Self-Regulatory Organizations; Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc.; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Change Relating to Provision of Test Result Information to Candidates Who Pass a FINRA Qualification Examination, 51720-51722 [2018-22205]
Download as PDF
51720
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 198 / Friday, October 12, 2018 / Notices
accelerated approval of the proposed
rule change pursuant to Section
19(b)(2)(C)(iii) of the Exchange Act.27
Under Section 19(b)(2)(C)(iii) of the
Act,28 the Commission may grant
accelerated approval of a proposed rule
change if the Commission finds good
cause for doing so. ICE Clear Europe
believes that accelerated approval is
warranted because the proposed rule
change, as modified by Amendment No.
1, is required to comply with
requirements under the European
Market Infrastructure Regulation that
ICE Clear Europe have the ability to call
for intraday margin for relevant F&O
contracts, and ICE Clear Europe is
seeking to comply with those
requirements as soon as possible.29
The Commission finds good cause,
pursuant to Section 19(b)(2)(C)(iii) of
the Act,30 for approving the proposed
rule change, as modified by Amendment
No. 1, on an accelerated basis, prior to
the 30th day after the date of
publication of notice in the Federal
Register, because the proposed rule
change is required as soon as possible
in order to facilitate ICE Clear Europe’s
efforts to comply with the
aforementioned requirements.31
Additionally, the Commission notes that
the proposed changes do not impede
compliance with relevant U.S. law,
including Section 17A(b)(3)(F) of the
Act.32
VI. Conclusion
On the basis of the foregoing, the
Commission finds that the proposal is
consistent with the requirements of the
Act, and in particular, with the
requirements of Section 17A(b)(3)(F) of
the Act 33 and Rules 17Ad–22(e)(6)(ii)
and 17Ad–22(e)(16) thereunder.34
It is therefore ordered pursuant to
Section 19(b)(2) of the Act 35 that the
proposed rule change (SR–ICEEU–2018–
012), as modified by Amendment No. 1,
be, and hereby is, approved on an
accelerated basis.36
27 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(C)(iii).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(C)(iii).
29 See supra note 5.
30 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(C)(iii).
31 See id.
32 15 U.S.C. 78q–1(b)(3)(F).
33 Id.
34 17 CFR 240.17Ad–22(e)(6)(ii) and (e)(16).
35 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
36 In approving the proposed rule change, the
Commission considered the proposal’s impact on
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. 15
U.S.C. 78c(f).
khammond on DSK30JT082PROD with NOTICES
28 15
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:19 Oct 11, 2018
Jkt 247001
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.37
Eduardo A. Aleman,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018–22204 Filed 10–11–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–84376; File No. SR–FINRA–
2018–036]
Self-Regulatory Organizations;
Financial Industry Regulatory
Authority, Inc.; Notice of Filing and
Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed
Change Relating to Provision of Test
Result Information to Candidates Who
Pass a FINRA Qualification
Examination
October 5, 2018.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on
September 27, 2018, Financial Industry
Regulatory Authority, Inc. (‘‘FINRA’’)
filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (‘‘SEC’’ or ‘‘Commission’’)
the proposed rule change as described
in Items I, II, and III below, which Items
have been prepared by FINRA. FINRA
has designated the proposed rule change
as ‘‘constituting a stated policy,
practice, or interpretation with respect
to the meaning, administration, or
enforcement of an existing rule’’ under
Section 19(b)(3)(A)(i) of the Act 3 and
Rule 19b–4(f)(1) thereunder,4 which
renders the proposal effective upon
receipt of this filing by the Commission.
The Commission is publishing this
notice to solicit comments on the
proposed rule change from interested
persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
FINRA is proposing revisions relating
to test results information on the
content outlines of certain FINRA
representative- and principal-level
qualification examinations. FINRA is
not proposing any textual changes to the
By-Laws, Schedules to the By-Laws or
Rules of FINRA.
The text of the proposed rule change
[sic] is available on FINRA’s website at
https://www.finra.org, at the principal
37 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
3 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(i).
4 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(1).
PO 00000
Frm 00061
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
office of FINRA and at the
Commission’s Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission,
FINRA included statements concerning
the purpose of and basis for the
proposed rule change and discussed any
comments it received on the proposed
rule change. The text of these statements
may be examined at the places specified
in Item IV below. FINRA has prepared
summaries, set forth in sections A, B,
and C below, of the most significant
aspects of such statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
Each FINRA representative- and
principal-level qualification
examination has a minimum score
threshold that is necessary for passing
the examination (also referred to as a
‘‘passing score’’). For instance, the
passing score for the current General
Securities Representative (Series 7)
examination is 72. FINRA determines
the passing score for each examination
based on a process known as standard
setting, which assesses a number of
factors, including industry trends,
historical examination performance and
evaluations of content difficulty by a
committee of industry professionals
who have passed the related
examination. The passing score for an
examination reflects the minimum level
of knowledge necessary to perform the
functions for which a candidate is
registering.
A candidate’s numerical score on an
examination is necessary to determine
whether the candidate has satisfied the
minimum score threshold for passing
the examination. In addition, if a
candidate fails to meet the minimum
score threshold for passing an
examination, the candidate’s numerical
score is relevant in evaluating the extent
to which the candidate needs additional
study time and training and whether the
candidate should retake the
examination.5
Currently, candidates who take a
FINRA qualification examination
receive a test results report of their
5 A candidate who fails an examination is eligible
to retake that examination after 30 calendar days.
However, if a candidate fails an examination three
or more times in succession within a two-year
period, the candidate is prohibited from retaking
that examination until 180 calendar days from the
date of the candidate’s last attempt to pass it.
E:\FR\FM\12OCN1.SGM
12OCN1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 198 / Friday, October 12, 2018 / Notices
khammond on DSK30JT082PROD with NOTICES
performance at the end of their test
session. The test results report will
indicate a pass or fail status. Further,
the report will indicate a total score and
a score profile for each major section of
the content outline. Several FINRA
representative- and principal-level
examination content outlines currently
include information relating to the test
results.6 This information appears in
different places in the content outlines.
For instance, in the Series 99
examination outline, the information
appears under the ‘‘Candidates’ Test
Results’’ heading; whereas, in the Series
22 examination outline, the information
is under the ‘‘Introduction’’ heading.
Effective October 1, 2018, FINRA is
restructuring its representative-level
qualification examination program.7 In
conjunction with the restructuring,
starting on October 1, 2018, FINRA will
no longer provide a total score and a
score profile for each major section of
the content outline to candidates who
pass a qualification examination. FINRA
believes that providing such
information is unnecessary once a
candidate has met the minimum score
threshold for passing an examination.8
6 These representative-level examinations are the
current Investment Company and Variable
Contracts Products Representative (Series 6),
General Securities Representative (Series 7), Order
Processing Assistant Representative (Series 11),
United Kingdom Securities Representative (Series
17), Direct Participation Programs Representative
(Series 22), Canadian Securities Representative
(Series 37 and Series 38), Options Representative
(Series 42), Securities Trader (Series 57), Corporate
Securities Representative (Series 62), Government
Securities Representative (Series 72), Investment
Banking Representative (Series 79), Private
Securities Offerings Representative (Series 82) and
Operations Professional (Series 99) examinations.
These examinations are available to candidates who
open an examination window in the Central
Registration Depository (‘‘CRD®’’) system prior to
October 1, 2018. The revised Series 6, 7, 22, 57, 79,
82 and 99 examinations, which will be available to
candidates who open an examination window on or
after October 1, 2018, do not include information
relating to examination results. In addition, the
current Series 11, 17, 37, 38, 42, 62 and 72 will not
be available to candidates who open an
examination window on or after October 1, 2018.
The principal-level examinations are the
Registered Options Principal (Series 4), General
Securities Sales Supervisor (Series 9 and Series 10),
Supervisory Analyst (Series 16), General Securities
Principal Sales Supervisor Module (Series 23),
General Securities Principal (Series 24), Investment
Company and Variable Contracts Products Principal
(Series 26), Financial and Operations Principal
(Series 27), Introducing Broker-Dealer Financial and
Operations Principal (Series 28) and Direct
Participation Programs Principal (Series 39)
examinations.
7 See Regulatory Notice 17–30 (October 2017).
8 Unlike FINRA qualification examinations, some
examinations, such as the SAT, do not have a
minimum score threshold for passing the
examination (i.e., they do not have a passing score).
For such an examination, an individual’s total score
and breakdown of the score is necessary in
evaluating the individual’s performance compared
to other individuals who took the examination.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:19 Oct 11, 2018
Jkt 247001
However, FINRA will continue to
provide a total score and a score profile
for each major section of the content
outline to a candidate who fails an
examination. As noted above, such
information is relevant in evaluating
whether the candidate needs additional
study time and training and whether the
candidate should retake the
examination.
Consistent with this administrative
change, FINRA is reformatting the
content outlines for the current Series 6,
7, 11, 17, 22, 37, 38, 42, 57, 62, 72, 79,
82 and 99 examinations as well as for
the Series 4, 9, 10, 16, 23, 24, 26, 27, 28
and 39 examinations to remove
references to information relating to test
results. Instead, such information will
be available on a dedicated location on
FINRA’s website.
Availability of Content Outlines
The revised content outlines will be
available on FINRA’s website on the
date of this filing.
FINRA is filing the proposed rule
change for immediate effectiveness. The
implementation date will be October 1,
2018, to coincide with the
implementation of the restructured
representative-level examination
program.
2. Statutory Basis
FINRA believes that the proposed
changes to the examination content
outlines are consistent with the
provisions of Section 15A(b)(6) of the
Act,9 which requires, among other
things, that FINRA rules must be
designed to prevent fraudulent and
manipulative acts and practices, to
promote just and equitable principles of
trade, and, in general, to protect
investors and the public interest, and
Section 15A(g)(3) of the Act,10 which
authorizes FINRA to prescribe standards
of training, experience, and competence
for persons associated with FINRA
members. FINRA is proposing an
administrative change relating to test
results information on the content
outlines, without compromising the
qualification standards. In addition, the
proposed rule change streamlines the
content outlines by moving test results
information, which currently appears in
different places on the outlines, to a
dedicated location on the FINRA
website.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
FINRA does not believe that the
proposed rule change will result in any
9 15
U.S.C. 78o–3(b)(6).
U.S.C. 78o–3(g)(3).
burden on competition that is not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act.
Economic Impact Assessment
Economic Baseline
Currently, candidates who take a
FINRA qualification examination
receive a total score and score break
down regardless of whether they pass or
fail their examination. These
examinations are designed to
demonstrate basic proficiency around a
subject matter.
Anecdotally, FINRA is aware that
candidates approach the test with
different objectives; specifically, some
candidates seek to achieve the highest
possible score while others seek only to
ensure that they achieve a score
sufficient to pass the examination.
Economic Impact
Beginning on October 1, 2018, FINRA
will no longer provide score information
to candidates who pass a qualification
examination. A candidate will receive
score information only if the candidate
did not pass the examination. In
conjunction with this change, the
proposed rule change revises the
impacted content outlines to remove
references to information relating to
score information.
Impact on Individuals
The absence of score information for
candidates who pass a qualification
examination neither imposes additional
costs on, nor provides additional
benefits to, non-passing candidates. The
continued availability of the failing
scores and score profiles will continue
to benefit candidates who want to use
this information to decide whether to
retake the examination and if so, what
areas they should focus on when
studying for future examinations.
For passing candidates, the lack of
score information affects the
information set available to them, and
thus may impact them in different ways.
For example, candidates may use the
information provided today in a variety
of contexts related to their employment,
including negotiating compensation,
seeking future employment or
demonstrating areas of particular
strength. However, FINRA knows of no
established evidence that these scores
reliably predict future outcomes related
to employment success.11 Further,
11 In Do Investors Have Valuable Information
About Brokers?, Qureshi and Sokobin demonstrate
that examination scores are not informative for
predicting future customer harm when used in
conjunction with other relevant public data
10 15
PO 00000
Frm 00062
Fmt 4703
51721
Continued
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\12OCN1.SGM
12OCN1
51722
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 198 / Friday, October 12, 2018 / Notices
FINRA qualification examinations are
not designed to provide information
beyond demonstration of basic
proficiency. For these reasons,
comparisons of test scores across
candidates may not be appropriate.12
Nevertheless, to the extent that test
scores are used by individuals and
others today, restricting the information
may impose certain costs. For
individuals, these costs can vary from
time and effort to differentiate
themselves, to direct monetary costs if
a test score would have improved their
compensation or position. Regardless of
its predictive ability, where parties
today rely on the details of passing
scores to make decisions and would
make a different judgment in the
absence of such information, the change
may result in an economic transfer away
from high-scoring individuals towards
others.
Impact on Other Users of the
Information
khammond on DSK30JT082PROD with NOTICES
The economic impact to others is
fundamentally related to the extent to
which candidates share passing score
information with current or prospective
employers and the reliability of such
scores as a signal in the contexts for
which they are being used.
In situations where passing scores are
misleading and cause users to make
inefficient or ineffective decisions, the
elimination of this information may lead
to benefits through better decision
making. In situations where passing
scores are not misleading but are
uninformative, they add noise to the
decision-making process. However,
noisy information should not cause
consistent bias in the aggregate. Finally,
in situations where passing scores are
viewed as providing valuable
information in decision making, the
elimination of this information may
result in the need for an alternative
process and, in turn, result in additional
costs.
(available at: https://www.finra.org/industry/chiefeconomist).
12 The Standard for Educational and
Psychological Testing published by the American
Education Research Association, American
Psychological Association, and National Council on
Measurement in Education have established that
‘‘[i]f validity for some common or likely
interpretation for a given use has not been
evaluated, or if such an interpretation is
inconsistent with available evidence, that fact
should be made clear and potential users should be
strongly cautioned about making unsupported
interpretations.’’
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:19 Oct 11, 2018
Jkt 247001
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
Written comments were neither
solicited nor received.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing rule change has become
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)
of the Act 13 and paragraph (f)(1) of Rule
19b–4 thereunder.14 At any time within
60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may
temporarily suspend such rule change if
it appears to the Commission that such
action is necessary or appropriate in the
public interest, for the protection of
investors, or otherwise in furtherance of
the purposes of the Act. If the
Commission takes such action, the
Commission shall institute proceedings
to determine whether the proposed rule
should be approved or disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include File Number SR–
FINRA–2018–036 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Secretary, Securities and Exchange
Commission, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–FINRA–2018–036. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
internet website (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
13 15
14 17
PO 00000
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
CFR 240.19b–4(f)(1).
Frm 00063
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for website viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of 10
a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of such filing
also will be available for inspection and
copying at the principal office of
FINRA. All comments received will be
posted without change. Persons
submitting comments are cautioned that
we do not redact or edit personal
identifying information from comment
submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR–FINRA–
2018–036 and should be submitted on
or before November 2, 2018.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.15
Eduardo A. Aleman,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018–22205 Filed 10–11–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–84374; File No. SR–FINRA–
2018–032]
Self-Regulatory Organizations;
Financial Industry Regulatory
Authority, Inc.; Order Approving
Proposed Rule Change to FINRA Rule
6710 To Modify the Dissemination
Protocols for Agency Debt Securities
October 5, 2018.
I. Introduction
On August 16, 2018, the Financial
Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc.
(‘‘FINRA’’) filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (‘‘Commission’’),
pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2 a
proposed rule change to modify the
dissemination protocols for Agency
Debt Securities. The proposed rule
change was published for comment in
the Federal Register on August 23,
2018.3 The Commission received no
comment letters on the proposed rule
15 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
3 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 83882
(August 17, 2018), 83 FR 42732 (‘‘Notice’’).
1 15
E:\FR\FM\12OCN1.SGM
12OCN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 198 (Friday, October 12, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 51720-51722]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-22205]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-84376; File No. SR-FINRA-2018-036]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Financial Industry Regulatory
Authority, Inc.; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a
Proposed Change Relating to Provision of Test Result Information to
Candidates Who Pass a FINRA Qualification Examination
October 5, 2018.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on September 27, 2018, Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc.
(``FINRA'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``SEC''
or ``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I,
II, and III below, which Items have been prepared by FINRA. FINRA has
designated the proposed rule change as ``constituting a stated policy,
practice, or interpretation with respect to the meaning,
administration, or enforcement of an existing rule'' under Section
19(b)(3)(A)(i) of the Act \3\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(1) thereunder,\4\ which
renders the proposal effective upon receipt of this filing by the
Commission. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
\3\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(i).
\4\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(1).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
FINRA is proposing revisions relating to test results information
on the content outlines of certain FINRA representative- and principal-
level qualification examinations. FINRA is not proposing any textual
changes to the By-Laws, Schedules to the By-Laws or Rules of FINRA.
The text of the proposed rule change [sic] is available on FINRA's
website at https://www.finra.org, at the principal office of FINRA and
at the Commission's Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, FINRA included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. FINRA has prepared summaries, set forth in sections A,
B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
Each FINRA representative- and principal-level qualification
examination has a minimum score threshold that is necessary for passing
the examination (also referred to as a ``passing score''). For
instance, the passing score for the current General Securities
Representative (Series 7) examination is 72. FINRA determines the
passing score for each examination based on a process known as standard
setting, which assesses a number of factors, including industry trends,
historical examination performance and evaluations of content
difficulty by a committee of industry professionals who have passed the
related examination. The passing score for an examination reflects the
minimum level of knowledge necessary to perform the functions for which
a candidate is registering.
A candidate's numerical score on an examination is necessary to
determine whether the candidate has satisfied the minimum score
threshold for passing the examination. In addition, if a candidate
fails to meet the minimum score threshold for passing an examination,
the candidate's numerical score is relevant in evaluating the extent to
which the candidate needs additional study time and training and
whether the candidate should retake the examination.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ A candidate who fails an examination is eligible to retake
that examination after 30 calendar days. However, if a candidate
fails an examination three or more times in succession within a two-
year period, the candidate is prohibited from retaking that
examination until 180 calendar days from the date of the candidate's
last attempt to pass it.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Currently, candidates who take a FINRA qualification examination
receive a test results report of their
[[Page 51721]]
performance at the end of their test session. The test results report
will indicate a pass or fail status. Further, the report will indicate
a total score and a score profile for each major section of the content
outline. Several FINRA representative- and principal-level examination
content outlines currently include information relating to the test
results.\6\ This information appears in different places in the content
outlines. For instance, in the Series 99 examination outline, the
information appears under the ``Candidates' Test Results'' heading;
whereas, in the Series 22 examination outline, the information is under
the ``Introduction'' heading.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ These representative-level examinations are the current
Investment Company and Variable Contracts Products Representative
(Series 6), General Securities Representative (Series 7), Order
Processing Assistant Representative (Series 11), United Kingdom
Securities Representative (Series 17), Direct Participation Programs
Representative (Series 22), Canadian Securities Representative
(Series 37 and Series 38), Options Representative (Series 42),
Securities Trader (Series 57), Corporate Securities Representative
(Series 62), Government Securities Representative (Series 72),
Investment Banking Representative (Series 79), Private Securities
Offerings Representative (Series 82) and Operations Professional
(Series 99) examinations. These examinations are available to
candidates who open an examination window in the Central
Registration Depository (``CRD[supreg]'') system prior to October 1,
2018. The revised Series 6, 7, 22, 57, 79, 82 and 99 examinations,
which will be available to candidates who open an examination window
on or after October 1, 2018, do not include information relating to
examination results. In addition, the current Series 11, 17, 37, 38,
42, 62 and 72 will not be available to candidates who open an
examination window on or after October 1, 2018.
The principal-level examinations are the Registered Options
Principal (Series 4), General Securities Sales Supervisor (Series 9
and Series 10), Supervisory Analyst (Series 16), General Securities
Principal Sales Supervisor Module (Series 23), General Securities
Principal (Series 24), Investment Company and Variable Contracts
Products Principal (Series 26), Financial and Operations Principal
(Series 27), Introducing Broker-Dealer Financial and Operations
Principal (Series 28) and Direct Participation Programs Principal
(Series 39) examinations.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Effective October 1, 2018, FINRA is restructuring its
representative-level qualification examination program.\7\ In
conjunction with the restructuring, starting on October 1, 2018, FINRA
will no longer provide a total score and a score profile for each major
section of the content outline to candidates who pass a qualification
examination. FINRA believes that providing such information is
unnecessary once a candidate has met the minimum score threshold for
passing an examination.\8\ However, FINRA will continue to provide a
total score and a score profile for each major section of the content
outline to a candidate who fails an examination. As noted above, such
information is relevant in evaluating whether the candidate needs
additional study time and training and whether the candidate should
retake the examination.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ See Regulatory Notice 17-30 (October 2017).
\8\ Unlike FINRA qualification examinations, some examinations,
such as the SAT, do not have a minimum score threshold for passing
the examination (i.e., they do not have a passing score). For such
an examination, an individual's total score and breakdown of the
score is necessary in evaluating the individual's performance
compared to other individuals who took the examination.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Consistent with this administrative change, FINRA is reformatting
the content outlines for the current Series 6, 7, 11, 17, 22, 37, 38,
42, 57, 62, 72, 79, 82 and 99 examinations as well as for the Series 4,
9, 10, 16, 23, 24, 26, 27, 28 and 39 examinations to remove references
to information relating to test results. Instead, such information will
be available on a dedicated location on FINRA's website.
Availability of Content Outlines
The revised content outlines will be available on FINRA's website
on the date of this filing.
FINRA is filing the proposed rule change for immediate
effectiveness. The implementation date will be October 1, 2018, to
coincide with the implementation of the restructured representative-
level examination program.
2. Statutory Basis
FINRA believes that the proposed changes to the examination content
outlines are consistent with the provisions of Section 15A(b)(6) of the
Act,\9\ which requires, among other things, that FINRA rules must be
designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to
promote just and equitable principles of trade, and, in general, to
protect investors and the public interest, and Section 15A(g)(3) of the
Act,\10\ which authorizes FINRA to prescribe standards of training,
experience, and competence for persons associated with FINRA members.
FINRA is proposing an administrative change relating to test results
information on the content outlines, without compromising the
qualification standards. In addition, the proposed rule change
streamlines the content outlines by moving test results information,
which currently appears in different places on the outlines, to a
dedicated location on the FINRA website.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ 15 U.S.C. 78o-3(b)(6).
\10\ 15 U.S.C. 78o-3(g)(3).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
FINRA does not believe that the proposed rule change will result in
any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
Economic Impact Assessment
Economic Baseline
Currently, candidates who take a FINRA qualification examination
receive a total score and score break down regardless of whether they
pass or fail their examination. These examinations are designed to
demonstrate basic proficiency around a subject matter.
Anecdotally, FINRA is aware that candidates approach the test with
different objectives; specifically, some candidates seek to achieve the
highest possible score while others seek only to ensure that they
achieve a score sufficient to pass the examination.
Economic Impact
Beginning on October 1, 2018, FINRA will no longer provide score
information to candidates who pass a qualification examination. A
candidate will receive score information only if the candidate did not
pass the examination. In conjunction with this change, the proposed
rule change revises the impacted content outlines to remove references
to information relating to score information.
Impact on Individuals
The absence of score information for candidates who pass a
qualification examination neither imposes additional costs on, nor
provides additional benefits to, non-passing candidates. The continued
availability of the failing scores and score profiles will continue to
benefit candidates who want to use this information to decide whether
to retake the examination and if so, what areas they should focus on
when studying for future examinations.
For passing candidates, the lack of score information affects the
information set available to them, and thus may impact them in
different ways. For example, candidates may use the information
provided today in a variety of contexts related to their employment,
including negotiating compensation, seeking future employment or
demonstrating areas of particular strength. However, FINRA knows of no
established evidence that these scores reliably predict future outcomes
related to employment success.\11\ Further,
[[Page 51722]]
FINRA qualification examinations are not designed to provide
information beyond demonstration of basic proficiency. For these
reasons, comparisons of test scores across candidates may not be
appropriate.\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ In Do Investors Have Valuable Information About Brokers?,
Qureshi and Sokobin demonstrate that examination scores are not
informative for predicting future customer harm when used in
conjunction with other relevant public data (available at: https://www.finra.org/industry/chief-economist).
\12\ The Standard for Educational and Psychological Testing
published by the American Education Research Association, American
Psychological Association, and National Council on Measurement in
Education have established that ``[i]f validity for some common or
likely interpretation for a given use has not been evaluated, or if
such an interpretation is inconsistent with available evidence, that
fact should be made clear and potential users should be strongly
cautioned about making unsupported interpretations.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Nevertheless, to the extent that test scores are used by
individuals and others today, restricting the information may impose
certain costs. For individuals, these costs can vary from time and
effort to differentiate themselves, to direct monetary costs if a test
score would have improved their compensation or position. Regardless of
its predictive ability, where parties today rely on the details of
passing scores to make decisions and would make a different judgment in
the absence of such information, the change may result in an economic
transfer away from high-scoring individuals towards others.
Impact on Other Users of the Information
The economic impact to others is fundamentally related to the
extent to which candidates share passing score information with current
or prospective employers and the reliability of such scores as a signal
in the contexts for which they are being used.
In situations where passing scores are misleading and cause users
to make inefficient or ineffective decisions, the elimination of this
information may lead to benefits through better decision making. In
situations where passing scores are not misleading but are
uninformative, they add noise to the decision-making process. However,
noisy information should not cause consistent bias in the aggregate.
Finally, in situations where passing scores are viewed as providing
valuable information in decision making, the elimination of this
information may result in the need for an alternative process and, in
turn, result in additional costs.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
Written comments were neither solicited nor received.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \13\ and paragraph (f)(1) of Rule 19b-4
thereunder.\14\ At any time within 60 days of the filing of the
proposed rule change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend
such rule change if it appears to the Commission that such action is
necessary or appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of
investors, or otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If
the Commission takes such action, the Commission shall institute
proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule should be approved
or disapproved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
\14\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(1).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an email to [email protected]. Please include
File Number SR-FINRA-2018-036 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-FINRA-2018-036. This
file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's internet website (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml).
Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written
statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with
the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed
rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those
that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions
of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and printing in
the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC
20549, on official business days between the hours of 10 a.m. and 3
p.m. Copies of such filing also will be available for inspection and
copying at the principal office of FINRA. All comments received will be
posted without change. Persons submitting comments are cautioned that
we do not redact or edit personal identifying information from comment
submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions should refer to File Number SR-
FINRA-2018-036 and should be submitted on or before November 2, 2018.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\15\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\15\
Eduardo A. Aleman,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018-22205 Filed 10-11-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P