Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip From the United Arab Emirates: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2016-2017, 63157-63159 [2018-26545]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 235 / Friday, December 7, 2018 / Notices
Weightedaverage
dumping
margin
(percent)
Producer or exporter
Borusan Mannesmann Boru Sanayi ve
Ticaret A.S./Borusan Istikbal Ticaret
T.A.S ..................................................
Toscelik Profil ve Sac Endustrisi A.S./
Tosyali Dis Ticaret A.S./Toscelik
Metal Ticaret A.S ...............................
Cayirova Boru Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S ...
Yu¨cel Boru ve Profil Endustrisi A.S ......
Yu¨cel boru Ihracat Ithalat ve Pazarlama
A.S .....................................................
2.55
0.00
2.55
2.55
2.55
Disclosure
We intend to disclose the calculations
performed for these final results of
review within five days of the date of
publication of this notice in the Federal
Register, in accordance with 19 CFR
351.224(b).
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with NOTICES
Duty Assessment
Commerce shall determine, and CBP
shall assess, antidumping duties on all
appropriate entries covered by this
review pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C)
of the Act and 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1).
For Borusan, because its weightedaverage dumping margin is not zero or
de minimis (i.e., less than 0.5 percent),
Commerce has calculated importerspecific antidumping duty assessment
rates. We calculated importer-specific
ad valorem antidumping duty
assessment rates by aggregating the total
amount of dumping calculated for the
examined sales of each importer and
dividing each of these amounts by the
total entered value associated with those
sales. We will instruct CBP to assess
antidumping duties on all appropriate
entries covered by this review where an
importer-specific assessment rate is not
zero or de minimis. Pursuant to 19 CFR
351.106(c)(2), we will instruct CBP to
liquidate without regard to antidumping
duties any entries for which the
importer-specific assessment rate is zero
or de minimis.
For Toscelik, we will instruct CBP to
liquidate its entries during the POR
imported by the importers identified in
its questionnaire responses without
regard to antidumping duties because its
weighted-average dumping margin in
these final results is zero.13
For companies that were not selected
for individual examination, we will
instruct CBP to liquidate unreviewed
entries based on the methodology
described in the ‘‘Final Rates for NonExamined Companies’’ section, above.
13 See Antidumping Proceeding: Calculation of
the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and
Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping Duty
Proceedings; Final Modification, 77 FR 8103
(February 14, 2012).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:56 Dec 06, 2018
Jkt 247001
Consistent with Commerce’s
assessment practice, for entries of
subject merchandise during the POR
produced by any company upon which
we initiated an administrative review,
for which they did not know that the
merchandise was destined for the
United States, we will instruct CBP to
liquidate unreviewed entries at the allothers rate if there is no rate for the
intermediate company(ies) involved in
the transaction.14
We intend to issue instructions to
CBP 15 days after publication of the
final results of this review.
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following cash deposit
requirements will be effective for all
shipments of subject merchandise
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse,
for consumption on or after the
publication date of the final results of
this administrative review, as provided
by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1)
The cash deposit rates will be equal to
the weighted-average dumping margins
established in the final results of this
review; (2) for previously reviewed or
investigated companies not
participating in this review, the cash
deposit rate will continue to be the
company-specific rate published for the
most recently completed segment of this
proceeding in which the company was
reviewed; (3) if the exporter is not a firm
covered in this review, a previous
review, or the original less-than-fairvalue (LTFV) investigation, but the
manufacturer is, the cash deposit rate
will be the rate established for the most
recently completed segment of this
proceeding for the manufacturer of
subject merchandise; and (4) the cash
deposit rate for all other manufacturers
or exporters will continue to be 14.74
percent, the all-others rate established
in the LTFV investigation.15 These
deposit requirements, when imposed,
shall remain in effect until further
notice.
Notification to Importers
This notice serves as a final reminder
to importers of their responsibility
under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a
certificate regarding the reimbursement
of antidumping duties prior to
liquidation of the relevant entries
during this review period. Failure to
comply with this requirement could
result in the presumption that
14 For a full discussion of this practice, see
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings:
Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954
(May 6, 2003).
15 See Antidumping Duty Order; Welded Carbon
Steel Standard Pipe and Tube Products from
Turkey, 51 FR 17784 (May 15, 1986).
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
63157
reimbursement of antidumping duties
occurred and the subsequent assessment
of double antidumping duties.16
Administrative Protective Orders
This notice also serves as a reminder
to parties subject to administrative
protective order (APO) of their
responsibility concerning the
destruction of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely
written notification of the return or
destruction of APO materials or
conversion to judicial protective order is
hereby requested. Failure to comply
with the regulations and terms of an
APO is a sanctionable violation.
We are issuing and publishing these
results in accordance with sections
751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19
CFR 351.213(h) and 351.221(b)(5) of
Commerce’s regulations.
Dated: November 30, 2018.
Gary Taverman,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping
and Countervailing Duty Operations,
performing the non-exclusive functions and
duties of the Assistant Secretary for
Enforcement and Compliance.
Appendix
List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and
Decision Memorandum
1. Summary
2. Background
3. Scope of the Order
4. Discussion of the Issues
Comment 1: Yucel Group’s No-Shipments
Claim
Comment 2: Calculation of Toscelik’s Total
Cost of Manufacture
Comment 3: Calculation of Toscelik’s
Average Cost of Production
Comment 4: Calculation of Borusan’s Gross
Unit Price
5. Recommendation
[FR Doc. 2018–26544 Filed 12–6–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–520–803]
Polyethylene Terephthalate Film,
Sheet, and Strip From the United Arab
Emirates: Preliminary Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review; 2016–2017
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
(Commerce) preliminarily finds that JBF
RAK LLC, the sole producer/exporter
AGENCY:
16 See
E:\FR\FM\07DEN1.SGM
19 CFR 351.402(f)(3).
07DEN1
63158
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 235 / Friday, December 7, 2018 / Notices
subject to this administrative review,
has made sales of subject merchandise
at less than normal value. Interested
parties are invited to comment on these
preliminary results.
DATES: Applicable December 7, 2018.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Andrew Huston, AD/CVD Operations,
Office VII, Enforcement and
Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone:
(202) 482–4261.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Commerce is conducting an
administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on
polyethylene terephthalate film, sheet,
and strip (PET Film) from the United
Arab Emirates (UAE). The notice of
initiation of this administrative review
was published on January 11, 2018.1
This review only covers JBF RAK LLC,
a producer and exporter of the subject
merchandise. The period of review is
November 1, 2016, through October 31,
2017.
Scope of the Order
The merchandise subject to the order
is polyethylene terephthalate film. The
product is currently classified under
subheading 3920.62.00.90 of the
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the
United States (HTSUS). Although the
HTSUS number is provided for
convenience and for customs purposes,
the written product description,
available in the Preliminary Decision
Memorandum, remains dispositive.2
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with NOTICES
Methodology
Commerce is conducting this review
in accordance with section 751(a) of the
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act).
Export price and constructed export
price are calculated in accordance with
section 772 of the Act. Normal value is
calculated in accordance with section
773 of the Act.
For a full description of the
methodology underlying our
preliminary results, see the Preliminary
Decision Memorandum, which is hereby
adopted by this notice.3 A list of topics
included in the Preliminary Decision
1 See Initiation of Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 83 FR
1329, 1333 (January 11, 2018).
2 See Memorandum, ‘‘Decision Memorandum for
the Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review: Polyethylene Terephthalate
Film, Sheet, and Strip from the United Arab
Emirates’’ (Preliminary Decision Memorandum),
dated concurrently with this notice.
3 Id.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:56 Dec 06, 2018
Jkt 247001
Memorandum is included as an
Appendix to this notice. The
Preliminary Decision Memorandum is
on file electronically via Enforcement
and Compliance’s Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Centralized
Electronic Service System (ACCESS).
ACCESS is available to registered users
at https://access.trade.gov and in the
Central Records Unit in Room B8024 of
the main Commerce building. In
addition, a complete version of the
Preliminary Decision Memorandum can
be accessed directly on the internet at
https://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The
signed Preliminary Decision
Memorandum and electronic versions of
the Preliminary Decision Memorandum
are identical in content.
Preliminary Results of Review
As a result of our review, we
preliminarily determine the following
weighted-average dumping margin for
the period November 1, 2016, through
October 31, 2017:
Manufacturer/exporter
Weightedaverage
margin
(percent)
JBF RAK LLC .............................
57.33
Disclosure and Public Comment
Commerce intends to disclose the
calculations used in our analysis for the
preliminary results to parties in this
review within five days of the date of
publication of this notice in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.224(b). Interested
parties are invited to comment on the
preliminary results of this review.
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.309(c)(1)(ii),
interested parties may submit case briefs
not later than 30 days after the date of
publication of this notice. Rebuttal
briefs, limited to issues raised in the
case briefs, may not be filed later than
five days after the time limit for filing
case briefs.4 Parties who submit case
briefs or rebuttal briefs in this review
are requested to submit with each brief:
(1) A statement of the issue, (2) a brief
summary of the argument, and (3) a
table of authorities.5 Executive
summaries should be limited to five
pages total, including footnotes.6 All
briefs must be filed electronically using
ACCESS. An electronically filed
document must be received successfully
in its entirety by the established
deadline.
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c),
interested parties who wish to request a
hearing, or to participate if one is
4 See
5 See
19 CFR 351.309(d)(1).
19 CFR 351.309(c)(2), (d)(2).
6 Id.
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
requested, must submit a written
request to the Assistant Secretary for
Enforcement and Compliance, filed
electronically via ACCESS within 30
days after the date of publication of this
notice. Requests should contain: (1) The
party’s name, address, and telephone
number; (2) the number of participants;
and (3) a list of the issues to be
discussed. Issues raised in the hearing
will be limited to those raised in the
respective case briefs. If a hearing is
requested, Commerce will notify
interested parties of the hearing
schedule.
We intend to issue the final results of
this administrative review, including
the results of our analysis of issues
raised by the parties in the written
comments, within 120 days of
publication of these preliminary results
in the Federal Register, unless
otherwise extended.7
Assessment Rates
Upon issuing the final results of the
review, Commerce shall determine, and
U.S. Customs and Border Protection
(CBP) shall assess, antidumping duties
on all appropriate entries covered by
this review. Commerce intends to issue
assessment instructions to CBP 15 days
after the date of publication of the final
results of review.
For any individually examined
respondents whose weighted-average
dumping margin is above de minimis,
we will calculate importer-specific ad
valorem duty assessment rates based on
the ratio of the total amount of dumping
calculated for the importer’s examined
sales to the total entered value of those
same sales in accordance with 19 CFR
351.212(b)(1).8 We will instruct CBP to
assess antidumping duties on all
appropriate entries covered by this
review when the importer-specific
assessment rate calculated in the final
results of this review is above de
minimis. Where either the respondent’s
weighted-average dumping margin is
zero or de minimis, or an importerspecific assessment rate is zero or de
minimis, we will instruct CBP to
liquidate the appropriate entries
without regard to antidumping duties.
The final results of this review shall
be the basis for the assessment of
antidumping duties on entries of
merchandise covered by the final results
7 See
section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act.
these preliminary results, Commerce applied
the calculation methodology adopted in
Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of the
Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and
Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping
Proceedings: Final Modification, 77 FR 8101
(February 14, 2012).
8 In
E:\FR\FM\07DEN1.SGM
07DEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 235 / Friday, December 7, 2018 / Notices
of this review and for future deposits of
estimated duties, where applicable.
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following deposit requirements
will be effective upon publication of the
final results for all shipments of PET
Film from the UAE entered, or
withdrawn from warehouse, for
consumption on or after the date of
publication of the final results of this
administrative review, as provided for
by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1)
The cash deposit rate for the companies
under review will be the rate
established in the final results of this
review (except, if the rate is zero or de
minimis, no cash deposit will be
required); (2) for previously reviewed or
investigated companies not listed above,
the cash deposit rate will continue to be
the company-specific rate published for
the most recent period; (3) if the
exporter is not a firm covered in this
review, a prior review, or the less-thanfair-value investigation, but the
manufacturer is, the cash deposit rate
will be the rate established for the most
recent period for the manufacturer of
the merchandise; and (4) the cash
deposit rate for all other manufacturers
or exporters will continue to be 4.05
percent, the all-others rate established
in the investigation.9 These cash deposit
requirements, when imposed, shall
remain in effect until further notice.
Notification to Importers
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with NOTICES
This notice also serves as a
preliminary reminder to importers of
their responsibility under 19 CFR
351.402(f) to file a certificate regarding
the reimbursement of antidumping
duties prior to liquidation of the
relevant entries during this review
period. Failure to comply with this
requirement could result in Commerce’s
presumption that reimbursement of
antidumping duties occurred and the
subsequent assessment of double
antidumping duties.
These preliminary results of
administrative review are issued and
published in accordance with sections
751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19
CFR 351.213(h)(1).
9 See Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and
Strip from Brazil, the People’s Republic of China
and the United Arab Emirates: Antidumping Duty
Orders and Amended Final Determination of Sales
at Less Than Fair Value for the United Arab
Emirates, 73 FR 66595, 66597 (November 10, 2008).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:56 Dec 06, 2018
Jkt 247001
Dated: November 29, 2018.
Gary Taverman,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping
and Countervailing Duty Operations,
performing the non-exclusive functions and
duties of the Assistant Secretary for
Enforcement and Compliance.
Appendix—List of Topics Discussed in
the Preliminary Decision Memorandum
1. Summary
2. Background
3. Scope of the Order
4. Date of Sale
5. Discussion of Methodology
6. Product Comparisons
7. Export Price/Constructed Export Price
8. Normal Value
9. Currency Conversions
10. Conclusion
[FR Doc. 2018–26545 Filed 12–6–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
63159
(Kangtai). Commerce postponed the
preliminary results of this
administrative review and the revised
deadline is now November 30, 2018.2
For a complete description of the events
that followed the initiation of this
administrative review, see Preliminary
Decision Memorandum.3
Scope of the Order
The products covered by the order are
chloro isos, which are derivatives are
cyanuric acid, described as chlorinated
s-triazine triones.4 Chloro isos are
currently classifiable under subheadings
2933.69.6015, 2933.69.6021,
2933.69.6050, 3808.50.4000,
3808.94.5000, and 3808.99.9500 of the
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the
United States (HTSUS). The HTSUS
subheadings are provided for
convenience and customs purposes; the
written product description of the scope
of the order is dispositive.
Methodology
[C–570–991]
Chlorinated Isocyanurates From the
People’s Republic of China:
Preliminary Results of Countervailing
Duty Administrative Review; 2016
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
(Commerce) preliminarily finds that
countervailable subsidies are being
provided to producers and exporters of
chlorinated isocyanurates (chloro isos)
from the People’s Republic of China
(China) for the period of review (POR)
January 1, 2016, through December 31,
2016. Interested parties are invited to
comment on these preliminary results.
DATES: Applicable December 7, 2018.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Omar Qureshi or Susan Pulongbarit,
AD/CVD Operations, Office V,
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401
Constitution Avenue NW, Washington,
DC 20230; telephone (202) 482–5307 or
(202) 482–4031, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
AGENCY:
Background
Commerce published the notice of
initiation of this administrative review
on January 11, 2018.1 This review
covers two producer/exporters: (1) Heze
Huayi Chemical Co., Ltd. (Huayi); and
(2) Juancheng Kangtai Chemical Co. Ltd.
1 See Initiation of Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 83 FR
1329 (January 11, 2018).
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
On November 13, 2014, Commerce
published in the Federal Register a
countervailing duty (CVD) order on
chloro isos from China.5 Commerce is
conducting this administrative review
in accordance with section 751(a)(1)(A)
of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended
(the Act). For each of the subsidy
programs found countervailable, we
preliminarily find that there is a
subsidy, i.e., a financial contribution
from an ‘‘authority’’ that gives rise to a
benefit to the recipient, and that the
subsidy is specific.6 In making this
preliminary finding, Commerce relied,
in part, on facts otherwise available,
with the application of adverse
2 See Memorandum, ‘‘Chlorinated Isocyanurates
from the People’s Republic of China: Extension of
Deadline for Preliminary Results of Third
Countervailing Duty Administrative Review,’’ dated
August 2, 2018; see also Memorandum,
‘‘Chlorinated Isocyanurates from the People’s
Republic of China: Extension of Deadline for
Preliminary Results of Third Countervailing Duty
Administrative Review,’’ dated October 11, 2018.
3 See Memorandum, ‘‘Decision Memorandum for
Preliminary Results of Countervailing Duty
Administrative Review: Chlorinated Isocyanurates
from the People’s Republic of China,’’ dated
concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this
notice (Preliminary Decision Memorandum).
4 For a complete description of the Scope of the
Order, see Countervailing Duty Administrative
Review of Chlorinated Isocyanurates from the
People’s Republic of China: Decision Memorandum
for the Preliminary Results, published concurrently
with this notice.
5 See Chlorinated Isocyanurates from the People’s
Republic of China: Countervailing Duty Order, 79
FR 67424 (November 13, 2014).
6 See sections 771(5)(B) and (D) of the Act
regarding financial contribution; section 771(5)(E)
of the Act regarding benefit; and section 771(5A) of
the Act regarding specificity.
E:\FR\FM\07DEN1.SGM
07DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 235 (Friday, December 7, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 63157-63159]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-26545]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-520-803]
Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip From the United
Arab Emirates: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review; 2016-2017
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (Commerce) preliminarily finds that
JBF RAK LLC, the sole producer/exporter
[[Page 63158]]
subject to this administrative review, has made sales of subject
merchandise at less than normal value. Interested parties are invited
to comment on these preliminary results.
DATES: Applicable December 7, 2018.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Andrew Huston, AD/CVD Operations,
Office VII, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-4261.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Commerce is conducting an administrative review of the antidumping
duty order on polyethylene terephthalate film, sheet, and strip (PET
Film) from the United Arab Emirates (UAE). The notice of initiation of
this administrative review was published on January 11, 2018.\1\ This
review only covers JBF RAK LLC, a producer and exporter of the subject
merchandise. The period of review is November 1, 2016, through October
31, 2017.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Administrative Reviews, 83 FR 1329, 1333 (January 11, 2018).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scope of the Order
The merchandise subject to the order is polyethylene terephthalate
film. The product is currently classified under subheading
3920.62.00.90 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States
(HTSUS). Although the HTSUS number is provided for convenience and for
customs purposes, the written product description, available in the
Preliminary Decision Memorandum, remains dispositive.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ See Memorandum, ``Decision Memorandum for the Preliminary
Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: Polyethylene
Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip from the United Arab Emirates''
(Preliminary Decision Memorandum), dated concurrently with this
notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Methodology
Commerce is conducting this review in accordance with section
751(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). Export price
and constructed export price are calculated in accordance with section
772 of the Act. Normal value is calculated in accordance with section
773 of the Act.
For a full description of the methodology underlying our
preliminary results, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum, which is
hereby adopted by this notice.\3\ A list of topics included in the
Preliminary Decision Memorandum is included as an Appendix to this
notice. The Preliminary Decision Memorandum is on file electronically
via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to
registered users at https://access.trade.gov and in the Central Records
Unit in Room B8024 of the main Commerce building. In addition, a
complete version of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum can be accessed
directly on the internet at https://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The
signed Preliminary Decision Memorandum and electronic versions of the
Preliminary Decision Memorandum are identical in content.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Preliminary Results of Review
As a result of our review, we preliminarily determine the following
weighted-average dumping margin for the period November 1, 2016,
through October 31, 2017:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Weighted-
average
Manufacturer/exporter margin
(percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
JBF RAK LLC................................................. 57.33
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Disclosure and Public Comment
Commerce intends to disclose the calculations used in our analysis
for the preliminary results to parties in this review within five days
of the date of publication of this notice in accordance with 19 CFR
351.224(b). Interested parties are invited to comment on the
preliminary results of this review. Pursuant to 19 CFR
351.309(c)(1)(ii), interested parties may submit case briefs not later
than 30 days after the date of publication of this notice. Rebuttal
briefs, limited to issues raised in the case briefs, may not be filed
later than five days after the time limit for filing case briefs.\4\
Parties who submit case briefs or rebuttal briefs in this review are
requested to submit with each brief: (1) A statement of the issue, (2)
a brief summary of the argument, and (3) a table of authorities.\5\
Executive summaries should be limited to five pages total, including
footnotes.\6\ All briefs must be filed electronically using ACCESS. An
electronically filed document must be received successfully in its
entirety by the established deadline.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ See 19 CFR 351.309(d)(1).
\5\ See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2), (d)(2).
\6\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), interested parties who wish to
request a hearing, or to participate if one is requested, must submit a
written request to the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance, filed electronically via ACCESS within 30 days after the
date of publication of this notice. Requests should contain: (1) The
party's name, address, and telephone number; (2) the number of
participants; and (3) a list of the issues to be discussed. Issues
raised in the hearing will be limited to those raised in the respective
case briefs. If a hearing is requested, Commerce will notify interested
parties of the hearing schedule.
We intend to issue the final results of this administrative review,
including the results of our analysis of issues raised by the parties
in the written comments, within 120 days of publication of these
preliminary results in the Federal Register, unless otherwise
extended.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ See section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assessment Rates
Upon issuing the final results of the review, Commerce shall
determine, and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) shall assess,
antidumping duties on all appropriate entries covered by this review.
Commerce intends to issue assessment instructions to CBP 15 days after
the date of publication of the final results of review.
For any individually examined respondents whose weighted-average
dumping margin is above de minimis, we will calculate importer-specific
ad valorem duty assessment rates based on the ratio of the total amount
of dumping calculated for the importer's examined sales to the total
entered value of those same sales in accordance with 19 CFR
351.212(b)(1).\8\ We will instruct CBP to assess antidumping duties on
all appropriate entries covered by this review when the importer-
specific assessment rate calculated in the final results of this review
is above de minimis. Where either the respondent's weighted-average
dumping margin is zero or de minimis, or an importer-specific
assessment rate is zero or de minimis, we will instruct CBP to
liquidate the appropriate entries without regard to antidumping duties.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ In these preliminary results, Commerce applied the
calculation methodology adopted in Antidumping Proceedings:
Calculation of the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and Assessment
Rate in Certain Antidumping Proceedings: Final Modification, 77 FR
8101 (February 14, 2012).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The final results of this review shall be the basis for the
assessment of antidumping duties on entries of merchandise covered by
the final results
[[Page 63159]]
of this review and for future deposits of estimated duties, where
applicable.
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following deposit requirements will be effective upon
publication of the final results for all shipments of PET Film from the
UAE entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after
the date of publication of the final results of this administrative
review, as provided for by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) The
cash deposit rate for the companies under review will be the rate
established in the final results of this review (except, if the rate is
zero or de minimis, no cash deposit will be required); (2) for
previously reviewed or investigated companies not listed above, the
cash deposit rate will continue to be the company-specific rate
published for the most recent period; (3) if the exporter is not a firm
covered in this review, a prior review, or the less-than-fair-value
investigation, but the manufacturer is, the cash deposit rate will be
the rate established for the most recent period for the manufacturer of
the merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit rate for all other
manufacturers or exporters will continue to be 4.05 percent, the all-
others rate established in the investigation.\9\ These cash deposit
requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further
notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ See Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip from
Brazil, the People's Republic of China and the United Arab Emirates:
Antidumping Duty Orders and Amended Final Determination of Sales at
Less Than Fair Value for the United Arab Emirates, 73 FR 66595,
66597 (November 10, 2008).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Notification to Importers
This notice also serves as a preliminary reminder to importers of
their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation
of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply
with this requirement could result in Commerce's presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent
assessment of double antidumping duties.
These preliminary results of administrative review are issued and
published in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the
Act, and 19 CFR 351.213(h)(1).
Dated: November 29, 2018.
Gary Taverman,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Operations, performing the non-exclusive functions and duties of the
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
Appendix--List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Decision
Memorandum
1. Summary
2. Background
3. Scope of the Order
4. Date of Sale
5. Discussion of Methodology
6. Product Comparisons
7. Export Price/Constructed Export Price
8. Normal Value
9. Currency Conversions
10. Conclusion
[FR Doc. 2018-26545 Filed 12-6-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P