate enforcement agencies.
The CO may refer any findings that an
employer discouraged a qualified U.S.
worker from applying, or failed to hire,
discharged, or otherwise discriminated
against a qualified U.S. worker, to the
Department of Justice, Civil Rights
Division, Immigrant and Employee
Rights Section.
§ 655.471
Assisted recruitment.
(a) Requirement of assisted
recruitment. If, as a result of audit or
otherwise, the CO determines that a
violation has occurred that does not
warrant debarment, the CO may require
the employer to engage in assisted
recruitment for a defined period of time
for any future CW–1 Application for
Temporary Employment Certification.
(b) Notification of assisted
recruitment. The CO will notify the
employer (and its attorney or agent, if
applicable) in writing of the assisted
recruitment that will be required of the
employer for a period of up to 2 years
from the date the notice is issued. The
notification will state the reasons for the
imposition of the additional
requirements, state that the employer’s
agreement to accept the conditions will
constitute their inclusion as bona fide
conditions and terms of a CW–1
Application for Temporary Employment
Certification, and offer the employer an
opportunity to request an administrative
review. If administrative review is
requested, the procedures in § 655.461
apply.
(c) Assisted recruitment. The assisted
recruitment process will be in addition
to any recruitment required of the
employer by §§ 655.442 through 655.445
and may consist of, but is not limited to,
one or more of the following:
(1) Requiring the employer to submit
a draft advertisement to the CO for
review and approval at the time of filing
the CW–1 Application for Temporary
Employment Certification;
(2) Designating the sources where the
employer must recruit for U.S. workers
in the Commonwealth and directing the
PO 00000
Frm 00068
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
employer to place the advertisement(s)
in such sources;
(3) Extending the length of the
placement of the advertisements;
(4) Requiring the employer to notify
the CO in writing when the
advertisement(s) are placed;
(5) Requiring an employer to perform
any additional assisted recruitment
directed by the CO;
(6) Requiring the employer to provide
proof of the publication of all
advertisements as directed by the CO;
(7) Requiring the employer to provide
proof of all U.S. workers who applied
(or on whose behalf an application is
made) in response to the employer’s
recruitment efforts;
(8) Requiring the employer to submit
any proof of contact with all referrals
and former U.S. workers; or
(9) Requiring the employer to provide
any additional documentation verifying
it conducted the assisted recruitment as
directed by the CO.
(d) Failure to comply. If an employer
materially fails to comply with
requirements ordered by the CO under
this section, the certification will be
denied and the employer and its
attorney or agent may be debarred under
§ 655.473.
§ 655.472
Revocation.
(a) Basis for revocation. The OFLC
Administrator may revoke a TLC
approved under this subpart, if the
OFLC Administrator finds:
(1) The issuance of the TLC was not
justified due to fraud or
misrepresentation of a material fact in
the application process;
(2) The employer substantially failed
to comply with any of the terms or
conditions of the approved TLC. A
substantial failure is a failure to comply
that constitutes a significant deviation
from the terms and conditions of the
approved certification and is further
defined in § 655.473(d); or
(3) The employer impeded the audit
process, as set forth in § 655.470, or
impeded any Federal Government
Official performing an investigation,
inspection, audit, or law enforcement
function.
(b) DOL procedures for revocation—
(1) Notice of Revocation. If the OFLC
Administrator makes a determination to
revoke an employer’s TLC, the OFLC
Administrator will issue a Notice of
Revocation to the employer (and its
attorney or agent, if applicable). The
notice will contain a detailed statement
of the grounds for the revocation and
inform the employer of its right to
submit rebuttal evidence to the OFLC
Administrator or to request
administrative review of the Notice of
E:\FR\FM\01APR2.SGM
01APR2
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 62 / Monday, April 1, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
Revocation by BALCA. If the employer
does not submit rebuttal evidence or
request administrative review within 10
business days from the date the Notice
of Revocation is issued, the notice will
become the final agency action and will
take effect immediately at the end of the
10 business days.
(2) Rebuttal. If the employer timely
submits rebuttal evidence, the OFLC
Administrator will inform the employer
of the final determination on the
revocation within 10 business days of
receiving the rebuttal evidence. If the
OFLC Administrator determines that the
certification must be revoked, the OFLC
Administrator will inform the employer
of its right to appeal the final
determination to BALCA according to
the procedures of § 655.461. If the
employer does not appeal the final
determination, it will become the final
agency action.
(3) Request for review. An employer
may appeal a Notice of Revocation or a
final determination of the OFLC
Administrator after the review of
rebuttal evidence to BALCA, according
to the appeal procedures of § 655.461.
The ALJ’s decision is the final agency
action.
(4) Stay. The timely submission of
rebuttal evidence or a request for
administrative review will stay the
revocation pending the outcome of the
proceeding.
(5) Decision. If the TLC is revoked, the
OFLC Administrator will provide copies
of final revocation decisions to DHS and
DOS promptly.
(c) Employer’s obligations in the event
of revocation. If an employer’s TLC is
revoked, the employer is responsible
for:
(1) Reimbursement of actual inbound
transportation and other required
expenses;
(2) The workers’ outbound
transportation and other required
expenses;
(3) Payment to the workers of the
amount due under the three-fourths
guarantee; and
(4) Any other wages, benefits, and
working conditions due or owing to the
workers under this subpart.
§ 655.473
Debarment.
(a) Debarment of an employer, agent,
or attorney. The OFLC Administrator
may debar an employer, agent, attorney,
or any successor in interest to that
employer, agent, or attorney, from
participating in any action under this
subpart, subject to the time limits set
forth in paragraph (c) of this section, if
the OFLC Administrator finds that the
employer, agent, or attorney
substantially violated a material term or
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:01 Mar 29, 2019
Jkt 247001
condition of the Application for
Prevailing Wage Determination or CW–
1 Application for Temporary
Employment Certification, as defined in
paragraph (d) of this section. The OFLC
Administrator will provide copies of
final debarment decisions to DHS and
DOS promptly.
(b) Effect on future applications in all
foreign labor programs. The debarred
employer, or a debarred agent or
attorney, or any successor in interest to
any debarred employer, agent, or
attorney, will be disqualified from filing
any labor certification applications or
labor condition applications with the
Department subject to the term limits set
forth in paragraph (c) of this section. If
such an application is filed, it will be
denied without review.
(c) Period of debarment. No employer,
agent, or attorney may be debarred
under this subpart for more than 5 years
for a single violation.
(d) Definition of violation. For the
purposes of this section, a violation of
a material term or condition of the
Application for Prevailing Wage
Determination or CW–1 Application for
Temporary Employment Certification
includes:
(1) One or more acts of commission or
omission on the part of the employer or
the employer’s agent or attorney that
involve:
(i) Failure to pay or provide the
required wages, benefits, or working
conditions to the employer’s CW–1
workers or workers in corresponding
employment;
(ii) Failure, except for lawful, jobrelated reasons, to offer employment to
qualified U.S. workers who applied for
the job opportunity for which
certification was sought;
(iii) Failure to comply with the
employer’s obligations to recruit U.S.
workers;
(iv) Improper layoff or displacement
of U.S. workers or workers in
corresponding employment;
(v) Failure to comply with the NOD
process, as set forth in § 655.431, or the
assisted recruitment process, as set forth
in § 655.471;
(vi) Impeding the audit process, as set
forth in § 655.470, or impeding any
Federal Government Official performing
an investigation, inspection, audit, or
law enforcement function;
(vii) Employing a CW–1 worker
outside of the Commonwealth, in an
activity not listed in the work contract,
or outside the validity period of
employment of the work contract,
including any approved extension
thereof;
(viii) A violation of the requirements
of § 655.423(n) or (o);
PO 00000
Frm 00069
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
12447
(ix) A violation of any of the
provisions listed in § 655.423(q); or
(x) Any other act showing such
flagrant disregard for the law that future
compliance with program requirements
cannot reasonably be expected;
(2) Fraud involving the Application
for Prevailing Wage Determination or
the CW–1 Application for Temporary
Employment Certification under this
subpart; or
(3) A material misrepresentation of
fact during the course of processing the
CW–1 Application for Temporary
Employment Certification.
(e) Determining whether a violation is
substantial. In determining whether a
violation is substantial as to merit
debarment, the factors the OFLC
Administrator may consider include,
but are not limited to, the following:
(1) Previous history of violation(s)
under the CW–1 program;
(2) The number of CW–1 workers,
workers in corresponding employment,
or U.S. workers who were or are affected
by the violation(s);
(3) The gravity of the violation(s); or
(4) The extent to which the violator
achieved a financial gain due to the
violation(s), or the potential financial
loss or potential injury to the worker(s).
(f) Debarment procedure—(1) Notice
of Debarment. If the OFLC
Administrator makes a determination to
debar an employer, agent, attorney, or
any successor in interest to that
employer, agent, or attorney, the OFLC
Administrator will issue the party a
Notice of Debarment. The notice will
state the reason(s) for the debarment
finding, including a detailed
explanation of the grounds for and the
duration of the debarment, and it will
inform the party subject to the notice of
its right to submit rebuttal evidence to
the OFLC Administrator, or to request
administrative review of the decision by
BALCA. If the party does not file
rebuttal evidence or a request for review
within 30 calendar days of the date of
the Notice of Debarment, the notice is
the final agency action and the
debarment will take effect on the date
specified in the notice or if no date is
specified, at the end of 30 calendar days
The timely filing of rebuttal evidence or
a request for review stays the debarment
pending the outcome of the appeal as
provided in paragraphs (f)(2) through (6)
of this section.
(2) Rebuttal. The party who received
the Notice of Debarment may choose to
submit evidence to rebut the grounds
stated in the notice within 30 calendar
days of the date the notice is issued. If
rebuttal evidence is timely filed, the
OFLC Administrator will issue a Final
Determination on the debarment within
E:\FR\FM\01APR2.SGM
01APR2
12448
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 62 / Monday, April 1, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
30 calendar days of receiving the
rebuttal evidence. If the OFLC
Administrator determines that the party
must be debarred, the OFLC
Administrator will issue a Final
Determination and inform the party of
its right to request administrative review
of the debarment by BALCA according
to the procedures in this section. The
party must request review within 30
calendar days after the date of the Final
Determination, or the Final
Determination will be the final agency
order and the debarment will take effect
on the date specified in the Final
Determination or if no date is specified,
at the end of 30 calendar days.
(3) Request for review. (i) The
recipient of a Notice of Debarment or
Final Determination seeking to
challenge the debarment must request
review of the debarment within 30
calendar days of the date of the Notice
of Debarment or the date of the Final
Determination by the OFLC
Administrator after review of rebuttal
evidence submitted under paragraph
(f)(2) of this section. A request for
review of debarment must be sent in
writing to the Chief ALJ, United States
Department of Labor, with a
simultaneous copy served on the OFLC
Administrator; the request must clearly
identify the particular debarment
determination for which review is
sought; and must set forth the particular
grounds for the request. If no timely
request for review is filed, the
debarment will take effect on the date
specified in the Notice of Debarment or
Final Determination, or if no date is
specified, 30 calendar days from the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:01 Mar 29, 2019
Jkt 247001
date the Notice of Debarment or Final
Determination is issued.
(ii) Upon receipt of a request for
review, the OFLC Administrator will
promptly send a certified copy of the
ETA case file to the Chief ALJ by means
normally assuring expedited delivery.
The Chief ALJ will immediately assign
an ALJ to conduct the review.
(iii) Statements, briefs, and other
submissions of the parties must contain
only legal argument and only such
evidence that was within the record
upon which the debarment was based,
including any rebuttal evidence
submitted pursuant to paragraph (f)(2)
of this section.
(4) Review by the ALJ. (i) In
considering requests for review, the ALJ
must afford all parties 30 days to submit
or decline to submit any appropriate
Statement of Position or legal brief. The
ALJ must review the debarment
determination on the basis of the record
upon which the decision was made, the
request for review, and any Statements
of Position or legal briefs submitted.
(ii) The ALJ’s final decision must
affirm, reverse, or modify the OFLC
Administrator’s determination. The
ALJ’s decision will be provided to the
parties by expedited mail. The ALJ’s
decision is the final agency action,
unless either party, within 30 calendar
days of the ALJ’s decision, seeks review
of the decision with the Administrative
Review Board (ARB).
(5) Review by the ARB. (i) Any party
wishing review of the decision of an ALJ
must, within 30 calendar days of the
decision of the ALJ, petition the ARB to
review the decision. Copies of the
petition must be served on all parties
PO 00000
Frm 00070
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 9990
and on the ALJ. The ARB will decide
whether to accept the petition within 30
calendar days of receipt. If the ARB
declines to accept the petition, or if the
ARB does not issue a notice accepting
a petition within 30 calendar days after
the receipt of a timely filing of the
petition, the decision of the ALJ is the
final agency action. If a petition for
review is accepted, the decision of the
ALJ will be stayed unless and until the
ARB issues an order affirming the
decision. The ARB must serve notice of
its decision to accept or not to accept
the petition upon the ALJ and upon all
parties to the proceeding.
(ii) Upon receipt of the ARB’s notice
to accept the petition, the Office of
Administrative Law Judges will
promptly forward a copy of the
complete appeal record to the ARB.
(iii) Where the ARB has determined to
review the decision and order, the ARB
will notify each party of the issue(s)
raised, the form in which submissions
must be made (e.g., briefs or oral
argument), and the time within which
the presentation must be submitted.
(6) ARB Decision. The ARB’s final
decision must be issued within 90
calendar days from the notice granting
the petition and served upon all parties
and the ALJ.
§§ 655.474–655.499
[Reserved]
Signed at Washington, DC.
Molly E. Conway,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Employment
and Training, Labor.
[FR Doc. 2019–05937 Filed 3–27–19; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–FP–P
E:\FR\FM\01APR2.SGM
01APR2
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 62 (Monday, April 1, 2019)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 12380-12448]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-05937]
[[Page 12379]]
Vol. 84
Monday,
No. 62
April 1, 2019
Part III
Department of Labor
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Employment and Training Administration
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
20 CFR Part 655
Labor Certification Process for Temporary Employment in the
Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands (CW-1 Workers); Interim
Final Rule
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 62 / Monday, April 1, 2019 / Rules
and Regulations
[[Page 12380]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training Administration
20 CFR Part 655
[DOL Docket No. ETA-2019-0001]
RIN 1205-AB92
Labor Certification Process for Temporary Employment in the
Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands (CW-1 Workers)
AGENCY: Employment and Training Administration, Department of Labor.
ACTION: Interim final rule; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of Labor (Department or DOL) is issuing new
regulations governing the certification of temporary employment
opportunities to be filled by nonimmigrant workers in the Commonwealth
of the Northern Mariana Islands (CNMI) and the obligations applicable
to employers of such workers under the CNMI-Only Transitional Worker
visa program (CW-1). This interim final rule (IFR), implementing
provisions of the Northern Mariana Islands U.S. Workforce Act of 2018
(Workforce Act), establishes the process by which a CNMI employer will
obtain a prevailing wage determination (PWD) and temporary labor
certification (TLC) from DOL for use in petitioning the Department of
Homeland Security (DHS) to employ a nonimmigrant worker in CW-1 status.
Although the CW-1 visa classification predates the Workforce Act,
classification as a CW-1 nonimmigrant does not currently require a
labor certification. The Workforce Act institutes a labor certification
requirement as a prerequisite for approval of a CW-1 petition by DHS
and charges the Department with promulgating an IFR to administer this
new labor certification requirement. We are also issuing regulations to
provide for increased worker protections for both United States (U.S.)
and foreign workers to ensure no U.S. worker is placed at a competitive
disadvantage compared to a foreign worker or is displaced by a foreign
worker.
DATES: This IFR is effective April 4, 2019, at 12:00 a.m. Eastern Time
(ET). Interested parties are invited to submit written comments on this
IFR on or before May 31, 2019.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by the Regulatory
Information Number (RIN) 1205-AB92, by any one of the following
methods:
Electronic Comments: Comments may be sent via https://www.regulations.gov, a Federal E-Government website that allows the
public to find, review, and submit comments on documents that agencies
have published in the Federal Register and that are open for comment.
Simply type in ``DOL CNMI IFR'' (in quotes) in the Comment or
Submission search box, click Go, and follow the instructions for
submitting comments.
Mail: Address written submissions to (including disk and CD-ROM
submissions) to Adele Gagliardi, Administrator, Office of Policy
Development and Research, Employment and Training Administration, U.S.
Department of Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue NW, Room N-5641,
Washington, DC 20210.
Instructions: Please submit only one copy of your comments by only
one method. All submissions must include the agency name and the RIN
1205-AB92. Please be advised that comments received will become a
matter of public record and will be posted without change to https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided.
Comments that are mailed must be received by the date indicated for
consideration.
Docket: For access to the docket to read documentation prepared in
support of this rule or comments, go to the Federal e-Rulemaking Portal
at https://www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Thomas M. Dowd, Deputy Assistant
Secretary, Employment and Training Administration, Department of Labor,
Box #12-200, 200 Constitution Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20210, telephone
(202) 513-7350 (this is not a toll-free number). Individuals with
hearing or speech impairments may access the telephone numbers above
via TTY by calling the toll-free Federal Information Relay Service at
1-877-889-5627 (TTY/TDD).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Executive Summary
The Workforce Act, Public Law 115-218 (July 24, 2018), provides the
Secretary of Homeland Security with authority to administer and enforce
a system of allocating and determining the terms and conditions of
visas to be issued to certain nonimmigrant workers performing services
or labor for an employer in the CNMI. Department of Homeland Security
(DHS) regulations establish the CW-1 visa classification to provide for
an orderly transition from the CNMI permit system to the U.S.
immigration system for a foreign national who is otherwise ineligible
for another classification under the Immigration and Nationality Act
(INA). In accordance with the Workforce Act, DHS will update
regulations to reflect the statutory requirement that a CW-1 petition
for temporary employment in the CNMI be accompanied by an approved TLC
from DOL. A TLC granted by DOL confirms that there are not sufficient
U.S. workers in the CNMI who are able, willing, qualified, and
available to fill the petitioning CW-1 employer's job opportunity. The
TLC also confirms that a foreign worker's employment in the job
opportunity will not adversely affect the wages or working conditions
of similarly employed U.S. workers.
As explained more fully in the preamble, the IFR establishes the
process by which employers obtain a TLC from DOL for use in petitioning
DHS to employ a nonimmigrant worker in CW-1 status, which involves four
basic steps. First, the employer must request and obtain a PWD from
DOL's Office of Foreign Labor Certification (OFLC) before filing a CW-1
Application for Temporary Employment Certification. To make this
request, the employer will submit a completed Application for
Prevailing Wage Determination (Form ETA-9141C) with OFLC's National
Prevailing Wage Center (NPWC) containing information about the job
opportunity in which the nonimmigrant workers will be employed. Based
on a review of the information provided by the employer on the Form
ETA-9141C, the NPWC will issue a PWD, indicate the source and validity
period for its use, and return the Form ETA-9141C with its endorsement
to the employer.
Second, the employer must file a completed CW-1 Application for
Temporary Employment Certification (Form ETA-9142C and appropriate
appendices) with the OFLC National Processing Center (NPC) no more than
120 calendar days before the date of need. Consistent with the
Workforce Act, the employer seeking to extend the employment of a CW-1
worker may file a CW-1 Application for Temporary Employment
Certification no more than 180 calendar days before the date on which
the CW-1 status expires. The NPC Certifying Officer (CO) will review
the employer's application for compliance with all applicable program
requirements and issue either a Notice of Deficiency (NOD) or Notice of
Acceptance (NOA). Where deficiencies in the application are discovered,
the NOD will direct the employer that it must respond within 10
business days to submit a modified application
[[Page 12381]]
correcting the deficiencies or the CO will deny the application.
Third, where all program requirements are met, the employer will
receive a NOA from the CO directing the recruitment of U.S. workers for
the job opportunity and requesting a written report of the employer's
recruitment efforts. To encourage the hiring of U.S. workers for
employment in the CNMI, the employer will be required to advertise the
job opportunity on the CNMI Department of Labor's job listing system;
contact its former U.S. workers and solicit their return to the job;
post a copy of the CW-1 Application for Temporary Employment
Certification at the place(s) of employment in which the work will be
performed by the CW-1 workers; and conduct any other recruitment
activities (e.g., contacting community-based organizations or trade
unions) required by the CO. The recruitment period will last
approximately 21 calendar days and all employer-conducted recruitment
must be completed before the written recruitment report can be
prepared, signed, and submitted to the NPC for review.
And finally, upon review of the recruitment report, the CO will
make a determination either to certify or to deny the CW-1 Application
for Temporary Employment Certification. The CO will certify the
application only where the employer has met all regulatory
requirements. If the employer has met all requirements, the CO will
send a Final Determination notice and copy of the certified CW-1
Application for Temporary Employment Certification to the employer and
a copy, if applicable, to the employer's agent or attorney. The
employer will use the Final Determination notice, as well as any other
required documentation, to support the filing of a CW-1 petition with
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS).
As a condition of receiving a TLC, the IFR provides a number of
worker protections to ensure U.S. workers are not placed at a
competitive disadvantage compared to a CW-1 worker, such as requiring a
minimum number of hours per week for full-time employment; requiring
that U.S. workers in corresponding employment receive the same wages
and benefits as the CW-1 workers; and requiring the payment of wages by
employers to be finally and unconditionally ``free and clear'' and no
less frequent than every 2 weeks. It also requires that employers
guarantee employment for a total number of work hours equal to at least
three-fourths of the workdays of the total period of employment for
both CW-1 workers and workers in corresponding employment.
The IFR requires employers to pay visa and related fees of CW-1
workers, and it requires employers to pay the inbound transportation
costs--including subsistence costs incurred in transit--of workers who
complete 50 percent of the job order period and the outbound
transportation costs--including subsistence costs incurred in transit--
of employees who complete the entire job order period. To protect U.S.
workers in their employment from displacement by a CW-1 worker, this
IFR prohibits the employer from laying off any similarly employed U.S.
worker in the occupation beginning 270 calendar days before the date of
need through the end of the period of employment certified by DOL. It
also prohibits employers from retaliating against employees for
exercising rights under the CW-1 program and protects workers from
discriminatory hiring practices.
Finally, the IFR contains a number of provisions that will lead to
increased transparency and enhanced program integrity. It requires
employers to provide workers with earnings statements on or before each
payday, with hours worked and deductions clearly specified; requires
employers to provide workers with copies of the work contract in a
language understood by the worker; and requires DOL to maintain an
electronic file accessible to the general public with information on
all employers applying for TLC to employ CW-1 workers. Additionally,
the IFR requires employers to retain all documents and records
establishing compliance with the regulations for a period of 3 years
after the CW-1 Application for Temporary Employment Certification is
adjudicated or from the date the CO receives a letter of withdrawal.
The employer must make these documents and records available to the
DOL, DHS or to any Federal Government Official performing an
investigation, inspection, audit, or other law enforcement activity. It
also establishes a sanctions and penalties regime for employers that
violate program requirements, such as more intensive or assisted
recruitment requirements, revocation of a certified CW-1 Application
for Temporary Employment Certification, or debarment from filing any
labor certification application or labor condition application with the
Department for up to 5 years. The debarment process for the CW-1
program will provide for notice, an opportunity for rebuttal, and a
right to appeal the Department's determination. CW-1 debarment, once it
takes effect however, will automatically debar an individual or entity
from other foreign labor certification programs as well. That is, an
individual or entity debarred from the CW-1 program will be
disqualified from filing any labor certification applications \1\ or
labor condition applications \2\ with DOL, including an agent or
attorney's filing of an application on the debarred entity's behalf,
for the period of time set forth in the CW-1 Notice of Debarment, Final
Determination (if rebuttal evidence is submitted), or ARB Decision (if
the debarment action is appealed).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See 20 CFR part 655, subpart A (governing H-2B temporary
nonagricultural workers); 20 CFR part 655, subpart B (governing H-2A
temporary agricultural workers); 20 CFR part 655, subpart F
(governing the temporary employment of D-1 crewmembers on foreign
vessels to perform longshore work at U.S. ports); and 20 CFR part
656 (permanent labor certification).
\2\ See 20 CFR part 655, subpart H (governing labor condition
applications for H-1B foreign nationals entering the U.S. on a
temporary basis to work in specialty occupations or as fashion
models, H-1b1 professionals entering under the U.S.-Chile or U.S.-
Singapore Free Trade Agreements, and E-3 professionals entering
under the U.S.-Australia Free Trade Agreement).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Department has concluded that the procedures and requirements
outlined in this IFR will help employers obtain a reliable and
productive workforce while also providing appropriate incentives to
encourage the hiring of U.S. workers in the CNMI and protect the
integrity of the program. This IFR is considered an Executive Order
(E.O.) 13771 regulatory action. Details on the estimated costs can be
found in the rule's economic analysis. Implementing this new labor
certification process will further the Congressional intent to
incentivize the hiring of U.S. workers in the CNMI by developing and
strengthening the CNMI labor force over time; contribute to the success
of its economy and labor market by benefiting small business; and
create greater job opportunities for U.S. workers in that geographical
demarcation. The new regulations also seek to ensure that the wages of
U.S. workers are protected, in addition to extending worker protection
assurances currently afforded in other TLC programs.
II. Background
A. Legal Framework
President Donald J. Trump signed the Workforce Act into law on July
24, 2018. The purposes of the Workforce Act are to encourage the hiring
of U.S. workers in the CNMI workforce and ensure that no U.S. worker is
placed at a competitive disadvantage compared to a non-U.S. worker or
is displaced by a non-U.S. worker. The Workforce Act
[[Page 12382]]
extends the transition period described below (and thus, the CW-1 visa
program) through 2029. It also requires that a CW-1 petition for
temporary employment filed with DHS be accompanied by an approved TLC
from DOL. See Public Law 115-218, sec. 3, 48 U.S.C. 1806(a)(2) and
(d)(2). The TLC from DOL must confirm that: (1) There are not
sufficient U.S. workers in the CNMI who are able, willing, qualified,
and available at the time and place needed to perform the services or
labor involved in the petition; and (2) the employment of a
nonimmigrant worker who is the subject of a petition will not adversely
affect the wages and working conditions of similarly employed U.S.
workers. 48 U.S.C. 1806(d)(2)(A).
In order to implement the second requirement that nonimmigrant
employment will not adversely affect U.S. workers' wages and working
conditions, the Workforce Act mandates the determination of the
relevant wage rates. The first option for this determination is for DOL
to use, or make available to employers, an occupational wage survey
conducted by the Governor of the CNMI (Governor) that meets the
statistical standards established by the Department for determining
prevailing wages in the CNMI on an annual basis. 48 U.S.C.
1806(d)(2)(B). If that does not occur, then the Workforce Act requires
that the prevailing wage for a given occupation in the CNMI be the
arithmetic mean of the wages of workers similarly employed in the
territory of Guam based on the Occupational Employment Statistics (OES)
Survey conducted by the Department's Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS).
Id. The Secretary of Labor (Secretary) has delegated the statutory
responsibilities of administering the TLC process through the ETA
Assistant Secretary to OFLC.
The CNMI is a self-governing commonwealth and unincorporated
territory of the United States. In 1976, Congress approved a Covenant
to Establish a Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands in
Political Union with the United States of America (the Covenant),
Public Law 94-241, sec. 1, 90 Stat. 263 (Mar. 24, 1976) (48 U.S.C. 1801
and 1801 note). The Covenant, which entered into full effect on Nov. 4,
1986, Presidential Proclamation No. 5564, 51 FR 40399 (Nov. 3, 1986)
(48 U.S.C. 1801 note), established the terms of the political
relationship between the United States and the CNMI, granted U.S.
citizenship to eligible CNMI residents, exempted the CNMI from most
U.S. immigration laws, and gave the CNMI local control over its own
immigration system. Congress retained the authority to extend U.S.
immigration laws to the CNMI at any time.\3\ In addition, the Covenant
sought to increase the percentage of U.S. workers in the total
workforce of the CNMI, while maintaining the minimum number of workers
who are not U.S. workers to meet the changing demands of the CNMI
economy; to encourage the hiring of U.S. workers into such workforce;
and to ensure that no U.S. worker is at a competitive disadvantage for
employment compared to a worker who is not a U.S. worker, or is
displaced by a worker who is not a U.S. worker.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ See history summarized in S. Rep. No. 115-214 at 6-7 (2018),
https://www.congress.gov/115/crpt/srpt214/CRPT-115srpt214.pdf,
accompanying S.2325, Northern Mariana Islands U.S. Workforce Act.
Provisions of S. 2325 were enacted as part of the Workforce Act. See
also immigration issues and recommendations discussed, pre-Workforce
Act, in Special Representatives of the United States and the
Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, ``Report to the
President on 902 Consultations 6-25'' (Jan. 2017) (hereafter
``Report on 902 Consultations''), https://www.doi.gov/sites/doi.gov/files/uploads/902-consultations-report-january-2017.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In 2008, Congress extended U.S. immigration laws to the CNMI
through the Consolidated Natural Resources Act of 2008 (CNRA). See
Public Law 110-229, Title VII, 122 Stat. 754, 853 (May 8, 2008) (48
U.S.C. 1806 note). Under the CNRA, which amended the Covenant, Federal
immigration laws would fully apply after a 5-year (2009-2014)
transition period. Once the Federal immigration laws were in place in
2014 without CNMI exceptions, a percentage of the workforce would
likely not meet the requirements of U.S. temporary employment visas,
and thus would be ineligible to enter or reenter the CNMI, negatively
impacting the local economy. Thus, the CNRA provided for a new
Commonwealth-Only Transitional Worker visa classification, to be
administered by DHS, with the proviso that, to incrementally reduce the
Commonwealth's dependence on foreign labor, the number of visas issued
would decrease each year, ending with the issuance of zero visas by the
end of the transition period. Congress later extended the period's end
to December 31, 2019. See Public law 110-229, sec. 702(a); S. Rep. No.
115-214 at 6-7; Report on 902 Consultations at 6-7; and Consolidated
and Further Continuing Appropriations Act, 2015, Public Law 113-235,
sec. 10, 128 Stat. 2130, 2134 (Dec. 16, 2014) (extending the transition
period to December 31, 2019). The CNRA did not stipulate the
requirement of obtaining a labor certification prior to filing a
petition for a CW-1 worker with DHS.
B. Statutory Basis for an Interim Final Rule
The Workforce Act requires the Secretary to promulgate an IFR
implementing the CW-1 TLC and its related provisions, and exempts this
rulemaking from the Administrative Procedure Act's (APA's) notice-and-
comment requirement under 5 U.S.C. 553(b). See Public Law 115-218, sec.
3(b)(2).
This exemption reflects the exigency created by the new labor
certification requirement. Under the CW-1 visa program as amended by
the Workforce Act, the Secretary must develop and implement new
standards, requirements, and procedures for employers to obtain a TLC
before a CW-1 petition can be submitted to DHS. This new TLC process--
including a procedure to obtain a PWD required to support the
employer's TLC application--must enable employers to hire a
nonimmigrant worker under the CW-1 classification with an employment
start date as early as October 1, 2019, when the new requirement takes
effect.\4\ By statute, an employer that desires to renew the employment
of a CW-1 worker may petition DHS no more than 180 calendar days before
the expiration of that worker's visa status.\5\ The earliest possible
renewal petition date for a CW-1 worker with an October 1, 2019 start
date is April 4, 2019. Accordingly, the Secretary must have a process
for employers to obtain a PWD and TLC in place by April 4, 2019. See 48
U.S.C. 1806(d)(2)(A)(i).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ The governing statute, as amended by the Workforce Act,
establishes a temporary labor certification requirement beginning
with CW-1 petitions filed with DHS with employment start dates in FY
2020. See 48 U.S.C. 1806(d)(2)(A)(i).
\5\ See 48 U.S.C. 1806(d)(3)(D), providing that an employer may
petition DHS no earlier than 180 days before the expiration of a CW-
1 visa, when the petition is for renewal of the visa.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Because of the exigency created by the statute, the Department is
also issuing this IFR with an April 4, 2019 effective date, rather than
providing for the usual 30-day waiting period required by section
553(d) of the APA. Under the APA, an agency is authorized to make a
rule effective immediately upon a showing of good cause instead of
imposing a 30-day delay. 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3). An agency can show good
cause for eliminating the 30-day waiting period when it demonstrates
urgent conditions the rule seeks to correct or unavoidable time
limitations. U.S. Steel Corp. v. EPA, 605 F.2d 283, 290 (7th Cir.
[[Page 12383]]
1979); United States v. Gavrilovic, 551 F.2d 1099, 1104 (8th Cir.
1977). As explained above, because Congress has required that a labor
certification process be in place to enable employers to hire CW-1
workers with start dates as early as October 1, 2019, this rulemaking
must be effective no later than April 4, 2019, so that an employer may
obtain a timely PWD. A valid PWD is required when an employer files its
CW-1 Application for Temporary Employment Certification. Only after the
employer receives a TLC from the Department may it petition USCIS for a
CW-1 visa, so the Department is making this rule effective as soon as
possible. Employers may request a PWD as early as April 4, 2019.
C. CNMI Labor Market
The CNMI has a total population of 52,263, according to the CNMI
Department of Commerce Central Statistics Division.\6\ In the years
that followed the establishment of the Covenant, the CNMI economy
became reliant on the use of temporary foreign labor. The Government
Accountability Office (GAO) found that in 2016, foreign workers made up
53 percent of those employed and filled the majority of all hospitality
and construction jobs. The GAO also found that, if all CW workers were
removed from the CNMI's labor market, the CNMI's gross domestic product
(GDP) would be reduced by between 26 and 62 percent. The GAO report
noted that the supply of workers in the unemployed domestic workforce
would be well below the CNMI's demand for foreign labor.\7\ The
estimated employment level was 29,215 workers (15,559 foreign workers
and 13,656 domestic workers) in 2016,\8\ while the number of unemployed
persons was 2,386 persons.\9\ Historically, the unemployment rate in
the CNMI has been higher than 10 percent because many unemployed
persons in the CNMI lack the skill sets and work experience required
for the jobs filled by foreign workers, even though many of those jobs
are for low-skilled workers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ CNMI Department of Commerce, Central Statistics Division,
``CNMI Labor Force Participation Measures'' (May 2018), https://ver1.cnmicommerce.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/20174QLFPFD-ver.-1.1.pdf.
\7\ See Report on 902 Consultations at 6-7. See U.S. Govt.
Accountability Office, ``Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana
Islands: Implementation of Federal Minimum Wage and Immigration
Laws,'' GAO-17-437 (May 2017), https://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-17-437.
\8\ U.S. Government Accountability Office, ``Commonwealth of the
Northern Mariana Islands: Recent Economic Trends and Preliminary
Observations on Workforce Data,'' GAO-18-373T (Feb. 2018), https://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-18-373T.
\9\ U.S. Government Accountability Office, ``Commonwealth of the
Northern Mariana Islands: Implementation of Federal Minimum Wage and
Immigration Laws,'' GAO-17-437 (May 2017), https://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-17-437.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
According to the CNMI Department of Commerce Central Statistics
Division, there were an estimated 2,646 unemployed persons in the CNMI
in the 4th quarter of 2017, 53.1 percent (1,406) of whom were U.S.
citizens and 11.7 percent (310) of whom were permanent residents.\10\
The CNMI unemployment rate was 10.5 percent. The unemployment rate for
U.S. citizens was 13.5 percent, for permanent residents was 9.2
percent, and for non-U.S. citizens was 8.2 percent. The unemployment
rate was negatively associated with age: The highest rate was 26.2
percent for youth 16 to 19 years of age, while the lowest rate was 2.0
percent for persons 65 years of age and older. The unemployment rate
was also inversely related to education level: Persons with less than a
high school diploma had the highest unemployment rate at 21.3 percent,
while those with at least a master's degree had the lowest unemployment
rate at 3.7 percent. With respect to place of birth, the unemployment
rate for persons born in a U.S. State or territory was 14.3 percent,
for persons born in an Asian country was 7.3 percent, and for persons
born in the Pacific Islands was 18.9 percent.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ The report included the following note regarding the
presence of unemployed non-U.S. citizens: ``Note that while there
are Not U.S. Citizens in the unemployed population, they are likely
to be more temporary, compared to U.S Citizen and Permanent
Resident, because of existing laws governing migrant workers. With
no job, Not U.S. Citizen, migrant worker will eventually leave the
CNMI.''
\11\ CNMI Department of Commerce, Central Statistics Division,
``CNMI Labor Force Participation Measures'' (May 2018), https://ver1.cnmicommerce.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/20174QLFPFD-ver.-1.1.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In light of the CNMI economy's continuing dependence on foreign
labor, the CNRA's requirement to reduce and eventually eliminate CW-1
visas generated significant concern among CNMI employers. Increased
employer demand for CW-1 visas has resulted, in large part, from recent
economic expansion in the construction, casinos, and related
hospitality industry sectors. In its February 2018 report, the GAO
noted that the U.S. Department of Commerce's Bureau of Economic
Analysis (BEA) estimated that the CNMI's GDP increased by almost 29
percent in 2016 (to $1.242 billion), after increasing by about 4
percent in 2015. BEA attributed this economic growth to a significant
increase in visitor spending, particularly for casino gambling, and
investment in the construction of a casino resort in Garapan and other
hotel construction in Saipan.\12\ The number of visitors to the CNMI
grew over 10 percent, primarily reflecting an increase in visitor
arrivals from South Korea and China. Reflecting the increase in
economic activity, employment rose by approximately 25 percent, from
23,344 in 2013 to 29,215 in 2016. However, documented patterns of labor
abuse and exploitation of foreign workers by certain CNMI employers in
recent decades have also led to calls for improving the employment
opportunities of U.S. workers and strengthening labor protections.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ See S. Rep. No. 115-214 at 7. See U.S. Govt. Accountability
Office, ``Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands: Recent
Economic Trends and Preliminary Observations on Workforce Data,''
GAO-18-373T (Feb. 2018), https://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-18-373T.
\13\ See S. Rep. No. 115-214 at 8 (referring to protections such
as ``higher minimum wage requirements, the potential for revocation,
legitimate business requirements, [and] a prohibition on the use of
CW visas for construction workers'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The number of guest workers in the CNMI surged in the 1980s when
garment manufacturers from Hong Kong and Korea set up business in the
CNMI. The CNMI economy became dependent on foreign labor as the garment
and tourism industries expanded in the 1980s and 1990s. According to an
October 1999 economic study by the Northern Marianas College, garment
manufacturing and tourism accounted for about 85 percent of the CNMI's
total economic activity and 96 percent of its exports.\14\ The CNMI's
guest worker program gained worldwide notoriety in the 1990s when
reports of sweatshop conditions and widespread abuse of guest workers
began to surface.\15\ Notwithstanding large lawsuit settlements and
independent monitoring at garment factories, the number of labor abuses
continued to be significant.\16\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ U.S. Government Accountability Office, ``U.S. Insular
Areas: Economic, Fiscal, and Financial Accountability Challenges,''
GAO-07-119 (Dec. 12, 2006) https://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-07-119.
\15\ Scott L. Cummings, ``Hemmed In Legal Mobilization in the
Los Angeles Anti-Sweatshop Movement,'' Berkeley Journal of
Employment and Labor Law, Volume 30, 2009.
\16\ U.S. Department of the Interior, Office of Insular Affairs,
``Federal Ombudsman's Report on the Status of Nonresident Workers in
the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands: Current
Conditions, Issues and Trends in the CNMI'' (Mar. 29, 2006), https://www.doi.gov/oia/reports/upload/OmbudsmansReport.pdf. (concluding
that while labor conditions had improved ``significantly'' in the
CNMI since the late 1990s, ``complaints of illegal recruitment scams
and nonpayment of wages [were] still prevalent.'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 12384]]
Changes to international trade law and various external events led
to declines in the garment and tourism industries in the early 2000s.
In the process, the CNMI's dependence on foreign labor in those
industries also declined. In 2016, foreign workers were primarily
employed in the following occupations: Food preparation and serving
related (1,434 foreign workers); management (1,423); office and
administrative support (1,269); construction and extraction (1,221);
and education, training, and library (1,016). Foreign workers
especially outnumbered U.S. workers in education, training, and library
(1,016 foreign workers compared to 214 U.S. workers); construction and
extraction (1,221 foreign workers compared to 268 U.S. workers); and
building and grounds cleaning and maintenance (895 foreign workers
compared to 255 U.S. workers).\17\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\17\ CNMI Department of Commerce, Statistical Yearbook 2017,
Table 5.24 ``Average Hourly Wages by Occupation and Citizenship,
CNMI: 2016,'' https://ver1.cnmicommerce.com/sy-2017-table-5-17-31-wage-survey/.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
D. Comments on the Rulemaking From Governor of the CNMI
Pursuant to section 3(b)(3) of the Workforce Act, the Governor
submitted comments and recommendations on the development of this IFR
in a September 2018 letter. In the letter, the Governor recommended
that the Department adopt a regulatory framework for the Commonwealth's
CW-1 program similar to the H-2B program's framework for Guam, in which
the government of Guam approves TLCs. Specifically, the letter stated
that ``[g]iven the changing nature of the CNMI labor force, and the
lack of DOL statistics for the CNMI labor force, it would be in the
interest of both DOL and the CNMI to authorize that the preliminary
determination of U.S. worker availability in occupational categories
petitioned for CW-1 permits be granted to the CNMI government.''
Alternatively, the Governor recommended that the Commonwealth
collaborate with the Department by providing the Department with data
on the number of U.S. workers available in the Commonwealth's major
occupational categories. The Governor suggested that the Department use
this information to determine whether applications for TLC must be
approved.
In accordance with the Workforce Act, the Department has considered
the Governor's recommendations in the development of this regulation.
As stated in sec. 3(b)(3)(B) of the Workforce Act, the Department may
include provisions in this IFR ``that are responsive to any
recommendation of the Governor that is not inconsistent with this
Act,'' including the need to protect U.S. workers.
The Governor's request for the authority to issue TLCs in the same
manner as the government of Guam approves TLCs in the H-2B program is
inconsistent with the statute. This procedure for Guam was established
by DHS regulation, under which a petitioning employer must apply for a
temporary labor certification with the Governor of Guam. 8 CFR
214.2(h)(6)(iii)(A). The Workforce Act mandates that the Secretary of
Homeland Security may not approve a CW-1 petition unless the employer
has received a TLC from the Secretary. Public Law 115-218 sec.
3(a)(2)(B), 48 U.S.C. 1806(d)(2)(A). The underlying statutory schemes
and histories for these programs are different. Given DOL's
longstanding role in issuing TLCs in other contexts, as well as
Congress' express direction that DOL issue such TLCs, DOL respectfully
declines the Governor's request.
The Governor also requested that the Department use Commonwealth-
provided local data in major occupational categories as the primary
means for granting TLCs. This request is inconsistent with statutory
requirements. The statute states that a TLC must confirm the lack of
qualified workers available at the time and place needed to perform the
job for which foreign workers are sought. Public Law 115-218 sec.
3(a)(2)(A)(i)(I), 48 U.S.C. 1806(d)(2)(A)(i)(I). The statute requires a
case-by-case determination of worker unavailability at the particular
time and location of the job for which foreign workers are sought, as
opposed to a determination based on general data about worker
availability in certain occupational categories. Therefore, the
Department did not accept this proposal. It should also be noted that
the Governor's suggestion does not provide any details as to what kind
of local data might be provided and that it is unclear how ``major
occupational categories'' would be determined or whether those
categories would align with the occupations for which there is demand
in the CW-1 program. It is possible that local data could be useful to
the CO when deciding whether additional recruitment methods are
required, but without substantial details as to what kind of data is
being proposed, it is not possible to determine whether such data would
be useful to the CO.
E. Request for Comments on all Aspects of This Interim Final Rule
The Department invites the public to submit comments on this IFR.
The standards and procedures for employers to obtain a TLC under this
IFR are largely equivalent to the provisions governing the H-2B
temporary nonagricultural program, 80 FR 24042 (Apr. 29, 2015) (2015 H-
2B Rule).
III. Discussion of 20 CFR Part 655, Subpart E
A. Introductory Sections
1. Section 655.400, Scope and Purpose of Subpart E
This section informs program users of the statutory authority for
the CW-1 TLC process, and the scope of the Department's role in
receiving, reviewing, and adjudicating applications for TLC, and in
upholding the integrity of CW-1 Applications for Temporary Employment
Certification. It is through the regulatory provisions in this subpart
that the Secretary makes the statutory determination that: (1) There
are not sufficient U.S. workers in the Commonwealth who are able,
willing, qualified, and who will be available at the time and place
needed to perform the services or labor for which an employer desires
to import foreign workers; and (2) the employment of the CW-1 worker(s)
will not adversely affect the wages and working conditions of U.S.
workers similarly employed. Under the authority in 48 U.S.C.
1806(d)(2)(A), this section also explains that this subpart establishes
the minimum standards and obligations with respect to the terms and
conditions of the TLC with which CW-1 employers must comply, as well as
the rights and obligations of CW-1 workers and workers in corresponding
employment.
2. Section 655.401, Authority of Agencies, Offices and Divisions in the
Department of Labor
This section describes the authority of and division of activities
related to the CW-1 program within DOL. It discusses the authority of
OFLC, an office within the Department's Employment and Training
Administration (ETA), to issue TLCs and carry out the Secretary's
statutory responsibilities as required by 48 U.S.C. 1806.
3. Section 655.402, Definition of Terms
This section establishes definitions of the terms used in part 655,
subpart E. To the extent possible, the definitions in this section are
consistent with the definition of terms used in other TLC programs,
such as the H-2A and H-2B programs.
[[Page 12385]]
a. Administrative Law Judge
Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) means a person within the
Department's Office of Administrative Law Judges (OALJ) appointed under
5 U.S.C. 3105, or a panel of such persons designated by the Chief ALJ
from the Board of Alien Labor Certification Appeals (BALCA or Board)
established by part 656 of this chapter, but which must hear and decide
administrative judicial reviews, as set forth in Sec. 655.461.
b. Agent
Agent is a term commonly defined and used in other TLC programs and
is defined in this section similarly as a person or entity authorized
to act on behalf of the employer for TLC purposes, and does not itself
employ workers with respect to a specific application. This definition
further provides that the agent representing the CW-1 employer must not
be disallowed from practice before any court, the Department, the
Executive Office for Immigration Review (EOIR) or DHS under 8 CFR 292.3
or 1003.101.
c. Applicant
Applicant means a U.S. worker who is applying for a job
opportunity, or on whose behalf an application is made, in response to
the employer's recruitment efforts required by this subpart and for
which an employer has filed a CW-1 Application for Temporary Employment
Certification.
d. Application for Prevailing Wage Determination
The Application for Prevailing Wage Determination means the Office
of Management and Budget (OMB)-approved Form ETA-9141C and the
appropriate appendices, submitted by an employer, as set forth in Sec.
655.410, to secure a PWD for use in filing a CW-1 Application for
Temporary Employment Certification.
e. CW-1 Application for Temporary Employment Certification
The CW-1 Application for Temporary Employment Certification means
the OMB-approved Form ETA-9142C and the appropriate appendices, a valid
PWD, and all supporting documentation submitted by an employer, as set
forth in Sec. Sec. 655.420 through 655.422, to secure a TLC
determination from OFLC Administrator.
f. Attorney
Attorney means any person who is a member in good standing of the
bar of the highest court of any State, possession, territory, or
commonwealth of the United States, or the District of Columbia. An
attorney can act as an agent as defined in, and subject to the
requirements of, this regulation.
g. Board of Alien Labor Certification Appeals or BALCA
BALCA means the permanent Board established by part 656 of this
chapter, chaired by the Chief ALJ, and consisting of ALJs appointed
pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 3105 and designated by the Chief ALJ to be members
of BALCA, to handle all administrative judicial reviews in accordance
with Sec. 655.461 of this subpart.
h. Certifying Officer or CO
CO means the person who processes CW-1 Applications for Temporary
Employment Certification submitted by employers with authority to grant
or deny TLC, as set forth in Sec. 655.450 of this subpart, under the
CW-1 program. The OFLC Administrator is the national CO. Other COs may
also be designated by the OFLC Administrator to make the determinations
required under this subpart, including making PWDs.
i. Chief Administrative Law Judge or Chief ALJ
Chief ALJ means the chief official of the Department's OALJ or the
Chief ALJ's designee.
j. CNMI Department of Labor
The CNMI Department of Labor means the executive Department of the
Commonwealth Government that administers employment and job training
activities for employers and U.S. workers in the Commonwealth.
k. Commonwealth or CNMI
Commonwealth or CNMI, used interchangeably in this subpart, means
the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands.
l. Corresponding Employment
Corresponding employment means the employment of U.S. workers who
are not CW-1 workers by an employer that has an approved CW-1
Application for Temporary Employment Certification in any work included
in the approved job offer, or in any work performed by the CW-1
workers. Workers in corresponding employment may be either workers
hired during the recruitment process, in connection with the CW-1
Application for Temporary Employment Certification, or workers who
already work for the employer and who perform any work included in the
approved job order or any work performed by CW-1 workers.
m. CW-1 Petition
The CW-1 petition means USCIS Form I-129CW, Petition for a CNMI-
Only Nonimmigrant Transitional Worker, a successor form, other form, or
electronic equivalent, any supplemental information requested by USCIS,
and additional evidence as may be prescribed or requested by USCIS.
n. CW-1 Worker
The CW-1 worker means any foreign worker who is lawfully present in
the Commonwealth and authorized by DHS to perform temporary labor or
services under 48 U.S.C. 1806(d).
o. Date of Need
The date of need means the first date the employer requires
services of the CW-1 workers as indicated on the CW-1 Application for
Temporary Employment Certification.
p. Department of Homeland Security or DHS
DHS means the Federal Department having jurisdiction over certain
immigration-related functions, acting through its component agencies,
including USCIS.
q. Employee
Employee means a person who is engaged to perform work for an
employer, as defined under the general common law of agency. Some of
the factors relevant to the determination of employee status include:
The hiring party's right to control the manner and means by which the
work is accomplished; the skill required to perform the work; the
source of the instrumentalities and tools for accomplishing the work;
the location of the work; the hiring party's discretion over when and
how long to work; and whether the work is part of the regular business
of the hiring party. Other applicable factors may be considered and no
one factor is dispositive. The terms employee and worker are used
interchangeably in this subpart.
r. Employer
Employer means, in summary, a person with a physical location in
the Commonwealth that has an employer relationship with a CW-1 worker
or worker in corresponding employment under the common law of agency,
and that possesses a Federal Employer Identification Number.
s. Employer-Client
Employer-client means an employer that has entered into an
agreement with a job contractor and that is not an affiliate, branch,
or subsidiary of the job
[[Page 12386]]
contractor, under which the job contractor provides services or labor
to the employer-client on a temporary basis and will not exercise
substantial, direct day-to-day supervision and control in the
performance of the services or labor to be performed other than hiring,
paying, and firing the workers.
t. Employment and Training Administration or ETA
ETA means the agency within the Department that includes OFLC and
has been delegated authority by the Secretary to fulfill the
Secretary's mandate under the Workforce Act for the administration and
adjudication of a CW-1 Application for Temporary Employment
Certification and related functions.
u. Federal Holiday
Federal holiday means a legal public holiday as defined at 5 U.S.C.
6103.
v. Full-Time
Full-time for the CW-1 program is 35 or more hours of work per
week.
w. Governor
Governor means the Governor of the Commonwealth of the Northern
Mariana Islands.
x. Job Contractor
Job contractor means an employer that contracts services or labor
on a temporary basis to one or more employers which is not an
affiliate, branch, or subsidiary of the job contractor and where the
job contractor will not exercise substantial, direct day-to-day
supervision and control over the services or labor other than hiring,
paying, and releasing the workers.
Job contractors generally have an ongoing business of supplying
workers to other employers where substantial, direct day-to-day
supervision, scheduling, and assignment of work occurs. The following
examples illustrate the differences between an employer that is a job
contractor and an employer that is not. Employer A is a construction
staffing company. It sends several of its employees to Acme Corporation
to perform construction work on a commercial building for 11 months.
Although Employer A has hired these employees and will be issuing
paychecks to these employees for the time worked at Acme Corporation,
Employer A will not exercise substantial, direct day-to-day supervision
and control over its employees during their performance of services at
Acme Corporation. Rather, Acme Corporation will direct and supervise
the Employer A employees during the 11-month project period. Under this
particular set of facts, Employer A would be considered a job
contractor. By contrast, Employer B is a computer repair company. It
sends several of its employees to Acme Corporation and many other
employers during the course of a year to disassemble desktop computers
for repair and maintenance. Among the employees that Employer B sends
to Acme Corporation and these other employers are several computer
repair technicians and one supervisor. Employer B's supervisor
instructs and supervises the technicians as to the desktops to be
repaired at each employer's establishment. Under this particular set of
facts, Employer B generally would not be considered a job contractor.
y. Job Offer
Job offer means the written offer made by an employer or potential
employer of CW-1 workers to both U.S. and CW-1 workers describing all
the material terms and conditions of employment, including those
relating to wages, working conditions, and other benefits, for which
the CW-1 Application for Temporary Employment Certification is filed.
The minimum content requirements of the employer's job offer are
discussed under Sec. 655.441 of this subpart.
z. Job Opportunity
Job opportunity means full-time employment at a place in the
Commonwealth to which U.S. workers can be referred.
aa. Joint Employment
Where two or more employers each have sufficient definitional
indicia of being a joint employer of a worker under the common law of
agency, they are, at all times, joint employers of that worker. The
Department additionally notes that the CNMI program definitions of
employer, employee, and joint employment that the Department provides
herein are different from the definitions of ``employer,''
``employee,'' and ``employ'' in the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C.
201 et seq. (FLSA) and the definition of ``employ'' in the Migrant and
Seasonal Agricultural Worker Protection Act, 29 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
(MSPA). Thus, the statutory definitions in the FLSA and MSPA that
determine the existence of an employment relationship or joint employer
status neither apply nor are relevant to the determination of whether
an entity is a CNMI employer or joint employer.
bb. Layoff
Layoff means any involuntary separation of one or more U.S.
employees. This does not include an employer's cause-based termination
actions.
cc. Long-Term Worker
Long-term worker means an alien who was admitted to the CNMI as a
CW-1 nonimmigrant during fiscal year (FY) 2015, and who was granted CW-
1 nonimmigrant status during each of FYs 2016 through 2018. Public Law
115-218 sec. 3(a)(3)(F), 48 U.S.C. 1806(d)(7)(B). As provided by the
statute, long-term workers are exempt from the prohibition on
Construction and Extraction Occupations under the Department's Standard
Occupational Classification Group 47-0000. Public Law 115-218 sec.
3(a)(3)(C), 48 U.S.C. 1806(d)(3)(D)(v).
dd. National Prevailing Wage Center or NPWC
NPWC means that office within OFLC from which employers, agents, or
attorneys who wish to file an CW-1 Application for Temporary Employment
Certification receive a PWD.
ee. NPWC Director
The NPWC Director means the OFLC official to whom the OFLC
Administrator has delegated authority to carry out certain NPWC
operations and functions.
ff. National Processing Center or NPC
NPC means the office within OFLC in which the COs operate, and
which are charged with the adjudication of CW-1 Applications for
Temporary Employment Certification.
gg. NPC Director
The NPC Director is the OFLC official to whom the OFLC
Administrator has delegated authority for purposes of certain NPC
operations and functions.
hh. Occupational Employment Statistics or OES Survey
The OES survey means the program under the jurisdiction of BLS that
reports annual wage estimates for Guam based on standard occupational
classifications (SOCs).
ii. Offered Wage
The offered wage means the wage offered by an employer in the CW-1
Application for Temporary Employment Certification and job offer. The
offered wage must equal or exceed the highest of the prevailing wage,
the Federal minimum wage, or the Commonwealth minimum wage.
[[Page 12387]]
jj. Office of Foreign Labor Certification or OFLC
OFLC means the organizational component of the ETA, within the
Department of Labor, that provides national leadership and policy
guidance and develops regulations to carry out the Secretary's
responsibilities, including overseeing the CW-1 program and issuing
determinations related to an employer's request for an Application for
Prevailing Wage Determination or CW-1 Application for Temporary
Employment Certification.
kk. Place of Employment
The place of employment means the worksite (or physical location)
where work under the CW-1 Application for Temporary Employment
Certification, including the job offer, actually is performed by the
CW-1 workers and workers in corresponding employment. The employer must
provide all known places of employment at the time of filing the CW-1
Application for Temporary Employment Certification.
ll. Prevailing Wage
A prevailing wage is the official wage issued by the NPWC on the
Form ETA 9141C, Application for Prevailing Wage Determination for the
CW-1 Program. The employer must pay all CW-1 workers and U.S. workers
in corresponding employment the highest of the prevailing wage, the
Federal minimum wage, or the Commonwealth minimum wage.
mm. Prevailing Wage Determination or PWD
A PWD is the prevailing wage determination issued by OFLC's NPWC on
the Form ETA-9141C, Application for Prevailing Wage Determination. The
PWD is used in support of the CW-1 Application for Temporary Employment
Certification.
nn. Secretary
The Secretary means the U.S. Secretary of Labor, the chief official
of the U.S. DOL, or the Secretary's designee.
oo. Secretary of Homeland Security
The Secretary of Homeland Security means the chief official of the
U.S. DHS or the Secretary of Homeland Security's designee.
pp. Secretary of State
The Secretary of State means the chief official of the U.S.
Department of State or the Secretary of State's designee.
qq. Strike
Strike means a concerted stoppage of work by employees as a result
of a labor dispute, or any concerted slowdown or other concerted
interruption of operation (including stoppage by reason of the
expiration of a collective bargaining agreement).
rr. Successor in Interest
Successor in interest means an employer, agent or attorney that is
controlling and carrying on the business of a previous employer:
Where an employer, agent, or attorney has violated 48
U.S.C. 1806 or these regulations, and has ceased doing business or
cannot be located for purposes of enforcement, the following factors,
as used under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act and the Vietnam Era
Veterans' Readjustment Assistance Act, may be considered in determining
whether an employer, agent, or attorney is a successor in interest; no
one factor is dispositive, and all the circumstances will be considered
as a whole:
[cir] Substantial continuity of the same business operations;
[cir] Use of the same facilities;
[cir] Continuity of the work force;
[cir] Similarity of jobs and working conditions;
[cir] Similarity of supervisory personnel;
[cir] Whether the former management or owner retains a direct or
indirect interest in the new enterprise;
[cir] Similarity in machinery, equipment, and production methods;
[cir] Similarity of products and services; and
[cir] The ability of the predecessor to provide relief.
For purposes of debarment only, the primary consideration
will be the personal involvement of the firm's ownership, management,
supervisors, and others associated with the firm in the violation(s) at
issue.
ss. Temporary Labor Certification or TLC
TLC means the certification made by the OFLC Administrator, based
on the CW-1 Application for Temporary Employment Certification, job
offer, and all supporting documentation, with respect to an employer
seeking to file with DHS a visa petition to employ one or more foreign
nationals as a CW-1 worker.
tt. United States
The United States means the continental United States, Alaska,
Hawaii, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, Guam, the U.S. Virgin Islands,
and the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands.
uu. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services or USCIS
USCIS means the Federal agency within DHS that makes the
determination under the immigration laws whether to grant petitions
filed by employers seeking CW-1 workers to perform temporary work in
the Commonwealth.
vv. United States Worker
United States worker (U.S. worker) means a worker who is:
A citizen or national of the United States;
An alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence; or
A citizen of the Federated States of Micronesia, the
Republic of the Marshall Islands, or the Republic of Palau, who has
been admitted to the United States as a nonimmigrant and is employment-
authorized under the Compacts of Free Association between the United
States and those nations.
ww. Wages
Wages mean all forms of cash remuneration to a worker by an
employer in payment for labor or services.
xx. Work Contract
Work contract means the document containing all the material terms
and conditions of employment relating to wages, hours, working
conditions, places of employment, and other benefits, including all
assurances and obligations required to be included under this subpart.
4. Section 655.403, Persons and Entities Authorized To File
The employer, the employer's agent, or the employer's attorney is
authorized to file Applications for Prevailing Wage Determination and/
or CW-1 Applications for Temporary Employment Certification. To obtain
a TLC, the employer must submit to OFLC a signed and dated Appendix C
of the CW-1 Application for Temporary Employment Certification (Form
ETA-9142C) attesting to comply with all of the terms, assurances, and
obligations of the CW-1 program, regardless of whether it is
represented by an agent or attorney. If an agent or attorney is
identified in the CW-1 Application for Temporary Employment
Certification, that agent or attorney must also sign and date Appendix
C, declaring that the employer has designated the agent or attorney to
act on the employer's behalf in connection with the CW-1 Application
for Temporary Employment Certification. Employers, their agents, and
their attorneys are each responsible
[[Page 12388]]
for the truthfulness and accuracy of the information and documentation
submitted with the CW-1 Application for Temporary Employment
Certification.
5. Section 655.404, Requirements of Agents
In addition to signing Appendix C of the CW-1 Application for
Temporary Employment Certification, an employer's agent is required to
provide, as part of the CW-1 Application for Temporary Employment
Certification, a copy of the current agreement, contract, or other
document defining the scope of its relationship with the employer and
demonstrating the agent's authority to represent the employer. The
Department will review the agreement to determine if a bona fide
relationship exists between the agent and the employer and, where the
agent is also engaged in recruitment, review to ensure it includes
language prohibiting the payment of fees by the worker, as required by
Sec. 655.423(n).
The Department reserves the right to further review the agreement
in the course of an audit examination or other integrity measure and
provide the agreement to DHS or any other Federal Government Official
performing an investigation, inspection, audit, or law enforcement
function. A certification of an employer's CW-1 Application for
Temporary Employment Certification that includes such an agreement in
no way indicates OFLC's approval of the agreement or the terms therein.
The requirement does not obligate either the agent or the employer to
disclose any trade secrets or other proprietary business information;
rather it only requires the agent to provide sufficient documentation
to demonstrate clearly the scope of the agent's relationship with the
employer.
B. Prefiling Procedures
1. Section 655.410, Offered Wage Rate and Determination of Prevailing
Wage
The Workforce Act requires that an employer must pay each CW-1
worker ``a wage that is not less than the greater of--(i) the statutory
minimum wage in the Commonwealth; (ii) the Federal minimum wage; or
(iii) the prevailing wage in the Commonwealth for the occupation in
which the worker is employed.'' 48 U.S.C. 1806(d)(2)(C). The Workforce
Act further provides that ``the Secretary of Labor shall use, or make
available to employers, an occupational wage survey conducted by the
Governor that the Secretary of Labor has determined meets the
statistical standards for determining prevailing wages in the
Commonwealth on an annual basis.'' Id. at 1806(d)(2)(B)(i). Finally,
under the statute, ``[i]n the absence of an occupational wage survey
approved by the Secretary of Labor . . . the prevailing wage for an
occupation in the Commonwealth shall be the arithmetic mean of the
wages of workers similarly employed in the territory of Guam according
to the wage component of the Occupational Employment Statistics Survey
conducted by the Bureau of Labor Statistics.'' Id. at
1806(d)(2)(B)(ii). Section 655.410 of this IFR establishes the
procedures for wage determinations, how employers will obtain a PWD,
and employers record retention requirements for the PWD.
Consistent with 48 U.S.C. 1806(d)(2)(C), Sec. 655.410(a) of the
IFR requires an employer seeking to employ CW-1 workers to offer and
pay the highest of the prevailing wage, the Federal minimum wage,\18\
or the Commonwealth minimum wage to both CW-1 workers and workers in
corresponding employment. While the statute does not expressly state
that the employer must pay the offered wage to workers in corresponding
employment, this requirement is necessary to prevent the employment of
CW-1 workers from causing an adverse effect on the wages and working
conditions of similarly employed U.S. workers. The statute prohibits
the Department from approving an application for TLC unless the
petitioner has demonstrated that there are not sufficient U.S. workers
in CNMI and that employment of CW-1 workers will not adversely affect
the wages of similarly employed U.S. workers. Without this wage
requirement, U.S. workers performing the same work as the work
requested in the job order, but earning less than the advertised wage,
would be required to quit their current employment and re-apply for the
same job with the same employer to obtain the higher wage rate offered
to the CW-1 worker. Such a result is inconsistent with the requirement
to protect against adverse effects on similarly employed U.S. workers.
Section 655.410(a) also clarifies that the issuance of a PWD does not
permit an employer to pay less than the highest wage required by any
applicable Federal or Commonwealth law. This requirement is also
consistent with similar requirements currently in place for other TLC
programs.\19\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\18\ Effective October 1, 2018, the full Federal minimum wage of
$7.25 per hour applies to workers in the Commonwealth.
\19\ 20 CFR part 655, subpart A; While this requirement is true
also for 20 CFR part 655, subpart B, in terms of the offered wage
requirement, employers do not receive a PWD from DOL's NPWC for the
H-2A program.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
As required by the Workforce Act, Sec. 655.410(b)(1) provides that
if the Governor conducts an annual survey for an occupational
classification, and the survey meets the statistical requirements set
forth in Sec. 655.410(e), as determined by the OFLC Administrator, the
wage reported by the Governor's survey must be the prevailing wage for
the occupational classification. The regulation requires that the
survey must include a mean hourly wage. The requirement that the
Governor's survey reports a mean hourly wage provides consistency
between prevailing wages issued from the Governor's survey and
prevailing wages issued from the OES survey, which by statute must use
the mean wage. See 48 U.S.C. 1806(d)(2)(B)(ii).
After the NPWC reviews the Governor's survey for consistency with
the statistical standards in Sec. 655.410(e), discussed below, OFLC
will make available on its website a listing of all occupational
classifications for which it has determined there is a valid Governor's
survey wage with the accompanying prevailing wage. This will allow
employers to determine the potential wage obligation associated with
the CW-1 program, even before submitting a PWD request.
In the absence of an approved wage survey, the Department will
establish the prevailing wage using the mean wage of workers similarly
employed in Guam from the OES survey. The OES survey is among the
largest continuous statistical wage survey programs and is
cooperatively administered between BLS and the State Workforce Agencies
(SWAs). For the territory of Guam, the OES survey is administered by
BLS and the Guam Department of Labor. BLS funds the OES survey and
provides the statistical procedures and technical support, while the
SWAs and Guam Department of Labor collect most of the data. BLS creates
a national sampling frame by combining the administrative lists of
unemployment insurance (UI) program reports from all of the SWAs into a
single database called the Quarterly Census of Employment and
Wages.\20\ Because the territory of Guam does not report data to the UI
program, the Guam Department of Labor administers an Annual Census of
Establishments survey program to create a database of employers in all
industries
[[Page 12389]]
for use in the OES survey.\21\ The OES survey sample is stratified by
metropolitan and nonmetropolitan area, industry, and size, and the
survey reports wage estimates based on geographic areas at the national
and State levels and for certain territories in which the OES survey
can report statistically valid data, including Guam, but not the CNMI.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\20\ See Bureau of Labor Statistics, ``Survey Methods and
Reliability Statement for the May 2017 Occupational Employment
Statistics Survey for a comprehensive and technical discussion of
the OES survey methodology,'' https://www.bls.gov/oes/current/methods_statement.pdf.
\21\ The Bureau of Labor Statistics within the Guam Department
of Labor is responsible for administering the Annual Census of
Establishments, which is funded in part by the Department's
Employment and Training Administration under the Workforce
Information Grants, https://bls.guam.gov/annual-census-of-establishments/.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Wages for the OES survey are straight-time, gross pay, exclusive of
premium pay. For purposes of the OES survey, ``pay'' includes base
rate; cost-of-living allowances; guaranteed pay; hazardous duty pay;
incentive pay, including commissions and production bonuses; piece-
rates; tips; and on-call pay.\22\ The OES survey is a comprehensive and
statistically valid wage survey and is widely used in the DOL's
nonagricultural foreign labor certification programs (H-2B, H-1B, and
PERM). The frequency and precision of the data collected, as well as
the comprehensive nature of the occupations for which such data are
collected, make it an appropriate data source for determining
applicable wages across the range of occupations found in the CW-1
program.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\22\ See ``Occupational Employment Report Form, Instructions for
Reporting Wage Information,'' p. 2, available at https://www.bls.gov/respondents/oes/pdf/forms/uuuuuu_fillable.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The OES prevailing wage that will be used for the CW-1 program is
the mean wage paid to workers in a particular SOC in Guam. The use of
the mean wage in this IFR is required by the Workforce Act. See 48
U.S.C. 1806(d)(2)(B)(ii). The Department will therefore issue
prevailing wages at the mean of all workers ``similarly employed in the
territory of Guam'' in the relevant SOC from the OES survey, without
regard to industry, experience, or skill level.
The Workforce Act requires employers to pay a wage that is the
highest of the Commonwealth minimum wage, the Federal minimum wage, or
the prevailing wage in the Commonwealth. 48 U.S.C. 1806(d)(2)(C).
However, the statute is silent about how the Department must set the
prevailing wage if both: (1) The Governor's annual survey for the
occupation does not meet the Department's statistical standards or the
Governor does not submit a survey covering a given occupation; and (2)
the OES survey does not report a mean of the wages paid to workers in
the SOC in Guam due to insufficient data. In the event this situation
occurs, the Department remains statutorily bound to issue a prevailing
wage given that the statute requires the employer to pay the highest of
the statutory minimum wage, the Federal minimum wage, or the prevailing
wage in the Commonwealth. See 48 U.S.C. 1806(d)(2)(C).
When the OES survey cannot produce a statistically valid wage
estimate for a given geographic area, BLS reports a wage at the next
largest geographic area until it reaches an area large enough that it
has enough data to report.\23\ As a result, when the BLS cannot produce
a statistically valid wage rate for Guam in a given SOC, the reported
wage rate is a national wage for the SOC. OFLC uses that national wage
rate to establish the prevailing wage in Guam in the other foreign
labor certification programs when BLS cannot report a mean wage based
on wages paid to workers in Guam for a given SOC. However, the
Workforce Act's mandate for the Department to base prevailing wage
rates on wages paid to workers in the Commonwealth or Guam as the first
and second prevailing wage options establishes a clear preference in
the CW-1 program for prevailing wage rates to be based on wages paid in
these islands, rather than other geographic areas. As a result, the
Department concludes that it would be inappropriate to require an
employer to pay a prevailing wage that is based only on the national
wage for the SOC from the OES survey, without adjustment, in the CW-1
program. Accordingly, if both prevailing wage sources expressly
provided in the statute do not report a wage, the Department will base
the prevailing wage on the national mean wage for the SOC from the OES,
but will adjust the national SOC wage by the percentage difference
between the mean wage paid to workers in all SOCs for which the OES
survey can produce an average wage paid to workers in Guam compared
with the national mean wage paid to workers in all SOCs in the United
States. Given the lack of available, comprehensive, and reliable
alternative data sources, this method will best meet: (1) The statutory
requirement for the Department to require employers to pay a prevailing
wage; and (2) the statutory intent for the Department to issue
prevailing wage rates based on wages paid to similarly employed workers
in the Commonwealth or Guam. The Department requests comments on its
use of an adjusted national wage to establish the prevailing wage for
the CW-1 program if a mean wage is not available for the occupational
classification from both a survey conducted by the CNMI Governor and
from the OES for workers in Guam, as well as on alternative sources it
might use to establish the prevailing wage in these circumstances.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\23\ The BLS practice of survey expansion is generally described
in GAL 2-98, at p. 4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Section 655.410(b)(2) provides that if the job duties on the
Application for Prevailing Wage Determination do not fall within a
single occupational classification, the NPWC will determine the
prevailing wage by assigning the highest prevailing wage for all
applicable occupational classifications. This approach ensures that
employers do not adversely affect wages or discourage U.S. workers from
applying for a job by advertising a job which contains the duties of
distinct occupations, and asking workers to perform the duties of a
higher wage occupation while being paid for the duties of a lower wage
occupation. This is codifies existing NPWC procedures and practice for
determining prevailing wages for other foreign labor certification
programs (i.e., H-1B, H-2B, and PERM) and protects against occupational
misclassification.\24\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\24\ See OFLC Frequently Asked Questions and Answers, https://www.foreignlaborcert.doleta.gov/faqsanswers.cfm.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Section 655.410(c) requires an employer to electronically request
and obtain a PWD from the NPWC before electronically submitting its CW-
1 Application for Temporary Employment Certification. The PWD must be
valid on the day the employer submits the CW-1 Application for
Temporary Employment Certification. To avoid delays, the Department
encourages employers to request a PWD in the CW-1 program at least 90
calendar days before the date the employer plans to file its CW-1
Application for Temporary Employment Certification.
CW-1 employers that lack adequate access to electronic filing,
either due to lack of internet access of physical disability precluding
electronic filing, may file the Application for Prevailing Wage
Determination by mail with a statement of why it qualifies to file by
mail. There is no specific format for the statement but it must
accompany the application at the time of filing. The NPWC will return
without review any application submitted by mail or any method other
than the designated electronic method(s) provided in this regulation,
unless the employer submits the application package in accordance
[[Page 12390]]
with paragraph (c)(1)(ii) of Sec. 655.410 and with the statement of
the need to file by mail. If an employer files its Application for
Prevailing Wage Determination by mail with the required statement of
need, the employer may file its CW-1 Application for Temporary
Employment Certification by mail without a statement of need. This
statement must be updated each fiscal year.
Section 655.410(d) provides that when the NPWC issues the
prevailing wage, it must provide the following information: The
prevailing wage, the source of the prevailing wage, and the Application
for Prevailing Wage Determination, with the NPWC's endorsement to the
employer.
Section 655.410(e) establishes the ``statistical standards'' the
Department will use to evaluate a survey conducted by the Governor
under 48 U.S.C. 1806(d)(2)(B)(i). The Department will use a survey
conducted by the Governor to establish the prevailing wage for an
occupational classification only if the survey meets the following
requirements: (1) The survey must be independently conducted and issued
by the Governor, including through any Commonwealth agency,
Commonwealth college, or Commonwealth university; (2) the survey must
provide the arithmetic mean of the wages of workers in the occupational
classification in the Commonwealth; (3) the independent surveyor must
either make a reasonable, good faith attempt to contact all employers
in the Commonwealth employing workers in that occupation or conduct a
randomized sampling of such employers, which means the surveyor must
collect the wages of workers performing the job duties covered by the
survey's occupational classification without regard to the education,
experience, or immigration status of the workers in the occupational
classification or the size of the employer; (4) if used, the randomized
survey must include the wages of at least 30 workers in the
Commonwealth; (5) if used, the randomized survey must include the wages
of workers in the Commonwealth employed by at least 3 employers; (6) if
used, the randomized survey must be conducted across industries that
employ workers in the occupational classification; \25\ (7) the wage
reported in the survey must include all types of pay, consistent with
the OES definition of ``pay,'' as discussed above; (8) the survey must
be based on wages paid to workers in the occupational classification
not more than 12 months before the date the survey is submitted to the
OFLC Administrator for consideration; and (9) the Governor of the
Commonwealth must submit the survey to the OFLC Administrator, with
specific information about the survey methodology, including such items
as sample size and source, sample selection procedures, types of
payments (e.g., overtime, weekend or holiday pay premiums) included in
the survey, and survey job descriptions, to allow a determination to be
made about the adequacy of the data provided and the validity of the
statistical methodology used in conducting the survey.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\25\ The occupational classification for the survey is based on
the job duties performed and need not be identical to an SOC.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The statistical standards in this IFR for surveys conducted by the
Governor in the CW-1 program are generally consistent with the
regulatory standards for prevailing wage surveys in the H-2B program.
See 20 CFR 655.10(f).\26\ Adherence to the H-2B survey standards will
promote consistency in the wage rates that apply to similarly employed
workers across nonimmigrant programs in the Commonwealth. This
alignment will also make the CW-1 regulation easier to implement
because the Commonwealth government has experience in conducting
prevailing wage surveys under the H-2B standards.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\26\ The H-2B regulatory survey standards are discussed in depth
in the 2015 H-2B Rule, 80 FR 24146 (Apr. 29, 2015). Except for
limitations on who may conduct a survey--which are not relevant here
because 48 U.S.C. 1806(d)(2)(B)(i) allows only for surveys conducted
by the Governor and the BLS--the regulatory H-2B survey standards
are unaffected by current appropriations riders in the H-2B program.
See ``Effects of the 2016 Department of Labor Appropriations Act''
(Dec. 29, 2015), https://www.foreignlaborcert.doleta.gov/pdf/H-2B_Prevailing_Wage_FAQs_DOL_Appropriations_Act.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The CW-1 program is based on the statutory requirement that the
Governor's survey must be conducted ``on an annual basis.'' 48 U.S.C.
1806(d)(2)(B)(i). In comparison to the H-2B program, there are two
notable changes. First, a survey for the CW-1 program must report the
mean and cannot report only the median, unlike in the H-2B program,
which permits a survey to report either a mean or a median only. As
discussed above, this CW-1 requirement will align the survey
methodology for the Governor's survey with the OES methodology required
by the Workforce Act. Either a mean or median rate can be calculated
from the underlying survey data, so limiting CW-1 surveys to those that
produce a mean wage requires no change in the practice of conducting
surveys that is used for H-2B. In addition, past prevailing wage
surveys conducted by the Commonwealth government for the H-2B program
have reported a mean wage, and so the CW-1 regulation will not require
a change to existing practice. Second, Sec. 655.410(e)(8) of this IFR
requires that the survey is based on wages paid to workers in the
occupational classification not more than 12 months before the survey
is submitted to OFLC, while the H-2B regulation permits employers to
submit surveys based on wages paid no more than 24 months before the
survey is submitted. This difference for the CW-1 program is based on
the statutory requirement that the Governor's survey must be conducted
``on an annual basis.''
As provided in Sec. 655.410(f), the OFLC Administrator will review
the survey for compliance with the regulatory requirements. If the OFLC
Administrator finds the wage reported for any occupational
classification is unacceptable, the OFLC Administrator must inform the
Governor in writing of the reasons for the finding. The Governor may
respond to the finding by submitting corrected wage data or by
conducting a new wage survey, and may submit the revised wage data to
the OFLC Administrator for consideration.
Under Sec. 655.410(g), a PWD issued based on either the Governor's
survey or the OES survey will be valid for at least 90 calendar days
and as many as 365 days, the same validity period used by the NPWC
across programs. See, e.g., 20 CFR 656.40(c). The length of the
validity period for the survey will depend, in part, on when the
prevailing wage source used to establish the prevailing wage will be
updated.
As provided in Sec. 655.410(h), employers must retain the PWD for
3 years from the date of issuance if not used in support of a TLC
application or if used in support of a TLC application that is denied,
or 3 years from the end date of the validity period of the CW-1
Application for Temporary Employment Certification, whichever is later.
The employer must submit the PWD to the CO if requested and to any
Federal Government Official performing an investigation, inspection,
audit, or law enforcement function.
Employers may request review of a PWD only through the appeals
process described in Sec. 655.411 of this IFR.
2. Section 655.411, Review of Prevailing Wage Determinations
Paragraph (a) of this section requires an employer that wants to
appeal a PWD to make a written request to the NPWC Director within 7
business days from the date the PWD was issued. Requests made more than
7 business days after
[[Page 12391]]
the issuance of a PWD will be considered time barred. The request for
review must clearly identify the PWD for which review is sought, set
forth the particular grounds for the request, and include any materials
submitted to the NPWC for the purposes of securing the PWD.
Under paragraph (b), the employer may submit supplementary material
with its request for review by the NPWC Director. The NPWC Director
will review the employer's request and accompanying documentation,
including supplementary material provided. After performing a review of
the documentation, the NPWC Director will issue a Final Determination
letter to the employer and, if applicable, to the employer's agent or
attorney, either affirming the PWD as issued or modifying the PWD.
If the employer desires review of the NPWC Director's decision,
paragraph (c) establishes the process the employer must follow to
request review by BALCA. Specifically, the employer must make a written
request for review that must be received by BALCA within 10 business
days from the date the Final Determination letter was issued by the
NPWC Director, and the employer must simultaneously send a copy to the
NPWC Director who issued the Final Determination. Upon receipt of the
request, the NPWC will prepare an Appeal File and submit it to BALCA.
The request for review, statements, briefs, and other submissions of
the parties must contain only legal arguments and may only refer to
evidence that was within the record upon which the decision on the PWD
by the NPWC Director was based. BALCA will then handle the appeal in
accordance with Sec. 655.461 as explained further in the preamble to
that section.
C. CW-1 Application for Temporary Employment Certification Filing
Procedures
1. Section 655.420, Application Filing Requirements
In accordance with Section (2)(A)(i) of the Workforce Act, an
employer must first obtain a TLC from the Department before filing a
CW-1 petition with DHS. Public Law 115-218 sec. 3(a)(3)(B), 48 U.S.C.
1806(d)(2)(A). This section establishes the standards, timeframes, and
procedures for employers to request TLC under the CW-1 program,
including the requirement that the employer must file the TLC
application electronically unless the employer has submitted a
statement when filing the PWD request or files a statement when
submitting the TLC application indicating that it qualifies for one of
the regulatory exemptions in the IFR. The Department believes that the
below regulatory requirements will advance the Department's statutory
obligations. Based on the Department's experience administering other
TLC programs, the requirements outlined below appropriately ensure that
U.S. workers have equal access to job opportunities and protect their
wages and working conditions from adverse effect.
a. Paragraphs (a) and (b), What To File and Statutory Timeframes for
Filing an CW-1 Application for Temporary Employment Certification
Paragraph (a) specifies that an employer seeking TLC must file a
completed CW-1 Application for Temporary Employment Certification--
consisting of the Form ETA-9142C, appropriate appendices, and a valid
PWD--and all supporting documentation and information that this subpart
requires at the time of filing. Incomplete applications will not be
accepted for processing; OFLC will return them without review. In
accordance with the Workforce Act, 48 U.S.C. 1806(d)(3)(D)(i),
paragraph (b)(1) provides that an employer seeking to hire CW-1 workers
must file a completed CW-1 Application for Temporary Employment
Certification no more than 120 calendar days before the employer's date
of need. However, where the employer is seeking TLC to support a
petition to renew a visa (extending the employment of a CW-1 worker),
paragraph (b)(2) requires that the employer file the application no
more than 180 calendar days before the date on which the CW-1 status
expires. See id.
b. Paragraph (c), Location and Methods of Filing
Paragraph (c) of this section establishes the location and method
by which an employer may file a CW-1 Application for Temporary
Employment Certification under the CW-1 program. In paragraph (c)(1),
the Department requires an employer to submit the Form ETA-9142C and
all required supporting documentation to the NPC using an electronic
method(s) designated by the OFLC Administrator. Unless the employer
qualifies to file by mail,, the NPC will return, without review, any
CW-1 Application for Temporary Employment Certification submitted using
a method other than the electronic method(s) designated by the OFLC
Administrator.
c. Paragraph (c)(1), Procedures for Electronic Filing of the CW-1
Application for Temporary Employment Certification
Absent an exemption employers or, if applicable, their agents or
attorneys will prepare and electronically submit CW-1 Applications for
Temporary Employment Certification using OFLC's new Foreign Labor
Application Gateway (FLAG) System at https://flag.dol.gov. E-filing
will be required for the Form ETA-9142C, applicable appendices, and all
supporting documentation required by this subpart. All of these
documents must be electronically submitted at the time of filing to
constitute a complete, properly filed application. In addition, DOL's
forms, will require employers and, if applicable, their authorized
representatives, to designate a valid email address for sending and
receiving official correspondence concerning the processing of these e-
filings by the NPC.
d. Justification for Mandatory Electronic Filing of CW-1 Applications
for Temporary Employment Certification
For the reasons discussed below in the preamble, the Department has
concluded that the e-filing requirement for employers will modernize
the end-to-end electronic processing of CW-1 Applications for Temporary
Employment Certification and create significant administrative
efficiencies for employers in the CNMI and the Department. The
Department has also estimated that mandating e-filing should minimize
costs and burdens for employers and the Department, improve the quality
of the information collected by minimizing errors through system-
generated prompts, ensure required information and document uploads are
provided to reduce the frequency of delays related to filing
applications, improve the quality of information collected, and promote
administrative efficiency and accountability.
Electronic submissions do not require manual data entry by NPC
staff and can be instantaneously categorized and assigned for review by
the NPC. If an electronic CW-1 Application for Temporary Employment
Certification requires amendments or other corrections, those
amendments and corrections can be automatically entered by NPC staff.
Furthermore, as previously stated, electronic submissions are more
likely to include all necessary documentation and information because
the system will require electronic validation of the form entries and
supporting documentation prior to acceptance. Again, employers will
have an immediate opportunity to correct the
[[Page 12392]]
errors or upload the missing documentation. Electronic filing also
expedites the process of addressing any potential problems with an
application because the NPC is able to email an employer or their
representative directly from the electronic filing module to alert it
of information which must be corrected or if it needs clarification
about something. Electronic contact with the employer or their
representative allows for instantaneous delivery of questions to
employers and allows employers to respond quickly as well, which is
much faster than transmitting questions by mail. The electronic system
will also allow an employer or their representative to upload necessary
documentation directly to their case file, which expedites review of
applications and the issuance of final determinations. The Department's
e-filing requirement will improve the customer experience by permitting
more prompt adjudication of applications and reducing paperwork burdens
and mailing costs. This approach should reduce processing delays and
costs employers with access to the internet, as they would otherwise
need to pay for expedited mail or private courier services to submit
corrected applications, as has been OFLC's experience in connection
with its other temporary labor certification programs.\27\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\27\ 20 CFR part 655, subpart A; 20 CFR part 655, subpart B.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Department's e-filing requirement is consistent with several
Federal statutes. First, the Government Paperwork Elimination Act
(GPEA), Public Law 105-277, Title XVII (secs. 1701-1710), 112 Stat.
2681-749 (Oct. 21, 1998), 44 U.S.C. 3504 note, was enacted to improve
customer service and governmental efficiency through the use of
information technology. The GPEA directs federal agencies, when
possible, to use electronic forms, e-filing, and electronic submissions
to conduct agency business with the public. Second, the E-Government
Act of 2002, Public Law 107-347, 116 Stat. 2899 (Dec. 17, 2002), 44
U.S.C. 3601 note, was enacted to encourage use of technology to enhance
governmental functions and services, integrate related interagency
functions, achieve more efficient agency performance, increase public
access to Government information, and reduce costs and burdens for
businesses and other Government entities. Third, the Paperwork
Reduction Act (PRA), 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq., was enacted with the goal
of reducing paperwork burdens imposed by Government information
collections, improving the efficiency of Government information
collection and the quality of information collected, and minimizing
Government costs associated with the creation, collection, maintenance,
use, and disposition of information. Finally, this e-filing requirement
is consistent with several other open Government initiatives and
information technology modernization policies expressed in memoranda
and Executive Orders, such as E.O. 13571,\28\ which require agencies to
use innovative technology to reduce costs and streamline customer
service processes.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\28\ E.O. 13571, Streamlining Service Delivery and Improving
Customer Service (Apr. 27, 2011) (requiring agencies to enhance
customer service by ``identifying ways to use innovative
technologies . . . [to] lower[] costs, decreas[e] service delivery
times, and improve[e] the customer experience.''); see also OMB
Memorandum M-11-24, ``Implementing Executive Order 13571 on
Streamlining Service Delivery and Improving Customer Service'' (June
13, 2011) (implementing E.O. 13571).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Department is aware that some employers in the CNMI, especially
those located on islands without adequate technological infrastructure,
may be unable to take advantage of the more efficient e-filing process.
Therefore, the Department will permit these employers to file using a
paper-based process if they lack adequate access to e-filing. This IFR
also establishes that individuals with disabilities may file by mail.
e. Paragraphs (c)(2) and (3), Alternative Filing Procedures for
Employers Lacking Adequate Access to Electronic Filing or Due to a
Disability in the CNMI
The Department is also establishing procedures allowing employers
in the CNMI that lack adequate access to e-filing to file by mail and,
for those employers who are unable or limited in their ability to use
or access the electronic application due to a disability, file the
application through other means.
f. Paragraph (d), Original Signature and Acceptance of Electronic
Signatures
Paragraph (d) of this section requires that the CW-1 Application
for Temporary Employment Certification, as filed, contains an
electronic (scanned) copy of the employer's original signature (and
that of the employer's authorized attorney or agent, if the employer is
represented by an attorney or agent) or, in the alternative, use a
verifiable electronic signature method, as directed by the OFLC
Administrator. If the employer, under paragraph (c) of this section, is
permitted to file by mail, the CW-1 Application for Temporary
Employment Certification, when filed, must bear the original signature
of the employer and, if applicable, the employer's authorized attorney
or agent.
When electronically filing the CW-1 Application for Temporary
Employment Certification, the FLAG System will require the employer
and, if applicable, the employer's authorized attorney or agent to
digitally sign the Form ETA-9142C, Appendix C,\29\ or require the
system account holder to upload an electronic (scanned) copy of the
originally signed and dated Appendix C. In the case of a job contractor
filing as a joint employer with its employer-client, a separate signed
and dated Appendix C for the employer-client must also be submitted
concurrently with the CW-1 Application for Temporary Employment
Certification, as required by Sec. 655.421 of this subpart. The
Appendix C is a crucial component of the CW-1 Application for Temporary
Employment Certification because it contains the requisite program
assurances and obligations an employer must provide to the Department.
An employer that fails to provide a signed and dated Appendix C at the
time of filing the CW-1 Application for Temporary Employment
Certification, in accordance with the original signature requirements
of this paragraph, is ineligible to file and its application will be
returned by the NPC without review.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\29\ Appendix C includes a declaration to be signed by the
employer's attorney or agent, and a separate, lengthier declaration
to be signed by the employer.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Department has concluded that this provision will maximize
efficiencies in the application process and establish parity between
paper and electronic documents by expanding the ability of employers,
agents, and attorneys to use electronic methods to comply with
signature requirements for the CW-1 program. As a matter of
longstanding policy, the Department considers an original signature to
be legally binding evidence of the intention of a person with regard to
a document, record, or transaction. Since the implementation of an e-
filing option in late 2012 for the H-2A and H-2B programs, the
Department also has considered a signature valid where the employer's
original signature on a document retained in the employer's file is
photocopied, scanned, or similarly reproduced for electronic
transmission to the Department, whether at the time of filing or during
the course of processing a CW-1 Application for Temporary Employment
Certification. Although acceptance of
[[Page 12393]]
electronic (scanned) copies of original signatures on documents
generates efficiencies in the application process, modern technologies
and evolving business practices are rendering the distinction between
original paper and electronic signatures nearly obsolete. The
Department and employers can achieve even greater efficiencies using
and accepting electronic signature methods.
Under this provision, the Department will permit an employer,
agent, or attorney to sign or certify a document required under this
subpart using a valid electronic signature method. This proposal is
consistent with the principles of two Federal statutes that govern an
agency's implementation of electronic document and signature
requirements. First, the GPEA requires Federal agencies to allow
individuals or entities that deal with the agencies, when practicable,
the option to submit information or transact with the agencies
electronically and to electronically maintain those records. The GPEA
and e-Gov also specifically states that electronic records and their
related electronic signatures are not to be denied legal effect,
validity, or enforceability merely because they are in electronic form,
and encourages Federal Government use of a range of electronic
signature alternatives. See sections 1704, 1707 of the GPEA. Second,
the Electronic Signatures in Global and National Commerce (E-SIGN) Act,
Public Law 106-229, 114 Stat. 464 (June 30, 2000), 15 U.S.C. 7001 et
seq., generally provides that electronic documents have the same legal
effect as their hard copy counterparts.
The GPEA and E-SIGN Act adopt a ``functional equivalence approach''
to electronic signature requirements where the purposes and functions
of the traditional paper-based requirements for a signature must be
considered, together with how those purposes and functions can be
fulfilled in an electronic context. The functional equivalence approach
rejects the precept that Federal agency requirements impose on users of
electronic signatures more stringent standards of security than
required for handwritten or other forms of signatures in a paper-based
environment.
Consistent with the GPEA, the Department will accept an electronic
signature on CW-1 applications as long as it: (1) Identifies and
authenticates a particular person as the source of the electronic
communication; and (2) indicates such person's approval of the
information contained in the electronic communication.\30\ In addition,
OMB guidelines state that a valid and enforceable electronic signature
would require satisfying the following signing requirements: (1) The
signer must use an acceptable electronic form of signature; (2) the
electronic form of signature must be executed or adopted by the signer
with the intent to sign the electronic record; (3) the electronic form
of signature must be attached to or associated with the electronic
record being signed; (4) there must be a means to identify and
authenticate a particular person as the signer; and (5) there must be a
means to preserve the integrity of the signed record.\31\ The
Department will rely on best practices for electronic signature safety
and integrity, such as these five signing requirements. Consistent with
the GPEA and E-SIGN Act, the Department adopts a technology ``neutral''
policy with respect to the requirements for electronic signature. That
is, the employer, agent, or attorney can apply an electronic signature
required on a document using any available technology that meets the
five signing requirements.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\30\ Section 1710(1) of the GPEA. The definition of electronic
signature in the E-SIGN Act essentially is equivalent to the
definition in the GPEA. The E-SIGN Act defines an electronic
signature as ``an electronic sound, symbol, or process, attached to
or logically associated with a contract or other record and executed
or adopted by a person with the intent to sign the record.'' 15
U.S.C. 7006(5).
\31\ Federal Chief Information Council, ``Use of Electronic
Signatures in Federal Organization Transactions,'' Version 1.0 (Jan.
25, 2013).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Department concludes that these standards for electronic
signature are reasonable and accepted by Federal agencies. Promoting
the use of electronic signatures will enable employers, agents, and
attorneys to reduce printing, paper, and storage costs. For employers
that need to retain and refer to multiple CW-1 Applications for
Temporary Employment Certification, the time and costs savings can be
considerable. Since the CW-1 program serves employers located thousands
of miles from the continental United States on the westward side of the
International Date Line, implementing electronic signatures will help
reduce operational costs and maximize processing efficiency for the
Department.
g. Paragraph (e), Requests for Multiple Positions on the CW-1
Application for Temporary Employment Certification
Similar to the Department's administration of other TLC
programs,\32\ paragraph (e) of this section permits an employer to
request certification of more than one position on its CW-1 Application
for Temporary Employment Certification as long as all CW-1 workers will
perform the same services or labor under the same terms and conditions,
in the same occupation, during the same period of employment, and at a
location (or locations) covered by the application. The Department's
experience in managing similar programs demonstrates this policy
reduces the paperwork and advertising burden on employers while also
preventing the NPC from receiving and processing multiple applications
for the same employer and job opportunity. Filing more than one CW-1
Application for Temporary Employment Certification is necessary when an
employer needs CW-1 workers to perform full-time job opportunities that
do not involve the same occupation or comparable work, or needs workers
to perform the same full-time work, but in different areas of intended
employment or with different starting and ending dates.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\32\ 20 CFR part 655, subparts A and B.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
h. Paragraph (f), Scope of CW-1 Applications for Temporary Employment
Certification
Paragraph (f) of this section specifies the scope of all CW-1
Applications for Temporary Employment Certification submitted by
employers to the NPC. First, paragraph (f)(1) provides that each CW-1
Application for Temporary Employment Certification must be limited to
places of employment within the Commonwealth. In circumstances where
the job opportunity covers places of employment located on more than
one of the islands within the Commonwealth, the employer may submit a
single CW-1 Application for Temporary Employment Certification to the
NPC. However, an employer submitting a CW-1 Application for Temporary
Employment Certification containing places of employment outside the
Commonwealth, regardless of the period of employment, will not be
accepted by the CO.
The CO will use the places of employment identified in the CW-1
Application for Temporary Employment Certification for the purpose of
determining the recruitment requirements employers must follow to
locate qualified and available U.S. workers, and to aid the CO in
assessing whether the wages, job requirements, and terms and conditions
of the job opportunity will adversely affect U.S. workers similarly
employed within the Commonwealth.
Second, paragraph (f)(2) prohibits an association or other
organization of employers from filing a CW-1
[[Page 12394]]
Application for Temporary Employment Certification on behalf of more
than one employer-member under the CW-1 program. An association or
other organization of employers is permitted by this subpart to file
CW-1 Applications for Temporary Employment Certification as either a
sole employer of CW-1 workers, or as an agent representing one
employer-member seeking to employ CW-1 workers.
However, this subpart does not permit an association or other
organization of employers to file CW-1 Applications for Temporary
Employment Certification on behalf of multiple employer-members, each
seeking to employ CW-1 workers in full-time employment. This type of
filing is often referred to as a ``master'' application and is likewise
prohibited in the H-2B program. Only an agricultural association
seeking to employ H-2A workers jointly with its employer-members is
expressly permitted by the INA to file an Application for Temporary
Employment Certification in this manner. Accordingly, except where
otherwise permitted under Sec. 655.421 of this subpart governing job
contractors, each employer-member of an association or other
organization of employers seeking to employ CW-1 workers in full-time
employment within the Commonwealth must submit separate CW-1
Applications for Temporary Employment Certification to the NPC.
i. Paragraph (g), Maximum Period of Employment on the CW-1 Application
for Temporary Employment Certification
Under paragraph (g) of this section, an employer seeking to employ
a CW-1 worker is permitted to identify a period of employment lasting
not more than 1 year. However, an employer seeking to employ a long-
term CW-1 worker, as defined under Sec. 655.402 of this subpart, is
permitted to identify a period of employment lasting not more than 3
years. The effect of these provisions is that the period of employment
on the CW-1 Application for Temporary Employment Certification will be
consistent with the maximum periods of admission permitted by the
Workforce Act,\33\ regardless of whether the employer's need for the
services or labor to be performed is temporary or permanent in nature.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\33\ See 48 U.S.C. 1806(d)(7)(A)(i) (generally limiting CW-1
permit validity to a period not to exceed 1 year, renewable for no
more than 2 consecutive 1-year periods) and 1806(d)(7)(B) (a long-
term worker may receive a permit that is valid for a period not to
exceed 3 years, renewable for additional 3-year periods during the
transition period).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Under this provision, an employer seeking a TLC would be required
to disclose the period of employment for the job opportunity in the CW-
1 Application for Temporary Employment Certification. Generally, the
employer will be held to recruiting and filling with a CW-1 worker(s) a
job opportunity that lasts no longer than 1 year. If, however, the
employer attests in the CW-1 Application for Temporary Employment
Certification that it intends to employ a long-term CW-1 worker, and
that the period of employment will be longer than 1 year, the CO would
approve a labor certification lasting no longer than 3 years, the
maximum period permitted by the statute.
Before issuing a NOA under Sec. 655.433, the Department would
review the expected start and end dates of work identified in the CW-1
Application for Temporary Employment Certification as discussed above.
The Department's NOA would not serve as an approval that the
application demonstrated the work under the certification will be
performed by a long-term CW-1 worker. As the Department does not have
access to the identities of CW-1 beneficiaries, only USCIS is able to
make a determination with respect to whether the CW-1 beneficiary
involved in the petition qualifies as a long-term worker.
j. Paragraph (h), Return of CW-1 Applications for Temporary Employment
Certification Based on USCIS Reaching Statutory Cap
The Workforce Act raised the annual numerical limits, or ``visa
caps,'' on the total number of foreign nationals who may be issued a
CW-1 visa or otherwise granted CW-1 status by DHS for FY 2019, and
established new, annually reduced caps for subsequent fiscal years. See
48 U.S.C. 1806(d)(3)(B).\34\ As employer demand for foreign workers in
the CNMI could remain high in relation to these statutory visa caps,
the Department anticipates receiving more requests for TLC than will
result in CW-1 visas in some fiscal years. Based on OFLC's experience
administering the H-1B and H-2B programs, both of which are subject to
statutory visa caps, the Department has determined that an effective
and efficient administration of the CW-1 program must provide for the
suspension of the acceptance of employer applications for TLC as soon
as the statutory visa cap in a fiscal year is reached.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\34\ The fiscal year in which the annual statutory numerical
limits apply spans October 1 through September 30.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Accordingly, if USCIS issues a public notice stating that it has
received a sufficient number of CW-1 petitions to meet the statutory
numerical limit on the total number of foreign nationals who may be
issued a CW-1 visa or otherwise granted CW-1 status for the fiscal
year, paragraph (h)(1) of this section authorizes the OFLC
Administrator to return without review any CW-1 Applications for
Temporary Employment Certification with dates of need in that fiscal
year and received on or after the date that the OFLC Administrator
provides public notice.
Paragraph (h)(2) of this section specifies that the OFLC
Administrator will announce, through a notice on OFLC's website, the
last receipt date of the applications OFLC will review, and the return
of CW-1 Applications for Temporary Employment Certification received
after that date reflecting dates of need in the fiscal year for which
the statutory limit has been met. This notice will be effective on the
date it is posted on OFLC's website and will remain in effect until the
close of the fiscal year, unless: (1) USCIS subsequently issues a
public notice stating additional CW-1 visas are available for that
fiscal year; and (2) the OFLC Administrator publishes a new notice
announcing that OFLC will accept additional TLCs with dates of need in
the fiscal year. This provision provides the OFLC Administrator with
flexibility to adapt to future changes DHS may announce in the
availability of CW-1 visas within a fiscal year. The Department reminds
employers that the notices issued under this paragraph are premised on
interagency consultation and visa cap processing considerations by DHS.
Except where a qualifying exemption applies, the Department will not
suspend filing or lift a suspension of filing notice due to the
individual circumstances of employers, workers, or other interested
stakeholders.
Finally, paragraph (h)(3) of this section establishes the two
instances when the OFLC Administrator's notice to return CW-1
Applications for Temporary Employment Certification filed after the
effective date, will not be applied. First, OFLC will not return, but
will continue to process CW-1 Applications for Temporary Employment
Certification filed before the last receipt date listed on the notice
in accordance with all requirements of this subpart. Second, OFLC will
continue to accept the filing of CW-1 Applications for Temporary
Employment Certification by employers that identify in the CW-1
Application
[[Page 12395]]
for Temporary Employment Certification that the CW-1 workers to be
employed under the application will be exempt from the statutory visa
cap for that fiscal year.\35\ Since DHS is the agency responsible for
administering the annual CW-1 visa cap and for making final
determinations regarding any exemptions to the visa cap, the
designation of cap-exempt status in the CW-1 Application for Temporary
Employment Certification is an attestation by the employer at the TLC
stage. Even when an application is prepared by an authorized agent or
attorney, the Department reminds employers that they are obligated to
read and review the CW-1 Application for Temporary Employment
Certification prior to its submission to OFLC, including every page of
the Form ETA-9142C and any applicable appendices and supporting
documentation, as they will be held, through their original signature,
to the assurance that the information contained therein is true and
accurate, subject to penalties contained in this rulemaking and
otherwise according to law.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\35\ As currently, designed, the form will ask the employer (or
preparer) to indicate the type of CW-1 application it is filing:
Whether it will support a petition for a new visa or a renewal and,
separately, whether it involves long-term workers, cap-exempt
workers, or an emergency situation.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Section 655.421, Job Contractor Filing Requirements
This section establishes the requirements under which job
contractors may file CW-1 Applications for Temporary Employment
Certification in the CW-1 program. Generally, a job contractor, as
defined under Sec. 655.402, has no need for workers itself. Rather,
its need for labor is based on the underlying need of its employer-
clients. A job contractor generally has an ongoing business of
supplying workers to its employer-clients.
Paragraph (a) of this section provides that a job contractor may
file an application on behalf of itself and an employer-client. When
the job contractor does so, the Department will deem the job contractor
a joint employer. Pursuant to paragraph (b), job contractors must also
have a separate contract with each employer-client, and each agreement
may only support one CW-1 Application for Temporary Employment
Certification. While either a job contractor or the employer-client may
file an Application for Prevailing Wage Determination, paragraph (c)
specifies that each of the joint employers is separately responsible
for ensuring that the wage offer(s) listed in the CW-1 Application for
Temporary Employment Certification and related recruitment at least
equals the prevailing wage obtained from the NPWC, or the Federal or
Commonwealth minimum wage, whichever is higher, and that all other wage
obligations are met.
As required by paragraph (d) of this section, a job contractor
filing as a joint employer with its employer-client must submit to the
NPC a completed CW-1 Application for Temporary Employment Certification
clearly identifying its employer-client. This must be accompanied by
the contract or agreement establishing the employers' relationship to
the workers sought. Consistent with the requirements for original
signature explained in further detail under Sec. 655.420(d), the CW-1
Application for Temporary Employment Certification must bear the
original signature of both the job contractor and the employer-client,
or use a verifiable electronic signature method. By signing the CW-1
Application for Temporary Employment Certification, each employer
independently attests to the conditions of employment required of an
employer participating in the CW-1 program. Each employer assumes full
responsibility for the accuracy of the representations made in the
application and for an employer's obligations in the CW-1 program, as
defined in this IFR. If a violation of these obligations has occurred,
either or both employers may be found to be responsible for attendant
penalties and for remedying the violation.
To ensure an adequate level of transparency in the recruitment of
U.S. workers in the CNMI, paragraph (e) establishes standards related
to advertising the job opportunity, interviewing prospective U.S.
workers, and preparing the recruitment report. Specifically, although
either the job contractor or its employer-client may place
advertisements for the job opportunity, conduct the recruitment
required by the CO, and assume responsibility for interviewing U.S.
workers who apply, both joint employers must sign the recruitment
report that is submitted to the NPC as a condition of receiving a final
determination. All recruitment conducted by the joint employers must
satisfy the job-offer-assurance and advertising content requirements,
as specified and further explained under Sec. 655.441.
In order to fully inform prospective applicants of the job
opportunity and avoid potential confusion inherent in a job opportunity
involving two employers, paragraph (e) also requires that the
advertisements clearly identify both employers (the job contractor and
its employer-client) by name and the place(s) of employment where
workers will perform labor or services. In situations where all of the
employer-clients' job opportunities are in the same occupation and have
the same requirements and terms and conditions of employment (including
dates of employment), this paragraph permits a job contractor to
combine more than one of its joint-employer employer-clients' job
opportunities in a single advertisement. The regulation provides a
sample format to assist job contractors in properly disclosing the job
opportunities and creates standard language that job contractors must
use in their advertisements to inform U.S. workers fully on how to
apply for the job opportunities.
Finally, paragraph (f) of this section provides that if a TLC for
the joint employers is granted by the CO, the Final Determination
notice certifying the CW-1 Application for Temporary Employment
Certification will be sent to both the job contractor and its employer-
client, in accordance with the procedures set forth under Sec.
655.452, governing approved certifications.
3. Section 655.422, Emergency Situations
This section provides an employer in a qualifying emergency
situation with some flexibility to participate in the CW-1 program
without first obtaining a PWD from the NPWC. Specifically, paragraph
(a) permits the CO to waive the requirement for an employer to obtain a
PWD prior to filing a CW-1 Application for Temporary Employment
Certification, provided the employer can demonstrate good and
substantial cause and meets the requirements of subpart E. The
requirement to obtain a PWD prior to filing the TLC application is the
only provision of this rule that is waived by the emergency situation
procedures. If the employer's request for emergency situation
procedures is granted, it must comply with all other requirements under
this subpart. To rely on this provision, paragraph (b) requires the
employer to submit to the NPC a completed Application for Prevailing
Wage Determination, a completed CW-1 Application for Temporary
Employment Certification, and a detailed statement describing the good
and substantial cause that has necessitated the waiver request. Good
and substantial cause may include the substantial loss of U.S. workers
due to Acts of God, similar unforeseeable man-made catastrophic events
(such as a
[[Page 12396]]
hazardous materials emergency or government-controlled flooding),
unforeseeable changes in market conditions, pandemic health issues, or
similar conditions that are wholly outside the employer's control.
However, an employer may not justify an emergency situation based
on the Department's promulgation of this IFR and the associated
timeframes for requesting prevailing wage and TLC determinations, which
are foreseeable events required by the statute. A denial of a
previously submitted CW-1 Application for Temporary Employment
Certification or CW-1 petition with USCIS also does not constitute good
and substantial cause. Consistent with OFLC's treatment of emergency
requests for the H-2B program, another program subject to a visa cap,
the CW-1 visa cap does not constitute ``good and substantial cause''
justifying an emergency application. Unlike the H-2B regulations,
however, the CW-1 regulation makes explicit that the visa cap may not
be the basis for such an application, thus clarifying that the
Department does not consider an impending visa cap to be an
unforeseeable event beyond the employer's control. Finally, an employer
may also not use the procedures contained in this section to either
request a waiver of the timeframe for filing an CW-1 Application for
Temporary Employment Certification earlier than that permitted under
Sec. 655.420(b) or request an amendment to the date of need for an CW-
1 Application for Temporary Employment Certification that has already
been submitted to the NPC for processing.
Paragraph (c) of this section establishes the procedures under
which the CO will handle the employer's requests for a waiver. Upon
receipt of the request, the CO will process the Application for
Prevailing Wage Determination and CW-1 Application for Temporary
Employment Certification concurrently and in a manner consistent with
the provisions of this subpart E. While Sec. 655.420(a) states that
incomplete applications are to be returned unprocessed, in the case of
applications which request emergency situation procedures at the time
of filing and do not provide good and substantial cause for doing so,
the application will be returned unprocessed, but with an explanation
as to why the employer failed to justify good and substantial case for
the use of the procedures. Prior to returning the application, the CO
at its discretion, may request additional details about the employer's
good and substantial cause.
CW-1 Applications for Temporary Employment Certification processed
under the emergency situation provision are subject to the same
recruitment requirements, audit processes, and other integrity measures
as nonemergency CW-1 Applications for Temporary Employment
Certification. However, DOL intends to subject emergency applications
to a higher level of scrutiny than nonemergency applications in order
to ensure that this provision is not misused. The regulation provides
the CO with the discretion to reject the emergency filing based on the
totality of the circumstances and documentation provided in the CW-1
Application for Temporary Employment Certification. The CO will
determine the foreseeability of the emergency based on the precise
circumstances of each situation presented. The burden is on the
employer to demonstrate the unforeseeability of the events leading to a
request for a filing on an emergency basis.
4. Section 655.423, Assurances and Obligations of CW-1 Employers
This section contains the terms, assurances, and obligations of the
CW-1 program, similar to requirements for the H-2A and H-2B TLC
programs the Department administers, that will be enforced to ensure
the employment of CW-1 workers will not adversely affect the wages and
working conditions of similarly employed U.S. workers. The terms,
assurances, and obligations contained in this section are essential for
the protection of U.S. workers from adverse effects related to the
hiring of CW-1 workers. As participants in the CW-1 program, employers
are required to review and comply with program provisions to protect
similarly employed U.S. workers. Further, employers are to ensure that
their hiring of CW-1 workers will not disadvantage the U.S. workers in
their employ. Requiring employers to comply with these terms,
assurances, and obligations, which are incorporated into the Form ETA-
9142C, Appendix C, is the most effective way to meet the requirements
of the Workforce Act. The Form ETA-9142C, Appendix C, reiterates
necessary worker protections for the CW-1 program and by completing
Appendix C the employer attests its agreement to ensuring the
protection of CW-1 workers and, further, ensuring that U.S. workers are
both protected and not disadvantaged by the employer's CW-1 employment.
As discussed in the preamble to Sec. 655.402, workers engaged in
corresponding employment are entitled to the same protections and
benefits, set forth below, that are provided to CW-1 workers.
a. Paragraph (a), Rate of Pay
Paragraph (a)(1) of this section, consistent with the Workforce
Act, provides that to protect U.S. worker wages the offered wage in the
work contract must equal or exceed the highest of the prevailing wage
or Federal minimum wage, or Commonwealth minimum wage. If, during the
course of the period certified in the CW-1 Application for Temporary
Employment Certification, the Federal or Commonwealth minimum wage
increases to a level higher than the prevailing wage certified in the
CW-1 Application for Temporary Employment Certification, then the
employer is obligated to pay that higher rate for the work performed
after the new minimum wage takes effect. It also requires the employer
to pay such wages, free and clear, during the entire period of the CW-1
Application for Temporary Employment Certification granted by OFLC. See
29 CFR 531.35. In addition, to ensure the wage equals or exceeds the
highest of the prevailing wage, Federal minimum wage, or Commonwealth
minimum wage, paragraph (a)(2) provides that the wage may not be based
on commissions, bonuses, or other incentives, including paying on a
piece-rate basis, unless the employer guarantees a wage earned every
workweek that equals or exceeds the offered wage.
If one or more minimum productivity standards is required of
workers as a condition of job retention, paragraph (a)(3) requires the
employer to disclose the minimum productivity standards in the work
contract and the employer must be able to demonstrate that such
standards are normal and usual for non-CW-1 employers for the same
occupation in the Commonwealth. Productivity standards must be
expressed in objective and quantifiable terms based on the hours or
days of work needed to produce a unit of production, and the standards
must be specified in a manner that is easily understood by the worker.
The CO will not accept productivity standards that fail to quantify
specifically the expected output per worker or do not clearly
communicate to the worker the output required for job retention. For
example, requiring workers to ``perform work in a timely and proficient
manner,'' ``perform work at a sustained, vigorous pace,'' ``make bona
fide efforts to work efficiently and consistently considering climatic
and other working conditions,'' ``keep up with the work crew,''
``produce at a rate that does not
[[Page 12397]]
detrimentally affect other workers' productivity,'' or ``perform work
in the amount, quality, and efficiency of other workers'' are
unacceptable because such statements lack objectivity, quantification,
and clarity regarding job performance expectations for workers.
Consistent with the Department's administration of the H-2B
program, if an employer wishes to provide productivity standards as a
condition of job retention, the burden of proof rests with the employer
to show that such productivity standards are normal and usual for
employers in the same occupation that are not employing CW-1 workers,
in order to ensure there is no adverse effect on similarly employed
U.S. workers. Some examples of evidence that may be used to prove that
productivity standards are normal and usual include industry-level
reports of typical production standards for a job, copies of production
reports from other employers, and copies of job advertisements from
employers with similar production requirements.
Finally, pursuant to paragraph (a)(4), an employer that pays on a
piece-rate basis must demonstrate that the piece-rate is no less than
the normal rate paid by non-CW-1 employers to workers performing the
same activity in the Commonwealth, and that each workweek the average
hourly piece-rate earnings result in an amount at least equal to the
offered wage (or the employer must make up the difference).
b. Paragraph (b), Wages Free and Clear
To protect the wages of CW-1 workers and workers in corresponding
employment, paragraph (b) requires the employer to timely pay wages
either in cash or in negotiable instrument payable at par. The payment
of wages to workers must also be made finally and unconditionally and
``free and clear,'' in accordance with WHD regulations at 29 CFR part
531. This assurance clarifies the preexisting obligation for both
employers and employees to ensure that wages are not reduced below the
required rate.
c. Paragraph (c), Deductions
Paragraph (c) of this section ensures workers are paid the wage
offered in the job opportunity by limiting deductions that reduce wages
to below the offered wage indicated on the CW-1 Application for
Temporary Employment Certification. Specifically, this section requires
the employer make all deductions required by law, such as taxes payable
by workers that are required to be withheld by the employer and amounts
due under a court order. The section also limits other authorized
deductions to those that are for the reasonable cost or fair value of
board, lodging, or facilities furnished that primarily benefit the
employee, or that are amounts paid to third parties authorized by the
employee or a collective bargaining agreement. The work contract must
specify all deductions not required by law that the employer will make
from the worker's pay. Any such deductions not disclosed in the work
contract are prohibited.
The section also specifies deductions that are never permissible to
the extent they reduce the actual wage below the offered wage.
Additionally, these deductions are always prohibited: those for costs
that are primarily for the benefit of the employer; those not specified
in the work contract; ``kick-backs'' of worker wages, directly or
indirectly, to the employer or to another person for the employer's
benefit; and amounts paid to third parties which are unauthorized,
unlawful, or from which the employer or its foreign labor contractor,
recruiter, agent, or affiliated person benefits.
Consistent with the FLSA and 29 CFR part 531, for deductions not
required by law to be permissible, they must, among other requirements,
be truly voluntary, and may not be a condition of employment as
determined under the totality of the circumstances. Moreover, for
purposes of paragraph (c), a deduction for any cost that is primarily
for the benefit of the employer is never permitted under this IFR. Some
examples of costs that the Department has long held to be primarily for
the benefit of the employer are tools of the trade and other materials
and services incidental to carrying on the employer's business; the
cost of any construction by and for the employer; the cost of required
uniforms (whether purchased or rented) and their laundering; and
transportation charges where such transportation is an incident of and
necessary to the employment. 29 CFR 531.3(d)(1). This list is not all-
inclusive. Further, the concept of de facto deductions initially
developed under the FLSA, where employees are required to purchase
items like uniforms or tools that are employer business expenses, is
equally applicable to purchases that bring CW-1 workers' wages below
the required wage, as the payment of the prevailing wage is necessary
to ensure that the employment of foreign workers does not adversely
affect the wages and working conditions of similarly employed U.S.
workers. Allowing worker deductions for business expenses would
undercut the prevailing wage and, as a result, would hurt U.S. workers.
d. Paragraph (d), Job Opportunity Is Full-Time
Paragraph (d) of this section requires that the job opportunity for
which the employer is seeking to employ CW-1 workers is a full-time
position, and that the employer use a single workweek as its standard
for computing wages due. Additionally, consistent with the FLSA, this
section provides that the workweek must be a fixed and regularly
recurring period of 168 hours, i.e., 7 consecutive 24-hour periods,
which may start on any day and any hour of the day. This establishment
of a clear period for determining whether wages are properly paid by
the employer will help workers understand their wage guarantees and aid
the Department in determining compliance during the audit examination
process.
The requirement that the position be full-time is for the
protection of U.S. workers in the CNMI and for the protection of U.S.
workers in corresponding employment. By virtue of the CW-1 TLC, the
Department requires the employer to ensure that the employment of CW-1
workers will not adversely affect the wages and working conditions of
U.S. workers similarly employed. Comparably, the full-time requirement
is consistent with the Department's administration of its other TLC
programs, the H-2B and H-2A programs, both of which require full-time
positions for issuance of the labor certification.\36\ Most similar to
the H-2B program, the CW-1 program has a statutory numerical visa cap,
which limits the number of annually available visas. As with the capped
H-2B program, the Department believes that allowing CW-1 employers to
hire part-time workers in instances in which an employer could,
instead, choose to hire one or more full-time workers, could serve to
dissuade U.S. workers from the job opportunity or place U.S. workers,
who may be less likely to seek part-time work, at a competitive
disadvantage for employment compared to CW-1 workers. The Department
believes such an allowance would undercut the law as intended, which
serves to encourage the hiring of U.S. workers in the CNMI.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\36\ See 20 CFR part 655, subpart A (governing H-2B temporary
nonagricultural workers); 20 CFR part 655, subpart B (governing H-2A
temporary agricultural workers). The TLC programs are unlike the
Department's H-1B program, which is a labor condition application
program, for which the U.S. labor market is only tested in very
limited circumstances for H-1B dependent employers and willful
violators not claiming an exemption, and for which certification is
granted unless the application is obviously inaccurate or
incomplete. See 20 CFR part 655, subpart H (governing H-1B labor
condition applications for H-1B workers).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 12398]]
e. Paragraph (e), Job Qualifications and Requirements
Paragraph (e) of this section requires that each qualification and
requirement for the job be listed in the work contract, and be bona
fide and consistent with the normal and accepted qualifications and
requirements imposed by non-CW-1 employers in the same occupation and
in the CNMI. This protects U.S. workers and is consistent with
requirements for the Department's administration of similar TLC
programs.\37\ Further, the employer's job qualifications and
requirements imposed on U.S. workers must be no less favorable than the
qualifications and requirements that the employer is imposing or will
impose on CW-1 workers. The CO has the authority to require the
employer to provide sufficient justification for any job qualification
or requirement imposed for the particular job opportunity.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\37\ 20 CFR part 655, subpart A; 20 CFR part 655, subpart B.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Consistent with the Department's administration of similar TLC
programs,\38\ job qualifications and requirements must be customary,
i.e., they may not be used to discourage applicants capable of
performing the needed work from applying for the job opportunity. The
standard for employment of CW-1 workers is that there are not
sufficient U.S. workers in the CNMI who are able, willing, and
qualified, and who will be available to perform such services or labor.
For purposes of complying with this statutory mandate, the Department
has clarified the meaning of qualifications and requirements. A
qualification means a characteristic that is necessary to the
individual's ability to perform the job in question. Such
characteristics include the ability to use specific equipment or any
education or experience required for performing a certain job task. A
requirement, on the other hand, means a term or condition of employment
that a worker must accept in order to obtain or retain the job
opportunity.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\38\ 20 CFR part 655, subpart A; 20 CFR part 655, subpart B.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
To the extent an employer has requirements that are related to the
U.S. workers' qualifications or availability, the Department uses the
Occupational Information Network database (O*NET) as a primary source
for occupational qualifications and requirements, and will therefore
consult O*NET when making a determination as to whether qualifications
or requirements are normal for a specific job. For example, the
Department recognizes that background checks are used in private
industry, so employers may conduct them to the extent that the
requirement is a bona fide, normal, and accepted requirement applied by
non-CW-1 employers for the occupation in the area of employment, and
the employer applies the same criteria to both CW-1 and U.S. workers.
However, where such job requirements are included in the recruitment
materials, the Department may inquire further as to whether such
requirements are normal and accepted by non-CW-1 employers in the CNMI
and by which methods the employer will use such requirements.
f. Paragraph (f), Three-Fourths Guarantee
To ensure CW-1 workers and workers in corresponding employment are
provided full-time employment under the work contract, the employer
must guarantee under paragraph (f)(1) to offer each worker employment
for a total number of work hours equal to at least three-fourths of the
workdays of the total period of employment specified in the work
contract, beginning with the first workday after the arrival of the
worker at the place of employment or the advertised contractual first
date of need, whichever is later, and ending on the expiration date
specified in the work contract or in its extensions, if any.
Paragraph (f)(1)(i) defines a workday to mean the number of hours
in a workday as stated in the work contract. The employer must offer a
total number of hours to ensure the provision of sufficient work to
reach the three-fourths guarantee. The work hours must be offered
during the work period specified in the work contract, or during any
modified work contract period to which the worker and employer have
mutually agreed and that has been approved by the CO. In the event the
worker begins working later than the specified beginning date,
paragraph (f)(1)(ii) clarifies that the guarantee period begins with
the first workday after the arrival of the worker at the place of
employment and continues until the last day during which the work
contract and all extensions thereof are in effect. To assist employers
in complying with the three-fourths guarantee, paragraph (f)(1)(iii)
provides a practical example of how to calculate the guaranteed total
number of work hours for a 10-week work contract period.
Paragraph (f)(1)(iv) establishes additional standards for employers
to comply with this provision. Specifically, although a worker may be
offered more than the specified hours of work on a single workday, the
worker cannot be required to work for more than the number of hours
specified in the work contract for a workday. However, all hours of
work actually performed may be counted by the employer in calculating
whether the period of guaranteed employment has been met. An employer
will not be considered to have met the work guarantee if the employer
has merely offered work on three-fourths of the workdays of the work
contract period if each workday did not consist of a full number of
hours of work time as specified in the work contract.
To ensure workers are not adversely impacted in their employment,
if during the total work contract period the employer affords the U.S.
or CW-1 worker less employment than that required under the three-
fourths guarantee, the employer must pay such worker the amount the
worker would have earned had the worker, in fact, worked for the
guaranteed number of days. For workers that are paid on a piece-rate
basis, paragraph (f)(2) specifies that the employer must use the
worker's average hourly piece-rate earnings or the offered wage,
whichever is higher, to calculate the amount due under the guarantee in
accordance with paragraph (f)(1) of this section.
Pursuant to paragraph (f)(3), any hours the worker fails to work,
up to a maximum of the number of hours specified in the work contract
for a workday, when the worker has been offered an opportunity to work,
and all hours of work actually performed (including voluntary work over
8 hours in a workday), may be counted by the employer in calculating
whether the period of guaranteed employment has been met. An employer
seeking to calculate whether the guaranteed number of hours has been
met must maintain the payroll records in accordance with this subpart.
Based on its experience with administering TLC programs, the
Department has concluded that a three-fourths guarantee strikes an
appropriate balance of guaranteeing the benefits of full-time
employment to workers, while providing employers with sufficient
flexibility to spread the required work contract hours over a
sufficiently long period of time such that the vagaries of the weather
or other events out of their control that affect their need for labor
do not prevent employers from fulfilling their guarantee. When
employers file applications for CW-1 TLCs, they represent that they
have a need for full-time workers during the entire certification
period. Therefore, it is important to the integrity of the program,
which is a capped visa
[[Page 12399]]
program, to have a methodology for ensuring that employers have fairly
and accurately estimated their temporary need.
The guarantee also deters employers from misusing the program by
overstating their need for full-time workers. This will prevent
employers from overestimating the hours of work needed per week, or the
total number of workers required to do the work available. The
guarantee will not only result in U.S. and CW-1 workers actually
working most of the hours promised in the work contract, but also free
up capped CW-1 visas for other employers whose businesses need CW-1
workers.
g. Paragraph (g), Impossibility of Fulfillment
Paragraph (g) of this section allows an employer to terminate the
work contract in certain narrowly prescribed circumstances where the
services of the worker are no longer required for reasons beyond the
control of the employer due to fire, weather, or other Act of God, or
similar unforeseeable man-made catastrophes (such as oil spills or
controlled flooding) wholly outside the employer's control that makes
fulfillment of the work contract impossible. In such an event, the
employer must fulfill the three-fourths guarantee for the time that has
elapsed from the start date listed in the work contract or the first
workday after the arrival of the worker at the place of employment,
whichever is later, to the time of its termination.
To safeguard the employment of the workers, this paragraph also
requires the employer to make efforts to transfer the CW-1 worker (to
the extent permitted by DHS) and worker in corresponding employment to
other comparable employment acceptable to the worker. Actions employers
could take include contacting any known CW-1 employers with comparable
employment or the CNMI Department of Labor for assistance in placing
workers with other CNMI employers with comparable job vacancies. Absent
such placement, the employer is required to comply with the
transportation requirement, as set forth under Sec. 655.423(j), to
return the worker to the place from which the worker came prior to
entering the Commonwealth (disregarding intervening employment \39\) or
transport the worker to the worker's next certified CW-1 employer,\40\
whichever the worker prefers. CO approval is required before
terminating the work contract with the workers. Simply submitting a
request to the CO is insufficient to terminate the work contract and
absolve the employer of the three-fourths guarantee.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\39\ In terms of the referenced transportation requirements in
an intervening employment situation for the CW-1 worker, where there
is an initial CW-1 employer and a subsequent non-CW-1 employer, the
obligation to pay for the transportation costs between the place of
employment with the CW-1 employer and the subsequent place of
employment with the non-CW-1 employer depends on the subsequent
employer's work contract. In the absence of a contractual agreement
to pay for travel costs, the CW-1 employer is obligated to pay the
travel expenses between its place of employment and the immediate
subsequent place of employment with the non-CW-1 employer.
\40\ In terms of the referenced transportation requirements in
an intervening employment situation for the CW-1 worker, where there
is an initial CW-1 employer and a subsequent CW-1 employer, the
initial CW-1 employer is responsible for transporting the CW-1
worker from its place of employment to the subsequent CW-1
employer's place of employment, but the subsequent CW-1 employer is
responsible for reimbursing the initial CW-1 employer with
transportation costs.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
h. Paragraph (h), Frequency of Pay
Paragraph (h) of this section requires that the employer indicate
the frequency of pay in the work contract, and guarantee to pay workers
at least every 2 weeks and when wages are due. The requirement that
workers be paid at least every 2 weeks is designed to protect
financially vulnerable workers. Allowing an employer to pay less
frequently than every 2 weeks would impose an undue burden on workers
who are often paid low wages and may lack the means to make their
income last through a month until they get paid.
i. Paragraph (i), Earnings Statements
To ensure compliance with the wage requirements of this subpart and
transparency of the requirement to workers, paragraph (i)(1) of this
section requires the employer to maintain accurate and adequate records
with respect to the workers' earnings and to specify the minimum amount
of information to be retained. The employer is further required under
paragraph (i)(2) to furnish to each worker an appropriate written
earnings statement on or before each payday, specifying the information
that the employer must include in such a statement (e.g., the worker's
total earnings for each workweek in the pay period, the hourly rate or
piece-rate of pay, the hours of employment offered and hours actually
worked by the worker, and an itemization of all deductions from the
worker's wages).
The Department notes that this paragraph also requires employers to
maintain records of any additions made to a worker's wages and to
include such information in the earnings statements furnished to the
worker. Such additions could include performance bonuses, cash
advances, or reimbursements for costs incurred by the worker. This
requirement is consistent with the recordkeeping requirements under the
FLSA in 29 CFR part 516. See 29 CFR part 785 for guidance regarding
what constitutes hours worked.
The Department has concluded that any administrative burden
resulting from this provision is outweighed by the importance of
providing workers with this crucial information, especially because an
earnings statement provides workers with an opportunity to quickly
identify and resolve any anomalies with the employer and will hold
employers accountable for proper payment. Similar to Sec. 655.20(i) in
the H-2B program, this IFR requires an employer to record the reasons
why a worker declined any offered hours of work, which will support the
Department's audit examination activities related to the three-fourths
guarantee previously discussed under paragraph (f) of this section.
j. Paragraph (j), Transportation and Visa Fees
Consistent with the Department's transportation provisions in
similar TLC programs, paragraph (j)(1)(i) of this section requires an
employer to provide inbound transportation and subsistence during
transportation to CW-1 employees and to U.S. employees in corresponding
employment who have traveled to take the position from such a distance
that they are not reasonably able to return to their residence each
day, if the workers complete 50 percent of the period of employment
covered by the work contract (not counting any extensions). Before the
50 percent point, employers have no responsibility under the CW-1
program to pay these expenses. Transportation and subsistence costs
must be paid for travel between the place from which the worker has
come to work for the employer, whether in the United States, including
another part of the CNMI, or abroad, to the place of employment. This
paragraph provides that employers may arrange and pay for the
transportation and subsistence directly; advance, at a minimum, the
most economical and reasonable common carrier cost and subsistence; or
reimburse the worker's reasonable costs. If the employer advances or
provides transportation and subsistence costs to foreign workers, or it
is the prevailing practice of non-CW-1 employers in the CNMI to do so,
the employer must advance such costs or provide the
[[Page 12400]]
services to workers in corresponding employment traveling to the place
of employment. The Department has concluded that this approach is
appropriate and adequately protects the interests of both U.S. and CW-1
workers and employers because it does not require employers to pay the
inbound transportation and subsistence costs of U.S. workers recruited
pursuant to CW-1 job offers who do not remain on the job for more than
a very brief period.
Paragraph (j)(1)(ii) requires the employer, at the end of the
employment, to provide or pay for the U.S. or foreign worker's return
transportation and daily subsistence from the place of employment to
the place from which the worker departed to work for the employer, if
the worker has no immediate subsequent approved CW-1 employment.
However, this obligation attaches only if the worker completes the
period of employment covered by the work contract or if the worker is
dismissed from employment for any reason before the end of the
certified period of employment. The employer is required to provide or
pay for the return transportation and daily subsistence of a worker who
has completed the period of employment listed on the certified CW-1
Application for Temporary Employment Certification, regardless of any
subsequent extensions of the work contract for that worker. An employer
is not required to provide return transportation if separation is due
to a worker's voluntary abandonment or termination for cause, as set
forth under Sec. 655.423(v). If the worker has been contracted to work
for a subsequent and certified employer, the last CW-1 employer to
employ the worker is required to provide or pay the U.S. or foreign
worker's return transportation. Therefore, prior employers are not
obligated to pay for such return transportation costs.
Paragraph (j)(1)(iii) of this section requires that all employer-
provided transportation--including transportation to and from the place
of employment, if provided--comply with all applicable Federal and
Commonwealth laws and regulations including vehicle safety standards,
driver licensure requirements, and vehicle insurance coverage.
And finally, to protect CW-1 workers from predatory and abusive
labor practices, paragraph (j)(2) of this section requires the employer
to pay or reimburse the worker in the first workweek for all visa, visa
processing, border crossing, and other related fees (including those
mandated by the government) incurred by the CW-1 worker, but not for
passport expenses or other charges primarily for the benefit of the
worker.
Under the FLSA and as the Department has explained in Wage and
Hour's Field Assistance Bulletin No. 2009-2 (Aug. 21, 2009),
transportation, subsistence, and visa and related expenses for CW-1
workers are for the primary benefit of employers. The employer
primarily benefits because it obtains foreign workers where the
employer has demonstrated that there are not sufficient qualified U.S.
workers available to perform the work; the employer has demonstrated
that unavailability by engaging in prescribed recruiting activities
that do not yield sufficient U.S. workers.
The CW-1 workers, on the other hand, only receive the right to work
for a particular employer, in a particular location, and for a
particular period of time. If they leave that specific job, they
generally must leave the country. Transporting these CW-1 workers from
remote locations to the workplace thus primarily benefits the employer
who has sought authority to fill its workforce needs by bringing in
workers from foreign countries. Similarly, because a CW-1 worker's visa
(including all the related expenses, which vary by country, including
the visa processing interview fee and border crossing fee) is an
incident of and necessary to employment under the program, the employer
is the primary beneficiary of such expenses. The visa does not allow
the employee to find work in the United States generally, but rather
permits the visa holder to apply for admission in CW-1 nonimmigrant
status in the CNMI, which restricts the worker to the employer with an
approved TLC and petition to the particular approved work described in
the employer's application.
In addition, the FLSA applies independently of the CW-1
requirements and imposes obligations on employers regarding payment of
wages. Employers covered by the FLSA must generally pay such expenses
to nonexempt employees in the first workweek, to the level necessary to
meet the FLSA minimum wage. See, e.g., Rivera v. Peri & Sons Farms,
Inc., 735 F.3d 892, 898-99 (9th Cir. 2013); Arriaga v. Florida Pacific
Farms, LLC, 305 F.3d 1228 (11th Cir. 2002); Morante-Navarro v. T&Y Pine
Straw, Inc., 350 F.3d 1163 (11th Cir. 2003); Gaxiola v. Williams
Seafood of Arapahoe, Inc., 2011 WL 806792 (E.D.N.C. 2011); Teoba v.
Trugreen Landcare LLC, 2011 WL 573572 (W.D.N.Y. 2011); DeLeon-Granados
v. Eller & Sons Trees, Inc., 581 F. Supp. 2d 1295 (N.D. Ga. 2008);
Rosales v. Hispanic Employee Leasing Program, 2008 WL 363479 (W.D.
Mich. 2008); Rivera v. Brickman Group, 2008 WL 81570 (E.D. Pa. 2008).
But see Castellanos-Contreras v. Decatur Hotels, LLC, 622 F.3d 393 (5th
Cir. 2010) (en banc). Payment sufficient to satisfy the FLSA in the
first workweek is also required because Sec. 655.423(w) specifically
requires employers to comply with all applicable Federal and
Commonwealth employment-related laws and regulations, including health
and safety laws. Furthermore, because U.S. workers are entitled to
receive at least the same terms and conditions of employment as CW-1
workers, in order to prevent adverse effects on U.S. workers from the
presence of foreign workers, employers must provide the same
reimbursement for U.S. workers in corresponding employment who are
unable to return to their residence each workday, such as those from
another U.S. State or territory who saw the position advertised on the
CNMI Department of Labor's job listing system.
The Department has determined these provisions fulfill its
statutory mandate to protect U.S. workers from adverse effects due to
the presence of temporary foreign workers. As discussed above, under
the FLSA, numerous courts have held in the context of both H-2B and H-
2A workers that the inbound and outbound transportation costs
associated with employing workers are an inevitable and inescapable
consequence of employers choosing to participate in these visa
programs. Moreover, the courts have held that such transportation
expenses are not ordinary living expenses, because they have no
substantial value to the employee independent of the job and do not
ordinarily arise in an employment relationship, unlike normal daily
home-to-work commuting costs.
Therefore, the courts view employers as the primary beneficiaries
of such expenses under the FLSA; in essence the courts have held that
inbound and outbound transportation are employer business expenses. A
similar analysis applies to the CW-1 required wage. This requirement
ensures the integrity of the full CW-1 required wage, over the full
term of employment. Both CW-1 workers and U.S. workers in corresponding
employment will receive the CW-1 required wage they were promised, as
well as reimbursement for the reasonable transportation and subsistence
costs that primarily benefit the employer, over the full period of
employment.
Finally, to comply with the provisions of this section,
transportation must be reimbursed from wherever the place from which
the worker has come to
[[Page 12401]]
work for the employer to the place of employment; therefore, the
employer must pay for transportation from the place of recruitment to
the city with the consulate that adjudicates the worker's visa
application and then on to the place of employment. Similarly, the
employer must pay for subsistence during that period, so if an
overnight stay at a hotel in the consular city is required while the
employee is interviewing for and obtaining a visa, that subsistence
must be reimbursed.
k. Paragraph (k), Employer-Provided Items
Consistent with the requirement under the FLSA regulations at 29
CFR part 531, paragraph (k) of this section requires the employer
provide to the worker, without charge or deposit charge, all tools,
supplies, and equipment required to perform the duties assigned. The
employer may not shift to the employee the burden to pay for damage to,
loss of, or normal wear and tear of, such items. This provision gives
workers additional protections against improper deductions for the
employer's business expenses from required wages.
Section 3(m) of the FLSA (29 U.S.C. 203(m)) prohibits employers
from making deductions for items that are primarily for the benefit of
the employer if such deductions reduce the employee's wage below the
Federal minimum wage. Therefore, an employer that does not provide
tools but requires its employees to bring their own would already be
required under the FLSA to reimburse its employees for the difference
between the weekly wage minus the cost of equipment and the weekly
minimum wage. Paragraph (k) simply extends this protection in a manner
that protects the integrity of the required CW-1 wage rate and thereby
avoids adverse effects on the wages of U.S. workers. However, this
requirement does not prohibit employees from voluntarily choosing to
use their own specialized equipment; rather, it simply requires
employers to make available to employees adequate and appropriate
equipment.
l. Paragraph (l), Disclosure of Work Contract
Paragraph (l) of this section requires the employer to provide a
copy of the work contract, including any subsequent approved
modifications, to a CW-1 worker outside of the United States no later
than the time at which the worker applies for the visa, or to a worker
in corresponding employment no later than on the day work commences. To
clarify, the time at which the worker applies for the visa should be
read as the time before the worker has made any payment, whether to a
recruiter or directly to the consulate, to initiate the visa
application process. The Department has concluded that it is most
practical to require disclosure of the work contract at the time the
worker applies for a visa, to ensure that workers fully understand the
terms and conditions of their job offer before they make a commitment
to come to the United States.
For CW-1 workers who are moving to a subsequent CW-1 employer, the
work contract must be provided no later than the time the subsequent
offer of employment is made. At a minimum, the work contract must
contain all of the provisions required to be included by this section
and must be in a language understood by the worker. In the absence of a
separate, written work contract between the employer and the worker,
the required terms of the certified CW-1 Application for Temporary
Employment Certification are those in the work contract.
The Department has determined that the disclosure required by this
paragraph is a vital component of strengthening program compliance and
provides workers with sufficient notice of the terms and conditions of
the job so that they can make an informed decision of the terms under
which they are accepting the job. In addition, providing the terms and
conditions of employment to each worker in a language that the
individual understands protects those workers.
m. Paragraph (m), No Unfair Treatment
To protect vulnerable U.S. workers and CW-1 workers, paragraph (m)
of this section provides nondiscrimination and nonretaliation
protections for workers. Workers are protected from retaliation,
including retaliation based on contact or consultation with an employee
of a legal assistance program, labor union, workers' center, or
community organization, or an attorney on matters related to perceived
violations. These entities frequently have the first contact with
temporary foreign workers when they seek help to correct or report
perceived violations. This provision applies to oral complaints and
complaints made internally to employers, and it also applies to
current, former, and prospective workers.
This provision protects workers from discrimination and retaliation
for asserting rights under any applicable Federal or Commonwealth law
or regulation, including the CW-1 program. For example, if workers
sought legal assistance relating to the terms and conditions of
employment, such as employer-provided housing because an employer
charged for housing that was listed as free of charge in the work
contract, this serves as a protected act; however, a routine landlord-
tenant dispute may not fall under the protections of this section. This
section provides protection to U.S. workers and CW-1 workers alike.
n. Paragraph (n), Comply With the Prohibitions Against Employees Paying
Fees
Paragraph (n), similarly to the Department's H-2B regulation at 20
CFR 655.20(o), of this section prohibits the employer and its
attorneys, agents, or employees from seeking or receiving payment of
any kind from workers for any activity related to obtaining CW-1 labor
certification or employment, including payment of the employer's
attorney or agent fees, application and CW-1 Petition fees, recruitment
costs, or any fees attributed to obtaining the approved CW-1
Application for Temporary Employment Certification. Payments under this
provision include but are not limited to monetary payments, wage
concessions (including deductions from wages, salary, or benefits),
kickbacks, bribes, tributes, in-kind payments, and free labor. However,
this provision allows employers and their agents to receive
reimbursement for fees that are primarily for the benefit of the
worker, such as Government-required passport fees, which can be used
for personal travel or for travel to another job. This provision also
reiterates that employers must pay all wages to workers free and clear.
Paragraph (o), Contracts with Third Parties to Comply with
Prohibitions.
Paragraph (o) of this section requires that an employer
contractually prohibit in writing any agent or recruiter (or any agent
or employee of such agent or recruiter) whom the employer engages,
either directly or indirectly, in recruitment of CW-1 workers to seek
or receive payments or other compensation from prospective workers. For
employers' convenience, this paragraph contains the exact language of
the required contractual prohibition that must appear in such
agreements.
o. Paragraph (p), Prohibition Against Preferential Treatment of Foreign
Workers
For the protection of U.S. workers, paragraph (p) of this section
requires the employer to offer and provide to U.S. workers no less than
the same benefits, wages, and working conditions that the
[[Page 12402]]
employer is offering, intends to offer, or will provide to CW-1
workers. Job offers may not impose on U.S. workers any restrictions or
obligations that will not be imposed on the employer's CW-1 workers.
Employers are required to offer and provide CW-1 workers at least the
minimum benefits, wages, and working conditions outlined in this
paragraph. This provision will protect U.S. workers by ensuring that
employers do not understate wages and/or benefits in an attempt to
discourage U.S. applicants or to provide preferential treatment to
temporary foreign workers.
The employer is not precluded from offering a higher wage rate or
more generous benefits or working conditions to U.S. workers, so long
as the employer offers to U.S. workers all the wages, benefits, and
working conditions offered to and required for CW-1 workers pursuant to
the certified CW-1 Application for Temporary Employment Certification.
p. Paragraph (q), Nondiscriminatory Hiring Practices
For the protection of U.S. workers, paragraph (q) of this section
sets forth a nondiscriminatory hiring provision by guaranteeing the job
opportunity is open to any qualified U.S. worker regardless of race,
color, national origin, age, sex, religion, disability, or citizenship.
This paragraph works together with paragraph (p) of this same section,
which specifies that job qualifications and requirements imposed on
U.S. workers must be no less favorable than the qualifications and
requirements that the employer is imposing or will impose on CW-1
workers. Thus, for example, an employer violates this provision if it
requires drug tests or criminal background checks for U.S. workers but
not for CW-1 workers.
Additionally, where an employer conducts criminal background checks
on prospective employees, in order to be lawful and job-related, the
employer's consideration of any arrest or conviction history must be
consistent with applicable guidance from the Equal Employment
Opportunity Commission on employer consideration of arrest and
conviction history under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
Thus, employers may reject U.S. workers solely for lawful, job-related
reasons, and they must also comply with all applicable employment-
related laws, as set forth under Sec. 655.423(w). All U.S. workers not
rejected on this basis must be hired. This paragraph also reminds the
employer of its obligation to retain records of all hired workers as
well as those rejected, as set forth under Sec. 655.456.
q. Paragraph (r), Recruitment Requirements
Paragraph (r) of this section requires employers to assure the
Department that they will conduct all recruitment for U.S. workers
required by Sec. Sec. 655.440 through 655.445, including any
activities directed by the CO. Such required recruitment activities are
discussed further in the preamble to those applicable sections.
r. Paragraph (s), No Strike or Lockout
Paragraph (s) of this section requires an employer to assure the
Department that there is no strike or lockout at any of the employer's
place(s) of employment within the Commonwealth for which the employer
is requesting CW-1 certification. If there is a strike or lockout at
the place(s) of employment when the employer requests CW-1 workers, the
CO may deny the CW-1 certification to ensure that U.S. workers are not
adversely impacted by the hiring of a CW-1 worker(s). This provision
will protect U.S. workers in their employment by preventing employers
from filling positions with CW-1 workers at places of employment where
such positions are vacated by U.S. workers due to a strike or
lockout.\41\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\41\ This provision is consistent with the H-2B provisions at 20
CFR 655.20(u).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
s. Paragraph (t), No Recent or Future Layoffs
Paragraph (t) of this section establishes the standards under which
an employer cannot lay off similarly employed U.S. workers who would be
considered in corresponding employment upon approval of a TLC.
Specifically, the employer must assure the Department that it has not
laid off any similarly employed U.S. worker in the occupation that is
the subject of the CW-1 Application for Temporary Employment
Certification in the Commonwealth within the period beginning 270
calendar days before the date of need and will not lay off any
similarly employed U.S. worker in the occupation that is subject to the
CW-1 Application for Temporary Employment Certification in the
Commonwealth through the end of the period of certification. However,
the provision specifically permits layoffs due to lawful, job-related
reasons, such as lack of work or the end of a season, as long as, if
applicable, the employer lays off its CW-1 workers first before any
U.S. worker in corresponding employment.
The Department has determined that the 270-day period before the
date of need is an appropriate timeframe to prohibit layoffs of
similarly employed U.S. workers, because it represents the earliest
possible period the employer may request a PWD from the NPWC for a job
opportunity that it may seek to fill with a nonimmigrant worker in CW-1
status. By extending this prohibition through the end of the certified
period of employment, the Department is seeking to maximize the
protection of U.S. workers in their employment and discourage employers
from seeking to use the CW-1 program to displace their current U.S.
workforce.
t. Paragraph (u), No Work Performed Outside the Commonwealth and Job
Opportunity
Paragraph (u) of this section helps ensure integrity of the CW-1
program by prohibiting the employer from placing any CW-1 workers
outside the Commonwealth or in a job opportunity not listed on the
approved CW-1 Application for Temporary Employment Certification. The
requirement that all work must be performed within the Commonwealth is
consistent with the statutory mandate prohibiting individuals in CW-1
status from being present anywhere in the United States other than the
Commonwealth, with limited exception. Furthermore, placing CW-1 workers
to perform labor or services outside the scope of the job opportunity
certified by the CO can depress the wages of similarly employed U.S.
workers and undermines the labor market test upon which the CO granted
TLC.
u. Paragraph (v), Abandonment/Termination of Employment
Paragraph (v) of this section requires the employer to notify OFLC
within 2 working days of the separation of a CW-1 worker or worker in
corresponding employment if the separation occurs before the end date
of the period of employment certified in the CW-1 Application for
Temporary Employment Certification. It also deems that an abandonment
or abscondment begins after a worker fails to report for work at the
regularly scheduled time without the employer's consent for 5
consecutive working days, and adds language relieving the employer of
the subsequent transportation and subsistence requirements, previously
discussed under Sec. 655.423(j), only where the separation is due to a
worker's voluntary abandonment or termination for cause. Additionally,
the section clarifies that if a worker voluntarily abandons employment
or is terminated for cause, and appropriate notification under this
section is provided, an employer is not required to guarantee three-
fourths of the work
[[Page 12403]]
contract, as previously discussed under Sec. 655.423(f).\42\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\42\ This provision is consistent with H-2B program requirements
at 20 CFR 655.20(y).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
OFLC's awareness of early separations is critical to program
integrity, and timely notification of CW-1 workers who voluntarily
abandon employment is likewise vital to identifying workers who are no
longer covered by an approved temporary labor certification and no
longer have a legal purpose for being in the CNMI. Timely notification
also allows the agency to conduct audit examinations or refer matters
for further investigation to DHS or any other Federal Government
Office. Absent proper notification, employers with histories of
frequent and unjustified early dismissals of workers could continue to
have their CW-1 Applications for Temporary Employment Certification
certified and a CW-1 Petitions approved.
v. Paragraph (w), Compliance With Applicable Laws
During the period of employment certified by the CO on the CW-1
Application for Temporary Employment Certification, paragraph (w) of
this section requires CW-1 employers to comply with all applicable
Federal and Commonwealth employment and labor laws and regulations,
including health and safety laws. It also explicitly references 18
U.S.C. 1592(a), which prohibits holding or confiscating workers'
immigration documents, such as passports or visas, under certain
circumstances.
D. Processing of an CW-1 Application for Temporary Employment
Certification
1. Section 655.430, Review of Applications
This section establishes requirements for the CO to review CW-1
Applications for Temporary Employment Certification, methods of
communication between the CO and employer, and authority for the CO to
share information with other Federal Government Officials performing
enforcement and/or investigative activities.
Paragraph (a) requires the CO to conduct a comprehensive review of
the CW-1 Application for Temporary Employment Certification, including
all applicable addenda and supporting documentation, for compliance
with all applicable program requirements. After performing a review,
the CO will provide written notification to the employer and, if
applicable, to the employer's agent or attorney indicating whether the
CW-1 Application for Temporary Employment Certification can be accepted
for further processing. If the CO determines all applicable program
requirements have been met, a NOA authorizing the recruitment of U.S.
workers in the CNMI will be issued, as required by Sec. 655.433.
However, if the CO determines the CW-1 Application for Temporary
Employment Certification contains one or more deficiencies, a NOD will
be issued, as required by Sec. 655.431, requiring a response from the
employer addressing each deficiency before a NOA can be issued.
To ensure communications between the CO and employer are
accomplished in a reliable and efficient manner, paragraph (b) of this
section requires the CO to send all notices or requests to the employer
electronically or using first class U.S. Mail based on address
information supplied by the employer on the CW-1 Application for
Temporary Employment Certification. Similarly, the employer's response
to a notice or request received from the CO must be sent electronically
or via traditional methods that assure expedited delivery. If the due
date for the employer's response falls on a Saturday, Sunday or Federal
Holiday, this paragraph requires the employer to send the response by
the date due or the next business day.
To ensure program integrity and effective coordination with other
Federal Government Officials, and consistent with how the Department
administers other TLC programs, paragraph (c) provides that OFLC may
forward to DHS or any other Federal Government Official performing an
investigation, inspection, audit, or law enforcement function, the
information that OFLC receives in the course of processing a request
for an CW-1 Application for Temporary Employment Certification or of
administering program integrity measures such as audits under this
subpart.
2. Section 655.431, Notice of Deficiency
This section establishes the procedures under which the CO will
issue a NOD after reviewing the employer's CW-1 Application for
Temporary Employment Certification. The purpose of the NOD is to
provide employers, especially those participating in the CW-1 program
for the first time, an opportunity to comply with program requirements
before a denial determination needs to be issued by the CO, thereby
avoiding a burdensome and costly administrative judicial review
process. Thus, paragraph (a) provides that a NOD will be issued to the
employer where the CO determines the CW-1 Application for Temporary
Employment Certification, including the material terms and conditions
of the job offer, contains errors or inaccuracies, or fails to comply
with applicable requirements set forth in this subpart. A copy of the
NOD will be sent to the employer's agent or attorney, as applicable.
Paragraph (b) of this section specifies the content requirements of
the NOD. The NOD will include the specific reason(s) the CW-1
Application for Temporary Employment Certification fails to meet the
criteria for acceptance and will identify the type(s) of response(s) or
modification(s) needed for the CO to issue a NOA. The employer will be
offered an opportunity to submit a modified CW-1 Application for
Temporary Employment Certification within 10 business days from the
date of the NOD addressing each deficiency noted by the CO. Finally,
the NOD will state that if the employer does not submit a modified CW-1
Application for Temporary Employment Certification, in accordance with
the standards and procedures set forth under Sec. 655.432, the CO will
deny the CW-1 Application for Temporary Employment Certification.
Based on the Department's experience administering other TLC
programs, there are circumstances in which the modified CW-1
Application for Temporary Employment Certification submitted by the
employer does not resolve the stated deficiency or creates a question
or concern requiring additional clarification before a NOA can be
issued. Therefore, as Sec. 655.432(a) provides, the CO may issue one
or more NODs, as necessary, to work with employers to resolve
deficiencies that are preventing acceptance of their CW-1 Application
for Temporary Employment Certification and achieve program compliance.
3. Section 655.432, Submission of Modified Applications
This section establishes the procedures under which the CO will
handle responses to a NOD, including any modifications to the CW-1
Application for Temporary Employment Certification, submitted by an
employer as well as other necessary modifications requested by the CO
before a final determination is issued. Upon receipt of a response to a
NOD, including any modifications to the CW-1 Application for Temporary
Employment Certification, paragraph (a) specifies the CO will review
the response and may issue one or more additional NODs to ensure
compliance with regulatory
[[Page 12404]]
requirements before issuing a decision under this section. However, an
employer's failure to comply with a NOD, including not responding in a
timely manner or not providing all required documentation requested by
the CO, will result in a denial of the CW-1 Application for Temporary
Employment Certification.
If the CO accepts the response submitted by the employer, paragraph
(b) provides that the CO will issue a NOA. In the NOA, the CO directs
the employer to conduct recruitment of U.S. workers for the job
opportunity, in accordance with the procedures and requirements set
forth under Sec. 655.433. If the modified application fails to cure
the deficiencies or otherwise comply with program requirements, and the
CO finds the employer's response to the NOD unacceptable, paragraphs
(c) and (d) provide that the CO will deny the CW-1 Application for
Temporary Employment Certification, and offer the employer an
opportunity to request administrative judicial review of the denial, in
accordance with the procedures set forth under Sec. 655.461.
Notwithstanding the decision to accept the CW-1 Application for
Temporary Employment Certification, paragraph (e) of this section
authorizes the CO to require additional modifications where the CO
determines the job offer identified in the CW-1 Application for
Temporary Employment Certification does not contain all the minimum
benefits, wages, and working conditions specified under Sec. 655.441.
The CO's ability to require modification(s) of a job offer strengthens
CW-1 program integrity. In some cases, information may come to the CO's
attention after acceptance indicating that the job offer does not
contain all the applicable minimum benefits, wages, and working
conditions that are required for certification. This provision enables
the CO to ensure that the job offer meets all regulatory requirements
before a decision to grant TLC is issued.
The CO may request additional modifications at any time after the
NOA is issued and before the CO makes the final determination to grant
or deny the CW-1 Application for Temporary Employment Certification.
The employer must make the requested modifications, or the CO will deny
the TLC in accordance with the procedures set forth under Sec.
655.453. Once all requested modifications are made and approved by the
CO, paragraph (e) requires that the employer provide to all workers
recruited in connection with the job opportunity a copy of the modified
CW-1 Application for Temporary Employment Certification no later than
the date work commences.
4. Section 655.433, Notice of Acceptance
This section establishes the procedures under which the CO will
issue a NOA after reviewing the employer's CW-1 Application for
Temporary Employment Certification. The purpose of the NOA is to
provide the employer with specific instructions on where to conduct
recruitment in the CNMI and the length of time advertisements for the
job opportunity must appear to prospective U.S. workers. Paragraph (a)
provides that a NOA will be issued to the employer where the CO
determines the CW-1 Application for Temporary Employment Certification,
including the material terms and conditions of the job offer, contains
no errors or inaccuracies, and meets the requirements set forth in this
subpart. A copy of the NOA will be sent to the employer's agent or
attorney, as applicable.
Paragraph (b) of this section specifies the content requirements of
the NOA. The NOA will direct the employer to recruit for U.S. workers
by placing an advertisement on the CNMI Department of Labor's job
listing system, as further explained under Sec. 655.442; contacting
its former U.S. employees employed during the previous year and
soliciting their return to the jobs, as further explained under Sec.
655.443; and posting notice of the job opportunity in at least two
conspicuous locations at the place(s) of employment, as further
explained under Sec. 655.444. Additionally, the NOA may contain
instructions for the employer to conduct additional recruitment where
the CO determines qualified U.S. workers will be available for the
work, as further explained under Sec. 655.445.
To ensure employers initiate recruitment in a timely manner, the
NOA will require all employer-conducted recruitment to begin within 14
calendar days from the date the NOA is issued. Finally, in the NOA the
CO will require the employer to submit a report of its recruitment
efforts by a specific date, as further explained under Sec. 655.446,
for the CO to determine whether there is a sufficient number of
qualified U.S. workers in the CNMI who will be available for the
employer's job opportunity.
5. Section 655.434, Amendments to an Application
This section establishes the standards and procedures under which
the employer may request to amend its CW-1 Application for Temporary
Employment Certification to increase the number of workers requested,
modify the period of employment, and/or request other minor changes to
the application. All amendment requests must be made in writing and
before a certification determination is issued on the employer's CW-1
Application for Temporary Employment Certification and will not be
effective until approved by the CO.
Paragraph (a) permits the employer to request a minor amendment to
increase the number of workers requested in the initial CW-1
Application for Temporary Employment Certification. The employer may
request an increase of not more than 20 percent (50 percent for
employers requesting less than 10 workers) of the number of workers
requested on the initial application without requiring an additional
recruitment period for U.S. workers. Requests for increases above the
prescribed percentages, which are similar to other TLC programs \43\
administered by the Department, may be approved without additional
recruitment only when the employer demonstrates that the need for
additional workers could not have been foreseen and is wholly outside
of the employer's control.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\43\ The H-2B provisions may be found at 20 CFR 655.35. The H-2A
provisions may be found at 20 CFR 655.145.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Paragraph (b) permits the employer to request minor changes in the
total period of employment in the initial CW-1 Application for
Temporary Employment Certification. The employer may request an
amendment of not more than 14 calendar days to the total period of
employment without requiring an additional recruitment period for U.S.
workers. Requests for minor changes to the period of employment must be
in writing and may be approved by the CO only when the employer
demonstrates that the need for such changes could not have been
foreseen and is wholly outside of the employer's control. To ensure
amendments to the period of employment are approved in a manner
consistent with the statute, the CO will deny any request to change the
period of employment where the total amended period of employment will
exceed the maximum applicable duration permitted under Sec.
655.420(g). Additionally, the Department does not intend for employers
to use this provision to amend their dates of need in order to gain a
competitive advantage with respect to accessing the USCIS-administered
CW-1 visa cap. Therefore, the Department will not approve cap-
[[Page 12405]]
related amendment requests on the CW-1 Application for Temporary
Employment Certification.
Paragraph (c) permits the employer to request other minor changes
to the initial CW-1 Application for Temporary Employment Certification
before the CO's certification determination is issued. After reviewing
an employer's request to amend its CW-1 Application for Temporary
Employment Certification, the CO will approve these changes if the CO
determines the proposed amendment(s) are justified after review of
pertinent information, including what effect, if any, the proposed
amendments have on the underlying labor market test in the CNMI for
U.S. workers.
This provision provides clarity to employers and workers alike of
the limitations on and processes for amending a CW-1 Application for
Temporary Employment Certification and the need to inform any U.S.
workers already recruited of the changed job opportunity. For any
amendments approved by the CO under this section, the employer is
required to promptly provide copies of any approved amendments to all
U.S. workers recruited and hired under the original job offer. These
provisions also recognize that business operations are dynamic and
employers can face changed circumstances from varying sources--from
climatic conditions to cancelled contracts. Accordingly, the Department
includes these provisions to provide a limited degree of flexibility to
enable employers to assess and respond to such changes. However, as
provided for in paragraph (d) of this section, these provisions permit
an employer to seek such amendments only prior to the CO issuing a
determination to certify the CW-1 Application for Temporary Employment
Certification, not after certification.
E. Post-Acceptance Requirements
1. Section 655.440, Employer-Conducted Recruitment
This section establishes the requirements for employers to conduct
recruitment for U.S. workers in the CNMI and provides that such
recruitment may occur only after the employer files a CW-1 Application
for Temporary Employment Certification and receives a NOA from the CO.
To carry out the statutory requirement that certifications be granted
only if no U.S. workers are available, paragraph (a) contains the
general requirement that employers must conduct recruitment in the CNMI
to ensure that there are not able and qualified U.S. workers who will
be available for the positions listed in the CW-1 Application for
Temporary Employment Certification. The requirement that employers
seeking TLC conduct a thorough test of the CNMI labor market is an
essential requirement to ensure that the importation of foreign workers
will not have an adverse effect on U.S. workers.
Paragraph (b) requires that the employer begin specific recruitment
steps outlined in Sec. Sec. 655.442 through 655.445 within 14 calendar
days from the date the NOA is issued, unless the CO provides different
instructions to the employer in the NOA. This requirement provides the
employer with time to initiate all recruitment steps and ensures all
advertisements and notices of the job opportunities appear to
prospective U.S. workers in the same time period. To ensure U.S.
workers are fully considered for the job opportunities, this paragraph
also requires that all employer-conducted recruitment be completed
before the employer submits the recruitment report to the CO as
specified in the NOA and required in Sec. 655.446.
Where the employer desires to conduct interviews with U.S. workers
for the job opportunity, paragraph (c) requires that such interviews
with U.S. workers be done by telephone or at a location where workers
can participate at little or no cost to the workers. This provision
does not require employers to conduct employment interviews under this
provision. Rather, where employers choose to conduct interviews,
employers are barred from offering preferential treatment to potential
CW-1 workers, including any requirement to interview for the job
opportunity. In addition, this provision ensures that employers conduct
a fair labor market test by requiring employers to conduct those
interviews by phone or provide a procedure for the interviews to be
conducted in the location where the worker is being recruited so that
the worker incurs little or no cost. Accordingly, an employer who
requires a U.S. worker to undergo an interview must provide such worker
with a reasonable opportunity to meet such a requirement. The purpose
of these requirements is to ensure that the employer does not use the
interview process to the disadvantage of U.S. workers.
To ensure no adverse effect to U.S. workers, paragraph (d) requires
the employer to consider all U.S. applicants interested in the
position, and hire all U.S. applicants who are qualified and who will
be available for the job opportunity. This paragraph further provides
that U.S. applicants can be rejected only for lawful, job-related
reasons, and those not rejected on this basis will be hired by the
employer.
And finally, in order for the CO to issue a final determination on
the CW-1 Application for Temporary Employment Certification, paragraph
(e) requires the employer to prepare and submit a written report of its
recruitment activities, in accordance with the requirements set forth
under Sec. 655.446.
2. Section 655.441, Job Offer Assurances and Advertising Contents
This section establishes the standards and minimum content
requirements for an employer to advertise the job opportunity to U.S.
workers for employment in the CNMI. The job offer is essential for U.S.
workers to make informed employment decisions. The job offer serves to
apprise U.S. workers of the available job opportunity and, further,
provides U.S. and CW-1 workers with the material terms and conditions
of employment under this program. To apprise both U.S. and CW-1
workers, it must include not only standard information about the job
opportunity, including wage information to avoid any U.S. worker wage
depression, but also key assurances to which the employer is committed
by filing an CW-1 Application for Temporary Employment Certification to
employ CW-1 workers and to which U.S. workers are also entitled.
Accordingly, paragraph (a) provides that all recruitment contain terms
and conditions of employment that are not less favorable than those
offered to the CW-1 workers and comply with the assurances applicable
to job offers, as set forth in Sec. 655.423.
Paragraph (b) provides a list of the minimum terms and conditions
of employment that must be included in all advertising, including a
requirement that the employer make the appropriate disclosure when it
is offering or providing board, lodging or other facilities, as well as
identify any deductions not required by law, if applicable, that will
be applied to the employee's pay for the provision of such
accommodations. The terms and conditions of employment, as well as the
required disclosures, serve to inform U.S. workers of the available job
opportunity. In requiring that advertisements comply with minimum
content requirements, but not requiring that advertisements contain all
the text of the applicable regulatory assurances associated with these
terms and conditions of employment under Sec. 655.423, the Department
is striking an appropriate balance between the
[[Page 12406]]
employer's cost in placing potentially lengthy advertisements and the
need to ensure consistent disclosure of all necessary information to
prospective U.S. workers. In addition, as a continuing practice in
other TLC programs administered by the Department, employers will be
able to use abbreviations in the advertisements so long as they clearly
and accurately capture the underlying content requirement.
In order to help employers comply with these requirements, the
Department provides specific language which is sufficient on the
material terms and conditions of employment related to transportation;
the three-fourths guarantee; availability of overtime; availability of
on-the-job training; and tools, equipment, and supplies to apprise U.S.
applicants of those required items in the advertisement. As provided
above, the employer may abbreviate some of this language so long as the
underlying guarantee is clearly stated for U.S. workers and can be
clearly understood by a prospective applicant. To apprise U.S. workers
of the available job opportunity, the following statements in an
employer's advertisements are permitted:
1. Transportation: Transportation (including meals and, to the
extent necessary, lodging) to the place of employment will be provided,
or its cost to workers reimbursed, if the worker completes half the
employment period. Return transportation will be provided if the worker
completes the employment period or is dismissed early by the employer.
2. Three-fourths guarantee: Employment will be offered for a total
number of work hours equal to at least three fourths of the workdays of
the total period of employment.
3. Availability of overtime: Overtime hours may be available and
will be paid at $__ per hour.
4. Availability of on-the-job training: Employer will provide on-
the-job training to perform the duties safely and effectively.
5. Tools, equipment, and supplies: Employer will provide workers at
no charge all tools, supplies, and equipment required to perform the
job.
To afford U.S. workers access to available job opportunities, this
paragraph also requires all advertisements include the name and contact
information of the employer, and a statement directing applicants to
apply for the job with the employer using two verifiable methods, one
of which must be electronic, and the time applicants will be considered
for the job opportunity. Contact information of the employer must be a
person employed by the employer with authority to consider U.S. workers
who apply for the job opportunity. Electronic methods by which
applicants may apply for the job can include a telephone number,
electronic mail address, or website where applications or resumes can
be submitted for the specific job opportunity. At any time during the
processing of a CW-1 Application for Temporary Employment Certification
or a post-certification audit examination, the CO has the authority to
verify the methods by which applicants apply for the job opportunity to
ensure each is bona fide.
3. Section 655.442, Place Advertisement With CNMI Department of Labor
This section requires the employer to place an advertisement with
the CNMI Department of Labor. Specifically, paragraph (a) requires the
employer to place an advertisement with the CNMI Department of Labor
that satisfies the requirements set forth in Sec. 655.441 and remains
open to prospective U.S. workers for 21 consecutive calendar days,
which is similar to the H-2B program. Also similar to other TLC
programs,\44\ the advertisement must be sufficient under Sec. 655.441
to ensure that the advertisement informs U.S. workers of the employer's
available job opportunity and to ensure that U.S. workers are not
placed at a competitive disadvantage. Further, the advertisement
provides the means by which U.S. workers will contact employers for the
available job opportunity. The employer's job qualifications and
requirements imposed on U.S. workers must be no less favorable than the
qualifications and requirements that the employer is imposing or will
impose on CW-1 workers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\44\ 20 CFR 655.41; 20 CFR 655.18; 20 CFR 655.151; 20 CFR
655.122.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The CNMI Department of Labor is the government agency responsible
for providing employment and training services, and maintaining an
electronic system for registered and approved employers to post job
vacancy announcements and receive referrals of qualified U.S. workers
in the CNMI. Registration for employers to post vacancy announcements
on the job listing system is a one-time, free process, and readily
accessible through the CNMI Department of Labor's website. Consistent
with the requirements in other TLC programs \45\ for employers to place
job orders with SWAs, the Department has concluded that the requirement
for employers to place an advertisement with the CNMI Department of
Labor represents a reliable method of recruitment for the job
opportunity with a capacity to reach a large number of prospective U.S.
workers in the CNMI.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\45\ 20 CFR part 655, subpart A; 20 CFR part 655, subpart B.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Paragraph (b) also requires the employer to maintain documentation
that the advertisement was placed with the CNMI Department of Labor to
establish compliance with the requirements of this section. The
employer's documentation must include printouts of web pages in which
the advertisement appeared on the CNMI Department of Labor job listing
system, or other verifiable evidence from the CNMI Department of Labor
containing the text of the advertisement. The documentation must also
clearly show the dates on which the advertisement appeared on the CNMI
Department of Labor's job listing system in order to establish
compliance with the 21-day recruitment period. The Department reminds
employers that the CO may request this documentation during the course
of processing the CW-1 Application for Temporary Employment
Certification or a post-certification audit examination.
4. Section 655.443, Contact With Former U.S. Workers
This section requires the employer to make reasonable efforts to
contact by mail or other effective means its former U.S. workers,
including those who were laid off within 270 calendar days before the
date of need listed in the CW-1 Application for Temporary Employment
Certification, employed by the employer in the occupation and at the
places of employment listed in the application during the previous year
to solicit their return to the job. However, employers are not required
to contact U.S. workers who were dismissed for cause or who abandoned
the places of employment. The dismissal-for-cause exception does not
apply to workers improperly fired in retaliation for their exercise of
rights protected under the program. The Department has concluded that
this provision will help ensure that the greatest number of U.S.
workers, particularly those who have previously held these positions,
have awareness of and access to these job opportunities.
Each employer must provide its former U.S. workers with a full
disclosure of the material terms and conditions of the job offer and
solicit the U.S. workers' return to the job. This contact must occur
during the period of time that the job offer is being advertised on the
CNMI Department of
[[Page 12407]]
Labor's job listing system, and the employer must maintain
documentation sufficient to prove such contact in the event of an
investigation, inspection, audit, or law enforcement function performed
by the Department, DHS, or any Federal Government Official. This
documentation may consist of a dated copy of a form letter or other
written notification sent to all former U.S. workers, along with
evidence of its transmission (postage account, address list, etc.).
The Department recognizes that collective bargaining agreements may
exist between employers and workers and contain requirements for the
employer to contact laid-off workers in accordance with specific terms
governing recall and a recall period. The requirement in this section
that the employer contact former U.S. workers employed by the employer
during the 270 calendar days before the date of need would not
substitute for the terms in a collective bargaining agreement. The
employer is separately obligated to comply with the terms and
conditions of the bargaining agreement, which may include recall
provisions that cover workers employed by the employer beyond the 270
calendar day period.
5. Section 655.444, Notice of Posting Requirement
Consistent with the Department's TLC programs, for the protection
of U.S. workers, this section requires employers to post notice of the
job opportunity sufficient to apprise U.S. workers of the available
opportunity. For this notice requirement, the employer must post a copy
of the CW-1 Application for Temporary Employment Certification in at
least two conspicuous locations at all places of employment or in some
other manner that provides reasonable notification to all employees in
the job classification and area in which the work will be performed by
the CW-1 workers. The notice must be posted at all places of employment
for a period of 21 consecutive calendar days. Posting on a website may
fulfill this requirement in some circumstances.
The posting of the notice at the employer's place(s) of employment
is intended to provide notice that all the employer's U.S. workers are
afforded the same access to the job opportunities for which the
employer intends to hire CW-1 workers. In addition, the posting of the
notice may result in the sharing of information between the employer's
unionized and nonunionized workers and therefore result in more
referrals and a greater pool of qualified U.S. workers. This IFR
provides flexibility for complying with this requirement; specifically,
the regulation includes the language ``or in some other manner that
provides reasonable notification to all employees in the job
classification and area in which the work will be performed by the CW-1
workers.'' This permits the employer to devise an alternative method
for disseminating this information to the employer's U.S. workers, for
example, by posting the notice in the same manner and location as for
other notices, such as safety and health occupational notices, that the
employer is required by law to post. This provision further provides
that electronic posting, such as displaying the notice prominently on
any internal or external website that is maintained by the employer and
customarily used for notices to employees about terms and conditions of
employment, is sufficient to meet this posting requirement as long as
the posting otherwise meets the requirements of this section. Finally,
this section requires the employer maintain proof the CW-1 Application
for Temporary Employment Certification was posted and identify the
location(s) and the specific period of time on which the notice
appeared to U.S. workers, in accordance with Sec. 655.456.
6. Section 655.445, Additional Employer-Conducted Requirement
Where the CO determines that the employer-conducted recruitment
described in Sec. Sec. 655.442 through 655.444 is not sufficient to
attract qualified U.S. workers, this section provides the CO with
discretion to require the employer to engage in additional recruitment
activities. Paragraph (a) provides the CO with discretion to order
additional reasonable recruitment where the CO has determined that
there is a likelihood that U.S. workers who are qualified will be
available for the work. This discretion may be exercised where
additional recruitment efforts will likely result in more opportunities
for and a greater response from available and qualified U.S. workers.
The additional recruitment ordered by the CO under this section will be
conducted within the same time period as placement of the advertisement
with the CNMI Department of Labor and the other mandatory employer-
conducted recruitment described above.
Paragraph (b) provides that, if the CO elects to require additional
recruitment, the CO will describe the number and type of additional
recruitment efforts required. This paragraph also provides a
nonexhaustive list of the types of additional recruitment that may be
required by the CO, including advertising on the employer's website or
another website, with community-based organizations, local unions or
trade unions, or via a professional, trade, or other publication where
such a publication is appropriate for the workers likely to apply for
the job opportunity. When assessing the appropriateness of a particular
recruitment method, the CO will take into consideration all options at
her/his disposal, and will consider both the cost and the likelihood
that the additional recruitment will identify qualified and available
U.S. workers, and will, where appropriate, opt for the least burdensome
method(s).
The Department recognizes that the increased rate of technological
innovation, including its implications for communication of information
about job opportunities, is changing the way many U.S. workers search
for and find jobs. In part due to these changes, the inclusion of this
requirement is intended to allow the CO flexibility to keep pace with
the ever-changing labor market trends. To administer this provision
effectively, the Department intends to leverage its relationship with
the CNMI Department of Labor to obtain information on the primary
sources and methods of recruitment that are reasonable and most likely
to attract U.S. workers in the CNMI for those jobs employers who are
seeking CW-1 workers.
Paragraph (c) provides that, where the CO requires additional
recruitment, the CO will specify the documentation or other supporting
evidence that must be retained by the employer as proof that the
additional recruitment requirements were met, as required in Sec.
655.456.
7. Section 655.446, Recruitment Report
This section establishes the requirements that all employers must
meet in order for the CO to issue a final determination on the CW-1
Application for Temporary Employment Certification. Specifically,
paragraph (a) requires the employer to submit to the NPC a signed and
dated recruitment report, by the date specified in the NOA, which
accounts for its recruitment efforts for U.S. workers in the CNMI.
Where recruitment was conducted by a job contractor or its employer-
client, then both joint employers named in the CW-1 Application for
Temporary Employment Certification must sign the recruitment report, as
specified under Sec. 655.421(e)(1). To ensure all U.S. workers who
apply for the job are fully considered, paragraph (a) specifies that
the employer must not prepare, sign, and date the recruitment report
until 2 calendar days after the last date on which the last
advertisement appeared.
[[Page 12408]]
Except in circumstances where an employer may be required to do
assisted recruitment under Sec. 655.471, the last day on which the
last advertisement appears will generally be the 21st consecutive
calendar day of the recruitment period.
The minimum content recruitment report must contain, the name of
each recruitment activity or source, confirmation that each recruitment
step required by the CO in the NOA was completed and when, and the
results of the recruitment effort. The employer must provide the name
and contact information of each U.S. worker who applied or was referred
to the job opportunity as well as the disposition of each worker's
application. The employer must clearly indicate whether the job
opportunity was offered to each U.S. worker applicant and whether each
U.S. worker accepted or declined employment. This reporting allows the
Department to ensure the employer has met its recruitment obligations
whether there were insufficient U.S. workers who are able, qualified
and available to perform the job for which the employer seeks TLC. In
addition, the NPC may contact U.S. workers listed in the recruitment
report, either prior to issuing a final determination or during the
course of a post-certification audit examination, to verify the reasons
given by the employer as to why they were not hired, where applicable.
To ensure all U.S. applicants are considered for the job
opportunity and the outcome of each worker's application are recorded
timely and accurately, paragraph (b) of this section requires employers
to update the recruitment report throughout the recruitment period. In
a joint employment situation, either the job contractor or the
employer-client may update the recruitment report throughout the
recruitment period.
F. Labor Certification Determinations
1. Section 655.450, Determinations
This section generally authorizes the OFLC Administrator and NPC-
based COs, by virtue of delegation from the OFLC Administrator, to make
the determinations to certify or deny CW-1 Applications for Temporary
Employment Certification. The CO will certify the CW-1 Application for
Temporary Employment Certification only if the employer has met all
requirements, including the criteria established at Sec. 655.451, thus
demonstrating that there is an insufficient number of U.S. workers in
the Commonwealth who are able, willing, qualified, and available for
the job opportunity for which certification is sought and that the
employment of the CW-1 workers will not adversely affect the wages and
working conditions of U.S. workers similarly employed in the
Commonwealth.
2. Section 655.451, Criteria for Temporary Labor Certification
This section requires, as a condition of certification, that the
employer demonstrate full compliance with the requirements of this
subpart. The CO will determine whether the employer has successfully
established that there are insufficient U.S. workers in the
Commonwealth to fill the employer's job opportunity. In making a
determination about the availability of U.S. workers in the
Commonwealth for the job opportunity, the CO will consider individuals
whom the employer rejected for any reason that was not lawful or job-
related to be willing, able, available, and qualified U.S. workers.
Since the individuals will be considered willing, able, available, and
qualified U.S. workers who were unlawfully rejected, if the application
is certified, the number of certified CW-1 workers will be reduced by
the number of unlawfully rejected U.S. workers. If the number of
unlawfully rejected U.S. workers exceeds the number of CW-1 workers
requested, the application will be denied. This new section furthers
the explicit Congressional intent to require a TLC in connection with
the CW-1 visa program, as expressly mandated in Sec. (2)(A) of the
Workforce Act, which seeks to protect U.S. workers by means of adding
this requirement to the program, in addition to mandating a prevailing
wage survey, and an alternate method for determining a prevailing wage,
as well as requiring that a minimum wage is paid. See also 48 U.S.C.
1806 (d)(2)(A)-(C).
3. Section 655.452, Approved Certification
In cases where the CO grants TLC, the CO will electronically
transmit a Final Determination notice and certified CW-1 Application
for Temporary Employment Certification to the employer and USCIS. In
cases where an employer is permitted to file by mail, the CO will use
the same electronic method to transmit the certification documentation
directly to USCIS electronically, but will deliver certification
documentation to the employer using first class mail.
Consistent with current practices in other TLC programs, the
Department will send a copy of all certification documentation to the
employer and, if applicable, to the employer's agent or attorney. The
Department has determined that that even when an employer is
represented, the employer should directly receive notification from
OFLC, and maintain the Final Determination notice, as well as the
certified CW-1 Application for Temporary Employment Certification,
because the employer attests to, and is primarily responsible for,
meeting the obligations and requirements.
Due to the geographic location of the CNMI, the Department has
concluded that the use of an electronic method to issue approved
certification approvals will be most efficient. The Department
anticipates these procedures will also promote program integrity and
expedite the processing of CW-1 petitions at USCIS, in part, by
providing certification information directly from OFLC to USCIS
electronically.
Finally, the employer is required to retain a copy of the certified
CW-1 Application for Temporary Employment Certification, including the
original signed Appendix C, as required under the record keeping
provisions at Sec. 655.456.
4. Section 655.453, Denied Certification
In cases where the CO denies TLC, the CO issues a Final
Determination notice to the employer and, if applicable, to the
employer's agent or attorney. Consistent with the procedural
requirements for issuing approved certifications, the CO is required to
send the Final Determination notice to the employer using an electronic
method authorized by the OFLC Administrator, except where the
Department has permitted an employer to file by mail as set forth in
Sec. 655.420(c), in which case the CO will send the Final
Determination notice using first class mail.
The Final Determination notice will state the reason(s) for denying
the employer's request for TLC, and cite the relevant regulatory
provisions governing the stated grounds for denial. The Final
Determination notice will also advise the employer of its right to seek
administrative review of the final determination. The Final
Determination notice will notify the employer that failure to timely
request administrative judicial review will result in the denial of the
application for labor certification becoming final and the Department
will not accept any appeal on such application.
5. Section 655.454, Partial Certification
This section provides the CO with authority to issue a partial TLC
reflecting either a shorter-than-requested period of employment or a
lower-than-requested number of CW-1
[[Page 12409]]
workers, or both. A partial certification may be issued based upon
information the CO receives during the course of processing the CW-1
Application for Temporary Employment Certification. For example, the
period of employment will be reduced where the employer is unable to
demonstrate that full-time employment will be available beginning on
the date of need through the entire period of employment identified on
the application. The number of workers requested for certification will
be reduced by one for each able, willing, qualified, and available U.S.
worker the CNMI Department of Labor refers or who applies directly with
the employer, and who the employer has rejected for reasons that are
unlawful or unrelated to the job. In other words, the CO can issue a
full certification only where the employer has fully considered each
U.S. worker who applied, whether directly or through referral from the
CNMI Department of Labor, and has identified a lawful, job-related
reason for each U.S. worker not hired.
If a partial labor certification is issued, the CO will send the
Final Determination notice and certified CW-1 Application for Temporary
Employment Certification electronically, except where the employer is
permitted to file by mail as set forth in Sec. 655.420(c). The Final
Determination notice will state the reasons why either the period of
need or the number of CW-1 workers requested has been reduced. The
Final Determination notice will also offer the employer an opportunity
to request administrative judicial review using the procedures further
explained under Sec. 655.461. Where the employer does not timely
request administrative judicial review, the partial certification
determination will be final on the date the CO issued the
certification, and the Department will not accept any appeal on that
CW-1 Application for Temporary Employment Certification.
6. Section 655.455, Validity of Temporary Labor Certification
This section provides that a TLC granted by the CO is valid only
for the period of employment identified in the certified CW-1
Application for Temporary Employment Certification and for the number
of CW-1 positions, the places of employment, the job classification,
the specific services or labor to be performed, and the employer(s),
including any modifications approved by the CO. Finally, a TLC is
prohibited from being transferred from one employer to another unless
the employer to which the TLC is being transferred is a successor in
interest to the employer that received the TLC.
These limitations protect the integrity of the labor certification
process and are consistent with the other labor certification programs
administered by the Department.
7. Section 655.456, Document Retention Requirements for CW-1 Employers
CW-1 employers filing an CW-1 Application for Temporary Employment
Certification must retain the documents and records to demonstrate
compliance for 3 years from the date on which the CW-1 Application for
Temporary Employment Certification expires, or 3 years from the date of
the final determination if the CW-1 Application for Temporary
Employment Certification is denied, or 3 years from the date the
Department receives the request for withdrawal of the CW-1 Application
for Temporary Employment Certification. Employers may maintain these
documents and records electronically.
The documents and records required to be retained include: Proof of
efforts to recruit U.S. workers in the Commonwealth; documentation
supporting the recruitment report, including justification for failure
to contact former U.S. workers, and any supporting resumes and contact
information; and records of each worker's earnings, hours offered and
worked, location(s) where work is performed, if applicable, records of
reimbursement of transportation and subsistence costs incurred by the
workers during transportation; copies of written contracts with third
parties demonstrating compliance with the prohibitions to seek or
receive payments or other compensation of any kind from prospective
workers; evidence of the employer's contact with U.S. workers who
applied for the job opportunity, including documents demonstrating that
any rejections of U.S. workers were for lawful, job-related reasons;
copies of written notices informing OFLC of each CW-1 worker or worker
in corresponding employment who separate from employment; and a copy of
the CW-1 Application for Temporary Employment Certification (including
the original signed Form ETA-9142C, Appendix C) and all accompanying
appendices, including any modifications, amendments or extensions
approved by the CO.
Based on the Department's experience administering other TLC
programs, the documents and records to be retained by the employer are
critical to ensuring an appropriate level of integrity and
accountability in the CW-1 program. Thus, paragraph (d) of this section
requires employers to make all documents and records required to be
retained under this subpart available to the Department, DHS or to any
Federal Government Official performing an investigation, inspection,
audit, or law enforcement function for purposes of copying,
transcribing, or inspecting them to verify employer compliance with
program requirements.
G. Post Certification Activities
1. Section 655.460, Extensions
This section establishes the standards and procedures for employers
to request extensions of the period of employment on the certified CW-1
Application for Temporary Employment Certification. Extensions differ
from amendments to the period of employment in that extensions are
requested after certification, while amendments are requested before
the CO issues a final determination. The Department's experience
administering other TLC programs demonstrates that some employers, due
to unforeseen circumstances, need some degree of flexibility in the
authorized period of employment after the CW-1 Application for
Temporary Employment Certification is granted.
Therefore, employers may request extensions to the period of
employment related solely to weather conditions or other factors beyond
their control (which may include unforeseen changes in market
conditions). The employer must submit the request to the CO documenting
that the extension is needed and that it could not have been reasonably
foreseen by the employer. The CO will not grant an extension where the
total period of employment with the extension would exceed the maximum
applicable duration permitted under Sec. 655.420(g). The Department
has concluded that this requirement provides employers with important
flexibility to address unforeseen circumstances while maintaining the
integrity of the certification decision issued by the Department,
including the labor market test to ensure U.S. worker access to the job
opportunities.
Upon review of the employer's extension request, the CO will
provide notification to the employer and, if applicable, to the
employer's agent or attorney of the decision. Where the CO denies the
extension request, the employer has the right to request administrative
review using the procedures under Sec. 655.461. Where the CO approves
the employer's request for an extension, the written notification
[[Page 12410]]
the employer receives from the CO will constitute an amended Final
Determination notice.
The employer must immediately provide to its CW-1 workers and
workers in corresponding employment a copy of any approved extension,
especially since the CO's determination may have an impact on the
duration of the CW-1 visa status of the workers.
2. Section 655.461, Administrative Review
This section establishes the standards and procedures under which
an employer may request administrative review of a determination issued
by the CO, as well as the procedures BALCA must follow in conducting
such a review. An employer may request administrative review of a
determination issued by the CO with respect to a PWD under Sec.
655.411; denial of a modified CW-1 Application for Temporary Employment
Certification under Sec. 655.432; denial of TLC under Sec. 655.453;
issuance of a partial certification under Sec. 655.454; denial of a
request for an extension under Sec. 655.460; imposition of assisted
recruitment under Sec. 655.471. In addition, an employer may request
administrative review of a revocation of an approved TLC by the OFLC
Administrator under Sec. 655.472.
An employer wishing review of a determination by the CO must
request an administrative review before BALCA to exhaust its
administrative remedies within 10 business days from the date of the
CO's determination. This allows for prompt processing while providing
employers with sufficient time to prepare their requests. Additionally,
this paragraph sets forth the various requirements for requests for
review. Such requests must clearly identify the particular
determination for which review is sought and include a copy of that
determination, and set forth the grounds for the request, including the
specific factual issues the employer wishes BALCA to examine, but may
contain only evidence that was actually before the CO at the time of
the determination.
To facilitate the timely preparation of the Appeal File, the
employer must also send a copy of its request for review to the CO.
Upon the receipt of the request for review, paragraph (b) of this
section requires the CO to assemble and submit the Appeal File to
BALCA, the employer, and the Associate Solicitor for Employment and
Training Legal Services, Office of the Solicitor, U.S. Department of
Labor as soon as practicable by means normally assuring expedited
delivery. If applicable, a copy of the Appeal File will also be sent to
the employer's agent or attorney. Pursuant to paragraph (c), once BALCA
receives the Appeal File, the Chief ALJ will assign either a single ALJ
or a panel of three ALJs to consider the case.
Paragraph (d)(1) explains the briefing schedules for appeals under
this section. If the employer wishes to submit a brief, it must do so
with its request for review. The CO may submit a brief within 7
business days of receipt of the Appeal File. Under this schedule,
within the timeframe permitted for the submission of a request for
review, the employer may develop a brief that sets forth the specific
grounds for its request and corresponding legal arguments. In turn, the
CO may respond to those arguments within a set timeframe. This
procedure assists the ALJ's decision-making process by allowing for a
complete set of arguments by the employer and responses by the CO while
providing the parties a predictable, yet expedited, briefing schedule.
Paragraph (d)(2) sets forth the standard of review that applies to
requests for administrative review. When reviewing such requests, the
ALJ must uphold the CO's decision unless the employer shows that the
decision is arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, or otherwise
not in accordance with the law. Including this standard in the IFR will
make clear what employers must prove in order to receive a favorable
decision. It will also ensure BALCA is conducting its administrative
review in a consistent manner.
To ensure an administrative judicial decision is rendered as
expeditiously as possible, paragraph (e) specifies that BALCA must
review the CO's determination only on the basis of the documents in the
Appeal File that were before the CO at the time of the CO's
determination, the request for review, and any legal briefs submitted.
Sometimes, the Appeal File contains new evidence submitted by the
employer to the CO after the CO has issued his or her decision, such as
when the employer submits a request for review with new evidence, or a
corrected recruitment report with new information, after the CO has
denied certification. Although such evidence is in the Appeal File,
BALCA may not consider this new evidence because it was not before the
CO at the time of the CO's determination. Similarly, BALCA may not
consider evidence not before the CO by the time the CO's determination
was issued, even if such evidence is in the request for review or legal
briefs. This provision reflects longstanding principles in the
administrative review of H-2A and H-2B cases, and provides for fair
determinations of these matters.
Finally, paragraphs (e) and (f) states that BALCA must notify all
parties of its decision within 7 business days of the submission of the
CO's brief or 10 business days after receipt of the Appeal File,
whichever is later, of its decision to: (1) Affirm the CO's
determination; (2) reverse or modify the CO's determination; or (3)
remand the case back to the CO for further action. This timeline
provides BALCA with a reasonable timeframe in which to render a
decision, while ensuring prompt resolution of employers' review
requests.
3. Section 655.462, Withdrawal of an CW-1 Application for Temporary
Employment Certification
Paragraph (a) permits an employer to submit a request to withdraw
an CW-1 Application for Temporary Employment Certification at any time
after the application is submitted to the NPC for processing, including
after the CO grants TLC under Sec. 655.450. However, the employer must
continue to comply with the terms and conditions of employment
contained in the CW-1 Application for Temporary Employment
Certification and work contract for all workers recruited and hired in
connection with that application. In accordance with paragraph (b), the
employer must submit a withdrawal request in writing to the NPC,
clearly identifying the CW-1 Application for Temporary Employment
Certification to be withdrawn and stating the reasons for requesting
withdrawal.
4. Section 655.463, Public Disclosure
This section provides that the Department will maintain a publicly
accessible electronic file with information on all employers who
voluntarily elect to request TLC under the CW-1 program. The database
will include nonprivileged information extracted from the CW-1
Applications for Temporary Employment Certification including, but not
limited to, the number of workers requested for TLC, the date an
application is filed, the date an application is decided, and the final
disposition of an application. Providing this information
electronically will enhance transparency of the CW-1 program and of
OFLC's processing of these applications. It will also make certain that
such information is readily available to those who seek it from the
Department.
[[Page 12411]]
H. Integrity Measures
1. Section 655.470, Audits
This section outlines the process under which the CO will conduct
audits of certified CW-1 Applications for Temporary Employment
Certification. The statutory mandate to ensure that a sufficient number
of qualified U.S. workers in the CNMI are not available and that
employment of the foreign workers will not adversely affect the wages
and working conditions of similarly employed U.S. workers serves as the
basis for the Department's authority to conduct audit examinations.
There is real value in auditing certified CW-1 Applications for
Temporary Employment Certification because they can establish a record
of employer compliance or noncompliance with program requirements, and
they contain information that assists the Department in determining
whether it needs to refer findings to other Federal agencies for
further investigation or, depending on the nature of the violations,
initiate debarment proceedings to prohibit an employer, agent, or
attorney, or their successors in interest, from participating in the
CW-1 program.
Paragraph (a) provides that the CO has sole discretion to choose
the certified CW-1 Applications for Temporary Employment Certification
that will be audited, which includes the selection of applications
using a random assignment method. When a certified CW-1 Application for
Temporary Employment Certification is selected for audit, paragraph (b)
requires the CO to issue an audit letter to the employer and, if
appropriate, a copy of such letter to the employer's attorney or agent,
listing the documentation the employer must submit and the date (no
more than 30 calendar days from the date the audit letter is issued) by
which the documentation must be sent to the CO. Additionally, paragraph
(b) requires that the audit letter issued by the CO advise the employer
that failure to fully comply with the audit process may result in the
revocation of its certification or in debarment, under Sec. Sec.
655.472 and 655.473, respectively, or require the employer to undergo
assisted recruitment in future filings of a CW-1 Application for
Temporary Employment Certification, under Sec. 655.471.
Paragraph (c) permits the CO to request additional information and/
or documentation from the employer as needed in order to complete the
audit. Paragraph (d) provides the CO with authority to provide the
audit findings and underlying documentation to DHS or other appropriate
enforcement agencies. The CO may refer any findings that an employer
discouraged a qualified U.S. worker from applying, failed to hire,
discharged, or otherwise discriminated against a qualified U.S. worker,
to the Department of Justice, Civil Rights Division, Immigrant and
Employee Rights Section.
2. Section 655.471, Assisted Recruitment
This section protects the integrity of the CW-1 program by
requiring the employer to follow special requirements during its
recruitment process where the CO determines the employer committed one
or more violations that do not warrant program debarment. Specifically,
paragraph (a) permits the CO to require an employer to participate in
assisted recruitment for any future CW-1 Application for Temporary
Employment Certification, if the CO determines as a result of an audit,
or otherwise, that a violation not warranting debarment from the CW-1
program has occurred. Assisted recruitment ordered by the CO can also
be an effective tool to help employers that, due to either program
inexperience or confusion, commit unintentional violations in their CW-
1 Application for Temporary Employment Certification and indicate a
need for further assistance from the Department.
Paragraph (b) of this section requires the CO to provide written
notification to the employer and, if applicable, to the employer's
agent or attorney, of the requirement to participate in assisted
recruitment for any future filed CW-1 Application for Temporary
Employment Certification. The CO may require the employer to follow
special requirements during its recruitment process for a period of up
to 2 years from the date the notice is issued. The nature of the
assisted recruitment will be at the discretion of the CO, and such
requirements will be based on the totality of the circumstances of the
employer. The notification issued by the CO will state the reasons for
the imposition of the additional requirements and explain that the
employer's agreement to accept the conditions related to the assisted
recruitment process will constitute their inclusion as bona fide
conditions and terms of a CW-1 Application for Temporary Employment
Certification. In the notice, the CO must also offer the employer an
opportunity to request an administrative judicial review, in accordance
with the procedures further explained under Sec. 655.461.
As set forth in paragraph (c), the assisted recruitment process
will be in addition to any recruitment required of the employer under
Sec. Sec. 655.442 through 655.445 of this subpart. This paragraph also
provides a nonexhaustive list of special requirements the CO may order
the employer to undertake during its recruitment process, such as
requiring submission to the CO of draft advertisements at the time of
filing the CW-1 Application for Temporary Employment Certification,
designating specific sources of recruitment for U.S. workers, extending
the period of time advertisements are available to U.S. workers,
requiring the employer to either notify the CO when advertisements are
placed and/or provide proof of publication of all advertisements, or
other requirements verifying the employer conducted the assisted
recruitment ordered by the CO.
To ensure employers comply with these assisted recruitment
requirements, paragraph (d) provides that, where the employer
materially fails to comply with the requirements of this section, the
CO will deny the CW-1 Application for Temporary Employment
Certification and may initiate debarment proceedings against the
employer, agent, or attorney, or their successors in interest, in
accordance with the standard and procedures under Sec. 655.473.
3. Section 655.472, Revocation
This section outlines the process by which the OFLC Administrator
may revoke an approved CW-1 TLC. The ability to revoke an approved
labor certification is a critical tool for enabling the Department to
protect the integrity of the CW-1 program and stems from the agency's
inherent authority to reconsider its decisions.
As set forth in paragraph (a) of this section, the OFLC
Administrator will only revoke TLCs under certain circumstances: (1)
When the OFLC Administrator finds that the issuance of the TLC was not
justified due to fraud or willful misrepresentation of a material fact
in the application process, as defined in at Sec. 655.473(d); (2) when
the OFLC Administrator finds that the employer substantially failed to
comply with any of the terms and conditions of the TLC, as defined in
Sec. 655.473(d) and (e); or (3) when the OFLC Administrator determines
that the employer is impeding the Department's audit examination
authority under Sec. 655.470, or impeding any Federal Government
Official performing an investigation, inspection, audit, or law
enforcement function under this subpart.
Paragraph (b) of this section outlines the procedures OFLC will use
when the OFLC Administrator decides to revoke
[[Page 12412]]
an approved TLC for CW-1 workers. If the OFLC Administrator decides to
revoke an approved TLC, paragraph (b)(1) provides that it will send a
Notice of Revocation to the CW-1 employer, and a copy to its attorney
or agent, if applicable. The notice will contain a detailed statement
of the grounds for the revocation and inform the employer, and its
agent or attorney if applicable, of the employer's rights. Upon
receiving the Notice of Revocation, the CW-1 employer has two options
if it wishes to challenge the revocation: (1) It may submit rebuttal
evidence to the OFLC Administrator; or (2) it may request Administrator
review of the Notice of Revocation by BALCA pursuant to the procedures
detailed in Sec. 655.461. As set forth in paragraph (b)(2) of this
section, if the employer does not submit rebuttal evidence or file a
request for Administrator review within 10 business days of the date of
the Notice of Revocation, the notice will be deemed the final agency
action and will take effect immediately at the end of the 10 business
days. If the employer chooses to file rebuttal evidence, and the
employer timely files that evidence, the OFLC Administrator will review
it and provide the employer with a final determination on revocation
within 10 business days of receiving the rebuttal evidence.
If the OFLC Administrator decides to uphold the revocation, it will
inform the CW-1 employer of its right to request administrative review
by BALCA according to the procedures set forth at Sec. 655.461. The
CW-1 employer must appeal OFLC's determination within 10 business days;
otherwise, OFLC's decision becomes the final agency action by the
Secretary and will take effect immediately at the end of the 10
business days.
If the CW-1 employer chooses to request administrative review,
either in lieu of submitting rebuttal evidence, or after the OFLC
Administrator makes a determination on the rebuttal evidence, paragraph
(b)(3) of this section explains that such requests must be submitted
according to the appeal procedures of Sec. 655.461. Paragraph (b)(4)
provides that the timely filing of either the rebuttal evidence or a
request for administrative review stays the revocation pending the
outcome of the applicable proceeding. If the TLC is ultimately revoked,
paragraph (b)(5) provides that OFLC will notify DHS and the Department
of State.
Finally, paragraph (c) of this section lists a CW-1 employer's
continuing obligations to its CW-1 and corresponding workers if the
employer's CW-1 certification is revoked. The obligations include
reimbursement of actual inbound transportation, visa, and other
expenses (if they have not been paid), payment of the workers' outbound
transportation expenses, payment to the workers of the amount due under
the three-fourths guarantee; and payment of any other wages, benefits,
and working conditions due or owing to workers under this subpart.
When an employer's certification is revoked, the revocation applies
to that particular certification only; violations relating to a
particular certification will not be imputed to other certifications
issued to the same employer for which there has been no finding of
employer culpability. In some situations, however, OFLC may revoke all
of an employer's existing labor certifications where the underlying
violation applies to all of the employer's certifications. For
instance, if OFLC finds that the employer meets either the basis for
revocation in paragraph (a)(3) of this section (i.e., failure to
cooperate with a Department's investigation or with a Department
official performing an investigation, inspection, audit, or law
enforcement function), this finding could provide a basis for revoking
any and all of the employer's existing TLCs approved under this
subpart. Additionally, where OFLC finds that violations of paragraph
(a)(1) or (2) of this section affect all of the employer's
certifications, such as where an employer misrepresents its legal
status, OFLC also may revoke all of that employer's certifications.
Lastly, where an employer's certification has been revoked, OFLC may
take a more careful look at the employer's other certifications to
determine if similar violations exist that would warrant revocation.
The Department recognizes the seriousness of revocation as an
administrative remedy; accordingly, the grounds for revocation reflect
violations that significantly undermine the integrity of the CW-1
program. OFLC intends to use the authority to revoke only when an
employer's actions warrant such a severe consequence.
4. Section 655.473, Debarment
This section outlines the process under which the OFLC
Administrator may debar an employer, agent, attorney, or their
successors in interest, from participation in the CW-1 program. The
ability to suspend and debar entities from participating in the labor
certification program is necessary to encourage compliance with program
requirements and maintain the integrity of the program. Suspension and
debarment authority is a critical tool for enabling the Department to
protect both U.S. and foreign workers, and to fulfill its statutory
mandate to prevent adverse effects on U.S. workers due to the presence
of temporary foreign labor.
The Department has repeatedly recognized its inherent suspension
and debarment authority in the foreign labor certification context. As
the Second Circuit found in Janik Paving & Construction, Inc. v. Brock,
828 F.2d 84 (2d Cir. 1987), the Department possesses an inherent
authority to refuse to provide a benefit or lift a restriction for an
employer that has acted contrary to the welfare of U.S. workers. In
assessing the Department's authority to debar violators, the court
found that ``[t]he Secretary may . . . make such rules and regulations
allowing reasonable variations, tolerances, and exemptions to and from
any or all provisions . . . as he may find necessary and proper in the
public interest to prevent injustice or undue hardship or to avoid
serious impairment of the conduct of Government business.'' Id. at 89
n.6. In that case, the implied authority to debar existed even though
the statute in question ``specifically provided civil and criminal
sanctions for violations of overtime work requirements but failed to
mention debarment.'' Id. at 89. The court held that debarment may be
necessary to ``effective enforcement of a statute.'' Id. at 91.
The power to debar is also a function of a Federal agency's general
authority to prescribe rules of procedure to determine who can practice
and participate in administrative proceedings before it. Koden v. DOJ,
546 F.2d 228, 232-33 (7th Cir. 1977) (citing Goldsmith v. U.S. Board of
Tax Appeals, 270 U.S. 117 (1926)). Such power exists even if the agency
does not have express statutory authority to prescribe the
qualifications of those entities. Touche Ross & Co. v. SEC, 609 F.2d
570, 582 (2d Cir. 1979). An agency with the power to determine who may
practice before it also has the authority to debar or discipline such
individuals for unprofessional conduct. See Koden, 564 F. 2d at 233.
The Department has exercised such authority in the past in prescribing
the qualifications, and procedures for denying the appearance, of
attorneys and other representatives before the Department's OALJ under
29 CFR 18.34(g). See also Smiley v. Director, OWCP, 984 F.2d 278, 283
(9th Cir. 1993).
In order to encourage compliance, the regulations for the CW-1
program incorporate attestations, audits, and the remedial measure of
debarment. Use of debarment as a mechanism to encourage compliance has
been used by the
[[Page 12413]]
Department in its other foreign labor certification and attestation
programs.\46\ Ensuring the integrity of a statutory program enacted to
protect U.S. workers is an important part of the Department's mission.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\46\ 20 CFR 655.73; 20 CFR 655.182; and 20 CFR 656.31(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Paragraph (a) of this section provides that the OFLC Administrator
may debar an employer, agent, attorney, or any successor in interest to
that employer, agent, or attorney, from participating in any action
under this subpart, if the OFLC Administrator finds that the employer,
agent, or attorney substantially violated a material term or condition
of the Application for Prevailing Wage Determination or CW-1
Application for Temporary Employment Certification. This section also
notes that copies of final debarment decisions will be forwarded to DHS
and DOS promptly. Paragraph (b) explains that the debarred employer,
agent, attorney, or any successor in interest to any debarred employer,
agent, or attorney, will be disqualified not only from filing under
this subpart, but also from filing any labor certification applications
\47\ or labor condition applications \48\ with the Department. If such
an application is filed, it will be denied without review. The debarred
party will be unable to file, or have filed on its behalf, labor
certification applications in connection with not only the CW-1
program, but also applications under any other program managed by OFLC.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\47\ See 20 CFR part 655, subpart A (governing H-2B temporary
nonagricultural workers); 20 CFR part 655, subpart B (governing H-2A
temporary agricultural workers); 20 CFR part 655, subpart F
(governing the temporary employment of D-1 crewmembers on foreign
vessels to perform longshore work at U.S. ports); and 20 CFR part
656 (permanent labor certification).
\48\ 20 CFR 655, subpart H (governing labor condition
applications for H-1B foreign nationals entering the U.S. on a
temporary basis to work in specialty occupations or as fashion
models, H-1b1 professionals entering under the U.S.-Chile or U.S.-
Singapore Free Trade Agreements, and E-3 professionals entering
under the U.S.-Australia Free Trade Agreement).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Paragraph (c) limits any period of debarment under paragraphs (a)
and (b) to not more than 5 years for a single violation. This means
that the total debarment period may exceed 5 years if more than one
violation has occurred. For example, if the OFLC Administrator finds
that an employer, agent, attorney, or any successor in interest to that
employer, agent, or attorney, has committed two violations warranting
debarment, the OFLC Administrator may impose two periods of debarment
that will run consecutively, for a total of up to 10 years. The first
period of debarment would run from the date of the final agency
decision, and the second period of debarment would run from the end of
the first period of debarment.
Paragraph (d) of this section defines a violation for purposes of
debarment. It explains that a violation includes one or more acts of
commission or omission on the part of the employer, agent, or attorney,
which involve: Failure to pay or provide the required wages, benefits,
or working conditions to the employer's CW-1 workers and/or workers in
corresponding employment; failure, except for lawful, job-related
reasons, to offer employment to qualified U.S. workers who applied for
the job opportunity for which certification was sought; failure to
comply with the employer's obligations to recruit U.S. workers;
improper layoff or displacement of U.S. workers or workers in
corresponding employment; failure to comply with the NOD process, as
set forth in Sec. 655.431, or the assisted recruitment process, as set
forth in Sec. 655.471; impeding the audit process, as set forth in
Sec. 655.470, or impeding any Federal Government Official performing
an investigation, inspection, audit, or law enforcement function;
employing a CW-1 worker outside of the Commonwealth, in an activity/
activities not listed in the work contract, or outside the validity
period of employment of the work contract, including any approved
extension thereof; a violation of the requirements of Sec. 655.423(n)
or (o); a violation of any of the provisions listed in Sec.
655.423(q); or any other act showing such flagrant disregard for the
law that future compliance with program requirements cannot reasonably
be expected. For debarment purposes, a violation also includes fraud
involving the Application for Prevailing Wage Determination or the CW-1
Application for Temporary Employment Certification, or a material
misrepresentation of fact during the course of processing the CW-1
Application for Temporary Employment Certification. It is important to
emphasize that debarment in the context of the CW-1 program can be
triggered by a single act or omission, as opposed to a pattern or
practice of such actions or omissions.
Paragraph (e) provides the standard for determining whether a
violation is so substantial as to merit debarment. This section
provides a nonexhaustive list of factors that the OFLC Administrator
may consider in determining whether a violation is substantial,
including: A previous history of violations under the CW-1 program; the
number of CW-1 workers, workers in corresponding employment, or U.S.
workers who were and/or are affected by the violations; the gravity of
the violations; and the extent to which the violator achieved a
financial gain due to the violations, or the potential financial loss
or potential injury to the workers. This list provides comprehensive,
but not exhaustive, grounds or factors that may advise the OFLC
Administrator when making a determination as to whether the
substantiality standard has been met. In assessing whether debarment is
appropriate, the OFLC Administrator may also consider any mitigating
facts the employer, agent, or attorney wishes to provide, such as
efforts made in good faith to comply with the CW-1 program, an
explanation from the person charged with the violation or violations,
or a commitment to future compliance, taking into account the public
health, interest, or safety, and previous history of violations under
the CW-1 program.
Paragraph (f) provides the procedures for debarment. The procedures
for debarment are similar to the debarment procedures that are
currently in place in other temporary employment programs, particularly
the H-2B program. See 20 CFR 655.73. As provided in paragraph (f)(1),
the debarment process begins when the OFLC Administrator makes a
determination to debar an employer, agent, attorney, or any successor
in interest to the employer, agent, or attorney, and issues the party a
Notice of Debarment. The notice must state the reasons for the
debarment finding, including a detailed explanation of the grounds for
and the duration of the debarment, and must inform the party subject to
the notice of its right to submit rebuttal evidence or to request
administrative review of the debarment by BALCA. If the party does not
file rebuttal evidence or a request for BALCA review within 30 calendar
days, the Notice of Debarment will take effect on the date specified in
the notice or, if no date is specified, at the end of the 30-day
period. If the party timely files rebuttal evidence or a request for
review, the debarment will be stayed pending the outcome of the appeal
as provided in paragraphs (f)(2) through (6) of this section.
If the party who received the Notice of Debarment wishes to file
rebuttal evidence, paragraph (f)(2) provides that the OFLC
Administrator will review any timely filed rebuttal evidence and will
inform the party of the Final Determination on debarment within 30
calendar days of receiving the rebuttal evidence. If the OFLC
Administrator determines that the party must be
[[Page 12414]]
debarred, OFLC will inform the party of its right to request
administrative review by BALCA. The party must request review within 30
calendar days after the date of the Final Determination, or the Final
Determination becomes the final agency order and the debarment will
take effect on the date specified in the Final Determination or, if no
date is specified, at the end of that 30-day period.
Paragraph (f)(3) explains the process for requesting review of a
Notice of Debarment or Final Determination. Paragraph (f)(3)(i)
instructs the party requesting review of a debarment to file a written
request with the Chief ALJ and simultaneously serve a copy on the OFLC
Administrator. The request for review must clearly identify the
particular debarment determination for which review is sought and must
set forth the particular grounds for the request. If no request for
review is filed, or if such a request is filed untimely, the debarment
will take effect on the date specified in the Notice of Debarment or
Final Determination or, if no date is specified, 30 calendar days from
the date the Notice of Debarment or Final Determination is issued.
Paragraph (f)(3)(ii) explains that upon receipt of the request for
review, the OFLC Administrator will promptly send a certified copy of
the ETA case file to the Chief ALJ by means normally assuring expedited
delivery. The Chief ALJ will immediately assign an ALJ to conduct the
review. Paragraph (f)(3)(iii) states that the submissions of the
parties must contain only legal argument and evidence that was within
the record upon which the debarment was based. This ensures that all
parties have fair notice of the facts potentially at issue during the
review.
Paragraph (f)(4) explains the procedures for the ALJ's review. In
considering requests for review, the ALJ must provide all parties with
30 calendar days to submit legal briefs. The ALJ must review the
debarment determination on the basis of the record upon which the
determination was made, the request for review, and any briefs
submitted. The ALJ's decision must affirm, reverse, or modify the OFLC
Administrator's determination, and provide the decision to the parties
by means normally assuring expedited delivery. The ALJ's decision will
become the final agency action, unless either party timely seeks review
of the decision with the Administrative Review Board (ARB).
As set forth in paragraph (f)(5)(i), either party wishing review of
the ALJ's decision must, within 30 calendar days of the decision, file
a petition with the ARB requesting review of the decision. Copies of
the petition request must be served on all parties and on the ALJ. If
the ARB declines to accept the petition or does not issue a notice
accepting the petition for review within 30 calendar days after the
receipt of a timely filed petition, the ALJ's decision becomes the
final agency action. If the ARB accepts the petition for review, the
ALJ's decision will be stayed unless and until the ARB issues an order
affirming the decision. The ARB must serve notice of its decision to
accept or not to accept the petition upon the ALJ and upon all parties
to the proceeding. Paragraphs (f)(5)(ii) and (iii) provide that, upon
receipt of the ARB's notice to accept the petition, the OALJ will
promptly forward a copy of the complete appeal record to the ARB. Where
the ARB has determined to review the decision and order, the ARB will
notify each party of the issues raised, the form in which submissions
must be made (e.g., briefs or oral argument), and the time within which
the presentation must be submitted. Paragraph (f)(6) requires the ARB's
final decision to be issued within 90 calendar days from the notice
granting the petition, and to be served upon all parties and the ALJ.
IV. Rulemaking Analyses and Notices
A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory Planning and Review; Executive
Order 13563: Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review; and Executive
Order 13771: Reducing Regulation and Controlling Regulatory Costs
Under E.O. 12866, the OMB's Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs (OIRA) determines whether a regulatory action is significant
and, therefore, subject to the requirements of the E.O. and review by
OMB. Section 3(f) of E.O. 12866 defines a ``significant regulatory
action'' as an action that is likely to result in a rule that: (1) Has
an annual effect on the economy of $100 million or more, or adversely
affects in a material way the economy, a sector of the economy,
productivity, competition, jobs, the environment, public health or
safety, or State, local, or tribal governments or communities (also
referred to as ``economically significant''); (2) creates serious
inconsistency or otherwise interferes with an action taken or planned
by another agency; (3) materially alters the budgetary impacts of
entitlement grants, user fees, or loan programs, or the rights and
obligations of recipients thereof; or (4) raises novel legal or policy
issues arising out of legal mandates, the President's priorities, or
the principles set forth in the E.O. Id. OMB has determined that this
IFR is significant regulatory action under section 3(f) of E.O. 12866.
E.O. 13563 directs agencies to: (1) Propose or adopt a regulation
only upon a reasoned determination that its benefits justify its costs;
(2) tailor the regulation to impose the least burden on society,
consistent with achieving the regulatory objectives; and (3) in
choosing among alternative regulatory approaches, select those
approaches that maximize net benefits. E.O. 13563 recognizes that some
benefits are difficult to quantify and provides that, where appropriate
and permitted by law, agencies may consider and discuss qualitatively
values that are difficult or impossible to quantify, including equity,
human dignity, fairness, and distributive impacts.
This IFR is an E.O. 13771 regulatory action.
1. Summary of the Economic Analysis
The Department anticipates that the IFR will result in benefits,
costs, and transfer payments, and will benefit U.S. workers and their
wages, as described in more detail below. In particular, and as
presented in Exhibit 1 below, U.S. workers are estimated to receive
wage transfer payments of approximately $102,042,965 \49\ from
employers over the 11.25-year period that the IFR is in effect (from FY
2019 through FY 2030 Q1).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\49\ For purposes of this economic analysis the Department has
conservatively estimated a constant number of U.S. workers and
corresponding total wage transfer to those U.S. workers in the CNMI
throughout the life of the program.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The benefits of the IFR are described qualitatively in section
IV.A.2 (Benefits). The estimated costs and transfer payments are
explained in sections IV.A.3 (Quantitative Analysis Considerations) and
IV.A.4 (Subject-by-Subject Analysis).
The costs of the IFR are associated with rule familiarization and
recordkeeping requirements for CW-1 employers, as well as the new
processes by which employers will obtain a PWD and TLC from the
Department. The estimated transfer payments reflect the requirement
that employers pay for transportation, lodging, and subsistence for CW-
1 workers traveling between the workers' country of origin and the
CNMI. In addition, the estimated transfer payments include the
anticipated impact on the wages of CW-1 workers and corresponding U.S.
workers.
Exhibit 1 shows the total estimated costs and transfer payments of
the IFR. The IFR is expected to have first-year costs of $4,359,067 and
first-year
[[Page 12415]]
transfer payments of $42,286,653 (= $28,877,022 to CW-1 workers +
$13,409,631 to U.S. workers). Over the 11.25-year period that the IFR
is in effect, the annualized costs are estimated at $3,190,028 and the
annualized transfer payments are estimated at $35,522,023 (=$22,117,381
to CW-1 workers+$13,404,642 to U.S. workers) at a discount rate of 7
percent. In total, the IFR is estimated to result in a cost of
$24,284,121 and transfer payments of $270,411,736 (=$168,368,772 to CW-
1 workers + $102,042,965 to U.S. workers) at a discount rate of 7
percent.
Exhibit 1--Estimated Costs and Transfer Payments
[2018 dollars]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Transfer payments
-----------------------------------------------
Costs Transfer Transfer
Total transfer payments to CW- payments to
payments 1 workers U.S. workers
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
First Year Total................................ $4,359,067 $42,286,653 $28,877,022 $13,409,631
Annualized, 3% discount rate, 11.25 years....... 3,086,620 34,794,484 21,387,623 12,406,860
Annualized, 7% discount rate, 11.25 years....... 3,190,028 35,522,023 22.118.381 13,404,642
Total, 3% discount rate, 11.25 years............ 29,106,568 328,109,108 201,683,522 126,425,586
Total, 7% discount rate, 11.25 years............ 24,284,121 270,411,736 168,368,772 102,042,965
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Benefits
The purposes of the Workforce Act are (1) to increase the
percentage of U.S. workers in the CNMI while maintaining the minimum
number of foreign workers to meet the changing demands of the CNMI
economy; (2) to encourage the hiring of U.S. workers; and (3) to ensure
that no U.S. worker is at a competitive disadvantage for employment
compared to a foreign worker or is displaced by a foreign worker. The
Department anticipates that the provisions of this IFR will engender
the benefits for U.S. workers that Congress intended in passing the
Workforce Act. For example, the mandated payment of transportation and
subsistence costs for CW-1 workers and corresponding U.S. workers will
help ensure that U.S. workers are not placed at a competitive
disadvantage compared to foreign workers. Additionally, the requirement
to advertise the job opportunity on the CNMI Department of Labor's job
listing system will improve the visibility of job openings to U.S.
workers, thus expanding employment opportunities for U.S. workers. The
requirement of a supervised labor market test and required submission
of supporting documents by the employer will further provide that CW-1
workers are only hired if there are not sufficient U.S. workers in the
Commonwealth who are able, willing, qualified, and available to perform
the work for which CW-1 workers are sought. In addition, employers
seeking to employ CW-1 workers must pay the highest of the prevailing
wage, the Commonwealth minimum wage, or the Federal minimum wage; and
corresponding U.S. workers must be offered at least the same wages,
benefits, and working conditions offered to foreign workers. These
protections, and others in this regulation, will provide that the
employment of nonimmigrant workers will not adversely affect the wages
and working conditions of U.S. workers.
According to the BEA, the GDP of the CNMI increased 25.1 percent in
2017 after increasing 28.2 percent in 2016.\50\ The most significant
contributor to GDP growth was the accommodations and amusement
industry, which includes tourism as well as the casino sector. The CNMI
experienced substantial growth in visitor spending, particularly on
casino gambling. The number of visitors to the CNMI grew 11 percent in
2016 and 24 percent in 2017.\51\ CW-1 workers are heavily employed in
these sectors. The CNMI's Bureau of Environmental and Coastal Quality
estimates that at least 8,124 employees will be needed to operate new
hotels and casinos.\52\ The island of Tinian's labor demand alone is
expected to be 6,359 workers for operation, more than twice the Tinian
island population in 2016.\53\ The 2017 ``Report to the President on
902 Consultations'' estimates that 11,613 workers will be needed to
operate the new facilities by 2021.\54\ This would be a substantial
increase from the 3,226 workers in the accommodation and food services
industry in 2014 (80 percent of whom were not U.S. citizens) and 928
workers in the arts, entertainment, and recreation industry (78 percent
of whom were not U.S. citizens).\55\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\50\ Source: U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Economic
Analysis, ``CNMI GDP Increases in 2017: Growth Led by Tourism and
Gaming Industry Revenue,'' https://www.bea.gov/system/files/2018-10/cnmigdp_101718.pdf.
\51\ Id.
\52\ Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office,
``Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands Implementation of
Federal Minimum Wage and Immigration Laws'' (May 2017), https://www.gao.gov/assets/690/684778.pdf.
\53\ Ibid.
\54\ Source: Special Representatives of the United States and
the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, ``Report to the
President on 902 Consultations'' (January 2017), https://www.doi.gov/sites/doi.gov/files/uploads/902-consultations-report-january-2017.pdf.
\55\ Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office,
``Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands Implementation of
Federal Minimum Wage and Immigration Laws'' (May 2017), https://www.gao.gov/assets/690/684778.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Available CNMI labor could be recruited from recent graduates. CNMI
high schools graduated 678 students in 2016, while the Northern
Marianas College graduated 204 students, although this increase by new
entrants may be somewhat offset by people who are retiring from the
workforce.\56\ Additionally, there were nearly 2,400 unemployed persons
in the CNMI domestic workforce in 2016.\57\ Workers could also be
recruited from U.S. States, territories, and freely associated States.
Higher prevailing wages and employer-provided transportation and
subsistence costs may make relocation to the CNMI more attractive and
feasible for workers in U.S. States, territories and freely associated
States. Thus, the Department anticipates that the IFR will increase the
percentage of U.S. workers employed in the CNMI.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\56\ Id.
\57\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
3. Quantitative Analysis Considerations
The Department estimated the costs and transfer payments of the IFR
relative to the existing baseline (i.e., the current practices for
complying with the CW-1 program as currently codified at 8 CFR
214.2(w)). In accordance with the regulatory analysis guidance
articulated in OMB's Circular A-4 and consistent with the Department's
practices in
[[Page 12416]]
previous rulemakings, this regulatory analysis focuses on the likely
consequences of the IFR (i.e., the costs and transfer payments that are
expected to accrue to the affected entities). The analysis covers 11.25
years (from FY 2019 through FY 2030 Q1) to ensure it captures the major
costs and transfer payments that are likely to accrue over time. The
Department expresses all quantifiable impacts in 2018 dollars and uses
discount rates of three and seven percent, pursuant to Circular A-4.
a. Estimated Number of CW-1 Employers, Applications, and Workers
To calculate the annual costs and transfer payments, the Department
first needed to estimate the number of CW-1 employers, CW-1 TLC
applications, and CW-1 workers (beneficiaries) in the 11.25-year period
from FY 2019 through the first quarter of FY 2030. Both the projected
number of CW-1 employers and the projected number of CW-1 TLC
applications are based on the projected number of CW-1 workers. The
projected number of CW-1 workers is equivalent to the annual statutory
limit (numerical cap) on the number of CW-1 beneficiaries.
To estimate the number of CW-1 employers, the Department identified
the total number of unique employers in the USCIS beneficiary data over
the FY 2012-2018 period, which was 2,404 employers.\58\ Then, the
Department calculated the ratio of projected CW-1 workers to employers
for FY 2019, which is 5.4 (= 13,000 / 2,404). Next, the Department
divided the numerical cap of CW-1 workers for each fiscal year by 5.4
to project the number of CW-1 employers for each year in the analysis
period. For example, the numerical cap for FY 2020 is 12,500, so the
projected number of CW-1 employers in FY 2020 is 2,315 (= 12,500 /
5.4).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\58\ Source: U.S. Department of Homeland Security, U.S.
Citizenship and Immigration Services, unpublished table. In
accordance with 8 CFR 214.2(w)(9), a petitioning employer may
include more than one beneficiary in a CW-1 petition if the
beneficiaries will be working in the same occupational category, for
the same period of time, and in the same location.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
To estimate the number of CW-1 TLC applications, the Department
calculated the average annual ratio of CW-1 beneficiaries to CW-1
petitions filed with DHS over the FY 2012-2018 period, which was 1.5
(rounded).\59\ Then, the Department divided the numerical cap of CW-1
workers for each fiscal year by 1.5 to project the number of CW-1
applications for each year in the analysis period. For example, the
numerical cap for FY 2019 is 13,000, so the projected number of CW-1
labor certification applications for FY 2019 is 8,636 (= 13,000 /
1.5054).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\59\ Source: U.S. Department of Homeland Security, U.S.
Citizenship and Immigration Services, unpublished table.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Exhibit 2 presents the projected number of CW-1 employers,
applications, and workers for each year in the analysis period.
Exhibit 2: Projected Number of CW-1 Employers, Applications, and Workers
[FY 2019-FY 2030 Q1]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Projected CW-1
Projected CW-1 Projected CW-1 workers
Fiscal year employers applications (equivalent to
numerical cap)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2019...................................................... 2,404 8,636 13,000
2020...................................................... 2,315 8,303 12,500
2021...................................................... 2,222 7,971 12,000
2022...................................................... 2,130 7,639 11,500
2023...................................................... 2,037 7,307 11,000
2024...................................................... 1,852 6,643 10,000
2025...................................................... 1,667 5,979 9,000
2026...................................................... 1,481 5,314 8,000
2027...................................................... 1,296 4,650 7,000
2028...................................................... 1,111 3,986 6,000
2029...................................................... 926 3,321 5,000
2030 Q1................................................... 185 664 1,000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
To estimate the number of CW-1 workers who will need to be provided
with transportation, lodging, and subsistence payments, the Department
used petition renewal data from USCIS.\60\ The data reveal that
employers filed extension-of-stay petitions for 63 percent of CW-1
workers in FYs 2016-18, indicating that those CW-1 workers were already
living in the CNMI. Therefore, the DOL projects that 37 percent of CW-1
workers will travel to the CNMI from their country of origin in FY 2019
through the first quarter of FY 2030.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\60\ Source: U.S. Department of Homeland Security, U.S.
Citizenship and Immigration Services, unpublished table.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
b. Estimated Number of Corresponding U.S. Workers
To estimate the number of corresponding U.S. workers in the CNMI in
FY 2019 through the first quarter of FY 2030, the Department used 2016
data from the CNMI Department of Commerce on the number of U.S.
citizens and non-U.S. citizens by major occupation.\61\ The Department
calculated the ratios of the number of U.S. citizens to non-U.S.
citizens by major occupation, and then applied those ratios to the
pertinent number of CW-1 workers in each detailed occupation in FY
2018. Totaling these results, the Department estimates that there were
8,353 corresponding U.S. workers in FY 2018.\62\ This estimate remains
constant throughout the analysis because the Department does not expect
the number of corresponding U.S. workers to decrease; in fact, the
number may increase.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\61\ CNMI Department of Commerce, Statistical Yearbook 2017,
Table 5.24 ``Average Hourly Wages by Occupation and Citizenship,
CNMI: 2016,'' https://ver1.cnmicommerce.com/sy-2017-table-5-17-31-wage-survey/.
\62\ Source: U.S. Department of Homeland Security, U.S.
Citizenship and Immigration Services, unpublished table.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
c. Compensation Rates
Exhibit 3 presents the hourly compensation rates for the
occupational categories that are expected to experience an increase in
workload due to the provisions of the IFR. The Department used the mean
hourly wage rate for private sector Human Resources
[[Page 12417]]
Managers and Translators in the CNMI.\63\ These hourly wage rates
include benefits. The Department adjusted the 2016 CNMI wages to 2018
dollars, and then increased them by 17 percent to account for overhead
costs such as rent, utilities, and office equipment.\64\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\63\ Source: CNMI Department of Commerce, ``2016 CNMI Prevailing
Wage and Workforce Assessment Study,'' https://i2io42u7ucg3bwn5b3l0fquc.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/2016-PWWAS-Report-One-Full-Report-v1.1-1.pdf. The wage rates
used here ``include all applicable fringe benefits.''
\64\ Source: Cody Rice, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
``Wage Rates for Economic Analyses of the Toxics Release Inventory
Program'' (June 10, 2002), https://www.regulations.gov/document?D=EPA-HQ-OPPT-2014-0650-0005.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The wage rates of Federal employees at NPWC and NPC in Chicago were
estimated using the midpoint (Step 5) for Grade 12 of the General
Schedule in the Chicago locality area.\65\ The Department multiplied
the hourly wage rate by 2 to account for a fringe benefits rate of 69
percent \66\ and an overhead rate of 31 percent.\67\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\65\ Source: Office of Personnel Management, ``2018 General
Schedule (GS) Locality Pay Tables,'' https://www.opm.gov/policy-data-oversight/pay-leave/salaries-wages/2018/general-schedule/.
\66\ Source: Congressional Budget Office, ``Comparing the
Compensation of Federal and Private-Sector Employees, 2011 to 2015''
(April 2017), https://www.cbo.gov/publication/52637. The wages of
Federal workers averaged $38.30 per hour over the study period,
while the benefits averaged $26.50 per hour, which is a benefits
rate of 69 percent.
\67\ Source: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services,
``Guidelines for Regulatory Impact Analysis'' (2016), https://aspe.hhs.gov/system/files/pdf/242926/HHS_RIAGuidance.pdf. On page
30, HHS states, ``As an interim default, while HHS conducts more
research, analysts should assume overhead costs (including benefits)
are equal to 100 percent of pretax wages. . . .'' To isolate the
overhead rate, the Department subtracted the benefits rate of 69
percent from the recommended rate of 100 percent.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Department used the hourly compensation rates presented in
Exhibit 3 throughout this analysis to estimate the labor costs for each
provision.
Exhibit 3--Compensation Rates
[2018 dollars]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hourly
Position Grade level Base hourly Loaded wage compensation
wage rate factor rate
(a) (b) a x b
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CNMI Private Sector Employees:
Human Resources Manager..................... N/A $20.08 1.17 $23.49
Translator.................................. N/A $16.01 1.17 18.73
Federal Government Employees:
NPWC Staff.................................. 12 44.02 2 88.04
NPC Staff................................... 12 44.02 2 88.04
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
4. Subject-by-Subject Analysis
The Department's subject-by-subject analysis covers the estimated
costs and transfer payments of the IFR. In accordance with Circular A-
4, the Department considers transfer payments to be payments from one
group to another that do not affect the total resources available to
society.
a. Costs
The following sections describe the costs of the IFR. The costs of
the IFR may vary with the size of the CW-1 employers in the CNMI. As
such, the Department requests comments from the public on the
distribution of participating CW-1 firms by size.
(1) Rule Familiarization
When the IFR takes effect, employers of CW-1 workers will need to
familiarize themselves with the new regulations, thereby incurring a
one-time cost in the first year. To estimate the first-year cost of
rule familiarization, the Department multiplied the estimated number of
unique CW-1 employers in FY 2019 (2,404) by the estimated amount of
time required to review the rule based on the Department's experience
with other TLC programs (1 hour) and by the hourly compensation rate of
Human Resources Managers ($23.49 per hour). This calculation results in
a one-time undiscounted cost of $56,470 (= 2,404 employers x 1 hour x
$23.49 per hour). The annualized cost over the 11.25-year period is
estimated at $5,814 at a discount rate of 3 percent and $6,933 at a
discount rate of 7 percent. The total cost over the 11.25-year period
is estimated at $54,825 at a discount rate of 3 percent and $52,776 at
a discount rate of 7 percent.
(2) Recordkeeping
The IFR requires that all CW-1 employers filing a CW-1 Application
for Temporary Employment Certification retain documents and records for
a period of 3 years from the date of certification. Employers may keep
these documents and records electronically. Based on the Department's
experience administering other TLC programs, the documents and records
to be retained by the employer are critical to ensuring an appropriate
level of integrity and accountability in the CW-1 program, and to
protecting the wages, benefits, and other guarantees afforded to CW-1
workers and workers in corresponding employment. For purposes of this
analysis, the Department assumes that employers will not retain these
documents and records electronically, although they are permitted to do
so. Therefore, the following recordkeeping costs may be an
overestimation.
To calculate the estimated recordkeeping costs associated with
purchasing a filing cabinet for document retention, the Department
multiplied the number of unique CW-1 employers in FY 2019 (2,404) by
the estimated cost of a filing cabinet ($89.99),\68\ which equals
$216,336. This cost is assumed to be a one-time cost in the first year.
The annualized cost over the 11.25-year period is estimated at $22,273
at a discount rate of 3 percent and $26,559 at a discount rate of 7
percent. The total cost over the 11.25-year period is estimated at
$210,035 at a discount rate of 3 percent and $202,183 at a discount
rate of 7 percent.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\68\ Source: https://www.staples.com/staples-2-drawer-vertical-file-cabinet-charcoal-letter-18-d-52143/product_2806760.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
To estimate the recordkeeping costs associated with printing CW-1
applications, the Department multiplied the number of projected CW-1
applications in each year by the
[[Page 12418]]
estimated number of pages in a CW-1 application (30 pages) and by the
estimated paper and printing cost ($0.09 per page) to estimate the
total cost of printing applications. For example, the projected number
of CW-1 applications in FY 2019 is 8,636, so the estimated FY 2019 cost
is $23,317 (= 8,636 applications x 30 pages x $0.09 per page). The
annualized cost over the 11.25-year period is estimated at $17,354 at a
discount rate of 3 percent and $17,925 at a discount rate of 7 percent.
The total cost over the 11.25-year period is estimated at $163,647 at a
discount rate of 3 percent and $136,454 at a discount rate of 7
percent.
To calculate the estimated recordkeeping costs associated with a
Human Resources Manager printing and filing documents, the Department
multiplied the projected number of CW-1 applications in each year by
the estimated time required to print and file documents (20 minutes)
and by the hourly compensation rate for Human Resources Managers
($23.49 per hour). For example, the projected number of CW-1
applications in FY 2019 is 8,636, so the estimated FY 2019 cost is
$66,944 (= 8,636 applications x 20 minutes x $23.49 per hour). The
annualized cost over the 11.25-year period is estimated at $49,824 at a
discount rate of 3 percent and $51,462 at a discount rate of 7 percent.
The total cost over the 11.25-year period is estimated at $469,832 at a
discount rate of 3 percent and $391,758 at a discount rate of 7
percent.
(3) Applications
(a) Electronic Filing of Request for Prevailing Wage Determination
The IFR establishes the process by which employers obtain a TLC
from the Department for use in petitioning DHS to employ a nonimmigrant
worker in CW-1 status, which involves four basic steps. First, the
employer must request and obtain a PWD from the Department's OFLC NPWC
before filing a CW-1 Application for Temporary Employment
Certification. To make this request, the employer will submit a
completed Application for Prevailing Wage Determination to the NPWC
containing information about the job opportunity in which the
nonimmigrant workers will be employed. Based on a review of the
information provided by the employer, the NPWC will issue a PWD,
indicate the source and validity period for its use, and return the
application with its endorsement to the employer.
To estimate the labor costs to employers associated with
electronically filing a PWD request, the Department multiplied the
number of projected CW-1 applications in each year by the estimated
time required to file the request based on the Department's experience
with other TLC programs (46 minutes) and by the hourly compensation
rate for Human Resources Managers ($23.49 per hour). For example, the
projected number of CW-1 applications in FY 2019 is 8,636, so the
estimated FY 2019 cost is $156,202 (= 8,636 applications x 46 minutes x
$23.49 per hour). The annualized cost over the 11.25-year period is
estimated at $116,255 at a discount rate of 3 percent and $120,079 at a
discount rate of 7 percent. The total cost over the 11.25-year period
is estimated at $1,096,274 at a discount rate of 3 percent and $914,102
at a discount rate of 7 percent.
To estimate the labor costs to the Federal Government associated
with reviewing PWD requests and issuing PWDs, the Department multiplied
the number of projected CW-1 applications in each year by the estimated
time required to review a PWD request and issue a PWD (1 hour) and by
the hourly compensation rate for NPWC staff ($88.04 per hour). For
example, the projected number of CW-1 applications in FY 2019 is 8,636,
so the estimated FY 2019 cost is $760,313 (= 8,636 applications x 1
hour x $88.04 per hour). The annualized cost over the 11.25-year period
is estimated at $565,871 at a discount rate of 3 percent and $584,485
at a discount rate of 7 percent. The total cost over the 11.25-year
period is estimated at $5,336,117 at a discount rate of 3 percent and
$4,449,397 at a discount rate of 7 percent.
(b) Appealing a Prevailing Wage Determination
An employer that does not agree with a PWD may appeal under 20 CFR
655.411. The employer must make a written request to the NPWC Director
within 7 business days from the date the PWD was issued.
To estimate the labor costs associated with filing an appeal of a
PWD, the Department multiplied the number of projected CW-1
applications in each year by the estimated percentage of applications
that will involve an appeal based on the Department's experience with
other TLC programs (5 percent of applications). Then, the Department
multiplied this number by the estimated time required to comply with
this provision (1 hour) and by the hourly compensation rate for Human
Resources Managers ($23.49 per hour). For example, the projected number
of CW-1 applications in FY 2019 is 8,636, so the estimated FY 2019 cost
is $10,143 (= 8,636 applications x 5 percent x 1 hour x $23.49 per
hour). The annualized cost over the 11.25-year period is estimated at
$7,549 at a discount rate of 3 percent and $7,797 at a discount rate of
7 percent. The total cost over the 11.25-year period is estimated at
$71,187 at a discount rate of 3 percent and $59,357 at a discount rate
of 7 percent.
(c) Electronic Filing of CW-1 Application
Next, the IFR requires the employer to file a completed CW-1
Application for Temporary Employment Certification with the OFLC NPC no
more than 120 calendar days before the date of need or, for employers
seeking to extend the employment of a CW-1 worker, no more than 180
calendar days before the date on which the CW-1 status expires. The NPC
CO will review the employer's application for compliance with all
applicable program requirements and issue either a NOD or NOA. Where
deficiencies in the application are discovered, the NOD will provide
the employer with 10 business days to correct the deficiencies.
To calculate the estimated labor costs associated with
electronically filing a CW-1 application, the Department multiplied the
number of projected CW-1 applications in each year by the estimated
time required to file the application (45 minutes) and by the hourly
compensation rate for Human Resources Managers ($23.49 per hour). For
example, the projected number of CW-1 applications in FY 2019 is 8,636,
so the estimated FY 2019 cost is $152,145 (= 8,636 applications x 45
minutes x $23.49 per hour). The annualized cost over the 11.25-year
period is estimated at $113,235 at a discount rate of 3 percent and
$116,960 at a discount rate of 7 percent. The total cost over the
11.25-year period is estimated at $1,067,799 at a discount rate of 3
percent and $890,359 at a discount rate of 7 percent.
To estimate the labor costs to the Federal Government associated
with reviewing applications and issuing initial determinations, the
Department multiplied the number of projected CW-1 applications in each
year by the estimated time required to review an application and issue
an initial determination (1 hour) and by the hourly compensation rate
for OFLC NPC staff ($88.04 per hour). For example, the projected number
of CW-1 applications in FY 2019 is 8,636, so the estimated FY 2019 cost
is $760,313 (= 8,636 applications x 1 hour x $88.04 per hour). The
annualized cost over the 11.25-year period is estimated at
[[Page 12419]]
$565,871 at a discount rate of 3 percent and $584,485 at a discount
rate of 7 percent. The total cost over the 11.25-year period is
estimated at $5,336,117 at a discount rate of 3 percent and $4,449,397
at a discount rate of 7 percent.
(d) Proof of Agent Relationship
The IFR requires all agents who file CW-1 applications on behalf of
employers to demonstrate that a bona fide relationship exists between
them and the employer. The Department will accept a copy of the agent
agreement or any other document demonstrating the agent's authority to
act on behalf of the employer.
To estimate the labor costs associated with creating, printing,
signing, and delivering a document confirming the agent relationship,
the Department multiplied the number of projected CW-1 employers in
each year by the estimated percentage of employers that will be
represented based on the Department's experience with other TLC
programs (25 percent of employers). Then, the Department multiplied
this number by the estimated time required to comply with this
provision (30 minutes) and by the hourly compensation rate for Human
Resources Managers ($23.49 per hour). For example, the projected number
of CW-1 employers in FY 2019 is 2,404, so the estimated FY 2019 cost is
$7,059 (= 2,404 employers x 25 percent x 30 minutes x $23.49 per hour).
The annualized cost over the 11.25-year period is estimated at $5,260
at a discount rate of 3 percent and $5,433 at a discount rate of 7
percent. The total cost over the 11.25-year period is estimated at
$49,603 at a discount rate of 3 percent and $41,359 at a discount rate
of 7 percent.
(e) Contracts With Third Parties To Comply With Prohibitions
The IFR requires employers to prohibit in a written contract any
agent or recruiter whom the employer engages in recruitment of CW-1
workers, from seeking or receiving payments or other compensation from
prospective workers. The required contractual prohibition applies to
the agents and employees of the recruiting agent, and encompasses both
direct and indirect fees.
To estimate the labor costs associated with creating, printing,
signing, and delivering the written contract, the Department multiplied
the number of projected CW-1 employers in each year by the estimated
percentage of employers that will use an agent or recruiter based on
the Department's experience with other TLC programs (55 percent of
employers). Then, the Department multiplied this number by the
estimated time required to comply with this provision (15 minutes) and
by the hourly compensation rate for Human Resources Managers ($23.49
per hour). For example, the projected number of CW-1 employers in FY
2019 is 2,404, so the estimated FY 2019 cost is $7,765 (= 2,404
employers x 55 percent x 15 minutes x $23.49 per hour). The annualized
cost over the 11.25-year period is estimated at $5,786 at a discount
rate of 3 percent and $5,976 at a discount rate of 7 percent. The total
cost over the 11.25-year period is estimated at $54,564 at a discount
rate of 3 percent and $45,495 at a discount rate of 7 percent.
(f) Appendix A of Form ETA-9142C, Employer-Client Information of Job
Contractor
The IFR requires an employer filing as a job contractor and acting
as a joint employer with its employer-client to submit a single
application. In filing the application, the job contractor must
disclose the identity and contact information of its employer-client by
completing Appendix A.
To estimate the labor costs associated with completing Appendix A,
the Department multiplied the number of projected CW-1 applications in
each year by the estimated percentage of applications that will include
Appendix A based on the Department's experience with other TLC programs
(35 percent of applications). Then, the Department multiplied this
number by the estimated time required to comply with this provision (15
minutes) and by the hourly compensation rate for Human Resources
Managers ($23.49 per hour). For example, the projected number of CW-1
applications in FY 2019 is 8,636, so the estimated FY 2019 cost is
$17,750 (= 8,636 applications x 35 percent x 15 minutes x $23.49 per
hour). The annualized cost over the 11.25-year period is estimated at
$13,211 at a discount rate of 3 percent and $13,645 at a discount rate
of 7 percent. The total cost over the 11.25-year period is estimated at
$124,577 at a discount rate of 3 percent and $103,875 at a discount
rate of 7 percent.
(g) Appendix B of Form ETA-9142C, Additional Place(s) of Employment and
Wage Information
If work needs to be performed at worksite locations other than the
primary one identified on Form ETA-9142C, the employer must complete
Appendix B identifying all places of employment and details about the
wage offers for each of those places of employment. OFLC will use this
information to ensure all places of employment are located within the
CNMI and that the employer is offering wages that are at least equal to
the prevailing wage covering each place of employment.
To estimate the labor costs associated with completing Appendix B,
the Department multiplied the number of projected CW-1 applications in
each year by the estimated percentage of applications that will include
Appendix B based on the Department's experience with other TLC programs
(70 percent of applications). Then, the Department multiplied this
number by the estimated time required to comply with this provision (20
minutes) and by the hourly compensation rate for Human Resources
Managers ($23.49 per hour). For example, the projected number of CW-1
applications in FY 2019 is 8,636, so the estimated FY 2019 cost is
$46,861 (= 8,636 applications x 70 percent x 20 minutes x $23.49 per
hour). The annualized cost over the 11.25-year period is estimated at
$34,876 at a discount rate of 3 percent and $36,024 at a discount rate
of 7 percent. The total cost over the 11.25-year period is estimated at
$328,882 at a discount rate of 3 percent and $274,231 at a discount
rate of 7 percent.
(h) Appendix C of Form ETA-9142C, Attorney/Agent/Employer Declarations
The IFR requires an employer to complete Appendix C to attest to
compliance with all of the terms, assurances, and obligations of the
CW-1 program. The agent or attorney identified in the CW-1 Application
for Temporary Employment Certification must also sign and date Appendix
C, declaring that it has been designated by the employer to act on the
employer's behalf.
To estimate the labor costs associated with completing Appendix C,
the Department multiplied the number of projected CW-1 applications in
each year by the estimated time required to comply with this provision
(20 minutes) and by the hourly compensation rate for Human Resources
Managers ($23.49 per hour). For example, the projected number of CW-1
applications in FY 2019 is 8,636, so the estimated FY 2019 cost is
$66,944 (= 8,636 applications x 20 minutes x $23.49 per hour). The
annualized cost over the 11.25-year period is estimated at $49,824 at a
discount rate of 3 percent and $51,462 at a discount rate of 7 percent.
The total cost over the 11.25-year period is estimated at $469,832 at a
discount rate
[[Page 12420]]
of 3 percent and $391,758 at a discount rate of 7 percent.
(i) Request for Waiver of Obtaining PWD Due to Emergency Situation
The IFR permits an employer that is unable to obtain a PWD prior to
filing an application to request a waiver by submitting a letter of
explanation along with the completed application. The employer must
provide a detailed statement describing the good and substantial cause
that necessitated the waiver request. This provision provides an
employer experiencing a qualifying emergency situation with some degree
of flexibility to participate in the CW-1 program without first
obtaining a PWD from the NPWC.
To estimate the labor costs associated with composing and
submitting a waiver request, the Department multiplied the number of
projected CW-1 applications in each year by the estimated percentage of
applications that will include a waiver request based on the
Department's experience with other TLC programs (10 percent of
applications). (10 percent of applications). Then, the Department
multiplied this number by the estimated time required to comply with
this provision (30 minutes) and by the hourly compensation rate for
Human Resources Managers ($23.49 per hour). For example, the projected
number of CW-1 applications in FY 2019 is 8,636, so the estimated FY
2019 cost is $10,143 (= 8,636 applications x 10 percent x 30 minutes x
$23.49 per hour). The annualized cost over the 11.25-year period is
estimated at $7,549 at a discount rate of 3 percent and $7,797 at a
discount rate of 7 percent. The total cost over the 11.25-year period
is estimated at $71,187 at a discount rate of 3 percent and $59,357 at
a discount rate of 7 percent.
(j) Submission of a Modified Application
The IFR permits an employer to modify and resubmit its application
to address insufficiencies listed in the NOD. The employer must respond
to the NOD and correct any deficiencies within 10 business days of
issuance.
To estimate the labor costs associated with modifying an
application, the Department multiplied the number of projected CW-1
applications in each year by the estimated percentage of applications
that will be modified based on the Department's experience with other
TLC programs (one-third of applications). Then, the Department
multiplied this number by the estimated time required to comply with
this provision (1 hour) and by the hourly compensation rate for Human
Resources Managers ($23.49 per hour). For example, the projected number
of CW-1 applications in FY 2019 is 8,636, so the estimated FY 2019 cost
is $67,620 (= 8,636 applications x 33.3 percent x 1 hour x $23.49 per
hour). The annualized cost over the 11.25-year period is estimated at
$50,327 at a discount rate of 3 percent and $51,982 at a discount rate
of 7 percent. The total cost over the 11.25-year period is estimated at
$474,577 at a discount rate of 3 percent and $395,715 at a discount
rate of 7 percent.
(k) Amending the Application
The IFR permits an employer to request to amend its application at
any time before the Department makes a final determination to grant or
deny the application. The employer may request to increase the number
of workers requested, modify the period of employment, or request other
minor changes to the application.
To estimate the labor costs associated with amending an
application, the Department multiplied the number of projected CW-1
applications in each year by the estimated percentage of applications
that will be amended based on the Department's experience with other
TLC programs (15 percent of applications). Then, the Department
multiplied this number by the estimated time required to comply with
this provision (30 minutes) and by the hourly compensation rate for
Human Resources Managers ($23.49 per hour). For example, the projected
number of CW-1 applications in FY 2019 is 8,636, so the estimated FY
2019 cost is $15,214 (= 8,636 applications x 15 percent x 30 minutes x
$23.49 per hour). The annualized cost over the 11.25-year period is
estimated at $11,324 at a discount rate of 3 percent and $11,696 at a
discount rate of 7 percent. The total cost over the 11.25-year period
is estimated at $106,780 at a discount rate of 3 percent and $89,036 at
a discount rate of 7 percent.
(l) Posting the Job With the CNMI Department of Labor
If all program requirements are met, the employer will receive a
NOA from the CO directing the recruitment of U.S. workers for the job
opportunity and requesting a written report of the employer's
recruitment efforts. To encourage the hiring of U.S. workers for
employment in the CNMI, the employer will be required to advertise the
job opportunity on the CNMI Department of Labor's job listing system.
To calculate the estimated labor costs associated with posting a
job opportunity with the CNMI Department of Labor, the Department
multiplied the number of projected CW-1 applications in each year by
the estimated time required to post the job ad (1 hour) and by the
hourly compensation rate for Human Resources Managers ($23.49 per
hour). For example, the projected number of CW-1 applications in FY
2019 is 8,636, so the estimated FY 2019 cost is $202,860 (= 8,636
applications x 1 hour x $23.49 per hour). The annualized cost over the
11.25-year period is estimated at $150,980 at a discount rate of 3
percent and $155,947 at a discount rate of 7 percent. The total cost
over the 11.25-year period is estimated at $1,423,732 at a discount
rate of 3 percent and $1,187,146 at a discount rate of 7 percent.
(m) Contacting Former U.S. Employees
As part of an employer's recruitment efforts and to encourage the
hiring of U.S. workers, the IFR requires employers to contact former
U.S. employees and solicit their return to the job.
To estimate the labor costs associated with contacting former U.S.
employees regarding the job opportunity, the Department multiplied the
number of projected CW-1 applications in each year by the estimated
number of former U.S. employees that will be contacted based on the
Department's experience with other TLC programs (an average of 1.5
former U.S. employees per application). Then, the Department multiplied
this number by the estimated time required to comply with this
provision (1 hour) and by the hourly compensation rate for Human
Resources Managers ($23.49 per hour). For example, the projected number
of CW-1 applications in FY 2019 is 8,636, so the estimated FY 2019 cost
is $304,289 (= 8,636 applications times; 1.5 former U.S. employees x 1
hour x $23.49 per hour). The annualized cost over the 11.25-year period
is estimated at $226,471 at a discount rate of 3 percent and $233,920
at a discount rate of 7 percent. The total cost over the 11.25-year
period is estimated at $2,135,598 at a discount rate of 3 percent and
$1,780,719 at a discount rate of 7 percent.
(n) Posting a Job Notice
As part of an employer's recruitment efforts and to encourage the
hiring of U.S. workers, the IFR requires employers to post a copy of
the CW-1 Application for Temporary Employment Certification in at least
two conspicuous locations at the place(s) of employment or in some
other manner that provides reasonable notification to all employees
[[Page 12421]]
in the area in which the work will be performed by the CW-1 workers.
To estimate the labor costs associated with posting a notice of the
job, the Department multiplied the number of projected CW-1
applications in each year by the estimated time required to post the
notice (30 minutes) and by the hourly compensation rate for Human
Resources Managers ($23.49 per hour). For example, the projected number
of CW-1 applications in FY 2019 is 8,636, so the estimated FY 2019 cost
is $101,430 (= 8,636 applications x 30 minutes x $23.49 per hour). The
annualized cost over the 11.25-year period is estimated at $75,490 at a
discount rate of 3 percent and $77,973 at a discount rate of 7 percent.
The total cost over the 11.25-year period is estimated at $711,866 at a
discount rate of 3 percent and $593,573 at a discount rate of 7
percent.
(o) Additional Recruitment
As part of an employer's recruitment efforts and to encourage the
hiring of U.S. workers, the IFR requires employers to conduct other
recruitment activities such as contacting community-based organization
or trade unions when required by the CO.
To estimate the labor costs associated with conducting additional
recruiting if ordered by the CO, the Department multiplied the number
of projected CW-1 applications in each year by the estimated percentage
of applications that will require additional recruitment based on the
Department's experience with other TLC programs (35 percent of
applications). Then, the Department multiplied this number by the
estimated time required to make the additional outreach based on the
Department's experience with other TLC programs (15 minutes) and by the
hourly compensation rate for Human Resources Managers ($23.49 per
hour). For example, the projected number of CW-1 applications in FY
2019 is 8,636, so the estimated FY 2019 cost is $17,750 (= 8,636
applications x 35 percent x 15 minutes x $23.49 per hour). The
annualized cost over the 11.25-year period is estimated at $13,211 at a
discount rate of 3 percent and $13,645 at a discount rate of 7 percent.
The total cost over the 11.25-year period is estimated at $124,577 at a
discount rate of 3 percent and $103,875 at a discount rate of 7
percent.
(p) Electronic Submission of Recruitment Report
The recruitment period will last approximately 21 calendar days and
all employer-conducted recruitment must be completed before the written
recruitment report can be prepared, signed, and submitted to the NPC
for review. Upon review of the recruitment report, the CO will make a
determination either to certify or to deny the CW-1 Application for
Temporary Employment Certification. The employer will use the Final
Determination notice and any other required documentation to support
the filing of a CW-1 petition with USCIS.
To estimate the labor costs associated with electronically
submitting a recruitment report, the Department multiplied the number
of projected CW-1 applications in each year by the estimated time
required to file the report (1 hour) and by the hourly compensation
rate for Human Resources Managers ($23.49 per hour). For example, the
projected number of CW-1 applications in FY 2019 is 8,636, so the
estimated FY 2019 cost is $202,860 (= 8,636 applications x 1 hour x
$23.49 per hour). The annualized cost over the 11.25-year period is
estimated at $150,980 at a discount rate of 3 percent and $155,947 at a
discount rate of 7 percent. The total cost over the 11.25-year period
is estimated at $1,423,732 at a discount rate of 3 percent and
$1,187,146 at a discount rate of 7 percent.
To estimate the labor costs to the Federal Government associated
with reviewing recruitment reports and issuing final determinations,
the Department multiplied the number of projected CW-1 applications in
each year by the estimated time required to review a recruitment report
and issue a final determination (1 hour) and by the hourly compensation
rate for OFLC NPC staff ($88.04 per hour). For example, the projected
number of CW-1 applications in FY 2019 is 8,636, so the estimated FY
2019 cost is $760,313 (= 8,636 applications x 1 hour x $88.04 per
hour). The annualized cost over the 11.25-year period is estimated at
$565,871 at a discount rate of 3 percent and $584,485 at a discount
rate of 7 percent. The total cost over the 11.25-year period is
estimated at $5,336,117 at a discount rate of 3 percent and $4,449,397
at a discount rate of 7 percent.
(q) Translating the Work Contract
The IFR contains provisions related to the disclosure of the work
contract. The employer is required to provide a copy of the work
contract to a CW-1 worker outside of the United States no later than
the time at which the worker applies for the visa, or to a worker in
corresponding employment no later than on the day the work commences.
For a CW-1 worker changing to another CW-1 employer, the work contract
must be provided no later than the time the subsequent offer of
employment is made. The work contract must be provided in a language
understood by the worker. The costs associated with the disclosure
requirements include translating costs, time and materials costs, and
postage costs.
To estimate the labor costs associated with translating the work
contract, the Department multiplied the number of projected CW-1
applications in each year by the estimated time required to translate
the work contract (1 hour) and by the hourly compensation rate for
Translators ($18.73 per hour). For example, the projected number of CW-
1 applications in FY 2019 is 8,636, so the estimated FY 2019 cost is
$161,752 (= 8,636 applications x 1 hour x $18.73 per hour). The
annualized cost over the 11.25-year period is estimated at $120,386 at
a discount rate of 3 percent and $124,346 at a discount rate of 7
percent. The total cost over the 11.25-year period is estimated at
$1,135,228 at a discount rate of 3 percent and $946,583 at a discount
rate of 7 percent.
(r) Reproducing the Work Contract
To estimate the labor costs associated with reproducing the work
contract, the Department added the projected number of CW-1 workers in
each year to the estimated number of corresponding U.S. workers (8,353
U.S. workers). The Department then multiplied the estimated total
number of workers in each year by the amount of time required to
reproduce each work contract (5 minutes) and by the hourly compensation
rate for Human Resources Managers ($23.49 per hour). For example, the
projected number of CW-1 workers in FY 2019 is 13,000 and the projected
number of U.S. workers is 8,353, which totals 21,353 workers. So, the
estimated FY 2019 labor cost is $41,631 (= 21,353 workers x 5 minutes x
$23.49 per hour).
To estimate the materials costs associated with reproducing the
work contract, the Department again added the projected number of CW-1
workers in each year to the estimated number of corresponding U.S.
workers (8,353 U.S. workers). The Department then multiplied the
estimated total number of workers in each year by the estimated length
of a work contract (3 pages) and by the estimated per-page printing
cost ($0.09). For example, the projected number of CW-1 and U.S.
workers in FY 2019 is 21,353, so the estimated FY 2019 materials cost
is $5,765 (= 21,353 workers x 3 pages x $0.09 per page).
Combining the labor and materials costs for reproducing the work
contract,
[[Page 12422]]
the first-year cost is estimated at $47,397 (= $41,631 + $5,765). The
annualized cost over the 11.25-year period is estimated at $41,049 at a
discount rate of 3 percent and $41,529 at a discount rate of 7 percent.
The total cost over the 11.25-year period is estimated at $387,085 at a
discount rate of 3 percent and $316,138 at a discount rate of 7
percent.
(s) Mailing the Work Contracts
To estimate the labor costs associated with mailing work contracts
to workers, the Department first added the projected number of CW-1
workers in each year to the estimated number of corresponding U.S.
workers (8,353 U.S. workers). The Department then multiplied the
estimated total number of workers in each year by the amount of time
required to mail each work contract (10 minutes) and by the hourly
compensation rate for Human Resources Managers ($23.49 per hour). For
example, the projected number of CW-1 workers in FY 2019 is 13,000 and
the projected number of U.S. workers is 8,353, which totals 21,353
workers. So, the estimated FY 2019 labor cost is $83,764 (= 21,353
workers x 10 minutes x $23.49 per hour).
To estimate the postage costs associated with mailing work
contracts to CW-1 workers not living in the CNMI, the Department
multiplied the projected number of CW-1 workers in each year by the
estimated percentage of CW-1 workers not currently living in the CNMI
(37 percent) and by the estimated international postage cost ($1.15).
For example, the projected number of CW-1 workers in FY 2019 is 13,000,
so the estimated FY 2019 cost to employers for mailing work contracts
to CW-1 workers not living in the CNMI is $5,532 (= 13,000 CW-1 workers
x 37 percent x $1.15 per work contract).
To estimate the postage costs associated with mailing work
contracts to workers currently in the CNMI, the Department multiplied
the projected number of CW-1 workers by the estimated percentage of CW-
1 workers currently in the CNMI (63 percent) and then added the
estimated number of corresponding U.S. workers (8,353 U.S. workers) to
obtain the total number of work contracts to be mailed within the CNMI.
The Department multiplied this estimate by the current cost of a U.S.
postage stamp ($0.50). For example, the projected number of CW-1
workers in FY 2019 is 13,000, so the estimated number of CW-1 workers
currently in the CNMI is 8,190 (= 13,000 x 63 percent). Combined with
8,353 U.S. workers, the total number of workers in the CNMI who would
be mailed a work contract in FY 2019 is estimated to be 16,543.
Accordingly, the estimated FY 2019 cost to employers for mailing work
contracts within the CNMI is $8,272 (= 16,543 workers x $0.50 per work
contract).
Combining the labor and materials costs for mailing the work
contract, the first-year cost is estimated at $97,568 (= $83,764 +
$5,532 + $8,272). The annualized cost over the 11.25-year period is
estimated at $84,119 at a discount rate of 3 percent and $85,152 at a
discount rate of 7 percent. The total cost over the 11.25-year period
is estimated at $793,235 at a discount rate of 3 percent and $648,223
at a discount rate of 7 percent.
(t) Notification of Abandonment or Termination
The IFR requires employers to notify the Department when any of
their CW-1 workers voluntarily abandons the job or is terminated before
the certified end date of employment. This task involves writing an
email message to the Department to meet this requirement.
To estimate the labor costs associated with notifying the
Department of abandonment or termination of employment, the Department
multiplied the number of projected CW-1 applications in each year by
the estimated percentage of applications that will be affected by this
requirement based on the Department's experience with other TLC
programs (5 percent of applications). Then, the Department multiplied
this number by the estimated time required to comply with this
provision (10 minutes) and by the hourly compensation rate for Human
Resources Managers ($23.49 per hour). For example, the projected number
of CW-1 applications in FY 2019 is 8,636, so the estimated FY 2019 cost
is $1,694 (= 8,636 applications x 5 percent x 10 minutes x $23.49 per
hour). The annualized cost over the 11.25-year period is estimated at
$1,261 at a discount rate of 3 percent and $1,302 at a discount rate of
7 percent. The total cost over the 11.25-year period is estimated at
$11,888 at a discount rate of 3 percent and $9,913 at a discount rate
of 7 percent.
(u) Extension of the Certified Period of Employment
The IFR permits employers, under certain circumstances involving
weather conditions or other factors beyond the control of the employer,
to request in writing an extension of the certified period of
employment. The employer must submit the written request to the CO with
documentation showing that the extension is needed and that the need
could not have been reasonably foreseen by the employer.
To estimate the labor costs associated with requesting an extension
of the certified period of employment, the Department multiplied the
number of projected CW-1 applications in each year by the estimated
percentage of applications for which an extension will be requested
based on the Department's experience with other TLC programs (5 percent
of applications).Then, the Department multiplied this number by the
estimated time required to comply with this provision (30 minutes) and
by the hourly compensation rate for Human Resources Managers ($23.49
per hour). For example, the projected number of CW-1 applications in FY
2019 is 8,636, so the estimated FY 2019 cost is $5,071 (= 8,636
applications x 5 percent x 30 minutes x $23.49 per hour). The
annualized cost over the 11.25-year period is estimated at $3,775 at a
discount rate of 3 percent and $3,899 at a discount rate of 7 percent.
The total cost over the 11.25-year period is estimated at $35,593 at a
discount rate of 3 percent and $29,679 at a discount rate of 7 percent.
(v) Administrative Appeals
The IFR permits an employer that has certification denied to
request administrative review of the decision by BALCA. To do so, an
employer must submit a written request for review within 10 business
days from the date of determination.
To estimate the labor costs associated with seeking administrative
review, the Department multiplied the number of projected CW-1
applications in each year by the estimated percentage of applications
for which administrative review will be requested based on the
Department's experience with other TLC programs (5 percent of
applications). Then, the Department multiplied this number by the
estimated time required to comply with this provision (1 hour) and by
the hourly compensation rate for Human Resources Managers ($23.49 per
hour). For example, the projected number of CW-1 applications in FY
2019 is 8,636, so the estimated FY 2019 cost is $10,143 (= 8,636
applications x 5 percent x 1 hour x $23.49 per hour). The annualized
cost over the 11.25-year period is estimated at $7,549 at a discount
rate of 3 percent and $7,797 at a discount rate of 7 percent. The total
cost over the 11.25-year period is estimated at $71,187 at a discount
rate of 3 percent and $59,357 at a discount rate of 7 percent.
[[Page 12423]]
(w) Request for Withdrawal
The IFR permits employers to request withdrawal of an application
any time after it has been accepted for processing, as long as the
employer complies with the terms and conditions of employment in the
application and work contract with respect to all workers recruited and
hired in connection with that application. The employer must submit a
request in writing to the NPC stating the reason(s) for withdrawal.
To estimate the labor costs associated with requesting withdrawal
of an application, the Department multiplied the number of projected
CW-1 applications in each year by the estimated percentage of
applications that will be withdrawn based on the Department's
experience with other TLC programs (10 percent of applications).).
Then, the Department multiplied this number by the estimated time
required to comply with this provision (10 minutes) and by the hourly
compensation rate for Human Resources Managers ($23.49 per hour). For
example, the projected number of CW-1 applications in FY 2019 is 8,636,
so the estimated FY 2019 cost is $3,388 (= 8,636 applications x 10
percent x 10 minutes x $23.49 per hour). The annualized cost over the
11.25-year period is estimated at $2,521 at a discount rate of 3
percent and $2,604 at a discount rate of 7 percent. The total cost over
the 11.25-year period is estimated at $23,776 at a discount rate of 3
percent and $19,825 at a discount rate of 7 percent.
(x) Certifying Officer-Ordered Assisted Recruitment
If an employer violates the terms of the CW-1 program and the
Department determines that the violation does not warrant debarment,
the CO may require the employer to undergo assisted recruitment for
future applications. This requirement not only protects the integrity
of the CW-1 program but can also be an effective tool to help an
employer that, due to either program inexperience or confusion, commits
an unintentional violation in its application and indicates a need for
assistance from the Department.
To estimate the labor costs associated with conducting assisted
recruitment, the Department multiplied the number of projected CW-1
applications in each year by the estimated percentage of applications
that will be affected by this requirement based on the Department's
experience with other TLC programs (0.5 percent of applications). Then,
the Department multiplied this number by the estimated time required to
comply with this provision (1 hour) and by the hourly compensation rate
for Human Resources Managers ($23.49 per hour). For example, the
projected number of CW-1 applications in FY 2019 is 8,636, so the
estimated FY 2019 cost is $1,014 (= 8,636 applications x 0.5 percent x
1 hour x $23.49 per hour). The annualized cost over the 11.25-year
period is estimated at $755 at a discount rate of 3 percent and $780 at
a discount rate of 7 percent. The total cost over the 11.25-year period
is estimated at $7,119 at a discount rate of 3 percent and $5,936 at a
discount rate of 7 percent.
b. Transfer Payments
This section discusses the quantifiable transfer payments related
to transportation and subsistence costs, as well as the impact on the
wages of CW-1 workers and corresponding U.S. workers.
(1) Transportation and Subsistence Costs
The IFR requires CW-1 employers to pay the inbound transportation
and daily subsistence costs of workers who complete 50 percent of the
job order period and the outbound transportation and subsistence costs
of workers who complete the entire job order period. Reasonable
expenses incurred between a worker's hometown and the consular city are
within the scope of inbound transportation and subsistence costs,
including lodging costs while CW-1 workers travel from their hometown
to the consular city to wait to obtain a visa and from the consular
city to the place of employment. The impacts of requiring CW-1
employers to pay for workers' transportation and subsistence represent
transfers from CW-1 employers to workers because the impacts are
distributional effects, not a change in society's resources.\69\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\69\ For the purpose of this analysis, CW-1 workers are
considered temporary residents of the United States.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
To estimate the transfer payments related to transportation and
subsistence, the Department first calculated the proportion of CW-1
workers from each of the 10 most common countries of origin in FY 2016-
2018. The Department then averaged these proportions and normalized
them to account for the small portion of CW-1 workers in each year
originating from countries other than the 10 most common countries of
origin. These normalized proportions, presented in Exhibit 4, were used
to create weighted averages of travel costs in the analysis below.
Exhibit 4--Average Proportion of Workers by Country of Origin
[FY 2016-2018]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Average Normalized
Country FY 2016 Proportion FY 2017 Proportion FY 2018 Proportion proportion proportion
(percent) (percent) (percent) (percent) (percent)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Philippines..................................... 7,086 53.28 6,497 47.90 6,043 65.02 55.40 56.34
China........................................... 4,844 36.42 5,298 39.06 1,703 18.32 31.27 31.80
South Korea..................................... 433 3.26 380 2.80 374 4.02 3.36 3.42
Bangladesh...................................... 473 3.56 352 2.60 210 2.26 2.80 2.85
Japan........................................... 142 1.07 200 1.47 92 0.99 1.18 1.20
Taiwan.......................................... 35 0.26 240 1.77 276 2.97 1.67 1.70
Malaysia........................................ 26 0.20 200 1.47 202 2.17 1.28 1.30
Vietnam......................................... 4 0.03 116 0.86 95 1.02 0.64 0.65
Thailand........................................ 56 0.42 58 0.43 54 0.58 0.48 0.48
India........................................... 14 0.11 24 0.18 44 0.47 0.25 0.26
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Top 10 Total................................ 13,113 98.60 13,365 98.54 9,093 97.84 98.33 100.00
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 12424]]
Total....................................... 13,299 100.00 13,563 100.00 9,294 100.00 ........... ...........
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Department estimated total transportation, lodging, and
subsistence costs to and from the CNMI based on four components: (1)
The average estimated cost of a one-way bus or train trip from three
major regional cities to the consular city; (2) the estimated cost of
lodging in the consular city for 1 night; (3) the minimum daily
subsistence amount for workers traveling to their place of employment;
and (4) the estimated cost of a one-way flight from the consular city
to Saipan. The Department estimated the total one-way cost from each
country of origin by adding these four components and then estimating a
weighted average total one-way travel cost by multiplying the total
one-way travel cost from each country of origin with the appropriate
normalized weight from Exhibit 4 and summing the resulting weighted
costs. The Department estimated the total round-trip travel costs by
multiplying the weighted average total one-way travel cost by two.
These figures are presented in Exhibit 5.
Exhibit 5--Estimated Cost of Travel for CW-1 Workers
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cost (2018
Item dollars)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Philippines
------------------------------------------------------------------------
One-way travel--within Manila......................... $0.00
One-way travel--Quezon City to Manila................. 1.00
One-way travel--Caloocan to Manila.................... 1.00
-----------------
Average--Home city to Manila...................... 0.67
Lodging Cost--Manila.................................. 1.47
Meals................................................. 12.26
One-way travel--Manila to Saipan...................... 397.00
-----------------
Total one-way travel.............................. 411.40
------------------------------------------------------------------------
China
------------------------------------------------------------------------
One-way travel--within Beijing........................ 0.00
One-way travel--Chongqing to Beijing.................. 77.00
One-way travel--Shanghai to Beijing................... 87.50
-----------------
Average--Home city to Beijing..................... 54.83
Lodging cost--Beijing................................. 8.74
Meals................................................. 12.26
One-way travel--Beijing to Saipan..................... 410.20
-----------------
Total one-way travel.............................. 486.03
------------------------------------------------------------------------
South Korea
------------------------------------------------------------------------
One-way travel--within Seoul.......................... 0.00
One-way travel--Busan to Seoul........................ 27.00
One-way travel--Incheon to Seoul...................... 1.50
-----------------
Average--Home city to Seoul....................... 9.50
Lodging cost--Seoul................................... 9.01
Meals................................................. 12.26
One-way travel--Seoul to Saipan....................... 206.00
-----------------
Total one-way travel.............................. 236.77
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bangladesh
------------------------------------------------------------------------
One-way travel--within Dhaka.......................... 0.00
One-way travel--Sylhet to Dhaka....................... 6.00
One-way travel--Chittagong to Dhaka................... 12.00
-----------------
Average--Home city to Dhaka....................... 6.00
Lodging cost--Dhaka................................... 15.00
Meals................................................. 12.26
One-way travel--Dhaka to Saipan....................... 970.00
-----------------
[[Page 12425]]
Total one-way travel.............................. 1,003.26
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Japan
------------------------------------------------------------------------
One-way travel--within Tokyo.......................... 0.00
One-way travel--Yokohama to Tokyo..................... 5.50
One-way travel--Osaka to Tokyo........................ 60.00
-----------------
Average--Home city to Tokyo....................... 21.83
Lodging cost--Tokyo................................... 12.26
Meals................................................. 12.26
One-way travel--Tokyo to Saipan....................... 336.00
-----------------
Total one-way travel.............................. 382.35
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Taiwan
------------------------------------------------------------------------
One-way travel--New Taipei City to Taipei City........ 1.00
One-way travel--Taichung to Taipei City............... 6.50
One-way travel--Kaohsiung to Taipei City.............. 21.00
-----------------
Average--Home city to Taipei City................. 9.50
Lodging cost--Taipei City............................. .79
Meals................................................. 12.26
One-way travel--Taipei City to Saipan................. 308.00
-----------------
Total one-way travel.............................. 339.55
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Malaysia
------------------------------------------------------------------------
One-way travel--within Kuala Lumpur................... 0.00
One-way travel--Ipoh to Kuala Lumpur.................. 5.00
-----------------
One-way travel--Iskander Puteri to Kuala Lumpur....... 21.50
-----------------
Average--Home city to Kuala Lumpur................ 8.83
Lodging cost--Kuala Lumpur............................ 5.08
Meals................................................. 12.26
One-way travel--Kuala Lumpur to Saipan................ 445.00
-----------------
Total one-way travel.............................. 471.17
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Vietnam
------------------------------------------------------------------------
One-way travel--within Hanoi.......................... 0.00
One-way travel--Ho Chi Minh City to Hanoi............. 30.00
One-way travel--Da Nang to Hanoi...................... 14.00
-----------------
Average--Home city to Hanoi....................... 14.67
Lodging cost--Hanoi................................... 5.08
Meals................................................. 12.26
One-way travel--Hanoi to Saipan....................... 419.00
-----------------
Total one-way travel.............................. 448.63
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Thailand
------------------------------------------------------------------------
One-way travel--within Bangkok........................ 0.00
One-way travel--Pattaya to Bangkok.................... 5.00
One-way travel--Nonthaburi to Bangkok................. 1.00
-----------------
Average--Home city to Bangkok..................... 2.00
Lodging cost--Bangkok................................. 3.68
Meals................................................. 12.26
One-way travel--Bangkok to Saipan..................... 447.00
-----------------
Total one-way travel.............................. 464.94
------------------------------------------------------------------------
India
------------------------------------------------------------------------
One-way travel--within New Delhi...................... 0.00
One-way travel--Mumbai to New Delhi................... 16.00
[[Page 12426]]
One-way travel--Bengaluru to New Delhi................ 30.00
-----------------
Average--Home city to New Delhi................... 15.33
Lodging cost--New Delhi............................... 3.27
Meals................................................. 12.26
One-way travel--New Delhi to Saipan................... 592.00
-----------------
Total one-way travel.............................. 622.86
------------------------------------------------------------------------
All
------------------------------------------------------------------------
One-way travel--Weighted average...................... 446.27
Round-trip travel--Weighted average................... 892.54
------------------------------------------------------------------------
To calculate the total transfers associated with workers traveling
to the CNMI, the Department first multiplied the projected number of
CW-1 workers in each year by the estimated percentage of CW-1 workers
not currently living in CNMI (37 percent) to obtain an estimate for the
number of workers that will require transportation, lodging, and
subsistence. The Department then multiplied this estimate by the
country-of-origin weighted average total round-trip travel cost
($892.54). For example, the projected number of CW-1 workers in FY 2019
is 13,000, so the estimated FY 2019 transfer is $4,293,109 (= 13,000
workers x 37 percent x $892.54). The annualized transfer over the
11.25-year period is estimated at $3,195,353 at a discount rate of 3
percent and $3,300,461 at a discount rate of 7 percent. The total
transfer over the 11.25-year period is estimated at $30,131,920 at a
discount rate of 3 percent and $25,124,791 at a discount rate of 7
percent.
(2) Wage Impact Analysis
The IFR, at Sec. 655.410(b)(1), provides that if the mean hourly
wage for an occupational classification in the CNMI is reported by the
Governor, annually, and meets the Department's statistical requirements
set forth in Sec. 655.410(e), the wage reported by the Governor must
be the prevailing wage for the occupational classification. When the
Department has not approved a survey for the occupation--either because
the Governor has not conducted a survey or because the Governor's
survey fails to meet the statistical standards for the occupation--the
prevailing wage must be the mean wage estimate for Guam for the
appropriate occupation, as reported by BLS in the OES. If Guam OES wage
data are unavailable for an occupation, the prevailing wage must be the
mean wage paid to workers in the SOC in the United States from the BLS
OES Survey, adjusted based on the ratio of the mean wage paid to
workers in all SOCs in Guam compared to the mean wage paid to workers
in all SOCs in the United States from the BLS OES survey. For this
analysis, the Department used the May 2017 ratio of 0.71, which is the
ratio of the Guam mean wage rate of $17.30 \70\ to the national mean
wage rate of $24.34.\71\ First, the Department matched each CW-1
occupation from the USCIS CW-1 beneficiary data to the most appropriate
SOC code. Then, the Department established a baseline wage for each
occupation using the hourly wage for the appropriate SOC code in the
2016 CNMI Prevailing Wage and Workforce Assessment Study (inflated to
2018 dollars). In contrast to the statistical requirements for the
prevailing wage--namely, 3 or more employers surveyed with a total of
30 or more employees--the baseline wage for this analysis was
established using a statistical standard of 3 or more employers
surveyed with a total of just 6 or more employees. If the occupation
met the statistical standard but the survey wage was lower than $7.25
per hour, the Department assigned $7.25 per hour as the baseline
because the CNMI minimum wage increased to $7.25 after the reference
period for the 2016 CNMI Prevailing Wage and Workforce Assessment Study
(November 1-16, 2016). Similarly, if the survey wage failed to meet the
statistical standard, the Department assigned $7.25 per hour. For each
occupation, the Department calculated the hourly wage difference by
subtracting the baseline wage estimate from the chosen prevailing wage.
Exhibit 6 provides four examples to illustrate how the baseline and
prevailing wages were chosen for each occupation.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\70\ U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics,
Occupational Employment Statistics program, ``State Occupational
Employment and Wage Estimates, Guam'' (May 2017), https://www.bls.gov/oes/current/oes_gu.htm.
\71\ U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics,
Occupational Employment Statistics program, ``National Occupational
Employment and Wage Estimates, United States'' (May 2017), https://www.bls.gov/oes/current/oes_nat.htm.
Exhibit 6--CNMI Prevailing Hourly Wage Under the IFR
[Example cases]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Baseline wage CNMI survey National OES Wage
CW-1 occupation title SOC code \a\ wage Guam OES wage wage x 0.71 Assigned wage difference
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Accountant.............................. 132011 $12.86 $12.86 $22.23 $26.60 $12.86 $0.00
Civil Engineer.......................... 172051 23.52 N/A 29.06 31.33 29.06 5.54
Architect/Surveyor...................... 173031 8.06 N/A N/A 15.82 15.82 7.76
Fisher/Hunter/Trapper................... 453011 7.25 N/A N/A 10.65 10.65 3.40
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\a\ The baseline wage is the wage in the 2016 CNMI Prevailing Wage and Workforce Assessment Study (inflated to 2018 dollars) if the number of employers
surveyed is three or more and the total number of employees is six or more. Otherwise, the baseline is $7.25 per hour.
[[Page 12427]]
For accountants, the 2016 CNMI Prevailing Wage and Workforce
Assessment Study provided an hourly wage of $12.86 (inflated to 2018
dollars) based on survey responses from 165 employers with a total of
332 employees, meeting the Department's baseline wage criteria of 3
employers and 6 employees. The survey sample size also met the
Department's prevailing wage criteria of 3 employers and 30 employees,
so $12.86 per hour was assigned. This results in zero wage difference
between the baseline and the chosen prevailing wage for accountants in
the CNMI.
For civil engineers, the 2016 CNMI Prevailing Wage and Workforce
Assessment Study provided an hourly wage of $23.52 (inflated to 2018
dollars) based on survey responses from 12 employers with a total of 26
employees, meeting the Department's baseline criteria. However, this
survey sample size falls short of the Department's prevailing wage
criteria of 3 employers with a total of 30 employees. Therefore, the
2016 CNMI Prevailing Wage and Workforce Assessment Study hourly wage
for civil engineers was not chosen as the prevailing wage. Instead, the
May 2017 OES wage for Guam of $29.06 per hour was assigned as the
prevailing wage, resulting in an hourly wage difference of $5.54 for
civil engineers.
The CW-1 occupation labeled as architect/surveyor was assigned the
SOC code for Surveying and Mapping Technicians. The 2016 CNMI
Prevailing Wage and Workforce Assessment Study provided an hourly wage
of $8.06 (inflated to 2018 dollars) for Surveying and Mapping
Technicians. The survey wage was based on responses from three
employers with a total of eight employees, making it sufficient for the
baseline estimate but not for the prevailing wage. The May 2017 OES
hourly wage for Guam was also unavailable. Therefore, the scaled down
May 2017 national OES wage of $15.82 per hour was assigned as the
prevailing wage, resulting in a wage difference of $7.76.
Lastly, the CW-1 occupation labeled as fishers, hunters, and
trappers was assigned the SOC code for Fishers and Related Fishing
Workers. The 2016 CNMI Prevailing Wage and Workforce Assessment Study
provided an hourly wage of $6.60 for this SOC code, so the Department
assigned $7.25 per hour as the baseline. The hourly wage from the 2016
CNMI Prevailing Wage and Workforce Assessment Study was based on
responses from 8 employers with a total of 19 employees, so the survey
sample size was not large enough to use as the prevailing wage. The May
2017 OES hourly wage for Guam was also unavailable. Therefore, the
scaled down May 2017 national OES wage of $10.65 was assigned as the
prevailing wage, resulting in a wage difference of $3.40. This process
was repeated for all CW-1 occupation titles provided by USCIS.
Next, the Department used FY 2018 USCIS CW-1 beneficiary approvals
data to calculate the percentage of the CW-1 workers in each occupation
relative to the total number of CW-1 workers. The Department then
multiplied the percentage for each occupation by the statutory limit of
workers to estimate the total number of CW-1 workers in each occupation
for each year of the analysis. The Department then calculated the
number of U.S. workers in corresponding employment by multiplying the
number of CW-1 beneficiaries in each occupation in FY 2018 by a ratio
of citizen to noncitizen workers derived from CNMI Department of
Commerce data on the number of citizen and noncitizen workers in highly
aggregated occupational groups.\72\ Exhibit 7 provides examples for the
same CW-1 occupations as in Exhibit 6 to illustrate how the number of
CW-1 workers and corresponding U.S. workers were estimated.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\72\ CNMI Department of Commerce, Statistical Yearbook 2017,
Table 5.24 ``Average Hourly Wages by Occupation and Citizenship,
CNMI: 2016'' at https://ver1.cnmicommerce.com/sy-2017-table-5-17-31-wage-survey/.
Exhibit 7--FY 2019 Corresponding U.S. Workers in CW-1 Occupations
[Example cases]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ratio of
FY 2018 CW- Percentage U.S. Total
CW-1 occupation title SOC code 1 of FY 2018 Projected FY 2019 CNMI Department of workers to Corresponding affected
approvals approvals CW-1 workers Commerce category CW-1 U.S. workers workers
workers
........ (a) (b) (c) = 13,000 x ...................... (d) (e) = (a) x (c) +
(b) (d) (e)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Accountant......................... 132011 287 3.09 401 Business and Financial 1.35 387 788
Operations.
Civil Engineer..................... 172051 10 0.11 14 Architecture and 0.84 8 22
Engineering.
Architect/Surveyor................. 173031 6 0.06 8 Architecture and 0.84 5 13
Engineering.
Fisher/Hunter/Trapper.............. 453011 19 0.20 27 Farming, Fishing, and 0.77 15 42
Forestry.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Department estimated wage impacts for each occupation by
multiplying the sum of the estimated number of CW-1 workers and
corresponding U.S. workers in each occupation by the difference between
the chosen prevailing hourly wage and the baseline wage, multiplied by
2,080 hours per year. For example, in the case of civil engineers, the
Department estimated a wage increase of $5.54 per hour, as shown in
Exhibit 6. Exhibit 7 projects 14 CW-1 workers and 8 corresponding U.S.
workers in FY 2019. To calculate the wage impacts for CW-1 workers
resulting from the increase in the prevailing wage for civil engineers,
the Department multiplied the number of affected CW-1 workers (14) by
the number of hours worked in 1 year (2,080) and by the change in the
hourly wage ($5.54). The result is an estimated increase in wages of
$161,257 in FY 2019 (= 14 workers x 2,080 hours x $5.54).\73\ For U.S.
workers, the result is an estimated increase in wages of $96,223 in FY
2019 (= 8 workers x 2,080 hours x $5.54).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\73\ Calculations may not match due to rounding.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
This calculation was performed for each CW-1 occupation in each
year, and the total impacts were estimated by summing across all
occupations in each year. The annualized wage transfer over the 11.25-
year period is estimated at $31,599,130 (= $18,192,270 to CW-1 workers
+ $13,406,860 to U.S. workers) at a discount rate of 3 percent and
$32,221,562 (= $18,816,920 to CW-1 workers + $13,404,642 to U.S.
workers) at a discount rate of 7 percent. The total wage transfer over
the 11.25-year period is estimated at $297,977,189 (= $171,551,603 to
CW-1 workers + $126,425,586 to U.S. workers) at a discount rate of 3
percent and $245,286,945 (= $143,243,981 to CW-1 workers + $102,042,965
to U.S. workers) at a discount rate of 7 percent.
[[Page 12428]]
The wage impact estimates of this IFR are driven, in large part, by
the statutory requirement that employers offer a wage that equals or
exceeds the highest of the prevailing wage, or the Federal minimum
wage, or the Commonwealth minimum wage. In the absence of a valid wage
based on the 2016 CNMI Prevailing Wage and Workforce Assessment Study
conducted by the CNMI Governor, the Department's estimates
predominantly use the mean wage of workers similarly employed in Guam
from the BLS OES survey, as required by the statute, which are
significantly higher than what employers in the CNMI are currently
paying workers in the occupational classification. Additionally,
beginning September 30, 2018, the minimum wage in the Commonwealth
reached the Federal minimum wage of $7.25 per hour, representing a
$0.20-cent increase over the Commonwealth's prior minimum wage of $7.05
per hour. Thus, where the wage for any occupation based on the 2016
CNMI Prevailing Wage and Workforce Assessment Study conducted by the
CNMI Governor fell below $7.25 per hour, the Department's estimates
assume these employers would increase the rate of pay for workers to
match current minimum wage requirements in the Commonwealth.
5. Summary of Costs and Transfer Payments
Exhibit 8 presents a summary of the costs and transfer payments
associated with this IFR.\74\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\74\ In addition to the costs and transfers estimated by the
Department, the IFR is expected to cause deadweight loss (DWL). DWL
occurs when a market operates at less than optimal equilibrium
output, which happens anytime the conditions for a perfectly
competitive market are not met. Causes of DWL include taxes,
subsidies, externalities, labor market interventions, price
ceilings, and price floors. This IFR establishes a wage floor, which
will increase compensation rates above the equilibrium level for
some occupations. The higher cost of labor may lead to a decrease in
the total number of labor hours that are purchased on the market.
DWL is a function of the difference between the compensation
employers were willing to pay for the hours lost and the
compensation employees were willing to accept for those hours. The
extent of the DWL will largely depend on the elasticities of labor
demand and labor supply in the CNMI.
Exhibit 8--Estimated Costs and Transfer Payments
[2018 dollars]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Transfer payments
-----------------------------------------------
Fiscal year Costs Transfer Transfer
Total transfer payments to CW- payments to
payments 1 workers U.S. workers
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2019............................................ $4,359,067 $42,286,653 $28,877,022 $13,409,631
2020............................................ 3,930,868 41,175,998 27,766,367 13,409,631
2021............................................ 3,775,905 40,065,343 26,655,712 13,409,631
2022............................................ 3,620,948 38,954,589 25,545,058 13,409,631
2023............................................ 3,465,984 37,844,034 24,434,403 13,409,631
2024............................................ 3,156,064 35,622,725 22,213,094 13,409,631
2025............................................ 2,846,144 33,401,415 19,991,784 13,409,631
2026............................................ 2,535,763 31,180,106 17,770,475 13,409,631
2027............................................ 2,225,842 28,958,796 15,549,165 13,409,631
2028............................................ 1,915,922 26,737,487 13,327,856 13,409,631
2029............................................ 1,605,547 24,516,178 11,106,547 13,409,631
2030,Q1......................................... 365,405 4,155,414 903,007 3,352,408
Annualized, 3% discount rate, 11.25 years....... 3,086,620 34,794,484 21,387,623 13,406,860
Annualized, 7% discount rate, 11.25 years....... 3,190,028 35,522,023 22,117,381 13,404,642
Total, 3% discount rate, 11.25 years............ 29,106,568 328,109,108 201,683,522 126,425,586
Total, 7% discount rate, 11.25 years............ 24,284,121 270,411,736 168,638,772 102,042,965
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
6. Regulatory Alternatives
The Department considered two regulatory alternatives to the
provisions in the IFR. The two alternatives differ from the IFR in one
respect: The third option used to set the prevailing wage. Under the
IFR, if wage data are not available from the Governor's survey or the
OES survey for Guam, the Department will base the prevailing wage on an
adjusted national OES wage. Under the first regulatory alternative, the
third option would be the national OES wage without adjustment. To
illustrate how prevailing wages would be determined under this
regulatory alternative, Exhibit 9 presents the PWD for four
occupations.
Exhibit 9--CNMI Prevailing Hourly Wage Under Regulatory Alternative 1
[Example cases]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CNMI survey National OES Wage
CW-1 occupation title SOC code Baseline wage wage Guam OES wage wage Assigned wage difference
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Accountant.............................. 132011 $12.86 $12.86 $22.23 $37.46 $12.86 $0.00
Civil Engineer.......................... 172051 23.52 N/A 29.06 44.13 29.06 5.54
Architect/Surveyor...................... 173031 8.06 N/A N/A 22.28 22.28 14.22
Fisher/Hunter/Trapper................... 453011 7.25 N/A N/A 15.00 15.00 7.75
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The PWDs for accountants and civil engineers under this regulatory
alternative are identical to those of the IFR methodology. In contrast,
the PWDs for architects/surveyors and fishers/hunters/trappers are
higher due to the fact that they are not scaled down to reflect the
ratio of the mean wage in
[[Page 12429]]
Guam compared to the mean national wage.
The total impact of this regulatory alternative was calculated in
the same manner as the calculations for the IFR. The annualized
transfer over the 11.25-year period is estimated at $37,945,227 (=
$21,376,630 to CW-1 workers + $16,568,597 to U.S. workers) at a
discount rate of 3 percent and $38,676,475 (= $22,110,619 to CW-1
workers + $16,565,856 to U.S. workers) at a discount rate of 7 percent.
The total transfer over the 11.25-year period is estimated at
$357,820,363 (= $201,579,856 to CW-1 workers + $156,240,507 to U.S.
workers) at a discount rate of 3 percent and $294,425,028 (=
$168,317,291 to CW-1 workers + $126,107,737 to U.S. workers) at a
discount rate of 7 percent. As explained earlier in the preamble, the
Department did not select this regulatory option because the Department
concluded it would be inappropriate to require an employer to pay a
prevailing wage that is based only on the national wage for the SOC
from the OES survey, without adjustment.
Under the second regulatory alternative considered by the
Department, the third option used to set the prevailing wage would be
the Federal minimum wage of $7.25. To illustrate how prevailing wages
would be determined under this regulatory alternative, Exhibit 10
presents the PWD for four occupations.
Exhibit 10--CNMI Prevailing Hourly Wage Under Regulatory Alternative 2
[Example cases]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CNMI survey Federal Wage
CW-1 occupation title SOC code Baseline wage wage Guam OES wage minimum wage Assigned wage difference
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Accountant.............................. 132011 $12.86 $12.86 $22.23 $7.25 $12.86 $0.00
Civil Engineer.......................... 172051 23.52 N/A 29.06 7.25 29.06 5.54
Architect/Surveyor...................... 173031 8.06 N/A N/A 7.25 7.25 -0.81
Fisher/Hunter/Trapper................... 453011 7.25 N/A N/A 7.25 7.25 0.00
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The PWDs for accountants and civil engineers under this regulatory
alternative are identical to those of the IFR methodology. In contrast,
the PWDs for architects/surveyors and fishers/hunters/trappers are
lower due to the fact that they are based on the Federal minimum wage
rather than an adjusted national wage.
The total impact of this regulatory alternative was calculated in
the same manner as the calculations for the IFR. The annualized
transfer over the 11.25-year period is estimated at $21,206,225 (=
$13,260,759 to CW-1 workers + $7,945,466 to U.S. workers) at a discount
rate of 3 percent and $21,660,232 (= $13,716,081 to CW-1 workers +
$7,944,151 to U.S. workers) at a discount rate of 7 percent. The total
transfer over the 11.25-year period is estimated at $199,972,952 (=
$125,047,868 to CW-1 workers + $74,925,085 to U.S. workers) at a
discount rate of 3 percent and $164,888,722 (= $104,413,798 to CW-1
workers + $60,474,924 to U.S. workers) at a discount rate of 7 percent.
The Department did not select this regulatory option because the
Department concluded it would not prevent the employment of CW-1
workers from causing an adverse effect on the wages and working
conditions of similarly employed U.S. workers.
B. Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601 et seq. (RFA) imposes
certain requirements on Federal agency rules that are subject to the
notice-and-comment requirements of the APA, 5 U.S.C. 553(b),\75\ and
that are likely to have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. This IFR is exempt from the notice-and-
comment requirements of the APA because, as described earlier, the
Workforce Act directs the Secretary to publish an IFR
``[n]otwithstanding the requirements under sec. 553(b) of [the
Administrative Procedure Act].'' Public Law 115-218, sec. 3(b).
Therefore, the requirements of the RFA applicable to notices of
proposed rulemaking, 5 U.S.C. 603 (providing for an initial regulatory
flexibility analysis), do not apply to this IFR. Accordingly, the
Department is not required to either certify that the IFR would not
have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities or conduct a regulatory flexibility analysis.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\75\ The Regulatory Flexibility Act, as amended, governs ``any
rule for which [a Federal] agency publishes a general notice of
proposed rulemaking pursuant to sec. 553(b) of [the Administrative
Procedure Act] or any other law.'' 5 U.S.C. 601(2) (defining
``rule,'' for purposes of the RFA).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
C. Paperwork Reduction Act
As part of its effort to streamline information collection, clarify
statutory and regulatory requirements, and provide greater transparency
and oversight of PWDs and TLCs in the context of the CW-1 program, the
Department engages with the public and Federal agencies to provide them
with an opportunity to comment on collections of information tools in
accordance with the PRA (44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)). In January 2019, the
Department submitted an Information Collection Requests (ICR) in
connection with this IFR to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB)
for which it obtained approval using emergency clearance procedures
outlined at 5 CFR 1320.13, to create new information collection tools
on which it will rely to administer the issuance of PWDs and TLCs in
connection with the CW-1 program. OMB assigned a new OMB Control Number
for this information collection, 1205-053X.
This process of engaging the public and other Federal agencies
helps ensure that requested data can be provided in the desired format,
reporting burden (time and financial resources) is minimized,
collection instruments are clearly understood, and the impact of
collection requirements on respondents can be properly assessed. The
PRA provides that a Federal agency generally cannot conduct or sponsor
a collection of information, and the public is generally not required
to respond to an information collection, unless it is approved by OMB
under the PRA and displays a currently valid OMB Control Number. See 44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq. In addition, notwithstanding any other provisions
of law, no person must generally be subject to penalty for failing to
comply with a collection of information that does not display a valid
OMB Control Number. See 5 CFR 1320.5(a) and 1320.6.
In accordance with the PRA, the Department, is affording the public
with notice and an opportunity to comment on these new information
collection tools that are related to the CW-1 Program, and that are
necessary to
[[Page 12430]]
implement the requirements of this IFR. The information collection
activities covered by this new OMB Control Number 1205-053X is required
by 48 U.S.C. 1806 of the Workforce Act, and 20 CFR 655, subpart E. The
Workforce Act provides that a petition to import a nonimmigrant worker
under the CW-1 visa classification may not be approved by DHS unless
the employer has received a TLC from the Department confirming that:
(1) There are not sufficient U.S. workers in the CNMI who are able,
willing, qualified, and available at the time and place needed to
perform the services or labor involved in the petition; and (2) the
employment of a nonimmigrant worker who is the subject of a petition
will not adversely affect the wages and working conditions of similarly
employed U.S. workers.
As mentioned above, the new OMB Control No. 1205-053X, includes the
collection of information to be conducted through information
collection tools, that include forms and record keeping requirements,
on which the Department relies for determining prevailing wages and
issuing TLCs in connection with the CW-1 program. Additionally, the new
information collection tools permit employers to assure compliance with
respect to the minimum terms and conditions associated with the PWD and
TLC processes, which include the rights and obligations of CW-1 workers
and workers in corresponding employment, in addition to information
regarding record keeping requirements associated with the CW-1 program.
Specifically, ETA has created new Form ETA-9141C, Application for
Prevailing Wage Determination and new Form ETA-9142C, CW-1 Application
for Temporary Employment Certification.
The information contained in the new Form ETA-9141C is the basis
for the Secretary's determination of the appropriate prevailing wage
that employers in the CNMI must pay in the hiring of a foreign worker,
to make sure there is no adverse effect on U.S. workers' wages. Prior
to submitting a requests to OFLC for a TLCs and, as needed, labor
condition applications, employers must obtain a prevailing wage for the
job opportunity based on the place of employment. In order to carry out
the provisions of this IFR, the Department created under this ICR the
collection of information on the Form ETA-9141C, to collect information
from employers under the CW-1 program to establish a prevailing wage in
the occupational classification and places of employment within the
Commonwealth. This request must be electronically submitted unless the
regulatory exemptions, specified in the rule, apply, in which case the
employer will be allowed to submit a PW via mail.
In addition, the Department has created the Form ETA-9142C, CW-1
Application for Temporary Employment Certification, and corresponding
appendices which serve as the basis for the Secretary's certification
that qualified U.S. workers are not available to perform the services
or labor needed by the employer, and that the wages and working
conditions of similarly employed U.S. workers will not be adversely
affected by the employment of CW-1 workers. This certification is
required before a petition for a CW-1 worker can be filed with and
approved by DHS. This request must be filed electronically through the
newly created OFLC FLAG system, unless the employer establishes
inadequate access to the internet or requests that a special
accommodation be made; under these exemptions, employers will be
allowed to file the request by mail, and when necessary, with the
assistance of the Department.
The Form ETA-9142C collects basic information related to the
employer in the CNMI and the job opportunity in which it seeks to
employ CW-1 workers, including, but not limited to, the job title and
occupational classification, number of workers, period of employment,
job duties and minimum requirements, and other material terms and
conditions of the job offer. To ensure no adverse effect on the wages
of similarly employed U.S. workers and that all work expected to be
performed by CW-1 workers will be located within the Commonwealth, an
employer must disclose on the Form ETA-9142C--and on Appendix B, if
appropriate \76\--all places of employment (i.e., worksites) and the
wage rates to be paid to CW-1 workers at those worksites. The latter
allows OFLC to compare the reported wage rates with the PWDs obtained
by the employer for each of those places of employment. Where it is not
practical to collect supporting documentation using one of the standard
OMB-approved appendices, the newly created FLAG System will permit an
employer to upload documentation in support of the application,
required by this subpart at the time of filing, in an acceptable
digitized format (e.g., Adobe PDF, Microsoft Word, .TXT) to minimize
employer reporting burden.
The Form ETA-9142C must also be filed electronically through the
newly created OFLC FLAG system, unless the employer establishes
inadequate access to the internet or requests that a special
accommodation be made; under these exemptions, employers will be
allowed to file the request by mail, and when necessary, with the
assistance of the Department. In preparing the Form ETA-9142C in the
FLAG System, the employer will be provided with a series of electronic
data validation checks and prompts to ensure each required field is
completed and values entered on the form are valid and consistent with
regulatory requirements. OFLC's website and the FLAG System's e-filing
capability will include detailed instructions designed to help
employers understand what each form collection item means, what kind of
entries are required, and what other documentation or information is
required to be attached in order for a complete Application for
Temporary Employment Certification for the CW-1 Program to be submitted
for processing by the NPC.
In addition to its requests for comments in connection with this
IFR, the Department is seeking comments on the recordkeeping costs
associated with this IFR and its implementation of Form ETA-9142C and
its three appendices and accompanying general instructions. The
Appendix A provides a standard format for an employer filing as a job
contractor to disclose the name and contact information of its
employer-client, as required by this IFR. The Appendix B requires an
employer to use a standard format to disclose multiple places of
employment and, if applicable, multiple wage offers for the job
opportunity within the Commonwealth. And finally, employers and, if
applicable, their authorized agents or attorneys, use Appendix C to
attest to their compliance with all of the terms, conditions, and
obligations of the CW-1 program.
To promote greater efficiency in issuing TLC decisions and minimize
delays associated with employers filing CW-1 petitions with DHS, the
Form ETA-9142C, Final Determination: CW-1 Temporary Labor Certification
Approval, will be issued electronically to employers granted TLC by
ETA. In circumstances where the employer or, if applicable, its
authorized attorney or agent, is not able to receive the TLC documents
electronically, ETA will send the certification documents printed on
standard paper in a manner that ensures expedited delivery.
The information collection requirements associated with this rule
are summarized as follows:
Agency: DOL-ETA.
Type of Information Collection: New.
Title of the Collection: CW-1 Temporary Labor Certification.
[[Page 12431]]
Agency Form Number: Form ETA-9142C; Form ETA-9141C; recordkeeping
requirements.
Affected Public: Private Sector--businesses or other for-profits;
non-profits.
Total Estimated Number of Respondents: Approximately 2,314.
Form ETA-9142C:
Estimated Number of Respondents filing electronically:
Approximately 2,198
Estimated Number of Respondents filing by mail: Approximately 166
Form ETA-9141C:
Estimated Number of Respondents filing electronically:
Approximately 2,198
Estimated Number of Respondents filing by mail: Approximately 116
Record keeping:
Estimated Number of Respondents that must comply with record
keeping requirements: Approximately 2,314.
Total Estimated Number of Responses: Approximately 149,739
responses.
Average Time per Response: 46 minutes per Form ETA 9141 application
and 1 hour and 50 minutes per Form ETA 9142C application materials; 20
minutes to comply with recordkeeping requirements.
Total Estimated Annual Time Burden: 73,987 hours.
Total Estimated Other Costs Burden: $155,155.00.
D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
This IFR has been reviewed in accordance with the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA). 2 U.S.C. 1501 et seq. For the purposes of
the UMRA, this IFR does not impose any federal mandate that may result
in increased expenditures by State, local, or Tribal governments, or
increased expenditures by the private sector, of more than $100 million
in any year.
E. Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996
This IFR would not be a major rule as defined by section 804 of the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Act of 1996, Public Law 104-121,
804, 110 Stat. 847, 872 (1996), 5 U.S.C. 804(2). OIRA has found that
this rule is not likely to result in an annual effect on the economy of
$100 million or more; a major increase in costs or prices; or
significant adverse effects on competition, employment, investment,
productivity, innovation, or on the ability of United States-based
companies to compete with foreign-based companies in domestic or export
markets.
F. Executive Order 13132, Federalism
This IFR does not have federalism implications because it would not
have substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
Accordingly, E.O. 13132, Federalism, requires no further agency action
or analysis.
G. Executive Order 13175, Indian Tribal Governments
This IFR does not have ``tribal implications'' because it would not
have substantial direct effects on one or more Indian tribes, on the
relationship between the Federal government and Indian tribes, or on
the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal
government and Indian tribes. Accordingly, E.O. 13175, Consultation and
Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments, requires no further agency
action or analysis.
List of Subjects in 20 CFR Part 655
Administrative practice and procedure, Foreign workers, Employment,
Employment and training, Enforcement, Forest and forest products,
Fraud, Health professions, Immigration, Labor, Passports and visas,
Penalties, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Unemployment,
Wages, Working conditions.
For the reasons stated in the preamble, the Department of Labor
amends 20 CFR part 655 as follows:
Title 20--Employees' Benefits
PART 655--TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT OF FOREIGN WORKERS IN THE UNITED
STATES
0
1. The authority citation for part 655 is revised to read as follows:
Authority: Section 655.0 issued under 8 U.S.C.
1101(a)(15)(E)(iii), 1101(a)(15)(H)(i) and (ii), 8 U.S.C.
1103(a)(6), 1182(m), (n), and (t), 1184(c), (g), and (j), 1188, and
1288(c) and (d); sec. 3(c)(1), Pub. L. 101-238, 103 Stat. 2099, 2102
(8 U.S.C. 1182 note); sec. 221(a), Pub. L. 101-649, 104 Stat. 4978,
5027 (8 U.S.C. 1184 note); sec. 303(a)(8), Pub. L. 102-232, 105
Stat. 1733, 1748 (8 U.S.C. 1101 note); sec. 323(c), Pub. L. 103-206,
107 Stat. 2428; sec. 412(e), Pub. L. 105-277, 112 Stat. 2681 (8
U.S.C. 1182 note); sec. 2(d), Pub. L. 106-95, 113 Stat. 1312, 1316
(8 U.S.C. 1182 note); 29 U.S.C. 49k; Pub. L. 107-296, 116 Stat.
2135, as amended; Pub. L. 109-423, 120 Stat. 2900; 8 CFR
214.2(h)(4)(i); 8 CFR 214.2(h)(6)(iii); and sec. 6, Pub. L. 115-218,
132 Stat. 1547 (48 U.S.C. 1806).
Subpart A issued under 8 CFR 214.2(h).
Subpart B issued under 8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(15)(H)(ii)(a), 1184(c),
and 1188; and 8 CFR 214.2(h).
Subpart E issued under 48 U.S.C. 1806.
Subparts F and G issued under 8 U.S.C. 1288(c) and (d); sec.
323(c), Pub. L. 103-206, 107 Stat. 2428; and 28 U.S.C. 2461 note,
Pub. L. 114-74 at section 701.
Subparts H and I issued under 8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(15)(H)(i)(b) and
(b)(1), 1182(n) and (t), and 1184(g) and (j); sec. 303(a)(8), Pub.
L. 102-232, 105 Stat. 1733, 1748 (8 U.S.C. 1101 note); sec. 412(e),
Pub. L. 105-277, 112 Stat. 2681; 8 CFR 214.2(h); and 28 U.S.C. 2461
note, Pub. L. 114-74 at section 701.
Subparts L and M issued under 8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(15)(H)(i)(c) and
1182(m); sec. 2(d), Pub. L. 106-95, 113 Stat. 1312, 1316 (8 U.S.C.
1182 note); Pub. L. 109-423, 120 Stat. 2900; and 8 CFR 214.2(h).
0
2. Add subpart E to read as follows:
Subpart E--Labor Certification Process for Temporary Employment in
the Commonwealth of the Northern Marianas Islands (CW-1 Workers)
Sec.
655.400 Scope and purpose of this subpart.
655.401 Authority of the agencies, offices, and divisions in the
Department of Labor.
655.402 Definition of terms.
655.403 Persons and entities authorized to file.
655.404 Requirements for agents.
655.405-655.409 [Reserved]
Prefiling Procedures
655.410 Offered wage rate and determination of prevailing wage.
655.411 Review of prevailing wage determinations.
655.412-655.419 [Reserved]
CW-1 Application for Temporary Employment Certification Filing
Procedures
655.420 Application filing requirements.
655.421 Job contractor filing requirements.
655.422 Emergency situations.
655.423 Assurances and obligations of CW-1 employers.
655.424-655.429 [Reserved]
Processing of an CW-1 Application for Temporary Employment
Certification
655.430 Review of applications.
655.431 Notice of Deficiency.
655.432 Submission of modified applications.
655.433 Notice of Acceptance.
655.434 Amendments to an application.
655.435-655.439 [Reserved]
Post Acceptance Requirements
655.440 Employer-conducted recruitment.
655.441 Job offer assurances and advertising contents.
655.442 Place advertisement with CNMI Department of Labor.
655.443 Contact with former U.S. workers.
655.444 Notice of posting requirement.
655.445 Additional employer-conducted recruitment.
655.446 Recruitment report.
655.447-655.449 [Reserved]
Labor Certification Determinations
655.450 Determinations.
[[Page 12432]]
655.451 Criteria for temporary labor certification.
655.452 Approved certification.
655.453 Denied certification.
655.454 Partial certification.
655.455 Validity of temporary labor certification.
655.456 Document retention requirements for CW-1 employers.
655.457-655.459 [Reserved]
Post Certification Activities
655.460 Extensions.
655.461 Administrative review.
655.462 Withdrawal of a CW-1 Application for Temporary Employment
Certification.
655.463 Public disclosure.
655.464-655.469 [Reserved]
Integrity Measures
655.470 Audits.
655.471 Assisted recruitment.
655.472 Revocation.
655.473 Debarment.
655.474-655.499 [Reserved]
Sec. 655.400 Scope and purpose of this subpart.
(a) Purpose. (1) A temporary labor certification (TLC) issued under
this subpart reflects a determination by the Secretary of Labor
(Secretary), pursuant to 48 U.S.C. 1806(d)(2)(A), that:
(i) There are not sufficient U.S. workers in the Commonwealth who
are able, willing, and qualified and who will be available at the time
and place needed to perform the services or labor for which an employer
desires to hire foreign workers; and
(ii) The employment of the CNMI-Only Transitional Worker visa
program (CW-1) nonimmigrant worker(s) will not adversely affect the
wages and working conditions of U.S. workers similarly employed.
(2) This subpart describes the process by which the Department of
Labor (Department or DOL) makes such a determination and certifies its
determination to the Department of Homeland Security (DHS).
(b) Scope. This subpart sets forth the procedures governing the
labor certification process for the employment of foreign workers in
the CW-1 nonimmigrant classification, as defined in 48 U.S.C. 1806(d).
It also establishes standards and obligations with respect to the terms
and conditions of the temporary labor certification (TLC) with which
CW-1 employers must comply, as well as the rights and obligations of
CW-1 workers and workers in corresponding employment. Additionally,
this subpart sets forth integrity measures for ensuring employers'
continued compliance with the terms and conditions of the TLC.
Sec. 655.401 Authority of the agencies, offices, and divisions in
the Department of Labor.
The Secretary has delegated authority to the Assistant Secretary
for the Employment and Training Administration (ETA), who in turn has
delegated that authority to the Office of Foreign Labor Certification
(OFLC), to issue certifications and carry out other statutory
responsibilities as required by 48 U.S.C. 1806. Determinations on a CW-
1 Application for Temporary Employment Certification are made by the
OFLC Administrator who, in turn, may delegate this responsibility to
designated staff members, e.g., a Certifying Officer (CO).
Sec. 655.402 Definition of terms.
For purposes of this subpart:
Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) means a person within the
Department's Office of Administrative Law Judges appointed under 5
U.S.C. 3105.
Agent means a person or a legal entity, such as an association or
other organization of employers, or an attorney for an association or
other organization of employers, that:
(1) Is authorized to act on behalf of the employer for Temporary
Labor Certification (TLC) purposes;
(2) Is not itself an employer, or a joint employer, as defined in
this subpart with respect to the specific application; and
(3) Is not under suspension, debarment, expulsion, disbarment, or
otherwise restricted from practice before any court, the Department,
the Executive Office for Immigration Review or DHS under 8 CFR 292.3 or
1003.101.
Applicant (or U.S. applicant) means a U.S. worker who is applying
for a job opportunity for which an employer has filed a CW-1
Application for Temporary Employment Certification.
Application for Prevailing Wage Determination means the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB)-approved Form ETA-9141C (or successor form)
and the appropriate appendices, submitted by an employer to secure a
prevailing wage determination (PWD) from the National Prevailing Wage
Center (NPWC).
CW-1 Application for Temporary Employment Certification means the
OMB-approved Form ETA-9142C (or successor form) and the appropriate
appendices, a valid wage determination, as required by Sec. 655.410,
and all supporting documentation submitted by an employer to secure a
TLC determination from the OFLC Administrator.
Attorney means any person who is a member in good standing of the
bar of the highest court of any State, possession, territory, or
commonwealth of the United States, or the District of Columbia. Such a
person is also permitted to act as an agent under this subpart. No
attorney who is under suspension, debarment, expulsion, or disbarment
from practice before any court, the Department, the Executive Office
for Immigration Review, or DHS under 8 CFR 1003.101 or 292.3, may
represent an employer under this subpart.
Board of Alien Labor Certification Appeals (BALCA or Board) means
the permanent Board established by part 656 of this chapter, chaired by
the Chief Administrative Law Judge (Chief ALJ), and consisting of ALJs
appointed pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 3105 and designated by the Chief ALJ to
be members of BALCA.
Certifying Officer or CO means the person who makes determination
on a CW-1 Application for Temporary Employment Certification filed
under the CW-1 program. The OFLC Administrator is the national CO.
Other COs may also be designated by the OFLC Administrator to make the
determinations required under this subpart, including making PWDs.
Chief Administrative Law Judge or Chief ALJ means the chief
official of the Department's Office of Administrative Law Judges or the
Chief ALJ's designee.
CNMI Department of Labor means the executive Department of the
Commonwealth Government that administers employment and job training
activities for employers and U.S. workers in the Commonwealth.
Commonwealth or CNMI means the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana
Islands.
Corresponding employment means the employment of U.S. workers who
are not CW-1 workers by an employer who has an approved CW-1
Application for Temporary Employment Certification in any work included
in the approved job offer, or in any work performed by the CW-1
workers. To qualify as corresponding employment the work must be
performed during the validity period of the CW-1 Application for
Temporary Employment Certification and approved job offer, including
any approved extension thereof.
CW-1 Petition means the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services
(USCIS) Form I-129CW, Petition for a CNMI-Only Nonimmigrant
Transitional Worker, a successor form, other form, or electronic
equivalent, any supplemental information requested by USCIS, and
[[Page 12433]]
additional evidence as may be prescribed or requested by USCIS.
CW-1 worker means any foreign worker who is lawfully present in the
Commonwealth and authorized by DHS to perform temporary labor or
services under 48 U.S.C. 1806(d).
Date of need means the first date the employer requires services of
the CW-1 workers as indicated on the CW-1 Application for Temporary
Employment Certification.
Department of Homeland Security or DHS means the Federal Department
having jurisdiction over certain immigration-related functions, acting
through its component agencies, including USCIS.
Employee means a person who is engaged to perform work for an
employer, as defined under the general common law of agency. Some of
the factors relevant to the determination of employee status include:
The hiring party's right to control the manner and means by which the
work is accomplished; the skill required to perform the work; the
source of the instrumentalities and tools for accomplishing the work;
the location of the work; the hiring party's discretion over when and
how long to work; and whether the work is part of the regular business
of the hiring party. Other applicable factors may be considered and no
one factor is dispositive. The terms employee and worker are used
interchangeably in this subpart.
Employer means a person (including any individual, partnership,
association, corporation, cooperative, firm, joint stock company,
trust, or other organization with legal rights and duties) that:
(1) Has a place of business (physical location) in the Commonwealth
and a means by which it may be contacted for employment;
(2) Has an employer relationship (such as the ability to hire, pay,
fire, supervise or otherwise control the work of employees) with
respect to a CW-1 worker or a worker in corresponding employment, as
defined under the common law of agency; and
(3) Possesses, for purposes of filing a CW-1 Application for
Temporary Employment Certification, a valid Federal Employer
Identification Number (FEIN).
Employer-client means an employer that has entered into an
agreement with a job contractor and that is not an affiliate, branch,
or subsidiary of the job contractor, under which the job contractor
provides services or labor to the employer-client on a temporary basis
and will not exercise substantial, direct day-to-day supervision and
control in the performance of the services or labor to be performed
other than hiring, paying, and firing the workers.
Employment and Training Administration or ETA means the agency
within the Department that includes OFLC and has been delegated
authority by the Secretary to fulfill the Secretary's mandate under for
the administration and adjudication of a CW-1 Application for Temporary
Employment Certification and related functions.
Federal holiday means a legal public holiday as defined at 5 U.S.C.
6103.
Full-time means 35 or more hours of work per week.
Governor means the Governor of the Commonwealth of the Northern
Mariana Islands.
Job contractor means a person, association, firm, or a corporation
that meets the definition of an employer and that contracts services or
labor on a temporary basis to one or more employers that are not an
affiliate, branch, or subsidiary of the job contractor and where the
job contractor will not exercise substantial, direct day-to-day
supervision and control in the performance of the services or labor to
be performed other than hiring, paying, and releasing the workers.
Job offer means the offer made by an employer or potential employer
of CW-1 workers to both U.S. and CW-1 workers describing all the
material terms and conditions of employment, including those relating
to wages, working conditions, and other benefits.
Job opportunity means full-time employment at a place in the
Commonwealth to which U.S. workers can be referred.
Joint employment means that where two or more employers each have
sufficient definitional indicia of being a joint employer of a worker
under the common law of agency, they are, at all times, joint employers
of that worker.
Layoff means any involuntary separation of one or more U.S.
employees other than for cause.
Long-term worker means an alien who was admitted to the CNMI as a
CW-1 nonimmigrant during fiscal year (FY) 2015, and who was granted CW-
1 nonimmigrant status during each of FYs 2016 through 2018, as defined
by DHS.
National Prevailing Wage Center or NPWC means that office within
OFLC from which employers, agents, or attorneys who wish to file a CW-1
Application for Temporary Employment Certification receive a PWD.
NPWC Director means the OFLC official to whom the OFLC
Administrator has delegated authority to carry out certain NPWC
operations and functions.
National Processing Center (NPC) means the office within OFLC in
which the COs operate, and which are charged with the adjudication of
CW-1 Applications for Temporary Employment Certification.
NPC Director means the OFLC official to whom the OFLC Administrator
has delegated authority for purposes of certain NPC operations and
functions.
Occupational employment statistics (OES) survey means the program
under the jurisdiction of the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) that
reports annual wage estimates, including those for Guam, based on
standard occupational classifications (SOCs).
Offered wage means the wage offered by an employer in the CW-1
Application for Temporary Employment Certification and job offer. The
offered wage must equal or exceed the highest of the prevailing wage,
or the Federal minimum wage, or the Commonwealth minimum wage.
Office of Foreign Labor Certification or OFLC means the
organizational component of the ETA that provides national leadership
and policy guidance and develops regulations to carry out the
Secretary's responsibilities, including determinations related to an
employer's request for an Application for Prevailing Wage Determination
or CW-1 Application for Temporary Employment Certification.
Place of employment means the worksite (or physical location) where
work under the CW-1 Application for Temporary Employment Certification
and job offer actually is performed by the CW-1 workers and workers in
corresponding employment.
Prevailing wage (PW) means the official wage issued by the NPWC on
the Form ETA 9141C, Application for Prevailing Wage Determination for
the CW-1 Program, or successor form. At least that amount must be paid
to all CW-1 workers and U.S. workers in corresponding employment.
Prevailing wage determination (PWD) means the prevailing wage
issued by the OFLC NPWC on the Form ETA-9141C, Application for
Prevailing Wage Determination for the CW-1 Program, or successor form.
The PWD is used in support of the CW-1 Application for Temporary
Employment Certification.
Secretary of Labor or Secretary means the chief official of the
U.S. DOL, or the Secretary's designee.
Secretary of Homeland Security means the chief official of DHS or
the Secretary of Homeland Security's designee.
[[Page 12434]]
Secretary of State means the chief official of the U.S. Department
of State or the Secretary of State's designee.
Strike means a concerted stoppage of work by employees as a result
of a labor dispute, or any concerted slowdown or other concerted
interruption of operation (including stoppage by reason of the
expiration of a collective bargaining agreement).
Successor in interest means an employer, agent, or attorney that is
controlling and carrying on the business of a previous employer.
(1) Where an employer, agent, or attorney has violated 48 U.S.C.
1806 or the regulations in this subpart and has ceased doing business
or cannot be located for purposes of enforcement, a successor in
interest to that employer, agent, or attorney may be held liable for
the duties and obligations of the violating employer in certain
circumstances. The following factors, as used under Title VII of the
Civil Rights Act and the Vietnam Era Veterans' Readjustment Assistance
Act, may be considered in determining whether an employer, agent, or
attorney is a successor in interest; no one factor is dispositive, and
all the circumstances will be considered as a whole:
(i) Substantial continuity of the same business operations;
(ii) Use of the same facilities;
(iii) Continuity of the work force;
(iv) Similarity of jobs and working conditions;
(v) Similarity of supervisory personnel;
(vi) Whether the former management or owner retains a direct or
indirect interest in the new enterprise;
(vii) Similarity in machinery, equipment, and production methods;
(viii) Similarity of products and services; and
(ix) The ability of the predecessor to provide relief.
(2) For purposes of debarment only, the primary consideration will
be the personal involvement of the firm's ownership, management,
supervisors, and others associated with the firm in the violation(s) at
issue.
Temporary labor certification or TLC means the certification made
by the OFLC Administrator, based on the CW-1 Application for Temporary
Employment Certification, job offer, and all supporting documentation,
with respect to an employer seeking to file with DHS a visa petition to
employ one or more foreign nationals as a CW-1 worker.
United States means the continental United States, Alaska, Hawaii,
the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, Guam, the U.S. Virgin Islands, and the
Commonwealth.
United States worker (U.S. worker) means a worker who is:
(1) A citizen or national of the United States;
(2) An alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence; or
(3) A citizen of the Federated States of Micronesia, the Republic
of the Marshall Islands, or the Republic of Palau, who is eligible for
nonimmigrant admission and is employment-authorized under the Compacts
of Free Association between the United States and those nations.
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services or USCIS means the
Federal agency within DHS that makes the determination whether to grant
petitions filed by employers seeking CW-1 workers to perform temporary
work in the Commonwealth.
Wages mean all forms of cash remuneration to a worker by an
employer in payment for labor or services.
Work contract means the document containing all the material terms
and conditions of employment relating to wages, hours, working
conditions, places of employment, and other benefits, including all
assurances and obligations required to be included under this subpart.
The contract between the employer and the worker may be in the form of
a separate written document containing the advertised terms and
conditions of the job offer. In the absence of a separate, written work
contract incorporating the required terms and conditions of employment,
agreed to by both the employer and the worker, the required terms of
the certified CW-1 Application for Temporary Employment Certification
will be the work contract.
Sec. 655.403 Persons and entities authorized to file.
(a) Persons authorized to file. In addition to the employer, a
request for a PWD or TLC under this subpart may be filed by an attorney
or agent, as defined in Sec. 655.402.
(b) Employer's signature required. Regardless of whether the
employer is represented by an attorney or agent, the employer is
required to sign the CW-1 Application for Temporary Employment
Certification and all documentation submitted to the Department.
Sec. 655.404 Requirements for agents.
An agent filing a CW-1 Application for Temporary Employment
Certification on behalf of an employer must provide a copy of the agent
agreement or other document demonstrating the agent's authority to
represent the employer to the NPC at the time of filing the
application.
Sec. Sec. 655.405-655.409 [Reserved]
Prefiling Procedures
Sec. 655.410 Offered wage rate and determination of prevailing wage.
(a) Offered wage. (1) The employer must advertise the position to
all potential workers at a wage that is at least the highest of the
following:
(i) The prevailing wage for the job opportunity obtained from the
NPWC;
(ii) The Federal minimum wage; or
(iii) The Commonwealth minimum wage.
(2) The employer must offer and pay at least the wage provided in
paragraph (a)(1) of this section to both its CW-1 workers and its
workers in corresponding employment. The issuance of a PWD under this
section does not permit an employer to pay a wage lower than the
highest wage required by any applicable Federal or Commonwealth law.
(b) Determinations--(1) Methods. The OFLC Administrator will
determine prevailing wages in the Commonwealth and occupational
classification as follows:
(i) If the mean hourly wage for the occupational classification in
the Commonwealth is reported by the Governor, annually, and meets the
requirements set forth in paragraph (e) of this section, as determined
by the OFLC Administrator, that wage must be the prevailing wage for
the occupational classification;
(ii) If the OFLC Administrator has not approved a survey, as
reported by the Governor, for the occupational classification under
paragraph (b)(1)(i) of this section, and the BLS OES survey reports a
mean wage paid to workers in the SOC in Guam, the prevailing wage must
be the mean wage paid to workers in the SOC in Guam from the BLS OES
survey; and
(iii) If the OFLC Administrator has not approved a survey, as
reported by the Governor, for the occupational classification under
paragraph (b)(1)(i) of this section and the BLS OES survey does not
report the mean wage paid to workers in the SOC in Guam under paragraph
(b)(1)(ii) of this section, the prevailing wage must be the mean wage
paid to workers in the SOC in the United States from the BLS OES
Survey, adjusted based on the ratio of the mean wage paid to workers in
all SOCs in Guam compared to the mean wage paid to workers in all SOCs
in the United States from the BLS OES survey.
[[Page 12435]]
(2) Multiple occupations. If the job duties on the Application for
Prevailing Wage Determination do not fall within a single occupational
classification, the NPC will determine the applicable prevailing wage
based on the highest prevailing wage for all applicable occupational
classifications.
(c) Request for PWD. (1) Filing requirement. An employer must
electronically request and receive a PWD from the NPWC then
electronically file the CW-1 Application for Temporary Employment
Certification with the NPC.
(2) Location and methods of filing--(i) Electronic filing. The
employer must file the Application for Prevailing Wage Determination
and all required supporting documentation with the NPWC using the
electronic method(s) designated by the OFLC Administrator. The NPWC
will return without review any application submitted using a method
other than the designated electronic method(s), unless the employer
submits with the application a statement of the need to file by mail.
(ii) Filing by mail. Employers that are unable to file
electronically, either due to lack of internet access or physical
disability precluding electronic filing, may file the application by
mail. The mailed application must include a statement indicating the
need to file by mail. The NPWC will return, without review, mailed
applications that do not contain such a statement. OFLC will publish
the address for mailed applications in the instructions to Form ETA-
9141C.
(d) NPWC action. The NPWC will provide the PWD, indicate the source
of the PWD, and return the Application for Prevailing Wage
Determination with its endorsement to the employer.
(e) Wage survey reported by the Governor. The OFLC Administrator
will issue a prevailing wage for the occupational classification in the
Commonwealth based on a wage survey reported by the Governor if all of
the following requirements are met:
(1) The survey was independently conducted and issued by the
Governor of the Commonwealth, including through any Commonwealth
agency, Commonwealth college, or Commonwealth university;
(2) The survey provides the arithmetic mean of the wages of workers
in the occupational classification in the Commonwealth;
(3) The surveyor either made a reasonable, good faith attempt to
contact all employers in the Commonwealth employing workers in the
occupation or conducted a randomized sampling of such employers;
(4) The survey includes the wages of at least 30 workers in the
Commonwealth;
(5) The survey includes the wages of workers in the Commonwealth
employed by at least three employers;
(6) The survey was conducted across industries that employ workers
in the occupational classification;
(7) The wage reported in the survey includes all types of pay;
(8) The survey is based on wages paid to workers in the
occupational classification not more than 12 months before the date the
survey is submitted to the OFLC Administrator for consideration; and
(9) The Governor submits the survey to the OFLC Administrator, with
specific information about the survey methodology, including such items
as sample size and source, sample selection procedures, and survey job
descriptions, to allow a determination of the adequacy of the data
provided and validity of the statistical methodology used in conducting
the survey.
(f) Review of wage survey reported by the Governor. (1) If the OFLC
Administrator finds the wage reported for any occupational
classification not to be acceptable, the OFLC Administrator must inform
the Governor in writing of the reasons the wage reported in the survey
was not accepted.
(2) The Governor, after receiving notification from the OFLC
Administrator that the wage reported in the survey it provided for
consideration is not acceptable, may submit corrected wage data or
conduct a new wage survey and submit revised wage data to the OFLC
Administrator for consideration under this section.
(g) Validity period. The NPWC will specify the validity period of
the prevailing wage, which in no event may be more than 365 days or
fewer than 90 days from the date that the determination is issued.
(h) Retention of documentation. The employer must retain the PWD
for 3 years from the date of issuance if not used in support of a TLC
application or if it is used in support of a TLC application that is
denied, and 3 years from the date on which the certification of the CW-
1 Application for Temporary Employment Certification expires, whichever
is later. The employer must submit the PWD to a CO if requested by a
Notice of Deficiency (NOD), described in Sec. 655.431, or audit, as
described in Sec. 655.470, or to any Federal Government Official
performing an investigation, inspection, audit, or law enforcement
function.
Sec. 655.411 Review of prevailing wage determinations.
(a) Request for review of PWDs. Any employer desiring review of a
PWD must make a written request for such review to the NPWC Director.
The written request must be received by the NPWC Director within 7
business days from the date the PWD was issued. The request for review
must clearly identify the PWD for which review is sought; set forth the
particular grounds for the request; and include any materials submitted
to the NPWC for purposes of securing the PWD.
(b) NPWC review. Upon the receipt of the written request for
review, the NPWC Director will review the employer's request and
accompanying documentation, including any supplementary material
submitted by the employer, and after review must issue a Final
Determination letter; that letter may:
(1) Affirm the PWD issued by the NPWC; or
(2) Modify the PWD.
(c) Request for review by BALCA. Any employer desiring review of
the NPWC Director's decision on a PWD must make a written request to
BALCA for review of the determination, with a copy simultaneously sent
to the NPWC Director who issued the final determination. The written
request must be received by BALCA within 10 business days from the date
the Final Determination letter was issued.
(1) Upon receipt of a request for BALCA review, the NPWC will
prepare an Appeal File and submit it to BALCA.
(2) The request for review, statements, briefs, and other
submissions of the parties must contain only legal arguments and may
refer to only the evidence that was within the record upon which the
decision on the PWD by the NPWC Director was based.
(3) BALCA will handle appeals in accordance with Sec. 655.461.
Sec. Sec. 655.412 -655.419 [Reserved]
CW-1 Application for Temporary Employment Certification Filing
Procedures
Sec. 655.420 Application filing requirements.
An employer seeking to hire CW-1 workers must electronically file a
CW-1 Application for Temporary Employment Certification with the NPC
designated by the OFLC Administrator. This section provides the
procedures an employer must follow when filing.
(a) What to file. An employer seeking a TLC must file a completed
CW-1 Application for Temporary Employment Certification (Form ETA-9142C
and the appropriate appendices and valid PWD),
[[Page 12436]]
and all supporting documentation and information required at the time
of filing under this subpart. Applications that are incomplete at the
time of submission will be returned to the employer without review.
(b) Timeliness. (1) Except as provided in paragraph (b)(2) of this
section, a completed CW-1 Application for Temporary Employment
Certification must be filed no more than 120 calendar days before the
employer's date of need.
(2) If the employer is seeking a TLC to extend the employment of a
CW-1 worker, a completed CW-1 Application for Temporary Employment
Certification must be filed no more than 180 calendar days before the
date on which the CW-1 status expires.
(c) Location and methods of filing--(1) Electronic filing. The
employer must file the CW-1 Application for Temporary Employment
Certification and all required supporting documentation with the NPC
using the electronic method(s) designated by the OFLC Administrator.
The NPC will return, without review, any application submitted using a
method other than the designated electronic method(s), unless the
employer submits with the application a statement of the need to file
by mail or indicates that it already submitted such a statement to NPWC
during the same fiscal year.
(2) Filing by mail. Employers that are unable to file
electronically, either due to lack of internet access or physical
disability precluding electronic filing, may file the application by
mail. The mailed application must include a statement indicating the
need to file by mail as indicated above. The NPC will return, without
review, mailed applications that do not contain such a statement. OFLC
will publish the address for mailed applications in the instructions to
Form ETA-9142C.
(d) Original signature and acceptance of electronic signatures. An
electronically filed CW-1 Application for Temporary Employment
Certification must contain an electronic (scanned) copy of the original
signature of the employer (and that of the employer's authorized
attorney or agent, if the employer is represented by an attorney or
agent) or, in the alternative, use a verifiable electronic signature
method, as directed by the OFLC Administrator. If submitted by mail,
the CW-1 Application for Temporary Employment Certification must bear
the original signature of the employer and, if applicable, the
employer's authorized attorney or agent.
(e) Requests for multiple positions. An employer may request
certification of more than one position on its CW-1 Application for
Temporary Employment Certification as long as all CW-1 workers will
perform the same services or labor under the same terms and conditions,
in the same occupation, during the same period of employment, and at a
location (or locations) covered by the application.
(f) Scope of application. (1) A CW-1 Application for Temporary
Employment Certification must be limited to places of employment within
the Commonwealth.
(2) In a single application filing, an association or other
organization of employers is not permitted to file a CW-1 Application
for Temporary Employment Certification on behalf of more than one
employer-member under the CW-1 program.
(g) Period of employment. (1) Except as provided in paragraph
(g)(2) of this section, the period of need identified in the CW-1
Application for Temporary Employment Certification must not exceed 1
year.
(2) If the employer is seeking TLC to employ a long-term CW-1
worker, the period of need identified in the CW-1 Application for
Temporary Employment Certification must not exceed 3 years.
(h) Return of applications based on USCIS CW-1 cap notice. (1)
Except as provided in paragraph (h)(3) of this section, if USCIS issues
a public notice stating that it has received a sufficient number of CW-
1 petitions to meet the statutory numerical limit on the total number
of foreign nationals who may be issued a CW-1 permit or otherwise
granted CW-1 status for the fiscal year, the OFLC Administrator must
return without review any CW-1 Applications for Temporary Employment
Certification with dates of need in that fiscal year received on or
after the date that the OFLC Administrator provides the notice in
paragraph (h)(2) of this section.
(2) The OFLC Administrator will announce the return of future CW-1
Applications for Temporary Employment Certification with dates of need
in the fiscal year for which the cap is met with a notice on the OFLC's
website. This notice will be effective on the date of its publication
on the OFLC's website and will remain valid for the fiscal year unless:
(i) USCIS issues a public notice stating additional CW-1 permits
are available for the fiscal year; and
(ii) The OFLC Administrator publishes a new notice announcing that
additional TLCs may be granted in the fiscal year.
(3) After the notice that OFLC will return future CW-1 Applications
for Temporary Employment Certification, the OFLC Administrator will
continue to process CW-1 Applications for Temporary Employment
Certification filed before the effective date of the suspension notice
and will continue to permit the filing of CW-1 Applications for
Temporary Employment Certification by employers who identify in the CW-
1 Application for Temporary Employment Certification that the
employment of all CW-1 workers employed under the CW-1 Application for
Temporary Employment Certification will be exempt from the statutory
numerical limit on the total number of foreign nationals who may be
issued a CW-1 permit or otherwise granted CW-1 status.
Sec. 655.421 Job contractor filing requirements.
(a) A job contractor may submit a CW-1 Application for Temporary
Employment Certification on behalf of itself and that employer-client.
By doing so, the Department deems the job contractor a joint employer.
(b) A job contractor must have separate contracts with each
different employer-client. A single contract or agreement may support
only one CW-1 Application for Temporary Employment Certification for
each employer-client job opportunity in the Commonwealth.
(c) Either the job contractor or its employer-client may submit an
Application for Prevailing Wage Determination describing the job
opportunity to the NPWC. However, each of the joint employers is
separately responsible for ensuring that the wage offer(s) listed in
the CW-1 Application for Temporary Employment Certification and related
recruitment at least equals the prevailing wage obtained from the NPWC,
or the Federal or Commonwealth minimum wage, whichever is highest, and
that all other wage obligations are met.
(d)(1) A job contractor that is filing as a joint employer with its
employer-client must submit to the NPC a completed CW-1 Application for
Temporary Employment Certification that clearly identifies the joint
employers (the job contractor and its employer-client) and the
employment relationship (including the places of employment), in
accordance with instructions provided by the OFLC Administrator. The
CW-1 Application for Temporary Employment Certification must bear the
original signature of the job contractor and the employer-client or use
a verifiable electronic signature method, consistent with the
requirements set forth at Sec. 655.420(d), and be accompanied by the
contract or agreement establishing
[[Page 12437]]
the employers' relationships related to the workers sought.
(2) By signing the CW-1 Application for Temporary Employment
Certification, each employer independently attests to the conditions of
employment required of an employer participating in the CW-1 program
and assumes full responsibility for the accuracy of the representations
made in the application and for all of the responsibilities of an
employer in the CW-1 program.
(e)(1) Either the job contractor or its employer-client may place
the required advertisements and conduct recruitment as described in
Sec. Sec. 655.442 through 655.445. Also, either one of the joint
employers may assume responsibility for interviewing applicants.
However, both of the joint employers must sign the recruitment report
that is submitted to the NPC meeting the requirement set forth in Sec.
655.446.
(2) All recruitment conducted by the joint employers must satisfy
the job offer assurance and advertising content requirements identified
in Sec. 655.441. Additionally, in order to fully inform applicants of
the job opportunity and avoid potential confusion inherent in a job
opportunity involving two employers, joint employer recruitment must
clearly identify both employers (the job contractor and its employer-
client) by name and must clearly identify the place(s) of employment
where workers will perform labor or services.
(3)(i) Provided that all of the employer-clients' job opportunities
are in the same occupation located in the Commonwealth and have the
same requirements and terms and conditions of employment, including
dates of employment, a job contractor may combine more than one of its
joint employer employer-clients' job opportunities in a single
advertisement. Each advertisement must fully inform potential workers
of the job opportunity available with each employer-client and
otherwise satisfy the job offer assurances and advertising content
requirements identified in Sec. 655.441. Such a shared advertisement
must clearly identify the job contractor by name, the joint employment
relationship, and the number of workers sought for each job
opportunity, identified by employer-client names and locations (e.g.,
five openings with Employer-Client A (place of employment location),
three openings with Employer-Client B (place of employment location)).
(ii) In addition, the advertisement must contain the following
statement: ``Applicants may apply for any or all of the jobs listed.
When applying, please identify the job(s) (by company and work
location) you are applying to for the entire period of employment
specified.'' If an applicant fails to identify one or more specific
work location(s), that applicant is presumed to have applied to all
work locations listed in the advertisement.
(f) If a TLC for the joint employers is granted, the Final
Determination certifying the CW-1 Application for Temporary Employment
Certification will be sent to both the job contractor and employer-
client.
Sec. 655.422 Emergency situations.
(a) Waiver of PWD requirement prior to application filing. The CO
may waive the requirement to obtain a PWD, as required under Sec.
655.410(c), prior to filing a CW-1 Application for Temporary Employment
Certification for employers that have good and substantial cause,
provided that the CO has sufficient time to thoroughly test the labor
market and to make a final determination as required by Sec. 655.450.
The requirement to obtain a PWD prior to filing the CW-1 Application
for Temporary Employment Certification, under Sec. 655.410(c), is the
only provision of this subpart which will be waived under these
emergency situation procedures.
(b) Employer requirements. The employer requesting a waiver of the
requirement to obtain a PWD must submit to the NPC a completed
Application for Prevailing Wage Determination, a completed CW-1
Application for Temporary Employment Certification, and a statement
justifying the waiver request. The employer's waiver request must
include detailed information describing the good and substantial cause
that has necessitated the waiver request. Good and substantial cause
may include, but is not limited to, the substantial loss of U.S.
workers due to an Act of God, or similar unforeseeable man-made
catastrophic events (such as a hazardous materials emergency or
government-controlled flooding), unforeseeable changes in market
conditions, pandemic health issues, or similar conditions that are
wholly outside of the employer's control. Issues related to the CW-1
visa cap are not good and substantial cause for a waiver of the filing
requirements. Further, a denial of a previously submitted CW-1
Application for Temporary Employment Certification or CW-1 petition
with USCIS does not constitute good and substantial cause necessitating
a waiver under this section.
(c) Processing of emergency applications. The CO will process the
emergency CW-1 Application for Temporary Employment Certification,
including the Application for Prevailing Wage Determination for the CW-
1 Program, in a manner consistent with the provisions of this subpart
and make a determination in accordance with Sec. 655.450. The CO will
notify the employer, if the application cannot be processed because,
pursuant to paragraph (a) of this section, the request for emergency
filing was not justified and/or the filing does not meet the
requirements set forth in this subpart.
Sec. 655.423 Assurances and obligations of CW-1 employers.
An employer employing CW-1 workers and/or workers in corresponding
employment under a CW-1 Application for Temporary Employment
Certification has agreed as part of the CW-1 Application for Temporary
Employment Certification that it will abide by the following conditions
with respect to its CW-1 workers and any workers in corresponding
employment:
(a) Rate of pay. (1) The offered wage in the work contract equals
or exceeds the highest of the prevailing wage, Federal minimum wage, or
Commonwealth minimum wage. The employer must pay at least the offered
wage, free and clear, during the entire period of the CW-1 Application
for Temporary Employment Certification granted by OFLC.
(2) The offered wage is not based on commissions, bonuses, or other
incentives, including paying on a piece-rate basis, unless the employer
guarantees a wage earned every workweek that equals or exceeds the
offered wage.
(3) If the employer requires one or more minimum productivity
standards of workers as a condition of job retention, the standards
must be specified in the work contract and the employer must
demonstrate that they are normal and usual for non-CW-1 employers for
the same occupation in the Commonwealth.
(4) An employer that pays on a piece-rate basis must demonstrate
that the piece-rate is no less than the normal rate paid by non-CW-1
employers to workers performing the same activity in the Commonwealth.
The average hourly piece-rate earnings must result in an amount at
least equal to the offered wage. If the worker is paid on a piece-rate
basis and at the end of the workweek the piece-rate does not result in
average hourly piece-rate earnings during the workweek at least equal
to
[[Page 12438]]
the amount the worker would have earned had the worker been paid at the
offered hourly wage, then the employer must supplement the worker's pay
at that time so that the worker's earnings are at least as much as the
worker would have earned during the workweek if the worker had instead
been paid at the offered hourly wage for each hour worked.
(b) Wages free and clear. The payment requirements for wages in
this section will be satisfied by the timely payment of such wages to
the worker either in cash or in negotiable instrument payable at par.
The payment must be made finally and unconditionally and ``free and
clear.'' The principles applied in determining whether deductions are
reasonable and payments are received free and clear, and the
permissibility of deductions for payments to third persons are
explained in more detail in 29 CFR part 531.
(c) Deductions. The employer must make all deductions from the
worker's paycheck required by law. The work contract must specify all
deductions not required by law that the employer will make from the
worker's pay; any such deductions not disclosed in the work contract
are prohibited. The wage payment requirements of paragraph (b) of this
section are not met where unauthorized deductions, rebates, or refunds
reduce the wage payment made to the worker below the minimum amounts
required by the offered wage or where the worker fails to receive such
amounts free and clear because the worker ``kick backs'' directly or
indirectly to the employer or to another person for the employer's
benefit the whole or part of the wages delivered to the worker.
Authorized deductions are limited to: Those required by law, such as
taxes payable by workers that are required to be withheld by the
employer and amounts due workers which the employer is required by
court order to pay to another; deductions for the reasonable cost or
fair value of board, lodging, and facilities furnished; and deductions
of amounts which are authorized to be paid to third persons for the
worker's account and benefit through his or her voluntary assignment or
order or which are authorized by a collective bargaining agreement with
bona fide representatives of workers which covers the employer.
Deductions for amounts paid to third persons for the worker's account
and benefit which are not so authorized or are contrary to law or from
which the employer, agent, or recruiter, including any agents or
employees of these entities or any affiliated person, derives any
payment, rebate, commission, profit, or benefit directly or indirectly,
may not be made if they reduce the actual wage paid to the worker below
the offered wage indicated on the CW-1 Application for Temporary
Employment Certification.
(d) Job opportunity is full time. The job opportunity is a full-
time position, consistent with Sec. 655.402, and the employer must use
a single workweek as its standard for computing wages due. An
employee's workweek must be a fixed and regularly recurring period of
168 hours--7 consecutive 24-hour periods. It need not coincide with the
calendar week but may begin on any day and at any hour of the day.
(e) Job qualifications and requirements. Each job qualification and
requirement must be listed in the work contract and must be bona fide
and consistent with the normal and accepted qualifications and
requirements imposed by non-CW-1 employers in the same occupation and
in the Commonwealth. The employer's job qualifications and requirements
imposed on U.S. workers must not be less favorable than the
qualifications and requirements that the employer is imposing or will
impose on CW-1 workers. A qualification means a characteristic that is
necessary to the individual's ability to perform the job in question. A
requirement means a term or condition of employment that a worker is
required to accept in order to obtain the job opportunity. The CO may
require the employer to submit documentation to substantiate the
appropriateness of any job qualification and/or requirement.
(f) Three-fourths guarantee--(1) Offer to worker. The employer must
guarantee to offer the worker employment for a total number of work
hours equal to at least three-fourths of the workdays of the total
period of employment specified in the work contract, beginning with the
first workday after the arrival of the worker at the place of
employment or the advertised contractual first date of need, whichever
is later, and ending on the expiration date specified in the work
contract or in its extensions, if any. See the exception in paragraph
(f)(1)(iv) of this section.
(i) For purposes of this paragraph (f), a workday means the number
of hours in a workday as stated in the work contract. The employer must
offer a total number of hours to ensure the provision of sufficient
work to reach the three-fourths guarantee. The work hours must be
offered during the work period specified in the work contract, or
during any modified work contract period to which the worker and
employer have mutually agreed and that has been approved by the CO.
(ii) In the event the worker begins working later than the start
date of need specified in the application, the guarantee period begins
with the first workday after the arrival of the worker at the place of
employment and continues until the last day during which the work
contract and all extensions thereof are in effect.
(iii) Therefore, if, for example, a work contract is for a 10-week
period, during which a normal workweek is specified as 6 days a week, 8
hours per day, the worker would have to be guaranteed employment for at
least 360 hours (10 weeks x 48 hours/week = 480 hours x 75 percent =
360). If a Federal holiday occurred during the 10-week period, the 8
hours would be deducted from the total hours for the work contract,
before the guarantee is calculated. Continuing with the above example,
the worker would have to be guaranteed employment for 354 hours (10
weeks x 48 hours/week = 480 hours-8 hours (Federal holiday) = 472 hours
x 75 percent = 354 hours).
(iv) A worker may be offered more than the specified hours of work
on a single workday. For purposes of meeting the guarantee, the worker
will not be required to work more than the number of hours specified in
the work contract for a workday but all hours of work actually
performed may be counted by the employer in calculating whether the
period of guaranteed employment has been met. If during the total work
contract period the employer affords the U.S. or CW-1 worker less
employment than that required under this paragraph (f)(1)(iv), the
employer must pay such worker the amount the worker would have earned
had the worker, in fact, worked for the guaranteed number of days. An
employer will not be considered to have met the work guarantee if the
employer has merely offered work on three-fourths of the workdays of
the work contract period if each workday did not consist of a full
number of hours of work time as specified in the work contract.
(2) Guarantee for piece-rate paid worker. If the worker is paid on
a piece-rate basis, the employer must use the worker's average hourly
piece-rate earnings or the offered wage, whichever is higher, to
calculate the amount due under the guarantee in accordance with
paragraph (f)(1) of this section.
(3) Failure to work. Any hours the worker fails to work, up to a
maximum of the number of hours specified in the work contract for a
workday, when the worker has been offered an opportunity to work in
accordance with paragraph (f)(1) of this section, and all hours of work
actually performed (including
[[Page 12439]]
voluntary work over 8 hours in a workday), may be counted by the
employer in calculating whether the period of guaranteed employment has
been met. An employer seeking to calculate whether the guaranteed
number of hours has been met must maintain the payroll records in
accordance with this subpart.
(g) Impossibility of fulfillment. If before the expiration date
specified in the work contract, the services of the worker are no
longer required for reasons beyond the control of the employer due to
fire, weather, or other Act of God, or similar unforeseeable man-made
catastrophic event (such as an oil spill or controlled flooding) that
is wholly outside the employer's control that makes the fulfillment of
the work contract impossible, the employer may terminate the work
contract with the approval of the CO. In the event of such termination,
the employer must fulfill a three-fourths guarantee, as described in
paragraph (f) of this section, for the time that has elapsed from the
start date listed in the work contract or the first workday after the
arrival of the worker at the place of employment, whichever is later,
to the time of its termination. The employer must make efforts to
transfer the CW-1 worker or worker in corresponding employment to other
comparable employment acceptable to the worker and consistent with
immigration laws, as applicable. If a transfer is not affected, the
employer must return the worker, at the employer's expense, to the
place from which the worker (disregarding intervening employment) came
to work for the employer, or transport the worker to the worker's next
certified CW-1 employer, whichever the worker prefers.
(h) Frequency of pay. The employer must state in the work contract
the frequency with which the worker will be paid, which must be at
least every 2 weeks. Employers must pay wages when due.
(i) Earnings statements. (1) The employer must keep accurate and
adequate records with respect to the workers' earnings, including but
not limited to: Records showing the nature, amount, and location(s) of
the work performed; the number of hours of work offered each day by the
employer (broken out by hours offered both in accordance with and over
and above the three-fourths guarantee in paragraph (f) of this
section); the hours actually worked each day by the worker; if the
number of hours worked by the worker is less than the number of hours
offered, the reason(s) the worker did not work; the time the worker
began and ended each workday; the rate of pay (both piece-rate and
hourly, if applicable); the worker's earnings per pay period; the
worker's home address; and the amount of and reasons for any and all
deductions taken from or additions made to the worker's wages.
(2) The employer must furnish to the worker on or before each
payday in one or more written statements the following information:
(i) The worker's total earnings for each workweek in the pay
period;
(ii) The worker's hourly rate or piece-rate of pay;
(iii) For each workweek in the pay period the hours of employment
offered to the worker (showing offers in accordance with the three-
fourths guarantee as determined in paragraph (f) of this section,
separate from any hours offered over and above the guarantee);
(iv) For each workweek in the pay period the hours actually worked
by the worker;
(v) An itemization of all deductions made from or additions made to
the worker's wages;
(vi) If piece-rates are used, the units produced daily;
(vii) The beginning and ending dates of the pay period; and
(viii) The employer's name, address, and FEIN.
(j) Transportation and visa fees--(1)(i) Transportation to the
place of employment. The employer must provide or reimburse the worker
for transportation and subsistence from the place from which the worker
has come to work for the employer, whether in the United States,
including another part of the Commonwealth, or abroad, to the place of
employment if the worker completes 50 percent of the period of
employment covered by the work contract (not counting any extensions).
The employer may arrange and pay for the transportation and subsistence
directly, advance at a minimum the most economical and reasonable
common carrier cost of the transportation and subsistence to the worker
before the worker's departure, or pay the worker for the reasonable
costs incurred by the worker. When it is the prevailing practice of
non-CW-1 employers in the occupation and in the Commonwealth to do so
or when the employer extends such benefits to similarly situated CW-1
workers, the employer must advance the required transportation and
subsistence costs (or otherwise provide them) to workers in
corresponding employment who are traveling to the employer's place of
employment from such a distance that the worker is not reasonably able
to return to their residence each day. The amount of the transportation
payment must be no less (and is not required to be more) than the most
economical and reasonable common carrier transportation charges for the
distances involved. The amount of the daily subsistence must be at
least the amount permitted in Sec. 655.173. Where the employer will
reimburse the reasonable costs incurred by the worker, it must keep
accurate and adequate records of: The costs of transportation and
subsistence incurred by the worker; the amount reimbursed; and the
date(s) of reimbursement. Note that the Fair Labor Standards Act
applies independently of the CW-1 requirements and imposes obligations
on employers regarding payment of wages.
(ii) Transportation from the place of employment. If the worker
completes the period of employment covered by the work contract (not
counting any extensions), or if the worker is dismissed from employment
for any reason by the employer before the end of the period, and the
worker has no immediate subsequent CW-1 employment, the employer must
provide or pay at the time of departure for the worker's cost of return
transportation and daily subsistence from the place of employment to
the place from which the worker, disregarding intervening employment,
departed to work for the employer. If the worker has contracted with a
subsequent employer that has not agreed in the work contract to provide
or pay for the worker's transportation from the former employer's place
of employment to such subsequent employer's place of employment, the
former employer must provide or pay for that transportation and
subsistence. If the worker has contracted with a subsequent employer
that has agreed in the work contract to provide or pay for the worker's
transportation from the former employer's place of employment to such
subsequent employer's place of employment, the subsequent employer must
provide or pay for such expenses.
(iii) Employer-provided transportation. All employer-provided
transportation must comply with all applicable Federal and Commonwealth
laws and regulations including, but not limited to, vehicle safety
standards, driver licensure requirements, and vehicle insurance
coverage.
(2) The employer must pay or reimburse the worker in the first
workweek for all visa, visa processing, border crossing, and other
related fees (including those mandated by the government) incurred by
the CW-1 worker, but not for passport expenses or
[[Page 12440]]
other charges primarily for the benefit of the worker.
(k) Employer-provided items. The employer must provide to the
worker, without charge or deposit charge, all tools, supplies, and
equipment required to perform the duties assigned.
(l) Disclosure of work contract. The employer must provide to a CW-
1 worker outside of the United States no later than the time at which
the worker applies for the visa, or to a worker in corresponding
employment no later than on the day work commences, a copy of the work
contract including any subsequent approved modifications. For a CW-1
worker changing employment from a CW-1 employer to a subsequent CW-1
employer, the copy must be provided no later than the time an offer of
employment is made by the subsequent CW-1 employer. The disclosure of
all documents required by this paragraph (l) must be provided in a
language understood by the worker. At a minimum, the work contract must
contain all of the provisions required to be included by this section.
In the absence of a separate, written work contract entered into
between the employer and the worker, the required terms of the
certified CW-1 Application for Temporary Employment Certification will
be the work contract.
(m) No unfair treatment. The employer has not and will not
intimidate, threaten, restrain, coerce, blacklist, discharge, or in any
manner discriminate against, and has not and will not cause any person
to intimidate, threaten, restrain, coerce, blacklist, discharge, or in
any manner discriminate against, any person who has, related to the CW-
1 program:
(1) Filed a complaint under or related to any applicable Federal or
Commonwealth laws and regulations;
(2) Instituted or caused to be instituted any proceeding under or
related to any applicable Federal or Commonwealth laws and regulations;
(3) Testified or is about to testify in any proceeding under or
related to any applicable Federal or Commonwealth laws and regulations;
(4) Consulted with a workers' center, community organization, labor
union, legal assistance program, or an attorney on matters related to
any applicable Federal or Commonwealth laws and regulations; or
(5) Exercised or asserted on behalf of himself/herself or others
any right or protection afforded by any applicable Federal or
Commonwealth laws and regulations.
(n) Comply with the prohibitions against employees paying fees. The
employer and its attorney, agents, or employees have not sought or
received payment of any kind from the worker for any activity related
to obtaining CW-1 labor certification or employment, including payment
of the employer's attorney or agent fees, application and CW-1 Petition
fees, recruitment costs, or any fees attributed to obtaining the
approved CW-1 Application for Temporary Employment Certification. For
purposes of this paragraph (n), payment includes, but is not limited
to, monetary payments, wage concessions (including deductions from
wages, salary, or benefits), kickbacks, bribes, tributes, in-kind
payments, and free labor. All wages must be paid free and clear. This
paragraph (n) does not prohibit employers or their agents from
receiving reimbursement for costs that are the responsibility and
primarily for the benefit of the worker, such as government-required
passport fees.
(o) Contracts with third parties to comply with prohibitions. The
employer must contractually prohibit in writing any agent or recruiter
(or any agent or employee of such agent or recruiter) whom the employer
engages, either directly or indirectly, in recruitment of CW-1 workers
to seek or receive payments or other compensation from prospective
workers. The contract must include the following statement: ``Under
this agreement, [name of agent, recruiter] and any agent of or employee
of [name of agent or recruiter] are prohibited from seeking or
receiving payments from any prospective employee of [employer name] at
any time, including before or after the worker obtains employment.
Payments include but are not limited to, any direct or indirect fees
paid by such employees for recruitment, job placement, processing,
maintenance, attorneys' fees, agent fees, application fees, or petition
fees.''
(p) Prohibition against preferential treatment of foreign workers.
The employer's job offer must offer to U.S. workers no less than the
same benefits, wages, and working conditions that the employer is
offering, intends to offer, or will provide to CW-1 workers. Job offers
may not impose on U.S. workers any restrictions or obligations that
will not be imposed on the employer's CW-1 workers. This does not
relieve the employer from providing to CW-1 workers at least the
minimum benefits, wages, and working conditions which must be offered
to U.S. workers consistent with this section.
(q) Nondiscriminatory hiring practices. The job opportunity is open
to any qualified U.S. worker as defined in Sec. 655.402, regardless of
race, color, national origin, age, sex, religion, disability, or
citizenship. Rejections of any U.S. workers who applied or apply for
the job must only be for lawful, job-related reasons, and those not
rejected on this basis have been or will be hired. In addition, the
employer has and will continue to retain records of all hired workers
and rejected applicants as required by Sec. 655.456.
(r) Recruitment requirements. The employer must conduct all
required recruitment activities, including any additional employer-
conducted recruitment activities as directed by the CO, and as
specified in Sec. Sec. 655.442 through 655.445.
(s) No strike or lockout. There is no strike or lockout at any of
the employer's place(s) of employment within the Commonwealth for which
the employer is requesting CW-1 certification at the time the CW-1
Application for Temporary Employment Certification is filed.
(t) No recent or future layoffs. The employer has not laid off and
will not lay off any similarly employed U.S. worker in the occupation
that is the subject of the CW-1 Application for Temporary Employment
Certification in the Commonwealth within the period beginning 270
calendar days before the date of need and through the end of the TLC's
period of certification. A layoff for lawful, job-related reasons such
as lack of work or the end of a season is permissible if all CW-1
workers are laid off before any U.S. worker in corresponding
employment.
(u) No work performed outside the Commonwealth and job opportunity.
The employer must not place any CW-1 workers employed under the
approved CW-1 Application for Temporary Employment Certification
outside the Commonwealth or in a job opportunity not listed on the
approved CW-1 Application for Temporary Employment Certification.
(v) Abandonment/termination of employment. Upon the separation from
employment of any worker employed under the CW-1 Application for
Temporary Employment Certification or workers in corresponding
employment, if such separation occurs before the end date of the
employment period specified in the CW-1 Application for Temporary
Employment Certification, the employer must notify OFLC in writing of
the separation from employment not later than 2 working days after such
separation is discovered by the employer. An abandonment or abscondment
is deemed to begin after a worker fails to report for work at the
regularly scheduled time for 5 consecutive working days without the
consent of the employer. If the
[[Page 12441]]
separation is due to the voluntary abandonment of employment by the CW-
1 worker or worker in corresponding employment or is terminated for
cause, and the employer provides appropriate notification specified
under this paragraph (v), the employer will not be responsible for
providing or paying for the subsequent transportation and subsistence
costs of that worker under this section, and that worker is not
entitled to the three-fourths guarantee described in paragraph (f) of
this section.
(w) Compliance with applicable laws. During the period of
employment specified on the CW-1 Application for Temporary Employment
Certification, the employer must comply with all applicable Federal and
Commonwealth employment-related laws and regulations, including health
and safety laws. This includes compliance with 18 U.S.C. 1592(a), with
respect to prohibitions against employers, the employer's agents, or
their attorneys knowingly holding, destroying or confiscating workers'
passports, visas, or other immigration documents.
Sec. Sec. 655.424-655.429 [Reserved]
Processing of an CW-1 Application for Temporary Employment
Certification
Sec. 655.430 Review of applications.
(a) NPC review. The CO will review the CW-1 Application for
Temporary Employment Certification for compliance with all applicable
program requirements, including compliance with the requirements set
forth in this subpart, and make a decision as to whether to issue a NOD
under Sec. 655.431 or a Notice of Acceptance (NOA) under Sec.
655.433.
(b) Mailing and postmark requirements. Any notice or request sent
by the CO to an employer requiring a response will be sent
electronically or via first class mail using the address, including
electronic mail address, provided on the CW-1 Application for Temporary
Employment Certification. The employer's response to such a notice or
request must be filed electronically or via first class mail. The
employer's response must be filed electronically or postmarked by the
date due or the next business day if the due date falls on a Saturday,
Sunday, or Federal Holiday.
(c) Information dissemination. OFLC may forward, to DHS or any
other Federal Government Official performing an investigation,
inspection, audit, or law enforcement function, information OFLC
receives in the course of processing a request for a CW-1 Application
for Temporary Employment Certification or of administering program
integrity measures such as audits.
Sec. 655.431 Notice of Deficiency.
(a) Notification. If the CO determines the CW-1 Application for
Temporary Employment Certification contains errors or inaccuracies, or
does not meet the requirements set forth in this subpart, the CO will
issue a NOD to the employer and, if applicable, the employer's attorney
or agent.
(b) Notice content. The NOD will:
(1) State the reason(s) the CW-1 Application for Temporary
Employment Certification fails to meet the criteria for acceptance;
(2) Offer the employer an opportunity to submit a modified CW-1
Application for Temporary Employment Certification within 10 business
days from the date of the NOD, and state the modification that is
required for the CO to issue a NOA; and
(3) State that if the employer does not comply with the
requirements of Sec. 655.432 for submitting a modified application,
the CO will deny the CW-1 Application for Temporary Employment
Certification.
Sec. 655.432 Submission of modified applications.
(a) Review of a modified CW-1 Application for Temporary Employment
Certification. Upon receipt of a response to a NOD, including any
modifications, the CO will review the response. The CO may issue one or
more additional NODs before issuing a decision. The employer's failure
to comply with a NOD, including not responding in a timely manner or
not providing all required documentation, will result in a denial of
the CW-1 Application for Temporary Employment Certification.
(b) Acceptance of a modified CW-1 Application for Temporary
Employment Certification. If the CO accepts the modification(s) to the
CW-1 Application for Temporary Employment Certification, the CO will
issue a NOA to the employer and, if applicable, the employer's attorney
or agent.
(c) Denial of modified CW-1 Application for Temporary Employment
Certification. If the modified CW-1 Application for Temporary
Employment Certification does not cure the deficiencies cited in the
NOD(s) or otherwise fails to satisfy the criteria required for
certification, the CO will, at its discretion, either send a second NOD
or deny the CW-1 Application for Temporary Employment Certification in
accordance with the labor certification determination provisions in
Sec. 655.453.
(d) Appeal from denial of modified CW-1 Application for Temporary
Employment Certification. The procedures for appealing a denial of a
modified CW-1 Application for Temporary Employment Certification are
the same as for appealing the denial of a nonmodified CW-1 Application
for Temporary Employment Certification, outlined in Sec. 655.461.
(e) Post acceptance modifications. Notwithstanding the decision to
accept the CW-1 Application for Temporary Employment Certification, the
CO may require modifications to the CW-1 Application for Temporary
Employment Certification at any time before the final determination to
grant or deny the CW-1 Application for Temporary Employment
Certification if the CO determines that the job offer does not contain
the minimum benefits, wages, and working conditions set forth in Sec.
655.441. The employer must make such modifications, or the application
will be denied under Sec. 655.453. The employer must provide all
workers recruited in connection with the job opportunity in the CW-1
Application for Temporary Employment Certification with a copy of the
modified CW-1 Application for Temporary Employment Certification, as
approved by the CO, no later than the date work commences.
Sec. 655.433 Notice of Acceptance.
(a) Notification. When the CO determines the CW-1 Application for
Temporary Employment Certification contains no errors or inaccuracies,
and meets the requirements set forth in this subpart, the CO will issue
a NOA to the employer and, if applicable, the employer's attorney or
agent.
(b) Notice content. The NOA must:
(1) Direct the employer to engage in recruitment of U.S. workers as
provided in Sec. Sec. 655.442 through 655.444, including any
additional recruitment ordered by the CO under Sec. 655.445;
(2) State that such employer-conducted recruitment must begin
within 14 calendar days from the date the NOA is issued, consistent
with Sec. 655.440(b);
(3) Require the employer to submit a report of its recruitment
efforts, by the date required by the CO in the NOA, as specified in
Sec. 655.446; and
(4) Advise the employer that failure to submit a complete
recruitment report by the deadline will lead to denial of the
application.
Sec. 655.434 Amendments to an application.
(a) Increases in number of workers. The CW-1 Application for
Temporary Employment Certification may be amended at any time before
the CO's certification determination to increase
[[Page 12442]]
the number of workers requested in the initial CW-1 Application for
Temporary Employment Certification by not more than 20 percent (50
percent for employers requesting less than 10 workers) without
requiring an additional recruitment period for U.S. workers. Requests
for increases above the percent prescribed, without additional
recruitment, may be approved by the CO only when the employer
demonstrates that the need for additional workers could not have been
foreseen and is wholly outside of the employer's control. All requests
to increase the number of workers must be made in writing and will not
be effective until approved by the CO. Upon acceptance of an amendment,
the employer must promptly provide copies of any approved amendments to
all U.S. workers recruited and hired under the original job offer.
(b) Minor changes to the period of employment. The CW-1 Application
for Temporary Employment Certification may be amended at any time
before the CO's certification determination to make minor changes
(meaning a change of up to 14 calendar days) in the total period of
employment, without requiring an additional recruitment period for U.S.
workers. Changes will not be effective until submitted in writing and
approved by the CO. In considering whether to approve the request, the
CO will review the reason(s) for the request, determine whether the
reason(s) are on the whole justified, and take into account the effect
any change(s) would have on the adequacy of the underlying test of the
domestic labor market for the job opportunity. An employer must
demonstrate that the change to the period of employment could not have
been foreseen and is wholly outside of the employer's control. The CO
will deny any request to change the period of employment where the
total amended period of employment will exceed the maximum applicable
duration permitted under Sec. 655.420(g). Upon acceptance of an
amendment, the employer must promptly provide copies of any approved
amendments to all U.S. workers recruited and hired under the original
job offer.
(c) Other minor amendments to the CW-1 Application for Temporary
Employment Certification. The employer may request other minor
amendments to the CW-1 Application for Temporary Employment
Certification at any time before the CO's certification determination
is issued. In considering whether to approve the request, the CO will
determine whether the proposed amendment(s) are sufficiently justified
and must take into account the effect of the changes on the underlying
labor market test for the job opportunity. All requests for minor
changes must be made in writing and will not be effective until
approved by the CO. Upon acceptance of an amendment, the employer must
promptly provide copies of any approved amendments to all U.S. workers
recruited and hired under the original job offer.
(d) Amendments after certification are not permitted. After the CO
has made a determination to certify the CW-1 Application for Temporary
Employment Certification, the employer may no longer request
amendments.
Sec. Sec. 655.435-655.439 [Reserved]
Post Acceptance Requirements
Sec. 655.440 Employer-conducted recruitment.
(a) Employer obligations. Employers must conduct recruitment of
U.S. workers to ensure that there are not qualified U.S. workers who
will be available for the positions listed in the CW-1 Application for
Temporary Employment Certification.
(b) Period to begin employer-conducted recruitment. Unless
otherwise instructed by the CO, the employer must begin the recruitment
required in Sec. Sec. 655.442 through 655.445 within 14 calendar days
from the date the NOA is issued. All employer-conducted recruitment
must be completed before the employer submits the recruitment report as
required in Sec. 655.446.
(c) Interviewing U.S. workers. Employers that wish to require
interviews must conduct those interviews by phone or provide a
procedure for the interviews to be conducted in the location where the
worker is being recruited so that the worker incurs little or no cost.
Employers cannot provide potential CW-1 workers with more favorable
treatment with respect to the requirement for, and conduct of,
interviews.
(d) Qualified and available U.S. workers. The employer must
consider all U.S. applicants for the job opportunity and must hire all
U.S. applicants who are qualified and who will be available for the job
opportunity. U.S. applicants may be rejected only for lawful, job-
related reasons, and those not rejected on this basis will be hired.
(e) Recruitment report. The employer must prepare a recruitment
report meeting the requirements of Sec. 655.446, by the date specified
by the CO in the NOA.
Sec. 655.441 Job offer assurances and advertising contents.
(a) General. All recruitment conducted under Sec. Sec. 655.442
through 655.445 in connection with an CW-1 Application for Temporary
Employment Certification must contain terms and conditions of
employment that are not less favorable than those offered to the CW-1
workers and must comply with the assurances applicable to job offers as
set forth in Sec. 655.423.
(b) Contents. All advertising must contain the following
information:
(1) The employer's name and contact information;
(2) A statement that the job opportunity is a temporary, full-time
position and identify the job title and total number of job openings
the employer intends to fill;
(3) A description of the job opportunity with sufficient
information to apprise applicants of the services or labor to be
performed, including the job duties, the minimum education and
experience requirements, the work hours and days, and the anticipated
start and end dates of the job opportunity;
(4) The place(s) of employment with enough specificity to apprise
applicants of any travel requirements and where applicants will likely
have to reside to perform the services or labor;
(5) The wage that the employer is offering, intends to offer or
will provide to the CW-1 workers or, in the event that there are
multiple wage offers, the range of applicable wage offers, each of
which must equal or exceed the highest of the prevailing wage or the
Federal or Commonwealth minimum wage;
(6) If applicable, a statement that overtime will be available to
the worker and specify the wage offer(s) for working any overtime
hours;
(7) The frequency with which the worker will be paid as required by
Sec. 655.423(h);
(8) A statement that the employer will make all deductions from the
worker's paycheck required by law, and must specify any deductions the
employer intends to make from the worker's paycheck which are not
required by law, including, if applicable, any deductions for the
reasonable cost of board, lodging, or other facilities;
(9) A statement summarizing the three-fourths guarantee as required
by Sec. 655.423(f);
(10) A statement that transportation and subsistence will be
provided to the worker while traveling from the worker's origin to the
place of employment as will the return transportation and subsistence
at the
[[Page 12443]]
conclusion of the job opportunity, as required by Sec. 655.423(j)(1);
(11) If applicable, a statement that daily transportation to and
from the place(s) of employment will be provided by the employer;
(12) If applicable, a statement that the employer will provide to
the worker, without charge or deposit charge, all tools, supplies, and
equipment required to perform the duties assigned, in accordance with
Sec. 655.423(k);
(13) If applicable, any board, lodging, or other facilities the
employer will offer to workers or intends to assist workers in
securing;
(14) If applicable, a statement indicating that on-the-job training
will be provided to the worker; and
(15) A statement that directs applicants to apply for the job
opportunity directly with the employer, and that indicates at least two
verifiable methods by which applicants may apply for the job
opportunity, one of which must be via electronic means, and that
provides the days and hours during which applicants may be interviewed
for the job opportunity.
Sec. 655.442 Place advertisement with CNMI Department of Labor.
(a) The employer must place an advertisement with the CNMI
Department of Labor for a period of 21 consecutive calendar days
satisfying the requirements set forth in Sec. 655.441.
(b) Documentation of this step must include:
(1) Either printouts of web pages in which the advertisement
appeared on the CNMI Department of Labor job listing system, or other
verifiable evidence from the CNMI Department of Labor containing the
text of the advertisement; and
(2) The dates of publication demonstrating compliance with the
requirement of this section.
Sec. 655.443 Contact with former U.S. workers.
The employer must contact (by mail or other effective means) its
former U.S. workers, including those who have been laid off within 270
calendar days before the date of need, employed by the employer in the
occupation at the place(s) of employment during the previous year
(except those who were dismissed for cause or who abandoned the
place(s) of employment), provide a copy of the CW-1 Application for
Temporary Employment Certification, and solicit their return to the
job. This contact must occur during the period of time that the job
offer is being advertised on the CNMI Department of Labor's job listing
system under Sec. 655.442. The employer must retain documentation
sufficient to prove such contact in accordance with Sec. 655.456. An
employer has no obligation to contact U.S. workers it terminated for
cause or who abandoned employment at any time during the previous year,
if the employer provided timely notice to the NPC of the termination or
abandonment in the manner described in Sec. 655.423(v).
Sec. 655.444 Notice of posting requirement.
The employer must post a copy of the CW-1 Application for Temporary
Employment Certification in at least two conspicuous locations at the
place(s) of employment or in some other manner that provides reasonable
notification to all employees in the job classification and area in
which the work will be performed by the CW-1 workers. Electronic
posting, such as displaying an electronic copy of the CW-1 Application
for Temporary Employment Certification prominently on any internal or
external website that is maintained by the employer and customarily
used for notices to employees about terms and conditions of employment,
is sufficient to meet this posting requirement as long as it otherwise
meets the requirements of this section. The notice must be posted for a
period of 21 consecutive calendar days. The employer must maintain
proof the CW-1 Application for Temporary Employment Certification was
posted and identify where and during what period of time it was posted
in accordance with Sec. 655.456.
Sec. 655.445 Additional employer-conducted recruitment.
(a) Requirement to conduct additional recruitment. The employer may
be instructed by the CO to conduct additional reasonable recruitment.
Such recruitment may be required at the discretion of the CO where the
CO has determined that there is a likelihood that U.S. workers who are
qualified will be available for the work.
(b) Nature of the additional employer-conducted recruitment. The CO
will describe the precise number and nature of the additional
recruitment efforts. Additional recruitment may include, but is not
limited to, advertising the job offer on the employer's website or
another electronic job search website; advertising with community-based
organizations, local unions, or trade unions; or other advertising
using a professional, trade, or other publication where such a
publication is appropriate for the workers likely to apply for the job
opportunity. When assessing the appropriateness of a particular
recruitment method, the CO will consider the cost of the additional
recruitment and the likelihood that the additional recruitment
method(s) will identify qualified and available U.S. workers.
(c) Proof of the additional employer-conducted recruitment. The CO
will specify the documentation or other supporting evidence that must
be retained by the employer as proof that the additional recruitment
requirements were met. Documentation must be retained as required in
Sec. 655.456.
Sec. 655.446 Recruitment report.
(a) Requirements of the recruitment report. No fewer than 2
calendar days after the last date on which the last advertisement
appeared, as required by the NOA issued under Sec. 655.433, the
employer must prepare, sign, and date a recruitment report. Where
recruitment was conducted by a job contractor or its employer-client,
both joint employers must sign the recruitment report in accordance
with Sec. 655.421(e)(1). The recruitment report must be submitted to
the NPC, by the date specified in the NOA, and contain the following
information:
(1) The name of each recruitment activity or source;
(2) The name and contact information of each U.S. worker who
applied or was referred to the job opportunity up to the date of the
preparation of the recruitment report, and the disposition of each
worker's application. The employer must clearly indicate whether the
job opportunity was offered to the U.S. worker and whether the U.S.
worker accepted or declined;
(3) Confirmation that the advertisement was posted on the CNMI
Department of Labor's job listing system and the dates of advertising;
(4) Confirmation that former U.S. employees were contacted, if
applicable, and by what means and the date(s) of contact;
(5) Confirmation the employer posted the availability of the job
opportunity to all employees in the job classification and area in
which the work will be performed by the CW-1 workers and the dates of
advertising;
(6) If applicable, confirmation that additional recruitment was
conducted as directed by the CO and the date(s) of advertising; and
(7) If applicable, for each U.S. worker who applied for the
position but was not hired, the lawful job-related reason(s) for not
hiring the U.S. worker.
(b) Duty to update and retain the recruitment report. The employer
must update the recruitment report throughout the recruitment period.
In a joint employment situation, either the
[[Page 12444]]
job contractor or the employer-client may update the recruitment report
throughout the recruitment period. The employer must retain the
recruitment report as required in Sec. 655.456.
Sec. Sec. 655.447-655.449 [Reserved]
Labor Certification Determinations
Sec. 655.450 Determinations.
Except as otherwise noted in this section, the OFLC Administrator
and CO(s), by virtue of delegation from the OFLC Administrator, have
the authority to certify or deny CW-1 Applications for Temporary
Employment Certification. The CO will certify the application only if
the employer has met all the requirements of this subpart, including
the criteria for certification in Sec. 655.451, thus demonstrating
that there is an insufficient number of U.S. workers in the
Commonwealth who are able, willing, qualified and who will be available
at the time and place of the job opportunity for which certification is
sought and that the employment of the CW-1 workers will not adversely
affect the wages and working conditions of similarly employed U.S.
workers.
Sec. 655.451 Criteria for temporary labor certification.
(a) The criteria for TLC include whether the employer has complied
with all of the requirements of this subpart, which are required to
grant the labor certification.
(b) In determining whether there are insufficient U.S. workers in
the Commonwealth to fill the employer's job opportunity, the CO will
count as available any U.S. worker who applied (or on whose behalf an
application is made) directly to the employer, but who was rejected by
the employer for other than a lawful job-related reason. In making this
determination, the CO will also consider the employer's contacts with
its former U.S. workers, including workers that have been laid off
within 270 calendar days before the date of need.
Sec. 655.452 Approved certification.
If the TLC is granted, the CO will send a Final Determination
notice and a copy of the certified CW-1 Application for Temporary
Employment Certification to the employer and a copy, if applicable, to
the employer's agent or attorney using an electronic method(s)
designated by the OFLC Administrator. For employers permitted to file
by mail as set forth in Sec. 655.420(c), the CO will send the Final
Determination notice and a copy of the certified CW-1 Application for
Temporary Employment Certification by first class mail. The CO will
send the certified CW-1 Application for Temporary Employment
Certification, including approved modifications, on behalf of the
employer, directly to USCIS using an electronic method(s) designated by
the OFLC Administrator. The employer must retain a copy of the
certified CW-1 Application for Temporary Employment Certification,
including the original signed Appendix C, as required by Sec. 655.456.
Sec. 655.453 Denied certification.
If an electronically filed TLC is denied, the CO will send the
Final Determination notice to the employer and a copy, if applicable,
to the employer's agent or attorney using an electronic method(s)
designated by the OFLC Administrator. For employers permitted to file
by mail as set forth in Sec. 655.420(c), the CO will send the Final
Determination notice by first class mail. The Final Determination
notice will:
(a) State the reason(s) certification is denied, citing the
relevant regulatory standards;
(b) Offer the employer an opportunity to request administrative
review of the denial under Sec. 655.461; and
(c) State that if the employer does not request administrative
review in accordance with Sec. 655.461, the denial is final, and the
Department will not accept any appeal on that CW-1 Application for
Temporary Employment Certification.
Sec. 655.454 Partial certification.
The CO may issue a partial certification, reducing either the
period of need or the number of CW-1 workers or both, based upon
information the CO receives during the course of processing the CW-1
Application for Temporary Employment Certification, an audit, or
otherwise. The number of workers certified will be reduced by one for
each U.S. worker who is able, willing, and qualified, and who will be
available at the time and place needed and who has not been rejected
for lawful, job-related reasons, to perform the labor or services. If a
partial labor certification is issued, the CO will send the Final
Determination notice approving partial certification using the
procedures at Sec. 655.452.
The Final Determination notice will:
(a) State the reason(s) the period of employment or the number of
CW-1 workers requested has been reduced, citing the relevant regulatory
standards;
(b) Offer the employer an opportunity to request administrative
review of the partial certification under Sec. 655.461; and
(c) State that if the employer does not request administrative
judicial review in accordance with Sec. 655.461, the partial
certification is final, and the Department will not accept any appeal
on that CW-1 Application for Temporary Employment Certification.
Sec. 655.455 Validity of temporary labor certification.
(a) Validity period. A TLC is valid only for the period of
employment as approved on the CW-1 Application for Temporary Employment
Certification. The certification expires after the last day of
authorized employment, including any approved extensions thereof.
(b) Scope of validity. A TLC is valid only for the number of CW-1
positions, the places of employment located in the Commonwealth, the
job classification and specific services or labor to be performed, and
the employer(s) specified on the approved CW-1 Application for
Temporary Employment Certification, including any approved
modifications. The TLC may not be transferred from one employer to
another unless the employer to which it is transferred is a successor
in interest to the employer to which it was issued.
Sec. 655.456 Document retention requirements for CW-1 employers.
(a) Entities required to retain documents. All CW-1 employers
filing a CW-1 Application for Temporary Employment Certification are
required to retain the documents and records establishing compliance
with this subpart, including but not limited to those specified in
paragraph (c) of this section.
(b) Period of record retention. The employer must retain records
and documents for 3 years from the date on which the certification of
the CW-1 Application for Temporary Employment Certification expires, or
3 years from the date of the final determination if the CW-1
Application for Temporary Employment Certification is denied, or 3
years from the date the Department receives the request for withdrawal
of a CW-1 Application for Temporary Employment Certification under
Sec. 655.462.
(c) Documents and records to be retained by all employers. All
employers filing a CW-1 Application for Temporary Employment
Certification must retain the following documents and records and must
provide the documents and records to the Department and any other
Federal Government Official in the event of an audit or investigation:
[[Page 12445]]
(1) Proof of recruitment efforts, including:
(i) Placement of the job offer with the CNMI Department of Labor as
specified in Sec. 655.442;
(ii) Contact with former U.S. employees as specified in Sec.
655.443, including documents demonstrating that each such U.S. worker
had been offered the job opportunity listed in the CW-1 Application for
Temporary Employment Certification, and that the U.S. worker either
refused the job opportunity or was rejected only for lawful, job-
related reasons;
(iii) Posting notice of the job opportunity to all employees in the
job classification and area in which the work will be performed by the
CW-1 workers as specified in Sec. 655.444; and
(iv) All additional employer-conducted recruitment required by the
CO as specified in Sec. 655.445.
(2) Documentation supporting the information submitted in the
recruitment report prepared in accordance with Sec. 655.446, such as
evidence of nonapplicability of contact with former workers as
specified in Sec. 655.443 and any supporting resumes and contact
information as specified in Sec. 655.446.
(3) Records of each worker's earnings, hours offered and worked,
location(s) where work is performed, and other information as specified
in Sec. 655.423(i).
(4) If applicable, records of reimbursement of transportation and
subsistence costs incurred by the workers, as specified in Sec.
655.423(j).
(5) Copies of written contracts with third parties demonstrating
compliance with the prohibition of seeking or receiving payments or
other compensation of any kind from prospective workers as specified in
Sec. 655.423(o).
(6) Evidence of the employer's contact with U.S. workers who
applied for the job opportunity in the CW-1 Application for Temporary
Employment Certification, including, but not limited to, documents
demonstrating that any rejections of U.S. workers were for lawful, job-
related reasons, as specified in Sec. 655.423(q).
(7) Written notice provided to and informing OFLC that a CW-1
worker or worker in corresponding employment has separated from
employment before the end date of employment specified in the CW-1
Application for Temporary Employment Certification, as specified in
Sec. 655.423(v).
(8) A copy of the CW-1 Application for Temporary Employment
Certification and all accompanying appendices, including any
modifications, amendments, or extensions, signed by the employer as
directed by the CO.
(d) Availability of documents and records for enforcement purposes.
The employer must make available to the Department, DHS or to any
Federal Government Official performing an investigation, inspection,
audit, or law enforcement function all documents and records required
to be retained under this subpart for purposes of copying,
transcribing, or inspecting them.
Sec. Sec. 655.457-655.459 [Reserved]
Post Certification Activities
Sec. 655.460 Extensions.
(a) Basis for extension. Under certain circumstances an employer
may apply for extensions of the period of employment. A request for
extension must be related to weather conditions or other factors beyond
the control of the employer (which may include unforeseen changes in
market conditions). Such requests must be supported in writing, with
documentation showing that the extension is needed and that the need
could not have been reasonably foreseen by the employer. The CO will
not grant an extension where the total period of employment under that
CW-1 Application for Temporary Employment Certification and the
authorized extension would exceed the maximum applicable duration
permitted under Sec. 655.420(g).
(b) Decision by the CO. The CO will notify the employer of the
decision in writing. The employer may appeal a denial of a request for
an extension by following the appeal procedures in Sec. 655.461.
(c) Obligations during period of extension. The CW-1 employer's
assurances and obligations under the TLC will continue to apply during
the extended period of employment. The employer must immediately
provide to its CW-1 workers and workers in corresponding employment a
copy of any approved extension.
Sec. 655.461 Administrative review.
(a) Request for review. Where authorized in this subpart, an
employer wishing review of a determination by the CO must request an
administrative review before BALCA of that determination to exhaust its
administrative remedies. In such cases, the request for review:
(1) Must be received by BALCA, and the CO who issued the
determination, within 10 business days from the date of the
determination;
(2) Must clearly identify the particular determination for which
review is sought;
(3) Must include a copy of the CO's determination;
(4) Must set forth the particular grounds for the request,
including the specific factual issues the requesting party alleges
needs to be examined in connection with the CO's determination;
(5) May contain any legal argument that the employer believes will
rebut the basis for the CO's determination, including any briefing the
employer wishes to submit; and
(6) May contain only such evidence as was actually before the CO at
the time of the CO's determination.
(b) Appeal File. After the receipt of a request for review, the CO
will send a copy of the Appeal File, as soon as practicable by means
normally assuring next-day delivery, to BALCA, the employer, the
employer's attorney or agent (if applicable), and the Associate
Solicitor for Employment and Training Legal Services, Office of the
Solicitor, U.S. Department of Labor (counsel).
(c) Assignment. The Chief ALJ will immediately, upon receipt of the
appeal file from the CO, assign either a single member or a three-
member panel of BALCA to consider a particular case.
(d) Administrative review--(1) Briefing schedule. If the employer
wishes to submit a brief on appeal, it must do so as part of its
request for review. Within 7 business days of receipt of the Appeal
File, the counsel for the CO may submit a brief in support of the CO's
decision and, if applicable, in response to the employer's brief.
(2) Standard of review. The ALJ must uphold the CO's decision
unless shown by the employer to be arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of
discretion, or otherwise not in accordance with the law.
(e) Scope of review. BALCA will affirm, reverse, or modify the CO's
determination, or remand to the CO for further action. BALCA will reach
this decision after due consideration of the documents in the Appeal
File that were before the CO at the time of the CO's determination, the
request for review, and any legal briefs submitted. BALCA may not
consider evidence not before the CO at the time of the CO's
determination, even if such evidence is in the Appeal File, request for
review, or legal briefs.
(f) Decision. The decision of BALCA must specify the reasons for
the action taken and must be provided to the employer, the CO, and
counsel for the CO within 7 business days of the submission of the CO's
brief or 10
[[Page 12446]]
business days after receipt of the Appeal File, whichever is later,
using means normally assuring expedited delivery.
Sec. 655.462 Withdrawal of a CW-1 Application for Temporary
Employment Certification.
(a) The employer may withdraw a CW-1 Application for Temporary
Employment Certification after it has been submitted to the NPC for
processing, including after the CO grants certification under Sec.
655.450. However, the employer is still obligated to comply with the
terms and conditions of employment contained in the CW-1 Application
for Temporary Employment Certification and work contract with respect
to all workers recruited and hired in connection with that application.
(b) To request withdrawal, the employer must submit a request in
writing to the NPC identifying the CW-1 Application for Temporary
Employment Certification and stating the reason(s) for the withdrawal.
Sec. 655.463 Public disclosure.
The Department will maintain an electronic file accessible to the
public with information on all employers applying for TLCs. The
database will include such information as the number of workers
requested, the date filed, the date decided, and the final disposition.
Sec. Sec. 655.464-655.469 [Reserved]
Integrity Measures
Sec. 655.470 Audits.
The CO may conduct audits of certified CW-1 Applications for
Temporary Employment Certification.
(a) Discretion. The CO has the sole discretion to choose the
certified applications selected for audit.
(b) Audit letter. Where an application is selected for audit, the
CO will issue an audit letter to the employer and a copy, if
appropriate, to the employer's attorney or agent. The audit letter
will:
(1) Specify the documentation that must be submitted by the
employer;
(2) Specify a date, no more than 30 calendar days from the date the
audit letter is issued, by which the required documentation must be
sent to the CO; and
(3) Advise that failure to comply fully with the audit process may
result:
(i) In the requirement that the employer undergo the assisted
recruitment procedures in Sec. 655.471 in future filings of CW-1
Applications for Temporary Employment Certification for a period of up
to 2 years; or
(ii) In a revocation of the certification or debarment from the CW-
1 program and any other foreign labor certification program
administered by the Department.
(c) Supplemental information request. During the course of the
audit examination, the CO may request supplemental information or
documentation from the employer in order to complete the audit. If
circumstances warrant, the CO can issue one or more requests for
supplemental information.
(d) Potential referrals. In addition to measures in this subpart,
the CO may decide to provide the audit findings and underlying
documentation to DHS or other appropriate enforcement agencies. The CO
may refer any findings that an employer discouraged a qualified U.S.
worker from applying, or failed to hire, discharged, or otherwise
discriminated against a qualified U.S. worker, to the Department of
Justice, Civil Rights Division, Immigrant and Employee Rights Section.
Sec. 655.471 Assisted recruitment.
(a) Requirement of assisted recruitment. If, as a result of audit
or otherwise, the CO determines that a violation has occurred that does
not warrant debarment, the CO may require the employer to engage in
assisted recruitment for a defined period of time for any future CW-1
Application for Temporary Employment Certification.
(b) Notification of assisted recruitment. The CO will notify the
employer (and its attorney or agent, if applicable) in writing of the
assisted recruitment that will be required of the employer for a period
of up to 2 years from the date the notice is issued. The notification
will state the reasons for the imposition of the additional
requirements, state that the employer's agreement to accept the
conditions will constitute their inclusion as bona fide conditions and
terms of a CW-1 Application for Temporary Employment Certification, and
offer the employer an opportunity to request an administrative review.
If administrative review is requested, the procedures in Sec. 655.461
apply.
(c) Assisted recruitment. The assisted recruitment process will be
in addition to any recruitment required of the employer by Sec. Sec.
655.442 through 655.445 and may consist of, but is not limited to, one
or more of the following:
(1) Requiring the employer to submit a draft advertisement to the
CO for review and approval at the time of filing the CW-1 Application
for Temporary Employment Certification;
(2) Designating the sources where the employer must recruit for
U.S. workers in the Commonwealth and directing the employer to place
the advertisement(s) in such sources;
(3) Extending the length of the placement of the advertisements;
(4) Requiring the employer to notify the CO in writing when the
advertisement(s) are placed;
(5) Requiring an employer to perform any additional assisted
recruitment directed by the CO;
(6) Requiring the employer to provide proof of the publication of
all advertisements as directed by the CO;
(7) Requiring the employer to provide proof of all U.S. workers who
applied (or on whose behalf an application is made) in response to the
employer's recruitment efforts;
(8) Requiring the employer to submit any proof of contact with all
referrals and former U.S. workers; or
(9) Requiring the employer to provide any additional documentation
verifying it conducted the assisted recruitment as directed by the CO.
(d) Failure to comply. If an employer materially fails to comply
with requirements ordered by the CO under this section, the
certification will be denied and the employer and its attorney or agent
may be debarred under Sec. 655.473.
Sec. 655.472 Revocation.
(a) Basis for revocation. The OFLC Administrator may revoke a TLC
approved under this subpart, if the OFLC Administrator finds:
(1) The issuance of the TLC was not justified due to fraud or
misrepresentation of a material fact in the application process;
(2) The employer substantially failed to comply with any of the
terms or conditions of the approved TLC. A substantial failure is a
failure to comply that constitutes a significant deviation from the
terms and conditions of the approved certification and is further
defined in Sec. 655.473(d); or
(3) The employer impeded the audit process, as set forth in Sec.
655.470, or impeded any Federal Government Official performing an
investigation, inspection, audit, or law enforcement function.
(b) DOL procedures for revocation--(1) Notice of Revocation. If the
OFLC Administrator makes a determination to revoke an employer's TLC,
the OFLC Administrator will issue a Notice of Revocation to the
employer (and its attorney or agent, if applicable). The notice will
contain a detailed statement of the grounds for the revocation and
inform the employer of its right to submit rebuttal evidence to the
OFLC Administrator or to request administrative review of the Notice of
[[Page 12447]]
Revocation by BALCA. If the employer does not submit rebuttal evidence
or request administrative review within 10 business days from the date
the Notice of Revocation is issued, the notice will become the final
agency action and will take effect immediately at the end of the 10
business days.
(2) Rebuttal. If the employer timely submits rebuttal evidence, the
OFLC Administrator will inform the employer of the final determination
on the revocation within 10 business days of receiving the rebuttal
evidence. If the OFLC Administrator determines that the certification
must be revoked, the OFLC Administrator will inform the employer of its
right to appeal the final determination to BALCA according to the
procedures of Sec. 655.461. If the employer does not appeal the final
determination, it will become the final agency action.
(3) Request for review. An employer may appeal a Notice of
Revocation or a final determination of the OFLC Administrator after the
review of rebuttal evidence to BALCA, according to the appeal
procedures of Sec. 655.461. The ALJ's decision is the final agency
action.
(4) Stay. The timely submission of rebuttal evidence or a request
for administrative review will stay the revocation pending the outcome
of the proceeding.
(5) Decision. If the TLC is revoked, the OFLC Administrator will
provide copies of final revocation decisions to DHS and DOS promptly.
(c) Employer's obligations in the event of revocation. If an
employer's TLC is revoked, the employer is responsible for:
(1) Reimbursement of actual inbound transportation and other
required expenses;
(2) The workers' outbound transportation and other required
expenses;
(3) Payment to the workers of the amount due under the three-
fourths guarantee; and
(4) Any other wages, benefits, and working conditions due or owing
to the workers under this subpart.
Sec. 655.473 Debarment.
(a) Debarment of an employer, agent, or attorney. The OFLC
Administrator may debar an employer, agent, attorney, or any successor
in interest to that employer, agent, or attorney, from participating in
any action under this subpart, subject to the time limits set forth in
paragraph (c) of this section, if the OFLC Administrator finds that the
employer, agent, or attorney substantially violated a material term or
condition of the Application for Prevailing Wage Determination or CW-1
Application for Temporary Employment Certification, as defined in
paragraph (d) of this section. The OFLC Administrator will provide
copies of final debarment decisions to DHS and DOS promptly.
(b) Effect on future applications in all foreign labor programs.
The debarred employer, or a debarred agent or attorney, or any
successor in interest to any debarred employer, agent, or attorney,
will be disqualified from filing any labor certification applications
or labor condition applications with the Department subject to the term
limits set forth in paragraph (c) of this section. If such an
application is filed, it will be denied without review.
(c) Period of debarment. No employer, agent, or attorney may be
debarred under this subpart for more than 5 years for a single
violation.
(d) Definition of violation. For the purposes of this section, a
violation of a material term or condition of the Application for
Prevailing Wage Determination or CW-1 Application for Temporary
Employment Certification includes:
(1) One or more acts of commission or omission on the part of the
employer or the employer's agent or attorney that involve:
(i) Failure to pay or provide the required wages, benefits, or
working conditions to the employer's CW-1 workers or workers in
corresponding employment;
(ii) Failure, except for lawful, job-related reasons, to offer
employment to qualified U.S. workers who applied for the job
opportunity for which certification was sought;
(iii) Failure to comply with the employer's obligations to recruit
U.S. workers;
(iv) Improper layoff or displacement of U.S. workers or workers in
corresponding employment;
(v) Failure to comply with the NOD process, as set forth in Sec.
655.431, or the assisted recruitment process, as set forth in Sec.
655.471;
(vi) Impeding the audit process, as set forth in Sec. 655.470, or
impeding any Federal Government Official performing an investigation,
inspection, audit, or law enforcement function;
(vii) Employing a CW-1 worker outside of the Commonwealth, in an
activity not listed in the work contract, or outside the validity
period of employment of the work contract, including any approved
extension thereof;
(viii) A violation of the requirements of Sec. 655.423(n) or (o);
(ix) A violation of any of the provisions listed in Sec.
655.423(q); or
(x) Any other act showing such flagrant disregard for the law that
future compliance with program requirements cannot reasonably be
expected;
(2) Fraud involving the Application for Prevailing Wage
Determination or the CW-1 Application for Temporary Employment
Certification under this subpart; or
(3) A material misrepresentation of fact during the course of
processing the CW-1 Application for Temporary Employment Certification.
(e) Determining whether a violation is substantial. In determining
whether a violation is substantial as to merit debarment, the factors
the OFLC Administrator may consider include, but are not limited to,
the following:
(1) Previous history of violation(s) under the CW-1 program;
(2) The number of CW-1 workers, workers in corresponding
employment, or U.S. workers who were or are affected by the
violation(s);
(3) The gravity of the violation(s); or
(4) The extent to which the violator achieved a financial gain due
to the violation(s), or the potential financial loss or potential
injury to the worker(s).
(f) Debarment procedure--(1) Notice of Debarment. If the OFLC
Administrator makes a determination to debar an employer, agent,
attorney, or any successor in interest to that employer, agent, or
attorney, the OFLC Administrator will issue the party a Notice of
Debarment. The notice will state the reason(s) for the debarment
finding, including a detailed explanation of the grounds for and the
duration of the debarment, and it will inform the party subject to the
notice of its right to submit rebuttal evidence to the OFLC
Administrator, or to request administrative review of the decision by
BALCA. If the party does not file rebuttal evidence or a request for
review within 30 calendar days of the date of the Notice of Debarment,
the notice is the final agency action and the debarment will take
effect on the date specified in the notice or if no date is specified,
at the end of 30 calendar days The timely filing of rebuttal evidence
or a request for review stays the debarment pending the outcome of the
appeal as provided in paragraphs (f)(2) through (6) of this section.
(2) Rebuttal. The party who received the Notice of Debarment may
choose to submit evidence to rebut the grounds stated in the notice
within 30 calendar days of the date the notice is issued. If rebuttal
evidence is timely filed, the OFLC Administrator will issue a Final
Determination on the debarment within
[[Page 12448]]
30 calendar days of receiving the rebuttal evidence. If the OFLC
Administrator determines that the party must be debarred, the OFLC
Administrator will issue a Final Determination and inform the party of
its right to request administrative review of the debarment by BALCA
according to the procedures in this section. The party must request
review within 30 calendar days after the date of the Final
Determination, or the Final Determination will be the final agency
order and the debarment will take effect on the date specified in the
Final Determination or if no date is specified, at the end of 30
calendar days.
(3) Request for review. (i) The recipient of a Notice of Debarment
or Final Determination seeking to challenge the debarment must request
review of the debarment within 30 calendar days of the date of the
Notice of Debarment or the date of the Final Determination by the OFLC
Administrator after review of rebuttal evidence submitted under
paragraph (f)(2) of this section. A request for review of debarment
must be sent in writing to the Chief ALJ, United States Department of
Labor, with a simultaneous copy served on the OFLC Administrator; the
request must clearly identify the particular debarment determination
for which review is sought; and must set forth the particular grounds
for the request. If no timely request for review is filed, the
debarment will take effect on the date specified in the Notice of
Debarment or Final Determination, or if no date is specified, 30
calendar days from the date the Notice of Debarment or Final
Determination is issued.
(ii) Upon receipt of a request for review, the OFLC Administrator
will promptly send a certified copy of the ETA case file to the Chief
ALJ by means normally assuring expedited delivery. The Chief ALJ will
immediately assign an ALJ to conduct the review.
(iii) Statements, briefs, and other submissions of the parties must
contain only legal argument and only such evidence that was within the
record upon which the debarment was based, including any rebuttal
evidence submitted pursuant to paragraph (f)(2) of this section.
(4) Review by the ALJ. (i) In considering requests for review, the
ALJ must afford all parties 30 days to submit or decline to submit any
appropriate Statement of Position or legal brief. The ALJ must review
the debarment determination on the basis of the record upon which the
decision was made, the request for review, and any Statements of
Position or legal briefs submitted.
(ii) The ALJ's final decision must affirm, reverse, or modify the
OFLC Administrator's determination. The ALJ's decision will be provided
to the parties by expedited mail. The ALJ's decision is the final
agency action, unless either party, within 30 calendar days of the
ALJ's decision, seeks review of the decision with the Administrative
Review Board (ARB).
(5) Review by the ARB. (i) Any party wishing review of the decision
of an ALJ must, within 30 calendar days of the decision of the ALJ,
petition the ARB to review the decision. Copies of the petition must be
served on all parties and on the ALJ. The ARB will decide whether to
accept the petition within 30 calendar days of receipt. If the ARB
declines to accept the petition, or if the ARB does not issue a notice
accepting a petition within 30 calendar days after the receipt of a
timely filing of the petition, the decision of the ALJ is the final
agency action. If a petition for review is accepted, the decision of
the ALJ will be stayed unless and until the ARB issues an order
affirming the decision. The ARB must serve notice of its decision to
accept or not to accept the petition upon the ALJ and upon all parties
to the proceeding.
(ii) Upon receipt of the ARB's notice to accept the petition, the
Office of Administrative Law Judges will promptly forward a copy of the
complete appeal record to the ARB.
(iii) Where the ARB has determined to review the decision and
order, the ARB will notify each party of the issue(s) raised, the form
in which submissions must be made (e.g., briefs or oral argument), and
the time within which the presentation must be submitted.
(6) ARB Decision. The ARB's final decision must be issued within 90
calendar days from the notice granting the petition and served upon all
parties and the ALJ.
Sec. Sec. 655.474-655.499 [Reserved]
Signed at Washington, DC.
Molly E. Conway,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Employment and Training, Labor.
[FR Doc. 2019-05937 Filed 3-27-19; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FP-P