Certain Submarine Telecommunication Systems and Components Thereof; Commission Determination Not To Review an Initial Determination Granting an Unopposed Motion To Terminate the Investigation; Termination of the Investigation, 62345 [2018-26180]

Download as PDF khammond on DSK30JT082PROD with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 232 / Monday, December 3, 2018 / Notices including antidumping duties). If you are a trade/business association, provide the information, on an aggregate basis, for the firms which are members of your association. (a) Production (quantity) and, if known, an estimate of the percentage of total production of Subject Merchandise in the Subject Country accounted for by your firm’s(s’) production; (b) Capacity (quantity) of your firm(s) to produce the Subject Merchandise in the Subject Country (that is, the level of production that your establishment(s) could reasonably have expected to attain during the year, assuming normal operating conditions (using equipment and machinery in place and ready to operate), normal operating levels (hours per week/weeks per year), time for downtime, maintenance, repair, and cleanup, and a typical or representative product mix); and (c) the quantity and value of your firm’s(s’) exports to the United States of Subject Merchandise and, if known, an estimate of the percentage of total exports to the United States of Subject Merchandise from the Subject Country accounted for by your firm’s(s’) exports. (12) Identify significant changes, if any, in the supply and demand conditions or business cycle for the Domestic Like Product that have occurred in the United States or in the market for the Subject Merchandise in the Subject Country after 2012, and significant changes, if any, that are likely to occur within a reasonably foreseeable time. Supply conditions to consider include technology; production methods; development efforts; ability to increase production (including the shift of production facilities used for other products and the use, cost, or availability of major inputs into production); and factors related to the ability to shift supply among different national markets (including barriers to importation in foreign markets or changes in market demand abroad). Demand conditions to consider include end uses and applications; the existence and availability of substitute products; and the level of competition among the Domestic Like Product produced in the United States, Subject Merchandise produced in the Subject Country, and such merchandise from other countries. (13) (OPTIONAL) A statement of whether you agree with the above definitions of the Domestic Like Product and Domestic Industry; if you disagree with either or both of these definitions, please explain why and provide alternative definitions. Authority: This proceeding is being conducted under authority of title VII of VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:52 Nov 30, 2018 Jkt 247001 the Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published pursuant to section 207.61 of the Commission’s rules. By order of the Commission. Issued: November 27, 2018. Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 2018–26136 Filed 11–30–18; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation No. 337–TA–1113] Certain Submarine Telecommunication Systems and Components Thereof; Commission Determination Not To Review an Initial Determination Granting an Unopposed Motion To Terminate the Investigation; Termination of the Investigation U.S. International Trade Commission. ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has determined not to review an initial determination (‘‘ID’’) (Order No. 19) of the presiding administrative law judge (‘‘ALJ’’) granting an unopposed motion to terminate the investigation based on withdrawal of the complaint. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Amanda Pitcher Fisherow, Esq., Office of the General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205–2737. Copies of non-confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are or will be available for inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205–2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at https:// edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on (202) 205–1810. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted this investigation on May 23, 2018, based on a complaint, filed on behalf of NEC Corporation of Tokyo, Japan and NEC Corporation of America of Irving, Texas (‘‘complainants’’). 83 FR 23936–37 (May SUMMARY: PO 00000 Frm 00056 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 62345 23, 2018). The complaint alleges violations of section 337 based upon the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of certain submarine telecommunication systems and components thereof by reason of infringement of certain claims of U.S. Patent 8,244,131. The Notice of Institution named Xtera, Inc. of Allen, Texas; MC Assembly, LLC of Melbourne, Florida; and MC Test Services, Inc. of Melbourne, Florida as respondents. The Office of Unfair Import Investigations (‘‘OUII’’) was named as a party. On October 26, 2018, complainants filed a motion to withdraw the complaint and suspend the procedural schedule pending final termination of the investigation. OUII and respondents did not oppose the motion. On October 29, 2018, the ALJ issued the subject ID (Order No. 19) granting complainants’ motion. The ALJ found that no extraordinary circumstances prevent the termination of the investigation. No petitions for review were filed. The Commission has determined not to review the ID. The investigation is terminated. The authority for the Commission’s determination is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in part 210 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR part 210). By order of the Commission. Issued: November 28, 2018. Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 2018–26180 Filed 11–30–18; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation Nos. 701–TA–603–605 and 731–TA–1413–1415 (Final)] Glycine From China, India, Japan, and Thailand; Scheduling of the Final Phase of Countervailing Duty and AntiDumping Duty Investigations United States International Trade Commission. ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: The Commission hereby gives notice of the scheduling of the final phase of antidumping and countervailing duty investigation Nos. 701–TA–603–605 and 731–TA–1413– 1415 (Final) pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930 (‘‘the Act’’) to determine SUMMARY: E:\FR\FM\03DEN1.SGM 03DEN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 232 (Monday, December 3, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 62345]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-26180]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation No. 337-TA-1113]


Certain Submarine Telecommunication Systems and Components 
Thereof; Commission Determination Not To Review an Initial 
Determination Granting an Unopposed Motion To Terminate the 
Investigation; Termination of the Investigation

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade 
Commission has determined not to review an initial determination 
(``ID'') (Order No. 19) of the presiding administrative law judge 
(``ALJ'') granting an unopposed motion to terminate the investigation 
based on withdrawal of the complaint.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Amanda Pitcher Fisherow, Esq., Office 
of the General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E 
Street SW, Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205-2737. Copies of 
non-confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation 
are or will be available for inspection during official business hours 
(8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. 
International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, Washington, DC 20436, 
telephone (202) 205-2000. General information concerning the Commission 
may also be obtained by accessing its internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be viewed 
on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. 
Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter 
can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on (202) 
205-1810.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted this investigation 
on May 23, 2018, based on a complaint, filed on behalf of NEC 
Corporation of Tokyo, Japan and NEC Corporation of America of Irving, 
Texas (``complainants''). 83 FR 23936-37 (May 23, 2018). The complaint 
alleges violations of section 337 based upon the importation into the 
United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United 
States after importation of certain submarine telecommunication systems 
and components thereof by reason of infringement of certain claims of 
U.S. Patent 8,244,131. The Notice of Institution named Xtera, Inc. of 
Allen, Texas; MC Assembly, LLC of Melbourne, Florida; and MC Test 
Services, Inc. of Melbourne, Florida as respondents. The Office of 
Unfair Import Investigations (``OUII'') was named as a party.
    On October 26, 2018, complainants filed a motion to withdraw the 
complaint and suspend the procedural schedule pending final termination 
of the investigation. OUII and respondents did not oppose the motion.
    On October 29, 2018, the ALJ issued the subject ID (Order No. 19) 
granting complainants' motion. The ALJ found that no extraordinary 
circumstances prevent the termination of the investigation. No 
petitions for review were filed.
    The Commission has determined not to review the ID. The 
investigation is terminated.
    The authority for the Commission's determination is contained in 
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and 
in part 210 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 
part 210).

    By order of the Commission.

    Issued: November 28, 2018.
Lisa Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2018-26180 Filed 11-30-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 7020-02-P