Hercules Capital, Inc., 67447-67451 [2018-28318]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 248 / Friday, December 28, 2018 / Notices
development of appropriate systems,
controls, and procedures, consistent
with the requirements of Rule 17Ad22(d)(4).9
Rule 17Ad–22(d)(8) 10 requires ICC to
establish, implement, maintain and
enforce written policies and procedures
reasonably designed to have governance
arrangements that are clear and
transparent to fulfill the public interest
requirements in Section 17A of the
Act.11 The NIA Policy clearly assigns
and documents responsibility and
accountability for the identification,
review, and approval of New Initiatives
by the NIAC, the maintenance of the
NIA Policy by the Chair of the NIAC,
and the approval of material changes to
the NIA Policy by the Board. These
governance arrangements are clear and
transparent, such that information
relating to the assignment of
responsibilities and the requisite
involvement of department heads, the
NIAC, and the Board is clearly
documented, consistent with the
requirements of Rule 17Ad–22(d)(8).12
(B) institute proceedings to determine
whether the proposed rule change
should be disapproved.
(B) Clearing Agency’s Statement on
Burden on Competition
ICC does not believe the proposed
rule change would have any impact, or
impose any burden, on competition.
The proposed change to formalize ICC’s
NIA Policy will apply uniformly across
all market participants. Therefore, ICC
does not believe the proposed rule
change imposes any burden on
competition that is inappropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–ICC–2018–011. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
internet website (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for website viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such
filings will also be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
office of ICE Clear Credit and on ICE
Clear Credit’s website at https://
www.theice.com/clear-credit/regulation.
All comments received will be posted
without change. Persons submitting
comments are cautioned that we do not
redact or edit personal identifying
information from comment submissions.
You should submit only information
that you wish to make available
publicly. All submissions should refer
to File Number SR–ICC–2018–011 and
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with NOTICES1
(C) Clearing Agency’s Statement on
Comments on the Proposed Rule
Change Received From Members,
Participants or Others
Written comments relating to the
proposed rule change have not been
solicited or received. ICC will notify the
Commission of any written comments
received by ICC.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Within 45 days of the date of
publication of this notice in the Federal
Register or within such longer period
up to 90 days (i) as the Commission may
designate if it finds such longer period
to be appropriate and publishes its
reasons for so finding or (ii) as to which
the self-regulatory organization
consents, the Commission will:
(A) By order approve or disapprove
such proposed rule change, or
9 Id.
10 17
CFR 240.17Ad–22(d)(8).
U.S.C. 78q–1.
12 17 CFR 240.17Ad–22(d)(8).
11 15
VerDate Sep<11>2014
21:43 Dec 27, 2018
Jkt 247001
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include File Number SR–
ICC–2018–011 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to
Secretary, Securities and Exchange
Commission, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549.
PO 00000
Frm 00237
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
67447
should be submitted on or before
January 18, 2019.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.13
Brent J. Fields,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018–28186 Filed 12–27–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Investment Company Act Release No.
33341; File No. 812–14910]
Hercules Capital, Inc.
December 21, 2018.
Securities and Exchange
Commission (‘‘Commission’’).
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
Notice of an application for an order
under section 6(c) of the Investment
Company Act of 1940 (the ‘‘Act’’) for an
exemption from sections 23(a), 23(b)
and 63 of the Act; under sections
57(a)(4) and 57(i) of the Act and rule
17d–1 under the Act permitting certain
joint transactions otherwise prohibited
by section 57(a)(4) of the Act; and under
section 23(c)(3) of the Act for an
exemption from section 23(c) of the Act.
SUMMARY OF THE APPLICATION: Hercules
Capital, Inc. (‘‘Company’’ or
‘‘Applicant’’) requests an order that
would permit Applicant to (i) issue
restricted shares of its common stock
(‘‘Restricted Stock’’) as part of the
compensation package for its nonemployee directors (the ‘‘Non-Employee
Directors’’) 1 through its 2018 NonEmployee Director Plan (the ‘‘NonEmployee Director Plan’’) for NonEmployee Director Participants, (ii)
issue Restricted Stock and Restricted
Stock Units 2 (i.e., the right to receive,
on the date of settlement, one share of
common stock or an amount equal to
the fair market value of one share of
common stock) as part of the
compensation package for certain of its
employees, officers and directors,
excluding the Non-Employee Directors,
through its Amended and Restated 2018
Equity Incentive Plan (the ‘‘Equity
Incentive Plan’’), (iii) withhold shares of
the Applicant’s common stock or
purchase shares of Applicant’s common
stock from Participants to satisfy tax
13 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
officers and employee directors,
together the ‘‘Employee Participants’’ and each an
‘‘Employee Participant.’’ The Employee Participants
and the Non-Employee Directors, together the
‘‘Participants’’ and each, a ‘‘Participant.’’
2 Restricted Stock and Restricted Stock Units are
collectively referred to herein as Restricted Stock.
1 Employees,
E:\FR\FM\28DEN1.SGM
28DEN1
67448
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 248 / Friday, December 28, 2018 / Notices
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with NOTICES1
withholding obligations relating to the
vesting of Restricted Stock or Restricted
Stock Units or the exercise of options to
purchase shares of Applicant’s common
stock (‘‘Options’’) that will be granted
pursuant to the Equity Incentive Plan 3
and (iv) permit Participants to pay the
exercise price of Options that will be
granted to them pursuant to the Equity
Incentive Plan with shares of
Applicant’s common stock.
APPLICANT: Hercules Capital, Inc.
FILING DATES: The application was filed
on May 29, 2018, and amended on
September 27, 2018.
HEARING OR NOTIFICATION OF HEARING:
An order granting the requested relief
will be issued unless the Commission
orders a hearing. Interested persons may
request a hearing by writing to the
Commission’s Secretary and serving
applicant with a copy of the request,
personally or by mail. Hearing requests
should be received by the Commission
by 5:30 p.m. on January 15, 2019 and
should be accompanied by proof of
service on applicant, in the form of an
affidavit, or for lawyers, a certificate of
service. Pursuant to rule 0–5 under the
Act, hearing requests should state the
nature of the writer’s interest, any facts
bearing upon the desirability of a
hearing on the matter, the reason for the
request, and the issues contested.
Persons who wish to be notified of a
hearing may request notification by
writing to the Commission’s Secretary.
ADDRESSES: Secretary, Securities and
Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549–1090.
Applicant: Manuel A. Henriquez, Chief
Executive Officer, Hercules Capital, Inc.,
400 Hamilton Avenue, Suite 310, Palo
Alto, California 94301.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Elizabeth G. Miller, Senior Counsel, at
(202) 551–8707, or Aaron Gilbride,
Branch Chief, at (202) 551–6825,
(Division of Investment Management,
Chief Counsel’s Office).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
following is a summary of the
application. The complete application
may be obtained via the Commission’s
website by searching for the file
number, or for the applicant using the
Company name box, at https://
www.sec.gov/search/search.htm or by
calling (202) 551–8090.
Applicant’s Representations
1. The Company is an internally
managed, non-diversified, closed-end
investment company that has elected to
3 Options will not be granted to Non-Employee
Directors and, therefore, no relief is sought in the
application for the grant of Options.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:13 Dec 27, 2018
Jkt 247001
be regulated as a business development
company (‘‘BDC’’) under the Act.
Applicant represents that it is a
specialty finance company focused on
providing senior secured loans to highgrowth, innovative venture capitalbacked companies in a variety of
technology, life sciences, and
sustainable and renewable technology
industries. Applicant was incorporated
under General Corporation Law of the
State of Maryland in December 2003. As
of March 31, 2018, Applicant had 64
employees.
2. Hercules Technology II, L.P. (‘‘HT
II’’), Hercules Technology III, L.P. (‘‘HT
III’’), and Hercules Technology IV, L.P.
(‘‘HT IV’’) are Delaware limited
partnerships that were formed in
January 2005, September 2009 and
December 2010, respectively. HT II and
HT III were licensed to operate as small
business investment companies
(‘‘SBICs’’) under the authority of the
Small Business Administration on
September 27, 2006 and May 26, 2010,
respectively. HT IV was formed in
anticipation of receiving an additional
SBIC license; however, the Company
has not received such license and HT IV
currently has no material assets or
liabilities. The Company also formed
Hercules Technology SBIC
Management, LLC (‘‘HTM’’), a limited
liability company in November 2003.
HTM is a wholly owned subsidiary of
Applicant and serves as the limited
partner and general partner of HT II and
HT III. HT II and HT III hold
approximately $113.1 million and
$285.8 million in assets, respectively,
and they accounted for approximately
5.7% and 14.4% of Applicant’s total
assets, respectively, prior to
consolidation at March 31, 2018.
3. Applicant also established wholly
own subsidiaries, all of which are
structured as Delaware corporations and
limited liability companies, to hold
portfolio companies organized as
limited liability companies (or other
forms of pass-through entities).
4. Applicant currently has an eightmember board of directors (the ‘‘Board’’)
of whom seven are Non-Employee
Directors or non-interested persons of
Applicant within the meaning of section
2(a)(19), and one is considered an
‘‘interested person’’ of Applicant.
5. Applicant believes that, because the
market for superior investment
professionals is highly competitive,
Applicant’s successful performance
depends on its ability to offer fair
compensation packages to its
professionals that are competitive with
those offered by other investment
management businesses. Applicant
states that the ability to offer equity-
PO 00000
Frm 00238
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
based compensation to its employees
and Non-Employee Directors, which
both aligns employee and Board
behavior with stockholder interests and
provides a retention tool, is vital to
Applicant’s future growth and success.
6. The Applicant’s 2006 NonEmployee Director Plan, as amended in
2007 (the ‘‘2006 Plan’’) terminated in
accordance with its terms in 2017, and
no new awards are permitted to be
granted under the 2006 Plan after its
termination. The 2006 Plan provided for
the grant of Options and shares of
Restricted Stock subject to certain
forfeiture restrictions to Non-Employee
Directors. As a result of the termination
of the 2006 Plan, the Non-Employee
Director Plan was adopted on May 13,
2018 by the Board, including the
required majority as defined in Section
57(o) (the ‘‘Required Majority’’),4 and
will be administered by a committee
designated by the Board, the
composition of which consists of ‘‘nonemployee directors’’ within the meaning
of rule 16b–3 (the ‘‘Compensation
Committee’’).
7. The Non-Employee Plan provides
for the grant of Restricted Stock, but
unlike the 2006 Plan, does not provide
for the grant of Options. Issuance of the
Restricted Stock will allow the NonEmployee Directors to become owners
of the Applicant’s stock with a vested
interest in value maintenance, income
stream and stock appreciation, which
interests align with those of the
Applicant’s stockholders.
8. Shares of Restricted Stock granted
automatically under the Non-Employee
Director Plan (i) upon initial election to
the Board, are no longer subject to
forfeiture restrictions, as to one-third
immediately after the expiration of 33%
of the initial three-year term, as to an
additional one-third immediately after
the expiration of 66% of the initial
three-year term and the remaining onethird on the third anniversary of the
commencement date of the applicable
three-year staggered class term, and (ii)
upon reelection to the Board, are no
longer subject to forfeiture restrictions
as to one-third of such shares on the
anniversary of such grant over three
years.
9. The maximum aggregate number of
shares of common stock that may be
authorized for issuance under awards of
Restricted Stock under the Non4 Section 57(o) of the Act provides that the term
‘‘required majority,’’ when used with respect to the
approval of a proposed transaction, plan, or
arrangement, means both a majority of a BDC’s
directors or general partners who have no financial
interest in such transaction, plan, or arrangement
and a majority of such directors or general partners
who are not interested persons of such company.
E:\FR\FM\28DEN1.SGM
28DEN1
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 248 / Friday, December 28, 2018 / Notices
Employee Director Plan is 300,000
shares. The maximum number of shares
of common stock for which any NonEmployee Director may be granted
awards under the Non-Employee
Director Plan in any calendar year is
20,000 shares.
10. Shares of Restricted Stock will not
be transferable except for disposition by
will or the laws of descent and
distribution or by gift to a permitted
transferee. If any award of Restricted
Stock for any reason is forfeited or
otherwise terminates, in whole or in
part, the shares not acquired under such
award of Restricted Stock will revert to
and again become available for issuance
under the Non-Employee Director Plan
on a one-for-one basis.
11. Unless sooner terminated by the
Board, the Non-Employee Director Plan
will terminate on the day before the
tenth anniversary of the date the NonEmployee Director Plan is initially
adopted by the Board or approved by
stockholders, whichever is earlier.
12. The Applicant’s Amended and
Restated 2004 Equity Incentive Plan (the
‘‘2004 EIP’’) provides for grants of
Options, Restricted Stock, restricted
stock units (i.e., the right to receive, on
the date of settlement, one share of
common stock or an amount equal to
the fair market value of one share of
common stock) (‘‘Restricted Stock
Units’’), Performance Restricted Stock
Units and other performance-based
awards (collectively, ‘‘Awards’’) and
warrants to Employee Participants.
Applicant proposes to amend and
restate the 2004 EIP, in its entirety, as
the ‘‘Equity Incentive Plan.’’ The Equity
Incentive Plan was adopted on May 13,
2018 by the Board, including the
Required Majority, and will be
administered by the Compensation
Committee.
13. The Equity Incentive Plan
provides for grants of Awards, but,
unlike the 2004 EIP, does not provide
for grants of warrants. The Equity
Incentive Plan permits Employee
Participants, subject to approval of the
Board and if permitted by law, to pay
the exercise price of Options with
shares of the Applicant’s common stock.
The maximum aggregate number of
shares of common stock that may be
authorized for issuance under Awards
granted under the Equity Incentive Plan
is 9,261,229 shares, less one share for
every one share issued under the plan
after March 31, 2018 and prior to the
date the plan is approved by
stockholders. Notwithstanding anything
to the contrary, the following shares will
not revert to and again be available for
issuance: (i) Shares tendered by an
Employee Participant or withheld by the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:13 Dec 27, 2018
Jkt 247001
Applicant in payment of the purchase
price of an Option; (ii) shares tendered
by an Employee Participant or withheld
by the Applicant to satisfy any tax
withholding obligation with respect to
Options; and (iii) shares reacquired by
the Applicant on the open market or
otherwise using cash proceeds from the
exercise of Options.
14. The Board, including the Required
Majority, found that the issuance of
Awards will allow the Applicant to
align its business plan, stockholder
interests and employee interests based
on the nature of the Applicant’s
business. Issuance of certain Awards
will allow the Employee Participants to
become owners of the Applicant’s stock
with a vested interest in value
maintenance, income stream and stock
appreciation, which interests align with
those of the Applicant’s stockholders.
15. Unless sooner terminated by the
Board, the Equity Incentive Plan will
terminate on the day before the tenth
anniversary of the date the Equity
Incentive Plan is initially adopted by
the Board or approved by stockholders,
whichever is earlier.
Applicant’s Legal Analysis
Sections 23(a) and (b), Section 63
1. Under section 63 of the Act, the
provisions of section 23(a) of the Act
generally prohibiting a registered
closed-end investment company from
issuing securities for services or for
property other than cash or securities
are made applicable to BDCs. This
provision would prohibit the issuance
of Restricted Stock as a part of the Plans.
2. Section 23(b) of the Act generally
prohibits a registered closed-end
investment company from selling any
common stock of which it is the issuer
at a price below its current net asset
value. Section 63(2) of the Act makes
section 23(b) applicable to BDCs unless
certain conditions are met. Because
Restricted Stock that would be granted
under the Plans would not meet the
terms of section 63(2), sections 23(b)
and 63 would prevent the issuance of
Restricted Stock.
3. Section 6(c) provides, in part, that
the Commission may, by order upon
application, conditionally or
unconditionally exempt any person,
security, or transaction, or any class or
classes thereof, from any provision of
the Act, if and to the extent that the
exemption is necessary or appropriate
in the public interest and consistent
with the protection of investors and the
purposes fairly intended by the policy
and provisions of the Act.
4. Applicant requests an order
pursuant to section 6(c) of the Act
PO 00000
Frm 00239
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
67449
granting an exemption from the
provisions of sections 23(a), 23(b) and
63 of the Act. Applicant states that the
Plans would not violate the concerns
underlying these sections, which
include: (a) Preferential treatment of
investment company insiders and the
use of options and other rights by
insiders to obtain control of the
investment company; (b) complication
of the investment company’s structure
that made it difficult to determine the
value of the company’s shares; and (c)
dilution of shareholders’ equity in the
investment company. Applicant asserts
that the Restricted Stock element of the
Plans does not raise concerns about
preferential treatment of Applicant’s
insiders because this element is a bona
fide compensation plan of the type that
is common among corporations
generally. In addition, section
61(a)(3)(B) of the Act permits a BDC to
issue to its directors, officers,
employees, and general partners
warrants, options, and rights to
purchase the BDC’s voting securities
pursuant to an executive compensation
plan, subject to certain conditions.
Applicant states that, for reasons that
are unclear, section 61 and its legislative
history do not address the issuance by
a BDC of restricted stock as incentive
compensation. Applicant believes,
however, that the issuance of Restricted
Stock is substantially similar, for
purposes of investor protection under
the Act, to the issuance of warrants,
options, and rights as contemplated by
section 61. Applicant also asserts that
the issuance of Restricted Stock would
not become a means for insiders to
obtain control of Applicant because the
maximum amount of Restricted Stock
that may be issued under the Plans and
the 2006 Plan at any one time will be
ten percent of the outstanding shares of
common stock of Applicant.
5. Applicant further states that the
Restricted Stock feature will not unduly
complicate Applicant’s capital structure
because equity-based incentive
compensation arrangements are widely
used among corporations and
commonly known to investors.
Applicant notes that the Plans will be
submitted for approval to the
Applicant’s stockholders. Applicant
represents that the proxy materials
submitted to Applicant’s stockholders
will contain a concise ‘‘plain English’’
description of the Plans and their
potential dilutive effect. Applicant also
states that it will comply with the proxy
disclosure requirements in Item 10 of
Schedule 14A under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934. Applicant further
notes that the Plans will be disclosed to
E:\FR\FM\28DEN1.SGM
28DEN1
67450
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 248 / Friday, December 28, 2018 / Notices
investors in accordance with the
requirements of the Form N–2
registration statement for closed-end
investment companies and pursuant to
the standards and guidelines adopted by
the Financial Accounting Standards
Board for operating companies.
Applicant also will comply with the
disclosure requirements for executive
compensation plans applicable to
BDCs.5 Applicant thus concludes that
the Plans will be adequately disclosed
to investors and appropriately reflected
in the market value of Applicant’s
shares.
6. Applicant acknowledges that
awards granted under the Plans may
have a dilutive effect on the
stockholders’ equity per share in
Applicant, but believes that effect
would be outweighed by the anticipated
benefits of the Plans to Applicant and
its stockholders. Moreover, based on the
manner in which the issuance of
Restricted Stock pursuant to the Plans
will be administered, the Restricted
Stock will be no more dilutive than if
Applicant were to issue only Options to
Participants who are employees, as is
permitted by section 61(a)(3) of the Act.
Applicant asserts that it needs the
flexibility to provide the requested
equity-based compensation in order to
be able to compete effectively with
commercial banks, investment banks,
and other publicly traded companies
that also are not investment companies
registered under the Act for talented
professionals. These professionals,
Applicant suggests, in turn are likely to
increase Applicant’s performance and
stockholder value. Applicant also
asserts that equity-based compensation
would more closely align the interests of
Applicant’s employees and NonEmployee Directors with those of its
stockholders. In addition, Applicant
states that its stockholders will be
further protected by the conditions to
the requested order that assure
continuing oversight of the operation of
the Plans by the Board.
Section 57(a)(4), Rule 17d–1
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with NOTICES1
7. Section 57(a) proscribes certain
transactions between a BDC and persons
related to the BDC in the manner
described in section 57(b) (‘‘57(b)
persons’’), absent a Commission order.
Section 57(a)(4) generally prohibits a
5 See Executive Compensation and Related Party
Disclosure, Securities Act Release No. 8655 (Jan. 27,
2006) (proposed rule); Executive Compensation and
Related Party Disclosure, Securities Act Release No.
8732A (Aug. 29, 2006) (final rule and proposed
rule), as amended by Executive Compensation
Disclosure, Securities Act Release No. 8756 (Dec.
22, 2006) (adopted as interim final rules with
request for comments).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:13 Dec 27, 2018
Jkt 247001
57(b) person from effecting a transaction
in which the BDC is a joint participant
absent such an order. Rule l7d-1, made
applicable to BDCs by section 57(i),
proscribes participation in a ‘‘joint
enterprise or other joint arrangement or
profit-sharing plan,’’ which includes a
stock option or purchase plan.
Employees and directors of a BDC are
57(b) persons. Thus, the issuance of
shares of Restricted Stock could be
deemed to involve a joint transaction
involving a BDC and a 57(b) person in
contravention of section 57(a)(4). Rule
17d–1(b) provides that, in considering
relief pursuant to the rule, the
Commission will consider (a) whether
the participation of the BDC in a joint
enterprise is consistent with the policies
and purposes of the Act and (b) the
extent to which such participation is on
a basis different from or less
advantageous than that of other
participants.
8. Applicant requests an order
pursuant to sections 57(a)(4) and 57(i) of
the Act and rule 17d–1 under the Act to
permit Applicant to issue Restricted
Stock under the Plans. Applicant
acknowledges that its role is necessarily
different from the other participants
because the other participants are its
directors and employees. It notes,
however, that the Plans are in the
interest of the Applicant’s stockholders,
because the Plans will help align the
interests of Applicant’s employees with
those of its stockholders, which will
encourage conduct on the part of those
employees designed to produce a better
return for Applicant’s stockholders.
Additionally, section 57(j)(1) of the Act
expressly permits any director, officer or
employee of a BDC to acquire warrants,
options and rights to purchase voting
securities of such BDC, and the
securities issued upon the exercise or
conversion thereof, pursuant to an
executive compensation plan which
meets the requirements of section
61(a)(3)(B) of the Act. Applicant submits
that the issuance of Restricted Stock
pursuant to the Plans poses no greater
risk to stockholders than the issuances
permitted by section 57(j)(1) of the Act.
Section 23(c)
9. Section 23(c) of the Act, which is
made applicable to BDCs by section 63
of the Act, generally prohibits a BDC
from purchasing any securities of which
it is the issuer except in the open market
pursuant to tenders, or under other
circumstances as the Commission may
permit to ensure that the purchases are
made in a manner or on a basis that
does not unfairly discriminate against
any holders of the class or classes of
securities to be purchased. Applicant
PO 00000
Frm 00240
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
states that the withholding or purchase
of shares of Restricted Stock and
common stock in payment of applicable
withholding tax obligations or of
common stock in payment for the
exercise price of a stock option might be
deemed to be purchases by the
Company of its own securities within
the meaning of section 23(c) and
therefore prohibited by the Act.
10. Section 23(c)(3) of the Act permits
a BDC to purchase securities of which
it is the issuer in circumstances in
which the repurchase is made in a
manner or on a basis that does not
unfairly discriminate against any
holders of the class or classes of
securities to be purchased. Applicant
believes that the requested relief meets
the standards of section 23(c)(3).
11. Applicant submits that these
purchases will be made in a manner that
does not unfairly discriminate against
Applicant’s stockholders because all
purchases of Applicant’s stock will be at
the closing price of the common stock
on the Nasdaq Global Market (or any
primary exchange on which its shares of
common stock may be traded in the
future) on the relevant date (i.e., the
public market price on the date of grant
of Restricted Stock and the date of grant
of Options). Applicant submits that
because all transactions with respect to
the Plans will take place at the public
market price for the Applicant’s
common stock, these transactions will
not be significantly different than could
be achieved by any stockholder selling
in a market transaction. Applicant
represents that no transactions will be
conducted pursuant to the requested
order on days where there are no
reported market transactions involving
Applicant’s shares.
12. Applicant represents that the
withholding provisions in the Plans do
not raise concerns about preferential
treatment of Applicant’s insiders
because each Plan is a bona fide
compensation plan of the type that is
common among corporations generally.
Furthermore, the vesting schedule is
determined at the time of the initial
grant of the Restricted Stock and the
option exercise price is determined at
the time of the initial grant of the
Options. Applicant represents that all
purchases may be made only as
permitted by the Plans, which will be
approved by the Applicant’s
stockholders prior to any application of
the relief. Applicant believes that
granting the requested relief would be
consistent with the policies underlying
the provisions of the Act permitting the
use of equity compensation as well as
prior exemptive relief granted by the
E:\FR\FM\28DEN1.SGM
28DEN1
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 248 / Friday, December 28, 2018 / Notices
Commission under section 23(c) of the
Act.
condition will be subject to examination
by the Commission and its staff.
Applicant’s Conditions
Applicant agrees that the order
granting the requested relief will be
subject to the following conditions:
1. The Plans will be authorized by
Applicant’s stockholders.
2. Each issuance of Restricted Stock to
an officer, employee, or Non-Employee
Director will be approved by the
Required Majority of Applicant’s
directors on the basis that such grant is
in the best interest of Applicant and its
stockholders.
3. The amount of voting securities
that would result from the exercise of all
of Applicant’s outstanding warrants,
options and rights, together with any
Restricted Stock issued under the Plans
and the 2006 Plan, at the time of
issuance shall not exceed 25% of the
outstanding voting securities of the
Company, except that if the amount of
voting securities that would result from
the exercise of all of the Company’s
outstanding warrants, options and rights
issued to the Company’s directors,
officers and employees, together with
any Restricted Stock issued pursuant to
the Plans and the 2006 Plan, would
exceed 15% of the outstanding voting
securities of the Company, then the total
amount of voting securities that would
result from the exercise of all
outstanding warrants, options and
rights, together with any Restricted
Stock issued pursuant to the Plans and
the 2006 Plan, at the time of issuance
shall not exceed 20% of the outstanding
voting securities of the Company.
4. The amount of Restricted Stock
issued and outstanding will not at the
time of issuance of any shares of
Restricted Stock exceed ten percent of
Applicant’s outstanding voting
securities.
5. The Board will review the Plans at
least annually. In addition, the Board
will review periodically the potential
impact that the issuance of Restricted
Stock under the Plans could have on
Applicant’s earnings and net asset value
per share, such review to take place
prior to any decisions to grant Restricted
Stock under the Plans, but in no event
less frequently than annually. Adequate
procedures and records will be
maintained to permit such review. The
Board will be authorized to take
appropriate steps to ensure that the
issuance of Restricted Stock under the
Plans will be in the best interest of
Applicant’s stockholders. This authority
will include the authority to prevent or
limit the granting of additional
Restricted Stock under the Plans. All
records maintained pursuant to this
For the Commission, by the Division of
Investment Management, pursuant to
delegated authority.
Brent J. Fields,
Secretary.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:13 Dec 27, 2018
Jkt 247001
[FR Doc. 2018–28318 Filed 12–27–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–84892; File No. SR–ICEEU–
2018–025]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; ICE
Clear Europe Limited; Notice of Filing
and Immediate Effectiveness of a
Proposed Rule Change To Adopt
Revised Clearing Fees
December 20, 2018.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on December
18, 2018, ICE Clear Europe Limited
(‘‘ICE Clear Europe’’) filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule
changes described in Items I, II, and III
below, which Items have been primarily
prepared by ICE Clear Europe. ICE Clear
Europe filed the proposed rule changes
pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the
Act 3 and Rule 19b–4(f)(4)(ii)
thereunder,4 so that the proposal was
immediately effective upon filing with
the Commission. The Commission is
publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change
from interested persons.
I. Clearing Agency’s Statement of the
Terms of Substance of the Proposed
Rule Change
The principal purpose of the
proposed rule change is to revise
clearing fees applicable to certain ICE
Futures Europe Limited (‘‘IFEU’’)
financials and softs and UK natural gas
products (‘‘IFEU Products’’). The
revisions do not involve any changes to
the ICE Clear Europe Clearing Rules or
Procedures.5
II. Clearing Agency’s Statement of the
Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the
Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, ICE
Clear Europe included statements
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
CFR 240.19b–4.
3 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
4 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(4)(ii).
5 Capitalized terms used but not defined herein
have the meanings specified in the ICE Clear
Europe Clearing Rules.
67451
concerning the purpose of and basis for
the proposed rule change. The text of
these statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below.
ICE Clear Europe has prepared
summaries, set forth in sections (A), (B),
and (C) below, of the most significant
aspects of such statements.
(A) Clearing Agency’s Statement of the
Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the
Proposed Rule Change
(a) Purpose
The purpose of the proposed rule
change is for ICE Clear Europe to modify
certain clearing fees relating to certain
IFEU Products 6 as set out below:
• IFEU Softs: Clearing fee would
increase from £0.37 to £0.55 per lot;
• IFEU Equities: Clearing fee would
increase from £0.20 to £0.21 per lot for
the following contracts:
Æ FTSE 100 Futures (Z);
Æ FTSE 100 Dividend Index Futures
(YZ);
Æ FTSE 100 Dividend Index—RDSA
withholding future (XZ); and
• ICE’s UK Natural Gas: clearing fee
would increase from £0.26 to £0.34 for
screen transactions and decrease from
£0.58 to £0.46 per lot for block/
exchange of futures for physicals (EFP)/
exchange of futures for swap (EFS)
transactions.
Attached as Exhibit 5 are the circulars
listing the new fees relating to the IFEU
Products. The relevant fee schedules
relating to the IFEU Products will be
updated and are available at: https://
www.theice.com/fees?=custom. The new
fees are expected to come into effect on
January 2, 2019.
(b) Statutory Basis
ICE Clear Europe has determined that
the proposed fee changes set forth above
are reasonable and appropriate. In
particular, ICE Clear Europe believes
that the fees have been set at an
appropriate level given the costs and
expenses to ICE Clear Europe in offering
clearing of such IFEU Products, taking
into account the investments ICE Clear
Europe has made in clearing the markets
for these products. The fees will apply
to all F&O Clearing Members. ICE Clear
Europe believes that imposing such
charges thus provides for the equitable
allocation of reasonable dues, fees, and
other charges among its Clearing
Members, within the meaning of Section
17A(b)(3)(D) of the Act.7 ICE Clear
1 15
2 17
PO 00000
Frm 00241
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
6 ICE Futures Europe is also changing certain
exchange fees with respect to the IFEU Products at
the same time.
7 15 U.S.C. 78q–1(b)(3)(D). Under this provision,
‘‘[a] clearing agency shall not be registered unless
E:\FR\FM\28DEN1.SGM
Continued
28DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 248 (Friday, December 28, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 67447-67451]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-28318]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Investment Company Act Release No. 33341; File No. 812-14910]
Hercules Capital, Inc.
December 21, 2018.
AGENCY: Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'').
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Notice of an application for an order under section 6(c) of the
Investment Company Act of 1940 (the ``Act'') for an exemption from
sections 23(a), 23(b) and 63 of the Act; under sections 57(a)(4) and
57(i) of the Act and rule 17d-1 under the Act permitting certain joint
transactions otherwise prohibited by section 57(a)(4) of the Act; and
under section 23(c)(3) of the Act for an exemption from section 23(c)
of the Act.
SUMMARY OF THE APPLICATION: Hercules Capital, Inc. (``Company'' or
``Applicant'') requests an order that would permit Applicant to (i)
issue restricted shares of its common stock (``Restricted Stock'') as
part of the compensation package for its non-employee directors (the
``Non-Employee Directors'') \1\ through its 2018 Non-Employee Director
Plan (the ``Non-Employee Director Plan'') for Non-Employee Director
Participants, (ii) issue Restricted Stock and Restricted Stock Units
\2\ (i.e., the right to receive, on the date of settlement, one share
of common stock or an amount equal to the fair market value of one
share of common stock) as part of the compensation package for certain
of its employees, officers and directors, excluding the Non-Employee
Directors, through its Amended and Restated 2018 Equity Incentive Plan
(the ``Equity Incentive Plan''), (iii) withhold shares of the
Applicant's common stock or purchase shares of Applicant's common stock
from Participants to satisfy tax
[[Page 67448]]
withholding obligations relating to the vesting of Restricted Stock or
Restricted Stock Units or the exercise of options to purchase shares of
Applicant's common stock (``Options'') that will be granted pursuant to
the Equity Incentive Plan \3\ and (iv) permit Participants to pay the
exercise price of Options that will be granted to them pursuant to the
Equity Incentive Plan with shares of Applicant's common stock.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Employees, officers and employee directors, together the
``Employee Participants'' and each an ``Employee Participant.'' The
Employee Participants and the Non-Employee Directors, together the
``Participants'' and each, a ``Participant.''
\2\ Restricted Stock and Restricted Stock Units are collectively
referred to herein as Restricted Stock.
\3\ Options will not be granted to Non-Employee Directors and,
therefore, no relief is sought in the application for the grant of
Options.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
APPLICANT: Hercules Capital, Inc.
FILING DATES: The application was filed on May 29, 2018, and amended
on September 27, 2018.
HEARING OR NOTIFICATION OF HEARING: An order granting the requested
relief will be issued unless the Commission orders a hearing.
Interested persons may request a hearing by writing to the Commission's
Secretary and serving applicant with a copy of the request, personally
or by mail. Hearing requests should be received by the Commission by
5:30 p.m. on January 15, 2019 and should be accompanied by proof of
service on applicant, in the form of an affidavit, or for lawyers, a
certificate of service. Pursuant to rule 0-5 under the Act, hearing
requests should state the nature of the writer's interest, any facts
bearing upon the desirability of a hearing on the matter, the reason
for the request, and the issues contested. Persons who wish to be
notified of a hearing may request notification by writing to the
Commission's Secretary.
ADDRESSES: Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street
NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090. Applicant: Manuel A. Henriquez, Chief
Executive Officer, Hercules Capital, Inc., 400 Hamilton Avenue, Suite
310, Palo Alto, California 94301.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elizabeth G. Miller, Senior Counsel,
at (202) 551-8707, or Aaron Gilbride, Branch Chief, at (202) 551-6825,
(Division of Investment Management, Chief Counsel's Office).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The following is a summary of the
application. The complete application may be obtained via the
Commission's website by searching for the file number, or for the
applicant using the Company name box, at https://www.sec.gov/search/search.htm or by calling (202) 551-8090.
Applicant's Representations
1. The Company is an internally managed, non-diversified, closed-
end investment company that has elected to be regulated as a business
development company (``BDC'') under the Act. Applicant represents that
it is a specialty finance company focused on providing senior secured
loans to high-growth, innovative venture capital-backed companies in a
variety of technology, life sciences, and sustainable and renewable
technology industries. Applicant was incorporated under General
Corporation Law of the State of Maryland in December 2003. As of March
31, 2018, Applicant had 64 employees.
2. Hercules Technology II, L.P. (``HT II''), Hercules Technology
III, L.P. (``HT III''), and Hercules Technology IV, L.P. (``HT IV'')
are Delaware limited partnerships that were formed in January 2005,
September 2009 and December 2010, respectively. HT II and HT III were
licensed to operate as small business investment companies (``SBICs'')
under the authority of the Small Business Administration on September
27, 2006 and May 26, 2010, respectively. HT IV was formed in
anticipation of receiving an additional SBIC license; however, the
Company has not received such license and HT IV currently has no
material assets or liabilities. The Company also formed Hercules
Technology SBIC Management, LLC (``HTM''), a limited liability company
in November 2003. HTM is a wholly owned subsidiary of Applicant and
serves as the limited partner and general partner of HT II and HT III.
HT II and HT III hold approximately $113.1 million and $285.8 million
in assets, respectively, and they accounted for approximately 5.7% and
14.4% of Applicant's total assets, respectively, prior to consolidation
at March 31, 2018.
3. Applicant also established wholly own subsidiaries, all of which
are structured as Delaware corporations and limited liability
companies, to hold portfolio companies organized as limited liability
companies (or other forms of pass-through entities).
4. Applicant currently has an eight-member board of directors (the
``Board'') of whom seven are Non-Employee Directors or non-interested
persons of Applicant within the meaning of section 2(a)(19), and one is
considered an ``interested person'' of Applicant.
5. Applicant believes that, because the market for superior
investment professionals is highly competitive, Applicant's successful
performance depends on its ability to offer fair compensation packages
to its professionals that are competitive with those offered by other
investment management businesses. Applicant states that the ability to
offer equity-based compensation to its employees and Non-Employee
Directors, which both aligns employee and Board behavior with
stockholder interests and provides a retention tool, is vital to
Applicant's future growth and success.
6. The Applicant's 2006 Non-Employee Director Plan, as amended in
2007 (the ``2006 Plan'') terminated in accordance with its terms in
2017, and no new awards are permitted to be granted under the 2006 Plan
after its termination. The 2006 Plan provided for the grant of Options
and shares of Restricted Stock subject to certain forfeiture
restrictions to Non-Employee Directors. As a result of the termination
of the 2006 Plan, the Non-Employee Director Plan was adopted on May 13,
2018 by the Board, including the required majority as defined in
Section 57(o) (the ``Required Majority''),\4\ and will be administered
by a committee designated by the Board, the composition of which
consists of ``non-employee directors'' within the meaning of rule 16b-3
(the ``Compensation Committee'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ Section 57(o) of the Act provides that the term ``required
majority,'' when used with respect to the approval of a proposed
transaction, plan, or arrangement, means both a majority of a BDC's
directors or general partners who have no financial interest in such
transaction, plan, or arrangement and a majority of such directors
or general partners who are not interested persons of such company.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
7. The Non-Employee Plan provides for the grant of Restricted
Stock, but unlike the 2006 Plan, does not provide for the grant of
Options. Issuance of the Restricted Stock will allow the Non-Employee
Directors to become owners of the Applicant's stock with a vested
interest in value maintenance, income stream and stock appreciation,
which interests align with those of the Applicant's stockholders.
8. Shares of Restricted Stock granted automatically under the Non-
Employee Director Plan (i) upon initial election to the Board, are no
longer subject to forfeiture restrictions, as to one-third immediately
after the expiration of 33% of the initial three-year term, as to an
additional one-third immediately after the expiration of 66% of the
initial three-year term and the remaining one-third on the third
anniversary of the commencement date of the applicable three-year
staggered class term, and (ii) upon reelection to the Board, are no
longer subject to forfeiture restrictions as to one-third of such
shares on the anniversary of such grant over three years.
9. The maximum aggregate number of shares of common stock that may
be authorized for issuance under awards of Restricted Stock under the
Non-
[[Page 67449]]
Employee Director Plan is 300,000 shares. The maximum number of shares
of common stock for which any Non-Employee Director may be granted
awards under the Non-Employee Director Plan in any calendar year is
20,000 shares.
10. Shares of Restricted Stock will not be transferable except for
disposition by will or the laws of descent and distribution or by gift
to a permitted transferee. If any award of Restricted Stock for any
reason is forfeited or otherwise terminates, in whole or in part, the
shares not acquired under such award of Restricted Stock will revert to
and again become available for issuance under the Non-Employee Director
Plan on a one-for-one basis.
11. Unless sooner terminated by the Board, the Non-Employee
Director Plan will terminate on the day before the tenth anniversary of
the date the Non-Employee Director Plan is initially adopted by the
Board or approved by stockholders, whichever is earlier.
12. The Applicant's Amended and Restated 2004 Equity Incentive Plan
(the ``2004 EIP'') provides for grants of Options, Restricted Stock,
restricted stock units (i.e., the right to receive, on the date of
settlement, one share of common stock or an amount equal to the fair
market value of one share of common stock) (``Restricted Stock
Units''), Performance Restricted Stock Units and other performance-
based awards (collectively, ``Awards'') and warrants to Employee
Participants. Applicant proposes to amend and restate the 2004 EIP, in
its entirety, as the ``Equity Incentive Plan.'' The Equity Incentive
Plan was adopted on May 13, 2018 by the Board, including the Required
Majority, and will be administered by the Compensation Committee.
13. The Equity Incentive Plan provides for grants of Awards, but,
unlike the 2004 EIP, does not provide for grants of warrants. The
Equity Incentive Plan permits Employee Participants, subject to
approval of the Board and if permitted by law, to pay the exercise
price of Options with shares of the Applicant's common stock. The
maximum aggregate number of shares of common stock that may be
authorized for issuance under Awards granted under the Equity Incentive
Plan is 9,261,229 shares, less one share for every one share issued
under the plan after March 31, 2018 and prior to the date the plan is
approved by stockholders. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary, the
following shares will not revert to and again be available for
issuance: (i) Shares tendered by an Employee Participant or withheld by
the Applicant in payment of the purchase price of an Option; (ii)
shares tendered by an Employee Participant or withheld by the Applicant
to satisfy any tax withholding obligation with respect to Options; and
(iii) shares reacquired by the Applicant on the open market or
otherwise using cash proceeds from the exercise of Options.
14. The Board, including the Required Majority, found that the
issuance of Awards will allow the Applicant to align its business plan,
stockholder interests and employee interests based on the nature of the
Applicant's business. Issuance of certain Awards will allow the
Employee Participants to become owners of the Applicant's stock with a
vested interest in value maintenance, income stream and stock
appreciation, which interests align with those of the Applicant's
stockholders.
15. Unless sooner terminated by the Board, the Equity Incentive
Plan will terminate on the day before the tenth anniversary of the date
the Equity Incentive Plan is initially adopted by the Board or approved
by stockholders, whichever is earlier.
Applicant's Legal Analysis
Sections 23(a) and (b), Section 63
1. Under section 63 of the Act, the provisions of section 23(a) of
the Act generally prohibiting a registered closed-end investment
company from issuing securities for services or for property other than
cash or securities are made applicable to BDCs. This provision would
prohibit the issuance of Restricted Stock as a part of the Plans.
2. Section 23(b) of the Act generally prohibits a registered
closed-end investment company from selling any common stock of which it
is the issuer at a price below its current net asset value. Section
63(2) of the Act makes section 23(b) applicable to BDCs unless certain
conditions are met. Because Restricted Stock that would be granted
under the Plans would not meet the terms of section 63(2), sections
23(b) and 63 would prevent the issuance of Restricted Stock.
3. Section 6(c) provides, in part, that the Commission may, by
order upon application, conditionally or unconditionally exempt any
person, security, or transaction, or any class or classes thereof, from
any provision of the Act, if and to the extent that the exemption is
necessary or appropriate in the public interest and consistent with the
protection of investors and the purposes fairly intended by the policy
and provisions of the Act.
4. Applicant requests an order pursuant to section 6(c) of the Act
granting an exemption from the provisions of sections 23(a), 23(b) and
63 of the Act. Applicant states that the Plans would not violate the
concerns underlying these sections, which include: (a) Preferential
treatment of investment company insiders and the use of options and
other rights by insiders to obtain control of the investment company;
(b) complication of the investment company's structure that made it
difficult to determine the value of the company's shares; and (c)
dilution of shareholders' equity in the investment company. Applicant
asserts that the Restricted Stock element of the Plans does not raise
concerns about preferential treatment of Applicant's insiders because
this element is a bona fide compensation plan of the type that is
common among corporations generally. In addition, section 61(a)(3)(B)
of the Act permits a BDC to issue to its directors, officers,
employees, and general partners warrants, options, and rights to
purchase the BDC's voting securities pursuant to an executive
compensation plan, subject to certain conditions. Applicant states
that, for reasons that are unclear, section 61 and its legislative
history do not address the issuance by a BDC of restricted stock as
incentive compensation. Applicant believes, however, that the issuance
of Restricted Stock is substantially similar, for purposes of investor
protection under the Act, to the issuance of warrants, options, and
rights as contemplated by section 61. Applicant also asserts that the
issuance of Restricted Stock would not become a means for insiders to
obtain control of Applicant because the maximum amount of Restricted
Stock that may be issued under the Plans and the 2006 Plan at any one
time will be ten percent of the outstanding shares of common stock of
Applicant.
5. Applicant further states that the Restricted Stock feature will
not unduly complicate Applicant's capital structure because equity-
based incentive compensation arrangements are widely used among
corporations and commonly known to investors. Applicant notes that the
Plans will be submitted for approval to the Applicant's stockholders.
Applicant represents that the proxy materials submitted to Applicant's
stockholders will contain a concise ``plain English'' description of
the Plans and their potential dilutive effect. Applicant also states
that it will comply with the proxy disclosure requirements in Item 10
of Schedule 14A under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Applicant
further notes that the Plans will be disclosed to
[[Page 67450]]
investors in accordance with the requirements of the Form N-2
registration statement for closed-end investment companies and pursuant
to the standards and guidelines adopted by the Financial Accounting
Standards Board for operating companies. Applicant also will comply
with the disclosure requirements for executive compensation plans
applicable to BDCs.\5\ Applicant thus concludes that the Plans will be
adequately disclosed to investors and appropriately reflected in the
market value of Applicant's shares.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ See Executive Compensation and Related Party Disclosure,
Securities Act Release No. 8655 (Jan. 27, 2006) (proposed rule);
Executive Compensation and Related Party Disclosure, Securities Act
Release No. 8732A (Aug. 29, 2006) (final rule and proposed rule), as
amended by Executive Compensation Disclosure, Securities Act Release
No. 8756 (Dec. 22, 2006) (adopted as interim final rules with
request for comments).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
6. Applicant acknowledges that awards granted under the Plans may
have a dilutive effect on the stockholders' equity per share in
Applicant, but believes that effect would be outweighed by the
anticipated benefits of the Plans to Applicant and its stockholders.
Moreover, based on the manner in which the issuance of Restricted Stock
pursuant to the Plans will be administered, the Restricted Stock will
be no more dilutive than if Applicant were to issue only Options to
Participants who are employees, as is permitted by section 61(a)(3) of
the Act. Applicant asserts that it needs the flexibility to provide the
requested equity-based compensation in order to be able to compete
effectively with commercial banks, investment banks, and other publicly
traded companies that also are not investment companies registered
under the Act for talented professionals. These professionals,
Applicant suggests, in turn are likely to increase Applicant's
performance and stockholder value. Applicant also asserts that equity-
based compensation would more closely align the interests of
Applicant's employees and Non-Employee Directors with those of its
stockholders. In addition, Applicant states that its stockholders will
be further protected by the conditions to the requested order that
assure continuing oversight of the operation of the Plans by the Board.
Section 57(a)(4), Rule 17d-1
7. Section 57(a) proscribes certain transactions between a BDC and
persons related to the BDC in the manner described in section 57(b)
(``57(b) persons''), absent a Commission order. Section 57(a)(4)
generally prohibits a 57(b) person from effecting a transaction in
which the BDC is a joint participant absent such an order. Rule l7d-1,
made applicable to BDCs by section 57(i), proscribes participation in a
``joint enterprise or other joint arrangement or profit-sharing plan,''
which includes a stock option or purchase plan. Employees and directors
of a BDC are 57(b) persons. Thus, the issuance of shares of Restricted
Stock could be deemed to involve a joint transaction involving a BDC
and a 57(b) person in contravention of section 57(a)(4). Rule 17d-1(b)
provides that, in considering relief pursuant to the rule, the
Commission will consider (a) whether the participation of the BDC in a
joint enterprise is consistent with the policies and purposes of the
Act and (b) the extent to which such participation is on a basis
different from or less advantageous than that of other participants.
8. Applicant requests an order pursuant to sections 57(a)(4) and
57(i) of the Act and rule 17d-1 under the Act to permit Applicant to
issue Restricted Stock under the Plans. Applicant acknowledges that its
role is necessarily different from the other participants because the
other participants are its directors and employees. It notes, however,
that the Plans are in the interest of the Applicant's stockholders,
because the Plans will help align the interests of Applicant's
employees with those of its stockholders, which will encourage conduct
on the part of those employees designed to produce a better return for
Applicant's stockholders. Additionally, section 57(j)(1) of the Act
expressly permits any director, officer or employee of a BDC to acquire
warrants, options and rights to purchase voting securities of such BDC,
and the securities issued upon the exercise or conversion thereof,
pursuant to an executive compensation plan which meets the requirements
of section 61(a)(3)(B) of the Act. Applicant submits that the issuance
of Restricted Stock pursuant to the Plans poses no greater risk to
stockholders than the issuances permitted by section 57(j)(1) of the
Act.
Section 23(c)
9. Section 23(c) of the Act, which is made applicable to BDCs by
section 63 of the Act, generally prohibits a BDC from purchasing any
securities of which it is the issuer except in the open market pursuant
to tenders, or under other circumstances as the Commission may permit
to ensure that the purchases are made in a manner or on a basis that
does not unfairly discriminate against any holders of the class or
classes of securities to be purchased. Applicant states that the
withholding or purchase of shares of Restricted Stock and common stock
in payment of applicable withholding tax obligations or of common stock
in payment for the exercise price of a stock option might be deemed to
be purchases by the Company of its own securities within the meaning of
section 23(c) and therefore prohibited by the Act.
10. Section 23(c)(3) of the Act permits a BDC to purchase
securities of which it is the issuer in circumstances in which the
repurchase is made in a manner or on a basis that does not unfairly
discriminate against any holders of the class or classes of securities
to be purchased. Applicant believes that the requested relief meets the
standards of section 23(c)(3).
11. Applicant submits that these purchases will be made in a manner
that does not unfairly discriminate against Applicant's stockholders
because all purchases of Applicant's stock will be at the closing price
of the common stock on the Nasdaq Global Market (or any primary
exchange on which its shares of common stock may be traded in the
future) on the relevant date (i.e., the public market price on the date
of grant of Restricted Stock and the date of grant of Options).
Applicant submits that because all transactions with respect to the
Plans will take place at the public market price for the Applicant's
common stock, these transactions will not be significantly different
than could be achieved by any stockholder selling in a market
transaction. Applicant represents that no transactions will be
conducted pursuant to the requested order on days where there are no
reported market transactions involving Applicant's shares.
12. Applicant represents that the withholding provisions in the
Plans do not raise concerns about preferential treatment of Applicant's
insiders because each Plan is a bona fide compensation plan of the type
that is common among corporations generally. Furthermore, the vesting
schedule is determined at the time of the initial grant of the
Restricted Stock and the option exercise price is determined at the
time of the initial grant of the Options. Applicant represents that all
purchases may be made only as permitted by the Plans, which will be
approved by the Applicant's stockholders prior to any application of
the relief. Applicant believes that granting the requested relief would
be consistent with the policies underlying the provisions of the Act
permitting the use of equity compensation as well as prior exemptive
relief granted by the
[[Page 67451]]
Commission under section 23(c) of the Act.
Applicant's Conditions
Applicant agrees that the order granting the requested relief will
be subject to the following conditions:
1. The Plans will be authorized by Applicant's stockholders.
2. Each issuance of Restricted Stock to an officer, employee, or
Non-Employee Director will be approved by the Required Majority of
Applicant's directors on the basis that such grant is in the best
interest of Applicant and its stockholders.
3. The amount of voting securities that would result from the
exercise of all of Applicant's outstanding warrants, options and
rights, together with any Restricted Stock issued under the Plans and
the 2006 Plan, at the time of issuance shall not exceed 25% of the
outstanding voting securities of the Company, except that if the amount
of voting securities that would result from the exercise of all of the
Company's outstanding warrants, options and rights issued to the
Company's directors, officers and employees, together with any
Restricted Stock issued pursuant to the Plans and the 2006 Plan, would
exceed 15% of the outstanding voting securities of the Company, then
the total amount of voting securities that would result from the
exercise of all outstanding warrants, options and rights, together with
any Restricted Stock issued pursuant to the Plans and the 2006 Plan, at
the time of issuance shall not exceed 20% of the outstanding voting
securities of the Company.
4. The amount of Restricted Stock issued and outstanding will not
at the time of issuance of any shares of Restricted Stock exceed ten
percent of Applicant's outstanding voting securities.
5. The Board will review the Plans at least annually. In addition,
the Board will review periodically the potential impact that the
issuance of Restricted Stock under the Plans could have on Applicant's
earnings and net asset value per share, such review to take place prior
to any decisions to grant Restricted Stock under the Plans, but in no
event less frequently than annually. Adequate procedures and records
will be maintained to permit such review. The Board will be authorized
to take appropriate steps to ensure that the issuance of Restricted
Stock under the Plans will be in the best interest of Applicant's
stockholders. This authority will include the authority to prevent or
limit the granting of additional Restricted Stock under the Plans. All
records maintained pursuant to this condition will be subject to
examination by the Commission and its staff.
For the Commission, by the Division of Investment Management,
pursuant to delegated authority.
Brent J. Fields,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018-28318 Filed 12-27-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P