Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof From the People's Republic of China: Notice of Court Decision Not in Harmony With the Final Results of Review and Amended Final Results of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2012-2013, 55520-55522 [2018-24251]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
khammond on DSK30JT082PROD with NOTICES
55520
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 215 / Tuesday, November 6, 2018 / Notices
and allocate sales resulting from such
arrangements among the Members.
4. The Members may refuse to deal
with export intermediaries other than
AGC and its Members.
5. AGC may, for itself and on behalf
of its Members, by agreement with its or
its Members’ distributors or agents, or
on the basis of its own determination:
(a) Establish the prices at which
Export Product will be sold in export
markets;
(b) establish standard terms of sale of
Export Product;
(c) establish standard quality grades
for Export Product;
(d) establish target prices for sales of
Export Product by its Members in export
markets, with each Member remaining
free to deviate from such target prices in
its sole discretion;
(e) subject to the limitations set forth
in paragraph 1, above, establish the
quantity of Export Product to be sold in
export markets;
(f) allocate among the Members export
markets or customers in the export
markets;
(g) refuse to quote prices for, or to
market or sell, Export Product in export
markets; and
(h) engage in joint promotional
activities aimed at developing existing
or new export markets, such as
advertising and trade shows.
6. AGC may, for itself and on behalf
of its Members, contact non-member
suppliers of Export Product to elicit
information relating to price, volume
delivery schedules, terms of sale, and
other matters relating to such suppliers’
sales or prospective sales in export
markets.
7. Subject to the limitations set forth
in paragraph 1, above, AGC and its
Members may agree on the quantities of
Export Product and the prices at which
AGC and its Members may sell Export
Product in and for export markets, and
may also agree on territorial and
customer allocations in export markets
among the Members.
8. AGC and its Members may enter
into exclusive and non-exclusive
agreements appointing third parties as
export intermediaries for the sale of
Export Product in export markets. Such
agreements may contain the price,
quantity, territorial and customer
restrictions for export markets contained
in paragraph 5, above.
9. AGC and its Members may solicit
individual non-Member suppliers of
Export Product to sell such Export
Product to AGC or Members for sale in
export markets.
10. AGC and its Members may
prescribe conditions for withdrawal of
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:05 Nov 05, 2018
Jkt 247001
Members from and admission of
Members to AGC.
11. AGC may, for itself or on behalf
of its Members, establish and implement
a quality assurance program for Export
Product, including without limitation
establishing, staffing, and operating a
laboratory to conduct quality testing,
promulgating quality standards or
grades, inspecting Export Product
samples and publishing guidelines for
and reports of the results of laboratory
testing.
12. AGC may conduct meetings of its
Members to engage in the activities
described in paragraphs 1 through 11,
above.
13. AGC may compile for, collect
from, and disseminate to its Members,
and the Members may discuss among
themselves, either in meetings
conducted by AGC or independently via
telephone and other available and
appropriate modes of communication,
the following types of information with
respect to the export of
Export Product to export markets
only:
(a) Sales and marketing efforts, and
activities and opportunities for sales of
Export Product, including but not
limited to selling strategies and pricing,
projected demand for Export Product,
standard or customary terms of sale in
export markets, prices and availability
of Export Product from competitors, and
specifications for Export Product by
customers in export markets;
(b) Price, quality, quantity, source,
and delivery dates of Export Product
available from the Members for export
including but not limited to export
inventory levels and geographic
availability;
(c) Terms and conditions of contracts
for sales to be considered and/or bid on
by AGC and its Members;
(d) Joint bidding or selling
arrangements and allocation of sales
resulting from such arrangements
among the Members, including each
Member’s share of the previous calendar
year’s total foreign sales;
(e) Expenses specific to exporting to
and within export markets, including
without limitation transportation, transor intermodal shipments, cold storage,
insurance, inland freight to port, port
storage, commissions, export sales,
documentation, financing, customs
duties, and taxes;
(f) U.S. and foreign legislation
regulations and policies affecting export
sales; and
(g) AGC’s and/or its Members’ export
operations, including without
limitation, sales and distribution
networks established by AGC or its
Members in export markets, and prior
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
export sales by Members (including
export price information).
Dated: October 31, 2018.
Joseph Flynn,
Director, Office of Trade and Economic
Analysis, International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce.
[FR Doc. 2018–24220 Filed 11–5–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DR–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–570–900]
Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof
From the People’s Republic of China:
Notice of Court Decision Not in
Harmony With the Final Results of
Review and Amended Final Results of
the Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review; 2012–2013
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On October 23, 2018, the
United States Court of International
Trade (CIT) sustained the final remand
redetermination pertaining to the
administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on diamond
sawblades and parts thereof from the
People’s Republic of China covering the
period November 1, 2012, through
October 31, 2013. The Department of
Commerce (Commerce) is notifying the
public that the CIT’s final judgment in
this case is not in harmony with the
final results of the administrative review
and that Commerce is amending the
final results with respect to the
respondents eligible for separate rates.
DATES: Applicable November 2, 2018.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Yang Jin Chun or Minoo Hatten, AD/
CVD Operations, Office I, Enforcement
and Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone
(202) 482–5760 or (202) 482–1690,
respectively.
AGENCY:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On June 8, 2015, Commerce published
the Final Results, in which we valued
cores produced by Weihai Xiangguang
Mechanical Industrial Co., Ltd., using a
build-up methodology and calculated
surrogate financial ratios using
Philippine financial statements.1 On
1 See Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof from
the People’s Republic of China: Final Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2012–
E:\FR\FM\06NON1.SGM
06NON1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 215 / Tuesday, November 6, 2018 / Notices
March 31, 2017, the CIT remanded the
Final Results to Commerce to reconsider
the valuation of cores and the use of
certain financial statements.2 In the first
final remand redetermination, we
revised the valuation of cores and used
other available financial statements to
calculate surrogate financial ratios.3 On
March 22, 2018, the CIT remanded the
Final Results to further examine the
revisions to the valuation of cores and
our decision not to use certain financial
statements in the first final remand
redetermination.4 In the second final
remand redetermination, we further
revised the valuation of cores and we
used additional financial statements to
calculate surrogate financial ratios.5 On
October 23, 2018, the CIT sustained our
second final remand redetermination in
its entirety.6
Timken Notice
In its decision in Timken Co. v.
United States, 893 F.2d 337, 341 (Fed.
Cir. 1990) (Timken), as clarified by
Diamond Sawblades Mfrs. Coalition v.
United States, 626 F.3d 1374 (Fed. Cir.
2010), the United States Court of
Appeals for the Federal Circuit held
that, pursuant to section 516A(e) of the
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act),
Commerce must publish a notice of a
court decision that is not ‘‘in harmony’’
with a Commerce determination and
must suspend liquidation of entries
pending a ‘‘conclusive’’ court decision.
The CIT’s October 23, 2018, final
judgment sustaining the second final
remand redetermination constitutes the
CIT’s final decision which is not ‘‘in
harmony’’ with the Final Results. This
notice is published in fulfillment of the
publication requirements of Timken.
Accordingly, Commerce will continue
the suspension of liquidation of the
subject merchandise pending expiration
of the period to appeal or, if appealed,
pending a final and conclusive court
decision.
Amended Final Results of Review
Because there is now a final court
decision, Commerce is amending the
Final Results with respect to the
separate rate respondents as follows:
Weighted-average
dumping margin
(percent)
Exporter
Bosun Tools Co., Ltd ...................................................................................................................................................................
Chengdu Huifeng Diamond Tools Co., Ltd 7 ...............................................................................................................................
Danyang City Ou Di Ma Tools Co., Ltd ......................................................................................................................................
Danyang Huachang Diamond Tools Manufacturing Co., Ltd .....................................................................................................
Danyang NYCL Tools Manufacturing Co., Ltd ............................................................................................................................
Danyang Tsunda Diamond Tools Co., Ltd ..................................................................................................................................
Danyang Weiwang Tools Manufacturing Co., Ltd .......................................................................................................................
Guilin Tebon Superhard Material Co., Ltd ..................................................................................................................................
Hangzhou Deer King Industrial and Trading Co., Ltd .................................................................................................................
Hangzhou Kingburg Import & Export Co., Ltd ............................................................................................................................
Huzhou Gu’s Import & Export Co., Ltd .......................................................................................................................................
Jiangsu Fengtai Diamond Tool Manufacture Co., Ltd 8 ..............................................................................................................
Jiangsu Inter-China Group Corporation ......................................................................................................................................
Jiangsu Youhe Tool Manufacturer Co., Ltd ................................................................................................................................
Pujiang Talent Diamond Tools Co., Ltd ......................................................................................................................................
Qingdao Hyosung Diamond Tools Co., Ltd ................................................................................................................................
Qingyuan Shangtai Diamond Tools Co., Ltd ...............................................................................................................................
Quanzhou Zhongzhi Diamond Tool Co., Ltd ...............................................................................................................................
Rizhao Hein Saw Co., Ltd ...........................................................................................................................................................
Saint-Gobain Abrasives (Shanghai) Co., Ltd ..............................................................................................................................
Shanghai Jingquan Ind. Trade Co., Ltd ......................................................................................................................................
Shanghai Starcraft Tools Company Limited ................................................................................................................................
Weihai Xiangguang Mechanical Industrial Co., Ltd ....................................................................................................................
Wuhan Wanbang Laser Diamond Tools Co 9 .............................................................................................................................
Xiamen ZL Diamond Technology Co., Ltd ..................................................................................................................................
Zhejiang Wanli Tools Group Co., Ltd ..........................................................................................................................................
khammond on DSK30JT082PROD with NOTICES
55521
3.45
12.05
12.05
12.05
12.05
12.05
12.05
12.05
12.05
12.05
12.05
12.05
12.05
12.05
12.05
12.05
12.05
12.05
12.05
12.05
12.05
12.05
22.57
12.05
12.05
12.05
In the event the CIT’s ruling is not
appealed or, if appealed, upheld by a
final and conclusive court decision,
Commerce will instruct the U.S.
Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to
assess antidumping duties on
unliquidated entries of subject
merchandise based on the revised rates
Commerce determined and listed above.
2013, 80 FR 32344 (June 8, 2015) (Final Results) and
accompanying Issues and Decision Memorandum at
Comments 14 and 16.
2 See Diamond Sawblades Manufacturers’
Coalition v. United States, 219 F. Supp. 3d 1368
(CIT 2017).
3 See Final Remand Redetermination dated
September 21, 2017, pursuant to Diamond
Sawblades Manufacturers’ Coalition v. United
States, 219 F. Supp. 3d 1368 (CIT 2017), and
available at https://enforcement.trade.gov/remands/
17-36.pdf.
4 See Diamond Sawblades Manufacturers’
Coalition v. United States, 299 F. Supp. 3d 1374
(CIT 2018).
5 See Final Second Remand Redetermination
dated July 20, 2018, pursuant to Diamond
Sawblades Manufacturers’ Coalition v. United
States, 299 F. Supp. 3d 1374 (CIT 2018), and
available at https://enforcement.trade.gov/remands/
18-26.pdf.
6 See Diamond Sawblades Manufacturers’
Coalition v. United States, Consol. Court No. 15–
00164, slip op. 18–145 (CIT Oct. 23, 2018).
7 Commerce determined that Chengdu Huifeng
New Material Technology Co., Ltd., is the
successor-in-interest to Chengdu Huifeng Diamond
Tools Co., Ltd. See Diamond Sawblades and Parts
Thereof from the People’s Republic of China: Final
Results of Antidumping Duty Changed
Circumstances Review, 82 FR 60177 (December 19,
2017).
8 Commerce found Jiangsu Fengtai Diamond Tool
Manufacture Co., Ltd., Jiangsu Fengtai Tools Co.,
Ltd., and Jiangsu Fengtai Sawing Industry Co., Ltd.,
affiliated and Commerce collapsed these three
companies into the Jiangsu Fengtai Single Entity.
See, e.g., Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof
from the People’s Republic of China: Final Results
of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2014–
2015, 82 FR 26912, 26913 n.5 (June 12, 2017).
9 Commerce determined that Wuhan Wanbang
Laser Diamond Tools Co., Ltd., is the successor-ininterest to Wuhan Wanbang Laser Diamond Tools
Co. See Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof
from the People’s Republic of China: Final Results
of Antidumping Duty Changed Circumstances
Review, 81 FR 20618 (April 8, 2016).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:05 Nov 05, 2018
Jkt 247001
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\06NON1.SGM
06NON1
55522
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 215 / Tuesday, November 6, 2018 / Notices
Cash Deposit Requirements
As the cash deposit rates for Danyang
City Ou Di Ma Tools Co., Ltd., and
Danyang Tsunda Diamond Tools Co.,
Ltd., have not been subject to
subsequent administrative reviews,
Commerce will issue revised cash
deposit instructions to CBP adjusting
the rate from 2.34 percent to 12.05
percent, effective November 2, 2018. For
all other respondents listed above,
because the cash deposit rates have been
updated in subsequent administrative
reviews,10 we will not update their cash
deposit rates as a result of these
amended final results.
Notification to Interested Parties
This notice is issued and published in
accordance with sections 516A(e)(1),
751(a)(1), and 777(i)(1) of the Act.
Dated: October 31, 2018.
Gary Taverman,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping
and Countervailing Duty Operations,
performing the non-exclusive functions and
duties of the Assistant Secretary for
Enforcement and Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2018–24251 Filed 11–5–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Submission for OMB Review;
Comment Request
khammond on DSK30JT082PROD with NOTICES
The Department of Commerce will
submit to the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) for clearance the
following proposal for collection of
information under the provisions of the
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35).
Agency: National Institute of
Standards and Technology (NIST).
Title: National Cybersecurity Center of
Excellence (NCCoE) Participant Letter(s)
of Interest (LoI).
10 See Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof
from the People’s Republic of China: Final Results
of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2014–
2015, 82 FR 26912, 26913 (June 12, 2017), for
Jiangsu Inter-China Group Corporation, Diamond
Sawblades and Parts Thereof from the People’s
Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping
Duty Administrative Review; 2013–2014, 81 FR
38673, 38674–75 n.15 (June 14, 2016), for Pujiang
Talent Diamond Tools Co., Ltd., which we
identified as part of the China-wide entity, and
Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof from the
People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2015–
2016, 82 FR 57585, 57586 (December 6, 2017), and
accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum
at 3–4. 9, unchanged in Diamond Sawblades and
Parts Thereof from the People’s Republic of China:
Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review; 2015–2016, 83 FR 17527 (April 20, 2018),
for all other respondents listed above for which the
cash deposit rates will not be updated as a result
of these amended final results.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:05 Nov 05, 2018
Jkt 247001
OMB Control Number: #0693–0075.
Form Number(s): None.
Type of Request: Regular submission
(revision and extension of a currently
approved information collection.
Number of Respondents: 120.
Average Hours per Response: 2 hours
per response.
Burden Hours: 240 Hours.
Needs and Uses: New collaborative
projects to address specific
cybersecurity challenges. Technology
providers having an interest in
participating in an announced project
are invited to submit Letters of Interest
(LoI) in participation. NIST provides a
LoI template to technology providers
that express a desire to participate in a
project.
Affected Public: Business or other for
profit.
Frequency: Once per announcement.
Respondent’s Obligation: Voluntary.
This information collection request
may be viewed at reginfo.gov. Follow
the instructions to view Department of
Commerce collections currently under
review by OMB.
Written comments and
recommendations for the proposed
information collection should be sent
within 30 days of publication of this
notice to OIRA_Submission@
omb.eop.gov or fax to (202) 395–5806.
November 16, 2018, 10–12 p.m., Pacific
Time.
ADDRESSES: The public meeting will be
conducted by telephone conference call.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Katherine Cheney; NFMS West Coast
Region; 503–231–6730; email:
Katherine.Cheney@noaa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is
hereby given of a meeting of MAFAC’s
CBP Task Force. The MAFAC was
established by the Secretary of
Commerce (Secretary), and, since 1971,
advises the Secretary on all living
marine resource matters that are the
responsibility of the Department of
Commerce. The MAFAC charter and
summaries of prior MAFAC meetings
are located online at https://
www.fisheries.noaa.gov/topic/
partners#marine-fisheries-advisorycommittee-. The CBP Task Force reports
to MAFAC and is being convened to
develop recommendations for long-term
goals to meet Columbia Basin salmon
recovery, conservation needs, and
harvest opportunities, in the context of
habitat capacity and other factors that
affect salmon mortality. More
information is available at the CBP Task
Force web page: https://
www.westcoast.fisheries.noaa.gov/
columbia_river/.
Sheleen Dumas,
Departmental Lead PRA Officer, Office of the
Chief Information Officer.
Matters To Be Considered
[FR Doc. 2018–24263 Filed 11–5–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
RIN 0648–XG603
Meeting of the Columbia Basin
Partnership Task Force of the Marine
Fisheries Advisory Committee
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of open public meeting.
AGENCY:
This notice sets forth the
proposed schedule and agenda of two
forthcoming meetings of the Marine
Fisheries Advisory Committee’s
(MAFAC’s) Columbia Basin Partnership
Task Force (CBP Task Force). The CBP
Task Force will discuss the issues
outlined in the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION below.
DATES: The meetings are scheduled for
November 15, 2018, 1–4 p.m. and
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
The Committee is convening to
discuss updates to the shared
provisional salmon and steelhead
quantitative goals, the draft
recommendations report, and planning
for the next phase of work for the CBP
Task Force.
Time and Date
The meeting is scheduled for
November 15, 2018, 1–4 p.m. and
November 16, 2018, 10 a.m.–12 p.m.,
Pacific Time by conference call and
webinar. Access information for the
public will be posted at https://
www.westcoast.fisheries.noaa.gov/
columbia_river/ by
November 9, 2018.
Special Accommodations
These meetings are physically
accessible to people with disabilities.
Requests for auxiliary aids should be
directed to Katherine Cheney, 503–231–
6730 by November 8, 2018.
Dated: October 31, 2018.
Jennifer L. Lukens,
Federal Program Officer, Marine Fisheries
Advisory Committee, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2018–24237 Filed 11–5–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
E:\FR\FM\06NON1.SGM
06NON1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 215 (Tuesday, November 6, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 55520-55522]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-24251]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-570-900]
Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof From the People's Republic of
China: Notice of Court Decision Not in Harmony With the Final Results
of Review and Amended Final Results of the Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review; 2012-2013
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On October 23, 2018, the United States Court of International
Trade (CIT) sustained the final remand redetermination pertaining to
the administrative review of the antidumping duty order on diamond
sawblades and parts thereof from the People's Republic of China
covering the period November 1, 2012, through October 31, 2013. The
Department of Commerce (Commerce) is notifying the public that the
CIT's final judgment in this case is not in harmony with the final
results of the administrative review and that Commerce is amending the
final results with respect to the respondents eligible for separate
rates.
DATES: Applicable November 2, 2018.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Yang Jin Chun or Minoo Hatten, AD/CVD
Operations, Office I, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone (202) 482-5760 or (202) 482-1690,
respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On June 8, 2015, Commerce published the Final Results, in which we
valued cores produced by Weihai Xiangguang Mechanical Industrial Co.,
Ltd., using a build-up methodology and calculated surrogate financial
ratios using Philippine financial statements.\1\ On
[[Page 55521]]
March 31, 2017, the CIT remanded the Final Results to Commerce to
reconsider the valuation of cores and the use of certain financial
statements.\2\ In the first final remand redetermination, we revised
the valuation of cores and used other available financial statements to
calculate surrogate financial ratios.\3\ On March 22, 2018, the CIT
remanded the Final Results to further examine the revisions to the
valuation of cores and our decision not to use certain financial
statements in the first final remand redetermination.\4\ In the second
final remand redetermination, we further revised the valuation of cores
and we used additional financial statements to calculate surrogate
financial ratios.\5\ On October 23, 2018, the CIT sustained our second
final remand redetermination in its entirety.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof from the People's
Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review; 2012-2013, 80 FR 32344 (June 8, 2015) (Final Results) and
accompanying Issues and Decision Memorandum at Comments 14 and 16.
\2\ See Diamond Sawblades Manufacturers' Coalition v. United
States, 219 F. Supp. 3d 1368 (CIT 2017).
\3\ See Final Remand Redetermination dated September 21, 2017,
pursuant to Diamond Sawblades Manufacturers' Coalition v. United
States, 219 F. Supp. 3d 1368 (CIT 2017), and available at https://enforcement.trade.gov/remands/17-36.pdf.
\4\ See Diamond Sawblades Manufacturers' Coalition v. United
States, 299 F. Supp. 3d 1374 (CIT 2018).
\5\ See Final Second Remand Redetermination dated July 20, 2018,
pursuant to Diamond Sawblades Manufacturers' Coalition v. United
States, 299 F. Supp. 3d 1374 (CIT 2018), and available at https://enforcement.trade.gov/remands/18-26.pdf.
\6\ See Diamond Sawblades Manufacturers' Coalition v. United
States, Consol. Court No. 15-00164, slip op. 18-145 (CIT Oct. 23,
2018).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Timken Notice
In its decision in Timken Co. v. United States, 893 F.2d 337, 341
(Fed. Cir. 1990) (Timken), as clarified by Diamond Sawblades Mfrs.
Coalition v. United States, 626 F.3d 1374 (Fed. Cir. 2010), the United
States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit held that, pursuant to
section 516A(e) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act),
Commerce must publish a notice of a court decision that is not ``in
harmony'' with a Commerce determination and must suspend liquidation of
entries pending a ``conclusive'' court decision. The CIT's October 23,
2018, final judgment sustaining the second final remand redetermination
constitutes the CIT's final decision which is not ``in harmony'' with
the Final Results. This notice is published in fulfillment of the
publication requirements of Timken. Accordingly, Commerce will continue
the suspension of liquidation of the subject merchandise pending
expiration of the period to appeal or, if appealed, pending a final and
conclusive court decision.
Amended Final Results of Review
Because there is now a final court decision, Commerce is amending
the Final Results with respect to the separate rate respondents as
follows:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Weighted-average
Exporter dumping margin
(percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bosun Tools Co., Ltd................................ 3.45
Chengdu Huifeng Diamond Tools Co., Ltd \7\.......... 12.05
Danyang City Ou Di Ma Tools Co., Ltd................ 12.05
Danyang Huachang Diamond Tools Manufacturing Co., 12.05
Ltd................................................
Danyang NYCL Tools Manufacturing Co., Ltd........... 12.05
Danyang Tsunda Diamond Tools Co., Ltd............... 12.05
Danyang Weiwang Tools Manufacturing Co., Ltd........ 12.05
Guilin Tebon Superhard Material Co., Ltd............ 12.05
Hangzhou Deer King Industrial and Trading Co., Ltd.. 12.05
Hangzhou Kingburg Import & Export Co., Ltd.......... 12.05
Huzhou Gu's Import & Export Co., Ltd................ 12.05
Jiangsu Fengtai Diamond Tool Manufacture Co., Ltd 12.05
\8\................................................
Jiangsu Inter-China Group Corporation............... 12.05
Jiangsu Youhe Tool Manufacturer Co., Ltd............ 12.05
Pujiang Talent Diamond Tools Co., Ltd............... 12.05
Qingdao Hyosung Diamond Tools Co., Ltd.............. 12.05
Qingyuan Shangtai Diamond Tools Co., Ltd............ 12.05
Quanzhou Zhongzhi Diamond Tool Co., Ltd............. 12.05
Rizhao Hein Saw Co., Ltd............................ 12.05
Saint-Gobain Abrasives (Shanghai) Co., Ltd.......... 12.05
Shanghai Jingquan Ind. Trade Co., Ltd............... 12.05
Shanghai Starcraft Tools Company Limited............ 12.05
Weihai Xiangguang Mechanical Industrial Co., Ltd.... 22.57
Wuhan Wanbang Laser Diamond Tools Co \9\............ 12.05
Xiamen ZL Diamond Technology Co., Ltd............... 12.05
Zhejiang Wanli Tools Group Co., Ltd................. 12.05
------------------------------------------------------------------------
In the event the CIT's ruling is not appealed or, if appealed,
upheld by a final and conclusive court decision, Commerce will instruct
the U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to assess antidumping
duties on unliquidated entries of subject merchandise based on the
revised rates Commerce determined and listed above.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ Commerce determined that Chengdu Huifeng New Material
Technology Co., Ltd., is the successor-in-interest to Chengdu
Huifeng Diamond Tools Co., Ltd. See Diamond Sawblades and Parts
Thereof from the People's Republic of China: Final Results of
Antidumping Duty Changed Circumstances Review, 82 FR 60177 (December
19, 2017).
\8\ Commerce found Jiangsu Fengtai Diamond Tool Manufacture Co.,
Ltd., Jiangsu Fengtai Tools Co., Ltd., and Jiangsu Fengtai Sawing
Industry Co., Ltd., affiliated and Commerce collapsed these three
companies into the Jiangsu Fengtai Single Entity. See, e.g., Diamond
Sawblades and Parts Thereof from the People's Republic of China:
Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2014-2015,
82 FR 26912, 26913 n.5 (June 12, 2017).
\9\ Commerce determined that Wuhan Wanbang Laser Diamond Tools
Co., Ltd., is the successor-in-interest to Wuhan Wanbang Laser
Diamond Tools Co. See Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof from the
People's Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty
Changed Circumstances Review, 81 FR 20618 (April 8, 2016).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 55522]]
Cash Deposit Requirements
As the cash deposit rates for Danyang City Ou Di Ma Tools Co.,
Ltd., and Danyang Tsunda Diamond Tools Co., Ltd., have not been subject
to subsequent administrative reviews, Commerce will issue revised cash
deposit instructions to CBP adjusting the rate from 2.34 percent to
12.05 percent, effective November 2, 2018. For all other respondents
listed above, because the cash deposit rates have been updated in
subsequent administrative reviews,\10\ we will not update their cash
deposit rates as a result of these amended final results.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ See Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof from the People's
Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review; 2014-2015, 82 FR 26912, 26913 (June 12, 2017), for Jiangsu
Inter-China Group Corporation, Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof
from the People's Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping
Duty Administrative Review; 2013-2014, 81 FR 38673, 38674-75 n.15
(June 14, 2016), for Pujiang Talent Diamond Tools Co., Ltd., which
we identified as part of the China-wide entity, and Diamond
Sawblades and Parts Thereof from the People's Republic of China:
Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2015-
2016, 82 FR 57585, 57586 (December 6, 2017), and accompanying
Preliminary Decision Memorandum at 3-4. 9, unchanged in Diamond
Sawblades and Parts Thereof from the People's Republic of China:
Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2015-2016,
83 FR 17527 (April 20, 2018), for all other respondents listed above
for which the cash deposit rates will not be updated as a result of
these amended final results.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Notification to Interested Parties
This notice is issued and published in accordance with sections
516A(e)(1), 751(a)(1), and 777(i)(1) of the Act.
Dated: October 31, 2018.
Gary Taverman,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Operations, performing the non-exclusive functions and duties of the
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2018-24251 Filed 11-5-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
