Petitions for Modification of Application of Existing Mandatory Safety Standard, 5108-5111 [2019-02744]
Download as PDF
5108
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 34 / Wednesday, February 20, 2019 / Notices
E.O. 13496 advances the
Administration’s goal of promoting
economy and efficiency of Federal
government procurement by ensuring
that workers employed in the private
sector as a result of Federal government
contracts are informed of their rights to
engage in union activity and collective
bargaining. Knowledge of such basic
statutory rights promotes stable labormanagement relations, thus reducing
costs to the Federal government.
The contractual provisions require
contractors and subcontractors to post a
notice, created by the Secretary of
Labor, informing employees of their
rights under the National Labor
Relations Act. The notice also provides
a statement of the policy of the United
States to encourage collective
bargaining, as well as a list of activities
that are illegal under the Act. The notice
concludes with a general description of
the remedies to which employees may
be entitled if these rights have been
violated and contact information for
further information about those rights
and remedies, as well as enforcement
procedures.
The clause also requires contractors to
include the same clause in their
nonexempt subcontracts and purchase
orders, and describes generally the
sanctions, penalties, and remedies that
may be imposed if the contractor fails to
satisfy its obligations under the Order
and the clause.
The regulatory provisions
implementing E.O. 13496 (29 CFR part
471) include the language of the
required notices, and they explain
posting and contractual requirements,
the complaint process, the investigatory
process, and sanctions, penalties, and
remedies that may be imposed if the
contractor or subcontractor fails to
comply with its obligations under the
Order. Specifically, 29 CFR part
471.11(c) sets forth the procedures that
the Department must use when
accepting written complaints alleging
that a contractor doing business with
the Federal government has failed to
post the notice required by the
Executive Order.
Type of Review: Extension.
Agency: Office of Labor-Management
Standards.
OMB Number: 1245–0004.
Affected Public: Employees of Federal
Contractors and Subcontractors.
Total Respondents: 10.
Total Annual Responses: 10.
Estimated Total Burden Hours: 12.80.
Estimated Time per Response: 1.28
hours.
Frequency: On occasion of employee
of a Federal contractor or subcontractor
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:16 Feb 19, 2019
Jkt 247001
filing a complaint alleging a violation of
proposed 29 CFR part 471.
Total Burden Cost (capital/startup):
$5.90 ($0.59 per response × 10
respondents).
Total Burden Cost (operating/
maintenance): $0.
Employee Complaints Cost: $351.70
($35.17 per response × 10 respondents).
Total Annual Burden Cost: $357.60
($5.90 + $351.70).
Total respondent and responses
estimates are based upon the estimate of
10 in the previous E.O. 13496 extension
of information collection, in 2016. See
81 FR 7376. Since 2016, the Department
has received 0 complaints. The
Department maintains the estimate of 10
complaints for purposes of this renewal
request.
The Department has not adjusted its
total employee complaint hour estimate
of 1.28 hours, which it estimated in the
E.O. 13496 final rule. 75 FR 28368.
Based on the average seasonallyadjusted hourly earnings on private
non-farm payrolls for all workers of
$27.48, we estimate that an employee
will incur a cost of approximately
$35.17 for the 1.28 hours involved
($27.48 × 1.28) in preparing a
complaint. The total hourly cost for all
employees is therefore $351.70.
Additionally, employees will incur
costs of $0.59 per complaint in capital/
start-up costs ($0.55 for postage + $0.03
for an envelope + $0.01 for paper) for a
total cost of $5.90. (Although employees
will submit many if not all complaints
via email, the Department assumes,
conservatively, that it will receive all
via mail.) The total cost for the
estimated 10 complaints is therefore
$357.60 ($351.70 + $5.90). There are no
ongoing operation/maintenance costs
associated with this information
collection.
Comments submitted in response to
this notice will be summarized and/or
included in the request for Office of
Management and Budget approval of the
information collection request; they will
also become a matter of public record.
Dated: February 8, 2019.
Andrew R. Davis,
Chief of the Division of Interpretations and
Standards, Office of Labor-Management
Standards, U.S. Department of Labor.
[FR Doc. 2019–02647 Filed 2–19–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
PO 00000
Frm 00063
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Mine Safety and Health Administration
Petitions for Modification of
Application of Existing Mandatory
Safety Standard
Mine Safety and Health
Administration, Labor.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
This notice is a summary of
petitions for modification submitted to
the Mine Safety and Health
Administration (MSHA) by the parties
listed below.
DATES: All comments on the petitions
must be received by MSHA’s Office of
Standards, Regulations, and Variances
on or before March 22, 2019.
ADDRESSES: You may submit your
comments, identified by ‘‘docket
number’’ on the subject line, by any of
the following methods:
1. Email: zzMSHA-comments@
dol.gov. Include the docket number of
the petition in the subject line of the
message.
2. Facsimile: 202–693–9441.
3. Regular Mail or Hand Delivery:
MSHA, Office of Standards,
Regulations, and Variances, 201 12th
Street South, Suite 4E401, Arlington,
Virginia 22202–5452, Attention: Sheila
McConnell, Director, Office of
Standards, Regulations, and Variances.
Persons delivering documents are
required to check in at the receptionist’s
desk in Suite 4E401. Individuals may
inspect a copy of the petitions and
comments during normal business
hours at the address listed above.
MSHA will consider only comments
postmarked by the U.S. Postal Service or
proof of delivery from another delivery
service such as UPS or Federal Express
on or before the deadline for comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Barbara Barron, Office of Standards,
Regulations, and Variances at 202–693–
9447 (voice), barron.barbara@dol.gov
(email), or 202–693–9441 (fax). [These
are not toll-free numbers.]
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section
101(c) of the Federal Mine Safety and
Health Act of 1977 and Title 30 of the
Code of Federal Regulations Part 44
govern the application, processing, and
disposition of petitions for modification.
SUMMARY:
I. Background
Section 101(c) of the Federal Mine
Safety and Health Act of 1977 (Mine
Act) allows the mine operator or
representative of miners to file a
petition to modify the application of any
mandatory safety standard to a coal or
E:\FR\FM\20FEN1.SGM
20FEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 34 / Wednesday, February 20, 2019 / Notices
other mine if the Secretary of Labor
(Secretary) determines that:
1. An alternative method of achieving
the result of such standard exists which
will at all times guarantee no less than
the same measure of protection afforded
the miners of such mine by such
standard; or
2. That the application of such
standard to such mine will result in a
diminution of safety to the miners in
such mine.
In addition, the regulations at 30 CFR
44.10 and 44.11 establish the
requirements and procedures for filing
petitions for modification.
II. Petitions for Modification
Docket Number: M–2018–026–C.
Petitioner: Castle Valley Mining, LLC,
P.O. Box 475, Huntington, Utah 84528.
Mine: Castle Valley Mine No. 3,
MSHA I.D. No. 42–02263 and Castle
Valley Mine No. 4, MSHA I.D. No. 42–
02335, located in Emery County, Utah.
Regulation Affected: 30 CFR 75.507–
1(a) (Electric equipment other than
power-connection points; outby the last
open crosscut; return air; permissibility
requirements).
Modification Request: The petitioner
requests a modification of the existing
standard to permit an alternate method
of compliance to allow the use of low
voltage battery-powered nonpermissible
electronic surveying equipment,
including, but not limited to, portable
battery-operated mine transits, total
station surveying equipment, distance
meters, and data loggers, in return
airways.
The petitioner states that:
(1) To comply with the requirements
of 30 CFR 75.372 and 75.1200, use of
the most practical and accurate
surveying equipment is necessary.
(2) Underground mining, by its nature
and the size and complexity of mine
plans, requires that accurate and precise
measurements be completed in a
prompt and efficient manner.
(3) The petitioner will use the
following total station and similar low
voltage battery-operated total stations if
they have an ingress protection (IP)
rating of 66 or greater in return airways
subject to the conditions in the
Proposed Decision and Order (PDO):
—Sokkia Electronic Total Station
Model CX–103.
(4) Nonpermissible electronic
surveying equipment will only be used
until equivalent permissible electronic
surveying equipment is available.
(5) The operator will maintain a
logbook for nonpermissible electronic
surveying equipment with the
equipment, or in the location where
mine record books are kept, or in the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:16 Feb 19, 2019
Jkt 247001
location where the surveying record
books are kept. The logbook will contain
the date of manufacture and/or purchase
of each particular piece of electronic
surveying equipment. The logbook will
be made available to MSHA on request.
(6) All nonpermissible electronic
surveying equipment to be used in the
return airways will be examined by the
person operating the equipment prior to
taking the equipment underground to
ensure the equipment is being
maintained in a safe operating
condition. These examinations will
include:
(i) Checking the instrument for any
physical damage and the integrity of the
case;
(ii) Removing the battery and
inspecting for corrosion;
(iii) Inspecting the contact points to
ensure a secure connection to the
battery;
(iv) Reinserting the battery and
powering up and shutting down to
ensure proper connections; and
(v) Checking the battery compartment
cover or battery attachment to ensure
that it is securely fastened.
The results of the examinations will
be recorded in the logbook.
(7) The equipment will be examined
at least weekly by a qualified person as
defined in 30 CFR 75.153. The
examination results will be recorded
weekly in the equipment logbook.
Examination entries in the logbook will
be maintained for at least 1 year from
the date of entry.
(8) The operator will ensure that all
nonpermissible electronic surveying
equipment is serviced according to the
manufacturer’s recommendations. Dates
of service will be recorded in the
equipment log book and will include a
description of the work performed.
(9) Nonpermissible electronic
surveying equipment that will be used
in return airways will not be put into
service until MSHA has initially
inspected the equipment and
determined that it is in compliance with
all the terms and conditions of the PDO.
(10) Nonpermissible electronic
surveying equipment will not be used if
methane is detected in concentrations at
or above 1.0 percent. When 1.0 percent
or more of methane is detected while
the equipment is being used, the
equipment will be de-energized
immediately and withdrawn out of the
return airways. All the requirements of
30 CFR 75.323 will be complied with
prior to entering the return airways.
(11) Prior to setting up and energizing
nonpermissible electronic surveying
equipment in return airways, the
surveyor(s) will conduct a visual
examination of the immediate area for
PO 00000
Frm 00064
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
5109
evidence that the area appears to be
sufficiently rock-dusted and for the
presence of accumulated float coal dust.
If the rock-dusting appears insufficient
or the presence of accumulated float
coal dust is observed, the
nonpermissible electronic surveying
equipment will not be energized until
sufficient rock dust has been applied
and/or the accumulations of float coal
dust have been cleaned up. If
nonpermissible electronic surveying
equipment is to be used in an area
within 40 feet of a working face where
a continuous mining machine is used to
extract coal, the area will be rockeddusted prior to energizing the
nonpermissible electronic surveying
equipment.
(12) All hand-held methane detectors
will be MSHA-approved and
maintained in permissible and proper
operating condition as defined in 30
CFR 75.320. All methane detectors will
provide visual and audible warnings
when methane is detected at or above
1.0 percent.
(13) Prior to energizing the
nonpermissible electronic surveying
equipment in return airways, methane
tests will be made in accordance with
30 CFR 75.323.
(14) Prior to surveying, all areas to be
surveyed will be examined according to
30 CFR 75.360. If the area has not been
examined, a supplemental examination
according to 30 CFR 75.361 will be
performed before any non-certified
person enters the area.
(15) A qualified person, as defined in
30 CFR 75.151, will continuously
monitor for methane immediately before
and during the use of nonpermissible
electronic surveying equipment in
return airways, outby the last open
crosscut. If there are two people in the
surveying crew, both persons will
continuously monitor for methane. The
other person will either be a qualified
person, as defined in 30 CFR 75.151, or
be in the process of being trained to be
a qualified person but has yet to make
such tests for a period of 6 months, as
required in 30 CFR 75.150. Upon
completion of the 6-month training
period, the second person on the
surveying crew must become qualified,
as defined in 30 CFR 75.151, to continue
on the surveying crew. If the surveying
crew consists of one person, that person
will monitor for methane with two
separate devices.
(16) Batteries contained in the
nonpermissible electronic surveying
equipment will be changed out or
charged in intake air out of the return
airways. Replacement batteries will be
carried only in the compartment
provided for a spare battery in the
E:\FR\FM\20FEN1.SGM
20FEN1
5110
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 34 / Wednesday, February 20, 2019 / Notices
nonpermissible electronic surveying
equipment carrying case. Before each
shift of surveying, all batteries for the
nonpermissible electronic surveying
equipment will be charged sufficiently
so that they are not expected to be
replaced on that shift.
(17) When using nonpermissible
electronic surveying equipment in
return airways outby the last open
crosscut, the surveyor will confirm by
measurement or by inquiry of the
person in charge of the section that the
air quantity on the section, on that shift,
in the last open crosscut is at least the
minimum quantity that is required by
the mine’s ventilation plan.
(18) Personnel engaged in the use of
nonpermissible electronic surveying
equipment will be properly trained to
recognize the hazards and limitations
associated with the use of such
equipment in areas where methane
could be present.
(19) All members of the surveying
crew will receive specific training on
the terms and conditions of the PDO
before using nonpermissible electronic
surveying equipment in return airways.
A record of the training will be kept
with the other training records.
(20) Within 60 days after the PDO
becomes final, the operator will submit
proposed revisions for its approved 30
CFR part 48 training plans to the District
Manager. These revisions will specify
initial and refresher training regarding
the terms and conditions of the PDO.
When training is conducted on the
terms and conditions in the PDO, an
MSHA Certificate of Training (Form
5000–23) will be completed and will
indicate that it was surveyor training.
(21) The operator will replace or retire
from service any electronic surveying
instrument that was acquired prior to
December 31, 2004 within 1 year of the
PDO becoming final. The operator will
replace or retire from service any
electronic surveying instrument that
was acquired between January 1, 2005
and December 31, 2010 within 2 years
of the PDO becoming final. Within 3
years of the date that the PDO becomes
final, the operator will replace or retire
from service any total station or other
electronic surveying equipment
identified in the PDO acquired more
than 10 years prior to the date that the
PDO became final. After 5 years, the
operator will maintain a cycle of
purchasing new electronic surveying
equipment that will be no older than 5
years from date of manufacture and total
stations and other electronic surveying
equipment will be no older than 10
years from date of manufacture.
(22) The operator will ensure that all
surveying contractors hired by the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:16 Feb 19, 2019
Jkt 247001
operator are using nonpermissible
electronic surveying equipment in
accordance with the requirements in the
PDO.
(23) The petitioner states that it may
use nonpermissible electronic surveying
equipment when production is
occurring, subject to the following
conditions:
(a) On a mechanized mining unit
(MMU) where production is occurring,
nonpermissible electronic surveying
equipment will not be used downwind
of the discharge point of any face
ventilation controls, such as tubing or
curtains, where coal is being mined.
(b) Production may continue while
nonpermissible electronic surveying
equipment is used, if the surveying
equipment is used in a separate split of
air from where production is occurring.
(c) Nonpermissible electronic
surveying equipment will not be used in
a split of air ventilating an MMU if any
ventilation controls will be disrupted
during such surveying. Disruption of
ventilation controls means any change
to the mine’s ventilation system that
causes the ventilation system not to
function in accordance with the mine’s
approved ventilation plan.
(d) If, while surveying, a surveyor
must disrupt ventilation, the surveyor
will cease surveying and communicate
to the section foreman that ventilation
must be disrupted. Production will stop
while ventilation is disrupted.
Ventilation controls will be
reestablished immediately after the
disruption is no longer necessary.
Production can only resume after all
ventilation controls are reestablished
and are in compliance with approved
ventilation or other plans, and other
applicable laws, standards, or
regulations.
(e) Any disruption in ventilation will
be recorded in the logbook required by
the PDO. The logbook will include a
description of the nature of the
disruption, the location of the
disruption, the date and time of the
disruption and the date and time the
surveyor communicated the disruption
to the section foreman, the date and
time production ceased, the date and
time ventilation was reestablished, and
the date and time production resumed.
(f) All surveyors, section foremen,
section crew members, and other
personnel who will be involved with or
affected by surveying operations will
receive training in accordance with 30
CFR 48.7 on the requirements of the
PDO within 60 days of the date the PDO
becomes final. The training will be
completed before any nonpermissible
electronic surveying equipment will be
used while production is occurring. The
PO 00000
Frm 00065
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
operator will keep a record of the
training and provide the record to
MSHA on request.
(g) The operator will provide annual
retraining to all personnel involved with
or affected by surveying operations in
accordance with 30 CFR 48.8. The
operator will train new miners on the
requirements of the PDO in accordance
with 30 CFR 48.5, and will train
experienced miners, as defined in 30
CFR 48.6, on the requirements of the
PDO in accordance with 30 CFR 48.6.
The operator will keep a record of the
training and provide the record to
MSHA on request.
The petitioner asserts that application
of existing standard will result in a
diminution of safety to the miners and
the proposed alternative method will at
all times guarantee no less than the
same measure of protection afforded by
the existing standard.
Docket Number: M–2018–027–C.
Petitioner: Spartan Mining Company,
#10 Hale Street, 4th Floor, Charleston,
West Virginia 25301.
Mine: Road Fork No. 52 Mine, MSHA
I.D. No. 46–09522, located in Wyoming
County, West Virginia.
Regulation Affected: 30 CFR 75.503
(Permissible electric face equipment;
maintenance) and 30 CFR 18.35
(Portable (trailing) cables and cords).
Modification Request: The petitioner
requests a modification of the existing
standard to allow the length of trailing
cables to be increased for the feeder and
continuous mining machines as the
equipment is trammed in and out of the
petitioner’s mine and at other times
throughout the mine when the
equipment is operating in a nonproducing function.
(1) The petitioner seeks to extend the
length of the continuous mining
machine cable up to 2,000 feet with 1⁄0
American Wire Gauge (AWG) or larger
copper cable.
(2) When the cable length is extended
beyond the requirements in 30 CFR
75.503, the petitioner will only operate
the continuous mining machine in tram
mode up and down the slope and
throughout the mine in non-production
activities, such as moving the
continuous mining machine from one
area of the mine to another.
(3) With the extended cable, only the
tram motor on the continuous mining
machine will be operated. No other
motor on the machine will be energized
while the extended cable is installed.
(4) The petitioner states that
extending the continuous mining
machine cable for tramming will allow
the petitioner to tram the continuous
mining machine longer distances and
handle the cable less often. While
E:\FR\FM\20FEN1.SGM
20FEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 34 / Wednesday, February 20, 2019 / Notices
tramming the continuous mining
machine up and down the slope, the
extended cable will allow the petitioner
to use the power supply at the top and
bottom of the slope and eliminate the
need for a move box. The petitioner
states that, given the width of the slope,
the elimination of the move box will
reduce the likelihood of an accident.
(5) An electrical engineering study
was conducted and has demonstrated
that the continuous mining machine
cable can be safely extended.
(6) The petitioner seeks to extend the
length of the feeder cable up to 2,000
feet with No. 2 AWG or larger copper
cable.
(7) When the cable length is extended
beyond the requirements set forth in 30
CFR 75.503, the petitioner will only
operate the feeder in tram mode up and
down the slope and throughout the
mine in non-production activities, such
as moving the feeder from one location
in the mine to another.
(8) The petitioner states that
extending the feeder cable for tramming
will allow the petitioner to tram the
feeder longer distances and handle the
cable less often. While tramming the
feeder up and down the slope, the
extended cable will allow the petitioner
to use the power supply at the top and
bottom of the slope and eliminate the
need for a move box. The petitioner
states that, given the width of the slope,
elimination of the move box will reduce
the likelihood of an accident.
(9) An electrical engineering study
was conducted and has demonstrated
that the feeder cable can be safely
extended.
(10) Within 60 days after the Proposed
Decision and Order (PDO) becomes
final, the petitioner will submit
proposed revisions for its approved 30
CFR part 48 training plan to the District
Manager. These proposed revisions will
include initial and refresher training
regarding compliance with the terms
and conditions in the PDO.
The petitioner asserts that the
proposed alternative method will at all
times guarantee no less than the same
measure of protection afforded the
miners under the existing standard.
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Sheila McConnell,
Director, Office of Standards, Regulations,
and Variances.
I. Background
[FR Doc. 2019–02744 Filed 2–19–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4520–43–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:16 Feb 19, 2019
Jkt 247001
Mine Safety and Health Administration
Petitions for Modification of
Application of Existing Mandatory
Safety Standard
Mine Safety and Health
Administration, Labor.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
This notice is a summary of
petitions for modification submitted to
the Mine Safety and Health
Administration (MSHA) by the parties
listed below.
DATES: All comments on the petition
must be received by MSHA’s Office of
Standards, Regulations, and Variances
on or before March 22, 2019.
ADDRESSES: You may submit your
comments, identified by ‘‘docket
number’’ on the subject line, by any of
the following methods:
1. Email: zzMSHA-comments@
dol.gov. Include the docket number of
the petition in the subject line of the
message.
2. Facsimile: 202–693–9441.
3. Regular Mail or Hand Delivery:
MSHA, Office of Standards,
Regulations, and Variances, 201 12th
Street South, Suite 4E401, Arlington,
Virginia 22202–5452, Attention: Sheila
McConnell, Director, Office of
Standards, Regulations, and Variances.
Persons delivering documents are
required to check in at the receptionist’s
desk in Suite 4E401. Individuals may
inspect a copy of the petition and
comments during normal business
hours at the address listed above.
MSHA will consider only comments
postmarked by the U.S. Postal Service or
proof of delivery from another delivery
service such as UPS or Federal Express
on or before the deadline for comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Barbara Barron, Office of Standards,
Regulations, and Variances at 202–693–
9447 (voice), barron.barbara@dol.gov
(email), or 202–693–9441 (fax). [These
are not toll-free numbers.]
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section
101(c) of the Federal Mine Safety and
Health Act of 1977 and Title 30 of the
Code of Federal Regulations Part 44
govern the application, processing, and
disposition of petitions for modification.
SUMMARY:
Section 101(c) of the Federal Mine
Safety and Health Act of 1977 (Mine
Act) allows the mine operator or
representative of miners to file a
petition to modify the application of any
mandatory safety standard to a coal or
PO 00000
Frm 00066
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
5111
other mine if the Secretary of Labor
(Secretary) determines that:
1. An alternative method of achieving
the result of such standard exists which
will at all times guarantee no less than
the same measure of protection afforded
the miners of such mine by such
standard; or
2. That the application of such
standard to such mine will result in a
diminution of safety to the miners in
such mine.
In addition, the regulations at 30 CFR
44.10 and 44.11 establish the
requirements and procedures for filing
petitions for modification.
II. Petitions for Modification
Docket Number: M–2018–023–C.
Petitioner: Little Buck Coal Company,
21 Pine Lane, Pine Grove, Pennsylvania
17963.
Mine: Broad Mountain Slope, MSHA
I.D. No. 36–10233, located in Schuylkill
County, Pennsylvania.
Regulation Affected: 30 CFR
75.1200(d), (h) and (i) (Mine map).
Modification Request: The petitioner
requests a modification of the existing
standard to permit the substation of
cross-sections in lieu of contour lines
through the intake slope, at locations of
rock tunnel connections between veins,
at 1,000 feet intervals of advance from
the intake slope, and to limit the
required mapping of mine workings
above and below to those present within
100 feet of the coal vein(s) being mined
through rock tunnels, unless these veins
are interconnected to other veins
beyond the 100 feet limit.
The petitioner requests modification
of 30 CFR 75.1200(d), (h) and (i) for the
following reasons:
(1) Due to the steep pitch encountered
in mining anthracite coal veins, contour
lines provide no useful information and
their presence would make portions of
the map illegible.
(2) The use of cross-sections in lieu of
contour lines has been practiced since
the late 1800s and provides critical
information about spacing between
veins and proximity to other mine
workings, which fluctuate considerably.
(3) The vast majority of current
underground anthracite mining involves
either second mining of remnant pillars
from previous mining or the mining of
coal veins of lower quality in proximity
to inaccessible and frequently flooded
abandoned mine workings that may or
may not be mapped.
(4) All mapping for mines above and
below is researched by the petitioner’s
contract engineer for the presence of
interconnecting rock tunnels between
veins in relation to the mine, and a
hazard analysis is done when mapping
E:\FR\FM\20FEN1.SGM
20FEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 34 (Wednesday, February 20, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 5108-5111]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-02744]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Mine Safety and Health Administration
Petitions for Modification of Application of Existing Mandatory
Safety Standard
AGENCY: Mine Safety and Health Administration, Labor.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This notice is a summary of petitions for modification
submitted to the Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA) by the
parties listed below.
DATES: All comments on the petitions must be received by MSHA's Office
of Standards, Regulations, and Variances on or before March 22, 2019.
ADDRESSES: You may submit your comments, identified by ``docket
number'' on the subject line, by any of the following methods:
1. Email: zzMSHA-comments@dol.gov. Include the docket number of the
petition in the subject line of the message.
2. Facsimile: 202-693-9441.
3. Regular Mail or Hand Delivery: MSHA, Office of Standards,
Regulations, and Variances, 201 12th Street South, Suite 4E401,
Arlington, Virginia 22202-5452, Attention: Sheila McConnell, Director,
Office of Standards, Regulations, and Variances. Persons delivering
documents are required to check in at the receptionist's desk in Suite
4E401. Individuals may inspect a copy of the petitions and comments
during normal business hours at the address listed above.
MSHA will consider only comments postmarked by the U.S. Postal
Service or proof of delivery from another delivery service such as UPS
or Federal Express on or before the deadline for comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Barbara Barron, Office of Standards,
Regulations, and Variances at 202-693-9447 (voice),
barron.barbara@dol.gov (email), or 202-693-9441 (fax). [These are not
toll-free numbers.]
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 101(c) of the Federal Mine Safety
and Health Act of 1977 and Title 30 of the Code of Federal Regulations
Part 44 govern the application, processing, and disposition of
petitions for modification.
I. Background
Section 101(c) of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977
(Mine Act) allows the mine operator or representative of miners to file
a petition to modify the application of any mandatory safety standard
to a coal or
[[Page 5109]]
other mine if the Secretary of Labor (Secretary) determines that:
1. An alternative method of achieving the result of such standard
exists which will at all times guarantee no less than the same measure
of protection afforded the miners of such mine by such standard; or
2. That the application of such standard to such mine will result
in a diminution of safety to the miners in such mine.
In addition, the regulations at 30 CFR 44.10 and 44.11 establish
the requirements and procedures for filing petitions for modification.
II. Petitions for Modification
Docket Number: M-2018-026-C.
Petitioner: Castle Valley Mining, LLC, P.O. Box 475, Huntington,
Utah 84528.
Mine: Castle Valley Mine No. 3, MSHA I.D. No. 42-02263 and Castle
Valley Mine No. 4, MSHA I.D. No. 42-02335, located in Emery County,
Utah.
Regulation Affected: 30 CFR 75.507-1(a) (Electric equipment other
than power-connection points; outby the last open crosscut; return air;
permissibility requirements).
Modification Request: The petitioner requests a modification of the
existing standard to permit an alternate method of compliance to allow
the use of low voltage battery-powered nonpermissible electronic
surveying equipment, including, but not limited to, portable battery-
operated mine transits, total station surveying equipment, distance
meters, and data loggers, in return airways.
The petitioner states that:
(1) To comply with the requirements of 30 CFR 75.372 and 75.1200,
use of the most practical and accurate surveying equipment is
necessary.
(2) Underground mining, by its nature and the size and complexity
of mine plans, requires that accurate and precise measurements be
completed in a prompt and efficient manner.
(3) The petitioner will use the following total station and similar
low voltage battery-operated total stations if they have an ingress
protection (IP) rating of 66 or greater in return airways subject to
the conditions in the Proposed Decision and Order (PDO):
--Sokkia Electronic Total Station Model CX-103.
(4) Nonpermissible electronic surveying equipment will only be used
until equivalent permissible electronic surveying equipment is
available.
(5) The operator will maintain a logbook for nonpermissible
electronic surveying equipment with the equipment, or in the location
where mine record books are kept, or in the location where the
surveying record books are kept. The logbook will contain the date of
manufacture and/or purchase of each particular piece of electronic
surveying equipment. The logbook will be made available to MSHA on
request.
(6) All nonpermissible electronic surveying equipment to be used in
the return airways will be examined by the person operating the
equipment prior to taking the equipment underground to ensure the
equipment is being maintained in a safe operating condition. These
examinations will include:
(i) Checking the instrument for any physical damage and the
integrity of the case;
(ii) Removing the battery and inspecting for corrosion;
(iii) Inspecting the contact points to ensure a secure connection
to the battery;
(iv) Reinserting the battery and powering up and shutting down to
ensure proper connections; and
(v) Checking the battery compartment cover or battery attachment to
ensure that it is securely fastened.
The results of the examinations will be recorded in the logbook.
(7) The equipment will be examined at least weekly by a qualified
person as defined in 30 CFR 75.153. The examination results will be
recorded weekly in the equipment logbook. Examination entries in the
logbook will be maintained for at least 1 year from the date of entry.
(8) The operator will ensure that all nonpermissible electronic
surveying equipment is serviced according to the manufacturer's
recommendations. Dates of service will be recorded in the equipment log
book and will include a description of the work performed.
(9) Nonpermissible electronic surveying equipment that will be used
in return airways will not be put into service until MSHA has initially
inspected the equipment and determined that it is in compliance with
all the terms and conditions of the PDO.
(10) Nonpermissible electronic surveying equipment will not be used
if methane is detected in concentrations at or above 1.0 percent. When
1.0 percent or more of methane is detected while the equipment is being
used, the equipment will be de-energized immediately and withdrawn out
of the return airways. All the requirements of 30 CFR 75.323 will be
complied with prior to entering the return airways.
(11) Prior to setting up and energizing nonpermissible electronic
surveying equipment in return airways, the surveyor(s) will conduct a
visual examination of the immediate area for evidence that the area
appears to be sufficiently rock-dusted and for the presence of
accumulated float coal dust. If the rock-dusting appears insufficient
or the presence of accumulated float coal dust is observed, the
nonpermissible electronic surveying equipment will not be energized
until sufficient rock dust has been applied and/or the accumulations of
float coal dust have been cleaned up. If nonpermissible electronic
surveying equipment is to be used in an area within 40 feet of a
working face where a continuous mining machine is used to extract coal,
the area will be rocked-dusted prior to energizing the nonpermissible
electronic surveying equipment.
(12) All hand-held methane detectors will be MSHA-approved and
maintained in permissible and proper operating condition as defined in
30 CFR 75.320. All methane detectors will provide visual and audible
warnings when methane is detected at or above 1.0 percent.
(13) Prior to energizing the nonpermissible electronic surveying
equipment in return airways, methane tests will be made in accordance
with 30 CFR 75.323.
(14) Prior to surveying, all areas to be surveyed will be examined
according to 30 CFR 75.360. If the area has not been examined, a
supplemental examination according to 30 CFR 75.361 will be performed
before any non-certified person enters the area.
(15) A qualified person, as defined in 30 CFR 75.151, will
continuously monitor for methane immediately before and during the use
of nonpermissible electronic surveying equipment in return airways,
outby the last open crosscut. If there are two people in the surveying
crew, both persons will continuously monitor for methane. The other
person will either be a qualified person, as defined in 30 CFR 75.151,
or be in the process of being trained to be a qualified person but has
yet to make such tests for a period of 6 months, as required in 30 CFR
75.150. Upon completion of the 6-month training period, the second
person on the surveying crew must become qualified, as defined in 30
CFR 75.151, to continue on the surveying crew. If the surveying crew
consists of one person, that person will monitor for methane with two
separate devices.
(16) Batteries contained in the nonpermissible electronic surveying
equipment will be changed out or charged in intake air out of the
return airways. Replacement batteries will be carried only in the
compartment provided for a spare battery in the
[[Page 5110]]
nonpermissible electronic surveying equipment carrying case. Before
each shift of surveying, all batteries for the nonpermissible
electronic surveying equipment will be charged sufficiently so that
they are not expected to be replaced on that shift.
(17) When using nonpermissible electronic surveying equipment in
return airways outby the last open crosscut, the surveyor will confirm
by measurement or by inquiry of the person in charge of the section
that the air quantity on the section, on that shift, in the last open
crosscut is at least the minimum quantity that is required by the
mine's ventilation plan.
(18) Personnel engaged in the use of nonpermissible electronic
surveying equipment will be properly trained to recognize the hazards
and limitations associated with the use of such equipment in areas
where methane could be present.
(19) All members of the surveying crew will receive specific
training on the terms and conditions of the PDO before using
nonpermissible electronic surveying equipment in return airways. A
record of the training will be kept with the other training records.
(20) Within 60 days after the PDO becomes final, the operator will
submit proposed revisions for its approved 30 CFR part 48 training
plans to the District Manager. These revisions will specify initial and
refresher training regarding the terms and conditions of the PDO. When
training is conducted on the terms and conditions in the PDO, an MSHA
Certificate of Training (Form 5000-23) will be completed and will
indicate that it was surveyor training.
(21) The operator will replace or retire from service any
electronic surveying instrument that was acquired prior to December 31,
2004 within 1 year of the PDO becoming final. The operator will replace
or retire from service any electronic surveying instrument that was
acquired between January 1, 2005 and December 31, 2010 within 2 years
of the PDO becoming final. Within 3 years of the date that the PDO
becomes final, the operator will replace or retire from service any
total station or other electronic surveying equipment identified in the
PDO acquired more than 10 years prior to the date that the PDO became
final. After 5 years, the operator will maintain a cycle of purchasing
new electronic surveying equipment that will be no older than 5 years
from date of manufacture and total stations and other electronic
surveying equipment will be no older than 10 years from date of
manufacture.
(22) The operator will ensure that all surveying contractors hired
by the operator are using nonpermissible electronic surveying equipment
in accordance with the requirements in the PDO.
(23) The petitioner states that it may use nonpermissible
electronic surveying equipment when production is occurring, subject to
the following conditions:
(a) On a mechanized mining unit (MMU) where production is
occurring, nonpermissible electronic surveying equipment will not be
used downwind of the discharge point of any face ventilation controls,
such as tubing or curtains, where coal is being mined.
(b) Production may continue while nonpermissible electronic
surveying equipment is used, if the surveying equipment is used in a
separate split of air from where production is occurring.
(c) Nonpermissible electronic surveying equipment will not be used
in a split of air ventilating an MMU if any ventilation controls will
be disrupted during such surveying. Disruption of ventilation controls
means any change to the mine's ventilation system that causes the
ventilation system not to function in accordance with the mine's
approved ventilation plan.
(d) If, while surveying, a surveyor must disrupt ventilation, the
surveyor will cease surveying and communicate to the section foreman
that ventilation must be disrupted. Production will stop while
ventilation is disrupted. Ventilation controls will be reestablished
immediately after the disruption is no longer necessary. Production can
only resume after all ventilation controls are reestablished and are in
compliance with approved ventilation or other plans, and other
applicable laws, standards, or regulations.
(e) Any disruption in ventilation will be recorded in the logbook
required by the PDO. The logbook will include a description of the
nature of the disruption, the location of the disruption, the date and
time of the disruption and the date and time the surveyor communicated
the disruption to the section foreman, the date and time production
ceased, the date and time ventilation was reestablished, and the date
and time production resumed.
(f) All surveyors, section foremen, section crew members, and other
personnel who will be involved with or affected by surveying operations
will receive training in accordance with 30 CFR 48.7 on the
requirements of the PDO within 60 days of the date the PDO becomes
final. The training will be completed before any nonpermissible
electronic surveying equipment will be used while production is
occurring. The operator will keep a record of the training and provide
the record to MSHA on request.
(g) The operator will provide annual retraining to all personnel
involved with or affected by surveying operations in accordance with 30
CFR 48.8. The operator will train new miners on the requirements of the
PDO in accordance with 30 CFR 48.5, and will train experienced miners,
as defined in 30 CFR 48.6, on the requirements of the PDO in accordance
with 30 CFR 48.6. The operator will keep a record of the training and
provide the record to MSHA on request.
The petitioner asserts that application of existing standard will
result in a diminution of safety to the miners and the proposed
alternative method will at all times guarantee no less than the same
measure of protection afforded by the existing standard.
Docket Number: M-2018-027-C.
Petitioner: Spartan Mining Company, #10 Hale Street, 4th Floor,
Charleston, West Virginia 25301.
Mine: Road Fork No. 52 Mine, MSHA I.D. No. 46-09522, located in
Wyoming County, West Virginia.
Regulation Affected: 30 CFR 75.503 (Permissible electric face
equipment; maintenance) and 30 CFR 18.35 (Portable (trailing) cables
and cords).
Modification Request: The petitioner requests a modification of the
existing standard to allow the length of trailing cables to be
increased for the feeder and continuous mining machines as the
equipment is trammed in and out of the petitioner's mine and at other
times throughout the mine when the equipment is operating in a non-
producing function.
(1) The petitioner seeks to extend the length of the continuous
mining machine cable up to 2,000 feet with \1/0\ American Wire Gauge
(AWG) or larger copper cable.
(2) When the cable length is extended beyond the requirements in 30
CFR 75.503, the petitioner will only operate the continuous mining
machine in tram mode up and down the slope and throughout the mine in
non-production activities, such as moving the continuous mining machine
from one area of the mine to another.
(3) With the extended cable, only the tram motor on the continuous
mining machine will be operated. No other motor on the machine will be
energized while the extended cable is installed.
(4) The petitioner states that extending the continuous mining
machine cable for tramming will allow the petitioner to tram the
continuous mining machine longer distances and handle the cable less
often. While
[[Page 5111]]
tramming the continuous mining machine up and down the slope, the
extended cable will allow the petitioner to use the power supply at the
top and bottom of the slope and eliminate the need for a move box. The
petitioner states that, given the width of the slope, the elimination
of the move box will reduce the likelihood of an accident.
(5) An electrical engineering study was conducted and has
demonstrated that the continuous mining machine cable can be safely
extended.
(6) The petitioner seeks to extend the length of the feeder cable
up to 2,000 feet with No. 2 AWG or larger copper cable.
(7) When the cable length is extended beyond the requirements set
forth in 30 CFR 75.503, the petitioner will only operate the feeder in
tram mode up and down the slope and throughout the mine in non-
production activities, such as moving the feeder from one location in
the mine to another.
(8) The petitioner states that extending the feeder cable for
tramming will allow the petitioner to tram the feeder longer distances
and handle the cable less often. While tramming the feeder up and down
the slope, the extended cable will allow the petitioner to use the
power supply at the top and bottom of the slope and eliminate the need
for a move box. The petitioner states that, given the width of the
slope, elimination of the move box will reduce the likelihood of an
accident.
(9) An electrical engineering study was conducted and has
demonstrated that the feeder cable can be safely extended.
(10) Within 60 days after the Proposed Decision and Order (PDO)
becomes final, the petitioner will submit proposed revisions for its
approved 30 CFR part 48 training plan to the District Manager. These
proposed revisions will include initial and refresher training
regarding compliance with the terms and conditions in the PDO.
The petitioner asserts that the proposed alternative method will at
all times guarantee no less than the same measure of protection
afforded the miners under the existing standard.
Sheila McConnell,
Director, Office of Standards, Regulations, and Variances.
[FR Doc. 2019-02744 Filed 2-19-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4520-43-P