Certain Pasta From Italy and Turkey: Final Results of Expedited Fourth Sunset Reviews of the Antidumping Duty Orders, 62840-62841 [2018-26429]
Download as PDF
62840
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 234 / Thursday, December 6, 2018 / Notices
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–475–818, A–489–805]
Certain Pasta From Italy and Turkey:
Final Results of Expedited Fourth
Sunset Reviews of the Antidumping
Duty Orders
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: As a result of these sunset
reviews, the Department of Commerce
(Commerce) finds that revocation of the
antidumping duty orders on certain
pasta (pasta) from Italy and Turkey
would be likely to lead to the
continuation or recurrence of dumping
at the levels indicated in the ‘‘Final
Results of Review’’ section of this
notice.
DATES: Applicable December 5, 2018.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Daniel Deku or Scott Hoefke, AD/CVD
Operations, Office VI, Enforcement and
Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone:
202–482–5075 or 202–482–4947,
respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
AGENCY:
khammond on DSK30JT082PROD with NOTICES
Background
Commerce published antidumping
duty orders on pasta from Italy and
Turkey on July 24, 1996.1 On August 1,
2018, Commerce published the notice of
initiation of the fourth sunset reviews of
the Orders, pursuant to section 751(c) of
the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the
Act).2 On August 16, 2018, Commerce
received notices of intent to participate
from the following domestic interested
parties: A. Zerega’s Sons, Inc.; Dakota
Growers Pasta Company, Inc.; Riviana
Foods, Inc. (formerly, New World Pasta
Company); and TreeHouse Foods, Inc.3
(collectively, domestic interested
parties),4 within the deadline specified
1 See Notice of Antidumping Duty Order and
Amended Final Determination of Sales at Less
Than Fair Value: Certain Pasta from Italy, 61 FR
38547 (July 24, 1996) (Italy Order), see also Notice
of Antidumping Duty Order and Amended Final
Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value:
Certain Pasta from Turkey, 61 FR 38545 (July 24,
1996) (Turkey Order) (collectively, the Orders).
2 See Initiation of Five-Year (Sunset) Reviews, 83
FR 37463 (August 1, 2018) (Sunset Initiation).
3 The domestic interested parties stated that
TreeHouse Foods, Inc. acquired the American
Italian Pasta Company in February 2016, and that
the American Italian Pasta Company is now an
indirect wholly owned subsidiary of TreeHouse
Foods, Inc. See Domestic Interested Parties’ August
16, 2018 Intent to Participate for Italy. See Domestic
August 16, 2018 Intent to Participate for Turkey.
4 Id.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:35 Dec 04, 2018
Jkt 247001
in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(i). The
domestic interested parties claimed
interested party status within the
meaning of section 771(9)(C) of the Act,
as U.S. producers of certain pasta.5
On August 22, 2018, we received an
extension request from the Government
of Italy (GOI) for its response.6 On
August 31, 2018, we granted an
extension to the GOI to submit its
substantive response by September 10,
2018.7
On August 31, 2018, Commerce
received complete substantive responses
from the domestic interested parties
within the 30-day deadline specified in
19 CFR 351.218(d)(3)(i).8 We received
no substantive responses from
respondent interested parties with
respect to the orders covered by these
sunset reviews.
On August 21, 2018, Commerce
notified the U.S. International Trade
Commission that it received a notice of
intent to participate from domestic
interested parties as required by 19 CFR
351.218(d).9 As a result, pursuant to
751(c)(3)(B) of the Act and 19 CFR
351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2), Commerce
conducted an expedited (120-day)
sunset reviews of the Orders.
Scope of the Orders
Italy (A–475–818)
The merchandise subject to the order
is pasta. The product is currently
classified under items 1901.90.90.95
and 1902.19.20 of the Harmonized Tariff
Schedule of the United States (HTSUS).
Although the HTSUS numbers are
provided for conveniences and customs
purposes, the written product
description available in Italian Order
remains dispositive. The full scope
language can be found in the
accompanying Issues and Decision
Memorandum.
Turkey (A–489–805)
The merchandise subject to the order
is pasta. The product is currently
classified under items 1902.19.20 of the
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the
United States (HTSUS). Although the
HTSUS numbers are provided for
conveniences and custom purposes, the
5 Id.
6 See
GOI’s August 22, 2018 Extension Request.
Commerce Letter ‘‘Five-Year (Sunset)
Review of the Antidumping Duty Order on Certain
Pasta from Italy: Request for Extension of Time to
File Substantive Responses,’’ dated August 29,
2018.
8 See Domestic Interested Parties’ August 31, 2018
Substantive Response for Italy; see also Domestic
Interested Parties’ August 31, 2018 Substantive
Response for Turkey.
9 See Commerce Letter re: ‘‘Sunset Reviews
Initiated on August 1, 2018,’’ dated August 21,
2018.
7 See
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
written product description available in
Turkish Order remains dispositive. The
full scope language can be found in the
accompanying Issues and Decision
Memorandum.
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised in these sunset
reviews, including the likelihood of
continuation or recurrence of dumping
and the magnitude of the margins likely
to prevail if the Orders were revoked,
are addressed in Issues and Decision
Memorandum,10 which is hereby
adopted by this notice. The Issues and
Decision Memorandum is a public
document and is on file electronically
via Enforcement and Compliance’s
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Centralized Electronic Service System
(ACCESS). ACCESS is available to
registered users at https://
access.trade.gov, and to all parties in the
Central Records Unit, Room B8024 of
the main Department of Commerce
building. In addition, a complete
version of the Issues and Decision
Memorandum can be accessed directly
on the internet at https://
enforcement.trade.gov/frn. The signed
Issues and Decision Memorandum and
the electronic version of the Issues and
Decision Memorandum are identical in
content.
Final Results of Reviews
Pursuant to sections 751(c)(1) and
752(c)(1) and (3) of the Act, we
determine that revocation of the
antidumping duty orders on pasta from
Italy and Turkey would likely lead to
the continuation or recurrence of
dumping and that the magnitude of the
dumping margins likely to prevail
would be weighted-average dumping
margins up to 20.84 percent for Italy
and up to 63.29 percent for Turkey.
Notification Regarding Administrative
Protective Order
This notice also serves as the only
reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective order (APO) of
their responsibility concerning the
return or destruction of proprietary
information disclosed under APO in
accordance with 19 CFR 351.305.
Timely notification of the return or
destruction of APO materials or
conversion to judicial protective orders
is hereby requested. Failure to comply
with the regulations and terms of an
APO is a violation which is subject to
10 See Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision
Memorandum for the Final Results of the Expedited
Fourth Sunset Reviews of the Antidumping Duty
Orders on Certain Pasta from Italy and Turkey,’’
dated concurrently with this notice (Issues and
Decision Memorandum).
E:\FR\FM\06DEN1.SGM
06DEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 234 / Thursday, December 6, 2018 / Notices
sanction. We are issuing and publishing
these final results and notice in
accordance with sections 751(c), 752(c),
and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR
351.218.
Dated: November 28, 2018.
Gary Taverman,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping
and Countervailing Duty Operations,
performing the non-executive functions and
duties of the Assistance Secretary for
Enforcement and Compliance.
Appendix
List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and
Decision Memorandum
1. Summary
2. Background
3. Scope of the Orders
4. History of the Orders
5. Legal Framework
6. Discussion of the Issues
I. Likelihood of Continuation or
Recurrence of Dumping
II. Magnitude of the Margins Likely to
Prevail
7. Final Results of Reviews
8. Recommendation
[FR Doc. 2018–26429 Filed 12–4–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[C–489–806]
Certain Pasta From Turkey: Final
Results of the Expedited Fourth
Sunset Review of the Countervailing
Duty Order
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
(Commerce) finds that revocation of the
countervailing duty (CVD) order on
certain pasta from Turkey would be
likely to lead to continuation or
recurrence of a countervailable subsidy
at the levels indicated in the ‘‘Final
Results of Review’’ section of this
notice.
DATES: Applicable December 5, 2018.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Aimee Phelan or Mary Kolberg at (202)
482–0697 or (202) 482–1785,
respectively; AD/CVD Operations,
Office I, Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401
Constitution Avenue NW, Washington,
DC 20230.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
khammond on DSK30JT082PROD with NOTICES
AGENCY:
Background
On July 24, 1996, Commerce
published the CVD order on certain
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:35 Dec 04, 2018
Jkt 247001
pasta from Turkey.1 On August 1, 2018,
Commerce published the notice of
initiation of the fourth sunset review of
this order, pursuant to section 751(c)(2)
of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended
(the Act).2 On August 16, 2018,
Commerce received a notice of intent to
participate from A. Zerega’s Sons, Inc.
(Zerega), Dakota Growers Pasta
Company, Inc. (Dakota Growers),
Riviana Foods, Inc. (Riviana) (formerly,
New World Pasta Company),3 and
TreeHouse Foods, Inc. (TreeHouse)
(formerly, The American Italian Pasta
Company) 4 within the deadline
specified in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(i).5
Zerega, Dakota Growers, Riviana, and
TreeHouse claimed interested party
status under section 771(9)(C) of the Act
as producers of pasta in the United
States.6
On August 31, 2018, Commerce
received an adequate substantive
response to the notice of initiation from
domestic interested parties within the
30-day deadline specified in 19 CFR
351.218(d)(3)(i).7 On August 31, 2018,
Commerce also received a substantive
response from the Government of
Turkey (GOT).8 However, we received
no substantive responses from
respondent interested parties who are
producers or exporters of merchandise
subject to the order covered by this
sunset review. A government’s response
alone, normally, is not sufficient for
Commerce to conduct a full sunset
review, unless the investigation was
1 See Notice of Countervailing Duty Order:
Certain Pasta (‘‘Pasta’’) From Turkey, 61 FR 38546
(July 24, 1996) (Order); see also Final Affirmative
Countervailing Duty Determination: Certain Pasta
(‘‘Pasta’’) from Turkey, 61 FR 30366 (June 14, 1996)
(Final Determination).
2 See Initiation of Five-Year (Sunset) Reviews, 83
FR 37463 (August 1, 2018).
3 New World Pasta Company merged into Riviana
Foods Inc. effective January 1, 2017.
4 The American Italian Pasta Company was
acquired by TreeHouse Foods in February 1, 2016.
5 See Letter from Zerega, Dakota Growers,
Riviana, and Treehouse, ‘‘Five-Year (Sunset)
Review of the Countervailing Duty Order on Certain
Pasta from Turkey—Domestic Interested Parties’
Notice of Intent to Participate,’’ dated August 16,
2018 (Domestic Parties’ Notice of Intent to
Participate).
6 See Letter from Domestic Interested Parties,
‘‘Five-Year (Sunset) Review of the Countervailing
Duty Order on Certain Pasta from Turkey—
Domestic Interested Parties’ Notice of Intent to
Participate,’’ August 16, 2018. As domestic
producers of certain pasta, the petitioners are
interested parties to this proceeding pursuant to
section 771(9)(C) of the Act.
7 See Letter from the petitioner, ‘‘Certain Pasta
from Turkey—Five-Year (‘‘4th Sunset’’) Review of
Countervailing Duty Order,’’ dated August 31, 2018
(Petitioners’ Substantive Response).
8 See Letter from the GOT, ‘‘Substantive Response
of the Government of Turkey in the Countervailing
Duty 4th Sunset Review Involving Certain Pasta
from Turkey,’’ dated August 31, 2018 (GOT
substantive response).
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
62841
conducted on an aggregate basis.9 This
investigation was conducted on a
company-specific, rather than an
aggregate, basis.
On September 20, 2018, Commerce
notified the U.S. International Trade
Commission that it did not receive an
adequate substantive response from
respondent interested parties.10 As a
result, pursuant to 751(c)(3)(B) of the
Act and 19 CFR 351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2),
Commerce has conducted an expedited
(120-day) sunset review of the CVD
order on certain pasta from Turkey.
Scope of the Order
The scope of the CVD order consists
of certain non-egg dry pasta in packages
of five pounds (or 2.27 kilograms) or
less, whether or not enriched or fortified
or containing milk or other optional
ingredients such as chopped vegetables,
vegetable purees, milk, gluten, diastases,
vitamins, coloring and flavorings, and
up to two percent egg white. The pasta
covered by the order is typically sold in
the retail market, in fiberboard or
cardboard cartons or polyethylene or
polyethylene bags, of varying
dimensions.
Excluded from the scope of the order
are refrigerated, frozen, or canned
pastas, as well as all forms of egg pasta,
with the exception of non-egg dry pasta
containing up to two percent egg white.
The merchandise under review is
currently classifiable under subheading
1902.19.20 of the Harmonized Tariff
Schedule of the United States (HTSUS).
Although the HTSUS subheading is
provided for convenience and customs
purposes, our written description of the
scope of the order is dispositive.
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised in this sunset review
are addressed in the Issues and Decision
Memorandum,11 which is hereby
adopted by this notice. The issues
discussed in the Issues and Decision
Memorandum are the likelihood of
continuation or recurrence of a
countervailable subsidy and the net
countervailable subsidy likely to prevail
if the order were revoked. The Issues
and Decision Memorandum is a public
9 See, e.g., Certain Pasta from Turkey: Final
Results of Expedited Five-Year (‘‘Sunset’’) Review of
the Countervailing Duty Order, 72 FR 5269
(February 5, 2007); Certain Carbon Steel Products
from Sweden: Final Results of Expedited Sunset
Review of Countervailing Duty Order, 65 FR 18304
(April 7, 2000).
10 See Letter re: ‘‘Sunset Reviews Initiated on
August 1, 2018,’’ dated September 20, 2018.
11 See Memorandum ‘‘Issues and Decision
Memorandum for the Expedited Fourth Sunset
Review of the Countervailing Duty Order on Certain
Pasta from Turkey,’’ dated concurrently with this
notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum).
E:\FR\FM\06DEN1.SGM
06DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 234 (Thursday, December 6, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 62840-62841]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-26429]
[[Page 62840]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-475-818, A-489-805]
Certain Pasta From Italy and Turkey: Final Results of Expedited
Fourth Sunset Reviews of the Antidumping Duty Orders
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: As a result of these sunset reviews, the Department of
Commerce (Commerce) finds that revocation of the antidumping duty
orders on certain pasta (pasta) from Italy and Turkey would be likely
to lead to the continuation or recurrence of dumping at the levels
indicated in the ``Final Results of Review'' section of this notice.
DATES: Applicable December 5, 2018.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Daniel Deku or Scott Hoefke, AD/CVD
Operations, Office VI, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: 202-482-5075 or 202-482-4947,
respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Commerce published antidumping duty orders on pasta from Italy and
Turkey on July 24, 1996.\1\ On August 1, 2018, Commerce published the
notice of initiation of the fourth sunset reviews of the Orders,
pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the
Act).\2\ On August 16, 2018, Commerce received notices of intent to
participate from the following domestic interested parties: A. Zerega's
Sons, Inc.; Dakota Growers Pasta Company, Inc.; Riviana Foods, Inc.
(formerly, New World Pasta Company); and TreeHouse Foods, Inc.\3\
(collectively, domestic interested parties),\4\ within the deadline
specified in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(i). The domestic interested parties
claimed interested party status within the meaning of section 771(9)(C)
of the Act, as U.S. producers of certain pasta.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Notice of Antidumping Duty Order and Amended Final
Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value: Certain Pasta from
Italy, 61 FR 38547 (July 24, 1996) (Italy Order), see also Notice of
Antidumping Duty Order and Amended Final Determination of Sales at
Less Than Fair Value: Certain Pasta from Turkey, 61 FR 38545 (July
24, 1996) (Turkey Order) (collectively, the Orders).
\2\ See Initiation of Five-Year (Sunset) Reviews, 83 FR 37463
(August 1, 2018) (Sunset Initiation).
\3\ The domestic interested parties stated that TreeHouse Foods,
Inc. acquired the American Italian Pasta Company in February 2016,
and that the American Italian Pasta Company is now an indirect
wholly owned subsidiary of TreeHouse Foods, Inc. See Domestic
Interested Parties' August 16, 2018 Intent to Participate for Italy.
See Domestic August 16, 2018 Intent to Participate for Turkey.
\4\ Id.
\5\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
On August 22, 2018, we received an extension request from the
Government of Italy (GOI) for its response.\6\ On August 31, 2018, we
granted an extension to the GOI to submit its substantive response by
September 10, 2018.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ See GOI's August 22, 2018 Extension Request.
\7\ See Commerce Letter ``Five-Year (Sunset) Review of the
Antidumping Duty Order on Certain Pasta from Italy: Request for
Extension of Time to File Substantive Responses,'' dated August 29,
2018.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
On August 31, 2018, Commerce received complete substantive
responses from the domestic interested parties within the 30-day
deadline specified in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(3)(i).\8\ We received no
substantive responses from respondent interested parties with respect
to the orders covered by these sunset reviews.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ See Domestic Interested Parties' August 31, 2018 Substantive
Response for Italy; see also Domestic Interested Parties' August 31,
2018 Substantive Response for Turkey.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
On August 21, 2018, Commerce notified the U.S. International Trade
Commission that it received a notice of intent to participate from
domestic interested parties as required by 19 CFR 351.218(d).\9\ As a
result, pursuant to 751(c)(3)(B) of the Act and 19 CFR
351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2), Commerce conducted an expedited (120-day)
sunset reviews of the Orders.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ See Commerce Letter re: ``Sunset Reviews Initiated on August
1, 2018,'' dated August 21, 2018.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scope of the Orders
Italy (A-475-818)
The merchandise subject to the order is pasta. The product is
currently classified under items 1901.90.90.95 and 1902.19.20 of the
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). Although the
HTSUS numbers are provided for conveniences and customs purposes, the
written product description available in Italian Order remains
dispositive. The full scope language can be found in the accompanying
Issues and Decision Memorandum.
Turkey (A-489-805)
The merchandise subject to the order is pasta. The product is
currently classified under items 1902.19.20 of the Harmonized Tariff
Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). Although the HTSUS numbers are
provided for conveniences and custom purposes, the written product
description available in Turkish Order remains dispositive. The full
scope language can be found in the accompanying Issues and Decision
Memorandum.
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised in these sunset reviews, including the likelihood
of continuation or recurrence of dumping and the magnitude of the
margins likely to prevail if the Orders were revoked, are addressed in
Issues and Decision Memorandum,\10\ which is hereby adopted by this
notice. The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document and is
on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS).
ACCESS is available to registered users at https://access.trade.gov, and
to all parties in the Central Records Unit, Room B8024 of the main
Department of Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the
Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly on the internet
at https://enforcement.trade.gov/frn. The signed Issues and Decision
Memorandum and the electronic version of the Issues and Decision
Memorandum are identical in content.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ See Memorandum, ``Issues and Decision Memorandum for the
Final Results of the Expedited Fourth Sunset Reviews of the
Antidumping Duty Orders on Certain Pasta from Italy and Turkey,''
dated concurrently with this notice (Issues and Decision
Memorandum).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Final Results of Reviews
Pursuant to sections 751(c)(1) and 752(c)(1) and (3) of the Act, we
determine that revocation of the antidumping duty orders on pasta from
Italy and Turkey would likely lead to the continuation or recurrence of
dumping and that the magnitude of the dumping margins likely to prevail
would be weighted-average dumping margins up to 20.84 percent for Italy
and up to 63.29 percent for Turkey.
Notification Regarding Administrative Protective Order
This notice also serves as the only reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility
concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305. Timely
notification of the return or destruction of APO materials or
conversion to judicial protective orders is hereby requested. Failure
to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a violation which
is subject to
[[Page 62841]]
sanction. We are issuing and publishing these final results and notice
in accordance with sections 751(c), 752(c), and 777(i)(1) of the Act
and 19 CFR 351.218.
Dated: November 28, 2018.
Gary Taverman,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Operations, performing the non-executive functions and duties of the
Assistance Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
Appendix
List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum
1. Summary
2. Background
3. Scope of the Orders
4. History of the Orders
5. Legal Framework
6. Discussion of the Issues
I. Likelihood of Continuation or Recurrence of Dumping
II. Magnitude of the Margins Likely to Prevail
7. Final Results of Reviews
8. Recommendation
[FR Doc. 2018-26429 Filed 12-4-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P