Certain Pasta From Italy: Final Results of the Expedited Fourth Sunset Review of the Countervailing Duty Order, 62838-62839 [2018-26431]

Download as PDF 62838 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 234 / Thursday, December 6, 2018 / Notices Dated: November 29, 2018. Man Cho, Deputy Director, Office of Energy and Environmental Industries. [FR Doc. 2018–26421 Filed 12–4–18; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DR–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration khammond on DSK30JT082PROD with NOTICES Application(s) for Duty-Free Entry of Scientific Instruments Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the Educational, Scientific and Cultural Materials Importation Act of 1966 (Public Law 89–651, as amended by Public Law 106–36; 80 Stat. 897; 15 CFR part 301), we invite comments on the question of whether instruments of equivalent scientific value, for the purposes for which the instruments shown below are intended to be used, are being manufactured in the United States. Comments must comply with 15 CFR 301.5(a)(3) and (4) of the regulations and be postmarked on or before (Insert date 20 days after publication in the Federal Register). Address written comments to Statutory Import Programs Staff, Room 3720, U.S. Department of Commerce, Washington, DC 20230. Applications may be examined between 8:30 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. at the U.S. Department of Commerce in Room 3720. Docket Number: 18–006. Applicant: Fermi Research Alliance, LLC., 2000 East Wilson Street, Batavia, IL 60510. Instrument: Short Baseline Near Detector (SBND) Liquid Argon Time Projection Chamber (LArTPC). Manufacturer: The Scientific Facilities Research Council (STFC), United Kingdom. Intended Use: The instrument will be used for a basic scientific research project that will study neurtrinos, a type of elementary particle. There are three known types of neutrinos in the universe, although there could be more that have not yet been observed. The phenomena to be studied are the number of neutrino types and interaction cross-sections for the currently known neutrino types. Two detectors are required to perform the neutrino oscillation studies: The Short Baseline Near Detector (SBND) is one of these detectors. The primary objective of the SBN program is to look for evidence of neutrino oscillations, over distances of 1 kilometer or less, and if found to measure the oscillation parameters. The SBND TPC is a complex and unique instrument. Justification for Duty-Free Entry: There are no instruments of the same general VerDate Sep<11>2014 20:35 Dec 04, 2018 Jkt 247001 category manufactured in the United States. Application accepted by Commissioner of Customs: July 13, 2018. Docket Number: 18–008. Applicant: Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, One Cyclotron Road, Berkeley, CA 94720. Instrument: In Vacuum Insertion Device (aka Undulator). Manufacturer: Hitachi Metals America, LLC, Japan. Intended Use: The instrument will be installed in Sector 2.0 of the Advanced Light Source (ALS) facility at Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, for use as a high brightness beamline source for the sector. Sector 2.0 of the ALS is dedicated to the study and analysis of protein crystallography. The objectives pursued are to determine the atomicresolution, three-dimensional structures of proteins and nucleic acids-the building blocks of life-as well as complexes of these molecules, the interactions of which give rise to biological processes. Justification for Duty-Free Entry: There are no instruments of the same general category manufactured in the United States. Application accepted by Commissioner of Customs: September 11, 2018. Dated: November 29, 2018. Gregory W. Campbell, Director, Subsidies Enforcement, Enforcement and Compliance. [FR Doc. 2018–26432 Filed 12–4–18; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [C–475–819] Certain Pasta From Italy: Final Results of the Expedited Fourth Sunset Review of the Countervailing Duty Order Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (Commerce) finds that revocation of the countervailing duty order would be likely to lead to the continuation or recurrence of a countervailable subsidy at the levels indicated in the ‘‘Final Results of Review’’ section of this notice. DATES: Applicable December 5, 2018. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mary Kolberg, AD/CVD Operations, Office I, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–1785. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: AGENCY: PO 00000 Frm 00006 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Background On July 24, 1996, Commerce published the countervailing duty order on certain pasta from Italy.1 On August 1, 2018, Commerce published the notice of initiation of the fourth sunset review of this order, pursuant to section 751(c)(2) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act).2 On August 16, 2018, Commerce received a notice of intent to participate from A. Zerega’s Sons, Inc. (Zerega), Dakota Growers Pasta Company, Inc. (Dakota Growers), Riviana Foods, Inc. (Riviana) (formerly, New World Pasta Company),3 and TreeHouse Foods, Inc. (TreeHouse) 4 within the deadline specified in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(i).5 Zerega, Dakota Growers, Riviana, and TreeHouse claimed interested party status under section 771(9)(C) of the Act as producers of pasta in the United States. On August 31, 2018, Commerce received an adequate substantive response to the notice of initiation from the domestic interested parties within the 30-day deadline specified in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(3)(i).6 On September 10, 2018, Commerce received a substantive response from the Government of Italy (GOI).7 However, we received no substantive responses from respondent interested parties who are producers or exporters of the subject merchandise. A government’s response alone, normally, is not sufficient for Commerce to conduct a full sunset review, unless the investigation was conducted on an aggregate basis.8 This investigation was conducted on a company-specific, rather than an aggregate, basis. On September 20, 2018, Commerce notified the U.S. International Trade 1 See Notice of Countervailing Duty Order and Amended Final Affirmative Countervailing Duty Determination: Certain Pasta (‘‘Pasta’’) from Italy, 61 FR 38544 (July 24, 1996). 2 See Initiation of Five-Year (Sunset) Reviews, 83 FR 37463 (August 1, 2018) (Initiation Notice). 3 New World Pasta Company merged into Riviana Foods Inc. effective January 1, 2017. 4 TreeHouse acquired the American Italian Pasta Company in February 2016. 5 See letter from Zerega, Dakota Growers, Riviana, and TreeHouse, ‘‘Five-Year (‘‘Sunset’’) Review of the Countervailing Duty Order on Certain Pasta from Italy—Domestic Interested Parties’ Notice of Intent to Participate,’’ dated August 16, 2018. 6 See letter from Zerega, Dakota Growers, Riviana, and TreeHouse, ‘‘Certain Pasta From Italy—FiveYear (‘‘4th Sunset’’) Review of the Countervailing Duty Order,’’ dated August 31, 2018. 7 See letter from the GOI, ‘‘Five-Year (Sunset) Review of the Countervailing Duty Order on Certain Pasta From Italy: Response of the Government of Italy,’’ dated September 10, 2018. 8 See, e.g., Certain Pasta from Turkey: Final Results of Expedited Five-Year (‘‘Sunset’’) Review of the Countervailing Duty Order, 72 FR 5269 (February 5, 2007); Certain Carbon Steel Products from Sweden: Final Results of Expedited Sunset Review of Countervailing Duty Order, 65 FR 18304 (April 7, 2000). E:\FR\FM\06DEN1.SGM 06DEN1 62839 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 234 / Thursday, December 6, 2018 / Notices Commission (ITC) that it did not receive an adequate substantive response from respondent interested parties.9 As a result, pursuant to section 751(c)(3)(B) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2), Commerce has conducted an expedited (120-day) sunset review of the countervailing duty order on certain pasta from Italy. Scope of the Order khammond on DSK30JT082PROD with NOTICES Imports covered by the Order are shipments of certain non-egg dry pasta in packages of five pounds four ounces or less, whether or not enriched or fortified or containing milk or other optional ingredients such as chopped vegetables, vegetable purees, milk, gluten, diastasis, vitamins, coloring and flavorings, and up to two percent egg white. The pasta covered by the scope of the Order is typically sold in the retail market, in fiberboard or cardboard cartons, or polyethylene or polypropylene bags of varying dimensions. Excluded from the scope of the Order are refrigerated, frozen, or canned pastas, as well as all forms of egg pasta, with the exception of non-egg dry pasta containing up to two percent egg white. Multicolored pasta, imported in kitchen display bottles of decorative glass that are sealed with cork or paraffin and bound with raffia, is excluded from the scope of the Order.10 Pursuant to Commerce’s May 12, 2011, changed circumstances review, effective January 1, 2009, gluten free pasta is also excluded from the scope of the Order.11 Effective January 1, 2012, ravioli and tortellini filled with cheese and/or vegetables are also excluded from the scope of the Order.12 Also excluded are imports of organic pasta from Italy that are certified by an EU authorized body in accordance with the United States Department of Agriculture’s National Organic Program for organic products. The organic pasta certification must be retained by exporters and importers and made available to U.S. Customs and Border 9 See Commerce Letter re: ‘‘Sunset Reviews Initiated on August 1, 2018,’’ dated September 20, 2018. 10 See Memorandum to Richard Moreland, dated August 25, 1997, which is on file in the Central Records Unit. 11 See Certain Pasta from Italy: Final Results of Countervailing Duty Changed Circumstances Review and Revocation, In Part, 76 FR 27634 (May 12, 2011). 12 See Certain Pasta from Italy: Final Results of Antidumping Duty and Countervailing Duty Changed Circumstances Reviews and Revocation, in Part 79 FR 58319, 58320 (September 29, 2014). VerDate Sep<11>2014 20:35 Dec 04, 2018 Jkt 247001 Protection or the Department of Commerce upon request. The merchandise subject to the order is currently classifiable under items 1901.90.90.95 and 1902.19.20 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). Although the HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes, the written description of the merchandise subject to the Order is dispositive. Analysis of Comments Received All issues raised in this sunset review are addressed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum,13 which is dated concurrently with and hereby adopted by this notice. The issues discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum are the likelihood of continuation or recurrence of a countervailable subsidy and the net countervailable subsidy likely to prevail if the order were revoked. The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance’s Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at https://access.trade.gov and to all parties in the Central Records Unit, Room B8024 of the main Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly at https://enforcement.trade.gov/frn. The signed and electronic versions of the Issues and Decision Memorandum are identical in content. Pursuant to sections 751(c)(1) and 752(b) of the Act, Commerce determines that revocation of the countervailing duty order on pasta from Italy would be likely to lead to the continuation or recurrence of a countervailable subsidy at the rates listed below: Net subsidy rate (percent) Agritalia, S.r.l ........................ Arrighi S.p.A. Industrie Alimentari .......................... De Matteis Agroalimentare S.p.A ................................. Delverde, S.r.l ....................... F.lli DeCecco di Fillippo Fara S. Martino S.p.A ................ 10.45 10.34 9.64 13.25 9.90 13 See Memorandum ‘‘Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Final Results of the Fourth Expedited Five-Year Sunset Review of the Countervailing Duty Order on Certain Pasta from Italy,’’ dated concurrently with and hereby adopted by this notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum). PO 00000 Frm 00007 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Net subsidy rate (percent) Industria Alimentare Colavita, S.p.A ................................. Isola del Grano, S.r.L ........... Italpast S.p.A ........................ Italpasta S.r.l ......................... La Molisana Alimentari S.p.A Labor, S.r.L ........................... Molino e Pastificio DeCecco S.p.A. Pescara .................. Pastificio Guido Ferrara ........ Pastificio Campano, S.p.A .... Pastificio Riscossa F.lli Mastromauro S.r.L ............ Tamma Industrie Alimentari di Capitanata ..................... All Others .............................. 9.50 17.19 17.19 10.34 11.31 17.19 9.90 8.83 9.96 14.30 13.25 11.01 Notification to Interested Parties This notice also serves as the only reminder to parties subject to administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility concerning the destruction of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305. Timely written notification of the return or destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation. We are issuing and publishing these results in accordance with sections 751(c), 752(b), and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218. Dated: November 28, 2018. Final Results of Review Producer/exporter Producer/exporter Gary Taverman, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, performing the non-exclusive functions and duties of the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Appendix List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum I. Summary II. History of the Order III. Background IV. Scope of the Order V. Discussion of the Issues 1. Revocation of the Order is Likely to Lead to a Continuation or Recurrence of a Countervailable Subsidy 2. Net Countervailable Subsidy Rates that are Likely to Prevail 3. Nature of the Subsidies VI. Final Results of the Review VII. Recommendation [FR Doc. 2018–26431 Filed 12–4–18; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P E:\FR\FM\06DEN1.SGM 06DEN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 234 (Thursday, December 6, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 62838-62839]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-26431]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[C-475-819]


Certain Pasta From Italy: Final Results of the Expedited Fourth 
Sunset Review of the Countervailing Duty Order

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (Commerce) finds that revocation of 
the countervailing duty order would be likely to lead to the 
continuation or recurrence of a countervailable subsidy at the levels 
indicated in the ``Final Results of Review'' section of this notice.

DATES: Applicable December 5, 2018.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mary Kolberg, AD/CVD Operations, 
Office I, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade 
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-1785.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background

    On July 24, 1996, Commerce published the countervailing duty order 
on certain pasta from Italy.\1\ On August 1, 2018, Commerce published 
the notice of initiation of the fourth sunset review of this order, 
pursuant to section 751(c)(2) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended 
(the Act).\2\ On August 16, 2018, Commerce received a notice of intent 
to participate from A. Zerega's Sons, Inc. (Zerega), Dakota Growers 
Pasta Company, Inc. (Dakota Growers), Riviana Foods, Inc. (Riviana) 
(formerly, New World Pasta Company),\3\ and TreeHouse Foods, Inc. 
(TreeHouse) \4\ within the deadline specified in 19 CFR 
351.218(d)(1)(i).\5\ Zerega, Dakota Growers, Riviana, and TreeHouse 
claimed interested party status under section 771(9)(C) of the Act as 
producers of pasta in the United States.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Notice of Countervailing Duty Order and Amended Final 
Affirmative Countervailing Duty Determination: Certain Pasta 
(``Pasta'') from Italy, 61 FR 38544 (July 24, 1996).
    \2\ See Initiation of Five-Year (Sunset) Reviews, 83 FR 37463 
(August 1, 2018) (Initiation Notice).
    \3\ New World Pasta Company merged into Riviana Foods Inc. 
effective January 1, 2017.
    \4\ TreeHouse acquired the American Italian Pasta Company in 
February 2016.
    \5\ See letter from Zerega, Dakota Growers, Riviana, and 
TreeHouse, ``Five-Year (``Sunset'') Review of the Countervailing 
Duty Order on Certain Pasta from Italy--Domestic Interested Parties' 
Notice of Intent to Participate,'' dated August 16, 2018.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On August 31, 2018, Commerce received an adequate substantive 
response to the notice of initiation from the domestic interested 
parties within the 30-day deadline specified in 19 CFR 
351.218(d)(3)(i).\6\ On September 10, 2018, Commerce received a 
substantive response from the Government of Italy (GOI).\7\ However, we 
received no substantive responses from respondent interested parties 
who are producers or exporters of the subject merchandise. A 
government's response alone, normally, is not sufficient for Commerce 
to conduct a full sunset review, unless the investigation was conducted 
on an aggregate basis.\8\ This investigation was conducted on a 
company-specific, rather than an aggregate, basis.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ See letter from Zerega, Dakota Growers, Riviana, and 
TreeHouse, ``Certain Pasta From Italy--Five-Year (``4th Sunset'') 
Review of the Countervailing Duty Order,'' dated August 31, 2018.
    \7\ See letter from the GOI, ``Five-Year (Sunset) Review of the 
Countervailing Duty Order on Certain Pasta From Italy: Response of 
the Government of Italy,'' dated September 10, 2018.
    \8\ See, e.g., Certain Pasta from Turkey: Final Results of 
Expedited Five-Year (``Sunset'') Review of the Countervailing Duty 
Order, 72 FR 5269 (February 5, 2007); Certain Carbon Steel Products 
from Sweden: Final Results of Expedited Sunset Review of 
Countervailing Duty Order, 65 FR 18304 (April 7, 2000).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On September 20, 2018, Commerce notified the U.S. International 
Trade

[[Page 62839]]

Commission (ITC) that it did not receive an adequate substantive 
response from respondent interested parties.\9\ As a result, pursuant 
to section 751(c)(3)(B) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2), 
Commerce has conducted an expedited (120-day) sunset review of the 
countervailing duty order on certain pasta from Italy.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ See Commerce Letter re: ``Sunset Reviews Initiated on August 
1, 2018,'' dated September 20, 2018.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Scope of the Order

    Imports covered by the Order are shipments of certain non-egg dry 
pasta in packages of five pounds four ounces or less, whether or not 
enriched or fortified or containing milk or other optional ingredients 
such as chopped vegetables, vegetable purees, milk, gluten, diastasis, 
vitamins, coloring and flavorings, and up to two percent egg white. The 
pasta covered by the scope of the Order is typically sold in the retail 
market, in fiberboard or cardboard cartons, or polyethylene or 
polypropylene bags of varying dimensions.
    Excluded from the scope of the Order are refrigerated, frozen, or 
canned pastas, as well as all forms of egg pasta, with the exception of 
non-egg dry pasta containing up to two percent egg white. Multicolored 
pasta, imported in kitchen display bottles of decorative glass that are 
sealed with cork or paraffin and bound with raffia, is excluded from 
the scope of the Order.\10\ Pursuant to Commerce's May 12, 2011, 
changed circumstances review, effective January 1, 2009, gluten free 
pasta is also excluded from the scope of the Order.\11\ Effective 
January 1, 2012, ravioli and tortellini filled with cheese and/or 
vegetables are also excluded from the scope of the Order.\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ See Memorandum to Richard Moreland, dated August 25, 1997, 
which is on file in the Central Records Unit.
    \11\ See Certain Pasta from Italy: Final Results of 
Countervailing Duty Changed Circumstances Review and Revocation, In 
Part, 76 FR 27634 (May 12, 2011).
    \12\ See Certain Pasta from Italy: Final Results of Antidumping 
Duty and Countervailing Duty Changed Circumstances Reviews and 
Revocation, in Part 79 FR 58319, 58320 (September 29, 2014).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Also excluded are imports of organic pasta from Italy that are 
certified by an EU authorized body in accordance with the United States 
Department of Agriculture's National Organic Program for organic 
products. The organic pasta certification must be retained by exporters 
and importers and made available to U.S. Customs and Border Protection 
or the Department of Commerce upon request.
    The merchandise subject to the order is currently classifiable 
under items 1901.90.90.95 and 1902.19.20 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). Although the HTSUS subheadings 
are provided for convenience and customs purposes, the written 
description of the merchandise subject to the Order is dispositive.

Analysis of Comments Received

    All issues raised in this sunset review are addressed in the Issues 
and Decision Memorandum,\13\ which is dated concurrently with and 
hereby adopted by this notice. The issues discussed in the Issues and 
Decision Memorandum are the likelihood of continuation or recurrence of 
a countervailable subsidy and the net countervailable subsidy likely to 
prevail if the order were revoked. The Issues and Decision Memorandum 
is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and 
Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic 
Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at 
https://access.trade.gov and to all parties in the Central Records Unit, 
Room B8024 of the main Commerce building. In addition, a complete 
version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly 
at https://enforcement.trade.gov/frn. The signed and electronic versions 
of the Issues and Decision Memorandum are identical in content.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ See Memorandum ``Issues and Decision Memorandum for the 
Final Results of the Fourth Expedited Five-Year Sunset Review of the 
Countervailing Duty Order on Certain Pasta from Italy,'' dated 
concurrently with and hereby adopted by this notice (Issues and 
Decision Memorandum).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Final Results of Review

    Pursuant to sections 751(c)(1) and 752(b) of the Act, Commerce 
determines that revocation of the countervailing duty order on pasta 
from Italy would be likely to lead to the continuation or recurrence of 
a countervailable subsidy at the rates listed below:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                            Net subsidy
                    Producer/exporter                     rate (percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Agritalia, S.r.l........................................           10.45
Arrighi S.p.A. Industrie Alimentari.....................           10.34
De Matteis Agroalimentare S.p.A.........................            9.64
Delverde, S.r.l.........................................           13.25
F.lli DeCecco di Fillippo Fara S. Martino S.p.A.........            9.90
Industria Alimentare Colavita, S.p.A....................            9.50
Isola del Grano, S.r.L..................................           17.19
Italpast S.p.A..........................................           17.19
Italpasta S.r.l.........................................           10.34
La Molisana Alimentari S.p.A............................           11.31
Labor, S.r.L............................................           17.19
Molino e Pastificio DeCecco S.p.A. Pescara..............            9.90
Pastificio Guido Ferrara................................            8.83
Pastificio Campano, S.p.A...............................            9.96
Pastificio Riscossa F.lli Mastromauro S.r.L.............           14.30
Tamma Industrie Alimentari di Capitanata................           13.25
All Others..............................................           11.01
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Notification to Interested Parties

    This notice also serves as the only reminder to parties subject to 
administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility 
concerning the destruction of proprietary information disclosed under 
APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305. Timely written notification of 
the return or destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial 
protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the 
regulations and terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation.
    We are issuing and publishing these results in accordance with 
sections 751(c), 752(b), and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218.

    Dated: November 28, 2018.
Gary Taverman,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 
Operations, performing the non-exclusive functions and duties of the 
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.

Appendix

List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum

I. Summary
II. History of the Order
III. Background
IV. Scope of the Order
V. Discussion of the Issues
    1. Revocation of the Order is Likely to Lead to a Continuation 
or Recurrence of a Countervailable Subsidy
    2. Net Countervailable Subsidy Rates that are Likely to Prevail
    3. Nature of the Subsidies
VI. Final Results of the Review
VII. Recommendation

[FR Doc. 2018-26431 Filed 12-4-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.