Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip From India: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2016-2017, 9092-9094 [2019-04624]

Download as PDF 9092 Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 49 / Wednesday, March 13, 2019 / Notices rescind the review with respect to these companies but, rather, to complete the review with respect to TMI/TMM and issue appropriate instructions to CBP based on the final results of the review, consistent with our practice in nonmarket economy (NME) cases.9 Public Comment Interested parties may submit case briefs no later than 30 days after the date of publication of this notice in the Federal Register.10 Rebuttals to case briefs, which must be limited to issues raised in the case briefs, must be filed within five days after the date for filing case briefs.11 Parties who submit arguments are requested to submit with each argument (a) a statement of the issue, (b) a brief summary of the argument, and (c) a table of authorities.12 Parties submitting briefs should do so pursuant to Commerce’s electronic filing system: Enforcement and Compliance’s Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS).13 ACCESS is available to registered users at https://access.trade.gov, and is available to all parties in the Central Records Unit, room B8024 of the main Department of Commerce building. Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), interested parties who wish to request a hearing must submit a written request to the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, U.S. Department of Commerce within 30 days of the date of publication of this notice. Hearing requests should contain the following information: (1) The party’s name, address, and telephone number; (2) the number of participants; and (3) a list of the issues parties intend to discuss. Issues raised in the hearing will be limited to those raised in the respective case and rebuttal briefs. If a request for a hearing is made, parties will be notified of the time and date of the hearing which will be held at the U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230. Unless extended, we intend to issue the final results of this administrative review, including our analysis of all issues raised in any written brief, within 120 days of publication of this notice in amozie on DSK9F9SC42PROD with NOTICES 9 See Glycine from the People’s Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review 2014–2015, 81 FR 72567 (October 20, 2016) and the ‘‘Assessment Rates’’ section, below. 10 See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(1)(ii). 11 See 19 CFR 351.309(d)(1)(2). 12 See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2), (d)(2). 13 See 19 CFR 351.303 (for general filing requirements). VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:45 Mar 12, 2019 Jkt 247001 the Federal Register, pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act. Assessment Rates Upon issuance of the final results, Commerce will determine, and CBP shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries covered by this review.14 We intend to issue assessment instructions to CBP 15 days after the publication date of the final results of this review. Pursuant to Commerce’s practice in NME cases, if Commerce continues to determine in the final results that that TMI/TMM had no shipments of subject merchandise, any suspended entries during the POR from TMI/TMM will be liquidated at the China-wide rate.15 Cash Deposit Requirements The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon publication of the final results of this administrative review for all shipments of the subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date, as provided for by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For TMI/ TMM, which claimed no shipments, the cash deposit rate will remain unchanged from the rate assigned to TMI/TMM in the most recently completed review of the company; (2) for previously investigated or reviewed Chinese and non-Chinese exporters who are not under review in this segment of the proceeding but who have separate rates, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the exporter-specific rate published for the most recent period; (3) for all Chinese exporters of subject merchandise that have not been found to be entitled to a separate rate, the cash deposit rate will be the China-wide rate of 111.73 percent; and (4) for all nonChinese exporters of subject merchandise which have not received their own rate, the cash deposit rate will be the rate applicable to Chinese exporter(s) that supplied that nonChinese exporter. These deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice. Notification to Importers This notice also serves as a preliminary reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement off antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this 14 See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). a full discussion of this practice, see NonMarket Economy Antidumping Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76 FR 65694 (October 24, 2011). 15 For PO 00000 Frm 00019 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 period. Failure to comply with this requirement may result in the Secretary’s presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of double antidumping duties. This notice is issued in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.221(b)(4). Dated: March 6, 2019. Gary Taverman, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, performing the non-exclusive functions and duties of the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. [FR Doc. 2019–04621 Filed 3–12–19; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–533–824] Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip From India: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2016–2017 Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that Jindal Poly Films Ltd. (India) made sales of subject merchandise below normal value, and that SRF Limited of India did not. The period of review (POR) is July 1, 2016, through June 30, 2017. DATES: Applicable March 13, 2019. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jacqueline Arrowsmith at (202) 482– 5255, AD/CVD Operations, Office VII, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: AGENCY: Background On August 10, 2018, Commerce published the Preliminary Results.1 For a history of events that have occurred since the Preliminary Results, see the Issues and Decision Memorandum.2 On 1 See Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip from India: Preliminary Results and Partial Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2016–2017, 83 FR 39667 (August 10, 2018) (Preliminary Results). 2 See Department Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: Polyethylene Terephthalate Film from India; 2016– 2017 Administrative Review’’ (Issues and Decision Memorandum), dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this notice. E:\FR\FM\13MRN1.SGM 13MRN1 Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 49 / Wednesday, March 13, 2019 / Notices November 27, 2018, we extended the deadline for these Final Results from December 10, 2018 until January 11, 2019.3 Commerce exercised its discretion to toll all deadlines affected by the partial federal government closure from December 22, 2018, through the resumption of operations on January 29, 2019.4 Accordingly, the revised deadline for these Final Results of this administrative review became February 20, 2019. On February 14, 2019, we extended the deadline for these Final Results until March 6, 2019.5 Scope of the Order The merchandise subject to the order is polyethylene terephthalate film, sheet, and strip (PET Film). The PET Film subject to the order is currently classifiable under subheading 3920.62.00.90 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States.6 Analysis of Comments Received amozie on DSK9F9SC42PROD with NOTICES The issues raised in the case and rebuttal briefs that were submitted by interested parties are discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum. The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance’s Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at http://access.trade.gov, and is available to all parties in the Central Records Unit, room B8024 of the main Department of Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly on the internet at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed Issues and Decision Memorandum and the electronic versions of the Issues and Decision Memorandum are identical in content. A list of the issues that parties raised, and to which we responded in the 3 See Memorandum, ‘‘Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet and Strip from India: Extension of Deadline for Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review,—2016–2017,’’ dated November 27, 2018. 4 See Memorandum to the Record from Gary Taverman, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, performing the non-exclusive functions and duties of the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, ‘‘Deadlines Affected by the Partial Shutdown of the Federal Government,’’ dated January 28, 2019. All deadlines in this segment of the proceeding have been extended by 40 days. 5 See Memorandum, ‘‘Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet and Strip from India: Extension of Deadline for Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review,—2016–2017,’’ dated February 14, 2019. 6 For a full description of the scope of the order see the Issues and Decision Memorandum. VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:45 Mar 12, 2019 Jkt 247001 Issues and Decision Memorandum, is attached to this notice in the Appendix. Changes Since the Preliminary Results Based on our analysis of the comments received from parties, we made certain changes to Jindal’s margin calculations 7 and SRF’s margin calculations.8 Final Results of Review As a result of this review, we determine the following weightedaverage dumping margins for the period July 1, 2016, through June 30, 2017. 9093 For entries of subject merchandise produced by Jindal or SRF for which it did not know its merchandise was destined for the United States, we will instruct CBP to liquidate unreviewed entries at the all-others rate established in the less-than fair value (LTFV) investigation, 5.71 percent,10 if there is no rate for the intermediate company(ies) involved in the transaction.11 Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2), we will instruct CBP to liquidate without regard to antidumping duties any entries produced and/or exported by SRF during the POR. Cash Deposit Requirements The following deposit requirements Manufacturer/exporter will be effective for all shipments of PET Film from India entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for Jindal Poly Films Limited of 9 India ...................................... 5.95 consumption on or after the date of publication of the Final Results of this SRF Limited/SRF Limited of India ........................................ 0.00 administrative review, as provided for by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) The cash deposit rate will be zero Disclosure and Public Comment percent for merchandise exported by We intend to disclose the calculations SRF; (2) the cash deposit rate will be performed to parties in this proceeding 5.95 percent for merchandise exported within five days after public by Jindal; (3) for previously reviewed or announcement of these Final Results, in investigated companies not listed above, accordance with section 751(a) and 19 the cash deposit rate will continue to be CFR 351.224(b). the company-specific rate published for the most recent period; (4) if the Assessment Rates exporter is not a firm covered in this Upon completion of this review, a prior review, or the less-thanadministrative review, Commerce shall fair-value investigation, but the determine and U.S. Customs and Border manufacturer is, the cash deposit rate Protection (CBP) shall assess will be the rate established for the most antidumping duties on all appropriate recent period for the manufacturer of entries. Because SRF’s weighted-average the merchandise; and (5) the cash dumping margin have been determined deposit rate for all other manufacturers to be zero or de minimis within the or exporters is 5.71 percent.12 These meaning of 19 CFR 351.106(c), we will cash deposit requirements, when instruct CBP to liquidate the appropriate imposed, shall remain in effect until entries without regard to antidumping further notice. duties. Commerce intends to issue Notification to Interested Parties assessment instructions directly to CBP This notice also serves as a final 15 days after publication of these final reminder to importers of their results of review. For Jindal, we will responsibility under 19 CFR base the assessment rate for the 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate corresponding entries on the margin regarding the reimbursement of listed above. antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this 7 See Issues and Decision Memorandum; see also review period. Failure to comply with Analysis Memorandum for the Final Results of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review of this requirement could result in the Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip Secretary’s presumption that from India: Jindal Poly Films Limited (Jindal), dated reimbursement of antidumping duties concurrently with this memorandum (Jindal Final Weightedaverage margin (percent) Analysis Memo). 8 See Issues and Decision Memorandum; see also Analysis Memorandum for the Final Results of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review of Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip from India: SRF Limited (SRF), dated concurrently with this memorandum (SRF Final Analysis Memo). 9 As we noted in the Preliminary Results, Commerce has determined that Jindal Poly Films Limited of India is the same company as Jindal Poly Films Ltd. (India). PO 00000 Frm 00020 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 10 See Notice of Amended Final Antidumping Duty Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Antidumping Duty Order: Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip from India, 67 FR 44175 (July 1, 2002) (Amended Final Determination). 11 See Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and Assessment Proceedings; Final Modification, 77 FR 8101, 8102 (February 14, 2012) (Final Modification). 12 See Amended Final Determination. E:\FR\FM\13MRN1.SGM 13MRN1 9094 Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 49 / Wednesday, March 13, 2019 / Notices Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce. ACTION: Notice; public meeting. Dated: March 8, 2019. Tracey L. Thompson, Acting Deputy Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries Service. [FR Doc. 2019–04590 Filed 3–12–19; 8:45 am] Dated: March 5, 2019. Gary Taverman, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, performing the non-exclusive functions and duties of the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. The New England Fishery Management Council (Council) is scheduling a public meeting of its Groundfish Committee to consider actions affecting New England fisheries in the exclusive economic zone (EEZ). Recommendations from this group will be brought to the full Council for formal consideration and action, if appropriate. DATES: This meeting will be held on Tuesday, April 2, 2019 at 9 a.m. ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Hilton Garden Inn, 100 Boardman Street, Boston, MA 02129; telephone: (617) 561–0798. Council address: New England Fishery Management Council, 50 Water Street, Mill 2, Newburyport, MA 01950. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Thomas A. Nies, Executive Director, New England Fishery Management Council; telephone: (978) 465–0492. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Appendix Agenda List of Topics Discussed in the Decision Memorandum I. Summary II. List of Issues III. Background IV. Scope of the Order V. Changes Made Since the Preliminary Results VI. Discussion of the Issues Comment 1: Whether To Grant Certain Post-Sale Price Adjustments to Jindal for the Final Results Comment 2: Whether To Continue To Grant Certain Post-Sale Price Adjustments to SRF for the Final Results Comment 3: Whether To Use the Export Subsidy Rates Calculated in the 2016 Countervailing Duty Administrative Review as the Export Subsidy Offset in This Administrative Review Comment 4: Whether To Revise Jindal’s Home Market and Margin Programs Comment 5: Whether To Revise SRF’s Home Market Program VII. Recommendation The committee will review the Groundfish Advisory Panel and the Plan Development Team’s (PDT) revisions to Amendment 23/Groundfish Monitoring. They will also review the PDT revisions to the council policy on gear standards to facilitate use of gear in accountability measures. They will receive an update of the Council’s priorities for 2019. Other business will be discussed as necessary. Although non-emergency issues not contained in this agenda may come before this group for discussion, those issues may not be the subject of formal action during this meeting. Action will be restricted to those issues specifically listed in this notice and any issues arising after publication of this notice that require emergency action under section 305(c) of the Magnuson-Stevens Act, provided the public has been notified of the Council’s intent to take final action to address the emergency. occurred and the subsequent assessment of double antidumping duties. Notifications to Interested Parties This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility concerning the destruction of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely written notification of the return or destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation. Commerce is issuing and publishing these final results of administrative review in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.221. [FR Doc. 2019–04624 Filed 3–12–19; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P amozie on DSK9F9SC42PROD with NOTICES National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration RIN 0648–XG887 New England Fishery Management Council; Public Meeting National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and AGENCY: 17:45 Mar 12, 2019 Jkt 247001 This meeting is physically accessible to people with disabilities. Requests for sign language interpretation or other auxiliary aids should be directed to Thomas A. Nies, Executive Director, at (978) 465–0492, at least 5 days prior to the meeting date. This meeting will be recorded. Consistent with 16 U.S.C. 1852, a copy of the recording is available upon request. Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq. PO 00000 Frm 00021 BILLING CODE 3510–22–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration RIN 0648–XG852 Marine Mammals; File No. 22723 National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce. ACTION: Notice; receipt of application. AGENCY: Notice is hereby given that Sean Todd, Ph.D., College of the Atlantic, 105 Eden Street, Bar Harbor, ME 04609, has applied in due form for a permit to receive, import, and export marine mammals parts for scientific research. SUMMARY: Written, telefaxed, or email comments must be received on or before April 12, 2019. ADDRESSES: The application and related documents are available for review by selecting ‘‘Records Open for Public Comment’’ from the ‘‘Features’’ box on the Applications and Permits for Protected Species (APPS) home page, https://apps.nmfs.noaa.gov, and then selecting File No. 22723 from the list of available applications. These documents are also available upon written request or by appointment in the Permits and Conservation Division, Office of Protected Resources, NMFS, 1315 East-West Highway, Room 13705, Silver Spring, MD 20910; phone (301) 427–8401; fax (301) 713–0376. Written comments on this application should be submitted to the Chief, Permits and Conservation Division, at the address listed above. Comments may also be submitted by facsimile to (301) 713–0376, or by email to NMFS.Pr1Comments@noaa.gov. Please include the File No. 22723 in the subject line of the email comment. Those individuals requesting a public hearing should submit a written request to the Chief, Permits and Conservation Division at the address listed above. The request should set forth the specific reasons why a hearing on this application would be appropriate. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jennifer Skidmore or Shasta McClenahan, (301) 427–8401. DATES: Special Accommodations DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE VerDate Sep<11>2014 SUMMARY: Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\13MRN1.SGM 13MRN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 49 (Wednesday, March 13, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 9092-9094]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-04624]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-533-824]


Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip From India: 
Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2016-2017

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
U.S. Department of Commerce.

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that Jindal 
Poly Films Ltd. (India) made sales of subject merchandise below normal 
value, and that SRF Limited of India did not. The period of review 
(POR) is July 1, 2016, through June 30, 2017.

DATES: Applicable March 13, 2019.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jacqueline Arrowsmith at (202) 482-
5255, AD/CVD Operations, Office VII, Enforcement and Compliance, 
International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 
Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background

    On August 10, 2018, Commerce published the Preliminary Results.\1\ 
For a history of events that have occurred since the Preliminary 
Results, see the Issues and Decision Memorandum.\2\ On

[[Page 9093]]

November 27, 2018, we extended the deadline for these Final Results 
from December 10, 2018 until January 11, 2019.\3\ Commerce exercised 
its discretion to toll all deadlines affected by the partial federal 
government closure from December 22, 2018, through the resumption of 
operations on January 29, 2019.\4\ Accordingly, the revised deadline 
for these Final Results of this administrative review became February 
20, 2019. On February 14, 2019, we extended the deadline for these 
Final Results until March 6, 2019.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip from 
India: Preliminary Results and Partial Rescission of Antidumping 
Duty Administrative Review; 2016-2017, 83 FR 39667 (August 10, 2018) 
(Preliminary Results).
    \2\ See Department Memorandum, ``Issues and Decision Memorandum 
for the Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: 
Polyethylene Terephthalate Film from India; 2016-2017 Administrative 
Review'' (Issues and Decision Memorandum), dated concurrently with, 
and hereby adopted by, this notice.
    \3\ See Memorandum, ``Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet and 
Strip from India: Extension of Deadline for Final Results of 
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review,--2016-2017,'' dated November 
27, 2018.
    \4\ See Memorandum to the Record from Gary Taverman, Deputy 
Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 
Operations, performing the non-exclusive functions and duties of the 
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, ``Deadlines 
Affected by the Partial Shutdown of the Federal Government,'' dated 
January 28, 2019. All deadlines in this segment of the proceeding 
have been extended by 40 days.
    \5\ See Memorandum, ``Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet and 
Strip from India: Extension of Deadline for Final Results of 
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review,--2016-2017,'' dated February 
14, 2019.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Scope of the Order

    The merchandise subject to the order is polyethylene terephthalate 
film, sheet, and strip (PET Film). The PET Film subject to the order is 
currently classifiable under subheading 3920.62.00.90 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ For a full description of the scope of the order see the 
Issues and Decision Memorandum.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Analysis of Comments Received

    The issues raised in the case and rebuttal briefs that were 
submitted by interested parties are discussed in the Issues and 
Decision Memorandum. The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public 
document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's 
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service 
System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at http://access.trade.gov, and is available to all parties in the Central 
Records Unit, room B8024 of the main Department of Commerce building. 
In addition, a complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum 
can be accessed directly on the internet at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed Issues and Decision Memorandum 
and the electronic versions of the Issues and Decision Memorandum are 
identical in content.
    A list of the issues that parties raised, and to which we responded 
in the Issues and Decision Memorandum, is attached to this notice in 
the Appendix.

Changes Since the Preliminary Results

    Based on our analysis of the comments received from parties, we 
made certain changes to Jindal's margin calculations \7\ and SRF's 
margin calculations.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ See Issues and Decision Memorandum; see also Analysis 
Memorandum for the Final Results of the Antidumping Duty 
Administrative Review of Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and 
Strip from India: Jindal Poly Films Limited (Jindal), dated 
concurrently with this memorandum (Jindal Final Analysis Memo).
    \8\ See Issues and Decision Memorandum; see also Analysis 
Memorandum for the Final Results of the Antidumping Duty 
Administrative Review of Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and 
Strip from India: SRF Limited (SRF), dated concurrently with this 
memorandum (SRF Final Analysis Memo).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Final Results of Review

    As a result of this review, we determine the following weighted-
average dumping margins for the period July 1, 2016, through June 30, 
2017.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ As we noted in the Preliminary Results, Commerce has 
determined that Jindal Poly Films Limited of India is the same 
company as Jindal Poly Films Ltd. (India).

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                               Weighted-
                                                                average
                    Manufacturer/exporter                       margin
                                                               (percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jindal Poly Films Limited of India \9\......................        5.95
SRF Limited/SRF Limited of India............................        0.00
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Disclosure and Public Comment

    We intend to disclose the calculations performed to parties in this 
proceeding within five days after public announcement of these Final 
Results, in accordance with section 751(a) and 19 CFR 351.224(b).

Assessment Rates

    Upon completion of this administrative review, Commerce shall 
determine and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) shall assess 
antidumping duties on all appropriate entries. Because SRF's weighted-
average dumping margin have been determined to be zero or de minimis 
within the meaning of 19 CFR 351.106(c), we will instruct CBP to 
liquidate the appropriate entries without regard to antidumping duties. 
Commerce intends to issue assessment instructions directly to CBP 15 
days after publication of these final results of review. For Jindal, we 
will base the assessment rate for the corresponding entries on the 
margin listed above.
    For entries of subject merchandise produced by Jindal or SRF for 
which it did not know its merchandise was destined for the United 
States, we will instruct CBP to liquidate unreviewed entries at the 
all-others rate established in the less-than fair value (LTFV) 
investigation, 5.71 percent,\10\ if there is no rate for the 
intermediate company(ies) involved in the transaction.\11\ Pursuant to 
19 CFR 351.106(c)(2), we will instruct CBP to liquidate without regard 
to antidumping duties any entries produced and/or exported by SRF 
during the POR.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ See Notice of Amended Final Antidumping Duty Determination 
of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Antidumping Duty Order: 
Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip from India, 67 FR 
44175 (July 1, 2002) (Amended Final Determination).
    \11\ See Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of the Weighted-
Average Dumping Margin and Assessment Proceedings; Final 
Modification, 77 FR 8101, 8102 (February 14, 2012) (Final 
Modification).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Cash Deposit Requirements

    The following deposit requirements will be effective for all 
shipments of PET Film from India entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, 
for consumption on or after the date of publication of the Final 
Results of this administrative review, as provided for by section 
751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) The cash deposit rate will be zero percent 
for merchandise exported by SRF; (2) the cash deposit rate will be 5.95 
percent for merchandise exported by Jindal; (3) for previously reviewed 
or investigated companies not listed above, the cash deposit rate will 
continue to be the company-specific rate published for the most recent 
period; (4) if the exporter is not a firm covered in this review, a 
prior review, or the less-than-fair-value investigation, but the 
manufacturer is, the cash deposit rate will be the rate established for 
the most recent period for the manufacturer of the merchandise; and (5) 
the cash deposit rate for all other manufacturers or exporters is 5.71 
percent.\12\ These cash deposit requirements, when imposed, shall 
remain in effect until further notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ See Amended Final Determination.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Notification to Interested Parties

    This notice also serves as a final reminder to importers of their 
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation 
of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply 
with this requirement could result in the Secretary's presumption that 
reimbursement of antidumping duties

[[Page 9094]]

occurred and the subsequent assessment of double antidumping duties.

Notifications to Interested Parties

    This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to 
administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility 
concerning the destruction of proprietary information disclosed under 
APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely written 
notification of the return or destruction of APO materials or 
conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to 
comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a sanctionable 
violation.
    Commerce is issuing and publishing these final results of 
administrative review in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 
777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.221.

    Dated: March 5, 2019.
Gary Taverman,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 
Operations, performing the non-exclusive functions and duties of the 
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.

Appendix

List of Topics Discussed in the Decision Memorandum

I. Summary
II. List of Issues
III. Background
IV. Scope of the Order
V. Changes Made Since the Preliminary Results
VI. Discussion of the Issues
    Comment 1: Whether To Grant Certain Post-Sale Price Adjustments 
to Jindal for the Final Results
    Comment 2: Whether To Continue To Grant Certain Post-Sale Price 
Adjustments to SRF for the Final Results
    Comment 3: Whether To Use the Export Subsidy Rates Calculated in 
the 2016 Countervailing Duty Administrative Review as the Export 
Subsidy Offset in This Administrative Review
    Comment 4: Whether To Revise Jindal's Home Market and Margin 
Programs
    Comment 5: Whether To Revise SRF's Home Market Program
VII. Recommendation

[FR Doc. 2019-04624 Filed 3-12-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P