Powered Industrial Trucks; Request for information, 8633-8641 [2019-04338]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 47 / Monday, March 11, 2019 / Proposed Rules
small governmental jurisdictions. State
and federal agencies and private
landowners are not small entities under
the RFA.
NOAA has stated for past CZMA
federal consistency rulemakings that the
federal consistency process and appeals
to the Secretary do not have a
significant impact on small entities and
anticipates the same finding would be
reached for a proposed rule based upon
this document. See e.g., 65 FR 20270,
20280–81 (Apr. 14, 2000). However,
NOAA invites comment on the potential
costs that could be incurred by small
entities during CZMA consistency
appeals if NOAA revises the federal
consistency regulations to provide
greater efficiency and predictability as
discussed in this document.
Comments submitted to NOAA will
help us determine whether to propose
changes to the CZMA federal
consistency regulations. Any proposed
changes to the federal consistency
regulations would be published in the
Federal Register as a proposed rule
following compliance with the
Administrative Procedures Act (5 U.S.C.
553) and other relevant statutes and
executive orders.
This regulatory action is significant
for purposes of Executive Order 12866.
Dated: March 1, 2019.
Paul M. Scholz,
Chief Financial Officer/Chief Administrative
Officer, National Ocean Service, National
Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.
[FR Doc. 2019–04199 Filed 3–8–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Occupational Safety and Health
Administration
29 CFR Parts 1910, 1915, 1917, 1918,
and 1926
[Docket No. OSHA–2018–0008]
RIN 1218–AC99
Powered Industrial Trucks; Request for
information
Occupational Safety and Health
Administration (OSHA), Labor.
ACTION: Request for Information (RFI).
AGENCY:
OSHA requests information
and comment on issues related to
requirements in the standards on
powered industrial trucks for general,
maritime, and construction industries.
OSHA is seeking information regarding
the types, age, and usage of powered
industrial trucks, maintenance and
retrofitting of powered industrial trucks,
amozie on DSK9F9SC42PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:46 Mar 08, 2019
Jkt 247001
how to regulate older powered
industrial trucks, the types of accidents
and injuries associated with operation
of powered industrial trucks, the costs
and benefits of retrofitting powered
industrial trucks with safety features,
and the costs and benefits of all other
components of a safety program, as well
as various other issues. OSHA is also
interested in understanding whether the
differences between the standards for
maritime, construction, and general
industry are appropriate and effective
for each specific industrial sector.
OSHA will use the information received
in response to this RFI to determine
what action, if any, it may take to
reduce regulatory burdens while
maintaining worker safety.
DATES: Submit comments and additional
material on or before June 10, 2019. All
submissions must bear a postmark or
provide other evidence of the
submission date.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments and
additional materials, identified by
Docket No. OSHA–2018–0008, by any of
the following methods:
Electronically: Submit comments and
attachments electronically at https://
www.regulations.gov, which is the
Federal eRulemaking Portal. Follow the
instructions online for making
electronic submissions.
Facsimile: OSHA allows facsimile
transmission of comments and
additional material that are 10 pages or
fewer in length (including attachments).
Send these documents to the OSHA
Docket Office at (202) 693–1648. OSHA
does not require hard copies of these
documents. Instead of transmitting
facsimile copies of attachments that
supplement these documents (for
example, studies, journal articles),
commenters must submit these
attachments to the OSHA Docket Office,
Room N–3653, Occupational Safety and
Health Administration, U.S. Department
of Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue NW,
Washington, DC 20210. These
attachments must identify clearly the
commenter’s name, the date of
submission, the title of this RFI
(Powered Industrial Trucks), and docket
no. OSHA–2018–0008 so that the
Docket Office can attach them to the
appropriate document.
Regular mail, express mail, hand
delivery, or messenger (courier) service:
Submit comments and any additional
material (for example, studies, journal
articles) to the OSHA Docket Office,
Docket No. OSHA–2018–0008 or RIN
(1218–AC99), Room N–3653,
Occupational Safety and Health
Administration, U.S. Department of
Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue NW,
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
8633
Washington, DC 20210; telephone: (202)
693–2350. (OSHA’s TTY number is
(877) 889–5627.) Contact the OSHA
Docket Office for information about
security procedures concerning delivery
of materials by express mail, hand
delivery, and messenger service. The
hours of operation for the OSHA Docket
Office are 10:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m., ET.
Instructions: All submissions must
include the agency’s name, the title of
this RFI (Powered Industrial Trucks),
and the docket no. OSHA–2018–0008.
OSHA will place comments and other
material, including any personal
information, in the public docket
without revision, and these materials
will be available online at https://
www.regulations.gov. Therefore, OSHA
cautions commenters about submitting
statements they do not want made
available to the public and submitting
comments that contain personal
information (either about themselves or
others) such as Social Security numbers,
birth dates, and medical data.
Docket: To read or download
submissions or other material in the
docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov
or the OSHA Docket Office at the above
address. The https://www.regulations.gov
index lists all documents in the docket.
However, some information (e.g.,
copyrighted material) is not available
publicly to read or download through
the website. All submissions, including
copyrighted material, are available for
inspection at the OSHA Docket Office.
Contact the OSHA Docket Office for
assistance in locating docket
submissions.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Press inquiries: Frank Meilinger,
Director, OSHA Office of
Communications; telephone: (202) 693–
1999; email: meilinger.francis2@dol.gov.
General and technical information:
Lisa Long, Director, Office of
Engineering Safety, OSHA Directorate of
Standards and Guidance; telephone:
(202) 693–2222; fax: (202) 693–1663;
email: long.lisa@dol.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Copies of this Federal Register notice:
Electronic copies are available at https://
www.regulations.gov. This Federal
Register notice, as well as news releases
and other relevant information, also are
available at OSHA’s web page at https://
www.osha.gov.
References and Exhibits: Documents
referenced by OSHA in this RFI, other
than OSHA standards and Federal
Register notices, are in Docket No.
OSHA–2018–0008 (powered industrial
trucks; request for information). The
docket is available at https://
www.regulations.gov, the Federal
E:\FR\FM\11MRP1.SGM
11MRP1
8634
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 47 / Monday, March 11, 2019 / Proposed Rules
eRulemaking Portal. For additional
information on submitting items to, or
accessing items in, the docket, please
refer to the ADDRESSES section of this
RFI. While most exhibits are available at
https://www.regulations.gov, some
information (e.g., copyrighted material)
is not available to download from that
web page. However, all materials in the
docket are available for inspection at the
OSHA Docket Office.
Table of Contents
I. Background
A. Introduction
B. Fatality and Injury Data
C. Regulatory History
1. General Industry
2. Shipyards, Longshoring, and Marine
Cargo Handling
3. Construction
II. Request for Information, Data, and
Comments
A. General Issues
1. Types of Powered Industrial Trucks
2. Truck Operation, Maintenance, and
Training
3. Incidents and Injuries
4. Consistency Among OSHA Standards
B. Consensus Standards
1. American National Standards Institute
2. National Fire Protection Association
3. Other Standards
C. Compliance Issues
D. Economic Issues
E. Other Comments/Suggestions/Concerns
amozie on DSK9F9SC42PROD with PROPOSALS
I. Background
A. Introduction
OSHA is considering whether or not
to initiate rulemaking to revise the
powered industrial trucks standards for
general, maritime, and construction
industries (29 CFR 1910.178, 1915.120,
1917.43, 1918.65, and 1926.602(c), (d)).
These regulations, promulgated in 1971
and updated in 1998, are intended to
protect operators of these trucks and
their coworkers. In this RFI, OSHA is
seeking public comments that will
inform OSHA on potential updates to
the powered industrial trucks standards.
The term ‘‘powered industrial truck’’
includes what are commonly termed
forklifts, but the term also includes all
fork trucks, tractors, platform lift trucks,
motorized hand trucks, and other
specialized industrial trucks powered
by an electric motor or an internal
combustion engine. The aim of this RFI
is to seek public comment on what
aspects of the powered industrial trucks
standards are effective as well as those
that may be outdated, inefficient,
unnecessary, or overly burdensome, and
how those provisions might be repealed,
replaced, or modified while maintaining
or improving worker safety.
OSHA’s powered industrial trucks
standards contain requirements for
machine design and construction,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:46 Mar 08, 2019
Jkt 247001
locations of use, maintenance, training,
and operations, among other
requirements. OSHA initially adopted
the powered industrial trucks standard
(29 CFR 1910.178) on May 29, 1971 (36
FR 10613), pursuant to section 6(a) of
the Occupational Safety and Health Act
of 1970 (OSH Act) (29 U.S.C. 651, 655),1
based on the 1969 editions of the
American National Standards Institute’s
(ANSI) Safety Standard for Powered
Industrial Trucks, B56.1, and the
National Fire Protection Association’s
(NFPA) standard for Type Designation,
Areas of Use, Maintenance and
Operation of Powered Industrial Trucks,
NFPA 505. Since the promulgation of
OSHA’s powered industrial trucks
standard in 1971, these national
consensus standards have been updated
a number of times. The most recent
edition of ANSI B56.1 was issued in
2018, in conjunction with the Industrial
Truck Standards Development
Foundation (ITSDF) (OSHA–2018–
0008–0002). The most recent edition of
NFPA 505 was issued in 2018 (OSHA–
2018–0008–0003). OSHA has updated
the powered industrial trucks standards
only once, on December 1, 1998 (63 FR
66270), to revise the requirements for
operator training codified at
§ 1910.178(l) and to include references
to § 1910.178(l) in the standards for
shipyards, marine terminals,
longshoring, and construction
(§§ 1910.16, 1915.120, 1917.1, 1918.1,
and 1926.602(d)).2
ANSI B56.1 defines the safety
requirements relating to the elements of
design, operation, and maintenance of
powered industrial trucks. This national
consensus standard has two basic parts.
The first part establishes manufacturer
requirements to ensure hazards do not
result from the design and construction
of powered industrial trucks at the time
of manufacture. This includes a variety
of test methods to determine loadhandling capacity, which must also be
indicated through appropriate markings.
When OSHA originally promulgated the
powered industrial trucks standard, the
agency incorporated by reference the
design requirements section of ANSI
B56.1–1969.
The second part of B56.1 establishes
guidelines for operators of industrial
trucks, including requirements for
operator qualifications and training,
operator safety rules, and maintenance
practices. Although OSHA did not
1 Section 6(a) directed OSHA, during the first two
years after the OSH Act became effective, to
promulgate as an occupational safety and health
standard any national consensus standard or any
established Federal standard if such promulgation
would improve employee safety or health.
2 See Docket OSHA–S008–2006–0639.
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
incorporate by reference the ANSI
B56.1–1969 user requirements in its
powered industrial trucks standard,
OSHA did base some of the provisions
on this part of the ANSI standard.
Throughout the years, ANSI/ITSDF has
added other requirements to improve
the safety of industrial truck operators
and other employees. Examples of
additions to the user requirements in
B56.1 include:
• A requirement that operator
training programs cover hazards from
carbon monoxide production by internal
combustion engines and common initial
symptoms of exposure.
• A requirement that, prior to
working on engine fuel systems of
liquefied petroleum (LP) gas-powered
trucks with engines that will not run,
users must close the LP tank and vent
fuel slowly in a non-hazardous area.
• A requirement for stopping
distances when descending grades. This
section states that when descending a
grade, required stopping distances must
be greater and methods must be
employed to allow for this condition.
Such methods include: Reducing speed,
limiting loads, and allowing for
adequate clear space at the bottom of the
grade.
• A requirement to consider noise
exposure of personnel in the work area.
• A requirement regarding relocation
of powered industrial trucks. This
section states that when using lifting
equipment such as elevators, cranes,
ship hoisting gear, to relocate a powered
industrial truck, the user shall ensure
that the capacity of the hoisting
equipment being used is not exceeded.
The NFPA 505 standard contains fire
safety guidelines for powered industrial
trucks including type designations,
areas of use, conversions, maintenance,
and operations. This standard is
designed to mitigate potential fire and
explosion hazards involving powered
industrial trucks, including fork trucks,
tractors, platform lift trucks, motorized
hand trucks, and other specialized
industrial trucks powered by electric
motors or internal combustion engines.
When OSHA adopted the powered
industrial trucks standard in 1971, there
were 11 designated types of trucks.3
3 These 11 designations represent the following
truck types: D–Diesel-powered unit; DS-Dieselpowered unit with additional safeguards to exhaust,
fuel and electrical systems; DY-Diesel-powered unit
with safe guards of DS unit and do not have any
electrical equipment including the ignition system
and have temperature limiting features;
E-Electrically powered unit; ES-Electrical powered
unit with additional safeguards to electrical systems
to prevent hazardous sparks and limit surface
temperatures; EE-Electrical powered unit with
safeguards of ES units and all electric motors and
electrical equipment enclosed; EX-Electrical
E:\FR\FM\11MRP1.SGM
11MRP1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 47 / Monday, March 11, 2019 / Proposed Rules
NFPA has since listed an additional
eight truck types: CGH, CN, CNS, DX, G/
CN, G/LP, GS/CNS, and GS/LPS.4 These
are not listed in OSHA’s standard.
NFPA first added type designations
G/LP and GS/LPS, which are both dualfuel type trucks that operate on gasoline
and/or liquefied petroleum gas. NFPA
next added new truck type designation
DX, which is a diesel-powered unit that
is constructed to allow it to be used in
atmospheres that contain specifically
named flammable vapors, dust, and
fibers. NFPA added a new section on
compressed natural gas (CNG) that
included the addition of type
designations CN, CNS, G/CN, and GS/
CNS, and made changes to the fuel
handling and storage chapters for these
amozie on DSK9F9SC42PROD with PROPOSALS
powered unit that differs from E, ES and EE units
that allows it to be used in certain atmospheres
containing flammable vapors and dust; G-Gasoline
powered unit; GS-Gasoline powered unit with
additional safeguards to exhaust, fuel and electrical
systems; LP-Liquefied Petroleum powered unit;
LPS-Liquefied Petroleum powered unit with
additional safeguards to exhaust, fuel and electrical
systems.
4 These eight designations are: CGH-Compressed
hydrogen-powered unit utilizing a fuel cell that has
minimum acceptable safeguards against inherent
fire and electrical shock hazards; CN-Compressed
natural gas-powered unit that has minimum
acceptable safeguards against inherent fire hazards;
CNS-Compressed natural gas-powered unit that, in
addition to meeting the requirements for Type CN
units, is provided with additional safeguards to the
exhaust, fuel, and electric systems; DX-Dieselpowered unit in which the diesel engine and the
electric fittings and equipment are designed,
constructed, and assembled in such a way that the
unit can be used in atmospheres that contain
specifically named flammable vapors, dusts, and,
under certain conditions, fibers; G/CN-Gasoline or
compressed natural gas unit that has minimum
acceptable safeguards against inherent fire hazards;
G/LP-Gasoline or liquefied petroleum gas and has
minimum acceptable safeguards against inherent
fire hazards; GS/CNS-Gasoline or compressed
natural gas unit and, in addition to meeting all the
requirements for G/CN units, is provided with
additional safeguards to the exhaust, fuel, and
electric systems; GS/LPS-Gasoline or liquefied
petroleum gas unit and, in addition to meeting all
the requirements for the G/LP units, is provided
with additional safeguards to the exhaust, fuel, and
electric systems.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:46 Mar 08, 2019
Jkt 247001
trucks, as well as for the dual fuel and
converted trucks. NFPA’s most recent
type designation is a compressed
hydrogen-powered unit (CGH).
These eight type-designated units—
CGH, CN, CNS, DX, G/CN, G/LP, GS/
CNS, GS/LPS—have different
requirements for safe operation,
maintenance, and handling due to their
fuel source, but they are generally the
same in design and function as the 11
truck types currently listed in OSHA’s
standard. For instance, the chapter in
NFPA 505 for fuel handling and storage
prohibits over-pressurizing fuel
cylinders and requires that pressure
relief devices be free of plugging and
maintained in good operating condition;
these requirements are not reflected in
OSHA’s current standard.
OSHA requests information from the
public on the powered industrial trucks
standards to help the agency determine
how to best protect employees who use
powered industrial trucks and eliminate
unnecessary burdens. OSHA is seeking
public comments on whether and how
the powered industrial trucks standards
should be amended.
B. Fatality and Injury Data
Statistics show that, in some
instances, powered industrial trucks
cause worker fatalities and injuries.
Accordingly, OSHA is considering ways
to maintain or improve worker safety
while modernizing its standards and
reducing any overly-burdensome
requirements.
Data from the Bureau of Labor
Statistics (BLS) (OSHA–2018–0008–
0004) for the years 2011 through 2016
indicate a total of 1,357 fatalities
resulting from the use of powered
material hauling and transport
industrial vehicles and tractors. As
shown in Table 1, the annual number of
fatalities ranged from 218 to 241, with
an annual average of 226 fatalities. The
data show that the majority of these
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
8635
fatalities, 1,169 (89 percent), occurred in
five industry sectors: Agriculture,
forestry, fishing, and hunting (788);
manufacturing (126); construction (94);
wholesale trade (83); and transportation
and warehousing (78). Nearly all the
fatalities, 1,316 (97 percent), occurred
during the use of powered forklifts,
order pickers, platform trucks, tractors,
and power take-offs.
With respect to injury data, BLS
reports that, for the three most recent
years with complete results from the
BLS surveillance system (2014–2016),
lost-workday injuries resulting from
incidents associated with powered
industrial forklifts, trucks, and tractors
ranged from 11,790 cases (2016) to
11,940 cases (2015) and averaged 11,857
cases.5 Over 90 percent of cases during
this three-year period involved powered
industrial material hauling and
transport vehicles. The remainder
involved tractors and power take-offs.
OSHA’s data from the Severe Injury
Reports (SIRs) mirror that of BLS. The
SIRs recorded 1,238 incidents from
January 1, 2015, through February 28,
2017, resulting in 1,123 hospitalizations
and 193 amputations. Approximately 97
percent of the 1,238 incidents involved
powered forklifts, order pickers,
platform trucks, pallet jacks, airport
utility vehicles, and other powered
industrial material hauling and
transport vehicles, not elsewhere
classified, while the remainder involved
tractors and power take-offs.6
BILLING CODE 4510–26–P
5 US Dept. of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics,
Nonfatal cases involving days away from work:
Selected characteristics (2011 forward), 2011–2016,
https://www.bls.gov/iif/ (accessed January 23,
2018).
6 U.S. Dept. of Labor, Occupational Safety and
Health Administration, Severe Injury Reports,
https://www.osha.gov/severeinjury/
(accessed January 18, 2018).
E:\FR\FM\11MRP1.SGM
11MRP1
amozie on DSK9F9SC42PROD with PROPOSALS
8636
VerDate Sep<11>2014
1:
Fatalities -- Industrial Vehicles, Powered Material Hauling and Transport Vehicles, and Tractors (Primary Source of Accident),
2011-20161
Jkt 247001
All Powered lndusbial Vehicles and Trectors 2
PO 00000
NAICS
Industry Title
Tractors and Power Take-Offs
Trucks
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\11MRP1.SGM
11MRP1
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
To1al
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
Total
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
Total
225
218
221
224
228
241
1,35
7
66
67
69
65
71
72
410
152
144
144
152
149
165
906
133
121
130
135
129
140
788
3
3
3
3
12
130
121
127
132
126
140
776
8
8
10
9
8
5
48
5
6
2
3
1
17
2
2
2
2
8
Construction
15
14
13
14
14
24
94
11
9
9
9
9
16
63
3
5
5
7
29
Manufacturing
18
22
18
20
28
20
126
16
18
17
18
23
19
111
3
2
3
1
9
12
18
14
16
9
14
83
11
15
14
12
9
11
72
3
3
3
9
4
5
5
3
4
21
4
5
5
3
4
12
9
13
13
17
78
9
8
8
9
14
Industry
Frm 00010
Fmt 4702
2011
Total - Private
Agriculture,
11
Forestry,
Fishing and
Hunting
Mining,
21
Quarrying, and
Oil and Gas
Extraction
23
31-33
42
44-45
Wholesale
Trade
Retail Trade
4
5
21
Transportation
48-49
and
Warehousing
EP11MR19.025</GPH>
Powered Forklifts, Order Pickers, & Platform
14
13
61
3
1
4
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 47 / Monday, March 11, 2019 / Proposed Rules
17:46 Mar 08, 2019
Table
amozie on DSK9F9SC42PROD with PROPOSALS
VerDate Sep<11>2014
Table 1 Continued: Fatalities- Industrial Vehicles, Powered Material Hauling and Transport Vehicles and Tractors (Primary Source of
Powered Forklifts, Order Picker, & Platfonn
All Powered Industrial Vehicles and
Tractors2
NAICS
Industry Title
Tractors and Power Take-Offs
Trucks
Jkt 247001
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
Total
2011
13
10
6
1
8
7
45
6
4
1
2
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
Total
2011
2012
3
4
6
24
7
7
3
4
2013
2014
2015
2016
Total
5
3
22
Professional,
PO 00000
54
Scientific, and
Technical
Services
Management of
Frm 00011
55
Companies and
Enterprises
Administrative
5
Fmt 4702
and Support and
Waste
Sfmt 4702
56
Management
and
Remediation
E:\FR\FM\11MRP1.SGM
Services
Arts,
71
Entertainment,
10
3
1
2
6
1
1
and Recreation
Accommodation
72
and Food
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
11MRP1
Services
Other Services
81
(except Public
4
5
3
4
16
3
5
1
9
1
3
4
8
Administration)
*Data in columns may not sum to the totals on the top row due to adherence to statistical protocols such as ensuring an adequate sample size at the 2-digit NAICS level.
1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 47 / Monday, March 11, 2019 / Proposed Rules
17:46 Mar 08, 2019
Accident), 2011-20161
Data for 2016 are preliminary for industry sectors below the super sector (multiple 2-digit) NAICS level.
21 ncludes powered industrial vehicles not shown elsewhere in this table.
Source: US Department of Labor, OSHA, Directorate of Standards and Guidance, based on Bureau of Labor Statistics, Census of Fatal Occupational Injuries, January, 2018 (accessed January
23, 2018).
8637
EP11MR19.026</GPH>
8638
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 47 / Monday, March 11, 2019 / Proposed Rules
BILLING CODE 4510–26–C
C. Regulatory History
amozie on DSK9F9SC42PROD with PROPOSALS
1. General Industry
As previously noted, in June 1971,
OSHA adopted the powered industrial
trucks standard, 29 CFR 1910.178,
implementing several measures to
encourage worker safety. As part of that
rulemaking, and under section 6(a) of
the Act, OSHA codified ANSI B56.1–
1969, Safety Standard for Powered
Industrial Trucks, including the
provisions covering operator training.
On December 1, 1998 (63 FR 66270),
after notice and comment rulemaking,
OSHA published a final rule updating
the provisions covering powered
industrial truck operator training, which
was codified at 29 CFR 1910.178(l).
These provisions mandate a training
program that bases the amount and type
of training required on the operator’s
prior knowledge and skill; the types of
powered industrial trucks the operator
will operate in the workplace; the
hazards present in the workplace; and
the operator’s demonstrated ability to
operate a powered industrial truck
safely. Refresher training is required if
the operator is involved in an accident
or a near-miss incident; the operator has
been observed operating the vehicle in
an unsafe manner; the operator has been
determined during an evaluation to
need additional training; there are
changes in the workplace that could
affect safe operation of the truck; or the
operator is assigned to operate a
different type of truck. Evaluations of
each operator’s performance are
required as part of the initial and
refresher training and each operator’s
performance must be evaluated at least
once every three years. These training
requirements apply to all industries
(general industry, construction,
shipyards, marine terminals, and
longshoring operations) that use
powered industrial trucks, except
agricultural operations.
Since the 1998 final rule on powered
industrial truck operator training, OSHA
has not revised the general industry
powered industrial truck requirements
or updated references to the national
industry consensus standard (B56.1) to
include newer versions of that standard.
2. Shipyards, Longshoring, and Marine
Cargo Handling
In 1974, pursuant to Section 41 of the
Longshore and Harbor Workers’
Compensation Act, the Secretary issued
the existing shipyards and longshoring
regulations (39 FR 22074, June 19,
1974). These regulations appear at 29
CFR part 1915 for shipyards and 29 CFR
part 1918 for longshoring. Because the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:46 Mar 08, 2019
Jkt 247001
OSH Act comprehensively covers most
private employers, the longshoring
standards also were applied to shoreside
cargo handling operations (i.e. marine
terminal operations) at 29 CFR part
1917. In addition, in accordance with 29
CFR 1910.5(c)(2), OSHA applied the
general industry standards to shoreside
activities not covered by the older
longshoring rules. Under section
1910.5(c)(2), a general industry standard
covering a hazardous condition applies
to shoreside activities not covered by a
specific standard addressing that
hazard. Shipyards are covered by the
general industry standard.
On July 5, 1983 (48 FR 30886), OSHA
published the final standard for marine
terminals (29 CFR part 1917). This rule
was intended to further address the
shoreside segment of marine cargo
handling (29 CFR 1917.27). The marine
terminals standard includes
requirements for powered industrial
trucks at 29 CFR 1917.43.
On July 25, 1997, OSHA published a
final rule revising the marine terminals
standard (29 CFR part 1917) and the
longshoring standard (29 CFR part
1918), and improving the training
requirements for powered industrial
truck operators in the marine cargo
handling industries (62 FR 40142).
Then, on December 1, 1998 (63 FR
66238), OSHA adopted a final rule for
shipyard employment (29 CFR
1915.120), Powered Industrial Truck
Operator Training, which set forth
training requirements applicable to
shipyard employment identical to the
requirements in the general industry
powered industrial truck training
standard at 29 CFR 1910.178(l).
3. Construction
In 1971, under section 6(a) of the OSH
Act, the Secretary of Labor adopted the
existing Federal standards that had been
issued under the Contract Work Hours
and Safety Standards Act as OSHA
construction standards (36 FR 7340,
April 17, 1971). The provisions
pertaining to powered industrial trucks
used in construction are contained at 29
CFR 1926.602(c). Paragraph
1926.602(c)(1)(vi) states:
All industrial trucks in use shall meet the
applicable requirements of design,
construction, stability, inspection, testing,
maintenance, and operation, as defined in
American National Standards Institute
B56.1–1969, Safety Standards for Powered
Industrial Trucks.
Thus, by incorporating by reference
the same 1969 ANSI standard that was
the source document for the general
industry standard at 29 CFR 1910.178,
the powered industrial truck
construction standard imposes the
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
identical powered industrial truck
requirements on the construction
industry as applied to general industry.
On December 1, 1998, 29 CFR part
1926 was amended by adding a new
paragraph (d), which provides the same
powered industrial truck operator
training requirements for construction
work as adopted at 29 CFR 1910.178(l)
for general industry.
II. Request for Information, Data, and
Comments
OSHA is seeking information, data,
and comments (information), including
information on anticipated costs, cost
savings, and benefits related to the
questions below, that will inform the
agency’s analysis of technological and
economic feasibility and will help
determine what action, if any, should be
taken to repeal, replace or modify
outdated, unnecessary or overly
burdensome aspects of the powered
industrial trucks standard while
maintaining or improving worker safety.
OSHA is providing the following
questions to facilitate responses to this
RFI, but commenters may supply other
information pertaining to the RFI not
explicitly solicited by the questions.
When responding, please reference the
specific question number that you are
responding to, provide a detailed
response, explain the reasons behind
your views, and, if possible, identify,
and provide relevant information on
which you rely, including, but not
limited to, data, studies, and articles.
Throughout this RFI, OSHA requests
economic data on issues such as current
practices and compliance resource
expenditures. In your response, please
provide details on your establishment
including number of employees and
categories of employee occupations;
industry identification (by North
American Industrial Classification
System 6-digit code if available); and
the primary types of goods or services
produced by your company. This
information will help OSHA develop a
more accurate analysis of the impacts of
any potential rule. OSHA will carefully
review and evaluate the information,
data, and comments received in
response to this Federal Register notice
to decide on an appropriate course of
action.
A. General Issues
1. Types of Powered Industrial Trucks
OSHA’s current powered industrial
trucks standards list 11 different types
of powered industrial trucks, while
NFPA 505–2018 lists 19 different types
of powered industrial trucks (the ANSI
B56.1 standard does not list types of
E:\FR\FM\11MRP1.SGM
11MRP1
amozie on DSK9F9SC42PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 47 / Monday, March 11, 2019 / Proposed Rules
powered industrial trucks). OSHA is
considering adding these eight new
truck types to modernize its standard
and improve worker safety. The eight
new truck types not currently listed in
OSHA’s powered industrial trucks
standards are:
• CGH: Compressed hydrogenpowered unit utilizing a fuel cell that
has minimum acceptable safeguards
against inherent fire and electrical shock
hazards.
• CN: Compressed natural gaspowered unit that has minimum
acceptable safeguards against inherent
fire hazards.
• CNS: Compressed natural gaspowered unit that, in addition to
meeting the requirements for Type CN
units, is provided with additional
safeguards to the exhaust, fuel, and
electric systems;
• DX: Diesel-powered unit in which
the diesel engine and the electric fittings
and equipment are designed,
constructed, and assembled in such a
way that the unit can be used in
atmospheres that contain specifically
named flammable vapors, dusts, and,
under certain conditions, fibers.
• G/CN: Gasoline or compressed
natural gas unit that has minimum
acceptable safeguards against inherent
fire hazards.
• G/LP: Gasoline or liquefied
petroleum gas unit that has minimum
acceptable safeguards against inherent
fire hazards;
• GS/CNS: Gasoline or compressed
natural gas unit and, in addition to
meeting all the requirements for G/CN
units, is provided with additional
safeguards to the exhaust, fuel, and
electric systems.
• GS/LPS: Gasoline or liquefied
petroleum gas unit and, in addition to
meeting all the requirements for the G/
LP units, is provided with additional
safeguards to the exhaust, fuel, and
electric systems.
(a) Please provide OSHA with data on
characteristics such as usage,
specifications, capacity, function, ages,
and lifespans of trucks in your fleet for
the 19 truck types listed in the NFPA
standard. Please include information on
the number of each type of truck you
use, the number of employees assigned
to operate these trucks, and for what
activities each type of truck is used.
(b) In addition to these 19 truck types,
should OSHA consider including any
other types of powered industrial trucks
in a future OSHA standard? What would
be the basis for inclusions, given that
those types are not currently in NFPA
505–2018?
(c) How commonly used are the eight
powered industrial truck types
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:46 Mar 08, 2019
Jkt 247001
identified in NFPA 505–2018 but not in
OSHA’s current standard?
(d) In the Supporting Statement for
the 2017 Information Collection Request
of the standard on powered industrial
trucks (29 CFR 1910.178) (Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) Control
No. 1218–0242 (September 2017)),
OSHA estimated that 1.8 million
workers operate 1.2 million trucks
within all affected establishments in
construction, general industry,
longshoring, marine terminals, and
shipyards.7 Do these estimates
accurately reflect the current number of
workers and trucks affected by the
standard on powered industrial trucks
in general industry (29 CFR 1910.178)?
If not, should the number of workers
and trucks be adjusted up or down and
by how much?
2. Truck Operations, Maintenance, and
Training
(a) Do you perform training in-house
or contract out to specialists?
(b) If you provide training in-house,
do you purchase training modules or
develop your own?
(c) Who actually provides the training
(e.g., supervisor, safety and health
specialist)?
(d) Is your current training limited to
truck operations and maintenance or do
you manage a broad occupational safety
and health training program that
includes training on trucks? For all of
your workplace safety and health
training programs, please provide
details on length, frequency, scope, and
types of technical resources deployed
(e.g., DVDs, online courses, hands-on
training, computer simulation or
robotics).
(e) Are OSHA’s current training
requirements adequate or excessive? If
not adequate, what modifications or
additional requirements should OSHA
consider? If excessive, what
requirements are unnecessary or overly
burdensome?
(f) Does your workplace have a
training program that you think is more
effective than that required by the
OSHA standard?
7 Docket Exhibit OSHA–2011–0062–0009,
Document ID 0009, p. 5, https://
www.regulations.gov/document?D=OSHA-20110062-0009. As reported in that document (2017 ICR
supporting statement), ‘‘In 1998, OSHA published
a final rule in which it revised the operator training
requirements specified by paragraph (l) of the
Standard (see 63 FR 66238). As part of this
rulemaking, the agency performed a Final Economic
Analysis (FEA) (see 63 FR 66262). Using data from
the FEA for the burden hour and cost estimates
described below, OSHA finds that the Standard
applies to employers using an estimated 1,210,679
powered industrial trucks operated by about
1,816,018 workers.’’
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
8639
(g) Please share the aspects of the
program in your workplace that you
recommend OSHA consider and
provide any data to support its
effectiveness.
(h) Are you using any powered
industrial truck aftermarket equipment,
such as a back-up camera or perimeter
sensor alarm? Is such equipment
effective in reducing accidents?
(i) What number or percentage of
powered industrial trucks in use have
rollover protection or enclosures?
(j) Can powered industrial trucks
without rollover protection be
retrofitted? If so, how, and what is your
estimate of that cost?
(k) How often do you inspect your
powered industrial trucks? Please
describe your inspection procedures
and provide any checklists that are
used.
3. Incidents and Injuries
(a) What are the most common types
of workplace incidents and injuries
involving powered industrial trucks that
have occurred in your facility or
industry (e.g., rollovers, struck by,
falling off docks)?
(b) What are the most common causes
of hazardous incidents involving
powered industrial trucks (please
specify those factors)? Please provide
case reports, redacted data, or
aggregated data, and information
quantifying and describing such
incidents.
(c) Which activities involving
powered industrial trucks result in the
most incidents (e.g., loading, unloading,
traveling, backing up)?
(d) Do more incidents occur with
older equipment? If so, please provide
detailed information on why the older
equipment is more hazardous.
(e) Do incidents vary by type of
industrial truck, and if so, how?
4. Consistency Among OSHA Standards
(a) If OSHA determines that it is
necessary to revise the general industry
standard, how should the agency
consider revising the maritime and
construction powered industrial trucks
standards?
(b) Should OSHA’s maritime and
construction standards be identical or,
at least, substantially similar to the
general industry standard?
(c) Are there differences specific to
the maritime and construction
industries that should be addressed
through different requirements?
E:\FR\FM\11MRP1.SGM
11MRP1
8640
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 47 / Monday, March 11, 2019 / Proposed Rules
B. Consensus Standards
1. American National Standards
Institute
As previously stated, OSHA’s
standards addressing powered
industrial trucks reference ANSI B56.1,
developed in 1969. However, this
consensus standard has been updated
several times since then with the latest
version published in 2018 (ANSI/ITSDF
B56.1a).
(a) Do the requirements in the 2018
edition of ANSI/ITSDF B56.1a
adequately protect workers operating
powered industrial trucks?
(b) What requirements, if any, are
missing from this ANSI standard that
would ensure safety for employees
during powered industrial truck
operations?
(c) Does compliance with ANSI/
ITSDF B56.1a-2018 address most
hazards commonly encountered with
powered industrial trucks and is it
better or preferable than the existing
OSHA regulation? Please explain.
(d) Are there any hazards not
addressed by ANSI/ITSDF B56.1a–
2018?
(e) Are there any requirements in
ANSI/ITSDF B56.1a–2018 that reduce
worker safety?
2. National Fire Protection Association
The National Fire Protection
Association standard (NFPA 505–2018)
is the fire safety standard for powered
industrial trucks and covers truck types,
designations, areas of use, maintenance,
and operation of powered industrial
trucks.
(a) Does compliance with the NFPA
standard ensure that workers are
protected from hazards associated with
the operation of powered industrial
trucks, or are there additional
procedures OSHA should consider?
(b) Are employers currently in
compliance with this consensus
standard? If not, what provisions are
employers not following? Why?
3. Other Standards
Are there other standards OSHA
should consider or use if the agency
determines it is necessary to revise its
powered industrial trucks standards?
amozie on DSK9F9SC42PROD with PROPOSALS
C. Compliance Issues
(a) If OSHA decides to revise the
standards based on the most recent
ANSI and NFPA standards, what
requirements, if any, in ANSI/ITSDF
B56.1a–2018 and NFPA 505–2018
would make it difficult or impossible for
older equipment to be in compliance?
(b) If OSHA revises the standards on
powered industrial trucks, should
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:46 Mar 08, 2019
Jkt 247001
OSHA consider grandfathering in
powered industrial trucks manufactured
before a certain date and, if so, what
date would that be? Please provide your
reasoning for that date.
(c) Would it be appropriate for
grandfathering dates to vary for different
types of truck?
(d) If OSHA decides to consider
grandfathering older equipment, is there
a future date OSHA should set beyond
which the ‘‘grandfathered’’ clause (or
safe harbor) should not apply?
(e) How many older powered
industrial trucks are you using? What
type of trucks are these and what do you
use them for?
(f) How many powered industrial
trucks do you use that do not have seat
belts?
(g) Can any of these trucks be
retrofitted with seat belts? If so, how,
and what is your estimate of that cost?
(h) What is the average life span of a
powered industrial truck?
D. Economic Issues
(a) Please describe in detail any
provision of the current standard that
you believe is outdated, unnecessary, or
ineffective; or imposes costs that exceed
benefits. Please provide information
supporting your view, including data,
studies, and articles.
(b) To what extent do employers
already comply with the current ANSI
consensus standard (ANSI/ITSDF
B56.1a–2018)? Are there situations
where equipment could be easily
retrofitted to meet the requirements
contained in the revised consensus
standard ANSI/ITSDF B56.1a–2018?
Please include information on the type
of vehicle and modifications necessary,
including how much time is required to
perform the retrofitting, the type of
worker who could do the retrofitting,
and the cost of equipment needed for
the vehicle modification or the cost to
contract out the work.
(c) What are the baseline practices in
your industry with respect to complying
with the provisions of consensus
standards relating to training, operation,
maintenance, or work practices?
(d) Is there older equipment that
cannot be updated without significant
cost, and what factors would contribute
to the costs of retrofitting or augmenting
older equipment to achieve compliance
with ANSI/ITSDF B56.1a-2018? Please
specify the types of costs (i.e., labor,
materials, equipment, and consultant
fees) that affected employers would
incur to comply with ANSI/ITSDF
B56.1a–2018 and the costs per unit (e.g.,
worker, machinery, energy). If a new
OSHA standard required changes that
applied to older powered industrial
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
trucks, at what cost of compliance
expense would it be more cost effective
simply to replace older trucks with
newer ones?
(e) If OSHA incorporated the
requirements of NFPA 505–2018 into its
standards and applied it to older
powered industrial trucks, would
employers retrofit or augment their
older trucks, or replace them with
already-compliant trucks?
(f) Are there particular impacts on
small entities from a revision to the
powered industrial trucks standards that
references current consensus standards,
including ANSI/ITSDF B56.1a––2018?
(g) Would small entities face
economic or technological feasibility
challenges to comply with revised
standards that reference current
consensus standards?
(h) Do you identify as a small entity
in your industry? If so, what is the basis
for that identification (for example,
reliance on Small Business
Administration size standards)? If you
are uncertain as to your qualifications as
a small entity, please provide details on
your establishment size in terms of
number of employees and categories of
employee occupations; industry
identification (by North American
Industrial Classification System 6-digit
code, if available); and the primary
types of goods or services produced by
your company.
(i) Please describe in detail the
technical or financial concerns that
employers encounter when
implementing or planning the
implementation of safety programs for
powered industrial trucks.
(l) OSHA requests comments,
particularly from small entities, on
current practices with respect to safe
handling and operation of powered
industrial trucks. Please identify the
practices that are critical to safe
handling and operation of powered
industrial trucks (i.e., those practices
whose absence would significantly
compromise the safety of employees).
Please discuss the role of employee
training in your safety programs
involving powered industrial trucks and
the perceived benefits of employee
training. Where possible, please
estimate the cost per employee for any
component of your safety programs
involving powered industrial trucks.
E. Other Comments/Suggestions/
Concerns
OSHA invites interested persons—
including employers, trade associations,
workers, worker organizations, and
public health and safety organizations—
to submit information, comments, data,
studies, and other materials on the
E:\FR\FM\11MRP1.SGM
11MRP1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 47 / Monday, March 11, 2019 / Proposed Rules
issues and questions in this RFI. In
particular, OSHA invites comment on
specific issues and requests information
and data about practices at affected
establishments in general industry,
construction, shipyard employment,
and marine cargo handling. When
submitting comments in response to
questions or issues raised or revisions
that OSHA is considering, OSHA
requests that you explain your rationale
and, if possible, provide data and
information to support your comments
and recommendations.
Authority and Signature
Loren Sweatt, Acting Assistant
Secretary of Labor for Occupational
Safety and Health, authorized the
preparation of this notice pursuant to 29
U.S.C. 653,655, and 657, Secretary’s
Order 1–2012 (77 FR 3912; Jan. 25,
2012), and 29 CFR part 1911.
Signed at Washington, DC, on March 5,
2019.
Loren Sweatt,
Acting Assistant Secretary of Labor for
Occupational Safety and Health.
[FR Doc. 2019–04338 Filed 3–8–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–26–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 100
[Docket Number USCG–2018–1098]
RIN 100–AA08
Special Local Regulations; Annual
Boyne Thunder Poker Run; Charlevoix,
MI
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notification of proposed
rulemaking.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard proposes to
add a special local regulation to increase
safety in the navigable waters of Round
Lake and Pine River Channel,
Charlevoix, MI during the annual Boyne
Thunder Poker Run. The proposal will
allow the Coast Guard Patrol
Commander to control vessel traffic
during the event in this small and
restricted waterway. The proposed
regulation will be enforced during the
day of the event. The date and time will
be announced via a Notice of
Enforcement. We invite your comments
on this proposed rulemaking.
DATES: Comments and related material
must be received by the Coast Guard on
or before May 10, 2019.
amozie on DSK9F9SC42PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:46 Mar 08, 2019
Jkt 247001
You may submit comments
identified by docket number USCG–
2018–1098 using the Federal eRulemaking Portal at https://
www.regulations.gov. Type the docket
number (USCG–2018–1098) in the
‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click ‘‘SEARCH.’’
See the ‘‘Public Participation and
Request for Comments’’ portion of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for
further instructions on submitting
comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this rule, call or
email MST2 Blackledge, Waterways
Management, Coast Guard Sector Sault
Sainte Marie, U.S. Coast Guard;
telephone 906–253–2443, email
Onnalee.A.Blackledge@uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
ADDRESSES:
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
COTP Captain of the Port
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
§ Section
U.S.C. United States Code
II. Background, Purpose, and Legal
Basis
The Annual Boyne Thunder Poker
Run is a charity marine event occurring
in the month of July with a route that
runs from Boyne City out to Lake
Michigan and back to Boyne City. This
event, occurring annually for the past 15
years, includes approximately 100
participants in offshore type power
vessels. Round Lake and Pine River
Channel are small restricted waterways
that normally have a variety of
recreational users and a commercial
ferry that provides service to Beaver
Island. This mix of vessels in close
proximity to the event warrants
additional safety measures.
The legal basis for this proposed
rulemaking is found at 33 U.S.C. 1233;
33 CFR 1.05–1; Department of
Homeland Security Delegation No.
0170.1.
III. Discussion of Proposed Rule
The Captain of the Port Sault Sainte
Marie (COTP) has determined that
adding the Annual Boyne City Poker
Run to the list of Special Local
Regulations in the navigable waters of
Round Lake and Pine River Channel in
Charlevoix, MI is the most practical way
to ensure the safety of the boating
public.
V. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after
considering numerous statutes and
Executive Orders related to rulemaking.
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
8641
Below we summarize our analyses
based on a number of these statutes and
Executive Orders, and we discuss First
Amendment rights of protestors.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
direct agencies to assess the costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits.
Executive Order 13771 directs agencies
to control regulatory costs through a
budgeting process. This NPRM has not
been designated a ‘‘significant
regulatory action,’’ under Executive
Order 12866. Accordingly, the NPRM
has not been reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB), and
pursuant to OMB guidance it is exempt
from the requirements of Executive
Order 13771.
This regulatory action determination
is based on the size, location, duration,
and time-of-day for the Special Local
Regulation. Vessel traffic will be able to
safely transit through the regulated area
which will impact a small designated
area within the COTP zone for a short
duration of time. Moreover, the Coast
Guard will issue Broadcast Notice to
Mariners via VHF–FM marine channel
16 about the special local area.
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of
1980, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended,
requires Federal agencies to consider
the potential impact of regulations on
small entities during rulemaking. The
term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises small
businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and
operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions
with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C.
605(b) that this rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
While some owners or operators of
vessels intending to transit the regulated
area may be small entities, for the
reasons stated in section V.A. above,
this rule will not have a significant
economic impact on any vessel owner
or operator.
If you think that your business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity
and that this rule would have a
significant economic impact on it,
please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it
qualifies and how and to what degree
this rule would economically affect it.
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
E:\FR\FM\11MRP1.SGM
11MRP1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 47 (Monday, March 11, 2019)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 8633-8641]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-04338]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Occupational Safety and Health Administration
29 CFR Parts 1910, 1915, 1917, 1918, and 1926
[Docket No. OSHA-2018-0008]
RIN 1218-AC99
Powered Industrial Trucks; Request for information
AGENCY: Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), Labor.
ACTION: Request for Information (RFI).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: OSHA requests information and comment on issues related to
requirements in the standards on powered industrial trucks for general,
maritime, and construction industries. OSHA is seeking information
regarding the types, age, and usage of powered industrial trucks,
maintenance and retrofitting of powered industrial trucks, how to
regulate older powered industrial trucks, the types of accidents and
injuries associated with operation of powered industrial trucks, the
costs and benefits of retrofitting powered industrial trucks with
safety features, and the costs and benefits of all other components of
a safety program, as well as various other issues. OSHA is also
interested in understanding whether the differences between the
standards for maritime, construction, and general industry are
appropriate and effective for each specific industrial sector. OSHA
will use the information received in response to this RFI to determine
what action, if any, it may take to reduce regulatory burdens while
maintaining worker safety.
DATES: Submit comments and additional material on or before June 10,
2019. All submissions must bear a postmark or provide other evidence of
the submission date.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments and additional materials, identified by
Docket No. OSHA-2018-0008, by any of the following methods:
Electronically: Submit comments and attachments electronically at
https://www.regulations.gov, which is the Federal eRulemaking Portal.
Follow the instructions online for making electronic submissions.
Facsimile: OSHA allows facsimile transmission of comments and
additional material that are 10 pages or fewer in length (including
attachments). Send these documents to the OSHA Docket Office at (202)
693-1648. OSHA does not require hard copies of these documents. Instead
of transmitting facsimile copies of attachments that supplement these
documents (for example, studies, journal articles), commenters must
submit these attachments to the OSHA Docket Office, Room N-3653,
Occupational Safety and Health Administration, U.S. Department of
Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20210. These
attachments must identify clearly the commenter's name, the date of
submission, the title of this RFI (Powered Industrial Trucks), and
docket no. OSHA-2018-0008 so that the Docket Office can attach them to
the appropriate document.
Regular mail, express mail, hand delivery, or messenger (courier)
service: Submit comments and any additional material (for example,
studies, journal articles) to the OSHA Docket Office, Docket No. OSHA-
2018-0008 or RIN (1218-AC99), Room N-3653, Occupational Safety and
Health Administration, U.S. Department of Labor, 200 Constitution
Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20210; telephone: (202) 693-2350. (OSHA's TTY
number is (877) 889-5627.) Contact the OSHA Docket Office for
information about security procedures concerning delivery of materials
by express mail, hand delivery, and messenger service. The hours of
operation for the OSHA Docket Office are 10:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m., ET.
Instructions: All submissions must include the agency's name, the
title of this RFI (Powered Industrial Trucks), and the docket no. OSHA-
2018-0008. OSHA will place comments and other material, including any
personal information, in the public docket without revision, and these
materials will be available online at https://www.regulations.gov.
Therefore, OSHA cautions commenters about submitting statements they do
not want made available to the public and submitting comments that
contain personal information (either about themselves or others) such
as Social Security numbers, birth dates, and medical data.
Docket: To read or download submissions or other material in the
docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov or the OSHA Docket Office at
the above address. The https://www.regulations.gov index lists all
documents in the docket. However, some information (e.g., copyrighted
material) is not available publicly to read or download through the
website. All submissions, including copyrighted material, are available
for inspection at the OSHA Docket Office. Contact the OSHA Docket
Office for assistance in locating docket submissions.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Press inquiries: Frank Meilinger,
Director, OSHA Office of Communications; telephone: (202) 693-1999;
email: meilinger.francis2@dol.gov.
General and technical information: Lisa Long, Director, Office of
Engineering Safety, OSHA Directorate of Standards and Guidance;
telephone: (202) 693-2222; fax: (202) 693-1663; email:
long.lisa@dol.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Copies of this Federal Register notice: Electronic copies are
available at https://www.regulations.gov. This Federal Register notice,
as well as news releases and other relevant information, also are
available at OSHA's web page at https://www.osha.gov.
References and Exhibits: Documents referenced by OSHA in this RFI,
other than OSHA standards and Federal Register notices, are in Docket
No. OSHA-2018-0008 (powered industrial trucks; request for
information). The docket is available at https://www.regulations.gov,
the Federal
[[Page 8634]]
eRulemaking Portal. For additional information on submitting items to,
or accessing items in, the docket, please refer to the ADDRESSES
section of this RFI. While most exhibits are available at https://www.regulations.gov, some information (e.g., copyrighted material) is
not available to download from that web page. However, all materials in
the docket are available for inspection at the OSHA Docket Office.
Table of Contents
I. Background
A. Introduction
B. Fatality and Injury Data
C. Regulatory History
1. General Industry
2. Shipyards, Longshoring, and Marine Cargo Handling
3. Construction
II. Request for Information, Data, and Comments
A. General Issues
1. Types of Powered Industrial Trucks
2. Truck Operation, Maintenance, and Training
3. Incidents and Injuries
4. Consistency Among OSHA Standards
B. Consensus Standards
1. American National Standards Institute
2. National Fire Protection Association
3. Other Standards
C. Compliance Issues
D. Economic Issues
E. Other Comments/Suggestions/Concerns
I. Background
A. Introduction
OSHA is considering whether or not to initiate rulemaking to revise
the powered industrial trucks standards for general, maritime, and
construction industries (29 CFR 1910.178, 1915.120, 1917.43, 1918.65,
and 1926.602(c), (d)). These regulations, promulgated in 1971 and
updated in 1998, are intended to protect operators of these trucks and
their coworkers. In this RFI, OSHA is seeking public comments that will
inform OSHA on potential updates to the powered industrial trucks
standards. The term ``powered industrial truck'' includes what are
commonly termed forklifts, but the term also includes all fork trucks,
tractors, platform lift trucks, motorized hand trucks, and other
specialized industrial trucks powered by an electric motor or an
internal combustion engine. The aim of this RFI is to seek public
comment on what aspects of the powered industrial trucks standards are
effective as well as those that may be outdated, inefficient,
unnecessary, or overly burdensome, and how those provisions might be
repealed, replaced, or modified while maintaining or improving worker
safety.
OSHA's powered industrial trucks standards contain requirements for
machine design and construction, locations of use, maintenance,
training, and operations, among other requirements. OSHA initially
adopted the powered industrial trucks standard (29 CFR 1910.178) on May
29, 1971 (36 FR 10613), pursuant to section 6(a) of the Occupational
Safety and Health Act of 1970 (OSH Act) (29 U.S.C. 651, 655),\1\ based
on the 1969 editions of the American National Standards Institute's
(ANSI) Safety Standard for Powered Industrial Trucks, B56.1, and the
National Fire Protection Association's (NFPA) standard for Type
Designation, Areas of Use, Maintenance and Operation of Powered
Industrial Trucks, NFPA 505. Since the promulgation of OSHA's powered
industrial trucks standard in 1971, these national consensus standards
have been updated a number of times. The most recent edition of ANSI
B56.1 was issued in 2018, in conjunction with the Industrial Truck
Standards Development Foundation (ITSDF) (OSHA-2018-0008-0002). The
most recent edition of NFPA 505 was issued in 2018 (OSHA-2018-0008-
0003). OSHA has updated the powered industrial trucks standards only
once, on December 1, 1998 (63 FR 66270), to revise the requirements for
operator training codified at Sec. 1910.178(l) and to include
references to Sec. 1910.178(l) in the standards for shipyards, marine
terminals, longshoring, and construction (Sec. Sec. 1910.16, 1915.120,
1917.1, 1918.1, and 1926.602(d)).\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Section 6(a) directed OSHA, during the first two years after
the OSH Act became effective, to promulgate as an occupational
safety and health standard any national consensus standard or any
established Federal standard if such promulgation would improve
employee safety or health.
\2\ See Docket OSHA-S008-2006-0639.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
ANSI B56.1 defines the safety requirements relating to the elements
of design, operation, and maintenance of powered industrial trucks.
This national consensus standard has two basic parts. The first part
establishes manufacturer requirements to ensure hazards do not result
from the design and construction of powered industrial trucks at the
time of manufacture. This includes a variety of test methods to
determine load-handling capacity, which must also be indicated through
appropriate markings. When OSHA originally promulgated the powered
industrial trucks standard, the agency incorporated by reference the
design requirements section of ANSI B56.1-1969.
The second part of B56.1 establishes guidelines for operators of
industrial trucks, including requirements for operator qualifications
and training, operator safety rules, and maintenance practices.
Although OSHA did not incorporate by reference the ANSI B56.1-1969 user
requirements in its powered industrial trucks standard, OSHA did base
some of the provisions on this part of the ANSI standard. Throughout
the years, ANSI/ITSDF has added other requirements to improve the
safety of industrial truck operators and other employees. Examples of
additions to the user requirements in B56.1 include:
A requirement that operator training programs cover
hazards from carbon monoxide production by internal combustion engines
and common initial symptoms of exposure.
A requirement that, prior to working on engine fuel
systems of liquefied petroleum (LP) gas-powered trucks with engines
that will not run, users must close the LP tank and vent fuel slowly in
a non-hazardous area.
A requirement for stopping distances when descending
grades. This section states that when descending a grade, required
stopping distances must be greater and methods must be employed to
allow for this condition. Such methods include: Reducing speed,
limiting loads, and allowing for adequate clear space at the bottom of
the grade.
A requirement to consider noise exposure of personnel in
the work area.
A requirement regarding relocation of powered industrial
trucks. This section states that when using lifting equipment such as
elevators, cranes, ship hoisting gear, to relocate a powered industrial
truck, the user shall ensure that the capacity of the hoisting
equipment being used is not exceeded.
The NFPA 505 standard contains fire safety guidelines for powered
industrial trucks including type designations, areas of use,
conversions, maintenance, and operations. This standard is designed to
mitigate potential fire and explosion hazards involving powered
industrial trucks, including fork trucks, tractors, platform lift
trucks, motorized hand trucks, and other specialized industrial trucks
powered by electric motors or internal combustion engines.
When OSHA adopted the powered industrial trucks standard in 1971,
there were 11 designated types of trucks.\3\
[[Page 8635]]
NFPA has since listed an additional eight truck types: CGH, CN, CNS,
DX, G/CN, G/LP, GS/CNS, and GS/LPS.\4\ These are not listed in OSHA's
standard. NFPA first added type designations G/LP and GS/LPS, which are
both dual-fuel type trucks that operate on gasoline and/or liquefied
petroleum gas. NFPA next added new truck type designation DX, which is
a diesel-powered unit that is constructed to allow it to be used in
atmospheres that contain specifically named flammable vapors, dust, and
fibers. NFPA added a new section on compressed natural gas (CNG) that
included the addition of type designations CN, CNS, G/CN, and GS/CNS,
and made changes to the fuel handling and storage chapters for these
trucks, as well as for the dual fuel and converted trucks. NFPA's most
recent type designation is a compressed hydrogen-powered unit (CGH).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ These 11 designations represent the following truck types:
D-Diesel-powered unit; DS-Diesel-powered unit with additional
safeguards to exhaust, fuel and electrical systems; DY-Diesel-
powered unit with safe guards of DS unit and do not have any
electrical equipment including the ignition system and have
temperature limiting features; E-Electrically powered unit; ES-
Electrical powered unit with additional safeguards to electrical
systems to prevent hazardous sparks and limit surface temperatures;
EE-Electrical powered unit with safeguards of ES units and all
electric motors and electrical equipment enclosed; EX-Electrical
powered unit that differs from E, ES and EE units that allows it to
be used in certain atmospheres containing flammable vapors and dust;
G-Gasoline powered unit; GS-Gasoline powered unit with additional
safeguards to exhaust, fuel and electrical systems; LP-Liquefied
Petroleum powered unit; LPS-Liquefied Petroleum powered unit with
additional safeguards to exhaust, fuel and electrical systems.
\4\ These eight designations are: CGH-Compressed hydrogen-
powered unit utilizing a fuel cell that has minimum acceptable
safeguards against inherent fire and electrical shock hazards; CN-
Compressed natural gas-powered unit that has minimum acceptable
safeguards against inherent fire hazards; CNS-Compressed natural
gas-powered unit that, in addition to meeting the requirements for
Type CN units, is provided with additional safeguards to the
exhaust, fuel, and electric systems; DX-Diesel-powered unit in which
the diesel engine and the electric fittings and equipment are
designed, constructed, and assembled in such a way that the unit can
be used in atmospheres that contain specifically named flammable
vapors, dusts, and, under certain conditions, fibers; G/CN-Gasoline
or compressed natural gas unit that has minimum acceptable
safeguards against inherent fire hazards; G/LP-Gasoline or liquefied
petroleum gas and has minimum acceptable safeguards against inherent
fire hazards; GS/CNS-Gasoline or compressed natural gas unit and, in
addition to meeting all the requirements for G/CN units, is provided
with additional safeguards to the exhaust, fuel, and electric
systems; GS/LPS-Gasoline or liquefied petroleum gas unit and, in
addition to meeting all the requirements for the G/LP units, is
provided with additional safeguards to the exhaust, fuel, and
electric systems.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
These eight type-designated units--CGH, CN, CNS, DX, G/CN, G/LP,
GS/CNS, GS/LPS--have different requirements for safe operation,
maintenance, and handling due to their fuel source, but they are
generally the same in design and function as the 11 truck types
currently listed in OSHA's standard. For instance, the chapter in NFPA
505 for fuel handling and storage prohibits over-pressurizing fuel
cylinders and requires that pressure relief devices be free of plugging
and maintained in good operating condition; these requirements are not
reflected in OSHA's current standard.
OSHA requests information from the public on the powered industrial
trucks standards to help the agency determine how to best protect
employees who use powered industrial trucks and eliminate unnecessary
burdens. OSHA is seeking public comments on whether and how the powered
industrial trucks standards should be amended.
B. Fatality and Injury Data
Statistics show that, in some instances, powered industrial trucks
cause worker fatalities and injuries. Accordingly, OSHA is considering
ways to maintain or improve worker safety while modernizing its
standards and reducing any overly-burdensome requirements.
Data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) (OSHA-2018-0008-
0004) for the years 2011 through 2016 indicate a total of 1,357
fatalities resulting from the use of powered material hauling and
transport industrial vehicles and tractors. As shown in Table 1, the
annual number of fatalities ranged from 218 to 241, with an annual
average of 226 fatalities. The data show that the majority of these
fatalities, 1,169 (89 percent), occurred in five industry sectors:
Agriculture, forestry, fishing, and hunting (788); manufacturing (126);
construction (94); wholesale trade (83); and transportation and
warehousing (78). Nearly all the fatalities, 1,316 (97 percent),
occurred during the use of powered forklifts, order pickers, platform
trucks, tractors, and power take-offs.
With respect to injury data, BLS reports that, for the three most
recent years with complete results from the BLS surveillance system
(2014-2016), lost-workday injuries resulting from incidents associated
with powered industrial forklifts, trucks, and tractors ranged from
11,790 cases (2016) to 11,940 cases (2015) and averaged 11,857
cases.\5\ Over 90 percent of cases during this three-year period
involved powered industrial material hauling and transport vehicles.
The remainder involved tractors and power take-offs.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ US Dept. of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Nonfatal
cases involving days away from work: Selected characteristics (2011
forward), 2011-2016, https://www.bls.gov/iif/ (accessed January 23,
2018).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
OSHA's data from the Severe Injury Reports (SIRs) mirror that of
BLS. The SIRs recorded 1,238 incidents from January 1, 2015, through
February 28, 2017, resulting in 1,123 hospitalizations and 193
amputations. Approximately 97 percent of the 1,238 incidents involved
powered forklifts, order pickers, platform trucks, pallet jacks,
airport utility vehicles, and other powered industrial material hauling
and transport vehicles, not elsewhere classified, while the remainder
involved tractors and power take-offs.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ U.S. Dept. of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health
Administration, Severe Injury Reports, https://www.osha.gov/severeinjury/ (accessed January 18, 2018).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
BILLING CODE 4510-26-P
[[Page 8636]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP11MR19.025
[[Page 8637]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP11MR19.026
[[Page 8638]]
BILLING CODE 4510-26-C
C. Regulatory History
1. General Industry
As previously noted, in June 1971, OSHA adopted the powered
industrial trucks standard, 29 CFR 1910.178, implementing several
measures to encourage worker safety. As part of that rulemaking, and
under section 6(a) of the Act, OSHA codified ANSI B56.1-1969, Safety
Standard for Powered Industrial Trucks, including the provisions
covering operator training.
On December 1, 1998 (63 FR 66270), after notice and comment
rulemaking, OSHA published a final rule updating the provisions
covering powered industrial truck operator training, which was codified
at 29 CFR 1910.178(l). These provisions mandate a training program that
bases the amount and type of training required on the operator's prior
knowledge and skill; the types of powered industrial trucks the
operator will operate in the workplace; the hazards present in the
workplace; and the operator's demonstrated ability to operate a powered
industrial truck safely. Refresher training is required if the operator
is involved in an accident or a near-miss incident; the operator has
been observed operating the vehicle in an unsafe manner; the operator
has been determined during an evaluation to need additional training;
there are changes in the workplace that could affect safe operation of
the truck; or the operator is assigned to operate a different type of
truck. Evaluations of each operator's performance are required as part
of the initial and refresher training and each operator's performance
must be evaluated at least once every three years. These training
requirements apply to all industries (general industry, construction,
shipyards, marine terminals, and longshoring operations) that use
powered industrial trucks, except agricultural operations.
Since the 1998 final rule on powered industrial truck operator
training, OSHA has not revised the general industry powered industrial
truck requirements or updated references to the national industry
consensus standard (B56.1) to include newer versions of that standard.
2. Shipyards, Longshoring, and Marine Cargo Handling
In 1974, pursuant to Section 41 of the Longshore and Harbor
Workers' Compensation Act, the Secretary issued the existing shipyards
and longshoring regulations (39 FR 22074, June 19, 1974). These
regulations appear at 29 CFR part 1915 for shipyards and 29 CFR part
1918 for longshoring. Because the OSH Act comprehensively covers most
private employers, the longshoring standards also were applied to
shoreside cargo handling operations (i.e. marine terminal operations)
at 29 CFR part 1917. In addition, in accordance with 29 CFR
1910.5(c)(2), OSHA applied the general industry standards to shoreside
activities not covered by the older longshoring rules. Under section
1910.5(c)(2), a general industry standard covering a hazardous
condition applies to shoreside activities not covered by a specific
standard addressing that hazard. Shipyards are covered by the general
industry standard.
On July 5, 1983 (48 FR 30886), OSHA published the final standard
for marine terminals (29 CFR part 1917). This rule was intended to
further address the shoreside segment of marine cargo handling (29 CFR
1917.27). The marine terminals standard includes requirements for
powered industrial trucks at 29 CFR 1917.43.
On July 25, 1997, OSHA published a final rule revising the marine
terminals standard (29 CFR part 1917) and the longshoring standard (29
CFR part 1918), and improving the training requirements for powered
industrial truck operators in the marine cargo handling industries (62
FR 40142). Then, on December 1, 1998 (63 FR 66238), OSHA adopted a
final rule for shipyard employment (29 CFR 1915.120), Powered
Industrial Truck Operator Training, which set forth training
requirements applicable to shipyard employment identical to the
requirements in the general industry powered industrial truck training
standard at 29 CFR 1910.178(l).
3. Construction
In 1971, under section 6(a) of the OSH Act, the Secretary of Labor
adopted the existing Federal standards that had been issued under the
Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards Act as OSHA construction
standards (36 FR 7340, April 17, 1971). The provisions pertaining to
powered industrial trucks used in construction are contained at 29 CFR
1926.602(c). Paragraph 1926.602(c)(1)(vi) states:
All industrial trucks in use shall meet the applicable
requirements of design, construction, stability, inspection,
testing, maintenance, and operation, as defined in American National
Standards Institute B56.1-1969, Safety Standards for Powered
Industrial Trucks.
Thus, by incorporating by reference the same 1969 ANSI standard
that was the source document for the general industry standard at 29
CFR 1910.178, the powered industrial truck construction standard
imposes the identical powered industrial truck requirements on the
construction industry as applied to general industry.
On December 1, 1998, 29 CFR part 1926 was amended by adding a new
paragraph (d), which provides the same powered industrial truck
operator training requirements for construction work as adopted at 29
CFR 1910.178(l) for general industry.
II. Request for Information, Data, and Comments
OSHA is seeking information, data, and comments (information),
including information on anticipated costs, cost savings, and benefits
related to the questions below, that will inform the agency's analysis
of technological and economic feasibility and will help determine what
action, if any, should be taken to repeal, replace or modify outdated,
unnecessary or overly burdensome aspects of the powered industrial
trucks standard while maintaining or improving worker safety. OSHA is
providing the following questions to facilitate responses to this RFI,
but commenters may supply other information pertaining to the RFI not
explicitly solicited by the questions. When responding, please
reference the specific question number that you are responding to,
provide a detailed response, explain the reasons behind your views,
and, if possible, identify, and provide relevant information on which
you rely, including, but not limited to, data, studies, and articles.
Throughout this RFI, OSHA requests economic data on issues such as
current practices and compliance resource expenditures. In your
response, please provide details on your establishment including number
of employees and categories of employee occupations; industry
identification (by North American Industrial Classification System 6-
digit code if available); and the primary types of goods or services
produced by your company. This information will help OSHA develop a
more accurate analysis of the impacts of any potential rule. OSHA will
carefully review and evaluate the information, data, and comments
received in response to this Federal Register notice to decide on an
appropriate course of action.
A. General Issues
1. Types of Powered Industrial Trucks
OSHA's current powered industrial trucks standards list 11
different types of powered industrial trucks, while NFPA 505-2018 lists
19 different types of powered industrial trucks (the ANSI B56.1
standard does not list types of
[[Page 8639]]
powered industrial trucks). OSHA is considering adding these eight new
truck types to modernize its standard and improve worker safety. The
eight new truck types not currently listed in OSHA's powered industrial
trucks standards are:
CGH: Compressed hydrogen-powered unit utilizing a fuel
cell that has minimum acceptable safeguards against inherent fire and
electrical shock hazards.
CN: Compressed natural gas-powered unit that has minimum
acceptable safeguards against inherent fire hazards.
CNS: Compressed natural gas-powered unit that, in addition
to meeting the requirements for Type CN units, is provided with
additional safeguards to the exhaust, fuel, and electric systems;
DX: Diesel-powered unit in which the diesel engine and the
electric fittings and equipment are designed, constructed, and
assembled in such a way that the unit can be used in atmospheres that
contain specifically named flammable vapors, dusts, and, under certain
conditions, fibers.
G/CN: Gasoline or compressed natural gas unit that has
minimum acceptable safeguards against inherent fire hazards.
G/LP: Gasoline or liquefied petroleum gas unit that has
minimum acceptable safeguards against inherent fire hazards;
GS/CNS: Gasoline or compressed natural gas unit and, in
addition to meeting all the requirements for G/CN units, is provided
with additional safeguards to the exhaust, fuel, and electric systems.
GS/LPS: Gasoline or liquefied petroleum gas unit and, in
addition to meeting all the requirements for the G/LP units, is
provided with additional safeguards to the exhaust, fuel, and electric
systems.
(a) Please provide OSHA with data on characteristics such as usage,
specifications, capacity, function, ages, and lifespans of trucks in
your fleet for the 19 truck types listed in the NFPA standard. Please
include information on the number of each type of truck you use, the
number of employees assigned to operate these trucks, and for what
activities each type of truck is used.
(b) In addition to these 19 truck types, should OSHA consider
including any other types of powered industrial trucks in a future OSHA
standard? What would be the basis for inclusions, given that those
types are not currently in NFPA 505-2018?
(c) How commonly used are the eight powered industrial truck types
identified in NFPA 505-2018 but not in OSHA's current standard?
(d) In the Supporting Statement for the 2017 Information Collection
Request of the standard on powered industrial trucks (29 CFR 1910.178)
(Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Control No. 1218-0242 (September
2017)), OSHA estimated that 1.8 million workers operate 1.2 million
trucks within all affected establishments in construction, general
industry, longshoring, marine terminals, and shipyards.\7\ Do these
estimates accurately reflect the current number of workers and trucks
affected by the standard on powered industrial trucks in general
industry (29 CFR 1910.178)? If not, should the number of workers and
trucks be adjusted up or down and by how much?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ Docket Exhibit OSHA-2011-0062-0009, Document ID 0009, p. 5,
https://www.regulations.gov/document?D=OSHA-2011-0062-0009. As
reported in that document (2017 ICR supporting statement), ``In
1998, OSHA published a final rule in which it revised the operator
training requirements specified by paragraph (l) of the Standard
(see 63 FR 66238). As part of this rulemaking, the agency performed
a Final Economic Analysis (FEA) (see 63 FR 66262). Using data from
the FEA for the burden hour and cost estimates described below, OSHA
finds that the Standard applies to employers using an estimated
1,210,679 powered industrial trucks operated by about 1,816,018
workers.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Truck Operations, Maintenance, and Training
(a) Do you perform training in-house or contract out to
specialists?
(b) If you provide training in-house, do you purchase training
modules or develop your own?
(c) Who actually provides the training (e.g., supervisor, safety
and health specialist)?
(d) Is your current training limited to truck operations and
maintenance or do you manage a broad occupational safety and health
training program that includes training on trucks? For all of your
workplace safety and health training programs, please provide details
on length, frequency, scope, and types of technical resources deployed
(e.g., DVDs, online courses, hands-on training, computer simulation or
robotics).
(e) Are OSHA's current training requirements adequate or excessive?
If not adequate, what modifications or additional requirements should
OSHA consider? If excessive, what requirements are unnecessary or
overly burdensome?
(f) Does your workplace have a training program that you think is
more effective than that required by the OSHA standard?
(g) Please share the aspects of the program in your workplace that
you recommend OSHA consider and provide any data to support its
effectiveness.
(h) Are you using any powered industrial truck aftermarket
equipment, such as a back-up camera or perimeter sensor alarm? Is such
equipment effective in reducing accidents?
(i) What number or percentage of powered industrial trucks in use
have rollover protection or enclosures?
(j) Can powered industrial trucks without rollover protection be
retrofitted? If so, how, and what is your estimate of that cost?
(k) How often do you inspect your powered industrial trucks? Please
describe your inspection procedures and provide any checklists that are
used.
3. Incidents and Injuries
(a) What are the most common types of workplace incidents and
injuries involving powered industrial trucks that have occurred in your
facility or industry (e.g., rollovers, struck by, falling off docks)?
(b) What are the most common causes of hazardous incidents
involving powered industrial trucks (please specify those factors)?
Please provide case reports, redacted data, or aggregated data, and
information quantifying and describing such incidents.
(c) Which activities involving powered industrial trucks result in
the most incidents (e.g., loading, unloading, traveling, backing up)?
(d) Do more incidents occur with older equipment? If so, please
provide detailed information on why the older equipment is more
hazardous.
(e) Do incidents vary by type of industrial truck, and if so, how?
4. Consistency Among OSHA Standards
(a) If OSHA determines that it is necessary to revise the general
industry standard, how should the agency consider revising the maritime
and construction powered industrial trucks standards?
(b) Should OSHA's maritime and construction standards be identical
or, at least, substantially similar to the general industry standard?
(c) Are there differences specific to the maritime and construction
industries that should be addressed through different requirements?
[[Page 8640]]
B. Consensus Standards
1. American National Standards Institute
As previously stated, OSHA's standards addressing powered
industrial trucks reference ANSI B56.1, developed in 1969. However,
this consensus standard has been updated several times since then with
the latest version published in 2018 (ANSI/ITSDF B56.1a).
(a) Do the requirements in the 2018 edition of ANSI/ITSDF B56.1a
adequately protect workers operating powered industrial trucks?
(b) What requirements, if any, are missing from this ANSI standard
that would ensure safety for employees during powered industrial truck
operations?
(c) Does compliance with ANSI/ITSDF B56.1a-2018 address most
hazards commonly encountered with powered industrial trucks and is it
better or preferable than the existing OSHA regulation? Please explain.
(d) Are there any hazards not addressed by ANSI/ITSDF B56.1a-2018?
(e) Are there any requirements in ANSI/ITSDF B56.1a-2018 that
reduce worker safety?
2. National Fire Protection Association
The National Fire Protection Association standard (NFPA 505-2018)
is the fire safety standard for powered industrial trucks and covers
truck types, designations, areas of use, maintenance, and operation of
powered industrial trucks.
(a) Does compliance with the NFPA standard ensure that workers are
protected from hazards associated with the operation of powered
industrial trucks, or are there additional procedures OSHA should
consider?
(b) Are employers currently in compliance with this consensus
standard? If not, what provisions are employers not following? Why?
3. Other Standards
Are there other standards OSHA should consider or use if the agency
determines it is necessary to revise its powered industrial trucks
standards?
C. Compliance Issues
(a) If OSHA decides to revise the standards based on the most
recent ANSI and NFPA standards, what requirements, if any, in ANSI/
ITSDF B56.1a-2018 and NFPA 505-2018 would make it difficult or
impossible for older equipment to be in compliance?
(b) If OSHA revises the standards on powered industrial trucks,
should OSHA consider grandfathering in powered industrial trucks
manufactured before a certain date and, if so, what date would that be?
Please provide your reasoning for that date.
(c) Would it be appropriate for grandfathering dates to vary for
different types of truck?
(d) If OSHA decides to consider grandfathering older equipment, is
there a future date OSHA should set beyond which the ``grandfathered''
clause (or safe harbor) should not apply?
(e) How many older powered industrial trucks are you using? What
type of trucks are these and what do you use them for?
(f) How many powered industrial trucks do you use that do not have
seat belts?
(g) Can any of these trucks be retrofitted with seat belts? If so,
how, and what is your estimate of that cost?
(h) What is the average life span of a powered industrial truck?
D. Economic Issues
(a) Please describe in detail any provision of the current standard
that you believe is outdated, unnecessary, or ineffective; or imposes
costs that exceed benefits. Please provide information supporting your
view, including data, studies, and articles.
(b) To what extent do employers already comply with the current
ANSI consensus standard (ANSI/ITSDF B56.1a-2018)? Are there situations
where equipment could be easily retrofitted to meet the requirements
contained in the revised consensus standard ANSI/ITSDF B56.1a-2018?
Please include information on the type of vehicle and modifications
necessary, including how much time is required to perform the
retrofitting, the type of worker who could do the retrofitting, and the
cost of equipment needed for the vehicle modification or the cost to
contract out the work.
(c) What are the baseline practices in your industry with respect
to complying with the provisions of consensus standards relating to
training, operation, maintenance, or work practices?
(d) Is there older equipment that cannot be updated without
significant cost, and what factors would contribute to the costs of
retrofitting or augmenting older equipment to achieve compliance with
ANSI/ITSDF B56.1a-2018? Please specify the types of costs (i.e., labor,
materials, equipment, and consultant fees) that affected employers
would incur to comply with ANSI/ITSDF B56.1a-2018 and the costs per
unit (e.g., worker, machinery, energy). If a new OSHA standard required
changes that applied to older powered industrial trucks, at what cost
of compliance expense would it be more cost effective simply to replace
older trucks with newer ones?
(e) If OSHA incorporated the requirements of NFPA 505-2018 into its
standards and applied it to older powered industrial trucks, would
employers retrofit or augment their older trucks, or replace them with
already-compliant trucks?
(f) Are there particular impacts on small entities from a revision
to the powered industrial trucks standards that references current
consensus standards, including ANSI/ITSDF B56.1a--2018?
(g) Would small entities face economic or technological feasibility
challenges to comply with revised standards that reference current
consensus standards?
(h) Do you identify as a small entity in your industry? If so, what
is the basis for that identification (for example, reliance on Small
Business Administration size standards)? If you are uncertain as to
your qualifications as a small entity, please provide details on your
establishment size in terms of number of employees and categories of
employee occupations; industry identification (by North American
Industrial Classification System 6-digit code, if available); and the
primary types of goods or services produced by your company.
(i) Please describe in detail the technical or financial concerns
that employers encounter when implementing or planning the
implementation of safety programs for powered industrial trucks.
(l) OSHA requests comments, particularly from small entities, on
current practices with respect to safe handling and operation of
powered industrial trucks. Please identify the practices that are
critical to safe handling and operation of powered industrial trucks
(i.e., those practices whose absence would significantly compromise the
safety of employees). Please discuss the role of employee training in
your safety programs involving powered industrial trucks and the
perceived benefits of employee training. Where possible, please
estimate the cost per employee for any component of your safety
programs involving powered industrial trucks.
E. Other Comments/Suggestions/Concerns
OSHA invites interested persons--including employers, trade
associations, workers, worker organizations, and public health and
safety organizations--to submit information, comments, data, studies,
and other materials on the
[[Page 8641]]
issues and questions in this RFI. In particular, OSHA invites comment
on specific issues and requests information and data about practices at
affected establishments in general industry, construction, shipyard
employment, and marine cargo handling. When submitting comments in
response to questions or issues raised or revisions that OSHA is
considering, OSHA requests that you explain your rationale and, if
possible, provide data and information to support your comments and
recommendations.
Authority and Signature
Loren Sweatt, Acting Assistant Secretary of Labor for Occupational
Safety and Health, authorized the preparation of this notice pursuant
to 29 U.S.C. 653,655, and 657, Secretary's Order 1-2012 (77 FR 3912;
Jan. 25, 2012), and 29 CFR part 1911.
Signed at Washington, DC, on March 5, 2019.
Loren Sweatt,
Acting Assistant Secretary of Labor for Occupational Safety and Health.
[FR Doc. 2019-04338 Filed 3-8-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-26-P
