Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE Arca, Inc.; Order Approving a Proposed Rule Change To Amend NYSE Arca Rule 1.1(ll) To Modify the Formula for Establishing the Official Closing Price for a Derivative Securities Product When There Is No Closing Auction or if the Closing Auction Is Less Than One Round Lot, by Excluding the NBBO Midpoint if the Midpoint Multiplied by 10% Is Less Than the NBBO Spread or if the NBBO Is Crossed, 54384-54385 [2018-23507]
Download as PDF
54384
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 209 / Monday, October 29, 2018 / Notices
security’s true and current value. The
proposed rule change was published for
comment in the Federal Register on
September 17, 2018.6 The Commission
received no comment letters on the
proposed rule change. This order
approves the proposed rule change.
collection of information is 78 hours
and $239,400.
Issued in Washington, DC.
Hilary Duke,
Assistant General Counsel for Regulatory
Affairs, Pension Benefit Guaranty
Corporation.
II. Description of the Proposed Rule
Change
[FR Doc. 2018–23498 Filed 10–26–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7709–02–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–84471; File No. SR–
NYSEArca–2018–63]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE
Arca, Inc.; Order Approving a
Proposed Rule Change To Amend
NYSE Arca Rule 1.1(ll) To Modify the
Formula for Establishing the Official
Closing Price for a Derivative
Securities Product When There Is No
Closing Auction or if the Closing
Auction Is Less Than One Round Lot,
by Excluding the NBBO Midpoint if the
Midpoint Multiplied by 10% Is Less
Than the NBBO Spread or if the NBBO
Is Crossed
October 23, 2018.
I. Introduction
On August 29, 2018, NYSE Arca, Inc.
(‘‘Exchange’’ or ‘‘NYSE Arca’’) filed
with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (‘‘Commission’’) pursuant
to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (‘‘Act’’ 1 and Rule
19b–4 thereunder,2 a proposed rule
change to amend NYSE Arca Rule 1.1(ll)
to exclude from the time-weighted
average price (‘‘TWAP’’) calculation, for
purpose of determining the Official
Closing Price 3 for an Exchange-listed
security that is a Derivative Securities
Product 4 if the Exchange does not
conduct a Closing Auction 5 or if a
Closing Auction trade is less than a
round lot, a midpoint that is based on
a National Best Bid and Offer (‘‘NBBO’’)
that may not be reflective of the
1 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
CFR 240.19b–4.
3 See NYSE Arca Rule 1.1(ll) for a definition of
Official Closing Price.
4 With respect to equities traded on the Exchange,
the term ‘‘Derivative Securities Product’’ means a
security that meets the definition of ‘‘derivative
securities product’’ in Rule 19b–4(e) under the Act.
See NYSE Arca Rule 1.1(k). For purposes of Rule
19b–4(e), a ‘‘derivative securities product’’ means
any type of option, warrant, hybrid securities
product or any other security, other than a single
equity option or a security futures product, whose
value is based, in whole or in part, upon the
performance of, or interest, in, an underlying
instrument. 17 CFR 240.19b–4(e).
5 See NYSE Arca Rule 7.35–E(d) regarding the
operation of Closing Auctions on the Exchange.
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with NOTICES1
2 17
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:48 Oct 26, 2018
Jkt 247001
On March 20, 2018, the Commission
approved the Exchange’s proposal
(‘‘OCP Filing’’) to amend NYSE Arca
Rule 1.1(ll) to provide for how the
Official Closing Price is determined for
an Exchange-listed security that is a
Derivative Securities Product if the
Exchange does not conduct a Closing
Auction or if a Closing Auction trade is
less than a round lot.7 As described in
the Notice, the Exchange had sought a
method for deriving the Official Closing
Price that would be more indicative of
the actual value of the securities, in
particular for listed securities that are
thinly traded or generally illiquid.8
Prior to approval of the OCP Filing, the
Official Closing Price for such securities
would have been based on a last-sale
trade that may have been hours, days, or
even months old and therefore not
necessarily indicative of their true and
current value. With approval of the OCP
Filing, the Exchange adopted a revised
calculation to derive the value for
securities that have a potentially stale
last-price, depending on when the last
consolidated last-sale eligible trade
occurred. Specifically, for such
securities, the Official Closing Price
would be derived by adding a
percentage of the TWAP of the NBBO
midpoint measured over the last five
minutes before the end of Core Trading
Hours and a percentage of the last
consolidated last-sale eligible trade
before the end of Core Trading Hours on
that trading day.9
The Exchange now proposes to
further amend NYSE Arca Rule
1.1(ll)(1)(B) to exclude from the TWAP
calculation a midpoint that is based on
an NBBO that the Exchange believes is
too wide and therefore not reflective of
the security’s true and current value.10
Specifically, the Exchange proposes to
exclude an NBBO midpoint from the
calculation of the Official Closing Price
if that midpoint, when multiplied by ten
percent (10%), is less than the spread of
6 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 84079
(September 11, 2018), 83 FR 46981 (‘‘Notice’’).
7 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 82907
(March 20, 2018), 83 FR 12980 (March 26, 2018)
(order approving SR–NYSEArca–2018–08).
8 See Notice, supra, note 6, at 46981.
9 See NYSE Arca Rule 1.1(ll)(1)(B)(i)–(vi).
10 See Notice, supra, note 6, at 46981.
PO 00000
Frm 00077
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
that NBBO.11 The Exchange also would
exclude a crossed NBBO from the
calculation.12
The Exchange notes that its proposed
change to the Official Closing Price
calculation in this scenario is similar to
how it considers an ‘‘Auction NBBO,’’
which is used as a basis for determining
the Auction Reference Price for the Core
Open Auction.13 To qualify as an
Auction NBBO for the Core Open
Auction, there must be both a bid and
an offer that is not zero, the NBBO
cannot be crossed, and the midpoint of
the NBBO when multiplied by a
designated percentage cannot be greater
than or equal to the spread of the
NBBO.14
The Exchange also proposes a nonsubstantive clarifying change to NYSE
Arca Rule 1.1(ll) to specify that the
process under NYSE Arca Rule
1.1(ll)(1)(D) would be utilized if the
Official Closing Price cannot be
determined under NYSE Arca
Rule1.1(ll)(1)(A), (B), or (C).15
The Exchange anticipates the
implementation date for the proposed
rule change will be in the first quarter
of 2019, and the Exchange will
announce such implementation date by
Trader Update.16
III. Discussion and Commission’s
Findings
After careful review, the Commission
finds that the proposed rule change is
consistent with the requirements of the
Act and the rules and regulations
thereunder applicable to a national
securities exchange.17 In particular, the
Commission finds that the proposed
rule change is consistent with Section
6(b)(5) of the Act,18 which requires,
among other things, that the rules of a
national securities exchange be
11 See
proposed NYSE Arca Rule 1.1(ll)(1)(B).
id. For an example of this proposed new
process, see Notice, supra, note 6, at 46981–82.
13 The term ‘‘Auction NBBO’’ means an NBBO
that is used for purposes of pricing an auction. See
NYSE Arca Rule 7.35–E(a)(5). The Exchange also
uses the Auction NBBO for determining the
Indicative Match Price in specified situations for
the Closing Auction. See NYSE Arca Rule 7.35–
E(a)(8)(C).
14 See NYSE Arca Rule 7.35–E(a)(5). The
Exchange notes that, unlike its current proposal to
codify a designated percentage of ten percent (10%)
to be used in the TWAP calculation for the Official
Closing Price, the designated percentage used for
determining the Auction NBBO for the Core Open
Auction is determined by the Exchange upon prior
notice to ETP Holders. See Notice, supra, note 6,
at 46982.
15 See proposed NYSE Arca Rule 1.1(ll)(1)(D).
16 See Notice, supra, note 6, at 46982.
17 In approving this proposed rule change, the
Commission has considered the proposed rule’s
impact on efficiency, competition, and capital
formation. See 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
18 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
12 See
E:\FR\FM\29OCN1.SGM
29OCN1
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 209 / Monday, October 29, 2018 / Notices
designed to promote just and equitable
principles of trade, to foster cooperation
and coordination with persons engaged
in regulating transactions in securities,
to remove impediments to and perfect
the mechanism of a free and open
market and a national market system
and, in general, to protect investors and
the public interest, and not be designed
to permit unfair discrimination between
customers, issuers, brokers, or dealers.
The Commission also finds that the
proposed rule change is consistent with
Section 6(b)(8) of the Act,19 which
requires that the rules of an exchange
not impose any burden on competition
that is not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
The proposal would set forth an
additional procedure governing how the
Exchange would determine the Official
Closing Price in Exchange-listed
securities that are Derivative Securities
Products when the Exchange does not
conduct a Closing Auction or if a
Closing Auction trade is less than a
round lot. The Commission notes that
the primary listing market’s closing
price for a security is relied upon by
market participants for a variety of
reasons, including, but not limited to,
calculation of index values, calculation
of the net asset value of mutual funds
and exchange-traded products, the price
of derivatives that are based on the
security, and certain types of trading
benchmarks such as volume weighted
average price strategies. As the
Exchange notes, its current calculation
for the Official Closing Price in such a
scenario is designed to utilize more
recent and reliable market information
to provide a closing price that more
accurately reflects the true and current
value of a security that may be thinly
traded or generally illiquid and when
the Official Closing Price for such
security may otherwise be based on a
potentially stale last-sale trade.20 The
Exchange now proposes to exclude from
the TWAP calculation used under this
process a midpoint that is based on an
NBBO that the Exchange believes is too
wide and therefore not reflective of the
security’s true and current value.21 The
Commission believes that this
exclusion, utilizing a specified
percentage of the midpoint value, is a
reasonable approach to avoid utilizing
market information in the TWAP
calculation that may provide less
accurate information about the true
value of a security. The Commission
therefore believes that the Exchange’s
proposal is reasonably designed to
19 15
U.S.C. 78f(b)(8).
Notice, supra note 6, at 46981.
21 See id.
20 See
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:48 Oct 26, 2018
Jkt 247001
achieve the Act’s objectives to protect
investors and the public interest.
Accordingly, the Commission finds that
the proposed rule change is consistent
with the requirements of the Act.
IV. Conclusion
It is therefore ordered, pursuant to
Section 19(b)(2) of the Act,22 that the
proposed rule change (SR–NYSEArca2018–63) be, and hereby is, approved.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.23
Eduardo A. Aleman,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018–23507 Filed 10–26–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–84473; File No. SR–OCC–
2018–012]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; The
Options Clearing Corporation; Order
Approving Proposed Rule Change
Related to The Options Clearing
Corporation’s Board of Directors and
Board Committee Charters
October 23, 2018.
I. Introduction
On August 24, 2018, The Options
Clearing Corporation (‘‘OCC’’) filed with
the Securities and Exchange
Commission (‘‘Commission’’) the
proposed rule change SR–OCC–2018–
012 (‘‘Proposed Rule Change’’) pursuant
to Section 19(b) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (‘‘Exchange
Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4 2 thereunder to
make changes to OCC’s (1) Audit
Committee Charter, (2) Compensation
and Performance Committee Charter, (3)
Governance and Nominating Committee
Charter, (4) Risk Committee Charter, (5)
Technology Committee Charter and (6)
Board of Directors Charter. The
Proposed Rule Change was published
for comment in the Federal Register on
September 10, 2018,3 and the
Commission has received no comments
in response.
II. Background 4
The Proposed Rule Change would
make certain changes to OCC’s (1) Audit
22 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
3 Securities Exchange Act Release No. 84021 (Sep.
4, 2018), 83 FR 45706 (Sep. 10, 2018) (SR–OCC–
2018–012) (‘‘Notice’’).
4 All terms with initial capitalization that are not
otherwise defined herein have the same meaning as
23 17
PO 00000
Frm 00078
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
54385
Committee (‘‘AC’’) Charter (‘‘AC
Charter’’), (2) Compensation and
Performance Committee (‘‘CPC’’)
Charter (‘‘CPC Charter’’), (3) Governance
and Nominating Committee (‘‘GNC’’)
Charter (‘‘GNC Charter’’), (4) Risk
Committee (‘‘RC’’) Charter (‘‘RC
Charter’’), (5) Technology Committee
(‘‘TC’’) Charter (‘‘TC Charter’’), and (6)
Board of Directors (‘‘Board’’) Charter
(‘‘Board Charter’’).5 These changes are
described and broadly categorized
below.6
As a general matter, the Proposed
Rule Change would amend the charters
to provide that in carrying out their
responsibilities the Board and the
committees would prioritize the safety
and efficiency of OCC, generally support
the stability of the broader financial
system and consider the legitimate
interests of Clearing Members,
customers of Clearing Members and
other relevant stakeholders, including
OCC’s shareholders and other
participant exchanges, taking into
account prudent risk management
standards (including systemic risk
mitigation) and industry best practices.
A. Clarity and Transparency
Several of the changes within the
Proposed Rule Change seek to better
describe OCC’s current processes. Such
changes range from clarification (e.g.,
changing ‘‘annually’’ to ‘‘each calendar
year’’) to removal of redundancies (e.g.,
where a requirement is found elsewhere
in OCC’s rules) to stating the existing
functions and responsibilities of OCC’s
Board and Board committees. These
changes are described in more detail
below.
The Proposed Rule Change would
make a number of changes to OCC’s
Board committee charters to clarify that,
where certain actions were required to
be performed ‘‘annually’’ under the
charters, those actions would now be
required to occur ‘‘each calendar year.’’
OCC believes that it is appropriate to
clarify which actions are required on an
every twelve months-basis, particularly
in cases where a regulatory requirement
set forth in the OCC By-Laws and Rules. OCC’s ByLaws and Rules can be found on OCC’s public
website: https://optionsclearing.com/about/
publications/bylaws.jsp.
5 See Notice at 45707–08. As discussed below, the
changes to the Board Charter would involve
incorporating provisions from OCC’s Corporate
Governance Principles (‘‘CGP’’) and changing the
title of the resultant document to the Board Charter
and Corporate Governance Principles.
6 Many of the components of the Proposed Rule
Change may serve more than one purpose and
could, therefore, be discussed in more than one
category herein. The categorization of changes is
not designed to denote otherwise.
E:\FR\FM\29OCN1.SGM
29OCN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 209 (Monday, October 29, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 54384-54385]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-23507]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-84471; File No. SR-NYSEArca-2018-63]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE Arca, Inc.; Order Approving a
Proposed Rule Change To Amend NYSE Arca Rule 1.1(ll) To Modify the
Formula for Establishing the Official Closing Price for a Derivative
Securities Product When There Is No Closing Auction or if the Closing
Auction Is Less Than One Round Lot, by Excluding the NBBO Midpoint if
the Midpoint Multiplied by 10% Is Less Than the NBBO Spread or if the
NBBO Is Crossed
October 23, 2018.
I. Introduction
On August 29, 2018, NYSE Arca, Inc. (``Exchange'' or ``NYSE Arca'')
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'')
pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act'' \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ a proposed rule change to
amend NYSE Arca Rule 1.1(ll) to exclude from the time-weighted average
price (``TWAP'') calculation, for purpose of determining the Official
Closing Price \3\ for an Exchange-listed security that is a Derivative
Securities Product \4\ if the Exchange does not conduct a Closing
Auction \5\ or if a Closing Auction trade is less than a round lot, a
midpoint that is based on a National Best Bid and Offer (``NBBO'') that
may not be reflective of the security's true and current value. The
proposed rule change was published for comment in the Federal Register
on September 17, 2018.\6\ The Commission received no comment letters on
the proposed rule change. This order approves the proposed rule change.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
\3\ See NYSE Arca Rule 1.1(ll) for a definition of Official
Closing Price.
\4\ With respect to equities traded on the Exchange, the term
``Derivative Securities Product'' means a security that meets the
definition of ``derivative securities product'' in Rule 19b-4(e)
under the Act. See NYSE Arca Rule 1.1(k). For purposes of Rule 19b-
4(e), a ``derivative securities product'' means any type of option,
warrant, hybrid securities product or any other security, other than
a single equity option or a security futures product, whose value is
based, in whole or in part, upon the performance of, or interest,
in, an underlying instrument. 17 CFR 240.19b-4(e).
\5\ See NYSE Arca Rule 7.35-E(d) regarding the operation of
Closing Auctions on the Exchange.
\6\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 84079 (September 11,
2018), 83 FR 46981 (``Notice'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
II. Description of the Proposed Rule Change
On March 20, 2018, the Commission approved the Exchange's proposal
(``OCP Filing'') to amend NYSE Arca Rule 1.1(ll) to provide for how the
Official Closing Price is determined for an Exchange-listed security
that is a Derivative Securities Product if the Exchange does not
conduct a Closing Auction or if a Closing Auction trade is less than a
round lot.\7\ As described in the Notice, the Exchange had sought a
method for deriving the Official Closing Price that would be more
indicative of the actual value of the securities, in particular for
listed securities that are thinly traded or generally illiquid.\8\
Prior to approval of the OCP Filing, the Official Closing Price for
such securities would have been based on a last-sale trade that may
have been hours, days, or even months old and therefore not necessarily
indicative of their true and current value. With approval of the OCP
Filing, the Exchange adopted a revised calculation to derive the value
for securities that have a potentially stale last-price, depending on
when the last consolidated last-sale eligible trade occurred.
Specifically, for such securities, the Official Closing Price would be
derived by adding a percentage of the TWAP of the NBBO midpoint
measured over the last five minutes before the end of Core Trading
Hours and a percentage of the last consolidated last-sale eligible
trade before the end of Core Trading Hours on that trading day.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 82907 (March 20,
2018), 83 FR 12980 (March 26, 2018) (order approving SR-NYSEArca-
2018-08).
\8\ See Notice, supra, note 6, at 46981.
\9\ See NYSE Arca Rule 1.1(ll)(1)(B)(i)-(vi).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange now proposes to further amend NYSE Arca Rule
1.1(ll)(1)(B) to exclude from the TWAP calculation a midpoint that is
based on an NBBO that the Exchange believes is too wide and therefore
not reflective of the security's true and current value.\10\
Specifically, the Exchange proposes to exclude an NBBO midpoint from
the calculation of the Official Closing Price if that midpoint, when
multiplied by ten percent (10%), is less than the spread of that
NBBO.\11\ The Exchange also would exclude a crossed NBBO from the
calculation.\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ See Notice, supra, note 6, at 46981.
\11\ See proposed NYSE Arca Rule 1.1(ll)(1)(B).
\12\ See id. For an example of this proposed new process, see
Notice, supra, note 6, at 46981-82.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange notes that its proposed change to the Official Closing
Price calculation in this scenario is similar to how it considers an
``Auction NBBO,'' which is used as a basis for determining the Auction
Reference Price for the Core Open Auction.\13\ To qualify as an Auction
NBBO for the Core Open Auction, there must be both a bid and an offer
that is not zero, the NBBO cannot be crossed, and the midpoint of the
NBBO when multiplied by a designated percentage cannot be greater than
or equal to the spread of the NBBO.\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ The term ``Auction NBBO'' means an NBBO that is used for
purposes of pricing an auction. See NYSE Arca Rule 7.35-E(a)(5). The
Exchange also uses the Auction NBBO for determining the Indicative
Match Price in specified situations for the Closing Auction. See
NYSE Arca Rule 7.35-E(a)(8)(C).
\14\ See NYSE Arca Rule 7.35-E(a)(5). The Exchange notes that,
unlike its current proposal to codify a designated percentage of ten
percent (10%) to be used in the TWAP calculation for the Official
Closing Price, the designated percentage used for determining the
Auction NBBO for the Core Open Auction is determined by the Exchange
upon prior notice to ETP Holders. See Notice, supra, note 6, at
46982.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange also proposes a non-substantive clarifying change to
NYSE Arca Rule 1.1(ll) to specify that the process under NYSE Arca Rule
1.1(ll)(1)(D) would be utilized if the Official Closing Price cannot be
determined under NYSE Arca Rule1.1(ll)(1)(A), (B), or (C).\15\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\15\ See proposed NYSE Arca Rule 1.1(ll)(1)(D).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange anticipates the implementation date for the proposed
rule change will be in the first quarter of 2019, and the Exchange will
announce such implementation date by Trader Update.\16\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\16\ See Notice, supra, note 6, at 46982.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
III. Discussion and Commission's Findings
After careful review, the Commission finds that the proposed rule
change is consistent with the requirements of the Act and the rules and
regulations thereunder applicable to a national securities
exchange.\17\ In particular, the Commission finds that the proposed
rule change is consistent with Section 6(b)(5) of the Act,\18\ which
requires, among other things, that the rules of a national securities
exchange be
[[Page 54385]]
designed to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to foster
cooperation and coordination with persons engaged in regulating
transactions in securities, to remove impediments to and perfect the
mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system and,
in general, to protect investors and the public interest, and not be
designed to permit unfair discrimination between customers, issuers,
brokers, or dealers. The Commission also finds that the proposed rule
change is consistent with Section 6(b)(8) of the Act,\19\ which
requires that the rules of an exchange not impose any burden on
competition that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\17\ In approving this proposed rule change, the Commission has
considered the proposed rule's impact on efficiency, competition,
and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
\18\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
\19\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(8).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The proposal would set forth an additional procedure governing how
the Exchange would determine the Official Closing Price in Exchange-
listed securities that are Derivative Securities Products when the
Exchange does not conduct a Closing Auction or if a Closing Auction
trade is less than a round lot. The Commission notes that the primary
listing market's closing price for a security is relied upon by market
participants for a variety of reasons, including, but not limited to,
calculation of index values, calculation of the net asset value of
mutual funds and exchange-traded products, the price of derivatives
that are based on the security, and certain types of trading benchmarks
such as volume weighted average price strategies. As the Exchange
notes, its current calculation for the Official Closing Price in such a
scenario is designed to utilize more recent and reliable market
information to provide a closing price that more accurately reflects
the true and current value of a security that may be thinly traded or
generally illiquid and when the Official Closing Price for such
security may otherwise be based on a potentially stale last-sale
trade.\20\ The Exchange now proposes to exclude from the TWAP
calculation used under this process a midpoint that is based on an NBBO
that the Exchange believes is too wide and therefore not reflective of
the security's true and current value.\21\ The Commission believes that
this exclusion, utilizing a specified percentage of the midpoint value,
is a reasonable approach to avoid utilizing market information in the
TWAP calculation that may provide less accurate information about the
true value of a security. The Commission therefore believes that the
Exchange's proposal is reasonably designed to achieve the Act's
objectives to protect investors and the public interest. Accordingly,
the Commission finds that the proposed rule change is consistent with
the requirements of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\20\ See Notice, supra note 6, at 46981.
\21\ See id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
IV. Conclusion
It is therefore ordered, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the
Act,\22\ that the proposed rule change (SR-NYSEArca-2018-63) be, and
hereby is, approved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\22\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\23\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\23\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eduardo A. Aleman,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018-23507 Filed 10-26-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P