Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bars From Belarus, the People's Republic of China, Indonesia, Latvia, Moldova, Poland, and Ukraine: Final Results of Expedited Third Sunset Reviews of the Antidumping Duty Orders, 50344-50345 [2018-21731]

Download as PDF 50344 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 194 / Friday, October 5, 2018 / Notices applicable standards, and does not reference an exclusive manufacturing process. Forged steel fittings are not manufactured from casting. Pursuant to the applicable specifications, subject fittings may also be machined from bar stock or machined from seamless pipe and tube. All types of fittings are included in the scope regardless of nominal pipe size (which may or may not be expressed in inches of nominal pipe size), pressure rating (usually, but not necessarily expressed in pounds of pressure/PSI, e.g., 2,000 or 2M; 3,000 or 3M; 6,000 or 6M; 9,000 or 9M), wall thickness, and whether or not heat treated. Excluded from this scope are all fittings entirely made of stainless steel. Also excluded are flanges, butt weld fittings, butt weld outlets, nipples, and all fittings that have a maximum pressure rating of 300 pounds of pressure/PSI or less. Also excluded are fittings certified or made to the following standards, so long as the fittings are not also manufactured to the specifications of ASME B16.11, MSS SP–79, MSS SP–83, MSS SP–97, ASTM A105, ASTM A350, and ASTM A182: • American Petroleum Institute (API) API 5CT, API 5L, or API 11B • Society of Automotive Engineering (SAE) SAE J476, SAE J514, SAE J516, SAE J517, SAE J518, SAE J1026, SAE J1231, SAE J1453, SAE J1926, J2044 or SAE AS 35411 • Underwriter’s Laboratories (UL) certified electrical conduit fittings • ASTM A153, A536, A576, or A865 • Casing Conductor Connectors 16–42 inches in diameter made to proprietary specifications • Military Specification (MIL) MIL–C–4109F and MIL–F–3541 • International Organization for Standardization (ISO) ISO6150–B To be excluded from the scope, products must have the appropriate standard or pressure markings and/or accompanied by documentation showing product compliance to the applicable standard or pressure, e.g. , ‘‘API 5CT’’ mark and/or a mill certification report. Subject carbon and alloy forged steel fittings are normally entered under Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) 7307.99.1000, 7307.99.3000, 7307.99.5045, and 7307.99.5060. They also may be entered under HTSUS 7307.92.3010, 7307.92.3030, 7307.92.9000, and 7326.19.0010. The HTSUS subheadings and specifications are provided for convenience and customs purposes; the written description of the scope is dispositive. daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES Appendix II List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum I. Summary II. Background III. Use of Facts Otherwise Available and Adverse Inferences IV. Subsidies Valuation V. Analysis of Programs VI. Analysis of Comments Comment 1: Provision for Land for Less Than Adequate Remuneration (LTAR): Appropriate Benchmark VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:11 Oct 04, 2018 Jkt 247001 Comment 2: Provision for Special Bar Quality(SBQ) Bar for LTAR: Whether Respondent’s Input Is Comparable to SBQ Bar Comment 3: SBQ Bar for LTAR: Market Distortion Analysis Comment 4: Affiliated Party Sales Comment 5: Removing Value-Added Tax (VAT) From Reported Freight Data Comment 6: Removing VAT From Reported Electricity Data Comment 7: Application of Adverse Facts Available (AFA) Concerning Electricity VII. Recommendation Indonesia, Latvia, Moldova, Poland, and Ukraine, pursuant to section 751(c)(2) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act).2 On June 12, 2018, Commerce received notices of intent to participate from the Rebar Trade Action Coalition (a domestic interested party) within the deadline specified in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(i).3 RTAC claimed interested party status under section 771(9)(C) of the Act, as a domestic producer of rebar.4 On June 12, 2018, Commerce received [FR Doc. 2018–21734 Filed 10–4–18; 8:45 am] complete substantive responses from the BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P domestic interested party within the 30day deadline specified in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(3)(i).5 We did not receive DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE any responses from respondent interested parties in these proceedings. International Trade Administration As a result, pursuant to 19 CFR [A–449–804, A–455–803, A–560–811, A–570– 351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2), Commerce 860, A–822–804, A–823–809, A–841–804] conducted expedited (120-day) sunset reviews of the Orders. Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bars From Belarus, the People’s Republic of Scope of the Orders China, Indonesia, Latvia, Moldova, There are existing antidumping duty Poland, and Ukraine: Final Results of orders on rebar from Belarus, China, Expedited Third Sunset Reviews of the Antidumping Duty Orders Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: As a result of these sunset reviews, the Department of Commerce (Commerce) finds that revocation of the antidumping duty (AD) orders on steel concrete reinforcing bars (rebar) from Belarus, the People’s Republic of China (China), Indonesia, Latvia, Moldova, Poland, and Ukraine would likely lead to a continuation or recurrence of dumping at the dumping margins identified in the ‘‘Final Results of Review’’ section of this notice. DATES: Applicable October 5, 2018. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Keith Haynes, AD/CVD Operations, Office III, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–5139. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: AGENCY: Background On June 1, 2018, Commerce published the notice of initiation of the third sunset reviews of the antidumping duty Orders 1 on rebar from Belarus, China, 1 See Antidumping Duty Orders: Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bars from Belarus, Indonesia, Latvia, Moldova, People’s Republic of China, Poland, Republic of Korea and Ukraine, 66 FR 46777 (September 7, 2001) (collectively, Orders). On August 9, 2007, Commerce suspended the antidumping duty investigation and signed a suspension agreement on rebar from Korea. See Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bars from South Korea: PO 00000 Frm 00014 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Revocation of Antidumping Duty Order, 72 FR 44830 (August 9, 2007). 2 See Initiation of Five-Year (Sunset) Reviews, 83 FR 25436 (June 1, 2018). 3 See letters from RTAC, ‘‘Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bars from the People’s Republic of China: Notice of Intent to Participate,’’ dated June 12, 2018 (China NOITP); ‘‘Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bars from Ukraine: Notice of Intent to Participate,’’ dated June 12, 2018 (Ukraine NOITP); ‘‘Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bars from Belarus: Notice of Intent to Participate,’’ dated June 12, 2018 (Belarus NOITP); ‘‘Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bars from Indonesia: Notice of Intent to Participate,’’ dated June 12, 2018 (Indonesia NOITP); ‘‘Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bars from Latvia: Notice of Intent to Participate,’’ dated June 12, 2018 (Latvia NOITP); ‘‘Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bars from Moldova: Notice of Intent to Participate,’’ dated June 12, 2018 (Moldova NOITP); ‘‘Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bars from Poland: Notice of Intent to Participate,’’ dated June 12, 2018 (Poland NOITP). 4 See China NOITP at 1–2; Ukraine NOITP at 1– 2; Belarus NOITP at 1–2; Indonesia NOITP at 1–2; Latvia NOITP at 1–2; Moldova NOITP at 1–2; Poland NOITP at 1–2. 5 See letters from RTAC, ‘‘Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bars from the People’s Republic of China: Substantive Response to Notice of Initiation,’’ dated July 2, 2018 (China Substantive Response); ‘‘Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bars from Belarus: Substantive Response to Notice of Initiation,’’ dated July 2, 2018 (Belarus Substantive Response); ‘‘Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bars from Indonesia: Substantive Response to Notice of Initiation,’’ dated July 2, 2018 (Indonesia Substantive Response); ‘‘Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bars from Latvia: Substantive Response to Notice of Initiation,’’ dated July 2, 2018 (Latvia Substantive Response); ‘‘Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bars from Moldova: Substantive Response to Notice of Initiation,’’ dated July 2, 2018 (Moldova Substantive Response); ‘‘Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bars from Poland: Substantive Response to Notice of Initiation,’’ dated July 2, 2018 (Poland Substantive Response); ‘‘Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bars from Ukraine: Substantive Response to Notice of Initiation,’’ dated July 2, 2018 (Ukraine Substantive Response). E:\FR\FM\05OCN1.SGM 05OCN1 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 194 / Friday, October 5, 2018 / Notices Indonesia, Latvia, Moldova, Poland, and Ukraine.6 The products covered by the Orders are all steel concrete reinforcing bars sold in straight lengths, currently classifiable in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) under item numbers 7214.20.00, 7228.30.8050, 7222.11.0050, 7222.30.0000, 7228.60.6000, 7228.20.1000, or any other tariff item number. Specifically excluded are plain rounds (i.e., non-deformed or smooth bars) and rebar that has been further processed through bending or coating. HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes. The written description of the scope of the orders is dispositive. Analysis of Comments Received All issues raised in these sunset reviews, including the likelihood of continuation or recurrence of dumping and the magnitude of the margins likely to prevail if the Orders were revoked, are addressed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum, dated concurrently with and hereby adopted by this notice.7 The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance’s Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at https://access.trade.gov and to all parties in the Central Records Unit, Room B8024 of the main Department of Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed at https://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed Issues and Decision Memorandum and the electronic version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum are identical in content. Final Results of Reviews daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES Pursuant to section 751(c)(1) and 752(c)(1) and (3) of the Act, we determine that revocation of the Orders would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping, and that the magnitude of the dumping margins likely to prevail would be weighted6 See Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bars from Belarus, Indonesia, Latvia, Moldova, Poland, the People’s Republic of China, and Ukraine: Continuation of Antidumping Duty Orders, 78 FR 43858 (July 22, 2012) (Second Sunset Continuation Order). 7 See Commerce’s memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Final Results of the Expedited Third Sunset Reviews of the Antidumping Duty Orders on Steel concrete reinforcing bars from the People’s Republic of Belarus, China, Indonesia, Latvia, Moldova, Poland, and Ukraine,’’ dated concurrently with this notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum). VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:11 Oct 04, 2018 Jkt 247001 average dumping margins up to 114.53 percent for Belarus, 133.00 percent for China, 71.01 percent for Indonesia, 16.99 percent for Latvia, 232.86 percent for Moldova, 52.07 percent for Poland, and 41.69 percent for Ukraine. Notification Regarding Administrative Protective Order This notice also serves as the only reminder to parties’ subject to administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305. Timely notification of the return or destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a violation which is subject to sanction. We are issuing and publishing these results and notice in accordance with sections 751(c), 752(c), and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CR 351.218. Dated: October 1, 2018. Gary Taverman, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, performing the non-exclusive functions and duties of the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. [FR Doc. 2018–21731 Filed 10–4–18; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–475–839] Forged Steel Fittings From Italy: Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that imports of forged steel fittings from Italy are being, or are likely to be, sold in the United States at less than fair value (LTFV). DATES: Applicable October 5, 2018. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael Bowen at (202) 482–0768 or Brian Smith at (202) 482–1766, AD/CVD Operations, Office VIII, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: AGENCY: Background On May 17, 2018, Commerce published in the Federal Register the PO 00000 Frm 00015 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 50345 Preliminary Determination and invited interested parties to comment.1 As no interested party submitted comments, we have made no changes to the estimated weighted-average dumping margins determined in the Preliminary Determination. Period of Investigation The period of investigation (POI) is October 1, 2016, through September 30, 2017. Scope of the Investigation The products covered by this investigation are forged steel fittings from Italy. For a full description of the scope of this investigation, see the ‘‘Scope of the Investigation,’’ at the Appendix to this notice. Scope Comments During the course of this investigation and the concurrent investigations of forged steel fittings from the People’s Republic of China (China) and Taiwan, Commerce received numerous scope comments from interested parties. Commerce issued a Preliminary Scope Decision Memorandum 2 and a Second Preliminary Scope Decision Memorandum 3 to address these comments. For a summary of the product coverage comments and rebuttals submitted to the records of this investigation and the concurrent investigations of forged steel fittings from China and Taiwan for consideration in the final determinations, and our accompanying discussion and analysis of them, see the Final Scope Decision Memorandum, issued July 23, 2018, concurrent with the final determination in the antidumping duty investigation of forged steel fittings from Taiwan.4 Verification As stated in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum, Officine Nicola Galperti 1 See Forged Steel Fittings from Italy: Preliminary Affirmative Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value, Postponement of Final Determination and Extension of Provisional Measures, 83 FR 22954 (May 17, 2018) (Preliminary Determination), and accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum. 2 See Memorandum, ‘‘Scope Comments Decision Memorandum for the Preliminary Determinations,’’ dated March 7, 2018 (Preliminary Scope Decision Memorandum). 3 See Memorandum, ‘‘Second Preliminary Scope Decision Memorandum,’’ dated May 17, 2018 (Second Preliminary Scope Decision Memorandum). 4 See Memorandum, ‘‘Forged Steel Fittings from China, Italy and Taiwan: Final Scope Determination Decision Memorandum,’’ dated July 23, 2018 (Final Scope Decision Memorandum); see also, Memorandum to the File, ‘‘Placing Carbon Steel Butt Weld Pipe Fitting Scope Information Ruling on the Record,’’ dated September 19, 2018. E:\FR\FM\05OCN1.SGM 05OCN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 194 (Friday, October 5, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 50344-50345]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-21731]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-449-804, A-455-803, A-560-811, A-570-860, A-822-804, A-823-809, A-
841-804]


Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bars From Belarus, the People's 
Republic of China, Indonesia, Latvia, Moldova, Poland, and Ukraine: 
Final Results of Expedited Third Sunset Reviews of the Antidumping Duty 
Orders

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

SUMMARY: As a result of these sunset reviews, the Department of 
Commerce (Commerce) finds that revocation of the antidumping duty (AD) 
orders on steel concrete reinforcing bars (rebar) from Belarus, the 
People's Republic of China (China), Indonesia, Latvia, Moldova, Poland, 
and Ukraine would likely lead to a continuation or recurrence of 
dumping at the dumping margins identified in the ``Final Results of 
Review'' section of this notice.

DATES: Applicable October 5, 2018.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Keith Haynes, AD/CVD Operations, 
Office III, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade 
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-5139.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background

    On June 1, 2018, Commerce published the notice of initiation of the 
third sunset reviews of the antidumping duty Orders \1\ on rebar from 
Belarus, China, Indonesia, Latvia, Moldova, Poland, and Ukraine, 
pursuant to section 751(c)(2) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended 
(the Act).\2\ On June 12, 2018, Commerce received notices of intent to 
participate from the Rebar Trade Action Coalition (a domestic 
interested party) within the deadline specified in 19 CFR 
351.218(d)(1)(i).\3\ RTAC claimed interested party status under section 
771(9)(C) of the Act, as a domestic producer of rebar.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Antidumping Duty Orders: Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bars 
from Belarus, Indonesia, Latvia, Moldova, People's Republic of 
China, Poland, Republic of Korea and Ukraine, 66 FR 46777 (September 
7, 2001) (collectively, Orders). On August 9, 2007, Commerce 
suspended the antidumping duty investigation and signed a suspension 
agreement on rebar from Korea. See Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bars 
from South Korea: Revocation of Antidumping Duty Order, 72 FR 44830 
(August 9, 2007).
    \2\ See Initiation of Five-Year (Sunset) Reviews, 83 FR 25436 
(June 1, 2018).
    \3\ See letters from RTAC, ``Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bars 
from the People's Republic of China: Notice of Intent to 
Participate,'' dated June 12, 2018 (China NOITP); ``Steel Concrete 
Reinforcing Bars from Ukraine: Notice of Intent to Participate,'' 
dated June 12, 2018 (Ukraine NOITP); ``Steel Concrete Reinforcing 
Bars from Belarus: Notice of Intent to Participate,'' dated June 12, 
2018 (Belarus NOITP); ``Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bars from 
Indonesia: Notice of Intent to Participate,'' dated June 12, 2018 
(Indonesia NOITP); ``Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bars from Latvia: 
Notice of Intent to Participate,'' dated June 12, 2018 (Latvia 
NOITP); ``Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bars from Moldova: Notice of 
Intent to Participate,'' dated June 12, 2018 (Moldova NOITP); 
``Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bars from Poland: Notice of Intent to 
Participate,'' dated June 12, 2018 (Poland NOITP).
    \4\ See China NOITP at 1-2; Ukraine NOITP at 1-2; Belarus NOITP 
at 1-2; Indonesia NOITP at 1-2; Latvia NOITP at 1-2; Moldova NOITP 
at 1-2; Poland NOITP at 1-2.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On June 12, 2018, Commerce received complete substantive responses 
from the domestic interested party within the 30-day deadline specified 
in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(3)(i).\5\ We did not receive any responses from 
respondent interested parties in these proceedings. As a result, 
pursuant to 19 CFR 351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2), Commerce conducted 
expedited (120-day) sunset reviews of the Orders.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ See letters from RTAC, ``Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bars 
from the People's Republic of China: Substantive Response to Notice 
of Initiation,'' dated July 2, 2018 (China Substantive Response); 
``Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bars from Belarus: Substantive Response 
to Notice of Initiation,'' dated July 2, 2018 (Belarus Substantive 
Response); ``Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bars from Indonesia: 
Substantive Response to Notice of Initiation,'' dated July 2, 2018 
(Indonesia Substantive Response); ``Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bars 
from Latvia: Substantive Response to Notice of Initiation,'' dated 
July 2, 2018 (Latvia Substantive Response); ``Steel Concrete 
Reinforcing Bars from Moldova: Substantive Response to Notice of 
Initiation,'' dated July 2, 2018 (Moldova Substantive Response); 
``Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bars from Poland: Substantive Response 
to Notice of Initiation,'' dated July 2, 2018 (Poland Substantive 
Response); ``Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bars from Ukraine: 
Substantive Response to Notice of Initiation,'' dated July 2, 2018 
(Ukraine Substantive Response).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Scope of the Orders

    There are existing antidumping duty orders on rebar from Belarus, 
China,

[[Page 50345]]

Indonesia, Latvia, Moldova, Poland, and Ukraine.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ See Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bars from Belarus, Indonesia, 
Latvia, Moldova, Poland, the People's Republic of China, and 
Ukraine: Continuation of Antidumping Duty Orders, 78 FR 43858 (July 
22, 2012) (Second Sunset Continuation Order).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The products covered by the Orders are all steel concrete 
reinforcing bars sold in straight lengths, currently classifiable in 
the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) under item 
numbers 7214.20.00, 7228.30.8050, 7222.11.0050, 7222.30.0000, 
7228.60.6000, 7228.20.1000, or any other tariff item number. 
Specifically excluded are plain rounds (i.e., non-deformed or smooth 
bars) and rebar that has been further processed through bending or 
coating.
    HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs 
purposes. The written description of the scope of the orders is 
dispositive.

Analysis of Comments Received

    All issues raised in these sunset reviews, including the likelihood 
of continuation or recurrence of dumping and the magnitude of the 
margins likely to prevail if the Orders were revoked, are addressed in 
the Issues and Decision Memorandum, dated concurrently with and hereby 
adopted by this notice.\7\ The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a 
public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and 
Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic 
Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at 
https://access.trade.gov and to all parties in the Central Records 
Unit, Room B8024 of the main Department of Commerce building. In 
addition, a complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can 
be accessed at https://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed Issues and 
Decision Memorandum and the electronic version of the Issues and 
Decision Memorandum are identical in content.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ See Commerce's memorandum, ``Issues and Decision Memorandum 
for the Final Results of the Expedited Third Sunset Reviews of the 
Antidumping Duty Orders on Steel concrete reinforcing bars from the 
People's Republic of Belarus, China, Indonesia, Latvia, Moldova, 
Poland, and Ukraine,'' dated concurrently with this notice (Issues 
and Decision Memorandum).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Final Results of Reviews

    Pursuant to section 751(c)(1) and 752(c)(1) and (3) of the Act, we 
determine that revocation of the Orders would be likely to lead to 
continuation or recurrence of dumping, and that the magnitude of the 
dumping margins likely to prevail would be weighted-average dumping 
margins up to 114.53 percent for Belarus, 133.00 percent for China, 
71.01 percent for Indonesia, 16.99 percent for Latvia, 232.86 percent 
for Moldova, 52.07 percent for Poland, and 41.69 percent for Ukraine.

Notification Regarding Administrative Protective Order

    This notice also serves as the only reminder to parties' subject to 
administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility 
concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information 
disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305. Timely 
notification of the return or destruction of APO materials or 
conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to 
comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a violation which is 
subject to sanction.
    We are issuing and publishing these results and notice in 
accordance with sections 751(c), 752(c), and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 
19 CR 351.218.

    Dated: October 1, 2018.
Gary Taverman,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 
Operations, performing the non-exclusive functions and duties of the 
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2018-21731 Filed 10-4-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.