Petition for Exemption From the Federal Motor Vehicle Theft Prevention Standard; Porsche Cars North America, Inc., 10891-10893 [2019-05446]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 56 / Friday, March 22, 2019 / Notices
installed as standard equipment on all
of its North American Ford, Lincoln and
Mercury vehicles but was offered as
optional equipment on its 2010 F-series
Super Duty pickups, Econoline and
Transit Connect vehicles. Ford further
stated that beginning with MY 2010, the
IAwPB device was installed as standard
equipment on its Lincoln MKT vehicles.
In MY 2011, the device was offered as
standard equipment on its Lincoln MKX
vehicle line, and as an option on the
Lincoln MKS, Ford Taurus, Edge,
Explorer and Focus vehicles. Beginning
with MY 2013, the device was offered
as standard equipment on the Lincoln
MKZ and optionally on the Ford Fusion,
C-Max and Escape vehicles.
Ford referenced the agency’s
published theft rate data for the Ford
Escape vehicles and stated that the
Lincoln Corsair will use the IAwPB
device similar to the design and
architecture of the Ford Escape. Ford
also stated that the Lincoln Corsair is
comparably similar to the Ford Escape
in vehicle segment, size and equipment.
The agency notes that current theft rate
data for the Ford Escape vehicle line for
MYs 2012 through 2014 are 0.8336,
0.8547 and 0.5051 respectively.
Based on the supporting evidence
submitted by Ford on the device, the
agency believes that the antitheft device
for the Lincoln Corsair vehicle line is
likely to be as effective in reducing and
deterring motor vehicle theft as
compliance with the parts-marking
requirements of the Theft Prevention
Standard (49 CFR part 541).
Pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 33106 and 49
CFR 543.7(b), the agency grants a
petition for exemption from the partsmarking requirements of Part 541 either
in whole or in part, if it determines that,
based upon substantial evidence, the
standard equipment antitheft device is
likely to be as effective in reducing and
deterring motor vehicle theft as
compliance with the parts-marking
requirements of Part 541. The agency
finds that Ford has provided adequate
reasons for its belief that the antitheft
device for the Lincoln Corsair vehicle
line is likely to be as effective in
reducing and deterring motor vehicle
theft as compliance with the partsmarking requirements of the Theft
Prevention Standard (49 CFR part 541).
This conclusion is based on the
information Ford provided about its
device.
The agency concludes that the device
will provide the five types of
performance listed in 543.6(a)(3):
Promoting activation; attracting
attention to the efforts of unauthorized
persons to enter or operate a vehicle by
means other than a key; preventing
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:37 Mar 21, 2019
Jkt 247001
defeat or circumvention of the device by
unauthorized persons; preventing
operation of the vehicle by
unauthorized entrants; and ensuring the
reliability and durability of the device.
The agency notes that 49 CFR part
541, Appendix A–1, identifies those
lines that are exempted from the Theft
Prevention Standard for a given model
year. 49 CFR part 543.7(f) contains
publication requirements incident to the
disposition of all Part 543 petitions.
Advanced listing, including the release
of future product nameplates, the
beginning model year for which the
petition is granted and a general
description of the antitheft device is
necessary in order to notify law
enforcement agencies of new vehicle
lines exempted from the parts-marking
requirements of the Theft Prevention
Standard.
If Ford decides not to use the
exemption for this line, it must formally
notify the agency. If such a decision is
made, the line must be fully marked
according to the requirements under 49
CFR parts 541.5 and 541.6 (marking of
major component parts and replacement
parts).
NHTSA notes that if Ford wishes in
the future to modify the device on
which this exemption is based, the
company may have to submit a petition
to modify the exemption. Part 543.7(d)
states that a Part 543 exemption applies
only to vehicles that belong to a line
exempted under this part and equipped
with the antitheft device on which the
line’s exemption is based. Further, Part
543.10(c)(2) provides for the submission
of petitions ‘‘to modify an exemption to
permit the use of an antitheft device
similar to but differing from the one
specified in that exemption.’’
The agency wishes to minimize the
administrative burden that Part
543.10(c)(2) could place on exempted
vehicle manufacturers and itself. The
agency did not intend in drafting Part
543 to require the submission of a
modification petition for every change
to the components or design of an
antitheft device. The significance of
many such changes could be de
minimis. Therefore, NHTSA suggests
that if the manufacturer contemplates
making any changes, the effects of
which might be characterized as de
minimis, it should consult the agency
before preparing and submitting a
petition to modify.
For the foregoing reasons, the agency
hereby grants in full Ford’s petition for
exemption for the Lincoln Corsair
vehicle line from the parts-marking
requirements of 49 CFR part 541,
beginning with its model year (MY)
2020 vehicles.
PO 00000
Frm 00122
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
10891
Issued in Washington, DC, under authority
delegated in 49 CFR 1.95 and 501.8.
Raymond R. Posten,
Associate Administrator for Rulemaking.
[FR Doc. 2019–05447 Filed 3–21–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–59–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration
Petition for Exemption From the
Federal Motor Vehicle Theft Prevention
Standard; Porsche Cars North
America, Inc.
National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration (NHTSA),
Department of Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Grant of petition for exemption.
AGENCY:
This document grants in full
the Porsche Cars North America, Inc.’s
(Porsche) petition for exemption of the
2020 model year Taycan vehicle line
from the Federal Motor Vehicle Theft
Prevention Standard (Theft Prevention
Standard). The petition is granted
because the agency has determined that
the antitheft device to be placed on the
line as standard equipment is likely to
be as effective in reducing and deterring
motor vehicle theft as compliance with
the parts-marking requirements of the
Theft Prevention Standard.
DATES: The exemption granted by this
notice is effective beginning with the
2020 model year (MY).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Carlita Ballard, Office of International
Policy, Fuel Economy and Consumer
Standards, NHTSA, West Building,
W43–439, NRM–310, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590. Ms.
Ballard’s phone number is (202) 366–
5222. Her fax number is (202) 493–2990.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In a
petition dated November 6, 2018,
Porsche requested an exemption from
the parts-marking requirements of the
Theft Prevention Standard for its
Taycan vehicle line beginning with MY
2020. The petition requested exemption
from parts-marking pursuant to 49 CFR
part 543, Exemption from Vehicle Theft
Prevention Standard, based on the
installation of an antitheft device as
standard equipment for the entire
vehicle line.
Under 49 CFR part 543.5(a), a
manufacturer may petition NHTSA to
grant an exemption for one vehicle line
per model year. In its petition, Porsche
provided a detailed description and
diagram of the identity, design, and
location of the components of the
antitheft device for its Porsche Taycan
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\22MRN1.SGM
22MRN1
10892
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 56 / Friday, March 22, 2019 / Notices
vehicle line. Porsche stated that the
Taycan vehicle line will be installed
with a passive antitheft device as
standard equipment on the entire
vehicle line. Porsche also stated that its
vehicles will be installed with a keyless
go system that will consists of two major
subsystems: A microprocessor based
immobilizer system that prevents the
power unit from functioning when the
system is engaged and a transmission
control locking and alarm system. Key
components of the antitheft device will
include a passive immobilizer,
electronic ignition switch, transponder
key, remote control unit, alarm/central
locking control unit, engine control
unit, transmission control unit and an
electronic parking brake. Porsche stated
that it will offer a keyless entry system
as an option for its Taycan vehicle line.
Porsche also stated that its vehicle line
will be installed with an audible and
visible alarm as standard equipment.
Additionally, Porsche stated that the
central locking system works in
conjunction with the audible and visible
alarm by locking the doors with the
ignition key or the remote control
activating the audible and visible alarm.
Porsche stated that an ultrasonic sensor
in the alarm system will monitor the
doors, rear luggage compartment, front
deck lid, fuel filler door, and interior
movement. The horn will sound and the
lights will flash if there is any detection
of unauthorized use.
Porsche stated that the immobilizer
system cannot be disabled unless an
original key sends the proper code to
the immobilizer system instructing the
engine management system via a code to
begin functioning again. The
immobilizer is automatically activated
after the ignition is turned off from the
dashboard control switch. The
immobilizer then returns to its normal
‘‘off’’ state, where engine starting and
transmission starting are not allowed.
Starting the engine and operation of the
vehicle will be allowed only when the
correct code is sent to the control unit
by using the correct key in the ignition
switch, or by having the correct keyless
entry key within the occupant
compartment of the car. The ignition
key contains a radio signal transponder,
which signals the control unit to allow
the engine to be started. With the
keyless entry system, operation of the
vehicle is allowed when the ignition key
is substituted with the special key that
contains a radio signal transmitter
similar to the transponder in the
standard ignition key.
Porsche’s submission is considered a
complete petition as required by 49 CFR
543.7 in that it meets the general
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:37 Mar 21, 2019
Jkt 247001
requirements contained in 543.5 and the
specific content requirements of 543.6.
In addressing the specific content
requirements of 543.6, Porsche provided
information on the reliability and
durability of its proposed device. To
ensure reliability and durability of the
device, Porsche conducted tests based
on its own specified standards. Porsche
provided a detailed list of the tests
conducted (i.e., extreme temperature
tests, voltage spike tests, reverse polarity
tests, electromagnetic interference tests,
vibration test and endurance tests) and
believes that the device is reliable and
durable since the device complied with
its specific requirements for each test.
Additionally, Porsche stated that the
antitheft device also features a built-in
self-diagnostic that constantly checks
for system failures. If a failure is
detected, an alarm indicator will signal
the driver.
Porsche further states that
disablement of the immobilizer is
virtually impossible. Disconnecting
power to the antitheft device does not
affect the operation of the device. Once
the antitheft device is activated, the
device stays activated until the correct
key or optional keyless entry key is used
to instruct the engine management
system through the proper code to begin
functioning again.
In further support of the reliability of
its antitheft device, Porsche informed
the agency that it will continue to use
the ‘‘off-board’’ antitheft strategy that
reduces the marketability of stolen
electronic components and making the
theft of vehicles unattractive.
Specifically, Porsche stated that during
the production of its vehicle, the
initialization and registration of various
antitheft electronic components are
recorded in a central database. If the
components have to be repaired or
replaced, authorized access to the
database must be obtained to receive
authorization for the components. If
authorized access to the central database
is unavailable or the database indicates
that the components are not authorized,
further operation and use of the vehicle
will be restricted or impossible to
obtain.
Porsche stated that its central locking
system works in conjunction with its
audible and visible alarm. Locking the
doors with the ignition key, the remote
control or a door switch (with the
keyless entry option) will also activate
the audible and visible alarm. Porsche
also stated that the immobilizer cannot
be disabled by manipulation of the door
locks or central-locking system because
the locks/locking system are incapable
of sending the code needed to disable
the device.
PO 00000
Frm 00123
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
As an additional feature, Porsche
stated that it will also incorporate an
electronically activated parking brake
on the Taycan vehicle which is
electronically activated and integrated
into the vehicle’s antitheft device.
Porsche stated that if the control unit
does not receive the correct code from
the ignition key or keyless entry key, the
parking brake will remain activated and
the vehicle cannot be towed away.
Since the Porsche Taycan is a new
vehicle line, there is currently no
available theft rate data published by
the agency for the vehicle line.
However, Porsche provided data on the
effectiveness of other similar antitheft
devices that have been installed on its
911 and Boxster/Cayman vehicle lines
in support of its belief that its proposed
device will be at least as effective as
those comparable devices previously
granted exemptions by the agency.
Porsche’s data showed that the theft rate
for the 911 and Boxster/Cayman vehicle
lines remained consistently low over a
three-year period. Using an average of 3
MYs’ theft data (2012–2014), the theft
rates for the Boxster/Cayman, Porsche
911 and Panamera vehicle lines are
0.4917, 0.6009 and 2.6518, respectively.
Porsche stated that its off-board antitheft
concept, similar in concept to partsmarking will further reduce the demand
for stolen Porsche vehicle components.
Based on the experience of these vehicle
lines, Porsche has concluded that the
antitheft device proposed for its Porsche
Taycan vehicle line is no less effective
than those devices in lines for which
NHTSA has already granted full
exemption from the parts-marking
requirements.
Based on the supporting evidence
submitted by Porsche, the agency
believes that the antitheft device for the
Taycan vehicle line is likely to be as
effective in reducing and deterring
motor vehicle theft as compliance with
the parts-marking requirements of the
Theft Prevention Standard (49 CFR part
541).
Pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 33106 and 49
CFR 543.7(b), the agency grants a
petition for exemption from the partsmarking requirements of Part 541, either
in whole or in part, if it determines that,
based upon substantial evidence, the
standard equipment antitheft device is
likely to be as effective in reducing and
deterring motor vehicle theft as
compliance with the parts-marking
requirements of Part 541. The agency
finds that Porsche has provided
adequate reasons for its belief that the
antitheft device for the Porsche Taycan
vehicle line is likely to be as effective
in reducing and deterring motor vehicle
theft as compliance with the parts-
E:\FR\FM\22MRN1.SGM
22MRN1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 56 / Friday, March 22, 2019 / Notices
marking requirements of the Theft
Prevention Standard (49 CFR part 541).
This conclusion is based on the
information Porsche provided about its
device.
The agency concludes that the device
will provide the five types of
performance listed in 543.6(a)(3):
Promoting activation; attracting
attention to the efforts of unauthorized
persons to enter or operate a vehicle by
means other than a key; preventing
defeat or circumvention of the device by
unauthorized persons; preventing
operation of the vehicle by
unauthorized entrants; and ensuring the
reliability and durability of the device.
The agency notes that 49 CFR part
541, Appendix A–1, identifies those
lines that are exempted from the Theft
Prevention Standard for a given model
year. 49 CFR part 543.7(f) contains
publication requirements incident to the
disposition of all Part 543 petitions.
Advanced listing, including the release
of future product nameplates, the
beginning model year for which the
petition is granted and a general
description of the antitheft device is
necessary in order to notify law
enforcement agencies of new vehicle
lines exempted from the parts marking
requirements of the Theft Prevention
Standard.
If Porsche decides not to use the
exemption for this line, it should
formally notify the agency. If such a
decision is made, the line must be fully
marked according to the requirements
under 49 CFR parts 541.5 and 541.6
(marking of major component parts and
replacement parts).
NHTSA notes that if Porsche wishes
in the future to modify the device on
which this exemption is based, the
company may have to submit a petition
to modify the exemption. Part 543.7(d)
states that a Part 543 exemption applies
only to vehicles that belong to a line
exempted under this part and equipped
with the antitheft device on which the
line’s exemption is based. Further, Part
543.10(c)(2) provides for the submission
of petitions ‘‘to modify an exemption to
permit the use of an antitheft device
similar to but differing from the one
specified in that exemption.’’
The agency wishes to minimize the
administrative burden that Part
543.10(c)(2) could place on exempted
vehicle manufacturers and itself. The
agency did not intend in drafting Part
543 to require the submission of a
modification petition for every change
to the components or design of an
antitheft device. The significance of
many such changes could be de
minimis. Therefore, NHTSA suggests
that if the manufacturer contemplates
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:37 Mar 21, 2019
Jkt 247001
making any changes, the effects of
which might be characterized as de
minimis, it should consult the agency
before preparing and submitting a
petition to modify.
For the foregoing reasons, the agency
hereby grants in full Porsche’s petition
for exemption for the Porsche Taycan
vehicle line from the parts-marking
requirements of 49 CFR part 541,
beginning with its model year (MY)
2020 vehicles.
Issued in Washington, DC, under authority
delegated in 49 CFR 1.95 and 501.8.
Raymond R. Posten,
Associate Administrator for Rulemaking.
[FR Doc. 2019–05446 Filed 3–21–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–59–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration
Petition for Exemption From the
Federal Motor Vehicle Theft Prevention
Standard; Nissan North America, Inc
National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration (NHTSA),
Department of Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Grant of petition for exemption.
AGENCY:
This document grants in full
Nissan North America, Inc.’s, (Nissan)
petition for exemption of the model year
2020 Versa vehicle line from the Federal
Motor Vehicle Theft Prevention
Standard. This petition is granted
because the agency has determined that
the antitheft device to be placed on the
line as standard equipment is likely to
be as effective in reducing and deterring
motor vehicle theft as compliance with
the parts-marking requirements of the
Theft Prevention Standard.
DATES: The exemption granted by this
notice is effective beginning with the
2020 model year (MY).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Carlita Ballard, Office of International
Policy, Fuel Economy and Consumer
Programs, National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE, West Building, Room W43–
439, Washington, DC 20590. Ms.
Ballard’s telephone phone number is
202–366–5222.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In a
petition dated October 1, 2018, Nissan
requested an exemption from the partsmarking requirements of the Theft
Prevention Standard for the Versa
vehicle line beginning with MY 2020.
The petition requested an exemption
from parts-marking pursuant to 49 CFR
part 543, ‘‘Exemption from Vehicle
Theft Prevention Standard’’, based on
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00124
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
10893
the installation of an antitheft device as
standard equipment for the entire
vehicle line.
Under 49 CFR part 543.5(a), a
manufacturer may petition NHTSA to
grant an exemption for one vehicle line
per model year. In its petition, Nissan
provided a detailed description and
diagram of the identity, design, and
location of components of the antitheft
device for the Versa vehicle line. Nissan
stated the MY 2020 Versa vehicle line
will be installed with a passive,
electronic engine immobilizer antitheft
device as standard equipment. Key
components of the antitheft device will
include an engine immobilizer, engine
control module (ECM), body control
module (BCM), security indicator light,
immobilizer antenna, Key FOB, and a
specially-designed key with a
microchip. Nissan stated its vehicle’s
security indicator light will be a
warning to a potential thief and an
added deterrence to a thief’s decision to
enter the vehicle. However, Nissan will
not provide any visible or audible
indication of unauthorized vehicle entry
(i.e., flashing lights and horn alarm) on
its Versa vehicle line.
Nissan’s submission is considered a
complete petition as required by 49 CFR
543.7, in that it meets the general
requirements contained in § 543.5 and
the specific content requirements of
§ 543.6.
In addressing the specific content
requirements of § 543.6, Nissan
provided information on the reliability
and durability of its proposed device.
Nissan stated its antitheft device is
tested for specific parameters to ensure
its reliability and durability. Nissan
provided a detailed list of tests
conducted and believes the device is
reliable and durable since the device
complied with its specified
requirements for each test. Nissan
further stated its immobilizer device
satisfies the European Directive ECE
R116, including requirements for
tamper resistance. Nissan also stated all
control units for the device are located
inside the vehicle, providing further
protection from unauthorized
accessibility of the device from outside
the vehicle.
Nissan stated activation of its
immobilizer device occurs
automatically when the ignition switch
is turned to the ‘‘OFF’’ position, which
then causes the security indicator light
to flash notifying the operator that the
immobilizer device is activated. Nissan
stated the immobilizer device prevents
normal operation of the vehicle without
using a specially–designed microchip
key with a pre-registered ‘‘Key-ID.’’
Nissan also stated that, when the brake
E:\FR\FM\22MRN1.SGM
22MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 56 (Friday, March 22, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 10891-10893]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-05446]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
Petition for Exemption From the Federal Motor Vehicle Theft
Prevention Standard; Porsche Cars North America, Inc.
AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA),
Department of Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Grant of petition for exemption.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document grants in full the Porsche Cars North America,
Inc.'s (Porsche) petition for exemption of the 2020 model year Taycan
vehicle line from the Federal Motor Vehicle Theft Prevention Standard
(Theft Prevention Standard). The petition is granted because the agency
has determined that the antitheft device to be placed on the line as
standard equipment is likely to be as effective in reducing and
deterring motor vehicle theft as compliance with the parts-marking
requirements of the Theft Prevention Standard.
DATES: The exemption granted by this notice is effective beginning with
the 2020 model year (MY).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Carlita Ballard, Office of
International Policy, Fuel Economy and Consumer Standards, NHTSA, West
Building, W43-439, NRM-310, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC
20590. Ms. Ballard's phone number is (202) 366-5222. Her fax number is
(202) 493-2990.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In a petition dated November 6, 2018,
Porsche requested an exemption from the parts-marking requirements of
the Theft Prevention Standard for its Taycan vehicle line beginning
with MY 2020. The petition requested exemption from parts-marking
pursuant to 49 CFR part 543, Exemption from Vehicle Theft Prevention
Standard, based on the installation of an antitheft device as standard
equipment for the entire vehicle line.
Under 49 CFR part 543.5(a), a manufacturer may petition NHTSA to
grant an exemption for one vehicle line per model year. In its
petition, Porsche provided a detailed description and diagram of the
identity, design, and location of the components of the antitheft
device for its Porsche Taycan
[[Page 10892]]
vehicle line. Porsche stated that the Taycan vehicle line will be
installed with a passive antitheft device as standard equipment on the
entire vehicle line. Porsche also stated that its vehicles will be
installed with a keyless go system that will consists of two major
subsystems: A microprocessor based immobilizer system that prevents the
power unit from functioning when the system is engaged and a
transmission control locking and alarm system. Key components of the
antitheft device will include a passive immobilizer, electronic
ignition switch, transponder key, remote control unit, alarm/central
locking control unit, engine control unit, transmission control unit
and an electronic parking brake. Porsche stated that it will offer a
keyless entry system as an option for its Taycan vehicle line. Porsche
also stated that its vehicle line will be installed with an audible and
visible alarm as standard equipment. Additionally, Porsche stated that
the central locking system works in conjunction with the audible and
visible alarm by locking the doors with the ignition key or the remote
control activating the audible and visible alarm. Porsche stated that
an ultrasonic sensor in the alarm system will monitor the doors, rear
luggage compartment, front deck lid, fuel filler door, and interior
movement. The horn will sound and the lights will flash if there is any
detection of unauthorized use.
Porsche stated that the immobilizer system cannot be disabled
unless an original key sends the proper code to the immobilizer system
instructing the engine management system via a code to begin
functioning again. The immobilizer is automatically activated after the
ignition is turned off from the dashboard control switch. The
immobilizer then returns to its normal ``off'' state, where engine
starting and transmission starting are not allowed. Starting the engine
and operation of the vehicle will be allowed only when the correct code
is sent to the control unit by using the correct key in the ignition
switch, or by having the correct keyless entry key within the occupant
compartment of the car. The ignition key contains a radio signal
transponder, which signals the control unit to allow the engine to be
started. With the keyless entry system, operation of the vehicle is
allowed when the ignition key is substituted with the special key that
contains a radio signal transmitter similar to the transponder in the
standard ignition key.
Porsche's submission is considered a complete petition as required
by 49 CFR 543.7 in that it meets the general requirements contained in
543.5 and the specific content requirements of 543.6.
In addressing the specific content requirements of 543.6, Porsche
provided information on the reliability and durability of its proposed
device. To ensure reliability and durability of the device, Porsche
conducted tests based on its own specified standards. Porsche provided
a detailed list of the tests conducted (i.e., extreme temperature
tests, voltage spike tests, reverse polarity tests, electromagnetic
interference tests, vibration test and endurance tests) and believes
that the device is reliable and durable since the device complied with
its specific requirements for each test. Additionally, Porsche stated
that the antitheft device also features a built-in self-diagnostic that
constantly checks for system failures. If a failure is detected, an
alarm indicator will signal the driver.
Porsche further states that disablement of the immobilizer is
virtually impossible. Disconnecting power to the antitheft device does
not affect the operation of the device. Once the antitheft device is
activated, the device stays activated until the correct key or optional
keyless entry key is used to instruct the engine management system
through the proper code to begin functioning again.
In further support of the reliability of its antitheft device,
Porsche informed the agency that it will continue to use the ``off-
board'' antitheft strategy that reduces the marketability of stolen
electronic components and making the theft of vehicles unattractive.
Specifically, Porsche stated that during the production of its vehicle,
the initialization and registration of various antitheft electronic
components are recorded in a central database. If the components have
to be repaired or replaced, authorized access to the database must be
obtained to receive authorization for the components. If authorized
access to the central database is unavailable or the database indicates
that the components are not authorized, further operation and use of
the vehicle will be restricted or impossible to obtain.
Porsche stated that its central locking system works in conjunction
with its audible and visible alarm. Locking the doors with the ignition
key, the remote control or a door switch (with the keyless entry
option) will also activate the audible and visible alarm. Porsche also
stated that the immobilizer cannot be disabled by manipulation of the
door locks or central-locking system because the locks/locking system
are incapable of sending the code needed to disable the device.
As an additional feature, Porsche stated that it will also
incorporate an electronically activated parking brake on the Taycan
vehicle which is electronically activated and integrated into the
vehicle's antitheft device. Porsche stated that if the control unit
does not receive the correct code from the ignition key or keyless
entry key, the parking brake will remain activated and the vehicle
cannot be towed away.
Since the Porsche Taycan is a new vehicle line, there is currently
no available theft rate data published by the agency for the vehicle
line. However, Porsche provided data on the effectiveness of other
similar antitheft devices that have been installed on its 911 and
Boxster/Cayman vehicle lines in support of its belief that its proposed
device will be at least as effective as those comparable devices
previously granted exemptions by the agency. Porsche's data showed that
the theft rate for the 911 and Boxster/Cayman vehicle lines remained
consistently low over a three-year period. Using an average of 3 MYs'
theft data (2012-2014), the theft rates for the Boxster/Cayman, Porsche
911 and Panamera vehicle lines are 0.4917, 0.6009 and 2.6518,
respectively. Porsche stated that its off-board antitheft concept,
similar in concept to parts-marking will further reduce the demand for
stolen Porsche vehicle components. Based on the experience of these
vehicle lines, Porsche has concluded that the antitheft device proposed
for its Porsche Taycan vehicle line is no less effective than those
devices in lines for which NHTSA has already granted full exemption
from the parts-marking requirements.
Based on the supporting evidence submitted by Porsche, the agency
believes that the antitheft device for the Taycan vehicle line is
likely to be as effective in reducing and deterring motor vehicle theft
as compliance with the parts-marking requirements of the Theft
Prevention Standard (49 CFR part 541).
Pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 33106 and 49 CFR 543.7(b), the agency grants
a petition for exemption from the parts-marking requirements of Part
541, either in whole or in part, if it determines that, based upon
substantial evidence, the standard equipment antitheft device is likely
to be as effective in reducing and deterring motor vehicle theft as
compliance with the parts-marking requirements of Part 541. The agency
finds that Porsche has provided adequate reasons for its belief that
the antitheft device for the Porsche Taycan vehicle line is likely to
be as effective in reducing and deterring motor vehicle theft as
compliance with the parts-
[[Page 10893]]
marking requirements of the Theft Prevention Standard (49 CFR part
541). This conclusion is based on the information Porsche provided
about its device.
The agency concludes that the device will provide the five types of
performance listed in 543.6(a)(3): Promoting activation; attracting
attention to the efforts of unauthorized persons to enter or operate a
vehicle by means other than a key; preventing defeat or circumvention
of the device by unauthorized persons; preventing operation of the
vehicle by unauthorized entrants; and ensuring the reliability and
durability of the device.
The agency notes that 49 CFR part 541, Appendix A-1, identifies
those lines that are exempted from the Theft Prevention Standard for a
given model year. 49 CFR part 543.7(f) contains publication
requirements incident to the disposition of all Part 543 petitions.
Advanced listing, including the release of future product nameplates,
the beginning model year for which the petition is granted and a
general description of the antitheft device is necessary in order to
notify law enforcement agencies of new vehicle lines exempted from the
parts marking requirements of the Theft Prevention Standard.
If Porsche decides not to use the exemption for this line, it
should formally notify the agency. If such a decision is made, the line
must be fully marked according to the requirements under 49 CFR parts
541.5 and 541.6 (marking of major component parts and replacement
parts).
NHTSA notes that if Porsche wishes in the future to modify the
device on which this exemption is based, the company may have to submit
a petition to modify the exemption. Part 543.7(d) states that a Part
543 exemption applies only to vehicles that belong to a line exempted
under this part and equipped with the antitheft device on which the
line's exemption is based. Further, Part 543.10(c)(2) provides for the
submission of petitions ``to modify an exemption to permit the use of
an antitheft device similar to but differing from the one specified in
that exemption.''
The agency wishes to minimize the administrative burden that Part
543.10(c)(2) could place on exempted vehicle manufacturers and itself.
The agency did not intend in drafting Part 543 to require the
submission of a modification petition for every change to the
components or design of an antitheft device. The significance of many
such changes could be de minimis. Therefore, NHTSA suggests that if the
manufacturer contemplates making any changes, the effects of which
might be characterized as de minimis, it should consult the agency
before preparing and submitting a petition to modify.
For the foregoing reasons, the agency hereby grants in full
Porsche's petition for exemption for the Porsche Taycan vehicle line
from the parts-marking requirements of 49 CFR part 541, beginning with
its model year (MY) 2020 vehicles.
Issued in Washington, DC, under authority delegated in 49 CFR
1.95 and 501.8.
Raymond R. Posten,
Associate Administrator for Rulemaking.
[FR Doc. 2019-05446 Filed 3-21-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-59-P