Certain Pasta From Italy: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2016-2017, 63627-63629 [2018-26771]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 237 / Tuesday, December 11, 2018 / Notices intermediate company (or companies) involved in the transaction.5 We intend to issue appropriate instructions to CBP 15 days after the date of publication of the final results of this review. For the company for which this review is rescinded (i.e., Miwon), antidumping duties shall be assessed at rates equal to the cash deposit of estimated antidumping duties required at the time of entry, or withdrawal from warehouse, for consumption, during the period in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(c)(1)(i). Commerce intends to issue appropriate assessment instructions with respect to the company for which this review is being rescinded to CBP 15 days after the publication of this notice. Cash Deposit Requirements The following cash deposit requirements will be effective for all shipments of the subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date of the final results of this administrative review, as provided by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) The cash deposit rate for CJ Indonesia will be the rate established in the final results of this review, except if the rate is less than 0.5 percent and, therefore, de minimis within the meaning of 19 CFR 351.106(c)(1), in which case the cash deposit rate will be zero; (2) for previously reviewed or investigated companies not participating in this review, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the company-specific rate published for the most recent period; (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered in this review, a prior review, or the lessthan-fair-value (LTFV) investigation, but the manufacturer is covered in this review, the cash deposit rate will be the rate established for the most recent period for the manufacturer of the merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit rate for all other manufacturers or exporters will continue to be 6.19 percent, the all-others rate established in the LTFV investigation.6 These deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice. Disclosure and Public Comment amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with NOTICES1 Commerce intends to disclose to interested parties the calculations 5 See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003). 6 See Monosodium Glutamate from the People’s Republic of China, and the Republic of Indonesia: Antidumping Duty Orders; and Monosodium Glutamate from the People’s Republic of China: Amended Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value, 79 FR 70505 (November 26, 2014). VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:51 Dec 10, 2018 Jkt 247001 performed in reaching these preliminary results within five days of the date of publication of this notice in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b). Interested parties may submit written comments (case briefs) at a date to be determined by Commerce and rebuttal comments (rebuttal briefs) within five days after the time limit for filing case briefs.7 Rebuttal briefs must be limited to issues raised in the case briefs.8 Commerce will notify interested parties when it has determined a deadline for case briefs. Parties who submit case or rebuttal briefs are requested to submit with the argument: (1) A statement of the issue; (2) a brief summary of the argument; and (3) a table of authorities.9 Interested parties who wish to request a hearing must do so within 30 days of publication of these preliminary results by submitting a written request to the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, U.S. Department of Commerce, using Enforcement and Compliance’s ACCESS system.10 Hearing requests should contain the party’s name, address, and telephone number, the number of participants, and a list of the issues to be discussed. If a request for a hearing is made, we will inform parties of the scheduled date for the hearing, which will be held at the U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230, at a time and location to be determined.11 Parties should confirm by telephone the date, time, and location of the hearing. Issues addressed at the hearing will be limited to those raised in the briefs.12 All briefs and hearing requests must be filed electronically and received successfully in their entirety through ACCESS by 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time by their respective deadlines. Commerce intends to issue the final results of this administrative review, including the results of its analysis of issues raised in any written briefs, not later than 120 days after the date of publication of this notice, unless otherwise extended.13 Notification to Importers This notice serves as a preliminary reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping and/or 7 See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(l)(ii) and 351.309(d)(l). Interested parties will be notified through ACCESS regarding the deadline for submitting case briefs. 8 See 19 CFR 351.309(d)(2). 9 See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2). 10 See 19 CFR 351.310(c). 11 See 19 CFR 351.310. 12 See 19 CFR 351.310(c). 13 See section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act. PO 00000 Frm 00016 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 63627 countervailing duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in the Secretary’s presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties and/or countervailing duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of double antidumping duties. We are issuing and publishing these preliminary results in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act. Dated: December 3, 2018. Gary Taverman, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, performing the non-exclusive functions and duties of the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Appendix List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum I. Summary II. Background III. Scope of the Order IV. Partial Rescission of Administrative Review V. Discussion of the Methodology A. Comparison to Normal Value 1. Determination of Comparison Method 2. Results of Differential Pricing Analysis B. Product Comparisons C. Date of Sale D. Constructed Export Price VI. Normal Value A. Home Market Viability as Comparison Market B. Affiliated Party Transactions and Arm’sLength Test C. Level of Trade D. Cost of Production Analysis 1. Calculation of Cost of Production 2. Test of Comparison Market Sales Prices 3. Results of Cost of Production Test 4. Calculation of Normal Value Based on Comparison Prices VII. Currency Conversion VIII. Verification IX. Recommendation [FR Doc. 2018–26772 Filed 12–10–18; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–475–818] Certain Pasta From Italy: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2016–2017 Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that Ghigi 1870 S.p.A. and Pasta Zara S.p.A. (collectively, Ghigi/Zara) sold pasta AGENCY: E:\FR\FM\11DEN1.SGM 11DEN1 63628 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 237 / Tuesday, December 11, 2018 / Notices from Italy at less than normal value (NV) during the period of review (POR) July 1, 2016, through June 30, 2017, but Industria Alimentare Colavita S.p.A. (Indalco) did not. DATES: Applicable December 11, 2018. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joy Zhang (Ghigi/Zara) or George McMahon (Indalco), AD/CVD Operations, Office III, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–1168 or (202) 482–1167, respectively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background Commerce published the Preliminary Results on August 10, 2018.1 For events subsequent to the Preliminary Results, see Commerce’s Issues and Decision Memorandum.2 Scope of the Order Imports covered by the order are shipments of certain non-egg dry pasta. The merchandise subject to review is currently classifiable under items 1901.90.90.95 and 1902.19.20 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). Although the HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes, the written description of the merchandise subject to the order is dispositive.3 Analysis of Comments Received amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with NOTICES1 In the Issues and Decision Memorandum, we addressed all issues raised in parties’ case and rebuttal briefs. In the Appendix to this notice, we provide a list of the issues raised by parties. The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on-file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance’s Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at https://access.trade.gov and in the Central Records Unit (CRU), Room B8024 of the main Department of Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly on the internet at https:// 1 See Certain Pasta from Italy: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2016– 2017, 83 FR 39685 (August 10, 2018) (Preliminary Results), and accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum. 2 See Memorandum, ‘‘Certain Pasta from Italy: Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Final Results; 2016–2017,’’ dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum). 3 See Issues and Decision Memorandum for a complete description of the scope of the Order. VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:51 Dec 10, 2018 Jkt 247001 enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed Issues and Decision Memorandum and the electronic versions of the Issues and Decision Memorandum are identical in content. Changes Since the Preliminary Results Based on our review of the record and comments received from interested parties, these final results do not differ from the Preliminary Results with respect to Ghigi/Zara, Indalco, and the seven firms not subject to individual review.4 Final Results of the Review As a result of this review, Commerce calculated a weighted-average dumping margin that is above de minimis for Ghigi/Zara and a zero margin for Indalco for the POR. Therefore, consistent with its practice and the methodology set forth in section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), Commerce assigned the weighted-average dumping margin calculated for Ghigi/Zara to the seven non-selected companies in these final results, as referenced below. Producer and/or exporter Weightedaverage dumping margin (percent) Ghigi 1870 S.p.A. and Pasta Zara S.p.A. (Zara) (collectively Ghigi/Zara) ............... Industria Alimentare Colavita S.p.A. (Indalco) ................. Agritalia S.r.L. (Agritalia) ...... Alessio, Panarese Soceieta Agricola (Alessio) .............. Antico Pastificio Morelli 1860 S.r.l. (Antico) ..................... Colussi SpA (Colussi) ........... Liguori Pastificio dal 1820 S.p.A. (Liguori) .................. Pastificio Menucci SpA (Menucci) .......................... Tesa SrL (Tesa) ................... 5.97 we calculated importer-specific ad valorem duty assessment rates based on the ratio of the total amount of dumping calculated for the importer’s examined sales to the total entered value of those same sales in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). Upon issuance of the final results of this administrative review, if any importer-specific assessment rates calculated in the final results are above de minimis (i.e., at or above 0.5 percent), Commerce will issue instructions directly to CBP to assess antidumping duties on appropriate entries. Where either the respondent’s weightedaverage dumping margin is zero or de minimis, or an importer-specific assessment rate is zero or de minimis, we will instruct CBP to liquidate the appropriate entries without regard to antidumping duties. In accordance with Commerce’s ‘‘automatic assessment’’ practice,6 for entries of subject merchandise during the POR produced by each respondent for which it did not know that its merchandise was destined for the United States, we will instruct CBP to liquidate unreviewed entries at the allothers rate if there is no rate for the intermediate company(ies) involved in the transaction. We intend to issue assessment instructions directly to CBP 15 days after publication of the final results of this review. Cash Deposit Requirements 0.00 5.97 The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon publication of the notice of final results 5.97 of administrative review for all 5.97 shipments of subject merchandise 5.97 entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the 5.97 publication of the final results of this administrative review, as provided by 5.97 section 751(a)(2) of the Act: (1) The cash 5.97 deposit rate for respondents noted above will be the rate established in the final Duty Assessment results of this administrative review; (2) Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the for merchandise exported by manufacturers or exporters not covered Act and 19 CFR 351.212(b), Commerce in this administrative review but shall determine and Customs and covered in a prior segment of the Border Protection (CBP) shall assess proceeding, the cash deposit rate will antidumping duties on all appropriate entries.5 For any individually examined continue to be the company specific rate published for the most recently respondent whose weighted-average completed segment of this proceeding; dumping margin is above de minimis, (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered 4 The seven companies not subject to individual in this review, a prior review, or the review are listed in the ‘‘Final Results of Review’’ original investigation, but the section below. manufacturer is, the cash deposit rate 5 In these final results, Commerce applied the will be the rate established for the most assessment rate calculation method adopted in Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping Proceedings: Final Modification, 77 FR 8101 (February 14, 2012). PO 00000 Frm 00017 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 6 For a full discussion of this clarification, see Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003). E:\FR\FM\11DEN1.SGM 11DEN1 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 237 / Tuesday, December 11, 2018 / Notices recently completed segment of this proceeding for the manufacturer of the subject merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit rate for all other manufacturers or exporters will continue to be 15.45 percent, the all-others rate established in the antidumping investigation as modified by the section 129 determination. These cash deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice. Disclosure We intend to disclose the calculations performed to parties in this proceeding within five days of the date of publication of this notice in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b). Appendix List of Topics Discussed in the Final Issues and Decision Memorandum I. Summary II. Background III. Scope of the Order IV. Discussion of the Issues Comment: Whether to Recalculate Ghigi/ Zara’s Material Cost as One WeightedAverage Cost V. Recommendation [FR Doc. 2018–26771 Filed 12–10–18; 8:45 am] Notification to Importers Regarding the Reimbursement of Duties BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P This notice also serves as a final reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping and/or countervailing duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during the POR. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in Commerce’s presumption that reimbursement of antidumping and/or countervailing duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of doubled antidumping duties. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Notification Regarding Administrative Protective Order amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with NOTICES1 Dated: December 4, 2018. Gary Taverman, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, performing the non-exclusive functions and duties of the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to administrative protective orders (APO) of their responsibility concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which continues to govern business proprietary information in this segment of the proceeding. Timely written notification of the return/destruction of APO materials, or conversion to judicial protective order, is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and the terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation. We are issuing and publishing this notice in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.221(b)(5). VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:51 Dec 10, 2018 Jkt 247001 National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request The Department of Commerce will submit to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for clearance the following proposal for collection of information under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. chapter 35). Agency: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). Title: Greater Atlantic Region Surfclam and Ocean Quahog ITQ Administration. OMB Control Number: 0648–0240. Form Number(s): None. Type of Request: Regular (extension of a currently approved information collection). Number of Respondents: 177. Average Hours per Response:: ITQ permit application form, review of a pre-filled form for renewing entities, ITQ transfer form, 5 minutes each; 1 hour to complete the ITQ ownership form for new applicants and 30 minutes for the application to shuck surfclams and ocean quahogs at sea. The requirements under the PSP protocol are based on the number of vessels that land surfclams or ocean quahogs and the number of trips taken into the area, with a total estimated annual burden of 3 hours per vessel. Burden Hours: 2,473. Needs and Uses: This request is for an extension of a currently approved collection associated with the Atlantic surfclam and ocean quahog fisheries. National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) Greater Atlantic Region PO 00000 Frm 00018 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 63629 manages these fisheries in the Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) of the Northeastern United States through the Atlantic Surfclam and Ocean Quahog Fishery Management Plan (FMP). The Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council prepared the FMP pursuant to the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act (Magnuson-Stevens Act). The regulations implementing the FMP are specified at 50 CFR part 648. The recordkeeping and reporting requirements at §§ 648.74, 648.75, and 648.76 form the basis for this collection of information. We request information from surfclam and ocean quahog individual transferable quota (ITQ) permit holders to issue ITQ permits and to process and track requests from permit holders to transfer quota share or cage tags. We also request information from surfclam and ocean quahog ITQ permit holders to track and properly account for surfclam and ocean quahog harvest shucked at sea. Because there is not a standard conversion factor for estimating unshucked product from shucked product, NMFS requires vessels that shuck product at sea to carry on board the vessel a NMFSapproved observer to certify the amount of these clams harvested. This information, upon receipt, results in an efficient and accurate database for management and monitoring of fisheries of the Northeastern U.S. EEZ. Georges Bank has been closed to the harvest of surfclams and ocean quahogs since 1990 due to red tide blooms that cause paralytic shellfish poisoning (PSP). We reopened a portion of the Georges Bank Closed Area starting in 2012 under certain conditions. We request information from surfclam and ocean quahog ITQ permit holders who fish in the reopened area to ensure compliance with the Protocol for Onboard Screening and Dockside Testing in Molluscan Shellfish. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration, the commercial fishing industry, and NMFS developed the PSP protocol to test and verify that clams harvested from Georges Bank continue to be safe for human consumption. The National Shellfish Sanitation Program adopted the PSP protocol at the October 2011 Interstate Shellfish Sanitation Conference. Affected Public: Business or other forprofit organizations; individuals or households. Frequency: Annually and on occasion. Respondent’s Obligation: Mandatory. This information collection request may be viewed at reginfo.gov. Follow the instructions to view Department of E:\FR\FM\11DEN1.SGM 11DEN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 237 (Tuesday, December 11, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 63627-63629]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-26771]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-475-818]


Certain Pasta From Italy: Final Results of Antidumping Duty 
Administrative Review; 2016-2017

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that Ghigi 
1870 S.p.A. and Pasta Zara S.p.A. (collectively, Ghigi/Zara) sold pasta

[[Page 63628]]

from Italy at less than normal value (NV) during the period of review 
(POR) July 1, 2016, through June 30, 2017, but Industria Alimentare 
Colavita S.p.A. (Indalco) did not.

DATES: Applicable December 11, 2018.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joy Zhang (Ghigi/Zara) or George 
McMahon (Indalco), AD/CVD Operations, Office III, Enforcement and 
Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of 
Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: 
(202) 482-1168 or (202) 482-1167, respectively.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    Commerce published the Preliminary Results on August 10, 2018.\1\ 
For events subsequent to the Preliminary Results, see Commerce's Issues 
and Decision Memorandum.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Certain Pasta from Italy: Preliminary Results of 
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2016-2017, 83 FR 39685 
(August 10, 2018) (Preliminary Results), and accompanying 
Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
    \2\ See Memorandum, ``Certain Pasta from Italy: Issues and 
Decision Memorandum for the Final Results; 2016-2017,'' dated 
concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this notice (Issues and 
Decision Memorandum).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Scope of the Order

    Imports covered by the order are shipments of certain non-egg dry 
pasta. The merchandise subject to review is currently classifiable 
under items 1901.90.90.95 and 1902.19.20 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). Although the HTSUS subheadings 
are provided for convenience and customs purposes, the written 
description of the merchandise subject to the order is dispositive.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ See Issues and Decision Memorandum for a complete 
description of the scope of the Order.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Analysis of Comments Received

    In the Issues and Decision Memorandum, we addressed all issues 
raised in parties' case and rebuttal briefs. In the Appendix to this 
notice, we provide a list of the issues raised by parties. The Issues 
and Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on-file 
electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and 
Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). 
ACCESS is available to registered users at https://access.trade.gov and 
in the Central Records Unit (CRU), Room B8024 of the main Department of 
Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the Issues and 
Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly on the internet at https://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed Issues and Decision 
Memorandum and the electronic versions of the Issues and Decision 
Memorandum are identical in content.

Changes Since the Preliminary Results

    Based on our review of the record and comments received from 
interested parties, these final results do not differ from the 
Preliminary Results with respect to Ghigi/Zara, Indalco, and the seven 
firms not subject to individual review.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ The seven companies not subject to individual review are 
listed in the ``Final Results of Review'' section below.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Final Results of the Review

    As a result of this review, Commerce calculated a weighted-average 
dumping margin that is above de minimis for Ghigi/Zara and a zero 
margin for Indalco for the POR. Therefore, consistent with its practice 
and the methodology set forth in section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Tariff Act 
of 1930, as amended (the Act), Commerce assigned the weighted-average 
dumping margin calculated for Ghigi/Zara to the seven non-selected 
companies in these final results, as referenced below.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                             Weighted-
                                                              average
                Producer and/or exporter                      dumping
                                                              margin
                                                             (percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ghigi 1870 S.p.A. and Pasta Zara S.p.A. (Zara)                      5.97
 (collectively Ghigi/Zara)..............................
Industria Alimentare Colavita S.p.A. (Indalco)..........            0.00
Agritalia S.r.L. (Agritalia)............................            5.97
Alessio, Panarese Soceieta Agricola (Alessio)...........            5.97
Antico Pastificio Morelli 1860 S.r.l. (Antico)..........            5.97
Colussi SpA (Colussi)...................................            5.97
Liguori Pastificio dal 1820 S.p.A. (Liguori)............            5.97
Pastificio Menucci SpA (Menucci)........................            5.97
Tesa SrL (Tesa).........................................            5.97
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Duty Assessment

    Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.212(b), 
Commerce shall determine and Customs and Border Protection (CBP) shall 
assess antidumping duties on all appropriate entries.\5\ For any 
individually examined respondent whose weighted-average dumping margin 
is above de minimis, we calculated importer-specific ad valorem duty 
assessment rates based on the ratio of the total amount of dumping 
calculated for the importer's examined sales to the total entered value 
of those same sales in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). Upon 
issuance of the final results of this administrative review, if any 
importer-specific assessment rates calculated in the final results are 
above de minimis (i.e., at or above 0.5 percent), Commerce will issue 
instructions directly to CBP to assess antidumping duties on 
appropriate entries. Where either the respondent's weighted-average 
dumping margin is zero or de minimis, or an importer-specific 
assessment rate is zero or de minimis, we will instruct CBP to 
liquidate the appropriate entries without regard to antidumping duties.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ In these final results, Commerce applied the assessment rate 
calculation method adopted in Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation 
of the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and Assessment Rate in 
Certain Antidumping Proceedings: Final Modification, 77 FR 8101 
(February 14, 2012).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In accordance with Commerce's ``automatic assessment'' practice,\6\ 
for entries of subject merchandise during the POR produced by each 
respondent for which it did not know that its merchandise was destined 
for the United States, we will instruct CBP to liquidate unreviewed 
entries at the all-others rate if there is no rate for the intermediate 
company(ies) involved in the transaction.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ For a full discussion of this clarification, see Antidumping 
and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping 
Duties, 68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    We intend to issue assessment instructions directly to CBP 15 days 
after publication of the final results of this review.

Cash Deposit Requirements

    The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon 
publication of the notice of final results of administrative review for 
all shipments of subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from 
warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication of the final 
results of this administrative review, as provided by section 751(a)(2) 
of the Act: (1) The cash deposit rate for respondents noted above will 
be the rate established in the final results of this administrative 
review; (2) for merchandise exported by manufacturers or exporters not 
covered in this administrative review but covered in a prior segment of 
the proceeding, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the company 
specific rate published for the most recently completed segment of this 
proceeding; (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered in this review, a 
prior review, or the original investigation, but the manufacturer is, 
the cash deposit rate will be the rate established for the most

[[Page 63629]]

recently completed segment of this proceeding for the manufacturer of 
the subject merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit rate for all other 
manufacturers or exporters will continue to be 15.45 percent, the all-
others rate established in the antidumping investigation as modified by 
the section 129 determination. These cash deposit requirements, when 
imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice.

Disclosure

    We intend to disclose the calculations performed to parties in this 
proceeding within five days of the date of publication of this notice 
in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b).

Notification to Importers Regarding the Reimbursement of Duties

    This notice also serves as a final reminder to importers of their 
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f) to file a certificate regarding 
the reimbursement of antidumping and/or countervailing duties prior to 
liquidation of the relevant entries during the POR. Failure to comply 
with this requirement could result in Commerce's presumption that 
reimbursement of antidumping and/or countervailing duties occurred and 
the subsequent assessment of doubled antidumping duties.

Notification Regarding Administrative Protective Order

    This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to 
administrative protective orders (APO) of their responsibility 
concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information 
disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which 
continues to govern business proprietary information in this segment of 
the proceeding. Timely written notification of the return/destruction 
of APO materials, or conversion to judicial protective order, is hereby 
requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and the terms of an 
APO is a sanctionable violation.
    We are issuing and publishing this notice in accordance with 
sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.221(b)(5).

    Dated: December 4, 2018.
Gary Taverman,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 
Operations, performing the non-exclusive functions and duties of the 
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.

Appendix

List of Topics Discussed in the Final Issues and Decision Memorandum

I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Order
IV. Discussion of the Issues
    Comment: Whether to Recalculate Ghigi/Zara's Material Cost as 
One Weighted-Average Cost
V. Recommendation

[FR Doc. 2018-26771 Filed 12-10-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P