Circular Welded Carbon Steel Pipes and Tubes From Thailand: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2016-2017, 51927-51929 [2018-22237]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 199 / Monday, October 15, 2018 / Notices Dated: October 9, 2018. Gary Taverman, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Operations, performing the non-exclusive functions and duties of the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. [FR Doc. 2018–22365 Filed 10–12–18; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–570–086, A–549–839] Steel Propane Cylinders From the People’s Republic of China and Thailand: Postponement of Preliminary Determinations in the Less-Than-FairValue Investigations Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce DATES: Applicable October 15, 2018. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jonathan Cornfield or Laura Griffith at (202) 482–3855, or (202) 482–6430, respectively (People’s Republic of China (China)) and Cindy Robinson or Stephanie Moore at (202) 482–3797, or (202) 482–3692, respectively (Thailand), AD/CVD Operations, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: AGENCY: khammond on DSK30JT082PROD with NOTICES Background On June 11, 2018, the Department of Commerce (Commerce) initiated lessthan-fair-value (LTFV) investigations of imports of steel propane cylinders from China, Taiwan, and Thailand.1 On June 20, 2018, Commerce terminated its antidumping duty investigation of imports of steel propane cylinders from Taiwan, following the petitioners’2 withdrawal of the petition and request that the investigation be terminated.3 Because Commerce has terminated its investigation of steel propane cylinderes from Taiwan, the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC)’s investigation is also terminated.4 The preliminary 1 See Steel Propane Cylinders from the People’s Republic of China, Taiwan, and Thailand: Initiation of Less-Than-Fair-Value Investigations, 83 FR 28196 (June 18, 2018). 2 The petitioners are Worthington Industries and Manchester Tank &, Equipment Co. 3 See Steel Propane Cylinders from Taiwan: Termination of Less-Than-Fair-Value Investigation, 83 29748 (June 26, 2018). 4 See ITC Investigation No. 731–TA–1418 (Preliminary). See also Steel Propane Cylinders from Taiwan, Termination of Investigation, 83 FR 31174 (July 3, 2018). VerDate Sep<11>2014 21:34 Oct 12, 2018 Jkt 247001 determinations for China and Thailand are currently due no later than October 29, 2018. Postponement of Preliminary Determinations Section 733(b)(1)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), requires Commerce to issue the preliminary determination in an LTFV investigation within 140 days after the date on which Commerce initiated the investigation. However, section 733(c)(1) of the Act permits Commerce to postpone the preliminary determination until no later than 190 days after the date on which Commerce initiated the investigation if: (A) The petitioner makes a timely request for a postponement; or (B) Commerce concludes that the parties concerned are cooperating, that the investigation is extraordinarily complicated, and that additional time is necessary to make a preliminary determination. Under 19 CFR 351.205(e), the petitioner must submit a request for postponement 25 days or more before the scheduled date of the preliminary determination and must state the reasons for the request. Commerce will grant the request unless it finds compelling reasons to deny the request.5 On October 1, 2018, the petitioners submitted timely requests to postpone the preliminary determinations in these LTFV investigations.6 The petitioners stated that they requested postponement because Commerce is still gathering data and questionnaire responses from the foreign producers in these investigations, and additional time is necessary for interested parties to respond to additional requests from Commerce before Commerce makes its preliminary determinations. For the reasons stated above and because there are no compelling reasons to deny the petitioners’ request, Commerce, in accordance with section 733(c)(1)(A) of the Act, is postponing the deadline for the preliminary determinations by 50 days (i.e., 190 days after the date on which these investigations were initiated). As a result, Commerce will issue its preliminary determinations no later than December 18, 2018. In accordance with section 735(a)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.210(b)(1), the deadline for the final determinations of these investigations will continue to be 75 days after the date of the preliminary 5 See 19 CFR 351.205(e). letter from the petitioners, ‘‘Steel Propane Cylinders from the People’s Republic of China and Thailand—Petitioners’ Request to Extend the Preliminary Antidumping Duty Determination’’ dated October 1, 2018. 6 See PO 00000 Frm 00005 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 51927 determinations, unless postponed at a later date. This notice is issued and published pursuant to section 733(c)(2) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.205(f)(1). Dated: October 9, 2018. Gary Taverman, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, performing the non-exclusive functions and duties of the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. [FR Doc. 2018–22367 Filed 10–12–18; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–549–502] Circular Welded Carbon Steel Pipes and Tubes From Thailand: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2016–2017 Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that circular welded carbon steel pipes and tubes (pipes and tubes) from Thailand are being, or are likely to be sold, at less than normal value during the period of review (POR), March 1, 2016, through February 28, 2017. DATES: Applicable: October 15, 2018. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Toni Page or Kathryn Wallace, AD/CVD Operations, Office VII, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–1398 or (202) 482–6251, respectively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: AGENCY: Background On April 9, 2018, Commerce published the Preliminary Results of the 2016–2017 administrative review of the antidumping duty order on pipes and tubes from Thailand.1 For a discussion of the events subsequent to the Preliminary Results, see the Issues and Decision Memorandum dated concurrently with and hereby adopted by this notice.2 1 See Circular Welded Carbon Steel Pipes and Tubes from Thailand: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2016– 2017, 83 FR 15127 (April 9, 2018) (Preliminary Results) and accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum (PDM). 2 See Memorandum, ‘‘Circular Welded Carbon Steel Pipes and Tubes from Thailand: Decision E:\FR\FM\15OCN1.SGM Continued 15OCN1 51928 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 199 / Monday, October 15, 2018 / Notices Scope of the Order The products covered by this review are certain circular welded carbon steel pipes and tubes from Thailand. For a full description of the scope, see the Issues and Decision Memorandum.3 Analysis of Comments Received All issues raised in the case and rebuttal briefs by parties to this administrative review are addressed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum.4 A list of issues raised, and to which we responded in the Issues and Decision Memorandum, is attached to this notice as an Appendix. The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on-file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance’s Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at https:// access.trade.gov, and it is available to all parties in the Central Records Unit (CRU), Room B8024 of the main Department of Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly on the internet at https://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/ index.html. The signed Issues and Decision Memorandum and the electronic versions of the Issues and Decision Memorandum are identical in content. Changes Since the Preliminary Results Based on a review of the record and comments received from interested parties, we have made certain changes to Pacific Pipe Public Company Limited’s (Pacific Pipe); Saha Thai Steel Pipe (Public) Company, Ltd.’s (Saha Thai); and Thai Premium Pipe Co., Ltd.’s (Thai Premium) weighted-average dumping margins. For further discussion, see the Issues and Decision Memorandum. Final Results of Review We determine that, for the period March 1, 2016, through February 28, 2017, the following weighted-average dumping margins exist: Weightedaverage dumping margin (percent) khammond on DSK30JT082PROD with NOTICES Producer or exporter Pacific Pipe Company Limited .............. Saha Thai Steel Pipe (Public) Company, Ltd ............................................ 30.61 28.00 Memorandum for the Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2016–2017,’’ dated concurrently with this notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum). 3 Id. 4 Id. VerDate Sep<11>2014 21:34 Oct 12, 2018 Jkt 247001 Weightedaverage dumping margin (percent) Producer or exporter Thai Premium Pipe Company Ltd ......... 30.98 Assessment Rates Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act) and 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), Commerce determined, and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries of subject merchandise, in accordance with the final results of this review. If a respondent’s weightedaverage dumping margin is not zero or de minimis (i.e., less than 0.5 percent), we will calculate importer-specific ad valorem assessment rates on the basis of the ratio of the total amount of dumping calculated for an importer’s examined sales and the total entered value of such sales in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). Where either the respondent’s weighted-average dumping margin is zero or de minimis within the meaning of 19 CFR 351.106(c), or an importer-specific rate is zero or de minimis, we will instruct CBP to liquidate the appropriate entries without regard to antidumping duties. Commerce intends to issue appropriate assessment instructions to CBP 15 days after the date of publication of the final results of review. Cash Deposit Requirements The following cash deposit requirements will be effective for all shipments of subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the date of publication of the final results of this administrative review, as provided for by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) The cash deposit rate for the companies under review will be equal to the weighted-average dumping margin established in the final results of this review; (2) for previously reviewed or investigated companies not listed above in the Final Results of Review, including those for which Commerce may determine had no shipments during the POR, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the companyspecific rate published for the most recently completed segment of this proceeding; (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered in this review or another completed segment of this proceeding, but the producer is, then the cash deposit rate will be the rate established for the most recently completed segment of this proceeding for the producer of the merchandise; and (4) if neither the exporter nor the producer is a firm PO 00000 Frm 00006 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 covered in this or a previously completed segment of this proceeding, then the cash deposit rate will be the ‘‘all-others’’ rate of 15.67 percent established in the less-than-fair-value investigation.5 These cash deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice. Notification to Importers This notice serves as a final reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in the Secretary’s presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of doubled antidumping duties. Administrative Protective Order This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility concerning the destruction of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely written notification of the return or destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation. Notification to Interested Parties We are issuing and publishing this notice in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.221(b)(5). Dated: October 4, 2018. Gary Taverman, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, performing the non-exclusive functions and duties of the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Appendix Issues and Decision Memorandum I. Summary II. List of Comments III. Background IV. Scope of the Order V. Discussion of the Comments Comment 1: Whether to Accept Certain New Factual Information Regarding Particular Market Situation (PMS) Allegation Comment 2: Whether Commerce Improperly Made PMS Adjustments to the Respondents’ Cost of Production. 5 See Antidumping Duty Order; Circular Welded Carbon Steel Pipes and Tubes from Thailand, 51 FR 8341 (March 11, 1986). E:\FR\FM\15OCN1.SGM 15OCN1 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 199 / Monday, October 15, 2018 / Notices Comment 3: PMS Adjustments to Pacific Pipe’s and Saha Thai’s Calculations Comment 4: Sales Date Parameters of Pacific Pipe’s Home Market and U.S. Sales Programs Comment 5: Pacific Pipe’s Fixed Overhead Costs Comment 6: Assignment of Surrogate Costs to Certain Pacific Pipe Home Market Sales Comment 7: Pacific Pipe’s Home Market Discounts and Rebates Comment 8: Sales Date Parameters of Saha Thai’s Home Market and U.S. Sales Programs Comment 9: Saha Thai’s Duty Drawback Adjustment Comment 10: Differential Pricing Analysis of Saha Thai’s U.S. Sales Comment 11: Sales Date Parameters of Thai Premium’s Home Market Sales Program Comment 12: Assignment of Surrogate Costs to Certain Thai Premium Home Market Sales Comment 13: Revision of Variable Names in Thai Premium’s Home Market Program VI. Recommendation [FR Doc. 2018–22237 Filed 10–12–18; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Notice of Findings Regarding Non-U.S. Commercial Availability of Satellite Imagery With Respect to Israel ACTION: Notice. Consistent with the requirement that commercial remote sensing licensees operate their systems in a manner that protects national security concerns, foreign policy and international obligations, Section 1064, Public Law 104–201, (the 1997 Defense Authorization Act), referred to as the Kyl-Bingaman Amendment, requires that ‘‘[a] department or agency of the United States may issue a license for the collection or dissemination by a nonFederal entity of satellite imagery with respect to Israel only if such imagery is no more detailed or precise than satellite imagery of Israel that is available from commercial sources.’’ Pursuant to this law, the Department of Commerce will make findings as to the level of detail or precision of satellite imagery of Israel available from commercial sources. The Department has found that imagery over Israel is not readily and consistently available in sufficient quantities from non-U.S. sources at under the 2 m Ground Sample Distance (GSD) resolution limit currently set by the Department; therefore, the Department is not changing this resolution limit. khammond on DSK30JT082PROD with NOTICES SUMMARY: VerDate Sep<11>2014 21:34 Oct 12, 2018 Jkt 247001 This Notice informs U.S. satellite operators collecting imagery over Israel or with plans to collect imagery over Israel that current restrictions regarding data collection/dissemination of imagery over Israel remain in place with the resolution limit at 2 m GSD. This Notice is consistent with the requirement that the Department of Commerce review non-U.S. commercial availability of imagery over Israel and any input from licensees or from the general public and publish findings of this review in the Federal Register. To determine what imagery is ‘‘available from commercial sources,’’ the Department looks to what ‘‘level of imagery resolution [is] readily and consistently available in sufficient quantities from non-U.S. sources.’’ Licensing of Private Land RemoteSensing Space Systems, 71 FR 24474, 24479 (Apr. 25, 2006). After a recent investigation and analysis, the Department determined that imagery over Israel is not readily and consistently available in sufficient quantities from non-U.S. sources at under 2 m GSD to consider sub-2 m imagery ‘‘commercially available.’’ There are non-U.S. commercial sources that are capturing imagery at lower than the 2 m resolution limit, but very little of this imagery is available for sale. Further, the imagery is not easily accessible enough to be readily available. A customer must apply to acquire the imagery. Even if their application is granted and the customer is able to buy imagery at under 2 m, the license terms of the sale often restrict the customer from further disseminating the imagery. Therefore, the Department has determined that commercial imagery is not readily or consistently available from non-U.S. sources in sufficient quantities to be considered commercially available. The Department of Commerce may reevaluate this finding in the future as additional information is made available. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tahara Dawkins, Commercial Remote Sensing Regulatory Affairs Office, NOAA Satellite and Information Services, 1335 East-West Highway, Suite G–101, Silver Spring, Maryland 20910; telephone (301) 713–3385, email tahara.dawkins@noaa.gov. Tahara Dawkins, Director, Commercial Remote Sensing Regulatory Affairs. [FR Doc. 2018–22366 Filed 10–12–18; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–HR–P PO 00000 Frm 00007 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 51929 DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE Department of the Army Notice of Intent to Grant Exclusive Patent License to Dilatant, LLC; Kansas City, MO Department of the Army, DoD. Notice of intent. AGENCY: ACTION: The Department of the Army hereby gives notice of its intent to grant to Dilatant, LLC; a company having its principle place of business at 1111 West 46th Street #45, Kansas City, MO 64112, an exclusive license. DATES: Written objections must be filed not later than 15 days following publication of this announcement. ADDRESSES: Send written objections to U.S. Army Research Laboratory Technology Transfer and Outreach Office, RDRL-DPT/Annmarie Martin, Building 321 Room 113, 6375 Johnson Rd., Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD 21005–5425. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Annmarie Martin, (410) 278–9106, email: ORTA@arl.army.mil. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Department of the Army plans to grant an exclusive license to Dilatant, LLC in the field of use related to head and body resistant systems incorporating rateactuated tethers for use in automotive racing applications relative to the following— • ‘‘Rate-Responsive, Stretchable Devices’’, US Patent No. 9,303,717, Filing Date June 26, 2013, Issue Date April 5, 2016. • ‘‘Rate-Responsive, Stretchable Devices (Further Improvements)’’, US Patent No. 9,958,023, Filing Date March 1, 2016, Issue Date May 1, 2018. • ‘‘Head Restraint System Having a Rate Sensitive Device’’, US Patent Application No. 15/366,578, Filed December 1, 2016. The prospective exclusive license may be granted unless within fifteen (15) days from the date of this published notice, the U.S. Army Research Laboratory receives written objections including evidence and argument that establish that the grant of the license would not be consistent with the requirements of 35 U.S.C. 209(e) and 37 CFR 404.7(a)(1)(i). Competing applications completed and received by the U.S. Army Research Laboratory within fifteen (15) days from the date of this published notice will also be treated as objections to the grant of the contemplated exclusive license. Objections submitted in response to this notice will not be made available to the public for inspection and, to the SUMMARY: E:\FR\FM\15OCN1.SGM 15OCN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 199 (Monday, October 15, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 51927-51929]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-22237]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-549-502]


Circular Welded Carbon Steel Pipes and Tubes From Thailand: Final 
Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2016-2017

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that circular 
welded carbon steel pipes and tubes (pipes and tubes) from Thailand are 
being, or are likely to be sold, at less than normal value during the 
period of review (POR), March 1, 2016, through February 28, 2017.

DATES: Applicable: October 15, 2018.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Toni Page or Kathryn Wallace, AD/CVD 
Operations, Office VII, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade 
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-1398 or (202) 482-6251, 
respectively.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    On April 9, 2018, Commerce published the Preliminary Results of the 
2016-2017 administrative review of the antidumping duty order on pipes 
and tubes from Thailand.\1\ For a discussion of the events subsequent 
to the Preliminary Results, see the Issues and Decision Memorandum 
dated concurrently with and hereby adopted by this notice.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Circular Welded Carbon Steel Pipes and Tubes from 
Thailand: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative 
Review; 2016-2017, 83 FR 15127 (April 9, 2018) (Preliminary Results) 
and accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum (PDM).
    \2\ See Memorandum, ``Circular Welded Carbon Steel Pipes and 
Tubes from Thailand: Decision Memorandum for the Final Results of 
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2016-2017,'' dated 
concurrently with this notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum).

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 51928]]

Scope of the Order

    The products covered by this review are certain circular welded 
carbon steel pipes and tubes from Thailand. For a full description of 
the scope, see the Issues and Decision Memorandum.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Analysis of Comments Received

    All issues raised in the case and rebuttal briefs by parties to 
this administrative review are addressed in the Issues and Decision 
Memorandum.\4\ A list of issues raised, and to which we responded in 
the Issues and Decision Memorandum, is attached to this notice as an 
Appendix. The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document and 
is on-file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping 
and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). 
ACCESS is available to registered users at https://access.trade.gov, 
and it is available to all parties in the Central Records Unit (CRU), 
Room B8024 of the main Department of Commerce building. In addition, a 
complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed 
directly on the internet at https://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed Issues and Decision Memorandum and the 
electronic versions of the Issues and Decision Memorandum are identical 
in content.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Changes Since the Preliminary Results

    Based on a review of the record and comments received from 
interested parties, we have made certain changes to Pacific Pipe Public 
Company Limited's (Pacific Pipe); Saha Thai Steel Pipe (Public) 
Company, Ltd.'s (Saha Thai); and Thai Premium Pipe Co., Ltd.'s (Thai 
Premium) weighted-average dumping margins. For further discussion, see 
the Issues and Decision Memorandum.

Final Results of Review

    We determine that, for the period March 1, 2016, through February 
28, 2017, the following weighted-average dumping margins exist:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                               Weighted-
                                                                average
                    Producer or exporter                        dumping
                                                                margin
                                                               (percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pacific Pipe Company Limited................................       30.61
Saha Thai Steel Pipe (Public) Company, Ltd..................       28.00
Thai Premium Pipe Company Ltd...............................       30.98
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Assessment Rates

    Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 
amended (the Act) and 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), Commerce determined, and 
U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) shall assess, antidumping 
duties on all appropriate entries of subject merchandise, in accordance 
with the final results of this review. If a respondent's weighted-
average dumping margin is not zero or de minimis (i.e., less than 0.5 
percent), we will calculate importer-specific ad valorem assessment 
rates on the basis of the ratio of the total amount of dumping 
calculated for an importer's examined sales and the total entered value 
of such sales in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). Where either the 
respondent's weighted-average dumping margin is zero or de minimis 
within the meaning of 19 CFR 351.106(c), or an importer-specific rate 
is zero or de minimis, we will instruct CBP to liquidate the 
appropriate entries without regard to antidumping duties. Commerce 
intends to issue appropriate assessment instructions to CBP 15 days 
after the date of publication of the final results of review.

Cash Deposit Requirements

    The following cash deposit requirements will be effective for all 
shipments of subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, 
for consumption on or after the date of publication of the final 
results of this administrative review, as provided for by section 
751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) The cash deposit rate for the companies 
under review will be equal to the weighted-average dumping margin 
established in the final results of this review; (2) for previously 
reviewed or investigated companies not listed above in the Final 
Results of Review, including those for which Commerce may determine had 
no shipments during the POR, the cash deposit rate will continue to be 
the company-specific rate published for the most recently completed 
segment of this proceeding; (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered 
in this review or another completed segment of this proceeding, but the 
producer is, then the cash deposit rate will be the rate established 
for the most recently completed segment of this proceeding for the 
producer of the merchandise; and (4) if neither the exporter nor the 
producer is a firm covered in this or a previously completed segment of 
this proceeding, then the cash deposit rate will be the ``all-others'' 
rate of 15.67 percent established in the less-than-fair-value 
investigation.\5\ These cash deposit requirements, when imposed, shall 
remain in effect until further notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ See Antidumping Duty Order; Circular Welded Carbon Steel 
Pipes and Tubes from Thailand, 51 FR 8341 (March 11, 1986).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Notification to Importers

    This notice serves as a final reminder to importers of their 
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation 
of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply 
with this requirement could result in the Secretary's presumption that 
reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent 
assessment of doubled antidumping duties.

Administrative Protective Order

    This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to 
administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility 
concerning the destruction of proprietary information disclosed under 
APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely written 
notification of the return or destruction of APO materials or 
conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to 
comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a sanctionable 
violation.

Notification to Interested Parties

    We are issuing and publishing this notice in accordance with 
sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.221(b)(5).

    Dated: October 4, 2018.
Gary Taverman,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 
Operations, performing the non-exclusive functions and duties of the 
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.

Appendix

Issues and Decision Memorandum

I. Summary
II. List of Comments
III. Background
IV. Scope of the Order
V. Discussion of the Comments
    Comment 1: Whether to Accept Certain New Factual Information 
Regarding Particular Market Situation (PMS) Allegation
    Comment 2: Whether Commerce Improperly Made PMS Adjustments to 
the Respondents' Cost of Production.

[[Page 51929]]

    Comment 3: PMS Adjustments to Pacific Pipe's and Saha Thai's 
Calculations
    Comment 4: Sales Date Parameters of Pacific Pipe's Home Market 
and U.S. Sales Programs
    Comment 5: Pacific Pipe's Fixed Overhead Costs
    Comment 6: Assignment of Surrogate Costs to Certain Pacific Pipe 
Home Market Sales
    Comment 7: Pacific Pipe's Home Market Discounts and Rebates
    Comment 8: Sales Date Parameters of Saha Thai's Home Market and 
U.S. Sales Programs
    Comment 9: Saha Thai's Duty Drawback Adjustment
    Comment 10: Differential Pricing Analysis of Saha Thai's U.S. 
Sales
    Comment 11: Sales Date Parameters of Thai Premium's Home Market 
Sales Program
    Comment 12: Assignment of Surrogate Costs to Certain Thai 
Premium Home Market Sales
    Comment 13: Revision of Variable Names in Thai Premium's Home 
Market Program
VI. Recommendation
[FR Doc. 2018-22237 Filed 10-12-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P