Submission and Consideration of Petitions for Duty Suspensions and Reductions, 9273-9276 [2019-04095]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 50 / Thursday, March 14, 2019 / Proposed Rules
some of the requirements contained in
this rule.
[FR Doc. 2018–27324 Filed 3–13–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6750–01–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
19 CFR Part 220
Submission and Consideration of
Petitions for Duty Suspensions and
Reductions
United States International
Trade Commission.
ACTION: Proposed amendments to rule
with request for comments.
AGENCY:
The United States
International Trade Commission
(Commission) proposes to amend Part
220 of its Rules of Practice and
Procedure. Part 220 governs the
submission and consideration of
petitions for duty suspensions and
reductions under the American
Manufacturing Competitiveness Act of
2016. The amendments are necessary to
clarify certain provisions and address
concerns that have arisen in
Commission practice.
DATES: To be assured of consideration,
written comments must be received by
5:15 p.m.: April 15, 2019.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by docket number MISC–046,
Rulemaking Regarding Petitions for
Duty Suspensions/Reductions, by any of
the following methods:
—Federal eRulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
—Agency Website: https://
edis.usitc.gov. Follow the instructions
for submitting comments on the
website.
—Mail: For paper submission. U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E
Street SW, Room 112A, Washington, DC
20436.
—Hand Delivery/Courier: U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E
Street SW, Room 112A, Washington, DC
20436. From the hours of 8:45 a.m. to
5:15 p.m.
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the agency name and
docket number (MISC–046, Rulemaking
Regarding Petitions for Duty
Suspensions/Reductions), along with a
cover letter stating the nature of the
commenter’s interest in the proposed
rulemaking. All comments received will
be posted, without change, to https://
edis.usitc.gov including any personal
information provided. For paper copies,
a signed original and 8 copies of each
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:06 Mar 13, 2019
Jkt 247001
set of comments should be submitted to
Lisa R. Barton, Secretary, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E
Street SW, Room 112A, Washington, DC
20436.
For access to the docket to read
background documents or comments
received, go to https://edis.usitc.gov
and/or the U.S. International Trade
Commission, 500 E Street SW, Room
112A, Washington, DC 20436.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lisa
R. Barton, Secretary, telephone (202)
205–2000 or William Gearhart, Esquire,
Office of the General Counsel, United
States International Trade Commission,
telephone (202) 205–3091. Hearingimpaired individuals are advised that
information on this matter can be
obtained by contacting the
Commission’s TDD terminal at 202–
205–1810. General information
concerning the Commission may also be
obtained by accessing its website at
https://www.usitc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
preamble below is designed to assist
readers in understanding these
proposed amendments to the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure (the Rules). This preamble
provides background information, a
regulatory analysis of the amendments,
a section-by-section explanation of the
amendments, and a description of the
amendments to the Rules. The
Commission encourages members of the
public to comment on whether the
language of the amendments is
sufficiently clear for users to
understand, and to submit any other
comments they wish to make on the
amendments.
These amendments are being
promulgated in accordance with the
Administrative Procedure Act (5 U.S.C.
553) (APA). If the Commission decides
to proceed with this rulemaking after
reviewing the comments filed in
response to this notice, the proposed
rule revisions will be promulgated in
accordance with the applicable
requirements of the APA and will be
codified in 19 CFR part 220.
Background
Section 335 of the Tariff Act of 1930
(19 U.S.C. 1335) authorizes the
Commission to adopt such reasonable
procedures, rules and regulations as it
deems necessary to carry out its
functions and duties. In addition,
section 3(b)(5) of the American
Manufacturing Competitiveness Act of
2016 (19 U.S.C. 1332 note) (the Act)
directs the Commission to prescribe and
publish in the Federal Register, and on
a publicly available internet website of
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
9273
the Commission, procedures to be
complied with by members of the public
submitting petitions for duty
suspensions and reductions under
section 3(b)(1)(A) of that Act.
The Commission is amending its rules
governing the submission and
consideration of petitions for duty
suspensions and reductions under the
Act. Section 3 of the Act establishes a
process for the submission and
consideration of petitions for duty
suspensions and reductions. More
specifically, it directs the Commission
to publish notices, not later than
October 15, 2016, and October 15, 2019,
that requests members of the public to
submit petitions to the Commission for
duty suspensions and reductions,
provided they can demonstrate that they
are likely beneficiaries of such duty
suspensions or reductions. The Act also
provides that the petitioners must
submit disclosure forms with respect to
such duty suspensions and reductions.
The petitions and disclosure forms must
be submitted during the 60-day period
beginning on the date of publication of
the Commission’s notices. Section 3 of
the Act also lists the types of
information that must be included in a
petition.
Section 3 of the Act requires that the
Commission publish on its website all
petitions that contain the required
information and the related disclosure
forms no later than 30 days after the
close of the 60-day filing period. It also
provides that members of the public
will have 45 days from the date of the
notice’s publication to submit
comments to the Commission regarding
the petitions and disclosure forms. The
Commission must make those
comments available to the public on the
Commission’s website.
The Commission adopted the rules it
is amending as a final rule effective
December 26, 2018 (see notice
published in the Federal Register on
December 26, 2018 (83 FR 66102)). In so
doing the Commission adopted, without
change, the interim rule published in
the Federal Register on September 30,
2016 (61 FR 67144). In its notice
promulgating the interim rule, the
Commission invited interested parties to
file comments on the interim rule; no
comments were filed. In its notice of
final rulemaking published on
December 26, 2018, the Commission
stated that it may propose several
amendments to this final rule.
These amendments modify the text of
sections 220.5, 220.6, 220.7, 220.9,
220.10, and 220.11 of Part 220. In
addition, these amendments redesignate current sections 220.11,
220.12, 220.13, and 220.14 as sections
E:\FR\FM\14MRP1.SGM
14MRP1
9274
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 50 / Thursday, March 14, 2019 / Proposed Rules
220.12, 220.13, 220.14, and 220.15,
respectively. The Commission is
inviting comments only on the changes
in the text of the above rule sections.
The changes principally (1) require
petitions to include certain additional
information to assist the Commission in
evaluating a petition, (2) clarify and
provide additional instruction with
respect to information to be included in
a petition, (3) revise the requirement
regarding the time when a petition may
be withdrawn. The changes also divide
section 220.11 into two sections, section
220.11 and section 220.12, and
renumber current sections 220.12
through 220.14.
Procedure for Adopting the Proposed
Amendments
Consistent with its ordinary practice,
the Commission is issuing these
proposed amendments in accordance
with the notice-and-comment
rulemaking procedure in section 553 of
the Administrative Procedure Act (APA)
(5 U.S.C. 553). That procedure entails
the following steps: (1) Publication of a
notice of proposed rulemaking; (2)
solicitation of public comments on the
proposed amendments; (3) Commission
review of public comments on the
proposed amendments, and (4)
publication of final amendments at least
30 days prior to their effective date.
Regulatory Analysis of Proposed
Amendments to the Commission’s Rules
The Commission has determined that
these proposed amendments to the rules
do not meet the criteria described in
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866
(58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and thus
do not constitute a ‘‘significant
regulatory action’’ for purposes of the
Executive Order.
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.) is inapplicable to this
rulemaking because it is not one for
which a notice of proposed rulemaking
is required under 5 U.S.C. 553(b) or any
other statute. Although the Commission
has chosen to publish a notice of
proposed rulemaking, these proposed
regulations are ‘‘agency rules of
procedure and practice,’’ and thus are
exempt from the notice requirement
imposed by 5 U.S.C. 553(b).
These proposed rules do not contain
federalism implications warranting the
preparation of a federalism summary
impact statement pursuant to Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, Aug. 4,
1999).
No actions are necessary under title II
of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995, Public Law 104–4 (2 U.S.C.
1531–1538) because the proposed
amendments to the rules will not result
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:06 Mar 13, 2019
Jkt 247001
in the expenditure by state, local, and
tribal governments, in the aggregate, or
by the private sector, of $100,000,000 or
more in any one year (adjusted annually
for inflation), and will not significantly
or uniquely affect small governments, as
defined in 5 U.S.C. 601(5).
The proposed rules are not ‘‘major
rules’’ as defined by section 251 of the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (5 U.S.C. 801 et
seq.). Moreover, they are exempt from
the reporting requirements of that Act
because they contain rules of agency
organization, procedure, or practice that
do not substantially affect the rights or
obligations of non-agency parties.
The Commission previously
submitted an information collection
request for its secure web portal for the
Miscellaneous Tariff Bills Petition
System to the Office of Management and
Budget for Paperwork Reduction Act
clearance. See 81 FR 58531 (Aug. 25,
2016). The Commission received the
appropriate clearance. However, this
clearance expires on September 30,
2019, and the Commission will be
seeking a new clearance. The
Commission intends to process the
information it collects consistent with
these rules as amended, and the
Commission intends to obtain the
appropriate clearance required by the
Paperwork Reduction Act before it
begins its next information collection on
October 15, 2019.
Section-by-Section Explanation of the
Proposed Amendments
Part 220—Process for Consideration of
Petitions for Duty Suspensions and
Reductions
Sections 220.1 through 220.4 of part
220, which refer, respectively, to the
applicability of this part, set out
applicable definitions, and state who
may file a petition and the time for
filing, are not changed.
Section 220.5 lists the types of
information that must be set forth in a
petition. The amendment modifies
section 220.5 in five respects. First, it
amends section 220.5(e)(1) to clarify
that the U.S. Customs and Border
Protection (CBP) ruling requested
should be one that indicates CBP’s
classification of the article. Second, it
divides section 220.5(h) into two parts.
New paragraph (1) requires petitions to
include an estimate of both total value
and, in addition, dutiable value in U.S.
dollars for the next 5 calendar years,
and new paragraph (2) requires petitions
to include an estimate of the share of
total imports represented by the
petitioner’s imports of the subject
article. Third, the amendment modifies
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
section 220.5(j) to require that the
petition include ‘‘The names of any
domestic producers of the article, if
available.’’ Fourth, it adds a new
subsection (n) that requires the petition
to include a certification that the
information supplied in the petition is
complete and correct to the best of the
petitioner’s knowledge and belief and
that the petitioner understands that the
information submitted is subject to
audit and verification by the
Commission. Fifth, it re-designates
existing subsection (n) as subsection (o).
Section 220.6 describes the
information that should be included in
the description of the article for which
a duty suspension or reduction is being
sought. The Commission proposes to
amend section 220.6(a)(4) to delete
current wording that requires that the
description be ‘‘sufficiently clear as to
be administrable by CBP.’’ The
Commission would substitute more
specific wording that requires the
petition to describe the article based on
the existing Harmonized Tariff Schedule
(HTS) category’s description (at the 8- or
10-digit level) in HTS chapters 1
through 97, or to delineate an article
representing a subset of the coverage of
the applicable HTS category using
terminology already included in the
HTS or interpreted in pertinent CBP
rulings.
Section 220.7 describes what
constitutes a properly filed petition and
describes how the Commission will
treat identical and overlapping petitions
filed by the same petitioner. The
Commission proposes to make two
changes to this section. First, it proposes
to expand the title of the rule section to
indicate that the rule also applies to
identical and overlapping petitions filed
by the same petitioner. Second, it
proposes to amend section 220.7(b)(2) to
delete the word ‘‘generally.’’ Section
220.7(b)(2) currently states that when a
petitioner has filed one or more
identical or overlapping petitions, the
Commission will ‘‘generally’’ consider
the earliest filed pending petition to be
the petition of record, leaving open the
possibility that the Commission might
consider a different petition for another
reason. In the few instances in which
the Commission received a petition that
fell into this category during the 2016
filing period, the Commission
considered the earliest filed petition to
be the petition of record. This change
removes any uncertainty.
Section 220.8 states that, in the case
of petitions for identical or overlapping
articles received from multiple
petitioners, the Commission may
consolidate those petitions and publish
a single recommendation. The
E:\FR\FM\14MRP1.SGM
14MRP1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 50 / Thursday, March 14, 2019 / Proposed Rules
Commission is not proposing any
changes.
Section 220.9 addresses withdrawal of
petitions, submission of new petitions,
and amendments to petitions. The
Commission proposes to amend section
220.9(a), which currently states that a
petitioner may withdraw a petition at
any time prior to the time the
Commission transmits its final report to
Congress. The Commission proposes to
revise this subsection to state that a
petitioner may withdraw a petition ‘‘no
later than 30 days after the Commission
submits its preliminary report.’’
Current section 220.10 addresses
Commission publication and public
availability of petitions and opportunity
for the public to comment on such
petitions. The Commission proposes to
divide section 220.10 into two separate
sections, with section 220.10 retitled
‘‘Commission publication and public
availability of petitions,’’ and new
section 220.11 titled ‘‘Public comment
period.’’ Revised section 220.10 tracks
the text of current section 220.10(a). The
Commission proposes to delete the title
of subsection (a) of current 220.10 and
incorporate it into the new title of
section 220.10.
New section 220.11, titled as ‘‘Public
comment period,’’ contains four
subsections. New subsection (a), ‘‘Time
for filing,’’ largely tracks the wording in
current section 220.10(b). New
subsection (b) includes a list of
information items that must be included
in a comment, including certain
information about the commenter; a
statement about whether the comment
supports, opposes, or takes no position
on the petition; and a certification
statement. It also refers commenters to
the Commission’s Handbook on MTB
Filing Procedures and requires that
commenters comply with those
requirements. New subsection (c) sets
out a list of requirements that apply to
comments from domestic producers.
Comments must include: (1) A
description of the product alleged to be
identical, like, or directly competitive
with the product that is the subject of
the petition; (2) the Chemical Abstracts
Services registry number (if any); (3)
certain information about production or
likely production of an identical, like, or
directly competitive article within the
United States; (4) information relating to
commercial availability; (5) addresses
for the locations of U.S. production
facilities; and (6) evidence
demonstrating the existence of domestic
production and citing possible
examples. Subsection (d) states that the
Commission may provide additional
opportunity for public comment and, if
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:06 Mar 13, 2019
Jkt 247001
9275
it does so, will publish notice of that
opportunity in the Federal Register.
The Commission proposes to redesignate current section 220.11 as
section 220.12. The section describes
the contents of the Commission’s
preliminary report to the Committees.
The Commission proposes only one
change: It would delete the
parenthetical in subsection (b)(2) that
relates to corrections of article
descriptions.
The Commission proposes to redesignate current section 220.12 as
section 220.13. The section describes
the timing and content of Commission
final reports. The Commission is not
proposing any other changes to this
section.
The Commission proposes to redesignate current section 220.13 as
section 220.14. The section describes
the treatment of confidential business
information. The Commission is not
proposing any other changes to this
section.
The Commission proposes to redesignate current section 220.14 as
section 220.15. The section identifies
certain rules in subpart B of part 201 of
subchapter A of chapter II that would
not apply to Commission proceedings
under part 220 of subchapter D of
chapter II. The Commission is not
proposing any other changes to this
section.
(2) A copy of other CBP
documentation indicating where the
article is classified in the HTS.
*
*
*
*
*
(h) For each HTS number included in
the article description,
(1) An estimate of the total and
dutiable value (in United States dollars)
of imports of the article covered by the
petition for the calendar year preceding
the year in which the petition is filed,
for the calendar year in which the
petition is filed, and for each of the 5
calendar years after the calendar year in
which the petition is filed, including an
estimate of the value of such imports by
the person who submits the petition and
by any other importers, if available, and
(2) An estimate of the share of total
imports represented by the petitioner’s
imports of the article that is the subject
of the petition.
*
*
*
*
*
(j) The names of any domestic
producers of the article, if available.
*
*
*
*
*
(n) A certification from the petitioner
that the information supplied is
complete and correct to the best of the
petitioner’s knowledge and belief, and
an acknowledgement from the petitioner
that the information submitted is subject
to audit and verification by the
Commission.
■ 3. Amend § 220.6 by revising
paragraph (a)(4) to read as follows:
List of Subjects in 19 CFR Part 220
§ 220.6
Administrative practice and
procedure, miscellaneous tariff bills.
For the reasons stated in the
preamble, the United States
International Trade Commission
proposes to amend 19 CFR part 220 to
read as follows:
(a) * * *
(4) describes all of the merchandise
covered by the article’s permanent
subheading in chapter 1 through 97 by
setting forth that subheading’s article
description, or describes a clearly
delineated subset of that coverage,
which may comprise the description of
one or more statistical reporting
numbers of the applicable subheading,
and
*
*
*
*
*
■ 4. Amend § 220.7 by revising the
section heading and paragraph (b)(2) to
read as follows:
PART 220—PROCESS FOR
CONSIDERATION OF PETITIONS FOR
DUTY SUSPENSIONS AND
REDUCTIONS
1. The authority citation for part 220
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 19 U.S.C. 1335; Pub. L. 114–
159, 130 Stat. 396 (19 U.S.C. 1332 note).
2. Amend § 220.5 by revising
paragraphs (e), (h), (j), re-designating
paragraph (n) as paragraph (o), and
adding a new paragraph (n) to read as
follows:
■
§ 220.5
Contents of petition.
*
*
*
*
*
(e) To the extent available—
(1) A classification ruling of U.S.
Customs and Border Protection (CBP)
that indicates CBP’s classification of the
article; and
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Article description.
§ 220.7 Properly filed petition; identical
and overlapping petitions from same
petitioner.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(2) Should the Commission find that
a petitioner has filed one or more
identical or overlapping petitions and
that such earlier filed petitions have not
been withdrawn, the Commission will
consider the earliest filed pending
petition to be the petition of the
petitioner.
■ 5. Amend § 220.9 by revising
paragraph (a) to read as follows:
E:\FR\FM\14MRP1.SGM
14MRP1
9276
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 50 / Thursday, March 14, 2019 / Proposed Rules
§ 220.9 Withdrawal of petitions,
amendments to petitions.
(a) Withdrawal of petitions. A
petitioner may withdraw a petition for
duty suspension or reduction filed
under this part no later than 30 days
after the Commission submits its
preliminary report, as described in
§ 220.12. It shall do so by notifying the
Commission through the Commission’s
designated secure web portal of its
withdrawal and the notification shall
include the name of the petitioner, the
Commission identification number for
the petition, and the HTS number for
the article concerned.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 6. Revise § 220.10 to read as follows:
§ 220.10 Commission publication and
public availability of petitions.
Not later than 30 days after expiration
of the 60-day period for filing petitions
for duty suspensions and reductions,
the Commission will publish on its
website the petitions for duty
suspensions and reductions submitted
under § 220.3 that were timely filed and
contain the information required under
§ 220.5. When circumstances allow, the
Commission may post such petitions on
its website earlier than 30 days after
expiration of the 60-day period for filing
petitions.
■ 7. Re-designate §§ 220.11 through
220.14 as §§ 220.12 through 220.15 and
add a new § 220.11 to read as follows:
§ 220.11
Public comment period
(a) Time for filing. Not later than 30
days after expiration of the 60-day
period for filing petitions, the
Commission will also publish in the
Federal Register and on its website a
notice requesting members of the public
to submit comments on the petitions for
duty suspensions and reductions. To be
considered, such comments must be
filed through the Commission’s secure
web portal during the 45-day period
following publication of the
Commission’s notice requesting
comments from members of the public.
For purposes of this section, all
petitions posted by the Commission on
its website, whether or not posted early,
shall be deemed to be officially
published by the Commission on its
website on the date of publication of the
notice seeking written comments from
members of the public on the petitions.
(b) In general. The comment shall
include the following information:
(1) The name, telephone number, and
postal and email address of the
commenter, and if appropriate, its
representative in the matter,
(2) A statement as to whether the
commenter is a U.S. producer, importer,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:06 Mar 13, 2019
Jkt 247001
government entity, trade association or
group, or other,
(3) A statement as to whether the
comment supports the petition; objects
to the petition; or takes no position with
respect to the petitions/provides other
comment,
(4) If the commenter is an importer, a
list of the leading source countries of
the product,
(5) A certification from the
commenter that the information
supplied is complete and correct to the
best of the commenter’s knowledge and
belief, and an acknowledgement from
the commenter that the information
submitted is subject to audit and
verification by the Commission,
(6) Comments, including any
attachments thereto, must comply with
the Commission’s Handbook on MTB
Filing Procedures as posted on the
Commission’s website.
(c) Comments from domestic
producers. Comments from a firm
claiming to be a domestic producer, as
defined in § 220.2(g), shall also include:
(1) A description of the product
alleged to be identical, like, or directly
competitive with the product that is the
subject of the petition,
(2) The Chemical Abstracts Service
registry number for the product (if
applicable),
(3) A statement as to whether an
identical, like, or directly competitive
product was produced in the current
calendar year and, if not, the year in
which the product was last produced or
in which production is expected to
begin within the United States,
(4) A statement as to whether such
product is commercially available and,
if not commercially available, an
explanation of its lack of availability,
(5) The physical address(es) for the
location(s) of the production facility(ies)
producing the product within the
United States, and
(6) Evidence demonstrating the
existence of domestic production (e.g.,
catalogs, press releases, marketing
materials, specification sheets, copies of
orders for the product).
(d) The Commission may provide
additional opportunity for public
comment and, if so, will announce that
comment period in the Federal Register.
■ 8. Amend newly re-designated
§ 220.12 by revising paragraph (b)(2) to
read as follows:
§ 220.12
Commission preliminary report.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(2) A list of petitions for duty
suspensions and reductions for which
the Commission recommends technical
corrections in order to meet the
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
requirements of the Act, with the
correction specified.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 9. Amend newly re-designated
§ 220.13 by revising the section heading
to read as follows:
§ 220.13
Commission final report.
10. Amend newly re-designated
§ 220.14 by revising the section heading
to read as follows:
■
§ 220.14 Confidential business
information.
11. Amend newly re-designated
§ 220.15 by revising the section heading
to read as follows:
■
§ 220.15
rules.
Application of other Commission
By order of the Commission.
Issued: March 1, 2019.
Katherine Hiner,
Acting Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2019–04095 Filed 3–13–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
47 CFR Part 64
[CG Docket Nos. 03–123 and 13–24; FCC
19–11]
IP CTS Improvements and Program
Management
Federal Communications
Commission.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
In this document, the
Commission proposes to require IP CTS
providers to include user account
identifiers in monthly call records
submitted for compensation; allow new
IP CTS users to receive service for up to
two weeks, while their identities are
verified in the User Registration
Database; and simplify the handling of
911 calls placed by IP CTS users who
connect to an IP CTS provider via the
internet in order to place a call. These
proposals will improve IP CTS by better
facilitating compensation of providers
by the TRS Fund administrator,
preventing unnecessary inconvenience
to IP CTS registrants seeking new
service, and eliminating outdated 911
rules that no longer appear to serve a
valid public safety purpose.
DATES: Comments are due April 15,
2019. Reply comments are due April 29,
2019.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by CG Docket Nos. 03–123
and 13–24, by either of the following
methods:
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\14MRP1.SGM
14MRP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 50 (Thursday, March 14, 2019)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 9273-9276]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-04095]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
19 CFR Part 220
Submission and Consideration of Petitions for Duty Suspensions
and Reductions
AGENCY: United States International Trade Commission.
ACTION: Proposed amendments to rule with request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The United States International Trade Commission (Commission)
proposes to amend Part 220 of its Rules of Practice and Procedure. Part
220 governs the submission and consideration of petitions for duty
suspensions and reductions under the American Manufacturing
Competitiveness Act of 2016. The amendments are necessary to clarify
certain provisions and address concerns that have arisen in Commission
practice.
DATES: To be assured of consideration, written comments must be
received by 5:15 p.m.: April 15, 2019.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by docket number MISC-
046, Rulemaking Regarding Petitions for Duty Suspensions/Reductions, by
any of the following methods:
--Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov. Follow
the instructions for submitting comments.
--Agency Website: https://edis.usitc.gov. Follow the instructions
for submitting comments on the website.
--Mail: For paper submission. U.S. International Trade Commission,
500 E Street SW, Room 112A, Washington, DC 20436.
--Hand Delivery/Courier: U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E
Street SW, Room 112A, Washington, DC 20436. From the hours of 8:45 a.m.
to 5:15 p.m.
Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency name
and docket number (MISC-046, Rulemaking Regarding Petitions for Duty
Suspensions/Reductions), along with a cover letter stating the nature
of the commenter's interest in the proposed rulemaking. All comments
received will be posted, without change, to https://edis.usitc.gov
including any personal information provided. For paper copies, a signed
original and 8 copies of each set of comments should be submitted to
Lisa R. Barton, Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E
Street SW, Room 112A, Washington, DC 20436.
For access to the docket to read background documents or comments
received, go to https://edis.usitc.gov and/or the U.S. International
Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, Room 112A, Washington, DC 20436.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lisa R. Barton, Secretary, telephone
(202) 205-2000 or William Gearhart, Esquire, Office of the General
Counsel, United States International Trade Commission, telephone (202)
205-3091. Hearing-impaired individuals are advised that information on
this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal
at 202-205-1810. General information concerning the Commission may also
be obtained by accessing its website at https://www.usitc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The preamble below is designed to assist
readers in understanding these proposed amendments to the Commission's
Rules of Practice and Procedure (the Rules). This preamble provides
background information, a regulatory analysis of the amendments, a
section-by-section explanation of the amendments, and a description of
the amendments to the Rules. The Commission encourages members of the
public to comment on whether the language of the amendments is
sufficiently clear for users to understand, and to submit any other
comments they wish to make on the amendments.
These amendments are being promulgated in accordance with the
Administrative Procedure Act (5 U.S.C. 553) (APA). If the Commission
decides to proceed with this rulemaking after reviewing the comments
filed in response to this notice, the proposed rule revisions will be
promulgated in accordance with the applicable requirements of the APA
and will be codified in 19 CFR part 220.
Background
Section 335 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1335) authorizes
the Commission to adopt such reasonable procedures, rules and
regulations as it deems necessary to carry out its functions and
duties. In addition, section 3(b)(5) of the American Manufacturing
Competitiveness Act of 2016 (19 U.S.C. 1332 note) (the Act) directs the
Commission to prescribe and publish in the Federal Register, and on a
publicly available internet website of the Commission, procedures to be
complied with by members of the public submitting petitions for duty
suspensions and reductions under section 3(b)(1)(A) of that Act.
The Commission is amending its rules governing the submission and
consideration of petitions for duty suspensions and reductions under
the Act. Section 3 of the Act establishes a process for the submission
and consideration of petitions for duty suspensions and reductions.
More specifically, it directs the Commission to publish notices, not
later than October 15, 2016, and October 15, 2019, that requests
members of the public to submit petitions to the Commission for duty
suspensions and reductions, provided they can demonstrate that they are
likely beneficiaries of such duty suspensions or reductions. The Act
also provides that the petitioners must submit disclosure forms with
respect to such duty suspensions and reductions. The petitions and
disclosure forms must be submitted during the 60-day period beginning
on the date of publication of the Commission's notices. Section 3 of
the Act also lists the types of information that must be included in a
petition.
Section 3 of the Act requires that the Commission publish on its
website all petitions that contain the required information and the
related disclosure forms no later than 30 days after the close of the
60-day filing period. It also provides that members of the public will
have 45 days from the date of the notice's publication to submit
comments to the Commission regarding the petitions and disclosure
forms. The Commission must make those comments available to the public
on the Commission's website.
The Commission adopted the rules it is amending as a final rule
effective December 26, 2018 (see notice published in the Federal
Register on December 26, 2018 (83 FR 66102)). In so doing the
Commission adopted, without change, the interim rule published in the
Federal Register on September 30, 2016 (61 FR 67144). In its notice
promulgating the interim rule, the Commission invited interested
parties to file comments on the interim rule; no comments were filed.
In its notice of final rulemaking published on December 26, 2018, the
Commission stated that it may propose several amendments to this final
rule.
These amendments modify the text of sections 220.5, 220.6, 220.7,
220.9, 220.10, and 220.11 of Part 220. In addition, these amendments
re-designate current sections 220.11, 220.12, 220.13, and 220.14 as
sections
[[Page 9274]]
220.12, 220.13, 220.14, and 220.15, respectively. The Commission is
inviting comments only on the changes in the text of the above rule
sections.
The changes principally (1) require petitions to include certain
additional information to assist the Commission in evaluating a
petition, (2) clarify and provide additional instruction with respect
to information to be included in a petition, (3) revise the requirement
regarding the time when a petition may be withdrawn. The changes also
divide section 220.11 into two sections, section 220.11 and section
220.12, and renumber current sections 220.12 through 220.14.
Procedure for Adopting the Proposed Amendments
Consistent with its ordinary practice, the Commission is issuing
these proposed amendments in accordance with the notice-and-comment
rulemaking procedure in section 553 of the Administrative Procedure Act
(APA) (5 U.S.C. 553). That procedure entails the following steps: (1)
Publication of a notice of proposed rulemaking; (2) solicitation of
public comments on the proposed amendments; (3) Commission review of
public comments on the proposed amendments, and (4) publication of
final amendments at least 30 days prior to their effective date.
Regulatory Analysis of Proposed Amendments to the Commission's Rules
The Commission has determined that these proposed amendments to the
rules do not meet the criteria described in section 3(f) of Executive
Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and thus do not constitute a
``significant regulatory action'' for purposes of the Executive Order.
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.) is
inapplicable to this rulemaking because it is not one for which a
notice of proposed rulemaking is required under 5 U.S.C. 553(b) or any
other statute. Although the Commission has chosen to publish a notice
of proposed rulemaking, these proposed regulations are ``agency rules
of procedure and practice,'' and thus are exempt from the notice
requirement imposed by 5 U.S.C. 553(b).
These proposed rules do not contain federalism implications
warranting the preparation of a federalism summary impact statement
pursuant to Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, Aug. 4, 1999).
No actions are necessary under title II of the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act of 1995, Public Law 104-4 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538) because the
proposed amendments to the rules will not result in the expenditure by
state, local, and tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector, of $100,000,000 or more in any one year (adjusted
annually for inflation), and will not significantly or uniquely affect
small governments, as defined in 5 U.S.C. 601(5).
The proposed rules are not ``major rules'' as defined by section
251 of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996
(5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.). Moreover, they are exempt from the reporting
requirements of that Act because they contain rules of agency
organization, procedure, or practice that do not substantially affect
the rights or obligations of non-agency parties.
The Commission previously submitted an information collection
request for its secure web portal for the Miscellaneous Tariff Bills
Petition System to the Office of Management and Budget for Paperwork
Reduction Act clearance. See 81 FR 58531 (Aug. 25, 2016). The
Commission received the appropriate clearance. However, this clearance
expires on September 30, 2019, and the Commission will be seeking a new
clearance. The Commission intends to process the information it
collects consistent with these rules as amended, and the Commission
intends to obtain the appropriate clearance required by the Paperwork
Reduction Act before it begins its next information collection on
October 15, 2019.
Section-by-Section Explanation of the Proposed Amendments
Part 220--Process for Consideration of Petitions for Duty Suspensions
and Reductions
Sections 220.1 through 220.4 of part 220, which refer,
respectively, to the applicability of this part, set out applicable
definitions, and state who may file a petition and the time for filing,
are not changed.
Section 220.5 lists the types of information that must be set forth
in a petition. The amendment modifies section 220.5 in five respects.
First, it amends section 220.5(e)(1) to clarify that the U.S. Customs
and Border Protection (CBP) ruling requested should be one that
indicates CBP's classification of the article. Second, it divides
section 220.5(h) into two parts. New paragraph (1) requires petitions
to include an estimate of both total value and, in addition, dutiable
value in U.S. dollars for the next 5 calendar years, and new paragraph
(2) requires petitions to include an estimate of the share of total
imports represented by the petitioner's imports of the subject article.
Third, the amendment modifies section 220.5(j) to require that the
petition include ``The names of any domestic producers of the article,
if available.'' Fourth, it adds a new subsection (n) that requires the
petition to include a certification that the information supplied in
the petition is complete and correct to the best of the petitioner's
knowledge and belief and that the petitioner understands that the
information submitted is subject to audit and verification by the
Commission. Fifth, it re-designates existing subsection (n) as
subsection (o).
Section 220.6 describes the information that should be included in
the description of the article for which a duty suspension or reduction
is being sought. The Commission proposes to amend section 220.6(a)(4)
to delete current wording that requires that the description be
``sufficiently clear as to be administrable by CBP.'' The Commission
would substitute more specific wording that requires the petition to
describe the article based on the existing Harmonized Tariff Schedule
(HTS) category's description (at the 8- or 10-digit level) in HTS
chapters 1 through 97, or to delineate an article representing a subset
of the coverage of the applicable HTS category using terminology
already included in the HTS or interpreted in pertinent CBP rulings.
Section 220.7 describes what constitutes a properly filed petition
and describes how the Commission will treat identical and overlapping
petitions filed by the same petitioner. The Commission proposes to make
two changes to this section. First, it proposes to expand the title of
the rule section to indicate that the rule also applies to identical
and overlapping petitions filed by the same petitioner. Second, it
proposes to amend section 220.7(b)(2) to delete the word ``generally.''
Section 220.7(b)(2) currently states that when a petitioner has filed
one or more identical or overlapping petitions, the Commission will
``generally'' consider the earliest filed pending petition to be the
petition of record, leaving open the possibility that the Commission
might consider a different petition for another reason. In the few
instances in which the Commission received a petition that fell into
this category during the 2016 filing period, the Commission considered
the earliest filed petition to be the petition of record. This change
removes any uncertainty.
Section 220.8 states that, in the case of petitions for identical
or overlapping articles received from multiple petitioners, the
Commission may consolidate those petitions and publish a single
recommendation. The
[[Page 9275]]
Commission is not proposing any changes.
Section 220.9 addresses withdrawal of petitions, submission of new
petitions, and amendments to petitions. The Commission proposes to
amend section 220.9(a), which currently states that a petitioner may
withdraw a petition at any time prior to the time the Commission
transmits its final report to Congress. The Commission proposes to
revise this subsection to state that a petitioner may withdraw a
petition ``no later than 30 days after the Commission submits its
preliminary report.''
Current section 220.10 addresses Commission publication and public
availability of petitions and opportunity for the public to comment on
such petitions. The Commission proposes to divide section 220.10 into
two separate sections, with section 220.10 retitled ``Commission
publication and public availability of petitions,'' and new section
220.11 titled ``Public comment period.'' Revised section 220.10 tracks
the text of current section 220.10(a). The Commission proposes to
delete the title of subsection (a) of current 220.10 and incorporate it
into the new title of section 220.10.
New section 220.11, titled as ``Public comment period,'' contains
four subsections. New subsection (a), ``Time for filing,'' largely
tracks the wording in current section 220.10(b). New subsection (b)
includes a list of information items that must be included in a
comment, including certain information about the commenter; a statement
about whether the comment supports, opposes, or takes no position on
the petition; and a certification statement. It also refers commenters
to the Commission's Handbook on MTB Filing Procedures and requires that
commenters comply with those requirements. New subsection (c) sets out
a list of requirements that apply to comments from domestic producers.
Comments must include: (1) A description of the product alleged to be
identical, like, or directly competitive with the product that is the
subject of the petition; (2) the Chemical Abstracts Services registry
number (if any); (3) certain information about production or likely
production of an identical, like, or directly competitive article
within the United States; (4) information relating to commercial
availability; (5) addresses for the locations of U.S. production
facilities; and (6) evidence demonstrating the existence of domestic
production and citing possible examples. Subsection (d) states that the
Commission may provide additional opportunity for public comment and,
if it does so, will publish notice of that opportunity in the Federal
Register.
The Commission proposes to re-designate current section 220.11 as
section 220.12. The section describes the contents of the Commission's
preliminary report to the Committees. The Commission proposes only one
change: It would delete the parenthetical in subsection (b)(2) that
relates to corrections of article descriptions.
The Commission proposes to re-designate current section 220.12 as
section 220.13. The section describes the timing and content of
Commission final reports. The Commission is not proposing any other
changes to this section.
The Commission proposes to re-designate current section 220.13 as
section 220.14. The section describes the treatment of confidential
business information. The Commission is not proposing any other changes
to this section.
The Commission proposes to re-designate current section 220.14 as
section 220.15. The section identifies certain rules in subpart B of
part 201 of subchapter A of chapter II that would not apply to
Commission proceedings under part 220 of subchapter D of chapter II.
The Commission is not proposing any other changes to this section.
List of Subjects in 19 CFR Part 220
Administrative practice and procedure, miscellaneous tariff bills.
For the reasons stated in the preamble, the United States
International Trade Commission proposes to amend 19 CFR part 220 to
read as follows:
PART 220--PROCESS FOR CONSIDERATION OF PETITIONS FOR DUTY
SUSPENSIONS AND REDUCTIONS
0
1. The authority citation for part 220 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 19 U.S.C. 1335; Pub. L. 114-159, 130 Stat. 396 (19
U.S.C. 1332 note).
0
2. Amend Sec. 220.5 by revising paragraphs (e), (h), (j), re-
designating paragraph (n) as paragraph (o), and adding a new paragraph
(n) to read as follows:
Sec. 220.5 Contents of petition.
* * * * *
(e) To the extent available--
(1) A classification ruling of U.S. Customs and Border Protection
(CBP) that indicates CBP's classification of the article; and
(2) A copy of other CBP documentation indicating where the article
is classified in the HTS.
* * * * *
(h) For each HTS number included in the article description,
(1) An estimate of the total and dutiable value (in United States
dollars) of imports of the article covered by the petition for the
calendar year preceding the year in which the petition is filed, for
the calendar year in which the petition is filed, and for each of the 5
calendar years after the calendar year in which the petition is filed,
including an estimate of the value of such imports by the person who
submits the petition and by any other importers, if available, and
(2) An estimate of the share of total imports represented by the
petitioner's imports of the article that is the subject of the
petition.
* * * * *
(j) The names of any domestic producers of the article, if
available.
* * * * *
(n) A certification from the petitioner that the information
supplied is complete and correct to the best of the petitioner's
knowledge and belief, and an acknowledgement from the petitioner that
the information submitted is subject to audit and verification by the
Commission.
0
3. Amend Sec. 220.6 by revising paragraph (a)(4) to read as follows:
Sec. 220.6 Article description.
(a) * * *
(4) describes all of the merchandise covered by the article's
permanent subheading in chapter 1 through 97 by setting forth that
subheading's article description, or describes a clearly delineated
subset of that coverage, which may comprise the description of one or
more statistical reporting numbers of the applicable subheading, and
* * * * *
0
4. Amend Sec. 220.7 by revising the section heading and paragraph
(b)(2) to read as follows:
Sec. 220.7 Properly filed petition; identical and overlapping
petitions from same petitioner.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(2) Should the Commission find that a petitioner has filed one or
more identical or overlapping petitions and that such earlier filed
petitions have not been withdrawn, the Commission will consider the
earliest filed pending petition to be the petition of the petitioner.
0
5. Amend Sec. 220.9 by revising paragraph (a) to read as follows:
[[Page 9276]]
Sec. 220.9 Withdrawal of petitions, amendments to petitions.
(a) Withdrawal of petitions. A petitioner may withdraw a petition
for duty suspension or reduction filed under this part no later than 30
days after the Commission submits its preliminary report, as described
in Sec. 220.12. It shall do so by notifying the Commission through the
Commission's designated secure web portal of its withdrawal and the
notification shall include the name of the petitioner, the Commission
identification number for the petition, and the HTS number for the
article concerned.
* * * * *
0
6. Revise Sec. 220.10 to read as follows:
Sec. 220.10 Commission publication and public availability of
petitions.
Not later than 30 days after expiration of the 60-day period for
filing petitions for duty suspensions and reductions, the Commission
will publish on its website the petitions for duty suspensions and
reductions submitted under Sec. 220.3 that were timely filed and
contain the information required under Sec. 220.5. When circumstances
allow, the Commission may post such petitions on its website earlier
than 30 days after expiration of the 60-day period for filing
petitions.
0
7. Re-designate Sec. Sec. 220.11 through 220.14 as Sec. Sec. 220.12
through 220.15 and add a new Sec. 220.11 to read as follows:
Sec. 220.11 Public comment period
(a) Time for filing. Not later than 30 days after expiration of the
60-day period for filing petitions, the Commission will also publish in
the Federal Register and on its website a notice requesting members of
the public to submit comments on the petitions for duty suspensions and
reductions. To be considered, such comments must be filed through the
Commission's secure web portal during the 45-day period following
publication of the Commission's notice requesting comments from members
of the public. For purposes of this section, all petitions posted by
the Commission on its website, whether or not posted early, shall be
deemed to be officially published by the Commission on its website on
the date of publication of the notice seeking written comments from
members of the public on the petitions.
(b) In general. The comment shall include the following
information:
(1) The name, telephone number, and postal and email address of the
commenter, and if appropriate, its representative in the matter,
(2) A statement as to whether the commenter is a U.S. producer,
importer, government entity, trade association or group, or other,
(3) A statement as to whether the comment supports the petition;
objects to the petition; or takes no position with respect to the
petitions/provides other comment,
(4) If the commenter is an importer, a list of the leading source
countries of the product,
(5) A certification from the commenter that the information
supplied is complete and correct to the best of the commenter's
knowledge and belief, and an acknowledgement from the commenter that
the information submitted is subject to audit and verification by the
Commission,
(6) Comments, including any attachments thereto, must comply with
the Commission's Handbook on MTB Filing Procedures as posted on the
Commission's website.
(c) Comments from domestic producers. Comments from a firm claiming
to be a domestic producer, as defined in Sec. 220.2(g), shall also
include:
(1) A description of the product alleged to be identical, like, or
directly competitive with the product that is the subject of the
petition,
(2) The Chemical Abstracts Service registry number for the product
(if applicable),
(3) A statement as to whether an identical, like, or directly
competitive product was produced in the current calendar year and, if
not, the year in which the product was last produced or in which
production is expected to begin within the United States,
(4) A statement as to whether such product is commercially
available and, if not commercially available, an explanation of its
lack of availability,
(5) The physical address(es) for the location(s) of the production
facility(ies) producing the product within the United States, and
(6) Evidence demonstrating the existence of domestic production
(e.g., catalogs, press releases, marketing materials, specification
sheets, copies of orders for the product).
(d) The Commission may provide additional opportunity for public
comment and, if so, will announce that comment period in the Federal
Register.
0
8. Amend newly re-designated Sec. 220.12 by revising paragraph (b)(2)
to read as follows:
Sec. 220.12 Commission preliminary report.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(2) A list of petitions for duty suspensions and reductions for
which the Commission recommends technical corrections in order to meet
the requirements of the Act, with the correction specified.
* * * * *
0
9. Amend newly re-designated Sec. 220.13 by revising the section
heading to read as follows:
Sec. 220.13 Commission final report.
0
10. Amend newly re-designated Sec. 220.14 by revising the section
heading to read as follows:
Sec. 220.14 Confidential business information.
0
11. Amend newly re-designated Sec. 220.15 by revising the section
heading to read as follows:
Sec. 220.15 Application of other Commission rules.
By order of the Commission.
Issued: March 1, 2019.
Katherine Hiner,
Acting Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2019-04095 Filed 3-13-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P