Self-Regulatory Organizations; New York Stock Exchange LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Amend Rule 15 Relating to the Reference Price for Exchange-Listed Securities, 64168-64170 [2018-26944]
Download as PDF
64168
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 239 / Thursday, December 13, 2018 / Notices
modification or revocation if at any time
the Commission determines that such
action is necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
Responsibility for compliance with any
applicable provisions of the Federal
securities laws must rest with the
persons relying on the exemptions that
are the subject of this Order.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.7
Eduardo A. Aleman,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018–27004 Filed 12–12–18; 8:45 am]
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and the
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–84755; File No. SR–NYSE–
2018–60]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; New
York Stock Exchange LLC; Notice of
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of
Proposed Rule Change To Amend Rule
15 Relating to the Reference Price for
Exchange-Listed Securities
December 7, 2018.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) 1 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’) 2 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,3
notice is hereby given that on December
4, 2018, New York Stock Exchange LLC
(‘‘NYSE’’ or the ‘‘Exchange’’) filed with
the Securities and Exchange
Commission (‘‘Commission’’) the
proposed rule change as described in
Items I and II below, which Items have
been prepared by the Exchange. The
Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule
change from interested persons.
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with NOTICES1
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend
Rule 15 relating to the Reference Price
for Exchange-listed securities. The
proposed rule change is available on the
Exchange’s website at www.nyse.com, at
the principal office of the Exchange, and
at the Commission’s Public Reference
Room.
7 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(83).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 15 U.S.C. 78a.
3 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
1 15
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:12 Dec 12, 2018
Jkt 247001
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
self-regulatory organization included
statements concerning the purpose of,
and basis for, the proposed rule change
and discussed any comments it received
on the proposed rule change. The text
of those statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below.
The Exchange has prepared summaries,
set forth in sections A, B, and C below,
of the most significant parts of such
statements.
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes to amend
Rule 15 relating to a security’s Reference
Price that is used in determining
whether to publish a pre-opening
indication prior to an opening auction
in a security that is already listed on the
Exchange. The Exchange proposes to
use the ‘‘Official Closing Price’’ (‘‘OCP’’)
rather than the last reported sale price 4
as an Exchange-listed security’s
Reference Price and to clarify that such
Reference Price would be adjusted as
applicable based on the publicly
disclosed terms of a corporate action.
Rule 15(a) states that a pre-opening
indication will include the security and
the price range within which the
opening price is anticipated to occur
and that a pre-opening indication is
published via the securities information
processor and the Exchange’s
proprietary data feeds. Rule 15(b)
provides that a designated market maker
(‘‘DMM’’) will publish a pre-opening
indication either: (i) Before a security
opens if the opening transaction on the
Exchange is anticipated to be at a price
that represents a change of more than
the ‘‘Applicable Price Range,’’ as
specified in Rule 15(d),5 from a
specified ‘‘Reference Price,’’ as specified
in Rule 15(c); or (ii) if a security has not
opened by 10:00 a.m. Eastern Time.
Accordingly, the Reference Price
operates as a trigger for whether to
publish a pre-opening indication. The
pre-opening indication price range that
is published is based on where the
4 All references to ‘‘last reported sale price’’ or
‘‘last-sale eligible trade’’ are to a trade that is of at
least one round lot.
5 Under Rule 15(d)(1), the Applicable Price Range
for determining whether to publish a pre-opening
indication is 5% for securities with a Reference
Price over $3.00 and $0.15 for securities with a
Reference Price equal to or lower than $3.00.
PO 00000
Frm 00072
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
opening price is anticipated to occur;
the Reference Price is not published as
part of the pre-opening indication.
Rule 15(c)(1)(A) specifies that the
Reference Price for a security (other
than an American Depository Receipt)
that is already listed on the Exchange
will be the security’s last reported sale
price on the Exchange.6 The Exchange
proposes to amend Rule 15(c)(1)(A) to:
(i) Use the Official Closing Price rather
than the last reported sale price as an
Exchange-listed security’s Reference
Price; and (ii) specify that the Official
Closing Price would be adjusted as
applicable based on the publicly
disclosed terms of a corporate action.
Official Closing Price. Currently, the
reference in Rule 15(c)(1)(A) to a
security’s ‘‘last reported sale price’’
means the last round-lot sale price on
the Exchange that is reported to the
Consolidated Tape, which includes the
closing transaction price of a round lot
or more in a security, and if there was
no closing transaction, the last round-lot
sale price on the Exchange in that
security. For example, if there was no
closing transaction, and the last
reported sale price of a round lot or
more on the Exchange was from 3:30
p.m., the Exchange would use that 3:30
p.m. last reported sale price as the
Reference Price for Rule 15(c)(1)(A). If
there was no reported sale price the
prior day, the Exchange will use the last
reported sale price, regardless of how
long ago it was published.
The Exchange proposes to update the
terminology used in Rule 15(c)(1)(A) to
reference the term OCP rather than
reference a security’s ‘‘last reported sale
price.’’ When the OCP is determined
under Rule 123C(1)(e)(i),7 use of such
OCP for purposes of Rule 15(c)(1)(A)
would result in the same Reference
Price as under the current rule using the
last reported sale price.8 In addition, by
6 See Rule 15(c)(1). Rule 15(c)(1)(B)–(D) also
specifies what the Reference Price will be for a
security that is the subject of an initial public
offering, that is transferred from another securities
market, or that is listed under Footnote (E) to
Section 102.01B of the Listed Company Manual.
7 In 2015, the Exchange amended Rule 123C to
define the term OCP and specified how the
Exchange would determine the OCP for a security.
See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 76598
(December 9, 2015), 80 FR 77688 (December 15,
2015) (SR–NYSE–2015–62) (Notice of filing and
immediate effectiveness of proposed rule change).
8 Rule 123C(1)(e)(i) provides that ‘‘[t]he Official
Closing Price is the price established in a closing
transaction under paragraphs (7) and (8) of [Rule
123C] of one round lot or more. If there is no closing
transaction in a security or if a closing transaction
is less than a round lot, the Official Closing Price
will be the most recent last-sale eligible trade in
such security on the Exchange on that trading day.’’
Rule 123C(7) and (8) specify the allocation process
for the closing transaction. Rule 123C(1)(e)(i)(A)
provides that ‘‘[i]f there were no last-sale eligible
E:\FR\FM\13DEN1.SGM
13DEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 239 / Thursday, December 13, 2018 / Notices
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with NOTICES1
referencing the OCP, the proposed
amendment to Rule 15(c)(1)(A) would
provide for a new method for
determining the Reference Price if the
Exchange is unable to conduct a closing
transaction due to a systems or technical
issue. In such case, Rules 123C(1)(e)(ii)
and (iii) specify that the OCP would be
determined via one of the contingency
procedures specified in that rule, the
selection of which depends on whether
the Exchange determines that it cannot
conduct a closing auction before or after
3:00 p.m. Eastern Time.9
The Exchange believes that it is
appropriate to amend Rule 15(c)(1)(A) to
reference the OCP instead of the last
reported sale price because using the
OCP as determined under Rules
123C(1)(e)(i), (ii), or (iii) as the
Reference Price would cover all
potential contingencies and reflect the
most recent valuation in a security,
including situations where the
Exchange is unable to conduct a closing
auction due to a systems or technical
issue. For example, if for a security the
last reported sale price on the Exchange
was at 2:00 p.m., and then the Exchange
uses either Rule 123C(1)(e)(ii) or (iii) to
determine an OCP, the Exchange
believes that the OCP that is determined
as of the close of trading is more
reflective of the value of such security
as compared to the Exchange’s last
reported sale price at 2:00 p.m.
Corporate Actions. The Exchange also
proposes to amend Rule 15(c)(1)(A) to
specify that the OCP used as the
Reference Price would be adjusted as
applicable based on the publicly
disclosed terms of a corporate action.
The Exchange notes that currently, the
Reference Price under Rule 15(c)(1)(A)
for a security that is the subject of a
corporate action would be adjusted
based on the publicly disclosed terms of
the corporate action before it is used to
determine whether to publish a preopening indication. For example, if an
Exchange-listed security that closed the
previous day with an Official Closing
Price of $50 per share is subject to a 2trades in a security on the Exchange on a trading
day, the Official Closing Price of such security will
be the prior day’s Official Closing Price.’’ Taken
together, these provisions would result in the same
Reference Price as under the current rule using the
last reported sale price.
9 In 2016, the Exchange further amended Rule
123C to modify how the Exchange would determine
an OCP if the Exchange is unable to conduct a
closing transaction due to a systems or technical
issue. In general, Rules 123C(1)(e)(ii) or (iii) provide
that the OCP would be either an official closing
price from a designated alternate exchange or a
volume weighted average price of the consolidated
last-sale eligible trades of the last five minutes of
trading during regular trading hours. See Securities
Exchange Act Release No. 78015 (June 8, 2016), 81
FR 38747 (June 14, 2016) (SR–NYSE–2016–18).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:12 Dec 12, 2018
Jkt 247001
for-1 stock split, the Reference Price
used for Rule 15(c)(1)(A) would be $25
per share, consistent with current
practice.10
Similarly, if a security is the subject
of a non-standard corporate action, such
as a merger or recapitalization,
currently, the last reported sale price
would be adjusted based on the publicly
disclosed terms of the corporate action.
For example, assume a listed company
is being recapitalized in a merger
transaction in which the Exchangelisted security (Class A) is exchanged for
a cash dividend of $10 per share of
Class A stock plus two shares of the
common stock of a new holding
company (New Holdco Common). If the
Class A stock is trading at a price of $90
prior to the corporate action, the
Reference Price under Rule 15(c)(1)(A)
for each share of New Holdco Common
Stock would be $40 per share (i.e.,
($90¥$10) ÷ 2). The Exchange believes
that this process ensures that a
Reference Price accurately reflects the
value of the security after a corporate
action. To promote transparency in its
rules, the Exchange proposes to codify
this practice in Rule 15(c)(1)(A) so that
member organizations and market
participants are appropriately advised of
how the Reference Price is determined
for securities that are subject to a
corporate action.
2. Statutory Basis
The proposed rule change is
consistent with Section 6(b) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
‘‘Act’’),11 in general, and furthers the
objectives of Section 6(b)(5),12 in
particular, because it is designed to
prevent fraudulent and manipulative
acts and practices, to promote just and
equitable principles of trade, to foster
cooperation and coordination with
persons engaged in facilitating
transactions in securities, to remove
impediments to, and perfect the
mechanism of, a free and open market
and a national market system and, in
general, to protect investors and the
public interest.
The Exchange believes that using the
OCP instead of the last reported sale
price on the Exchange would remove
impediments to and perfect the
mechanism of a free and open market
and a national market system because it
would align Rule 15(c)(1)(A) with how
the Exchange determines the OCP for a
security and would cover all potential
10 This represents an example of a ‘‘standard’’
corporate action, such as a stock split, reverse stock
split, or dividend payment.
11 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
12 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
PO 00000
Frm 00073
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
64169
contingencies if there is no closing
transaction on the Exchange, including
if the Exchange is unable to conduct a
closing transaction due to a systems or
technical issue. The proposed
amendment would maintain that the
Reference Price is the price of a last sale
of at least one round lot, and therefore
promotes just and equitable principles
of trade because it is consistent with
Rule 123C(1)(e)(i) which requires that
the OCP be either the price of the
closing transaction, or the last-sale
eligible trade on the Exchange when
there is no closing transaction or the
closing transaction is less than one
round lot. The proposal would,
therefore, continue to ensure that the
Reference Price is an accurate indicator
for determining whether a pre-opening
indication of interest should be
published. The proposed amendment
would also enable the determination of
a Reference Price under Rule 15(c)(1)(A)
to account for when the OCP is
determined via one of the contingency
procedures set forth in Rules
123C(1)(e)(ii) and (iii). The Exchange
believes that referencing the OCP rather
than the last reported sale price would
remove impediments to and perfect the
mechanism of a free and open market
and a national market system because it
would result in a Reference Price that is
more reflective of the most recent value
of the security value because the OCP as
determined under Rules 123C(1)(e)(ii) or
(iii) would be a price determined as of
the close of trading, rather than the
Exchange’s last reported sale price,
which may occur earlier in the trading
day.
The Exchange believes that amending
Rule 15(c)(1)(A) to specify that the OCP
would be adjusted as applicable based
on the publicly disclosed terms of a
corporate action would remove
impediments to and perfect the
mechanism of a free and open market
and a national market system by
promoting transparency in Exchange
rules of how the Reference Price is
determined if a security listed on the
Exchange is subject to a corporate
action. The Exchange believes it is
consistent with the protection of
investors and the public interest to
adjust the OCP that would be used as a
Reference Price under Rule 15(c)(1)(A)
based on the publicly disclosed terms of
a corporate action as such adjusted price
would better reflect the price of the
security for purposes of the opening
auction on the first day that a corporate
action is in effect. The Exchange notes
that the Reference Price is used as a
trigger for determining whether to
publish a pre-opening indication, and
E:\FR\FM\13DEN1.SGM
13DEN1
64170
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 239 / Thursday, December 13, 2018 / Notices
having a Reference Price more closely
aligned to the updated value of the
security, based on the terms of the
corporate action, would promote a more
efficient opening process.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that
the proposed rule change will impose
any burden on competition that is not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act. The
proposed rule change is designed to
promote clarity and transparency in
Exchange rules regarding how a
Reference Price under Rule 15 is
determined for an Exchange-listed
security. The proposed rule change is
therefore not designed to address any
competitive concerns but rather inform
member organizations that the OCP
would be used as the Reference Price for
listed securities, adjusted as applicable
based on the publicly disclosed terms of
a corporate action.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were solicited
or received with respect to the proposed
rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The Exchange has filed the proposed
rule change pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A) of the Act 13 and Rule 19b–
4(f)(6) thereunder.14 Because the
proposed rule change does not: (i)
Significantly affect the protection of
investors or the public interest; (ii)
impose any significant burden on
competition; and (iii) become operative
for 30 days from the date on which it
was filed, or such shorter time as the
Commission may designate, it has
become effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A) of the Act and Rule 19b–
4(f)(6) thereunder.15
A proposed rule change filed under
Rule 19b–4(f)(6) 16 normally does not
become operative for 30 days after the
date of the filing. However, pursuant to
Rule 19b–4(f)(6)(iii),17 the Commission
may designate a shorter time if such
13 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6).
15 In addition, Rule 19b–4(f)(6)(iii) requires a selfregulatory organization to give the Commission
written notice of its intent to file the proposed rule
change at least five business days prior to the date
of filing of the proposed rule change, or such
shorter time as designated by the Commission. The
Exchange has satisfied this requirement.
16 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6).
17 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6)(iii).
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with NOTICES1
14 17
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:12 Dec 12, 2018
Jkt 247001
action is consistent with the protection
of investors and the public interest. In
its filing with the Commission, the
Exchange has asked the Commission to
waive the 30-day operative delay so that
the proposal may become operative
immediately upon filing to provide
greater transparency to investors
regarding how a security’s Reference
Price would be adjusted if that security
is subject to a publicly disclosed
corporate action and avoid potential
investor confusion that could arise
during the operative delay period.
According to the Exchange, waiver of
the operative delay period would also
avoid potential investor confusion
because the proposal will clarify when
a pre-opening indication would be
published based on the security’s
Reference Price.
The Commission believes that waiver
of the 30-day operative delay is
consistent with the protection of
investors and the public interest
because it will provide transparency to
investors on the determination of the
Reference Price for Exchange listed
securities, which is used as the basis for
determining when pre-opening
indications will be published, as well as
provide transparency on the
adjustments that will be made to the
Reference Price as a result of corporate
actions. For these reasons, the
Commission hereby waives the
operative delay and designates the
proposed rule change operative upon
filing.18
At any time within 60 days of the
filing of such proposed rule change, the
Commission summarily may
temporarily suspend such rule change if
it appears to the Commission that such
action is necessary or appropriate in the
public interest, for the protection of
investors, or otherwise in furtherance of
the purposes of the Act. If the
Commission takes such action, the
Commission shall institute proceedings
under Section 19(b)(2)(B) 19 of the Act to
determine whether the proposed rule
change should be approved or
disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
18 For purposes only of waiving the operative
delay, the Commission has considered the proposed
rule’s impact on efficiency, competition, and capital
formation. See 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
19 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B).
PO 00000
Frm 00074
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 9990
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include File Number SR–
NYSE–2018–60 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Secretary, Securities and Exchange
Commission, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–NYSE–2018–60. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
internet website (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for website viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549 on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such
filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change.
Persons submitting comments are
cautioned that we do not redact or edit
personal identifying information from
comment submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish
to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File
Number SR–NYSE–2018–60, and
should be submitted on or before
January 3, 2019.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.20
Brent J. Fields,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018–26944 Filed 12–12–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
20 17
E:\FR\FM\13DEN1.SGM
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
13DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 239 (Thursday, December 13, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 64168-64170]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-26944]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-84755; File No. SR-NYSE-2018-60]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; New York Stock Exchange LLC;
Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To
Amend Rule 15 Relating to the Reference Price for Exchange-Listed
Securities
December 7, 2018.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) \1\ of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (``Act'') \2\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\3\ notice is hereby given
that on December 4, 2018, New York Stock Exchange LLC (``NYSE'' or the
``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I and
II below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The
Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the
proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 15 U.S.C. 78a.
\3\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend Rule 15 relating to the Reference
Price for Exchange-listed securities. The proposed rule change is
available on the Exchange's website at www.nyse.com, at the principal
office of the Exchange, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization
included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the
proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of those statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared
summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most
significant parts of such statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and the
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes to amend Rule 15 relating to a security's
Reference Price that is used in determining whether to publish a pre-
opening indication prior to an opening auction in a security that is
already listed on the Exchange. The Exchange proposes to use the
``Official Closing Price'' (``OCP'') rather than the last reported sale
price \4\ as an Exchange-listed security's Reference Price and to
clarify that such Reference Price would be adjusted as applicable based
on the publicly disclosed terms of a corporate action.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ All references to ``last reported sale price'' or ``last-
sale eligible trade'' are to a trade that is of at least one round
lot.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rule 15(a) states that a pre-opening indication will include the
security and the price range within which the opening price is
anticipated to occur and that a pre-opening indication is published via
the securities information processor and the Exchange's proprietary
data feeds. Rule 15(b) provides that a designated market maker
(``DMM'') will publish a pre-opening indication either: (i) Before a
security opens if the opening transaction on the Exchange is
anticipated to be at a price that represents a change of more than the
``Applicable Price Range,'' as specified in Rule 15(d),\5\ from a
specified ``Reference Price,'' as specified in Rule 15(c); or (ii) if a
security has not opened by 10:00 a.m. Eastern Time. Accordingly, the
Reference Price operates as a trigger for whether to publish a pre-
opening indication. The pre-opening indication price range that is
published is based on where the opening price is anticipated to occur;
the Reference Price is not published as part of the pre-opening
indication.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ Under Rule 15(d)(1), the Applicable Price Range for
determining whether to publish a pre-opening indication is 5% for
securities with a Reference Price over $3.00 and $0.15 for
securities with a Reference Price equal to or lower than $3.00.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rule 15(c)(1)(A) specifies that the Reference Price for a security
(other than an American Depository Receipt) that is already listed on
the Exchange will be the security's last reported sale price on the
Exchange.\6\ The Exchange proposes to amend Rule 15(c)(1)(A) to: (i)
Use the Official Closing Price rather than the last reported sale price
as an Exchange-listed security's Reference Price; and (ii) specify that
the Official Closing Price would be adjusted as applicable based on the
publicly disclosed terms of a corporate action.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ See Rule 15(c)(1). Rule 15(c)(1)(B)-(D) also specifies what
the Reference Price will be for a security that is the subject of an
initial public offering, that is transferred from another securities
market, or that is listed under Footnote (E) to Section 102.01B of
the Listed Company Manual.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Official Closing Price. Currently, the reference in Rule
15(c)(1)(A) to a security's ``last reported sale price'' means the last
round-lot sale price on the Exchange that is reported to the
Consolidated Tape, which includes the closing transaction price of a
round lot or more in a security, and if there was no closing
transaction, the last round-lot sale price on the Exchange in that
security. For example, if there was no closing transaction, and the
last reported sale price of a round lot or more on the Exchange was
from 3:30 p.m., the Exchange would use that 3:30 p.m. last reported
sale price as the Reference Price for Rule 15(c)(1)(A). If there was no
reported sale price the prior day, the Exchange will use the last
reported sale price, regardless of how long ago it was published.
The Exchange proposes to update the terminology used in Rule
15(c)(1)(A) to reference the term OCP rather than reference a
security's ``last reported sale price.'' When the OCP is determined
under Rule 123C(1)(e)(i),\7\ use of such OCP for purposes of Rule
15(c)(1)(A) would result in the same Reference Price as under the
current rule using the last reported sale price.\8\ In addition, by
[[Page 64169]]
referencing the OCP, the proposed amendment to Rule 15(c)(1)(A) would
provide for a new method for determining the Reference Price if the
Exchange is unable to conduct a closing transaction due to a systems or
technical issue. In such case, Rules 123C(1)(e)(ii) and (iii) specify
that the OCP would be determined via one of the contingency procedures
specified in that rule, the selection of which depends on whether the
Exchange determines that it cannot conduct a closing auction before or
after 3:00 p.m. Eastern Time.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ In 2015, the Exchange amended Rule 123C to define the term
OCP and specified how the Exchange would determine the OCP for a
security. See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 76598 (December 9,
2015), 80 FR 77688 (December 15, 2015) (SR-NYSE-2015-62) (Notice of
filing and immediate effectiveness of proposed rule change).
\8\ Rule 123C(1)(e)(i) provides that ``[t]he Official Closing
Price is the price established in a closing transaction under
paragraphs (7) and (8) of [Rule 123C] of one round lot or more. If
there is no closing transaction in a security or if a closing
transaction is less than a round lot, the Official Closing Price
will be the most recent last-sale eligible trade in such security on
the Exchange on that trading day.'' Rule 123C(7) and (8) specify the
allocation process for the closing transaction. Rule
123C(1)(e)(i)(A) provides that ``[i]f there were no last-sale
eligible trades in a security on the Exchange on a trading day, the
Official Closing Price of such security will be the prior day's
Official Closing Price.'' Taken together, these provisions would
result in the same Reference Price as under the current rule using
the last reported sale price.
\9\ In 2016, the Exchange further amended Rule 123C to modify
how the Exchange would determine an OCP if the Exchange is unable to
conduct a closing transaction due to a systems or technical issue.
In general, Rules 123C(1)(e)(ii) or (iii) provide that the OCP would
be either an official closing price from a designated alternate
exchange or a volume weighted average price of the consolidated
last-sale eligible trades of the last five minutes of trading during
regular trading hours. See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 78015
(June 8, 2016), 81 FR 38747 (June 14, 2016) (SR-NYSE-2016-18).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange believes that it is appropriate to amend Rule
15(c)(1)(A) to reference the OCP instead of the last reported sale
price because using the OCP as determined under Rules 123C(1)(e)(i),
(ii), or (iii) as the Reference Price would cover all potential
contingencies and reflect the most recent valuation in a security,
including situations where the Exchange is unable to conduct a closing
auction due to a systems or technical issue. For example, if for a
security the last reported sale price on the Exchange was at 2:00 p.m.,
and then the Exchange uses either Rule 123C(1)(e)(ii) or (iii) to
determine an OCP, the Exchange believes that the OCP that is determined
as of the close of trading is more reflective of the value of such
security as compared to the Exchange's last reported sale price at 2:00
p.m.
Corporate Actions. The Exchange also proposes to amend Rule
15(c)(1)(A) to specify that the OCP used as the Reference Price would
be adjusted as applicable based on the publicly disclosed terms of a
corporate action. The Exchange notes that currently, the Reference
Price under Rule 15(c)(1)(A) for a security that is the subject of a
corporate action would be adjusted based on the publicly disclosed
terms of the corporate action before it is used to determine whether to
publish a pre-opening indication. For example, if an Exchange-listed
security that closed the previous day with an Official Closing Price of
$50 per share is subject to a 2-for-1 stock split, the Reference Price
used for Rule 15(c)(1)(A) would be $25 per share, consistent with
current practice.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ This represents an example of a ``standard'' corporate
action, such as a stock split, reverse stock split, or dividend
payment.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Similarly, if a security is the subject of a non-standard corporate
action, such as a merger or recapitalization, currently, the last
reported sale price would be adjusted based on the publicly disclosed
terms of the corporate action. For example, assume a listed company is
being recapitalized in a merger transaction in which the Exchange-
listed security (Class A) is exchanged for a cash dividend of $10 per
share of Class A stock plus two shares of the common stock of a new
holding company (New Holdco Common). If the Class A stock is trading at
a price of $90 prior to the corporate action, the Reference Price under
Rule 15(c)(1)(A) for each share of New Holdco Common Stock would be $40
per share (i.e., ($90-$10) / 2). The Exchange believes that this
process ensures that a Reference Price accurately reflects the value of
the security after a corporate action. To promote transparency in its
rules, the Exchange proposes to codify this practice in Rule
15(c)(1)(A) so that member organizations and market participants are
appropriately advised of how the Reference Price is determined for
securities that are subject to a corporate action.
2. Statutory Basis
The proposed rule change is consistent with Section 6(b) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the ``Act''),\11\ in general, and
furthers the objectives of Section 6(b)(5),\12\ in particular, because
it is designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and
practices, to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to foster
cooperation and coordination with persons engaged in facilitating
transactions in securities, to remove impediments to, and perfect the
mechanism of, a free and open market and a national market system and,
in general, to protect investors and the public interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
\12\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange believes that using the OCP instead of the last
reported sale price on the Exchange would remove impediments to and
perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national market
system because it would align Rule 15(c)(1)(A) with how the Exchange
determines the OCP for a security and would cover all potential
contingencies if there is no closing transaction on the Exchange,
including if the Exchange is unable to conduct a closing transaction
due to a systems or technical issue. The proposed amendment would
maintain that the Reference Price is the price of a last sale of at
least one round lot, and therefore promotes just and equitable
principles of trade because it is consistent with Rule 123C(1)(e)(i)
which requires that the OCP be either the price of the closing
transaction, or the last-sale eligible trade on the Exchange when there
is no closing transaction or the closing transaction is less than one
round lot. The proposal would, therefore, continue to ensure that the
Reference Price is an accurate indicator for determining whether a pre-
opening indication of interest should be published. The proposed
amendment would also enable the determination of a Reference Price
under Rule 15(c)(1)(A) to account for when the OCP is determined via
one of the contingency procedures set forth in Rules 123C(1)(e)(ii) and
(iii). The Exchange believes that referencing the OCP rather than the
last reported sale price would remove impediments to and perfect the
mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system
because it would result in a Reference Price that is more reflective of
the most recent value of the security value because the OCP as
determined under Rules 123C(1)(e)(ii) or (iii) would be a price
determined as of the close of trading, rather than the Exchange's last
reported sale price, which may occur earlier in the trading day.
The Exchange believes that amending Rule 15(c)(1)(A) to specify
that the OCP would be adjusted as applicable based on the publicly
disclosed terms of a corporate action would remove impediments to and
perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national market
system by promoting transparency in Exchange rules of how the Reference
Price is determined if a security listed on the Exchange is subject to
a corporate action. The Exchange believes it is consistent with the
protection of investors and the public interest to adjust the OCP that
would be used as a Reference Price under Rule 15(c)(1)(A) based on the
publicly disclosed terms of a corporate action as such adjusted price
would better reflect the price of the security for purposes of the
opening auction on the first day that a corporate action is in effect.
The Exchange notes that the Reference Price is used as a trigger for
determining whether to publish a pre-opening indication, and
[[Page 64170]]
having a Reference Price more closely aligned to the updated value of
the security, based on the terms of the corporate action, would promote
a more efficient opening process.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. The proposed rule change is
designed to promote clarity and transparency in Exchange rules
regarding how a Reference Price under Rule 15 is determined for an
Exchange-listed security. The proposed rule change is therefore not
designed to address any competitive concerns but rather inform member
organizations that the OCP would be used as the Reference Price for
listed securities, adjusted as applicable based on the publicly
disclosed terms of a corporate action.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were solicited or received with respect to the
proposed rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The Exchange has filed the proposed rule change pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \13\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(6) thereunder.\14\
Because the proposed rule change does not: (i) Significantly affect the
protection of investors or the public interest; (ii) impose any
significant burden on competition; and (iii) become operative for 30
days from the date on which it was filed, or such shorter time as the
Commission may designate, it has become effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A) of the Act and Rule 19b-4(f)(6) thereunder.\15\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
\14\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
\15\ In addition, Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii) requires a self-
regulatory organization to give the Commission written notice of its
intent to file the proposed rule change at least five business days
prior to the date of filing of the proposed rule change, or such
shorter time as designated by the Commission. The Exchange has
satisfied this requirement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
A proposed rule change filed under Rule 19b-4(f)(6) \16\ normally
does not become operative for 30 days after the date of the filing.
However, pursuant to Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii),\17\ the Commission may
designate a shorter time if such action is consistent with the
protection of investors and the public interest. In its filing with the
Commission, the Exchange has asked the Commission to waive the 30-day
operative delay so that the proposal may become operative immediately
upon filing to provide greater transparency to investors regarding how
a security's Reference Price would be adjusted if that security is
subject to a publicly disclosed corporate action and avoid potential
investor confusion that could arise during the operative delay period.
According to the Exchange, waiver of the operative delay period would
also avoid potential investor confusion because the proposal will
clarify when a pre-opening indication would be published based on the
security's Reference Price.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\16\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
\17\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6)(iii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Commission believes that waiver of the 30-day operative delay
is consistent with the protection of investors and the public interest
because it will provide transparency to investors on the determination
of the Reference Price for Exchange listed securities, which is used as
the basis for determining when pre-opening indications will be
published, as well as provide transparency on the adjustments that will
be made to the Reference Price as a result of corporate actions. For
these reasons, the Commission hereby waives the operative delay and
designates the proposed rule change operative upon filing.\18\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\18\ For purposes only of waiving the operative delay, the
Commission has considered the proposed rule's impact on efficiency,
competition, and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
At any time within 60 days of the filing of such proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission
takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings under
Section 19(b)(2)(B) \19\ of the Act to determine whether the proposed
rule change should be approved or disapproved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\19\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an email to [email protected]. Please include
File Number SR-NYSE-2018-60 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NYSE-2018-60. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's internet website (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml).
Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written
statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with
the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed
rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those
that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions
of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and printing in
the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC
20549 on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and
3:00 p.m. Copies of such filing also will be available for inspection
and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change. Persons submitting comments are
cautioned that we do not redact or edit personal identifying
information from comment submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR-NYSE-2018-60, and should be submitted on
or before January 3, 2019.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\20\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\20\
Brent J. Fields,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018-26944 Filed 12-12-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P