Certain LTE- and 3G-Compliant Cellular Communications Devices Institution of Investigation, 53105-53106 [2018-22869]

Download as PDF amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with NOTICES1 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 203 / Friday, October 19, 2018 / Notices detail of cooperating agencies’ contributions, and availability of predecisional information. BOEM anticipates this summary will form the basis for a Memorandum of Agreement between BOEM and any non-Interior Department cooperating agency. Agencies should also consider the ‘‘Factors for Determining Cooperating Agency Status’’ in Attachment 1 to CEQ’s January 30, 2002, Memorandum for the Heads of Federal Agencies: Cooperating Agencies in Implementing the Procedural Requirements of the National Environmental Policy Act. This document is available on the internet at: http://energy.gov/sites/prod/files/ nepapub/nepa_documents/RedDont/GCEQ-CoopAgenciesImplem.pdf. BOEM, as the lead agency, will not provide financial assistance to cooperating agencies. Even if a governmental entity is not a cooperating agency, it will have opportunities to provide information and comments to BOEM during the public input stages of the NEPA process. Comments: Federal agencies, tribal, state, and local governments, and other interested parties are requested to comment on the scope of this EIS, significant issues that should be addressed, and alternatives that should be considered. Comments can be submitted in any of the following ways: 1. In written form, delivered by hand or by mail, enclosed in an envelope labeled, ‘‘Deepwater Wind South Fork COP EIS’’ and addressed to Program Manager, Office of Renewable Energy, Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, 45600 Woodland Road, Sterling, Virginia 20166. Comments must be received or postmarked no later than November 19, 2018; or 2. Through the regulations.gov web portal: Navigate to http:// www.regulations.gov and search for Docket No. BOEM–2018–0010. Click on the ‘‘Comment Now!’’ button to the right of the document link. Enter your information and comment, then click ‘‘Submit.’’ BOEM does not consider anonymous comments. Please include your name and address as part of your submittal. BOEM makes all comments, including the names and addresses of respondents, available for public review online and during regular business hours. Individual respondents may request that BOEM withhold their names or addresses from the public record; however, BOEM cannot guarantee that it will be able to do so. If you wish your name or address to be withheld, you must state your preference prominently at the beginning of your comment. All submissions from VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:25 Oct 18, 2018 Jkt 247001 organizations or businesses and from individuals identifying themselves as representatives or officials of organizations or businesses will be made available for public inspection in their entirety. Authority: This NOI is published pursuant to the regulations (40 CFR 1501.7) implementing the provisions of NEPA. Dated: October 12, 2018. William Yancey Brown, Chief Environmental Officer, Bureau of Ocean Energy Management. [FR Doc. 2018–22880 Filed 10–18–18; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4310–MR–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation No. 337–TA–1138] Certain LTE- and 3G-Compliant Cellular Communications Devices Institution of Investigation U.S. International Trade Commission. ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: Notice is hereby given that a complaint was filed with the U.S. International Trade Commission on September 14, 2018, under section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, on behalf of INVT SPE LLC of San Francisco, California. The complaint alleges violations of section 337 based upon the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of certain LTE- and 3Gcompliant cellular communications devices by reason of infringement of certain claims of U.S. Patent No. 6,760,590 (‘‘the ’590 patent’’); U.S. Patent No. 7,206,587 (‘‘the ’587 patent’’); U.S. Patent No. 7,764,711 (‘‘the ’711 patent’’); U.S. Patent No. 7,848,439 (‘‘the ’439 patent’’); and U.S. Patent No. 7,339,949 (‘‘the ’949 patent’’). The complaint further alleges that an industry in the United States exists as required by the applicable Federal Statute. The complainant requests that the Commission institute an investigation and, after the investigation, issue a limited exclusion order and cease and desist orders. ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for any confidential information contained therein, is available for inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, Room 112, Washington, DC 20436, telephone SUMMARY: PO 00000 Frm 00079 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 53105 (202) 205–2000. Hearing impaired individuals are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on (202) 205–1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at (202) 205– 2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Pathenia M. Proctor, The Office of Unfair Import Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, telephone (202) 205–2560. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Authority: The authority for institution of this investigation is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, and in section 210.10 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 (2018). Scope of Investigation: Having considered the complaint, the U.S. International Trade Commission, on October 15, 2018, ORDERED THAT— (1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, an investigation be instituted to determine whether there is a violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of section 337 in the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, or the sale within the United States after importation of certain products identified in paragraph (2) by reason of infringement of one or more of claims 3 and 4 of the ’590 patent; claim 4 of the ’587 patent; claims 1, 2, and 4 of the ’711 patent; claims 1–3 of the ’439 patent; and claim 16 of the ’949 patent; and whether an industry in the United States exists as required by subsection (a)(2) of section 337; (2) Pursuant to section 210.10(b)(1) of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10(b)(1), the plain language description of the accused products or category of accused products, which defines the scope of the investigation, is ‘‘personal electronic devices that are compliant with the LTE and/or 3G 3GPP specifications, and which enable LTE and/or 3G data transfer and communications’’; (3) Pursuant to Commission Rule 210.50(b)(1), 19 CFR 210.50(b)(1), the presiding administrative law judge shall take evidence or other information and hear arguments from the parties and other interested persons with respect to E:\FR\FM\19OCN1.SGM 19OCN1 53106 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 203 / Friday, October 19, 2018 / Notices amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with NOTICES1 the public interest in this investigation, as appropriate, and provide the Commission with findings of fact and a recommended determination on this issue, which shall be limited to the statutory public interest factors set forth in 19 U.S.C. 1337(d)(1), (f)(1), (g)(1); (4) For the purpose of the investigation so instituted, the following are hereby named as parties upon which this notice of investigation shall be served: (a) The complainant is: INVT SPE LLC, One Market Plaza, Spear Tower, 42nd Floor, San Francisco, CA 94105. (b) The respondents are the following entities alleged to be in violation of section 337, and are the parties upon which the complaint is to be served: Apple Inc., 1 Infinite Loop, Cupertino, CA 95014. HTC Corporation, 23 Xinghua Road, Taoyuan City, Taoyuan County 330, Taiwan. HTC America, Inc., 308 Occidental Ave. S, Suite 300, Seattle, WA 98104. ZTE Corporation, ZTE Plaza, Keji Road South, Hi-Tech Industrial Park, Nanshan District, Guangdong Province, 518057, China. ZTE (USA) Inc., 2425 N Central Expressway, Suite 800, Richardson, TX 75080. (c) The Office of Unfair Import Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, Suite 401, Washington, DC 20436; and (5) For the investigation so instituted, the Chief Administrative Law Judge, U.S. International Trade Commission, shall designate the presiding Administrative Law Judge. Responses to the complaint and the notice of investigation must be submitted by the named respondents in accordance with section 210.13 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. Pursuant to 19 CFR 201.16(e) and 210.13(a), such responses will be considered by the Commission if received not later than 20 days after the date of service by the Commission of the complaint and the notice of investigation. Extensions of time for submitting responses to the complaint and the notice of investigation will not be granted unless good cause therefor is shown. Failure of a respondent to file a timely response to each allegation in the complaint and in this notice may be deemed to constitute a waiver of the right to appear and contest the allegations of the complaint and this notice, and to authorize the administrative law judge and the Commission, without further notice to the respondent, to find the facts to be as alleged in the complaint and this notice and to enter an initial determination and a final determination containing such findings, and may result in the issuance of an exclusion order or a cease and desist order or both directed against the respondent. By order of the Commission. Issued: October 16, 2018. Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 2018–22869 Filed 10–18–18; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Antitrust Division Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993—Consortium for Execution of Rendezvous and Servicing Operations Notice is hereby given that, on September 10, 2018, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (‘‘the Act’’), Consortium for Execution of Rendezvous and Servicing Operations (‘‘CONFERS’’) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing (1) the identities of the parties to the venture and (2) the nature and objectives of the venture. The notifications were filed for the purpose of invoking the Act’s provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act, the identities of the parties to the venture are: Altius Space Machines, Inc., Broomfield, CO; Analytical Graphics, Inc., Exton, PA; Astroscale PTE. LTD., Tokyo, JAPAN; Ball Aerospace and Technology Corp., Boulder, CO; Chandah Space Technologies, Houston, TX; Hoffer Flow Controls, Inc. Elizabeth City, NC; iBOSS gmbH, Aachen, GERMANY; MacDonald, Dettwiler and Associates, Inc., Brampton, Ontario, CANADA; Thales Alenia Space, Courbevioe, FRANCE; The Aerospace Corporation, El Segundo, CA; and XL Catlin, LLC, New York, NY. The general area of CONFERS’ planned activity is to establish an independent, self-sustaining industry forum to advocate and promote on-orbit satellite maintenance, servicing, and rendezvous operations by collaborating to research, develop, and publish voluntary, consensus technical and safety standards, and engaging with governments on policy and oversight of satellite servicing activities. To fulfill its mission, CONFERS will recruit a broad array of members from satellite operators, service providers, insurers and underwriters, and engage other stakeholders from industry, academia, and governments. The process will be fully collaborative and will include dedicated outreach activities to engage the global commercial satellite community. The members of the CONFERS believe that future standards should be based on a set of guiding principles that will help establish responsible norms of behavior. Suzanne Morris, Chief, Premerger and Division Statistics Unit, Antitrust Division. [FR Doc. 2018–22826 Filed 10–18–18; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4410–11–P DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Drug Enforcement Administration [Docket No. DEA–392] Bulk Manufacturer of Controlled Substances Registration ACTION: Notice of registration. The registrant listed below has applied for and been granted registration by the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) as a bulk manufacturer of various classes of schedule I and II controlled substances. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The company listed below applied to be registered as a bulk manufacturer of various basic classes of controlled substances. Information on a previously published notice is listed in the table below. No comments or objections were submitted for this notice. SUMMARY: Company FR Docket Published Siegfried USA, LLC ................................................................................................................................................. 83 FR 32905 .. July 16, 2018. VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:25 Oct 18, 2018 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00080 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\19OCN1.SGM 19OCN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 203 (Friday, October 19, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 53105-53106]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-22869]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation No. 337-TA-1138]


Certain LTE- and 3G-Compliant Cellular Communications Devices 
Institution of Investigation

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a complaint was filed with the 
U.S. International Trade Commission on September 14, 2018, under 
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, on behalf of INVT 
SPE LLC of San Francisco, California. The complaint alleges violations 
of section 337 based upon the importation into the United States, the 
sale for importation, and the sale within the United States after 
importation of certain LTE- and 3G-compliant cellular communications 
devices by reason of infringement of certain claims of U.S. Patent No. 
6,760,590 (``the '590 patent''); U.S. Patent No. 7,206,587 (``the '587 
patent''); U.S. Patent No. 7,764,711 (``the '711 patent''); U.S. Patent 
No. 7,848,439 (``the '439 patent''); and U.S. Patent No. 7,339,949 
(``the '949 patent''). The complaint further alleges that an industry 
in the United States exists as required by the applicable Federal 
Statute.
    The complainant requests that the Commission institute an 
investigation and, after the investigation, issue a limited exclusion 
order and cease and desist orders.

ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for any confidential information 
contained therein, is available for inspection during official business 
hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. 
International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, Room 112, Washington, 
DC 20436, telephone (202) 205-2000. Hearing impaired individuals are 
advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting 
the Commission's TDD terminal on (202) 205-1810. Persons with mobility 
impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the 
Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at (202) 205-
2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be 
obtained by accessing its internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. The 
public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission's 
electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Pathenia M. Proctor, The Office of 
Unfair Import Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 
telephone (202) 205-2560.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 
    Authority: The authority for institution of this investigation is 
contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 
U.S.C. 1337, and in section 210.10 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 (2018).
    Scope of Investigation: Having considered the complaint, the U.S. 
International Trade Commission, on October 15, 2018, ORDERED THAT--
    (1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 
1930, as amended, an investigation be instituted to determine whether 
there is a violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of section 337 in the 
importation into the United States, the sale for importation, or the 
sale within the United States after importation of certain products 
identified in paragraph (2) by reason of infringement of one or more of 
claims 3 and 4 of the '590 patent; claim 4 of the '587 patent; claims 
1, 2, and 4 of the '711 patent; claims 1-3 of the '439 patent; and 
claim 16 of the '949 patent; and whether an industry in the United 
States exists as required by subsection (a)(2) of section 337;
    (2) Pursuant to section 210.10(b)(1) of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10(b)(1), the plain language 
description of the accused products or category of accused products, 
which defines the scope of the investigation, is ``personal electronic 
devices that are compliant with the LTE and/or 3G 3GPP specifications, 
and which enable LTE and/or 3G data transfer and communications'';
    (3) Pursuant to Commission Rule 210.50(b)(1), 19 CFR 210.50(b)(1), 
the presiding administrative law judge shall take evidence or other 
information and hear arguments from the parties and other interested 
persons with respect to

[[Page 53106]]

the public interest in this investigation, as appropriate, and provide 
the Commission with findings of fact and a recommended determination on 
this issue, which shall be limited to the statutory public interest 
factors set forth in 19 U.S.C. 1337(d)(1), (f)(1), (g)(1);
    (4) For the purpose of the investigation so instituted, the 
following are hereby named as parties upon which this notice of 
investigation shall be served:
    (a) The complainant is:

INVT SPE LLC, One Market Plaza, Spear Tower, 42nd Floor, San Francisco, 
CA 94105.

    (b) The respondents are the following entities alleged to be in 
violation of section 337, and are the parties upon which the complaint 
is to be served:

Apple Inc., 1 Infinite Loop, Cupertino, CA 95014.
HTC Corporation, 23 Xinghua Road, Taoyuan City, Taoyuan County 330, 
Taiwan.
HTC America, Inc., 308 Occidental Ave. S, Suite 300, Seattle, WA 98104.
ZTE Corporation, ZTE Plaza, Keji Road South, Hi-Tech Industrial Park, 
Nanshan District, Guangdong Province, 518057, China.
ZTE (USA) Inc., 2425 N Central Expressway, Suite 800, Richardson, TX 
75080.

    (c) The Office of Unfair Import Investigations, U.S. International 
Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, Suite 401, Washington, DC 20436; and
    (5) For the investigation so instituted, the Chief Administrative 
Law Judge, U.S. International Trade Commission, shall designate the 
presiding Administrative Law Judge.
    Responses to the complaint and the notice of investigation must be 
submitted by the named respondents in accordance with section 210.13 of 
the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. 
Pursuant to 19 CFR 201.16(e) and 210.13(a), such responses will be 
considered by the Commission if received not later than 20 days after 
the date of service by the Commission of the complaint and the notice 
of investigation. Extensions of time for submitting responses to the 
complaint and the notice of investigation will not be granted unless 
good cause therefor is shown.
    Failure of a respondent to file a timely response to each 
allegation in the complaint and in this notice may be deemed to 
constitute a waiver of the right to appear and contest the allegations 
of the complaint and this notice, and to authorize the administrative 
law judge and the Commission, without further notice to the respondent, 
to find the facts to be as alleged in the complaint and this notice and 
to enter an initial determination and a final determination containing 
such findings, and may result in the issuance of an exclusion order or 
a cease and desist order or both directed against the respondent.

    By order of the Commission.

    Issued: October 16, 2018.
Lisa Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2018-22869 Filed 10-18-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 7020-02-P