Certain Pickup Truck Folding Bed Cover Systems and Components Thereof Institution of Investigation, 4534-4535 [2019-02508]
Download as PDF
4534
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 32 / Friday, February 15, 2019 / Notices
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation Nos. 701–TA–598 and 731–
TA–1408 (Final)]
Rubber Bands From China;
Determinations
On the basis of the record 1 developed
in the subject investigations, the United
States International Trade Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) determines, pursuant
to the Tariff Act of 1930 (‘‘the Act’’),
that an industry in the United States is
materially injured by reason of imports
of rubber bands from China, provided
for in subheading 4016.99.35 2 of the
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the
United States, that have been found by
the U.S. Department of Commerce
(‘‘Commerce’’) to be sold in the United
States at less than fair value (‘‘LTFV’’),
and to be subsidized by the government
of China.3
khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES
Background
The Commission, pursuant to sections
705(b) and 735(b) of the Act (19 U.S.C.
1671d(b) and 19 U.S.C. 1673d(b)),
instituted these investigations effective
January 30, 2018, following receipt of a
petition filed with the Commission and
Commerce by Alliance Rubber Co., Hot
Springs, Arkansas. The final phase of
the investigations was scheduled by the
Commission following notification of
preliminary determinations by
Commerce that imports of rubber bands
from China were subsidized within the
meaning of section 703(b) of the Act (19
U.S.C. 1671b(b)) and sold at LTFV
within the meaning of 733(b) of the Act
(19 U.S.C. 1673b(b)). Notice of the
scheduling of the final phase of the
Commission’s investigations and of a
public hearing to be held in connection
therewith was given by posting copies
of the notice in the Office of the
Secretary, U.S. International Trade
Commission, Washington, DC, and by
publishing the notice in the Federal
Register on September 17, 2018 (83 FR
46969).4 The hearing was held in
1 The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19
CFR 207.2(f)).
2 Merchandise covered by the scope of these
investigations may also enter under HTSUS
subheading 4016.99.6050.
3 The Commission also finds that imports subject
to Commerce’s affirmative critical circumstances
determinations are not likely to undermine
seriously the remedial effect of the countervailing
and antidumping duty orders on rubber bands from
China.
4 Due to the lapse in appropriations and ensuing
cessation of Commission operations, all import
injury investigations conducted under authority of
Title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930 accordingly have
been tolled pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 1671d(b)(2),
1673d(b)(2).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:41 Feb 14, 2019
Jkt 247001
Washington, DC, on November 13, 2018,
and all persons who requested the
opportunity were permitted to appear in
person or by counsel.
The Commission made these
determinations pursuant to sections
705(b) and 735(b) of the Act (19 U.S.C.
1671d(b) and 19 U.S.C. 1673d(b)). It
completed and filed its determinations
in these investigations on January 7,
2019. The views of the Commission are
contained in USITC Publication 4863
(January 2019), entitled Rubber Bands
from China: Investigation Nos. 701–TA–
598 and 731–TA–1408 (Final).
By order of the Commission.
Issued: February 11, 2019.
Lisa Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2019–02437 Filed 2–14–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337–TA–1143]
Certain Pickup Truck Folding Bed
Cover Systems and Components
Thereof Institution of Investigation
U.S. International Trade
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
Notice is hereby given that a
complaint was filed with the U.S.
International Trade Commission on
December 7, 2018, under section 337 of
the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, on
behalf of Extang Corporation of Ann
Arbor, Michigan and Laurmark
Enterprises, Inc. of Ann Arbor,
Michigan. Amendments to the
complaint were filed on February 1,
2019. The complaint alleges violations
of section 337 based upon the
importation into the United States, the
sale for importation, and the sale within
the United States after importation of
certain pickup truck folding bed cover
systems and components thereof by
reason of infringement of: the claim of
U.S. Patent No. D620,877 (‘‘the ’877
patent’’); certain claims of U.S. Patent
No. 7,188,888 (‘‘the ’888 patent’’); U.S.
Patent No. 7,484,788 (‘‘the ’788 patent’’);
U.S. Patent No. 8,061,758 (‘‘the ’758
patent’’); U.S. Patent No. 8,182,021 (‘‘the
’021 patent’’); and U.S. Patent No.
8,690,224 (‘‘the ’224 patent’’); and U.S.
Trademark Registration No. 5,104,393
(‘‘the ’393 trademark’’) and U.S.
Trademark Registration No. 3,904,016
(‘‘the ’016 trademark’’). The complaint
further alleges that an industry in the
United States exists as required by the
applicable Federal Statute.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00103
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
The complainants request that the
Commission institute an investigation
and, after the investigation, issue a
general exclusion order, or in the
alternative a limited exclusion order,
and cease and desist orders.
A motion for temporary relief filed
concurrently with the complaint and
amended on February 1, 2019, requests
that the Commission issue a temporary
exclusion order and temporary cease
and desist orders prohibiting the
importation into and the sale within the
United States after importation of
certain pickup truck folding bed cover
systems and components thereof during
the course of the Commission’s
investigation.
ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for
any confidential information contained
therein, is available for inspection
during official business hours (8:45 a.m.
to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the
Secretary, U.S. International Trade
Commission, 500 E Street SW, Room
112, Washington, DC 20436, telephone
(202) 205–2000. Hearing impaired
individuals are advised that information
on this matter can be obtained by
contacting the Commission’s TDD
terminal on (202) 205–1810. Persons
with mobility impairments who will
need special assistance in gaining access
to the Commission should contact the
Office of the Secretary at (202) 205–
2000. General information concerning
the Commission may also be obtained
by accessing its internet server at
https://www.usitc.gov. The public
record for this investigation may be
viewed on the Commission’s electronic
docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Pathenia M. Proctor, The Office of
Unfair Import Investigations, U.S.
International Trade Commission,
telephone (202) 205–2560.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Authority: The authority for
institution of this investigation is
contained in section 337 of the Tariff
Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C.
1337, and in section 210.10 of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 (2018).
Scope of Investigation: Having
considered the complaint, the U.S.
International Trade Commission, on
February 11, 2018, ordered that—
(1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended, an investigation be instituted
to determine:
(a) Whether there is a violation of
subsection (a)(1)(B) of section 337 in the
importation into the United States, the
sale for importation, or the sale within
the United States after importation of
E:\FR\FM\15FEN1.SGM
15FEN1
khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 32 / Friday, February 15, 2019 / Notices
certain products identified in paragraph
(2) by reason of infringement of one or
more of the claim of the ’877 patent;
claims 11, 13, 17, and 18 of the ’888
patent; claims 1–3, 5, 6, 19, and 20 of
the ’788 patent; claim 2 of the ’758
patent; claims 1–7, and 11–30 of the
’021 patent; claims 1–6 and 8–10 of the
’224 patent; and whether an industry in
the United States exists as required by
subsection (a)(2) of section 337; and
(b) whether there is a violation of
subsection (a)(1)(C) of section 337 in the
importation into the United States, the
sale for importation, or the sale within
the United States after importation of
certain products identified in paragraph
(2) by reason of infringement of one or
more of the ’393 trademark and the ’016
trademark and whether an industry in
the United States exists as required by
subsection (a)(2) of section 337.
(2) Pursuant to section 210.10(b)(1) of
the Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10(b)(1), the
plain language description of the
accused products or category of accused
products, which defines the scope of the
investigation, is ‘‘folding cover
assemblies for pickup truck cargo boxes
and components thereof’’;
(3) Pursuant to section 210.58 of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure, 19 CFR 210.58, the motion
for temporary relief under subsection (e)
of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930,
which was filed with the complaint, is
provisionally accepted and referred to
the presiding administrative law judge
for investigation;
(4) For the purpose of the
investigation so instituted, the following
are hereby named as parties upon which
this notice of investigation shall be
served:
(a) The complainants are: Extang
Corporation, 5400 S. State Road, Ann
Arbor, Michigan 48108; Laurmark
Enterprises, Inc., d/b/a BAK Industries,
5400 Data Court, Ann Arbor, Michigan
48108.
(b) The respondents are the following
entities alleged to be in violation of
section 337, and are the parties upon
which the complaint is to be served:
Stehlen Automotive, 21912 Garcia Lane,
Walnut, California 91789; SyneticUSA,
7141 Paramount Boulevard, Pico Rivera,
California 90660; Topline Autoparts,
Inc., 1157 Dunswell Avenue, Hacienda
Heights, California 91745; Velocity
Concepts Inc., 2847 Villa Alta Place,
Hacienda Heights, CA 91745; JL
Concepts Inc., 21912 Garcia Lane,
Walnut, California 91789; DT Trading
Inc., 417 W San Marino Avenue,
Alhambra, CA 91801; Wenzhou Kouvi
Hardware Products Co., Ltd., No. 10,
Xiafeng Road, Xianyan Industrial Zone,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:41 Feb 14, 2019
Jkt 247001
Ouhai District, Wenzh City, Zhejiang
Province, China 325204; Syppo
Marketing, Inc., 15240 Nelson Avenue,
City of Industry, California 91744; Apex
Auto Parts Mfg. Inc., 15240 Nelson
Avenue, City of Industry, California
91744; Ningbo Huadian Cross Country
Automobile Accessories Co., Ltd., Room
2402 Huijin Building No. 77, Heyi Road,
Ningbo, China 315000; Sunwood
Industries Co., Ltd., Room 501, Sealand
Plaza, #20 Guanghua Street, Changzhou,
Jiangsu, China 213001.
(c) The Office of Unfair Import
Investigations, U.S. International Trade
Commission, 500 E Street SW, Suite
401, Washington, DC 20436; and
(5) For the investigation so instituted,
the Chief Administrative Law Judge,
U.S. International Trade Commission,
shall designate the presiding
Administrative Law Judge.
Responses to the complaint, motion
for temporary relief, and the notice of
investigation must be submitted by the
named respondents in accordance with
sections 210.13 and 210.59 of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13, 210.59.
Pursuant to 19 CFR 201.16(e), 210.13(a),
and 210.59, such responses will be
considered by the Commission if
received not later than 10 days after the
date of service by the Commission of the
complaint, motion for temporary relief,
and the notice of investigation.
Extensions of time for submitting
responses to the complaint, motion for
temporary relief, and the notice of
investigation will not be granted unless
good cause therefor is shown.
Failure of a respondent to file a timely
response to each allegation in the
complaint and in this notice may be
deemed to constitute a waiver of the
right to appear and contest the
allegations of the complaint, motion for
temporary relief, and this notice, and to
authorize the administrative law judge
and the Commission, without further
notice to the respondent, to find the
facts to be as alleged in the complaint
and this notice and to enter an initial
determination and a final determination
containing such findings, and may
result in the issuance of an exclusion
order or a cease and desist order or both
directed against the respondent.
By order of the Commission.
Issued: February 12, 2019.
Lisa Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2019–02508 Filed 2–14–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
PO 00000
Frm 00104
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
4535
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation Nos. 701–TA–365–366 and
731–TA–734–735 (Fourth Review)]
Pasta From Italy and Turkey;
Scheduling of Expedited Five-Year
Reviews
United States International
Trade Commission.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
Notice.
The Commission hereby gives
notice of the scheduling of expedited
reviews pursuant to the Tariff Act of
1930 (‘‘the Act’’) to determine whether
revocation of the antidumping duty and
countervailing duty orders on pasta
from Italy and Turkey would be likely
to lead to continuation or recurrence of
material injury within a reasonably
foreseeable time.
SUMMARY:
DATES:
November 5, 2018.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jordan Harriman (202–205–2610), Office
of Investigations, U.S. International
Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW,
Washington, DC 20436. Hearingimpaired persons can obtain
information on this matter by contacting
the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202–
205–1810. Persons with mobility
impairments who will need special
assistance in gaining access to the
Commission should contact the Office
of the Secretary at 202–205–2000.
General information concerning the
Commission may also be obtained by
accessing its internet server (https://
www.usitc.gov). The public record for
these reviews may be viewed on the
Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS)
at https://edis.usitc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background.—On November 5, 2018,
the Commission determined that the
domestic interested party group
response to its notice of institution (83
FR 37517, August 1, 2018) of the subject
five-year reviews was adequate and that
the respondent interested party group
responses were inadequate. The
Commission did not find any other
circumstances that would warrant
conducting full reviews.1 Accordingly,
the Commission determined that it
would conduct expedited reviews
pursuant to section 751(c)(3) of the
1 A record of the Commissioners’ votes, the
Commission’s statement on adequacy, and any
individual Commissioner’s statements will be
available from the Office of the Secretary and at the
Commission’s website.
E:\FR\FM\15FEN1.SGM
15FEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 32 (Friday, February 15, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 4534-4535]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-02508]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337-TA-1143]
Certain Pickup Truck Folding Bed Cover Systems and Components
Thereof Institution of Investigation
AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a complaint was filed with the
U.S. International Trade Commission on December 7, 2018, under section
337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, on behalf of Extang
Corporation of Ann Arbor, Michigan and Laurmark Enterprises, Inc. of
Ann Arbor, Michigan. Amendments to the complaint were filed on February
1, 2019. The complaint alleges violations of section 337 based upon the
importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the
sale within the United States after importation of certain pickup truck
folding bed cover systems and components thereof by reason of
infringement of: the claim of U.S. Patent No. D620,877 (``the '877
patent''); certain claims of U.S. Patent No. 7,188,888 (``the '888
patent''); U.S. Patent No. 7,484,788 (``the '788 patent''); U.S. Patent
No. 8,061,758 (``the '758 patent''); U.S. Patent No. 8,182,021 (``the
'021 patent''); and U.S. Patent No. 8,690,224 (``the '224 patent'');
and U.S. Trademark Registration No. 5,104,393 (``the '393 trademark'')
and U.S. Trademark Registration No. 3,904,016 (``the '016 trademark'').
The complaint further alleges that an industry in the United States
exists as required by the applicable Federal Statute.
The complainants request that the Commission institute an
investigation and, after the investigation, issue a general exclusion
order, or in the alternative a limited exclusion order, and cease and
desist orders.
A motion for temporary relief filed concurrently with the complaint
and amended on February 1, 2019, requests that the Commission issue a
temporary exclusion order and temporary cease and desist orders
prohibiting the importation into and the sale within the United States
after importation of certain pickup truck folding bed cover systems and
components thereof during the course of the Commission's investigation.
ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for any confidential information
contained therein, is available for inspection during official business
hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, Room 112, Washington,
DC 20436, telephone (202) 205-2000. Hearing impaired individuals are
advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting
the Commission's TDD terminal on (202) 205-1810. Persons with mobility
impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the
Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at (202) 205-
2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be
obtained by accessing its internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. The
public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission's
electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Pathenia M. Proctor, The Office of
Unfair Import Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission,
telephone (202) 205-2560.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Authority: The authority for institution of this investigation is
contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19
U.S.C. 1337, and in section 210.10 of the Commission's Rules of
Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 (2018).
Scope of Investigation: Having considered the complaint, the U.S.
International Trade Commission, on February 11, 2018, ordered that--
(1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of section 337 of the Tariff Act of
1930, as amended, an investigation be instituted to determine:
(a) Whether there is a violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of section
337 in the importation into the United States, the sale for
importation, or the sale within the United States after importation of
[[Page 4535]]
certain products identified in paragraph (2) by reason of infringement
of one or more of the claim of the '877 patent; claims 11, 13, 17, and
18 of the '888 patent; claims 1-3, 5, 6, 19, and 20 of the '788 patent;
claim 2 of the '758 patent; claims 1-7, and 11-30 of the '021 patent;
claims 1-6 and 8-10 of the '224 patent; and whether an industry in the
United States exists as required by subsection (a)(2) of section 337;
and
(b) whether there is a violation of subsection (a)(1)(C) of section
337 in the importation into the United States, the sale for
importation, or the sale within the United States after importation of
certain products identified in paragraph (2) by reason of infringement
of one or more of the '393 trademark and the '016 trademark and whether
an industry in the United States exists as required by subsection
(a)(2) of section 337.
(2) Pursuant to section 210.10(b)(1) of the Commission's Rules of
Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10(b)(1), the plain language
description of the accused products or category of accused products,
which defines the scope of the investigation, is ``folding cover
assemblies for pickup truck cargo boxes and components thereof'';
(3) Pursuant to section 210.58 of the Commission's Rules of
Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.58, the motion for temporary relief
under subsection (e) of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, which
was filed with the complaint, is provisionally accepted and referred to
the presiding administrative law judge for investigation;
(4) For the purpose of the investigation so instituted, the
following are hereby named as parties upon which this notice of
investigation shall be served:
(a) The complainants are: Extang Corporation, 5400 S. State Road,
Ann Arbor, Michigan 48108; Laurmark Enterprises, Inc., d/b/a BAK
Industries, 5400 Data Court, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48108.
(b) The respondents are the following entities alleged to be in
violation of section 337, and are the parties upon which the complaint
is to be served: Stehlen Automotive, 21912 Garcia Lane, Walnut,
California 91789; SyneticUSA, 7141 Paramount Boulevard, Pico Rivera,
California 90660; Topline Autoparts, Inc., 1157 Dunswell Avenue,
Hacienda Heights, California 91745; Velocity Concepts Inc., 2847 Villa
Alta Place, Hacienda Heights, CA 91745; JL Concepts Inc., 21912 Garcia
Lane, Walnut, California 91789; DT Trading Inc., 417 W San Marino
Avenue, Alhambra, CA 91801; Wenzhou Kouvi Hardware Products Co., Ltd.,
No. 10, Xiafeng Road, Xianyan Industrial Zone, Ouhai District, Wenzh
City, Zhejiang Province, China 325204; Syppo Marketing, Inc., 15240
Nelson Avenue, City of Industry, California 91744; Apex Auto Parts Mfg.
Inc., 15240 Nelson Avenue, City of Industry, California 91744; Ningbo
Huadian Cross Country Automobile Accessories Co., Ltd., Room 2402
Huijin Building No. 77, Heyi Road, Ningbo, China 315000; Sunwood
Industries Co., Ltd., Room 501, Sealand Plaza, #20 Guanghua Street,
Changzhou, Jiangsu, China 213001.
(c) The Office of Unfair Import Investigations, U.S. International
Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, Suite 401, Washington, DC 20436; and
(5) For the investigation so instituted, the Chief Administrative
Law Judge, U.S. International Trade Commission, shall designate the
presiding Administrative Law Judge.
Responses to the complaint, motion for temporary relief, and the
notice of investigation must be submitted by the named respondents in
accordance with sections 210.13 and 210.59 of the Commission's Rules of
Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13, 210.59. Pursuant to 19 CFR
201.16(e), 210.13(a), and 210.59, such responses will be considered by
the Commission if received not later than 10 days after the date of
service by the Commission of the complaint, motion for temporary
relief, and the notice of investigation. Extensions of time for
submitting responses to the complaint, motion for temporary relief, and
the notice of investigation will not be granted unless good cause
therefor is shown.
Failure of a respondent to file a timely response to each
allegation in the complaint and in this notice may be deemed to
constitute a waiver of the right to appear and contest the allegations
of the complaint, motion for temporary relief, and this notice, and to
authorize the administrative law judge and the Commission, without
further notice to the respondent, to find the facts to be as alleged in
the complaint and this notice and to enter an initial determination and
a final determination containing such findings, and may result in the
issuance of an exclusion order or a cease and desist order or both
directed against the respondent.
By order of the Commission.
Issued: February 12, 2019.
Lisa Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2019-02508 Filed 2-14-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P