Petition for Exemption From the Federal Motor Vehicle Theft Prevention Standard; General Motors Corporation, 5193-5194 [2019-02752]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 34 / Wednesday, February 20, 2019 / Notices
agency before preparing and submitting
a petition to modify.
For the foregoing reasons, the agency
hereby grants in full FCA’s petition for
exemption for its Jeep Gladiator vehicle
line from the parts-marking
requirements of 49 CFR part 541,
beginning with its MY 2020 Jeep
Gladiator vehicles.
Issued in Washington, DC, under authority
delegated in 49 CFR 1.95 and 501.8.
Raymond R. Posten,
Associate Administrator for Rulemaking.
[FR Doc. 2019–02724 Filed 2–19–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–59–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration
Petition for Exemption From the
Federal Motor Vehicle Theft Prevention
Standard; General Motors Corporation
National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration (NHTSA),
Department of Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Grant of petition for exemption.
AGENCY:
This document grants in full
the General Motors Corporation’s (GM)
petition for exemption of the Buick
Encore vehicle line in accordance with
Exemption from Vehicle Theft
Prevention Standard. This petition is
granted because the agency has
determined that the antitheft device to
be placed on the line as standard
equipment is likely to be as effective in
reducing and deterring motor vehicle
theft as compliance with the partsmarking requirements of the Federal
Motor Vehicle Theft Prevention
Standard (Theft Prevention Standard).
DATES: The exemption granted by this
notice is effective beginning with the
2020 model year (MY).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Carlita Ballard, Office of International
Policy, Fuel Economy, and Consumer
Standards, NHTSA, West Building,
W43–439, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE,
Washington, DC 20590. Ms. Ballard’s
phone number is (202) 366–5222. His
fax number is (202) 493–2990.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In a
petition dated October 11, 2018, GM
requested an exemption from the partsmarking requirements of the Theft
Prevention Standard for its Buick
Encore vehicle line beginning with MY
2020. The petition requested an
exemption from parts-marking pursuant
to 49 CFR 543, Exemption from Vehicle
Theft Prevention Standard, based on the
installation of an antitheft device as
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:16 Feb 19, 2019
Jkt 247001
standard equipment for the entire
vehicle line.
Under 49 CFR part 543.5(a), a
manufacturer may petition NHTSA to
grant an exemption for one vehicle line
per model year. In its petition, GM
provided a detailed description and
diagram of the identity, design, and
location of the components of the
antitheft device for its Buick Encore
vehicle line. GM stated that its MY 2020
Buick Encore vehicle line will be
installed with the PASS-Key III+
antitheft device as standard equipment
on the entire vehicle line. The PASSKey III+ is a passive, transponder-based,
electronic immobilizer device. The
major components of the antitheft
device are a PASS-Key III+ controller
module, engine control module (ECM),
electronically-coded ignition key, radio
frequency (RF) receiver, immobilizer
exciter module, three low frequency
antennas and a passive antenna module.
GM stated that the device will provide
protection against unauthorized use
(i.e., starting and engine fueling), but
will not provide any visible or audible
indication of unauthorized vehicle entry
(i.e., flashing lights or horn alarm). GM
stated that the PASS-Key III+
immobilizer device is designed to be
active at all times without direct
intervention by the vehicle operator.
GM further stated that activation of the
device occurs immediately after the
ignition has been turned off and the key
has been removed and deactivation of
the antitheft device occurs
automatically when the engine is
started. GM stated that the Buick Encore
vehicle line will be equipped with one
of two ignition versions. Specifically,
the Buick Encore will be equipped with
either a keyed or keyless ignition
version of its PASS-Key III+
immobilizer antitheft device. GM also
stated that the ‘‘keyed’’ ignition version
utilizes a special ignition key and
decoder module and its electrical code
must be sensed and properly decoded
by the controller module before the
vehicle can be operated. GM further
stated that with the ‘‘keyless’’ ignition
version, an electronic key fob performs
normal remote keyless entry functions
and communicates with the vehicle
without direct owner intervention.
Specifically, during operation of the
vehicle, when the owner presses the
engine start/stop switch, the vehicle
transmits a randomly generated
challenge and vehicle identifier within
the passenger compartment of the
vehicle via three low-frequency
antennas, controlled by the passive
antenna module. The electronic key
receives the data and if the vehicle
PO 00000
Frm 00148
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
5193
identifier matches that of the vehicle,
the electronic key will calculate the
response to the vehicle using the
challenge and secret information shared
between the key and the vehicle. The
electronic key then transmits the
response via a radio frequency channel
to a vehicle mounted receiver,
conveying the information to the PASSKey III+ control module. The PASS-Key
III+ control module compares the
received response with an internally
calculated response. If the values match,
the device will allow the vehicle to
enter functional modes and transmit a
fixed code pre-release password to the
engine controller over the serial data
bus, and enable computation and
communication of a response to any
valid challenge received from the engine
controller. If a valid key is not detected,
the device will not transmit a fixed code
pre-release password to the engine
controller preventing fuel from being
delivered to the engine, enabling
starting.
GM’s submission is considered a
complete petition as required by 49 CFR
543.7, in that it meets the general
requirements contained in 543.5 and the
specific content requirements of 543.6.
In addressing the specific content
requirements of 543.6, GM provided
information on the reliability and
durability of its proposed device. To
ensure reliability and durability of the
device, GM conducted tests based on its
own specified standards. GM provided
a detailed list of the specific tests it used
to validate the integrity, durability and
reliability of the PASS-Key III+ device.
Some of the tests GM conducted were
for high temperature storage, low
temperature storage, thermal shock,
humidity, frost, salt fog, flammability
and others. GM believes that the device
is reliable and durable since the
components must operate as designed
after each test. GM further stated that
the design and assembly processes of
the PASS-Key III+ subsystem and
components are validated for 10 years of
vehicle life and 150,000 miles of
performance.
GM further stated that the PASS-Key
III+ device has been designed to
enhance the functionality and theft
protection provided by its first, second
and third generation PASS-Key, PASSKey II, and PASS-Key III devices. GM
also referenced data provided by the
American Automobile Manufacturers
Association (AAMA) in support of the
effectiveness of GM’s PASS-Key devices
in reducing and deterring motor vehicle
theft. Specifically, GM stated that data
which provide the basis for GM’s
confidence that the PASS-Key III+
system will be effective in reducing and
E:\FR\FM\20FEN1.SGM
20FEN1
5194
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 34 / Wednesday, February 20, 2019 / Notices
deterring motor vehicle theft are
contained in the response of the
American Automobile Manufacturers
Association (AAMA) to Docket 97–042;
Notice I (NHTSA Request for Comments
on its preliminary Report to Congress on
the effects of the Anti Car Theft Act of
1992 and the Motor Vehicle Theft Law
Enforcement Act of 1984). In the Report
to Congress, AAMA stated the more
recent antitheft systems are more
effective in reducing auto theft. AAMA
also cited the Highway Loss Data
Institute (HLDI) findings on the
effectiveness of antitheft devices in
reducing theft. AAMA noted that
vehicles with antitheft devices are less
likely to be stolen for joyriding or
transportation and therefore, their
recovery rates are lower.
GM also noted that theft rate data
have indicated a decline in theft rates
for vehicle lines equipped with
comparable devices that have received
full exemptions from the parts-marking
requirements. GM stated that the theft
rate data, as provided by the Federal
Bureau of Investigation’s National Crime
Information Center (NCIC) and
compiled by the agency, show that theft
rates are lower for exempted GM models
equipped with the PASS-Key-like
systems than the theft rates for earlier
models with similar appearance and
construction that were parts-marked.
Based on the performance of the PASSKey, PASS-Key II, and PASS-Key III
devices on other GM models, and the
advanced technology utilized in PASSKey III+, GM believes that the PASS-Key
III+ device will be more effective in
deterring theft than the parts-marking
requirements of 49 CFR part 541.
GM stated that it believes that PASSKey III+ devices will be more effective
in deterring theft than the parts-marking
requirements and that the agency
should find that inclusion of the PASSKey III+ device on the Buick Encore
vehicle line is sufficient to qualify it for
full exemption from the parts-marking
requirements.
GM’s proposed device lacks an
audible or visible alarm. Therefore, this
device cannot perform one of the
functions listed in 49 CFR part
543.6(a)(3), that is, to call attention to
unauthorized attempts to enter or move
the vehicle. GM stated that based on
comparison of the reduction in the theft
rates of Chevrolet Corvettes using a
passive antitheft device along with an
audible/visible alarm system to the
reduction in theft rates for the Chevrolet
Camaro models equipped with a passive
antitheft device without an alarm, GM
finds that the lack of an alarm or
attention-attracting device does not
compromise the theft deterrent
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:16 Feb 19, 2019
Jkt 247001
performance of a device such as PASSKey III+ device. In these instances, the
agency has concluded that the lack of an
audible or visible alarm has not
prevented these antitheft devices from
being effective protection against theft.
Using an average of 3 MYs data (2012–
2014), NHTSA’s theft rates for the
Chevrolet Corvette and Chevrolet
Camaro vehicle lines are 1.2140 and
3.1337 respectively, both below the
median theft rate of 3.5826.
Based on the evidence submitted by
GM, the agency believes that the
antitheft device for the Buick Encore
vehicle line is likely to be as effective
in reducing and deterring motor vehicle
theft as compliance with the partsmarking requirements of the Theft
Prevention Standard (49 CFR 541).
Pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 33106 and 49
CFR 543.7(b), the agency grants a
petition for exemption from the partsmarking requirements of Part 541, either
in whole or in part, if it determines that,
based upon substantial evidence, the
standard equipment antitheft device is
likely to be as effective in reducing and
deterring motor vehicle theft as
compliance with the parts-marking
requirements of Part 541. The agency
finds that GM has provided adequate
reasons for its belief that the antitheft
device for the Buick Encore vehicle line
is likely to be as effective in reducing
and deterring motor vehicle theft as
compliance with the parts-marking
requirements of the Theft Prevention
Standard (49 CFR part 541). This
conclusion is based on the information
GM provided about its device.
The agency concludes that the device
will provide four of the five types of
performance listed in § 543.6(a)(3):
Promoting activation; preventing defeat
or circumvention of the device by
unauthorized persons; preventing
operation of the vehicle by
unauthorized entrants; and ensuring the
reliability and durability of the device.
The agency notes that 49 CFR part
541, Appendix A–1, identifies those
lines that are exempted from the Theft
Prevention Standard for a given model
year. 49 CFR part 543.7(f) contains
publication requirements incident to the
disposition of all Part 543 petitions.
Advanced listing, including the release
of future product nameplates, the
beginning model year for which the
petition is granted and a general
description of the antitheft device is
necessary in order to notify law
enforcement agencies of new vehicle
lines exempted from the parts marking
requirements of the Theft Prevention
Standard.
If GM decides not to use the
exemption for this line, it should
PO 00000
Frm 00149
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
formally notify the agency. If such a
decision is made, the line must be fully
marked according to the requirements
under 49 CFR parts 541.5 and 541.6
(marking of major component parts and
replacement parts).
NHTSA notes that if GM wishes in the
future to modify the device on which
this exemption is based, the company
may have to submit a petition to modify
the exemption. Part 543.7(d) states that
a Part 543 exemption applies only to
vehicles that belong to a line exempted
under this part and equipped with the
antitheft device on which the line’s
exemption is based. Further, Part
543.10(c)(2) provides for the submission
of petitions ‘‘to modify an exemption to
permit the use of an antitheft device
similar to but differing from the one
specified in that exemption.’’
The agency wishes to minimize the
administrative burden that Part
543.10(c)(2) could place on exempted
vehicle manufacturers and itself. The
agency did not intend in drafting Part
543 to require the submission of a
modification petition for every change
to the components or design of an
antitheft device. The significance of
many such changes could be de
minimis. Therefore, NHTSA suggests
that if the manufacturer contemplates
making any changes, the effects of
which might be characterized as de
minimis, it should consult the agency
before preparing and submitting a
petition to modify.
For the foregoing reasons, the agency
hereby grants in full GM’s petition for
exemption for the Buick Encore vehicle
line from the parts-marking
requirements of 49 CFR part 541,
beginning with its model year (MY)
2020 vehicles.
Issued in Washington, DC, under authority
delegated in 49 CFR 1.95 and 501.8.
Raymond R. Posten,
Associate Administrator for Rulemaking.
[FR Doc. 2019–02752 Filed 2–19–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–59–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Office of the Secretary
[Docket No. DOT–OST–2018–0202]
Privacy Act of 1974; Department of
Transportation, Office of the Secretary
of Transportation; DOT/OST–008,
Departmental Advisory Committee
Files
Office of the Departmental
Chief Information Officer, Office of the
Secretary of Transportation, DOT.
AGENCY:
E:\FR\FM\20FEN1.SGM
20FEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 34 (Wednesday, February 20, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 5193-5194]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-02752]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
Petition for Exemption From the Federal Motor Vehicle Theft
Prevention Standard; General Motors Corporation
AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA),
Department of Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Grant of petition for exemption.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document grants in full the General Motors Corporation's
(GM) petition for exemption of the Buick Encore vehicle line in
accordance with Exemption from Vehicle Theft Prevention Standard. This
petition is granted because the agency has determined that the
antitheft device to be placed on the line as standard equipment is
likely to be as effective in reducing and deterring motor vehicle theft
as compliance with the parts-marking requirements of the Federal Motor
Vehicle Theft Prevention Standard (Theft Prevention Standard).
DATES: The exemption granted by this notice is effective beginning with
the 2020 model year (MY).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Carlita Ballard, Office of
International Policy, Fuel Economy, and Consumer Standards, NHTSA, West
Building, W43-439, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590. Ms.
Ballard's phone number is (202) 366-5222. His fax number is (202) 493-
2990.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In a petition dated October 11, 2018, GM
requested an exemption from the parts-marking requirements of the Theft
Prevention Standard for its Buick Encore vehicle line beginning with MY
2020. The petition requested an exemption from parts-marking pursuant
to 49 CFR 543, Exemption from Vehicle Theft Prevention Standard, based
on the installation of an antitheft device as standard equipment for
the entire vehicle line.
Under 49 CFR part 543.5(a), a manufacturer may petition NHTSA to
grant an exemption for one vehicle line per model year. In its
petition, GM provided a detailed description and diagram of the
identity, design, and location of the components of the antitheft
device for its Buick Encore vehicle line. GM stated that its MY 2020
Buick Encore vehicle line will be installed with the PASS-Key III+
antitheft device as standard equipment on the entire vehicle line. The
PASS-Key III+ is a passive, transponder-based, electronic immobilizer
device. The major components of the antitheft device are a PASS-Key
III+ controller module, engine control module (ECM), electronically-
coded ignition key, radio frequency (RF) receiver, immobilizer exciter
module, three low frequency antennas and a passive antenna module. GM
stated that the device will provide protection against unauthorized use
(i.e., starting and engine fueling), but will not provide any visible
or audible indication of unauthorized vehicle entry (i.e., flashing
lights or horn alarm). GM stated that the PASS-Key III+ immobilizer
device is designed to be active at all times without direct
intervention by the vehicle operator. GM further stated that activation
of the device occurs immediately after the ignition has been turned off
and the key has been removed and deactivation of the antitheft device
occurs automatically when the engine is started. GM stated that the
Buick Encore vehicle line will be equipped with one of two ignition
versions. Specifically, the Buick Encore will be equipped with either a
keyed or keyless ignition version of its PASS-Key III+ immobilizer
antitheft device. GM also stated that the ``keyed'' ignition version
utilizes a special ignition key and decoder module and its electrical
code must be sensed and properly decoded by the controller module
before the vehicle can be operated. GM further stated that with the
``keyless'' ignition version, an electronic key fob performs normal
remote keyless entry functions and communicates with the vehicle
without direct owner intervention. Specifically, during operation of
the vehicle, when the owner presses the engine start/stop switch, the
vehicle transmits a randomly generated challenge and vehicle identifier
within the passenger compartment of the vehicle via three low-frequency
antennas, controlled by the passive antenna module. The electronic key
receives the data and if the vehicle identifier matches that of the
vehicle, the electronic key will calculate the response to the vehicle
using the challenge and secret information shared between the key and
the vehicle. The electronic key then transmits the response via a radio
frequency channel to a vehicle mounted receiver, conveying the
information to the PASS-Key III+ control module. The PASS-Key III+
control module compares the received response with an internally
calculated response. If the values match, the device will allow the
vehicle to enter functional modes and transmit a fixed code pre-release
password to the engine controller over the serial data bus, and enable
computation and communication of a response to any valid challenge
received from the engine controller. If a valid key is not detected,
the device will not transmit a fixed code pre-release password to the
engine controller preventing fuel from being delivered to the engine,
enabling starting.
GM's submission is considered a complete petition as required by 49
CFR 543.7, in that it meets the general requirements contained in 543.5
and the specific content requirements of 543.6.
In addressing the specific content requirements of 543.6, GM
provided information on the reliability and durability of its proposed
device. To ensure reliability and durability of the device, GM
conducted tests based on its own specified standards. GM provided a
detailed list of the specific tests it used to validate the integrity,
durability and reliability of the PASS-Key III+ device. Some of the
tests GM conducted were for high temperature storage, low temperature
storage, thermal shock, humidity, frost, salt fog, flammability and
others. GM believes that the device is reliable and durable since the
components must operate as designed after each test. GM further stated
that the design and assembly processes of the PASS-Key III+ subsystem
and components are validated for 10 years of vehicle life and 150,000
miles of performance.
GM further stated that the PASS-Key III+ device has been designed
to enhance the functionality and theft protection provided by its
first, second and third generation PASS-Key, PASS-Key II, and PASS-Key
III devices. GM also referenced data provided by the American
Automobile Manufacturers Association (AAMA) in support of the
effectiveness of GM's PASS-Key devices in reducing and deterring motor
vehicle theft. Specifically, GM stated that data which provide the
basis for GM's confidence that the PASS-Key III+ system will be
effective in reducing and
[[Page 5194]]
deterring motor vehicle theft are contained in the response of the
American Automobile Manufacturers Association (AAMA) to Docket 97-042;
Notice I (NHTSA Request for Comments on its preliminary Report to
Congress on the effects of the Anti Car Theft Act of 1992 and the Motor
Vehicle Theft Law Enforcement Act of 1984). In the Report to Congress,
AAMA stated the more recent antitheft systems are more effective in
reducing auto theft. AAMA also cited the Highway Loss Data Institute
(HLDI) findings on the effectiveness of antitheft devices in reducing
theft. AAMA noted that vehicles with antitheft devices are less likely
to be stolen for joyriding or transportation and therefore, their
recovery rates are lower.
GM also noted that theft rate data have indicated a decline in
theft rates for vehicle lines equipped with comparable devices that
have received full exemptions from the parts-marking requirements. GM
stated that the theft rate data, as provided by the Federal Bureau of
Investigation's National Crime Information Center (NCIC) and compiled
by the agency, show that theft rates are lower for exempted GM models
equipped with the PASS-Key-like systems than the theft rates for
earlier models with similar appearance and construction that were
parts-marked. Based on the performance of the PASS-Key, PASS-Key II,
and PASS-Key III devices on other GM models, and the advanced
technology utilized in PASS-Key III+, GM believes that the PASS-Key
III+ device will be more effective in deterring theft than the parts-
marking requirements of 49 CFR part 541.
GM stated that it believes that PASS-Key III+ devices will be more
effective in deterring theft than the parts-marking requirements and
that the agency should find that inclusion of the PASS-Key III+ device
on the Buick Encore vehicle line is sufficient to qualify it for full
exemption from the parts-marking requirements.
GM's proposed device lacks an audible or visible alarm. Therefore,
this device cannot perform one of the functions listed in 49 CFR part
543.6(a)(3), that is, to call attention to unauthorized attempts to
enter or move the vehicle. GM stated that based on comparison of the
reduction in the theft rates of Chevrolet Corvettes using a passive
antitheft device along with an audible/visible alarm system to the
reduction in theft rates for the Chevrolet Camaro models equipped with
a passive antitheft device without an alarm, GM finds that the lack of
an alarm or attention-attracting device does not compromise the theft
deterrent performance of a device such as PASS-Key III+ device. In
these instances, the agency has concluded that the lack of an audible
or visible alarm has not prevented these antitheft devices from being
effective protection against theft. Using an average of 3 MYs data
(2012-2014), NHTSA's theft rates for the Chevrolet Corvette and
Chevrolet Camaro vehicle lines are 1.2140 and 3.1337 respectively, both
below the median theft rate of 3.5826.
Based on the evidence submitted by GM, the agency believes that the
antitheft device for the Buick Encore vehicle line is likely to be as
effective in reducing and deterring motor vehicle theft as compliance
with the parts-marking requirements of the Theft Prevention Standard
(49 CFR 541).
Pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 33106 and 49 CFR 543.7(b), the agency grants
a petition for exemption from the parts-marking requirements of Part
541, either in whole or in part, if it determines that, based upon
substantial evidence, the standard equipment antitheft device is likely
to be as effective in reducing and deterring motor vehicle theft as
compliance with the parts-marking requirements of Part 541. The agency
finds that GM has provided adequate reasons for its belief that the
antitheft device for the Buick Encore vehicle line is likely to be as
effective in reducing and deterring motor vehicle theft as compliance
with the parts-marking requirements of the Theft Prevention Standard
(49 CFR part 541). This conclusion is based on the information GM
provided about its device.
The agency concludes that the device will provide four of the five
types of performance listed in Sec. 543.6(a)(3): Promoting activation;
preventing defeat or circumvention of the device by unauthorized
persons; preventing operation of the vehicle by unauthorized entrants;
and ensuring the reliability and durability of the device.
The agency notes that 49 CFR part 541, Appendix A-1, identifies
those lines that are exempted from the Theft Prevention Standard for a
given model year. 49 CFR part 543.7(f) contains publication
requirements incident to the disposition of all Part 543 petitions.
Advanced listing, including the release of future product nameplates,
the beginning model year for which the petition is granted and a
general description of the antitheft device is necessary in order to
notify law enforcement agencies of new vehicle lines exempted from the
parts marking requirements of the Theft Prevention Standard.
If GM decides not to use the exemption for this line, it should
formally notify the agency. If such a decision is made, the line must
be fully marked according to the requirements under 49 CFR parts 541.5
and 541.6 (marking of major component parts and replacement parts).
NHTSA notes that if GM wishes in the future to modify the device on
which this exemption is based, the company may have to submit a
petition to modify the exemption. Part 543.7(d) states that a Part 543
exemption applies only to vehicles that belong to a line exempted under
this part and equipped with the antitheft device on which the line's
exemption is based. Further, Part 543.10(c)(2) provides for the
submission of petitions ``to modify an exemption to permit the use of
an antitheft device similar to but differing from the one specified in
that exemption.''
The agency wishes to minimize the administrative burden that Part
543.10(c)(2) could place on exempted vehicle manufacturers and itself.
The agency did not intend in drafting Part 543 to require the
submission of a modification petition for every change to the
components or design of an antitheft device. The significance of many
such changes could be de minimis. Therefore, NHTSA suggests that if the
manufacturer contemplates making any changes, the effects of which
might be characterized as de minimis, it should consult the agency
before preparing and submitting a petition to modify.
For the foregoing reasons, the agency hereby grants in full GM's
petition for exemption for the Buick Encore vehicle line from the
parts-marking requirements of 49 CFR part 541, beginning with its model
year (MY) 2020 vehicles.
Issued in Washington, DC, under authority delegated in 49 CFR
1.95 and 501.8.
Raymond R. Posten,
Associate Administrator for Rulemaking.
[FR Doc. 2019-02752 Filed 2-19-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-59-P