Certain Polyester Staple Fiber From the People's Republic of China: Notice of Court Decision Not in Harmony With Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Notice of Amended Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 64330-64331 [2018-27121]
Download as PDF
64330
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 240 / Friday, December 14, 2018 / Notices
751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19
CFR 351.221(b)(5).
Dated: December 7, 2018.
Gary Taverman,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping
and Countervailing Duty Operations,
performing the non-exclusive functions and
duties of the Assistant Secretary for
Enforcement and Compliance.
Appendix
List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and
Decision Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. List of Interested Party Comments
IV. Scope of the Order
V. Changes Since the Preliminary Results
VI. Subsidy Valuation Information
VII. Analysis of Programs
VIII. Discussion of the Issues
Comment 1: Commerce Should Not Make
Any Changes to the Results Other Than
Those Raised in Parties’ Briefs
Comment 2: Commerce Should Exclude
the Action 6.1.4. Program from the Final
Results
Commerce 3: Commerce Should
Recalculate the Benefit for the ERDF
Action 4.1 Program
IX. Conclusion
[FR Doc. 2018–27119 Filed 12–13–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–570–905]
Certain Polyester Staple Fiber From
the People’s Republic of China: Notice
of Court Decision Not in Harmony With
Final Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review and Notice of
Amended Final Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On November 30, 2018, the
United States Court of International
Trade (CIT or the Court) sustained the
final results of redetermination
pertaining to the antidumping duty (AD)
administrative review of certain
polyester staple fiber (PSF) from the
People’s Republic of China (China) for
the period of review (POR) June 1, 2010,
through May 31, 2011. The Department
of Commerce (Commerce) is notifying
the public that the final judgment in this
case is not in harmony with the final
results of the AD administrative review
of the antidumping duty order on PSF
from China and that Commerce is
amending the final results with respect
to the AD cash deposit rate assigned to
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with NOTICES1
AGENCY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:57 Dec 13, 2018
Jkt 247001
Zhaoqing Tifo New Fibre Co., Ltd
(Zhaoqing Tifo).
DATES: Applicable December 10, 2018.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jerry
Huang, AD/CVD Operations, Office V,
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401
Constitution Avenue NW, Washington,
DC 20230; telephone (202) 482–4047.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On January 11, 2013, Commerce
published its Final Results of the 2010–
2011 AD administrative review of PSF
from China.1 On April 7, 2015, the CIT
remanded the Final Results to
Commerce to reconsider the dumping
margin calculation for Zhaoqing Tifo
and to consider any potential for double
counting of energy inputs by the
inclusion of coal as a factor of
production (FOP), as alleged by
Zhaoqing Tifo.2 In its First Remand
Redetermination, Commerce relied
upon a different set of financial
statements that allowed Commerce to
more accurately calculate Zhaoqing
Tifo’s dumping margin while also
addressing any concerns of double
counting of energy inputs.3 On August
30, 2017, the Court remanded this issue
to Commerce a second time, finding that
Commerce’s selection of financial
statements was not timely challenged by
any party and was, thus, beyond the
scope of the remand in Zhaoqing Tifo I.4
Therefore, the Court instructed
Commerce to reconsider how the
surrogate financial ratios originally used
in Final Results account for energy
sources and whether the inclusion of
coal in the FOP database results in
double-counting.5 In its Second Remand
Redetermination, under respectful
protest,6 Commerce relied on the
financial statements used in the Final
Results,7 and removed coal as a factor of
1 See Certain Polyester Staple Fiber from the
People’s Republic of China: Final Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2010–
2011, 78 FR 2366 (January 11, 2013) (Final Results)
and accompanying Issues and Decision
Memorandum (IDM).
2 See Zhaoqing Tifo New Fibre Co., Ltd. v. United
States, 60 F. Supp. 3d 1328 (CIT 2015) (Zhaoqing
Tifo I).
3 See Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant
to Zhaoqing Tifo New Fibre Co., Ltd. v. United
States, Court No. 13–00044, Slip Op. 15–31 (April
9, 2015), dated July 9, 2015 (First Remand
Redetermination).
4 See Zhaoqing Tifo New Fibre Co., Ltd. v. United
States, 256 F. Supp. 3d 1314, 1334 (CIT 2017)
(Zhaoqing II).
5 Id., 256 F. Supp. 3d at 1337.
6 See Viraj Grp, Ltd. v. United States, 343 F.3d
1371, 1376 (Fed. Cir. 2003).
7 Final Results, 78 FR at 2368, and accompanying
IDM at Comment 2.
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
production from the dumping margin
calculation to address the Court’s
concern over potential double counting
of energy inputs.8 On November 30,
2018, the CIT sustained Commerce’s
Second Remand Redetermination.9
Timken Notice
In its decision in Timken,10 as
clarified by Diamond Sawblades,11 the
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
(CAFC) held that, pursuant to section
516A of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (the Act), Commerce must
publish a notice of a court decision that
is not ‘‘in harmony’’ with a Commerce
determination and must suspend
liquidation of entries pending a
‘‘conclusive’’ court decision.12 The
CIT’s November 30, 2018, final
judgment affirming the Second Remand
Redetermination constitutes a final
decision of the Court that is not in
harmony with Commerce’s Final
Results. This notice is published in
fulfillment of the publication
requirements of Timken and section
516A of the Act.
Amended Final Results
Because there is now a final court
decision, Commerce is amending its
Final Results. Commerce finds that the
revised AD dumping margin for
Zhaoqing Tifo is as follows:
Producer/exporter
Zhaoqing Tifo New Fiber
Co., Ltd .............................
Weightedaverage
dumping
margin
(percent)
0.00
Accordingly, Commerce will continue
the suspension of liquidation of the
subject merchandise pending the
expiration of the period of appeal or, if
appealed, pending a final and
conclusive court decision. In the event
the Court’s ruling is not appealed or, if
appealed, upheld by the CAFC,
Commerce will instruct U.S. Customs
and Border Protection to assess
antidumping duties on unliquidated
entries of subject merchandise exported
8 See Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant
to Court Remand Zhaoqing Tifo New Fibre Co., Ltd.
v. United States, Court No. 13–00044, Slip Op. 17–
118 (CIT August 30, 2017), dated November 6, 2017
(Second Remand Redetermination).
9 See Zhaoqing Tifo New Fibre Co., Ltd. v. United
States, Court No. 13–00044, Slip Op. 18–168 (CIT
November 30, 2018).
10 See Timken Co., v United States, 893 F.2d 337
(Fed. Cir. 1990) (Timken).
11 See Diamond Sawblades Mfrs. Coalition v.
United States, 626 F.3d 1374 (Fed. Cir. 2010)
(Diamond Sawblades).
12 See Sections 516A(c) and (e) of the Act.
E:\FR\FM\14DEN1.SGM
14DEN1
64331
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 240 / Friday, December 14, 2018 / Notices
by Zhaoqing Tifo using the assessment
rate calculated by Commerce listed
above.
Cash Deposit Requirements
Because cash deposit rate for
Zhaoqing Tifo has been superseded by
cash deposit rates calculated in
intervening administrative reviews of
the AD order on PSF from China, we
will not alter the cash deposit rate for
Zhaoqing Tifo.
Notification to Interested Parties
This notice is issued and published in
accordance with sections 516A(e),
751(a)(1), and 777(i)(1) of the Act.
Dated: December 10, 2018.
Gary Taverman,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping
and Countervailing Duty Operations,
performing the non-exclusive functions and
duties of the Assistant Secretary for
Enforcement and Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2018–27121 Filed 12–13–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–570–900]
Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof
From the People’s Republic of China:
Final Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review; 2016–2017
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
(Commerce) finds that certain
companies covered by this
administrative review made sales of
diamond sawblades and parts thereof
(diamond sawblades) from the People’s
Republic of China (China) at less than
normal value during the period of
review (POR) November 1, 2016,
through October 31, 2017.
DATES: Applicable December 14, 2018.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Yang Jin Chun or Joshua Poole, AD/CVD
AGENCY:
Operations, Office I, Enforcement and
Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone:
(202) 482–5760 and (202) 482–1293,
respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Central Records Unit, room B8024 of the
main Department of Commerce
building. In addition, a complete
version of the Issues and Decision
Memorandum can be accessed directly
on the Enforcement and Compliance
website at https://enforcement.trade.gov/
frn/.
Background
On August 10, 2018, Commerce
published the preliminary results of the
administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on diamond
sawblades from China covering the
period of review (POR) November 1,
2016, through October 31, 2017.1 We
received case and rebuttal briefs with
respect to the Preliminary Results. The
deadline for the final results of this
review is December 10, 2018.2 We
conducted this administrative review in
accordance with section 751 of the
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act).
Final Determination of No Shipments
Scope of the Order
The merchandise subject to the order
is diamond sawblades. The diamond
sawblades subject to the order are
currently classifiable under subheadings
8202 to 8206 of the Harmonized Tariff
Schedule of the United States (HTSUS)
and may also enter under subheading
6804.21.00. The HTSUS subheadings
are provided for convenience and
customs purposes. A full description of
the scope of the order is contained in
the Issues and Decision Memorandum.3
The written description is dispositive.
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised in the case and
rebuttal briefs by parties to this
administrative review are addressed in
the Issues and Decision Memorandum.
A list of the issues raised is attached to
this notice as an appendix. The Issues
and Decision Memorandum is a public
document and is on file electronically
via Enforcement and Compliance’s
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Centralized Electronic Service System
(ACCESS). ACCESS is available to
registered users at https://
access.trade.gov and to all parties in the
We preliminarily found that Danyang
Hantronic Import & Export Co., Ltd.,
Danyang Tsunda Diamond Tools Co.,
Ltd., Jiangsu Huachang Tools
Manufacturing Co., Ltd., Shanghai
Starcraft Tools Company Limited,
Weihai Xiangguang Mechanical
Industrial Co., Ltd., and Wuhan
Wanbang Laser Diamond Tools Co.,
Ltd., which have been eligible for
separate rates in previous segments of
the proceeding and are subject to this
review, did not have any reviewable
entries of subject merchandise during
the POR.4 After the Preliminary Results,
we received no comments or additional
information with respect to these six
companies. Therefore, for the final
results, we continue to find that these
six companies did not have any
reviewable entries of subject
merchandise during the POR. Consistent
with our practice, we will issue
appropriate instructions to U.S.
Customs and Border Protection (CBP)
based on our final results.
Separate Rates
Commerce preliminarily determined
that 14 respondents are eligible to
receive separate rates in this review.5
We made no changes to these
determinations for the final results.
Changes Since the Preliminary Results
We made no revisions to the
Preliminary Results.
Final Results of the Review
As a result of this administrative
review, we determine that the following
weighted-average dumping margins
exist for the period November 1, 2016,
through October 31, 2017:
Margin
(percent)
Company
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with NOTICES1
Chengdu Huifeng New Material Technology Co., Ltd 6 ......................................................................................................................
Danyang Weiwang Tools Manufacturing Co., Ltd ...............................................................................................................................
1 See Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof from
the People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Results
of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2016–
2017, 83 FR 39673 (August 10, 2018) (Preliminary
Results), and accompanying Preliminary Decision
Memorandum.
2 See Notice of Clarification: Application of ‘‘Next
Business Day’’ Rule for Administrative
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:57 Dec 13, 2018
Jkt 247001
Determination Deadlines Pursuant to the Tariff Act
of 1930, as Amended, 70 FR 24533 (May 10, 2005).
The statutory deadline for the final results of this
review is Saturday, December 8, 2018.
3 See the Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision
Memorandum for the Administrative Review of the
Antidumping Duty Order on Diamond Sawblades
and Parts Thereof from the People’s Republic of
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
82.05
82.05
China,’’ (Issues and Decision Memorandum) dated
concurrently with and hereby adopted by this
notice at 2–3.
4 See Preliminary Results, 83 FR at 39673, n.2,
and accompanying Preliminary Decision
Memorandum at 3.
5 Id. at 39673, n.6, and accompanying Preliminary
Decision Memorandum at 4–8.
E:\FR\FM\14DEN1.SGM
14DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 240 (Friday, December 14, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 64330-64331]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-27121]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-570-905]
Certain Polyester Staple Fiber From the People's Republic of
China: Notice of Court Decision Not in Harmony With Final Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Notice of Amended Final
Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On November 30, 2018, the United States Court of International
Trade (CIT or the Court) sustained the final results of redetermination
pertaining to the antidumping duty (AD) administrative review of
certain polyester staple fiber (PSF) from the People's Republic of
China (China) for the period of review (POR) June 1, 2010, through May
31, 2011. The Department of Commerce (Commerce) is notifying the public
that the final judgment in this case is not in harmony with the final
results of the AD administrative review of the antidumping duty order
on PSF from China and that Commerce is amending the final results with
respect to the AD cash deposit rate assigned to Zhaoqing Tifo New Fibre
Co., Ltd (Zhaoqing Tifo).
DATES: Applicable December 10, 2018.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jerry Huang, AD/CVD Operations, Office
V, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S.
Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC
20230; telephone (202) 482-4047.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On January 11, 2013, Commerce published its Final Results of the
2010-2011 AD administrative review of PSF from China.\1\ On April 7,
2015, the CIT remanded the Final Results to Commerce to reconsider the
dumping margin calculation for Zhaoqing Tifo and to consider any
potential for double counting of energy inputs by the inclusion of coal
as a factor of production (FOP), as alleged by Zhaoqing Tifo.\2\ In its
First Remand Redetermination, Commerce relied upon a different set of
financial statements that allowed Commerce to more accurately calculate
Zhaoqing Tifo's dumping margin while also addressing any concerns of
double counting of energy inputs.\3\ On August 30, 2017, the Court
remanded this issue to Commerce a second time, finding that Commerce's
selection of financial statements was not timely challenged by any
party and was, thus, beyond the scope of the remand in Zhaoqing Tifo
I.\4\ Therefore, the Court instructed Commerce to reconsider how the
surrogate financial ratios originally used in Final Results account for
energy sources and whether the inclusion of coal in the FOP database
results in double-counting.\5\ In its Second Remand Redetermination,
under respectful protest,\6\ Commerce relied on the financial
statements used in the Final Results,\7\ and removed coal as a factor
of production from the dumping margin calculation to address the
Court's concern over potential double counting of energy inputs.\8\ On
November 30, 2018, the CIT sustained Commerce's Second Remand
Redetermination.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Certain Polyester Staple Fiber from the People's
Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review; 2010-2011, 78 FR 2366 (January 11, 2013) (Final Results) and
accompanying Issues and Decision Memorandum (IDM).
\2\ See Zhaoqing Tifo New Fibre Co., Ltd. v. United States, 60
F. Supp. 3d 1328 (CIT 2015) (Zhaoqing Tifo I).
\3\ See Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant to Zhaoqing
Tifo New Fibre Co., Ltd. v. United States, Court No. 13-00044, Slip
Op. 15-31 (April 9, 2015), dated July 9, 2015 (First Remand
Redetermination).
\4\ See Zhaoqing Tifo New Fibre Co., Ltd. v. United States, 256
F. Supp. 3d 1314, 1334 (CIT 2017) (Zhaoqing II).
\5\ Id., 256 F. Supp. 3d at 1337.
\6\ See Viraj Grp, Ltd. v. United States, 343 F.3d 1371, 1376
(Fed. Cir. 2003).
\7\ Final Results, 78 FR at 2368, and accompanying IDM at
Comment 2.
\8\ See Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant to Court
Remand Zhaoqing Tifo New Fibre Co., Ltd. v. United States, Court No.
13-00044, Slip Op. 17-118 (CIT August 30, 2017), dated November 6,
2017 (Second Remand Redetermination).
\9\ See Zhaoqing Tifo New Fibre Co., Ltd. v. United States,
Court No. 13-00044, Slip Op. 18-168 (CIT November 30, 2018).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Timken Notice
In its decision in Timken,\10\ as clarified by Diamond
Sawblades,\11\ the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) held
that, pursuant to section 516A of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended
(the Act), Commerce must publish a notice of a court decision that is
not ``in harmony'' with a Commerce determination and must suspend
liquidation of entries pending a ``conclusive'' court decision.\12\ The
CIT's November 30, 2018, final judgment affirming the Second Remand
Redetermination constitutes a final decision of the Court that is not
in harmony with Commerce's Final Results. This notice is published in
fulfillment of the publication requirements of Timken and section 516A
of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ See Timken Co., v United States, 893 F.2d 337 (Fed. Cir.
1990) (Timken).
\11\ See Diamond Sawblades Mfrs. Coalition v. United States, 626
F.3d 1374 (Fed. Cir. 2010) (Diamond Sawblades).
\12\ See Sections 516A(c) and (e) of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Amended Final Results
Because there is now a final court decision, Commerce is amending
its Final Results. Commerce finds that the revised AD dumping margin
for Zhaoqing Tifo is as follows:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Weighted-
average dumping
Producer/exporter margin
(percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Zhaoqing Tifo New Fiber Co., Ltd....................... 0.00
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Accordingly, Commerce will continue the suspension of liquidation
of the subject merchandise pending the expiration of the period of
appeal or, if appealed, pending a final and conclusive court decision.
In the event the Court's ruling is not appealed or, if appealed, upheld
by the CAFC, Commerce will instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection
to assess antidumping duties on unliquidated entries of subject
merchandise exported
[[Page 64331]]
by Zhaoqing Tifo using the assessment rate calculated by Commerce
listed above.
Cash Deposit Requirements
Because cash deposit rate for Zhaoqing Tifo has been superseded by
cash deposit rates calculated in intervening administrative reviews of
the AD order on PSF from China, we will not alter the cash deposit rate
for Zhaoqing Tifo.
Notification to Interested Parties
This notice is issued and published in accordance with sections
516A(e), 751(a)(1), and 777(i)(1) of the Act.
Dated: December 10, 2018.
Gary Taverman,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Operations, performing the non-exclusive functions and duties of the
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2018-27121 Filed 12-13-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P