Petitions for Modification of Application of Existing Mandatory Safety Standard, 5111-5113 [2019-02745]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 34 / Wednesday, February 20, 2019 / Notices
tramming the continuous mining
machine up and down the slope, the
extended cable will allow the petitioner
to use the power supply at the top and
bottom of the slope and eliminate the
need for a move box. The petitioner
states that, given the width of the slope,
the elimination of the move box will
reduce the likelihood of an accident.
(5) An electrical engineering study
was conducted and has demonstrated
that the continuous mining machine
cable can be safely extended.
(6) The petitioner seeks to extend the
length of the feeder cable up to 2,000
feet with No. 2 AWG or larger copper
cable.
(7) When the cable length is extended
beyond the requirements set forth in 30
CFR 75.503, the petitioner will only
operate the feeder in tram mode up and
down the slope and throughout the
mine in non-production activities, such
as moving the feeder from one location
in the mine to another.
(8) The petitioner states that
extending the feeder cable for tramming
will allow the petitioner to tram the
feeder longer distances and handle the
cable less often. While tramming the
feeder up and down the slope, the
extended cable will allow the petitioner
to use the power supply at the top and
bottom of the slope and eliminate the
need for a move box. The petitioner
states that, given the width of the slope,
elimination of the move box will reduce
the likelihood of an accident.
(9) An electrical engineering study
was conducted and has demonstrated
that the feeder cable can be safely
extended.
(10) Within 60 days after the Proposed
Decision and Order (PDO) becomes
final, the petitioner will submit
proposed revisions for its approved 30
CFR part 48 training plan to the District
Manager. These proposed revisions will
include initial and refresher training
regarding compliance with the terms
and conditions in the PDO.
The petitioner asserts that the
proposed alternative method will at all
times guarantee no less than the same
measure of protection afforded the
miners under the existing standard.
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Sheila McConnell,
Director, Office of Standards, Regulations,
and Variances.
I. Background
[FR Doc. 2019–02744 Filed 2–19–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4520–43–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:16 Feb 19, 2019
Jkt 247001
Mine Safety and Health Administration
Petitions for Modification of
Application of Existing Mandatory
Safety Standard
Mine Safety and Health
Administration, Labor.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
This notice is a summary of
petitions for modification submitted to
the Mine Safety and Health
Administration (MSHA) by the parties
listed below.
DATES: All comments on the petition
must be received by MSHA’s Office of
Standards, Regulations, and Variances
on or before March 22, 2019.
ADDRESSES: You may submit your
comments, identified by ‘‘docket
number’’ on the subject line, by any of
the following methods:
1. Email: zzMSHA-comments@
dol.gov. Include the docket number of
the petition in the subject line of the
message.
2. Facsimile: 202–693–9441.
3. Regular Mail or Hand Delivery:
MSHA, Office of Standards,
Regulations, and Variances, 201 12th
Street South, Suite 4E401, Arlington,
Virginia 22202–5452, Attention: Sheila
McConnell, Director, Office of
Standards, Regulations, and Variances.
Persons delivering documents are
required to check in at the receptionist’s
desk in Suite 4E401. Individuals may
inspect a copy of the petition and
comments during normal business
hours at the address listed above.
MSHA will consider only comments
postmarked by the U.S. Postal Service or
proof of delivery from another delivery
service such as UPS or Federal Express
on or before the deadline for comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Barbara Barron, Office of Standards,
Regulations, and Variances at 202–693–
9447 (voice), barron.barbara@dol.gov
(email), or 202–693–9441 (fax). [These
are not toll-free numbers.]
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section
101(c) of the Federal Mine Safety and
Health Act of 1977 and Title 30 of the
Code of Federal Regulations Part 44
govern the application, processing, and
disposition of petitions for modification.
SUMMARY:
Section 101(c) of the Federal Mine
Safety and Health Act of 1977 (Mine
Act) allows the mine operator or
representative of miners to file a
petition to modify the application of any
mandatory safety standard to a coal or
PO 00000
Frm 00066
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
5111
other mine if the Secretary of Labor
(Secretary) determines that:
1. An alternative method of achieving
the result of such standard exists which
will at all times guarantee no less than
the same measure of protection afforded
the miners of such mine by such
standard; or
2. That the application of such
standard to such mine will result in a
diminution of safety to the miners in
such mine.
In addition, the regulations at 30 CFR
44.10 and 44.11 establish the
requirements and procedures for filing
petitions for modification.
II. Petitions for Modification
Docket Number: M–2018–023–C.
Petitioner: Little Buck Coal Company,
21 Pine Lane, Pine Grove, Pennsylvania
17963.
Mine: Broad Mountain Slope, MSHA
I.D. No. 36–10233, located in Schuylkill
County, Pennsylvania.
Regulation Affected: 30 CFR
75.1200(d), (h) and (i) (Mine map).
Modification Request: The petitioner
requests a modification of the existing
standard to permit the substation of
cross-sections in lieu of contour lines
through the intake slope, at locations of
rock tunnel connections between veins,
at 1,000 feet intervals of advance from
the intake slope, and to limit the
required mapping of mine workings
above and below to those present within
100 feet of the coal vein(s) being mined
through rock tunnels, unless these veins
are interconnected to other veins
beyond the 100 feet limit.
The petitioner requests modification
of 30 CFR 75.1200(d), (h) and (i) for the
following reasons:
(1) Due to the steep pitch encountered
in mining anthracite coal veins, contour
lines provide no useful information and
their presence would make portions of
the map illegible.
(2) The use of cross-sections in lieu of
contour lines has been practiced since
the late 1800s and provides critical
information about spacing between
veins and proximity to other mine
workings, which fluctuate considerably.
(3) The vast majority of current
underground anthracite mining involves
either second mining of remnant pillars
from previous mining or the mining of
coal veins of lower quality in proximity
to inaccessible and frequently flooded
abandoned mine workings that may or
may not be mapped.
(4) All mapping for mines above and
below is researched by the petitioner’s
contract engineer for the presence of
interconnecting rock tunnels between
veins in relation to the mine, and a
hazard analysis is done when mapping
E:\FR\FM\20FEN1.SGM
20FEN1
5112
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 34 / Wednesday, February 20, 2019 / Notices
indicates the presence of known or
potentially flooded workings.
(5) When no rock tunnel connections
are found, mine workings that exist
beyond 100 feet from the mine are
recognized as presenting no hazard to
the mine due to the pitch of the vein
and rock separation between the
workings.
(6) The petitioner states that the mine
workings above and below are usually
inactive and abandoned and, therefore,
are not usually subject to changes
during the life of the mine.
(7) When evidence indicates prior
mining was conducted on a coal vein
above or below and research exhausts
the availability of mine mapping, the
vein will be considered mined and
flooded and appropriate precautions
will be taken in accordance with 30 CFR
75.388, which addresses drilling
boreholes in advance of mining.
(8) Where potential hazards exist and
in-mine drilling capabilities limit
penetration, surface boreholes may be
used to intercept the workings and the
results analyzed prior to beginning
mining in the affected area.
The petitioner proposed the following
terms and conditions:
(a) A search by a registered engineer
or surveyor of all available mapping,
including cross-sections will be
conducted to determine the spacing
between coal veins and the proximity of
the existing and projected workings of
the mine to other workings of adjacent
mines. A hazard analysis will be done
when mapping indicates the presence of
known or potentially flooded workings.
(b) The map will show cross section(s)
through the slope, at locations of rock
tunnels between coal veins, and along
gangways at 1,000-foot intervals. The
mapping provided will show the crop
line of the vein being mined.
(c) Where adjacent workings are
located within 1,000 feet of the
projected limit(s) of the same vein being
mined, those working will be mapped,
the potential water and gas hazards will
be evaluated, and a revised drilling
program, if needed, will be established
under 30 CFR 75.388.
(d) Where projections include miningthrough into inaccessible areas of the
same coal vein or adjacent vein(s) and
the conditions cannot be determined, a
plan detailing the operation will be
submitted under 30 CFR 75.389 for
approval by the District Manager.
(e) Prior to recovering pillars known
to be below the water level elevation in
adjacent workings, a revised recovery
plan will be submitted under 30 CFR
75.220(a)(1) for approval by the District
Manager.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:16 Feb 19, 2019
Jkt 247001
(f) When veins within 100 feet above
or below the coal vein being mined are
interconnected by rock tunnels to other
veins, all interconnected vein mapping
will be provided to within 1,000 feet of
the active workings.
(g) Within 60 days after the Proposed
Decision and Order (PDO) becomes
final, the petitioner will submit
proposed revisions for its approved 30
CFR part 48 training plan to the District
Manager. These proposed revisions will
include initial and refresher training
regarding compliance with the PDO.
The petitioner asserts that the
proposed alternative method will
provide no less than the same measure
of protection afforded the miners under
the existing standard.
Docket Number: M–2018–024–C.
Petitioner: Little Buck Coal Company,
21 Pine Lane, Pine Grove, Pennsylvania
17963.
Mine: Broad Mountain Slope, MSHA
I.D. No. 36–10233, located in Schuylkill
County, Pennsylvania.
Regulation Affected: 30 CFR 75.1202–
1(a) (Temporary notations, revisions,
and supplements).
Modification Request: The petitioner
requests a modification of the existing
standard to permit the required interval
of survey to be established on an annual
basis from the initial survey in lieu of
every 6 months as required.
The petitioner requests modification
of 30 CFR 75.1202–1(a) for the following
reasons:
(1) The low production and slow rate
of advance in anthracite mining make
surveying on a 6-month interval
impractical. In most cases, annual
development is frequently limited to
less than 500 feet of gangway
advancement with associated up-pitch
development.
(2) The vast majority of small
anthracite miners are using nonmechanized, hand-loading methods of
mining.
(3) Development above the active
gangway is designed to mine into the
level above at designated intervals
thereby maintaining sufficient control
between both survey gangways.
(4) The availability of engineering/
surveyor resources are very limited in
the anthracite coal fields with surveying
on an annual basis difficult to achieve
with three contractors currently
available.
The petitioner proposes the following
terms and conditions:
(a) The mine map will be revised and
supplemented at intervals of not more
than 12 months on the basis of a survey
made or certified by a registered
engineer or a registered surveyor.
PO 00000
Frm 00067
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
(b) The mine map will also be revised
and supplemented on the basis of a
survey made or certified by a registered
engineer or registered surveyor prior to
final retreat mining or from the point of
the deepest penetration of gangway
advance or breast advance if not
connected to a surveyed location.
(c) Within 60 days after the Proposed
Decision and Order (PDO) becomes
final, the petitioner will submit
proposed revisions for its approved 30
CFR part 48 training plan to the District
Manager. These proposed revisions will
include initial and refresher training
regarding compliance with the PDO.
The petitioner asserts that the
proposed alternative method will
provide no less than the same measure
of protection afforded the miners under
the existing standard.
Docket Number: M–2018–025–C.
Petitioner: Little Buck Coal Company,
21 Pine Lane, Pine Grove, Pennsylvania
17963.
Mine: Broad Mountain Slope, MSHA
I.D. No. 36–10233, located in Schuylkill
County, Pennsylvania.
Regulation Affected: 30 CFR
75.1400(c) (Hoisting equipment;
general).
Modification Request: The petitioner
requests a modification of the existing
standard to permit operating the
gunboat used in the mine to transport
persons without safety catches or other
no less effective devices because, to
date, no such safety catch or device is
available for use in the steeply pitching
and undulating slopes with numerous
curves and knuckles present in the main
haulage slopes of the petitioner’s mine.
The petitioner requests modification
of 30 CFR 75.1400(c) for the following
reasons:
(1) Anthracite mine slopes range in
length from 180 to 1,000 feet and vary
in pitch from 30 to 75 degrees.
(2) A functional safety catch has not
been developed and, consequently, if a
makeshift device is installed it could
activate on knuckles or curves when no
emergency existed, causing a tumbling
effect on the conveyance which would
increase rather than decrease the hazard
to miners. Therefore, the petitioner
proposes to operate the steel gunboat
with secondary safety connections
securely fastened around the gunboat
and to the hoisting rope above the main
connecting device, and use hoisting
ropes having a safety factor in excess of
three.
The petitioner proposes the following
terms and conditions:
(a) A communication signal system,
audible to the hoist operator, will be
installed so that it can be activated from
E:\FR\FM\20FEN1.SGM
20FEN1
5113
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 34 / Wednesday, February 20, 2019 / Notices
the gunboat at any location along the
slope.
(b) The design safety factor of the
hoist rope will be maintained at all
times as not less than three times the
values specified in 30 CFR 75.1431.
(c) A detailed inspection procedure of
the ropes and terminations used at the
mine will be posted in the hoist house
and complied with at all times.
(d) A secondary safety connection
will be securely fastened around the
gunboat and securely fastened to the
hoisting rope at a point above the main
connecting device. The secondary safety
connection must meet the safety factor
requirements described in Item (b)
above. The secondary safety connection
will be the same size as or greater than
the primary hoist rope and properly
terminated above the primary hoist rope
attachment with at least two clips on
each end or with equivalent strength
chains.
(e) At least 2 feet of clearance must be
maintained between the highest part of
the secondary attachment and the head
sheave when the gunboat is positioned
in the full dump position.
(f) Within 60 days after the Proposed
Decision and Order (PDO) becomes
final, the petitioner will submit
proposed revisions for its approved 30
CFR part 48 training plan to the District
Manager. These proposed revisions will
include initial and refresher training
regarding compliance with the PDO.
The petitioner asserts that the
alternative method will guarantee no
less than the same measure of protection
for all miners than that of the existing
standard.
Sheila McConnell,
Director, Office of Standards, Regulations,
and Variances.
[FR Doc. 2019–02745 Filed 2–19–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4520–43–P
OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND
BUDGET
Public Availability of Fiscal Year (FY)
2017 Agency Inventories Under the
Federal Activities Inventory Reform
(FAIR) Act
Office of Management and
Budget (OMB), Executive Office of the
President.
ACTION: Notice of public availability of
agency inventories of activities that are
not inherently governmental and of
activities that are inherently
governmental.
AGENCY:
The Federal Activities
Inventory Reform (FAIR) Act, Public
Law 105–270, requires covered agencies
to develop an annual inventory of
activities performed by their employees
that are not inherently governmental
functions. In addition, OMB Circular A–
SUMMARY:
76, Performance of Commercial
Activities, requires covered agencies to
develop an annual inventory of
activities performed by their employees
that are inherently governmental
functions. These inventories help the
agencies gain a better understanding of
how labor is being used to carry out
their mission. After OMB review, the
agencies are required to make their list
of activities available to the public. In
accordance with the FAIR Act, OMB is
publishing this notice to announce the
availability of the inventories for Fiscal
Year (FY) 2017 from the agencies listed
below. These inventories include both
activities that are not inherently
governmental and activities that are
inherently governmental. If an agency
has not yet posted its inventory on its
website, the agency’s point of contact
should be able to provide assistance.
As provided in the FAIR Act,
interested parties who disagree with the
agency’s initial judgment may challenge
the inclusion or the omission of an
activity on the list of activities that are
not inherently governmental within 30
working days of this Notice and, if not
satisfied with this review, may appeal to
a higher level within the agency.
Russell T. Vought,
Acting Director.
Attachment: FAIR Act Release FY 2017
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER (CFO) ACT AGENCIES
Item
Agency
1 .........
Department of Commerce
2 .........
Department of Defense .....
3 .........
4 .........
5 .........
Department of Education ...
Department of Energy .......
Department of Health and
Human Services.
Department of Homeland
Security.
6 .........
Point of contact
Email
Telephone
Virna Winters .....................
Ron Ortega ........................
Thomas Hessel ..................
vwinters@doc.gov ..............
rortega@doc.gov ...............
Thomas.j.hessel.civ@
mail.mil.
202–482–3483
202–482–3490
703–697–3402
Camille Manuel ..................
Jeff Davis ...........................
William Kim ........................
camille.manuel@ed.gov .....
jeff.davis@hq.doe.gov .......
William.Kim@hhs.gov ........
202–245–6658
202–287–1877
202–205–1341
https://prhome.defense.gov/
M-RA/Inside-M-RA/TFM/
Reports/.
https://www.ed.gov.
https://energy.gov.
https://www.hhs.gov/.
Katherine Chimera .............
202–447–0177
www.dhs.gov.
Maria Milligan .....................
katherine.chimera@
hq.dhs.gov.
pamela.campbell@
hq.dhs.gov.
Maria.L.Milligan@HUD.gov
202–402–6417
https://www.hud.gov/.
Felisha Griffin .....................
Neil Ryder ..........................
Tanisha Bynum-Frazier .....
Keisha Brown .....................
Kenneth Black ....................
Michelle Langley ................
Catherine Jones .................
felisha_griffin@ios.doi.gov
Neil.Ryder@usdoj.gov .......
bynum.frazier.t@dol.gov ....
brown.keisha@dol.gov .......
blackkh@state.gov .............
LangleyML@state.gov .......
Catherine.jones@dot.gov ..
202–513–7561
202–616–5499
202–693–4546
202–693–7271
202–485–7211
202–485–7198
202–366–4272
www.doi.gov.
https://www.justice.gov/.
www.dol.gov.
Germaine Myles .................
Kim Steide .........................
202–366–5935
202–622–9490
https://www.treasury.gov/.
Steven Carney ...................
germaine.myles@dot.gov ..
kimberly.steide@treasury.gov.
Steven.Carney@va.gov .....
202–461–5959
https://www.va.gov.
Jennifer Cranford ...............
Cranford.Jennifer@epa.gov
202–564–0798
www.epa.gov.
Pamela Campbell ..............
7 .........
8 .........
9 .........
10 .......
Department of Housing and
Urban Development.
Department of the Interior
Department of Justice ........
Department of Labor ..........
11 .......
Department of State ..........
12 .......
Department of Transportation.
13 .......
Department of the Treasury
14 .......
Department of Veterans Affairs.
Environmental Protection
Agency.
15 .......
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:16 Feb 19, 2019
Jkt 247001
PO 00000
Frm 00068
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Website
www.commerce.gov.
202–447–5255
E:\FR\FM\20FEN1.SGM
20FEN1
https://www.state.gov.
www.dot.gov.
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 34 (Wednesday, February 20, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 5111-5113]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-02745]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Mine Safety and Health Administration
Petitions for Modification of Application of Existing Mandatory
Safety Standard
AGENCY: Mine Safety and Health Administration, Labor.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This notice is a summary of petitions for modification
submitted to the Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA) by the
parties listed below.
DATES: All comments on the petition must be received by MSHA's Office
of Standards, Regulations, and Variances on or before March 22, 2019.
ADDRESSES: You may submit your comments, identified by ``docket
number'' on the subject line, by any of the following methods:
1. Email: zzMSHA-comments@dol.gov. Include the docket number of the
petition in the subject line of the message.
2. Facsimile: 202-693-9441.
3. Regular Mail or Hand Delivery: MSHA, Office of Standards,
Regulations, and Variances, 201 12th Street South, Suite 4E401,
Arlington, Virginia 22202-5452, Attention: Sheila McConnell, Director,
Office of Standards, Regulations, and Variances. Persons delivering
documents are required to check in at the receptionist's desk in Suite
4E401. Individuals may inspect a copy of the petition and comments
during normal business hours at the address listed above.
MSHA will consider only comments postmarked by the U.S. Postal
Service or proof of delivery from another delivery service such as UPS
or Federal Express on or before the deadline for comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Barbara Barron, Office of Standards,
Regulations, and Variances at 202-693-9447 (voice),
barron.barbara@dol.gov (email), or 202-693-9441 (fax). [These are not
toll-free numbers.]
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 101(c) of the Federal Mine Safety
and Health Act of 1977 and Title 30 of the Code of Federal Regulations
Part 44 govern the application, processing, and disposition of
petitions for modification.
I. Background
Section 101(c) of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977
(Mine Act) allows the mine operator or representative of miners to file
a petition to modify the application of any mandatory safety standard
to a coal or other mine if the Secretary of Labor (Secretary)
determines that:
1. An alternative method of achieving the result of such standard
exists which will at all times guarantee no less than the same measure
of protection afforded the miners of such mine by such standard; or
2. That the application of such standard to such mine will result
in a diminution of safety to the miners in such mine.
In addition, the regulations at 30 CFR 44.10 and 44.11 establish
the requirements and procedures for filing petitions for modification.
II. Petitions for Modification
Docket Number: M-2018-023-C.
Petitioner: Little Buck Coal Company, 21 Pine Lane, Pine Grove,
Pennsylvania 17963.
Mine: Broad Mountain Slope, MSHA I.D. No. 36-10233, located in
Schuylkill County, Pennsylvania.
Regulation Affected: 30 CFR 75.1200(d), (h) and (i) (Mine map).
Modification Request: The petitioner requests a modification of the
existing standard to permit the substation of cross-sections in lieu of
contour lines through the intake slope, at locations of rock tunnel
connections between veins, at 1,000 feet intervals of advance from the
intake slope, and to limit the required mapping of mine workings above
and below to those present within 100 feet of the coal vein(s) being
mined through rock tunnels, unless these veins are interconnected to
other veins beyond the 100 feet limit.
The petitioner requests modification of 30 CFR 75.1200(d), (h) and
(i) for the following reasons:
(1) Due to the steep pitch encountered in mining anthracite coal
veins, contour lines provide no useful information and their presence
would make portions of the map illegible.
(2) The use of cross-sections in lieu of contour lines has been
practiced since the late 1800s and provides critical information about
spacing between veins and proximity to other mine workings, which
fluctuate considerably.
(3) The vast majority of current underground anthracite mining
involves either second mining of remnant pillars from previous mining
or the mining of coal veins of lower quality in proximity to
inaccessible and frequently flooded abandoned mine workings that may or
may not be mapped.
(4) All mapping for mines above and below is researched by the
petitioner's contract engineer for the presence of interconnecting rock
tunnels between veins in relation to the mine, and a hazard analysis is
done when mapping
[[Page 5112]]
indicates the presence of known or potentially flooded workings.
(5) When no rock tunnel connections are found, mine workings that
exist beyond 100 feet from the mine are recognized as presenting no
hazard to the mine due to the pitch of the vein and rock separation
between the workings.
(6) The petitioner states that the mine workings above and below
are usually inactive and abandoned and, therefore, are not usually
subject to changes during the life of the mine.
(7) When evidence indicates prior mining was conducted on a coal
vein above or below and research exhausts the availability of mine
mapping, the vein will be considered mined and flooded and appropriate
precautions will be taken in accordance with 30 CFR 75.388, which
addresses drilling boreholes in advance of mining.
(8) Where potential hazards exist and in-mine drilling capabilities
limit penetration, surface boreholes may be used to intercept the
workings and the results analyzed prior to beginning mining in the
affected area.
The petitioner proposed the following terms and conditions:
(a) A search by a registered engineer or surveyor of all available
mapping, including cross-sections will be conducted to determine the
spacing between coal veins and the proximity of the existing and
projected workings of the mine to other workings of adjacent mines. A
hazard analysis will be done when mapping indicates the presence of
known or potentially flooded workings.
(b) The map will show cross section(s) through the slope, at
locations of rock tunnels between coal veins, and along gangways at
1,000-foot intervals. The mapping provided will show the crop line of
the vein being mined.
(c) Where adjacent workings are located within 1,000 feet of the
projected limit(s) of the same vein being mined, those working will be
mapped, the potential water and gas hazards will be evaluated, and a
revised drilling program, if needed, will be established under 30 CFR
75.388.
(d) Where projections include mining-through into inaccessible
areas of the same coal vein or adjacent vein(s) and the conditions
cannot be determined, a plan detailing the operation will be submitted
under 30 CFR 75.389 for approval by the District Manager.
(e) Prior to recovering pillars known to be below the water level
elevation in adjacent workings, a revised recovery plan will be
submitted under 30 CFR 75.220(a)(1) for approval by the District
Manager.
(f) When veins within 100 feet above or below the coal vein being
mined are interconnected by rock tunnels to other veins, all
interconnected vein mapping will be provided to within 1,000 feet of
the active workings.
(g) Within 60 days after the Proposed Decision and Order (PDO)
becomes final, the petitioner will submit proposed revisions for its
approved 30 CFR part 48 training plan to the District Manager. These
proposed revisions will include initial and refresher training
regarding compliance with the PDO.
The petitioner asserts that the proposed alternative method will
provide no less than the same measure of protection afforded the miners
under the existing standard.
Docket Number: M-2018-024-C.
Petitioner: Little Buck Coal Company, 21 Pine Lane, Pine Grove,
Pennsylvania 17963.
Mine: Broad Mountain Slope, MSHA I.D. No. 36-10233, located in
Schuylkill County, Pennsylvania.
Regulation Affected: 30 CFR 75.1202-1(a) (Temporary notations,
revisions, and supplements).
Modification Request: The petitioner requests a modification of the
existing standard to permit the required interval of survey to be
established on an annual basis from the initial survey in lieu of every
6 months as required.
The petitioner requests modification of 30 CFR 75.1202-1(a) for the
following reasons:
(1) The low production and slow rate of advance in anthracite
mining make surveying on a 6-month interval impractical. In most cases,
annual development is frequently limited to less than 500 feet of
gangway advancement with associated up-pitch development.
(2) The vast majority of small anthracite miners are using non-
mechanized, hand-loading methods of mining.
(3) Development above the active gangway is designed to mine into
the level above at designated intervals thereby maintaining sufficient
control between both survey gangways.
(4) The availability of engineering/surveyor resources are very
limited in the anthracite coal fields with surveying on an annual basis
difficult to achieve with three contractors currently available.
The petitioner proposes the following terms and conditions:
(a) The mine map will be revised and supplemented at intervals of
not more than 12 months on the basis of a survey made or certified by a
registered engineer or a registered surveyor.
(b) The mine map will also be revised and supplemented on the basis
of a survey made or certified by a registered engineer or registered
surveyor prior to final retreat mining or from the point of the deepest
penetration of gangway advance or breast advance if not connected to a
surveyed location.
(c) Within 60 days after the Proposed Decision and Order (PDO)
becomes final, the petitioner will submit proposed revisions for its
approved 30 CFR part 48 training plan to the District Manager. These
proposed revisions will include initial and refresher training
regarding compliance with the PDO.
The petitioner asserts that the proposed alternative method will
provide no less than the same measure of protection afforded the miners
under the existing standard.
Docket Number: M-2018-025-C.
Petitioner: Little Buck Coal Company, 21 Pine Lane, Pine Grove,
Pennsylvania 17963.
Mine: Broad Mountain Slope, MSHA I.D. No. 36-10233, located in
Schuylkill County, Pennsylvania.
Regulation Affected: 30 CFR 75.1400(c) (Hoisting equipment;
general).
Modification Request: The petitioner requests a modification of the
existing standard to permit operating the gunboat used in the mine to
transport persons without safety catches or other no less effective
devices because, to date, no such safety catch or device is available
for use in the steeply pitching and undulating slopes with numerous
curves and knuckles present in the main haulage slopes of the
petitioner's mine.
The petitioner requests modification of 30 CFR 75.1400(c) for the
following reasons:
(1) Anthracite mine slopes range in length from 180 to 1,000 feet
and vary in pitch from 30 to 75 degrees.
(2) A functional safety catch has not been developed and,
consequently, if a makeshift device is installed it could activate on
knuckles or curves when no emergency existed, causing a tumbling effect
on the conveyance which would increase rather than decrease the hazard
to miners. Therefore, the petitioner proposes to operate the steel
gunboat with secondary safety connections securely fastened around the
gunboat and to the hoisting rope above the main connecting device, and
use hoisting ropes having a safety factor in excess of three.
The petitioner proposes the following terms and conditions:
(a) A communication signal system, audible to the hoist operator,
will be installed so that it can be activated from
[[Page 5113]]
the gunboat at any location along the slope.
(b) The design safety factor of the hoist rope will be maintained
at all times as not less than three times the values specified in 30
CFR 75.1431.
(c) A detailed inspection procedure of the ropes and terminations
used at the mine will be posted in the hoist house and complied with at
all times.
(d) A secondary safety connection will be securely fastened around
the gunboat and securely fastened to the hoisting rope at a point above
the main connecting device. The secondary safety connection must meet
the safety factor requirements described in Item (b) above. The
secondary safety connection will be the same size as or greater than
the primary hoist rope and properly terminated above the primary hoist
rope attachment with at least two clips on each end or with equivalent
strength chains.
(e) At least 2 feet of clearance must be maintained between the
highest part of the secondary attachment and the head sheave when the
gunboat is positioned in the full dump position.
(f) Within 60 days after the Proposed Decision and Order (PDO)
becomes final, the petitioner will submit proposed revisions for its
approved 30 CFR part 48 training plan to the District Manager. These
proposed revisions will include initial and refresher training
regarding compliance with the PDO.
The petitioner asserts that the alternative method will guarantee
no less than the same measure of protection for all miners than that of
the existing standard.
Sheila McConnell,
Director, Office of Standards, Regulations, and Variances.
[FR Doc. 2019-02745 Filed 2-19-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4520-43-P