Certain Magnesia Carbon Bricks From the People's Republic of China: Preliminary Results of the Countervailing Duty Administrative Review; 2016, 51444-51446 [2018-22131]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
51444
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 197 / Thursday, October 11, 2018 / Notices
specific ad valorem assessment rates for
the merchandise based on the ratio of
the total amount of dumping calculated
for the examined sales made to each
importer and the total entered value of
those same sales, in accordance with 19
CFR 351.212(b)(1). If the respondent has
not reported reliable entered values, we
will calculate a per-unit assessment rate
for each importer by dividing the total
amount of dumping calculated for the
examined sales made to that importer by
the total sales quantity associated with
those transactions. Where an importerspecific ad valorem assessment rate is
zero or de minimis in the final results
of review, we will instruct CBP to
liquidate the appropriate entries
without regard to antidumping duties in
accordance with 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2). If
a respondent’s weighted-average
dumping margin is zero or de minimis
in the final results of review, we will
instruct CBP not to assess duties on any
of its entries in accordance with the
Final Modification for Reviews, i.e.,
‘‘{w}here the weighted-average margin
of dumping for the exporter is
determined to be zero or de minimis, no
antidumping duties will be assessed.’’ 13
For entries of subject merchandise
during the POR produced by NEXTEEL
or SeAH for which the producer did not
know its merchandise was destined for
the United States, or for any respondent
for which we have a final determination
of no shipments, we will instruct CBP
to liquidate unreviewed entries at the
all-others rate if there is no rate for the
intermediate company(ies) involved in
the transaction.14
khammond on DSK30JT082PROD with NOTICES
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following cash deposit
requirements will be effective upon
publication of the notice of final results
of this administrative review for all
shipments of the subject merchandise
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse,
for consumption on or after the date of
publication, as provided by section
751(a)(2) of the Act: (1) The cash deposit
rate for the companies listed in the final
results of review will be equal to the
weighted-average dumping margin
established in the final results of this
administrative review; (2) for
merchandise exported by producers or
exporters not covered in this review but
covered in a prior segment of the
13 See Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of
the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and
Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping
Proceedings: Final Modification, 77 FR 8101, 8102
(February 14, 2012) (Final Modification for
Reviews).
14 See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68
FR 23954 (May 6, 2003).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:54 Oct 10, 2018
Jkt 247001
proceeding, the cash deposit rate will
continue to be the company-specific rate
published for the most recently
completed segment of this proceeding in
which they were reviewed; (3) if the
exporter is not a firm covered in this
review, a prior review, or the original
investigation but the producer is, the
cash deposit rate will be the rate
established for the most recently
completed segment of this proceeding
for the producer of the merchandise; (4)
the cash deposit rate for all other
producers or exporters will continue to
be 5.24 percent,15 the all-others rate
established in the less-than-fair-value
investigation. These cash deposit
requirements, when imposed, shall
remain in effect until further notice.
Notification to Importers
This notice serves as a preliminary
reminder to importers of their
responsibility under 19 CFR
351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of
antidumping duties prior to liquidation
of the relevant entries during this POR.
Failure to comply with this requirement
could result in Commerce’s
presumption that reimbursement of
antidumping duties occurred and the
subsequent assessment of double
antidumping duties.
Notification to Interested Parties
Commerce is issuing and publishing
these results in accordance with
sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the
Act.
Dated: October 3, 2018.
Gary Taverman
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping
and Countervailing Duty Operations,
performing the non-exclusive functions and
duties of the Assistant Secretary for
Enforcement and Compliance.
Appendix I
List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary
Decision Memorandum
1. Summary
2. Background
3. Scope of the Order
4. Preliminary Determination of No
Shipments
5. Rates for Non-Examined Companies
6. Duty Absorption
7. Duty Reimbursement
8. Affiliation
9. Discussion of the Methodology
10. Currency Conversion
11. Recommendation
15 See Certain Oil Country Tubular Goods from
the Republic of Korea: Notice of Court Decision Not
in Harmony With Final Determination, 81 FR 59603
(August 30, 2016).
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Appendix II
List of Companies Not Individually
Examined
AJU Besteel Co., Ltd.
BDP International
Daewoo International Corporation
Daewoo America
Dong-A Steel Co. Ltd.
Dong Yang Steel Pipe
Dongbu Incheon Steel
DSEC
Erndtebruecker Eisenwerk and Company
Hansol Metal
Husteel Co., Ltd.
HYSCO
Hyundai RB
Hyundai Steel Co., Ltd.
Hyundai Steel Company 16
ILJIN Steel Corporation
Jim And Freight Co., Ltd.
Kia Steel Co. Ltd.
KSP Steel Company
Kukje Steel
Kurvers
POSCO Daewoo Corporation
POSCO Daewoo America
Steel Canada
Sumitomo Corporation
TGS Pipe
Yonghyun Base Materials
ZEECO Asia
[FR Doc. 2018–22128 Filed 10–10–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[C–570–955]
Certain Magnesia Carbon Bricks From
the People’s Republic of China:
Preliminary Results of the
Countervailing Duty Administrative
Review; 2016
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
(Commerce) preliminarily determines to
rescind this administrative review as
there is no evidence of any reviewable
entries, shipments, or sales of certain
magnesia carbon bricks (magnesia
carbon bricks) from the People’s
Republic of China (China) to the United
States during the January 1, 2016,
through December 31, 2016, period of
review (POR) by the companies subject
AGENCY:
16 On September 21, 2016, Commerce published
the final results of a changed circumstances review
with respect to OCTG from Korea, finding that
Hyundai Steel Corporation is the successor-ininterest to Hyundai HYSCO for purposes of
determining antidumping duty cash deposits and
liabilities. See Notice of Final Results of
Antidumping Duty Changed Circumstances Review:
Oil Country Tubular Goods from the Republic of
Korea, 81 FR 64873 (September 21, 2016). Hyundai
Steel Corporation is also known as Hyundai Steel
Company and Hyundai Steel Co. Ltd.
E:\FR\FM\11OCN1.SGM
11OCN1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 197 / Thursday, October 11, 2018 / Notices
to this review. Interested parties are
invited to comment on these
preliminary results.
DATES: Applicable: October 11, 2018.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Gene H. Calvert, AD/CVD Operations,
Office VII, Enforcement and
Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone:
(202) 482–3586.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On November 13, 2017, Commerce
published in the Federal Register a
notice of initiation of an administrative
review of the countervailing duty order
for five producers/exporters of magnesia
carbon bricks from China for the POR.1
Commerce exercised its discretion to
toll all deadlines affected by the closure
of the Federal Government from January
20 through January 22, 2018.2 As a
result, all deadlines in this segment of
the proceeding have been extended by
three days.
Scope of the Order
The scope of the order includes
certain chemically-bonded magnesia
carbon bricks from China. A full
description of the scope of the order is
contained in the Preliminary Decision
Memorandum, which is hereby adopted
by this notice.3
khammond on DSK30JT082PROD with NOTICES
Methodology
Commerce is conducting this
administrative review in accordance
with section 751(a)(1)(A) of the Tariff
Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). The
Preliminary Decision Memorandum
contains a full description of the
methodology underlying our
conclusions and is a public document
on file electronically via Enforcement
and Compliance’s Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Centralized
Electronic Service System (ACCESS).
ACCESS is available to registered users
at https://access.trade.gov and in the
1 See Initiation of Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 82 FR
52268 (November 13, 2017) (Initiation Notice). The
companies subject to this review are Fedmet
Resources Corporation; Fengchi Imp. and Exp. Co.,
Ltd. of Haicheng City, Fengchi Mining Co., Ltd. of
Haicheng City; Fengchi Refractories Co., of
Haicheng City; and RHI Refractories Co., of
Haicheng City.
2 See Memorandum, ‘‘Deadlines Affected by the
Shutdown of the Federal Government,’’ dated
January 23, 2018.
3 See Memorandum, ‘‘Decision Memorandum for
the Preliminary Results of the Administrative
Review of the Countervailing Duty Order on Certain
Magnesia Carbon Bricks from the People’s Republic
of China; 2016,’’ (dated concurrently with this
notice) (Preliminary Determination Memorandum).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:54 Oct 10, 2018
Jkt 247001
Central Records Unit, Room B8024 of
the main Commerce building. In
addition, a complete version of the
Preliminary Decision Memorandum can
be accessed directly at https://
enforcement.trade.gov/frn. The signed
Preliminary Decision Memorandum and
the election version of this
memorandum are identical in content.
Preliminary Intent To Rescind the
Administrative Review
Based on information submitted after
the initiation of this administrative
review, and due to the fact that we have
not received any information from U.S.
Customs and Border Protection (CBP)
indicating that the companies subject to
this review had reviewable entries of
subject merchandise to the United
States during the POR, Commerce
preliminarily determines that the record
evidence indicates that no company
subject to this review had reviewable
entries during the POR.4 Should
evidence arise that leads us to conclude
that the companies subject to this
review had reviewable entries of subject
merchandise to the United States during
the POR, we will revisit this issue in the
final results of this administrative
review. Absent any evidence of POR
entries of subject merchandise being
placed on the record, pursuant to 19
CFR 351.213(d)(3), we intend to rescind
the administrative review of these
companies in the final results.
Public Comment
Case briefs must be submitted to
Enforcement and Compliance’s
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Centralized Electronic Service System
(ACCESS) at a date to be determined by
Commerce, and rebuttal briefs, limited
to issues raised in the case briefs, may
be submitted no later than five days
after the deadline for the submission for
case briefs.5 Commerce will notify
interested parties when it has
determined a deadline for case briefs via
ACCESS. Parties who submit case or
rebuttal briefs in this proceeding are
encouraged to submit with each
argument: (1) A statement of the issue;
(2) a brief summary of the argument;
and (3) a table of authorities.6
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c),
interested parties who wish to request a
hearing must submit a written request to
the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement
and Compliance, U.S. Department of
Commerce, filed electronically through
ACCESS, within 30 days after the
publication of this notice. Hearing
requests should contain the party’s
name, address, telephone number, the
number of participants, and a list of the
issues parties intend to present at the
hearing. If a request for a hearing is
made, Commerce intends to hold the
hearing at the U.S. Department of
Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW, Washington, DC 20230, at a time to
be determined. Prior to the hearing,
Commerce will contact all parties who
submitted case or rebuttal briefs to
determine if they wish to participate in
the hearing. Commerce will then
distribute a hearing schedule to these
parties prior to the hearing, and only
those parties listed on the hearing
schedule may present issues raised in
their briefs.
All submissions, with limited
exceptions, must be filed electronically
using ACCESS.7 An electronically filed
document must be received successfully
in its entirety by ACCESS by 5:00 p.m.
Eastern Time, on the due dates
established above (or, where applicable,
to be established by Commerce at a later
date). Documents excepted from the
electronic submission requirements
must be filed manually, (i.e., in paper
form) with the APO/Dockets Unit in
Room 18022 and stamped with the date
and time of receipt by on the due date.8
Unless otherwise extended,
Commerce intends to issue the final
results of this administrative review,
which will include the results of its
analysis of issues raised in any briefs,
within 120 days of the publication of
these preliminary results or review,
pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of the
Act.
Assessment Rates
We intend to issue appropriate
assessment instructions to CBP 15 days
after the publication of the final
rescission (or, should we find that the
companies subject to this review had
reviewable entries of subject
merchandise to the United States during
the POR, the final results) of this
administrative review.
These preliminary results of review
are issued and published in accordance
with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(I) of
the Act, and 19 CFR 351.213 and
351.221(b)(4).
4 Id.
5 See
6 See
PO 00000
19 CFR 351.309(c)(1)(ii) and 351.309(d)(1).
19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and 351.309(d)(2).
Frm 00011
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
51445
7 See
19 CFR 351.303.
8 Id.
E:\FR\FM\11OCN1.SGM
11OCN1
51446
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 197 / Thursday, October 11, 2018 / Notices
Dated: October 3, 2018
Gary Taverman,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping
and Countervailing Duty Operations,
performing the non-exclusive functions and
duties of the Assistant Secretary for
Enforcement and Compliance.
Appendix
List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary
Decision Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Order
IV. Preliminary Determination of No
Shipments
V. Public Comment
VI. Recommendation
[FR Doc. 2018–22131 Filed 10–10–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[C–580–882]
Certain Cold-Rolled Steel Flat Products
From the Republic of Korea:
Preliminary Results of Countervailing
Duty Administrative Review, 2016
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
(Commerce) preliminarily determines
that Hyundai Steel Co., Ltd. (Hyundai
Steel), a producer/exporter of certain
cold-rolled steel flat products (coldrolled steel) from the Republic of Korea
(Korea), and POSCO, a producer/
exporter of cold-rolled from Korea,
received countervailable subsidies
during the period of review (POR), July
29, 2016, through December 31, 2016.
We invite interested parties to comment
on these preliminary results.
DATES: Applicable: October 11, 2018.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Yasmin Bordas or Tyler Weinhold, AD/
CVD Operations, Office VI, Enforcement
and Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone:
(202) 482–3813 and (202) 482–1121,
respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
khammond on DSK30JT082PROD with NOTICES
AGENCY:
Background
On November 13, 2017, Commerce
published a notice of initiation of an
administrative review of the
countervailing duty (CVD) order on
cold-rolled steel from Korea.1 On May
1 See Initiation of Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 82 FR
52268 (November 13, 2017) (Initiation Notice).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:54 Oct 10, 2018
Jkt 247001
17, 2018, and September 14, 2018,
Commerce extended the deadline for
preliminary results of this review to no
later than October 3, 2018.2 For a
complete description of the events that
followed the initiation of this review,
see the Preliminary Decision
Memorandum.3 A list of topics
discussed in the Preliminary Decision
Memorandum is included at the
Appendix to this notice. The
Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a
public document and is on file
electronically via Enforcement and
Compliance’s Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Centralized
Electronic Service System (ACCESS).
ACCESS is available to registered users
at https://access.trade.gov and is
available to all parties in the Central
Records Unit, room B8024 of the main
Department of Commerce building. In
addition, a complete version of the
Preliminary Decision Memorandum can
be accessed directly at https://
enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed
and electronic versions of the
Preliminary Decision Memorandum are
identical in content.
Companies Not Selected for Individual
Review
For the companies not selected for
individual review, because the rates
calculated for Hyundai Steel and
POSCO were above de minimis and not
based entirely on facts available, we
applied a subsidy rate based on a
weighted-average of the subsidy rates
calculated for Hyundai Steel and
POSCO using publicly-ranged sales data
submitted by the respondents. This is
consistent with the methodology that
we would use in an investigation to
establish the all-others rate, consistent
with section 705(c)(5)(A) of the Act.
Preliminary Results of Review
In accordance with 19 CFR
351.224(b)(4)(i), we calculated
individual subsidy rates for Hyundai
Steel and POSCO. For the period July
29, 2016, through December 31, 2016,
we preliminarily determine that the net
subsidy rates for the producers/
exporters under review to be as follows:
Company
Scope of the Order
The merchandise covered by the order
is certain cold-rolled steel flat products.
For a complete description of the scope
of the order, see the Preliminary
Decision Memorandum.
Methodology
Commerce is conducting this review
in accordance with section 751(a)(l)(A)
of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended
(the Act). For each of the subsidy
programs found countervailable, we
preliminarily determine that there is a
subsidy, i.e., a government-provided
financial contribution that gives rise to
a benefit to the recipient, and that the
subsidy is specific.4 For a full
description of the methodology
underlying our conclusions, see the
accompanying Preliminary Decision
Memorandum.
2 See March 23, 2018 Memorandums re:
Extension of Deadline for Preliminary Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review—2015–
2016; and July 3, 2018 Memorandums re: Second
Extension of Deadline for Preliminary Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review—2015–
2016.
3 See Memorandum, ‘‘Decision Memorandum for
the Preliminary Results of the Countervailing Duty
Administrative Review; 2016: Certain Cold-Rolled
Steel Flat Products from the Republic of Korea,’’
dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by,
this notice (Preliminary Decision Memorandum).
4 See sections 771(5)(B) and (D) of the Act
regarding financial contribution; section 771(5)(E)
of the Act regarding benefit; and section 771(5A) of
the Act regarding specificity.
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
POSCO .....................................
Hyundai Steel Co., Ltd .............
Dongbu Steel Co., Ltd ..............
Dongbu Incheon Steel Co., Ltd
Dongkuk Steel Mill Co., Ltd ......
Dongkuk Industries Co., Ltd .....
Hyuk San Profile Co., Ltd .........
Taihan Electric Wire Co., Ltd ...
Union Steel Co., Ltd .................
Subsidy
rate
(percent
ad valorem)
1.73
0.65
1.21
1.21
1.21
1.21
1.21
1.21
1.21
Assessment Rate
Consistent with section 751(a)(2)(C) of
the Act, upon issuance of the final
results, Commerce shall determine, and
Customs and Border Protection (CBP)
shall assess, countervailing duties on all
appropriate entries covered by this
review. We intend to issue instructions
to CBP 15 days after publication of the
final results of this review. Commerce
intends to issue appropriate assessment
instructions directly to CBP 15 days
after publication of this notice.
Cash Deposit Rate
Pursuant to section 751(a)(1) of the
Act, Commerce intends to instruct CBP
to collect cash deposits of estimated
countervailing duties in the amount
indicated above with regard to
shipments of subject merchandise
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse,
for consumption on or after the date of
publication of the final results of this
review. For all non-reviewed firms, we
will instruct CBP to continue to collect
cash deposits of estimated
countervailing duties at the most recent
E:\FR\FM\11OCN1.SGM
11OCN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 197 (Thursday, October 11, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 51444-51446]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-22131]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[C-570-955]
Certain Magnesia Carbon Bricks From the People's Republic of
China: Preliminary Results of the Countervailing Duty Administrative
Review; 2016
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (Commerce) preliminarily determines
to rescind this administrative review as there is no evidence of any
reviewable entries, shipments, or sales of certain magnesia carbon
bricks (magnesia carbon bricks) from the People's Republic of China
(China) to the United States during the January 1, 2016, through
December 31, 2016, period of review (POR) by the companies subject
[[Page 51445]]
to this review. Interested parties are invited to comment on these
preliminary results.
DATES: Applicable: October 11, 2018.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gene H. Calvert, AD/CVD Operations,
Office VII, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-3586.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On November 13, 2017, Commerce published in the Federal Register a
notice of initiation of an administrative review of the countervailing
duty order for five producers/exporters of magnesia carbon bricks from
China for the POR.\1\ Commerce exercised its discretion to toll all
deadlines affected by the closure of the Federal Government from
January 20 through January 22, 2018.\2\ As a result, all deadlines in
this segment of the proceeding have been extended by three days.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Administrative Reviews, 82 FR 52268 (November 13, 2017) (Initiation
Notice). The companies subject to this review are Fedmet Resources
Corporation; Fengchi Imp. and Exp. Co., Ltd. of Haicheng City,
Fengchi Mining Co., Ltd. of Haicheng City; Fengchi Refractories Co.,
of Haicheng City; and RHI Refractories Co., of Haicheng City.
\2\ See Memorandum, ``Deadlines Affected by the Shutdown of the
Federal Government,'' dated January 23, 2018.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scope of the Order
The scope of the order includes certain chemically-bonded magnesia
carbon bricks from China. A full description of the scope of the order
is contained in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum, which is hereby
adopted by this notice.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ See Memorandum, ``Decision Memorandum for the Preliminary
Results of the Administrative Review of the Countervailing Duty
Order on Certain Magnesia Carbon Bricks from the People's Republic
of China; 2016,'' (dated concurrently with this notice) (Preliminary
Determination Memorandum).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Methodology
Commerce is conducting this administrative review in accordance
with section 751(a)(1)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the
Act). The Preliminary Decision Memorandum contains a full description
of the methodology underlying our conclusions and is a public document
on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS).
ACCESS is available to registered users at https://access.trade.gov and
in the Central Records Unit, Room B8024 of the main Commerce building.
In addition, a complete version of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum
can be accessed directly at https://enforcement.trade.gov/frn. The
signed Preliminary Decision Memorandum and the election version of this
memorandum are identical in content.
Preliminary Intent To Rescind the Administrative Review
Based on information submitted after the initiation of this
administrative review, and due to the fact that we have not received
any information from U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP)
indicating that the companies subject to this review had reviewable
entries of subject merchandise to the United States during the POR,
Commerce preliminarily determines that the record evidence indicates
that no company subject to this review had reviewable entries during
the POR.\4\ Should evidence arise that leads us to conclude that the
companies subject to this review had reviewable entries of subject
merchandise to the United States during the POR, we will revisit this
issue in the final results of this administrative review. Absent any
evidence of POR entries of subject merchandise being placed on the
record, pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(3), we intend to rescind the
administrative review of these companies in the final results.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Public Comment
Case briefs must be submitted to Enforcement and Compliance's
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service
System (ACCESS) at a date to be determined by Commerce, and rebuttal
briefs, limited to issues raised in the case briefs, may be submitted
no later than five days after the deadline for the submission for case
briefs.\5\ Commerce will notify interested parties when it has
determined a deadline for case briefs via ACCESS. Parties who submit
case or rebuttal briefs in this proceeding are encouraged to submit
with each argument: (1) A statement of the issue; (2) a brief summary
of the argument; and (3) a table of authorities.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(1)(ii) and 351.309(d)(1).
\6\ See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and 351.309(d)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), interested parties who wish to
request a hearing must submit a written request to the Assistant
Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, U.S. Department of Commerce,
filed electronically through ACCESS, within 30 days after the
publication of this notice. Hearing requests should contain the party's
name, address, telephone number, the number of participants, and a list
of the issues parties intend to present at the hearing. If a request
for a hearing is made, Commerce intends to hold the hearing at the U.S.
Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC
20230, at a time to be determined. Prior to the hearing, Commerce will
contact all parties who submitted case or rebuttal briefs to determine
if they wish to participate in the hearing. Commerce will then
distribute a hearing schedule to these parties prior to the hearing,
and only those parties listed on the hearing schedule may present
issues raised in their briefs.
All submissions, with limited exceptions, must be filed
electronically using ACCESS.\7\ An electronically filed document must
be received successfully in its entirety by ACCESS by 5:00 p.m. Eastern
Time, on the due dates established above (or, where applicable, to be
established by Commerce at a later date). Documents excepted from the
electronic submission requirements must be filed manually, (i.e., in
paper form) with the APO/Dockets Unit in Room 18022 and stamped with
the date and time of receipt by on the due date.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ See 19 CFR 351.303.
\8\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unless otherwise extended, Commerce intends to issue the final
results of this administrative review, which will include the results
of its analysis of issues raised in any briefs, within 120 days of the
publication of these preliminary results or review, pursuant to section
751(a)(3)(A) of the Act.
Assessment Rates
We intend to issue appropriate assessment instructions to CBP 15
days after the publication of the final rescission (or, should we find
that the companies subject to this review had reviewable entries of
subject merchandise to the United States during the POR, the final
results) of this administrative review.
These preliminary results of review are issued and published in
accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(I) of the Act, and 19 CFR
351.213 and 351.221(b)(4).
[[Page 51446]]
Dated: October 3, 2018
Gary Taverman,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Operations, performing the non-exclusive functions and duties of the
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
Appendix
List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Order
IV. Preliminary Determination of No Shipments
V. Public Comment
VI. Recommendation
[FR Doc. 2018-22131 Filed 10-10-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
