Rescission of Regulations Implementing the Nondiscrimination and Equal Opportunity Provisions of the Job Training Partnership Act of 1982, 48576-48578 [2018-20409]
Download as PDF
48576
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 187 / Wednesday, September 26, 2018 / Proposed Rules
Discussion
The FAA issued an NPRM proposing
to amend part 39 of the Federal Aviation
Regulations (14 CFR part 39) with an
AD applicable to certain CFM
International CFM56–7B turbofan
engines. The proposed AD would have
required a one-time ultrasonic
inspection (USI) or eddy current
inspection (ECI) of certain fan blades
and, if they fail the inspection, their
replacement with parts eligible for
installation. The proposed action was
prompted by a report of an in-flight fan
blade failure and uncontained forward
release of debris on a CFM56–7B
turbofan engine.
Since issuing the NPRM, the FAA
determined that the identified unsafe
condition was not adequately addressed
by the actions proposed in the NPRM.
Therefore, the FAA published two final
rules, AD 2018–09–51 (83 FR 23794,
May 23, 2018) and AD 2018–10–11 (83
FR 22836, May 17, 2018) to require
initial and repetitive USI or ECI of
certain fan blades, and to reduce the
compliance time for the inspection of
certain fan blades. The unsafe condition
identified in the NPRM is now
addressed by AD 2018–09–51 (effective
June 7, 2018) and AD 2018–10–11
(effective June 1, 2018).
The Withdrawal
Accordingly, the FAA withdraws the
NPRM (Docket No. FAA–2017–0313,
Product Identifier 2017–NE–11–AD)
published at 82 FR 40516 on August 25,
2017.
Issued in Burlington, Massachusetts, on
September 17, 2018.
Robert J. Ganley,
Manager, Engine and Propeller Standards
Branch, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2018–20715 Filed 9–25–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Office of the Secretary
29 CFR Part 34
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
RIN 1290–AA32
Rescission of Regulations
Implementing the Nondiscrimination
and Equal Opportunity Provisions of
the Job Training Partnership Act of
1982
Office of the Assistant
Secretary for Administration and
Management, Department of Labor.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
The U.S. Department of Labor
proposes to remove regulations for an
inoperative program while continuing to
require non-discrimination and equalemployment opportunity under its
programs. The Department is
undergoing a process of identifying
regulations that are ‘‘outdated’’ and
‘‘unnecessary.’’ The regulations to be
rescinded by the proposed rule are
‘‘outdated’’ because they administer a
program that no longer exists. And they
are ‘‘unnecessary’’ because they
currently serve no purpose, as their
existence or non-existence has no
impact on the Department’s
enforcement of non-discrimination
standards under its existing programs.
In particular, the Department proposes
to rescind its regulations implementing
Section 167 of the Job Training
Partnership Act of 1982, as amended
(JTPA). Section 167 contained the
nondiscrimination and equalopportunity provisions of the JTPA. In
1998, Congress passed the Workforce
Investment Act (WIA), which repealed
the JTPA and required the Secretary of
Labor to transition any authority under
the JTPA to the system that WIA
created. WIA, in turn, was subsequently
altered by the Workforce Innovation and
Opportunity Act (WIOA). In sum, the
proposed rule removes regulations for
an inoperative program, but has no
impact on existing non-discrimination
rules.
SUMMARY:
17:24 Sep 25, 2018
Jkt 244001
To be assured of consideration,
comments must be received on or before
October 26, 2018.
ADDRESSES: Comments may be
submitted, identified by Regulatory
Information Number (RIN) 1290–AA32,
by any one of the following methods:
• Federal e-Rulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: (202) 693–6505 (for comments
of six pages or less).
• Mail or Hand Delivery/Courier:
Naomi Barry-Perez, Director, Civil
Rights Center (CRC), U.S. Department of
Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue NW,
Room N–4123, Washington, DC 20210.
• Email: CRC–WIOA@dol.gov.
Please submit your comment by only
one method. Receipt of comments will
not be acknowledged; however, the
Department will post all comments
received on https://www.regulations.gov
without making any change to the
comments, including any personal
information provided. The https://
www.regulations.gov website is the
Federal e-rulemaking portal, and all
comments posted there are available
and accessible to the public.
DATES:
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
The Department cautions commenters
not to include personal information,
such as Social Security Numbers,
personal addresses, telephone numbers
and email addresses, in comments, as
such submitted information will become
viewable by the public via https://
www.regulations.gov. It is the
responsibility of the commenter to
safeguard personal information.
Comments submitted through https://
www.regulations.gov will not include
the commenter’s email address unless
the commenter chooses to include that
information as part of a comment.
Postal delivery in Washington, DC,
may be delayed due to security
concerns. Therefore, the Department
encourages the public to submit
comments via the website indicated
above.
The Department will also make all the
comments it receives available for
public inspection during normal
business hours at the Civil Rights Center
at the above address. If you need
assistance to review the comments, the
Department will provide you with
appropriate aids such as readers or print
magnifiers. The Department will make
copies of this notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) available, upon
request, in large print and as an
electronic file on computer disk. The
Department will consider providing the
proposed rule in other formats upon
request. To schedule an appointment to
review the comments and/or obtain the
rule in an alternate format, contact CRC
at (202) 693–6500 (VOICE) or (800) 877–
8339 (TTY).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Naomi Barry-Perez, Director, Civil
Rights Center, U.S. Department of Labor,
200 Constitution Avenue NW, Room N–
4123, Washington, DC 20210, telephone
(202) 693–6500 (VOICE) or (800) 877–
8339 (Federal Relay Service—for TTY),
or by email at CRC–WIOA@dol.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
Under the JTPA, the Department of
Labor provided financial assistance to
certain recipients for the purpose of
establishing programs to meet the job
training needs of youth and adults
facing serious barriers to employment.
Section 167 of the JTPA contained
nondiscrimination and equal
opportunity provisions that prohibited
discrimination on the grounds of race,
color, religion, sex, national origin, age,
disability, political affiliation or belief,
and for beneficiaries only, citizenship
status or participation in a JTPA-funded
program or activity.
As amended by the Job Training
Reform Amendments of 1992, the JTPA
E:\FR\FM\26SEP1.SGM
26SEP1
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 187 / Wednesday, September 26, 2018 / Proposed Rules
provided that final regulations
implementing Section 167 be issued
within 90 days of the enactment date of
the Job Training Reform Amendments of
1992. On January 15, 1993, the
Department issued the implementing
regulations at 29 CFR part 34 for the
nondiscrimination and equal
opportunity provisions of the JTPA. The
rule applies to recipients of Federal
financial assistance under the JTPA. The
rule imposes general nondiscrimination
and equal opportunity requirements, as
well as certain affirmative obligations,
such as data collection and
recordkeeping requirements.
The JTPA was repealed by the
Workforce Investment Act of 1998
(WIA). The Department’s regulations
implementing WIA provided for the
phased transition of the JTPA programs
to WIA, to be fully completed by July 1,
2000. Section 188 of WIA contained
substantially similar nondiscrimination
and equal opportunity requirements as
those contained in the JTPA. The
Department issued regulations
implementing WIA Section 188 at 29
CFR part 37 on November 12, 1999.
WIA in turn was superseded by the
Workforce Innovation and Opportunity
Act (WIOA) in 2014. Section 188 of
WIOA contains the same
nondiscrimination and equal
opportunity provisions as those in WIA.
The Department issued final regulations
implementing WIOA Section 188 at 29
CFR part 38 on December 2, 2016.
Workforce Investment Act of 1998,
Public Law 105–220.
II. Purpose of the Regulatory Action
Direct final rulemaking in this
instance is appropriate because the
action is solely ministerial in nature, the
underlying statute (Section 167 of the
JTPA) has been superseded by the
requirements of Section 188 of WIA and
WIOA, and all funding under the JTPA
has expired. Direct final rulemaking is
used when a rule is noncontroversial
and is expected to elicit no adverse
comment. Here, direct final rulemaking
is appropriate because the rule does
nothing more than remove regulations
for a program that is no longer
operative. Under this circumstance, the
use of direct final rulemaking satisfies
APA requirements.
The Department is publishing
concurrently with this proposed rule an
identical direct final rule in the rules
section of this issue of the Federal
Register. This companion proposed rule
provides the procedural framework to
finalize the rule in the event that any
significant adverse comment is received.
The comment period for this proposed
rule runs concurrently with the
comment period for the direct final rule.
Any comments received in response to
The purpose of this action is to
rescind the regulations implementing
the nondiscrimination and equal
opportunity provisions of the JTPA. All
funding under the JTPA, together with
the obligation to comply with the
nondiscrimination and equal
opportunity requirements of Section
167, has expired. The Section 167
regulations have been superseded by
those implementing Section 188 of first
WIA, then WIOA. The regulations at 29
CFR part 34 govern a program that has
not been in operation for more than a
decade and so are outdated and
unnecessary. Therefore, the rescission of
the regulations is ministerial in nature.
However, the Department wishes to
provide the public with the opportunity
to submit comments on any aspect of
this proposed action.
III. Statement of Legal Authority
Statutory Authority
The Department proposes this
rescission consistent with the repeal of
the JTPA in Section 199(b)(2) of the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:24 Sep 25, 2018
Jkt 244001
Departmental Authorization
CRC issued the regulations
implementing the nondiscrimination
and equal opportunity obligations of the
JTPA pursuant to Secretary’s Order 2–
81, 50 FR 28853 (July 16, 1985), which
authorized the Assistant Secretary for
Administration and Management
(OASAM), working through the
Director, Office of Civil Rights (OCR),
now CRC, to establish and formulate all
policies, standards, and procedures, as
well as to issue rules and regulations,
governing the civil rights enforcement
programs under grant-related
nondiscrimination statutes. Secretary’s
Order 2–85 similarly delegated to
OASAM, working through the Director,
OCR, now CRC, exclusive authority for
the implementation and enforcement of
the nondiscrimination and equal
opportunity provisions of the JTPA.
Secretary’s Orders 2–81 and 2–85 were
canceled following the repeal of the
JTPA. Secretary’s Order 04–2000, 65 FR
69184 (Nov. 15, 2000), re-delegated the
relevant responsibilities to CRC. The
delegation in Secretary’s Order 04–2000
covers CRC’s proposed rescission of the
regulations implementing the
nondiscrimination and equal
opportunity provisions of the JTPA.
IV. Rulemaking Analyses and Notices
A. Administrative Procedure Act and
Companion Direct Final Rulemaking
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
48577
this proposed rule will also be
considered as comments regarding the
companion direct final rule.
If any significant adverse comments
are received during the comment
period, the Department will withdraw
the direct final rule and proceed in
developing a final rule using the usual
notice-and-comment procedure. If no
significant adverse comment is received
during the comment period, the
Department will publish a document
withdrawing this proposed rule.
B. Executive Orders 12866, 13563, and
13771
This proposed rule is not a
‘‘significant regulatory action’’ within
the meaning of Executive Order 12866
and the principles reaffirmed in
Executive Order 13563. In addition, this
rule is not an Executive Order 13771
regulatory action because this rule is not
significant under Executive Order
12866.
C. Paperwork Reduction Act
This regulatory action will not impose
any additional reporting or
recordkeeping requirements under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, 44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.
D. Executive Order 13132 (Federalism)
The Department has reviewed this
proposed rule in accordance with
Executive Order 13132 regarding
federalism, and has determined that it
does not have federalism implications.
This proposed rule will not have
substantial direct effects on the States,
on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995
This proposed rule does not contain
a Federal mandate that will result in the
expenditure by State, local, and tribal
governments, in aggregate, or by the
private sector of $100 million or more
in any one year.
F. Assessment of Federal Regulations
and Policies on Families)
This proposed rule will not affect
family well-being within the meaning of
Section 654 of the Treasury and General
Government Appropriations Act 1999, 5
U.S.C. 601 note.
G. Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980
Pursuant to Section 605(b) of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act, CRC certifies
that this rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
E:\FR\FM\26SEP1.SGM
26SEP1
48578
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 187 / Wednesday, September 26, 2018 / Proposed Rules
number of small entities. See 5 U.S.C.
605(b). As explained above, this rule is
ministerial in nature and does not
impose any additional regulatory
burdens.
rescind 29 CFR part 34 in its entirety as
follows:
H. Small Business Regulatory
Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996
■
This proposed rule is not a major rule
as defined by Section 804 of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996. This proposed rule
will not result in an annual effect on the
economy of $100,000,000 or more; a
major increase in costs or prices; or
significant adverse effects on
competition, employment, investment,
productivity, innovation, or on the
ability of the United States-based
companies to compete with foreignbased companies in domestic and
export markets.
Signed at Washington, DC, on September
13, 2018.
Bryan Slater,
Assistant Secretary, Office of the Assistant
Secretary for Administration and
Management, Department of Labor.
1. Remove and reserve part 34,
consisting of §§ 34.1 through 34.53.
I. Executive Order 13175 (Indian Tribal
Governments)
This proposed rule does not have
tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175 that would require a tribal
summary impact statement. The
proposed rule would not have
substantial direct effects on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal government and Indian tribes.
J. Executive Order 12630 (Government
Actions and Interference With
Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights)
This NPRM is not subject to Executive
Order 12630 because it does not involve
implementation of a policy that has
takings implications or that could
impose limitations on private property
use.
K. Executive Order 12988 (Civil Justice
Reform)
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
The NPRM was drafted and reviewed
in accordance with Executive Order
12988 and will not unduly burden the
Federal court system. The NPRM was:
(1) Reviewed to eliminate drafting errors
and ambiguities; (2) written to minimize
litigation; and (3) written to provide a
clear legal standard for affected conduct
and to promote burden reduction.
List of Subjects in 29 CFR Part 34
Implementation of the
Nondiscrimination and Equal
Opportunity Requirements of the Job
Training Partnership Act of 1982, as
Amended (JTPA).
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, the Department proposes to
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:23 Sep 25, 2018
Jkt 244001
PART 34—[REMOVED AND
RESERVED]
[FR Doc. 2018–20409 Filed 9–25–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
A request
was received by the Commission asking
that the comment period for the advance
notice of proposed rulemaking
(ANPRM) be extended to allow ‘‘extra
time . . . to coordinate a response to the
[notice] among various labor unions and
employee advocacy groups.’’ To make
the ANPRM comment process as
inclusive as possible, the Commission
has extended the comment period for
the ANPRM (83 FR 45366) to November
16, 2018.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Dated: September 18, 2018.
Heather L. MacDougall,
Chairman.
[FR Doc. 2018–20859 Filed 9–25–18; 8:45 am]
OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND
HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION
BILLING CODE 7600–01–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
29 CFR Part 2200
Revisions to Procedural Rules
Governing Practice Before the
Occupational Safety and Health
Review Commission
40 CFR Parts 85 and 86
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Occupational Safety and Health
Review Commission.
ACTION: Advance notice of proposed
rulemaking; extension of comment
period.
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration
On September 7, 2018, the
Occupational Safety and Health Review
Commission solicited recommendations
for amendments to the Commission’s
rules of procedure. The comment
period, which was set to expire on
October 9, 2018, has been extended to
November 16, 2018.
DATES: The comment period for the
advance notice of proposed rulemaking
(83 FR 45366) is extended. Submit
comments on or before November 16,
2018.
[NHTSA–2018–0067; EPA–HQ–OAR–2018–
0283; FRL–9984–62–OAR; NHTSA–2017–
0069]
AGENCY:
SUMMARY:
You may submit comments
by any of the following methods:
• Email: rbailey@oshrc.gov. Include
‘‘Advance notice of proposed
rulemaking, 29 CFR part 2200’’ in the
subject line of the message.
• Fax: 202–606–5417.
• Mail: One Lafayette Centre, 1120
20th Street NW, Ninth Floor,
Washington, DC 20036–3457.
• Hand Delivery/Courier: same as
mailing address.
Instructions: All submissions must
include your name, return address, and
email address, if applicable. Please
clearly label submissions as ‘‘Advance
notice of proposed rulemaking, 29 CFR
part 2200.’’
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ron
Bailey, via telephone at 202–606–5410,
or via email at rbailey@oshrc.gov.
ADDRESSES:
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
49 CFR Parts 523, 531, 533, 536, and
537
RIN 2127–AL76; RIN 2060–AU09
The Safer Affordable Fuel-Efficient
(SAFE) Vehicles Rule for Model Years
2021–2026 Passenger Cars and Light
Trucks; Extension of Comment Period
Environmental Protection
Agency and National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration.
ACTION: Proposed rule; extension of
comment period.
AGENCY:
This document extends the
comment period for a proposed rule
published in the August 24, 2018 issue
of the Federal Register entitled The
Safer Affordable Fuel-Efficient (SAFE)
Vehicles Rule for Model Years 2021–
2026 Passenger Cars and Light Trucks
and also extends the comment period
for NHTSA’s Draft Environmental
Impact Statement that accompanies it.
This extension is shorter than that
requested by several parties, and those
requests are accordingly denied.
DATES: The comment period for the
proposed rule published August 24,
2018, at 83 FR 42986, is extended. The
comment period for the Draft
Environmental Impact Statement
accompanying that proposed rule and
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\26SEP1.SGM
26SEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 187 (Wednesday, September 26, 2018)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 48576-48578]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-20409]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Office of the Secretary
29 CFR Part 34
RIN 1290-AA32
Rescission of Regulations Implementing the Nondiscrimination and
Equal Opportunity Provisions of the Job Training Partnership Act of
1982
AGENCY: Office of the Assistant Secretary for Administration and
Management, Department of Labor.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Labor proposes to remove regulations
for an inoperative program while continuing to require non-
discrimination and equal-employment opportunity under its programs. The
Department is undergoing a process of identifying regulations that are
``outdated'' and ``unnecessary.'' The regulations to be rescinded by
the proposed rule are ``outdated'' because they administer a program
that no longer exists. And they are ``unnecessary'' because they
currently serve no purpose, as their existence or non-existence has no
impact on the Department's enforcement of non-discrimination standards
under its existing programs. In particular, the Department proposes to
rescind its regulations implementing Section 167 of the Job Training
Partnership Act of 1982, as amended (JTPA). Section 167 contained the
nondiscrimination and equal-opportunity provisions of the JTPA. In
1998, Congress passed the Workforce Investment Act (WIA), which
repealed the JTPA and required the Secretary of Labor to transition any
authority under the JTPA to the system that WIA created. WIA, in turn,
was subsequently altered by the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity
Act (WIOA). In sum, the proposed rule removes regulations for an
inoperative program, but has no impact on existing non-discrimination
rules.
DATES: To be assured of consideration, comments must be received on or
before October 26, 2018.
ADDRESSES: Comments may be submitted, identified by Regulatory
Information Number (RIN) 1290-AA32, by any one of the following
methods:
Federal e-Rulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Fax: (202) 693-6505 (for comments of six pages or less).
Mail or Hand Delivery/Courier: Naomi Barry-Perez,
Director, Civil Rights Center (CRC), U.S. Department of Labor, 200
Constitution Avenue NW, Room N-4123, Washington, DC 20210.
Email: [email protected].
Please submit your comment by only one method. Receipt of comments
will not be acknowledged; however, the Department will post all
comments received on https://www.regulations.gov without making any
change to the comments, including any personal information provided.
The https://www.regulations.gov website is the Federal e-rulemaking
portal, and all comments posted there are available and accessible to
the public.
The Department cautions commenters not to include personal
information, such as Social Security Numbers, personal addresses,
telephone numbers and email addresses, in comments, as such submitted
information will become viewable by the public via https://www.regulations.gov. It is the responsibility of the commenter to
safeguard personal information. Comments submitted through https://www.regulations.gov will not include the commenter's email address
unless the commenter chooses to include that information as part of a
comment.
Postal delivery in Washington, DC, may be delayed due to security
concerns. Therefore, the Department encourages the public to submit
comments via the website indicated above.
The Department will also make all the comments it receives
available for public inspection during normal business hours at the
Civil Rights Center at the above address. If you need assistance to
review the comments, the Department will provide you with appropriate
aids such as readers or print magnifiers. The Department will make
copies of this notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) available, upon
request, in large print and as an electronic file on computer disk. The
Department will consider providing the proposed rule in other formats
upon request. To schedule an appointment to review the comments and/or
obtain the rule in an alternate format, contact CRC at (202) 693-6500
(VOICE) or (800) 877-8339 (TTY).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Naomi Barry-Perez, Director, Civil
Rights Center, U.S. Department of Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue NW,
Room N-4123, Washington, DC 20210, telephone (202) 693-6500 (VOICE) or
(800) 877-8339 (Federal Relay Service--for TTY), or by email at [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
Under the JTPA, the Department of Labor provided financial
assistance to certain recipients for the purpose of establishing
programs to meet the job training needs of youth and adults facing
serious barriers to employment. Section 167 of the JTPA contained
nondiscrimination and equal opportunity provisions that prohibited
discrimination on the grounds of race, color, religion, sex, national
origin, age, disability, political affiliation or belief, and for
beneficiaries only, citizenship status or participation in a JTPA-
funded program or activity.
As amended by the Job Training Reform Amendments of 1992, the JTPA
[[Page 48577]]
provided that final regulations implementing Section 167 be issued
within 90 days of the enactment date of the Job Training Reform
Amendments of 1992. On January 15, 1993, the Department issued the
implementing regulations at 29 CFR part 34 for the nondiscrimination
and equal opportunity provisions of the JTPA. The rule applies to
recipients of Federal financial assistance under the JTPA. The rule
imposes general nondiscrimination and equal opportunity requirements,
as well as certain affirmative obligations, such as data collection and
recordkeeping requirements.
The JTPA was repealed by the Workforce Investment Act of 1998
(WIA). The Department's regulations implementing WIA provided for the
phased transition of the JTPA programs to WIA, to be fully completed by
July 1, 2000. Section 188 of WIA contained substantially similar
nondiscrimination and equal opportunity requirements as those contained
in the JTPA. The Department issued regulations implementing WIA Section
188 at 29 CFR part 37 on November 12, 1999. WIA in turn was superseded
by the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act (WIOA) in 2014. Section
188 of WIOA contains the same nondiscrimination and equal opportunity
provisions as those in WIA. The Department issued final regulations
implementing WIOA Section 188 at 29 CFR part 38 on December 2, 2016.
II. Purpose of the Regulatory Action
The purpose of this action is to rescind the regulations
implementing the nondiscrimination and equal opportunity provisions of
the JTPA. All funding under the JTPA, together with the obligation to
comply with the nondiscrimination and equal opportunity requirements of
Section 167, has expired. The Section 167 regulations have been
superseded by those implementing Section 188 of first WIA, then WIOA.
The regulations at 29 CFR part 34 govern a program that has not been in
operation for more than a decade and so are outdated and unnecessary.
Therefore, the rescission of the regulations is ministerial in nature.
However, the Department wishes to provide the public with the
opportunity to submit comments on any aspect of this proposed action.
III. Statement of Legal Authority
Statutory Authority
The Department proposes this rescission consistent with the repeal
of the JTPA in Section 199(b)(2) of the Workforce Investment Act of
1998, Public Law 105-220.
Departmental Authorization
CRC issued the regulations implementing the nondiscrimination and
equal opportunity obligations of the JTPA pursuant to Secretary's Order
2-81, 50 FR 28853 (July 16, 1985), which authorized the Assistant
Secretary for Administration and Management (OASAM), working through
the Director, Office of Civil Rights (OCR), now CRC, to establish and
formulate all policies, standards, and procedures, as well as to issue
rules and regulations, governing the civil rights enforcement programs
under grant-related nondiscrimination statutes. Secretary's Order 2-85
similarly delegated to OASAM, working through the Director, OCR, now
CRC, exclusive authority for the implementation and enforcement of the
nondiscrimination and equal opportunity provisions of the JTPA.
Secretary's Orders 2-81 and 2-85 were canceled following the repeal of
the JTPA. Secretary's Order 04-2000, 65 FR 69184 (Nov. 15, 2000), re-
delegated the relevant responsibilities to CRC. The delegation in
Secretary's Order 04-2000 covers CRC's proposed rescission of the
regulations implementing the nondiscrimination and equal opportunity
provisions of the JTPA.
IV. Rulemaking Analyses and Notices
A. Administrative Procedure Act and Companion Direct Final Rulemaking
Direct final rulemaking in this instance is appropriate because the
action is solely ministerial in nature, the underlying statute (Section
167 of the JTPA) has been superseded by the requirements of Section 188
of WIA and WIOA, and all funding under the JTPA has expired. Direct
final rulemaking is used when a rule is noncontroversial and is
expected to elicit no adverse comment. Here, direct final rulemaking is
appropriate because the rule does nothing more than remove regulations
for a program that is no longer operative. Under this circumstance, the
use of direct final rulemaking satisfies APA requirements.
The Department is publishing concurrently with this proposed rule
an identical direct final rule in the rules section of this issue of
the Federal Register. This companion proposed rule provides the
procedural framework to finalize the rule in the event that any
significant adverse comment is received. The comment period for this
proposed rule runs concurrently with the comment period for the direct
final rule. Any comments received in response to this proposed rule
will also be considered as comments regarding the companion direct
final rule.
If any significant adverse comments are received during the comment
period, the Department will withdraw the direct final rule and proceed
in developing a final rule using the usual notice-and-comment
procedure. If no significant adverse comment is received during the
comment period, the Department will publish a document withdrawing this
proposed rule.
B. Executive Orders 12866, 13563, and 13771
This proposed rule is not a ``significant regulatory action''
within the meaning of Executive Order 12866 and the principles
reaffirmed in Executive Order 13563. In addition, this rule is not an
Executive Order 13771 regulatory action because this rule is not
significant under Executive Order 12866.
C. Paperwork Reduction Act
This regulatory action will not impose any additional reporting or
recordkeeping requirements under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995,
44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.
D. Executive Order 13132 (Federalism)
The Department has reviewed this proposed rule in accordance with
Executive Order 13132 regarding federalism, and has determined that it
does not have federalism implications. This proposed rule will not have
substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship between
the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
This proposed rule does not contain a Federal mandate that will
result in the expenditure by State, local, and tribal governments, in
aggregate, or by the private sector of $100 million or more in any one
year.
F. Assessment of Federal Regulations and Policies on Families)
This proposed rule will not affect family well-being within the
meaning of Section 654 of the Treasury and General Government
Appropriations Act 1999, 5 U.S.C. 601 note.
G. Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980
Pursuant to Section 605(b) of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, CRC
certifies that this rule will not have a significant economic impact on
a substantial
[[Page 48578]]
number of small entities. See 5 U.S.C. 605(b). As explained above, this
rule is ministerial in nature and does not impose any additional
regulatory burdens.
H. Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996
This proposed rule is not a major rule as defined by Section 804 of
the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996. This
proposed rule will not result in an annual effect on the economy of
$100,000,000 or more; a major increase in costs or prices; or
significant adverse effects on competition, employment, investment,
productivity, innovation, or on the ability of the United States-based
companies to compete with foreign-based companies in domestic and
export markets.
I. Executive Order 13175 (Indian Tribal Governments)
This proposed rule does not have tribal implications under
Executive Order 13175 that would require a tribal summary impact
statement. The proposed rule would not have substantial direct effects
on one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal government and Indian tribes.
J. Executive Order 12630 (Government Actions and Interference With
Constitutionally Protected Property Rights)
This NPRM is not subject to Executive Order 12630 because it does
not involve implementation of a policy that has takings implications or
that could impose limitations on private property use.
K. Executive Order 12988 (Civil Justice Reform)
The NPRM was drafted and reviewed in accordance with Executive
Order 12988 and will not unduly burden the Federal court system. The
NPRM was: (1) Reviewed to eliminate drafting errors and ambiguities;
(2) written to minimize litigation; and (3) written to provide a clear
legal standard for affected conduct and to promote burden reduction.
List of Subjects in 29 CFR Part 34
Implementation of the Nondiscrimination and Equal Opportunity
Requirements of the Job Training Partnership Act of 1982, as Amended
(JTPA).
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, the Department proposes
to rescind 29 CFR part 34 in its entirety as follows:
PART 34--[REMOVED AND RESERVED]
0
1. Remove and reserve part 34, consisting of Sec. Sec. 34.1 through
34.53.
Signed at Washington, DC, on September 13, 2018.
Bryan Slater,
Assistant Secretary, Office of the Assistant Secretary for
Administration and Management, Department of Labor.
[FR Doc. 2018-20409 Filed 9-25-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P