Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 From India: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2016-2017, 64529-64530 [2018-27243]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 241 / Monday, December 17, 2018 / Notices
provided for convenience and customs
purposes, our written description of the
scope of the Order is dispositive.
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–533–838]
Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 From
India: Preliminary Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review; 2016–2017
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
(Commerce) preliminarily determines
that Pidilite Industries Limited
(Pidilite), producer/exporter of
carbazole violet pigment 23 (CVP 23)
from India, did not sell subject
merchandise at prices below normal
value (NV) during the period of review
(POR) December 1, 2016, through
November 30, 2017.
DATES: Applicable December 17, 2018.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
George Ayache, AD/CVD Operations,
Office VIII, Enforcement and
Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone
(202) 482–2623.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
AGENCY:
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with NOTICES1
Scope of the Order 1
The merchandise covered by the
Order is CVP–23 identified as Color
Index No. 51319 and Chemical Abstract
No. 6358–30–1, with the chemical name
of diindolo [3,2-b:3′,2′m] 2 triphenodioxazine, 8,18-dichloro-5,
15-diethy-5, 15-dihydro-, and molecular
formula of C34 H22 Cl2 N4 O2. The
subject merchandise includes the crude
pigment in any form (e.g., dry powder,
paste, wet cake) and finished pigment in
the form of presscake and dry color.
Pigment dispersions in any form (e.g.,
pigments dispersed in oleoresins,
flammable solvents, water) are not
included within the scope of the order.
The merchandise subject to the Order
is classifiable under subheading
3204.17.9040 of the Harmonized Tariff
Schedule of the United States (HTSUS).
Although the HTSUS subheading is
1 See Notice of Amended Final Determination of
Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Antidumping
Duty Order: Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 From
India, 69 FR 77988 (December 29, 2004) (Order).
2 The bracketed section of the product
description, [3,2-b:3′,2′-m], is not business
proprietary information. In this case, the brackets
are simply part of the chemical nomenclature. See
‘‘Amendment to Petition for Antidumping
Investigations of China and India and a
Countervailing Duty Investigation of India on
Imports of Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 in the forms
of Crude Pigment, Presscake and Dry Color
Pigment,’’ dated December 3, 2003, at 8.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:17 Dec 14, 2018
Jkt 247001
Methodology
We are conducting this review in
accordance with section 751(a)(1)(B)
and (2) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (the Act). Constructed export
price is calculated in accordance with
section 772 of the Act. NV is calculated
in accordance with section 773 of the
Act.
For a full description of the
methodology underlying our
conclusions, see the Preliminary
Decision Memorandum.3 The
Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a
public document and is on file
electronically via Enforcement and
Compliance’s Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Centralized
Electronic Service System (ACCESS).
ACCESS is available to registered users
at https://access.trade.gov, and to all
parties in the Central Records Unit,
Room B8024 of the main Department of
Commerce building. In addition, a
complete version of the Preliminary
Decision Memorandum can be accessed
at https://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/
index.html. The signed Preliminary
Decision Memorandum and the
electronic version of the Preliminary
Decision Memorandum are identical in
content. A list of the topics discussed in
the Preliminary Decision Memorandum
is attached as an Appendix to this
notice.
Preliminary Results of the Review
As a result of this review, we
preliminarily determine that a
weighted-average dumping margin of
0.00 percent exists for Pidilite for the
period December 1, 2016, through
November 30, 2017.
Disclosure and Public Comment
We intend to disclose the calculations
performed in connection with these
preliminary results to interested parties
within five days of the date of
publication of this notice in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.224(b).
Interested parties may submit case
briefs no later than 30 days after the
date of publication of this notice.4
Rebuttal briefs, limited to issues raised
in the case briefs, may be filed not later
than five days after the date for filing
case briefs.5 Pursuant to 19 CFR
3 See Memorandum, ‘‘Decision Memorandum for
Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review: Carbazole Violet Pigment
23 from India; 2016–2017,’’ dated concurrently with
these results and hereby adopted by this notice.
4 See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(1)(ii).
5 See 19 CFR 351.309(d).
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
64529
351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2), parties who
submit case briefs or rebuttal briefs in
this proceeding are encouraged to
submit with each argument: (1) A
statement of the issue; (2) a brief
summary of the argument; and (3) a
table of authorities. Case and rebuttal
briefs should be filed using ACCESS.6
All submissions to Commerce must be
filed electronically using ACCESS and
must also be served on interested
parties.7 An electronically filed
document must be received successfully
in its entirety by Commerce’s electronic
records system, ACCESS, by 5:00 p.m.
Eastern Time on the date that the
document is due.
Interested parties who wish to request
a hearing must submit a written request
to the Assistant Secretary for
Enforcement and Compliance, U.S.
Department of Commerce, using
Enforcement and Compliance’s ACCESS
system within 30 days of publication of
this notice.8 Requests should contain:
(1) The party’s name, address, and
telephone number; (2) the number of
participants; and (3) a list of issues to be
discussed. Issues raised in the hearing
will be limited to those raised in the
respective case and rebuttal briefs. If a
request for a hearing is made, Commerce
intends to hold the hearing at the U.S.
Department of Commerce, 1401
Constitution Avenue NW, Washington,
DC 20230, at a time and date to be
determined. Parties should confirm by
telephone the date, time, and location of
the hearing two days before the
scheduled date.
Unless the deadline is extended
pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(B)(iv) of
the Act and 19 CFR 351.213(h)(2),
Commerce intends to issue the final
results of this administrative review,
including the results of its analysis of
issues raised in any written briefs, not
later than 120 days after the date of
publication of this notice.9
Assessment Rates
Upon issuance of the final results,
Commerce shall determine, and U.S.
Customs and Border Protection (CBP)
shall assess upon issuance of the final
results, antidumping duties on all
appropriate entries covered by this
review.10
If Pidilite’s calculated weightedaverage dumping margin is above de
minimis in the final results of this
review, we will calculate importer6 See
19 CFR 351.303.
19 CFR 351.303(f).
8 See 19 CFR 351.310(c).
9 See section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act and 19 CFR
351.213(h).
10 See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1).
7 See
E:\FR\FM\17DEN1.SGM
17DEN1
64530
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 241 / Monday, December 17, 2018 / Notices
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with NOTICES1
specific ad valorem duty assessment
rates based on the ratio of the total
amount of antidumping duties
calculated for the examined sales to the
total entered value of the examined
sales to that importer, and we will
instruct CBP to assess antidumping
duties on all appropriate entries covered
by this review. If Pidilite’s weightedaverage dumping margin continues to be
zero or de minimis, or the importerspecific assessment rate is zero or de
minimis, we will instruct CBP to
liquidate the appropriate entries
without regard to antidumping duties.11
In accordance with our ‘‘automatic
assessment’’ practice, for entries of
subject merchandise during the POR
produced by Pidilite for which it did
not know its merchandise was destined
for the United States, we will instruct
CBP to liquidate unreviewed entries at
the all-others rate.12
We intend to issue instructions to
CBP 15 days after the date of
publication of the final results of this
review.
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following deposit requirements
will be effective upon publication of the
notice of final results of administrative
review for all shipments of the subject
merchandise entered, or withdrawn
from warehouse, for consumption on or
after the publication date, as provided
by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1)
The cash deposit rate for Pidilite will be
the rate established in the final results
of this review, except if the rate is de
minimis within the meaning of 19 CFR
351.106(c)(1) (i.e., less than 0.50
percent), in which case the cash deposit
rate will be zero; (2) for merchandise
exported by manufacturers or exporters
not covered in this review but covered
in a prior completed segment of the
proceeding, the cash deposit rate will
continue to be the company-specific rate
published for the most recentlycompleted segment; (3) if the exporter is
not a firm covered in this review, a prior
review, or the original investigation, but
the manufacturer is, the cash deposit
rate will be the rate established for the
most recently-completed segment for
the manufacturer of the merchandise;
and (4) the cash deposit rate for all other
manufacturers or exporters will
continue to be 27.48 percent, the allothers rate established in the less-thanfair-value investigation.13 These cash
deposit requirements, when imposed,
shall remain in effect until further
notice.
Notification to Importers
This notice also serves as a
preliminary reminder to importers of
their responsibility under 19 CFR
351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of
antidumping duties prior to liquidation
of the relevant entries during this
review period. Failure to comply with
this requirement could result in the
Secretary’s presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties
occurred and the subsequent assessment
of double antidumping duties.
We are issuing and publishing these
results in accordance with sections
751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19
CFR 351.221(b)(4).
Dated: December 11, 2018.
Christian Marsh,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement
and Compliance.
Appendix
List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary
Decision Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Discussion of the Methodology
A. Comparisons to Normal Value
1. Determination of Comparison Method
2. Results of the Differential Pricing
Analysis
B. Date of Sale
C. Product Comparisons
D. Constructed Export Price
E. Normal Value
1. Home Market Viability and Selection of
Comparison Market
2. Level of Trade (LOT)
F. Cost of Production (COP) Analysis
1. Calculation of COP
2. Test of Comparison Market Sales Prices
3. Results of the COP Test
G. Calculation of NV Based on Comparison
Market Prices
H. Currency Conversion
IV. Recommendation
[FR Doc. 2018–27243 Filed 12–14–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
19 CFR 351.106(c)(2).
a full discussion of this clarification, see
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings:
Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954
(May 6, 2003).
13 See Order.
12 For
19:17 Dec 14, 2018
Jkt 247001
PO 00000
International Trade Administration
A–449–804, A–455–803, A–560–811, A–
570–860, A–822–804, A–823–809, A–
841–804
Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bars From
Belarus, the People’s Republic of
China, Indonesia, Latvia, Moldova,
Poland, and Ukraine: Continuation of
the Antidumping Duty Orders
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: As a result of the
determinations by the Department of
Commerce (Commerce) and the
International Trade Commission (ITC)
that revocation of the antidumping duty
(AD) orders on steel concrete reinforcing
bars (rebar) from Belarus, the People’s
Republic of China (China), Indonesia,
Latvia, Moldova, Poland, and Ukraine
would likely lead to a continuation or
recurrence of dumping and material
injury to an industry in the United
States, Commerce is publishing a notice
of continuation of the AD orders.
DATES: Applicable December 17, 2018.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Keith Haynes, AD/CVD Operations,
Office III, Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401
Constitution Avenue NW, Washington,
DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–5139.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
AGENCY:
Background
On June 1, 2018, Commerce published
the notice of initiation of the third
sunset reviews of the Orders 1 on rebar
from Belarus, China, Indonesia, Latvia,
Moldova, Poland, and Ukraine,
pursuant to section 751(c)(2) of the
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the
Act).2 As a result of its reviews,
Commerce determined that revocation
of the Orders on rebar from Belarus,
China, Indonesia, Latvia, Moldova,
Poland, and Ukraine would likely lead
to the continuation or recurrence of
dumping.3 Commerce, therefore,
1 See Antidumping Duty Orders: Steel Concrete
Reinforcing Bars from Belarus, Indonesia, Latvia,
Moldova, People’s Republic of China, Poland,
Republic of Korea and Ukraine, 66 FR 46777
(September 7, 2001) (Orders).
2 See Initiation of Five-Year (Sunset) Reviews, 83
FR 25436 (June 1, 2018).
3 See Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bars from
Belarus, the People’s Republic of China, Indonesia,
Latvia, Moldova, Poland, and Ukraine: Final
Results of Expedited Third Sunset Reviews of the
Antidumping Duty Orders, 83 FR 50344 (October 5,
2018), and accompanying Issues and Decision
Memorandum (Rebar 2018 Sunset Final).
11 See
VerDate Sep<11>2014
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Frm 00015
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\17DEN1.SGM
17DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 241 (Monday, December 17, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 64529-64530]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-27243]
[[Page 64529]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-533-838]
Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 From India: Preliminary Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2016-2017
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (Commerce) preliminarily determines
that Pidilite Industries Limited (Pidilite), producer/exporter of
carbazole violet pigment 23 (CVP 23) from India, did not sell subject
merchandise at prices below normal value (NV) during the period of
review (POR) December 1, 2016, through November 30, 2017.
DATES: Applicable December 17, 2018.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: George Ayache, AD/CVD Operations,
Office VIII, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone (202) 482-2623.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Scope of the Order \1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Notice of Amended Final Determination of Sales at Less
Than Fair Value and Antidumping Duty Order: Carbazole Violet Pigment
23 From India, 69 FR 77988 (December 29, 2004) (Order).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The merchandise covered by the Order is CVP-23 identified as Color
Index No. 51319 and Chemical Abstract No. 6358-30-1, with the chemical
name of diindolo [3,2-b:3',2'-m] \2\ triphenodioxazine, 8,18-dichloro-
5, 15-diethy-5, 15-dihydro-, and molecular formula of C34 H22 Cl2 N4
O2. The subject merchandise includes the crude pigment in any form
(e.g., dry powder, paste, wet cake) and finished pigment in the form of
presscake and dry color. Pigment dispersions in any form (e.g.,
pigments dispersed in oleoresins, flammable solvents, water) are not
included within the scope of the order.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ The bracketed section of the product description, [3,2-
b:3',2'-m], is not business proprietary information. In this case,
the brackets are simply part of the chemical nomenclature. See
``Amendment to Petition for Antidumping Investigations of China and
India and a Countervailing Duty Investigation of India on Imports of
Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 in the forms of Crude Pigment, Presscake
and Dry Color Pigment,'' dated December 3, 2003, at 8.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The merchandise subject to the Order is classifiable under
subheading 3204.17.9040 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United
States (HTSUS). Although the HTSUS subheading is provided for
convenience and customs purposes, our written description of the scope
of the Order is dispositive.
Methodology
We are conducting this review in accordance with section
751(a)(1)(B) and (2) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act).
Constructed export price is calculated in accordance with section 772
of the Act. NV is calculated in accordance with section 773 of the Act.
For a full description of the methodology underlying our
conclusions, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum.\3\ The
Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file
electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS).
ACCESS is available to registered users at https://access.trade.gov, and
to all parties in the Central Records Unit, Room B8024 of the main
Department of Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the
Preliminary Decision Memorandum can be accessed at https://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed Preliminary Decision
Memorandum and the electronic version of the Preliminary Decision
Memorandum are identical in content. A list of the topics discussed in
the Preliminary Decision Memorandum is attached as an Appendix to this
notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ See Memorandum, ``Decision Memorandum for Preliminary
Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: Carbazole Violet
Pigment 23 from India; 2016-2017,'' dated concurrently with these
results and hereby adopted by this notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Preliminary Results of the Review
As a result of this review, we preliminarily determine that a
weighted-average dumping margin of 0.00 percent exists for Pidilite for
the period December 1, 2016, through November 30, 2017.
Disclosure and Public Comment
We intend to disclose the calculations performed in connection with
these preliminary results to interested parties within five days of the
date of publication of this notice in accordance with 19 CFR
351.224(b).
Interested parties may submit case briefs no later than 30 days
after the date of publication of this notice.\4\ Rebuttal briefs,
limited to issues raised in the case briefs, may be filed not later
than five days after the date for filing case briefs.\5\ Pursuant to 19
CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2), parties who submit case briefs or
rebuttal briefs in this proceeding are encouraged to submit with each
argument: (1) A statement of the issue; (2) a brief summary of the
argument; and (3) a table of authorities. Case and rebuttal briefs
should be filed using ACCESS.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(1)(ii).
\5\ See 19 CFR 351.309(d).
\6\ See 19 CFR 351.303.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
All submissions to Commerce must be filed electronically using
ACCESS and must also be served on interested parties.\7\ An
electronically filed document must be received successfully in its
entirety by Commerce's electronic records system, ACCESS, by 5:00 p.m.
Eastern Time on the date that the document is due.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ See 19 CFR 351.303(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Interested parties who wish to request a hearing must submit a
written request to the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance, U.S. Department of Commerce, using Enforcement and
Compliance's ACCESS system within 30 days of publication of this
notice.\8\ Requests should contain: (1) The party's name, address, and
telephone number; (2) the number of participants; and (3) a list of
issues to be discussed. Issues raised in the hearing will be limited to
those raised in the respective case and rebuttal briefs. If a request
for a hearing is made, Commerce intends to hold the hearing at the U.S.
Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC
20230, at a time and date to be determined. Parties should confirm by
telephone the date, time, and location of the hearing two days before
the scheduled date.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ See 19 CFR 351.310(c).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unless the deadline is extended pursuant to section
751(a)(2)(B)(iv) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.213(h)(2), Commerce intends
to issue the final results of this administrative review, including the
results of its analysis of issues raised in any written briefs, not
later than 120 days after the date of publication of this notice.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ See section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.213(h).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assessment Rates
Upon issuance of the final results, Commerce shall determine, and
U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) shall assess upon issuance of
the final results, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries
covered by this review.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
If Pidilite's calculated weighted-average dumping margin is above
de minimis in the final results of this review, we will calculate
importer-
[[Page 64530]]
specific ad valorem duty assessment rates based on the ratio of the
total amount of antidumping duties calculated for the examined sales to
the total entered value of the examined sales to that importer, and we
will instruct CBP to assess antidumping duties on all appropriate
entries covered by this review. If Pidilite's weighted-average dumping
margin continues to be zero or de minimis, or the importer-specific
assessment rate is zero or de minimis, we will instruct CBP to
liquidate the appropriate entries without regard to antidumping
duties.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ See 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In accordance with our ``automatic assessment'' practice, for
entries of subject merchandise during the POR produced by Pidilite for
which it did not know its merchandise was destined for the United
States, we will instruct CBP to liquidate unreviewed entries at the
all-others rate.\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ For a full discussion of this clarification, see
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Assessment of
Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
We intend to issue instructions to CBP 15 days after the date of
publication of the final results of this review.
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following deposit requirements will be effective upon
publication of the notice of final results of administrative review for
all shipments of the subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from
warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date, as
provided by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) The cash deposit rate
for Pidilite will be the rate established in the final results of this
review, except if the rate is de minimis within the meaning of 19 CFR
351.106(c)(1) (i.e., less than 0.50 percent), in which case the cash
deposit rate will be zero; (2) for merchandise exported by
manufacturers or exporters not covered in this review but covered in a
prior completed segment of the proceeding, the cash deposit rate will
continue to be the company-specific rate published for the most
recently-completed segment; (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered
in this review, a prior review, or the original investigation, but the
manufacturer is, the cash deposit rate will be the rate established for
the most recently-completed segment for the manufacturer of the
merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit rate for all other manufacturers
or exporters will continue to be 27.48 percent, the all-others rate
established in the less-than-fair-value investigation.\13\ These cash
deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until
further notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ See Order.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Notification to Importers
This notice also serves as a preliminary reminder to importers of
their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation
of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply
with this requirement could result in the Secretary's presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent
assessment of double antidumping duties.
We are issuing and publishing these results in accordance with
sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.221(b)(4).
Dated: December 11, 2018.
Christian Marsh,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
Appendix
List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Discussion of the Methodology
A. Comparisons to Normal Value
1. Determination of Comparison Method
2. Results of the Differential Pricing Analysis
B. Date of Sale
C. Product Comparisons
D. Constructed Export Price
E. Normal Value
1. Home Market Viability and Selection of Comparison Market
2. Level of Trade (LOT)
F. Cost of Production (COP) Analysis
1. Calculation of COP
2. Test of Comparison Market Sales Prices
3. Results of the COP Test
G. Calculation of NV Based on Comparison Market Prices
H. Currency Conversion
IV. Recommendation
[FR Doc. 2018-27243 Filed 12-14-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P