Proposed Definitions and Requirements-Alaska Native Education Program, 66655-66658 [2018-28130]
Download as PDF
66655
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 247 / Thursday, December 27, 2018 / Proposed Rules
defined in § 1.751–1(a)). Immediately before
the sale, PRS’s balance sheet appears as
follows:
Adjusted basis
U.S. Business capital asset .....................................................................................................................................
U.S. Business inventory ..........................................................................................................................................
Country A Business capital asset ............................................................................................................................
Country A Business inventory .................................................................................................................................
$20x
30x
100x
50x
$50x
50x
80x
10x
Total ..................................................................................................................................................................
200x
190x
(ii) Analysis—(A) Outside gain or loss. FP
is a foreign transferor (within the meaning of
paragraph (g)(3) of this section) and transfers
(within the meaning of paragraph (g)(5) of
this section) its interest in PRS to X. Under
sections 741 and 751, FP recognizes a $10x
ordinary loss and a $5x capital gain. See
§ 1.751–1(a). Under paragraph (b)(2)(i) of this
section, FP has outside ordinary loss equal to
$10x and outside capital gain equal to $5x.
Under paragraph (b)(1) of this section, FP’s
outside ordinary loss and outside capital gain
are treated as effectively connected loss and
effectively connected gain to the extent that
each does not exceed the applicable
limitation described in paragraph (b)(3) of
this section. In the case of FP’s outside
ordinary loss, the applicable limitation is
FP’s aggregate deemed sale EC ordinary loss.
In the case of FP’s outside capital gain, the
applicable limitation is FP’s aggregate
deemed sale EC capital gain.
(B) Deemed sale. FP’s aggregate deemed
sale EC ordinary loss and aggregate deemed
sale EC capital gain are determined according
to the three-step process set forth in
paragraph (c) of this section.
(1) Step 1. The amount of gain or loss that
PRS would recognize with respect to each of
its assets upon a deemed sale described in
paragraph (c)(1) of this section is as follows:
Asset
U.S. Business capital asset ..
U.S. Business inventory .......
Country A Business capital
asset ..................................
Country A Business inventory ....................................
khammond on DSK30JT082PROD with PROPOSAL
Fair market
value
Gain/(loss)
$30x
20x
that is attributable to the deemed sale of
assets that are not section 751(a) property,
which is 50% of $30x) and FP’s aggregate
deemed sale EC ordinary loss is $0 (that is,
the aggregate of its distributive share of
deemed sale EC loss that is attributable to the
deemed sale of assets that are section 751(a)
property).
(C) Limitation—(i) Capital gain. Under
paragraph (b)(3)(i) of this section, the $5x
outside capital gain recognized by FP is
treated as effectively connected gain to the
extent that it does not exceed FP’s $15x
aggregate deemed sale EC capital gain.
Accordingly, the amount of FP’s capital gain
that is treated as effectively connected gain
is $5x.
(ii) Ordinary loss. Under paragraph
(b)(3)(iv) of this section, the $10x outside
ordinary loss recognized by FP is treated as
effectively connected loss to the extent that
it does not exceed FP’s $0 aggregate deemed
sale EC ordinary loss. Accordingly, the
amount of FP’s ordinary loss that is treated
as effectively connected loss is $0.
(j) Applicability date. This section applies
to transfers occurring on or after November
27, 2017.
Par. 3. Section 1.897–7 is added to
read as follows:
■
§ 1.897–7 Treatment of certain partnership
interests, trusts and estates under section
897(g).
(a) through (b) [Reserved]. For further
guidance, see § 1.897–7T(a) through (b).
(40x)
(c) Coordination with section
864(c)(8). Except as provided in
(2) Step 2. Under paragraph (c)(2) of this
§ 1.864(c)(8)–1, the amount of any
section, PRS’s deemed sale EC gain and
money, and the fair market value of any
deemed sale EC loss must be determined
property, received by a nonresident
with respect to each asset. The amounts
determined under paragraph (c)(2) of this
alien individual or foreign corporation
section are as follows:
in exchange for all or part of its interest
in a partnership, trust, or estate shall, to
Deemed sale
the extent attributable to United States
Asset
EC gain/(loss)
real property interests, be considered as
U.S. Business capital asset ..
$30x an amount received from the sale or
U.S. Business inventory .......
20x exchange in the United States of such
property. See also § 1.864(c)(8)–1(h) for
Country A Business capital
asset ..................................
0 an anti-stuffing rule that may apply to
Country A Business inventransactions subject to section 897. This
tory ....................................
0 paragraph applies to transfers occurring
on or after November 27, 2017.
(3) Step 3. Under paragraph (c)(3) of this
■ Par. 4. Section 1.897–7T is amended
section, FP’s aggregate deemed sale EC
by adding paragraph (c) to read as
capital gain is $15x (that is, the aggregate of
its distributive share of deemed sale EC gain
follows:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:31 Dec 26, 2018
(20x)
Jkt 247001
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
§ 1.897–7T Treatment of certain
partnership interests as entirely U.S. real
property interests under sections 897(g)
and 1445(e) (temporary).
*
*
*
*
*
(c) Coordination with section
864(c)(8). [Reserved]. For further
guidance, see § 1.897–7(c).
Kirsten Wielobob,
Deputy Commissioner for Services and
Enforcement.
[FR Doc. 2018–28167 Filed 12–26–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
34 CFR Chapter II
[Docket ID ED–2018–OESE–0122]
Proposed Definitions and
Requirements—Alaska Native
Education Program
Office of Elementary and
Secondary Education, Department of
Education.
ACTION: Proposed definitions and
requirements.
AGENCY:
The Assistant Secretary for
the Office of Elementary and Secondary
Education proposes definitions and
requirements under the Alaska Native
Education (ANE) program, Catalog of
Federal Domestic Assistance (CFDA)
number 84.356A. These definitions and
requirements would clarify the
eligibility requirements for the program,
based upon changes that the Every
Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) made to
the Elementary and Secondary
Education Act of 1965 (ESEA).
DATES: We must receive your comments
on or before January 28, 2019.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments
through the Federal eRulemaking Portal
or via postal mail, commercial delivery,
or hand delivery. We will not accept
comments submitted by fax or by email
or those submitted after the comment
period. To ensure that we do not receive
duplicate copies, please submit your
comments only once. In addition, please
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\27DEP1.SGM
27DEP1
66656
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 247 / Thursday, December 27, 2018 / Proposed Rules
include the Docket ID at the top of your
comments.
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
www.regulations.gov to submit your
comments electronically. Information
on using Regulations.gov, including
instructions for accessing agency
documents, submitting comments, and
viewing the docket, is available on the
site under ‘‘Help.’’
• Postal Mail, Commercial Delivery,
or Hand Delivery: The Department
strongly encourages commenters to
submit their comments electronically.
However, if you mail or deliver your
comments, address them to Almita
Reed, U.S. Department of Education,
400 Maryland Avenue SW, Room
3E222, Washington, DC 20202–6450.
Privacy Note: The Department’s
policy is to make all comments received
from members of the public available for
public viewing in their entirety on the
Federal eRulemaking Portal at
www.regulations.gov. Therefore,
commenters should be careful to
include in their comments only
information that they wish to make
publicly available.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Almita Reed, U.S. Department of
Education, 400 Maryland Avenue SW,
Room 3E222, Washington, DC 20202–
6450. Telephone: (202) 260–1979.
Email: almita.reed@ed.gov.
If you use a telecommunications
device for the deaf (TDD) or a text
telephone (TTY), call the Federal Relay
Service (FRS), toll free, at 1–800–877–
8339.
khammond on DSK30JT082PROD with PROPOSAL
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Invitation to Comment: We invite you
to submit comments regarding this
document. To ensure that your
comments have maximum effect in
developing the notice of final
definitions and requirements, we urge
you to identify clearly the specific
issues that each comment addresses.
We invite you to assist us in
complying with the specific
requirements of Executive Orders
12866, 13563, and 13771 and their
overall requirement of reducing
regulatory burden that might result from
these proposed definitions and
requirements. Please let us know of any
further ways we could reduce potential
costs or increase potential benefits
while preserving the effective and
efficient administration of the program.
During and after the comment period,
you may inspect all public comments
about this document by accessing
Regulations.gov. You may also inspect
the comments in person in room 3E222,
400 Maryland Avenue SW, Washington,
DC, between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:31 Dec 26, 2018
Jkt 247001
4:00 p.m., Eastern Time, Monday
through Friday of each week except
Federal holidays.
Assistance to Individuals with
Disabilities in Reviewing the
Rulemaking Record: On request, we will
provide an appropriate accommodation
or auxiliary aid to an individual with a
disability who needs assistance to
review the comments or other
documents in the public rulemaking
record for this document. If you want to
schedule an appointment for this type of
accommodation or auxiliary aid, please
contact the person listed under FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
Purpose of Program: The purpose of
the ANE program is to support
innovative projects that recognize and
address the unique education needs of
Alaska Natives. These projects must
include the activities authorized under
section 6304(a)(2) of the ESEA, as
amended by the ESSA, and may include
one or more of the activities authorized
under section 6304(a)(3) of the ESEA.
Program Authority: Title VI, part C of
the ESEA (20 U.S.C. 7541–7546).
Proposed Definitions
Background
The ESEA, reauthorized in December
2015,1 established new requirements
governing eligibility for the ANE
program. In Fiscal Year (FY) 2017, the
Department conducted the first ANE
program grant competition under the
new ESEA requirements. Through this
document the Department is proposing
definitions and requirements that will
apply to future competitions.
Prior to the FY 2017 competition, and
in June 2018, to gather feedback about
how the statutory amendments should
be implemented, the Department
conducted a Tribal consultation and
several listening sessions. These events
informed the provisions that governed
the FY 2017 competition, announced
through a notice inviting applications in
the Federal Register on May 15, 2017
(82 FR 22323), and the proposed
definitions and requirements in this
document.
Under section 6304(a)(1) of the ESEA,
three types of entities are eligible for
grants under the ANE program:
(a) Alaska Native organizations
(ANOs) with experience operating
programs that fulfill the purposes of the
ANE program;
(b) ANOs that do not have experience
operating programs that fulfill the
purposes of the ANE program, but are in
partnership with—
1 Throughout this document, unless otherwise
indicated, citations to the ESEA refer to the ESEA,
as amended by the ESSA.
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
(i) A State educational agency (SEA)
or local educational agency (LEA); or
(ii) An ANO that operates a program
that fulfills the purposes of the ANE
program; and
(c) An entity located in Alaska, and
predominately governed by Alaska
Natives, that does not meet the
definition of an ANO but—
(i) Has experience operating programs
that fulfill the purposes of the ANE
program; and
(ii) Is granted an official charter or
sanction from at least one Alaska Native
tribe or ANO to carry out programs that
meet the purposes of the ANE program.
For the FY 2017 competition, we
waived notice-and-comment
rulemaking, as permitted under section
437(d)(1) of the General Education
Provisions Act, to define several of these
statutory terms related to eligible
entities.
In this document, the Assistant
Secretary proposes three definitions for
this program to clarify these eligibility
requirements. These proposed
definitions are substantially similar to
those used for the FY 2017 competition,
but we have made minor adjustments to
improve their clarity. We may apply one
or more of these definitions in any year
in which this program is in effect.
Proposed Definitions
Experience operating programs that
fulfill the purposes of the ANE program
means that the entity has received and
satisfactorily administered, in
compliance with applicable terms and
conditions, a grant under the ANE
program or another Department program
within the past four years that focused
on meeting the unique education needs
of Alaska Native children and families
in Alaska.
Official charter or sanction means a
signed letter or written agreement from
an Alaska Native Tribe or ANO that is
dated within 120 days of the date of the
submission of the application and
expressly (1) authorizes the applicant to
conduct activities authorized under the
ANE program and (2) describes the
nature of those activities.
Predominately governed by Alaska
Natives means that at least 80 percent of
the individuals on the entity’s governing
board (i.e., the board elected or
appointed to direct the policies of the
organization) are Alaska Natives.
Proposed Requirements
Background: The proposed
requirements would clarify the
information needed for entities to
establish whether they meet the
eligibility requirements, including the
proposed definitions, for the program.
E:\FR\FM\27DEP1.SGM
27DEP1
khammond on DSK30JT082PROD with PROPOSAL
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 247 / Thursday, December 27, 2018 / Proposed Rules
These application requirements are
substantially similar to those used in the
FY 2017 ANE competition, but we have
made minor adjustments to improve
their clarity.
The Assistant Secretary proposes the
following requirements for this program.
We may apply one or more of these
requirements in any year in which this
program is in effect.
Proposed Requirement 1—Group
Application Requirement.
(a) An ANO that applies for a grant in
partnership with an SEA or LEA must
serve as the fiscal agent for the project.
(b) Group applications under the ANE
program must include a partnership
agreement that includes a Memorandum
of Understanding or a Memorandum of
Agreement (MOU/MOA) between the
members of the partnership identified
and discussed in the grant application.
Each MOU/MOA must—
(1) Be signed by all partners, and
dated within 120 days of the date of the
submission of the application;
(2) Clearly outline the work to be
completed by each partner that will
participate in the grant in order to
accomplish the goals and objectives of
the project; and
(3) Demonstrate an alignment between
the activities, roles, and responsibilities
described in the grant application for
each of the partners in the partnership
agreement.
Proposed Requirement 2—Applicants
Establishing Eligibility through a
Charter or Sanction from an Alaska
Native Tribe or ANO.
For an entity that does not meet the
eligibility requirements for an ANO,
established in sections 6304(a)(1) and
6306(2) of the ESEA and the proposed
definitions in this notice, and that seeks
to establish eligibility through a charter
or sanction provided by an Alaska
Native Tribe or ANO as required under
section 6304(a)(1)(C)(ii) of the ESEA, the
following documentation is required:
(1) Written documentation
demonstrating that the entity is
physically located in the State of
Alaska.
(2) Written documentation
demonstrating that the entity has
experience operating programs that
fulfill the purposes of the ANE program.
(3) Written documentation
demonstrating that the entity is
predominately governed by Alaska
Natives, including the total number,
names, and Tribal affiliations of
members of the governing board.
(4) A copy of the official charter or
sanction provided to the entity by an
Alaska Native Tribe or ANO.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:31 Dec 26, 2018
Jkt 247001
Final Definitions and Requirements
We will announce the final
definitions and requirements in a
document published in the Federal
Register. We will determine the final
definitions and requirements after
considering comments on the proposed
definitions and requirements and other
information available to the Department.
This document does not preclude us
from proposing additional definitions or
requirements, or proposing priorities or
selection criteria for the ANE program,
subject to meeting applicable
rulemaking requirements.
Note: This document does not solicit
applications. In any year in which we
choose to use one or more of these
definitions and requirements, we invite
applications through a notice in the
Federal Register.
Executive Orders 12866, 13563, and
13771
Regulatory Impact Analysis
Under Executive Order 12866, it must
be determined whether this regulatory
action is ‘‘significant’’ and, therefore,
subject to the requirements of the
Executive Order and subject to review
by the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB). Section 3(f) of Executive
Order 12866 defines a ‘‘significant
regulatory action’’ as an action likely to
result in a rule that may—
(1) Have an annual effect on the
economy of $100 million or more, or
adversely affect a sector of the economy,
productivity, competition, jobs, the
environment, public health or safety, or
State, local, or Tribal governments or
communities in a material way (also
referred to as an ‘‘economically
significant’’ rule);
(2) Create serious inconsistency or
otherwise interfere with an action taken
or planned by another agency;
(3) Materially alter the budgetary
impacts of entitlement grants, user fees,
or loan programs, or the rights and
obligations of recipients thereof; or
(4) Raise novel legal or policy issues
arising out of legal mandates, the
President’s priorities, or the principles
stated in the Executive order.
This proposed regulatory action is not
a significant regulatory action subject to
review by OMB under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866.
Under Executive Order 13771, for
each new regulation that the
Department proposes for notice and
comment, or otherwise promulgates,
that is a significant regulatory action
under Executive Order 12866 and that
imposes total costs greater than zero, it
must identify two deregulatory actions.
For FY 2019, any new incremental costs
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
66657
associated with a new regulation must
be fully offset by the elimination of
existing costs through deregulatory
actions. Because the proposed
regulatory action is not significant, the
requirements of Executive Order 13771
do not apply.
We have also reviewed this proposed
regulatory action under Executive Order
13563, which supplements and
explicitly reaffirms the principles,
structures, and definitions governing
regulatory review established in
Executive Order 12866. To the extent
permitted by law, Executive Order
13563 requires that an agency—
(1) Propose or adopt regulations only
upon a reasoned determination that
their benefits justify their costs
(recognizing that some benefits and
costs are difficult to quantify);
(2) Tailor its regulations to impose the
least burden on society, consistent with
obtaining regulatory objectives and
taking into account—among other things
and to the extent practicable—the costs
of cumulative regulations;
(3) In choosing among alternative
regulatory approaches, select those
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety,
and other advantages; distributive
impacts; and equity);
(4) To the extent feasible, specify
performance objectives, rather than the
behavior or manner of compliance a
regulated entity must adopt; and
(5) Identify and assess available
alternatives to direct regulation,
including economic incentives—such as
user fees or marketable permits—to
encourage the desired behavior, or
provide information that enables the
public to make choices.
Executive Order 13563 also requires
an agency ‘‘to use the best available
techniques to quantify anticipated
present and future benefits and costs as
accurately as possible.’’ The Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs of
OMB has emphasized that these
techniques may include ‘‘identifying
changing future compliance costs that
might result from technological
innovation or anticipated behavioral
changes.’’
We are issuing these proposed
definitions and requirements only on a
reasoned determination that their
benefits would justify their costs. In
choosing among alternative regulatory
approaches, we selected those
approaches that would maximize net
benefits. Based on the analysis that
follows, the Department believes that
this regulatory action is consistent with
the principles in Executive Order 13563.
E:\FR\FM\27DEP1.SGM
27DEP1
66658
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 247 / Thursday, December 27, 2018 / Proposed Rules
We also have determined that this
proposed regulatory action would not
unduly interfere with State, local, and
Tribal governments in the exercise of
their governmental functions.
In accordance with these Executive
orders, the Department has assessed the
potential costs and benefits, both
quantitative and qualitative, of this
regulatory action. The potential costs
are those resulting from statutory
requirements and those we have
determined as necessary for
administering the Department’s
programs and activities.
Discussion of Costs and Benefits
We have determined that these
proposed definitions and requirements
would impose minimal costs on eligible
applicants. Program participation is
voluntary, and the costs imposed on
applicants by these definitions and
requirements would be limited to
paperwork burden related to preparing
an application. The potential benefits of
implementing the programs would
outweigh any costs incurred by
applicants, and the costs of actually
carrying out activities associated with
the application would be paid for with
program funds. For these reasons, we
have determined that the costs of
implementation would not be
excessively burdensome for eligible
applicants, including small entities.
khammond on DSK30JT082PROD with PROPOSAL
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
These proposed definitions and
requirements do not contain any
information collection requirements.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Secretary certifies that this
proposed regulatory action would not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
The U.S. Small Business Administration
Size Standards define ‘‘small entities’’
as for-profit or nonprofit institutions
with total annual revenue below
$7,000,000 or, if they are institutions
controlled by small governmental
jurisdictions (that are comprised of
cities, counties, towns, townships,
villages, school districts, or special
districts), with a population of less than
50,000.
Although some of the ANOs, LEAs,
and other entities that receive ANE
program funds qualify as small entities
under this definition, the proposed
definitions and requirements would not
have a significant economic impact on
these small entities. The Department
believes that the costs imposed on an
applicant by the proposed definitions
and requirements would be limited to
the costs related to providing the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:31 Dec 26, 2018
Jkt 247001
documentation outlined in the proposed
definitions and requirements when
preparing an application and that those
costs would not be significant.
Participation in the ANE program is
voluntary. We invite comments from
small entities as to whether they believe
the proposed definitions and
requirements would have a significant
economic impact on them and, if so, we
request evidence to support that belief.
Intergovernmental Review
This program is not subject to
Executive Order 12372 and the
regulations in 34 CFR part 79.
Accessible Format: Individuals with
disabilities can obtain this document in
an accessible format (e.g., braille, large
print, audiotape, or compact disc) on
request to the program contact person
listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT.
Electronic Access to This Document:
The official version of this document is
the document published in the Federal
Register. You may access the official
edition of the Federal Register and the
Code of Federal Regulations via the
Federal Digital System at: www.gpo.gov/
fdsys. At this site you can view this
document, as well as all other
documents of this Department
published in the Federal Register, in
text or Adobe Portable Document
Format (PDF). To use PDF you must
have Adobe Acrobat Reader, which is
available free at the site.
You may also access documents of the
Department published in the Federal
Register by using the article search
feature at: www.federalregister.gov.
Specifically, through the advanced
search feature at this site, you can limit
your search to documents published by
the Department.
Dated: December 20, 2018.
Frank Brogan,
Assistant Secretary for Elementary and
Secondary Education.
[FR Doc. 2018–28130 Filed 12–26–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000–01–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R09–OAR–2018–0512; FRL–9988–53–
Region 9]
Air Plan Approval; California; Mojave
Desert Air Quality Management District
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve
revisions to the Mojave Desert Air
Quality Management District
(MDAQMD or ‘‘District’’) portion of the
California State Implementation Plan
(SIP). These revisions concern
emissions of volatile organic
compounds (VOCs) from wood products
coating operations and organic solvent
degreasing operations. We are proposing
to approve local rules to regulate these
emission sources under the Clean Air
Act (CAA or the Act). We are also
proposing to approve revisions to a
definitions rule. Finally, we are
proposing to convert the partial
conditional approval of the District’s
reasonably available control technology
(RACT) SIPs for the 1997 and 2008
ozone standards, as it applies to VOC
emissions from wood products coating
operations and organic solvent
degreasing operations, to a full
approval. We are taking comments on
this proposal and plan to follow with a
final action.
DATES: Any comments must arrive by
January 28, 2019.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R09–
OAR–2018–0512 at https://
www.regulations.gov. For comments
submitted at Regulations.gov, follow the
online instructions for submitting
comments. Once submitted, comments
cannot be edited or removed from
Regulations.gov. For either manner of
submission, the EPA may publish any
comment received to its public docket.
Do not submit electronically any
information you consider to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI)
or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Multimedia
submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be
accompanied by a written comment.
The written comment is considered the
official comment and should include
discussion of all points you wish to
make. The EPA will generally not
consider comments or comment
contents located outside of the primary
submission (i.e., on the web, cloud, or
other file sharing system). For
additional submission methods, please
contact the person identified in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
For the full EPA public comment policy,
information about CBI or multimedia
submissions, and general guidance on
making effective comments, please visit
https://www.epa.gov/dockets/
commenting-epa-dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Nancy Levin, EPA Region IX, (415) 972–
3848, levin.nancy@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\27DEP1.SGM
27DEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 247 (Thursday, December 27, 2018)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 66655-66658]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-28130]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
34 CFR Chapter II
[Docket ID ED-2018-OESE-0122]
Proposed Definitions and Requirements--Alaska Native Education
Program
AGENCY: Office of Elementary and Secondary Education, Department of
Education.
ACTION: Proposed definitions and requirements.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Assistant Secretary for the Office of Elementary and
Secondary Education proposes definitions and requirements under the
Alaska Native Education (ANE) program, Catalog of Federal Domestic
Assistance (CFDA) number 84.356A. These definitions and requirements
would clarify the eligibility requirements for the program, based upon
changes that the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) made to the
Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (ESEA).
DATES: We must receive your comments on or before January 28, 2019.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments through the Federal eRulemaking Portal
or via postal mail, commercial delivery, or hand delivery. We will not
accept comments submitted by fax or by email or those submitted after
the comment period. To ensure that we do not receive duplicate copies,
please submit your comments only once. In addition, please
[[Page 66656]]
include the Docket ID at the top of your comments.
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to www.regulations.gov to
submit your comments electronically. Information on using
Regulations.gov, including instructions for accessing agency documents,
submitting comments, and viewing the docket, is available on the site
under ``Help.''
Postal Mail, Commercial Delivery, or Hand Delivery: The
Department strongly encourages commenters to submit their comments
electronically. However, if you mail or deliver your comments, address
them to Almita Reed, U.S. Department of Education, 400 Maryland Avenue
SW, Room 3E222, Washington, DC 20202-6450.
Privacy Note: The Department's policy is to make all comments
received from members of the public available for public viewing in
their entirety on the Federal eRulemaking Portal at
www.regulations.gov. Therefore, commenters should be careful to include
in their comments only information that they wish to make publicly
available.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Almita Reed, U.S. Department of
Education, 400 Maryland Avenue SW, Room 3E222, Washington, DC 20202-
6450. Telephone: (202) 260-1979. Email: almita.reed@ed.gov.
If you use a telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD) or a text
telephone (TTY), call the Federal Relay Service (FRS), toll free, at 1-
800-877-8339.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Invitation to Comment: We invite you to submit comments regarding
this document. To ensure that your comments have maximum effect in
developing the notice of final definitions and requirements, we urge
you to identify clearly the specific issues that each comment
addresses.
We invite you to assist us in complying with the specific
requirements of Executive Orders 12866, 13563, and 13771 and their
overall requirement of reducing regulatory burden that might result
from these proposed definitions and requirements. Please let us know of
any further ways we could reduce potential costs or increase potential
benefits while preserving the effective and efficient administration of
the program.
During and after the comment period, you may inspect all public
comments about this document by accessing Regulations.gov. You may also
inspect the comments in person in room 3E222, 400 Maryland Avenue SW,
Washington, DC, between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 4:00 p.m., Eastern
Time, Monday through Friday of each week except Federal holidays.
Assistance to Individuals with Disabilities in Reviewing the
Rulemaking Record: On request, we will provide an appropriate
accommodation or auxiliary aid to an individual with a disability who
needs assistance to review the comments or other documents in the
public rulemaking record for this document. If you want to schedule an
appointment for this type of accommodation or auxiliary aid, please
contact the person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
Purpose of Program: The purpose of the ANE program is to support
innovative projects that recognize and address the unique education
needs of Alaska Natives. These projects must include the activities
authorized under section 6304(a)(2) of the ESEA, as amended by the
ESSA, and may include one or more of the activities authorized under
section 6304(a)(3) of the ESEA.
Program Authority: Title VI, part C of the ESEA (20 U.S.C. 7541-
7546).
Proposed Definitions
Background
The ESEA, reauthorized in December 2015,\1\ established new
requirements governing eligibility for the ANE program. In Fiscal Year
(FY) 2017, the Department conducted the first ANE program grant
competition under the new ESEA requirements. Through this document the
Department is proposing definitions and requirements that will apply to
future competitions.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Throughout this document, unless otherwise indicated,
citations to the ESEA refer to the ESEA, as amended by the ESSA.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Prior to the FY 2017 competition, and in June 2018, to gather
feedback about how the statutory amendments should be implemented, the
Department conducted a Tribal consultation and several listening
sessions. These events informed the provisions that governed the FY
2017 competition, announced through a notice inviting applications in
the Federal Register on May 15, 2017 (82 FR 22323), and the proposed
definitions and requirements in this document.
Under section 6304(a)(1) of the ESEA, three types of entities are
eligible for grants under the ANE program:
(a) Alaska Native organizations (ANOs) with experience operating
programs that fulfill the purposes of the ANE program;
(b) ANOs that do not have experience operating programs that
fulfill the purposes of the ANE program, but are in partnership with--
(i) A State educational agency (SEA) or local educational agency
(LEA); or
(ii) An ANO that operates a program that fulfills the purposes of
the ANE program; and
(c) An entity located in Alaska, and predominately governed by
Alaska Natives, that does not meet the definition of an ANO but--
(i) Has experience operating programs that fulfill the purposes of
the ANE program; and
(ii) Is granted an official charter or sanction from at least one
Alaska Native tribe or ANO to carry out programs that meet the purposes
of the ANE program.
For the FY 2017 competition, we waived notice-and-comment
rulemaking, as permitted under section 437(d)(1) of the General
Education Provisions Act, to define several of these statutory terms
related to eligible entities.
In this document, the Assistant Secretary proposes three
definitions for this program to clarify these eligibility requirements.
These proposed definitions are substantially similar to those used for
the FY 2017 competition, but we have made minor adjustments to improve
their clarity. We may apply one or more of these definitions in any
year in which this program is in effect.
Proposed Definitions
Experience operating programs that fulfill the purposes of the ANE
program means that the entity has received and satisfactorily
administered, in compliance with applicable terms and conditions, a
grant under the ANE program or another Department program within the
past four years that focused on meeting the unique education needs of
Alaska Native children and families in Alaska.
Official charter or sanction means a signed letter or written
agreement from an Alaska Native Tribe or ANO that is dated within 120
days of the date of the submission of the application and expressly (1)
authorizes the applicant to conduct activities authorized under the ANE
program and (2) describes the nature of those activities.
Predominately governed by Alaska Natives means that at least 80
percent of the individuals on the entity's governing board (i.e., the
board elected or appointed to direct the policies of the organization)
are Alaska Natives.
Proposed Requirements
Background: The proposed requirements would clarify the information
needed for entities to establish whether they meet the eligibility
requirements, including the proposed definitions, for the program.
[[Page 66657]]
These application requirements are substantially similar to those used
in the FY 2017 ANE competition, but we have made minor adjustments to
improve their clarity.
The Assistant Secretary proposes the following requirements for
this program. We may apply one or more of these requirements in any
year in which this program is in effect.
Proposed Requirement 1--Group Application Requirement.
(a) An ANO that applies for a grant in partnership with an SEA or
LEA must serve as the fiscal agent for the project.
(b) Group applications under the ANE program must include a
partnership agreement that includes a Memorandum of Understanding or a
Memorandum of Agreement (MOU/MOA) between the members of the
partnership identified and discussed in the grant application. Each
MOU/MOA must--
(1) Be signed by all partners, and dated within 120 days of the
date of the submission of the application;
(2) Clearly outline the work to be completed by each partner that
will participate in the grant in order to accomplish the goals and
objectives of the project; and
(3) Demonstrate an alignment between the activities, roles, and
responsibilities described in the grant application for each of the
partners in the partnership agreement.
Proposed Requirement 2--Applicants Establishing Eligibility through
a Charter or Sanction from an Alaska Native Tribe or ANO.
For an entity that does not meet the eligibility requirements for
an ANO, established in sections 6304(a)(1) and 6306(2) of the ESEA and
the proposed definitions in this notice, and that seeks to establish
eligibility through a charter or sanction provided by an Alaska Native
Tribe or ANO as required under section 6304(a)(1)(C)(ii) of the ESEA,
the following documentation is required:
(1) Written documentation demonstrating that the entity is
physically located in the State of Alaska.
(2) Written documentation demonstrating that the entity has
experience operating programs that fulfill the purposes of the ANE
program.
(3) Written documentation demonstrating that the entity is
predominately governed by Alaska Natives, including the total number,
names, and Tribal affiliations of members of the governing board.
(4) A copy of the official charter or sanction provided to the
entity by an Alaska Native Tribe or ANO.
Final Definitions and Requirements
We will announce the final definitions and requirements in a
document published in the Federal Register. We will determine the final
definitions and requirements after considering comments on the proposed
definitions and requirements and other information available to the
Department. This document does not preclude us from proposing
additional definitions or requirements, or proposing priorities or
selection criteria for the ANE program, subject to meeting applicable
rulemaking requirements.
Note: This document does not solicit applications. In any year in
which we choose to use one or more of these definitions and
requirements, we invite applications through a notice in the Federal
Register.
Executive Orders 12866, 13563, and 13771
Regulatory Impact Analysis
Under Executive Order 12866, it must be determined whether this
regulatory action is ``significant'' and, therefore, subject to the
requirements of the Executive Order and subject to review by the Office
of Management and Budget (OMB). Section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866
defines a ``significant regulatory action'' as an action likely to
result in a rule that may--
(1) Have an annual effect on the economy of $100 million or more,
or adversely affect a sector of the economy, productivity, competition,
jobs, the environment, public health or safety, or State, local, or
Tribal governments or communities in a material way (also referred to
as an ``economically significant'' rule);
(2) Create serious inconsistency or otherwise interfere with an
action taken or planned by another agency;
(3) Materially alter the budgetary impacts of entitlement grants,
user fees, or loan programs, or the rights and obligations of
recipients thereof; or
(4) Raise novel legal or policy issues arising out of legal
mandates, the President's priorities, or the principles stated in the
Executive order.
This proposed regulatory action is not a significant regulatory
action subject to review by OMB under section 3(f) of Executive Order
12866.
Under Executive Order 13771, for each new regulation that the
Department proposes for notice and comment, or otherwise promulgates,
that is a significant regulatory action under Executive Order 12866 and
that imposes total costs greater than zero, it must identify two
deregulatory actions. For FY 2019, any new incremental costs associated
with a new regulation must be fully offset by the elimination of
existing costs through deregulatory actions. Because the proposed
regulatory action is not significant, the requirements of Executive
Order 13771 do not apply.
We have also reviewed this proposed regulatory action under
Executive Order 13563, which supplements and explicitly reaffirms the
principles, structures, and definitions governing regulatory review
established in Executive Order 12866. To the extent permitted by law,
Executive Order 13563 requires that an agency--
(1) Propose or adopt regulations only upon a reasoned determination
that their benefits justify their costs (recognizing that some benefits
and costs are difficult to quantify);
(2) Tailor its regulations to impose the least burden on society,
consistent with obtaining regulatory objectives and taking into
account--among other things and to the extent practicable--the costs of
cumulative regulations;
(3) In choosing among alternative regulatory approaches, select
those approaches that maximize net benefits (including potential
economic, environmental, public health and safety, and other
advantages; distributive impacts; and equity);
(4) To the extent feasible, specify performance objectives, rather
than the behavior or manner of compliance a regulated entity must
adopt; and
(5) Identify and assess available alternatives to direct
regulation, including economic incentives--such as user fees or
marketable permits--to encourage the desired behavior, or provide
information that enables the public to make choices.
Executive Order 13563 also requires an agency ``to use the best
available techniques to quantify anticipated present and future
benefits and costs as accurately as possible.'' The Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs of OMB has emphasized that these
techniques may include ``identifying changing future compliance costs
that might result from technological innovation or anticipated
behavioral changes.''
We are issuing these proposed definitions and requirements only on
a reasoned determination that their benefits would justify their costs.
In choosing among alternative regulatory approaches, we selected those
approaches that would maximize net benefits. Based on the analysis that
follows, the Department believes that this regulatory action is
consistent with the principles in Executive Order 13563.
[[Page 66658]]
We also have determined that this proposed regulatory action would
not unduly interfere with State, local, and Tribal governments in the
exercise of their governmental functions.
In accordance with these Executive orders, the Department has
assessed the potential costs and benefits, both quantitative and
qualitative, of this regulatory action. The potential costs are those
resulting from statutory requirements and those we have determined as
necessary for administering the Department's programs and activities.
Discussion of Costs and Benefits
We have determined that these proposed definitions and requirements
would impose minimal costs on eligible applicants. Program
participation is voluntary, and the costs imposed on applicants by
these definitions and requirements would be limited to paperwork burden
related to preparing an application. The potential benefits of
implementing the programs would outweigh any costs incurred by
applicants, and the costs of actually carrying out activities
associated with the application would be paid for with program funds.
For these reasons, we have determined that the costs of implementation
would not be excessively burdensome for eligible applicants, including
small entities.
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
These proposed definitions and requirements do not contain any
information collection requirements.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Secretary certifies that this proposed regulatory action would
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities. The U.S. Small Business Administration Size Standards define
``small entities'' as for-profit or nonprofit institutions with total
annual revenue below $7,000,000 or, if they are institutions controlled
by small governmental jurisdictions (that are comprised of cities,
counties, towns, townships, villages, school districts, or special
districts), with a population of less than 50,000.
Although some of the ANOs, LEAs, and other entities that receive
ANE program funds qualify as small entities under this definition, the
proposed definitions and requirements would not have a significant
economic impact on these small entities. The Department believes that
the costs imposed on an applicant by the proposed definitions and
requirements would be limited to the costs related to providing the
documentation outlined in the proposed definitions and requirements
when preparing an application and that those costs would not be
significant. Participation in the ANE program is voluntary. We invite
comments from small entities as to whether they believe the proposed
definitions and requirements would have a significant economic impact
on them and, if so, we request evidence to support that belief.
Intergovernmental Review
This program is not subject to Executive Order 12372 and the
regulations in 34 CFR part 79.
Accessible Format: Individuals with disabilities can obtain this
document in an accessible format (e.g., braille, large print,
audiotape, or compact disc) on request to the program contact person
listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
Electronic Access to This Document: The official version of this
document is the document published in the Federal Register. You may
access the official edition of the Federal Register and the Code of
Federal Regulations via the Federal Digital System at: www.gpo.gov/fdsys. At this site you can view this document, as well as all other
documents of this Department published in the Federal Register, in text
or Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF). To use PDF you must have Adobe
Acrobat Reader, which is available free at the site.
You may also access documents of the Department published in the
Federal Register by using the article search feature at:
www.federalregister.gov. Specifically, through the advanced search
feature at this site, you can limit your search to documents published
by the Department.
Dated: December 20, 2018.
Frank Brogan,
Assistant Secretary for Elementary and Secondary Education.
[FR Doc. 2018-28130 Filed 12-26-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000-01-P