Self-Regulatory Organizations; Nasdaq PHLX LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To Amend the Options Regulatory Fee, 5171-5173 [2019-02730]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 34 / Wednesday, February 20, 2019 / Notices the Plan is consistent with Section 17A(b)(3)(I) of the Exchange Act.177 On this independent basis, we are unable to approve the proposed rule change. VI. Consideration of Potential Request for Relief The Commission recognizes that, in operating under the Capital Plan since 2015, OCC has acted in reliance on the Commission’s previous approval of the Plan. But, for the reasons discussed above, the Commission is now unable to find that the Capital Plan is consistent with the Exchange Act, and the proposed rule change is therefore disapproved. As a result of the Commission’s disapproval of the proposed rule change today, OCC is out of compliance with Rule 17Ad–22(e)(15). Accordingly, OCC will be required to submit to the Commission a new or amended version of a capital plan in order to comply with Rule 17Ad–22(e)(15).178 While OCC has represented that it is possible to unwind the Capital Plan,179 the Commission acknowledges that Petitioners argued and the D.C. Circuit recognized that unwinding and replacing the Capital Plan may pose considerable logistical challenges for OCC.180 The Commission will consider any requests for exemptive or other relief that OCC might seek while OCC establishes a new capital plan and seeks to come into compliance with Rule 17Ad–22(e)(15).181 The Commission 177 15 U.S.C. 78q–1(b)(3)(I). CFR 240.17Ad–22(e)(15). This order does not preclude OCC from revising the Capital Plan in the form of a new proposed rule change submission or submitting a completely new proposal to set a capital target and raise capital that is in compliance with OCC’s own rules and consistent with the Exchange Act and applicable regulations. Additionally, OCC will need to submit to the Commission some iteration of a capital plan in order to comply with its obligations under Section 19(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 19b–4 thereunder. 15 U.S.C. 78s; 17 CFR 240.19b–4. 179 Susquehanna, 866 F.3d at 451 (‘‘OCC assure[s] us that it will be possible to unwind the Plan at a later time’’) (citing Oral Argument Transcript at 33– 34, containing OCC statements at oral argument); OCC Opposition to Stay (D.C. Circuit Feb. 22, 2016) at 9 (arguing that Petitioners have failed to show any irreparable harm in the absence of a stay). 180 Susquehanna, 866 F.3d at 451; see also Petitioners September 2018 Expert Rebuttal at 13 (discussing alternatives to the current Capital Plan as well as potential Commission relief to manage consequences). See, e.g., OCC September 2018 Path to Re-Approval at 51–52; TABB September 2018 Report at 4–5; see also Opposition of the Securities and Exchange Commission to Petitioners’ Emergency Motion for Stay at 3, Susquehanna Int’l Grp., LLP v. SEC, Case No. 16–1061 (D.C. Cir.). 181 Section 36 of the Exchange Act authorizes the Commission, by rule, regulation, or order, to exempt, either conditionally or unconditionally, any person, security, or transaction, or any class of classes of persons, securities, or transaction, from any provision or provisions of the Exchange Act or 178 17 VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:16 Feb 19, 2019 Jkt 247001 does not currently have sufficient information to understand what, if any, specific challenges OCC may face, and if any regulatory relief may be necessary, or, if so, to appropriately tailor such relief. The Commission would expect any such potential request for relief by OCC to include information sufficient for the Commission to determine whether the requested relief is necessary or appropriate in the public interest, and is consistent with the protection of investors. The Commission expects that any such request from OCC would likely need to include a detailed explanation of (i) the relief being sought, (ii) why the requested relief is necessary, (iii) the time period for which OCC is seeking relief and an explanation of its appropriateness, and (iv) any limitations or conditions that OCC believes would be appropriate to impose in connection with the requested relief. VII. Conclusion It is hereby ordered that SR–OCC– 2015–02 is hereby disapproved pursuant to section 19(b)(2) of the Exchange Act; It is further ordered that, in accordance with Section 23(a)(3) of the Exchange Act, the information for which OCC requested confidential treatment will not be kept in a public file because that information is confidential commercial and financial information that could be withheld from the public under FOIA Exemption 4, 5 U.S.C. 552(b)(4). By the Commission. Eduardo A. Aleman, Deputy Secretary. [FR Doc. 2019–02731 Filed 2–19–19; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8011–01–P SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION [Release No. 34–85125; File No. SR–Phlx– 2019–01] Self-Regulatory Organizations; Nasdaq PHLX LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To Amend the Options Regulatory Fee February 13, 2019. Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2 any rule or regulation thereunder, to the extent that such exemption is necessary or appropriate in the public interest, and is consistent with the protection of investors. 15 U.S.C. 78mm. 1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). 2 17 CFR 240.19b–4. PO 00000 Frm 00126 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 5171 notice is hereby given that on February 1, 2019, Nasdaq PHLX LLC (‘‘Phlx’’ or ‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the ‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II, and III below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons. I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Terms of Substance of the Proposed Rule Change The Exchange proposes to revise its Pricing Schedule at Options 7, Section 6, Part D to amend the Phlx Options Regulatory Fee or ‘‘ORF.’’ The text of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange’s website at https://nasdaqphlx.cchwallstreet.com/, at the principal office of the Exchange, and at the Commission’s Public Reference Room. II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such statements. A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Purpose of, and the Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change 1. Purpose Currently, Phlx assesses an ORF of $0.0045 per contract side. The Exchange proposes to increase this ORF to $0.0050 per contract side as of February 1, 2019. In light of recent market volumes, the Exchange is proposing to increase the amount of ORF that will be collected by the Exchange. The proposal would allow the Exchange to increase the per contract amount of ORF in order to offset the Exchange anticipated regulatory costs. The Exchange’s proposed change to the ORF should balance the Exchange’s regulatory revenue against the anticipated regulatory costs. The Exchange also proposes to delete obsolete language in the rule text as described herein. E:\FR\FM\20FEN1.SGM 20FEN1 5172 Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 34 / Wednesday, February 20, 2019 / Notices Collection of ORF Currently, Phlx assesses its ORF for each customer option transaction that is either: (1) Executed by a member on Phlx; or (2) cleared by a Phlx member at The Options Clearing Corporation (‘‘OCC’’) in the customer range,3 even if the transaction was executed by a nonmember of Phlx, regardless of the exchange on which the transaction occurs.4 If the OCC clearing member is a Phlx member, ORF is assessed and collected on all cleared customer contracts (after adjustment for CMTA 5); and (2) if the OCC clearing member is not a Phlx member, ORF is collected only on the cleared customer contracts executed at Phlx, taking into account any CMTA instructions which may result in collecting the ORF from a nonmember. By way of example, if Broker A, a Phlx member, routes a customer order to CBOE and the transaction executes on CBOE and clears in Broker A’s OCC Clearing account, ORF will be collected by Phlx from Broker A’s clearing account at OCC via direct debit. While this transaction was executed on a market other than Phlx, it was cleared by a Phlx member in the member’s OCC clearing account in the customer range, therefore there is a regulatory nexus between Phlx and the transaction. If Broker A was not a Phlx member, then no ORF should be assessed and collected because there is no nexus; the transaction did not execute on Phlx nor was it cleared by a Phlx member. In the case where a member both executes a transaction and clears the transaction, the ORF is assessed to and collected from that member. In the case where a member executes a transaction and a different member clears the transaction, the ORF is assessed to and collected from the member who clears the transaction and not the member who executes the transaction. In the case where a non-member executes a transaction at an away market and a member clears the transaction, the ORF is assessed to and collected from the member who clears the transaction. In the case where a member executes a transaction on Phlx and a non-member clears the transaction, the ORF is assessed to the member that executed the transaction on Phlx and collected 3 Participants must record the appropriate account origin code on all orders at the time of entry in order. The Exchange represents that it has surveillances in place to verify that members mark orders with the correct account origin code. 4 The Exchange uses reports from OCC when assessing and collecting the ORF. 5 CMTA or Clearing Member Trade Assignment is a form of ‘‘give-up’’ whereby the position will be assigned to a specific clearing firm at OCC. VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:16 Feb 19, 2019 Jkt 247001 from the non-member who cleared the transaction. In the case where a member executes a transaction at an away market and a non-member clears the transaction, the ORF is not assessed to the member who executed the transaction or collected from the nonmember who cleared the transaction because the Exchange does not have access to the data to make absolutely certain that ORF should apply. Further, the data does not allow the Exchange to identify the member executing the trade at an away market. ORF Revenue and Monitoring of ORF The Exchange monitors the amount of revenue collected from the ORF to ensure that it, in combination with other regulatory fees and fines, does not exceed regulatory costs. In determining whether an expense is considered a regulatory cost, the Exchange reviews all costs and makes determinations if there is a nexus between the expense and a regulatory function. The Exchange notes that fines collected by the Exchange in connection with a disciplinary matter offset ORF. The ORF is designed to recover a material portion of the costs to the Exchange of the supervision and regulation of its members, including performing routine surveillances, investigations, examinations, financial monitoring, and policy, rulemaking, interpretive, and enforcement activities. The Exchange believes that revenue generated from the ORF, when combined with all of the Exchange’s other regulatory fees, will cover a material portion, but not all, of the Exchange’s regulatory costs. The Exchange will continue to monitor the amount of revenue collected from the ORF to ensure that it, in combination with its other regulatory fees and fines, does not exceed regulatory costs. If the Exchange determines regulatory revenues exceed regulatory costs, the Exchange will adjust the ORF by submitting a fee change filing to the Commission. Proposal The Exchange is proposing to increase the ORF from $0.0045 to $0.0050 per contract side as of February 1, 2019. In light of recent market volumes, the Exchange is proposing to increase the amount of ORF that will be collected by the Exchange. The proposal would allow the Exchange to increase the per contract amount of ORF in order to offset the Exchange anticipated regulatory costs. The Exchange proposes to add the following rule text to Options 7, Section 6, Part D, ‘‘Phlx will assess an Options Regulatory Fee of $0.0050 PO 00000 Frm 00127 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 per contract side as of February 1, 2019.’’ The Exchange regularly reviews its ORF to ensure that the ORF, in combination with its other regulatory fees and fines, does not exceed regulatory costs. The Exchange believes this adjustment will permit the Exchange to cover a material portion of its regulatory costs, while not exceeding regulatory costs. The Exchange notified members via an Options Trader Alert of the proposed change to the ORF thirty (30) calendar days prior to the proposed operative date, February 1, 2019.6 The Exchange believes that the prior notification market participants will ensure market participants are prepared to configure their systems to account properly for the ORF. Finally, the Exchange proposes to remove the following rule text from Options 7, Section 6, Part D, ‘‘$0.0045 per contract side’’. This text is obsolete as it references a prior ORF rate. 2. Statutory Basis The Exchange believes that its proposal is consistent with Section 6(b) of the Act 7 in general, and furthers the objectives of Sections 6(b)(4) and 6(b)(5) of the Act 8 in particular, in that it provides for the equitable allocation of reasonable dues, fees and other charges among members and issuers and other persons using its facility and is not designed to permit unfair discrimination between customers, issuers, brokers, or dealers. The Exchange believes that increasing the ORF from $0.0045 to $0.0050 per contract side as of February 1, 2019 is reasonable because with this increase, the Exchange would recoup additional regulatory revenue to offset anticipated regulatory costs. The Exchange believes that the proposed adjustments noted herein will serve to balance the Exchange’s regulatory revenue against the anticipated regulatory costs. The Exchange believes that increasing the ORF from $0.0045 to $0.0050 per contract side as of February 1, 2019 is equitable and not unfairly discriminatory because assessing the ORF to each member for options transactions cleared by OCC in the customer range where the execution occurs on another exchange and is cleared by a Phlx member is an equitable allocation of reasonable dues, fees, and other charges among its members and issuers and other persons using its facilities. OCC collects the ORF 6 See Options Trader Alert #2018–46. U.S.C. 78f(b). 8 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4) and (5). 7 15 E:\FR\FM\20FEN1.SGM 20FEN1 Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 34 / Wednesday, February 20, 2019 / Notices on behalf of Phlx from Exchange clearing members for all customer transactions they clear or from nonmembers for all customer transactions they clear that were executed on Phlx. The Exchange believes the ORF ensures fairness by assessing fees to members based on the amount of customer options business they conduct. Regulating customer trading activity is much more labor intensive and requires greater expenditure of human and technical resources than regulating noncustomer trading activity, which tends to be more automated and less laborintensive. As a result, the costs associated with administering the customer component of the Exchange’s overall regulatory program are materially higher than the costs associated with administering the noncustomer component (e.g., member proprietary transactions) of its regulatory program. The ORF is designed to recover a material portion of the costs of supervising and regulating members’ customer options business including performing routine surveillances, investigations, examinations, financial monitoring, and policy, rulemaking, interpretive, and enforcement activities. The Exchange will monitor the amount of revenue collected from the ORF to ensure that it, in combination with its other regulatory fees and fines, does not exceed the Exchange’s total regulatory costs. The Exchange has designed the ORF to generate revenues that, when combined with all of the Exchange’s other regulatory fees, will be less than or equal to the Exchange’s regulatory costs, which is consistent with the Commission’s view that regulatory fees be used for regulatory purposes and not to support the Exchange’s business side. B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement on Burden on Competition The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will impose any burden on competition not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. This proposal does not create an unnecessary or inappropriate intra-market burden on competition because the ORF applies to all customer activity, thereby raising regulatory revenue to offset regulatory expenses. It also supplements the regulatory revenue derived from noncustomer activity. This proposal does not create an unnecessary or inappropriate inter-market burden on competition because it is a regulatory fee that supports regulation in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. The Exchange is obligated to ensure that the amount of regulatory revenue VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:16 Feb 19, 2019 Jkt 247001 collected from the ORF, in combination with its other regulatory fees and fines, does not exceed regulatory costs. C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement on Comments on the Proposed Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others No written comments were either solicited or received. III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for Commission Action The foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act.9 At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule change if it appears to the Commission that such action is: (i) Necessary or appropriate in the public interest; (ii) for the protection of investors; or (iii) otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule should be approved or disapproved. IV. Solicitation of Comments Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods: Electronic Comments • Use the Commission’s internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/ rules/sro.shtml); or • Send an email to rule-comments@ sec.gov. Please include File No. SR– Phlx–2019–01 on the subject line. Paper Comments • Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549–1090. All submissions should refer to File No. SR–Phlx–2019–01. This file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on the Commission’s internet website (https://www.sec.gov/ rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and printing in the Commission’s Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments received will be posted without change. Persons submitting comments are cautioned that we do not redact or edit personal identifying information from comment submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions should refer to File No. SR–Phlx–2019–01, and should be submitted on or before March 13, 2019. For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated authority.10 Eduardo A. Aleman, Deputy Secretary. [FR Doc. 2019–02730 Filed 2–19–19; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8011–01–P SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION [Release No. 34–85127; File No. SR–MRX– 2019–03] Self-Regulatory Organizations; Nasdaq MRX, LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To Adopt an Options Regulatory Fee February 13, 2019. Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2 notice is hereby given that on February 1, 2019, Nasdaq MRX, LLC (‘‘MRX’’ or ‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the ‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II, and III below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons. 10 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12). U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). 2 17 CFR 240.19b–4. 1 15 9 15 PO 00000 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii). Frm 00128 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 5173 E:\FR\FM\20FEN1.SGM 20FEN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 34 (Wednesday, February 20, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 5171-5173]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-02730]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-85125; File No. SR-Phlx-2019-01]


Self-Regulatory Organizations; Nasdaq PHLX LLC; Notice of Filing 
and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To Amend the 
Options Regulatory Fee

February 13, 2019.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 
(``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that 
on February 1, 2019, Nasdaq PHLX LLC (``Phlx'' or ``Exchange'') filed 
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the ``Commission'') the 
proposed rule change as described in Items I, II, and III below, which 
Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The Commission is publishing 
this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from 
interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance 
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposes to revise its Pricing Schedule at Options 7, 
Section 6, Part D to amend the Phlx Options Regulatory Fee or ``ORF.''
    The text of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's 
website at https://nasdaqphlx.cchwallstreet.com/, at the principal 
office of the Exchange, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements 
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and 
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The 
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in 
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in 
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such 
statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and the 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    Currently, Phlx assesses an ORF of $0.0045 per contract side. The 
Exchange proposes to increase this ORF to $0.0050 per contract side as 
of February 1, 2019. In light of recent market volumes, the Exchange is 
proposing to increase the amount of ORF that will be collected by the 
Exchange. The proposal would allow the Exchange to increase the per 
contract amount of ORF in order to offset the Exchange anticipated 
regulatory costs. The Exchange's proposed change to the ORF should 
balance the Exchange's regulatory revenue against the anticipated 
regulatory costs. The Exchange also proposes to delete obsolete 
language in the rule text as described herein.

[[Page 5172]]

Collection of ORF
    Currently, Phlx assesses its ORF for each customer option 
transaction that is either: (1) Executed by a member on Phlx; or (2) 
cleared by a Phlx member at The Options Clearing Corporation (``OCC'') 
in the customer range,\3\ even if the transaction was executed by a 
non-member of Phlx, regardless of the exchange on which the transaction 
occurs.\4\ If the OCC clearing member is a Phlx member, ORF is assessed 
and collected on all cleared customer contracts (after adjustment for 
CMTA \5\); and (2) if the OCC clearing member is not a Phlx member, ORF 
is collected only on the cleared customer contracts executed at Phlx, 
taking into account any CMTA instructions which may result in 
collecting the ORF from a non-member.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ Participants must record the appropriate account origin code 
on all orders at the time of entry in order. The Exchange represents 
that it has surveillances in place to verify that members mark 
orders with the correct account origin code.
    \4\ The Exchange uses reports from OCC when assessing and 
collecting the ORF.
    \5\ CMTA or Clearing Member Trade Assignment is a form of 
``give-up'' whereby the position will be assigned to a specific 
clearing firm at OCC.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    By way of example, if Broker A, a Phlx member, routes a customer 
order to CBOE and the transaction executes on CBOE and clears in Broker 
A's OCC Clearing account, ORF will be collected by Phlx from Broker A's 
clearing account at OCC via direct debit. While this transaction was 
executed on a market other than Phlx, it was cleared by a Phlx member 
in the member's OCC clearing account in the customer range, therefore 
there is a regulatory nexus between Phlx and the transaction. If Broker 
A was not a Phlx member, then no ORF should be assessed and collected 
because there is no nexus; the transaction did not execute on Phlx nor 
was it cleared by a Phlx member.
    In the case where a member both executes a transaction and clears 
the transaction, the ORF is assessed to and collected from that member. 
In the case where a member executes a transaction and a different 
member clears the transaction, the ORF is assessed to and collected 
from the member who clears the transaction and not the member who 
executes the transaction. In the case where a non-member executes a 
transaction at an away market and a member clears the transaction, the 
ORF is assessed to and collected from the member who clears the 
transaction. In the case where a member executes a transaction on Phlx 
and a non-member clears the transaction, the ORF is assessed to the 
member that executed the transaction on Phlx and collected from the 
non-member who cleared the transaction. In the case where a member 
executes a transaction at an away market and a non-member clears the 
transaction, the ORF is not assessed to the member who executed the 
transaction or collected from the non-member who cleared the 
transaction because the Exchange does not have access to the data to 
make absolutely certain that ORF should apply. Further, the data does 
not allow the Exchange to identify the member executing the trade at an 
away market.
ORF Revenue and Monitoring of ORF
    The Exchange monitors the amount of revenue collected from the ORF 
to ensure that it, in combination with other regulatory fees and fines, 
does not exceed regulatory costs. In determining whether an expense is 
considered a regulatory cost, the Exchange reviews all costs and makes 
determinations if there is a nexus between the expense and a regulatory 
function. The Exchange notes that fines collected by the Exchange in 
connection with a disciplinary matter offset ORF.
    The ORF is designed to recover a material portion of the costs to 
the Exchange of the supervision and regulation of its members, 
including performing routine surveillances, investigations, 
examinations, financial monitoring, and policy, rulemaking, 
interpretive, and enforcement activities.
    The Exchange believes that revenue generated from the ORF, when 
combined with all of the Exchange's other regulatory fees, will cover a 
material portion, but not all, of the Exchange's regulatory costs. The 
Exchange will continue to monitor the amount of revenue collected from 
the ORF to ensure that it, in combination with its other regulatory 
fees and fines, does not exceed regulatory costs. If the Exchange 
determines regulatory revenues exceed regulatory costs, the Exchange 
will adjust the ORF by submitting a fee change filing to the 
Commission.
Proposal
    The Exchange is proposing to increase the ORF from $0.0045 to 
$0.0050 per contract side as of February 1, 2019. In light of recent 
market volumes, the Exchange is proposing to increase the amount of ORF 
that will be collected by the Exchange. The proposal would allow the 
Exchange to increase the per contract amount of ORF in order to offset 
the Exchange anticipated regulatory costs. The Exchange proposes to add 
the following rule text to Options 7, Section 6, Part D, ``Phlx will 
assess an Options Regulatory Fee of $0.0050 per contract side as of 
February 1, 2019.''
    The Exchange regularly reviews its ORF to ensure that the ORF, in 
combination with its other regulatory fees and fines, does not exceed 
regulatory costs. The Exchange believes this adjustment will permit the 
Exchange to cover a material portion of its regulatory costs, while not 
exceeding regulatory costs.
    The Exchange notified members via an Options Trader Alert of the 
proposed change to the ORF thirty (30) calendar days prior to the 
proposed operative date, February 1, 2019.\6\ The Exchange believes 
that the prior notification market participants will ensure market 
participants are prepared to configure their systems to account 
properly for the ORF.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ See Options Trader Alert #2018-46.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Finally, the Exchange proposes to remove the following rule text 
from Options 7, Section 6, Part D, ``$0.0045 per contract side''. This 
text is obsolete as it references a prior ORF rate.
2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that its proposal is consistent with Section 
6(b) of the Act \7\ in general, and furthers the objectives of Sections 
6(b)(4) and 6(b)(5) of the Act \8\ in particular, in that it provides 
for the equitable allocation of reasonable dues, fees and other charges 
among members and issuers and other persons using its facility and is 
not designed to permit unfair discrimination between customers, 
issuers, brokers, or dealers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \8\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4) and (5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange believes that increasing the ORF from $0.0045 to 
$0.0050 per contract side as of February 1, 2019 is reasonable because 
with this increase, the Exchange would recoup additional regulatory 
revenue to offset anticipated regulatory costs. The Exchange believes 
that the proposed adjustments noted herein will serve to balance the 
Exchange's regulatory revenue against the anticipated regulatory costs.
    The Exchange believes that increasing the ORF from $0.0045 to 
$0.0050 per contract side as of February 1, 2019 is equitable and not 
unfairly discriminatory because assessing the ORF to each member for 
options transactions cleared by OCC in the customer range where the 
execution occurs on another exchange and is cleared by a Phlx member is 
an equitable allocation of reasonable dues, fees, and other charges 
among its members and issuers and other persons using its facilities. 
OCC collects the ORF

[[Page 5173]]

on behalf of Phlx from Exchange clearing members for all customer 
transactions they clear or from non-members for all customer 
transactions they clear that were executed on Phlx. The Exchange 
believes the ORF ensures fairness by assessing fees to members based on 
the amount of customer options business they conduct. Regulating 
customer trading activity is much more labor intensive and requires 
greater expenditure of human and technical resources than regulating 
non-customer trading activity, which tends to be more automated and 
less labor-intensive. As a result, the costs associated with 
administering the customer component of the Exchange's overall 
regulatory program are materially higher than the costs associated with 
administering the non-customer component (e.g., member proprietary 
transactions) of its regulatory program.
    The ORF is designed to recover a material portion of the costs of 
supervising and regulating members' customer options business including 
performing routine surveillances, investigations, examinations, 
financial monitoring, and policy, rulemaking, interpretive, and 
enforcement activities. The Exchange will monitor the amount of revenue 
collected from the ORF to ensure that it, in combination with its other 
regulatory fees and fines, does not exceed the Exchange's total 
regulatory costs. The Exchange has designed the ORF to generate 
revenues that, when combined with all of the Exchange's other 
regulatory fees, will be less than or equal to the Exchange's 
regulatory costs, which is consistent with the Commission's view that 
regulatory fees be used for regulatory purposes and not to support the 
Exchange's business side.

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will 
impose any burden on competition not necessary or appropriate in 
furtherance of the purposes of the Act. This proposal does not create 
an unnecessary or inappropriate intra-market burden on competition 
because the ORF applies to all customer activity, thereby raising 
regulatory revenue to offset regulatory expenses. It also supplements 
the regulatory revenue derived from non-customer activity. This 
proposal does not create an unnecessary or inappropriate inter-market 
burden on competition because it is a regulatory fee that supports 
regulation in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. The Exchange is 
obligated to ensure that the amount of regulatory revenue collected 
from the ORF, in combination with its other regulatory fees and fines, 
does not exceed regulatory costs.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed 
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    No written comments were either solicited or received.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for 
Commission Action

    The foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to Section 
19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act.\9\ At any time within 60 days of the filing 
of the proposed rule change, the Commission summarily may temporarily 
suspend such rule change if it appears to the Commission that such 
action is: (i) Necessary or appropriate in the public interest; (ii) 
for the protection of investors; or (iii) otherwise in furtherance of 
the purposes of the Act. If the Commission takes such action, the 
Commission shall institute proceedings to determine whether the 
proposed rule should be approved or disapproved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and 
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule 
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of 
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to rule-comments@sec.gov. Please include 
File No. SR-Phlx-2019-01 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities 
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File No. SR-Phlx-2019-01. This file 
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help 
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, 
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on 
the Commission's internet website (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). 
Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written 
statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with 
the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed 
rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those 
that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions 
of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and printing in 
the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 
20549, on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 
3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection 
and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments 
received will be posted without change. Persons submitting comments are 
cautioned that we do not redact or edit personal identifying 
information from comment submissions. You should submit only 
information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions 
should refer to File No. SR-Phlx-2019-01, and should be submitted on or 
before March 13, 2019.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, 
pursuant to delegated authority.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Eduardo A. Aleman,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2019-02730 Filed 2-19-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.