Certain LTE- and 3G-Compliant Cellular Communications Devices Institution of Investigation, 53105-53106 [2018-22869]
Download as PDF
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 203 / Friday, October 19, 2018 / Notices
detail of cooperating agencies’
contributions, and availability of predecisional information. BOEM
anticipates this summary will form the
basis for a Memorandum of Agreement
between BOEM and any non-Interior
Department cooperating agency.
Agencies should also consider the
‘‘Factors for Determining Cooperating
Agency Status’’ in Attachment 1 to
CEQ’s January 30, 2002, Memorandum
for the Heads of Federal Agencies:
Cooperating Agencies in Implementing
the Procedural Requirements of the
National Environmental Policy Act. This
document is available on the internet at:
https://energy.gov/sites/prod/files/
nepapub/nepa_documents/RedDont/GCEQ-CoopAgenciesImplem.pdf. BOEM,
as the lead agency, will not provide
financial assistance to cooperating
agencies.
Even if a governmental entity is not a
cooperating agency, it will have
opportunities to provide information
and comments to BOEM during the
public input stages of the NEPA process.
Comments: Federal agencies, tribal,
state, and local governments, and other
interested parties are requested to
comment on the scope of this EIS,
significant issues that should be
addressed, and alternatives that should
be considered. Comments can be
submitted in any of the following ways:
1. In written form, delivered by hand
or by mail, enclosed in an envelope
labeled, ‘‘Deepwater Wind South Fork
COP EIS’’ and addressed to Program
Manager, Office of Renewable Energy,
Bureau of Ocean Energy Management,
45600 Woodland Road, Sterling,
Virginia 20166. Comments must be
received or postmarked no later than
November 19, 2018; or
2. Through the regulations.gov web
portal: Navigate to https://
www.regulations.gov and search for
Docket No. BOEM–2018–0010. Click on
the ‘‘Comment Now!’’ button to the right
of the document link. Enter your
information and comment, then click
‘‘Submit.’’
BOEM does not consider anonymous
comments. Please include your name
and address as part of your submittal.
BOEM makes all comments, including
the names and addresses of
respondents, available for public review
online and during regular business
hours. Individual respondents may
request that BOEM withhold their
names or addresses from the public
record; however, BOEM cannot
guarantee that it will be able to do so.
If you wish your name or address to be
withheld, you must state your
preference prominently at the beginning
of your comment. All submissions from
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:25 Oct 18, 2018
Jkt 247001
organizations or businesses and from
individuals identifying themselves as
representatives or officials of
organizations or businesses will be
made available for public inspection in
their entirety.
Authority: This NOI is published
pursuant to the regulations (40 CFR
1501.7) implementing the provisions of
NEPA.
Dated: October 12, 2018.
William Yancey Brown,
Chief Environmental Officer, Bureau of Ocean
Energy Management.
[FR Doc. 2018–22880 Filed 10–18–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–MR–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337–TA–1138]
Certain LTE- and 3G-Compliant
Cellular Communications Devices
Institution of Investigation
U.S. International Trade
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
Notice is hereby given that a
complaint was filed with the U.S.
International Trade Commission on
September 14, 2018, under section 337
of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended,
on behalf of INVT SPE LLC of San
Francisco, California. The complaint
alleges violations of section 337 based
upon the importation into the United
States, the sale for importation, and the
sale within the United States after
importation of certain LTE- and 3Gcompliant cellular communications
devices by reason of infringement of
certain claims of U.S. Patent No.
6,760,590 (‘‘the ’590 patent’’); U.S.
Patent No. 7,206,587 (‘‘the ’587 patent’’);
U.S. Patent No. 7,764,711 (‘‘the ’711
patent’’); U.S. Patent No. 7,848,439 (‘‘the
’439 patent’’); and U.S. Patent No.
7,339,949 (‘‘the ’949 patent’’). The
complaint further alleges that an
industry in the United States exists as
required by the applicable Federal
Statute.
The complainant requests that the
Commission institute an investigation
and, after the investigation, issue a
limited exclusion order and cease and
desist orders.
ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for
any confidential information contained
therein, is available for inspection
during official business hours (8:45 a.m.
to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the
Secretary, U.S. International Trade
Commission, 500 E Street SW, Room
112, Washington, DC 20436, telephone
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00079
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
53105
(202) 205–2000. Hearing impaired
individuals are advised that information
on this matter can be obtained by
contacting the Commission’s TDD
terminal on (202) 205–1810. Persons
with mobility impairments who will
need special assistance in gaining access
to the Commission should contact the
Office of the Secretary at (202) 205–
2000. General information concerning
the Commission may also be obtained
by accessing its internet server at
https://www.usitc.gov. The public
record for this investigation may be
viewed on the Commission’s electronic
docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Pathenia M. Proctor, The Office of
Unfair Import Investigations, U.S.
International Trade Commission,
telephone (202) 205–2560.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Authority: The authority for
institution of this investigation is
contained in section 337 of the Tariff
Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C.
1337, and in section 210.10 of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 (2018).
Scope of Investigation: Having
considered the complaint, the U.S.
International Trade Commission, on
October 15, 2018, ORDERED THAT—
(1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended, an investigation be instituted
to determine whether there is a
violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of
section 337 in the importation into the
United States, the sale for importation,
or the sale within the United States after
importation of certain products
identified in paragraph (2) by reason of
infringement of one or more of claims 3
and 4 of the ’590 patent; claim 4 of the
’587 patent; claims 1, 2, and 4 of the
’711 patent; claims 1–3 of the ’439
patent; and claim 16 of the ’949 patent;
and whether an industry in the United
States exists as required by subsection
(a)(2) of section 337;
(2) Pursuant to section 210.10(b)(1) of
the Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10(b)(1), the
plain language description of the
accused products or category of accused
products, which defines the scope of the
investigation, is ‘‘personal electronic
devices that are compliant with the LTE
and/or 3G 3GPP specifications, and
which enable LTE and/or 3G data
transfer and communications’’;
(3) Pursuant to Commission Rule
210.50(b)(1), 19 CFR 210.50(b)(1), the
presiding administrative law judge shall
take evidence or other information and
hear arguments from the parties and
other interested persons with respect to
E:\FR\FM\19OCN1.SGM
19OCN1
53106
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 203 / Friday, October 19, 2018 / Notices
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with NOTICES1
the public interest in this investigation,
as appropriate, and provide the
Commission with findings of fact and a
recommended determination on this
issue, which shall be limited to the
statutory public interest factors set forth
in 19 U.S.C. 1337(d)(1), (f)(1), (g)(1);
(4) For the purpose of the
investigation so instituted, the following
are hereby named as parties upon which
this notice of investigation shall be
served:
(a) The complainant is:
INVT SPE LLC, One Market Plaza, Spear
Tower, 42nd Floor, San Francisco, CA
94105.
(b) The respondents are the following
entities alleged to be in violation of
section 337, and are the parties upon
which the complaint is to be served:
Apple Inc., 1 Infinite Loop, Cupertino,
CA 95014.
HTC Corporation, 23 Xinghua Road,
Taoyuan City, Taoyuan County 330,
Taiwan.
HTC America, Inc., 308 Occidental Ave.
S, Suite 300, Seattle, WA 98104.
ZTE Corporation, ZTE Plaza, Keji Road
South, Hi-Tech Industrial Park,
Nanshan District, Guangdong
Province, 518057, China.
ZTE (USA) Inc., 2425 N Central
Expressway, Suite 800, Richardson,
TX 75080.
(c) The Office of Unfair Import
Investigations, U.S. International Trade
Commission, 500 E Street SW, Suite
401, Washington, DC 20436; and
(5) For the investigation so instituted,
the Chief Administrative Law Judge,
U.S. International Trade Commission,
shall designate the presiding
Administrative Law Judge.
Responses to the complaint and the
notice of investigation must be
submitted by the named respondents in
accordance with section 210.13 of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. Pursuant to
19 CFR 201.16(e) and 210.13(a), such
responses will be considered by the
Commission if received not later than 20
days after the date of service by the
Commission of the complaint and the
notice of investigation. Extensions of
time for submitting responses to the
complaint and the notice of
investigation will not be granted unless
good cause therefor is shown.
Failure of a respondent to file a timely
response to each allegation in the
complaint and in this notice may be
deemed to constitute a waiver of the
right to appear and contest the
allegations of the complaint and this
notice, and to authorize the
administrative law judge and the
Commission, without further notice to
the respondent, to find the facts to be as
alleged in the complaint and this notice
and to enter an initial determination
and a final determination containing
such findings, and may result in the
issuance of an exclusion order or a cease
and desist order or both directed against
the respondent.
By order of the Commission.
Issued: October 16, 2018.
Lisa Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2018–22869 Filed 10–18–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Antitrust Division
Notice Pursuant to the National
Cooperative Research and Production
Act of 1993—Consortium for Execution
of Rendezvous and Servicing
Operations
Notice is hereby given that, on
September 10, 2018, pursuant to Section
6(a) of the National Cooperative
Research and Production Act of 1993,
15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (‘‘the Act’’),
Consortium for Execution of
Rendezvous and Servicing Operations
(‘‘CONFERS’’) has filed written
notifications simultaneously with the
Attorney General and the Federal Trade
Commission disclosing (1) the identities
of the parties to the venture and (2) the
nature and objectives of the venture.
The notifications were filed for the
purpose of invoking the Act’s provisions
limiting the recovery of antitrust
plaintiffs to actual damages under
specified circumstances.
Pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act,
the identities of the parties to the
venture are: Altius Space Machines,
Inc., Broomfield, CO; Analytical
Graphics, Inc., Exton, PA; Astroscale
PTE. LTD., Tokyo, JAPAN; Ball
Aerospace and Technology Corp.,
Boulder, CO; Chandah Space
Technologies, Houston, TX; Hoffer Flow
Controls, Inc. Elizabeth City, NC; iBOSS
gmbH, Aachen, GERMANY; MacDonald,
Dettwiler and Associates, Inc.,
Brampton, Ontario, CANADA; Thales
Alenia Space, Courbevioe, FRANCE;
The Aerospace Corporation, El Segundo,
CA; and XL Catlin, LLC, New York, NY.
The general area of CONFERS’
planned activity is to establish an
independent, self-sustaining industry
forum to advocate and promote on-orbit
satellite maintenance, servicing, and
rendezvous operations by collaborating
to research, develop, and publish
voluntary, consensus technical and
safety standards, and engaging with
governments on policy and oversight of
satellite servicing activities. To fulfill its
mission, CONFERS will recruit a broad
array of members from satellite
operators, service providers, insurers
and underwriters, and engage other
stakeholders from industry, academia,
and governments. The process will be
fully collaborative and will include
dedicated outreach activities to engage
the global commercial satellite
community. The members of the
CONFERS believe that future standards
should be based on a set of guiding
principles that will help establish
responsible norms of behavior.
Suzanne Morris,
Chief, Premerger and Division Statistics Unit,
Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 2018–22826 Filed 10–18–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–11–P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Drug Enforcement Administration
[Docket No. DEA–392]
Bulk Manufacturer of Controlled
Substances Registration
ACTION:
Notice of registration.
The registrant listed below
has applied for and been granted
registration by the Drug Enforcement
Administration (DEA) as a bulk
manufacturer of various classes of
schedule I and II controlled substances.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
company listed below applied to be
registered as a bulk manufacturer of
various basic classes of controlled
substances. Information on a previously
published notice is listed in the table
below. No comments or objections were
submitted for this notice.
SUMMARY:
Company
FR Docket
Published
Siegfried USA, LLC .................................................................................................................................................
83 FR 32905 ..
July 16, 2018.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:25 Oct 18, 2018
Jkt 247001
PO 00000
Frm 00080
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\19OCN1.SGM
19OCN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 203 (Friday, October 19, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 53105-53106]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-22869]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337-TA-1138]
Certain LTE- and 3G-Compliant Cellular Communications Devices
Institution of Investigation
AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a complaint was filed with the
U.S. International Trade Commission on September 14, 2018, under
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, on behalf of INVT
SPE LLC of San Francisco, California. The complaint alleges violations
of section 337 based upon the importation into the United States, the
sale for importation, and the sale within the United States after
importation of certain LTE- and 3G-compliant cellular communications
devices by reason of infringement of certain claims of U.S. Patent No.
6,760,590 (``the '590 patent''); U.S. Patent No. 7,206,587 (``the '587
patent''); U.S. Patent No. 7,764,711 (``the '711 patent''); U.S. Patent
No. 7,848,439 (``the '439 patent''); and U.S. Patent No. 7,339,949
(``the '949 patent''). The complaint further alleges that an industry
in the United States exists as required by the applicable Federal
Statute.
The complainant requests that the Commission institute an
investigation and, after the investigation, issue a limited exclusion
order and cease and desist orders.
ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for any confidential information
contained therein, is available for inspection during official business
hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, Room 112, Washington,
DC 20436, telephone (202) 205-2000. Hearing impaired individuals are
advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting
the Commission's TDD terminal on (202) 205-1810. Persons with mobility
impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the
Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at (202) 205-
2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be
obtained by accessing its internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. The
public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission's
electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Pathenia M. Proctor, The Office of
Unfair Import Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission,
telephone (202) 205-2560.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Authority: The authority for institution of this investigation is
contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19
U.S.C. 1337, and in section 210.10 of the Commission's Rules of
Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 (2018).
Scope of Investigation: Having considered the complaint, the U.S.
International Trade Commission, on October 15, 2018, ORDERED THAT--
(1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of section 337 of the Tariff Act of
1930, as amended, an investigation be instituted to determine whether
there is a violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of section 337 in the
importation into the United States, the sale for importation, or the
sale within the United States after importation of certain products
identified in paragraph (2) by reason of infringement of one or more of
claims 3 and 4 of the '590 patent; claim 4 of the '587 patent; claims
1, 2, and 4 of the '711 patent; claims 1-3 of the '439 patent; and
claim 16 of the '949 patent; and whether an industry in the United
States exists as required by subsection (a)(2) of section 337;
(2) Pursuant to section 210.10(b)(1) of the Commission's Rules of
Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10(b)(1), the plain language
description of the accused products or category of accused products,
which defines the scope of the investigation, is ``personal electronic
devices that are compliant with the LTE and/or 3G 3GPP specifications,
and which enable LTE and/or 3G data transfer and communications'';
(3) Pursuant to Commission Rule 210.50(b)(1), 19 CFR 210.50(b)(1),
the presiding administrative law judge shall take evidence or other
information and hear arguments from the parties and other interested
persons with respect to
[[Page 53106]]
the public interest in this investigation, as appropriate, and provide
the Commission with findings of fact and a recommended determination on
this issue, which shall be limited to the statutory public interest
factors set forth in 19 U.S.C. 1337(d)(1), (f)(1), (g)(1);
(4) For the purpose of the investigation so instituted, the
following are hereby named as parties upon which this notice of
investigation shall be served:
(a) The complainant is:
INVT SPE LLC, One Market Plaza, Spear Tower, 42nd Floor, San Francisco,
CA 94105.
(b) The respondents are the following entities alleged to be in
violation of section 337, and are the parties upon which the complaint
is to be served:
Apple Inc., 1 Infinite Loop, Cupertino, CA 95014.
HTC Corporation, 23 Xinghua Road, Taoyuan City, Taoyuan County 330,
Taiwan.
HTC America, Inc., 308 Occidental Ave. S, Suite 300, Seattle, WA 98104.
ZTE Corporation, ZTE Plaza, Keji Road South, Hi-Tech Industrial Park,
Nanshan District, Guangdong Province, 518057, China.
ZTE (USA) Inc., 2425 N Central Expressway, Suite 800, Richardson, TX
75080.
(c) The Office of Unfair Import Investigations, U.S. International
Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, Suite 401, Washington, DC 20436; and
(5) For the investigation so instituted, the Chief Administrative
Law Judge, U.S. International Trade Commission, shall designate the
presiding Administrative Law Judge.
Responses to the complaint and the notice of investigation must be
submitted by the named respondents in accordance with section 210.13 of
the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13.
Pursuant to 19 CFR 201.16(e) and 210.13(a), such responses will be
considered by the Commission if received not later than 20 days after
the date of service by the Commission of the complaint and the notice
of investigation. Extensions of time for submitting responses to the
complaint and the notice of investigation will not be granted unless
good cause therefor is shown.
Failure of a respondent to file a timely response to each
allegation in the complaint and in this notice may be deemed to
constitute a waiver of the right to appear and contest the allegations
of the complaint and this notice, and to authorize the administrative
law judge and the Commission, without further notice to the respondent,
to find the facts to be as alleged in the complaint and this notice and
to enter an initial determination and a final determination containing
such findings, and may result in the issuance of an exclusion order or
a cease and desist order or both directed against the respondent.
By order of the Commission.
Issued: October 16, 2018.
Lisa Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2018-22869 Filed 10-18-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P